Slashdot Mirror


Linux at Industrial Light and Magic

Nicholas DePetrillo writes "Linux Journal has a big story about how LINUX is being used in hollywood, specificly at Industrial Light and Magic with some GREAT screenshots and a very descriptive article with configuration details." Word has it that their rendering farms have gotten even bigger since this article was published.

272 comments

  1. anology - Star Wars -- Linux by dirvish · · Score: 3, Funny

    Could there be some kind of anology between the light side vs the dark side and Linux vs Microsoft.

    Would that make Bill Vader? Which distro is Obi Wan Kanobi?

    1. Re:anology - Star Wars -- Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obi Wan Kenobi

      Suck the source.

      YHBT, HTH, HAND, FOAD.

    2. Re:anology - Star Wars -- Linux by msaavedra · · Score: 2, Funny
      Would that make Bill Vader? Which distro is Obi Wan Kanobi?
      No, everyone knows that Eric S. Raymond is Obi-Wan Kenobi.
      --
      "Any fool can make a rule, and any fool will mind it."
      --Henry David Thoreau
    3. Re:anology - Star Wars -- Linux by hagardtroll · · Score: 2

      Jar Jar binks goes over to the dark side to take over Microsoft. Developers! Developers! Developers! Developers!

    4. Re:anology - Star Wars -- Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ohh, dude, you've lit up my "light saber!" Grab my "force" and we'll thrust it into our enemas^H^H^H^H^H^Henemies (whichever cranks your tractor, if you know what I mean - Bubba)

    5. Re:anology - Star Wars -- Linux by Wudbaer · · Score: 4, Funny

      So Bill Gates is Linus Torvald's father ? Omygod !

    6. Re:anology - Star Wars -- Linux by Maax · · Score: 2

      So let's hope that Episode III isn't even darker than we expect:

      Obi-wan never told you, who rendered your father....

    7. Re:anology - Star Wars -- Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The analogy works pretty much both ways, with linux being represented by a toy doll (yoda) and artificial life (jar jar).

      You wanna bet that this gets modded troll? ;-)

    8. Re:anology - Star Wars -- Linux by be-fan · · Score: 2

      Who cares? I just want to know which distro is Natalie Portman...

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    9. Re:anology - Star Wars -- Linux by Rupert · · Score: 0

      I hope it's not Slackware.

      OMG that was horrible. Turning off the +1 bonus now!

      --

      --
      E_NOSIG
    10. Re:anology - Star Wars -- Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "So Bill Gates is Linus Torvald's father ? Omygod !"

      Shades of Spaceballs...

      Bill (to Linus): I'm your father's, brother's, cousin's roomate!

      Linus: Ah, so...what does that mean?

      Bill: Absolutely nothing!

  2. Graphics are great by ObviousGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Action is great!

    Music isn't bad!

    Acting is pathetic.

    No amount of eye candy will ever make the prequels worth watching as standalone movies.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:Graphics are great by telstar · · Score: 2

      Maybe you missed episodes IV, V, and VI ...
      The acting was pretty piss poor in those too.

    2. Re:Graphics are great by ObviousGuy · · Score: 1

      I agree that the acting was pretty bad in all the movies. However, the storytelling in episode IV was good enough as a standalone movie and V probably also falls into that category.

      Now Ewoks? It definitely doesn't stand on its own merits.

      --
      I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    3. Re:Graphics are great by telstar · · Score: 2
      Now Ewoks? It definitely doesn't stand on its own merits.
      • Yeah, but it sure sold toys...
    4. Re:Graphics are great by hagardtroll · · Score: 1

      We also haven't heard your opinion on the televised Star Wars Holiday special.

    5. Re:Graphics are great by Bladerunner2037 · · Score: 1

      What frightens me most is that I SAW THAT...and WANTED to see it. Help me Obi-Wan..

      --
      -- oodabadabaY
    6. Re:Graphics are great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Action is great!

      Music isn't bad!

      Acting is pathetic.

      No amount of eye candy will ever make the prequels worth watching as standalone movies.


      This from user "ObviousGuy". You know, buddy, just because you're right, that doesn't mean you're not a well-calculated troll :)

  3. But they don't use LINUX by 1015 · · Score: 1

    They use GNU/Linux

    1. Re:But they don't use LINUX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you Eric S. Raymond!

  4. slashdotted after 2 comments by bilbobuggins · · Score: 5, Funny

    'Linux Journal' no less.
    we must never speak of this again
    ;)

    1. Re:slashdotted after 2 comments by ivrcti · · Score: 1

      An alias from LOTR and a sig from The Killer Angels.... Me thinks thou wouldst be a hero...

    2. Re:slashdotted after 2 comments by bteeter · · Score: 1

      If it was hosted on one of our beefy web servers, it wouldn't have died so easily.

      I think Linux Journal needs to get some (more?) VC so they can upgrade their puny web servers. Or maybe we should all be buying the magazine if we read it online as someone here suggested. :-)

      Take care,

      Brian

    3. Re:slashdotted after 2 comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to the real world, Linux isn't good for much besides small backwater servers like weblogs.

    4. Re:slashdotted after 2 comments by fdisk3hs · · Score: 1

      Does anybody have the article on a different site? Will it ever come back up?

      Reminds me of Banjo... :)

    5. Re:slashdotted after 2 comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An alias from B oTR, knave!
      Now get out of my comic book shop!

    6. Re:slashdotted after 2 comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And top quality movie special effects, in case you missed that part. ;)

  5. dead already! by banky · · Score: 2

    2 comments and it's down already. I don't know which is worse: the old days where no one read the freaking articles, or how now the only people who get to read them are the First Post guys.

    --
    ZOMG I WOULD LOVE TO KNOW ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS ON MACINTOSH VERSUS WINDOWS, VI VERSUS EMACS, AND HOW YOU'RE NOT A DORK
    1. Re:dead already! by mithras+the+prophet · · Score: 1

      I think the problem is PHP and its ilk. In the old days, everyone hand-crafted each page, and they were all static.

      Nowadays, everybody's got to be running a fancy-pants database-driven site, and consequently their server chokes under even a moderate load.

      Back to the days of copy-and-paste templating, I say!

      --
      four nine eighteen twenty-7 thirty-nine forty-7 fiftyeight sixty-nine seventy-9 eighty-8 one-hundred-and-nine one-twenty
    2. Re:dead already! by chrisd · · Score: 2
      I'll give you that static pages are always faster then php, but you can't blame ljs problems on it, you can blame it on ljs lack of planning, I mean, they had to know we'd slashdot this.

      chrisd

      --
      Co-Editor, Open Sources
      Open Source Program Manager, Google, Inc.
  6. They'll have to stop using Linux by 1010011010 · · Score: 4, Funny

    They'll have to stop using Linux right after they outlaw it.

    I'm assuming that would be the case, anyway.

    --
    Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    1. Re:They'll have to stop using Linux by donglekey · · Score: 1

      I am sick and tired of "Hollywood is a hypocrite for using Linux!" comments. The only remotly relevant comparison would be if Sony Pictures Imageworks started using a whole lot of Linux, which very well may happen, but until the article is on that, no more of this please. I know you are being sarcastic, but I know others really think this. Come to think of it, Sony is using Linux for the PS2 huh? This is AOL/TimeWarner suing themsevles over Gnutella all over again, but NOT RELEVANT TO THIS ARTICLE!

    2. Re:They'll have to stop using Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Lucas himself has never had anything to say on DRM?

    3. Re:They'll have to stop using Linux by Charleton+Heston · · Score: 2, Funny

      Remember, it's your responsibility and your Second Ammendment right to defend Linux by owning a firearm, and also by joining the organization that I am proud to be the president of: the NRA.

      --
      ======
      Get your stinking paws off me, you damned dirty ape!
  7. Support Linux Journal by Burgundy+Advocate · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Remember everybody, if you like the article then please buy the magazine! The articles, while provided free of charge, do not magically appear.

    If you want more great articles like this, support Linux Journal. I know the idea of paying for something might go against some people's sensibilities (information wants to be FREEEEEEE!!! and such), but remember that in real life people need to eat. Please don't let the fine people at Linux Journal starve. Buy a magazine.

    Please. Do it for the authors.

    --
    Dragging people kicking and screaming into reality since 1996.
    1. Re:Support Linux Journal by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      Remember everybody, if you like the article then please buy the magazine! The articles, while provided free of charge, do not magically appear. If you want more great articles like this, support Linux Journal. I know the idea of paying for something might go against some people's sensibilities (information wants to be FREEEEEEE!!! and such), but remember that in real life people need to eat. Please don't let the fine people at Linux Journal starve. Buy a magazine.

      Sorry, I'm peeved with them. I had subscribed for two years, but had to cancel mid-stream due to some financial constraints (yeah, it got tight). I never got a refund. I called up, and was told that I hadn't paid yet. I said I did, and referred back to my credit card statement, and the lady sneeringly told me, "no you haven't!" Boy, was I surprised at that! So I said to myself, "I am never dealing with LJ again." I took the thirty dollar loss, figuring it was worth avoiding dealing with LJ.

      Not that I'm suggesting anyone _not_ buy it. I'm just saying, _I_ ain't buying.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    2. Re:Support Linux Journal by Cylix · · Score: 2

      But I do!

      I buy Linux Journal and Linux Magazine every month. Journal can be a bit dry sometimes, but it is worth a read.

      I do recommend them to newcommers. They often have some very good articles that are just perfect for those getting into the game.

      I've read some complaints where the focus is too great on code snippets and programming... but you will never hear me saying such ardasities!

      Buy em, enjoy em and lend em to your friends!

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    3. Re:Support Linux Journal by SamBeckett · · Score: 1

      You mean the authors aren't happy with writing articles for free???!!?? *WHY* are they writing about Linux then?

    4. Re:Support Linux Journal by mnordstr · · Score: 2

      I did buy the magazine, however, it never appeared in my mailbox and I really won't bother subscribing again...

    5. Re:Support Linux Journal by perly-king-69 · · Score: 1

      I subscribed for two years, but early last year they almost doubled the subscription rates for overseas subscribers, of which I *was*.

      --

      --
      This sig is inoffensive.

    6. Re:Support Linux Journal by Centove · · Score: 1

      Same here, I paid for a 1 year subscription, got like 3 magazines delievered for the 1 year subscription then never got anymore. The response I got was 'Well, we had some problems with our fufillmat house, but we changed to another supplier, would you like to subscribe for another year?' Um... no thanks, you didn't deliever on you promise once already... Thanks but no thanks, I wish you all the success in the world I however won't be participating.

