Slashdot Mirror

You're describing the national guard now, not what they've been historically.

The national guard's historic role has changed for one reason:

We've over-militarized our police into paranoids who'll shoot first and ask questions later.

Get rid of the military hardware. Stop training multiple generations of police to be paranoid, thinking that every citizen could stab them in the face at any moment.

And no, I'm not kidding. Surviving Edged Weapons is a real video produced by the Milwaukee PD in the 1990s. That's how long we've been training our police to be paranoid.

Police should look and act like this (forgiving the quality due to the uploader's attempts to dodge YouTube's bots). They should not look like this

They most certainly should not be able to be manipulated by a few scubag teenagers into blowing away innocents.

And so what if they have to call the Governor to get the national guard called out? You think the Police Chief doesn't have the Mayor's cell number; and that the Mayor doesn't have the Governor's? Calling the guard in an emergency situation is a pair of calls away. Done and done in 15 minutes, and the guard is on its way -- probably from a base within the city itself.

Over the last 40 years, we have simply over-militarized our police and this is a direct result.

Police don't need to be a hyper-paranoid, paramilitary group. Take away the hardware, let a patrolman knock on the door instead, and this would not have happened.

Adama was right. The people tend to become the enemies of the state.

Get rid of the military hardware and stop training them to be paranoids, and this crap simply won't happen.

I'm quite certain that the general attitude toward police would also rise. At present, I wouldn't call one unless my life absolutely depended on it. Calling a hyper-paranoid, paramilitary organization will only lead to ... well, this.

(Also, you need to stop resorting to name-calling. It makes you look like an ignorami incapable of making a reasoned argument.)

You're describing the national guard now, not what they've been historically.

The national guard's historic role has changed for one reason:

We've over-militarized our police into paranoids who'll shoot first and ask questions later.

Get rid of the military hardware. Stop training multiple generations of police to be paranoid, thinking that every citizen could stab them in the face at any moment.

And no, I'm not kidding. Surviving Edged Weapons is a real video produced by the Milwaukee PD in the 1990s. That's how long we've been training our police to be paranoid.

Police should look and act like this (forgiving the quality due to the uploader's attempts to dodge YouTube's bots). They should not look like this

They most certainly should not be able to be manipulated by a few scubag teenagers into blowing away innocents.

And so what if they have to call the Governor to get the national guard called out? You think the Police Chief doesn't have the Mayor's cell number; and that the Mayor doesn't have the Governor's? Calling the guard in an emergency situation is a pair of calls away. Done and done in 15 minutes, and the guard is on its way -- probably from a base within the city itself.

Over the last 40 years, we have simply over-militarized our police and this is a direct result.

Police don't need to be a hyper-paranoid, paramilitary group. Take away the hardware, let a patrolman knock on the door instead, and this would not have happened.

Adama was right. The people tend to become the enemies of the state.

Get rid of the military hardware and stop training them to be paranoids, and this crap simply won't happen.

I'm quite certain that the general attitude toward police would also rise. At present, I wouldn't call one unless my life absolutely depended on it. Calling a hyper-paranoid, paramilitary organization will only lead to ... well, this.

(Also, you need to stop resorting to name-calling. It makes you look like an ignorami incapable of making a reasoned argument.)

Then, why don't you limit your activity to reddit?

Meanwhile (since creimer amazingly seems to be able to understand that word), the creimy-dumpty video gets 1,000,000 views every single day due to creimer.

See the famous 1,000,000 views a day creimy-dumpty video here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Chris, my team has just updated me with your new contact info. It is nice to hear from you again and to see that you have managed to get a new Slashdot account.

*** Chris, contact me ASAP please. I have AI click bots that don't get detected by youtube algorythm! :) -2 subscribers and 10 views a day for you is sad.. -love granny XX ***

Dear Team Creimer,

I just noticed that the Humpty-Dumpty video has 435+ millions views, that should make you salivate!

