Slashdot Mirror


EU Debates Installing a Black Box On Your Computer

bs0d3 writes "EU MEP Tiziano Motti (Italy), wants everything you do online to be logged and saved, for the sake of the children. Like a black box installed on every computer. He proposes an early warning system of criminal activity, specifically whenever an image of sexually abused children is detected, an alarm, goes to the authorities to be able to see who uploaded it. Tiziano Motti was a politician who just over a year ago managed to get a majority of European Members of Parliament to support the proposal to expand the data storage directive to Google searches. The purpose was to protect children from pedophiles — the same excuse he is using now. His proposal involves a technology called Logbox. And just as with an aircraft's black box, Logbox is installed on computers, laptops, smartphones, and e-readers because yes, all that can be connected to the internet."

459 comments

  1. And who's gonna pay for that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Me? Ha-ha-ha!

    1. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by Z00L00K · · Score: 2

      Yes - you will, and Big Brother will be watching you.

      Don't forget that this can easily be changed to also take care of political opinions and just about everything.

      All while the criminals will find out that you can circumvent the filters one way or another.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    2. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by justforgetme · · Score: 1

      What, me? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA...

      Anyway, I'm not scared. Chances are the thing won't have drivers for linux anyway. So it will just take up space in the frame. Which space will be reclaimed and used for some other chipset first chance.

      --
      -- no sig today
    3. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yep. Somebody needs to ask him why there aren't video cameras in politician's houses/offices so we can watch them and prevent corruption.

      Lead us by example!

      --
      No sig today...
    4. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by ciderbrew · · Score: 1

      They'll outlaw you and list you as a peado for using linux. Try to get around the law will you!

    5. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      their prisons cannot hold me

      --
      3Jane Tessier-Ashpool
      via Wintermute I/O

    6. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by YouDieAtTheEnd · · Score: 0

      Chances are the thing won't have drivers for linux anyway.

      Since when do you need to install a driver to monitor raw HTTP data? I can monitor your connection sitting ten feet away from you at the coffee shop regardless of whether you're using Linux or not.

    7. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by vivian · · Score: 1

      I propose an alternative - make paedophilia punishable by a bullet to the head, and leave our privacy alone! I'm sick of the "think of the children" excuse being used as an excuse to strip more and more rights away, and increase state surveylance. If it wasn't for paedophiles, they wouldn't have this excuse. I think my proposal solved the problem neatly.

    8. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by justforgetme · · Score: 0

      OK, look:
      I didn't read TFA because I immediately understood it was just a joke to make my day.

      Anyway, so You suggest it will be doing network device monitoring and Internet packet assembly and dispatch on all network adapters (very doable) and content screening/decomposition/analysis on hardware logic (???)? Really? will next years netbook also come with a sun attached to it? Because that is what you need to drive such a big chip.

      --
      -- no sig today
    9. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by YouDieAtTheEnd · · Score: 0

      More likely it would just forward the data to a server for analysis.

    10. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      It said log, not censor. All it needs to do is record every IP address that you access, maybe every HTTP URL. It wouldn't take anything like a sun to power it, it's functionality that's already built in to a lot of Cisco switches and takes very little processing power. Presumably the idea is that law enforcement could then retrieve it if you are suspected of politically incorrect thought and see if you have been visiting any subversive web sites. Sorry, I mean check if you've been downloading kiddie porn.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    11. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by justforgetme · · Score: 1

      ohh.... well that sucks.

      Could we overload their system with torrent and streaming porn traffic?

      --
      -- no sig today
    12. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by justforgetme · · Score: 1

      OK, that sounds easy.
      But as I noted on the other comment, wouldn't that infrastructure just get saturated by torrenting and p2p?

      I know some people say that those things are against the law anyway but I don't subscribe to that theory much and it isn't my point either.

      --
      -- no sig today
    13. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 1

      Big brother doesn't care too much about the average citizen. He's interested in getting information that can be used to blackmail those with resources or influence.

    14. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, let's rather make pedophobia punishable by bullet in the head. Then they won't have this excuse anymore.

    15. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by Grave · · Score: 1

      Funny, I would have flipped that around... seems those with resources and influence try to gain information for blackmail/leverage on government. So it's a rather incestuous relationship, and frankly I wish they'd just leave average citizens out of it.

    16. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Yeah, just like capital punishment for murder in some countries solves murders. At least with murder there is a clear definition. The end point is that the victim is dead. You make no distinction between the 19 year old who went out and had sex with a 17 year old girl, and the rapist who likes to grab little boys and anally rape them?

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    17. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by Dunbal · · Score: 2

      But what will we do when all the politicians are dead?

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    18. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by malkavian · · Score: 1

      Oh, I'd love to see that. A server that has bandwidth to cope with a duplicate of all the EU traffic.
      I can see a big spike in the tax bills...

    19. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by newcastlejon · · Score: 2

      But what will we do when all the politicians are dead?

      There will be much rejoicing.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    20. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by iamhassi · · Score: 2

      You make no distinction between the 19 year old who went out and had sex with a 17 year old girl, and the rapist who likes to grab little boys and anally rape them?

      17? The age of consent where they're considering this black box, Italy, is 14

      "The age of consent in Italy is 14 years, with a close-in-age exception that allows those aged 13 to engage in sexual activity with partners who are less than 3 years older. The age of consent rises to 16 if one of the participants has some kind of influence on the other (e.g. teacher, tutor, adoptive parent)."

      Teachers can legally have sex with their 16 year old students. Wow, in the US you'd get 20 years for that.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    21. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by chill · · Score: 1

      Since I have a colocated server in a different jurisdiction that serves one purpose -- to act as a VPN end-point. Every connection I make from outside my home is visible only as an encrypted L2TP over IPSec packet.

      Monitor away.

      And for those who don't want to go to the lengths and expenses of colocating your own server, there are several inexpensive VPN services that offer the same thing.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    22. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      OK, a 14 year old going out with a 13 year old. It's not impossible - I myself was sexually active at age 14.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    23. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2

      NO, because it will be a box attatched to/inside your computer that will log what you do on the Internet that the police can access when they suspect you of supporting the opposition party....I mean, of acessing kiddie porn (of course, we all know that the opposition party websites are havens for kiddie porn).

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    24. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      And then criminals will use those computers and phones to make kiddie porn right there in the kids' homes. Brilliant!

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    25. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by RulerOf · · Score: 1

      Teachers can legally have sex with their 16 year old students. Wow, in the US you'd get 20 years for that.

      Teachers may be able to legally have sex with their 16 year old students in some states, but as we learned recently here in Ohio, there is apparently a law on the books that says teachers can't have sex with their students, ever.

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    26. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Or a distinction between the child rapist and the random (or not so random) person who the court convicted and killed "by mistake".

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    27. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      But is it legal in Italy for any teacher to have sex with any student, of any ages? It generally is in the US, too. Because generally in the US a person with some kind of professional power over another (as teachers have over their students) having sex with them is the basis of sexual harassment, where the sex isn't simply voluntary.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    28. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

      Teachers can legally have sex with their 16 year old students. Wow, in the US you'd get 20 years for that.

      If I were a high school teacher, I'd be on the first plane to Italy right now.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    29. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by Totenglocke · · Score: 2

      Ah yes, beautiful government, where two legal adults cannot legally have sex with each other without express permission from some old fat bastard hundreds or thousands of miles away....

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    30. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      Well, it said about providing an early warning, so I guess the data must be analysed somewhere in real-ish time.

      Of course, it might just be that he's a politician, has no idea how stuff works and thinks the internet runs on magic.

    31. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by AJH16 · · Score: 1

      Wow, and didn't even post as anonymous coward, guess we don't need a black box for you.

      --
      AJ Henderson
    32. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by adamjgp · · Score: 1
    33. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure magic is layer 0 in the OSI model.

    34. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Since politicians are responsible for everything that happens within their domain, the politicians should be shot if anyone commits pedophilia. <\sarcasm>

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    35. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Yea, what a lovely way to encourage the people with a chance of succeeding to rape INTERPOL.

      There's this saying about picking your battles... and that right there is one battle they would choose not to fight.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    36. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      You *do* know how loose the definition of pedophile is these days, right?

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    37. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Er, his point was to flood the logs to the point of uselessness (or exceed storage, probably causing old logs to flush out)

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    38. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Apparently, in Australia, you're a pedophile if you're attracted to an "a-cup breasted" woman.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    39. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Yep, I remember that one, but can't seem to find the link. Both here and here have hardly any comments.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    40. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      My suspicion is that the law would be written so that you would be required to have a log device large enough to hold the log for however long they require the log to be held. If the authorities show up and your logs do not go back as far as the law requires, you would be just as guilty as if you did not have the device in the first place. While it might be possible to have a flood of entries in the log making it harder for the authorities to find which sites you actually visit, the odds are great that in that flood of sites will be one's that are just as, or more, incriminating than the ones you actually visit.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    41. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by Verteiron · · Score: 1

      Only a pedophile, terrorist, or communist would think of such a thing. Please turn yourself in to the nearest Minitrue for reprogramming.

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    42. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      How about we make being a child a crime punishable by death? There's plenty of issues that children have to be protected from: sexual predators, illegal drugs, viewing pornography that has adults in it, sexting, political dissent, etc.. However, if there are no children to think of, then "think of the children" is no longer an excuse for anything. Besides, children are mostly social parasites without jobs.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    43. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      He's an ephebophile, not a pedophile or a paedophile. This law doesn't cover him, and he likely isn't a high school teacher anyway.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    44. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      I knew I shouldn't have started that diary.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    45. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This:
      OK, a 14 year old going out with a 13 year old. It's not impossible - I myself was sexually active at age 14.

      And then this:
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.

      Animals do not count.

    46. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 1

      Think of "government" as an umbrella term that encompasses a number of factions, not all of which have exactly the same specific agendas but all share the same overall goal of extracting resources from the citizens for their own benefit.

    47. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      someone just as bad will step in, after all nature Abhors a vacumn

    48. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

      I propose an alternative - make paedophilia punishable by a bullet to the head, and leave our privacy alone!

      This makes little sense, since "pedophilia" is a description of a paraphilia, not a criminal act.

      If it wasn't for paedophiles, they wouldn't have this excuse.

      If you truly believe that getting rid of one excuse will make any difference whatsoever, then you'll want to look up the definition of "power grab" and take special note that it's not limited to this particular hobgoblin.

      I think my proposal solved the problem neatly.

      Executing people for "undesirable traits" in the absence of an actual offense has been tried more than once in history, and I defy you to find any single example that even distantly approached "neatly" in that regard. You should really be ashamed of yourself.

      Virg

  2. Three words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck. That. Shit.

    1. Re:Three words... by bhagwad · · Score: 1

      No - screw the children. I'm tired of looking out for the little runts all the time. I don't even have kids, so...not my problem!

  3. Mr Motti: by zero.kalvin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Fuck you!

    1. Re:Mr Motti: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 This.

    2. Re:Mr Motti: by Stuarticus · · Score: 3, Informative

      Maybe he should clean up his own house before getting started on everyone else's... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silvio_Berlusconi_underage_prostitution_charges

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    3. Re:Mr Motti: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second this sentiment wholeheartedly. Fuck you, Tiziano Motti.

      If the people in Italy don't mind corruption and dictatorship, fine, leave the EU and keep your crap to yourself.

    4. Re:Mr Motti: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you!

      Your comment says it all! Nice

    5. Re:Mr Motti: by Vihai · · Score: 1

      Some of us actually cares and we are sorry too...

    6. Re:Mr Motti: by Shisha · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Second that!

      You'd think that Italian MEPs would have better things to worry about right now, like not being able to borrow money if it wasn't for ECB and possibly not being able to pay their debts.

      But no, that c.nt wants to have a way to let the government to spy on everyone.

    7. Re:Mr Motti: by shoehornjob · · Score: 0

      Second that!

      You'd think that Italian MEPs would have better things to worry about right now, like not being able to borrow money if it wasn't for ECB and possibly not being able to pay their debts.

      But no, that c.nt wants to have a way to let the government to spy on everyone.

      Third that. I don't think this asshole has any clue as to how much data needs to be analyzed if (for some f@cling miracle) this becomes a law. They don't even need this black box thing because Anonymous is already taking down these websites and exposing the members user names.

      --
      "We are just a war away from Amerikastan. When god vs god the undoing of man." Dave Mustaine
    8. Re:Mr Motti: by Nikker · · Score: 1

      bunga, bunga!

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    9. Re:Mr Motti: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do not wonder. In Italy, you cannot access free wifi hotspots without preceding online authorization SMS through italian mobile number.

      Which means, that in case you arrive to italy and do not register your own card, you have no internet. Or you brag some waiter for the sms code.

    10. Re:Mr Motti: by gmack · · Score: 2

      Most plans if this kind can be covered by the saying "Anything is easy if you don't know what you are talking about."

    11. Re:Mr Motti: by qubex · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That’s rude. I’m Italian and I hate the situation.

      And yes, I hate this fool’s proposal too.

      I wonder what country you herald from? What’s your country’s worst historical figure? How about I compare you to that person?

      --
      "Place me in the company of those who seek Truth, but deliver me from those who believe to have found it."
    12. Re:Mr Motti: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I heard the Coptic Christians were pretty damn safe under the Mubarak regime... It's the exact same thing; who care about a bit of despotism when it helps protect the weak in society?

    13. Re:Mr Motti: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I propose this system be installed on all of his machines and those of his close family.

      For the next 25 years, at the first positive (false or not), that person goes to jail, just like any other citizen would.

      If, at the end of this test, Mr Motti is still a free man AND still feels like implementing this, then I say we let him.

    14. Re:Mr Motti: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I propose Mr Motti to be locked up. Never heard of him before, but my early warning systems just went off about his future crimes against humanity.

    15. Re:Mr Motti: by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      Maybe he should clean up his own house before getting started on everyone else's... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silvio_Berlusconi_underage_prostitution_charges

      That's crazy, because he could have legally slept with a 14 yr old as long as he didn't pay her. So to sell yourself you must be 18 but you can sex with 14 yr olds as long as you don't pay. Oh and if you don't pay prostitutes you're guilty of rape.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    16. Re:Mr Motti: by shoehornjob · · Score: 1

      LMAO so true as he obviously doesn't have a f#cking clue what the hell he is talking about.

      --
      "We are just a war away from Amerikastan. When god vs god the undoing of man." Dave Mustaine
    17. Re:Mr Motti: by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I wonder what country you herald from? Whatâ(TM)s your countryâ(TM)s worst historical figure? How about I compare you to that person?

      I'm Canadian, and I think we've already apologised enough for Celine Dion.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    18. Re:Mr Motti: by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Which one of those three items do you find so strange?

    19. Re:Mr Motti: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to go back in history, I think it might be hard to compete with various emperors of the Roman Empire ;)

    20. Re:Mr Motti: by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      I wonder what country you herald from? Whatâ(TM)s your countryâ(TM)s worst historical figure? How about I compare you to that person?

      I'm Austrian.

      This can only reflect badly on you.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    21. Re:Mr Motti: by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      I wonder what country you herald from? Whatâ(TM)s your countryâ(TM)s worst historical figure? How about I compare you to that person?

      I'm from the US, and you can't compare me to him as I'm capable of constructing a complete sentence, containing all real words, without dribbling down my own tie or tripping over.

      I could do this all day!

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    22. Re:Mr Motti: by JadedIdealist · · Score: 1

      I came to make exactly this erudite statement :)

    23. Re:Mr Motti: by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's interesting. Who is America's worst historical figure?

      I'm thinking Nathan Bedford Forrest.

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    24. Re:Mr Motti: by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Erm, I find the last one pretty strange. Sex can't retroactively change into rape because of later actions.

      Failure to pay prostitutes is theft. Intending to fail to pay them in advance is also fraud. It is not rape.

      Of course, as we've learned with Sweden, apparently some places do not seem to translated the crime 'rape' in any particularly reasonable way. Perhaps this is just an Italian word with two meanings.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    25. Re:Mr Motti: by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Andrew Jackson.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    26. Re:Mr Motti: by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      You can sex with others!

      (you accidentally a word there)

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    27. Re:Mr Motti: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Start with the Vatican's computers.

    28. Re:Mr Motti: by bobamu · · Score: 1

      and this was marked -1 because people are unable to process satire? or maybe some point has just proven itself. It's sometimes hard to tell on here.