    7. Re:Support Linux Journal by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      I had subscribed for two years, but had to cancel mid-stream due to some financial constraints (yeah, it got tight). I never got a refund. I called up, and was told that I hadn't paid yet. I said I did, and referred back to my credit card statement, and the lady sneeringly told me, "no you haven't!" Boy, was I surprised at that! So I said to myself, "I am never dealing with LJ again."

      Most magazines farm that sort of thing out. You should try contacting LJ by email to make sure you get someone at the magazine. Let them know that their contractor is falling down on the job.

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    8. Re:Support Linux Journal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drop a line to subs@ssc.com or me directly scott@ssc.com and we will get this type of thing squared away.

      We brought subscription fulfillment back inhouse because of exactly the type of thing the other posters commented on.

      Scott Blanchard
      scott@ssc.com

    9. Re:Support Linux Journal by Grape+Shasta · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      So, did you email them and ask them to double check your address, and to send another copy? Or did you think the best approach was just a random complaint on /. ?

      --

      "I am a cipher, a cipher, wrapped in an enigma, smothered in secret sauce" -Jimmy James
    10. Re:Support Linux Journal by hey! · · Score: 2

      Having worked for magazines before, you have to realize that they don't handle their own subscriptions. These are done by "fulfulment houses". Of course you are responsible for picking a good one, I supposed, but if you don't have a lot of money and choose a cheap one, well, you get what you pay for. It's a case of simple economics. They'd have to charge more per issue or susbscription or more for advertisements; otherwise, they'd have to sell a lot more subscriptions to be able to afford better service.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    11. Re:Support Linux Journal by jazman_777 · · Score: 2
      Most magazines farm that sort of thing out. You should try contacting LJ by email to make sure you get someone at the magazine. Let them know that their contractor is falling down on the job.

      Have to say, someone from LJ posted on this thread, and I contacted him, and it's getting straightened out. Props to LJ, especially since this happened four years ago.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    12. Re:Support Linux Journal by Boiled+Frog · · Score: 1

      When was this?

      I just renewed my subscription to Linux Journal. A month later, I had two magazines in my mailbox. In other words, they created a new subscription instead of renewing it.

      I called their toll-free number and the problem turned out that the address was spelled slightly differently on the two accounts. They rectified it and gave me two extra months to compensate for the double issues. They were very professional and helpful. It took all of five minutes.

  8. And soon... by SteelX · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...we'll have to start calling the company GNU/Industrial Light and Magic. :-)

    1. Re:And soon... by saden1 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Dull Troll.

      --

      -----
      One is born into aristocracy, but mediocrity can only be achieved through hard work.
    2. Re:And soon... by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      Pot, meet Kettle. Kettle, this is Pot.

    3. Re:And soon... by Throatwarbler+Mangro · · Score: 1

      That's nothing. Wait for the Platinum-Iridium Special Limited Edition of Star Wars I-VI where Yoda is re-rendered wearing a red hat, and R2-D2 is replaced by Tux the penguin...

    4. Re:And soon... by MrCreosote · · Score: 1

      Pot:"Hey Kettle, you're black!"

      --
      MrCreosote Meow!Thump!Meow!Thump!Meow!Thump! "You're right! There isn't enough room to swing a cat in here!"
    5. Re:And soon... by Progoth · · Score: 1

      seriously though, I hope they're donating beaucoup bucks to the python software foundation & GNU. it seems like they're doing mission critical stuff with this software, I'm sure they can afford to cough up some change...

  9. Use the Source Luke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't give in to the Dark Side. Switch away
    from leenux. Come back to the light. Run FreeBSD.

  10. Great News by saden1 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Have a question for everyone: What would happen to the gaming world at large if Sony was to start developing games for Linux? Would developers support Sony? Would Linux gaming become a very viable option? How would it impact windows gaming?

    --

    -----
    One is born into aristocracy, but mediocrity can only be achieved through hard work.
    1. Re:Great News by handsomepete · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What would happen to the gaming world at large if Sony was to start developing games for Linux?

      If I had to guess, nothing major would happen except there'd be a few more games for Linux and there'd be a lot of articles about it on Linux Games.

      Would developers support Sony?

      Probably, but it depends on what you mean by developers. Hardware (read as video and sound card) developers may try and throw Linux gamers a bone in the driver arena (but it'll be a small, closed source one). Since nvidia already does this and most (if not all) Linux gamers opt for their cards because of it, impact would be minimal. Software developers could care less about what Sony does in the software market. It would probably go down as follows:
      1.) Sony develops games for Linux.
      2.) Other developers develop games for Linux thinking that Sony had some special information.
      3.) Sales aren't immediately stellar, other developers back out and snicker behind Sony's back thinking that they're superior.

      Would Linux gaming become a very viable option?

      IMHO, and don't take this as a flame because I'm a supporter and user of Linux, but I don't think it'll be really great until a brand new/standarized API (a la direct X - so shoot me) is developed (or a current one is seriously overhauled). There's something to be said in an all-in-one multimedia package that doesn't depend on a bunch of other things. Or until there's a working alternative to X which will never happen. *shrug* I'm probably wrong, but that's just my 2 cents.

    2. Re:Great News by saden1 · · Score: 1

      Here is what I'm thinking.

      1. Sony Releases its PlayStation Development Kit to the public (with some restrictions of course...don't want MS getting its hands on it).
      2. Sony starts shipping PCs that have Linux pre-installed.
      3. Sony encourages game developers to develop games for both Linux and PC at the same time with little to no extra development time (ala Windows and XBox style).
      4. Sony encourages other hardware manufactures with incentives to ship Linux drivers and desktop systems.
      5. Sony makes money as a publisher.

      Can this be done and besides money what are the obstacles to this idea?

      --

      -----
      One is born into aristocracy, but mediocrity can only be achieved through hard work.
    3. Re:Great News by handsomepete · · Score: 2

      Can this be done and besides money what are the obstacles to this idea?

      This is getting super off-topic, but what the hell. The most obvious obstacle (to me) is that there's no reason for Sony to do this. Why would they? Financially there isn't a good reason for them to push ahead with this kind of steam. It's not as if they have as much of a reason to try and cripple Microsoft's iron grip on the desktop market as other companies do, so inane corporate vengeance is probably out of the picture. Destroying competition? Well, Sony doesn't have a Linux distro and the X-Box is killing itself for the most part.

      While this is a nice thought, I doubt it'll happen. The more likely path is a company like Bioware really stepping it up and announcing complete support for Linux on all future releases. That would make a dent and an impression on the industry, but I also find it slightly less likely than me getting laid tonight.

    4. Re:Great News by mnordstr · · Score: 5, Funny

      "What would happen to the gaming world at large if Sony was to start developing games for Linux?"

      I would remove my Windows partition.

    5. Re:Great News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sony? Linux?

      I'd sooner expect the movie industry to stop encrypting DVD's or give away the keys for free to the linux community.

      MS isn't the only big bad corporation guarding their intellectual property with atomics...

    6. Re:Great News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahahahahahahaha, you have a Windows partition you loser. LMAO!!!!

    7. Re:Great News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      ... but I don't think it'll be really great until a brand new/standarized API (a la direct X - so shoot me) is developed ...

      Isn't this called SDL? Anytime I need to write code that even hints at needing multimedia capability I pull up the SDL man pages. Its fast, supports 2D and 3D (via OpenGL), Open Source, does hardware and software rendering, and handles keyboard/mouse/joystick input. Oh yeah, its also platform independent.

    8. Re:Great News by javester · · Score: 1

      Just wanted to point out that PS2 runs on a modified version of RedHat. Check it out here.

    9. Re:Great News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Super Off-Topic!" -- I Love that game!

      I can't wait for Turbo Off-Topic Super Troll! I hope they release it for my Colecovision!

    10. Re:Great News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cool, good info
      if i had modpoints ...

  11. ROTFLMAO by ObviousGuy · · Score: 1

    Bwahahahaha hahaha hehe

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:ROTFLMAO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed! +5 Insightful! Ha, ha, ha you moron moderators! YHBT! HTH HAND FOAD!
      Mod this down in resentment for your stupitity.

  12. Article Text by jcoy42 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here's the text from the article:

    The Computers of ILM
    ILM says they have rarely seen artists get excited by hardware, but artists fought to get the new Linux workstations--Dell single-CPU P4s with NVIDIA Quadra 2 Pro graphics cards. The question became, ``Where's my Linux box?''

    Production Engineering Manager Ken Beyer says

    More than 350 Linux boxes were deployed during Episode II. Animators and modelers got their workstations first, then compositors. The first group had flat panels because animators lack the desk space for monitors. There were problems with monitor calibration under Red Hat 7.1. We used flat panels to get Linux out there. Last to get workstations were TDs. They push the envelope of what they ask for. An issue was how quickly we could get things ported for them.

    ``We've changed over quite a bit of our plant here to Linux--half of our desktops and about 30% of our 2,000 CPU renderfarm is now Linux'', says ILM Director of Research and Development Andy Hendrickson. ``We've got 700-plus O2 machines'', adds Beyer. ``But it isn't affordable to replace those with Octanes.'' SGI is recognized for producing high-end workstations and servers but has abandoned competing with commodity PC hardware. SGI seems to be rebounding in the military market but less so in entertainment.
    ``Our renderfarm towers carry the Deathstar logo'', points out Beyer. A render tower is a stack of 1RU 2-CPU units connected together with inexpensive 100Base-TX. He says:

    These are 1RU, 2-CPU P4 units. If we lose a unit it is more convenient now that it is just two CPUs rather than four or eight with SGI 2800. For Episode II we had to double available capacity and power. It's 512 processors. We use dual 225 kVA UPS systems, and have three AC systems that rotate. Power goes out often in the San Rafael area. We can run on UPS for 15 minutes then [on a] diesel generator.

    An unexpected snag arose during the upgrade: all the PC fans had to be replaced because they were defective.
    Systems R&D Group Manager Mike Kiernan reports a few problems with Linux:

    Sometimes when I arrive in the morning a quarter of the Linux cluster is locked up. Fortunately, it doesn't happen too often. VM problems in the 2.4 kernel appear to be at the root of our kernel lockup problem. Recent improvements in the 2.4 kernel may resolve that. Things look promising.

    But he adds that ``Linux needs work on NFS big time.''

