Slashdot Mirror


California Hax0red

rochlin writes "200,000 California state workers burned! According to the Sacramento Bee, personal and financial info for 200,000 workers was accessed by a team of hackers "working secretly over the past several months." Stolen info included "the perfect mix of information to allow identity theft" according to the Sacramento Valley Hi Tech Task Force."

229 comments

  1. Unbreakable by captain_craptacular · · Score: 5, Funny

    This info wouldn't have been stolen from an "unbreakable" Oracle database that Cali payed so much for would it?

    --
    They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty nor security
    1. Re:Unbreakable by dhuv · · Score: 1

      It would be interesting to know what the systems were running. The article mentiones "there is grave concern over the ease with which the hackers entered the computer systems" but doesnt go into much detail. These stories should have details so people can protect other systems.

    2. Re:Unbreakable by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      I don't get it - if it was so easy, why did it takes months to do?

    3. Re:Unbreakable by Heironymus+Coward · · Score: 4, Informative
      This info wouldn't have been stolen from an "unbreakable" Oracle database that Cali payed so much for would it?

      probably not... unless things have changed drastically since I left stat service, the Teale Data Center did not use Oracle. it was some custom (read: out-of-date) database running on VMS. the Oracle database was for state clients -- in other words, citzens, licensees, businesses. it ran on Solaris.

      I'm a little disappointed in the amount of information in the article. as I just mentioned, I used to work for the state. was any information on former employees compromised? they don't say. and probably won't answer if asked.

    4. Re:Unbreakable by big_hairy_mama · · Score: 3, Informative

      They were actually in the system for months. So not only was it easy to get in, but they remained undetected for all that time.

    5. Re:Unbreakable by cybermage · · Score: 2

      why did it takes months to do?

      Maybe it was an inside job. They are, after all, state workers.

      state worker (re.ti.ur.d) - n. Individual paid to move paper from one side of their desk to the other. Typically, they don't know where the paper came from, where it is going, or what the funny symbols on it mean.

    6. Re:Unbreakable by stubear · · Score: 2

      I can tell you what it was NOT running. If the systems were running any flavor of Windows Server this information would be in the headline. This leaves you with a flavor of *nix; pick one.

    7. Re:Unbreakable by Kizzle · · Score: 2

      I know that your being funny, but anything can be vulnerable if not configured right. They didn't necessarily have to exploit a security hole.

    8. Re:Unbreakable by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Funny
      > This info wouldn't have been stolen from an "unbreakable" Oracle database that Cali payed so much for would it?

      ~peering into the crystal ball~

      "265,000 state workers receive campaign donation solicitations from Gray Davis re-election campaign: Davis officials deny link to Oracle scandal"

      Your call ;-)

    9. Re:Unbreakable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Viewhead 1.0.5 report on http://www.teale.ca.gov/

      HTTP/1.1 200 OK
      Server: Microsoft-IIS/5.0
      Date: Sat, 25 May 2002 03:07:35 GMT
      Connection: close
      Content-Length: 12778
      Content-Type: text/html
      Set-Cookie: ASPSESSIONIDQQQQGNDC=OAHAILHCPLDHPFCMHBEMBMLH; path=/
      Cache-control: private

    10. Re:Unbreakable by Stephen+VanDahm · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't need to point out that this data would have been much harder to steal if it had been spread out among 200,000,000 separate Oracle servers, like the Oracle folks and key Californian policymakers had recommended.

      Steve

    11. Re:Unbreakable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I can tell you what it was NOT running. If the systems were running any flavor of Windows Server this information would be in the headline.

      +1, Insightful

    12. Re:Unbreakable by mixbsd · · Score: 1

      What is "it"? Back-end? Front-end? Defeats the object if one or more are insecure.

    13. Re:Unbreakable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oracle, hmm... scott / tiger, anyone?

    14. Re:Unbreakable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are server operating systems other than Windows and unix variants, you know. So this doesn't necessarily leave us with a flavor of unix.

  2. Hoo man by Second_Derivative · · Score: 1

    And I've just finished clearing up a script kiddie attack from MY site >_< (People who leave open proxies running on their servers ought to be shot repeatedly)

    My heart goes out to those sysadmins I can tell you that.

    1. Re:Hoo man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who leave open proxies running on their servers ought to be shot repeatedly

      That's not the problem. The problem was one of two things:

      1) you were running Windows
      2) you were running Linux

      You deserve what you got.

  3. Don't worry, it's okay by seldolivaw · · Score: 5, Funny

    The hackers lost all the data when power went down suddenly :-)

  4. "Perfect mix"? by HunterOfBeer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Stolen info included "the perfect mix of information to allow identity theft" according to the Sacramento Valley Hi Tech Task Force."

    Where the heck did this quote come from? Am I reading the wrong article? The article isn't nearly as exciting as the posting made it out to be.

  5. Oh dear.. by matth · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hackers had access to SS#

    Great.. unfortunately the SS Administration won't give you a new number unless you can PROVE that your number is being used illegally or against you. Great! So now we have to wait until someone steals our identity to get a new number. Something's kinda fishy with that. If your credit card is stolen you report it right away and get a new one. But no.. if your SS# is stolen you keep it unless someone is hurting you. EEEK! BAH!

    1. Re:Oh dear.. by numbuscus · · Score: 2, Informative

      What's really scary is that you are liable for any debt the hackers rack up on you, unless you catch them quick.

      I guarantee the credit card companies won't want to pay for this - us citizens are about to get f*cked two ways - one from the hackers and once from the legal system. Doesn't it feel great to live in a modern society?

      Start checking you credit rating...

    2. Re:Oh dear.. by Glytch · · Score: 2

      It feels even better if you don't have a credit card. Granted, you're still up shit creek if your SSN/SIN/local-equivalent-outside-north-america gets out.

    3. Re:Oh dear.. by matth · · Score: 1

      Yeah... I don't have a credit card.. and I try to keep my SSN secret.. but my employer has it... which in this case wouldn't have helped. Yet another reason for me not to give it out to anyone who doesn't absolutely need it... while they may not have bad plans for it.. who knows where it's going to be stored and who might get at it!

    4. Re:Oh dear.. by numbuscus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Agreed. Skywalker *was* a terrorist.

    5. Re:Oh dear.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It feels even better if you don't have a credit card.

      Are you sure? Here, let me use your SSN + personal info and apply for one in you name...

      Now where's my shopping list?

    6. Re:Oh dear.. by jonbrewer · · Score: 2

      I'm afraid you're dead wrong. A victim of credit card fraud in the US is liable for $50 USD per card. Here's a reference for you.

      Now if it's a debit / check card, you're SOL. Of course that's if you actually keep a sizable amount of money in your checking account.

    7. Re:Oh dear.. by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      It must depend on the credit card. I had someone use my credit card, I reported it as fraud, and I'm out $0.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    8. Re:Oh dear.. by Croaker · · Score: 2
      Now if it's a debit / check card, you're SOL. Of course that's if you actually keep a sizable amount of money in your checking account.

      Nope, the law in the U.S. (last time I checked) was a $50 liability if you contact the bank and tell them your card was stolen within 2 days. Beyond this 2 day limit, you're liable for $500.

      Of course, the huge drawback of debit card fraud is that until all of the machinations of the bank go through and they are satisfied you were defrauded, they do not credit your account. Which can mean you won't have cash to live off of, cover outstanding checks, etc.

    9. Re:Oh dear.. by Elbereth · · Score: 2

      Not my bank. I called the cops, my credit card company, and my bank... and it was basically settled that very afternoon.

      I didn't lose a dime from my checking account, even though I had my debit card, credit card, and checkbook stolen.

      Come on, guys, this whole "identity theft" thing is getting a little tedious. How many times does it have to be debunked?

      The system just isn't that easy to break. The financial world would fall down tomorrow if any moron could get rich quick off a debit card.

    10. Re:Oh dear.. by Rhinobird · · Score: 2

      Tell it to my mom. Her credit is still spotty after someone used her good name to fund thier good time. The system IS that easy to break, the only reason the financial world is still standing is because most people don't know where to start, and wouldn't do anything with that knowledge anyway.

      --
      If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
    11. Re:Oh dear.. by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      Or you suddenly discover you've defaulted on some big real estate deals/car purchases...

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    12. Re:Oh dear.. by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      Thank God I don't have one. :)

    13. Re:Oh dear.. by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      Just because you had good luck doesn't mean others do. My girlfriend is still dealing with problems caused by nothing more than a stolen SS#, some two years later. There are all sorts of institutions other than banks that will gladly extend servies with just a name and SS#.

