Slashdot Mirror

Tinder is pretty garbage for men. You're far better off using traditional dating methods than dealing with that hyper competitive world of ultra ridiculous expectations in men where women receive hundreds of responses a day. No thanks, unless you're looking exclusively for hookups, then it's somewhat ok.

https://www.mrctv.org/blog/tin...

Seriously, mere rejection isn't enough, apparently there is a need to actively abuse men. One of the problems with Tinder is that if a woman is looking for an intelligent male, mere use of Tinder disqualifies him.

The Establishment has weaponized the mentally ill to attack anyone who dares speak common sense. In some cases they just outright pay mentally ill people to incite violence. For the most part though, the propaganda works better as you brainwash more of them at once and don't need any direct dealing with them.

And as always, they accuse their opponents of doing what they themselves are doing. Claim they are "inciting violence" with their "hate speech and rhetoric".

Also, to be blunt, women do better academically than men. The reason's really simple: girls calm down and start studying and an earlier age than boys so they get an extra year or two of education.

There are many reasons, but let me point out a couple of glaring ones:
1) There are plenty of "for women" scholarships and numerous women only programs, even though it is at least 55% girls vs 45% boys in colleges (and growing)
2) Strong gender bias among teachers who happen, hold on a second, be mostly women (it gets hilarious at times and she isn't even fired, by the way)
3) Education concept of "listen, remember and do what I say" not well suited for boys and men
4) When girls fall behind, system is being changed to address it vs no fucks given when boys are disadvantaged

The first time "but what about boys" was asked, was nearly 3 decades ago, an equity feminist (rare type), Christina Sommers wrote "The War Against Boys" book calling out lies in mainstream "myth of shortchanged girls".. She predicted the gap will only widen, and, hey, look, we are soon to hit 60% vs 40% "more equality". (UN for Women sounds alarm when there is 5% gap in boys favor (it still happens in crazy places like Sudan).

San Francisco has a massive homeless pooping problem . Even the mayor admits that, "There’s More Feces Than I’ve Ever Seen".

I'm pretty damn sure that the world ended in 2015 just like they predicted.

https://www.mrctv.org/videos/f...

If you don't believe that New York was underwater 24/7/365 BECAUSE CLIMATE CHANGE they clearly you are a science denier.

Facebook banned Bosch Fawstin, winner of the Draw Mohammed contest that was attacked by terrorists

Facebook censored war correspondant Michael Yon

Facebook bans Arab atheist pages

Facebook banned Anonymous Germany for posting police statistics about immigrant crime

Facebook suspended a Dutch MP for criticizing Recep Tayyip Erdogan

Facebook suspended Syrian blogger PartisanGirl for making fun or ISIS

Facebook banned a guy for calling the Muslim Brotherhood liars

Facebook banned a liberal Muslim Shireen Qudosi for insulting a member of the Muslim Brotherhood front CAIR.

Facebook suspended Stop Islamization of America for opposing the massacre at an Orlando gay bar

Facebook banned Gaystream for opposing the massacre at an Orlando gay bar

Facebook banned a researcher for reporting on crime by Muslim immigrants in Sweden

Facebook censors a news article exposing the racist words of a Muslim activist.

Facebook finds that the page Stab Zionists meets their community standards and refuses to remove it.

If someone wants to look for foreign interference in Facebook, they should start with the moderation staff.

The kids are not alright.

LOL! The wiki article is just a collection of the same unsubstantiated BS that the MSM has been slinging around for the past 6 months. "Intelligence agencies" said so, therefore it's fact, eh pleb? The same intelligence agencies that severely discredited themselves over the past decade or so and provide proof like "the hacks happened at night, which is daytime in Moscow. Therefore... Russians!"

But, that's not to say skullduggery didn't occur during the elections. Indeed, there were some evil actors attempting to rig it.

Here's some hard, video evidence for ya, and admission of cheating in the debates in order to deceive voters about their candidate's diplomacy skills. But it implicates the DNC and not the Russians, so I'm sure you'll go apeshit and start frothing at the mouth, claiming it's all a conspiracy.

Oh, and if you're going to claim the Veritas videos are doctored: Prove it or STFU.

I laughed out loud the first time I heard Trump say "clean" coal.

Were you laughing out loud when Hillary said this.

Lest we forget she was for "clean-coal" (running against Obama) before she was against it (running against Sanders)...

Politicians say whatever they think that will get them elected. Even if it's "funny"... :^(

Thanks Trump!

