Domain: youtube.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to youtube.com.
Comments · 87,129
-
Re:"people experiencing homelessness"?
He probably embedded code to insert in your database in one of his complex link redirect schemes or in one of his cookies. He leaves them all over the Internet. Very Dangerous!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Cryptofeces Lepidoptera Creimerus infestation is a serious problem. Not only are they capable of reproducing asexually like amoebas, they can also lay eggs hermaphroditically in unexpected places. They can disguise eggs as something useful to fool the unaware, sometimes pretending to be a haiku author, blogger, vlogger, or IT closet cleaner.
Very dangerous. They can seemingly reproduce out of the cosmic background radiation, even if you step on twelve of them, there's always one you miss.
Don't be fooled by the C. Lepidoptera Creimerus's innocuous, rolly-polly, and almost friendly appearance; despite its great size, stupid demeanor, and bedraggled toothless appearance, they have the hardiness of a tardigrade.
Only a concerted, targeted downmodding campaign has been shown effective in controlling this dangerous pest.
Experience shows that stopping such a campaign leads to C. Lepidoptera Creimerus returning within days.
Don't let it happen again!
--
the biggest looser on Slashdot -
Re:What is more amazing...
Creimer is too busy making YouTube videos and sticking it to The Verge for abusing YouTube's copyright system.
-
Re:What is more amazing...
Creimer is too busy making YouTube videos and sticking it to The Verge for abusing YouTube's copyright system.
-
Re:SkyNet
Creimer is too busy making YouTube videos and sticking it to The Verge for abusing YouTube's copyright system.
-
Re:SkyNet
Creimer is too busy making YouTube videos and sticking it to The Verge for abusing YouTube's copyright system.
-
Re:You use the cloud
Creimer is too busy making YouTube videos and sticking it to The Verge for abusing YouTube's copyright system.
-
Re:You use the cloud
Creimer is too busy making YouTube videos and sticking it to The Verge for abusing YouTube's copyright system.
-
Re:6 Wheels, Just Like NASA's Mars Rovers
This looks to be based on on the iBot wheelchair, which is capable of climbing stairs.
-
Re:creimer inquiring discreetly
Creimer gave $71 to Second Harvest Food Bank to stick it to VOX Media and The Verge. Over $7,000 raised for multiple charities via #SomethingPositive on Twitter.
-
Re:Misread the title...
Grampareimer gave $71 to Second Harvest Food Bank to stick it to VOX Media and The Verge. Over $7,000 raised for multiple charities via #SomethingPositive on Twitter.
-
You no talk smack on China. Irregal!
You nexus, huh? I design you eyes!
-
Bow Wow Wow c30 c60 c90
Bow Wow Wow approves! https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
-
Re:Pulling out
Obligatory non-Archer reply:
-
Obligatory
I think most of people's bad memories of cassettes come from using poor quality tapes on poor quality decks. Cassettes: Better than you don't remember
-
Re:Can congress stop throwing Zingers.
I think this is a necessary part of the political process. In an ideal world we'd all dispassionately weigh our opinions, carefully ensuring that they're consistently applied to ourselves and others. But we don't, not most of us. We live in a world controlled by the snap judgments of millions of voters, snap judgments informed by voter preconceptions. So it's strategically important to shape those preconceptions.
This is why corporations hire public relations people to cover their tracks on things like privacy. That's why PR is a 17 *billion* dollar industry in the US. That's about 10% of the size of the agriculture industry, which is astonishing if you think about it. The PR industry produces more "value" than all the wheat farmers in the US combined (about 11 billion).
All the privacy advocacy groups in the country couldn't scratch the budget a company like Equifax has to cover its ass. So yes, an occasional public hiding is called for, although you're right we shouldn't consider the job *done* once a CEO has been publicly humiliated.
It's also not true that a CEO can simply ignore these things. Administered to a vulnerable CEO at the right time, it can end his career. John Stumpf had to resign as Wells Fargo after this Congressional PR flogging.