    29. Re:Mr Motti: by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Wow, I just read part of the wikipedia entry. I had no idea. However, quoting 1 line from there:

      In their postwar writings, Confederate President Jefferson Davis and General Robert E. Lee both expressed their belief that the Confederate high command had failed to fully utilize Forrest's talents.

      To find worse than Forrest, I'd have to go smaller scale (McVeigh, Manson). Although on the larger scale, men who have impoverished millions with malice of foresight (Wilson, Obama) certainly deserve consideration.

      Thanks for your post, I think you've picked a "winner".

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    30. Re:Mr Motti: by AndroSyn · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's interesting. Who is America's worst historical figure?

      James Buchanan

    31. Re:Mr Motti: by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Yeah... I don't think it should be "rape," but a contract violation. I think calling it "rape" denigrates victims of actual rape.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    32. Re:Mr Motti: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I propose this system be installed on all of his machines and those of his close family.

      For the next 25 years, at the first positive (false or not), that person goes to jail, just like any other citizen would.

      If, at the end of this test, Mr Motti is still a free man AND still feels like implementing this, then I say we let him.

      As a politician, Mr. Motti doesn't have to worry about the black box, because politicians and other members of the 1% don't use the Internet to commit sexcrime. Mr. Berlusconi, for example, appears to prefer the real thing. And what happened in the White House under Reagan (1986), Clinton I (sexual harassment, but at least everyone was an adult), and Bush II (The male prostitute from Talon News, the 17-year-old Congressional pageboy with Rep. Mark Foley, etc...)

    33. Re:Mr Motti: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arguable. With the prostitute, her consent is granted contingent on being paid. No pay, no consent.

      There is also a certain similarity to some types of date-rape. Consent obtained via roofie leads to rape charges.

      OTOH, I agree that consensual sex shouldn't retroactively be considered rape because of buyer's remorse from either of the participants.

    34. Re:Mr Motti: by operagost · · Score: 1

      That's mean. Joe Biden doesn't always dribble on his own tie.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    35. Re:Mr Motti: by operagost · · Score: 1

      At least Jackson got rid of the Bank of the US. Woodrow Wilson created a new one that was a monster like never seen before. Oh, and he was a terrible racist who re-segregated the military, a liar who reneged on his reelection platform of continued noninvolvement in WWI, and imprisoned war protesters.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    36. Re:Mr Motti: by stanlyb · · Score: 1

      I double your comment.

    37. Re:Mr Motti: by ewibble · · Score: 1

      Failure to pay prostitutes is theft.

      not sure this is theft, theft is used to lightly If you don't pay the rent or you don't pay a phone bill are they sent to jail for theft? No, I think it is some form of contractual violation.

    38. Re:Mr Motti: by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      is that you Fred? also I think that the concern here is that while it starts with child porn, it is a matter of time before they expand to cover copyright violation and then Political Dissent.

    39. Re:Mr Motti: by Bayoudegradeable · · Score: 1

      Yeah? What about Bieber!? You got lots of apologizing to do!

      --
      Sig Registration Form 34c_766(a) submitted to Ministry of Signature Management. Approval pending.
    40. Re:Mr Motti: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is one sexy bastard!

    41. Re:Mr Motti: by dave420 · · Score: 0

      Ned Kelly wasn't that bad...

    42. Re:Mr Motti: by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      There is no such thing as consent being granted contingent on something. Consent is not a business agreement. (Sex can be, but that transaction is totally different from consent.)

      Such a concept makes a mockery of actual rape. It is not rape if someone promises to do something later and does not.

      And it leads down a rather horrible slippery slope where after you pay a prostitute, they now have 'consented' to sex.

      You think I'm kidding, but such rational was, for the longest time, basically the reason martial rape was legal. Because they had 'given their consent'.

      Consent is decision, made by each of two (Or more, obviously) parties, that happens at the actual time of sex, as to what they wish to allow at that time. Trying to make it anything else, either to remove it(1) or to add it, is not something we want to play with.

      1) We already run into enough trouble with trying to decide who cannot consent at all, like children, and under what circumstances others cannot, like being drunk.(2) We really don't need to be adding 'And the people have to not break promises later'.

      2) I should mention that most 'too drunk to consent' nonsense is really 'too drunk to struggle' or even 'passed out', and is not actually any sort of debatable consent issue, despite what a few men claim. Women do not normally wander around voluntarily sleeping with men while drunk and then claiming rape later.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    43. Re:Mr Motti: by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      OTOH, running out on the bill at a restaurant is theft.(1)

      With the things you mentioned, you have an actual contract, and they know who you are, and you're being sent bills and refusing to pay them. (And it's not a 'contract violation' to fail to pay. It's just a debt.)

      This is utterly different than walking out after anonymously consuming goods or services somewhere and not paying. The first is simply a debt, the second is a deliberate attempt to not have to pay. The first results in you being sued, the second results in you being arrested.

      Of course, I've been assuming some sort of hotel prostitute, where the anonymous client is supposed to pay before they leave. Running out without doing that would be like dining and dashing.

      It would be entirely different if someone, say, hires a call girl, telling them who they are, and having them come to their house for sex, with a bill sent later. (Not that illegal prostitution works that way, it's not even slightly safe for the prostitutes, but this is hypothetical.) That would be closer to not paying the phone bill.

      In the places I know of, where it's illegal and hence both sides are distrusting each other (because neither can go to the police if the other rips them off.), it's always the former situation. Prostitutes do not send bills. So running out on without paying is, probably, technically, theft. (And yes, it's still theft even if prostitution is illegal. Just like stealing someone else's cocaine is technically theft. It's just pretty silly to go to the police over it.)

      In places prostitution is legal, I suspect it operates rather closer to the later. They're going to want to know the names of all their clients, and, heck, probably want to get paid in advance, which makes this rather a moot point.

      1) Note I do mean 'running out'. Being unable to pay is not theft. Hell, being able to pay and refusing is not theft. You will, however, have to let them know who you are, so they can bill you. (Or sue you if you're actually not intending to pay at all.)

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    44. Re:Mr Motti: by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      It's a breach of contract, not rape. A civil case, not a criminal one. If you sell me a laptop on credit, and I never get around to paying you it's a civil issue as a contract dispute. If I just steal your laptop it's a criminal issue, in addition to you having a tort claim against me. IF the consent was actually contingent on being paid, that would mean the prostitute would wait until she had the cash in hand before any sexual activity occurred. Consent granted in expectation of being paid is consent for the purposes of criminal law without regard to the fact of actual payment.

    45. Re:Mr Motti: by KingBenny · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this guy already tried some dirty tricks before, i suppose most MEPs should be aware of his qualities by now. I don't think a black box like this will be european law, or they would like have to make a 180 degree turn on their privacy stance, he might get it thru in his own country so maybe it's a good thing moodies is trying to bring them down, that way they'll have to focus on more important matters. If not , someone will just have to come up with a way to circumvent the logbox

      --
      Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
  4. Fuck you Italy by funkatron · · Score: 2

    Would someone from Italy like to explain why you voted this authoritarian cunt into the EU. Go on! I'd love to hear it!

    --
    "Welcome to our world. We are the wasted youth. And we are the future too." Yes, I know these are stupid lyrics.
    1. Re:Fuck you Italy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Italy is effectively a dictatorship run by Berlusconi, so why not try to take over the rest of Europe. They tried it before... :)

    2. Re:Fuck you Italy by Uhyve · · Score: 1

      I think they might all be afraid of posting...

    3. Re:Fuck you Italy by bky1701 · · Score: 2

      WWIII could end our economic problems. Will someone please think of the children and invade Italy?

    4. Re:Fuck you Italy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would make the economic problems only larger. It took Europe over 40 years to recover from WWII.

    5. Re:Fuck you Italy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because in Italy it's not possible to vote candidates directly. You just choose the party you like (usually the one you dislike less :) ) and than the party chooses the candidate that will take the vote. In this way, Italian people think Italy is a democracy when in fact it's not.

    6. Re:Fuck you Italy by funkatron · · Score: 0

      Further research reveals that he is in the Christian Democrat party. This explains both why he is crazy and what sort of crazies voted for him.

      --
      "Welcome to our world. We are the wasted youth. And we are the future too." Yes, I know these are stupid lyrics.
    7. Re:Fuck you Italy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not from Italy, but if their view of the EU is anything like ours here in Denmark, they could not care less about EU politicians. Few can name even one, fewer bother to vote at the EU elections, and fewer still know anything about the candidates.

    8. Re:Fuck you Italy by __Paul__ · · Score: 4, Funny

      Such a contradiction in terms. Christianity is not democratic. When was the last time God ran for election?

      --
      worldmobilenet.com -- World Prepaid Wireless Internet plans
    9. Re:Fuck you Italy by pyrosine · · Score: 1

      I think he was referring to the genocidal losses that would be wrought by nuclear weapons. The lack of a functioning civilization does mean the lack of economical problems.

    10. Re:Fuck you Italy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm sorry i didn't vote him, neither my friends.
      Problem here is that we live with a lot of people who don't understand, don't use Internet and are very old.
      He was able to go to EU thanks to 20 000 votes but if you search for him you'll find a lot of "dark" things around him.

      I'm ashamed by this kind of people and the fact that they represent me.

    11. Re:Fuck you Italy by Sqr(twg) · · Score: 0

      On a scale of "stupid" voting an anti-pedo authoritarian cunt into the EU paralment is not as bad as voting a pedophile authoritarian cunt president of Italy. And neither is as bad as voting Bush/Vader president/vice president of the USA.

    12. Re:Fuck you Italy by Vectormatic · · Score: 2

      Would someone from Italy like to explain why you voted this authoritarian cunt into the EU. Go on! I'd love to hear it!

      Wouldnt know about the italian angle, but as a dutch guy, one of the reasons to vote for someone to get into the EU stuff is to get him out of local politics, perhaps the italians were just fed up with this idiot so much they decided to "promote him away"

      Also, fuck that guy.

      --
      People, what a bunch of bastards
    13. Re:Fuck you Italy by Chrisq · · Score: 5, Funny

      Such a contradiction in terms. Christianity is not democratic. When was the last time God ran for election?

      Is that you Lucifer?

    14. Re:Fuck you Italy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one of the reasons to vote for someone to get into the EU stuff is to get him out of local politics

      Italian here, and ... precisely.

      Also, fuck off that fucking guy.

    15. Re:Fuck you Italy by azalin · · Score: 1

      Basically because getting sacking politicians people voted for (probably indirectly, but who knows) from office if they turn out to be idiots is rather difficult. "Promoting" them to EU commissions is a good way to get rid of them and not only done in Italy but also in Germany (Oettinger anybody?).

    16. Re:Fuck you Italy by azalin · · Score: 1

      The Germans did it with Oettinger, most noteworthy for his "interesting" interpretation of the english language: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-RrEQ8Ovw-Q

    17. Re:Fuck you Italy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One doesn't vote for individuals but for a party list in the EU elections. Hence while I agree with you that usually they 'promote' to EUP the idiots they are fed up with or want to get rid of, it's done by the 'Europarty' who has this individual on the given aprty's list.

    18. Re:Fuck you Italy by muckracer · · Score: 2

      > When was the last time God ran for election?

      You could say, he (God/Jesus) were elected to their currently held positions in A.D. 325 at the First Council of Nicaea, where Jesus got promoted from just being a human to exclusive God privileges by a, albeit tight, vote by those present at the council. By extension, his now official Father (sorry, Joseph!) got simultaneously a vote of confidence (of existence and supreme rule).

    19. Re:Fuck you Italy by angelofdarkness · · Score: 2
      Damm between Berlusconi's shenanigans, the terrible state of Italian politics and now this I'm starting to be ashamed to be Italian.

      Would someone from Italy like to explain why you voted this authoritarian cunt into the EU. Go on! I'd love to hear it!

      Anyhow, most of the people voted into the EU are unknown to the voters because most people just vote the Party (Motti is part of the Christian Democrat Union -- UDC). Now you can express one or more preferences (up to 3 I think) for a single person and the vote goes to the political party and to the person(s). Total votes to the political party determine the number of seats, and total personal votes determine who gets elected. In case of a tie, the position in an internal list determines who goes so, in the extreme case where votes are only given to the party and no candidates receive a personal vote, the people that get elected are the first ones on the list... the list is obviously determined by the Party.
      Now not many voters in Italy know that they can express a personal preference in the EU elections (because in the national elections you cannot express a preference for a candidate -- you vote the party and the party chooses who gets elected according to the list) the above situation is not far-fetched. Add to this that most people in Italy honestly don't give a fuck about who is elected and tend to vote by "habit" (as in "I'm a Christian so I have to vote the Christian Party...") and you can see how a bunch of fascist, racist, close-minded cunts; some shady persons and even showgirls can get elected to the EU.

    20. Re:Fuck you Italy by Deus.1.01 · · Score: 1

      "We'll I didn't vote for you" -some Gnostic in the mud.

      --
      My -1 Troll is actually a +1 funny. And my -1 flame is actually a +1 insightfull.
    21. Re:Fuck you Italy by CadentOrange · · Score: 1

      > When was the last time God ran for election?

      You could say, he (God/Jesus) were elected to their currently held positions in A.D. 325 at the First Council of Nicaea, where Jesus got promoted from just being a human to exclusive God privileges by a, albeit tight, vote by those present at the council. By extension, his now official Father (sorry, Joseph!) got simultaneously a vote of confidence (of existence and supreme rule).

      You need to stop reading the Da Vinci code (and maybe Holy Blood, Holy Grail) and get a proper understanding of history.

      Jesus was not deified as a result of the council's vote. The whole reason for the council was because the church needed a coherent response to the rise of Arianism, which claimed that Jesus was a specially created being, who while being separate from creation was still a created being and thus lower than God. This was controversial because it went against what the majority of Christians at the time believed.

      As for the result of the vote, I find it hilarious that people mindlessly parrot the line that the results were "tight" and yet never provide solid numbers. Do you know why? Out of the approximate 300 attendees to the conference, 2 voted for the Arian position. 2 out of 300. That's less than 1%. If that is a tight vote, I'd be curious to know what you consider an overwhelming victory.

    22. Re:Fuck you Italy by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I doubt anyone would use nuclear weapons in a conflict in Europe - too much risk of fallout hitting their allies. That said, for most of the twentieth century, losing a war against the USA was a surefire way to fix any economic problems in your country. Maybe the thing for Italy to do now is invade China...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    23. Re:Fuck you Italy by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Let me guess: after not paying attention to the candidates and either voting along random party lines or not voting, they then complain about the EU not representing them?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    24. Re:Fuck you Italy by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Only half true. You vote for a party, but the party publishes its list of candidates before the election, so it's not like you suddenly get a surprise candidate (unless he's number six on the list and they somehow won all of the seats in a constituency).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    25. Re:Fuck you Italy by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      France lost WWII??? Didn't you mean Italy, instead?

    26. Re:Fuck you Italy by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      As a compatriot of the European Commission Head José Barroso, I can confirm this. Please, please, let him stay in Brussels...

    27. Re:Fuck you Italy by bmo · · Score: 1

      Italy has a habit of doing things like this.

      I seem to remember some guy who made the trains run on time.

      --
      BMO

    28. Re:Fuck you Italy by CoderFool · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why do people assume that the christians are the ones always behind these kind of fascist actions? If you go to far LEFT or RIGHT you find fascist extremists. In the US it isn't the conservatives or christians behind all the PC fascism and 'spread the wealth' crap, it is the liberals. Censorship in the form that you can't say anything negative about minorities or LGBT. Communism in the way they wan't to tax you to death so the greedy poor can have food and shelter without lifting a finger to work (not all poor are greedy, just 'occupiers' and the like). Fascism in the way they say you can't have fat or salt or have incandescent bulbs. 'Saving the planet' is crap when you mandate CFLs with toxic mercury powder or electric cars with toxic metal batteries or biofuels that drive up worldwide food prices and are worst CO2 emitters than petroleum. Don't get me wrong. I don't mind my taxes going to help the truly needy. I think we should try to do better by our environment, but what's the point in breaking our economy when other big polluters, like China and India and Brazil, aren't doing the same? Or do we need a fascist world government to force them? and OBTW when you give anyone too much power to do one thing, they will likely abuse that power whether they lean right or left. If you want economin communism of fascist environmentalism, don't be surprised if the empowered individuals use that power to regulate other aspects of your life and destroy all your freedoms. Can't have guns because of the lead. Can't have fat or salt because of the expense to the health care system. an so on and so forth

    29. Re:Fuck you Italy by mcvos · · Score: 1

      That's irrelevant. Christians can still support democracy.

