Slashdot Mirror

WHO IS JEAN DULEY?

Dr. Bruce Ivins, Ms. Jean Duley, and the FBI's "Court Document"

Verified:

http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/05/12/FBI-worried-as-DoD-sold-counterfeit-Cisco-gear_1.html

http://www.hereinreality.com/likashing.html

http://www.fas.org/news/china/1998/h980618-prc8.htm

Well there is also these problems:

Counterfeit chips in Cisco gear on military networks:

http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/05/12/FBI-worried-as-DoD-sold-counterfeit-Cisco-gear_1.html

Chinese buying the main fiber network the US military uses:

http://www.hereinreality.com/likashing.html

Stupid is, as stupid does...

If most of your military traffic goes over the old
global crossing network, don't allow the public sale of
that network to a foreign nation with an opposing ideology.

http://www.hereinreality.com/likashing.html

When you do stupid things, bad things happen.

It is not too hard to hack a network if you got
counterfeit hardware inside the network giving
you a backdoor in.

http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/05/12/FBI-worried-as-DoD-sold-counterfeit-Cisco-gear_1.html

So once they got in, they learned what they needed
to know to stay in, and put other methods in place
to stay in.

They are going to have to rebuild their network one segment
at a time from the ground up.

They need several things with one of them being segment
monitoring IDS system that can detect the outbound traffic.

Something that can track all outbound traffic against
a white-list of acceptable IPs, think a reverse peer guardian
that tracks what IP's are reached and snds alarms if they
are not on the list.

In any event they will have a monumental task of clearing
all the backdoors in the system, and should consider going
totally to a secure hardware+software encrypted VPN that
does not even travel over the public internet.

There is enough dark fiber out there to do it for the classified
material they transmit.

Also if most of your military traffic goes over the old
global crossing network, don't allow the public sale of
that network to a foreign nation with an oppposing ideology.

Namely China !

http://www.hereinreality.com/likashing.html

When you do stupid things, bad things happen.

I found a java simulation here.

I'll give you a hint: "If we make the wrong choice, then the danger is that we'll get hit again -- that we'll be hit in a way that will be devastating from the standpoint of the United States" -Dick Cheney

Seriously. Our own Government has done a lot more to make us afraid of terrorism then the terrorists themselves have done. How depressing that in 60 years we've gone from "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself" to "Buy duct tape!".

Selling fear and promoting terrorism paranoia has been an extremely profitable enterprise for those jackoffs currently infesting the white house and congress. Hundreds of billions of American dollars annually going to Carlyle group http://www.hereinreality.com/carlyle.html/ and Haliburton to devise, promote, sell, and start military occupations around the globe. It is absolutely disgraceful how our country has become controlled by corporations profiting through an industrial military complex of their creation.

The FCC isn't a group that just randomly censors this and that. They have a "constituency" (of sorts) that tells them what to do. People that complain about things that they don't want to see on television. And nearly all of those people all fall within exactly one group: parents. There's a reason that censorship and the police state are generally referred to be the euphemism of "family values".

One of the principal offenders.

Here's another. Oops! That was accidentally a link to a compilation of the corruption, greed, and support for fascist dictatorships that the Bush family has been engaging in for the last six decades. Still, it makes for an interesting diversion on the subject of Republican "family values" (ie: they're completely fictitious).

The fact [...] Dan Rather [...] presenting a fraudulent document

The person who is discussing this with you is being too generous. CBS News performed a high level investigation of the documents showing Bush did not attend his National Guard service (how did a C student get into the Texas National Guard during the Vietnam War to begin with?). The investigation was headed by a Republican. The conclusion of the investigation: it is impossible to say whether or not the document was a fabrication or a copy of the real document due to it having gone through too many generations of copies. They did find criticisms, like typography and font, without basis, as these methods of typography and fonts were in fact available at the time the document is dated.

But even if you do not agree with the results of the investigation, the other point still stands: multiple people corroborated the contents of the documents and there exists a high degree of certainty George Bush failed to perform his duty even in the cush job of national guardsman during the Vietnam War.

