Slashdot Mirror


How IBM (and Open Source) Won eBay

DemonBrew wrote to us with a new article in Business2 how IBM beat MSFT, Sun, BEA Systems to win the contract for the new eBay. Cool part is that it's based on Websphere, which has major open source components.

317 comments

  1. I'll tell ya how... by swordboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    They waited until the very last second and then squeezed their bid in.

    Bastards!

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    1. Re:I'll tell ya how... by Bouncings · · Score: 5, Funny

      Microsoft didn't use the "Buy It Now" button?

      --
      -- Ken Kinder ken@_nospam_kenkinder.com http://kenkinder.com/
    2. Re:I'll tell ya how... by Phroggy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Microsoft didn't use the "Buy It Now" button?

      That disappears after someone places a bid, and since we all know Microsoft is never first at anything, they would have missed that chance. Microsoft always waits for somebody else to go first, so they can see whether it's a good idea.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    3. Re:I'll tell ya how... by Xerithane · · Score: 2

      Actually it disappears after the reserve price has been met.

      Sorry for the nitpick.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    4. Re:I'll tell ya how... by westfieldscientific · · Score: 2, Funny

      M$ clicked the "Buy it Now" button but their browser crashed and they hadda reboot.

      By the time they got MSN back online the auction had ended.

      --
      give me a /home where the buffalo roam
    5. Re:I'll tell ya how... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there is a reserve price - usually there isnt, therefore generally the OP was correct!

    6. Re:I'll tell ya how... by jo42 · · Score: 1

      They should have talked to Google. I'm sure they would have suggested 10,001 Leenucks boxes running MySQL. Personally, I would have used 9,999 FreeBSD boxes with flat text files.

  2. I read this article... by Marx_Mrvelous · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It did seem very interesting. The article mentions that IBM is still loking for something to "light the fire" and produce large amounts of revenue... maybe hey don't need an internal change, but an external one; businesses realizeing the power and cost savings of open-source software and switching back to big blue.

    --

    Moderation: Put your hand inside the puppet head!
    1. Re:I read this article... by diggem · · Score: 3, Informative

      maybe [t]hey don't need an internal change, but an external one;

      But really they've already made an internal change. By embracing Linux and opensource. 2-3 years ago I had heard rumors of IBM revamping AIX to be more like Linux. Whether that's actually happened I don't know, but I see plenty of evidence which says they've certainly embraced Linux itself, as well as opensource. They've pushed the 'stick all your linux on our mainframe' for a while. I can only imagine the internal changes that took place to go from closed and proprietary to open. You won't see MS doing that any time soon.

    2. Re:I read this article... by HeUnique · · Score: 2

      "2-3 years ago I had heard rumors of IBM revamping AIX to be more like Linux. Whether that's actually happened I don't know..."

      It's called AIX5L (or AIX 5XL)...

      --
      Hetz (Heunique)
    3. Re:I read this article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IBM OSs have been open source for decades. Open Source is nothing new to them, in fact, they pioneered it.

    4. Re:I read this article... by svallarian · · Score: 1

      5L and the "Linux Affinity Toolkit for Aix 4.3.3" --- real nice package, includes rpm package manager and has a ton of precompiled rpms.

      --
      I patented screwing your mom. But it got revoked for "prior art."
  3. Websphere, Open Source, WTF? by outofthezone · · Score: 3, Flamebait

    What the hell are you talking about? Major open-source components? Which? Last I checked, (I have the Websphere Studio download sitting here, right from IBM's partner site - and I see nothing about open source anything. Is java open source? Or XML?

    Open Standards and open-source are 2 different things, and hell - Java isn't an open standard, nor is it open source in the truest sense. What a bunch of bullshit propaganda. Go Microsoft.

    1. Re:Websphere, Open Source, WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What webserver does WebSphere use?

    2. Re:Websphere, Open Source, WTF? by Gurft · · Score: 2, Informative

      umm Websphere is based on Apache Webserver... which last time I checked was one of the largest opensource projects EVER

      --
      I'm an AIX Systems administrator, and yes I do cry myself to sleep at night....
    3. Re:Websphere, Open Source, WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and the windows tcp stack is 'based' on BSD, but that doesn't make Windows open source either.

    4. Re:Websphere, Open Source, WTF? by EvilAlien · · Score: 2, Informative
      At least it can be argued that IBM is a proponent and supporter of Open Source:

      JFS - a filesystem is a pretty major component of a server, don't you think?.

      developerWorks: Open Source Projects - many more toys for development

      Meanwhile, other major vendors jump on the bandwagon with comparitively little (Sun, SGI's XFS which is not open but at least the distribute Linux clue, and HP are on the Linux bandwagon) to none (Microsoft). BEA is one of Sun's happy little Sun ONE minions. Meanwhile, Microsoft continues to be a joke for large projects. Go Microsoft indeed.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    5. Re:Websphere, Open Source, WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not the complete truth -- WebSphere distributes with Apache, but it's really just a Servlet engine.

    6. Re:Websphere, Open Source, WTF? by jmauro · · Score: 2, Informative

      XFS is as open as JFS. Get the complete source, GPL'ed even, at http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs.

    7. Re:Websphere, Open Source, WTF? by pwagland · · Score: 3, Informative
      What the hell are you talking about? Major open-source components? Which? Last I checked, (I have the Websphere Studio download sitting here, right from IBM's partner site - and I see nothing about open source anything. Is java open source? Or XML?
      Sadly, they are true, have a look at what is included with WebSphere:
      • Apache
      • XAlan
      • Xerces
      Having said this, I agree that the opensource bit is a little overstated, since the major part of WebSphere is not opensource at all, but how would it get onto /. if they didn't mention opensource! :-)
    8. Re:Websphere, Open Source, WTF? by Egoine · · Score: 1

      Not the complete truth either.

      Websphere is much more than a servlet engine:

      EJB,JNDI,JDBC,Remote manageability,clustering,and so on and so forth. Apache is a core part of it, even if you can use iPlanet if you want to replace apache.

    9. Re:Websphere, Open Source, WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
      The EJB and clustering support in Websphere is not open source either.

      Closed source parts:

      Servlet Engine

      EJB

      JNDI

      JDBC pooling

      Clustering

      Open source parts:

      Web server (Apache) assuming they're using Apache.

      XML (xerces, xalan)

      Kind of funny that anyone is clueless enough to think that WebSphere is open source.

    10. Re:Websphere, Open Source, WTF? by Egoine · · Score: 1

      >Kind of funny that anyone is clueless enough to think that WebSphere is open source.

      ?? who thinks that?

      "...which has *major* open source **components**"

      BTW, it also uses stuff from jakarta for JSP (at least in v3.5)

    11. Re:Websphere, Open Source, WTF? by irix · · Score: 1

      Umm, WebSphere Studio != WebSphere Application Server, which is what they are talking about.

      WAS includes an IBM version of Apache, but the main component is the J2EE application server, which AFAIK doesn't contain any open source components.

      Thanks for coming out, though.

      --

      Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
    12. Re:Websphere, Open Source, WTF? by mikolas · · Score: 1

      As I recall, the XML parts also originate from IBM, they donated those to Apache XML project.

      The JSP compiler is Jasper by the way. But all the enterprise level functionality is closed source.

    13. Re:Websphere, Open Source, WTF? by RoweM · · Score: 1

      And Jasper, the JSP compiler from TomCat

      --

      --
      "Small minds discuss people, average minds discuss events, great minds discuss ideas"

    14. Re:Websphere, Open Source, WTF? by RoweM · · Score: 1
      WebSphere App Dev Studio is based on Eclipse, which is open source.

      WAS uses several open source components in addition to Apache, such as the previously mention Xerces, Xalan, etc, and parts of Tomcat (the Jasper JSP compiler).

      --

      --
      "Small minds discuss people, average minds discuss events, great minds discuss ideas"

    15. Re:Websphere, Open Source, WTF? by Nept · · Score: 1

      Websphere Portal Server (a Websphere add-in) is built on top of Jetspeed, an Apache/Jakarta project.

      --
      "Teachers leave us kids alone ..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
    16. Re:Websphere, Open Source, WTF? by curunir · · Score: 2

      Is java open source?

      yes.

      Java isn't an open standard, nor is it open source in the truest sense.

      How many senses of the words "open-source" are there? Either the code is available to the public, or it isn't? Remember, Open-Source != Free.

      --
      "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
    17. Re:Websphere, Open Source, WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > "...which has *major* open source **components**"

      Which doesn't distinguish WebSphere from any other J2EE containers (with the exception of Jasper for JSP).

      Most of the J2EE containers work with Apache.

      Most servlet programmers use Xalan and Xerces no matter which J2EE container they use.

      Most (or at least many) servlet programmers also use open source frameworks like tapestry or velocity or struts. That's true no matter which J2EE container they use.

      So it's just not accurate to say that WebSphere is really any different than any other J2EE container with the exception that it uses Jasper. iPlanet also uses Jasper.

      You can say that IBM supports open source (Xalan, Xerces, Axis, jikes), but it's just inaccurate to use IBM's closed source product, WebSphere, as an example of open source.

    18. Re:Websphere, Open Source, WTF? by EvilAlien · · Score: 1

      Well damn... I don't know why I thought they weren't as open as IBM's project. I suck.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    19. Re:Websphere, Open Source, WTF? by nhavar · · Score: 2

      Websphere studio at least the newer versions run using the Eclipse package which is open source based off of netbeans I believe. Additionally I believe that the webserver itself uses apache code and tomcat.

      The newer builds of Websphere studio are amazing. I've edited HTML/XML/XSL/CSS/Javascript/Java/XHTML in it and it's great. Unfortunately the price tag is pretty steep at 3000-6000 per seat for the studio package depending on who you talk to. Eclipse is "free" and is the core that Websphere studio is built off of but it doesn't appear to have ALL the features studio has (but hey for editing Java it's excellent compared to some of the other crap out there).

      --
      "Do not be swept up in the momentum of mediocrity." - anon
    20. Re:Websphere, Open Source, WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "umm Websphere is based on Apache Webserver"

      Whoa...the 'moron' bell just went off at Slashdot.

      There might be Apache code that runs the built-in web server, but this is a tiny tiny part of websphere. Its like calling my copy of Windows XP "open source" because i used it to download an ISO of red hat.

    21. Re:Websphere, Open Source, WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      retard, can you even read english?

    22. Re:Websphere, Open Source, WTF? by rmjiv · · Score: 5, Informative

      umm Websphere is based on Apache Webserver

      umm, -5(Wrong)

      IBM does have a product called IBM HTTP Server, which is a rebrand of Apache Webserver with some configuration tools and (iirc) a different SSL engine. However, WebSphere is a totally different product with different functionality (application server vs. web-server). They are bundled together, but are different.

