Slashdot Mirror

A quick look at [uptime.netcraft.com] shows that a telia server has been up for about 3.7 years, 1369 days to be exact. Now this is just for known sites, who knows about some mainframe or server sitting out in the desert underground somewhere. My bet is 5 years is about the max uptime anyone has achieved.

Well maybe there not searching on google because there to busy
or setting up internet sites

All you've shown is search patterns.

Maybe the OSS changes less or has better help/forums than commercial software, so there's less need to search on google to solve your problems?

The funny thing is that the Disney.com website "powered by HP" is running Microsoft IIS on Win2k. See netcraft here

rant -
The ex-Starwave group has yet to die or see the light, hence the continued reliance on unscalable crap. Their internally developed software is much worse that you can imagine. Too bad they threw away all the cool technology Infoseek had.

And whatever happened to the Compaq deal ?

Why don't you go over to NetCraft to find out?

This all depends on what you think that the purpose of life is. If you are one of the strange people who think that life is about gathering as much money as possible then time is money, work hard, la la la. If you think (I'm in this category) that you should strive to be happy, make others happy (or at least don't make them unhappy unless they deserve it), and try to make the world even slightly better, then writing software and giving it away is well worth the time you put into it. You enjoy your hobby, get cool software, and other people get software too! You also get software from people with a similar philosophy. And yes, some free stuff is as good as or better than any commercial counterpart. Some examples that are hard to dispute are Hello World and ls. Some debatable ones are Python (a great language, much better than Visual Basic IMO) and Apache (which runs on almost all of the web servers with top uptime, according to netcraft.

goatse.cx runs linux

The now DEAD Bsd Daemon is wanted for its history of Penguin rape If you see him please shove his head up here Remember that goatse.cx runs on linux, not DeadBSD

Thank you for your cooperation.

You pro-Free Software people can be so brainwashed that you are retarded.

eBay runs IIS. Hear that? eBay RUNS IIS!

The site cgi.ebay.com is running Microsoft-IIS/4.0 on NT4/Windows 98.

Grow some pubes, please.

http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph/?host=www.gart ner.com

Hey, I thought the big selling point of BSD was that there are no holes in it. That looks like a pretty big hole on the goatse.cx page!

The site goatse.cx is running Apache/1.3.23 (Unix) on Linux

According to Netcraft

Yeah, that's because Apache isn't the fastest kid on the block, especially under a heavy load - I'd love to find out how various web servers handle being slashdotted.

More stuff here.

(yes, I am assuming that Rapidsite/Apa is an Apache variant. Am I wrong? I can't find any info on their website about their httpd server software.)

MjM

The site www.greens.org is running Apache/1.3.24 (Unix) PHP/4.2.1 on Linux

see for yourself

He's right: Apache has about double the market share of IIS. Mind you, about half of those Apache servers run on Windows, but it doesn't matter: Apache is OSS. So in this it seems market exposure is not a factor in determining the number of exploits and/or viruses plaguing IIS...and the proof that OSS can be as secure (if not more) than proprietary software.

More interesting is the load of other sites hosted by the same company (same box?) This Netcraft list proves quite usefull. The list includes www.illegal.com, www.wife-beaters.com, and www.vandals.com. I just thought that was interesting.

From Netcraft

"The site 24-6-206.wireless.lcs.mit.edu is running thttpd/2.20c 21nov01 on Linux.

Linux users include Rackspace, www.dialtone.com, www.vasoftware.com and Borders.com

We have no uptime data for 24-6-206.wireless.lcs.mit.edu at present, and cannot plot a graph.

The host 24-6-206.wireless.lcs.mit.edu has been added to the list of sites that we may monitor. We will start monitoring 24-6-206.wireless.lcs.mit.edu in the next daily monitoring cycle.

We will continue to monitor this host for a few days, to get enough values to plot a graph. After this time the host will not be monitored again unless it's requested again, or it is one of the most frequently requested hosts."

So for those that are intersted, keep checking this on Netcraft to see on the sitability of the wireless iPac as a hosting platform, you could even compare it to slashdot's uptime.

perhaps they will have as much joy as the Saltlake City Winter games site.

netcraft

The more acceptance OSS gains, the worse trolling from M$ monkeys we'll see. When that graph reaches critical peak it will start declining at a very, very steep angle, hopefully bringing down M$, as well.