Another interesting fact: the same month Bush's record of attendance slips (and there is no record of Bush receiving the required yearly physical that year or after) coincides with the National Guard implementing a new policy of mandatory drug testing. Several years later Bush will be arrested and convicted of drunk driving, making him the first criminal to reside in the white house as Commander-in-Chief.

They do things like buying enough "put" options on United Airlines to create a market spike - just three days before 9-11.

Something tells me that Peter Chung, formerly of the Carlyle Group, still regrets sending the infamous e-mail to his buddies that ended up in the NYT.

Google's finally getting big enough to open an "Evil Department" - they've hired White House propagandist^Wspokesman and Carlyle Group exec Dan Senor.

By the way the "movie" as you call it is a documentary, which is why it was excluded from the Oscars. Perhaps you've heard of them. They are educational films filled with facts.

The facts that Farenheit 9/11 revealed agree with the Duelfer report and all reputable news sources (even Faux News).

Republicans and doubters, If you haven't seen the movie and don't know what was discussed there, why are you posting here? You Republicans are better at changing the subject and dodging specific questions by trashing the subject than any organized group known to man. This quote by the Press Secretary of the White House sums up the type of behaviour I have been seeing very well: "I don't have to see the movie to know that it is full of invalid facts..." How is anything in America ever going to change with such closed minded thinkers and the sheep that follow them? I challenge the doubters to: a) actually see the movie b) understand what is being claimed c) actually do some research on what is being claimed. Finally, if you think you can discuss the movie's claims without seeing it, here's your quiz: 1)Who is "The Carlyle Group", who are/were the members, and what is their link to the war in Iraq? If you think you are open minded, watch the movie at this site to find out - first 37 seconds are in Dutch 2) Have you researched the pipeline in Afganistan? Who and what companies were behind it? Who did Hamid Karzai (Afgan Interim President)work for? How were the Taliban involved? 3) How many Bush cabinet members are tied to the energy and oil business (its easier to ask who isn't)? What large oil/gas company did Condleeza Rice work for? After you've researched these questions and viewed the video above, come back and discuss the facts that are at hand here. Thank You, Mike

No - they were already criminals - it's just that they had to be prosecuted when too much information leaked to the public.

Still, it's all OK now - Poindexter's rehabilitated and then some.

Isn't forgiveness a wonderful thing?

First, we have to assume that the president, the cabinet, and his whole administration are entering into war just to make money for some relative of the president.

And themselves. Why else? Because Saddam is a bad man? Bullshit. The US made him who he is today. North Korea is a hugely greater threat.

But wait! There's more! Then we have to assume that almost the entirety of the Senate and 75% of the House was in on the conspiracy, when they voted, in Joint Congressional Resolution 140 to approve the use of force!

How many of them do NOT have stock portfolios?

But that's not all! Then we have to figure out how the entire United Nations Security Council joined the conspiracy when they voted unanimously to approve UNSC Resolution 1441 approving `serious consequences' for Mr. Hussein if he did not take advantage of this `final opportunity'!

No conspiracy required. The President of The United States said jump. They fell over themselves to see who could jump highest.

But that's not all you get! Then we have to understand why a majority of Americans approve immediate action against Mr. Hussein, too (52%, according to this week's NYTimes/CBSNews opinion poll, with 58% supporting action if the UN doesn't act within the next week or two)!

Do you beleive everything you read? Most Americans do. Control the media, you control the people.

Then we have to understand why 19 European nations, and another several dozen nations from the rest of the world have signed on too!

See above re: UN Security Council.

I mean c'mon. That's all you've got?

Oh, there's lots more. You just have to look a little deeper than most people are willing to do. For instance, do you have a satisfactory explanation for this?
Not so much the fact that it happened, but the fact that you never heard anything further about it. The fact that an ex-director of the just happened to be in the position he was in just compounds the coincidence further. I mean if you laid all this out for the American public as a TV movie of the week, you might actually cause one or two people to ask embarrassing questions of the authorities. But if you have a reasonable explanation (not a coincidence, use Occam's Razor) I'm willing to listen.