      Note that this particular party is probably neither Christian not democratic. I'm not entirely sure, because there are several Italian parties in the European People's Party (the Christian democrats of the EP), but the party of Berlusconi, as famous for his wild sex parties with barely legal prostitutes, as for his control over Italian media and his laws to make himself immune to prosecution, is one of them, and the others are in league with him.

    30. Re:Fuck you Italy by mcvos · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is voting for Berlusconi really less stupid than voting for Bush? I hate Bush as much as the next guy, but I have my doubts in this case. Berlusconi was re-elected several times, even after it was abundantly clear that he was completely and irredeemably corrupt. Bush was an idiot, lied and instigated war, but Berlusconi appears to be an avatar of Satan himself. He was good buddies with Khadafi and Putin, likes calling German politicians nazi camp guards, has wild sex parties with barely legal prostitutes, controls most Italian media, partially as leader of the government, partially because of his own private media imperium. And he keeps introducing new laws to protect himself from criminal prosecution for all the cases of corruption he's been involved in.

    31. Re:Fuck you Italy by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Well, Italy is effectively a dictatorship run by Berlusconi

      So that's the question, then: Why did you vote that authoritarian cunt into office?

      How is that little strunz still in office? I was sure by now he'd have been dragged through the street by his heels.

      Man, the old country just ain't what it used to be...

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    32. Re:Fuck you Italy by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Italy will play as insignificant a part in the next world war as it has in the last two.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    33. Re:Fuck you Italy by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      I doubt anyone would use nuclear weapons anywhere, except perhaps as a weapon of terror. The political fallout would just be too steep. Besides, there are plenty of reasons to keep a war going, if you're "winning".

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    34. Re:Fuck you Italy by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      No it's an electric collage. No I didn't mis-spell college :)

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    35. Re:Fuck you Italy by Dunbal · · Score: 3, Funny

      This came as a shock coming fresh on the heels of being promoted to a human from a myth some years earlier.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    36. Re:Fuck you Italy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Italy finished the war on the Allied side. And they took care of Mussolini themselves.

    37. Re:Fuck you Italy by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      Maybe he's talking about Vichy France? Can't say it makes much sense though...

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    38. Re:Fuck you Italy by muckracer · · Score: 1

      > get a proper understanding of history.

      Well, you are certainly correct, that I have to learn a lot more. As does everyone. ;-)

      However, a proper understanding is pretty hard to achieve, especially in this kind of matter, given that the evidence to establish 'history' has been meddled with by far to many people. I dare say, it is pretty much impossible now, unless we make some pretty astounding discoveries of documents (or objects) so far unknown to sort out truth from fiction.
      Physical evidence of Christ is pretty also extremely slim, and even the documents are, at best, hear-say (why did J never write anything himself?).

      > Jesus was not deified as a result of the council's vote.

      OK, fine. Of course, by voting, that he was NOT anything less than a deity, he WAS, in fact, voted a deity ;-)
      But even disregarding that...then who DID establish him a deity?

    39. Re:Fuck you Italy by muckracer · · Score: 1

      > Physical evidence of Christ is pretty also extremely slim

      Meant:
      Physical evidence of Christ is also extremely slim...

    40. Re:Fuck you Italy by justforgetme · · Score: 1

      France lost in WWII. France had huge losses due to battling the Germans for {pick_time_period} while being bombed by allied forces for the rest of the war.

      --
      -- no sig today
    41. Re:Fuck you Italy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One would think that only the brightest politicians of each member country would get to be in the European Parliament. Unfortunately the truth is, that the parties in each country use the European Parliament as a job oportunity for their high profile members (in terms of social networking) that have either failed to deliver or have failed in the public opinion.

    42. Re:Fuck you Italy by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      pick_time_period = 1000 years?

    43. Re:Fuck you Italy by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      Disingenuous misdirection. The Arians were hardly the only sect of early Christianity that, for one reason or another, did not believe that Jesus was equivalent to Yahweh. There were also the Ebionites, Cerinthians, Sethians and other gnostics. The proto-Orthodoxy wisely approached the matter by 'divide and conquer' voting on each heretical sect one at a time, playing minority opinions against each other.

      Meanwhile proto-Orthodoxy succeeded by being everything to everybody, no matter how questionable the compatibility of their have-your-cake-and-eat-it-too theology was.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    44. Re:Fuck you Italy by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      When was the last time God ran for election?

      Every second of every day. ::snort::

    45. Re:Fuck you Italy by tibit · · Score: 1

      Posting to undo the mod. I meant it to be funny, not informative.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    46. Re:Fuck you Italy by tibit · · Score: 1

      I don't see anything legally wrong with "barely" legal prostitutes. Either they are legal in given jurisdiction or not. Whether it's an ethical or moral thing to do, is another story, of course.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    47. Re:Fuck you Italy by tibit · · Score: 1

      I think I'd like a showgirl to be a parliamentarian over Motti :)

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    48. Re:Fuck you Italy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't really make sense. I'd say they wanted everybody to suffer equally.

      Fuck you, Mr Motti!

    49. Re:Fuck you Italy by mcvos · · Score: 1

      There's quite a bit of hubub about when he actually met them and if and when they had sex.

      As for the moral side, remember this is not some random Joe, but a PM and leader of a supposedly Christian party. His wife left him not so much for having sex with prostitutes, but having rather close relationships with underage ones. But even if it wasn't illegal, what country would re-elect a 78 year old man that maintans a harem of 18 year old girls?

    50. Re:Fuck you Italy by Sqr(twg) · · Score: 1

      Comparing Berlusconi to Satan isn't really a good metaphor. Hanging out with the wrong people, shouting insults, having wild parties - that's more like a spoiled teenager.

      Torturing PoW:s in order to produce false evidence for starting a war that you have a strong personal financial interest in - that's what the Devil would do.

      Voting for either is perhaps stupid beyond compare, but Cheney had a much worse influence on the U.S. than Berlusconi has had on Italy, and he was reelected after that, too. Democracy is a flawed system.

    51. Re:Fuck you Italy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You say that like any politician is good... Maybe I'm just being pessimistic but very few of them seem to actually care about improving our lives...

      Can someone remind me why one of the most hated professions (laywers) get to run the world?

    52. Re:Fuck you Italy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One that's run by the Italian crime families.

      I think it's worth mentioning that this whole image of Christianity is sort of a joke. "Who are we to judge the PM? He shakes hands with the Pope. Only God can judge him, we are imperfect and weak as well." etc etc seems to be the prevailing attitude with older people.

      I'm not from Italy, but I've worked with enough Italians to get the jest of this.

    53. Re:Fuck you Italy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't vote for ki- I mean gods!

    54. Re:Fuck you Italy by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      You've never been to our neighborhood polling station at Alpha Centauri? Oh for heaven sake, it's only four light years away! I'm sorry but if you can't be bothered to vote, you've got no business complaining about this term's gods.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    55. Re:Fuck you Italy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sure:

      the left wing party has lost his credibility by years of collution with the right wing party, leaving the left wing electors disoriented and dispersed.

      the lack of those helped the government to became a majority just by being voted by a minority of the electors. (17 million votes from 47 million of eligible electors)

      this is before factoring in those regions that being governed by criminality are giving their votes to the best buyers: sicilia before anyone else

    56. Re:Fuck you Italy by Jonner · · Score: 1

      Would someone from Italy like to explain why you voted this authoritarian cunt into the EU. Go on! I'd love to hear it!

      He made the Intertubes run on time.

    57. Re:Fuck you Italy by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Crap. The Peter Principle played out in international politics. This is a tragedy waiting for an excuse to happen. The Next Great War will probably be started by this.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    58. Re:Fuck you Italy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wall of text attacks for 2d6!

    59. Re:Fuck you Italy by Baseclass · · Score: 1

      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.

      --
      ^^vv<><>BA
    60. Re:Fuck you Italy by mcvos · · Score: 1

      More importantly of course, Bush and Cheney had a gigantic impact on the world, though I suppose that comes with the job of US president.

      And you're right about the difference too. Berlusconi hangs out with scary people, is a creep, is corrupt and grabs as much power and money as he can, but he keeps it mostly to Italy. He doesn't set out to make the world a worse place, doesn't wage international wars for economic interests, and I haven't heard of him using torture. He's a clown. A really creepy one.

    61. Re:Fuck you Italy by mcvos · · Score: 1

      "Who are we to judge the PM?" Really? That's the entire job of a voter!

    62. Re:Fuck you Italy by funkatron · · Score: 1

      Why do people assume that the christians are the ones always behind these kind of fascist actions?

      Assume? Who do you think would vote for a party named Christian Democrat? Who do you think would see that name and NOT hear alarm bells in their head? (Hint: it isn't Jews, Muslims, Atheists, Hindus or Cthulhu Cultists). Also, remember that in fascist Italy and fascist Spain and a number of other scum regimes in recent European history the influence of a certain organisation from Rome was very much present. Why wouldn't it be believable to think that those ideas could lead to authoritarianism again?

      The rest of your post concerns US politics of which I don't know much. However, may I suggest you learn some words. Start with "right" and "far right", move on to "communism" and "fascism", and finally figure out "liberal". Your writing will be a lot easier to read if the positions described actually match up to the terminology.

      --
      "Welcome to our world. We are the wasted youth. And we are the future too." Yes, I know these are stupid lyrics.
    63. Re:Fuck you Italy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi, happy to explain.
      I'm 30 years old born and bred in Rome.
      I actually do not take part to any national poll (except last "referendum" about nuclear energy, justice and profits on water) since years.
      The poll system is wrong. You cannot actually choose anyone. Who made this system stated it is bad (few months later). Google and find something in English for "Calderoli porcellum".
      I cannot even blame, though, some very good friends of mine, people I totally respect, who believe that YOU HAVE TO VOTE. Because you have to raise your voice, express four feeling and blah blah blah :)

      So, even if they don't actually like these kind of guys, they have basically to choose between 2 icons that are the only difference between the guys behind them.
      What I see with my eyes is that Politics is corruption only, right here.
      This, as I learn from your message (thanks) made us Italians represented by people that actually shouldn't.

      Do you think this one who want the black box is doing it for the safe of children or to sell something (or track and control web usage etc..)?
      I guess no one would ever really spend a vote on him if they had knew about this proposal before voting.
      But then actually when is Politics Polls time you see faces and icons everywhere in the street and you have to choose one of the two.
      Or not vote.
      I don't know how much do you know about Italian politics but the 2 main parties are even called almost in the same way
      PD (Partito democratico) vs. PDL (Partito della libertà) which Berlusconi belongs to.
      After one falls the other get the power, and when it falls the other get the power. This happened in the last 20 years.

    64. Re:Fuck you Italy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't a snort normally the sign of something funny?

    65. Re:Fuck you Italy by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Actually we can be certain that a guy called Jesus lived around that time and was executed because the Romans kept meticulous records. Obviously that says nothing about his actions or divine nature, but the myth does have some small element of truth to it. Most of the rest is ripped off from other gods and religions, e.g. the Christmas birth story is the myth of Kronos with some names changed.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    66. Re:Fuck you Italy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, we've got a number of them now here in Italy, not only into the EU parlament. 60% of Italian voters ask themselves how that happened everyday, I still have to find an answer myself.

    67. Re:Fuck you Italy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would someone from Italy like to explain why you voted this authoritarian cunt into the EU. Go on! I'd love to hear it!

      Easy, he's a Christian Democrat - the key word there is "Christian", Italy being the West's response to Saudi Arabia.

      An Italian expat

  5. Presumably... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It has a bunga bunda override switch.

  6. Berlusconi first ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    then Motti and the rest of the politicos

  7. Opposite Effect by igreaterthanu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Studies have shown a negative correlation between the availability of porn and rape cases. IIRC this is also the case specifically with CP and child rape. If anything, this will make it worse for the children.

    Not to mention the problems with a software based solution. The software will, of course, only run on certain operating systems, who is the government to mandate I purchase a particular operating system/or agree to a contract (e.g. the GPL)? Anyone who knows what they are doing can get around this anyway. Even if it calls home, it could be faked by using a VM.

    --
    I dream of a nation where a man is not judged by his skin color but by an number assigned by a credit rating agency.
    1. Re:Opposite Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By appropriate definition, creation of child pornography requires sexual abuse of children

    2. Re:Opposite Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Studies have shown a negative correlation between the availability of porn and rape cases.

      What studies? Can you give us a reference (or more than one).

    3. Re:Opposite Effect by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Never mind that, here's some statistics!

      a) Most of the computers in the world are not involved in distribution of indecent images of minors.
      b) Most of the incidents of sexual indecency with a minor are by members of the family, or close family friends.

      Therefore, to have a greater chance of saving more children from sexual predators, we should ignore computers and break up all families. (Liberal use of the "~" marker here, folks).

      Child exploitation, of all sorts, is very serious. However, this kind of outright idiocy on the part of policy makers is starting to make me physically ill. There are so many reason why this is an awful, awful idea, and I know I don't need to spell them out.

      Why can't we have politicians who can think rationally?

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    4. Re:Opposite Effect by igreaterthanu · · Score: 1
      --
      I dream of a nation where a man is not judged by his skin color but by an number assigned by a credit rating agency.
    5. Re:Opposite Effect by Ardeaem · · Score: 2

      Not necessarily by legal definitions. Some jurisdictions have decided that pornography that shows virtual children is prosecutable, and yet does not require the sexual abuse of children. I guess maybe by "appropriate" definition, you meant your own definition, but even though the US Supreme Court decided that virtual child pornography is protected in some cases, that doesn't mean it isn't (or shouldn't be considered) child pornography.

    6. Re:Opposite Effect by AmonTheMetalhead · · Score: 1

      Not when you also consider cartoons to be kiddie porn

    7. Re:Opposite Effect by AmonTheMetalhead · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not about kids, it's about control (and media rights)

    8. Re:Opposite Effect by Yvanhoe · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Stop thinking that this has anything to do with porn. Stop thinking that the promoters of such laws care at all about pedophilia and fighting it. If they really cared, they would listen to the policemen and non-profits fighting it that censorship would be counter-productive.

      They just hate internet. It is the #2 media behind TV and is still gaining importance. They want to be able to control it. They want to be able to shut down websites. They need to tackle protests.

      The plan is simple : first, put a mechanism to fight against pedophilia. Then extend it to fight terrorism. Then, using the vague definitions of terrorism, use these tools to squash any kind of protest, because disturbing traffic is akin to terrorism.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    9. Re:Opposite Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually no.

      A 18 years old guy having sex with his 17 years old girlfriend while taping the act is *NOT* committing any sexual abuse, but *IS* producing child pornography.

      Age of consent (14 in most countries, 16/18 in others) is something totally different from underage pornography.

    10. Re:Opposite Effect by Kjella · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why can't we have politicians who can think rationally?

      They rationally play on people's irrational fears. Don't assume all politicians are drooling idiots, being a successful politician and a successful manipulator share many of the same traits.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    11. Re:Opposite Effect by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Never mind that, here's some statistics! a) Most of the computers in the world are not involved in distribution of indecent images of minors. b) Most of the incidents of sexual indecency with a minor are by members of the family, or close family friends.

      Shhhhh. This guy will want a black box in every house if you tell him that

    12. Re:Opposite Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They just hate internet. It is the #2 media behind TV and is still gaining importance. They want to be able to control it. They want to be able to shut down websites. They need to tackle protests.

      Quoted for emphasis.
      Guess how the current leader of Italy made his fortune...

    13. Re:Opposite Effect by x2A · · Score: 1

      I doubt anyone can code an algorithm sophisticated enough to tell whether is person is legally a child or not, let alone whether that person is being abused or not... even if these people decide it would be good to go ahead with such an idea, when they discover that what they want to do is actually impossible, the whole thing will disappear back into the void from whence it came anyway, just like every other time somebody who doesn't understand computers thinks they can be simply made to do things that are impossible (or at least not possible for the foreseeable future)

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    14. Re:Opposite Effect by scottrocket · · Score: 1
      "Therefore, to have a greater chance of saving more children from sexual predators, we should ignore computers and break up all families"

      i.e., we should build a shitty wall, and hope no mongowians show up.

