Domain: dictionary.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to dictionary.com.
Comments · 7,980
-
Re:Well..
Pressure at the summit of Mt. Everest is ~.25atm = 4.12psi (here). I have NEVER heard of anyone complaining that this is uncomfortable from the standpoint of wanting a pressurized suit to keep their body from exploding (it is, of course, uncomfortable since the partial pressure of oxygen at that elevation is less than 1psi [the percentage of oxygen in the air is the same at 29,028ft as at 0ft]. An unacclimatized individual would die in minutes).
And before anyone says something stupid like "acclimatize? don't you mean acclimate?", go here. -
Humorless fool.
-
Re:wait a minute
Err, I don't exactly see where anyone said "the US is the best" or where I refuted it but, hey, if you want to see something that's not there then that's your prerogative. But, if you want clarity, I'll try to give it to you.
Saying "the US is the best" is not a racist. But saying that "everything we do is great, everything you do sucks, not that what you do matters anyhow, and stop claiming credit for anything half-decent you lying foreigner" is racist.
Perhaps you would be more comfortable if I used the word xenophobic but racist is just as accurate a description for what the Anonymous Coward had to say.
And before you get on your high horse, racism doesn't have to be about skin colour. Here are a couple of nice dictionary definitions for you:
racism (n)
1. The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others.
2. Discrimination or prejudice based on race.
race (n)
1. A local geographic or global human population distinguished as a more or less distinct group by genetically transmitted physical characteristics.
2. A group of people united or classified together on the basis of common history, nationality, or geographic distribution: the German race.
3. A genealogical line; a lineage.
4. Humans considered as a group.
5. Biology
a. An interbreeding, usually geographically isolated population of organisms differing from other populations of the same species in the frequency of hereditary traits. A race that has been given formal taxonomic recognition is known as a subspecies.
b. A breed or strain, as of domestic animals.
6. A distinguishing or characteristic quality, such as the flavor of a wine.
Hope that clears things up for you. -
Re:wait a minute
Err, I don't exactly see where anyone said "the US is the best" or where I refuted it but, hey, if you want to see something that's not there then that's your prerogative. But, if you want clarity, I'll try to give it to you.
Saying "the US is the best" is not a racist. But saying that "everything we do is great, everything you do sucks, not that what you do matters anyhow, and stop claiming credit for anything half-decent you lying foreigner" is racist.
Perhaps you would be more comfortable if I used the word xenophobic but racist is just as accurate a description for what the Anonymous Coward had to say.
And before you get on your high horse, racism doesn't have to be about skin colour. Here are a couple of nice dictionary definitions for you:
racism (n)
1. The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others.
2. Discrimination or prejudice based on race.
race (n)
1. A local geographic or global human population distinguished as a more or less distinct group by genetically transmitted physical characteristics.
2. A group of people united or classified together on the basis of common history, nationality, or geographic distribution: the German race.
3. A genealogical line; a lineage.
4. Humans considered as a group.
5. Biology
a. An interbreeding, usually geographically isolated population of organisms differing from other populations of the same species in the frequency of hereditary traits. A race that has been given formal taxonomic recognition is known as a subspecies.
b. A breed or strain, as of domestic animals.
6. A distinguishing or characteristic quality, such as the flavor of a wine.
Hope that clears things up for you. -
Re:The free market at work
Why should M$ open their code? If you want open code, make a similiar product, create your own interface, and then market it.... Why should M$ give away its trade secrets? That's not a monopolistic practice...
That's not the point. The point is that the AMD/Intel example, in which AMD not only had access to Intel's instruction set, but (through some clever acquisitions), a license to use it in competing products, cannot be extended to the Microsoft situation, in which competitors do not have access to the complete API and most certainly do not have a license to use it in competing products.The point is that while the AMD/Intel example is a good case of market forces working to prevent the maintenance of a monopoly, it is not, in and of itself, sufficient evidence that market forces will always succeed in preventing the maintenance of a monopoly, because it includes a number of special features that aren't present in other cases that might, on the surface, be considered similar.
In other words, this isn't proof that "all 'big businesses' can be affected by smaller ones", it's just anecdotal evidence.
(P.S. Will somebody tell me why I'm bothering to respond to this troll? I must not have enough work to do.)
-
Re:The free market at work
Why should M$ open their code? If you want open code, make a similiar product, create your own interface, and then market it.... Why should M$ give away its trade secrets? That's not a monopolistic practice...
