Domain: youtube.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to youtube.com.
Comments · 87,129
-
Re:3 months
John Oliver did an interesting program on rehabilitation centers.
"The addiction treatment industry is dangerously unregulated. John Oliver explains why many rehab programs should incorporate more evidence-based care and carefully reconsider their doctor-to-horse ratio." -
You obviously are a fakebook "JuDeNoiD"
Khazar Talmudic Jews believe this of all they call goyim/gentiles (any non-jew): Jews = biggest racists of all for which they "jew guilt" you for no less! They're hypocrites known as thieves all thru history or were Argentines in the 1940 under Peron, Spanish inquistion, France (1306), Egypt (despoiled/robbed by jews), Arabs (pre & post 1948), England (1330 Edward longshanks), Romans under titus, Russia pogroms and Germany who got rid of them from their nations nazi german's too? No. Driven into DESERTS ages ago! Don't wonder why after all those exilings above.
Should anyone doubt any of this see Jacob Javits' crony Rosenthal spill the beans on it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4zMVZ8HnFI/ where he called all Christianity fools for helping Israel and the biggest scam of all time per their beliefs below from their Talmud.
This is the province of the synagogue of Satan (Pharisees whom Jesus Christ himself kicked to the curb out of the temple & they killed him for it. Jeremiah did the same to them also + the Essenes could not stand them either breaking away from the pharisee corruption):
Jew Talmud excerpts (the book that calls Christ's mother a whore & a bastard of a roman soldier):
1. Sanhedrin 59a: "Murdering Goyim is like killing a wild animal."
2. Abodah Zara 26b: "Even the best of the Gentiles should be killed."
3. Sanhedrin 59a: "A goy (Gentile) who pries into The Law (Talmud) is guilty of death."
4. Yebhamoth 11b: "Sexual intercourse with a little girl is permitted if she is three years of age."
5. Schabouth Hag. 6d: "Jews may swear falsely by use of subterfuge wording."
6. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Do not save Goyim in danger of death."
7. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Show no mercy to the Goyim."
8. Choschen Hamm 388, 15: "If it can be proven that someone has given the money of Israelites to the Goyim, a way must be found after prudent consideration to wipe him off the face of the earth."
9. Choschen Hamm 266,1: "A Jew may keep anything he finds which belongs to the Akum (Gentile). For he who returns lost property (to Gentiles) sins against the Law by increasing the power of the transgressors of the Law. It is praiseworthy, however, to return lost property if it is done to honor the name of God, namely, if by so doing, Christians will praise the Jews and look upon them as honorable people."
10. Szaaloth-Utszabot, The Book of Jore Dia 17: "A Jew should and must make a false oath when the Goyim asks if our books contain anything against them."
11. Baba Necia 114, 6: "The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings but beasts."
12. Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D: "When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves."
13. Nidrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L: "Jehovah created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night."
14. Aboda Sarah 37a: "A Gentile girl who is three years old can be violated."
15. Gad. Shas. 2:2: "A Jew may violate but not marry a non-Jewish girl."
16. Tosefta. Aboda Zara B, 5: "If a goy kills a goy or a Jew, he is responsible; but if a Jew kills a goy, he is NOT responsible."
17. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 388: "It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator everywhere. It is permitted to kill him even before he denounces."
18. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348: "All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which, consequently, is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples."
19. Tosefta, Abda Zara VIII, 5: "How to interpret the word 'robbery.' A goy is forbidden to steal, rob, or take women slaves, etc., from a goy or from a Jew. But a Jew is NOT forbidden to do all this to a goy."
20. Seph. Jp., 92, 1: "God has given the Jews power over the possessions and blood of all nations."
21. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen H
-
INVASION of Fakebook "JuDeNoiDz"
Khazar Talmudic Jews believe this of all they call goyim/gentiles (any non-jew): Jews = biggest racists of all for which they "jew guilt" you for no less! They're hypocrites known as thieves all thru history or were Argentines in the 1940 under Peron, Spanish inquistion, France (1306), Egypt (despoiled/robbed by jews), Arabs (pre & post 1948), England (1330 Edward longshanks), Romans under titus, Russia pogroms and Germany who got rid of them from their nations nazi german's too? No. Driven into DESERTS ages ago! Don't wonder why after all those exilings above.
Should anyone doubt any of this see Jacob Javits' crony Rosenthal spill the beans on it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4zMVZ8HnFI/ where he called all Christianity fools for helping Israel and the biggest scam of all time per their beliefs below from their Talmud.
This is the province of the synagogue of Satan (Pharisees whom Jesus Christ himself kicked to the curb out of the temple & they killed him for it. Jeremiah did the same to them also + the Essenes could not stand them either breaking away from the pharisee corruption):
Jew Talmud excerpts (the book that calls Christ's mother a whore & a bastard of a roman soldier):
1. Sanhedrin 59a: "Murdering Goyim is like killing a wild animal."
2. Abodah Zara 26b: "Even the best of the Gentiles should be killed."
3. Sanhedrin 59a: "A goy (Gentile) who pries into The Law (Talmud) is guilty of death."
4. Yebhamoth 11b: "Sexual intercourse with a little girl is permitted if she is three years of age."
5. Schabouth Hag. 6d: "Jews may swear falsely by use of subterfuge wording."
6. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Do not save Goyim in danger of death."
7. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Show no mercy to the Goyim."
8. Choschen Hamm 388, 15: "If it can be proven that someone has given the money of Israelites to the Goyim, a way must be found after prudent consideration to wipe him off the face of the earth."