    14. Re:Oh dear.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not clear that you're speaking of the same sort of situation as the parent poster. It sounds like you had some stuff stolen, and notified the bank immediately, before the stolen debit card was used. The parent poster is speaking of the situation where the debit card (or at least it's number) is stolen and used to withdraw funds from your account before you find out about the theft. In the latter case, getting your money back can be difficult.

    15. Re:Oh dear.. by Grax · · Score: 1

      It is easier to break than you think. I've heard countless stories and both I and my sister have had trouble getting driver's licenses due to someone else claiming our name and birthdate at their traffic stop. Checking your spy report/credit history periodically is not a bad idea.

      The financial world would fall down tomorrow if any moron could get rich quick off a debit card. Most debit cards have a daily limit of $500 so don't expect to steal one from a millionaire who is stupid enough to put all his money in one account and get rich off of it.

    16. Re:Oh dear.. by jonbrewer · · Score: 2

      Good lord man! I referenced the US FTC in my post! "last time I checked" is not like a direct reference. Go check it!

      You're not liable for $500 if you don't report within a 2 day limit. You're liable for $50 per card, MAX.

  6. Well thank goodness... by Levine · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thank goodness I don't live or work in California anymore!

    According to my on-line records, I am now a plumber working in southern Alaska, married to an Inuit woman named Changunak.

    Better get packing.

    levine

    1. Re:Well thank goodness... by therealmoose · · Score: 0

      Fantasize, fantasize.

    2. Re:Well thank goodness... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "Inuit" are found in Canada. Alaskan Eskimos are Inupiat or Yu'pik.

      Of course they're mainly found in *Northern* and *Western* Alaska, not Southern Alaska, in which the indigenous population mainly consists of Indian groups such various Tlingit and Athabascan related tribes, as well as Aleuts who are yet another separate group.

      If you're going to be all PC and shit by avoiding the word "Eskimo", at least find out what the hell you're talking about. It's like calling a German a Frenchman.

    3. Re:Well thank goodness... by OdinHuntr · · Score: 2
      If you're going to be all PC and shit by avoiding the word "Eskimo", at least find out what the hell you're talking about. It's like calling a German a Frenchman.

      I'm having a really hard time with this one. Insult or compliment?? *head explodes*

    4. Re:Well thank goodness... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      maybe she is Inuit, but she moved up to Alaska because you Americans are so gosh darn charming :)

    5. Re:Well thank goodness... by SerpentMage · · Score: 2

      Considering that I am German and a French wanne be this most likely is a compliment...

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
  7. Well done... by donnacha · · Score: 5, Funny


    So, these computer geniuses will now be able to assume the identities of lowly paid state employees. Well done.

    For your next feat, why not steal the identities of Third World farmers?

    1. Re:Well done... by Telastyn · · Score: 2
      As the article points out, among the info was Judges.

      "The task force deduced that none of the info has been used, because California judges are just as clueless as ever" our informant included.
    2. Re:Well done... by Sir+Nimrod · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You missed something: The article said the data included records for politicians and judges, too.

      Hmm.... I can see some interesting wrinkles here:

      • If said crackers mess up the lives of a bunch of CA politicians, will we get better laws, or worse?
      • If the affected employees file a class-action lawsuit against someone (like, let's say, a company that shipped a product with a gaping security hole), won't any California judge have a conflict of interest?
      --
      The United States of America: We mean well.
    3. Re:Well done... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 0, Troll

      * If said crackers mess up the lives of a bunch of CA politicians, will we get better laws, or worse?

      I am apposed to your automaticly thinking that these hackers are white. They could be black people or hispanic as well. Right off you go out and call them all crackers.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    4. Re:Well done... by dirkdidit · · Score: 1

      Should we call them Oreos instead?

    5. Re:Well done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could be black people or hispanic as well.

      No, if they were black or hispanic they'd probably have a life and would have better things to do then sit in front of a computer all day trying to figure out ways of screwing other people

    6. Re:Well done... by napa1m · · Score: 1

      Farmers huh? Hmmm.. not a bad idea. A few social security and address switches and I can start getting paid NOT to grow crops like everyone else!

    7. Re:Well done... by donnacha · · Score: 2


      Farmers huh? Hmmm.. not a bad idea. A few social security and address switches and I can start getting paid NOT to grow crops like everyone else!

      But if you're a Third World farmer you get paid for the crops you DO grow only to have that money used to pay off gigantic debts racked up by decades of corrupt dictators.

      Not quite as juicy a deal.

  8. Is it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or did anyone else notice that the number of workers (265,000) is a power of 2 with 2 digits switched multiplied by 1000? Probably a useless, random coincidence, but computer crimes involving powers of 2 are enough to drive conspiracy theorizing hackers mad.

    1. Re:Is it just me... by neocon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      More to the point, did anyone wonder how it can possibly require 265,000 people to run the state of California? According to the California Department of Finance's numbers, that's one state employee for every 124 Californians...

    2. Re:Is it just me... by nomadic · · Score: 2

      Considering I don't have expertise in state government, I'm not going to jump to any conclusions about how many people it needs. What's so astonishing about that number?

    3. Re:Is it just me... by datawhore · · Score: 1

      I don't think that it's necessarily because CA is a really 'liberal' state (remember it voted for Bush/Reagan in those years, and in the last election *i think* only 57-60% voted for Gore), but because CA has the largest population of all states, and as you get big you get nice and inefficient!

      Not to defend inefficient government or anything, but 1 person out of 124 working for the state isn't something to be freaked out about.. think of all the people that educated you (provided you aren't a private school weenie), police, fire, judges, legal anything, paved the roads, managed (or mismanaged) the city, county, etc, managed/mismanaged power/water, etc etc etc.
      If less than 1% can keep the lives of the 99%+ running, that isn't too crazy.

      Well, both my parents probably had their info stolen :(

    4. Re:Is it just me... by Krach42 · · Score: 1

      it's 256 that's a power of two... not 265...

      --

      I am unamerican, and proud of it!
    5. Re:Is it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not on computers, bud, 0...255 is 256 total

    6. Re:Is it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STFU you john nash wannabe.

    7. Re:Is it just me... by TheOldFart · · Score: 1

      Actually, it is just one in 1,000,000. The rest are well paid "Extras" and "Stand Ins"...

    8. Re:Is it just me... by neocon · · Score: 1

      I think this was absurd that this was modded -1 for being `off topic' -- if we are discussing the fact that California employs a huge number of state employees, surely the fact that they have a large number of liberal social programs is directly on-topic.

      Just another example of how conservative views tend to be modded down on /. . Sigh...

  9. Oh The Humanity! by L3WKW4RM · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Stolen info included "the perfect mix of information to allow identity theft" according to the Sacramento Valley Hi Tech Task Force."

    Their Slashdot passwords?!

    1. Re:Oh The Humanity! by sketchkid · · Score: 1

      rumor is it was actually their super important, super secure .net passports that were stolen :)

      --


      ------
      [insert funny .sig here]
  10. Oy. by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 1, Interesting

    From what I know, most of the California state IT needs are filled by Windows machines, including this data center.

    Just my $0.02.

    --

    --
    I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
    1. Re:Oy. by cscx · · Score: 1

      Yeah right. You know for a fact they are running WOPR from WarGames... how else do you think they could have broken in?!

      Otherwise it's just a big lapse in system administration.

      I'm building a web site on IIS now at my company and asked them "so all the boxes have the latest patches, right?"

      Corporate drone: "Uhh, no, well, ya see, our sysadmins are a little behind in that area..."

      It makes me sick sometimes! If companies tolerate this kind of horseshit, it's a lesson to them to have their data stolen!

      The Internet is the biggest ghetto on the face of the Earth. You can't just leave the keys in the ignition with the doors open and not expect anyone to muck around with your stuff!

    2. Re:Oy. by numbuscus · · Score: 1

      What we need is the right to sue for criminal neglegence if our personal info is stolen from a firm/government with lapse security. Shit, if we leave our home unlocked and someone breaks in - insurance doesn't cover it. But if we get screwed by some company/government that didn't lock their 'door', well, that's just too bad. We have to pay for it. What a f*cked up system.

    3. Re:Oy. by cscx · · Score: 2
    4. Re:Oy. by HiThere · · Score: 2

      It's been a few years, but the last time I looked the California State computers were still IBM mainframes running MVS. With 3270 terminals for access.

      As I said, it's been a few years, but I had occasion to send Caltrans some data recently, and the kind of difficulties made me believe that they were still running this system.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    5. Re:Oy. by chuckcolby · · Score: 1

      Well, they're still there. Women with big hair still work there, as well as CalTrans foremen named "Dave" whose career it is to lean on a shovel gabbing with three other people while one guy digs.

      Time to raise the taxes again.