    We won't be going to Linux for our NFS servers. I wish we could replace NFS, but none of the document management systems is flexible enough. And the ones that are flexible have a rather high integration cost. When AFS is distributed natively for all the client platforms we need to support, perhaps we'll consider it.

    ILM is comfortable with multiple platforms. Its 1,400 employees use a variety of operating systems. The art department has Macs, with the rotoscopers and painters transitioning to OS X. Hendrickson sees OS X as a possible player. ``What attracts us is the BSD-like Darwin core and network compatibility.'' ILM has few Windows boxes, besides those on business side. ``There's no advantage to a Windows conversion for us'', says Hendrickson. ``We're a UNIX shop and probably always will be.''
    R&D Principal Engineer Phil Peterson says ILM chose the Red Hat distro because it seemed easier to go with what's popular. ``At ILM the 2.4.9 kernel is deployed, and 2.4.17 or 2.4.18 is in test. We tweak the kernel--things like shared memory size, number of file descriptors, default stack size--nothing dramatic.'' Open Motif 2.1 did a good job maintaining the look-and-feel of IRIX, so ILM didn't try LessTif. ILM workstations include limited installations of GNOME and KDE. ``No special effort was spent to strip machines down'', says Peterson. ``We just left out unused portions of the full install. We're pretty vanilla.''

    An unusual aspect of the ILM Linux workstation configuration is the replacement of the MESA libs with the SGI open source, OpenGL implementation. ``MESA is behind compared to the SGI version in aspects such as libGLU'', explains Peterson. Other studios haven't experienced the best stability using Maya on Linux with NVIDIA drivers. It seems that may be due to MESA and not Maya, NVIDIA or Linux, as previously thought. ILM has replaced the MESA libraries with a combination of NVIDIA's core OpenGL and libraries from the SGI open-source sample implementation.

    ``Chances are you will not find solutions in any documentation'', notes Peterson.

    We don't have a support line to call. We fix things and extend. It introduces a layer of maintenance we're not used to. We had to use open-source drivers with tablets. With calibrating monitors, the work is ongoing. Still, we've had an easy road. Our artists are technically savvy, able to endure pain. Having the best testers in the world around the corner from you provides quick feedback.

    Hendrickson concurs that Linux support can be a problem. He says, ``As we get into Linux we're not finding one company to hand-hold. IBM and HP aren't there, yet. But, before Linux it was out of our control and out of control. [Now] we own our Linux problems.''
    Is it possible for Linux to be too fast? ``Due to the speed of Linux, for the first time in my life, 15 years in the business, I'm starting to feel some RSI [repetitive strain injury]'', says Technical Director Robert Weaver. ``Usually you are working the machine, but Linux is so fast it can overwork you.'' Weaver has to remember to take breaks because with Linux he doesn't get any breaks waiting for the machine anymore.

    --
    Never trust an atom. They make up everything.
    1. Re:Article Text by Sivar · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Which asshole moderated this guy as redundant? Do YOU see the content of the text before this message? There is a slow mirror link which is also down, but redundant? Nice thankyou for him bothering to post the text. Sheesh.

      Somebody mod this guy up at least back to two, please.

      --
      Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes. --E. W. Dijkstra
    2. Re:Article Text by Slashamatic · · Score: 2
      This is a bit meta, but shouldn't there be a mod category of Karma Whore, which add points to display but makes no net contribution to the Karma?

      I found the link down too (at least it didn't raect in a reasonable time), so the repost was most definitely useful.

    3. Re:Article Text by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      Underrated/Overrated already do this - change the post's score without changing karma.

      That said, if people would post reprints as AC's then people wouldn't whine about karma whoring (or, rather, they would still but they'd be morons).

  13. Re:Support Linux Journal QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Man, if the Linux world has to get down on its knees and beg for money like this, it is doomed. That's one of the most degrading posts I've ever seen. Sheesh, man, stop crying and pull yourself together.

    Is it too much to ask that Linux Journal provide value in exchange for money? I don't see PC Magazine going broke. I don't see Dr. Dobbs going broke. I don't see a lot of magazines going broke.

  14. This has been in the works! by Real+World+Stuff · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Here is older German link with additional information.

    "Microsofts recruiting rate gene could do to a wrong, because they purge in view of shrinking customer connection so obviously into panic. There as prestigious customers change as Pixar ("Toy Story") and Industrial Light & Magic ("Jurassic park ", "Shrek") its systems over course around course from Windows or SGI to Linux , and the Unterschleissheimer Dependance of the gate company breaks in nothing different one to take in than the middle class. Really pfiffig."

    --
    If we don't fight for ourselves no one will.
  15. Off Topic request by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Linux Journal has a big story..."

    Sigh. Not anymore, they don't.

    I don't suppose there's some automated way that Google-cached pages could be inserted into Slashdot story headers, is there?

    1. Re:Off Topic request by vinays · · Score: 1

      google cache

      that would be a good feature

      --

      "cogito, ergo sum"
  16. The "Unofficial" Story on the ports et al. by Real+World+Stuff · · Score: 1

    Not the official ILM site but has good insight and has been following the ILM ports.

    --
    If we don't fight for ourselves no one will.
    1. Re:The "Unofficial" Story on the ports et al. by malducin · · Score: 2

      Pretty please don't slashdot me ;-). Too bad I didn't mirror the article, didn't expect it on Slashdot. I also collected the other articles that came out yesterday. Probably the other two inetersting ones are from VFXPro and CGW:

      Episode 2 VFX Work Discussed Around the Net

  17. Re:Boy howdy... by packeteer · · Score: 1

    i know this is offtopic but ive heard thi asked before... actually it wouldn't be hard to tell the differnece form a DOS and a good old fashioned /.ing... they could easily check the referer and see that everyone is coming from a link on /.

    --
    unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
  18. Re:Support Linux Journal QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember the time when PC Mag was really a magazine. Now it's more like PC Leaflet.

    Times change, dead tree magazines are dieing.

  19. Re:Please Help Little Timmy!!! :( by IronTek · · Score: 0, Troll

    son, in the old days (and by old, I of course mean 6 or 7 months ago), we didn't have little scams going to get karma, we had to work for it, plain and simple!

    I swear, you kids these days. So soft with your karma! Giving it out freely like it's...free. Makes me sick!

  20. Re:mod parent as offtopic! by saden1 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Zero...i just felt like asking this question! Is that OK with you Sir?

    --

    -----
    One is born into aristocracy, but mediocrity can only be achieved through hard work.
  21. Looks bad for Alias Wavefront and SGI by PotatoHead · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not very nice comments in there about SGI. They are true enough though. The O2 is a *great* multimedia desktop machine. Lots of features, small package. Just like the Indy before it.

    Compute performance is a real problem though for all but the high end SGI machines. The O2 went EOL this year for all but OEM (Medical and Video apps).

    What I find interesting is that the studios are building their own tech to suit their needs. They started this process on SGI machines in order to leverage the rich toolset found in IRIX. Now they are able to build on the open tools found under Linux.

    Alias Wavefront (owned by SGI) used to package and sell critical technology to the Studios along with a number of services delivered under NDA. They still do this, but their days are numbered.

    Open Source is enabling a new trend toward in-house technology development. Given the high cost of A|W and SGI toolsets plus the added services and consulting required to make them work in creative ways, I am not surprised to find the studios able to just build what they want cheaper. They also are able to create the features that make their workflow better.

    Seems like the studios want nothing to do with any sort of lock in with any vendor. Talk about lowering TCO!

    Not only does their in-house development allow them to make the most of their time and creative energy, but they get to take advantage of new platforms in the future --without having to re-purchase tools.

    They are smart enough to develop common tools that they (and us) can all use while keeping those things that make them special in-house. Too bad more of the mainstream businesses are not able to see this yet. When they do --look out!

    So SGI moves back into their niche with IRIX, high end visualization, and parallel computing and serving. What of Alias Wavefront?

    They look doomed to me. Maya now is cheap and runs on Linux. Its users develop their own tools with it so A|W maybe gets consulting, but little else. On the Industrial Design side, their Studio Tools package really only appeals to the high end Automotive styling group. Everyone else can use either MCAD tools, or tools like Rhino to get their work done.

    This was a great article that does a lot to illuminate just how computing can change under an open platform.

    1. Re:Looks bad for Alias Wavefront and SGI by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      "Everyone else can use either MCAD tools, or tools like Rhino to get their work done." Uhm, not really. You ALWAYS use the right tool for the job. If you do (high end) visualisation, you won't use MCAD tools, 'cos MCAD is for production only. That's what they'r focussed on, what they do well and that shows in the toolset they incorporate into the package. And Rhino? Mwahahahaha! Come on. Rhino is a neat little package for home use. But it only does Nurbs, and the toolset isn't very complete, so don't expect a company which makes it's money doing CG to use it.

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    2. Re:Looks bad for Alias Wavefront and SGI by PotatoHead · · Score: 2

      Well, for one, I never said that anyone doing CG will be doing it with Rhino. (You are correct about its ability to be used for CG though.)

      I am seeing a lot of smaller design firms shy away from A|W though and they *are* using Rhino and MCAD. For class 'A' surfaces, Studio is a very nice tool. In recent times though, MCAD toolsets include most of what one needs to get there. For the high-end automotive like markets, MCAD does not yet cut it. For most everyone else, MCAD can and does do the job now.

      A|W is playing another game that is hard to play. They charge *lots* for a select few features needed by the high-end. This makes their product unattractive to the low end because without those select few features, the lesser products or a smart combination of them can do the job.

      Why not lower the price? In my mind they should, but they have waited too long. Lower the price and they lose the revenue from the big boys while only gaining some back from the low-end.

      Someone is going to do this and take a *lot* of market and mind-share from A|W, or they will continue to wither away quietly.

      Remember, I am a little off topic because I am talking about ID, not CG in this particular case.

    3. Re:Looks bad for Alias Wavefront and SGI by Skyshadow · · Score: 2

      SGI's big problem has always been twofold:

      1) Most of their gear is really, really expensive.
      2) The advantages of their stuff is hard to explain to cost-sensative pointy-hairs.

      They do have other issues, of course, one of which is a serious lack of follow-through. Still, they've done some pretty neat stuff, and it sucks to see them plow into the ground 'cause they can't seem to adapt to a new bid'ness model. That empty building on 101 and Shoreline seems to me like a constant reminder of the recession and tech bust.