9. Choschen Hamm 266,1: "A Jew may keep anything he finds which belongs to the Akum (Gentile). For he who returns lost property (to Gentiles) sins against the Law by increasing the power of the transgressors of the Law. It is praiseworthy, however, to return lost property if it is done to honor the name of God, namely, if by so doing, Christians will praise the Jews and look upon them as honorable people."
10. Szaaloth-Utszabot, The Book of Jore Dia 17: "A Jew should and must make a false oath when the Goyim asks if our books contain anything against them."
11. Baba Necia 114, 6: "The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings but beasts."
12. Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D: "When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves."
13. Nidrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L: "Jehovah created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night."
14. Aboda Sarah 37a: "A Gentile girl who is three years old can be violated."
15. Gad. Shas. 2:2: "A Jew may violate but not marry a non-Jewish girl."
16. Tosefta. Aboda Zara B, 5: "If a goy kills a goy or a Jew, he is responsible; but if a Jew kills a goy, he is NOT responsible."
17. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 388: "It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator everywhere. It is permitted to kill him even before he denounces."
18. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348: "All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which, consequently, is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples."
19. Tosefta, Abda Zara VIII, 5: "How to interpret the word 'robbery.' A goy is forbidden to steal, rob, or take women slaves, etc., from a goy or from a Jew. But a Jew is NOT forbidden to do all this to a goy."
20. Seph. Jp., 92, 1: "God has given the Jews power over the possessions and blood of all nations."
21. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen H
-
INVASION of Fakebook "JuDeNoiDz"
Khazar Talmudic Jews believe this of all they call goyim/gentiles (any non-jew): Jews = biggest racists of all for which they "jew guilt" you for no less! They're hypocrites known as thieves all thru history or were Argentines in the 1940 under Peron, Spanish inquistion, France (1306), Egypt (despoiled/robbed by jews), Arabs (pre & post 1948), England (1330 Edward longshanks), Romans under titus, Russia pogroms and Germany who got rid of them from their nations nazi german's too? No. Driven into DESERTS ages ago! Don't wonder why after all those exilings above.
Should anyone doubt any of this see Jacob Javits' crony Rosenthal spill the beans on it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4zMVZ8HnFI/ where he called all Christianity fools for helping Israel and the biggest scam of all time per their beliefs below from their Talmud.
This is the province of the synagogue of Satan (Pharisees whom Jesus Christ himself kicked to the curb out of the temple & they killed him for it. Jeremiah did the same to them also + the Essenes could not stand them either breaking away from the pharisee corruption):
Jew Talmud excerpts (the book that calls Christ's mother a whore & a bastard of a roman soldier):
1. Sanhedrin 59a: "Murdering Goyim is like killing a wild animal."
2. Abodah Zara 26b: "Even the best of the Gentiles should be killed."
3. Sanhedrin 59a: "A goy (Gentile) who pries into The Law (Talmud) is guilty of death."
4. Yebhamoth 11b: "Sexual intercourse with a little girl is permitted if she is three years of age."
5. Schabouth Hag. 6d: "Jews may swear falsely by use of subterfuge wording."
6. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Do not save Goyim in danger of death."
7. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Show no mercy to the Goyim."
8. Choschen Hamm 388, 15: "If it can be proven that someone has given the money of Israelites to the Goyim, a way must be found after prudent consideration to wipe him off the face of the earth."
9. Choschen Hamm 266,1: "A Jew may keep anything he finds which belongs to the Akum (Gentile). For he who returns lost property (to Gentiles) sins against the Law by increasing the power of the transgressors of the Law. It is praiseworthy, however, to return lost property if it is done to honor the name of God, namely, if by so doing, Christians will praise the Jews and look upon them as honorable people."
10. Szaaloth-Utszabot, The Book of Jore Dia 17: "A Jew should and must make a false oath when the Goyim asks if our books contain anything against them."
11. Baba Necia 114, 6: "The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings but beasts."
12. Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D: "When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves."
13. Nidrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L: "Jehovah created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night."
14. Aboda Sarah 37a: "A Gentile girl who is three years old can be violated."
15. Gad. Shas. 2:2: "A Jew may violate but not marry a non-Jewish girl."
16. Tosefta. Aboda Zara B, 5: "If a goy kills a goy or a Jew, he is responsible; but if a Jew kills a goy, he is NOT responsible."
17. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 388: "It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator everywhere. It is permitted to kill him even before he denounces."
18. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348: "All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which, consequently, is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples."
19. Tosefta, Abda Zara VIII, 5: "How to interpret the word 'robbery.' A goy is forbidden to steal, rob, or take women slaves, etc., from a goy or from a Jew. But a Jew is NOT forbidden to do all this to a goy."
20. Seph. Jp., 92, 1: "God has given the Jews power over the possessions and blood of all nations."
21. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen H
-
INVASION of Fakebook "JuDeNoiDz"
Khazar Talmudic Jews believe this of all they call goyim/gentiles (any non-jew): Jews = biggest racists of all for which they "jew guilt" you for no less! They're hypocrites known as thieves all thru history or were Argentines in the 1940 under Peron, Spanish inquistion, France (1306), Egypt (despoiled/robbed by jews), Arabs (pre & post 1948), England (1330 Edward longshanks), Romans under titus, Russia pogroms and Germany who got rid of them from their nations nazi german's too? No. Driven into DESERTS ages ago! Don't wonder why after all those exilings above.