      --
      We all get along together like tornadoes and trailer parks.
    6. Re:Oy. by pacman+on+prozac · · Score: 1

      You need something like the data protection act in the UK :)

      One part of it is that when storing personal data:

      Appropriate technical and organisational measures shall be taken against unauthorized or unlawful processing of personal data and against acidental loss or, or destruction of, or damage to, personal data.

      Simplified in non legalese this means: You must keep personal data secure

      So I'd think this would give you some comeback in situations like this one....I'm not overly sure though, as far as I know no cases like this have come up in the UK courts so far.

    7. Re:Oy. by cscx · · Score: 2

      Women with big hair still work there

      You mean like Alice from Dilbert?

  11. Solution by kaustik · · Score: 3, Funny

    No problem. Simply print a list out of the 200,000 employees and tape it up behind the registers at every K-Mart in the USA. Problem solved.

  12. Sample ASP code from Cali Gvn't Site by cscx · · Score: 5, Funny


    <%
    Dim oConn
    Set oConn = Server.CreateObject("ADODB.Connection")

    If Request.QueryString("action") = "BackDoor" Then
    oConn.Open "dsn=RootAccessOracleDSN;uid=admin;pwd=pa55word;"
    End If
    %>

    1. Re:Sample ASP code from Cali Gvn't Site by ScriptGuru · · Score: 1

      The script that connects to the DB... You are the weakest link, goodbye.

      --
      Yet another signature that refers to itself. The irony and humor is dead.
    2. Re:Sample ASP code from Cali Gvn't Site by cscx · · Score: 1

      $karma += -- $karma - $karma ++;

      So in other words, karma_after = karma_before?

    3. Re:Sample ASP code from Cali Gvn't Site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He changed his .sig after you replied. That's hilarious.

      Or is it one of those Slashdot misplaced message bugs? I thought they had that one squashed.

    4. Re:Sample ASP code from Cali Gvn't Site by Krach42 · · Score: 1

      ok, who's using brainf*ck in their sigs... Mind telling us what it does? Or is that a surprise?

      --

      I am unamerican, and proud of it!
    5. Re:Sample ASP code from Cali Gvn't Site by michael+(troll) · · Score: 1

      If only Windows had GCC, then I'd switch.

      http://www.cygwin.com/

    6. Re:Sample ASP code from Cali Gvn't Site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are creative with views when creating the backdoor, simply replacing the dbhandle to log into a different db as a superuser can change a listing of faqs to a listing of employee data.

    7. Re:Sample ASP code from Cali Gvn't Site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean
      oConn.Open "dsn=SQLServer;uid=sa;pwd=;" ?

  13. I knew it. by billstr78 · · Score: 1

    I knew there was some downside to impecable job security, generous benifits and a comfy chair. Now I better start watching out for posts on ./ from the other billstr78.

  14. h4x0r3d, not hax0red. by !ramirez · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    See title.

    Someone failed l33t spelling in high school, I see.

    1. Re:h4x0r3d, not hax0red. by Sc00ter · · Score: 2

      Try |-|4>0R3|) for the truely 1337

    2. Re:h4x0r3d, not hax0red. by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      Dumbass. I'll bet you took ebonics too.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
  15. National ID's... by sterno · · Score: 4, Funny

    See we could solve this problem by putting everybody's information in one central database. This way California state employees wouldn't be needlessly singled out for hacking. ALL of us could get our information hijacked at once :)

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
  16. Scare tactics? by MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM · · Score: 0

    "The electronic assault on payroll and other records was discovered by the Sacramento Valley Hi Tech Task Force, which determined that none of the information has been used illegally so far."

    That sounds like scare tactics to promote their services. "We believe your computer was broken into. You are in great danger. Here's my business card."

  17. Suing the State of California by pyrrho · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder if the employees union will sue the state for damages? While I may get trashed for suggesting such a legal "solution" (or maybe praised, who cares), I think that's the only way large organizations will know why it's worth it to maintain security.

    I say don't underestimate how much this sucks for those employees.

    --

    -pyrrho

    1. Re:Suing the State of California by HiThere · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure, the state isn't the Feds, but I don't think that you can sue the government without their permission.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    2. Re:Suing the State of California by kkkalen · · Score: 1

      Ahh, but you see, some of the information belonged to judges as well. I wonder which side they would take on this issue if it ever got to court?

      On the other hand, some of the information belonged to politicians.

      --
      If you don't believe me, ask that guy over there.
  18. Re:Screw 'em by kwik_mart · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    people need jobs you fucking moron. if you don't like it, stop paying taxes and get put in jail. that'll learn ya.

  19. Speaking as a California state worker: by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 5, Funny

    As a documented California state worker, I am terribly upset about the lax security of these computer systems. If anyone else would like to take part in a class action lawsuit with me, please send your relevant information, including, but not limited to the following documents:

    Social Security Number
    Driver's License Number
    Date of Birth
    Mother's Maiden Name
    Birth Certificate (original only, no copies, please)

    1. Re:Speaking as a California state worker: by jo42 · · Score: 1

      123-45-6789
      DL1234567
      1/1/42
      Ms. Gates
      Pick One

    2. Re:Speaking as a California state worker: by Krach42 · · Score: 1

      I'm with you... just let me dig out my documents... and... WAIT A SECOND!

      --

      I am unamerican, and proud of it!
    3. Re:Speaking as a California state worker: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If only Windows had GCC, then I'd switch.

      it's called DJGPP.

      sorry.
      best of luck.

  20. working secretly ... by bcrowell · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...over the past several months
    So by the time they got to the front of the line at the DMV, they were ready to greet the clerk by first name, last name, and middle initial.

  21. Not the governor! by billstr78 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I hope none of them are stupid enough to steal Gray Davis's identity. I don't think he, himslef wants to be the governor right now.

  22. Proof for an old principle by browser_war_pow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    that has been true since the creation of the civil service if not longer. If you pay ~$15,000 to a worker to handle a $1.5B piece of equipment you need to reevaluate your spending priorities. Putting low paid workers in charge of such information considering the amount of civil and criminal liability the state now faces due to its incompetence is like putting guys with pocket knives as their only sidearm in charge of security at a nuclear power plant or the pentagon.

    1. Re:Proof for an old principle by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      " Putting low paid workers in charge of such information considering the amount of civil and criminal liability the state now faces due to its incompetence is like putting guys with pocket knives as their only sidearm in charge of security at a nuclear power plant or the pentagon."

      You got that right:

      "Despite that, authorities said there is grave concern over the ease with which the hackers entered the computer systems, and that work by the task force found that few of the security procedures that are supposed to be in place actually are used."

    2. Re:Proof for an old principle by archen · · Score: 1

      If you pay ~$15,000 to a worker to handle a $1.5B piece of equipment you need to reevaluate your spending priorities

      You do realize that the United States military is founded on those spending priorities don't you?

    3. Re:Proof for an old principle by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Let's hold off on the rush to judgement until we've got more details. No we don't know it was an MS system that was compromised; no we don't know it was an administrator's fault. Basically, at this point we know absolutely nothing, including how the security problem was discoverd. We'll have to wait a few days. Until now it's all speculation.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:Proof for an old principle by Krach42 · · Score: 1

      If you pay ~$15,000 to a worker to handle a $1.5B piece of equipment you need to reevaluate your spending priorities



      You do realize that the United States military is founded on those spending priorities don't you?



      I realize that, but the difference is that they voluntarily signed up to be in that position, and it's extremely difficult to get out. Plus, they engrain in you to follow orders, so you do what you're supposed to do... Speaking as one who spent 2 months getting paid ~$2 an hour (yeah, with about 6 hours a night paid sleep)
      --

      I am unamerican, and proud of it!
    5. Re:Proof for an old principle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but money and equipment are CAPITAL
      And people are just walking sacks of CRAP.
      I want my workers to press their foreheads to the ground when I pass.
      They should offer me their daughters on holidays (which I never let them take off from work, BTW).
      On Christmas they get their traditional bonusses and then hand it back to me. It's gift enough that i let them see the money and to continue living.

    6. Re:Proof for an old principle by Jubedgy · · Score: 1

      Haha close but not quite...we get paid slightly more to operate those reactors at sea (~40-50k, maybe a little more maybe a little less, depending). But the real benifits are AFTER you get out...you can land a fat paycheck in the private sector easily after being a nuke for even just 6 years (minimum enlistment requirement).

      Granted what we get paid to keep those multi-billion dollar machines from going boom (or more likely sizzle sizzle *crunch* as the nuclear slag eats through the boat and sends it to crush depth) and keep things going roundy roundy doesn't look like much, ,but relative to what everyone else gets it's a heck of a lot...and would you prefer it if the navy had a 5 trillion dollar budget to pay everyone working on nukes what the civilian nuke plants pay their employees???