    15. Re:Opposite Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or indeed the right of anyone to make money from digital works they create, rather than having them stolen.

    16. Re:Opposite Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please try to make a search on Italian wikipedia.
      I am Italian.
      I truly apologize you have to be touched by our idiot political choices.

       

    17. Re:Opposite Effect by DarkOx · · Score: 2

      Why can't we have politicians who can think rationally?

      Because most of us don't enjoy arguing all day long which is pretty much what politicians do. Unlike the court room where they may be jurist or jury who is somewhat interested in facts to convince, these people win or lose principally on whether they can last longer than the other guys.
      You must have strong opinions to prevail in that system. The type of person attracted to that job is fundamentally not the type let facts get in the way of their opinions.
        BTW I am not a psychologist, sociologist, nor do I have any academic background which would permit me any special understanding of the above. You may consider it fact, that this post is only my opinion.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    18. Re:Opposite Effect by Corinna_ooo · · Score: 1

      Please try to make a search on Italian wikipedia. I am Italian. I truly apologize you have to be touched by our idiot political choices.

      now i'm logged in..sorry i didn't before

    19. Re:Opposite Effect by bjourne · · Score: 2

      Studies have shown a negative correlation between the availability of porn and rape cases. IIRC this is also the case specifically with CP and child rape. If anything, this will make it worse for the children.

      You need to provide more specific sources than "studies have shown" for that statement. It is true that the availability of porn has exploded since the 90's when internet became widely available to the public. The number of sex abuse cases has not increased anywhere near as much as it would have if there was a positive correlation between porn and sex abuse. On the other hand, and using the same logic, the amount of sex crimes has not decreased sufficiently (it has actually increased) that the explosion of porn would availability would predict if there was a negative correlation between them.

    20. Re:Opposite Effect by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Not always. Take the example from a couple of days ago of the Catholic priest whose bishop was prosecuted for not reporting his collection. Most of the images that he had were non-nude, just photographs of a (clothed) children with the crotch in the centre of the frame. I doubt that the children were even aware of this, they certainly wouldn't consider themselves to have been abused.

      There were also some nude shots, so it's not like he was totally innocent, but there are several categories of image that are counted as child pornography but don't require any child abuse to create. Off the top of my head:

      • Cartoon images of children in sexual situations
      • Images taken between consenting teenagers. In the UK, for example, the age of consent is 16, so two 16 year olds can have sex legally, but if they take photographs of it then they can be charged with creating child pornography.
      • Photographs of children that are considered to be created for erotic purposes by a vague definition.

      If child pornography meant pictures of children being sexually abused, then there would be a lot less of a problem. Unfortunately, the laws seem to keep expanding. Eventually, any picture that has someone who looks as if they look vaguely like they might be under 18 will probably be included...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    21. Re:Opposite Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why can't we have politicians who can think rationally?

      Because we don't have voters who can think rationally. Or, as Winston Churchill put it: The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter.

    22. Re:Opposite Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...Why can't we have politicians who can think rationally?

      Douglas Adams - The Restaurant at the End of the Universe
      - To summarize: it is a well-known fact that those people who must want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it. To summarize the summary: anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job. To summarize the summary of the summary: people are a problem.

    23. Re:Opposite Effect by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Studies have shown a negative correlation between the availability of porn and rape cases.

      [citation needed]

      In fact while not a scientific study, compare the frequency of rape in the Western world where internet is not (yet) censored, and the extreme islamic countries where pornography and the internet (and short skirts and bikinis) are heavily censored. You can also assume that there is a great deal of under-reporting of rape in those countries since they have a habit of accusing the victims.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    24. Re:Opposite Effect by iamhassi · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Child exploitation, of all sorts, is very serious. However, this kind of outright idiocy on the part of policy makers is starting to make me physically ill. There are so many reason why this is an awful, awful idea, and I know I don't need to spell them out. Why can't we have politicians who can think rationally?

      I think the ironic thing is the age of consent in Italy is 14. In most parts of the world that's considered a child and a man having sex with a 14 year old would be considered a pedo and sent to jail for a long time, but in Italy you can have sex with children legally, yet they want to put a black box on your computer to "protect children from pedophiles"?

      How can you protect children from pedophiles when your laws already allow pedophiles to have sex with children?

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    25. Re:Opposite Effect by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2

      Stop thinking that the promoters of such laws care at all about pedophilia and fighting it. If they really cared, they would listen to the policemen and non-profits fighting it that censorship would be counter-productive.

      You are making a fundamental mistake of logic here. Not all of the promoters of such laws are self serving, corrupt liars, a few of them are just stupid.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    26. Re:Opposite Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has more to do with rome burning than child porn.

    27. Re:Opposite Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some Japanese Manga Cartoons are child pornography in Sweden and a collector and professional manga translator has been convicted of possesion of child pornography because he had such manga cartoons in his possession.

    28. Re:Opposite Effect by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily by legal definitions. Some jurisdictions have decided that pornography that shows virtual children is prosecutable, and yet does not require the sexual abuse of children. I guess maybe by "appropriate" definition, you meant your own definition, but even though the US Supreme Court decided that virtual child pornography is protected in some cases, that doesn't mean it isn't (or shouldn't be considered) child pornography.

      Absolutely! I should hand myself in to the authorities immediately. All that virtual murder I committed when playing Doom^WGTA^WManhunt^W^Wwatching an action movie makes me a threat to society!

      Please, won't someone think of the general public and put me in jail, before it's too late?!

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    29. Re:Opposite Effect by mooingyak · · Score: 2

      Studies have shown a negative correlation between the availability of porn and rape cases.

      Citation please. And not because I doubt you. I've heard about this before, even remember reading it somewhere once. But googling "rape" and "porn" mysteriously doesn't seem to get me to any of those studies...

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    30. Re:Opposite Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We do have politicians who can think rationally. You just don't think like a politician. Here, let me help you out.
      You are a politician. You ran for an office and got elected. You told a lot of citizens a lot of things and a majority believed you so here you are. Now, where do your loyalties lie? The citizens say your loyalties should lay with them, but what have they ever done for you?

      Lately, I mean.

      Here you are with all of this power, looking out for all of this wonderful public money and all they want is medicine, food, and shelter. Take, take, take. What a bunch of losers. What you want, my friend, is someone who can do something for you. A fat check, a trip to someplace warm, someone with negotiable sense of morals - that sort of thing. Oh, and if they can get you a job after this gig is up, that would be great. After all you must look after number one and all that.

      So one day one of those horrid little men who want to protect the nation from other horrid little men has a plan. His plan sounds reasonable and, best of all, a great big chunk of money will go to the, ahem, lowest bidder. It's gravy every day form then on in.

      What? The people don't want this? Luddites! Tree-Huggers! Child Pornographers! There, that will keep them quiet. Just to keep them happy you throw in something about 'job creation' or whatever it is the plebs want today.

      Ta-da! you are now a rational politician.

    31. Re:Opposite Effect by Sparrow1492 · · Score: 1

      That's OK. Since the real intent of this is to track everything you do and not "protect the children", they'' just go ahead and log everything you do for potential "bad stuff".

    32. Re:Opposite Effect by Isaac+Remuant · · Score: 1

      Doesn't change anything. Neither malice nor stupidity are good traits for such a job.

      --
      "Science can amuse and fascinate us all, but it is engineering that changes the world. " - Asimov.
    33. Re:Opposite Effect by delt0r · · Score: 3, Insightful

      14 is a teenager, not a child. Once upon a time, 14 year old's had full time jobs and got married.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    34. Re:Opposite Effect by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      The stupid are used by the corrupt to achieve their goal. What better way to promote something you want than to find someone gullible enough to swallow your excuse whole and support it with all their will?

    35. Re:Opposite Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paedophilia is an attraction to prepubescent children. Girls are generally pubescent by age fourteen -- heck, look up Angie Varona, who was fourteen when the famous pictures of her were leaked. Fourteen is by definition too old for paedophiles.

    36. Re:Opposite Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're forgetting how they actually make the child porn. Hint: it's not fun for the child.

    37. Re:Opposite Effect by adisakp · · Score: 2

      Passing laws for the good of the children is like telling a man he can’t have a steak because a baby can’t chew it. (borrowed from Mark Twain on Censorship).

    38. Re:Opposite Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      99.999999% of people flying are not and do not inspire to be terrorists. That hasn't stopped everyone from being considered a suspect, X-rayed and groped. And yes, even the kids get the same treatment.

      Why can't we have politicians who can think rationally?

      Do I need to say more?

    39. Re:Opposite Effect by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      Real CP involves raping children for profit. So it is normal for it to be illegal. Virtual CP (e.g. lolicon) is another story.

    40. Re:Opposite Effect by Ardeaem · · Score: 1

      Absolutely! I should hand myself in to the authorities immediately. All that virtual murder I committed when playing Doom^WGTA^WManhunt^W^Wwatching an action movie makes me a threat to society!

      Don't be dense. Someone dying is a necessary condition for murder. Someone having sex is not a necessary condition for pornography (there is, for instance, pornographic animation). "Virtual murder" is not murder, but "virtual pornography" is still pornography. What defines "murder" and what defines "pornography" are totally different: murder is not a depiction of anything, while pornography is.

      I'm not arguing that there's anything wrong with pornography, I'm just saying it's dumb to say that "child pornography" should be defined by whether a child was abused to create it, since whether something is "pornographic" depends on what is depicted (and the manner of depiction), not how it was made.

    41. Re:Opposite Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it has nothing to do with children or abuse? This is about controlling everything we do.
      They need a "boogeyman" to get the sheep to accept such invasion on privacy.

    42. Re:Opposite Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exactly. what if someone borrows your phone? if they were serious about the problem the chip should be installed in the person's brain.
      I'm sure Mr Motti would be happy to lead by example

    43. Re:Opposite Effect by kermidge · · Score: 1

      Why can't we have politicians who can think rationally?

      Because rational people don't run for office?

      Or, perhaps, once elected they become irrational due to the job.

    44. Re:Opposite Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      absolutely

  8. Getting it in for one claim, using it for another by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    They'll try to get it in "for the children", but would rather use it to preempt people that want to release unsavory information about a politician.

    It'd be a black box that precedes a black-out or disappearance.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  9. uh, what can I say ? by sxpert · · Score: 1

    LOLWTFBBQ ???

  10. Of course, for the sake of the children! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As if there weren't more pressing issues at the moment for Italy and all of Europe.

  11. Excuse my French, by Elbart · · Score: 1

    Vaffanculo, Signore Motti.

    1. Re:Excuse my French, by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      I speak french. That was not french.

    2. Re:Excuse my French, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is Italian. In French it's "va te faire foutre"

    3. Re:Excuse my French, by Lockyy · · Score: 2

      "Excuse my french," is a saying that indicates "I'm going to/have just sworn, please don't get mad/offended." It isn't literal.

    4. Re:Excuse my French, by incer · · Score: 1

      That would be "Signor Motti"
      The first part was flawless.

    5. Re:Excuse my French, by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Yes, I know the saying, but normally when someone does that they either swear in french or the language in which they said "excuse my french".

  12. Don't Worry by HopefulIntern · · Score: 5, Informative
    Nothing will ever come of this. One crackpot idea from an idiot who knows nothing about technology does not constitute a reasonable proposal.

    FTFA:

    If it were China, North Korea or Saudi Arabia who had proposed this, what would we say then? It's scary in a democratic Europe to even hear a politician suggest such a thing. It is so absurd that I really hope we never have to discuss it seriously in Parliament.

    -MEP Lars Christian Engstrom (Sweden)

    The proposal claims to be based on users' rights and claims they are protected, that they should feel safe. He writes at the beginning that he did not want to create a new Big Brother Society. But then the whole document is about just that.

    -Former Piratbyran founder and current telecomix hactivist Marcin de Kaminski

    1. Re:Don't Worry by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Nothing will ever come of this. One crackpot idea from an idiot who knows nothing about technology does not constitute a reasonable proposal.

      ...Unless the people responsible for voting the proposal in or out are equally ignorant of technology.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    2. Re:Don't Worry by HopefulIntern · · Score: 2

      Nah, already other MEPs are pointing out how retarded both he and his idea are.

    3. Re:Don't Worry by HnT · · Score: 1

      Nothing will ever come of this. One crackpot idea from an idiot who knows nothing about technology does not constitute a reasonable proposal

      Well, hold on there just a second... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zugangserschwerungsgesetz

      --
      "Only one thing is impossible for God: To find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." - Mark Twain
    4. Re:Don't Worry by TechLA · · Score: 1

      It's scary in a democratic Europe to even hear a politician suggest such a thing. It is so absurd that I really hope we never have to discuss it seriously in Parliament.

      Well that's a stupid line too. You really don't want a true democracy, as then this black box would be implement just if more people are for it than against it. Every minor group would be abused as well, and less popular opinions probably would get you thrown into jail or killed.

    5. Re:Don't Worry by dcollins · · Score: 1

      "The proposal claims to be based on users' rights and claims they are protected, that they should feel safe. He writes at the beginning that he did not want to create a new Big Brother Society. But then the whole document is about just that."

      This is a good point. I'm kind of appalled to realize how common it is now to hear presentations of the form, "I don't want to be Big Brother, but [insert Big Brother project here]." I just experienced that exact delivery from the security department at my college a few weeks back.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    6. Re:Don't Worry by kangsterizer · · Score: 1

      As far as I'm concerned theres been more than one occurrence of such ideas actually being succesfull on the long run. I'd say do worry.

    7. Re:Don't Worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      To be honest, a lot of us democratic europeans from democratic european countries are not sure why the hell Italy was invited to join the EU.

    8. Re:Don't Worry by internerdj · · Score: 1

      Awww, but this would be fun. How long after implementation before some group of hackers has his office and home computer ringing the cops for violations every few minutes?

    9. Re:Don't Worry by PoopCat · · Score: 1

      One can have a democratic entity without a "true democracy", and since no-one but you brought up the latter, I wonder why you saw the need to bring the distinction into the conversation.

    10. Re:Don't Worry by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      In Europe, they use a sane, common-sense definition of "democracy", shared with most of the rest of the world - which is to say, any country where people elect representatives is considered a democracy.

      The whole "republic not a democracy!1!1111" meme is a US-specific abomination. Please keep it there.

  13. Not Gonna Happen by stereoroid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Like Members of Congress in the USA, EU MEPs come in all shapes, sizes, and states of sanity. This guy's just flying a kite, but any such law would apply the the MEPs too, and you can assume some of them have skeletons in their hard drives. Fuhgeddabouttit.

    --
    (this is not a .sig)
    1. Re:Not Gonna Happen by wvmarle · · Score: 2

      The fact that someone at that level can fly a kite like that, and get away with it, is worrisome enough to me.

    2. Re:Not Gonna Happen by Tomato42 · · Score: 1

      Exactly, it's like needing to install antivirus software on a voting machine.

    3. Re:Not Gonna Happen by andi75 · · Score: 1

      > some of them have skeletons in their hard drives

      Not if they play the Chinese Version of World of Warcraft...

    4. Re:Not Gonna Happen by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Yep. Why isn't he instantly being replaced with somebody who's got useful things on their mind?

      --
      No sig today...
    5. Re:Not Gonna Happen by am+2k · · Score: 1

      Like Members of Congress in the USA, EU MEPs come in all shapes, sizes, and states of sanity. This guy's just flying a kite, but any such law would apply the the MEPs too, and you can assume some of them have skeletons in their hard drives. Fuhgeddabouttit.

      You can be sure that politicians would be exempt from a law like this. Just because they can.

    6. Re:Not Gonna Happen by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Like Members of Congress in the USA, EU MEPs come in all shapes, sizes, and states of sanity.

      You mean that there are some normal sane ones??!!

    7. Re:Not Gonna Happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. Why isn't he instantly being replaced with somebody who's got useful things on their mind?

      Freedom of speech and all that. There are more limitations on it in the EU than in the US, but proposing idiotic measures is not one of them (unless it would involve denying the holocaust or so).

    8. Re:Not Gonna Happen by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      The fact that someone at that level can fly a kite like that, and get away with it, is worrisome enough to me.