Should anyone doubt any of this see Jacob Javits' crony Rosenthal spill the beans on it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4zMVZ8HnFI/ where he called all Christianity fools for helping Israel and the biggest scam of all time per their beliefs below from their Talmud.
This is the province of the synagogue of Satan (Pharisees whom Jesus Christ himself kicked to the curb out of the temple & they killed him for it. Jeremiah did the same to them also + the Essenes could not stand them either breaking away from the pharisee corruption):
Jew Talmud excerpts (the book that calls Christ's mother a whore & a bastard of a roman soldier):
1. Sanhedrin 59a: "Murdering Goyim is like killing a wild animal."
2. Abodah Zara 26b: "Even the best of the Gentiles should be killed."
3. Sanhedrin 59a: "A goy (Gentile) who pries into The Law (Talmud) is guilty of death."
4. Yebhamoth 11b: "Sexual intercourse with a little girl is permitted if she is three years of age."
5. Schabouth Hag. 6d: "Jews may swear falsely by use of subterfuge wording."
6. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Do not save Goyim in danger of death."
7. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Show no mercy to the Goyim."
8. Choschen Hamm 388, 15: "If it can be proven that someone has given the money of Israelites to the Goyim, a way must be found after prudent consideration to wipe him off the face of the earth."
9. Choschen Hamm 266,1: "A Jew may keep anything he finds which belongs to the Akum (Gentile). For he who returns lost property (to Gentiles) sins against the Law by increasing the power of the transgressors of the Law. It is praiseworthy, however, to return lost property if it is done to honor the name of God, namely, if by so doing, Christians will praise the Jews and look upon them as honorable people."
10. Szaaloth-Utszabot, The Book of Jore Dia 17: "A Jew should and must make a false oath when the Goyim asks if our books contain anything against them."
11. Baba Necia 114, 6: "The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings but beasts."
12. Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D: "When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves."
13. Nidrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L: "Jehovah created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night."
14. Aboda Sarah 37a: "A Gentile girl who is three years old can be violated."
15. Gad. Shas. 2:2: "A Jew may violate but not marry a non-Jewish girl."
16. Tosefta. Aboda Zara B, 5: "If a goy kills a goy or a Jew, he is responsible; but if a Jew kills a goy, he is NOT responsible."
17. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 388: "It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator everywhere. It is permitted to kill him even before he denounces."
18. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348: "All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which, consequently, is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples."
19. Tosefta, Abda Zara VIII, 5: "How to interpret the word 'robbery.' A goy is forbidden to steal, rob, or take women slaves, etc., from a goy or from a Jew. But a Jew is NOT forbidden to do all this to a goy."
20. Seph. Jp., 92, 1: "God has given the Jews power over the possessions and blood of all nations."
21. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen H
-
INVASION of the fakebook "JuDeNoiDz"
Khazar Talmudic Jews believe this of all they call goyim/gentiles (any non-jew): Jews = biggest racists of all for which they "jew guilt" you for no less! They're hypocrites known as thieves all thru history or were Argentines in the 1940 under Peron, Spanish inquistion, France (1306), Egypt (despoiled/robbed by jews), Arabs (pre & post 1948), England (1330 Edward longshanks), Romans under titus, Russia pogroms and Germany who got rid of them from their nations nazi german's too? No. Driven into DESERTS ages ago! Don't wonder why after all those exilings above.
Should anyone doubt any of this see Jacob Javits' crony Rosenthal spill the beans on it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4zMVZ8HnFI/ where he called all Christianity fools for helping Israel and the biggest scam of all time per their beliefs below from their Talmud.
This is the province of the synagogue of Satan (Pharisees whom Jesus Christ himself kicked to the curb out of the temple & they killed him for it. Jeremiah did the same to them also + the Essenes could not stand them either breaking away from the pharisee corruption):
Jew Talmud excerpts (the book that calls Christ's mother a whore & a bastard of a roman soldier):
1. Sanhedrin 59a: "Murdering Goyim is like killing a wild animal."
2. Abodah Zara 26b: "Even the best of the Gentiles should be killed."
3. Sanhedrin 59a: "A goy (Gentile) who pries into The Law (Talmud) is guilty of death."
4. Yebhamoth 11b: "Sexual intercourse with a little girl is permitted if she is three years of age."
5. Schabouth Hag. 6d: "Jews may swear falsely by use of subterfuge wording."
6. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Do not save Goyim in danger of death."
7. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Show no mercy to the Goyim."
8. Choschen Hamm 388, 15: "If it can be proven that someone has given the money of Israelites to the Goyim, a way must be found after prudent consideration to wipe him off the face of the earth."
9. Choschen Hamm 266,1: "A Jew may keep anything he finds which belongs to the Akum (Gentile). For he who returns lost property (to Gentiles) sins against the Law by increasing the power of the transgressors of the Law. It is praiseworthy, however, to return lost property if it is done to honor the name of God, namely, if by so doing, Christians will praise the Jews and look upon them as honorable people."
10. Szaaloth-Utszabot, The Book of Jore Dia 17: "A Jew should and must make a false oath when the Goyim asks if our books contain anything against them."
11. Baba Necia 114, 6: "The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings but beasts."
12. Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D: "When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves."
13. Nidrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L: "Jehovah created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night."
14. Aboda Sarah 37a: "A Gentile girl who is three years old can be violated."
15. Gad. Shas. 2:2: "A Jew may violate but not marry a non-Jewish girl."
16. Tosefta. Aboda Zara B, 5: "If a goy kills a goy or a Jew, he is responsible; but if a Jew kills a goy, he is NOT responsible."
17. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 388: "It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator everywhere. It is permitted to kill him even before he denounces."
18. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348: "All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which, consequently, is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples."
19. Tosefta, Abda Zara VIII, 5: "How to interpret the word 'robbery.' A goy is forbidden to steal, rob, or take women slaves, etc., from a goy or from a Jew. But a Jew is NOT forbidden to do all this to a goy."
20. Seph. Jp., 92, 1: "God has given the Jews power over the possessions and blood of all nations."
21. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen H
-
Re:"To most autonomous vehicle expert"?
4) This isn't coming out of the blue. Tesla's internal builds already handle city driving (including Musk himself). You don't have to take their word on it - customer cars are already doing detections required for city-driving in shadow mode
LOL, a video and a proclamation and you are already convinced Tesla has completely solved autonomous city driving. Your words, Tesla can 'already handle city driving".
You are falling for the exact same thing that many already have, bold capability overstatements. Not only falling for it, but you are re-enforcing it.
Put aside your fandom for a minute and think critically.
-
Re:"To most autonomous vehicle expert"?
The silly part is this:
Experts say Tesla's "full self-driving" feature is really a partial self-driving feature that handles minor driving tasks such as keeping pace with other cars on a highway and still requires diligent human oversight. To most autonomous vehicle experts, "full self-driving" means a car in which a person could safely fall asleep behind the wheel, and the steering wheel and pedals aren't even needed...
1) They're describing AP/EAP as a level 1-2 system. It's actually a level 3 system with Navigate on Autopilot (e.g. makes lane changes, takes exits, etc).
2) They're describing what's presently available, which is not FSD, as if that's what's being offered as FSD. Which is just ridiculous. What's currently being offered is AP/EAP, not FSD. Heck, they don't even run on the same computer. AP/EAP is HW2, FSD is HW3 (HW2 = GPU, HW3 = custom neural net chip, about 20x faster).
3) What was targeted for the end of this year has been clearly described, both by Musk in interviews, and in the description of the product: that the car can drive in all situations on its own, but you still need a human monitoring it (aka, level 4 autonomy), with an intent to eliminate the driver requirement as soon as is allowed thereafter (level 5 autonomy). The monitoring requirements will remain until regulators are satisfied that its safety record exceeds that of humans. Musk stated that he expects this to require 10 billion or so miles of data.
4) This isn't coming out of the blue. Tesla's internal builds already handle city driving (including Musk himself). You don't have to take their word on it - customer cars are already doing detections required for city-driving in shadow mode (same, but at night here) (These aren't Tesla vids - they're from people hacking the AP system to see what data it's detecting and processing).
You know, it's really easy to attack someone when you render what they say into a straw man. "OMG, Musk is saying that a Level 1 system is FSD!"
I had issues with Tesla selling FSD a year ago, but then again, so did most people, which is why few bought it. Today? Not so much. They've made a lot of progress in the past year. I still think it's going to be a long time before Tesla's safety data is good enough to convince regulators to say, "Yeah, you don't need a human any more" (level 5). But with Navigate on Autopilot, and their clear progress on city driving, I have no issue with them stating that they expect to be level 4 by the end of the year.
-
Re:"To most autonomous vehicle expert"?
The silly part is this:
Experts say Tesla's "full self-driving" feature is really a partial self-driving feature that handles minor driving tasks such as keeping pace with other cars on a highway and still requires diligent human oversight. To most autonomous vehicle experts, "full self-driving" means a car in which a person could safely fall asleep behind the wheel, and the steering wheel and pedals aren't even needed...
1) They're describing AP/EAP as a level 1-2 system. It's actually a level 3 system with Navigate on Autopilot (e.g. makes lane changes, takes exits, etc).
2) They're describing what's presently available, which is not FSD, as if that's what's being offered as FSD. Which is just ridiculous. What's currently being offered is AP/EAP, not FSD. Heck, they don't even run on the same computer. AP/EAP is HW2, FSD is HW3 (HW2 = GPU, HW3 = custom neural net chip, about 20x faster).
3) What was targeted for the end of this year has been clearly described, both by Musk in interviews, and in the description of the product: that the car can drive in all situations on its own, but you still need a human monitoring it (aka, level 4 autonomy), with an intent to eliminate the driver requirement as soon as is allowed thereafter (level 5 autonomy). The monitoring requirements will remain until regulators are satisfied that its safety record exceeds that of humans. Musk stated that he expects this to require 10 billion or so miles of data.
4) This isn't coming out of the blue. Tesla's internal builds already handle city driving (including Musk himself). You don't have to take their word on it - customer cars are already doing detections required for city-driving in shadow mode (same, but at night here) (These aren't Tesla vids - they're from people hacking the AP system to see what data it's detecting and processing).
You know, it's really easy to attack someone when you render what they say into a straw man. "OMG, Musk is saying that a Level 1 system is FSD!"
I had issues with Tesla selling FSD a year ago, but then again, so did most people, which is why few bought it. Today? Not so much. They've made a lot of progress in the past year. I still think it's going to be a long time before Tesla's safety data is good enough to convince regulators to say, "Yeah, you don't need a human any more" (level 5). But with Navigate on Autopilot, and their clear progress on city driving, I have no issue with them stating that they expect to be level 4 by the end of the year.
-
Think About The Harm
The OP compares one physical activity and one digital activity and suggests one might be illegal whilst the other is perfectly legal.
It might be worth taking a brief detour here and considering the way that society determines whether or not a particular activity is legal or illegal. This is a significant simplification, but in general terms we could summarize the core principle of illegality as being a range of activities which cause harm or damage to those disadvantaged by it.
