Slashdot Mirror

Al-Qaeda is a former CIA asset. In fact they are still using them in Egypt and Syria to exert regime change. They don't want to *really* want hurt their friend/ally by stealing money..... just put on a little show to impress the Americans back home.

1 - http://www.infowars.com/syrian-girl-natos-secret-agenda-in-syria/
2 - http://www.infowars.com/al-qaeda-rebel-pictured-with-un-observers-in-syria/
3 - http://www.infowars.com/cia-double-agent-cia-and-british-intelligence-created-ruse-known-as-al-qaeda/
4 - http://www.infowars.com/nato-using-al-qaeda-to-destabilize-syria/

>>>The hard work (discovering new drug targets) is done by the NIH anyway.

False.

And profit motive is what makes a doctor or hospital desire to do a better job (and draw customers away from the competition). If the profit motive did not exist and they knew they would get paid anyway, even if they did a shitty job, then they'd be like government-employed teachers. Let me cue-up the video where a teacher was criticizing Mitt Romney as a bully, but then threatened to cane a student who called Obama a bully too. The student said, "They cannot take away your right to have your opinion." The teacher states, "OK, do I have to get my cane? As a social studies teacher, I cannot allow you to slander any President." The teacher cannot be fired, so she keeps getting paid even as she does a lousy job. http://www.infowars.com/teacher-yells-at-student-criminal-offense-to-criticize-obama/

We provided a citation.
Now you (and others) provide an apology.
No need to "be a dick" to quote the grandparent.

"Senator Carl Levin has revealed it was the administration itself that lobbied to Remove language from the bill that would have protected American citizens from being detained indefinitely without trial."

(This includes multiple citations.) http://www.infowars.com/obama-administration-demanded-power-to-indefinitely-detain-u-s-citizens/

>>>Jesus Christ. All I did was ask for a cite. You provided it. Then you were a dick.

I apologize on behalf of my other republicans.
BUT when you look over this thread (and the one about a Tea Party engineer running for Congress), is it any surprise the Republicans are defensive? All day long Democrats have been spewing the most vile, racist hate towards them.

(This includes multiple citations.) http://www.infowars.com/obama-administration-demanded-power-to-indefinitely-detain-u-s-citizens/

2006: http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2006/061206seedmoney.htm

Prison planet?

2010: http://www.infowars.com/google-and-cia-fund-political-precrime-technology/

Infowars???

Free award-winning SF stories/novellas - http://www.asimovs.com/

Ah! I got it!

Seriously, Alex Jones, founder of Infowars and Prison Planet, is known for "Advocacy of national sovereignty; New World Order theories; anti-world government; and various conspiracy theories". And no, I'm not Portuguese.

Known for a long time? For some of us: Yes.

2006:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2006/061206seedmoney.htm

2010:
http://www.infowars.com/google-and-cia-fund-political-precrime-technology/

http://www.infowars.com/breitbart-and-the-cias-heart-attack-gun/

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
March 7, 2012

Andrew Breitbartâ(TM)s media empire undoubtedly posed a threat to the establishment. From the takedown of New York Rep. Anthony Weiner to the outing of the USDAâ(TM)s Shirley Sherrod and very public revelations about the seamy underside of ACORN, Breitbart was considered a thorn in the side of the liberal establishment.

Senators Frank Church and John Tower examine a CIA poison dart gun that causes cancer and heart attacks.

But it was his promise to release information that would critically damage Barack Obama prior to an election that really grabbed the attention of the establishment and possibly led to his assassination.

As firebrand talk show host Michael Savage said following Breitbartâ(TM)s collapse on a Brentwood, California, street and his subsequent death from an apparent heart attack, he would be remiss if he didnâ(TM)t suggest that the liberal gadfly was assassinated. âoeIâ(TM)m asking a crazy question,â Savage said on his nationally syndicated radio show, âoebut so what? We the people want an answer. This was not an ordinary man. If I donâ(TM)t ask this question, I would be remiss.â

Others insist Breitbart had a history of health issues and simply collapsed and died from a heart attack as thousands of Americans do every day. They say Savage, Alex Jones and many others who posit a Breitbart assassination are engaging in baseless conspiracy theories.

However, we do know that government engages in assassination of political enemies and has the means to do so without leaving a trace.