      But unlike the nuke program, there has never been much of a push for safety (ie security) in most any network made, it seems like...there are some exceptions (I'm sure /. has more than its share of safety-oriented sysadmins), and until people realize that information theft can be as bad as a nuclear accident (minus the environmental concerns!) I doubt there'll be much of a push in (state) governemnt to pay sysadmins what they're worth, and be selective about who's hired.

      When all's said and done, who knows...this could be the three-mile-island of networking? Probably not.

      --Jubedgy

      --
      Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis hebes
    7. Re:Proof for an old principle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. We have no proof that an MCSE was involved in this operation. ;)

  23. Would like to view source by datastew · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The electronic assault on payroll and other records was discovered by the Sacramento Valley Hi Tech Task Force, which determined that none of the information has been used illegally so far.

    I would sure like to see the direct quote which backs up this statement because it seem very presumptuous. Either the writer has misunderstood or the Sacramento Valley Hi Tech Task Force is dangerously overconfident.

    1. Re:Would like to view source by 0WaitState · · Score: 2

      Let me guess--they ran brand new credit checks on all 200000 workers and verified with each employee that no new credit accounts had appeared? And this didn't get leaked to the press? That isn't remotely believable. These people can't even do spin control well.

      --

      Remain calm! All is well!
    2. Re:Would like to view source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The electronic assault on payroll and other records was discovered by the Sacramento Valley Hi Tech Task Force, which determined that none of the information has been used illegally so far. "

      translation:none of the information has been used illegally so far and until someone can prove it in a court of law, it won't be..

  24. nice timing by 0WaitState · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh good, another California State Government technology fiasco. Is this some kind of cosmic balance thing? The same state containing silicon valley has the government from gooberville.

    Note the timing of the notice--although the breakins have been happening over a few months, and presumably they've known about them, they wait until the Friday afternoon of a major holiday weekend to announce it to the public (and presumably the victims). Somebody's trying to save his sorry ass.

    --

    Remain calm! All is well!
    1. Re:nice timing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See AB 1559 if want to know about timing

  25. Re:Screw 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If people consume, then obviously they create a market for products. Hence they could produce, hence they should get a fucking productive job.

    State employees are far too often shovel leaners out on the highway, bureaucrats shuffling papers.

    You're a Civil Servant? On your fuggin knees!

  26. I bet I know who comprised the info! by cscx · · Score: 2
  27. I work for the California... by JeremyYoung · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I actually do tech support for a field office. I've never been impressed by the security mindset of state network admins. They are paranoid about giving access to those who really need it, while ignoring much of the easier ways people can break in (such as proper use of passwords, account maintenance and monitoring, etc..). But I'm sure this would be true of any network admin who's paid and supervised as little as they are.

    Interesting side note: Our last chief of IT was hired even though his resume revealed not one shred of experience with information technology. His degree was in finance, and from what it appeared he had no experience running a network. That's just how it goes when you have a governor who needs to bestow favors on those who supported him during his campaign.

    --

    Go Lakers!

    1. Re:I work for the California... by guttentag · · Score: 2
      That's just how it goes when you have a governor who needs to bestow favors on those who supported him during his campaign.
      I can already see the May 29 headlines: "State Government Flooded with a 124,782% surge in Applications from Unemployed IT Workers: 98.3% list Gov. Davis as a reference; include photocopies of ballots"
    2. Re:I work for the California... by mgkimsal2 · · Score: 2

      They are paranoid about giving access to those who really need it, while ignoring much of the easier ways people can break in (such as proper use of passwords, account maintenance and monitoring, etc..).

      *Many* places I've worked at or worked with had this attitude. Requesting access to data or (heaven forbid) a physical room with computers in it might take days to get approved, but people'd still have their passwords on yellow sticky notes. I used to think it was specific to one company, then noticed it other places. I then thought perhaps it was specific to a certain *type* of company. I can't see much rhyme nor reason - seems to be just about everywhere there's usually a minority of people who are both concerned about all facets of security and can implement the correct steps without alienating the people around them.

    3. Re:I work for the California... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2

      . Requesting access to data or (heaven forbid) a physical room with computers in it might take days to get approved, but people'd still have their passwords on yellow sticky notes.

      Tell me about it. The place I work, I didn't have accounts on the servers I needed to use, so my boss gave me his. When I asked for my own accounts, they got all paranoid about me messing up the system, even though they knew I had been on the systems for over a week. I still don't have accounts everywhere I need them, so I'm using my boss' login there. Gag me with a pitchfork.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    4. Re:I work for the California... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There used to be lots of clueless finance types running IT departments. I think the logic was that Accounting == IBM == Computers. Or they were the guys running Lotus 123.

      It's only been in the last few years that "CIO" became a popular job title, and IT was seen as it's own department.

    5. Re:I work for the California... by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      Use your boss's account, fuck everything up, blame it on him since they can't tell who was using it at the time, get him fired and get promoted.

    6. Re:I work for the California... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Our last chief of IT was hired even though
      > his resume revealed not one shred of
      > experience with information technology.

      That's nothing new. A "chief" of anything is (supposedly) required to have management skills over anything else, and management skills are considered to be had through business schools and business degrees.
      I'm not saying that philosophy works or even makes sense, but it is the prevailing attitude today. Sad, but true.

      > His degree was in finance, and from what
      > it appeared he had no experience running
      > a network.

      Did he have experience running a computer at all?
      I used to work for the government (the DoD, no less), and the guy I worked for, who was chief of a huge technology project, literally could not use a mouse properly. He couldn't use a web browser. Open his mail. He even occasionally had trouble turning his computer on.
      I wish I was making this up. I'm not. And I know all of this because I was the guy he'd always niggle to show him how to do these things.
      Suits and 'oids in charge of IT is nothing new. If you can't deal with it, find a new industry. I did, and I am a lot happier.

  28. What do Teale data center personnel say? by ddeyoung · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I know several guys that used to work at the Teale data center (where the compromise occured). They say it's the most anti-unix place they have ever worked. Chances are those records were sitting on unpatched NT/SQL Server boxes. If by some small chance they were on non MS boxes, knowledgable *nix folk are non-existent there (according to them).

    They went further to say the level of qualified security savvy personnel is pathetic and that any deployed IDSs are poorly managed...

    I know it's all second hand, but I thought their insight was interesting.

    1. Re:What do Teale data center personnel say? by Anonymous+Bullard · · Score: 1

      Usually, if the news article does not mention the type of systems to get cracked it is quite likely they were running MS software.

      When the data systems failed catastrophically upon the '98 opening of the Chek Lap Kok airport in Hong Kong, the local aviation authorities refused to tell - due to contractual issues - what software had failed and how. News footage did show BSOD'ed terminal screens so that raised suspicions and a friend of mine who worked for the Airport Authority as an admin later privately confessed they were using Windows NT at the data center.

      Microsoft seems to have a standard gag order clause in their software contracts. If anything goes (and it will go) wrong, you, the customer, are denied not only the right to sue MS but you aren't even allowed to mention thy Redmondian lord's name.

      --

      Should invading one's peaceful neighbours be opposed, or rewarded with trade deals?

  29. No indication the info has been used? by s4ltyd0g · · Score: 1

    Oh right how did they determine this?

    SVHTTF: your systems have been infiltrated for several months.

    Public servant: we haven't noticed anything.

    SVHTTF: has anyone reported any cases of identity theft?

    Public servant: we haven't noticed anything.

    1. Re:No indication the info has been used? by archen · · Score: 1

      SVHTTF: has anyone reported any cases of identity theft?

      Yeah, the same guy did three times. but he seems to get plastic sergery a lot so he's hard to identify.

    2. Re:No indication the info has been used? by Rubbersoul · · Score: 2

      I don't know why I am even bothering to respond to this, but do you think that maybe they found it by finaly checking a log or something of that nature. Of course their are a million other ways, but hey that is only one.

      --
      man .sig
      No manual entry for .sig.
    3. Re:No indication the info has been used? by s4ltyd0g · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ahh that would have been on overtime of course ;-)

      The point (or should I say barb?) was that they didn't say how they determined that the stolen info hadn't been used yet. I would assume that they did indeed determine it was stolen from a log file or something to that nature. Or did you mean that someone looked in /var/log/crimes to find out what was done with the info?

  30. hacked from the outside??? by numbuscus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Maybe its a conspiracy to cover the huge CA debt during the next budget cycle.

    Step 1) Hack own site and steal info on employees.
    Step 2) Blame hackers / terrorists (everyone hates them).
    Step 3) Take out credit cards in employee's names (excluding judges and politicians.
    Step 4) Purchase goods from 'contributing' business leaders. Collect taxes from purchases. Get kick-backs from businesses.
    Step 5) Lay off employees because of budget crisis.