/.ers got used to trolls but I expect 700+ posts here, anyway.

They're not running their touted monoculture on their own web servers!

Originally posted by noahm:
You won't likely see a real-world web site run on thttpd or something.

There is no need for a web server to be running anything [on an open port] other than Apache.

What about Roxen? What about AOLserver? What about the hypothetical future complete rewrite of IIS? And what about Other?

Hmm...

Sounds like kill9 and m0rla got into the true spirit of the competition.

According to Netcraft , www.kdworks.co.kr was running IIS 5.0 since April.

(or look here if you don't believe me)

Hmm...

Sounds like kill9 and m0rla got into the true spirit of the competition.

According to Netcraft , www.kdworks.co.kr was running IIS 5.0 since April.

(or look here if you don't believe me)

-CPM

The site www.stallman.org is running Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) on FreeBSD.
Netcraft check of www.stallman.org

Also interstingly enough, SuSE 8.0 was fully LSB compliant, the first commercial distro to be so.

My guess is that the base OS will be SuSE. Who's management tools they decide to go with is still anyone's guess. Maybe it'll be a whole new set entirely.

Searches take entirely too long (about ten seconds. May not seem like alot, but it adds up) and the main page is Flash galore. You are also redirected immediately when you enter, so you have to hit "back" *realfast* to get back to Slashdot. The idea of presenting results as a web is kinda neat, but it ends at "kinda neat." The results are confusing and look disturbingly similar to the area of the computer tables behind my three computers--everything interconnected and difficult to follow.

I commend them on creating an original and refreshingly different idea in search engines, but I doubt Google has anything to worry about.

At least they run Linux

It is crap, its so crap infact, that the OpenBsd website runs on Solaris!

Netcraft tells it all!

BSD IS DYING! Linux rules!

no lets not:

Developer: March %: April %: %change
Apache 53.76 56.38 +2.62
Microsoft 34.02 31.96 -2.06
Zeus 2. 24 2.26 +0 . 2
iPlanet 2.33 2.21 -0 . 2

looks like microsoft should still be fearing apache rather a lot more than iPlanet, Zeus or thttpd for actual use which is after all what counts. source: netcraft Survey April 2002

Bsd is crap! Its so crap infact that the OpenBSD project runs on Solaris

Bsd is dead
Linux sucks
Mac OS X is expensive
Windows is fucked
Is there any sane OS?
Yes, and its name is MSDOS 1.10

The Social Security Administration's webserver (www.ssa.gov) undergoes a reboot every 3 days on average! Haha, even the SS bastards have problems!

Hey, its not really fair to just out Beverton as the only district running *nix on their servers. Here is what Netcraft says about other Oregon School Districts:

Starting with the MS supporters we have:
Lake Oswego is running IIS 5.0 on Win2k
Hillsboro is running IIS 5.0 on Win2k

And now on to the *nix supporters:
Eugene is running Apache 1.3.12 with php and ssl on Solaris 8
Tigard is running Apache 1.3.22 with php ssl and perl on Red Hat (I really wish netcraft would be more specific on os versions, oh well)
Portland is running Apache 1.3.24 with php and perl on "linux" (wont say which distro)
Gresham is running WebSTAR (whatever the hell that is) on "Linux"
I'm asuming that Oregon City is running AppleShareIP 6.3.1 on Linux since it has two history entries as such, as well as two unknowns (which is what it is reporting now)

Including Beaverton, that makes it 3:1 in favor of *nix on servers of major Oregon School Districts

Yes, I do live in Oregon, and yes I do go to a Beaverton School but I did have to use the power of google for most of those links

Hey, its not really fair to just out Beverton as the only district running *nix on their servers. Here is what Netcraft says about other Oregon School Districts:

Starting with the MS supporters we have:
Lake Oswego is running IIS 5.0 on Win2k
Hillsboro is running IIS 5.0 on Win2k

And now on to the *nix supporters:
Eugene is running Apache 1.3.12 with php and ssl on Solaris 8
Tigard is running Apache 1.3.22 with php ssl and perl on Red Hat (I really wish netcraft would be more specific on os versions, oh well)
Portland is running Apache 1.3.24 with php and perl on "linux" (wont say which distro)
Gresham is running WebSTAR (whatever the hell that is) on "Linux"
I'm asuming that Oregon City is running AppleShareIP 6.3.1 on Linux since it has two history entries as such, as well as two unknowns (which is what it is reporting now)