During Senate testimony in 1975 into illegal activities by the CIA, it was revealed that the agency had developed a dart gun capable of causing a heart attack. âoeAt the first televised hearing, staged in the Senate Caucus Room, Chairman Church dramatically displayed a CIA poison dart gun to highlight the committeeâ(TM)s discovery that the CIA directly violated a presidential order by maintaining stocks of shellfish toxin sufficient to kill thousands,â a Senate web page explains.

âoeThe lethal poison then rapidly enters the bloodstream causing a heart attack. Once the damage is done, the poison denatures quickly, so that an autopsy is very unlikely to detect that the heart attack resulted from anything other than natural causes. Sounds like the perfect James Bond weapon, doesnâ(TM)t it? Yet this is all verifiable in Congressional testimony,â writes Fred Burks.

âoeThe dart from this secret CIA weapon can penetrate clothing and leave nothing but a tiny red dot on the skin. On penetration of the deadly dart, the individual targeted for assassination may feel as if bitten by a mosquito, or they may not feel anything at all. The poisonous dart completely disintegrates upon entering the target.â

Burks suggests that Mark Pittman, a reporter who predicted the financial crisis and exposed Federal Reserve misdoings which led to a Bloomberg lawsuit against the bankster cartel, may have been assassinated with the CIA weapon.

Of course, Breitbartâ(TM)s untimely death prior to the release of information that would damage the presidential campaign of Obama may be purely coincidental. If he was, however, assassinated with a frozen dart that denatures and leaves no trace, chances are we will never know what really happened to him.

But if anyone besides a small following was listening to Ron Paul...

This is absurd.

from https://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/08/27-1 ... He also said this: "[T]he forced integration dictated by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 increased racial tensions while diminishing individual liberty." Ron Paul also occasionally appears at events sponsored by the John Birch Society, the segregationist right-wing organization that is closely aligned with the Christian Reconstructionist wing of the religious right. ... there's much more there to mull over, i.e. the wackjob writings that were printed in the publications he published (Though yes, in a show of unelectability, he admits "I have never uttered such words and denounce such small-minded thoughts.... I have publicly taken moral responsibility for not paying closer attention to what went out under my name.") Libertarians have some great points, kids.. yes, check out Alex Jones' 4-hours-daily radio show because he's great on the 4th & 1st Amendments, but do call in and bring up the fact that he's brainwashed as re climate change. http://xml.infowars.com/Alex.rss

If Ron Paul was running as an independent, he wouldn't get even the meagre MSM coverage that he is getting now.

They can limit his time to 89 SECONDS in a 'debate', but at least he is on camera.

I'm sure that any insurance investigation would involve investigating the car's software if there was a question of driver liability. We're already not far off from every car being required to have a "black box" for the purposes of accident reconstruction and assigning fault.

Either we're going to be signing EULAs and ToS documentation when we take possession of a new car in the future that specifically states that any modifications are at the owners risk....or there is going to be regulation in place prohibiting 3rd parties from editing the car's software. Either way, it's really going to depend on the first few legal cases to set some sort of precedent one way or the other.

Link

Link

Even "paleoconservative" Alex Jones is firing up his followers against government internet surveillance legislation in the works. Here's an example from one of his sites that even made the Drudge Report last Saturday.

Another interesting story from the same site: "TSA Screener Throws Hot Coffee In Face Of Pilot Who Asked Her To Stop Cursing" :-o Wow.

Holy crap, you're not kidding.

Mr Trivett then attempted to get a closer look at the screener's ID tags, presumably in order to report the incident. The screener, 30 year old Lateisha El, then reportedly shoved the pilot and hurled a full cup of hot coffee at his face.

Police said that Mr Trivett thankfully walked away without being seriously hurt. El, from East New York in Brooklyn, was arrested and charged with harassment and misdemeanor-assault.

I'm sorry, but if someone in uniform who has the authority to arrest and detain you does that, that should be a lot more than a misdemeanor. Because if I threw a cup of coffee into a TSA screener's face, I'd be sure as hell facing an entirely different set of charges. In fact, it would likely be a Federal offense.

>>>You have the right to not be offended. Right?

F.U.

(I am referring of course to the new Fiscal Union of europe.) The summary almost makes the law sound reasonable, but I prefer infowars' spin on it:

Internet Censorship Bill Goes After Free Speech In Arizona The state legislature of Arizona has passed a bill that vastly broadens telephone harassment laws and applies them to the Internet and other means of electronic communication.