-
Re:30% is not that Bad
Creimer gave $71 to Second Harvest Food Bank to stick it to VOX Media and The Verge. Over $7,000 raised for multiple charities via #SomethingPositive on Twitter.
-
Great Interview on Planet Nine
Event Horizon - Does Planet Nine Exist? Featuring Dr. Konstantin Batygin
-
Obligatory Techmoan
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
tl;dr - Yeah having to fast forward and rewind was annoying, but they sounded pretty good if you didn't buy the absolute cheapest cassettes you could find, and paid attention to what you were doing when recording.
-
Re:And for those of us old enough to remember
You beat me too it. When I read the summary, I looked up a link to the clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
-
Re:I sympathize
I stayed in Las Vegas in Wynn, and across the street there's a marketplace with a huge outdoor screen with music. They had this 30 second iPod commercial with insidious music going on repeat 24 hours a day and all night. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
-
it should have been called way out
at least it would have a catchy theme song
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... -
Re:One small problem...
This wizard would not be hard to identify by his gait: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
-
She actually didn't say that
She actually said the exact opposite.
If you read the above article you'll find what made everyone freak out is she said that having 63% of film critics being white males seems a bit high to her. Given that they're about 36% of the population she might not be too far off.
I'm not saying it's time for quotas (Troop Leader says ve have to meet our qoota) but it probably wouldn't hurt to make sure we haven't left some systemic discrimination in place. While I don't believe in "where there's smoke there's fire" I do think that if I see smoke I damn well check and if I find dry ice maybe I clean it up... -
I'm guessing the administrations argument
went something like this.
Thought it was a bit odd that an anti-regulation, pro business admin staffed mostly by same revolving door of ex-Goldman sachs folks we've had around since Reagan would stand in the way of a merger. Dammit, I wish we could get somebody like Liz Warren or Bernie in office along with a matching Congress. They'd put a stop to this crap right quick. -
Re:Chinese hero
What? First, it's only some scenes. Second, even if it was all the scenes, it still wouldn't double the cost.
Only all the scenes of people talking. And all the cover scenes. And all the scenes to recut the movie so it makes sense to non-Indians.
If no one wants to watch it, you wouldn't bother. And you don't have to pay Americans. You just need English speakers. In fact, it would be weirder if you used Americans.
That's a catch-22.
If you want to show it, just to see if anyone wants to watch it - you must already have filmed it.Also... Indians speak English. With an accent.
You're not dubbing it so lazy Americans don't have to read. You're dubbing it cause it sounds weird and confusing for those Americans.
It's like American... but it's like how Mexicans talk. Only not exactly. More like how Apu talks. Only that's funny and this isn't.And dubbing it in non-American you're just asking for trouble.
There's a reason British actors are THE go-to for villains, with their weird, non-American, "English".People watch a lot of weird shit full of cheap melodrama here.
Not like this.
India only got electrified last year. For certain values of "electrified".
Needless to say... their movies are made for a different kind of an audience.
And... Indian stories are... different.
So are their family comedies.
Can you even tell the genre of this one?All three movies are recent commercial and critical successes. All ranging around $3-4.5 million to make, and raking in around $15-30 million.
Just releasing them in US theaters would cost more. Cause they would be competing for theater screens with Hollywood movies.
While their entire take is less than a budget of a black and white indie. As in independent.Best they could hope for would be some kind of a digital Netflix-like distribution, hoping for their audience to stumble onto them or be pushed by algorithms.
But that would have happened already, had there been a market for those movies.
Maybe if more Indians migrate to US and they grow to be 1 or 2 percent of the population? -
Re:Chinese hero
What? First, it's only some scenes. Second, even if it was all the scenes, it still wouldn't double the cost.
Only all the scenes of people talking. And all the cover scenes. And all the scenes to recut the movie so it makes sense to non-Indians.