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    4. Re:Looks bad for Alias Wavefront and SGI by tolldog · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I wouldn't fear for A|W too much.
      Everybody in the industry uses it. We would not be able to function with out it. Being in a medium sized studio, we need to have some solutions come pre-packaged and others to be built in-house.

      I do worry for SGI though. They are loosing (or maybe lost) the high end desk top war. People are picking up dual Xeons and even after PC manufacturer's suport contracts, it is cheaper than a stand alone SGI that runs at half the speed.

      We have been migrating to linux for the last two years, first as a render solution and then as a desktop solution. When we get a linux compositing tool in house, we will be completely free of SGI systems for production work.

      -Tim

      --
      -I just work here... how am I supposed to know?
    5. Re:Looks bad for Alias Wavefront and SGI by UberLame · · Score: 1

      According to the book, "The Art of Blue Sky", Blue Sky (the people who made Ice Age) use Rhino for their initial NURBS models. The process outline was that first the characters are modelled in clay. Then they are digitized into Rhino using a microscribe. They are split into pieces and modelled in Rhino, then they are taken to a proprietary tool they call suction cup that basically is along the lines of SoftImage's Zipper tool (ie, if blends two NURBS models to look like one).

      Then the models are taken to Maya to be animated, where they have a thousand and one proprietary plugins and tools to help them.

      --
      I'm a loser baby, so why don't you kill me.
    6. Re:Looks bad for Alias Wavefront and SGI by monkeydo · · Score: 2

      I don't know much about making CG, but I do know about making movies, and I can tell you the studios really don't care about TCO. Do you think Lucas cares whether it cost $80 million to make EPIII on Linux or $85 Million to make it on SGI? He doesn't.

      They are gravitating towards open source, because it allows them to do what they want to do, faster and in house not because it is cheaper. The only people in Hollywood who care how much a movie costs are the ones making them on their own dime who had to get a second mortgage on their house to do it. Folks like Lucas care about making the movie exactly the way they want it, and they LOVE when they have to create the tools to do it. How many times have you seen director on press junkets saying something like, "No one had ever done this before so we had to invent the technology ourselves . You really have to see it." You'll never hear, "We used off the shelf hardware and stock footage to make this scene, and saved a few dollars."

      This is not a good example of Linux and open source lowering TCO. This is an example of people who have unlimited money, need extreme flexibility, and insist on controlling all of the smallest details finding a tool that meets their needs.

      If Hollywood really wanted to save money they'd stop supplying craft services to the extras.

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum
      The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian
    7. Re:Looks bad for Alias Wavefront and SGI by PotatoHead · · Score: 2

      Sounds like they have time in the Studios then. I still worry about their ID market though. Perhaps they will just adapt and focus more on entertainment.

      It is an interesting time for them in either case.

    8. Re:Looks bad for Alias Wavefront and SGI by PotatoHead · · Score: 2

      Ok so this particular studio does not care about TCO. You are probably right about that.

      What interests me though is the concept they are following. The technology investments they are making right now will last them a *long* time. (Building both common and in-house tools under Linux.)

      This shows the promise that OSS has for everyday business. Most of their basic computing needs can and will (if they let them) be addressed with OSS tools. They will have to invest some to make that happen, but once the investment is made, they are set for a very long time.

      That will affect TCO in a good way.

    9. Re:Looks bad for Alias Wavefront and SGI by ewagner · · Score: 1

      They are smart enough to develop common tools that they (and us) can all use while keeping those things that make them special in-house.

      But are they developing tools that are made public? It sounds like they're keeping everything on top of Linux proprietary. It's fine that they can get some use out of the OS, but it'd be nice if they'd open-source some of their work.

      -ewagner

    10. Re:Looks bad for Alias Wavefront and SGI by PotatoHead · · Score: 2

      Yes it would be nice, but the very elite tools that make the difference for them will be kept in-house. Since they don't distribute them, they have no obligation to make them public. (Maybe they will in the future if the tools are no longer a differentiator (sp?) for them.

      Anything that the core OS environment needs to improve will go public. They have no real reason not to. If they hold that stuff back, their in-house burden will grow until they are basically building their own OS. Why not just make the OS a notch better and forget about it?

  22. Re:what is the big news? by bogie · · Score: 1

    "How is this big news? Just because the word "LINUX" is in it??? "

    Ummmm... Yes??

    Why are you complaining that the biggest pro-linux newsite on the internet is reporting on a huge win for linux?

    I think you may have logged into the wrong website.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  23. These guys can't do a 405 ?? by serutan · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Gimme a break!

    Remember the short film "The 405" that was all over the net a year or two ago, about the airliner landing on an empty freeway? If two guys working nights and weekends for 3 months with a PC can make one of the busiest freeways in LA look empty, it doesn't make sense that a professional effects crew with a multimillion dollar budget can't simulate Sydney deserted. This has to be either a publicity thing or some unbelievable ego trip.

    1. Re:These guys can't do a 405 ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You post this to the wrong thread, and get modded up as "Insightful"? WTF!? Where's the mod points when I need them... somebody mod this offtopic already...

  24. ILM OSes by Brendor · · Score: 4, Informative
    ILM says they have rarely seen artists get excited by hardware, but artists fought to get the new Linux workstations--Dell single-CPU P4s with NVIDIA Quadra 2 Pro graphics cards. The question became, ``Where's my Linux box?''

    ILM is comfortable with multiple platforms. Its 1,400 employees use a variety of operating systems. The art department has Macs, with the rotoscopers and painters transitioning to OS X. Hendrickson sees OS X as a possible player. ``What attracts us is the BSD-like Darwin core and network compatibility.'' ILM has few Windows boxes, besides those on business side. ``There's no advantage to a Windows conversion for us'', says Hendrickson. ``We're a UNIX shop and probably always will be.''


    Nice to see ILM is keeping with the times. When Phantom Menace came out, SGI had promotional info up about SGI [origin?] servers and EP I. Fast forward three years and we have come upon another case of Linux and [relativel] commodity hardware changing the heart of a big Iron SGI all-star. ILM did have a JEDI Pact with SGI not too long ago, but as was inferred in the article, its really hard to compete with free (as in beer) in the shrinking-margin world of SFX.

    FWIW, On the Ep I DVD Making of Documentary, OS 9 was visible durinag a photoshopping session, Windows (or a GUI clone) for Motion capture and unix (presumably IRIX) for the rest.

    1. Re:ILM OSes by TandyMasterControl · · Score: 3, Insightful
      It was interesting to see the ILM Director of Research and Development, Andy Hendrickson, say this: "As we get into Linux we're not finding one company to hand-hold. IBM and HP aren't there, yet. But, before Linux it was out of our control and out of control. [Now] we own our Linux problems."

      That's really not a great position to be in, is it Andy?
      I mean, they bought the workstations from fucking Dell but obviously Dell tech support is in no position to aid them on the technology of the OS. Or anything beyond installing a ethernet driver or scanner on Windows, if even that. So about this time I am wondering :Gee wouldn't it have made better sense to buy the Intel hardware or support from SGI (who was trying to get started with Lintel workstations) so you could at least be dealing with people who CAN help with technical issues a linux customer is experiencing?

      Pennywise so often is pound stupid.

      --
      Johnny Quest has two Daddies.
    2. Re:ILM OSes by j1mmy · · Score: 1

      oh fuck

    3. Re:ILM OSes by nathanm · · Score: 2

      From the rest of the article, I gathered they had some top notch unix gurus in-house. Why out source the support if they don't need it? They seem more than capable of solving their own problems.

    4. Re:ILM OSes by buckeyeguy · · Score: 2
      Trivial but true: years ago (about 1989?) I was working on a Sequent multi-processor box, which ran Dynix/PTX, and came across an entry in the /etc/magic file... can't recall what the file type was supposed to be, but the comment field read: "for Lucasfilm". I thought that was so cool at the time... OS mods, just for George ;)

      I can only guess that they probably used such machines for their motion cameras; in any case, I'm sure SGI wasn't the only hardware platform sitting around ILM back then.

      --
      I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
    5. Re:ILM OSes by spudnic · · Score: 2

      Yeah, like having to change out all the fans on the pc's because they were defective? Amidst all the talk about how great Linux was doing for them, that was priceless. I have only a bit of experience on SGI machines, but I'm pretty sure that you wouldn't get a shipment of them with broken fans on every unit. Is the "tel" portion of "Lintel" really the part that isn't ready for the enterprise?

      Of course, with the money they are saving, changing a few fans and having a few hot spare workstations in a closet may be very well worth it.

      --
      load "linux",8,1
    6. Re:ILM OSes by jesse.k · · Score: 1

      FWIW, On the Ep I DVD Making of Documentary, OS 9 was visible durinag a photoshopping session,

      actually that was probably Commotion.

    7. Re:ILM OSes by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1

      Is the "tel" portion of "Lintel" really the part that isn't ready for the enterprise?

      I didn't know that Intel was producing fans now?

      Seriously, this is not a Lintel problem but a Dell (or whoever else made these machines) problem with QA.

      --
      "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
    8. Re:ILM OSes by spudnic · · Score: 2

      Sorry if I wasn't clear. I was saying the problem was with PC hardware (usually containing an Intel CPU, or at least something compatible). Even at the high end, "server class" PC kit just isn't generally the same quality as other options.

      --
      load "linux",8,1
  25. For the love of god, tell me what to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait, I thought ILM was "bad" because CGI sux, Jar Jar sux, George Luca$$$ sux.

    Now ILM is "good" because they use Linux?

    Jesus, which is it? Tell me what I'm supposed to think here.

    1. Re:For the love of god, tell me what to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...Let go. Use the group-think Luke.

  26. Re:analogy - Star Wars -- Linux by Jaghound · · Score: 1

    I have actually used this analogy, by casting Richard Stallman as the champion of light side, and Bill Gates representing the dark side. Personally I prefer the "grey" area between those two :-)

  27. New here? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2

    It wasn't that long ago that seeing anything related to linux -was- big news because you didn't see it hardly at all. Even more rare was hearing of a big shop, unix, windows, or otherwise, making a large switch to linux. So yeah, it was big news, and still feels like it to an extent. Combine that with it being ILM, makers of Star Wars, and you've got some double-geek factor going on.