      You imply that he should be punished for his opinions? I fundamentally disagree. Parliament, of all places, should be a forum for any and all views, whether or not they're popular. The proper way to deal with people who put forward views you do not agree with is to vote them down, not to use fear to silence them.

    9. Re:Not Gonna Happen by Serpents · · Score: 1

      What makes you think politicians would not be exempt from this? After all their drives might contain national secrets/confidential information an I bet they would try to play this card to weasel out of this so only the lowly peasant like us have to deal with this crap.

    10. Re:Not Gonna Happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least the parliament is an adequat reflextion of our society ...

    11. Re:Not Gonna Happen by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      It's not the actual proposal that bothers me, it's the complete lack of clue displayed by it.

      If I'm paying somebody to do some thinking I don't think it's unreasonable to expect them to be educated and in possession of a brain.

      --
      No sig today...
    12. Re:Not Gonna Happen by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      I bet if somebody was proposing use of dead badgers as psychic channels to guide fiscal policy you wouldn't be all "every viewpoint is valid!" and "let the voters decide".

      Life is too short to listen to every viewpoint. Let's make a minimum of effort to weed out the idiots.

      (And not pay them a salary to propose stuff like this...)

      --
      No sig today...
    13. Re:Not Gonna Happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Freedom of speech does not equal freedom from repercussions. If his party does not kick him out, the party could stand to lose a significant amount of seats in the next election. I'm sure that will never happen, but it should in theory. It's a failure of democracy that people like him are allowed to fester on.

    14. Re:Not Gonna Happen by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Not punished as in having to pay a fine or ending up in jail.

      Punished for politicians comes in the form of causing serious outrage both in and out of parliament, and (in extreme cases) the politician having to resign from his/her post.

      In this case, the person in question seems to have initiated more "think of the children" types of serious privacy invasions, some resulting in legislation even. That's bad. FTA:

      Tiziano Motti was a politician who just over a year ago managed to get a majority of European Members of Parliament to support the proposal to expand the data storage directive to Google searches. The purpose was to protect children from pedophiles - the same excuse he is using now.

      He's in a way just an embodiment of the real problem, which is that the rest of the politicians accept such arguments. And as those very politicians are not only the current representatives of the people, but most of them will be re-elected in next elections, that means that the population at large happily accepts such serious privacy invasions "to protect children".

    15. Re:Not Gonna Happen by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      This guy's just flying a kite, but any such law would apply the the MEPs too, and you can assume some of them have skeletons in their hard drives. Fuhgeddabouttit.

      No, there would be a special exemption for MEPs (and other government officials/bureaucrats).

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    16. Re:Not Gonna Happen by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      Punished for politicians comes in the form of causing serious outrage both in and out of parliament, and (in extreme cases) the politician having to resign from his/her post.

      Where is the serious outrage within parliament going to come from, if by your own admission, politicians can be convinced that such measures are right? If a parliament is capable of generating sufficient outrage surrounding a proposal that it causes the resignation of the person who proposed it, then it is certainly capable of voting the proposal down.

      Likewise, serious outrage outwith parliament should have the effect of persuading politicians who were previously minded to support such legislation, that it might not be such a good idea.

    17. Re:Not Gonna Happen by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      It's the responsibility for whoever sets the calendar for debates in parliament to choose which topics are the best use of the parliament's time. That doesn't mean that members of parliament should be prevented from submitting for consideration whatever topic they wish to talk about.

    18. Re:Not Gonna Happen by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      ...He was elected, he sits in Parliament, he can say what he wants and propose what he wants ... no-one has to pay any attention to him.

      There are three possible reasons :
      1) He is an idiot
      2) He has a hidden agenda
      3) He wants some publicity

      I bet number 3 ....

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    19. Re:Not Gonna Happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ". This guy's just flying a kite, but any such law would apply the the MEPs too, and you can assume some of them have skeletons in their hard drives."

      Why would you assume it would apply to the MEPs as well? After all, they gotta protect national security - and you can't have that if some box is collecting up every dirty little secret in government that passes through the computer. You can bet if you read any serious proposal this guy puts forward, there will be exceptions for himself and his kind.

    20. Re:Not Gonna Happen by Synesthes · · Score: 1

      The Canadian prime minister McKenzie King thought his dog was a medium for his dead mother. Just sayin' http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McKenzie_King

    21. Re:Not Gonna Happen by ewibble · · Score: 1

      It should be the opposite way around MEPs and MPs should have everything logged and up for public examination, they are the peoples employees after all.

      This should be part of terms and conditions of their employment contract.

      We don't want paedophiles in parliament, think of the children

  14. I bet.. by mvar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... EU MEP Tiziano Motti (Italy) can't tell the difference between desktop PCs, laptops, smartphones and e-readers. Like most of the politicians anyway. Six or seven years ago in Greece some morons (a.k.a. the parliament majority) voted for a law to prohibit electronic gambling - On their way, they made Internet Cafés illegal as well as coin-up arcade games. It was fun to watch the police bust into Internet Cafés and arrest their owners just because they had 5-6 desktops PCs connected to the Internet.

    1. Re:I bet.. by DZign · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Very true - half of the stupid proposals are just because mp's want to get their name out in the press and say 'look I did something this year'..
      Sometimes they either hardly know anything about the technology, or they are just so narrow minded that they don't consider it can apply to much more than they think of.

      The law was good for dealers in arcade machines/pinball machines who could suddenly get some good deals in Greece.. (you still can btw, just got a mail with someone from Greece offering me pinball machines for sale :-)

    2. Re:I bet.. by fleeped · · Score: 1

      What's even more fun is that now many internet cafes, which are now legal, can switch to "gambling mode" with a boss-key or sth.

  15. Again? by Lunaritian · · Score: 1

    Someone really has to tell these guys about live CDs and Tor. It's impossible to monitor absolutely everything on the internet.

    1. Re:Again? by Psychotria · · Score: 1

      Yes, yes, yes. But you neglect to consider whether or not the MP has shares in the software provider company.

    2. Re:Again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's Italian AND an EU politician. That's the equivalent of an 11 on the corruption Richter-scale. So, that's a purely rhetorical question.

    3. Re:Again? by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      The proposal is not a software based solution, it's not run as an application under os. How will you fight a chip with some storage on the motherboard that logs data passing to the network card?

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    4. Re:Again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your stuff is encrypted before it passes your network card, the chip will only register the encrypted stuff, which is almost useless for government.

      By the way, I used Tor to type this message so that the government can't track this message to me.

    5. Re:Again? by Lunaritian · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it still be possible to encrypt the data before it's sent anywhere?

    6. Re:Again? by Xemu · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it still be possible to encrypt the data before it's sent anywhere?

      You're completely missing the target.

      An unjust law should not be tolerated by citizens because there might be technological means to circumvent the law.

      It's also quite easy to simply outlaw encryption.

      --
      Tell your friends about xenu.net
    7. Re:Again? by Lunaritian · · Score: 1

      I'm absolutely against censorship and monitoring myself. I just mean that it's simply stupid to even think that these laws would have any actual effect.

  16. Salem by bky1701 · · Score: 1

    Society needs witches to hunt. First case I can think of was the Christians, then the pagans, then Jews, then Muslims, then "witches", then anarchists, then gays, then communists, then terrorists, now pedophiles. Sadly, it probably won't ever end. Humans have a tendency to want to kill the one who is "different" which often leads them to counter-productive activities, which quite often do nothing to harm the group they intend to. And it seems we can always find someone irreconcilably different, no matter how many greater differences have in the past been overcome, when we are at a loss for one.

    1. Re:Salem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wait, you are putting pedophiles in the same category as pagans, Jews, witches, anarchists, gays and communists. Terrorists, Christians and Muslims though...

    2. Re:Salem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >First case I can think of was the Christians
      >now pedophiles
      So... the cycle completes?

    3. Re:Salem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how many Motti's it would take to make politicians the next witches...

    4. Re:Salem by Dunbal · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sure. It's only recently that pedophilia has been demonized. It was actually a custom in ancient Greece and Rome. Having been a victim of rape myself at age 5, I can't say I stand up for pedophilia. However when I see people accusing each other for non sexual images of children (like the old Coppertone ad, for example), cartoon images (like say, Lisa Simpson), or for statutory rape when say an 18 year old goes out with a 17 year old, I just have to shake my head and conclude that people are over-reacting and not sane. There's a difference between feeling sexual attraction for a 16 year old girl in a tight bikini and raping a 4 year old child. If people can't see this then they are not much better.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    5. Re:Salem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's right, we don't like Terrorists or Pedophiles just because they are different.....

    6. Re:Salem by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      Come to the UK, where two 17 year olds can have sex with each other legally, but if one takes a picture of the other naked on the first one's phone, then they have both committed a crime - Producing and storing indecent images of minors ....

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    7. Re:Salem by tibit · · Score: 1

      I think that such laws are because people are becoming spineless softies who can't be bothered to think and take responsibility for their decisions. The zero tolerance laws basically promote stupidity: you don't need to think, as an administrator, judge or a juror, because the "books" made decisions for you. This goes for all sorts of zero tolerance rules.

      In some school districts, zero tolerance for prescription strength drugs means that a kid with strong ibuprofen gets sacked automatically, with no mental effort on anyone's part. That way the principal can blame the decision on someone else -- it's like saying "I'm a sissy who can't think, but here's why". Having an excuse is no reason that the macho administrator is any less of a sissy...

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    8. Re:Salem by Jawnn · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's pretty harsh on the witches and communists, man. Most pagans and Jews would agree, there's something of big fucking chasm between this or that religious or political group and a group that has it's unique characteristic the fact that it's members are participating in the sexual exploitation of children.

    9. Re:Salem by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      It's the same here (US). There are broadly written laws in some states which are being used too do the same thing.

    10. Re:Salem by Shompol · · Score: 1

      Wait, you are putting pedophiles in the same category as pagans, Jews, witches, anarchists, gays and communists. Terrorists, Christians and Muslims though...

      Do you imply that there is a difference? Are you aware that Jews eat children? How is that different from pedophiles?

    11. Re:Salem by Reziac · · Score: 1

      The nanny government doesn't want you to think, and people learn to say "Let the police handle it" about everything. The consequence of treating the populace like children is that they learn to react like children -- let mommy take care of it.

      And if you take care of your own affairs, or suffer your own consequences, you're labeled a bully or a victim, respectively, and find yourself regulated or cushioned by that nanny system. Only nonthinking persons are left alone to live as "free" individuals.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    12. Re:Salem by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      All pedophiles rape children.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    13. Re:Salem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add smokers to the list

    14. Re:Salem by bky1701 · · Score: 1

      When it comes to terrorists, it's more about the definition, and the view that simply being classed that way makes you sub-human. But then, you can say the same for many of the examples I gave. Hint: there were no real witches at Salem.

  17. When it is easier to molest for real than download by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Even if this were not grossly misused(which would surely happen), with this in place the child molesters will figure out that actually molesting children is less likely to get them caught than child porn. Making an incentive to do it for real instead of looking at it...

  18. Misleading title !! by Zoxed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    OK, this is Slashdot but 1 MEP suggests something, and it becomes "EU Debates Installing a Black Box On Your Computer". No one is debating anything !! (Unless TFA says more: it is currently Slashdotted.)

    1. Re:Misleading title !! by zixxt · · Score: 2

      OK, this is Slashdot but 1 MEP suggests something, and it becomes "EU Debates Installing a Black Box On Your Computer". No one is debating anything !! (Unless TFA says more: it is currently Slashdotted.)

      Its only takes one stupid idea to get a big enough following, especially with the "Think of the children" crowd and then boom its LAW!

      --
      ---- GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    2. Re:Misleading title !! by HopefulIntern · · Score: 3, Informative

      It doesn't. Like your assumption, it is one ignorant guy in need of some attention by suggesting a radical idea. The fact he had good support a while ago seems to suggest he is universally supported but they voices of other MEP's in response to his ludicrous proposition suggests otherwise. Nothing to worry about.

    3. Re:Misleading title !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately there was the absolute majority of the EU Parliament MEPs who supported the idea - here is the list of signatories and the text of the resolution adopted http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?reference=P7_TA(2010)0247&language=EN.
      My worry is about the european Commission rewieving now the Data Retention Directive. It might take on board the Resolution 29.

    4. Re:Misleading title !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, this is Slashdot but 1 MEP suggests something, and it becomes "EU Debates Installing a Black Box On Your Computer". No one is debating anything !! (Unless TFA says more: it is currently Slashdotted.)

      Its only takes one stupid idea to get a big enough following, especially with the "Think of the children" crowd and then boom its LAW!

      You're missing the point. The article says the UN is Debating this. They aren't, this clown has introduced a proposal but it hasn't even been brought to the floor yet so there isn't a Debate on it.

      The word "debate" when applied to politics does not mean "People are talking about it", it's a part of the formal Legislative process.

    5. Re:Misleading title !! by GreatBunzinni · · Score: 1

      Actually, it isn't "one ignorant guy". It's at least two ignorant MEPs: from Italy and Anna Záborská from Slovakia. They co-authored the Written Declaration 29, where they state quite bluntly that they want every european citizen being constantly monitored by the police to avoid putting some hypothetical nasty criminal "on the same footing as honest citizens and making it difficult for the authorities to trace them".

      More on this in:

      --
      Slashdot, fix your code or at least hire someone who is competent at it to do it for you.
    6. Re:Misleading title !! by GreatBunzinni · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, it isn't "one ignorant guy". It's at least two ignorant MEPs: from Italy and Anna Záborská from Slovakia. They co-authored the Written Declaration 29, where they state quite bluntly that they want every european citizen being constantly monitored by the police to avoid putting some hypothetical nasty criminal "on the same footing as honest citizens and making it difficult for the authorities to trace them".

      More on this in:

      --
      Slashdot, fix your code or at least hire someone who is competent at it to do it for you.
    7. Re:Misleading title !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It did. Read the article title. Zoxed isn't assuming anything, merely making a point about the extent to which hyperbole have penetrated media such that even "good" media sites like this one engage in it constantly (you might say that's just what the submitter wrote, but one submission is chosen from dozens on any given subject, and experience shows the headline with the most hyperbole wins).

    8. Re:Misleading title !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point of the discussion here on ./ should not be whether this is a good idea.
      The point should be: that MEP should be fired. Simple as that.

      Radical proposals require radical actions.

    9. Re:Misleading title !! by GreatBunzinni · · Score: 2

      Correction: along with the two ignorant MEPs who authored Written Declaration 29, currently 371 MEPs have signed this proposition. Here is a list of all signatories.

      --
      Slashdot, fix your code or at least hire someone who is competent at it to do it for you.
    10. Re:Misleading title !! by GreatBunzinni · · Score: 1

      Only two MEPs, Tiziano Motti and Anna Záborská, might have suggested this, but 371 members supported it. And the fact that "no one is debating anything" is because the vote was passed way back in 2010-06-23.

      This is how EU does democracy.

      --
      Slashdot, fix your code or at least hire someone who is competent at it to do it for you.
    11. Re:Misleading title !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one is debating anything !!

      Not true. There's A LOT of debate going on in this thread. Most of it calling out the statement for what it is, and this asshat who proposed it another empty suit politician who couldn't tell a telephone from a banana.

    12. Re:Misleading title !! by Menkhaf · · Score: 1

      Stupid politicians like that can be found anywhere.
      Recently (late February) a Danish politician, at the time legal policy spokesman for Konversative (Conservatives) Tom Behnke, (a former cop, by the way), argued that politicians from left-wing Enhedslisten (The Unity List/Red-Greens) and center-left Radikale Venstre (Radical Left) Line Barfoed and Manu Sareen shouldn't question the Danish logging directive (Logningsbekendtgørelsen). His reasoning? "Imagine a terrorist attack with 675,000 dead".

      If that's that best a legal policy spokesman can come up with, I want to be a fucking politician. I'll lower the speed limits on the highway to 40 km/h, because "imagine a 400 school-bus pileup"... Sigh.

      --
      A proud member of the Onion-in-Hand alliance
  19. The italian political way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you think the chances are that EU MEP Tiziano Motti has some sort of a connection to a company or person which hopes to make money from Logbox?