LINK - http://www.infowars.com/internet-censorship-bill-goes-after-free-speech-in-arizona/

Another interesting story from the same site: "TSA Screener Throws Hot Coffee In Face Of Pilot Who Asked Her To Stop Cursing" :-o Wow.

They were recently scolded by a Judge, for trying to imprison a group of supposed "terrorists" who were really just a rifle club:

"The prosecution is not free to roam at large â" to shift its theory of criminality so as to take advantage of each passing vicissitude of the trial,â Judge Victoria Roberts said. âoeIf the government now admits that the plan alleged in Count 1 of the indictment (seditious conspiracy) did not exist, then defendants must be acquitted," Roberts wrote in her 28-page ruling. "The governmentâ(TM)s case is built largely of circumstantial evidence. While this evidence could certainly lead a rational fact finder to conclude that âsomething fishyâ(TM) was going on, it does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that defendants reached a concrete agreement to forcibly oppose the U.S. government."

http://www.infowars.com/hutaree-acquitted-in-federal-terrorism-case/

>>>nothing more than an indignant letter and a small fine.

And a nice mortgage bailout for those fatcats too. (Yes it's a bad thing. It did almost nothing for mortgage customers, and was a giant gift for Bank of America and other major lenders.) Ignore the article and watch all the embedded links/videos. http://www.infowars.com/mortgage-settlement-is-just-another-stealth-bank-bailout/

Yep: Persian Gulf Option One: A False Flag

Yeah, a country run by a theocracy that has announced it wants to annihilate one of its neighbors and is busy getting nuclear weapons, what could possibly go wrong?

Yeah, but what does Israel have to do with this?

LK

Several provisions of the 1933 Banking Act sought to restrict 'speculative' uses of bank credit. Section 3(a) required each Federal Reserve Bank to monitor local member bank lending and investment to ensure there was not âoeundue useâ of bank credit for âoespeculative trading or carryingâ of securities, commodities or real estate.

Most would agree that when the fox is put in charge of the hen house, foul play will ensue. Just a couple examples:
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/665c90e8-ecf4-11e0-be97-00144feab49a.html
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/07/29/us-lme-warehousing-idUSTRE76R3YZ20110729
http://www.thestreet.com/story/10290085/1/goldman-citigroup-to-make-markets-on-cbot.html
http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2009/0413/096-sachs-semgroup-goldman-goose-oil.html
http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cvi/description

Forget about the economies their bookcooking destroyed, more important are the stooges being PLACED(not elected) into Euro leadership positions:
http://www.infowars.com/banker-coup-goldman-sachs-takes-over-europe/

I mean, this is a group that makes their money by paying off people to get them information, in ways that are hinted are against the law (likely they're getting other people to break the law of other countries, even if the company themselves aren't) ... but they're against hackers that break the law? It seems a a bit hypocritical to me.

It's only hacking if it is done by someone not in power, or not on the behest of someone in power.

The government can listen to your phone calls without a warrant. But a man recording police is being tried for a 75 year jail sentance for recording police out in the open.

In the same way, when it is the powers that be are stealing information through nefarious methods, it is just business as usual. When you do it to them, they call their friends - who arrest you.

The federal government originally hadn't mandated that the TSA be in every airport. In fact, the author of the bill creating the TSA encouraged airports to opt-out of using the TSA. Unfortunately, shortly after that article was written, the head of the TSA put a freeze on allowing any more opting-out from the airports. Even so, the Senate passed a bill a few weeks ago that would reinstate the practice. So it seems somewhat inevitable that this is the direction things are heading now. I.e. that the crazy pendulum swung far enough one way and is starting to come back towards the center now.

Alternatively, if the TSA continues to be forced on the airports, their policies aren't law, last I checked. IANAL, so this is likely wishful thinking, but stick with me:
1) If an action being done by the TSA (e.g. the new scanners) is dictated by TSA policy
2) And there are no federal laws on the books mandating the action
3) And a state passes a bill barring the action
4) That said action would be illegal in that state, since no federal law exists to trump the state's law

And if we assume that my wishful thinking is just that and nothing more, a state could still try their hand at creating laws like these. At the very least, they'd be able to force the issue to a head by pushing it into the legal system. The state laws may eventually get struck down, but the statement being made would likely be sufficient to get some changes made.

economic socialist

Socialism is inherently statist, and given no resistance statists will apply their 'justice' globally.