      WebSphere does use Xerces and Xalan which are Apache projects for XML processing. So do most of the Java application servers, though.

      FYI, IBM is a major supporter of the Xerces and Xalan sub-projects, and is a major supporter of the Jakarta Apache project, providing developers and code. So maybe they have a better claim on being "more" open source than other Java Application servers. This I leave up to others to decide.

      rmjiv

      --
      She came sliding down the alleyway like butter dripping off of a hot biscuit.
    23. Re:Websphere, Open Source, WTF? by sydlexic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      and available source != Open Source. Open Source proponents have gone to great lengths to establish a set of critera for evaluating licenses against Open Source standards. those standards insure that licenses to not permit the removal of source from the community once it is made available. if "available" meant "open", then Windows is open. the source is available if you sign the right licenses... just like java.

    24. Re:Websphere, Open Source, WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, so IBM got over for once on microsoft,
      why do you care ?, its not like microsoft
      hasnt done it to them a few time !.

    25. Re:Websphere, Open Source, WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a poor analogy (no disrespect to the poster, however). Not to nitpick (but since everyone else is): A better analogy^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H an improvement to _your_ analogy, would be saying that Windows XP is an example of Open Source because it has the BSD TCP/IP Stack under the hood.

    26. Re:Websphere, Open Source, WTF? by Mydron · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the other major "open source" components of websphere: DB2 or Oracle which are typically supported on AIX or Solaris. All hail the success of open-source!

      Thank you IBM.

    27. Re:Websphere, Open Source, WTF? by thammoud · · Score: 0

      They are ?

      Well then, open source AIX, WebSphere, AS400. IBM is only an advocate of open source when it suits their needs.

      They are a buch of hypocrites

    28. Re:Websphere, Open Source, WTF? by Joseph+Vigneau · · Score: 1

      IBM is only an advocate of open source when it suits their needs.
      They are a buch
      [sic] of hypocrites [emphasis added]

      Uh, you misspelled "businesspeople". They are a bunch of businesspeople who happen to also fund open source development, BTW. HTH. HAND.

    29. Re:Websphere, Open Source, WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't look closely enough at that WebSphere Studio did you? Its based on Eclipse which is open source!

    30. Re:Websphere, Open Source, WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Furthermore, "IBM HTTP Server" is even optional. You can use IIS or another older IBM web server called Domino Go.

    31. Re:Websphere, Open Source, WTF? by jsse · · Score: 2

      I see nothing about open source anything.

      Eclipse, which is supported by IBM, derived from Websphere Studio Workbench, for Java development.

      It's java-based application which can be running on many platforms including Linux.

      You really need to click few more buttons, the link is near to where you download websphere. :)

    32. Re:Websphere, Open Source, WTF? by xbytor · · Score: 1
      Their servlet engine was orginally from apache. I remember the exception stacks very clearly. A large part of the apache soap effort originated with IBM. Go back and look at the history in from the mail groups. IBM has fed a lot of tech into the Java Apache effort.

      Which brings me to my next point. I took a visit to their Java labs over in the UK a few years ago. (I fergit the town, but there was lots of sheep :-). I had serious doubts about java primarily because of Sun. After talking with the IBM folks, I decided java would survive in spite of Sun, not because of Sun.

      But I'll be happier when the MQJMS libs are cleaner...

      ciao,

      -bytor

    33. Re:Websphere, Open Source, WTF? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2

      Major open-source components? Which?

      IBM has contributed some important components to the Apache Jakarta and XML projects. They have also contributed the Eclipse IDE, and considerable code to the Linux kernel effort.

    34. Re:Websphere, Open Source, WTF? by _Swank · · Score: 2

      A quick correction -- eclipse is NOT based off netbeans. The eclipse source was developed entirely by IBM (before release to the community). The intent of both eclipse and netbeans is the same: to provide an open development platform. However there are some differences.

      1. Netbeans is 100% pure java. Eclipse is not. Rather than using swing or awt, eclipse uses a custom Standard Widget Toolkit (SWT) which uses native calls to windows api/motif/gnome2.

      2. Eclipse is really a framework and set of apis to allow the easy creation of plugins to provide a complete (and not necessarily java) develipment environment. As provided in it's initial release it contained most of the plugins necessary to develop the whole gamut of java applications. Several companies (e.g. Rational) have created their own plugins to provide development environments with a variety of different goals (UML modeling and development). It is my understanding that netbeans is geared specifically towards java.

    35. Re:Websphere, Open Source, WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong again. Apache is not a core part of it.
      Websphere is simply a J2EE compliant application-server. That means JCA, JMS, JDBC, EJB, JSP, Servlets, JavaMail, JTA, transcations, declarative security compinent, and other services. Apache is a *web* server. That's it. It doesn't handle any of that stuff.

      I don't know about WebShpere, but with most J2EE servers, you can put any web-server in from of the app-server you want. In fact, you don't need a web-server at all, you can run J2EE application servers standalone.

    36. Re:Websphere, Open Source, WTF? by berky · · Score: 1

      Websphere Studio is based on eclipse, which is open source - http://www.eclipse.org

    37. Re:Websphere, Open Source, WTF? by toriver · · Score: 2
      Websphere Studio is based on eclipse, which is open source - http://www.eclipse.org

      Good. Now, what does that development environment have to do with the application server other than sharing a name component?

  4. Microsofts secret. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:Microsofts secret. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Microsofts secret. by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Well you also have This Which clearly shows www.msf.microsoft.com running Linux and Apache. Also the march survey shows several hosts at the bottom which run linux.. but this page seems to be broken, perhaps covered up in embarassment.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  5. I wonder... by Mrdzone · · Score: 4, Funny

    what they are going to do with the old hardware. I can see it now your very own piece of ebay right at your house!

    1. Re:I wonder... by Phroggy · · Score: 2, Funny

      what they are going to do with the old hardware. I can see it now your very own piece of ebay right at your house!

      I'm thinking auctioning it off would be most appropriate.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    2. Re:I wonder... by GrandCow · · Score: 2

      what they are going to do with the old hardware. I can see it now your very own piece of ebay right at your house!
      I wonder if they'll sell it on the new ebay?

      --
      "Well kids, you tried your best, and you failed. The lesson is, never try." -Homer Simpson
    3. Re:I wonder... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2


      Just a piece? Why not pool your money with some pals and buy them all?

      Then you'll be able to say
      ALL YOUR eBAYS ARE BELONG TO US.

      *groan* I'm sorry.

  6. IBM is making a gamble here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if they take away Sun's marketshare, Java will become non-free (as in beer) and IBM will have to shell out a huge amount of money or make a long and risky switch to .NOT

    1. Re:IBM is making a gamble here by MaxwellStreet · · Score: 1

      The moment Sun makes java not free (as in beer), its huge developer base gets sliced in half. There's no way they're foolish enough to try to make people pay just to use java.

    2. Re:IBM is making a gamble here by victwenty · · Score: 1
      f they take away Sun's marketshare, Java will become non-free (as in beer) and IBM will have to shell out a huge amount of money


      More likely, IBM would just buy Sun..

    3. Re:IBM is making a gamble here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell are you talking about. Sun is in no way EVER going to charge for JAVA. They are even going the other way; they are not even charging for the testing of compatable JVM's anymore. Ohh wait I have an idea. When the guys that create and maintain apache get together and decide they are going to start charging for it, or no more upgrade by them... oh wait one better... Linus decides that all future kernel upgrades are not going to be free....

      That isn't going to happen. There is little risk here.

  7. They said "bake-off" by Pituritus+Ani · · Score: 4, Insightful
    in the second paragraph. I guess the lawsuit from Pillsbury will be rolling in any minute now.

    I also found this amusing (emphasis mine):

    eBay confirms that it was dazzled by IBM's expertise with the open-standard Java programming language . . .

    While Java could be called "open," compared with, say, the Windows API, I don't believe Sun has turned control over the language specification to a standards body.

    --

    Another proud carrier of the $rtbl flag

    1. Re:They said "bake-off" by geekoid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually they did, but then SUN found out they couldn't control the body, so they took it back.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:They said "bake-off" by AJWM · · Score: 3, Informative

      To be more precise, SUN found out that the body was already in Microsoft's pocket, so they took it back.

      --
      -- Alastair
    3. Re:They said "bake-off" by AJWM · · Score: 2

      While the Java trademark and JVM are still Sun-controlled, the various Java APIs are standardized by a community process which in fact tends to be dominated by IBM.

      --
      -- Alastair
  8. Open standard? by km790816 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    "IBM's expertise with the open-standard Java programming language..."

    Open standard? Did I read this wrong?

    1. Re:Open standard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you didn't read this wrong.

      However ANYONE can make a Java Virtual Machine.

      In that regard it is open.

  9. great news for online shoppers by tps12 · · Score: 0, Interesting
    This is great news for everyone, especially those of us in the Free Source community. While Linux has become a houshold verb, nearly rivalling other obscure operating systems such as the Macintosh and BeOS in user fervency, there has failed to be much of a dent made in the online auction community.

    True story, I was unable to leave feedback (for non-ebayers: feedback is what you leave for people, usually a letter grade) using Galeon. I had to do it from work with my IE browser. This is too much to ask of the average desktop user, but Linux is definitely on the right track.

    Not to mention the countless bugs, often resulting in lost orders or user fraud and credit card and identity theft, in the core ebay software. Once the next generation ebay is submitted to peer review, we will see an eradication of these bugs, just as we have seen in the Linux kernel 2.4.

    I give ebay A++++++++ great site!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:great news for online shoppers by synx · · Score: 3, Informative

      I wish I had mod points, I'd mod this -1 has no clue.

      The ebay software/business logic is highly proprietary and difficult to understand. The story is how IBM sold ebay to use their software which is based on open source technology including apache, linux. Then of course there is java which isnt open source, but "open standard" (ymmv).

      Anyways, peer review of complex business logic by people who don't understand it won't help nothing.

    2. Re:great news for online shoppers by delta407 · · Score: 1

      While Linux has become a houshold verb, nearly rivalling other obscure operating systems

      This is great! Linux is almost caught up to other obscure operating systems! Great job, guys!

      But... I'm not so sure about the household verb thing. "Eat your mashed potatoes, or I'll go Linux on your a__!" just doesn't seem all that common. The open-source community really needs to work together on this one, but with a little help and corporate cash I think we can pull this off.

    3. Re:great news for online shoppers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm not so sure about the household verb thing. "Eat your mashed potatoes, or I'll go Linux on your a__!"