I have plenty of ideas to make the views on your own youtube channel skyrocket but you didn't contact me yet. Is it because I am a lady? Ethell says that you are sexist but I hope it isn't true.

Anyway, I will give you a free hint anyway: Dress-up as Humpty in your videos, you shouldn't need that much makeup making this a money saving situation in your own case.

My YouTube channel has 222K subscribers and many videos with hundreds of thousands of views:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Now, with some slight adjustments, I think that together, we could make the view count skyrocket on your very own Team Creimer youtube channel :)

Please feel confident to contact me if you want me to coach you, we aren't living so far away from each other so we could even easily meet.

Love XX,

--
-Granny

See subject & "Tell ya what: IF you can catch me? Then MAYBE I'll *think* about it..." from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLYEExrAEJI/ - you never will!

(As you don't do a DAMN THING anyone says anything GOOD about - but they do for me & MY work, not yours, lol https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12238906&cid=56795354/ - want more? Ask & "ye shall receive" to your UTTER dismay (I can see you "RaGiNg" in your impotent loser anger, lol STEAMING - be angry @ yourself - I don't even HAVE to TRY win vs. "your kind" (a "not-man") - you do yourself in FOR me, everytime - hahahaha!)).

* ... lol, why?

You're SUPERLoser the psychotic online stalker of myself... & like the FLASH? I could be running BACKWARDS & run CIRCLES around you, SUPERLOSER!

APK

P.S.=> What's the matter JEALOUS Jowie? Can't stand I do well while you LANGUISH in your "ne'er-do-well" DO-NOTHING 'douchedom' (lmao)? Yes - I see RIGHT thru you & so does everyone else (which is WHY you post UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous vs. using 1 of your doubtless MANY sockpuppet registered ids on /. - I've dusted you SO MANY TIMES, especially on the above? You stalk me out of "butthurt" - it's YOUR FAULT you're a LAZY no good dildo you know, lol - not mine OR anyone else's - yours)... apk

Absolutely. And there is a very effective, and unfortunately extremely plausible warning film about this released in November of last year called SlaughterBots .

All of the pieces of technology described in this short film are available, and can soon be integrated into the little drone packages depicted.

Well, that reminds me on my this weeks Rust bootstrapping experience to actually only build Firefox: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Hopefully what happened to Praxis will not happen at CERN

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Please stop advocating copyright infringement on Slashdot by posting the Russian URL. The American URL is below.

http://www.youtube.com/cdreimer/videos

Ah yes, 40 years ago was a classic time in cinema. It's too bad we no longer get such intelligent fare as The Swarm, Laserblast and everyone's favorite The Star Wars holiday Special

Or maybe... just maybe... you've forgotten that 99% of what was produced back them was garbage too, just like 99% of what's produced today.

Not really. A ball projectile is going through a target with minimal damage compared to an HP. Amount of powder is a factor sure, but not near as much as the type of bullet... larger calibers tend to have more powder (for the standard loads), but again, bullet type is where it's at. Vid: at about 3:30 they do a sad ballistics test where you can see the same caliber, different bullet types (i have discovered it is harder than hell to find actual good ballistics tests with gel for basic standard rounds).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

The basics is, round nose punch holes through things (wasting all the energy left after leaving the body), hp's stop in things (releasing all energy)... obviously depending on the caliber. An HP 45-70 is still going to over penetrate a human by 10+ feet, but on the low end, an HP 9mm won't over penetrate, while a round nose will (for standard rounds).

Apparently there is some truth in that.

SeriousScience - Microbiome and Diet - Tim Spector

And now there is a poop study, for a diabetes trial, about how eating red grapes and olive oil changes the gut bacteria.

See subject LIMITED ones & this to even BEGIN to understand WHY I can call out the PhD "Supermen" (illusory) on hosts https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TLppsfzQH8

* It puts me 50 moves AHEAD of you... along w/ PRACTICAL useful application that helps you get there via programs I manufactuer in DAYS time, rather easily, multiplatform (I'm on them all now in fact). Fear me advertisers (above ALL others, my main enemy).