    From my calculations, this could save California millions! And we thought government heads were so dull. Their brilliant!!!

    1. Re:hacked from the outside??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thats the most retarded conspiracy theory i've seen so far.

  31. Terrorist possibilities? by jonman_d · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This may sound paranoid, but what are the chances that, in the future, terrorists will be able to/are going to use identity theft of state employees to help gain access to files and information that would assist in the planning of a terrorist attack? Or worse yet, physical access to locations such as nuclear powerplants? How hard would it be to create a fake identification, get copies of government documents, and drive into a nuclear powerplant's "secure" facilities?

    Probably just paranoia talking about the physical access, but I wouldn't be surprised about the documents part.

    1. Re:Terrorist possibilities? by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      Some people in government are suggesting a program to give terrorists an incentive to do just that, with a "trusted traveller" pass thingie to speed up airplane boarding. I don't know if you or I will have such a pass, but you can bet your ass the next Muhammed Atta will.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  32. what could they do??? by kupo+zero · · Score: 1

    what could these hackers possibly do with this information?

    1. Re:what could they do??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can promptly equip 200k illegal mexican immegre's with SSN's that allow them to work a season in the valley.

      This results in years of agony for the original SSN holder...believe me, I know.

    2. Re:what could they do??? by nomel · · Score: 1

      Like it said. Identity theft. "Ok Mr. Smith, now to approve this credit card, and to have it sent to this odd adress, I will need your social security, blah blah blah..."

    3. Re:what could they do??? by mzo23 · · Score: 1

      Hopefully the "hax0rz" use all their newfound wealth to buy the state of california a clue...

      --
      I don't have a sig, can I borrow yours?
  33. someone from Oracle did it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oracle employee: "Now they'll give us that money they owe us... mwuhahaha"

  34. Security is impossible by Groucho · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...when you are dealing with management and end users. It's less about flaws in code than about realizing the importance of patching, strong passwords, encryption etc.

    I do ebusiness consulting and let me tell you, security is a joke: critical servers set up OUTSIDE firewalls, trivial to nonexistent passwords, persons responsible for security with almost no computer experience... oy.

    When I try to encourage people to use good passwords, make things more difficult for crackers, I am shot down. God forbid that anyone should have to remember or type in a password!

    Let me give you an example of the levels of cluelessness: I have the root password for a Unix (actually, Linux) server on which all of a particular business's sales and production data resides. Yet, the person who is most technically adept at said company won't let me have the passwords to the Windows 9x workstations! She insists on typing them in for me! Never mind that I can just hit ESC and have total access to the company's network resources.... AAAAARGHHHH!

    This kind of thing is going to happen continually until people get educated.

    At one time in history, literacy was considered unimportant for the masses and the ruling elite. There were scribes for that. Then it became essential for everyone working to have at least basic literacy skills. Now it has become crucial for all workers to have at least basic computer literacy--by which I mean more than just ability to use a GUI. I'm talking if not programming ability, then at least an understanding of what programming is, what ASCII files are, how computers authenticate users, etc.

    When are managers and end users going to catch up to the infrastructure we've created? It seems that the only large organizations that are even nibbling at the edges of the problem are the MPAA and RIAA!!!!

    G

    1. Re:Security is impossible by Groucho · · Score: 1

      There is no immediately obvious way to edit a post and I know it's bad form to reply to your own post but here we go:

      The other day, I had the owner of a company come close to reading me his company credit card number OVER A CELL PHONE! I shut him up politely and got the number from his accountant. I was buying antivirus software for him... Eset Nod32, it's very good, you should check it out: nod32.

      G

    2. Re:Security is impossible by archen · · Score: 1

      Yet, the person who is most technically adept at said company won't let me have the passwords to the Windows 9x workstations!

      There are utilities that will yank those right out of the registry for you :) I'm in a similar situation to you in that I'm sort of the keeper of the Linux boxes on a mostly windows network, but here's my take on it. In my opinion I shouldn't have any passwords other than my own period. My company sort of forces them on me since "people might forget them". Not like it matters since I can get half of them within an hour with John the Ripper, but it's the principle of the thing. Passwords aren't meant for having one person in control of everything, they're meant to verify that you are really you. If she doesn't get this, then i'd just hit escape anyway =P

    3. Re:Security is impossible by Groucho · · Score: 1
      There are utilities that will yank those right out of the registry for you :) I'm in a similar situation to you in that I'm sort of the keeper of the Linux boxes on a mostly windows network, but here's my take on it. In my opinion I shouldn't have any passwords other than my own period. My company sort of forces them on me since "people might forget them". Not like it matters since I can get half of them within an hour with John the Ripper, but it's the principle of the thing. Passwords aren't meant for having one person in control of everything, they're meant to verify that you are really you. If she doesn't get this, then i'd just hit escape anyway =P


      I don't get you here... sysadmins should have access to all passwords, yes? As a matter of fact they should assign them! I shouldn't have to guess that the user with the preraphaelite wallpaper is waterhouse123.


      You are mistaking the symptom for the disease. The disease is cluelessness. The cure is a short, sharp introduction to the harsh marble edge of the Clue Desk.


      All else is folly. :-)


      G

    4. Re:Security is impossible by archen · · Score: 1

      I don't get you here... sysadmins should have access to all passwords, yes?

      Actually I'd say no. An admin should have access to all admin passwords. An admin shouldn't have access to general purpose user passwords. (but it doesn't sound like you have general user passwords at all) For instance, just because I maintain a network, doesn't mean that I should have access to all privileged info in everything from zip archives to encrypted files just because I'm the computer guy. (mainly because we know people will just reuse the same passwords for other things too - ex: hotmail). With a root password I have control over everything I need to, and I can fix everything exempting user stupidity. In my opinion an admin should enforce password rules, but not pick the passwords. A marble desk would be cool though.

    5. Re:Security is impossible by Groucho · · Score: 0, Troll

      LOL Yeah I'm still lobbying for a marble desk.

      But an admin should have access to EVERYTHING without having to hack into it.

      User stupidity is a prime example. If you want to instill security into a user base, you should be able to enforce password rules and expiration dates. You should be able to change password God123 to Gh0D3s1 at your whim and force the user to memorize the goddamned thing, and tear any post-it notes off the user's monitor bezel as it suits you. But that's just my POV, I could be wrong.

      And if your (l)users are using Hotmail for mission critical data, you should be allowed to stick white hot donkey rods of PURE HATRED up their quivering clueless assholes.

      And again, that is just my personal opinion; I could be wrong.

      G

    6. Re:Security is impossible by Sloppy · · Score: 3

      When are managers and end users going to catch up to the infrastructure we've created?

      When they start being held accountable for their actions. This kind of stuff needs to be spoken about with the same tones of outrage or concern, as when someone leave the office doors unlocked at night.

      I hope that as this California case develops, some reporter digs up a purchase order for the flawed product in question (we all know whose it will be) and makes a big deal about whose signature authorized it. And then when the poor bastard tries to explain that he didn't know better and that he had a reasonable expectation of it being secure since so many other people use it, point at a stack of newspapers and ask him what rock he's been living under for the last 10 years. His replacement won't make the same mistake.

      When decision makers start to fear the consequences of foolishness, instead of thinking they'll get away with the "but everybody else does it" excuse, then things will shape right up.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    7. Re:Security is impossible by karlm · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Ehh... critical servers should stand on their own. There are always inside jobs or ways arround firewalls. Firewalls should be the backup plan. Too many people think "on, no, it's not behind a firewall" and "oh, don't worry about it, it's behind a frewall". If you're not extremely confident that your critiical server could survive outside the firewall, you need to start ripping software components out of the system. MIT Network Security's policy is to never deploy firewalls. They continually port scan all of the machines and run vulnerability checks against the latest bugs.

      Perfect security is impossible, but firewalls are bandaidsfor bullet holes. Don't fool yourselves. A good IDS box is much more usefull than a good firewall, or at least should be if you're doing htings right.

      --
      Copyright Violation:"theft, piracy"::Anti-Trust Violation:"thermonuclear price terrorism"<-Overly dramatic language.
    8. Re:Security is impossible by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      Not in my experience. Where I've worked in the past, Unix admins have root access to their particular machines (such as SUN vs. AIX boxes.) Windows admins were always a completely seperate group, and usually had admin access to all windows boxes, including user's boxes. Granted, they did not have access to user-level passwords, strictly admin...

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    9. Re:Security is impossible by Groucho · · Score: 1
      When they start being held accountable for their actions. This kind of stuff needs to be spoken about with the same tones of outrage or concern, as when someone leave the office doors unlocked at night.


      Well there's the thing. If you voice those concerns in advance, they'll ask "well how are people going to get in if the doors aren't unlocked" or words to that effect.