    Though since you mention the performance gain... It sounds like they were mostly switching from O2s running IRIX to Linux... And Linux was presumeably running on some new (likely x86-based) machines. Now, if I'm not mistaken the O2 is a pretty old SGI machine, so I would be surprised if the new computers were many times faster. It probably had nothing to do with Linux, other than it being a free unix that runs on fast commodity x86 hardware.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
    1. Re:New here? by 0xA · · Score: 2
      Now, if I'm not mistaken the O2 is a pretty old SGI machine, so I would be surprised if the new computers were many times faster. It probably had nothing to do with Linux, other than it being a free unix that runs on fast commodity x86 hardware.

      I think you probably already understand this but in may ways that is the point. If they had $X to buy new workstations they probably could buy 5 P4s for the price of each SGI workstation.

      For me the article is interesting not because they started using Linux but becuase they are using Open Source tools and libraries. 2 or 3 years ago they would have had to build apps, libraries, evertyhing from scratch. Now they bascially use Red Hat.

      That is news.

    2. Re:New here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. We got the cheapest OS and the cheapest hardware, look at us go. OMG, look at the freakin electric and ac bills. I'll bet you anything an SGI solution of comparable cpu ability would run cooler. Much like the Sparc chips run slower than Intel, but get more done. Slower chips will use less electricity and output less heat. When you add the cost of powering and cooling these linux clusters I wonder how much you are really saving.

    3. Re:New here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add to that the fact that there are quality issues associated with PC hardware and OSS. It may work for some people but when it doesn't work it costs you money. Having to replace all the fans in a large render farm takes a lot of time ($$$) and when 1/4 of your render farm is locked up due to kernal issues ($$$) you may have been better off purchasing a big-iron SGI system that runs cooler and a bit slower but is easier to admin and more reliable.

  28. Re:analogy - Star Wars -- Linux by ObviousGuy · · Score: 1

    Perhaps Nathan Myhrvold as Billy Dee Williams?

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
  29. Re:Boy howdy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, that's because Apache isn't the fastest kid on the block, especially under a heavy load - I'd love to find out how various web servers handle being slashdotted.

    More stuff here.

  30. Re:Support Linux Journal QWZX by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Amen.

    I don't give a crap if any company goes under. They're companies, and if they don't sell me something that I think is worth it, screw them. I don't care what market it is, I'm not going to be providing corporate welfare. It's not like if some Linux company fails, then /Linux/ fails. Companies fail, Linux companies being no different. Except Linux companies have tended to be .com companies, and .com companies tend to have stupid unworkable business plans. Like, say, trying to annoy your customer into paying you to stop annoying them.

    Though this doesn't necessarily have anything to do with Linux Journal, since I don't think that guy represents them in any way.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  31. Which distro is Obi Wan Kenobi? by norweigiantroll · · Score: 1

    Debian, of course. Fighting for freedom and democracy, against the tyrranic Galactic Software Empire who ruthlessly conquer other companies.

  32. CBDTPA .... Linux ... the irony... by einTier · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Am I the only one who thinks it's rather odd that movie companies are pursuing a law that would effectively outlaw Linux -- while that's the operating system running most of their kick-ass render farms?

    --
    -------------------------------------------------- $665.95 -- retail price of the beast.
  33. in every joke there is a grain of truth by awful · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    ...so there really is a beowulf cluster of natalia portmans...


    hee

  34. Er. by MisterBlister · · Score: 1
    Sounds more like a big positive ad for P4s with NVidia Quadros rather than Linux, really. The machines just happen to run Linux because they're a UNIX shop moving over to PC hardware.

    I especially liked the hypebole about Linux being so fast it causes RSI. Er?? I didn't know Linux had some magical CPU performance enhancement system that makes it run software so much faster than other operating systems on the same hardware...

    1. Re:Er. by jcoy42 · · Score: 2
      I didn't know Linux had some magical CPU performance enhancement system that makes it run software so much faster than other operating systems on the same hardware...

      If you:

      a) use an OS with a good scheduler
      b) tune the kernel to the computer you are using
      c) use only the drivers you need
      d) don't run software you don't need.

      You will see quite a speed increase. The last 3 are things you have a hard time doing on most closed/proprietary operating systems.
      --
      Never trust an atom. They make up everything.
    2. Re:Er. by CommandNotFound · · Score: 1

      My home box (Linux) appears to be faster than my Windows box at work because (a) I can run a lightweight windowmanager (Fvwm2) and (b) the virtual memory system actually works; i.e. I'm not swapping when I have 200MB free, unlike in NT/2k, which both appear to constantly swap when plenty of memory is available. One can can also get speed improvements by compiling their own kernel.

      I also recall some benchmarks (warning!) about a year ago that showed some surprising speed differences between Linux and Windows when doing CPU-intensive work. I think that article was in LJ, as well.

    3. Re:Er. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's right, it's soooo hard to tune kernel params on Solaris, HP-UX, AIX and Tru64.

      OSen like Tru64 never compile in just what you ask for into a custom kernel during install.

      Commercial UNIX admins are too stoopid to remove init scripts...

  35. Mirror with pictures by moyix · · Score: 3, Informative

    Full article mirror. Produced with:
    wget -p --convert-links http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=6011

  36. Don't forget UNIX... by ChristopherMarlowe · · Score: 0

    While the power of LINUX is well known as a power-full OS, adequate for most jobs. There are some jobs that require the flair and power of UNIX to do the job right.
    I must cite the extensive use of SUN Systems used in many other movies, like Jurrasic Park and Terminator 2, and wonder what would prompt ILM to pick LINUX above an obviously proven set of tools?

    1. Re:Don't forget UNIX... by jcoy42 · · Score: 1
      what would prompt ILM to pick LINUX above an obviously proven set of tools?


      In a nutshell, more bang for the buck. From the article:
      half of our desktops and about 30% of our 2,000 CPU renderfarm is now Linux'', says ILM Director of Research and Development Andy Hendrickson. ``We've got 700-plus O2 machines'', adds Beyer. ``But it isn't affordable to replace those with Octanes.'' SGI is recognized for producing high-end workstations and servers but has abandoned competing with commodity PC hardware.

      As to sun, well, while sun makes more stable hardware, with the recent advances in speed on the intel hardware and the slacking of development by sun in the wake of it's dot.com loss intel has taken the lead in number crunching for low-end hardware.

      Who wouldn't rather have a farm of cheap, easily replacable boxes than a farm of expensive machines?

      And if you are asking why linux, it says in the article they decided to go with what is mainstream:
      R&D Principal Engineer Phil Peterson says ILM chose the Red Hat distro because it seemed easier to go with what's popular.

      --
      Never trust an atom. They make up everything.
    2. Re:Don't forget UNIX... by malducin · · Score: 1

      Another reason is that some of the stuff out there is only certified to run under redHat like Maya. So there is even more incentive to minimize any problems.

  37. SGI? by Skyshadow · · Score: 2

    Hm, so where does ILM's old standby (SGI) fit into this whole deal?

    My thinking: Lando. They've got soul, you're not really sure whose side they're on and they'll never find more work. =)

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
  38. Hollywood vs. Linux by wardk · · Score: 1

    Is this the same Hollywod that sues to deny Linux & the open source community a DVD player?

    What's up with that?

    1. Re:Hollywood vs. Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, this is the Hollywood of actors and artists.
      The one that sues is the Hollywood of corporations and suits.

    2. Re:Hollywood vs. Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ILM is not a coperation with suits?

  39. Re:CBDTPA .... Linux ... the irony... by PotatoHead · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You know I just thought about that a little. The way the laws are intended to work are subtle indeed.

    For you and I, Linux would be outlawed. For the Studios, things would work just fine. They have the lawyers to back them up, and they can just use Linux inside their firewalls.

    Since they create the content, it is easy for them to say Linux is ok. Nobody is watching unauthorized copies.

    They just don't want Joe citizen to have a user programmable system that allows programs they don't like.

    Irony indeed.

  40. Re:CBDTPA .... Linux ... the irony... by donglekey · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ignorance knows no bounds. 'Movie Companies?' The MPAA is pursuing laws that would make it difficult if not impossible for an operating system to be completely open source. The biggest thing to remember though, is that ILM is a visual effects and post production company, not a fucking giant movie studio, and not part of the MPAA or associated with it. They aren't even in Hollywood they are a 6 hour drive north. Get a clue and stop with this nonsense.

  41. thought process of the /. editors by madenosine · · Score: 2, Funny

    big article + screen shots = slashdotted = so posted

  42. Alternate mirror (better bandwidth) by moyix · · Score: 3, Informative

    Since my DSL upload (a puny 15 k/s) is flooded right now, have a shot at my school's fractional T1 (60 k/s).

    Here.

  43. Burn Karma Burn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hopefully your karma loss why make you do anything rash, like exit this world.

  44. Motivations by Scoria · · Score: 0

    Taco's primary motivation for Slashdotting Linux Journal are obvious:

    To convince the world that PERL is superior to PHP.

    (-1, Lame)

    --
    Do you like German cars?
  45. Qai Gon by DiSKiLLeR · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    In the original SW movies (Ep4-6) when a jedi died, their body disappeared. (Yoda, Obi Wan).

    They also turned into a ghost. (Yoda, Obi Wan, Anakin)

    How come this didn't happen to Qai gon jinn in episode 1? And they burnt his body at the end of the movie? Apparently this was meant to be made clear in Episode 2, but i didn't see how or where.

    Just curious.

    D.

    --
    You can tell how powerful someone is by the magnitude of the crime they can commit and be able to get away with.
    1. Re:Qai Gon by ObviousGuy · · Score: 1

      My theory is that until the Midichlorians are completely destroyed we won't have the disappearing act. They were introduced for some reason, so I think it's so that they can be killed off (so as to wipe out the Jedi) only to have the Jedi discover that the Force is the ultimate power of the universe that flows through us blah blah blah.

      The Midichlorians are preventing the Jedi from disintegrating and joining their power into the Force, actually. Wipe them out and we get dissolving Jedi and ghosts.

      Warning: Spoiler above.

      --
      I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    2. Re:Qai Gon by XoXus · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I'd guess because in the first case (Yoda, Obi Wan, Anakin) they were prepared (in a sense) for their death. They could probably prepare themselves for the end. For poor old Qai Gon, however, he died pretty quickly after Darth Maul impaled him, and so I guess that's why his body needed to be burned.

    3. Re:Qai Gon by 10Ghz · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Anakin, Yoda and Obi-Wan (not sure about the last one though) were jedi Masters. Qui-Gon was Jedi Knight. That might explain it

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    4. Re:Qai Gon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummmmm maybe its me, but they burned Darth Vader (Anakin) in the last movie. Dont you think its is some sort of Jedi burial thingy.....duh.