Don't forget Bush! Obama inherited DEA from his predecessor, didn't he? 8 years of Presidency is not enough to fix a federal law-enforcement agency, especially if you pick Attorney Generals for their Social Justice credentials, rather than the ability to run a sizeable organization. (An ability, Obama himself never had either.)

And, unlike closing Guantanamo, Obama never even promised to reign-in the Drug Enforcement Administration — so we can't hold him responsible for its abuses, can we?

No one is going to ban honest criticism or the expression of opinions. But they ARE going to ban threats of violence or inciting others to commit violence.

Sorry, you're wrong on the facts and that is indeed what is going on.

http://www.legal-project.org/4...

http://www.breitbart.com/londo...

http://heatst.com/tech/faceboo...

http://www.breitbart.com/big-g...

http://www.breitbart.com/tech/...

http://www.mrctv.org/blog/main...

http://christophercantwell.com...

If you cannot see the difference, go DIAF.

I love the hypocrisy of commanding me to "die in a fire" if I don't agree with your position.

I'll leave this here. Short and explains a lot. http://www.mrctv.org/embed/127...

you are twisting what peoples fears are, people are not in fear of transwomen, people are in fear of men, using this loophole to go peeping. which has already happened http://www.mrctv.org/blog/univ... . if you are going to argue what others are worried about, please get it right

What I found is even worse than that: "the rate of oxygen production by photosynthesis was slower in the Precambrian, and the concentrations of O2 attained were less than 10% of today's".

But the current hysteria is not about oxygen levels changing from 2% to 21% over any timescale; it's about CO2 levels changing from 0.028% to 0.045% -- while much larger changes have occurred naturally, over much shorter timescales than billions of years.

Humans are eminently adaptable. Even prehistoric humans found ways to survive in an incredibly diverse spectrum of environments, from the Sahara to the high Arctic.

I could get into how none of the climate models have proved correct, and none of the predictions made my climate doomsayers have come true. How many times do you have to hear a "climate expert" say something like "all the glaciers in region X will have melted by 2007" -- when in reality, nine years after that prediction's expiration date, all the glaciers in region X look pretty much like they always have -- before you begin to question the legitimacy of climate experts? Quoting David French,

In January, 2006 -- when promoting his Oscar-winning (yes, Oscar-winning) documentary, An Inconvenient Truth -- Gore declared that unless we took "drastic measures" to reduce greenhouse gasses, the world would reach a "point of no return" in a mere ten years. He called it a "true planetary emergency." Well, the ten years passed today, we're still here, and the climate activists have postponed the apocalypse. Again.

Gore's prediction fits right in with the rest of his comrades in the wild-eyed environmentalist movement. There's a veritable online cottage industry cataloging hysterical, failed predictions of environmentalist catastrophe. Over at the American Enterprise Institute, Mark Perry keeps his list of "18 spectacularly wrong apocalyptic predictions" made around the original Earth Day in 1970. Robert Tracinski at The Federalist has a nice list of "Seven big failed environmentalist predictions." The Daily Caller's "25 years of predicting the global warming 'tipping point'" makes for amusing reading, including one declaration that we had mere "hours to act" to "avert a slow-motion tsunami."

But for sheer vivid lunacy, nothing matches this Good Morning America report from 2008. The images show Manhattan shrinking against the onslaught of the rising seas -- in 2015. Last year. Gasoline was supposed to be $9 per gallon. Milk would cost almost $13 per gallon. Wildfires would rage, hurricanes would strike with ever-greater intensity. By the end of the clip I was expecting to see the esteemed doctors Peter Venkman, Egon Spengler, and Ray Stantz step forward to predict, "Rivers and Seas boiling!" "Forty years of darkness!" And of course the ultimate disasters: "Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together . . . Mass hysteria!"

Can we ignore them yet? Apparently not. Being a climate hysteric means never having to say you're sorry. Simply change the cataclysm -- Overpopulation! No, global cooling! No, global warming! No, climate change! -- push the apocalypse back just a few more years, and you're in business, big business.

In reality, I respect the wild-eyed rapture-pastors far more than the climate hysterics. They merely ask me to believe, they don't use the power of government to dictate how I live. Pastors aren't circumventing the democratic process to impose dangerous and job-killing environmental regulations.

Not corrupt? LOL Top 10 Scandals Hillary was involved in: http://www.mrctv.org/blog/10-s...

They don't need to "get together to conspire". They have all been educated in the party line and they follow it without question.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/...

http://www.mrctv.org/blog/libe...

Or are you going to deny the fact that colleges have a completely lopsided political composition despite the self-described politics of the people who work there? "They can't have a liberal bias because that would require colleges to get together and engage in a gigantic conspiracy?"