As far as biased sources go, are you saying that the right wing sources of news are bastions of impartiality?

Here

Here

Here

and here.

First two things to learn in journalism school: Behind every newsworthy event, find out who benefits and follow the money. That's where you'll find the REAL story.

Maybe it's about making, selling and using up armaments?armaments? After all, Dubya gets to inherit someday, so he has a vested interest in seeing daddy succeed in business.

Don't forget that in 1996 the Sudanese government offered three separate times to hand over bin Laden to the U.S. and Clinton refused. Ironically, Clinton, who could find a legal excuse to explain away ANY of his OWN behavior--including quibbling over the meaning of the word "is"--said that there was no legal justification for the U.S. to take custody of bin Laden.
Oh, if only Boy Clinton had put his legalistic mind towards something USEFUL (like protecting our country against bin Laden) as opposed to using it only to get himself out of his own self-made messes...who knows how different the world might be right now? SLURP SLURP SLURP says the whore

U.S. missiles pound targets in Afghanistan

U.S. missiles pound targets in Afghanistan, Sudan
Clinton: 'Our target was terror'
August 21, 1998
Web posted at: 5:10 a.m. EDT (0910 GMT)
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- American cruise missiles pounded sites in Afghanistan and Sudan Thursday in retaliation for the deadly bombings of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania on August 7.

"Let our actions today send this message loud and clear -- there are no expendable American targets," U.S. President Clinton said in a televised address to the American people Thursday evening. "There will be no sanctuary for terrorists. We will defend our people, our interests and our values."

U.S. officials say the six sites attacked in Afghanistan were part of a network of terrorist compounds near the Pakistani border that housed supporters of millionaire Osama bin Laden.

An official of the Taliban, Afgahanistan's Islamic rulers, reported 21 were killed and 30 were injured in the missile strikes in eastern Afghanistan.

In the Sudanese capital, Khartoum, the El Shifa Pharmaceutical Industries factory -- which U.S. officials say also has ties to bin Laden and produces chemicals that can be used to make deadly VX nerve gas -- was heavily damaged.

In response, an angry crowd of demonstrators, chanting "Down, Down, U.S.A." took over the U.S. embassy building in Khartoum, which had been closed after the August bombings, Sudanese television reported. U.S. diplomats had been pulled out of Sudan in 1996, after the State Department decided it could no longer ensure their safety.

U.S.: Bin Laden's network planning new attacks
Clinton said that information gathered by American intelligence showed that a network of terrorists affiliated with bin Laden was responsible for the bombings in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam, which killed 257 people, including 12 Americans.

"Our mission was clear -- to strike at the network of radical groups affiliated with, and funded by, Osama bin Laden, the pre-eminent organizer and financier of international terrorism in the world today," Clinton said.

National Security Adviser Sandy Berger said that American intelligence had also turned up "very specific" information that the bin Laden network was planning additional attacks, which Thursday's missile launches were designed to prevent.

In addition, the United States had information that top leaders of bin Laden's network were to meet in Afghanistan Thursday. Berger said that "influenced our planning" for the attack, which was authorized by the president last Friday.

Bin Laden has been given shelter by Afghanistan's Islamic rulers, the Taliban, and may have been in the area targeted by U.S. missiles. Taliban officials said bin Laden survived the attack, but U.S. officials said they did not know if he survived.

Pentagon sources confirmed to CNN that the attacks were made with Tomahawk cruise missiles, not aircraft. The missiles were fired from U.S. Navy ships in the Red Sea and the Arabian Sea. The simultaneous attacks took place about 1:30 p.m. EDT (1730 GMT).

Rubble, fire in Khartoum
Sudanese television showed piles of rubble at the Khartoum factory and fire raging in the distance. People were seen walking through the damage, wearing masks.

Sudanese officials reacted angrily to the attacks. Interior Minister Abdul Rahim told CNN in a telephone interview that the privately owned pharmaceutical firm had "nothing to do with chemical weapons."

"We have no chemical weapons factory in our country," he said.