That's not the point. The point is that the AMD/Intel example, in which AMD not only had access to Intel's instruction set, but (through some clever acquisitions), a license to use it in competing products, cannot be extended to the Microsoft situation, in which competitors do not have access to the complete API and most certainly do not have a license to use it in competing products.The point is that while the AMD/Intel example is a good case of market forces working to prevent the maintenance of a monopoly, it is not, in and of itself, sufficient evidence that market forces will always succeed in preventing the maintenance of a monopoly, because it includes a number of special features that aren't present in other cases that might, on the surface, be considered similar.
In other words, this isn't proof that "all 'big businesses' can be affected by smaller ones", it's just anecdotal evidence.
(P.S. Will somebody tell me why I'm bothering to respond to this troll? I must not have enough work to do.)
-
Re:There is no difference....
-
Re:Oh dear
Okay, then let me rephrase:I love it when people can't tell the difference between "I hate it" and "It sucks."
These statements are equivelant. Implicit in the phrase, "It sucks." is the phrase, "In my opinion." since there is no objective measure of "suckiness".
I love it when people present their opinions as facts.
For instance, "That font smoothing stuff is *really* hard on the eyes" would appear to be a fact, but actually it's an opinion. So is "With a sharp 17" it's not an improvement".P.S. Either your spelling or your typing sucks.
-
Re:Classic example:
Please, learn the proper English plural of the word 'virus.'
There's no need to be making up words in hopes of sounding smarter. You only end up looking silly. -
Has nobody realised yet....
That JASKER POWER is an anagram for JAPE WORKERS.
dictionary.com meaning of Jape :
n.
A joke or quip. -
Re:Hipocritical
-
Defining "community"Pardon me if this has already been discussed at length, but I don't recall seeing it on
/. before. The whole notion of "community" as people are arguing in the comments seems to be different than what I think of when I hear or say the word "community". Perhaps we need to come up with a different name for "online communities". Perhaps "online socializing"? It seems much more appropriate to me. Now, I realize that the word community can have many meanings (e.g., the "Scientific community"). But that doesn't seem to be the point people are arguing. The comparisons I'm seeing made are of online communities being as good as meatspace communities. The notion is not one of "the online community" (like you would say the "Los Angeles latino community"). I just want to make that distinction clear, and point out that I understand the differences...Having said all that. There really is a lot more to "community" than socializing, in meatspace, that is. And the benefits to getting involved in community in meatspace can be incredible. Disclaimer: I say this at a point in my life that I have no personal contact and knowledge of, but merely one of observation and conversation. It is my goal to get involved in an organization or program in the near future working with "community building". My dad has been doing this most of his life, and has some incredible stories to tell me regarding work he has been involved in, or seen happen by others doing similar work (and what he is doing right now).
-
Re:Spellcheck...If you need to comment on spelling, try some syntax checking too.
-
Re:Spellcheck...If you need to comment on spelling, try some syntax checking too.
-
Re:Spellcheck...If you need to comment on spelling, try some syntax checking too.
-
Re:Abuse of the word lossy. [WRONG]
If you were to by the LOTR DVD, would you consider that distribution format lossy?
Absolutely, DVD is lossy. If I took a DVD, decoded the content (which I think is always encoded with MPEG-2), re-encoded it with MPEG-2, and burned it to a DVD I would most likely have a worse copy than the original DVD. The process of encoding MPEG-2 is lossy.
Now it is true that I do not have to decode and encode every time I want to copy a DVD. I can use a non-lossy method of copying the digital data directly. This still does not change the fact that DVDs are lossy because the MPEG-2 codec is a lossy codec.
As for the "older and more established" definition, I could only find the following definition at dictionary.com:
lossy
A term describing a data compression algorithm which actually reduces the amount of information in the data, rather than just the number of bits used to represent that information. The lost information is usually removed because it is subjectively less important to the quality of the data (usually an image or sound) or because it can be recovered reasonably by interpolation from the remaining data.
MPEG and JPEG are examples of lossy compression techniques.
Source: The Free On-line Dictionary of Computing, © 1993-2001 Denis Howe -
Re:Abuse of the word lossy. [WRONG]
If you were to by the LOTR DVD, would you consider that distribution format lossy?
Absolutely, DVD is lossy. If I took a DVD, decoded the content (which I think is always encoded with MPEG-2), re-encoded it with MPEG-2, and burned it to a DVD I would most likely have a worse copy than the original DVD. The process of encoding MPEG-2 is lossy.
Now it is true that I do not have to decode and encode every time I want to copy a DVD. I can use a non-lossy method of copying the digital data directly. This still does not change the fact that DVDs are lossy because the MPEG-2 codec is a lossy codec.