(Judging by your BOGUS methods vs. logical factual debate against me (which you've ALL lost many times vs. me on hosts)? I feel as if I am dealing w/ WHITE MICE, lol... I am).

APK

P.S.=> Every time... apk

See subject: Quoting the FLASH from Smallville "Tell ya what - IF you can catch me? I'll think about it" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLYEExrAEJI/ as I KNOW who it is that impersonates/stalks (etc. "to break my will" lol, good luck that creampuffs from 'suburbia') me in advertisers/webmasters (dirty profiteers) & INFERIOR competitors that slow you (vs. hosts native ability via a PROVEN IP Stack since 1973) /. - bring Paul Vixie (arrogant smarmy one I already silenced on this years ago) here to debate it & I'll BURN HIM publicly on that note))!

Bring their BEST PhD - I've already BURNT more than a few on other things - but on this? It'd be MY FINEST HOUR smoking them on the grill, publicly & EASILY (& they KNOW it). They run... always.

APK

P.S.=> Thanks - I just give people what they WANT ("big companies" have FORGOTTEN that basic sales tenet & instead cater to BIG (too big) gov't.))... apk

Meanwhile (since creimer amazingly seem to be able to understand that word), the creimy-dumpty video gets 1,000,000 views every single day due to creimer.

See the famous 1,000,000 views a day creimy-dumpty video here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Let me just send you a case of beer by self-driving beer truck https://www.youtube.com/watch?... and delivery drone so we can drink to that proposition.

Oh look at that, Google Tomorrow (next version of Google Now) already scheduled and ordered that on my behalf.

MODDOWN! ; creimer spam post again!

creimer wants you to click on his youtube channel, then click on his stupid amazon affiliate link spam on Youtube. There is nothing of value on creimer youtube channel. Only creimer click-bot goes there and it has now been barred by the youtube algorithm.

Creimy Dumpty sat on the wall,
Creimy Dumpty had a great fall.
All the king's horses
And all the king's men
Couldn't put Creimy Dumpty
Together again.

Creimy-Dumpty official video by CVS (447M views, 12M subscribers):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Chris: here is an IQ test for you: please tell us what is the difference between the first half and the second half of the video?

P.S. That video is really funny anyway, it's like watching you stumbling over and over again. Of course, with 447,000,000+ views and 12,000,000+ subscribers, it is in a different ball park than the one you are used to be into.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Cryptofeces Lepidoptera Creimerus infestation is a serious problem. Not only are they capable of reproducing asexually like amoebas, they can also lay eggs hermaphroditically in unexpected places. They can disguise eggs as something useful to fool the unaware, sometimes pretending to be a haiku author, blogger, vlogger, or IT closet cleaner.

Very dangerous. They can seemingly reproduce out of the cosmic background radiation, even if you step on twelve of them, there's always one you miss.

Don't be fooled by the C. Lepidoptera Creimerus's innocuous, rolly-polly, and almost friendly appearance; despite its great size, stupid demeanor, and bedraggled toothless appearance, they have the hardiness of a tardigrade.

Only a concerted, targeted downmodding campaign has been shown effective in controlling this dangerous pest.

Experience shows that stopping such a campaign leads to C. Lepidoptera Creimerus returning within days.

Don't let it happen again!

See subject: After all, I hit you RIGHT on the head here in my last reply to you & you KNOW it https://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12238544&cid=56791308/ - I actually PITY you because of what you are: A waste of life & time (yours more than mine - you do me the honor of allowing ME to EXPOSE YOU for what you are exactly).

* Nope - sitting here having a Miller "HighLife" (my fav) in the SUN - Bills are all paid & I'm in good graces ALL the way around & it's SUMMERTIME baby!