If I steal from you, you are harmed. If I injure you, you are harmed. If I kill you; well, you get the point.
A big part of the apparent disparity between physically stalking someone [or, to simplify again, actions in meatspace] from the digital equivalent stems entirely from the fact that it is very difficult to evidence the harm being caused by digital stalking. That is not to say that digital stalking is harmless.
There are no end of ways that the unregulated actions of private companies such as Facebook and Google can harm you as a private citizen.
With no regulation of what data is collected, how it is analyzed, or who it is sold to, the opportunities for that data to harm you are diverse and significant. You may be unsuccessful in securing your next job if you are blacklisted by recruitment agencies. You may have to pay more for credit, or you may be refused loans, if you cross invisible lines with your digital life. You may be denied health insurance. You may be subject to even more surveillance if data collected on you by a private company is caught up in a government data request dragnet. You may be significantly defrauded if a company with whom you have shared data knowingly and willingly then fails to protect it, allowing you to become a victim of identity theft and associated fraud.
Governments the world over have failed to take steps to address these harms - even though that is the principle on which the concept of law was founded - for two broad reasons. The first is ignorance. As elected leaders demonstrate almost every time they speak, very few of them have a reasonable grasp of just how much harm this data harvesting can cause. The second is self-serving: the agencies charged with protecting citizens rights would much rather be able to issue a subpoena or NSL and get access to all that juicy data for themselves.
The only reason that the activities of companies like Facebook and Google are not illegal is because neither the people nor the government[s] truly understand what they can do. To get even the narrowest of ideas, look at what Christopher Wylie (of Cambridge Analytica) told Congress. -
They learned their lesson after Iraq
The Bush Administration made very specific claims about Iraq that could be falsified, eventually. With Russiagate, it's a bunch of Gish Gallop bullshit that sees it's True Believers hop back and forth between debunked talking points, like climate changers. Put the high priests of Russiagate on the spot and they quickly lose their shit when pressed. Adam Schitt loses his shit when asked to look into the camera and say, on the record, that Russia was behind the phishing of the Podesta emails.
-
Schiff the Nazi
Burn ze books, jahwohl Fuhrer AOC und die filmen too.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
People that forget history are bound to repeat it. And, no I don't agree with anti-vaccers, I think they're morons, but "burning" their books only puts them in the underground.
-
Re:Anyone with the balls to test enforcement?
They have the best animations of weapons that 3 rubles could buy...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v... - Boeing X-51
... is now the newest Russian weapon? :)Anyway, putin is afraid for his life, the longer he lives the more afraid he gets, after all the murdering and racketeering and stealing that he has done he expects everybody around him to be murderers, racketeers, thieves, he created a new internal army of 300,000 just to protect himself from the population, of-course he wants to ban the Internet, at least to mute it completely so that no dissent would be possible. putin controls all of the media in the country, he wants to prevent any other media from becoming a possibility. There are dozens of youtubers (maybe more than dozens) that offer a dissenting point of view, discuss what is really happening in the country, he cannot allow that.
-
Re:Anyone with the balls to test enforcement?
They have the best animations of weapons that 3 rubles could buy...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v... - Boeing X-51
... is now the newest Russian weapon? :)Anyway, putin is afraid for his life, the longer he lives the more afraid he gets, after all the murdering and racketeering and stealing that he has done he expects everybody around him to be murderers, racketeers, thieves, he created a new internal army of 300,000 just to protect himself from the population, of-course he wants to ban the Internet, at least to mute it completely so that no dissent would be possible. putin controls all of the media in the country, he wants to prevent any other media from becoming a possibility. There are dozens of youtubers (maybe more than dozens) that offer a dissenting point of view, discuss what is really happening in the country, he cannot allow that.
-
Re:Anyone with the balls to test enforcement?
They have the best animations of weapons that 3 rubles could buy...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v... - Boeing X-51
... is now the newest Russian weapon? :)Anyway, putin is afraid for his life, the longer he lives the more afraid he gets, after all the murdering and racketeering and stealing that he has done he expects everybody around him to be murderers, racketeers, thieves, he created a new internal army of 300,000 just to protect himself from the population, of-course he wants to ban the Internet, at least to mute it completely so that no dissent would be possible. putin controls all of the media in the country, he wants to prevent any other media from becoming a possibility. There are dozens of youtubers (maybe more than dozens) that offer a dissenting point of view, discuss what is really happening in the country, he cannot allow that.
-
Re:There's a book about this.
Did you know you can trade a red paperclip for a HOUSE?
These beancounters need to take notice.
-
There can be no privacy when...
... all states and their respective corporate elites fear the political awakening potential of the internet and mass communication technology. Privacy under a capitalist model is a fantasy when the state actor on behalf of the corporate elite will use the state against other businesses who enable resistance to their authority.
All states are preparing for the political awakening of the masses of the globe, they are expecting conflict. Zbigniew Brezinski former nationa security advisor of the united states:
-
Re:Winter and tiles don't get along
Here you can see the results beforehand.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
This install is not even a road!
Would be willing to bet somehow the originators of this idea are the same ones that are doing this one. Or it is a VC idea that is burning through cash faster than it can get it.
Tech dudes have 0 f-ng clue how to build things. The material engineers though. They may have a bit of knowledge on what works and what does not. Electronics burred into traffic areas break quickly. Software may eat the world but it does not replace concrete.
Can't wait for the next set of thunderf00t vids on this (again).
-
Re:I want one...
Science is a process, not a set of theories or conclusions.