If no one wants to watch it, you wouldn't bother. And you don't have to pay Americans. You just need English speakers. In fact, it would be weirder if you used Americans.
That's a catch-22.
If you want to show it, just to see if anyone wants to watch it - you must already have filmed it.Also... Indians speak English. With an accent.
You're not dubbing it so lazy Americans don't have to read. You're dubbing it cause it sounds weird and confusing for those Americans.
It's like American... but it's like how Mexicans talk. Only not exactly. More like how Apu talks. Only that's funny and this isn't.And dubbing it in non-American you're just asking for trouble.
There's a reason British actors are THE go-to for villains, with their weird, non-American, "English".People watch a lot of weird shit full of cheap melodrama here.
Not like this.
India only got electrified last year. For certain values of "electrified".
Needless to say... their movies are made for a different kind of an audience.
And... Indian stories are... different.
So are their family comedies.
Can you even tell the genre of this one?All three movies are recent commercial and critical successes. All ranging around $3-4.5 million to make, and raking in around $15-30 million.
Just releasing them in US theaters would cost more. Cause they would be competing for theater screens with Hollywood movies.
While their entire take is less than a budget of a black and white indie. As in independent.Best they could hope for would be some kind of a digital Netflix-like distribution, hoping for their audience to stumble onto them or be pushed by algorithms.
But that would have happened already, had there been a market for those movies.
Maybe if more Indians migrate to US and they grow to be 1 or 2 percent of the population? -
Re:Chinese hero
What? First, it's only some scenes. Second, even if it was all the scenes, it still wouldn't double the cost.
Only all the scenes of people talking. And all the cover scenes. And all the scenes to recut the movie so it makes sense to non-Indians.
If no one wants to watch it, you wouldn't bother. And you don't have to pay Americans. You just need English speakers. In fact, it would be weirder if you used Americans.
That's a catch-22.
If you want to show it, just to see if anyone wants to watch it - you must already have filmed it.Also... Indians speak English. With an accent.
You're not dubbing it so lazy Americans don't have to read. You're dubbing it cause it sounds weird and confusing for those Americans.
It's like American... but it's like how Mexicans talk. Only not exactly. More like how Apu talks. Only that's funny and this isn't.And dubbing it in non-American you're just asking for trouble.
There's a reason British actors are THE go-to for villains, with their weird, non-American, "English".People watch a lot of weird shit full of cheap melodrama here.
Not like this.
India only got electrified last year. For certain values of "electrified".
Needless to say... their movies are made for a different kind of an audience.
And... Indian stories are... different.
So are their family comedies.
Can you even tell the genre of this one?All three movies are recent commercial and critical successes. All ranging around $3-4.5 million to make, and raking in around $15-30 million.
Just releasing them in US theaters would cost more. Cause they would be competing for theater screens with Hollywood movies.
While their entire take is less than a budget of a black and white indie. As in independent.Best they could hope for would be some kind of a digital Netflix-like distribution, hoping for their audience to stumble onto them or be pushed by algorithms.
But that would have happened already, had there been a market for those movies.
Maybe if more Indians migrate to US and they grow to be 1 or 2 percent of the population? -
Re:Retard iggymanz is easily confused.
Wikipedia gives these years for millennials:
United States PIRG - 1983-2000
United States Census Bureau - 1982-2000
Demographers William Straus and Neil Howe - 1982-2004
Ernst and Young - 1981-1996
Pew Research Center - 1981-1996
SYZYGY - 1981-1998
Asia Business Unit of Corporate Directions - 1981-2000
Goldman Sachs - 1980-2000
Resolution Foundation - 1980-2000
Australia's McCrindle Research - 1980-1994
PricewaterhouseCoopers - 1980-1995
MSW Research - 1980-1996
United States Chamber of Commerce - 1980-1999
Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary - 1980-1999
MetLife - 1977-1994
Nielsen Media Research - 1977-1994I think we can all agree that those using 1980 are wrong! Certainty, somebody born in January 1980 is most definitely not a millennial!!!