      So "apeshit" is a verb? Nice move. "To shit an ape."

    4. Re:great news for online shoppers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It is nice to be in the fantasy land and read one thing and remember another. There is nothing in the article that says that IBM will use any open software. They will use WebSphere and most likely DB2. You will NEVER see the code in the open. WAKE UP!

    5. Re:great news for online shoppers by curunir · · Score: 2

      I wish I had mod points, I'd mod this -1 has no clue.

      Hi...kettle...this is the pot, you're black.

      ...java which isnt open source, but "open standard"

      Ummm...Java *is* open source. The source is available at Sun's site. I've downloaded the source to all the JDK's since 1.1 (the code is often the best documentation).

      --
      "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
    6. Re:great news for online shoppers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you, this poster seems to be a BSing for karma troll. Look at his previous posts here, most of them being offtopic requests for "Gandalf looking stoned." I say his best was this one, I guess adding Gnome keeps one from being modded.

    7. Re:great news for online shoppers by Watts+Martin · · Score: 2
      ...Linux has become a household verb, nearly rivalling other obscure operating systems such as the Macintosh...

      What color is the sky on the little world you live on?

    8. Re:great news for online shoppers by Yankovic · · Score: 1

      i hate to rain on your parade, but the chance that ebay is going to open up any of the code you list is about 1e-10%.

      My question is how much of websphere is really open source? I mean, i know about apache, and the USE the java apis, but what else is there?

    9. Re:great news for online shoppers by Mark+Imbriaco · · Score: 1

      Just because the source is available doesn't make it Open Source. You are not legally allowed to distribute that code in modified form, and I'm fairly sure you're not even allowed to in unmodified form.

    10. Re:great news for online shoppers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Open Source" was a reject as a trademark in the US because it has a common meaning, namely that you can see the source. Your attempt to capitalize the common language is either ignorant or Bolshevik.

      What you meant to refer to is the intentionally confusingly named "OSI-approved" trademark.

    11. Re:great news for online shoppers by fuzz6y · · Score: 1

      "Eat your mashed potatoes, or I'll go Linux on your a__!"
      That's an adjective, or maybe a noun.

      --
      If you're going to be elitist, it would help to be elite.
  10. Java makes Microsoft weak... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and makes everyone else stronger!

    Java has revolutionized this industry by providing a means for developers to write software that works on all platforms, without any strings attached. Of course this is very bad for Microsoft because it directly threatens their near-monopoly with Windows. The Java momentum is very strong, and will only get stronger as Microsoft continues to try to thwart its efforts.

  11. IBM sniped by mochan_s · · Score: 0, Redundant

    IBM must have sniped to win the ebay bid.

  12. Don't worry. by Anti-Microsoft+Troll · · Score: 0, Interesting

    MS wanted to have eBay run on its software, but there were so many security holes in it, people were winning auctions that had closed years ago.

    I beta tested Microsoft's software for eBay and managed to hack in bids that won auctions for that guy' kidney, Elian's raft, and that girder from the World Trade Center. There are no "invalid auctions" when the thing's running Microsoft's swiss cheese software.

  13. Have you heard of? by md17 · · Score: 5, Informative


    JCP - Java Community Process
    To take right from their website:

    The JCP is the way the Java platform evolves. It's an open organization of international Java developers and licensees whose charter is to develop and revise Java technology specifications, reference implementations, and technology compatibility kits. Both Java technology and the JCP were originally created by Sun Microsystems, however, the JCP has evolved from the informal process that Sun used beginning in 1995, to a formalized process overseen by representatives from many organizations across the Java community.

    Come on people, do your research before you blab this stuff.

    1. Re:Have you heard of? by Pituritus+Ani · · Score: 2

      So an independent organization can publish a Java language specification without Sun's blessing? Thanks for edifying me.

      --

      Another proud carrier of the $rtbl flag

    2. Re:Have you heard of? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

      A lot of the stuff done on the Java2ME, is being done without much of Suns blessing.

    3. Re:Have you heard of? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, so Sun calls it an open organization. Can I join? Would they even listen to me, if I could join?

    4. Re:Have you heard of? by MisterBlister · · Score: 1
      Are you so easily fooled?

      The JCP is a joke. Sun ultimate decides what goes into Java. The JCP is free to suggest anything it wants, and sometimes it will get what it asks for because what it asks for is good for Sun...

      Bbut in the end, Sun makes the decisions because nobody in the JCP (or out of it for that matter) is free to "fork" Java because the code is not truly Open Source. Nor are they completely free to create their own clean-room Java implementation because Sun holds the language name as a trademark. So you can create a "Java-like language", but you can't call it "Java" without Sun's blessing.

      This isn't open source OR open standards OR a really open organization, except in the neverland world of Sun's marketing hype.

    5. Re:Have you heard of? by Glock27 · · Score: 2
      Can I join?

      Yes, for free.

      Would they even listen to me, if I could join?

      Your votes on which Bug Parade bugs are highest priority would count the same as anyone else's. You would also have access to all the Java source code, if you want it.

      --
      Galileo: "The Earth revolves around the Sun!"
      Score: -1 100% Flamebait
    6. Re:Have you heard of? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would such and organization have the need to use a Sun trademark?

      Microsoft submitted C# and the CLR to a standards organization, but kept full ownership of the brandname .NET(TM).

    7. Re:Have you heard of? by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 2

      If Java is so open, where do I download the Java Compatibility Kit (the test suite for Java VMs)? The only way I've heard of is to agree to the SCSL and agree to pay royalties to Sun.

    8. Re:Have you heard of? by lgraba · · Score: 2

      And where would I get a similar compatibility kit to check for standards compliance on, say, a C++ compiler? Oh yeah, despite being a standard, C++ does not have a compliance kit, nor does it have any way to enforce adherance to a standard.

    9. Re:Have you heard of? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why would such and organization have the need to use a Sun trademark?

      Why would a standards body want to call a language FORTRAN? Or C? The fact that the very name of the language is a trademark that they can use "intellectual" "property" law as a hammer to keep people from using demonstrates perfectly Sun's disingenuousness in claiming it's an open standard.

  14. Nifty Manuevering by huckda · · Score: 1

    IBM with their infinite wisdom
    (KNOWING what happens when you create proprietary systems), came up with the greatest resolution.
    Coupled with their hardware know-how, why is anyone surprised that they won the bid due to eBay's high-load testing?

    IBM is heading back towards BIG BLUENESS..even if only one meager step at a time...and to incorporate OpenSource solutions...how novel!

    --
    "Just Smile and Nod." --Huck
    1. Re:Nifty Manuevering by Tony-A · · Score: 2

      IBM is heading back towards BIG BLUENESS
      Methinks you're right. It's a curious mixture. By lowering the bar for competition, it becomes harder to compete with IBM. Of course if IBM gets fat and lazy and sloppy, the competition will appear almost overnight. This makes IBM a very safe choice for big business.

      "hardware know-how"
      That's one way to put it and I can't think of a better term but there's a lot more than just hardware in there. Basically it needs to work under stress and high-load, without things going screwy on the edges and corners. Open Source tends to be better stress-tested than anything you can do with a completely closed system. If you can get the balance right, everybody gains.

  15. Open Standard and Java by pridkett · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There has been a fair number of posts about whether or not Java is really an "Open-Standard". The first thing to remember is where this article originates, Business 2.0.

    Taking that into account, Java is an open standard. Are there other compilers for Java? Yes. Are there multiple interpreters for Java? Yes. Is the standard published on how it works? Yes (Addison-Wesely publishes several books on it). So, for the average intended reader of business 2.0, Java is an open standard.

    I'm probably going to get flamed for this, but something doesn't have to be controlled by an international standards organization to be open.

    Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go prepare for flames as I've posted something that people are going to have problems with.

    --
    My Slashdot account is old enough to drink...
    1. Re:Open Standard and Java by delta407 · · Score: 2

      Correct, something does not have to be controlled by an international standards organization to be open. However, when it is controlled by one company that acts like a four-year-old that doesn't want to share, then it is not open.

      Just because there are other compilers and interpreters does not make it an open standard. Does WINE make the Windows API an open standard? Does Samba make SMB/CIFS an open standard? Microsoft is comparable to Sun -- they made this, it's their stuff, they can do whatever they darn well please.

    2. Re:Open Standard and Java by pridkett · · Score: 2

      With regards to CIFS it's controlled by SNIA. You can find the spec at http://www.snia.org/English/Work_Groups/NAS/CIFS/i ndex.html.

      It's Microsoft's extensions that make it a problem. Someone more knowledgeable might want to clear this up a little better than I can.

      --
      My Slashdot account is old enough to drink...
    3. Re:Open Standard and Java by Kingpin · · Score: 1
      ..controlled by one company that acts like a four-year-old that doesn't want to share..

      Uh, define share? Allow bastardized versions like J# or J++ to pollute the API? Allow the community to partake in the specification? The Java Community Process is nothing but this. Java is free to implement according to the specifications directed by Sun - this goes for runtime environment as well as core libraries. There are completely open source efforts that do this, there are other companies like IBM that do this as well. What is it that you so lack? What are you afraid of? That Sun is going to pull the plug? That cannot happen.

      Your examples suck at best. Parts of the Win32 API have never been published, CIFS was reverse engineered by the Samba gang. There are fully public complete specifications for both VMs and langauge implementation available. Same goes for architectural designs, eg. EJB containers.

      --
      Unable to read configuration file '/bigassraid/htdig//conf/14229.conf'
      Geocrawler error message.
    4. Re:Open Standard and Java by kinkie · · Score: 5, Informative

      CIFS per se is an open standard. What makes it difficult to interoperate with Microsoft's implementation of it is that CIFS is used by Microsoft to tunnel RPC calls which do very important tasks (even basic stuff like looking up an user SID to perform an ACL match).
      Without those calls filesharing should still be possible, but with VERY limited functionality.
      The problem is that (in true Microsoft fashion) there's HUNDREDS of calls, and each of those can have LOTS of variants with widely different results. See any network-related MSDN-documented
      information function call. Often you'll find a parameter which is an "info level" or somesuch. Change that parameter, and you change the type of the returned values and obviously the returned data. See this call for an example.
      Microsoft's interface design method appears (from the outside) to be something like this:they think in advance, and then they define those interfaces which they MIGHT need five years in the future, and place stubs until then. This has the side-effect that their interfaces have everything AND the kitchen sink, thus the hundreds of calls.

      --
      /kinkie
    5. Re:Open Standard and Java by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Preach it, brotha!

    6. Re:Open Standard and Java by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you.

      I'll go even a little further in Sun's defense.