As for the "older and more established" definition, I could only find the following definition at dictionary.com:
lossy
A term describing a data compression algorithm which actually reduces the amount of information in the data, rather than just the number of bits used to represent that information. The lost information is usually removed because it is subjectively less important to the quality of the data (usually an image or sound) or because it can be recovered reasonably by interpolation from the remaining data.
MPEG and JPEG are examples of lossy compression techniques.
Source: The Free On-line Dictionary of Computing, © 1993-2001 Denis Howe -
Re:Credit For:Top 11 Reasons AOL Wants to buy Red
Damn Spell check! I meant PLADGERIZE not PIDGINIZE
ITYM plagiarize . HTH.
You should also be attributing your
.sig quote to Richard Feynman. -
Re:Timothy complaining about censorship
If that's true, then this behaviour could be considered to meet the criteria for true censorship:
1: counterintelligence achieved by banning or deleting any information of value to the enemy
2: deleting parts of publications or correspondence or theatrical performances
Don't want to lose too much Karma on this one... slashdot.org/~slashdot.org. -
Re:Timothy complaining about censorship
Although I totally agree with you, the true definition of censorship does seem to require the actual banning or deletion of information.
Now, you could argue that OZ is certainly not deleting anything. They ban stuff, but that's a relative word,- I bet if someone got a dial-up account in the US and dialed it directly, they could still have access to the information. This is where things get fuzzy,- the information is still out there, it's just harder to get to. Therefore you would have to conclude that the use of the word censorship applies similarly to both discussed cases here.
In both cases the information is still accessible, however in both cases entities with the power try to keep people from seeing it.
What I can't believe is that this issue is taking on a rediculous magnitude. I don't understand why anyone of the staff doesn't say something like 'sorry guys, that was maybe not too kewl, we'll create a permanent thread where you can bitch about /. all you want', or something like that.
I mean, this thread is getting to the point where we all are probably going to lose a bit of Karma again... -
Rich Oil Reserves == BullshitFrom your source:
It is generally believed that there are significant mineral resources, but these have not yet been commercially exploited. Such deposits include uranium, copper, gypsum, iron, marble, manganese, tin and, perhaps, oil.
So you say what? I always thought It is generally believed != may be
Well, if you have to resort to selective reading, then I think I am winning this argument. From here:
perhaps adv. Maybe; possibly.
Therefore, It is generally believed ... perhaps == maybe.
Bush and Co. were there for corporate interests. That's a fact - live with it, what ever the sugar is coating it for general american electorate.
I am not disputing that - my argument is that there are no rich oil reserves in Somalia. Whoever (Chomsky or Chin) said that, is a liar. There might have been other corporate or strategic interests (note the uranium mentioned above), but there are no credible sources given here. The only ones I can find support my argument. If you can find others, please post, otherwise it may be a good idea to improve you reading comprehension. -
Free as in beer vs. free as in speech
Isn't English wonderfully ambiguous? On Slashdot, we know that the world "free" can take different meanings, which are not at all the same. However, there are other words like this as well: for instance, solid can mean "not liquid or gaseous", but it can also mean "Not hollowed out: a solid block of wood". I obviously meant the latter, as should have been clear by context (solid spheres, vs. hollow spheres as in gravastars). Moreover, in order to make myself clearer, I even put "full" in parenthesis after the words "solid speres".
-
Re:Am I the only one?
Not everybody's grasp of English is extensive enough to understand what pr0n or "not for young eyes" might mean.
That's why it's in the dictionary...
pr0n -
Re:The best reason to go: Good pings for everyone
"Why did it have to be millionMANlan, instead of millionPERSONLAN?"
Because english, unless used very specifically, is a genderless language. The word man has been (and if me and my english teachers have their way, will conitnue to be) used as a generic non-gender term for ages. It falls into the same category as he and his.
If I'm trying to put down women, you'll know when I am. But I don't, I won't, and I'm not.
It's right there, at dictionary.com. A "whopping" 33% of the definitions specify gender. The rest (10 of 15) clearly do not.
I guess I've never been one to use fashionable language. Thank God, since if I went round saying some of the stuff (especially fake computer references) on TV I'd probably want to lock myself up! 8-D -
Re:How many plugins!a "proper" web site will degrade gracefully and transparently in the case of a browser that doesn't support any of it's "enhanced experiences". Lynx is an excellent example, a great many blind people use it with screen readers. This site doesn't. I didn't see anything in the parent post about all communication being textual, but it SHOULD be accesible via a text only interface.