That reminds me of this video where Mahk finds out he's a millennial:
-
Re:No more YT kids for my kids
The clip being debated (if you follow the links back to the original blog post on pedimom.com) is almost certainly this scene from Family Guy, not something mysterious like a razor blade in a candy apple. It definitely didn't belong on YouTube Kids, but you should think twice about that before deciding how to react.
-
Seems somewhat similar to ...
FOAM: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... Naked Objects: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
-
Re:slur?
When is the last time you applied for a job and WEREN'T asked for your race?
I'm mulatto. White father and Indian mother (feather, not dot). First, time I've even heard any inclination that the term might be racist.
We're kind of locked in a weird sort of identity politic world these days. The best example is the star of Captain Marvel, Brie Larson, making the trip from far left to racism and sexism. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Too many white male critics, and repeatedly claims that she doesn't hate "White dudes"
In today's world, you are against racism and sexism by being racist and sexist. So my guess is if you are an SJW, the use of a race based word is fine.
Me? I just scrub my speech of as much language that can be connected to what we call "race" as possible. Not easy.
-
We've all seen this before
The party of the first part shall be known in this contract as the party of the first part....
Oh well, whatever the market will bear...
-
Re:Not sure about Monero...
CD Reimer gave $71 to Second Harvest Food Bank to show VOX Media and The Verge. #SomethingPositive has raised 7000+$ so far...
-
Re:Self-harm clips?
CD Reimer gave $71 to Second Harvest Food Bank to show VOX Media and The Verge. #SomethingPositive has raised 7000+$ so far...
-
This is a test. It is only a test
Do not be afraid. Do not get mad. Breathe deep... Relax... Mellow... Ommm... Ommm
-
Re:No Silver Bullet
You left out the link to the hilarious xtranormal skit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
And /dev/null is even faster! -
Driving employees nuts
And then once they are there they can listen to this
-
Wonder what they would do with the Curly Shuffle
-
Phil!
-
Re: Movie reviews
I'm Gen-X also, and when I was a teenager, Captain Marvel was a black woman
I guess part of my "bias" about the name also comes from watching "Shazam!" on TV on Saturday mornings in the '70s, and hearing that narration over and over again...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Narrator : In time of dire need, young Billy has been granted the power by the immortals to summon awesome forces at the utterance of a single word!
Billy Batson : SHAZAM!
Narrator : A word which transforms him, in a flash, into the mightiest of mortal beings, Captain Marvel! -
Music suggestion
-
Look out Jamal
-
CIA former head of disguise has the answer
Jonna Mendez talks about this in her masterclass on disguise: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
-
Re:good thing they don't read creimer ebooks
Creimer gave $71 to Second Harvest Food Bank to stick it to VOX Media and The Verge. As a group effort, #SomethingPositive on Twitter raised $7,000+ in charitable donations.
-
Re:I sympathize
Reminds me of The Walking Dead when Daryl is stuck in his prison cell. Here is a 10 hour track to replace it for you: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
-
Re:Movie reviews
You mean after the superbowl trailer aired? The time when pretty much all of the US and a sizable portion of the rest of the world learned about this movie's existence?
-
Rotten Tomatoes TOOK Down the Score!!
Update RT took down the score! https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
-
Re: I sympathize
Creimer gave $71 to Second Harvest Food Bank to stick it to VOX Media and The Verge. As a group effort, #SomethingPositive on Twitter raised $7,000+ in charitable donations.
-
Re:I sympathize
In Yodobashi in Japan, they have this on loop all day long. Over and over. It gets to you pretty quick.
-
Re:Up to *some* good.
CD Reimer gave $71 to Second Harvest Food Bank to show VOX Media and The Verge. #SomethingPositive