      Sun gave us what's now Open Office.
      Sun makes an excellent JVM for linux that is free(beer).
      Sun has also funded much gnome development.
      What's sad is that punks like Miguel de Icaza can turn their backs on Sun after what its done for our little open source community.

      Sure, all corporations are in business to make money, but some are much more evil than others. In that respect Sun has proven itself to be one of the "good guys"

    7. Re:Open Standard and Java by benedict · · Score: 1

      WINE and Samba were both reverse-engineered.
      I believe that the alternative Java environments
      were written from specifications. That's a big
      difference in my book.

      --
      Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems."
    8. Re:Open Standard and Java by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Allow bastardized versions like J# or J++ to pollute the API?"

      If I add COM or XPCOM support to a Perl/Ruby/Scheme runtime and leave out some built-in stuff, nobody would say that I've "bastardized" it. Your statement just proves that Java isn't an open standard at all. It is a documented system, which is a good thing, but even your statement admits that a single vendor is setting the spec.

    9. Re:Open Standard and Java by Tony-A · · Score: 2

      IBMJava2-13 says it's open.
      You have a couple of two-ton behemoths to keep each other honest.
      Neither of them gets to do what they please.
      An 800 pound gorilla trying to mix in becomes Microsquish.
      Pipsqueaks like you and me don't really even get to have an opinion.
      Eventually it will become an official standard, AFTER it's known exactly what that standard has to be.

    10. Re:Open Standard and Java by Kingpin · · Score: 1


      You assume that you know what I mean by bastardized. That's wrong. They took several of the Java core packages and redid those, effectively ruining the beauty a common core API is.

      If they'd done a com.m-shaft.java package, no harm done, and I would have loved to be able to use that.

      --
      Unable to read configuration file '/bigassraid/htdig//conf/14229.conf'
      Geocrawler error message.
  16. Too bad for ebay... by r0nc0 · · Score: 1

    ... they must have been dazzled by IBM's total bs when it comes to sales. I've worked on many recent projects where IBM has been pushing WebSphere really really hard. Some of it is interesting stuff, other parts of it is real crap. But then I suppose I could say that about any technology. And then there's IBM Global Services... It's a great win for J2EE, but it's too bad for eBay.

  17. Slashdot celebrates IBM winning a project? by vkg · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    WTF? It's all over, folks - it's not that the dot sold out, it's just that the old folks have won. Open source, ruled by Apple and IBM.

    Why is this news? Answer: it isn't. What it is is lame. The buzz has worn off, and it's back to business as usual.

    1. Re:Slashdot celebrates IBM winning a project? by zsmooth · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      All you have to do is say "I'LL SEE YOU IN METAMOD!" and the moderators get all scared and stuff and mod you back up.

  18. What you don't see at walmart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:What you don't see at walmart by egoots · · Score: 1

      Perhaps if you read this, you might be better informed

    2. Re:What you don't see at walmart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um why would Walmart want to send out
      misleading information when saying what
      their servers run on?

  19. The new grammar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Linux has become a houshold verb

    And BTW, it's "bested" (past tense), not "best"

    1. Re:The new grammar by perky · · Score: 2

      you don't think he might have meant "beat", what with the 'a' being next to the 's' and all.

      --
      "The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
  20. Cowards.... by alexborges · · Score: 0, Troll

    Id bet that a

    PHP+APACHE+MYSQL

    Might have proven much cheaper/better than the crappy websphere (ive tested it, used it and hate it).

    --
    NO SIG
    1. Re:Cowards.... by alen · · Score: 2

      Are you insane? Ebay uses Oracle to run it's database. You really think that MYSQL can handle a database that size with so many users at once?

    2. Re:Cowards.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MySQL selection queries are fast enough, and the database is cheap enough (free as opposed to millions of dollars for an Oracle solution). I think you're the insane one.

    3. Re:Cowards.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you twunt.
      PHP_does_not_SCALE.

      i'm sure it works fine for ur stamp collection webiste tho'.

    4. Re:Cowards.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the InnoDB back end for MySQL, it probably can. See this site

    5. Re:Cowards.... by alen · · Score: 2

      And how large is your database? How many users connect to it? To how many sites do you replicate it to? How many transactions does it process?

      MYSQL isn't even a relational DB. How is it going to run Ebay?

    6. Re:Cowards.... by brooks_talley · · Score: 1

      That may be the funniest thing I've ever read.

      PHP is pretty decent. Apache is top notch. MySQL is a joke, as far as databases go. It's maybe on par with MS Access as far as scalability.

      Can't you just see the headlines? "Ebay's new site: 2,000,000 lines of code, $5,000,000 in hardware and networking infrastructure, no stored procedures, no database fault tolerance, no referential integrity!"

      Cheers
      -b

    7. Re:Cowards.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MySQL is crap. Please, do your part to halt and reverse the proliferation of this server!

    8. Re:Cowards.... by Doug+Neal · · Score: 0

      Slashdot seems to manage okay ;P

    9. Re:Cowards.... by VRisaMetaphor · · Score: 1

      Um, how is MySQL not relational? How can something with SQL in its name not be relational?

    10. Re:Cowards.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MySQL was called MySQL for years before it got basic RDBMS features like foreign keys. There's no reason that you couldn't run SQL queries against text files (<-- basically what old MySQL versions did)

    11. Re:Cowards.... by MattRog · · Score: 2

      Although I agree MySQL is ill suited for medium/large projects (I'm a Sybase ASE man myself) I also used to fall in the trap of 'no foreign keys, so must not be relational!'

      Codd's "12 Rules" for a 'Fully Relational DBMS' are pretty grueling:
      http://newton.uor.edu/FacultyFolder/CKe ttemborough / odd12R.html (also here http://www.soi.city.ac.uk/~tony/dbms/codds_laws.ht ml)

      By those definitions, there are few, if any 'fully' relational RDBMS. MySQL is just really, really 'less' Relational than Oracle, MS SQL, Sybase, etc.

      --

      Thanks,
      --
      Matt
    12. Re:Cowards.... by VRisaMetaphor · · Score: 1

      But how the data is stored doesn't determine whether a database is relational or not. It's how the data is viewed and accessed. If the user can see the data as tables and run a join query against them, it's a relational database! :)

    13. Re:Cowards.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, according to my reading MS SQL 7 or higher meets all those rules. I won't endeavor to prove them all, but I was able to come up with an example or practical experience for each one. I can't speak for others, but I know for a fact that MySQL fails quite a few of these rules. Did you have a point?

    14. Re:Cowards.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not if it doesn't enforce the relationships when you add or change data (which is what foreign key constraints do).

    15. Re:Cowards.... by WWWWolf · · Score: 1
      MySQL selection queries are fast enough,
      Psst! Subselects! And the other stuff that's still missing from ANSI SQL compliance!
      and the database is cheap enough
      Well, so is PostgreSQL - and it has had transactions, subselects, and whole bunch of stuff that MySQL hasn't had for ages or only got recently. Plus, for BSD folks out there, it's also in "more free" license than MySQL =)

      Sequences instead of "auto_increment"... *drool*... Actually good client program... yummy.

    16. Re:Cowards.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can something with SQL in its name not be relational?

      That is just such a stupid statement that it doesn't warrant an answer. Oh bugger.

    17. Re:Cowards.... by VRisaMetaphor · · Score: 1

      Ah, that's the distinction. Makes sense. Thanks.

      So MySQL didn't used to enforce foreign key constraints, huh? Interesting....

  21. I've Said It Before... by pnatural · · Score: 0, Funny

    And I'll say it again:

    Java is to code as music is to country.

    'nuff said.

    1. Re:I've Said It Before... by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 2
      Huh? I'm not arguing, just don't get it.

      My first thought was that it was a shot at Java and country music, but that would be "Java:code::country:music". Then I thought, well, maybe the reference to "country" is really to "country music", indicating that Java is a superset of code just as music is a superset of country music. Or maybe Java is patriotic...

      I give up. Not 'nuff said, apparently.

      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

    2. Re:I've Said It Before... by lkaos · · Score: 2, Flamebait

      Funny thing is that music is for the most part subjective. Country music is by far the most popular form of music. At any rate, one could not even come close to objectively stating that country music is better than say rock (whereas one may be able to make an argue for classical music being better than either of the two).

      On the other hand, I think one can make a very good objective argument as to why Java is a much worse language than say C++. So, while I'd be inclined to agree with your analogy (if you actually said it right, since I hate both Java and country music), it doesn't really work as an analogy.

      Perhaps:

      Java is to programming as N'Sync is to rock.

      --
      int func(int a);
      func((b += 3, b));
    3. Re:I've Said It Before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your obviously ignorant of both.

    4. Re:I've Said It Before... by droleary · · Score: 2

      On the other hand, I think one can make a very good objective argument as to why Java is a much worse language than say C++.

      Nope. There are 100 OO languages you could have picked to compare Java against, and you picked one of the few that is "objectively" worse. And I'd be hard pressed to call either musical in any way.

    5. Re:I've Said It Before... by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 2


      Country music is certainly not the most popular form of music, it's one of the LEAST popular forms of music.

      maru

    6. Re:I've Said It Before... by mjh · · Score: 2
      while I'd be inclined to agree with your analogy (if you actually said it right, since I hate both Java and country music), it doesn't really work as an analogy.

      That depends on whether or not the guy's statement is an objective statement or an expression of his/her opinion. Stick "I think" in front of the analogy and it's much more difficult to argue with. I don't think there's enough content in the guy's post to know either way, whether he was trying to make an objective or subjective statement.

      Funny thing is that music is for the most part subjective. Country music is by far the most popular form of music. At any rate, one could not even come close to objectively stating that country music is better than say rock (whereas one may be able to make an argue for classical music being better than either of the two).

      I'm having a difficult time understanding how music can be anything but entirely subjective. As opposed to "for the most part" as you say. Music is good or bad based on a scale of how it moves the listener. So it's entirely possible that, for one listener country music is best, classical is second best, and rock is worst. How can you come to the statement that it might be possible to objectively argue that classical is "better" than either rock or country? Objectively judging something that's entirely subjective seems like nonsense to me. So your first statement (that one couldn't objectively state that country music is better than rock) is something that I can easily agree with, but not your parenthetical statement.

      --
      Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
  22. Yeah... by NickRob · · Score: 4, Funny

    But did they meet the reserve? They might be bragging and lose again.

  23. Closing Quote by Etcetera · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I really like the closing quote from the article:
    "Open-source is bigger than IBM."

    Hey, any additional fodder for my efforts to convince my boss to move over to completely open-source technologies is fine with me! It's really heartening to hear a company like IBM say that though. More reinforcement that this paradigm is here to stay, and isn't just some sort of post-modern fad.
    1. Re:Closing Quote by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2

      An intellectual snob is someone who can listen to the William Tell Overature and not think of
      The Lone Ranger.