As for abandoning wide scale communication... you need to drink less coffee and get off the crack. Or see this link.
-
I must really not understand antitrust lawHow can it not be illegal for a company (which by any measure is either a near-monopoly or monopoly) to demand (*) that you refuse to consider any other product in exchange for (**) not raising prices?
Trust:
8. A combination of firms or corporations for the purpose of reducing competition (c.f. *) and controlling prices (c.f. **) throughout a business or an industry.Surely someone here can help me resolve my confusion.
-
Police officers are exempt from 17 USC 1201
Look, if a law that restrictive was ever passed, Police officers would be breaking it.
According to page 5 of this PDF from the Library of Congress, law enforcement officers acting in official duty are exempt from the anti-circumvention provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.
Remember Prohibition?
The current crop of Republicrat legislators don't seem to; otherwise, they would have repealed the anti-recreational-drug laws a long time ago.
Any politician who would vote for such a thing better hope the donation from the media companies can buy him a ticket to Rio and keep him fed for the rest of his life
Find how much your politician got from Di$ney at Open Secrets.
because his public "service" career would end at the next election
Not with our ovine electorate.
-
Read 'em and weep
Okay then, here's the dictionary definition of "copyright":
The legal right granted to an author, composer, playwright, publisher, or distributor to exclusive publication, production, sale, or distribution of a literary, musical, dramatic, or artistic work.
-- Brian
-
Re:ugg.. fud.WOW.
This just became my new example to use when explaining to people what a malapropism is.
My old example had always been this: if someone were to say "taken for granite..." when they meant "taken for granted", that would be a malapropism.
This one is much better.
-
Google / Googol
-
Google / Googol
-
Re:Remember those old tape erasers......I think you meant "a bit moot", not "a bit mute".
Moot is a term sometimes used to describe a point or question while, which debatable, is insignificant or of little value. Interesting history of this word's entymology at Dictionary.com.
Most interesting is that the term originally meant the opposite (and in a Law sense, still may); that the point was open to debate.
-
Re:The word is googol
Remember, Billy....
It makes sense to at least follow the link a person provides as evidence before disputing their claim...
He's right. A googol is 1 followed by 100 zeroes. A google is a....that's right boys and girls, it's a homonym . -
Re:Very few people need an SUV.
http://www.dictionary.com/cgi-bin/dict.pl?term=en
q uire
enquire
v.
Variant of inquire.
[Middle English enquiren, from Old French enquerre, from Vulgar Latin *inquaerere]
Sorry grammar nazi. Keep readin' those textbooks. You'll get it one of these days. -
The word is googol... runs a total of 7 separate computers, a high speed network and a google of different communications devices
...
I hate to play the grammar nazi, but the word should be googol, not Google (TM). Google is joke word, based loosely on the idea of a lot of data being searched, or a lot of people using the search engine, etc. See Google's corporate info page if you're curious. -
Re:Very few people need an SUV.
You can do either.
They are alternative spellings of the same word, as this site says.
Dictionary.com lists 'enquire' as a 'Variant of inquire'.
Also, the Concise Oxford English Dictionary lists enquire and inquire as having the same meaning. -
Re:Very few people need an SUV.
You can do either.
They are alternative spellings of the same word, as this site says.
Dictionary.com lists 'enquire' as a 'Variant of inquire'.
Also, the Concise Oxford English Dictionary lists enquire and inquire as having the same meaning. -
Re:Wrong Audience
It makes you sexist by promoting the idea that men and women should be treated differently. Saying it would not be funny if it were about a man is the exact definition. Sexist
-
Theft != copyright violation
>Theft is theft, no matter who you're screwing over
Yeah, but the dictionary explains theft isn't copying files. Just read it. Theft, or its identical but clearly defined brother, larceny only applies when a physical item has been removed from the posession of another. In other words, the violated no longer has posession of the item.
Yup, I know about the law definition of posession. Of course, since this applies only to the violated and their product is still in their hands with their rightful ownership intact it still doesn't count.
Now, walking into NSync's house and stealing all their papers with their ideas for their next album is the only copyright violation I can come up with on the spot that is also theft.
However, fortunately KaZaa can't do that (yet)!
>and didn't understand that leaving Kazaa, Morpheus and all their other file trading utilities on all day long was not only illegal
No, leaving it on all day is not illegal. Perhaps against your AUP, but breaking an agreement between student and university is not illegal. That's why he can't go to jail or get community service for abusing your bandwidth in any way he likes.