A statement read on Sudanese television about an hour after the attack said "the wrongful American air force launched air attacks on Sudan tonight which aimed at strategic and vital areas."
[ more at web page ]

Oh, I'm sorry... I forgot to call them MONICA MISSILES as was choreographed by Newt Gingrich.

Who Killed John O'Neill?
If you believe the media, John P. O'Neill was simply another innocent victim killed in the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center. But you don't need much imagination to suspect something deeper was at work.
Clearly, O'Neill was a man Osama bin Laden wanted dead. O'Neill had been a Deputy Director of the FBI, and Osama bin Laden's main pursuer in the US government. O'Neill had investigated the bombings of the World Trade Center in 1993, a US base in Saudi Arabia in 1996, the US embassies in Nairobi and Dar-Es-Salaam in 1998, and the USS Cole last year.

But once the first plane hit the North Tower, Osama bin Laden wouldn't be the only man to profit from O'Neill's death. At the moment of impact, O'Neill became the man who knew too much.

Just two weeks, TWO WEEKS, prior to the attack, O'Neill had left his job with the FBI. O'Neill had quit because he believed that the Bush administration had stymied the intelligence agency's investigations on terrorism. O'Neill charged that it had done so even as it bargained with the Taliban on handing over of Osama bin Laden in exchange for political recognition and economic aid. In the ultimate irony, O'Neill had gone public with these charges at the same time that he was leaving the FBI to become the head of security at the World Trade Center.

"The main obstacles to investigate Islamic terrorism were US oil corporate interests, and the role played by Saudi Arabia in it," O'Neill reportedly told the authors of an explosive new book, Hidden Truth (Forbidden Truth in the US), by intelligence analysts Charles Brisard and Guillaume Dasquie. Brisard met O'Neill several times last summer and reports that O'Neill complained bitterly that the US State Department - and behind it the oil lobby who make up President Bush's entourage - blocked attempts to prove bin Laden's guilt.

Released just last November, Brisard and Dasquie's book was mostly ignored by the US media. But it is beginning to cause a stir. Just two days ago, the story aired for the first time on US television when CNN's Paula Zahn interviewed former Iraqi chief U.N. weapons inspector Richard Bulter. (Read CNN transcript) "The most explosive charge, Paula, is that the Bush administration -- the present one, just shortly after assuming office slowed down FBI investigations of al Qaeda and terrorism in Afghanistan in order to do a deal with the Taliban on oil -- an oil pipeline across Afghanistan" Butler said.

[ more at web page ]

New WTC Evidence Raises Questions Of Evidence Destruction

The evidence that the destruction of the WTC was to destroy evidence contained on the 23rd and 24th floors of the North Tower is now incontrovertable. This message is the first revelation of the evidence that makes this conclusion a certainty. As yet no one has contacted any authorities with this information. (I want to make sure it is well in the public sphere before I show up at the FBI office here in Yakima.)

Dick Eastman 223 S. 64th Ave Yakima, Washington

I want you to provide me with lists of names I can contact in government and elsewhere around the world. I also want you to work by your own avenues to get to any officials or law enforcement agencies with jurisdiction in this case. A war and the greatest crime in history are involved, and many of the people responsible are standing in the way of justice.

Here is evidence supplied by the Head of Security of the WTC on network television indicating that the FBI floors (the 22nd, 23rd and 24th floors) of the North Tower -- 70 floors below the crash-bombing impact -- had been devastated and reduced to debris that this same Head of Security himself dug through to get to trapped persons (whom he saved).

But it was on these floors that the entire accumulation of evidence and investigation briefs on two highly important cases were being stored:

(1) The case against Mobil Oil and James Giffen on illegal oil swaps between Iran and Kazakhstan (at that time before a New York grand jury as described in great detail by Seymore Hersh in the July 9 New Yorker magazine);

(2)And even more important, the evidence in the investigation of GOLD PRICE FIXING stemming from charges brought against Alan Greenspan, Morgan & Company, Goldman Sachs.
(see below [truth.htm] for full reconstruction of this crime -- that is now all but confirmed by this revelation of a bomb devastating the FBI floors of the North Tower before the tower collapsed.)