  46. Linux Journal won't take my money by r5t8i6y3 · · Score: 1

    I've tried to give them my money, but they wouldn't take it. I said, "I'll pay the subscription fee, but don't send me the dead trees. I'll just read it online." They told me I had to accept the dead trees. I told them to call me when I could pay them and just view the online version. It's been over a year since I had that conversation and have yet to hear from them.

  47. George Lucas should have the decency... by bankman · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ....and fairness to call it GNU/Star Wars then. Or there might be some dirty deal going on, like we get to see a Master Stallmann in GNU/Episode3. Who knows...

    --
    I feel so sig.
  48. Article text (no pictures on LJ site) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Computers of ILM

    ILM says they have rarely seen artists get excited by hardware, but artists fought to get the new Linux workstations--Dell single-CPU P4s with NVIDIA Quadra 2 Pro graphics cards. The question became, ``Where's my Linux box?''

    Production Engineering Manager Ken Beyer says

    More than 350 Linux boxes were deployed during Episode II. Animators and modelers got their workstations first, then compositors. The first group had flat panels because animators lack the desk space for monitors. There were problems with monitor calibration under Red Hat 7.1. We used flat panels to get Linux out there. Last to get workstations were TDs. They push the envelope of what they ask for. An issue was how quickly we could get things ported for them.

    ``We've changed over quite a bit of our plant here to Linux--half of our desktops and about 30% of our 2,000 CPU renderfarm is now Linux'', says ILM Director of Research and Development Andy Hendrickson. ``We've got 700-plus O2 machines'', adds Beyer. ``But it isn't affordable to replace those with Octanes.'' SGI is recognized for producing high-end workstations and servers but has abandoned competing with commodity PC hardware. SGI seems to be rebounding in the military market but less so in entertainment.
    ``Our renderfarm towers carry the Deathstar logo'', points out Beyer. A render tower is a stack of 1RU 2-CPU units connected together with inexpensive 100Base-TX. He says:

    These are 1RU, 2-CPU P4 units. If we lose a unit it is more convenient now that it is just two CPUs rather than four or eight with SGI 2800. For Episode II we had to double available capacity and power. It's 512 processors. We use dual 225 kVA UPS systems, and have three AC systems that rotate. Power goes out often in the San Rafael area. We can run on UPS for 15 minutes then [on a] diesel generator.

    An unexpected snag arose during the upgrade: all the PC fans had to be replaced because they were defective.
    Systems R&D Group Manager Mike Kiernan reports a few problems with Linux:

    Sometimes when I arrive in the morning a quarter of the Linux cluster is locked up. Fortunately, it doesn't happen too often. VM problems in the 2.4 kernel appear to be at the root of our kernel lockup problem. Recent improvements in the 2.4 kernel may resolve that. Things look promising.

    But he adds that ``Linux needs work on NFS big time.''

    We won't be going to Linux for our NFS servers. I wish we could replace NFS, but none of the document management systems is flexible enough. And the ones that are flexible have a rather high integration cost. When AFS is distributed natively for all the client platforms we need to support, perhaps we'll consider it.

    ILM is comfortable with multiple platforms. Its 1,400 employees use a variety of operating systems. The art department has Macs, with the rotoscopers and painters transitioning to OS X. Hendrickson sees OS X as a possible player. ``What attracts us is the BSD-like Darwin core and network compatibility.'' ILM has few Windows boxes, besides those on business side. ``There's no advantage to a Windows conversion for us'', says Hendrickson. ``We're a UNIX shop and probably always will be.''
    R&D Principal Engineer Phil Peterson says ILM chose the Red Hat distro because it seemed easier to go with what's popular. ``At ILM the 2.4.9 kernel is deployed, and 2.4.17 or 2.4.18 is in test. We tweak the kernel--things like shared memory size, number of file descriptors, default stack size--nothing dramatic.'' Open Motif 2.1 did a good job maintaining the look-and-feel of IRIX, so ILM didn't try LessTif. ILM workstations include limited installations of GNOME and KDE. ``No special effort was spent to strip machines down'', says Peterson. ``We just left out unused portions of the full install. We're pretty vanilla.''

    An unusual aspect of the ILM Linux workstation configuration is the replacement of the MESA libs with the SGI open source, OpenGL implementation. ``MESA is behind compared to the SGI version in aspects such as libGLU'', explains Peterson. Other studios haven't experienced the best stability using Maya on Linux with NVIDIA drivers. It seems that may be due to MESA and not Maya, NVIDIA or Linux, as previously thought. ILM has replaced the MESA libraries with a combination of NVIDIA's core OpenGL and libraries from the SGI open-source sample implementation.

    ``Chances are you will not find solutions in any documentation'', notes Peterson.

    We don't have a support line to call. We fix things and extend. It introduces a layer of maintenance we're not used to. We had to use open-source drivers with tablets. With calibrating monitors, the work is ongoing. Still, we've had an easy road. Our artists are technically savvy, able to endure pain. Having the best testers in the world around the corner from you provides quick feedback.

    Hendrickson concurs that Linux support can be a problem. He says, ``As we get into Linux we're not finding one company to hand-hold. IBM and HP aren't there, yet. But, before Linux it was out of our control and out of control. [Now] we own our Linux problems.''
    Is it possible for Linux to be too fast? ``Due to the speed of Linux, for the first time in my life, 15 years in the business, I'm starting to feel some RSI [repetitive strain injury]'', says Technical Director Robert Weaver. ``Usually you are working the machine, but Linux is so fast it can overwork you.'' Weaver has to remember to take breaks because with Linux he doesn't get any breaks waiting for the machine anymore.

  49. Yoda by AaronPSU79 · · Score: 1

    Render well, these workstations do

  50. ok.... by UU7 · · Score: 1

    Now, why would they be comparing linux on a mystery x86 box to an old O2.

    I'm sure it's faster, but this 5x faster crap is rather annoying when there is no mention of relative configurations.

    hell, I should hope linux on a p4 be fast.

  51. All this jargon... by XoXus · · Score: 2
    Does someone want to post what some of those terms are? In particular:
    • NOAA (through the first link)
    • TD (some kind of people?)
    1. Re:All this jargon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may want to try using this.

    2. Re:All this jargon... by TheKuz · · Score: 1

      No clue about NOAA in context, but TD stands for Technical Director. In a shop like ILM, the TD is a half-way blend between the artists, and the R&D programmers.

    3. Re:All this jargon... by Geordon · · Score: 0

      N.O.A.A. == National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration aka "1337 w347h3r d00dz" part of the USA Department of Commerce (??) Can't help you with TD, though

      --
      It is by caffiene alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of java that thoughts acquire speed, hands acquire
  52. Thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi. Thanks for hosting a mirror. Now I can truly appreciate using my current linux 2.4.18 for everyday use.
    (using Mozilla as I post this)

  53. Another great idea for google ... by hemabe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    hey, a few weeks ago you could win money for a great idea, how to extend google in an attractive way. here is mine: every time, an article is posted to slashdot, google will be automaticly informed a few seconds before (with SOAP) to fetch the links. This would be a great cowork between google and slashdot and i could finaly read all the articles ;) ciao, Hermi

    1. Re:Another great idea for google ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because this place is crawling with Google fan boys, that doesn't mean they would even consider doing something like this.

      Maybe /. should be doing this, not some external site.

    2. Re:Another great idea for google ... by Niles_Stonne · · Score: 1

      There are numerous issues with that, the most important being advertising revinue for the site we're slashdotting...

      Perhaps if it could be scripted with a fail-over setting (once it stops accepting connections, or perhaps when it takes more than xxx milliseconds to reply), everyone would be happy.

      --
      Sticks and Stones may break my bones, but copyright will always protect me.
    3. Re:Another great idea for google ... by spudnic · · Score: 1

      It amazes me that someone would moderate this up when you consider that in order to get moderator points you have had to have been around here for awhile and the moderator should know that a) this kind of thing gets posted all the time and b) this is answered in the FAQ.

      Geez. If you don't want to moderate correctly, opt out.

      --
      load "linux",8,1
    4. Re:Another great idea for google ... by WNight · · Score: 2

      Usually the ads are server from some other company. The host page just has a URL with a referrer number in it, like http://www.ads.com/ad/imageFoo?12345. If you were to reload the save page from elsewhere and load all the images, the ad company would serve the appropriate add and note the hit for the original page.

      Given that it's not the ad server that gets slashdotted into the ground, I think everyone involved would like it. Google could wrap everything in their own frame and sell a text ad at the top, the page would still attract viewers, and the ads would be served. (At least, unless you filter them.)

  54. Linux or Intel? by Coward+Anonymous · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Of course, performance doesn't suffer when you upgrade from a 5 y/o processor to a new top-of-the-line processor.
    Most of the descriptions about speed up seem to be directly attributable to Intel, not Linux...

    1. Re:Linux or Intel? by dead+sun · · Score: 1
      Blasphemy! You mean that installing linux hardware equivilent to their O2 systems wouldn't have gotten them a five fold increase in speed? According to this the O2 doesn't support linux, but many other SGIs do. I wonder what their performance would be like...

      Sarcasm aside though, I didn't see too many other comments (no other modded up) to the obvious conclusion that its the hardware that is increasing in speed, not the OS. I'm sure if they were running Maya on Windows on their new boxes it would kick the old O2s around as well. I'm not sure they would have made the transition as easily, nor could they have made their custom applications so easily either I'm thinking. However, attributing the speed to linux seems just silly.

      --
      If not now, when?
    2. Re:Linux or Intel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are some versions of Linux that will run on SGIs (not the O2 though). Only people who like pain will put Linux on their SGI, with the added benefit that none of the cool SGI hardware (like 3D T&L, or Texture hardware, or ISDN/MIDI/Sound, or Video I/O/Compression) will function under Linux. Putting Linux on your SGI will transform it from a cool little graphics machine to a dumb little thing capable of only Xwindows.

    3. Re:Linux or Intel? by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Of course, performance doesn't suffer when you upgrade from a 5 y/o processor to a new top-of-the-line processor.
      Most of the descriptions about speed up seem to be directly attributable to Intel, not Linux...


      I think part of the point, though, is that it is _because_ Linux is extremely flexible in terms of the wide variety of hardware it will run it that makes it very easy to upgrade your systems and still run the same system. This way, ILM doesn't have to wait for the next SGI systems to come out; if they need more, they can just go out and get it and intergrate it with the systems they are already running since it's all running the same thing.