You weren’t really confused by the parent, were you?

I don't think you have to go very far in to the "Globalist Conspiracy" theories to find out why Microsoft is funding this type of thing. Spend a bit of time on InfoWars and you will find lots of funny information linking "The Gates" and Microsoft to odd things.

https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ix=seb&ie=UTF-8&ion=1#hl=en&newwindow=1&safe=off&output=search&sclient=psy-ab&q=infant%20mortality%20rates%20higher%20in%20countries%20with%20vaccine&pbx=1&oq=&aq=&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=&gs_upl=&fp=12915d1a2a85fa97&ix=seb&ion=1&ix=seb&ion=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=d12e3d4071aa9682&biw=1273&bih=965&ix=seb&ion=1

http://www.infowars.com/new-study-finds-direct-link-between-vaccines-and-infant-mortality/

According to his biography, “Goldman has served as a reviewer for the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), Vaccine, AJMC, ERV, ERD, JEADV,and British Medical Journal (BMJ). He is included on the Editorial Board of Research and Reviews in BioSciences.”
Miller, a medical research journalist and the Director of the Thinktwice Global Vaccine Institute, has been studying the dangers of vaccines for 25 years.
“Linear regression analysis of unweighted mean IMRs showed a high statistically significant correlation between increasing number of vaccine doses and increasing infant mortality rates,” the study found, adding that the results demand an “essential” inquiry into the correlation between vaccine doses, biochemical or synergistic toxicity, and infant mortality rates.
Despite the fact that the United States administers the highest number of vaccine doses to children in the entire developed world, 26 before infants reach the age of one, its infant mortality rate is higher than 33 other nations, all of which administer less vaccines. The study clearly illustrates the fact that developed countries which administer less vaccines have lower infant mortality rates, suggesting a direct statistical link between vaccination side-effects and infant deaths.

he can welcome a happier, longer life.

http://www.infowars.com/new-study-finds-direct-link-between-vaccines-and-infant-mortality/

https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ix=seb&ie=UTF-8&ion=1#hl=en&newwindow=1&safe=off&output=search&sclient=psy-ab&q=infant%20mortality%20rates%20higher%20in%20countries%20with%20vaccine&pbx=1&oq=&aq=&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=&gs_upl=&fp=1&ix=seb&ion=1&ix=seb&ion=1&fp=d12e3d4071aa9682&biw=1273&bih=965&ix=seb&ion=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.r_qf.,cf.osb&cad=b

According to his biography, “Goldman has served as a reviewer for the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), Vaccine, AJMC, ERV, ERD, JEADV,and British Medical Journal (BMJ). He is included on the Editorial Board of Research and Reviews in BioSciences.”
Miller, a medical research journalist and the Director of the Thinktwice Global Vaccine Institute, has been studying the dangers of vaccines for 25 years.
“Linear regression analysis of unweighted mean IMRs showed a high statistically significant correlation between increasing number of vaccine doses and increasing infant mortality rates,” the study found, adding that the results demand an “essential” inquiry into the correlation between vaccine doses, biochemical or synergistic toxicity, and infant mortality rates.
Despite the fact that the United States administers the highest number of vaccine doses to children in the entire developed world, 26 before infants reach the age of one, its infant mortality rate is higher than 33 other nations, all of which administer less vaccines. The study clearly illustrates the fact that developed countries which administer less vaccines have lower infant mortality rates, suggesting a direct statistical link between vaccination side-effects and infant deaths.

The obvious answer to the question is, as usual; "Follow the money!"

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2010-11-22-scanner-lobby_N.htm

http://www.infowars.com/chertoff-linked-to-body-scanner-manufacturer/

IMO, the *real* question we should be asking is why we believed this costly new technology, coupled with a whole new govt. agency to operate it, was going to accomplish anything substantial in the first place? The argument over the cost is tough to make without somebody insisting that either A) it created so many new jobs for American citizens that it added a lot of value, and/or B) if it saves even ONE human life, how can you put a price on that? So IMO, we can probably just ignore the "cost" angle, and simply ask if the TSA screening procedure we've implemented is a net positive, or a net negative for everyone?