The secrets one will try to keep
It is long past due to impeach and execute the thief that stole the Presidency for High Crimes, Bribery, and Treason

And another link

http://www.hereinreality.com/bigbrother.html

I'm glad someone else remembered that name. Here's a little more info on this son of a bitch. For fuck's sake--you could not find a man more ill-suited for this job if you tried.

You mean this Poindexter? The only one to do jail time for Iran-Contra? BTW, his conviction wasn't overturned in a court of law, he (and Ollie North et al) were pardoned by GHW Bush. So that means he was still guilty. The CIA (and Mossad, and probably most other "intelligence" organizations) routinely deal drugs to raise money for other operations - it wasn't limited to Iran-Contra.

As far as the CIA in the drug trafficking business, there have been plenty of links, including a major series in the San Jose Mercury News in the late 1990's, also this one. Further, the www.copvcia.com website is run by a former LAPD narc who saw it all from the inside.

The US already attempted a "regime change" in Venezuela this year. This "regime change" was an effort to install a leader that would privatize Venezuela's oil industry. Privatization would allow foreign investors to manipulate the price of oil. Venezuela is an OPEC country so this would have a world-wide effect (imagine Enron on a global scale). If I remember correctly Venezuela broke the oil embargo in the 70's.

To bring us back on topic... The US government does a lot of awful things like this that the people of the US would not approve of. There is no reason a democratic government should be overthrowing other governments. This war, like the war on drugs, is a racket and a sham.

There are a lot of unanswered questions about 9/11. All we can do is continue to search for answers to the questions of who stood down that day and who is making money off this.

Take off your blinders.

Saddam Hussein has a bunker 75 feet under Bagdad.

We are seeking a way to use tactical nuclear weapons in the field.

Tactical nuke plans call for penetration into the ground so they can destroy bunkers.

Iraq is cutting oil production.

The Carlyle group uhh ... nevermind.

Former Pres. George Bush's career began in the oil industry.

Bush Sr. was President when we went to war with ... Iraq.

G. Dubya is President now and threatening Iraq ...

Saddam better duck.

Why grammar is the first casualty of war

"WHAT really alarms me about President Bush's "war on terrorism" is the grammar. How do you wage war on an abstract noun? It's rather like bombing murder."

"Imagine if Bush had said: "We're going to bomb murder wherever it lurks. We are going to seek out the murderers and the would-be murderers, and bomb any government that harbours murderers.""
...

---
Bush Family Values Photo Album
---

Book: U.S. Military Drafted Plans to Terrorize U.S. Cities to Provoke War With Cuba

In the early 1960s, America's top military leaders reportedly drafted plans to kill innocent people and commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities to create public support for a war against Cuba.


Bush and Ashcroft are making laws to keep this kind of revealing information from ever being released. The Freedom of Information Act was created after Nixon's antics, and it is being withdrawn for the wrong reasons. We need to keep gov't checks and balances, as this article clearly proves.
---
An article about Gulf War propaganda, outlining how the 'Babies Torn from Incubators by Iraqi Soldiers' was manufactured and used by Bush to instill war fever. 2 minute read.
---
More gov't lies - Trumped up terrorism numbers
---

I think I figured out the reason the White House covered up Bush's condition!

FACT 1)
REPORT: President Bush Has A Heart Arrhythmia; White House Did Not Disclose After Pretzel Incident That Mr. Bush Has Sinus Bradycardia
---
FACT 2)
Arrhythmias Causes and Risks:
[...]
Arrhythmias are also caused by some drugs. These include antiarrhythmics, Beta blockers, caffeine , COCAINE , psychotropics, and sympathomimetics.
...
---
GRAPH COMPARISON The EKG on the top shows normal sinus rhythm. The EKG at the bottom shows sinus bradycardia

A slowly beating heart means that he's not getting as much oxygen to his brain as healthy people, right? Could this partly be the reason his intelligence suffers?
:)