  55. Re:Interesting stuff... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It takes more than an attractive 30 year old daemon woman to get me use FreeBSD

  56. Re:Support Linux Journal QWZX by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    PC Magazine will never go broke since they are MS weenies. Yea, a clueless/light reply to a clueless/light flamebait.

  57. Re: ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Insightful?!?

    the Unterschleissheimer Dependance of the gate company breaks in nothing different one to take in than the middle class. Really pfiffig

    Man, either that's really deep, or there's a stoned moderator.

  58. The best solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone can steal a copy of the magazine, scan in the pages and post them onto their favourite P2P service. That IS the Linux way, after all!

    If you get used to stuff for free suddenly everything becomes worthless!

  59. Of course ILM is NOT Hollywood by My+Third+Account · · Score: 1

    ILM is in San Rafael, CA (near San Francisco)

    That might explain something, no?

  60. This is OK... by Kj0n · · Score: 1

    As long as they don't make the traditional mistakes about computers (see Computers in Movie's and Userfriendly's Movie OS).

  61. Google Mirror by cobar · · Score: 2

    Google cache

    A bit slow, but at least it's accessible.

  62. hexa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Repeated message:


    I'm informing you in this message that your use of decimal is disturbing to geeks. I think it likely that you do not know what radices mean, or else you would be using hexadecimal. Read about hexadecimal at intuitor and repost your comment using hexadecimal. You may use "0x" as a prefix or "h" as a suffix for the numbers. Intelligent people despise decimal--so try to show some intelligence. Perhaps you are just too stupid to get it. Please reply using this subject--I'll check for replies by it.
    Personalized message:


    Is linux hexadecimal?

  63. Linux compatible StarWars trailers? by Miska · · Score: 1

    Now that Linux is increacingly becoming the flavour of ILM, does that mean we'll be seeing Star Wars trailers watchable on Linux in the near future?

    (moreover, does that mean ILM linux users can't currently watch the trailers?)

    .

    --
    -
    1. Re:Linux compatible StarWars trailers? by malducin · · Score: 2

      They might be able to watch them. ILM developed libraries and their own Quicktime player for Linux, for watching previews of their work. There was mention that they might release it open source. Of course the problem might be the codecs.

  64. hexa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Repeated message:


    I'm informing you in this message that your use of decimal is disturbing to geeks. I think it likely that you do not know what radices mean, or else you would be using hexadecimal. Read about hexadecimal at intuitor and repost your comment using hexadecimal. You may use "0x" as a prefix or "h" as a suffix for the numbers. Intelligent people despise decimal--so try to show some intelligence. Perhaps you are just too stupid to get it. Please reply using this subject--I'll check for replies by it.
    Personalized message:


    Um, hi.

  65. free software and drm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    doesnt anyone else find it a bit hypocritical that
    "hollywood" is making use of opensource and free software while petitioning for its hobbling with the current legislation regarding digital "rights"?

    1. Re:free software and drm by fizban · · Score: 1

      Uh, I wouldn't call George Lucas and ILM "Hollywood"

      That man hates Hollywood, which is why he formed his own company to handle the production of his movies.

      Methinks you are confusing two VERY different entities.

      --

      +1 Insightful, -1 Troll. What can I say, I'm an Insightful Troll.

  66. Re:Please Help Little Timmy!!! :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't give no stinkin' head cheese up for no body!
    Oh - head cancer.
    Well, Tough tits kid.

  67. Linux making it faster by virve · · Score: 1

    Could anybody explain to me why this is a result of switching to Linux rather than the result of changing hardware etc. I mean, I am quite ready to accept that there could be a speed increase under Linux but a factor of five is quite a lot.

    And how much could they gain by using icc instead of gcc. This should be something that could give an important perfomance boost (though not a factor five, I guess).

    Any insight would be appreciated.

    virve
    --

    1. Re:Linux making it faster by malducin · · Score: 2

      One reason could be that the speed increase is for things that are CPU intensive, as opposed to OpenGL/interactive speed, which SGI's gear is very good at. Rendering, batch compositing and running their simulations are CPU intensive, so running this on fast CPUs might have shown that improvement.

      At one point I heard that ILM had several Alpha machines with Linux to run their simulations, to take over some of the stuff done on the Origins, but I never could confirm it.

    2. Re:Linux making it faster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 5x increase is just Moores' law over 5 years, those O2s are old.

      Too bad when ILM moved to Linux they gave up MIPSpro compilers for GCC. Nicest damn compilers/debuggers/dev tools on any system I've ever seen.

  68. This is very good comercial for Linux (and Python) by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    Everybody knows ILM and George Lucas. Them saying that Linux is 5 times faster than some other extra special plattform they've used up 'till now - without even wasting a breath on 'doze - is what convinces Execs and Deciders that Linux is a top notch OS and really cool.
    This article is one hell of a drumming for Linux (and Python for that matter)- I'm gonna translate it into german and show it to the people who aren't convinced yet. :-)

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  69. Re:This is very good comercial for Linux (and Pyth by idamaybrown · · Score: 1

    "Sometimes when I arrive in the morning a quarter of the Linux cluster is locked up. Fortunately, it doesn't happen too often. VM problems in the 2.4 kernel appear to be at the root of our kernel lockup problem. Recent improvements in the 2.4 kernel may resolve that. Things look promising. " I thought only windoze had problems...

  70. Re:Boy howdy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Straight out of the box installs??? Give me a break
    --
    I can almost see why many companies have problems
    with benchmarks.

  71. Re:CBDTPA .... Linux ... the irony... by Lonath · · Score: 2

    But ILM gets paid for making parts of movies and those get distributed by the big movie companies (like FOX) who pay money to the MPAA. They ARE in the movie business and money from there does go to the MPAA. They may not be a "movie company" but they get hired by movie companies to help make movies.

  72. It's the hardware, not the OS. by DrJolt · · Score: 0

    It's interesting to hear about the challenges they faced in calibrating monitors etc., but clearly the performance advantage comes from current PC hardware being faster than their old SGIs, not linux being faster than irix on equivalent hardware.

  73. The cult hobby by heroine · · Score: 2

    The multimedia series Linux Journal has been running since 2001 seems to be driving most of their readership, not the embedded systems, web applications stories or the security series that comprise 95% of the magazine. It's the least popular topic for publishers yet it's the most popular thing for readers. Movie making on Linux is part of a growing number of cult hobbies. No-one talks about all these uses for Linux besides embedded systems and servers. They're not regarded as the intended purpose of Linux, but everyone does them in their private time.

  74. ILM and Cray abuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I seem to recall an article in Wired several years back about ILM. What impressed the heck out of me was their Cray abuse, er, *modification*. As I remember it, they had a deal with whoever owned Cray at the time (probably SGI) that basically gave them free Crays every so often. So, they outgrew their current Cray, got a new one, gutted the old one, moved it to the basement, and installed beer taps ;) I just kept thinking "That poor, poor Cray. Could they have found *nothing* worthwhile to do with a freakin' supercomputer?"

  75. Re:CBDTPA .... Linux ... the irony... by malducin · · Score: 1

    Yes, but does the caterer for the crew is part of the MPAA cartel? What about the nurse, or animal trainers? If you look at many credits, the FX people most of the times come at the very bottomo. After all they are contractors. Lots of people get contracted out for making a movie, it's just a job, doesn't mean they have anything to do with with all the bad things Valenti and friends are trying to push.

  76. linux screenshot? ahaha by Pooh · · Score: 1

    These are all IRIX screenshot with gnome instead of 4DWM.

    the linux buzzword strike again

  77. Re:CBDTPA .... Linux ... the irony... by be-fan · · Score: 2

    Do you watch movies by any chance? Or TV? If so, then shut up, because you're helping to fund these guys...

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  78. Re:All this jargon...NOAA by Zzootnik · · Score: 1

    National
    Oceanographic and
    Atmospheric
    Administration

    They do Climate Research for the gov. (I expect their funding will probably be chopped by the current admin like many other useful organizations...)

    So for an example of what they do...
    They try to simulate the entire planet (and then some---solar flares, orbits, etc) to attempt to predict when it's going to rain, and when it's going to rain Lava.

    Definitely one of the cooler websites for the sheer Scientifically curious geek in all of us...

    http://www.noaa.gov/

    --
    Sig currently under construction. Mind the gap....
  79. It might be too late... by J3zmund · · Score: 1

    Please don't let the fine people at Linux Journal starve

    Have you seen a copy of LJ on the newsstand lately? I think they are already starving...

    --

    It's all Hood
  80. Re:CBDTPA .... Linux ... the irony... by Lonath · · Score: 2

    I see the difference being that the caterers and nurses can work for other people. What can ILM do outside of the realm of movies and TV?

    But I see your point that you have to cut it off someplace.

  81. Re:CBDTPA .... Linux ... the irony... by Lonath · · Score: 2

    I do watch some TV, but I decided to stop going to the movies and to stop buying CDs/tapes. I don't steal them either (despite what people say about distributing mp3's as not being stealing...it is). I do know that the industry has a point that people steal their stuff and they have to do something about it but I can't see how to stop piracy without destroying freedom. They would have to confiscate all current electronics or make them illegal to use to do what they want to do. I also think their real reason for doing all this is to stop competition machines that will make it cheap and easy to make good entertainment (given a creative story).

  82. Re:Support Linux Journal QWZX by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

    Afterall, don't you know what our new mantra around here is?

    "Tough. Adapt or die."

  83. A fallacious argument, yet again by FreeUser · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do you watch movies by any chance? Or TV? If so, then shut up, because you're helping to fund these guys...

    This fallacy has been rebutted numerous times.

    The long and short of it is: just because circumstances constrain you to operate within particular boundries, doesn't mean you are in any way wrong or hypocritical in criticizing those boundries, or anything unjust or wrong you find within those boundries. Many of the folk, black and white alike, who criticized apartheid in the United States and South Africa still paid taxes to those governments, watched the television and listened to the radio put out by those governments (or the private corporations profiting from those apartheid systems). Those who advocated communism or socialism still had jobs within those systems, and bought their food, clothing, and housing within those very same systems they so disapproved of. This did not in any way make their criticisms less valid, or make them hyporcrits for having the courage and moxy to stand up and criticize those systems. Quite the contrary.