Or do you mean that trading the Nsync album is illegal? There's a big difference between the medium and the message, you know. Just ask the art department.
I don't disagree with your actions, but unfortunately it seems the BSA has caught another computer professional up in their redefinition of the english language. Don't let it happen! Fight the power and keep the dictionary true to its roots! Copying copyrighted files without permission is copyright violation. Nothing more, nothing less.
You can say piracy. This word, however, is intentionally both overused and loaded. I'm sure you and me both don't consider a software "pirate" someone who goes to coastal villiages and nearby ships to rape women and pillage.
Sorry, don't take this all too seriously. I just think that when people stop calling piracy theft (which it isn't) people will see that the crime committed is nowhere near the level the RIAA would consider it. -
Theft != copyright violation
>Theft is theft, no matter who you're screwing over
Yeah, but the dictionary explains theft isn't copying files. Just read it. Theft, or its identical but clearly defined brother, larceny only applies when a physical item has been removed from the posession of another. In other words, the violated no longer has posession of the item.
Yup, I know about the law definition of posession. Of course, since this applies only to the violated and their product is still in their hands with their rightful ownership intact it still doesn't count.
Now, walking into NSync's house and stealing all their papers with their ideas for their next album is the only copyright violation I can come up with on the spot that is also theft.
However, fortunately KaZaa can't do that (yet)!
>and didn't understand that leaving Kazaa, Morpheus and all their other file trading utilities on all day long was not only illegal
No, leaving it on all day is not illegal. Perhaps against your AUP, but breaking an agreement between student and university is not illegal. That's why he can't go to jail or get community service for abusing your bandwidth in any way he likes.
Or do you mean that trading the Nsync album is illegal? There's a big difference between the medium and the message, you know. Just ask the art department.
I don't disagree with your actions, but unfortunately it seems the BSA has caught another computer professional up in their redefinition of the english language. Don't let it happen! Fight the power and keep the dictionary true to its roots! Copying copyrighted files without permission is copyright violation. Nothing more, nothing less.
You can say piracy. This word, however, is intentionally both overused and loaded. I'm sure you and me both don't consider a software "pirate" someone who goes to coastal villiages and nearby ships to rape women and pillage.
Sorry, don't take this all too seriously. I just think that when people stop calling piracy theft (which it isn't) people will see that the crime committed is nowhere near the level the RIAA would consider it. -
Theft != copyright violation
>Theft is theft, no matter who you're screwing over
Yeah, but the dictionary explains theft isn't copying files. Just read it. Theft, or its identical but clearly defined brother, larceny only applies when a physical item has been removed from the posession of another. In other words, the violated no longer has posession of the item.
Yup, I know about the law definition of posession. Of course, since this applies only to the violated and their product is still in their hands with their rightful ownership intact it still doesn't count.
Now, walking into NSync's house and stealing all their papers with their ideas for their next album is the only copyright violation I can come up with on the spot that is also theft.
However, fortunately KaZaa can't do that (yet)!
>and didn't understand that leaving Kazaa, Morpheus and all their other file trading utilities on all day long was not only illegal
No, leaving it on all day is not illegal. Perhaps against your AUP, but breaking an agreement between student and university is not illegal. That's why he can't go to jail or get community service for abusing your bandwidth in any way he likes.
Or do you mean that trading the Nsync album is illegal? There's a big difference between the medium and the message, you know. Just ask the art department.
I don't disagree with your actions, but unfortunately it seems the BSA has caught another computer professional up in their redefinition of the english language. Don't let it happen! Fight the power and keep the dictionary true to its roots! Copying copyrighted files without permission is copyright violation. Nothing more, nothing less.
You can say piracy. This word, however, is intentionally both overused and loaded. I'm sure you and me both don't consider a software "pirate" someone who goes to coastal villiages and nearby ships to rape women and pillage.
Sorry, don't take this all too seriously. I just think that when people stop calling piracy theft (which it isn't) people will see that the crime committed is nowhere near the level the RIAA would consider it. -
Theft != copyright violation
>Theft is theft, no matter who you're screwing over
Yeah, but the dictionary explains theft isn't copying files. Just read it. Theft, or its identical but clearly defined brother, larceny only applies when a physical item has been removed from the posession of another. In other words, the violated no longer has posession of the item.
Yup, I know about the law definition of posession. Of course, since this applies only to the violated and their product is still in their hands with their rightful ownership intact it still doesn't count.