    Weirdly the Logbox technology seems to be a ColdFusion logging libary... good luck with that on a kindle

  20. Do we have Strong AI? Pedophile Strong AI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "specifically whenever an image of sexually abused children is detected"
    First, I'm pretty sure we haven't got software that can do that reliably.
    Second, if we do, I certainly hope it's not sick enough to accept the job of scouring everyone's screen for kiddy porn. And if it is sick enough, somebody call John Connor quick.

    1. Re:Do we have Strong AI? Pedophile Strong AI? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Bet you $10,000 that RIAA and MPAA have their fingers in it as well and it will trigger on "stolen digital media"

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  21. This would help stop terrorists, too. by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

    Along with installing cameras in every home and spying on phone calls, we need to let the government log everyone's online activity, too. That'll stop those factually evil terrorists!

    --
    Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    1. Re:This would help stop terrorists, too. by HopefulIntern · · Score: 1

      It's pedos they are going after today, but it's all the same when you look at the bigger picture.

  22. Sounds like something Hitler would've loved! by madfilipino · · Score: 1

    60 some odd years later, what Hitler wanted comes back to life -- a chance to spy on the people for the sake of "saving Christianity", "saving Germany", "saving Europe", "saving children", and soon, themselves.

    No, thank you. This world doesn't need this kind of technology to help the modern equivalent of the KGB or the Stassi.

  23. 1984 by stooo · · Score: 1

    1984 is not a manual for politicians.
    Hitler is back, in Brussels,. But don't worry. What could possibly go wrong ?

    --
    aaaaaaa
    1. Re:1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      1984 is not a manual for politicians.
      Hitler is back, in Brussels,. But don't worry. What could possibly go wrong ?

      One out of over seven hundred MEPs, one out of over seven hundred members of a body with very little real power within the EU, one man says something technologically illiterate and Slashdot runs for the hills for fear of Blackshirts and deathcamps?

      Your post is absurd, absurd, hysterical and absurd. But thank you for keeping the world safe from totalitarianism. It's the thought (well, not thought, in this case... sentiment, perhaps) that counts....

      P.S. Never, under any circumstances, watch C-SPAN. Your terror will know no bounds.

    2. Re:1984 by itchythebear · · Score: 1

      It's more likely that they have read it and thought "Man, what a brilliant idea!"

      --
      If what I just said sounded like a troll, it was probably just a failed attempt at humor.
  24. Berlusconi first ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    then Motti and the rest of the scumbags

  25. Sure. by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2

    So if someone wants to research on the subject of child porn (not search for it, but search for information about it), and therefore enters that term into Google, he will cause an alarm at the police. Yeah, that makes perfectly sense. And of course they have the perfect algorithm to detect whether a photo shows an abused child. So it will never trigger if you e.g. send a holiday photo of your child at the beach to a friend.

    And of course, that box will never be used for any other purpose. Well, OK, they'll probably will soon add terrorist triggers, because terrorists are very bad, too. Don't complain about the police knocking on your door, you just shouldn't have used the word "terror" when you referred to the experience with your ex. Oh, and copyright violations for sure are also a target to be added soon. Oh, and since it is installed everywhere anyway, why not use it also for criminal investigations? And of course the secret service should have access to it. And it would surely come in handy for finding whistleblowers ...

    Ah, and if it's already there, why not add more functionality? Maybe not just report, but also block unwanted content? After all, it's bad stuff you want to be blocked. And of course it will never block legitimate but unwanted stuff ...

    And of course pedophiles, terrorists, copyright violators etc. won't ever find a way around it. Sure.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    1. Re:Sure. by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      I want to know how the hell a piece of software is going to tell adults from children.

      Last I checked, software was barely at the level where it could identify the shapes of people at all. Basically, faces.

      I suspect you could use somewhat the same approach to figure out if a picture had a nude person in it, (Except the face thing took years of work.) but figuring out even the approximate age would be a neat trick.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  26. In other news by Issarlk · · Score: 1

    Italy will solve it's unemployment problem. The governmnent decided to pay half the population to spy on the other half.
    "It's totaly not like the Stasi, we value freedom and privacy." commented one Italian MEP.

  27. Bribed by Murdoch by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

    He surely must be taking back-handers from Murdoch. The only half-sane reason to suggest these "black boxes" would be so The Sun can run the headline "Barmy Brussels Big Brother Bill".

    --
    -- Using the preview button since 2005
  28. Huh? by broknstrngz · · Score: 1

    The LogBox link leads to a logging subsystem for a web framework. How is that connected to something running on one's computer?

    1. Re:Huh? by larppaxyz · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there is no story at all and nothing to see.

  29. Seriously.. by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    isn't this a feature of Metro already? I'm sure Apple is up for it.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  30. I'm sure we all know this... by FalconZero · · Score: 1

    ...but clearly this isn't possible. Assuming this is software based, they'd have to prevent anyone installing 'unapproved' O/Ss, Also, live boots would be out. Also, all devices without said software would have to be 'dealt with'.

    Also - the LogBox linked to in the article appears to be for a ColdFusion logging library - I suspect this is either lazy journalism or politician luditism.

    --
    Windows in 6 Bytes (IA-32) : 90 90 90 90 CD 19
    1. Re:I'm sure we all know this... by pairo · · Score: 1

      Lazy journalism. The coldfusion stuff was made by Luis Majano, whereas the logbox the nutcase in question is talking about was made by this guy: http://www.fabioghioni.net/blog/2011/10/20/internet-e-l%E2%80%99arbitrio-assoluto-sui-dati-dei-service-provider-presentata-al-parlamento-l%E2%80%99iniziativa-per-un-sistema-di-controllo-sotto-garante/

  31. 2011 or 1984? by inkrypted · · Score: 1

    Is that the sound of big brother I hear approaching?

    --
    Chris Sheppard
    1. Re:2011 or 1984? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Notice those insurance commercials which include a grey USB box that you can put in your car to save insurance rates?

      What do you think it does? Spy on YOU!

      Cars already do so and computers are next.

    2. Re:2011 or 1984? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      This is by CHOICE, not by force. That's the nice part, Progressive insurance is not forced upon the world at gunpoint.

      The watch what you do with your computer box, will be forced upon you by gunpoint. or more accurately threat of gunpoint and incarceration.

      Or at least that is what the politicians like.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:2011 or 1984? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Phones have been doing so for years. If you don't want your location logged, turn off your cell modem.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    4. Re:2011 or 1984? by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      it's just a matter of time before Progressive or some other Insurance company makes it a requirement of coverage.

  32. Won't someone think of the adults? by mykos · · Score: 2

    Children are sure going to hate life when they become adults and these black boxes were installed "for their protection" during a brief phase of their lives.

    1. Re:Won't someone think of the adults? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, if this guy gets any traction he'll be installing them in the children at the age of majority.

  33. I find it ironic by Hentes · · Score: 1

    that Berlusconi's men are worrying about pedophiles.

    1. Re:I find it ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because having sexual relations with a 16yo is a clear case of paedophilia, yeah sure. On the other hand, Vouge (or some other "fashion" magazine) has 10yo on cover.

  34. The title is BS by ardor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Both this Slashdot story and TFA have a very misleading title. ONE MEP is thinking about this insane idea. It is not even in Parliament for discussion. Another MEP already vehemently spoke against it.

    Come on, ideas like these pop up and fizz out all the time. I bet there are other MEPs thinking about imprisoning gay people, reinstating a theocracy, establishing re-education centers, idolizing Hitler and Stalin, and so on and so forth. That doesn't mean any of these wacky ideas come through. There are no indications that this one will.

    Plus, it is not technically feasible, even with deep packet inspection. To connect the dots, to know who uploaded what where, is far from trivial, especially if the bad scary pedophile uses non-standard ways of transmitting this data. For example, what if he uses zip files? Also, there is encryption, which totally defeats this "logbox".

    --
    This sig does not contain any SCO code.
    1. Re:The title is BS by am+2k · · Score: 1

      Plus, it is not technically feasible, even with deep packet inspection. To connect the dots, to know who uploaded what where, is far from trivial, especially if the bad scary pedophile uses non-standard ways of transmitting this data. For example, what if he uses zip files? Also, there is encryption, which totally defeats this "logbox".

      The same can be said about data retention, but that didn't deter them from making it a directive.

    2. Re:The title is BS by sam0737 · · Score: 1

      Plus, it is not technically feasible, even with deep packet inspection...

      That's not the point. You do think the whole point is about the abused children issue?

    3. Re:The title is BS by GreatBunzinni · · Score: 2

      I don't believe that's the case. According to this report, "So far, 324 MPs have signed the proposal, or the written declaration that it called on European languages". It also mentions that "When more than half, ie 369 members signed up, it can be adopted and thus becomes its official position, but are not legislative in themselves."

      So, although it isn't quite the same thing as signing a law, it is in fact a bit more than "one MEP thinking about this insane idea", even when including the fact hat Written Declaration 29 is authored by two MEPs, Tiziano MOTTI and Anna ZÁBORSKÁ.

      --
      Slashdot, fix your code or at least hire someone who is competent at it to do it for you.
    4. Re:The title is BS by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      You are correct that it is important not to overreact to such a proposal. This proposal has little chance of going anywhere at this time. However, if people do not react at all to someone in this sort of position making this sort of proposal, it is only a matter of time until a similar proposal gets put forward seriously. And because the idea had been around for awhile, no one really pays attention until after it is enacted.
      So, when such a proposal is put forward by someone in a position of power (even as limited as that of a single MEP) it is important to loudly express opposition to the idea. However, yelling about how this is an example of how a particular government infringes on people's rights (when that government has not actually, and will not enact in the near future, the proposal) is going overboard, and probably just as damaging, if not more so, to the cause of individual freedom as the proposal (just the proposal, not the damage if the proposal was made law) itself, in the long run.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    5. Re:The title is BS by GreatBunzinni · · Score: 1

      Both this Slashdot story and TFA have a very misleading title. ONE MEP is thinking about this insane idea. It is not even in Parliament for discussion. Another MEP already vehemently spoke against it.

      Not quite. Two MEPs suggested this insane idea, and 371 MEPs signed it. This isn't about discussing an insane idea. This is about implementing an insane idea.

      --
      Slashdot, fix your code or at least hire someone who is competent at it to do it for you.
  35. Logbox? by Dr.+Hok · · Score: 1

    TFA links to "a technology called LogBox", a logging library for ColdFusion. That doesn't make sense. IMHO log4j would be much better.

    --
    Say out loud: I'm an Aspie and I'm somewhat proud, I guess. Uh. Can I write an email in all caps instead? Hm...
    1. Re:Logbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think obviously they meant a log-based filesystem, this way it's compatible with flash devices.

  36. One crazy MP does not change the laws of the EU by fantomas · · Score: 1

    One MP having a crazy idea does not mean the law will get changed over the whole of the EU. There are many examples of MPs who have changed one law but failed to change other laws. Every country has their radical MPs who make grand statements to capture media attention, it doesn't mean that their ideas will become law (we have to be thankful that the craziest ideas of the craziest US representatives haven't become law in the USA over the last 50 years).

  37. there is a word for that pedophiles ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in german it's called "totschlagargument" ;)

  38. This sounds absolutely fine. by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

    I'm more than happy to let them have this, just as long as we also have a black box on our politicians. All addresses, telephone numbers, email addresses, financial information and physical location for all the politicians, publically available, all the time.

    If they've nothing to hide, they've nothing to worry about.

  39. PARENTS rape children, NOT strangers by dbet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The people who actually molest kids are those with easy access to them. most cases of abuse are from moms, dads, stepmoms, aunts and uncles, sometimes even a teacher. They don't care if you monitor their computer because they don't need one to get what they're after. No amount of computer monitoring or demonizing things that are even tangentially related to kiddie porn will prevent or even slow down actual cases of actual abuse.

    These laws are about removing people from society who don't have a "healthy" sexual attitude. That's why drawings are illegal in many places. Because it's not about reducing abuse, it's about people making themselves feel less uncomfortable about their own sexuality. In my own country, the people here are absolutely bat shit crazy when it comes to sexuality. They fear it, and they hate people who have a different attitude about it than they do. My generation is the first where simply being gay is not a crime. Hell at this point I can see things at the beach that would be illegal on my computer. There have even been people investigated for looking at porn of adults who are young looking. And if you let yourself get wrapped up in this paranoia you are helping no one and hurting everyone, including yourself.

    And this needs to be said:

    I would rather live in a world where occasional child abuse happens, than one where it never happens because we're all under constant surveillance.

    1. Re:PARENTS rape children, NOT strangers by Lockyy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hey, don't forget. Porn of small breasted women is illegal in Australia because it's counted as child pornography...

    2. Re:PARENTS rape children, NOT strangers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been reading (lurking on) slashdot.org for 4 years now and no post has deserved a +1 more than this.

    3. Re:PARENTS rape children, NOT strangers by HopefulIntern · · Score: 1

      Though not a popular opinion to hold, I agree. Just as I would rather live in a world where every once in a while some people die in terrorist attacks, than be under constant surveillance.

    4. Re:PARENTS rape children, NOT strangers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post is very insightful. Not a mod comment, BTW.

      What I have always wondered is if images to "sate" someone are truly removed from society and somehow no one finds a way around it, how many more instances of actual physical abuse/harm would occur? I believe the numbers would be astounding.

    5. Re:PARENTS rape children, NOT strangers by Reziac · · Score: 1

      And it's a bigger problem than just "for the children". Laws and regulations are being proliferated under a "stop *potential* abuse of [cause of the day]" all across the U.S., and apparently across the entire modern democratic world. Yet these attempts to halt or regulate corner cases primarily hit the innocent.

      So I've come to your view across the board -- it's better that a few individuals (human, animal, environment, whatever) suffer, than that all of us be constantly under Big Brother's thumb.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    6. Re:PARENTS rape children, NOT strangers by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Hey, don't forget. Porn of small breasted women is illegal in Australia because it's counted as child pornography...

      This brings up an interesting question: What counts as small breasted? If I film my 34A girlfriend and I getting all freaky, and airport security check my phone at security for the return flight, am I likely to end up in Australia's version of Federal PMITA prison?

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    7. Re:PARENTS rape children, NOT strangers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would DEFINITELY like to subscribe to your newsletter!

  40. Re:Getting it in for one claim, using it for anoth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > They'll try to get it in "for the children"
    You have no idea how literally that is being (ab)used by those people.
    TFS mentions a "proposal to expand the data storage directive to Google searches", i.e.
    "written declaration 29".
    Take a look at the "Sign the written declaration No. 29 today!" site:
    http://smile29.eu/

    The Onion could not have done it better.

  41. is the TPM chip not working? by kubitus · · Score: 1

    or is the DC of Italy not trustworthy for Wintel?NSA to tell them that this comes already with every computer running a majority Operating System 7?

  42. Mhmmm temptation... by lorinc · · Score: 1

    Mr Motti, if you manage to have such logging capabilities installed on all European systems by default, I promise I will hack it. I will hack it and use the one on your computer to find all your dirty laundry related to political and financial affairs, and I will make all of them public. It will stink so fucking much you'll praise the Lord such a logging system would never have existed. Beware...

    1. Re:Mhmmm temptation... by Issarlk · · Score: 1

      Silly you! Logboxes are not for politicians and the powerfuls, it's only for proles! :D

  43. mafia by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    Where is mafia when one needs it? Wait, this guy must be one of them.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    1. Re:mafia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It took an Italian MEP to launch an initiative such as this. Let him go and make a pizza and keep the Mafia in his own country at bay.

  44. I'm guessing by DrXym · · Score: 1

    That Tiziano Motti is an idiot and his suggestion will be laughed out of parliament.

  45. Let him know what you think about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Mr. Motti official email address at the European Parliament: tiziano.motti@europarl.europa.eu
    Mr. Motti homepage: www.motti.eu

    1. Re:Let him know what you think about this by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Mr. Motti official email address at the European Parliament: tiziano.motti@europarl.europa.eu Mr. Motti homepage: www.motti.eu

      Now don't post him anything nasty. He could get in trouble if his black box shows he's opening up illegal images.

  46. What's going on here? by Xelios · · Score: 1

    The last 3 accepted stories have had clearly misleading titles or summaries. I don't normally complain about editing on /. but christ guys, get it together.

    --
    Murphey's fighting Occam, and we're in the stands.
  47. For the children, catch all by Gideon+Wells · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Forgive me for being a bit rude, but I woke up to this article. Mr. Motti, considering the reputation your PM has been gathering I must say screw you.