APK

P.S.=> A song by the GUESS WHO (No time left for you) I'm tuning into that describes exactly what I'm saying to YOU now: I've got NO TIME LEFT FOR YOU (or "your kind", wastes) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPX48NpSRvo/ ... apk

I'm not sure what you think is "behind the technology curve" with the iMac Pro or the 2017 MBP. Even the 2017 iMacs are up-to-date, too.

Yes, we ALL know the Mac mini and Mac Pro are SADLY in need of a refresh; but don't damn the entire BRAND, just because they have let a couple of products languish.

A "couple of products languish"? They only have a couple of products! They've got basically three desktop machines (with various configurations) and the iMac is the only one that is even remotely up to date as I write this. The Mac Mini and Mac Pro are not even close to the best hardware available in their respective market segments right now. They are better on the laptop side of things but their decisions there haven't been universally great either. (16GB max ram on MBP? One USB-C port for the whole machine?) I understand that they sell more laptops than desktops but that's not an acceptable excuse. With the billions Apple has in the bank I'm fairly confident that it isn't a resources problem so that means it is a decision rather than a limitation.

Most damning to my mind is that Apple still can't seem to figure out how to really tightly integrate the software between their Macintosh computers and their phones and tablets and other devices. The Mac has kind of become the bastard step child. Ironic since the real value proposition for any Apple machine is in the software. Put Windows on a Mac without OS X and nobody is going to pay a premium for that. People buy Apple products for the software and Apple really is a software company. If they are going to bundle their software with hardware as they have always done, then the hardware for their Macintosh line needs to be better than it currently is and needs to remain so. Otherwise one can find more value in a Windows or Linux box for a lot of use cases.

Apple has no been a company that believes they need to release a new Mac "just because" for several years now, and it isn't as if Intel has made great SIGNIFICANT progress on their "roadmap" in recent years.

Apple charges premium prices for their products and historically they've been good enough to justify that pricing. That's fine but with premium pricing we should fully expect to get a premium product including hardware that is somewhere close to the best available at the time of purchase. With as few products as Apple has in their lineup (by design) they should have NO problem keeping their products at or near the best available in their respective categories. And currently it is undeniable that they routinely fail in this test in their Macintosh division particularly with their desktop machines.

In addition to their Mobile and Home Entertainment Products, Apple has the following "Computing" Products:

1. MacBook (non-Pro)
2. MacBook Air
3. MacBook Pro
4. iMac
5. iMac Pro
6. Mac mini
7. Mac Pro

Out of those SEVEN computing products, only TWO of them have been shown no love for too long a time. What I believe is "too long" at this point is around 3 years; primarily because CPU advancement has slowed WAY down since 2015 or so, and we're getting to the same point now with GPUs, too.

The MacBook Air even received a small speed bump and faster Graphics in June 2017. As for the (non-pro) MacBook, I am way less-familiar with that model, but it appears that the mid 2015 and newer models can be upgraded to Mojave; so, it's not out of the game, yet.

You can ALWAYS "fake innovation" like most of the Windows-centric Computers do. But this is a bad joke on the consumer, and amounts to little more than changing the height of the tail-fins on car designs.

As I said to BronsCon, the MacBook Pro, iMac and iMac Pro are ALL using state-of-the-art CPUs and GPUs and I/O. I am tired of this "Macs use obsolete hardware" meme; because it JUST AIN'T SO!!!

So these are self-drining. And while I agree they won't take my job any time soon - after all, I'm a computer experts of sorts - I know for a fact that the ones shown already have taken ~300 jobs.

As soon as it is economically 10x more feasible to do automated driving - be it little bots or human-transporting "car-like" things it will happen. Even if that requires standardizing street signs and perhaps some guidance system for automated cars. Transport is 70 million jobs globally. At least. The incentive to cut those costs is presuring and it will happen once self-driving cars are feasible. And they are about to become.

I recommend this video for a different take on this issue.

I'm not sure what you think is "behind the technology curve" with the iMac Pro or the 2017 MBP. Even the 2017 iMacs are up-to-date, too.