      If that's the definition of an intellectual snob, then what do you call someone who knows the proper spelling of "overture" and condescendingly points it out to people?

    2. Re:Closing Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      intellectual arsehole.

  24. major kudos by RealisticWeb.com · · Score: 1

    I don't know about everyone else, but I for one am very exited about this.

    Java isn't my prefered language, but it seems to me like this kind of deal can have a big impact in the industry to promote open standards. With a BIG player like ebay getting rid of asp for java, and probably saving a pritty penny in the process, perhaps M$ will have more reason to re-evaluate thier game plan.

    --
    Sigs are out of style, so I'm not going to use one...oh wait..
    1. Re:major kudos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eBay uses ISAPI modules, not ASP.

  25. Deep Thoughts... by mosdef · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Does IBM's move to Java pose a threat to Windows? Tell us.

  26. The beat of them? by OpenSourcerer · · Score: 1

    how IBM best MSFT, Sun, BEA Systems to win the contract
    beat best besten?

    1. Re:The beat of them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just because your English vocabulary is limited to Simpson excerpts doesn't mean everyone must restrict themselves to appease you.

    2. Re:The beat of them? by jo42 · · Score: 1

      /. editor (wanker) already changed the wording. They do that after they realizing their lack of command of the US English language.

  27. old saying by k2enemy · · Score: 1

    with the tech job market the way it is, whoever made the desicion was obviously following the saying "nobody gets fired for buying ibm."

  28. Tomorrow's News Headlines: by dbretton · · Score: 5, Funny

    IBM Cited In Massive Online Scam
    Reuters, Inc.

    Ebay (www.ebay.com, NSDQ: EBAY), the world's largest online auction site, is reporting that it has been hoodwinked in an internet scam, involving International Business Machines (IBM), Inc.
    "They promised us all of these great services, and even showed us pictures and everything", claims Dave Hubnard, Ebay's CTO.
    "It looked so, perfect. They responded to all of our emails quickly and professionally. I really don't know what happened. They even sniped in at the last minute with an ultra-low bid."
    Shocked and bewildered, Ebay employees are uncertain when, or if, they will ever see the new services promised to them by IBM.
    Attempted telephone calls to IBM headquarters were returned with a "disconnected service" answer.
    Just hours before the deal was closed, IBM had the address of its corporate headquarters changed to a PO Box address in the sourthern section of Jacksonville, FL.

    1. Re:Tomorrow's News Headlines: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't know the writers for the Onion patroled this site :-)

  29. 'Down for maintainance' by Chicane-UK · · Score: 1

    Hm.. wonder now if they wont be 'down for maintainance' for a few hours some mornings now? I know that it works out at like 1am or somthing in the USA, but its right slap bang mid morning for UK eBayers... can really balls up your auctions :)

    --
    "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    1. Re:'Down for maintainance' by shuffle40 · · Score: 2

      I think that when you see those periods of 'maintenance' they are really out getting spelling lessons...

    2. Re:'Down for maintainance' by Chicane-UK · · Score: 1

      Jeesus.. why are some people so anal, they have to make a post to point out that I spelt a word incorrectly? You really need to make better use of your time.

      --
      "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    3. Re:'Down for maintainance' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're anal because we program computers, and they like it that way.

  30. IBM controlling future of java? by The-Dork · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Its interesting to see the existence of Java being linked to IBM more than Sun these days.
    What with IBM having the fastest java compiler Jikes,
    a Java-base development environment VisualAge,
    some stellar java development at DeveloperWorks,
    and talks of IBM acquiring Sun

    --
    The statement below is true.
    The statement above is false.
    1. Re:IBM controlling future of java? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure what your point is here but...

      Jikes is fast ONLY because it does NOT optimize your code that well. Look at your class sizes it produces. Also I don't know why anyone cares about this anymore. If you are on a machine that can handle most of the new IDE's then any JAVAC will be great.

      Visual Age kinda blows compared to Visual Cafe, Jdeveloper 9i, and JBuilder. All of these products have a similar interface and work well. Visual Age seems to be slow in adopting the new standards and has a huge learning curve.

      I agree that DeveloperWorks has some cool stuff, and I will add that IBM probably has at least 3X the number of people working on Java as Sun.

      Will IBM buy Sun. NO WAY! Why would they? Now will IBM buy SUSE or RedHat or both? Possibly.

    2. Re:IBM controlling future of java? by The-Dork · · Score: 1
      You might be right about Jikes not optimizing the code.
      My point is only to show the amount of research, money & men that IBM has devoted to Java. Can it just allow Java to be trampled by C#? NO WAY!

      And with Sun having problems on the Server side as well as software services, who better to take care of Java, than IBM?
      Maybe buying Sun is too far fetched, but controlling Java isnt, is it?

      --
      The statement below is true.
      The statement above is false.
  31. Well, now I'm conflicted . . . by Selanit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    On the one hand, Ebay's backend is now based on some very cool, open source technology.

    On the other hand, they use Microsoft Passport, which raises a whole bunch of privacy and security issues.

    Are they good or evil? Seems more like a shade of grey to me.

    1. Re:Well, now I'm conflicted . . . by enjo13 · · Score: 1

      I don't understand your logic. How can you be "good" for embracing open source??

      Its quite simple, companies are embracing open standards and open source software because it makes the most business sense. They want to reduce their costs while increasing their utility... certain open source projects tend to do just that.

      Ebays choice of technology does not make them good or evil, they are simply doing what they think is best for their company.. period. The concept of 'good' and 'evil' corporations is almost a laughable one.

      --
      Turn s60 photos into awesome videos with mScrapbook for all S60 3rd edition phones!
    2. Re:Well, now I'm conflicted . . . by Selanit · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Blockquoth the responder:

      I don't understand your logic. How can you be "good" for embracing open source??

      Its quite simple, companies are embracing open standards and open source software because it makes the most business sense. They want to reduce their costs while increasing their utility... certain open source projects tend to do just that.

      Ebays choice of technology does not make them good or evil, they are simply doing what they think is best for their company.. period. The concept of 'good' and 'evil' corporations is almost a laughable one.

      Ah, now we're getting into philosophy. Here's a hypothetical for you: One day, you look up and see your worst enemy, whom you hate. He is backing over a cliff . . . in your brand-new Porsche. Do you shout a warning to him or not?

      If you fail to warn him, most people would agree that you acted evilly. But even if you do warn him, it's still not clearly "good." Did you warn him because that is the right thing to do? Or did you warn him because you didn't want to lose your Porsche? Or maybe you warned him to preserve yourself from legal liability? Is it the action that counts, or the motivation, or a combination thereof? To my mind, action is more important than motivation.

      Corporations -- not just Ebay, but all corporations -- perform actions that effect individuals, both those who are employed by the corporation, the investors, the customers, business partners, and sometimes the general public. I contend that corporations can be judged by their actions, every bit as much as any other human organization can be judged by theirs. I speak not merely of legal liability, but moral accountability as well.

      Microsoft is a prime example. (Honestly, I am not trying to troll here, nor am I trying to make flamebait. Just bear with me.) Microsoft is extremely good at making good business decisions -- actions whose effect are to increase its market share, its bottom line, and its dominance in the industry. Some of those actions have had negative impact on others, both individuals and companies. The decisions that Microsoft has made regarding their course of action made the "most business sense." Does that absolve them of moral responsibility for the negative consequences of their actions?

      As for open source, I would argue that it is morally superior to proprietary source. Open source code promotes the spread of knowledge; because anyone can view the source code, anyone can study real-world examples in order to learn about programming, or even for curiousity's sake. Proprietary technologies seek to restrict the spread of knowledge: figuring out how a closed program works is a thousand times more difficult, and may also be illegal. Which is better -- widespread knowledge, or widespread ignorance?

      If open source software is morally superior to proprietary software, then logically embracing an open solution is an action which redounds to the credit of any company which does so. Their motivation for picking the software, be it because of "good business sense," because of approval of open source on general principles, or even because the CEO had indigestion and chose based on which representative had an antacid, is irrelevant. Consequences are derived from action, not motivation for that action.

      You are right to point out that the concepts of "good" and "evil" are too narrow to be particularly useful in this context. Nothing human can be fully "good" or "evil." As a child, Saint Augustine stole a crop of pears, destroyed them, and felt guilty about it for most of his adult life. Hitler loved his dogs, trite but true.

      Humans are complex, and may be good in some ways but not in others. Corporations are human institutions, and in exactly the same way they have both negative and positive aspects. Deciding what actions you approve or disapprove of in a corporation can help you establish how you, as an individual, will interact with any given corporation, but is basically a subjective decision.

      Whew! That was a mouthful. But I think it needed to be said. If I get modded down for it, so be it.

    3. Re:Well, now I'm conflicted . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For an interesting movie which deals with the moral responsibility of business decisions, I highly recommend Danny DeVito's black comedy Other People's Money. The entire movie revolves around the acquisition of a family business and its disembowelment by DeVito's company. In the climactic shareholder's meeting, DeVito rebuffs the emotional and not very realistic claims of the family with this entreaty to the shareholders: "Don't you understand? I'm making you money." Which really is the point of business: to make money. Which is why being "moral" and making "moral" business decisions is so difficult - the decision-maker needs to balance moral choices (definition: murky) with the realpolitik of the business world (definition: less murky).

  32. Now we can only imagine by alen · · Score: 5, Funny

    that if MS would have won the bid we would have had something in windows to let us bid and list auctions on ebay automatically. Ebay make a nice tool called mister lister to bulk upload your auctions. It could have become part of the next version of windows. Now MS will have to build it's own auction site from scratch and integrate it into windows.

    1. Re:Now we can only imagine by happyclam · · Score: 2
      Now MS will have to build it's own auction site from scratch and integrate it into windows.

      naw... they'll just steal it.

      --
      He looked at me and said, "Kid, we don't like your kind, and we're gonna send your fingerprints off to Washington."
  33. Websphere is crap by tbien · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but I had to work with versions from 3.02
    to 4.x and it is really bad. We replaced it with
    jBoss/ Jetty which is simply the better solution.

    In the time you need to generate a Websphere
    EJB jar, I can build, deploy the same EJBs on
    jBoss and even run all 40 jUnit tests.

    1. Re:Websphere is crap by borgboy · · Score: 1

      What, you can't automate that with Ant? Seriously, can you or can you not automate jar/war/ear creation and deployment for Websphere?