Wrong. "Science" is from Latin meaning "Knowledge". Knowledge encompasses methods, theories, conclusions, and even magic (which is something that works for unknown reasons, like magnetism once was magic).
The Academic Consensus is called "Scientific Consensus", but Academia's science is a process whereby truth is ignored in favor of defending the status quo. For example: Quasars give strong evidence that Non Cosmological Redshift exists, i.e., redshift that is not due to expansion of the universe. The fact that einstein rings have blue-shift when they shouldn't be (gravity shouldn't warp the spectra of the light that way, just change its direction), indicates that light bends in the interstellar medium due to refraction and diffraction -- a light passing from less dense vacuum into a denser galactic hydrogen envelope -- Not due to a "black hole". In fact, no black hole has ever been observed. Electromotive force could explain the faster rotation period and the "missing gravity" claimed to be caused by "dark matter". However, if an accredited astronomer assert any of these arguments, even with evidence, you are blacklisted from the clique of academic astronomy. That is "science" as a process -- a method of deception by selectively accepting evidence. Academia's "science" is purely based on this "scientific method" of lying for cash.
Your quote "I think, therefore I AM" means I think therefore a god exists, it is either you, existence itself, or some place in between (polytheism). IAM = I
/\ /\/\ (waves of increasing complexity). God says, "I AM that I AM" because media such as old works of art and religions is rich with hidden wisdom encoded by wizards (wise-ards). There is really only once force, Alchemists called it "Quintessence", which all other forces derive, increasing complex vibrations of this force make up all you experience, i.e., it is God. This "occulting" is necessary because the public is being fed so many grand deceptions the truth isn't allowed to be openly discussed.Hint: Look up "the axis of evil, astronomy", and think for yourself.
.
-
Re:The iPhone Effect on a society
It addresses the scenario where answer is known like is the Earth flat?
The answer is known, but it's not what you think it is: Earth is flat and much bigger than govs who want you control you admit. If you could see in infra red, you'd be ridiculing the ball-earth theory, and be mounting expeditions to discover entire continents worth of resource wealth...
Thankfully, we have cameras that can see in infra red now, taking infra-red footage of things that should be well "over the curve".
There's no observable curvature to the earth's surface. The Canigou Mountains can be seen from 175miles away when the sun sets behind them. They should be miles below the curvature, according to the ball-earth model. Refraction doesn't explain this. Flat Model matches all observation.
The problem is that people think the sun sets, forgetting that the air is a lens and is more dense near the surface, causing the rays of the sun to bend down and create an area of darkness where the small close sun's light does not reach. Similar to how a dome-shaped lens on a flat map shows the same light / dark patterns as the globe model clams.
Factbots ignore evidence and say: "No argument, earth is round, government space propaganda says so."
Skeptic Scientists say: "What about all this long distance photography that should be impossible on the ball model? Couldn't 'space' just be a tax collection scheme?" You know, like is suggested by this footage of Apollo 11 Astronauts faking a distant image of earth from low earth orbit by filming a round window?It's easy to deceive the public if you teach them all the same thing since birth and control all the information they see. Then facts like the flat earth or space largely being a tax theft fraud can be hidden and lies become your truth.
Strange that you accept things as fact without even questioning them, so much so you cite falsehood or hotly debated subjects as fact... QED
(Question Everything Damnit!) -
Re:The iPhone Effect on a society
It addresses the scenario where answer is known like is the Earth flat?
The answer is known, but it's not what you think it is: Earth is flat and much bigger than govs who want you control you admit. If you could see in infra red, you'd be ridiculing the ball-earth theory, and be mounting expeditions to discover entire continents worth of resource wealth...
Thankfully, we have cameras that can see in infra red now, taking infra-red footage of things that should be well "over the curve".
There's no observable curvature to the earth's surface. The Canigou Mountains can be seen from 175miles away when the sun sets behind them. They should be miles below the curvature, according to the ball-earth model. Refraction doesn't explain this. Flat Model matches all observation.
The problem is that people think the sun sets, forgetting that the air is a lens and is more dense near the surface, causing the rays of the sun to bend down and create an area of darkness where the small close sun's light does not reach. Similar to how a dome-shaped lens on a flat map shows the same light / dark patterns as the globe model clams.
Factbots ignore evidence and say: "No argument, earth is round, government space propaganda says so."
Skeptic Scientists say: "What about all this long distance photography that should be impossible on the ball model? Couldn't 'space' just be a tax collection scheme?" You know, like is suggested by this footage of Apollo 11 Astronauts faking a distant image of earth from low earth orbit by filming a round window?It's easy to deceive the public if you teach them all the same thing since birth and control all the information they see. Then facts like the flat earth or space largely being a tax theft fraud can be hidden and lies become your truth.
Strange that you accept things as fact without even questioning them, so much so you cite falsehood or hotly debated subjects as fact... QED
(Question Everything Damnit!) -
Re:The iPhone Effect on a society
It addresses the scenario where answer is known like is the Earth flat?
The answer is known, but it's not what you think it is: Earth is flat and much bigger than govs who want you control you admit. If you could see in infra red, you'd be ridiculing the ball-earth theory, and be mounting expeditions to discover entire continents worth of resource wealth...
Thankfully, we have cameras that can see in infra red now, taking infra-red footage of things that should be well "over the curve".
There's no observable curvature to the earth's surface. The Canigou Mountains can be seen from 175miles away when the sun sets behind them. They should be miles below the curvature, according to the ball-earth model. Refraction doesn't explain this. Flat Model matches all observation.