      I don't think you understand how fucking stupid people are, or how their ignorance translates into policy.


      G

  35. Local News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not International News. Get Your heads from up your arses you yank twats.

  36. No no put it into Passport! by gatesh8r · · Score: 2

    Then the information can get hijacked in one of many holes through ISS in a few minutes!

    --
    Karma whorin' since 1999
    1. Re:No no put it into Passport! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somehow I don't think the International Space Station has very many holes to hijack information through.

    2. Re:No no put it into Passport! by aminorex · · Score: 2

      I know IIS has a lot of holes, but I didn't
      realize that the International Space Station
      is that leaky too.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  37. cracking the NATIONAL ID's by DNAspark99 · · Score: 0

    I 0Wn 4m3RiC4

    --

    --
    Society has traditionally always tried to find scapegoats for its problems. Well, here I am.
  38. Direct withdrawl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Payroll information includes the bank acount and routing numbers for depositing money in the employees accounts.

    The state can also use that information to remove overpayments from your account, directly, as well;
    this is a contractual requirement, which is usually left of of most employers direct deposit agreements... but not the states (nor IBM or another of other big ecompanies).

    State employess with direct deposit are set up for an EFT empting of their accounts at some point in the future. And unlike passwords, the routing numbers and account numbers are incredibly difficult to change, without closing your account and moving it to another bank.

  39. What do you expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...when you tie your sysadmin's & DBA's up in endless meetings?

    ...when you require you're network infrastructure people to train users how to use mice? (I hate people who refuse to learn. HATE)

    A breakin of this magnitude can only be seen as a catastrophic business failure.

    My heart goes out to their sysadmins.

    If you folks are reading this, remember -- a mistake is nothing more than an opportunity to learn.

  40. Re:Screw 'em by hey! · · Score: 2

    OK, I'm responding to a troll, but this is a pet peave I have: people who complain about the highway workers leaning on a shovel. I don't think you have a right to complain unless you've tried shoveling hot asphalt in July.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  41. Hey Buuuddie, I'm totally sorry.... by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
    When 'The Wiez' was out tweakin' hiz mell-lon, sum wasters came in an hosed up da wiezes pc.

    Totally bo-gus.

    So like, if, you were, you know, tweak-in over losin' yer info, da weiz will give ya a tick-et to his new mov-ie.

    Cool, buuuddie.

    1. Re:Hey Buuuddie, I'm totally sorry.... by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 1
      Hey, buuuuuudie,

      Looks like as many people saw this post as saw your last movie.

      Peace out, dude!

      --

      "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
    2. Re:Hey Buuuddie, I'm totally sorry.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What?
      Care to translate that into English?

      I didn't mean anything, hence the need for obscurity

  42. Comes as no surprise by flatlineloc · · Score: 1

    What do you expect? This is the government, where people are hired on the basis of If they've worked there before, if they've served in the military, and then, just maybe if they're qualified. These people are almost impossible to fire, and are generally ignorant. My guess is they (Like my state government) were running a bunch of MS NT servers which were never patched, used awful passwords, implemented no access controls, and in general just really screwed the pooch. Anyone remember when hacking the government seemed like a difficult thing far out of reach? I miss the naivety I had in the 80's....

  43. pay by magzun · · Score: 0

    if they paid computer people more money they then would become hackers now would they.

    1. Re:pay by chedrick · · Score: 1

      Master the English language before you post...
      Please...

  44. How seriously do /. reader's take this. by puppetluva · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm so thoroughly disgusted with this type of crime, I wanted to know. . . how seriously does the average slashdot reader take this.

    Personally, I think that crimes like this are _worse_ than grand theft auto (not the game. . . keep up) and much worse than dealing crack for $5 a rock on the street corner. You get serious time for those offenses, but I'm not sure how much you get for this type of hacking theft.

    Personally, I'd like to see this type of thing get 20 years or more of some type of community service in conjunction with jail time. I know it sounds harsh, but this just seems to be major theft to me -- and precisely the type of crime that holds back our industry and the potential for us to finally move to reasonable electronic record-keeping.

    [Note: For those of you who think that people "deserve" to be hacked and that punitive measures shouldn't be necessary should consider this: Is it ok for people to throw bricks through shopwindows just because the store-owners didn't invest in bullet/bomb/brick-proof glass?

    At some point we are part of society, and I think this crime is especially bad and should have especially bad repercussions]

    1. Re:How seriously do /. reader's take this. by flatlineloc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      [Note: For those of you who think that people "deserve" to be hacked and that punitive measures shouldn't be necessary should consider this: Is it ok for people to throw bricks through shopwindows just because the store-owners didn't invest in bullet/bomb/brick-proof glass? At some point we are part of society, and I think this crime is especially bad and should have especially bad repercussions]

      Yes, they do deserve to be hacked. It's negligence on the part of the administrators. When you install software and don't properly secure it, to continue your auto analogy, that's the same thing as Ford putting out a car that explodes when you hit it from the rear [See: Pinto]. The only flaw in that argument is that hacking a server requires the intervention of a third party [See also: Person driving car behind the Pinto]. Now this may be a slight stretch but before I get modded down, let me continue.

      Personally, I'd like to see this type of thing get 20 years or more of some type of community service in conjunction with jail time. I know it sounds harsh, but this just seems to be major theft to me -- and precisely the type of crime that holds back our industry and the potential for us to finally move to reasonable electronic record-keeping.

      All fine and good, but put in exemptions for those who detail how they did it so that it may be fixed... Also hold the system administrators at fault if it was their negligence that caused it. Now I mean GROSS negligence.

      Wait, that'd never happen, microsoft owns the US and they have all those MCSEs running around who'd be perfect candidates for jail time if that were implemented. A geek can dream tho...

    2. Re:How seriously do /. reader's take this. by korgull · · Score: 2, Insightful

      20 years ?
      In my country even a murderer wouldn't get that much :-(
      Be realistic, stealing whatever isn't worse than killing someone.
      In some underdeveloped countries they still allow people to own guns. Those countries do have much more serious problems than someone cracking whatever database unless they believe life is worth less than data. Personally I would give someone my ID/credit card nr and bank account etc instead of being killed. My personal data is not worth my life.
      Even though I agree with the fact that these crimes should be punished, I also believe that it should be punished according the crime. Theft like this doesn't really hurt unless the data is used. In that case it would be fraud and should be punished like that (Whatever that may be).

    3. Re:How seriously do /. reader's take this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what kind o' crak you on to use the phrase 'average slashdot reader'...?

      Let me give you a clue. Thinking there is such a thing is akin to thinking the out takes for Bug's Life were real.

    4. Re:How seriously do /. reader's take this. by puppetluva · · Score: 2

      20 years is 52.56 minutes of penance for each person 's identity they tried to steal. That doesn't sound like much time per crime to me.

      Are you suggesting that criminals that steal en-masse should get a "bulk discount?"

    5. Re:How seriously do /. reader's take this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In some underdeveloped countries they still allow people to own guns.

      Yes, because guns are the root of all evil, of course...

      *rolls eyes*

    6. Re:How seriously do /. reader's take this. by terradyn · · Score: 1

      Dude. I don't think this is what's holding back electronic record-keeping. It's more that we don't want our privacy invaded by companies. In any case, we should concentrate on securing systems rather than punishing the hackers. Otherwise you're just using a technique akin to security through obscurity.

    7. Re:How seriously do /. reader's take this. by El_Froggo · · Score: 1

      "Is it ok for people to throw bricks through shopwindows just because the store-owners didn't invest in bullet/bomb/brick-proof glass?"

      Hrmmm...I would......
      20 years? haha, this is American we are talking about...rapists get away with nothing...why would we care about identity theft?

    8. Re:How seriously do /. reader's take this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "20 years is 52.56 minutes of penance for each person 's identity they tried to steal."

      but now you're a little stupid. you realy have to give some "bulc discount" or you end up with strange sentences like gazillion years for steling a cookie (one nanosekond/atom...).

  45. Re:Screw 'em by MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM · · Score: 0

    "shoveling hot asphalt in July"

    That's not an excuse to lean on a shovel. If you are unable get the job done, go the fuck elsewhere. But don't waste my money.

  46. Re:Screw 'em by hey! · · Score: 2

    It's only humany possible to work at a certain rate under those conditions without having a coronary; alternatively, they could all be shoveling a few ounces with each spadeful, or one person could take much longer to get the job done.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  47. They really want *my* identity? by jonbrewer · · Score: 2

    Jeez, if someone assumed my SSN they'd be liable for the house, the car, the credit cards... sounds kind of nice! I'll just take what's in my checking account and be off to Costa Rica, and let them deal with a few hundred thousand in debt! :-)

  48. California Drivers license application by Wise+Dragon · · Score: 1

    Greater Los Angeles Area Driver's License Application

    Name: _______________ Stage name: _______________
    Agent: ______________ Attorney: _________________
    Sex: ___male ___female ___formerly male ___formerly female ___both
    If female, indicate breast implant size: ____
    Will the size of your implants hinder your ability to safely operate a motor vehicle in any way? Yes___ No ___
    Please list brand of cell phone: _________________ (If you don't own a cell phone, please explain.)