Including Beaverton, that makes it 3:1 in favor of *nix on servers of major Oregon School Districts

Yes, I do live in Oregon, and yes I do go to a Beaverton School but I did have to use the power of google for most of those links

Hey, its not really fair to just out Beverton as the only district running *nix on their servers. Here is what Netcraft says about other Oregon School Districts:

Starting with the MS supporters we have:
Lake Oswego is running IIS 5.0 on Win2k
Hillsboro is running IIS 5.0 on Win2k

And now on to the *nix supporters:
Eugene is running Apache 1.3.12 with php and ssl on Solaris 8
Tigard is running Apache 1.3.22 with php ssl and perl on Red Hat (I really wish netcraft would be more specific on os versions, oh well)
Portland is running Apache 1.3.24 with php and perl on "linux" (wont say which distro)
Gresham is running WebSTAR (whatever the hell that is) on "Linux"
I'm asuming that Oregon City is running AppleShareIP 6.3.1 on Linux since it has two history entries as such, as well as two unknowns (which is what it is reporting now)

Including Beaverton, that makes it 3:1 in favor of *nix on servers of major Oregon School Districts

Yes, I do live in Oregon, and yes I do go to a Beaverton School but I did have to use the power of google for most of those links

Hey, its not really fair to just out Beverton as the only district running *nix on their servers. Here is what Netcraft says about other Oregon School Districts:

Starting with the MS supporters we have:
Lake Oswego is running IIS 5.0 on Win2k
Hillsboro is running IIS 5.0 on Win2k

And now on to the *nix supporters:
Eugene is running Apache 1.3.12 with php and ssl on Solaris 8
Tigard is running Apache 1.3.22 with php ssl and perl on Red Hat (I really wish netcraft would be more specific on os versions, oh well)
Portland is running Apache 1.3.24 with php and perl on "linux" (wont say which distro)
Gresham is running WebSTAR (whatever the hell that is) on "Linux"
I'm asuming that Oregon City is running AppleShareIP 6.3.1 on Linux since it has two history entries as such, as well as two unknowns (which is what it is reporting now)

Including Beaverton, that makes it 3:1 in favor of *nix on servers of major Oregon School Districts

Yes, I do live in Oregon, and yes I do go to a Beaverton School but I did have to use the power of google for most of those links

Hey, its not really fair to just out Beverton as the only district running *nix on their servers. Here is what Netcraft says about other Oregon School Districts:

Starting with the MS supporters we have:
Lake Oswego is running IIS 5.0 on Win2k
Hillsboro is running IIS 5.0 on Win2k

And now on to the *nix supporters:
Eugene is running Apache 1.3.12 with php and ssl on Solaris 8
Tigard is running Apache 1.3.22 with php ssl and perl on Red Hat (I really wish netcraft would be more specific on os versions, oh well)
Portland is running Apache 1.3.24 with php and perl on "linux" (wont say which distro)
Gresham is running WebSTAR (whatever the hell that is) on "Linux"
I'm asuming that Oregon City is running AppleShareIP 6.3.1 on Linux since it has two history entries as such, as well as two unknowns (which is what it is reporting now)

Including Beaverton, that makes it 3:1 in favor of *nix on servers of major Oregon School Districts

Yes, I do live in Oregon, and yes I do go to a Beaverton School but I did have to use the power of google for most of those links

Hey, its not really fair to just out Beverton as the only district running *nix on their servers. Here is what Netcraft says about other Oregon School Districts:

Starting with the MS supporters we have:
Lake Oswego is running IIS 5.0 on Win2k
Hillsboro is running IIS 5.0 on Win2k

And now on to the *nix supporters:
Eugene is running Apache 1.3.12 with php and ssl on Solaris 8
Tigard is running Apache 1.3.22 with php ssl and perl on Red Hat (I really wish netcraft would be more specific on os versions, oh well)
Portland is running Apache 1.3.24 with php and perl on "linux" (wont say which distro)
Gresham is running WebSTAR (whatever the hell that is) on "Linux"
I'm asuming that Oregon City is running AppleShareIP 6.3.1 on Linux since it has two history entries as such, as well as two unknowns (which is what it is reporting now)