    I am at the point I am no longer phased by the phrase "think of the children". All of this to protect kids? Dear god, at this point you might as well just take all the kids away from their parents in the hospital and raise them completely isolated from adults. Maybe even other kids so they don't even know what kids look like to be turned on by them.

    An image of a child being abused? I mean, obviously this guy has no clue about technology. Still, he did not research prior censorship attempts first? The whole Green Dam (or was it River) of China's blocking a website for showing too much skin was horribly broken. Should Europeans expect their equivalent of SWAT Teams to start charging in if they look up pig farming?

    And... and... *double face palms and sighs* Why the hell are politicians so apt to look at 1984 and like books as guides rather than warnings?

    --
    by Anonymous Coward: I, for one, welcome the shift from car analogies to pizza analogies. um.. overlords?
    1. Re:For the children, catch all by baKanale · · Score: 1

      The whole Green Dam (or was it River) of China's blocking a website.

      Yeah, it's Green Dam. The software controls the flow of information in the same way that a real dam controls the flow of water in a river. The name makes special sense when you remember the Three Gorges Dam, which the Chinese government finished a few years ago to control the seasonal flooding on the Yangtze River. I might imagine that they view the flood of information resulting from an uncensored Internet to be analogous to those yearly inundations which have, in the past, caused billions of dollars in damages and killed thousands of people.

    2. Re:For the children, catch all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because most of these politicians should've retired back in 1984.

  48. Not a chance by gweihir · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately clueless politicians proposing illegal and amoral things are just as present in the EU everywhere else.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  49. 1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think any of these politicians or lobbyists have ever read Orwell's masterpiece...

  50. Motti, Ghioni and free advertisements. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before you begin asking "why we voted for Motti" you must dig a bit deeper.

    Motti is talking specifically about a proprietary solution by an Italian enterpreneur, so they can sell it: by taking this proposal to the European Parliament they will be laughed by everyone, but still this is an excuse to have enough media coverage to sell the products to companies, hey, if the gubmint can log the kittydiddlers you can also log your disgruntles employees at your call center.

    You might want to pass these links to your google translate:
    http://www.fabioghioni.net/blog/2011/10/20/internet-e-l%E2%80%99arbitrio-assoluto-sui-dati-dei-service-provider-presentata-al-parlamento-l%E2%80%99iniziativa-per-un-sistema-di-controllo-sotto-garante/
    http://www.famigliacristiana.it/costume-e-societa/scienza-e-Tech/tech-news/dossier/inter_191011150826.aspx

  51. Don't take them in considerations by aglider · · Score: 1

    As long as they keep Berlusconi as PM, they are not credible at all.

    --
    Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
  52. E-Mail to Motti: tiziano.motti@europarl.europa.eu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I just mailed this to tiziano.motti@europarl.europa.eu:

    Mr. Motti,

    we have been informed, that you proposed plans to install a system of total surveillance for purposes of creating a totalitarian police state in the spirit of Stalin. As a additional insult, you excuse this behavior with âoeprotecting the childrenâ, despite it being a proven fact that this system will not only not help children, but in fact harm everyone, including children.

    In case you are ignorant of that fact: This is a criminal offense in the EU. Committed against every single member of the union. One you would commit deliberately and knowingly. One that WILL land you in prison for a decade.

    Because of this, we leave you the choice to either back down and reconsider changing your world views, or face a legal process on a massive scale, ending with you in prison.

    It is your choice, but we WILL bring you down. And other than you, we will do it in a legal and morally acceptable way.

    And I mean it!
    How about you?

  53. HE IS A BLOODY FRAUD! by biancmb · · Score: 0
  54. The EU can... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Shove it up their ass.

    Suddenly old computers will become valuable, and if that is illegal, I'll gladly be a part of the criminal world.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:The EU can... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      [eyeing computer graveyard] I'm gonna be rich!!

      Seriously, I'd rather be unconnected than support such a scheme.

      However... when they realise that simply tapping the ISPs will cover the same ground, with far fewer to coerce into cooperation...

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  55. Let's start with Silvio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Great idea. Let's kick off this great scheme with Berlusconi's computer.

  56. Long live childpr0n! by Sait-kun · · Score: 1

    I agree that childpr0n is horrible but this is worse.

    Not only are those children raped and have video's and pictures taken and posted on the internet now they are being screwed by their politicians as well?

    Childpr0n is bad but Nation / European / Worldwide censorship is 100x worse. They should invest their money in actually finding and hanging the makers of this crap instead of turning everyone into an criminal.

    But I highly doubt the idea will stand for long probably will get shot down the next meeting... They should jail the person/people who came up with this idea.. have they done something against the law? I don't think so but better safe then sorry, right? They might commit a crime at some point. Better jail them for the rest of their lives and make sure that doesn't happen. Lets call it precrime prevention!

  57. Early warning system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He proposes an early warning system of criminal activity, specifically whenever an image of sexually abused children is detected, an alarm, goes to the authorities to be able to see who uploaded it.

    Minority Report, anyone?

  58. maybe we should bomb Italy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just sayin'

    1. Re:maybe we should bomb Italy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What for? It'll be back in the stone age soon enough as half of the european economies fail.

  59. EU? by mmcuh · · Score: 1

    Is "the EU debating it", or is it just this one loon who has suggested it to the media? Has this suggestion made it to any committee, showed up in any directive proposal from the commission, been discussed in any meeting of the council of ministers?

    If one single parliamentarian doing a mouth-fart is the same as the entire institution he's in "debating it" then the EU is also debating reinstating the death penalty, banning the building of mosques, abandoning the inner market, patenting business methods, etc etc etc.

    1. Re:EU? by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      No. It is just one jerk from Italy. The other jerk they have is prime minister. Mr. Motti can be found here: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/members/expert/committees/view.do?language=EN&id=96760

    2. Re:EU? by gentryx · · Score: 1

      Just my thoughts. This story is overrated.

      --
      Computer simulation made easy -- LibGeoDecomp
  60. But this was 100% legal in 1940 by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    Yeah ive seen the B/W videos of life in the 40s, with some 35yo geezer married to some 14yo with the blessing of her parents.

    Does this make every single old fart over 80 a pedo because that was the norm before?

    Dont invent new morals, unless you want to retro actively charge 100s of millions of people as pedos in their graves.

    Bottom line, govts and leos should all stop destroying lives.

    Be fair, and DONT follow the book.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  61. Says EU MEP from Italy??? by Device666 · · Score: 1

    There seem always to be some brute force policy which affects the privacy of all citizens, because a few criminals. Let them first solve their problems with their president who is a pedophile. I suggest that they put a logbox in his computer and publish all logs for everyone to see!

    I also suggest governments should first solve their own ICT problems before exporting those to their citizens by shoving a hardware version of a bundestrojan in everyones throat.

  62. Re:E-Mail to Motti: tiziano.motti@europarl.europa. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    This would have a lot more weight if you cited exactly which laws you think he has broken...

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  63. my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EU sounds like they are taking a cue from the republicans here in the states. They want similar things for those that do not belong to the republican party.

  64. Re:E-Mail to Motti: tiziano.motti@europarl.europa. by TechLA · · Score: 1

    Yep, and stuff like "BACK DOWN NOW OR WE WILL BRING YOU DOWN" and making treats doesn't help at all. If anything, inane emails like that just hurt the cause.

  65. Doesn't go far enough! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a noble goal to save our children. But it doesn't go far enough! Our children are most often victims of abuse by members of their own family. We MUST put a stop to that! Lets give all of our children immediately from birth to catholic monasteries.

    Oh, yeah, right: </sarcasm>

    1. Re:Doesn't go far enough! by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Catholic monasteries are going to protect our children from being raped? Right.

      Let's protect all of our chickens in the fox den. All of our money in Wall Street. Yes, the perfect safekeeping.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    2. Re:Doesn't go far enough! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Catholic monasteries are going to protect our children from being raped?

      That was supposed to be part of the joke ;-)

  66. Tell him what you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Email Motti with your polite suggestions: tiziano.motti@europarl.europa.eu :)

  67. How convenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How convenient that this latest expansion of government power and revenue can be applied to an entire continent, rather than isolated to a single country. Am I implying that power and revenue grabs like this were the entire goal behind the EU? You're damn right I am.

    And this won't be the last power grab, not by any stretch of the imagination. Breadth and depth of power grabs were carefully built into the design.

  68. Re:Can I be frank? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It might also be related to the word frank/franc that means something like free or sincere.

    "Excuse my French" could be translated to "Excuse my free speech" or "Excuse me for being sincere"

  69. typical Italian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What do you wanna bet he's doing half the campaign staff

    http://www.ciroandreapiccinini.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/tiziano-motti.jpg

  70. M$: vaffanculo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    M$: vaffanculo

  71. Is this possible? by fa2k · · Score: 1

    I'm interested in their thoughts for implementing this.. It's easiest to implement in software, but they can't force everyone to use a specific version of Windows or Linux or OS X (I sure hope!!). I doubt they would develop proxy software for FreeBSD, for example. If it's in hardware, then I'm afraid you will get a big slow-down: most computers are connected to the LAN with the same interface as the WAN, so does it have to check and log all the files you transfer to your NAS? If they do destination-based filtering, then people with multiple public IPs are SOL, and anyone can use a local proxy anyway.. Well, unless that also has this tracking HW of course. This just isn't going to happen, because it screws up too much of IT.

  72. Rephrase the proposal as ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need this so we can monitor all of our politicians' online activity.

  73. Re:E-Mail to Motti: tiziano.motti@europarl.europa. by Ice+Station+Zebra · · Score: 1

    You didn't send him a link to click on? Shame.

  74. Totalitarism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Governments want one thing, and that is full control over the people. Here in the Netherlands, some minister suggested placing cameras in all daycare institutions. Apart from the fact that this is absolutely infeasible (costs, who has to watch all the camera's so that nothing goes unnoticed?) is this a severe violation of privacy. Furthermore, the people working at daycare institutions won't behave normally when they are under surveillance, which won't benefit the normal development of the children.

    The minister could have thought of this. He is either stupid or has to hide something.

    They also want to prohibit the use of face covering clothing, of course, this is in order to find anyone and identify anyone. It won't help preventing terrorism, because you still don't know who the terrorists are, whether you can see their faces or not!

    They wanted to introduce "kilometer tax" (roughly translated) to make you pay per kilometer. A system should be installed in your car which keeps track of the places you can visit. For obvious reasons, this violates privacy and civil rights.

    Concluding, we can say that governments are by nature totalitarian and HAVE TO BE CONTROLLED. Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Many people think the above mentioned proposals are normal and accept them. Slowly, we can see our rights and privacy vanish and Orwell's predictions come true.

    1. Re:Totalitarism by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      No, governments don't all want totalitarianism. Governments aren't people or even animals - they don't "want" anything.

      Some people want totalitarianism, and use governments to get it.

      These people are what we have government to protect the public from. Because without government, those people would be warlords (or their henchmen), and have all the totalitarianism they want.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  75. _The Da Vinci Code_ is fiction (was Re:Fyou Italy) by WillAdams · · Score: 1

    muckracer wrote:

    >You could say, he (God/Jesus) were elected to their currently held positions in A.D. 325
    >at the First Council of Nicaea, where Jesus got promoted from just being a human to
    >exclusive God privileges by a, albeit tight, vote by those present at the council.
    >y extension, his now official Father (sorry, Joseph!) got simultaneously a vote of confidence
    >(of existence and supreme rule).

    You do realize that Dan Brown's a _fiction_ author? And that he created an alternate history to make his story work?

    ``The council decided against the Arians overwhelmingly (of the estimated 250–318 attendees, all but two voted against Arius''
      --- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Council_of_Nicaea

    William

    --
    Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
  76. Red-herring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a father I am all about saving the children. The cure here would open up pandora's box and would put a lot of people's privacy at risk with some real life implications. If your laptop is stolen the thiefs would have a complete record of everything you have ever done on it. Including passwords to your emails, bank accounts, etc. Not every good intention leads to a good solution.

    I understand why they constantly use the issue about pedophiles when making these kinds of proposals; no one would argue against a measure to protect children from monsters. However, I think that is all an attempt to divert the attention from what really is going on. That they want to have access to what people are doing on the internet. With every similar proposal I feel Big Brother getting bigger.

  77. YOU and THEM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, except that the story I read right after this one is one about how they're forcing ISPs to censor peoplewebsites posting recordings of alleged police misconduct. YOU need to be watched at home. THEY cannot be recorded in the performance of their paid duties.

    http://yro.slashdot.org/story/11/10/20/0311234/eu-debates-installing-a-black-box-on-your-computer

  78. Citation required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is complete bullshit; there are entire child prostitution rings in operation. Over 1,000 young girls are involved in the UK alone. Maybe it helps you sleep at night to think this doesn't happen, but I'm afraid it does.

    I actually find it quite offensive that you can blame parents for the problem of child abuse - even amongst the cases that do occur within close family or at school or church (you missed church) it is almost never the natural parents doing the abuse. Usually it's a step-parent or uncle.

    And this needs to be said:

    Surveillance alone isn't harmful. There may be potentially harmful consequences, but the act of surveilling is completely neutral. Child abuse is actually harmful. I would rather live in a world where paranoid people whine about being watched than one in which increased levels of child abuse is an accepted collateral damage from our supposed right to do things on a worldwide network in absolute secrecy. And look, I smoke illegal drugs, I have a vested interest in keeping some privacy, because I have something to hide. It's just that the privacy we require in our lives has nothing to do with the internet.

    (All this doesn't change the fact that the MEP proposing this is a fucking idiot, by the way.)

  79. It is a virus by prefec2 · · Score: 1

    Among European conservatives, a virus was spread. They want to control the Internet, because it has to be controlled. Uncontrolled things are bad. And they all try to argument that with child pornography. They did that with web blockades. We have/had a law to enforce such blockades. However, they do not execute the law and want to abolish it. They had also a law so they can log all your traffic. However, the law was abolished by the Bundesverfassungsgericht (BVerfG = Supreme Court). And they had this state Trojan horse. However, that is illegal. As they all want it so desperate even when it is illegal and stupid and unethical, it must be a virus or it is a new drug which converts normal humans in control freaks.

    What do they all want on my computer? There is nothing on it beside recorded TV series, music, and all my scientific and not so scientific publications. Oh I forgot the collection of recipes. I guess they are after the very old dope-brownie recipe.

    Ah yes and Mr. Motti can be found here [http://www.europarl.europa.eu/members/expert/committees/view.do?language=EN&id=96760]

  80. It's not a crazy idea... by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

    It's just some company donating to his campaign trying to get a win on the Government slot machine for spending by using a politically corrupt politician to push their snake oil as a miracle cure for something. People aren't thinking of the children by any stretch of the imagination. They are either only thinking of their campaign donations or investors depending on what part of this you look at. The general public be damned since they'll be footing the bill for this if it were to go through.

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
  81. Chaperone Motti by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    After the beta test period, where Motti has a camera in his home to prevent the much more serious crimes that officials have the power to perpetrate, we will see how much of the kiddie porn problem can be solved by jailing Motti.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  82. Excellent Kiddie Porn Producer by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    When every EU child has a recording box on their computer, all the pictures of them will be easily uploaded, and indeed probably "preventively" already uploaded to some EU surveillance database. Including their home webcams and personal phones. Which can be remotely activated.

    I can't think of a better way to turn every EU child (and adult) into an unwilling porno star, when someone (on the inside, probably) publishes pictures take of those people without their even knowing it was their own equipment.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Excellent Kiddie Porn Producer by eXlin · · Score: 1

      Yeah, real question is who starts monitoring those suit-mans so that those suit-mans doesn't get too exited while crawling throught that material...

      What a great change for pedofiles to watch those photos and be not touchable by law and who else would like to spend ones days doing stuff like that...

  83. Eeeh... by f3rret · · Score: 1

    Somehow I am not bothered by this, I mean other than the fact it will be prohibitively expensive and for that reason wont happen, it will also be trivial to circumvent for those who really want to.

    I mean The Great Firewall of China isn't keeping anyone who really wants to see the real web from seeing it.

    --
    Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
    1. Re:Eeeh... by Xemu · · Score: 1

      Somehow I am not bothered by this, I mean other than the fact it will be prohibitively expensive and for that reason wont happen, it will also be trivial to circumvent for those who really want to.