Now, walking into NSync's house and stealing all their papers with their ideas for their next album is the only copyright violation I can come up with on the spot that is also theft.
However, fortunately KaZaa can't do that (yet)!
>and didn't understand that leaving Kazaa, Morpheus and all their other file trading utilities on all day long was not only illegal
No, leaving it on all day is not illegal. Perhaps against your AUP, but breaking an agreement between student and university is not illegal. That's why he can't go to jail or get community service for abusing your bandwidth in any way he likes.
Or do you mean that trading the Nsync album is illegal? There's a big difference between the medium and the message, you know. Just ask the art department.
I don't disagree with your actions, but unfortunately it seems the BSA has caught another computer professional up in their redefinition of the english language. Don't let it happen! Fight the power and keep the dictionary true to its roots! Copying copyrighted files without permission is copyright violation. Nothing more, nothing less.
You can say piracy. This word, however, is intentionally both overused and loaded. I'm sure you and me both don't consider a software "pirate" someone who goes to coastal villiages and nearby ships to rape women and pillage.
Sorry, don't take this all too seriously. I just think that when people stop calling piracy theft (which it isn't) people will see that the crime committed is nowhere near the level the RIAA would consider it. -
Re:Excellent, excellent news
If they're not too far to the right, you can paint linux as being a move away from capitalism, leading us to a less money-driven culture
You are correct. You can direct them here -
Crossplatform, I think not...
cross-platform RPM-based Unix software packaging.
software, hardware> A term that describes a language, software application or hardware device that works on more than one system platform (e.g. Unix, Microsoft Windows, Macintosh). E.g. Netscape Navigator, Java.
Using buzzwords, is great and everything if you're a marketing droid, but lets try to be a little more precise among ourselves.
I'm not trying to belittle this accomplishment, and I'm sure it is quite valuable, although I personally would give up apt-get only at gun point and to call something crossplatform that only really ones on one 'platform' is silly.
-
Another "Concept Virus" that you've heard about
Sounds like the vaporware phenomenon has extended to virii.
1. It's 'viruses'. ESR says so.
2. Concept Virus is also the name of the virus commonly known as Nimda.
-
Re:What the Deal?
>nothing but "milk toast" to offer
OT, but had to nit-pick - milquetoast is not "milk toast"
milquetoast - n. One who has a meek, timid, unassertive nature.
Word History: An indication of the effect on the English language of popular culture is the adoption of names from the comic strips as English words. Casper Milquetoast, created by Harold Webster in 1924, was a timid and retiring man named for a timid food. The first instance of milquetoast as a common noun is found in the mid-1930s. Milquetoast thus joins the ranks of other such words, including sad sack, from a blundering army private invented by George Baker in 1942, and Wimpy, from J. Wellington Wimpy in the Popeye comic strip, which became a trade name for a hamburger. If we look to a related form of popular culture, the animated cartoon, we must of course acknowledge Mickey Mouse, which has become a slang term for something that is easy, insignificant, small-time, worthless, or petty. -
Re:A concept virus?
Yes, it's viruses
-
Dear Slashdot,Dear Slashdot,
I am writing to ask you for your name and address, as I want to sue you. I am suing you for damages to my new 17" flatscreen monitor incurred by you providing a link to the webpage "Bernard Shifman Is A Moron Spammer", which I was compelled to click on, resulting in my aforementioned monitor being destroyed in a spray of Coca-Cola (which I was drinking calmly until being compelled to click on the link) issuing from my nostrils.
The Coca-Cola Company will also be a party to this suit, as the Coke that went through my nostrils has also caused serious damage to my sinuses. I am afraid a telephone discussion with you regarding the suit is therefore out of the question.
My legal team (me and my cat) agree that I have a watertight case.
Thank you.
Ethelred
P.S. First post!
-
Re:Barraty?I'd never heard of the crime(?) "barraty" before
That's because it is spelled barratry. And, interestingly, the layman's dictionary def is "instigating lawsuits", not "threating to instigate lawsuits". Dunno if there is a legal distinction, since (all together now, children) IANAL.
Over in what represents itself as a legal dictionary, law.com mentions barratry as a form of shady/illegal business practice by lawyers. Goodness, surely not lawyers.
-
Re:Great
No, a democracy is a much broader term than that; it simply means government by the people, through majority opinion, whether that's through direct vote or through representation. A republic can often be used synonymously, but is usually somewhat more specific, referring to a state run by an elected official. You can check any print or online dictionary (here, here, and here for example.
I'm not sure why so many people on slashdot set such narrow definitions for these two words.