Personally, I think you've got to be drinking some serious govt. kool-aid if you REALLY believe this nonsense of putting anyone on a secret "watch list" (based on the discretion of agents hired from the general public at hourly pay starting at around $11/hr.), and making everyone walk through body scanners before boarding commercial planes is going to save you from terrorist acts. As one of my friends pointed out, you can go to most airports in the U.S. and find that the only thing keeping you from wandering out to the hangars and runways is a chain-link fence around their perimeter. If someone REALLY wanted to sabotage a plane, they could throw on a mechanics' outfit or something, run out onto the tarmac, and do whatever they wanted to do with a parked jet, or even quickly insert something into some luggage on one of the transports, waiting to be loaded onto a flight. Trying to secure the plane from the terminal's boarding gate so heavily ignores all the other possibilities. Meanwhile, we've created a situation where EVERYONE is inconvenienced and put at risk of being falsely labeled a "potential terrorist" for transgressions as simple as wearing a t-shirt with a counter-culture political message printed on it, or making the wrong comment while standing in line.

Freedom = 0, Terrorists = 1 by my score-card

He signed it months ago, as a matter of fact. Before all the publicity surrounding SOPA and PIPA.

He's been doing a lot of that lately, ignoring the Constitution.

Source: http://www.infowars.com/obama-signs-global-internet-treaty-worse-than-sopa/

"Siri’s dirty little secret is that she’s a bandwidth guzzler, the digital equivalent of a 10-miles-per-gallon Hummer H1.
To make your wish her command, Siri floods your cell network with a stream of data; her responses require a similarly large flow in return. A study published this month by Arieso, an Atlanta firm that specializes in mobile networks, found that the Siri-equipped iPhone 4S uses twice as much data as does the plain old iPhone 4 and nearly three times as much as does the iPhone 3G. "

Exactly correct. Free enterprise is not the same as capitalism. And corporations, which cannot exist without government sanction, are the antithesis of true free enterprise.

Readers, check out distributism. "According to distributism, the ownership of the means of production should be spread as widely as possible among the general populace, rather than being centralized under the control of the state (state socialism) or a few large businesses or wealthy private individuals (laissez-faire capitalism). A summary of distributism is found in Chesterton's statement: 'Too much capitalism does not mean too many capitalists, but too few capitalists.'"

The only thing I would fix in that summary is "laissez-faire capitalism," which should read "state supported capitalism," where state support in the form of laws without which capitalism cannot succeed in taking over a society, is essential to the capitalism.

Think carefully before you scoff at the idea that individual enterprise, with the assistance of guilds, and obviously entailing cooperative effort where necessitated by the scale of the enterprise, is not capable of replacing, and indeed yielding superior economic results, not to mention liberty and personal fulfillment, as compared to either capitalism or socialism.

"Chesterton" refers to an early 20th century social genius, G. K. Chesterton. See What's Wrong with the World; it's free read. Try not fixating on "Catholic" as you read it; I find it is entirely inessential to the insight there presented.

Life Inc: How Corporatism Conquered the World, and How We Can Take It Back is excellent contemporary reading.

Capitalism is NOT Free Enterprise is good reading too.

>>>It's the world's greatest Blackmail Engine.

Also government spy resource and censorship: âoeUS government authorities called for the removal of 113 videos from YouTube, including several documenting alleged police brutality which Google refused to take down..... The reason listed for the removal of one You Tube video in one instance is âoegovernment criticismâ. The exact identity or content of the video is not divulged. The report states that the removal requests pertaining to âoepolice brutalityâ were done on the grounds of âoedefamationâ.....

"The number of âoeItems requested to be removedâ by US authorities was almost seven-fold the number requested to be removed by Chinese authorities, a country much maligned for its Internet censorship policies....."

"These figures illustrate how governments, particularly the United States and Britain, are getting more aggressive in pushing for web censorship as the state increasingly tries to strangle the last bastion of true free speech, the Internet"

http://www.infowars.com/feds-order-you-tube-to-remove-video-for-containing-government-criticism/

Example of how third party website interpret SOPA and PIPA:

http://www.infowars.com/why-we-must-stop-sopa/

The bills would empower the attorney general to create a blacklist of sites to be blocked by Internet service providers, search engines, payment providers and advertising networks, all without a court hearing or a trial.

Second, if you are referring to the 'newsletters', well, we know who wrote them, and it wasn't Paul.