      I'm flabbergasted by your statement. You seem to be saying that you're not bothered that the government may log everything a citizen reads online, because criminals who really want to can circumvent the child pornography log device if they really want to.

      I am very bothered by this device because no government should have access to a list of everything it's citizens read. We can be certain that at some point in the future, the contents will be used maliciously. The only way to prevent this is not to compile the list at all.

      --
      Tell your friends about xenu.net
    2. Re:Eeeh... by Crimius · · Score: 1

      I'm less concerned about their reasons behind it, and more concerned with the fact that such a device would be like making all computers look exactly the same to hackers interested in grabbing your personal data. It would provide them with a single system to get control of to have access to millions of peoples personal information, because as soon as someone discovers how to reroute the log information to their network on a single of these boxes, the rest will be simple. I'm not a big fan of security through obscurity, but I don't see any reason to invite not only the government to take a gander at my S&M fetish, but anyone with enough brains to re-purpose these devices as well.

  84. Other steps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why stop here?

    We could start collecting online database from every time you drink alcohol in sake of stopping you before you go driving as drunken.
    There are also other steps to go, how about video cam to every home so polices can caught you if you do nasty things...

    Both of those of cource to protect our children from drunken (or) pedofiles.

  85. Whack this piece of shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where's a good Mafia hit man when we need him?

  86. Cut your own dick off, Mr. Motti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps, if he feels he can't avoid looking at CP without Big Brother over his shoulder, Mr. Motti should just cut his own dick off to solve his "urges". With any luck, he'll manage to bleed to death...

  87. Who will be exempt? by erroneus · · Score: 1

    I think such law will be telling by who will be listed as exempt from monitoring.

    I have to wonder which common citizens will think this is a good idea?

  88. uh huh... by Syberz · · Score: 1

    Thousands die each year (including many children) from drunk driving but the government doesn't force mandatory breathalyzers in cars, so why would they force black boxes for kiddie porn detection. Come on, it's just some MP making noise to get votes come next election. Move along.

    --
    ~Syberz
  89. A different sollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I propose a different solution to the problem.
    If everyone stops having children, there will be 100% less child abuse.
    By having more than 0 children you are contributing the problem.
    I'm also still hopeful that Italy will be kicked out of the EU for being poor.

    And how exactly does he envision this box to work?
    Will I have to bring my PC somewhere every time it fills up, so they can empty it out?
    Or does it just overwrite the old data?
    If that’s the case everyone should just make sure they fill up the device several times over after going online.

  90. State Dept. Puppet Advising OWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  91. Actually pretty awesome by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    Ludicrous measure that will fail epically, but will cause a stink among voters.

    It's like politicians are conspiring to get online rights into the political mainstream. What's the recent membership trend for the Italian Pirate Party?

  92. Italian Politics by mbone · · Score: 1

    I read something like this and I think, who is funding this guy ? He is an Italian politician, and I have followed enough Italian politics to see no reason to assume he is on the level. That means that child porno is presumably just a cover, but what is it a cover for ? Is some intelligence agency bankrolling this tomfoolery ? Organized crime ?

  93. Re:E-Mail to Motti: tiziano.motti@europarl.europa. by Vegemeister · · Score: 1

    âoe ... â

    If I were him, I certainly wouldn't feel threatened by an email from someone who can't even keep their character sets straight.

  94. Re:Don't Worry - Let him try it for a while by scsirob · · Score: 1

    I suggest Mr. Motti set an example for us all. Have him install one of these boxes on all computers he personally uses to access the Internet. Better yet, any MEP who agrees with this proposal shall voluntary install these protective devices on their systems. Obviously, the people of Europe have a right to monitor the results of a test like this, so full disclosure online of all logs would be appropriate.

    Let's see how well this works for them..

    --
    To Terminate, or not to Terminate, that's the question - SCSIROB
  95. Pedophile? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is he a pedophile? Usually the ones fighting against something are the once that have a skeleton in the closet. Is he collecting more data for his own use?

  96. History Repeats by tonyAG · · Score: 2

    Adolf Hitler, Mien Kampf:
    "The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people.
    As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children,
    the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation."

  97. Third-world country by goldspider · · Score: 1

    I've said it before (and been modded "troll") and I'll say it again.

    Stuff like this is why Italy is still a third-world country.

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    1. Re:Third-world country by MadMaverick9 · · Score: 1

      And add on top of that, that Italy is the country where scientists are sued for not predicting earthquakes.

  98. Lack of thought by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    Again, the ranting and ravings of someone clueless to the internet, yet in power deciding what we should and should not do with the internet.
    Any pedophile in today's age knows how to encrypt data...and these are the real culprits,
    the ones that upload mega jumbo collection of files to be distributed on the net.....
    the ones that will never be decrypted because they know what they are doing....

    this will only catch the stupid low end ones which do not care or know about encryption,
    and mostly small time compared to what this bill is proposing the needs are for.

    1. Re:Lack of thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say the real culprits are the ones who produce it. Does it really matter who uploads it?

  99. This creates more problems than it solves by funkmotor · · Score: 1

    If the problem is with perverts looking at child porn then solve it by stopping the small number of perverts from being able to look at it rather than installing software or hardware in every internet capable device with a graphical display (which will then lead to homebrew devices being illegal etc). A fairly simple lo-tech way would be to stop perverts looking at porn by removing the sight of convicted paedophiles. This prevents the convicted ones reoffending and provides a significant dis-incentive for the others. You could either do this permanently ala the middle ages (with a hot poker in the eye), or with some high tech medical procedure (detach the optical nerve under general anaesthetic, possibly reversable after a sentance has been served), or ironically, by strapping black boxes over their heads.

  100. another stupid law to spy on people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and just what stops a real criminal from removing it

  101. Re:E-Mail to Motti: tiziano.motti@europarl.europa. by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

    1) Failure to capitalise first word in the missive.
    2) Misuse of comma in first sentence.
    3) Mis-statement of purpose; Mr Motti wishes to protect children from sexual abuse. The result of this is "Big Brother"-esque monitoring reminiscent of a totalitarian reigime.
    4) You state that "... this will not only not help children, but in fact harm everyone, including children." This system would, in fact, potentially protect some children. If you are going to refute this point, you need to provide evidence. Pointing out that black-box recording of all actions on a computer is only useful as a reactive measure, not proactive (nobody's life was saved in an air crash by the black box recorder. It is for ascribing blame after the fact).
    5) What is a criminal offence in the EU, and which law is he breaking? You need to be specific, so he can check the legality himself. More importantly, you are not a lawyer, so do not tell a politician what is legal or illegal. He has access to entire departments of lawyers, and will be damn sure that, should it get to that stage, he will shoehorn this scheme through a loophole so small you'd think it was made with an electron gun.
    6) Empty threats. Nice.

    In short, I think you mean well, but your execution is dire. Find more who think like you, nominate an articulate spokesperson, and have them do the talking.

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  102. O RLY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I consider buying a soldering gun.

    I'll also do hard time for tampering with it. I will protest the living fuck out of this.

  103. This sort of thing is by Crimius · · Score: 1

    Exceptionally disturbing. A government monitoring all network traffic to/from devices? I haven't looked at the specifications for such a device, but I imagine it would still function in a business environment as well, thus exposing proprietary company secrets in addition to other personal information. Not to mention, I'm sure such devices would easily be capable of feeding data back into computers, providing hackers with a common interface and easy monitoring system in every internet enabled device. No need to go to a coffee shop or hop on somebody's wireless to setup a MitM capture, it's already in place everywhere and you just need to figure out a way to take control of 1 to have access to millions of peoples personal information.

  104. Re:E-Mail to Motti: tiziano.motti@europarl.europa. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Congratulations you have just been registered as a Terrorist.

  105. A real treat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I say, you EU-pussies should go get the bastard and beat him to a bloody fookin' pulp just for the mere suggestion of this abomination.

    Now that.... would be a treat indeed.

  106. All...Canada's......Fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm Canadian, and I think we've already apologised enough for Celine Dion.

    But certainly not enough for William Shatner.

  107. Debating installation on MY computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm flattered. Would have thought they'd have more worthwhile things to debate, or at least limit debate to computers of EU citizens.

  108. Already exists in one form... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Posting AC for reasons that will become obvious.

    I work for a company that provides storage solutions for telcos, one of the things we do with this is called LEA, Law Enforcement Auditing. It's a specific database that tracks what people upload to our storage including file, timestamp, IP, times accessed and IPs of those accessing it. This is deployed or planned to be deployed to all of our customers in the EU, US, South America and Asia, but the only ones pushing for improvements and additions are the Italians.

    tl;dr everything you upload to an ISP storage solution is logged already.

  109. they just want more control over you and I by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The internet has been the biggest threat to the ruling class since the printing press.
    Now they are trying to put the geni back in the bottle as it were.

    A good video about all this can be found here....

    http://www.archive.org/details/WorldSuppressionAndTheTrueFreedomMovement

  110. Re:E-Mail to Motti: tiziano.motti@europarl.europa. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first paragraph looked good, but the rest almost start sounding like a threat.

  111. Be suspicious of suspicious people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Moral indignation - jealousy with a halo. ~ H. G. Wells.

  112. Facepalm.jpg by FyberOptic · · Score: 1

    I love how just because a company comes up with some convoluted piece of software, which likely doesn't even work as advertised due to its nature, that every technology-illiterate politician thinks this is naturally perfect to force onto everyone. For the children, you know. Let's just ignore the fact that even the most basic internet filters don't work properly and install a system onto everyone's machines which can automatically flag them for felonies. That can't possibly lead to false arrest lawsuits, or waste millions of taxpayer dollars implementing and "enforcing."

    Actually, I just now looked up what LogBox is, and now I'm facepalming even more. It's just a corporate logging system, to make a developer or sysadmin's job easier. So what other part of his proposed system lets them detect child pornography or illegal acts? Where does this get reported to? How much storage do you honestly think you could get away with putting in such a device to contain all of the information? Who all has access to that information? Who's paying for it? What happens if I disable it, or simply buy a computer outside of the country which doesn't contain one? What if I tampered with somebody else's device or used their machine to browse child porn sites to intentionally get them in trouble?

    I also guess nobody ever told him that it's impossible to detect if an image is actually child porn if it's an image that the pedo took themselves, so it's not exactly an early warning system of any child being abused. At best, it would let them detect known child porn images already in distribution, but how long did that child have to be abused, photographed, and transmitted around to other pedos before it was entered into a database for matching against?

    Oh well. It's hard for me to imagine what it must be like for people with such a blissful ignorance of technology.

  113. Fascism by TuringCheck · · Score: 1

    Guess where it came from? And how long a history it has...

  114. How about black boxing politicians? by whitroth · · Score: 1

    I propose we logbox all politicians, including their Blackberrys, so we can see who they're doing favors for, and who's paying them for what they do.

                    mark

  115. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought nazism was defeated?

  116. It's not enough! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not put the black box directly on the cameras? Putting it in the computer would just prevent distribution (which would almost immediately be disabled by anyone that is actually committing a crime). We should be more proactive, we need to be more proactive. Every camera should be GPS and internet enabled and notify the authorities immediately of any questionable photographs. Also, put a camera on the back of the camera, and embed a photograph of the photographer in every photo taken. From there, we should take it a step further and insert a black box into the brain of everyone born. Please, someone think of the children.

  117. Black boxes in the cloud? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if the "black box", was in the cloud? One for each person on earth, eligible as having a computer or not.

  118. Blackbox on every computer by xhest · · Score: 1

    I, for one, am looking forward to Blackbox on every computer - or even Fluxbox...

    *badam tsh*

  119. You'd have to pick an area for us by Quila · · Score: 1

    Andrew Jackson for atrocities committed against the natives.

    Franklin Roosevelt for most damage to the future of the country by making the people dependent on government, and don't forget the Japanese internment.

    Out of politics we did have Jim Jones, a communist behind a facade of religion, responsible for the Guyana deaths.

    Any other ideas? I'm sure I've missed some.

  120. I have two words for you by alexo · · Score: 1

    Selective enforcement

  121. Wait, there's a difference? by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1

    ... being a successful politician and a successful manipulator share many of the same traits.

    No, really, I thought successful politician was a subset of successful manipulator. Really. I can't come up with any examples of successful politicians who aren't successful manipulators.

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
  122. Odd... by matthewv789 · · Score: 1

    I thought "1984" was translated into many languages, but they must have never got around to Italian.

  123. Re:E-Mail to Motti: tiziano.motti@europarl.europa. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really? A criminal offense to propose legislation? Are you really that stupid or just trolling?

  124. But its the brains that are the real problem! by Marrow · · Score: 1

    The computers, cameras, network-switches, wires, cables. These are not the problem. Its the brains. We need to Lo-jack everyone's brain so that it explodes when it sees an illegal image. That way there are no design flaws.

  125. Re:E-Mail to Motti: tiziano.motti@europarl.europa. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is an even better idea.

    1. cat /dev/random > DCIM0079.jpg

    2. Anonymously email that file with the following message to tiziano.motti@europarl.europa.eu:

    "Here is that hot 6 year old I told you about. Decrypt with the usual password."

    3. Anonymously tip off the Italian police.

    Obviously you shouldn't do that. But someone could.

  126. Re:When it is easier to molest for real than downl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While I concur that this is a truly atrocious, idiotic proposal for all sorts of reasons, don't make the mistake of thinking that child porn is somehow separate from child molestation. By definition children get molested in the production of child porn.

    A better law would be for irreversible castration and branding of child abusers / pornographers for a first offence, natural life in prison for repeat offenders.

  127. "Trusted" Computing (was Re:Again?) by sowth · · Score: 1

    Yes, but if "Trusted Computing" gains its foothold, your live CD will just be a useless coaster. Wasn't there a recent story saying to get a Windows 8 certification, a computer had to turn on the TPM module on by default? Meaning it wouldn't run an "untrusted" OS unless you shut it off in the BIOS. How long until there is no option in the BIOS to turn it off at all? The day may be coming.

  128. Worry Plenty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "One crackpot idea from an idiot who knows nothing about technology does not constitute a reasonable proposal.

    How do you think we got saddled with the DMCA?

  129. 1984 something... by Tug3 · · Score: 1

    Mr. Motti, I salute you: Sieg Heil!

    --
    If all else fails, pull the plug and get out...
    The Life is out there...
  130. catholic priests should be the priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With that logic. A much higher percentage of priests have been involved in child abuse than computers. The day they log everything a priest does and sees, they are welcome to monitor my computer use.

  131. Unfortunately this could work by Zargs · · Score: 1

    The log-box could in fact be be the holy grail for those who would police the Internet. Any politician worth their salt would immediately recognize the money making potential here. Make the boxes compulsory and suddenly you have an instant market of epic proportions, just think how much money, money for nothing, a politician and his cronies in manufacturing can make from this, then you realize that this has a really good chance of flying.

  132. It's YOUR fault... (and mine) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We all suffer some what from "pedo-hysteria". In this pseudo-anon environment we post freely about these issues but what if this was at the dinner table with extended family? Co Workers? We would all error on the side of "hysteria" to make sure people knew we HATE pedophiles too!!!

    When it's "for the children" you can be assured of two things. The facts are exaggerated (and questioning the facts makes you a child-hater) and also that someone wants more control over you (read: $$$).

    When it's for-the-children and we play fast-and-loose with the facts we can't actually pin point problems and issues that might actually HELP the children, because those problems and issues are obfuscated with hyperbole and hysteria. We are too concerned with NOT appearing sympathetic to the Pedos...

  133. Re:When it is easier to molest for real than downl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes children get molested in the making of child porn and ideally we would want to stop all molestation, but which is better, one paedophile making CP and a thousand wanking over it, or 10% of those thousand finding children to molest because they couldn't get CP to wank over? And I'm sure a lot of CP has already been made, so it isn't like more children need to get molested so paedophiles can have some CP.

    And to be clear, I am not entirely opposed to those involved in sexual abuse of children being castrated, although there are undoubtedly human rights issues with that sort of punishment.

  134. Invasive use of storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While the stated intentions are good, this seems to be a highly invasive use of storage. Everyone should backup their data, but it seems unnecessary for the government to have it readily available at all times. Furthermore, it probably wouldn't be long before users found a clever way around it.

    http://www.mosaictec.com