Yes, we ALL know the Mac mini and Mac Pro are SADLY in need of a refresh; but don't damn the entire BRAND, just because they have let a couple of products languish.

A "couple of products languish"? They only have a couple of products! They've got basically three desktop machines (with various configurations) and the iMac is the only one that is even remotely up to date as I write this. The Mac Mini and Mac Pro are not even close to the best hardware available in their respective market segments right now. They are better on the laptop side of things but their decisions there haven't been universally great either. (16GB max ram on MBP? One USB-C port for the whole machine?) I understand that they sell more laptops than desktops but that's not an acceptable excuse. With the billions Apple has in the bank I'm fairly confident that it isn't a resources problem so that means it is a decision rather than a limitation.

Most damning to my mind is that Apple still can't seem to figure out how to really tightly integrate the software between their Macintosh computers and their phones and tablets and other devices. The Mac has kind of become the bastard step child. Ironic since the real value proposition for any Apple machine is in the software. Put Windows on a Mac without OS X and nobody is going to pay a premium for that. People buy Apple products for the software and Apple really is a software company. If they are going to bundle their software with hardware as they have always done, then the hardware for their Macintosh line needs to be better than it currently is and needs to remain so. Otherwise one can find more value in a Windows or Linux box for a lot of use cases.

Apple has no been a company that believes they need to release a new Mac "just because" for several years now, and it isn't as if Intel has made great SIGNIFICANT progress on their "roadmap" in recent years.

Apple charges premium prices for their products and historically they've been good enough to justify that pricing. That's fine but with premium pricing we should fully expect to get a premium product including hardware that is somewhere close to the best available at the time of purchase. With as few products as Apple has in their lineup (by design) they should have NO problem keeping their products at or near the best available in their respective categories. And currently it is undeniable that they routinely fail in this test in their Macintosh division particularly with their desktop machines.

CROFLOL :)

Meanwhile, the creimy-dumpty video gets 1,000,000 views every single day due to creimer.

See the famous 1,000,000 views a day creimy-dumpty video here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

no seatbelts, no airbag, no windshield
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

hahaha me in china and me pipi in your latte and caca in cliff bars you buy amazon.

you: The Fat Bastard Retard

all china know you account:
https://slashdot.org/~The+Fat+...

all china know you video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

all china know you caca youtube chanel but no link.

china the best

Smell-O-Vision?

I prefer Feel-Around

> What is different from 2016 technology from 2018?

A few things. If you buy a Skylake (2015-2016) i5 8600k you get 4 cores clocked at 3.5GHz. The Coffee Lake (2017-2018) 8600k gives you 6 cores clocked at 3.6GHz. Not earth shattering on the speed bump, but the 2 extra cores on the "same" part is nice. The Coffee Lake chip also supports a higher turbo clock speed, faster RAM, and has the next bump up in onboard graphics. And generally speaking the mobile chips of each generation usually get more energy efficient over their predecessors while keeping the same or better performance.

So while you're not getting 2-3x the performance in 2 years like the olden days of Moore, you still get improvements and better battery life. Why should consumers be happy leaving that on the table with Apple when they don't from other vendors?

But they DO get better performance!

For example, compare what a 2015 MacBook Pro can do, compared with the 2016 or 2017 models. They took those efficiency improvements and turned a laptop that had thermal throttling issues into a laptop that can cruise at 100% CPU all day without throttling.

If you think that doesn't make a difference in the real-world, you're sadly mistaken.

Here's a comparison of Final Cut Pro X processing on the 15" MacBook Pro vs. the 2016 version. Note that the 2017 model is not too much faster, but is between 1.5 and 13% faster than the 2016 model:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

For those people who do not have iPhones, they implant a similar system inside one of their teeth. That is the sources of the voices I hear in my head.

Something like this? ;^)

Was anyone at the handshake event for this? Were they able to tell if folks broke out into song singing the praises of the monorail... err.. ahh.. "loop train"?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

From the NASA article:

A new NASA study says that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers.