You mean all those people who were employed by Ron Paul to write things in his name and run his newsletter, people who were so close to Paul that it's completely implausible he never knew what they were doing? Some of them were close relatives, including his own wife! Another (one of those thought to have directly authored some of the virulent racism) still works for Paul, in a prominent position in Paul's current campaign.

Time to drop the Paulbomb, because you can't deny all the terrible things Paul has repeatedly supported in his time as a politician:

Ron Paul wants to define life as starting at conception, build a fence along the US-Mexico border, prevent the Supreme Court from hearing cases on the Establishment Clause or the right to privacy, permitting the return of sodomy laws and the like (a bill which he has repeatedly re-introduced), pull out of the UN, disband NATO, end birthright citizenship, deny federal funding to any organisation which "which presents male or female homosexuality as an acceptable alternative life style or which suggest that it can be an acceptable life style" along with destroying public education and social security,, and abolish the Federal Reserve in order to put America back on the gold standard. He was also the sole vote against divesting US federal government investments in corporations doing business with the genocidal government of the Sudan.

Oh, and he believes that the Left is waging a war on religion and Christmas, he's against gay marriage, is against the popular vote, opposes the Civil Rights Act of 1964, wants the estate tax repealed, is STILL making racist remarks, believes that the Panama Canal should be the property of the United States, and believes in New World Order conspiracy theories, not to mention his belief that the International Baccalaureate program is UN mind control..

That's OK... billionaire hedge fund manager and currency collapser George Soros funded Occupy Wall Street via the Tides Foundation. Slashdot-- you're all suckers.

Possible, merely theoretical solutions that have no basis in what would happen:
* Confiscate Cameras: http://www.infowars.com/cops-confiscate-cameras-at-ohio-congressmans-town-hall/
* Delete data: http://www.pixiq.com/article/chicago-police-delete-journalism-professors-video-footage
* Destroy phone/camera: http://scienceblogs.com/dispatches/2011/06/miami_police_destroy_cell_phon.php
* Use of a live streaming/storage to avoid confiscation/destruction? There's tech for that:
** http://inventorspot.com/articles/spy_technology_how_disable_a_cell_phone_15035
** http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_phone_jammer
* Wiretapping laws: http://yro.slashdot.org/story/11/03/05/1954216/Leave-a-Message-Go-To-Jail?from=twitter
* Camera blocking devices:
** http://www.gizmag.com/norte-photoblocker-club-beer-cooler/20820/
** Unable to find it, but I'm sure I remember Kipkay having a video showing how to make glasses that would blind any camera sensitive to infrared.

Some of this, such as the wiretapping cellphone case, has been overturned. I believe. This is just off the top of my head. I'm sure there is more for real cynics with time to list.

http://www.infowars.com/state-department-agitator-advising-occupy-movement/

http://www.infowars.com/obama-energy-secretary-promises-%E2%80%9Cmassive%E2%80%9D-coal-plant-closures/

Get over it. Obama has said increased electric costs and shortages are for your benefit.

Electric cars are going nowhere. And you'll pay more to go nowhere.

Its all for the good of mankind, the fish & geese, and we'll just feel better about ourselves. Its allworth.

Because free sample drones just popped up on NC beaches and someone has had a chance to reverse-engineer the control protocol?

http://www.infowars.com/

9-11 was an inside job...

The Libyan revolutionaries are more of a band of enthusiastic amateurs than experienced soldiers.

Lybian rebels are Al-Qaeda.

One cop involved, sounds like the one who was hitting him with a flashlight, was fired. The other two had disciplinary action taken against them, suspension without pay. They would be extraordinarily dumb, even for cops, to try it again.

Needless to say, that doesn't make up for it, it's still an injustice, and shouldn't have happened in the first place, they need to stop hiring the scum of the earth to uphold the law, but don't let rampant cynicism get the best of you.

http://www.infowars.com/calls-for-tsa-chiefs-head-as-agency-now-denies-it-forced-removal-of-adult-diaper/
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2007/07/tsa-undermining/

etc...

It's just time for the TSA to go, next wannabe bomber to pull a razor blade on a US airplane will probably get thrown out the emergency door.

Don't worry, pretty soon you won't be allowed to embed youtube videos.

At least not explicitly. They both live on the same side of a road that most of us here chose never to cross, but they aren't the same thing.