      --
      meh.
    2. Re:Websphere is crap by iacyclone · · Score: 1

      Yes you can automate ear/war/jar creations with Ant. I was doing the very same thing today with WAS4. It works fine as far as I am concerned.

    3. Re:Websphere is crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you've ever used IBM's version of Eclipse called "Websphere Studio Application Developer", you'll know that doing the actual development of J2EE apps on Windows or Linux is now quite trivial.

    4. Re:Websphere is crap by tbien · · Score: 1

      Yes you can and I'm doing it this way (same
      with jboss). But the generation of the Websphere
      deployable jar simply takes as long as the complete build/deploy/test suite take with jboss.

  34. Bidding on the contract by brer_rabbit · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ebay Computer Contract
    Item # 4886798269

    Category: Computers: Contracts

    Currently: $12,378,462
    Quantity: 1
    First bid: US $10
    # of bids: 3

    Seller (Rating): Ebay (999999999)

    High bid: IBM (10)

    Description

    You are bidding on a contract for providing software and hardware to power the next generation of e-bidding monstrosi-sites...

    1. Re:Bidding on the contract by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The question is who bid the $10. MSFT or BEA-Sun ?

  35. Does anyone remember... by raddan · · Score: 1

    Taligent, the company that was created between IBM, Apple, and Motorola in the early 90's - tied with Rhapsody - with the goal of creating a an open platform? I thought that IBM was in the openness game waaaay before Java (???).

  36. They also offered to sell PCs on EBay by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 2
    IBM will sell equipment on EBay as a normal vendor, thus adding thousands of listings to EBay's site.

    I suspect this is not a coincidence.

    1. Re:They also offered to sell PCs on EBay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IBM does this a lot. When Cisco bought their networking company from them (around 1999 or 2000) they also agreed to purchase billions from them in parts.

      Now Cisco uses powerpc chips in their routers and the employees have thinkpads on their desks.

      AC (to protect my job)

  37. typical IBM by Cheetahfeathers · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    They did the typical IBM thing of selling hardware at a massively low level (they loose money here), and even say that eBay can keep their old Sun hardware. Once they have the foot in the door, and run the support, they strip away hardware bit by bit, replace with IBM stuff, drain a company of money for high support costs, and end up with an all IBM shop in terms of hardware and support.

    It's happened time and time again, and killed many a small company that went with IBM support. The total cost is just not worth it.

  38. Deskstar by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    IBM might be all open source and anti-microsoft, but dude, that doesn't excuse them for the deskstar incident - its almost 3 weeks and i've yet to see my new drive... woa, how off-topic is this.. (i've already reached the cap so i just don't care anymore

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  39. No, their readers no the difference by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 2

    Biz 2.0 readers likely understand the difference between a true open standard and reverse-engineered documentation.

    1. Re:No, their readers no the difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate those companies that reverse engineer their own products and publish the API's

  40. IBM won because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they were the only ones that would accept Ebays stipulation to be paid by Paypal.

  41. mae culpa; $title =~ s/no/know/; (!) by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 1

    whoops.

    1. Re:mae culpa; $title =~ s/no/know/; (!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/(\b)no(\b)/\1know\2/

  42. Jikes is not meant for production code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jikes has always been a tool for studying java compilation. IBM does not recommend it as a production tool.

    1. Re:Jikes is not meant for production code by The-Dork · · Score: 1
      But that hasn't stopped people from using it for their commercial projects. And there aren't any problems with the code it compiles!

      And even as a study tool, doesn't it show the amount of research IBM is putting into Java?

      --
      The statement below is true.
      The statement above is false.
  43. Neat link? You decide. by hyyx · · Score: 2

    http://www.stores.ebay.com/ibm

    This is IBM's store at eBay. The cool part is that you can get some really great deals on IBM equipment here. I have already bought from here twice. I work for IBM, and I can tell you that the deals here are better than the employee discount!

  44. eBAY has the worst IT guys... by ajiva · · Score: 2, Interesting

    eBay has a bunch of idiots for IT guys. They setup one of their oracle machines to core dump onto the root partition. A bug in Solaris 2.6 would overwrite the whole partition if total memory was greater than total disk space. Sun told eBay about this, they didn't listen and install the patch. Guess what, their oracle db cored, and took their whole OS with it. They were down for days...

    1. Re:eBAY has the worst IT guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      solaris 2.6 ?? Did ebay even exist then ?

    2. Re:eBAY has the worst IT guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw a 2000 server do this once... crahsed, wrote all the physical memory, which was over 8 gigs, to the 4gig boot partician by default, over wrote the file allocation table, server never came back up, data wasn't hard to recover though, you can tell 2000 to do a small memory dump, and should! but the default is the full dump...

    3. Re:eBAY has the worst IT guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2.6 isn't that old. Perhaps you've been mesmerized by the 2.5...2.6...7...8 version sequence? King of like Word's 2...6...95...97.

    4. Re:eBAY has the worst IT guys... by jo42 · · Score: 1

      Would explain why they are farming it out instead of doing it in-house. Heck, if I where eBay's CEO, I'd farm everything out and just sit there collecting my big fat pay check and stock options.

  45. IBM Has the Right Ingredients by 4of12 · · Score: 2

    IBM is doing the Right Thing in capitalizing on the open standards, high reliability, free beer, community-developed software floating around.

    All the other vendors give you a single unmistakeable route into a closed box of their design. If I was buying a solution, a vendor that didn't insist they had the One True Way® (and that it cost money) would get more of my trust. I would feel I had a backdoor alternative with a rack of Linux machines and open source software.

    IBM acknowledges that you might want to run part of your business on extremely low cost tools.

    Then, if you want tools that are a step up in sophistication, then they are there to fill in the gap.

    However, in all fairness, IBM's been able to do this because of the huge reputation as ultra conservative banking mainframe vendor types and the foot in the door that they consequently have. That's why small random open source companies would have a harder time replicating IBM's kind of success.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
    1. Re:IBM Has the Right Ingredients by FrostedChaos · · Score: 1
      IBM sells hardware. Why would they care if the software business went to hell? In fact, they'd probably love to employ fewer programmers.


      It was this very disdain for programming that led them to employ microsoft to write DOS.

      --
      "Any connection between your reality and mine is purely coincidental." -Slashdot
    2. Re:IBM Has the Right Ingredients by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Software and services have surpassed hardware sales for IBM.

    3. Re:IBM Has the Right Ingredients by Salsaman · · Score: 2
      I expect to see much more of this in the future now that Sam Palmisano is CEO. You probably know this already, but Sam was the top guy who championed the use of open source in IBM, and he recently took over from Lou Gerstner.

    4. Re:IBM Has the Right Ingredients by FrostedChaos · · Score: 1
      according to this article, IBM made 7.71 billion off of computers, version 7.55 billion off of services. It's worth noting that the current economic slump has drastically shaped these numbers... last year computers was 8.75 billion. Software was around 3 billion or so.


      So the point still stands. IBM is not a software company in the same sense that Microsoft and Blizzard are software companies. IBM is a "solution provider" (yes, I know some people from IBM.) The bottom line is that they sell big iron to big organizations. Service comes as part of the package... at least theoretically. IBM would probably be just as well off without their software divisions, or even better.


      Services and software are not the same thing. Get it? I know the party line is to hate the software companies, but I actually pity them. What tangible assets do the smaller ones have to fall back on in the current economic climate?

      --
      "Any connection between your reality and mine is purely coincidental." -Slashdot
  46. Answer me t his by cscx · · Score: 0, Troll

    So... what was wrong with the IIS implementation in the first place? eBay is fast and works perfectly. And I don't want to hear that "IIS is insecure" bullshit; IIS is insecure in its default configuration, but not after you lock it down properly. I'm pretty sure that eBay has the resources to hire some good IIS admins. As for the backend, eBay wasn't even scripted... their main application was an in-process C++ MFC app. That equals even more speed. Combine that with IIS and you have a compact, scalable, fast web platform. And I bet they base their back database on Oracle, so that's taken care of in the MFC connector as well. Has the current implementation of eBay ever crashed? No.

    WebSphere = shit. I remember the old versions of it; they probably need a gig of RAM just to run at a decent speed!! Shit, I bet server boxes that run WebSphere come with giant primer handles to jumpstart the mofo, it's so bloated. And they're gonna rewrite the whole thing in java servlets now, for "performance"?? Puh-leeze.

    "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!!"

    1. Re:Answer me t his by MikeAR303 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Let the above post be an example of just how intelligent MS supporters are. Is this how you apply to be an MS "expert witness"?

      --
      This post will be modded down for no particular reason by a sweaty 14 year old who is not allowed out past dark.
    2. Re:Answer me t his by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go back to Redmond and lick Bill's ass, you Microshit-loving shit-eating brainwashed troll.

    3. Re:Answer me t his by esarjeant · · Score: 1

      FWIW, there have been more than just 2 outages with eBay and at least a few of them have been related to their Oracle backend.

      Websphere certainly isn't going to fix that, but it might help improve maintainability of what has traditionally been ISAPI code. There is also the stability quandry of a DLL that is sharing space with your IIS process, any fault here could cause the web server to die.

      While WebSphere is a more professional looking system from an admin perspective, my experience has shown WebLogic to be the superior performer.

      --

      Eric Sarjeant
      eric[@]sarjeant.com

    4. Re:Answer me t his by esarjeant · · Score: 1

      Also don't forget that eBay is primarily an NT4 shop. With W2K long-gone and .NET upon us, they are probably also considering how they might be able to maintain their NT4 investment.

      Ultimately, eBay may be factoring in TCO. Reports are showing Linux obviously has a substantially lower TCO, so by migrating to a Java engine the eBay NOC is giving itself a chance to roll some Linux servers into their NT server farm.

      --

      Eric Sarjeant
      eric[@]sarjeant.com

    5. Re:Answer me t his by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RMS, go back to MIT and have a shower please. there are lots of showers available for your use.

    6. Re:Answer me t his by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let the above post be an example of the pathetic loser attitude of the Microsoft hating club.

      It doesn't take a smart person to realize that ebay (currently) is very fast, stable, and uses something called ISAPIMFC.dll (obviously IIS). A reasonable person might ask why they are fixing something that doesn't seem broken from the outside. Only a resentful open sores hippie would react in disgust to the usefulness of eBay.

    7. Re:Answer me t his by cscx · · Score: 1

      There is also the stability quandry of a DLL that is sharing space with your IIS process, any fault here could cause the web server to die.


      It doesn't necessarily have to run in-process.

      Even a bad mod_perl implementation can bring down Apache in a similar manner; a mod_perl based perl script gone awry could bring Apache down in a hoot.