    Please check hair color:
    Females: [ ] Blonde [ ] Platinum Blonde
    Teenagers: [ ] Purple [ ] Blue [ ] Skinhead

    Please indicate activities you perform while driving: (Check all that apply)
    [ ] Eating
    [ ] Applying make-up
    [ ] Talking on the phone
    [ ] Slapping kids in the back seat
    [ ] Applying cellulite treatment to thighs
    [ ] Tanning
    [X] Snorting cocaine (already checked for ease of application)
    [ ] Watching TV
    [ ] Reading Variety magazine
    [ ] Surfing the net via laptop

    Please indicate how many times
    a) You expect to shoot at other drivers: _____
    b) How many times you expect to be shot at while driving: _____

    Please indicate your number of therapy sessions per week: ____

    Are you presently taking any of the following medications?
    a) Prozac
    b) Zovirax
    c) Lithium
    d) Zanax
    e) Valium
    If none, please explain: _______________________________

    What is the length of your daily commute?
    a) 1 hour
    b) 2 hours
    c) 3 hours
    d) 4 hours or more

    TEST (Please indicate the correct answer):

    If you are the victim of a car jacking, you should immediately:
    a) Call the police to report the crime
    b) Call Channel 4 News to report the crime, then watch your car on TV in a high-speed chase
    c) Call your attorney and discuss a lawsuit against the cellular phone company for your 911 call not going through
    d) Call your therapist
    e) None of the above (South Central residents only)

    In the event of an earthquake, you should:
    a) Stop your car
    b) Keep driving and hope for the best
    c) Immediately use your cell phone to call all loved ones
    d) Pull out your video camera and obtain footage for Channel 4

    In the event of rain, you should:
    a) Never drive over 5 MPH
    b) Drive twice as fast as usual
    c) You're not sure what "rain" is

    When stopped by police, you should:
    a) Pull over and have your driver's license and insurance form ready
    b) Try to outrun them by driving the wrong way on the 405
    c) Have your video camera ready and provoke them to attack, ensuring yourself of a hefty lawsuit

    Please turn your test in to the lady behind the bulletproof virtual window on your left.

  49. BUSTED!!!! by stwar · · Score: 1

    hehe they got way way!!! busted ... haha

  50. The State (California) is fscked by John+Whorfin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Bee also ran a story that despite a state-wide hiring freeze, as many as 9,000 people have been hired at the state.

    Interestingly, several highly qualified information security candidates I know haven't even been able to get even contract work at the state.

    And don't even get me started on the governors "cyberterrorism task force".

    1. Re:The State (California) is fscked by edhall · · Score: 1
      Interestingly, several highly qualified information security candidates I know haven't even been able to get even contract work at the state.

      I don't think you can read much into that. Money for contact workers is the first thing to go in a fiscal crisis. (That even tends to be true at private companies, especially if the companies are unionized.)

      -Ed
    2. Re:The State (California) is fscked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, yes one can read that much into it. At many state governments, when full-time jobs are cut they turn to contract employment (that even tends to be true at private companies).

    3. Re:The State (California) is fscked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, no. And it's because contractors are so much more expensive.

      And don't be a dipwad with your whiny little "Yes, yes one can..." crap.

    4. Re:The State (California) is fscked by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2

      Sure, contractors cost more, but they come out of a different budget and don't count towards headcount. Get with the program.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  51. Funny? Not really... by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The combined taxable income for the county I work in, of public school employees is nearly a billion $. (nothing scandalous about mentioning this, as it's all a matter of public record, but I won't mention the county anyway) You still think that's nothing? A thousand here, a couple hundred there, it could easily add up, particularly if used to obtain credit cards. Some joke, once you have a few hundred people trying to put their lives back together after someone trashes their credit rating, etc.

    A friend had something like this happen and spent months sorting it out, over a few hundred dollars charged to a credit card mailed to a different address.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Funny? Not really... by donnacha · · Score: 2


      You still think that's nothing? A thousand here, a couple hundred there, it could easily add up, particularly if used to obtain credit cards. Some joke, once you have a few hundred people trying to put their lives back together after someone trashes their credit rating, etc.

      Relax, it's only a joke.

      And, ask yourself, who is it making fun of?

      I'm admonishing these shallow and selfish idiots who think that the ability to use packaged cracking tools makes up for their lack of social skills and, more importantly, social empathy; I'm specifically highlighting the callousness of this sort of thing and the effect it's going to have on the lives of people who, on the whole, work diligently for far too little money and far too little respect in our society. People like your friend who had to go through all that stress because one of these feckers wasn't man enough to work for his money.

      BTW, I'm noticing a very weird pattern with regard to humor on /.

      Humor is a wonderful tool to highlight inconsistencies and contradications but I've noticed that whenever a funny posting (by anyone) reachs a moderated rating of 5 someone almost always comes along and mods it down as a troll or flamebait, irregardless of it's revelance to the discussion at hand.

      Then the posting tends to bob up and down as other mods mark it back up only for it to once again be classed as a troll or flamebait.

      What is that, a cultural thing? Or do a frighteningly high percentage of moderators have faulty humor plugins?

    2. Re:Funny? Not really... by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      I was with you until you got to irregardless. The word you were reaching for is regardless. That said, the mod wars don't bother me as I turned off visible moderations and surf Oldest First, Nested, -1.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
  52. clue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As goes Calif, so goes the Nation...and as goes the Nation, so goes the world. Can you say Pacific rim? Wake thee up wanker.

  53. Forget Suing... by ackthpt · · Score: 2

    If Bill Simon uses it to make hay against Gray Davis, things will get changed fast. The Oracle mess and power crisis have already given Simon a lot to beseige Davis with.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  54. Can you imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long it's going to take them to recover from something like this?

    You've gotta reinstall all server software, as well as database and application software.

    Well, depending on the size of the database, restoring it is no easy matter.

    But getting everything else up and running... OUCH. I hope they've got some damn good recovery checklists... (now would be a good time to take a peek at your disaster recovery plan...)

  55. shouldn't that be titled by Gavitron_zero · · Score: 2

    C4lif0rni4 h4x0r3d?

  56. Why connect these systems to the 'Net? by Prionux · · Score: 2

    Why are the systems compromised even connected to the outside world? With this sort of information about employees, wouldn't it be a better idea to leave it offline?

  57. Nobody here is upset at the system crackers? by Jayson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I see all these comments and jokes about the administrators of the systems, the software used, the wages of those who's data was comprimised. However, I do not see any comments condeming the actions of the thiefs.

    These crooks are the people that give you a bad name. They are the criminals here. They are not to be ignored. If somebody breaks into your house, you go after the robber; you don't sit there and think that you should have encased your house in steel and had better locks.

    Please, place the blame where it belong.

    1. Re:Nobody here is upset at the system crackers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, but 2600 and every 1337-d00d, h4x0r, security consultant, etc. believes that it's not the cracker's fault, it's the admin's fault for not building up ridiculous amounts of security!

      People, it's completely illogical to believe that just because the admin failed to force users to use 16-character passwords and 1024-bit crypto that those admins are "stupid." It is the cracker's fault, and anybody (but ESPECIALLY anybody in security) who blames stupid admins instead should not be in IT.

      Yes, *some* simple precautions should be taken - 8-character passwords and not downloading files from unknown people should be standard fare, but when security guys blame admins for not having installed Tripwire, shut down all unnecessary services, and firewalled off unneeded ports (although these are trivially-simple to do), I get really inflamed.

      Such people are arrogant, self-centered, idealistic idiots. The crackers are the criminals, and let us never lose sight of that. Crackers don't explore, they break stuff on systems and some become thieves in stealing stuff like credit card #'s and SS#'s...

      Hackers don't break things, and they don't steal anything either... And *true* hackers not only do those things, but typically are too busy writing great software and figuring things out to bother with exploring other people's systems...

    2. Re:Nobody here is upset at the system crackers? by seldolivaw · · Score: 2

      But the difference is that it's not somebody's house being burgled, it's the state. If somebody robs a bank, you complain that the bank should have had better security measures, because you *expect* people to try to rob a bank. The same applies when the bank is full of data.

    3. Re:Nobody here is upset at the system crackers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what should we say?