Including Beaverton, that makes it 3:1 in favor of *nix on servers of major Oregon School Districts

Yes, I do live in Oregon, and yes I do go to a Beaverton School but I did have to use the power of google for most of those links

Hey, its not really fair to just out Beverton as the only district running *nix on their servers. Here is what Netcraft says about other Oregon School Districts:

Starting with the MS supporters we have:
Lake Oswego is running IIS 5.0 on Win2k
Hillsboro is running IIS 5.0 on Win2k

And now on to the *nix supporters:
Eugene is running Apache 1.3.12 with php and ssl on Solaris 8
Tigard is running Apache 1.3.22 with php ssl and perl on Red Hat (I really wish netcraft would be more specific on os versions, oh well)
Portland is running Apache 1.3.24 with php and perl on "linux" (wont say which distro)
Gresham is running WebSTAR (whatever the hell that is) on "Linux"
I'm asuming that Oregon City is running AppleShareIP 6.3.1 on Linux since it has two history entries as such, as well as two unknowns (which is what it is reporting now)

Including Beaverton, that makes it 3:1 in favor of *nix on servers of major Oregon School Districts

Yes, I do live in Oregon, and yes I do go to a Beaverton School but I did have to use the power of google for most of those links

Hey, its not really fair to just out Beverton as the only district running *nix on their servers. Here is what Netcraft says about other Oregon School Districts:

Starting with the MS supporters we have:
Lake Oswego is running IIS 5.0 on Win2k
Hillsboro is running IIS 5.0 on Win2k

And now on to the *nix supporters:
Eugene is running Apache 1.3.12 with php and ssl on Solaris 8
Tigard is running Apache 1.3.22 with php ssl and perl on Red Hat (I really wish netcraft would be more specific on os versions, oh well)
Portland is running Apache 1.3.24 with php and perl on "linux" (wont say which distro)
Gresham is running WebSTAR (whatever the hell that is) on "Linux"
I'm asuming that Oregon City is running AppleShareIP 6.3.1 on Linux since it has two history entries as such, as well as two unknowns (which is what it is reporting now)

Including Beaverton, that makes it 3:1 in favor of *nix on servers of major Oregon School Districts

Yes, I do live in Oregon, and yes I do go to a Beaverton School but I did have to use the power of google for most of those links

According to the Netcraft poke, http://www.beavton.k12.or.us, the public webserver for the Beaverton (Oregon) School District, runs Linux/Apache. Interesting. Guess the ban on non-Windows and non-Mac machines doesn't extend to things that actually require stability. :)

-SymphonicMan

According to the Netcraft poke, http://www.beavton.k12.or.us, the public webserver for the Beaverton (Oregon) School District, runs Linux/Apache. Interesting. Guess the ban on non-Windows and non-Mac machines doesn't extend to things that actually require stability. :)

-SymphonicMan

The site smallbusiness.yahoo.com is running unknown on FreeBSD.

1) Go to hotmail.com
2) Note the "Sign Up" link and where it points to
3) You will see the IP address 216.32.182.250
4) Go to Netcraft. You will see that Hotmail's back end is still FreeBSD.

Apache gained 2.63% and IIS fell 2.06%. However, the previous month showed an even larger change in Microsoft's favor, so Apache is (quickly) making up for lost ground, as discussed before. Was this turnaround due to the release of Apache 2.0?

According to the Netcraft Web Server Survey page, the drop in IIS over the past month was due to a change in Homestead.com's policies:

Microsoft drop back a couple of percentage points this month, primarily attributable to the reaping of around a million expired sites at homestead.com. Homestead used to offer limited free hosting supported by advertising, but has revised its business model. As of April 15th has announced that it is migrating to a traditional paid-for services model.

--Cycon

Slashdot is running Apache/1.3.20 (Unix) mod_perl/1.25 mod_gzip/1.3.19.1a on Linux.

...run on Linux

Perhaps if you read this, you might be better informed

Well you also have This Which clearly shows www.msf.microsoft.com running Linux and Apache. Also the march survey shows several hosts at the bottom which run linux.. but this page seems to be broken, perhaps covered up in embarassment.

Well you also have This Which clearly shows www.msf.microsoft.com running Linux and Apache. Also the march survey shows several hosts at the bottom which run linux.. but this page seems to be broken, perhaps covered up in embarassment.