  47. Jesus Nelly by tps12 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Alright, I'm back. Shit, I step out for what, 45 minutes, and this place goes to hell. Looks like we have a long night ahead of us. Well, round up the boys and brew a pot of coffee. We'll see this job through to the end.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:Jesus Nelly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh no, it's tps12! get back to work everyone.

  48. The new studio is based on open source by Aelfweld · · Score: 1

    the new websphere studio application developer 4.0 is indeed based on open source components. Its base on eclipse which IBM released as open source.

    --
    Government is the abdication of your responsibility to a faceless bureaucracy. Anarchy(absence of government)is the a
  49. My only problem with WebSphere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is that it's gay.

  50. Keep up the good trolling! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to say I loved your latest troll work here, keep up the good work! I can belive the slashbot fell for it, they are so dumb you can just how great this is to opensource and they mod your post up beyond belief.

    You ROCK

    Oh yeah, GS for ever!

    1. Re:Keep up the good trolling! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only replies could be converted to karma...

  51. IBM UK on eBay UK by PhillC · · Score: 1
    http://members.ebay.co.uk/aboutme/bid.ibm.uk/


    And this is IBM UK's page on eBay UK.


    Note the negative and neutral feedback. So many of the big name, blue chip sellers on eBay just can't seem to get it right when it comes to basic customer service.


    I think this "open standards" deal with IBM and Websphere fits well with the eBay community values - http://pages.ebay.co.uk/help/community/values.html


    eBay can't be all bad......

    --
    Brought to you by the author of such childrens' classics as "Some Kittens can Fly!" and "All Dogs go to Hell."
  52. See you later, eBay... by shadowxtc · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I'm a professional web developer, and can tell you in absolute certainty that Websphere is -THE- worst app server. I'd rather be caught using old C-based CGIs, or better yet just go back to the BBS. Websphere may be open source, at the HTTP side (read: apache), and IBM likes to tell you what makes their stuff tick, sure.. But does all that really matter, if the software is slow, buggy, and far below the level of standards its FREEWARE competition lives up to (read: enhydra, resin). Open source can sometimes be blinding.

  53. Jesus loves the little trollers, by owlmeat · · Score: 1

    All the trollers of the world.
    Red, Yellow, Black or White,
    They are precious in His sight,
    Jesus loves the little trollers of the world.

    --
    They stab it with their steely knives,

    But they just can't kill the beast.

  54. Say what? by dr_dank · · Score: 1
    From a talkbalk blurb between paragraphs:

    Does IBM's move to Java pose a threat to Windows?

    Java is now an os? Wouldn't a better question be:

    Would fact-checking hurt Business 2.0?
    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    1. Re:Say what? by iapetus · · Score: 2

      Of course Java isn't an OS. How is that relevant? The idea is that moving away from Windows-targetted applications to applications that can run equally well on Linux for small solutions or IBM's own systems for larger solutions has the potential to pose a threat to Windows.

      --
      ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
      Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
  55. It's because of AIX and the Power4 CPUs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IBM won because AIX 6 now scales to 2048 1.8GHz 64-bit Power4 CPUs on their high-end p680s (was: RS/6000s).

    Sun can't touch that.

  56. eBay Has Crashed... by Frogg · · Score: 1

    eBay has crashed - and more than once. It's cost them a fair amount each time. Here's a couple of links

    14hrs and 22hrs in 1999
    2hrs and 5hrs in 2001
    1. Re:eBay Has Crashed... by cscx · · Score: 2

      Okay, but they were due to hardware failures:

      A message on the site said that its servers began experiencing problems Thursday night. Shortly after midnight, the company said it was rebuilding a "corrupt system disk."

      http://www.informationweek.com/story/IWK20011207S0 003

      <sarcasm>Yep, all due to IIS.</sarcasm> (not that you said that or anything, but minds tend to wander around here...

    2. Re:eBay Has Crashed... by Frogg · · Score: 1

      You sound like you're getting a little paranoid there!! ;o)

      I never said anything about IIS, I never even said anything about why eBay had crashed -- I was simply making people aware of the fact that you, my friend, were in error: eBay has crashed... ..and more than once.

      That aside, IIS is probably ok if you run it on 60 servers -- some of them will be redundant, so there's plenty of room for failure there! ..and it would've been planned that way too! ;oP

    3. Re:eBay Has Crashed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a homo.

  57. Duh by Mrdzone · · Score: 1

    I think that was obviously what i meant but if you want to be a little karma whore go ahead

    1. Re:Duh by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1

      pretty snooty for such a weak minded ignot

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    2. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's an ignot? Really, this is an honest question, so please don't flame.

      I know what an ingot is, but I don't think you meant that.

    3. Re:Duh by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1

      sorry - was just in a pissy mood. No offense, nor meaning, intended.

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  58. Yes. by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    The other poster was not quite right about it being free though - if you want to contribute to evolviing Java standards, you can join as an individual for only $100. That gives to the right to propose changes and make comments on drafts of standards before they go public.

    They also have company memberships, but those of course cost quite a bit more (a few K I think).

    What other standards bodies let ANYONE in that easily?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Yes. by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 2

      What other standards bodies let ANYONE in that easily?

      Participation in the IETF is free.

  59. You need to read by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Read up on the JCP. Java is controlled by that standards body, there are things that Sun would like in there but they have to go through standards like everything else. If it had been up to Sun generics would have been in 1.4 but they needed the extra time to make sure everyone was cool about how they worked. Sun is very careful to work ALL changes through this open process.

    The only advantage Sun has is that they have a perminent spot on the executive comittee. But that body decides what Java is, which sun the promotes.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:You need to read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, membership in the JCP is limited to people who pay Sun $2000 per year for education, gov't or NPO entities or $5000 per year for corporations. Otherwise you can apply and hope to be an "expert" and comment on one specific JSR. That's awfully convenient, having a "independent standards committee" run by Sun, requiring payment by Sun and requiring you sign an agreement with Sun. JCP is a joke.

    2. Re:You need to read by lgraba · · Score: 2

      Another example is enhancements to RMI for security. Sun was the proposer, and the proposal was rejected, mostly by J2EE vendors who didn't want to have to change their products to comply with the proposed changes. If Sun really had complete control, they could have rammed it through over the objections of the other committee members.

    3. Re:You need to read by lgraba · · Score: 2

      Are there membership fees for ECMA? IEEE? Of course there are, if for nothing else but to pay for some of the costs of these organizations.

      Even the so-called independent standards bodies are not impartial. Every company that sends a representative has an agenda, and it isn't always for the greater good of the community.

  60. Ebay downtime with IIS 5.0 on Windows 2000 by engine+matrix · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think this is great news for Ebay addicts like myself. Ebay is down for scheduled maintainance 2 hours a week. This equals 4 days of downtime a year which is unacceptable for a company as large as Ebay. This doesn't even include unscheduled downtime which we know is a lot higher! Yes, I am your typical Linux loving Micro$oft hating Slashdotter, but you can't tell me this downtime has nothing to do with Ebay currently running a Microsoft shop. I unfortunately admin a Win2K network at my job and the results are pretty much the same.

    1. Re:Ebay downtime with IIS 5.0 on Windows 2000 by martin · · Score: 2

      (2 hrs a week in the middle of the night - not such a big deal) With ebay being a truely global site which version of 'night' are you thinking about? There is not opportunity for downtime AFAIK, but I don;t know their architecture and this sort of thing should have been designed in..

    2. Re:Ebay downtime with IIS 5.0 on Windows 2000 by perky · · Score: 2

      Yes, I am your typical Linux loving Micro$oft hating Slashdotter, but you can't tell me this downtime has nothing to do with Ebay currently running a Microsoft shop

      Why can't I? Ebay isn't a MS shop - the front end is IIS, the search pages are Zeus webserver, the database is Oracle on Sun and the middleware is God know's what. Now think about the relative complexity here. Which is going to need more scheduled maintenance? A terabyte size DB with high turnover and billions of searches and updates a month or the cosmetic IIS installation serving mostly static pages? I'd bet that IIS has nothing to do with the downtime.

      --
      "The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
  61. eBay's existing hardware by Frogg · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here's a brief summary of what eBay are currently running....

    For the middle-tier and back-end they've got a couple of Sun Starfire E10K servers (with a third on standby for hot-swap fail-over). The back-end db is Oracle, most of the other software is by Veritas. This all uses a 400 disk RAID array (also made by Sun), which is also mirrored in real-time.

    They're using seven Sun Enterprise ES450s to provide the iron for searching, and the web front end is served by sixty-or-so Compaq servers.

    It seems impressive! ....but it's worth noting that some of the above may be a bit out-of-date, as it's based on the info in these articles, which are quite old now:-

    Article on Internet Week about eBay's steps to ensure performance
    Sun's page on what-they-do-for-eBay part way down the page, an article entitled: An Integrated, High Availability Cluster Solution)
  62. Open != Open Standard by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 2

    You gave several examples of open source software, but those aren't open standards.

    If Java was an open standard, independent and compatible implementations would be possible. That's not currently the case with Java, although it seems to be changing for the better.

  63. My thoughts on IBM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've heard a lot of negative threads on IBM, but one of the companies we deal with for server hardware buys their servers from IBM. For 1800 dollars we get dual PIII/1.2ghz 1 GB ram/80GB RAID5 storage, Redhat 7.2 loaded and supported. Not bad, the servers are blazing fast and well designed, I can't complain at all about the quality. As a good vendor, IBM won us over from HP (which did NOT support Linux on their servers, they wouldn't even answer basic questions or help out with drivers, etc.) IBM rules for us, say what you will about them.

  64. Is this an F'n ad? by ManDude · · Score: 1

    How much did IBM pay you to say?, "Cool part is that it's based on Websphere". How much for, "MS SQL Server has come along way".

  65. I love this kind of news.... by eyeareque · · Score: 1

    ...The best part about it is: this is only the tip of the iceberg...

  66. Hmmm if they won...why do they use MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... .NET passport as an alternate means of signing in?

  67. They thought they already had bought it... by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 2

    ...and they thought it was the Department of justice. Well, it's an honest (sic) mistake; the appeal is going so well.

  68. You must be new to slashdot by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    to have read the article before posting, and naive enough to admit it.

    You'll learn.

  69. Don't forget about Eclipse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget that IBM donated Eclipse to the open source community and that Eclipse is based on the WebSphere Studio Workbench.

  70. LInux Native support for java binaries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the comments had something about linux natively supporting java executables. Does anybody have an idea how fast this makes java programs as compared to thr traditional way.

    1. Re:LInux Native support for java binaries by morbid · · Score: 0

      They were either harking back to the days when you could build a java interpreter into the kernel as a compile-time option, or got muddled up with the fact that most Linux distributions come with the JDK which contains a JVM, of course. Beware of "technical" stories on business sites.