So, this thickening has been going on for around 10,000 years but still outweighs the increased losses that have been ramping up over the last 50-100 years. I assume that you therefore accept it when NASA says there has been increased losses from thinning glaciers -- I wonder what's causing that?

According to the new analysis of satellite data, the Antarctic ice sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001. That net gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008

So, the net gain in ice has decreased from 112 billion tons (over a 10 year span) to 82 billion tons (over a 5 year span). Seems that melting is overtaking accumulation significantly (decrease of nearly 33%). I also wonder what the figures would be if the last 5 years had been taken into account as the meliting seems to be increasing.

But it might only take a few decades for Antarctica’s growth to reverse, according to Zwally. “If the losses of the Antarctic Peninsula and parts of West Antarctica continue to increase at the same rate they’ve been increasing for the last two decades, the losses will catch up with the long-term gain in East Antarctica in 20 or 30 years -- I don’t think there will be enough snowfall increase to offset these losses.”

So, even the lead author of the paper admits that if this decline in gain merely continues at it's current rate we will see net loses of Antarctica ice in 20-30 years.

Zwally’s team calculated that the mass gain from the thickening of East Antarctica remained steady from 1992 to 2008 at 200 billion tons per year, while the ice losses from the coastal regions of West Antarctica and the Antarctic Peninsula increased by 65 billion tons per year.

So, there isn't any significant increase in ice accumulation during the 1992-2008 period but there is a significant increase in the loss of ice over that same period.

==========
Lastly, it is disingenuous to highlight one ice sheet that is gaining ice (for the time being) and not mention the other ice sheet...

This video deals specifically with the paper in question (Myth #2 at 4:30). To put it simply, while the Antarctic ice sheet has been gaining 82 billion tons of ice per year, the Greenland ice sheet has been losing 269 billion tons of ice per year.

So one ice sheet losing massive amounts of ice while the other is gaining ice at increasingly slower rates -- seems to be a pattern here.

Enjoy your Rothschild banker lies. You morons are so easily fooled.

Stop thinking that 21st century agenda science is truthful. The entire "Science" field is built upon bought and paid for lies. Literally by the bankers who have owned you for 300+ years.

Should the response be something like this? ;)

Not really. After the warantless mass-surveillance by the governments has been confirmed to the wider public, EU countries have allowed themselves to broaden their wiretapping laws. Countries within NATO exchange data they collect between each other to get around the national privacy laws.

The new eCall system is basically a mandatory car tracking system within the EU. The regulation says that the "minimum set of data" (MDS) includes:
Information about the incident including time, precise location, vehicle identification, eCall status (as a minimum, indication if eCall has been manually or automatically triggered) and information about a possible service provider (CEC, 2005).

Additionally, paid versions of this system provided by the car manufacturers or resellers, can include extra data and continuous reporting to the 3rd party. This is similar to the situation with some modern (e.g. hybrid) cars that are continuously connected to the 3rd party servers in exchange for cheaper insurance.

It doesn't matter what is the official explanation, as long as you have to connect to a base station, your location is known. The situation is analogous to cell phone tracking.

Betrayed by our own data - Zeit Online (2011)
Mobile phones are tracking devices that reveal much about our lives. One look at our interactive map of data provided by the Green party politician Malte Spitz shows why.

Malte Spitz: Your phone company is watching

The cameras have been invaluable for Uber and Lyft drivers, and for taxis. Too many customers have accused drivers of abuse, have accidentally left wallets or phones or luggage, and the cameras have been very useful very frequently for just that.

And then there is "Hugh Mungus", who set off some screaming SJW accusing hime of sexual harassment for saying his own name was "Hugh Mungus" and for pointing at himself when asked who he meant. I could not make this up.

* https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

The woman went off because no one wanted to interview *her*. Can't imagine why....