    Indeed, had reformers throughout history been required to operate within the parameters your troll implies ('you cannot legitimately criticize anything that is a part of your lifestyle!') we would be living no differently from people a thousand years ago. In other words, no reform would have been possible, because no criticism would have been possible.

    I suspect that, were someone who doesn't watch television or movies to criticize the Hollywood Copyright and Media Cartels, you would be the first to say something to the effect of "That's easy for you to say, you don't use their product anyway!" which is, of course, the flipside of the very same logical fallacy you've indulged in here.

    So it is you, not the person you responded to, who really ought to shut up.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    1. Re:A fallacious argument, yet again by be-fan · · Score: 2

      Since when is criticizing apartheid anything like criticizing a movie company? Since when has our society become so soft that watching TV and movies is somehow a necessity of life? People paid taxes to aparteid government because otherwise they'd go to jail. People operated within communist governments because otherwise they'd go to jail (or worse). Not watching TV or movies simply means you might (gasp!) have to read a book once in a while. Besides, you took the comment out of context. The original poster was criticizing ILM for working for the "evil" movie companies. I pointed out, that by watching movies and TV, he was in no position to criticize ILM for working for Sony and Universal. Under your logic, ILM is in a better position than the original poster. Making special effects it their livelihood, how they earn money to survive. If they have to do it in cooperation with the "evil" movie companies, then that's what they have to do. The poster, on the other hand, watches movies merely for entertainment. For him to pay the "evil" movie comapnies is ideologically unsupportable, because he is entirely free to not watch without undue trauma to himself.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  84. hmmmmm by rocket97 · · Score: 0

    can you install Linux on it?

    --
    "The two most abundant elements in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity." -Harlan Ellison
  85. Intel/AMD deserves more credit than Linux by mrm677 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Linux is not solely responsible for the five-fold increase in speed. Linux allows ILM to leverage the very high price/performance ratio of the x86 microprocessors produced by AMD and Intel. If SGI ported IRIX to x86, then they might not be using Linux. Of course Linux is free, but ILM had to spend many man hours to port their software.

    1. Re:Intel/AMD deserves more credit than Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SGI has no intention of supporting IRIX once Itanic hits full stride. Going forward, their OS of choice will be Linux.

      To that end, they've placed their outstanding journaling filesystem (XFS) under GPL, released several HA/system monitoring tools (PCP and FailSafe) and pretty much been working their asses off to support Linux. Too bad they don't get press like VA Linux^H^H^H^H^HSoftware, IBM or RedHat...

    2. Re:Intel/AMD deserves more credit than Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong.

      IRIX/MIPS and LINUX/IA64 will be two different product lines both supported by SGI. If you don't understand how a smaller tech company like SGI can support two product lines then you obviously aren't aware of their current architecture and their future plans. SGI has been contributing to OSS to help bring LINUX up to an acceptable level of performance and quality for their future IA64 products. IRIX/MIPS will still occupy the high end (Octane,Onyx,Origin 512+ CPUs), LINUX/IA64 will live in the low end up to the mid end in large single image shared memory computers (128+ CPUs)

    3. Re:Intel/AMD deserves more credit than Linux by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 2

      Linux is not solely responsible for the five-fold increase in speed. Linux allows ILM to leverage the very high price/performance ratio of the x86 microprocessors produced by AMD and Intel. If SGI ported IRIX to x86, then they might not be using Linux. Of course Linux is free, but ILM had to spend many man hours to port their software.

      I agree, in part. While it took many man hours to port, it took much less than it would to port to Windows. Remember, hardware is useless without software. Linux makes the cheap commodity Intel/AMD systems useful by providing a stable, efficient and full-featured platform that's largely compatible with what they're used to. I think you're selling Linu show to say the CPUs deserve more credit; there should be an even share for both.

  86. HA but this ones Free!!1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I consider it a major triumph for Richard Stallman lovers in general to see that GNOME desktop being used to scuplt Yoda!!! HAHAHA!~!! Microsoft Trolls BItE That one!!!

  87. The Good and The Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Good: They used Linux.
    The Bad: They used Linux to create Jar-Jar!

  88. effects aren't just for Lucas and Spielberg by _|()|\| · · Score: 2
    You'll never hear, "We used off the shelf hardware and stock footage to make this scene, and saved a few dollars."

    I saw a neat demo at a Maya seminar last week. They're looking to take panoramas to the next level--not only can you rotate the camera, but you can translate it. Combine this with some effects (e.g., moving water) and low-end compositing, and you can put together a passable demo reel with little or no video footage.

    As for production, we're seeing subtle effects in main-stream films. I was amazed by the behind-the-scenes footage of Cast Away, because I had no idea the extent to which CGI was used. This will eventually filter down even to the million dollar or less films. The difference between Linux and proprietary Unix will make a difference, there.

  89. Not "in" hollywood by sfjoe · · Score: 1


    ILM is at the Skywalker Ranch just north of San Francisco - a very long way from Hollywood.

    --
    It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
  90. Is this why? by sv0f · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    So Linux is being used at ILM. Could this be why The Phantom Menace and especially AOTC suck ass?

    They need to go back to CP/M or whatever they used back in the day.

    1. Re:Is this why? by gotak · · Score: 1

      No but you might be brain damanged.

  91. Qui-Gon Lives! by LMCBoy · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    It was "explained" in Ep II, you just missed it. As Anikan begins to slaughter the Tusken raiders, you hear a disembodied voice saying "Anikan, Anikan No!"...That voice was Qui-Gon's.

    --
    Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
  92. Re:CBDTPA .... Linux ... the irony... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's just the typical Linux user hypocracy. They all do it all the time. Fucking sickening isn't it? An entire software hippie movement that can't even put their own morals and philosophies on the line. Pathetic.

  93. PC Fans by epsalon · · Score: 2

    An unexpected snag arose during the upgrade: all the PC fans had to be replaced because they were defective.

    I guess all those PC fans were replaced with linux advocates...

  94. Re:Subscription help by scott+at+LJ · · Score: 1

    I don't know when that happened, but we do handle our own subscription fulfillment now and if anyone has/had a problem with their subscription we'd really like to hear from you and get it straightened out.

    e-mail me the details at scott@ssc.com and let me help.

    Thanks,
    Scott at LJ

  95. Re:Subscription help by scott+at+LJ · · Score: 1

    Send me an e-mail with the details and I can get that fixed for you.

    Scott at LJ
    scott@ssc.com

  96. FLTK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ant they are using my favorite FLTK toolkit for new stuff!

  97. Re: Linux speed. by PotatoHead · · Score: 2

    I saw that one too. It had to do with the ECAD industry. They did a straight port of one of their solvers. Got a 5x increase using Linux.

    That article was comparing SUN SPARC to INTEL Linux though so there may be other factors.

    5X is still good though. Something is being done right.

  98. Re:Subscription help by mnordstr · · Score: 2

    That's ok. It never appeared on my credit card bill either, so I didn't loose anything, except for a possible subscription.

    I don't know what happened, but I got a mail saying:

    "SSC Linux Journal thanks you for your order. Please allow 4-6 weeks for new subscriptions to arrive.
    (10-12 weeks for foreign orders)"

    After that, nothing... Maybe a bug?

  99. That seals the deal.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Jar-Jar Binks powered by Linux.

  100. Come on atleast try to look like you're being fair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The old system is so slow that the clones firing lasers appear to be throwing javelins. We've seen about a five times speed improvement with Linux, which is appreciated! ... Our renderer hasn't been ported yet but will be by the summer. That's all that's keeping me on the O2."

    It is not Linux that is making your damn software faster! It's the new hardware bozo. It is not really fair to compare a 6 year old computer with a new one. The O2 was fast in its day but of course any new PC will run rings around it in _most_ applications. Where the O2 still shines is in real time on-air graphics, large textures, built-in video and ICE, reliability, and it looks like a freaking blue toaster.

    The O2 is entering End of Production (EOP) in October. It first went on sale in 1996. It will be End of Lifed (EOL) in 2007.

  101. not all music by pixel+fairy · · Score: 1

    http://www.riaa.org/About-Members-1.cfm
    is a convienient list of labels to avoid. there are plenty of musicians who have nothing to do with them. of course the RIAA is doing everything in thier power to make it hard to musicians to get anywhere without them. thankfully there is alot of good music outside of thier controll.

    your right about them trying to take power from us. with the new technology people can make movies without them. people can distribute music without them. musicans can make a living without them controlling it or getting money from it. thats what they dont like. this non sense about piracy is a blatant lie. (if you dont believe me look at record sales when napster was popular, i have other reasons to believe these things, but mostly it just makes sense when you look at what they are doing.)

  102. Re:Subscription help by scott+at+LJ · · Score: 1

    That was just their (former outsource agent) autoresponse.

    At some point your order must have failed a check, like the bank software declined the authorization for whatever reason (sometimes that just happens) and your order dropped and they didn't try and contact you. Which is unfortunate because you didn't get your subscription and we didn't get a subscriber. Another reason why we are handling subscription fulfillment ourselves now.

    If you give it another go, drop me a line and I can confirm the order and get you your subscriber ID and so forth.

    Scott at LJ
    scott@ssc.com

  103. Could you imagine ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... a bewolf cluster of these ?

  104. Re: Linux speed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a modern sport bike that will greatly out perform a 1959 Ferrari Testa Rossa. And my bike only cost $13K compared to the $2M price tag on the Ferrari. I guess the Ferrari is crap. Nice logic.

  105. I R0X0R! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FIRSTUS&nbsp POSTUS&nbsp, BEEEEOTCHAE!
    I r #1! All others are #2 or lower!
    (You may touch my ewok!)




    pleeeease?!!!

  106. No, no, no, no, NO! You've got it all wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's GNU/ Troll!

  107. was there *any* AMD used at all in AOTC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I keep hearing that ILM used all AMD machines to render ep2

    is this true?

    1. Re:was there *any* AMD used at all in AOTC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, P4.

  108. SGI blurbs... building on 101 & Shoreline by green+pizza · · Score: 2

    SGI's follow-through in recent years has been pretty good. The NT and IA-32 Linux experiments didn't go too well, but they've been supporting IRIX on MIPS better than I could have ever asked.

    The funky SGI building on the corner of Shoreline and 101 is *old*. Drive down the street a ways towards their funky newer buildings... built just a couple years ago.

  109. Re:CBDTPA .... Linux ... the irony... by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 2

    the right hand doesnt know what the left is doing.

    --
    Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.