      --
      I'm out of my tree just now but please feel free to leave a banana.
  71. JCP is a killer of open source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    examples?
    • Log4j
    • JBoss
    1. Re:JCP is a killer of open source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What?!? Log4J and JBoss had been killed?!? Oh my God!!! I'm running dead software on my pc and I didn't even know about it! Arrrggggggg

  72. But I thought that by cca93014 · · Score: 1

    websphere was really really REALLY bad?

    Oh, I understand now.

  73. websphere ebay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh great, Now I have to load some over bloated java app just to find out some smuck bid 2 cents more than me on an itmem

  74. Will Ebay view the source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That brings me to another point if MSFT had won, would they typically show some of the source to Ebay (if Ebay asked).

    Couldn't MFST also crack a deal with the Peruvian govt. to meet some of their demands? e.g. going to some length to guarantee quicker security patches or cover some other liability?
    ...Guarantee NO presence of "spy code", e.t.c. On top of volume licensing.
    That would stop the Open source train in its tracks.

    Besides the current software model of creating the software & selling it is winding down.

    Just lease the Software and provide consultancy services. That's what they want.
    As for open standards, well they could offer support for them on top of their normal proprietary ones.

    I'm rambling -- lack of sleep....

  75. Re:Sun is not different from M$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    With JRE 1.4 Sun actually killed very good Open Source logging library - Log4J. You have to stick to old JRE 1.3 or your Log4J-based application will not work on JRE 1.4.

    Same about Xalan, Xerces, Tomcat, PostgreSQL/JDBC. Do you want to use them - stick with old JRE 1.3

    Finally, Sun killed all possible marketing of JBoss.

    Now, what makes Sun different from Microsoft? And what makes Java to be Open Standard? Just lying declarations!

    Python, Perl, Tcl (another Open Source project killed by Sun), Guile are Open Source and Open Standards. But not Java.

  76. Re:IBM forgot about java by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Jikes is dead, Visual Age is dying, most of software on Developer Works is outdated.

    Why?

    Because IBM forgot about Java. Java has no future on Linux, while IBM sees the future in Linux. Soon Developer Works will have more about Python and Perl, while next release of WebSphere will be based on 4Suite or AxKit, or Zope.

  77. Open Source? by RodeoBoy · · Score: 1

    If that is the case then the same can be said about Windows NT. I understand they use BSD and that is only the open source code we know about.

  78. AMEN BRO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No flames here.. you hit the nail on the head!

    But I'm going to be an AC for this posting anyway.. :)

  79. yea but Websphere's a piece of shit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And anyone who knows anything in the J2EE world will attest to this. The all-around best Application Servers one the market currently are..

    Weblogic
    Borland Appserver
    And for some things iPlanet

    But Websphere...?!?!? We can look forward to a new and screwed over eBay. And then of *course* Microsoft will use that as an example for; "SEE? This is why everyone and their camel should use .NET"

    I think someone just cracked the Seventh Seal...

  80. What a schuck! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, get a sense of humor.

  81. HAL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..these news (sic) means that HAL is actually running LINUX?

    H YBRID
    A UTONOMOUS
    L INUX

  82. Patents Abound by 1029 · · Score: 1

    From the article: In 2001, IBM filed a record 3,411 patent applications, making it the country's top patent filer for the ninth year in a row.

    Gad-frigging-zooks! It's gonna take a lot of free software advocacy to make up for 3000+ patents being filed per year.

    --
    - I love animals. I try to eat at least one a day.
    1. Re:Patents Abound by smaug195 · · Score: 1

      IBM mostly patents their hardware innovation, which they have a huge R&D budget for(over a billion last time I heard). Last time I checked slashdot wasn't against patenting new hardware technology.

    2. Re:Patents Abound by 1029 · · Score: 1

      Last I checked, I wasn't slashdot. Mayhaps others are just drones on here, but I have my own opionons on subjects, thank you kindly.

      That said, I knew it was probably mostly hardware, but hey, thats a shitload of patents anyhow :) As stated in the article, they have submitted the most patents in the US the last 9 years running (up to 2001 at least). Now don't tell me thay have more R&D than any other US company. All the same, I like IBM for the most part, and I'd like them better with less patents.

      --
      - I love animals. I try to eat at least one a day.
    3. Re:Patents Abound by perky · · Score: 2

      Now don't tell me thay have more R&D than any other US company.

      Actually more than any other company in the world. $5 billion a year with labs bloody everywhere.

      --
      "The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
  83. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  84. To bad for e-bay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They will soon find out that WebSphere should be re-named WebShit.

  85. Java has no future on Linux? by vanguard · · Score: 2

    I've always thought that java was the key to helping linux gain popularity. Java tools like IntelliJ's IDEA (my favorite IDE) run nice on windows, linux, and my mac. I see cross platform apps written in java as one of the keys to msft's demise. Java is getting better at GUI with every release. If you think it sucks my guess is that you haven't played with the most current stuff. It's getting great. I love it. Vanguard

    --
    That which does not kill me only makes me whinier
  86. Holy fuck! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have the WORST SIG EVER.

    1. Re:Holy fuck! by dbretton · · Score: 1

      Thank you. Your penis is small.

  87. java - .NET by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 1

    The evolution of a website, of which I won't say.

    94 - Perl
    99 - ATG Dynamo
    02 - MS .NET

    IBM websphere was a consideration for 99 and 02, but anyone who has done any development in websphere will tell you the same thing. Err.. it sucks if you haven't heard by now.

    Shoot me now, but it's all .NET now.

    1. Re:java - .NET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I gotta say...I don't like Microsoft as much as the next guy, but damn...I work with .NET and it's pretty sweet...for Windows development, that is...

    2. Re:java - .NET by iapetus · · Score: 2

      Websphere may have sucked in the past, but it's getting a lot better these days, and is still a *much* bigger contender than .NET according to all the surveys I've seen (other than the ZDNet one that Microsoft tried to rig, that is...)

      --
      ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
      Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
  88. bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please provide an example of a company put out of business because they bought IBM support.

    1. Re:bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      He wont be able to, because it's not true.

      Now on the other hand, if you'd asked about companies going out of business because of M$/BSA licensing audits...

  89. Re:IBM forgot about java by Tom+Davies · · Score: 1

    IBM forgot about Java?

    What rubbish.

    IBM makes up to date JDKs for all their platforms (even OS/2), plus Linux and Windows.

    They support one of the leading open source Java IDEs, eclipse.

    And their application server offering, Websphere, is a J2EE server.

    Java does have a future on Linux. I think the future of Linux is tied to the future of Java -- I wouldn't use Linux if it didn't support Java well.

    Tom

    --
    I have discovered a wonderful .sig, but 120 characters is too small to contain it.
  90. I like the last line: by Zo0ok · · Score: 4, Insightful

    [IBM technology strategist Irving] Wladawsky-Berger says: "Open-source is bigger than IBM".

    Such things make me happy for the entire day :)

  91. tango by simpl3x · · Score: 1

    "good" will never win, nor will "evil", they will simply dance the forbiden dance forever. there will never be complete security, because there will always be somebody straying from the party line, and there will always be crime because our inner child always wants something. criminals are masters at playing off of this desire. actions are truly what differentiates an individual. intelligence (cia/fbi, and psycho/social) is truly amusing when one digs down into the muck.

    1. Re:tango by mjh · · Score: 2

      Hmmm... I don't agree with this. And the reason I don't is that I think that evil borrows from good in order to succeed. For example, we all know of people and situations and times in our lives when we and others have done good things simply for the sake of doing something good. We don't always do this, but it's not a difficult concept. We can easily imagine/remember a time when we did a good thing just because it was good. We didn't profit from it. Probably no one else even knew. We simply did it because it was good.

      On the other hand, imagine doing something evil simply because it's evil. Almost no one does this. It's hard to even imagine such a situation. People are greedy because they want money. People are unfaithful to their spouses because they want sex. People commit crimes because they want security or freedom or whatever. The closest I can come to imagining doing something evil simply because it's evil is cruelty. But even that is done in the pursuit of pleasure or satisfaction.

      But in as far as they go, money, sex, freedom, security, pleasure and satisfaction aren't bad things. Most are neutral things, and some are good things. Pursuing those things isn't bad, but raising the pursuit of those things above other more important principles twists those good or neutral things into evil things. For example, raising my pursuit of money above my respect for your property enables me to steal from you. Pursuit of money isn't evil, but raising it above another, higher principle makes it evil.

      Which is to say that the evil acts depend on neutral/good things. In fact, if you want to be effectively evil, you need to be smart, patient, charming, logical, etc. Again, none of those things are bad things. They're all good things that have been twisted.

      It is this line of thinking that leads me to believe that good and evil are not on equal footing. IMHO, evil is dependant on, and suborinate to good.

      --
      Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
  92. Other Java Implementations by Dan-DAFC · · Score: 1

    There are several including IBM, TowerJ and KaffePro.

    --
    Suck figs.
    1. Re:Other Java Implementations by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 2

      IBM's VM and TowerJ are licensed from Sun, thus not independent. Kaffe doesn't support J2SE.

  93. Re:'Down for maintainance' [OT] by Chicane-UK · · Score: 1

    By the way.. thats BREAK, not BRAKE..

    --
    "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
  94. Re:'Down for maintainance' [OT] by Chicane-UK · · Score: 1

    Sorry but you are just too funny.. like its now a personal insult against the GREAT America or somthing? I have no problem with America.. I want to go to America.. I have friends who live in America.. I LIKE America!

    But I DO have issues with people who try to take the piss outta me for spelling incorrectly, only to find that they too have spelt a word wrong in their 'flame' - so its always worth pointing stuff like that out.

    Now just pack it in. This thread grows boring.

    --
    "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
  95. Re:'Down for maintainance' [OT] by Chicane-UK · · Score: 1

    Oh, and by the way Spellmaster.. thats 'brilliant', not 'brillient' :)

    --
    "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
  96. Re:'Down for maintainance' [OT] by Chicane-UK · · Score: 1

    "Week" of mind? I guess that as a "dumn" Brit I can't quite get my head around your command of the English language..

    Now just give it up.. its a pretty sure bet that the next post you make will be riddled with errors and I will be forced to humiliate you again.

    --
    "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
  97. Re:'Down for maintainance' [OT] by Chicane-UK · · Score: 1

    Ok ok.. thats enough.. this was fun for the first two weeks ;)

    I know that you can spell perfectly well, and that you have just been spelling like a "morron" for a bit of fun.. I'll leave it at that.

    Cya.

    --
    "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"