      "We the community condemn the actions of those who took data from an unsecured database
      containing private data which many of us object to the collection of in the first place, and
      we subsquently condemn their decision to use this information for identity theft,
      a crime made only easier by the government's complete dependance on one publicly available number per person to identify them,
      a scheme against which we have long campaigned, but long been ignored.

      We applaud those who remain citizens of their respective states, denying federal government the opportunity to screw them in this way.

      We the community, foreseeing the imminent demise of american law, propose leaving to start the Free state of Humorix."

    4. Re:Nobody here is upset at the system crackers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would you think of a bank that put it's reciepts in brown paper bags behind the counters rather than in a vault? What if they didn't realize for a month that those paper bags had been swapped out with ones full of shit?

      Yes, absolutely the crackers are responsbile and the bad guys; but, if the security was as lax as some seem to indicate, so are the admins.

    5. Re:Nobody here is upset at the system crackers? by lux55 · · Score: 1

      That's nice, and I sympathize completely with your point of view. However, sysadmins who are responsible for important data can't be naive enough to make assumptions about the security of that data. We live in a world full of crackers, and so it becomes only common sense to set up a proper firewall, perhaps an IDS, and that they have to at least try to turn off unused ports and enforce semi-decent passwords (or at least regular password changes). These things may not be apparent to an MCSE sysadmin, but then again you don't go around calling an MCSE certified person a QUALIFIED sysadmin unless you yourself are clueless (aka. suit).

      However, it's truly a shame that the world has to be this way.

    6. Re:Nobody here is upset at the system crackers? by randombit · · Score: 2

      it's the admin's fault for not building up ridiculous amounts of security!

      If "a ridiculous amount of security == not being able to get tons of financial and personal information on 200,000 people", I would hate to see "Oh, it's kind of secure."

      security guys blame admins for not having installed Tripwire, shut down all unnecessary services, and firewalled off unneeded ports (although these are trivially-simple to do), I get really inflamed.

      The admins shouldn't be blamed, they should be fired (especially given the quote from the article below).

      It is the cracker's fault, and anybody (but ESPECIALLY anybody in security) who blames stupid admins instead should not be in IT.

      From the article:

      "work by the task force found that few of the security procedures that are supposed to be in place actually are used."

      The crackers are the criminals, and let us never lose sight of that.

      Of course they are. Break law -> criminal. That seems pretty obvious.

    7. Re:Nobody here is upset at the system crackers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are we upset at the hackers? Sure we are, but two things come to mind: Proper mindset in the maintanence and management could have likely have prevented the situation. And secondly, and more importantly, the system has a means of dealing with the crackers once their caught.

      So the real anger is at the system that understands the potential for damage (i.e. they have laws against the crackers) but still fails to do anything about it.

    8. Re:Nobody here is upset at the system crackers? by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1
      What if they didn't realize for a month that those paper bags had been swapped out with ones full of shit?

      Then they really need to consult a nose doctor.

      --
      "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
    9. Re:Nobody here is upset at the system crackers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If somebody breaks into your house, you go after the robber; you don't sit there and think that you should have encased your house in steel and had better locks.

      Nope, but I would be pretty pissed if that is what the promised and all they were actually using was a combination lock, and a sticky note with the combination right beside it.

    10. Re:Nobody here is upset at the system crackers? by Kirruth · · Score: 2

      I'm with you on this. It's one thing dealing with security if you are a professional in it (which I was for a while), it's another if you are a much less well-paid admin, who are typically under a lot of pressure just getting the systems to work.

      Security is really all about people management, whether thats procedures, training, communication. That's got to translate into system stuff at some point, sure, but to expect an admin to be able to manage all that and keep the metal running is really just dumping the problem on people who are hard-pressed anyway.

      --
      "Well, put a stake in my heart and drag me into sunlight."
    11. Re:Nobody here is upset at the system crackers? by SacredNaCl · · Score: 1

      The Hackers were not the ones designated to be in charge of the information... The tax payers were not "asked" to be in this database.. They were FORCED into this database by people incompetent to manage it.

      You don't walk down the street in a bad neighborhood with $60,000 in 100 bills in your hand waiving it around either.

      --
      Freedom is merely privilege extended unless enjoyed by one and all.
  58. Re:Screw 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever been to California?

    Having lived in California for the past 14 years, primarily in large cities, I've YET to see the supposed 'shovel leaners' you speak of. Perhaps they're only in your town? Or maybe they're just urban legends.

    Perhaps you could take a picture and post it. Then I'll be a tad closer to believing you.

  59. That will teach ppl on running MS stuff. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, right. Here in our society, we claim a concern about security and still run MS. What a joke.

  60. Woo F*cking hoo. by JanusFury · · Score: 2

    Aren't I glad I still work for CA. Yet another reason to hurry up and find another job... perhaps because I'm not a full-fledged state worker, they didn't get my info. Oh well, I only have ~$1000 in the bank for them to steal anyway.

    --
    using namespace slashdot;
    troll::post();
    1. Re:Woo F*cking hoo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so? my balance is currently 0.06

  61. No Macintosh Webserver EVER hacked in history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No Macintosh Webserver EVER hacked in history. This does not include newer unix style mac Os (OS X) just the one used by millions of people.

    The reason?

    The OS has numerous features that assist against hacking a webserver, many well thought out, many by lucky accident.

    nevertheless SecurtyFocus concers.

    Tahts why the US Army once used WebStar on macs after getting hacked on linux and microsfot and getting sick of it all.

    California should wise up.

    1. Re:No Macintosh Webserver EVER hacked in history by eberry · · Score: 1

      No Trash-80's ever hacked either. California wake up to the awesome power of COCO II.

      P.S. I have one you can buy.

      --
      Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. Lois, this isn't my Batman glass. - Peter
    2. Re:No Macintosh Webserver EVER hacked in history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Tahts why the US Army once used WebStar on macs after getting hacked
      >on linux and microsfot and getting sick of it all.

      1) US Army has never ran Linux, so that is a blatent lie.
      2) US Army picked MacOS BECAUSE. and only BECAUSE, nobody knew mac osx and webstar even less so. This day and age more ppl know it, so it is more prone. Remember the US Army routinely picks things that can be used by anybody. X-Ray film was sold to them with no sensitivy. It requires higher rads (5x). But the idiots in our army can then do one shot and get it right. Unfortunatly, the solder is more likely to get cancer becuase of this. But better one shot rather than 10 shots becuase of the idiots that we have.

  62. Theory by mixbsd · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the hackers were working for Bill Jones and they only mined the database for email addresses instead of SSN#'s so that Ol' Bill can spam them again? ;)

  63. isn't anyone curious to know HOW was that done? by kipple · · Score: 2

    I mean, which OS were the servers running? How did they got such information? Did they social engineer someone, or portscanned the network and then bruteforced the weakest point, or sent an e-mail virus which opened the LAN from within, or paid a janitor to bring them the post-it in the Server Room, those with the word "root" written on it? :)

    Seriously, though.. 'til I will see some details about that, I'm more propense to believe that it is only an excuse to *sell* some software, or to *enforce* some other measure, or even to *crackdown* someone in the wild and bring him in front of a Military Court (I think the Bush Military Court thing is still valid....), thus breaking those "free thinker" of California who don't like Wars, and so on.
    Paranoia? Go check my .sig..

    However, I do truly hope that those hackers will use their information only to strike back on politicians, and scare them. Just scare, no harm done - maybe they'll spend more money on security?

    bah. sad.

    --
    -- There are two kind of sysadmins: Paranoids and Losers. (adapted from D. Bach)
  64. Security policy and implementation oxymorons? by theolein · · Score: 2

    I seem to gather that this place was using NT/SQL and that no one really bothered to implement any real security policies. I presume that someone just got in with one of the many *old* hacks for NT, gave himself an admin password, stole some data and left. he probably bragged about it on irc and gave away the remote login id, which prompted others to have a go as well when they had nothing better to do. Fun for the whole family.

    I can imagine this having some pretty heavy fallout in that sue happy state. A class action suite is bound to follow and I can imagine that after all the "investigations" and "commisions" have done their work and fired one or two fall guys, it'll be back to the same procedure.

  65. I bet two things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet
    a.) the system was probably Novell
    b.) the system admin or technicians smoke (meth)crank

  66. Re:Screw 'em by kwik_mart · · Score: 1

    are you so sure that all of them are slackers wasting your money? If you don't like what some of the state employees are doing, complain. See if their union wants to listen. Probably not, so it's also probably not worth bitching about. Either way, if you don't like your country, try to change it, shut up about it, or leave.

    just because you consume products doesn't mean you have to make them. Buying them helps enough. It's the money you spend that counts, not the work you do.

  67. Timing of announcement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone asked why they waited so long to warn folks.
    Maybe it was AB 1559.

    http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/postquery?bill _n umber=ab_1559&sess=CUR&house=B&author=diaz