The problem is that people think the sun sets, forgetting that the air is a lens and is more dense near the surface, causing the rays of the sun to bend down and create an area of darkness where the small close sun's light does not reach. Similar to how a dome-shaped lens on a flat map shows the same light / dark patterns as the globe model clams.
Factbots ignore evidence and say: "No argument, earth is round, government space propaganda says so."
Skeptic Scientists say: "What about all this long distance photography that should be impossible on the ball model? Couldn't 'space' just be a tax collection scheme?" You know, like is suggested by this footage of Apollo 11 Astronauts faking a distant image of earth from low earth orbit by filming a round window?It's easy to deceive the public if you teach them all the same thing since birth and control all the information they see. Then facts like the flat earth or space largely being a tax theft fraud can be hidden and lies become your truth.
Strange that you accept things as fact without even questioning them, so much so you cite falsehood or hotly debated subjects as fact... QED
(Question Everything Damnit!) -
Re:The iPhone Effect on a society
It addresses the scenario where answer is known like is the Earth flat?
The answer is known, but it's not what you think it is: Earth is flat and much bigger than govs who want you control you admit. If you could see in infra red, you'd be ridiculing the ball-earth theory, and be mounting expeditions to discover entire continents worth of resource wealth...
Thankfully, we have cameras that can see in infra red now, taking infra-red footage of things that should be well "over the curve".
There's no observable curvature to the earth's surface. The Canigou Mountains can be seen from 175miles away when the sun sets behind them. They should be miles below the curvature, according to the ball-earth model. Refraction doesn't explain this. Flat Model matches all observation.
The problem is that people think the sun sets, forgetting that the air is a lens and is more dense near the surface, causing the rays of the sun to bend down and create an area of darkness where the small close sun's light does not reach. Similar to how a dome-shaped lens on a flat map shows the same light / dark patterns as the globe model clams.
Factbots ignore evidence and say: "No argument, earth is round, government space propaganda says so."
Skeptic Scientists say: "What about all this long distance photography that should be impossible on the ball model? Couldn't 'space' just be a tax collection scheme?" You know, like is suggested by this footage of Apollo 11 Astronauts faking a distant image of earth from low earth orbit by filming a round window?It's easy to deceive the public if you teach them all the same thing since birth and control all the information they see. Then facts like the flat earth or space largely being a tax theft fraud can be hidden and lies become your truth.
Strange that you accept things as fact without even questioning them, so much so you cite falsehood or hotly debated subjects as fact... QED
(Question Everything Damnit!) -
Re:WUT?
Creimer gave $71 to Second Harvest Food Bank to stick it to VOX Media and The Verge. Over $7,000 raised for multiple charities via #SomethingPositive on Twitter.
-
Re:Can't trust Facebook, ever!
Creimer gave $71 to Second Harvest Food Bank to stick it to VOX Media and The Verge. Over $7,000 raised for multiple charities via #SomethingPositive on Twitter.
-
Re: Trump can't catch Obama
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Of course my bias is actual reality. So there is that.
-
Re:if creimer went to australia
Creimer gave $71 to Second Harvest Food Bank to stick it to VOX Media and The Verge. Over $7,000 raised for multiple charities via #SomethingPositive on Twitter.
-
Re:Paywalls Hamper Research
Just one example, from a defcon: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... And yes, people really do get their pets on review boards, as well as use well known names as co-authors (often with the famous guy's consent but not with his having read the crap) to get published....
IIRC someone recently got Mein Kampf published in one of these as a social sciences exercise - caught crap for it, but they did put it in print. They are not giving the organization and review service you pay for, not even close. It's not as though a webserver costs millions a year to run to dispense old RevSciIns scans from before the digital age.
Aaron Schwartz had the right idea....and I hope SciHub keeps working and the hero gal who runs it avoids jail. It really does do what the big boys claim - help science. Hero: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... -
Re:Different design philosophy
It's no different than anything else that grows and tries to expand the user base to people who are just starting out and don't have years of previous experience that they can fall back on. Look at the computer industry and early internet where there was little hand-holding and people needed to spend a lot of time figuring things out. Unfortunately if you're a company that wants to increase their customer-base, that naturally requires dumbing-down the product so that more people are able to use it.
Try and make something that harkens back to that time and you'll get called elitist or get accused of gate-keeping. I recall this happening last year (or was it the year before) when Cuphead came out and was brutally difficult, but had a tutorial level that didn't spell things out for you where some hapless reviewer got stuck on something that seemed simple if you had any knowledge of platformers and was pilloried for it.
There's a pretty good video that discusses the whole concept of tutorials and using good level design to teach gameplay that's worth the watch if you haven't seen it already. There's a good deal of profanity used, so you might not want to blast it if you're at work. -
Re:Mach 1.044
This seems as good a place as any to mention Brian Shul's SR-71 L.A. Speed Story!
-
Re:Have trouble believing it's really that short
Creimer gave $71 to Second Harvest Food Bank to stick it to VOX Media and The Verge. Over $7,000 raised for multiple charities via #SomethingPositive on Twitter.
-
Where the hell can I get eyes like that?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8n6RJsFj3M
Jack: Where the hell can I get eyes like that?
Riddick: Gotta kill a few people.
Jack: 'Kay, I can do it.
Riddick: Then you got to get sent to a slam, where they tell you you'll never see daylight again. You dig up a doctor, and you pay him 20 menthol Kools to do a surgical shine job on your eyeballs.
Jack: So you can see who's sneaking up on you in the dark?