See subject & https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PN6JFVQfwp8/ + my other reply to you https://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12229688&cid=56781466/

* :)

(... & like I said there? Enjoy... it rocks)

APK

P.S.=> LIKE ME, lol... apk

Fluttershy is more stable

I mean, on the one hand Fluttershy has a nervous breakdown about every other episode, but on the other when RD flips out there's much more collateral damage.

your reversal of US tropes reveals you are Russian.

Fucking russians again reeeeeeeeeeeeee!

So what if a net filtering tool developer looks like Poppin Fresh? You must not have paid attention to the energy with which Poppin moves around in some of the Pillsbury commercials.

Land that jump dude
Show me your moves
I can dig up more.

There are plenty of other "acrofatic" characters, and you might be able to catch one of them on someone's P***scope stream.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Cryptofeces Lepidoptera Creimerus infestation is a serious problem. Not only are they capable of reproducing asexually like amoebas, they can also lay eggs hermaphroditically in unexpected places. They can disguise eggs as something useful to fool the unaware, sometimes pretending to be a haiku author, blogger, vlogger, or IT closet cleaner.

Very dangerous. They can seemingly reproduce out of the cosmic background radiation, even if you step on twelve of them, there's always one you miss.

Don't be fooled by the C. Lepidoptera Creimerus's innocuous, rolly-polly, and almost friendly appearance; despite its great size, stupid demeanor, and bedraggled toothless appearance, they have the hardiness of a tardigrade.

Only a concerted, targeted downmodding campaign has been shown effective in controlling this dangerous pest.

Experience shows that stopping such a campaign leads to C. Lepidoptera Creimerus returning within days.

Don't let it happen again!

do the ENGLISH still use car phones?

probably when they're in the back seat putting the mustard on their sandwich.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

hahaha me in china and me pipi in your latte and caca in cliff bars.

you: The Fat Bastard Retard

all china know you account:
https://slashdot.org/~The+Fat+...

all china know you video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

all china know you caca youtube chanel but no link.

china the best

The revolution came from stable, standardized algorithms that allowed custom hardware to be built. Doing video decoding on general-purpose CPUs is never going to hold a candle to a custom H.264 chip.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Why Japanese People!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AqragQq63Js&index=2&list=RD4BMk47t4v78

hahahahahahaha

Listen up all you Soy Boys. It's time to get off the couch and start moving your fat lard ass around. You are soft girly-men who play children's games. Time for you boys to man up. There are myriad of ways but enlistment in the armed services might make a man out of you yet..

Put down the game controller. Place the children's games where they belong---back in your childhood. Realize that your low testosterone is directly correlated to all the crap girly food you eat. It fellas need to eat meat. Lots of it. And real milk and real butter. Throw away all the soy food that is chemically castrating you. Be all you can be. Be a man.

While I'm at it, if anyone have some love for Mario Franchise, you have to check this interview with Charles Martinet, the voice of Mario : https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

hahaha me in china and me pipi in your latte and caca in cliff bars.

you: The Fat Bastard Retard

all china know you account:
https://slashdot.org/~The+Fat+...

all china know you video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

all china know you caca youtube chanel but no link.

china the best

This one?

hahaha me in china and me pipi in your latte and caca in cliff bars.

you: The Fat Bastard Retard

all china know you account:
https://slashdot.org/~The+Fat+...

all china know you video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

all china know you caca youtube chanel but no link.

china the best

Team Creimer dreams:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

I have just closed my eyes again
Climbed aboard the Team Creimer train
Driver take away my worries of today
And leave tomorrow behind

Team Creimer, I believe you can get me through the night
Team Creimer, I believe we can reach the morning light

Fly me high through the starry skies
Or maybe to an astral plane
Cross the highways of fantasy
Help me to forget today's pain

Team Creimer, I believe you can get me through the night
Team Creimer, I believe we can reach the morning light

Though the dawn may be coming soon
There still may be some time
Fly me away to the bright side of the moon
And meet me on the other side

Team Creimer, I believe you can get me through the night
Team Creimer, I believe we can reach the morning light