Also important in this discussion though is the fact that engineers have been implicated as a group as being especially good violent extremists. (Viz. one , two , three , and of course, four.)

Probably also suited to running authoritarian, quasi-market-based state. Just a thought.

Fear of our privacy? Privacy is gone already, for some unlucky few completely. Tried posting this up at http://www.infowars.com/beware-lone-wolves-in-aftermath-of-bin-laden-killing-advisory-says/ where a few others were mentioning they are aware of remote neural monitoring. Unfortunately it is real and affect more and more people.
The best description of what it is like I have found here: http://www.mindjustice.org/2003_survey.htm
Start from “Reported mind control symptoms and descriptions include”
I will paste snips below for your enjoyment (ones that I personal identify with strongly):

Victims are subjected to various kinds of harassment and torture, twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week, for years on end.

Sometimes victims describe seeing the images of projected holograms. Thoughts can be read. Most victims describe a phenomenon they call “street theater.”

Note: for me street theatre only happened at the start to make me convinced everyone knew I was this person like that dumb movie where everyone watches your life. Took me some time to figure out the truth.

Implanted thoughts and visions are common.

Note: this is only happening to me recently, but I find these easy to identify and they only happen when I am in bed at home (in a place easy for them to control my surroundings)

Microwave hearing, known to be an unclassified military capability of creating voices in the head, is regularly reported.

Wrenching of house/building structures cause loud snapping or crackling noises, often heard at precisely the point where a victim is starting to doze off to sleep.

Note: used to stop you getting sleep or wake you up to limit your sleep and the main mode of torment they use on you once you realise what is going on and can somewhat defend your self mentally from the other attacks

Victims regularly report many types of bizarre and harassive remote manipulation of electrical equipment, phone, car, TV, and computers.

Note: I’ve found it takes them around 2 weeks to make a new modified version of any electronics I buy that assist me in trying to prove they are doing this unless I carry them on me 24 hours a day (such as mp3 player to play soft music while i sleep and a second to record any strange noises)

Hard to believe I know. Consider that the technology you see mostly is what is cheap enough to be consumerable... and that the secret state is somewhere from 10 to 25 years ahead of "known" science in these fields...

Yellowstone is terrorizing all of Idaho, Wyoming and Montana!

No, they'd rather spend their time molesting and drug testing six year old girls.

On a related note, one of the women accusing Assange of sexual misconduct works for USAID and had been kicked out of Cuba for her activities.
http://www.infowars.com/cia-honeytrap-ardin-deleted-twitter-posts-praising-assange/

In a speech last night Gaddafi, an ally of the ousted president, Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali, said he was "pained" by the fall of the Tunisian government. He claimed protesters had been led astray by WikiLeaks disclosures detailing the corruption in Ben Ali's family and his repressive regime. The leaked cables were written by "ambassadors in order to create chaos", Deutsche Press-Agentur reported Gaddafi as saying.

The Iranian government have claimed that Wikileaks is a U.S. plot to destabilise anti-colonislist governments.

the release was an organized coordinated move, adding that such a huge volume of documents could not have been released without the cooperation of intelligence services of Western governments, in particular the US.

A former Pakistanti General has also claimed Wikileaks is a CIA/Mossad plot:

The US has a hand in this plot, and these reports (posted by the WikiLeaks website) are part of the US psychological warfare

Disclaimer: Tunisia: Don't Call It a WikiLeaks Revolution

When will China just take over? We're already hearing about currency foreplay, corporations who bend to China's censorship (is Microsoft's Bing functional in China? Yes, you've heard of Google and China, but what of Microsoft Bing in China, do they censor for China?

Is China the Beast of Revelations? With it's growing power and weight, one has to ponder....

Glenn Chapman
The Sydney Morning Herald
January 6, 2011

US chip giant Intel has introduced a speedy new generation of chips that thwart film piracy and enable quick handling of data-rich video and games.

The second-generation Intel Core processors, referred to as “Sandy Bridge”, have been built into computers big and small, many of which will be displayed at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas.

“This is the best product we’ve ever built,” said Intel chief executive Paul Otellini. “We’ve shifted to processor-based graphics.”

New Intel chip that thwarts film piracy a coup for Hollywood
http://www.infowars.com/new-intel-chip-that-thwarts-film-piracy-a-coup-for-hollywood/