Riddick: Exactly. -
Rodney Dangerfield's First Economics Class
Yes, Amazon was starting to think that a consensus was forming that once they committed to building, they'd not want to abandon that, and so they'd be ripe for endless groups who'd be wanting to wet their beak. Sure, that's paranoid thinking, but was it paranoid enough? And was getting invited back to the table, with assurances from the politicians and the unions that beak wetting would be under control, what they were going for when they walked away from the table? Amazon's shareholders don't seem to be in an uproar over this, but a lot of the people that can make the lives of politicians and union leaders miserable are in one. So Amazon is making that clear, and maybe now negotiations can be finalized. Or maybe not, because Amazon has something to gain by not coming back to the table. It would serve to let other locales now that they aren't to be trifled with. I'm a retired union construction worker living not too far from where this headquarters would be built, and the salaries of the blue collar jobs that go with it, and they'd not just come from the construction, would be offering a better salary than what many workers are currently getting. We have work on Long Island, but more, better paying, jobs is like a tide that helps raise, or at least maintain, the salaries of everybody who works nearby in blue collar jobs. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
-
Check carefully
Obligatory Monty Python https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
-
Re:what kind of music does creimer listen to
Creimer gave $71 to Second Harvest Food Bank to stick it to VOX Media and The Verge. Over $7,000 raised for multiple charities via #SomethingPositive on Twitter.
-
Re:Not surprised
Creimer gave $71 to Second Harvest Food Bank to stick it to VOX Media and The Verge. Over $7,000 raised for multiple charities via #SomethingPositive on Twitter.
-
WATCH OUT FOR THE FLOYD HOLES!!
-
Re:And In Other News...
Oldie but goodie: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
-
Re:They don't deserve to use the UFS acronym
Actually I support thousands of machines using UFS. I can debug the filesystem code and have done so many times. So, yeah, I'm quite familiar with it. It's absolutely still in use in many many places (mostly legacy Solaris machines or on new NetBSD and/or FreeBSD boxes with low memory). Just because *you* don't see it, doesn't mean it's not there. Sure there are better file systems with more modern ideas incorporated into them like btrees, journaling or logging, and many other items like pseudo-volume-management like ZFS does. However, I'd point out that FAT is still in pretty wide use today and it's inferior to UFS in almost every way. So, the ever-lame "OMG that's so old" is just an ignorant and tiresome reaction like some scene from Idiocracy "Water... like from the toilet?". Water is "old" too. UFS is quite fast compared with FAT file systems (and beats ext2 quite handily most of the time, too depending on the workload). It's also easily tuned for prefetch caching on most systems that support it and it's ability to handle power failures is going to depend greatly on how much write-back caching is being used (and if it's battery backed or not). UFS in FreeBSD and NetBSD support logging quite nicely and handle power failures just fine, thanks (MUCH better than, say, ext4 which in my lab tests a few years ago performed the worst in power failure testing).
The point (besides you have no idea WTF you are talking about concerning UFS) is that manufacturers will start re-using acronyms that have been heavily used by others in the past and it pollutes search results for the unrelated items. Your judgment about UFS's lifecycle (besides being mostly wrong) just sounds like the view of an igmo who really doesn't know better and thinks he knows everything because he once built a gaming PC. -
Re:AV on TV
Sure you can delete it, but apparently it's quite an involved process.
-
Re:I'll be OK
Chip-hop is hip-hop music synthesized with simple square waves in the style of 1980s home computers and game consoles.
-
Re:Blackberries???
Creimer gave $71 to Second Harvest Food Bank to stick it to VOX Media and The Verge. Over $7,000 raised for multiple charities via #SomethingPositive on Twitter.
-
Re:Again this rubish?
Creimer gave $71 to Second Harvest Food Bank to stick it to VOX Media and The Verge. Over $7,000 raised for multiple charities via #SomethingPositive on Twitter.
-
Re:What about the 5 others?
Creimer gave $71 to Second Harvest Food Bank to stick it to VOX Media and The Verge. Over $7,000 raised for multiple charities via #SomethingPositive on Twitter.
-
Can be done without machinery
One guy can move big blocks of stone by hand.
This construction worker figured it out:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Just use the hardness of stone in your favor.
He places the rock on 2 small stones, balances it on one, then rotates and lets it down on the other. And there's rolling logs, etc. -
Re:First post
Lots of tiny echo chambers but when you start with with 7 BILLION, even tiny fractions represent a huge number and each echo chamber will inevitably reverberate with adjoining echo chambers, spreading the most popular tunes across the internet.
Reality is lies only sell in the absence of truth, in the truth being censored, no matter how isolated that echo chamber, if it contains the truth people will find it and spread it. Exactly what is happening now and why the corporate establishment with the fucking filth of the digital age, M$, Google, Facebook, Twitter et al, wants to censor it to keep their lies alive, the lie they should control the majority of the worlds assets, that they can use and abuse it at will for fun, they are entitled to generate as much pollution as their money can generate, those of insatiable greed, ego and lusts. The more they tighten their grip the more 'people' that will slip through their fingers https://www.youtube.com/watch?... and the more truth that will be revealed.
-
Walkman song from 1981
In 1981, when I was in my final year of high school, there was a song that I heard many times on the radio about the Walkman cassette tape player. Now, whenever I hear this I am brought back to 1981. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
-
Re:Ummm ...
It is also probable they had knowledge of the lever
Birds use levers to pry bark off trees to get at the insects underneath.
-
One guy can easily raise a single stone.
-
Re:Nonsense
You can stand up for you country better than that. Beat him with a leek and make him eat it.