Prepare your tinfoil hat dudes because lots of pieces of information are starting to come together.

If we take McAfee's findings as true (which they appear to be) then Iran is preparing the capability of conducting a massive chemical attack on the United States. I will now present the threads of evidence for you to consider.

• Motivation: it is well know that the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), a 57 country body, seeks to establish Sharia (Islamic Law) worldwide.
• Legal basis: the OIC defines "terrorism" only as non-lawful attacks made by non-Muslims against Muslims. Attacks made by jihadis supporting Sharia are considered lawful. The 9/11 attack is considered lawful under this basis. A ricin WMD attack by Hezbollah through Mexico would also be considered lawful by the OIC. Here is a 75-minute video by intelligence Major Stepehen Coughlin (retired) where he covers the legal concepts the OIC use (for fans of Orwell, the OIC are masters of doublespeak): http://www.mrctv.org/videos/stephen-coughlin-oic-brief [the first 55 seconds of the video is blank, please skip past it]
• Jurisdiction: The OIC claims jurisdiction over all Muslims. It also claims jurisdiction over non-Muslims engaging in "Islamophobia" (which the OIC defines as anything opposing the Sharia, eg. the US Constitution). Hence they essentially claim global jurisdiction. See the same video in the previous point for the discussion about this.
• Agents: Hezbollah are Iran's agents. They don't do anything without Iran's say so.
• Iran: Iran wishes to destroy the US, Israel and the Western way of life - it says so every day (it is trivial to find YouTube videos that show this). It appears Iran is preparing multiple ways to do this: a nuclear track and McAfee has uncovered a ricin WMD attack. See: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=px2CvPySHSs (with the input of a moderate Muslim, they're not all bad).
• US complicity: The State Department, White House and US military senior leadership (eg, after the Fort Hood massacre) appear to believe that intolerance of Muslims is a greater threat than the threat of jihadi terrorism. They are suppressing the information that independent researchers discover. They also vilify these researchers despite *facts* being uncovered. The State Department is currently (and probably unintentionally) advancing the cause of Islam by suppressing facts that are emerging and not standing up for the 1st Amendment (Free Speech) Rights of US citizens, instead suggesting things like Hillary Clinton's "naming and shaming" campaigns. This is a disgraceful position to suppress the lawful Free Speech rights of US citizens in their own country to appease foreign islamic powers. Conclusion: the State Department in the current administration is misguided and currently working *against the interests* of US citizens.
• US media: the US media are trying to promote tolerance of Islam to the point they overlook and suppress the significance of events happening around the world. Global media are self-censoring (notice how they pixellate out the image, where is Free Speech in the press?): http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2256690/Magazine-firebombed-printing-satirical-Sharia-edition-France-publishes-Prophet-Mohammed-cartoon-book.html
• False narrative: there is a false narrative that the threat to the US is caused by "radical Islam". While there are moderate Muslims (good people) there is no disagreement as to what the Qur'an and hadiths say. The problem is Islam. As Turkey's Erdogan famously said recently, "There is no moderate or immoderate Islam. Islam is Islam and that’s it.". It is important to understand that the

Planning on going to the polls after work today. The boss is letting us leave early to vote after I suggested he do so, so yay for me. Then Minecraft time!
Here's just a few of the stories about shenanigans today.
Philly GOP: Poll inspectors being ousted for Dems
Election Judge Wears Obama Cap While Checking in Voters in Obama's Chicago Ward
GOP - Poll watcher in Detroit threatened with gun, 911 call rejected
Former DNC Chair Howard Dean: The Only Way We Lose Is Through Fraud
Obama Poster Hanging in Florida Polling Station
GOP officials booted, Black Panthers return -- and Obama at polling site?

http://video.foxnews.com/v/4475823/death-panel-deception
http://video.foxnews.com/v/4475253/death-panel-comeback
http://video.foxnews.com/v/4313344/first-sign-of-death-panels
http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert/beck-has-happy-fearmongering-session
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ac3_1251310849
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MSI4RTWRTxo
http://video.foxnews.com/v/4475784/return-of-death-panels/?playlist_id=87937
http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201101020001
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkbzoGZTelU
http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201101060003
http://www.mrctv.org/videos/glenn-beck-ny-times-vindicates-death-panels-foxnews-2010-10-04

You were saying?

Do you want more? Because I can show you a lot more death panel videos from Fox.

Oh by the way, you might find this interesting:

http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/romenesko/110179/memos-reveal-how-fox-news-spun-the-health-care-debate/