Slashdot Mirror

I'm seeing a lot of armchair experts on this thread. If you've got time, go watch the video of his presentation, he explains the factors involved.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
It starts about 4 minutes in.

In my opinion, Trump is a loudmouth not unlike Howard Stern, and definitely should not be president. When it comes to RACIST remarks, these are some of the comments I've come across:
Calling employees "n*gger" (Hillary)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

This link doesn't work.

Calling people "f*cking Jew bastard" (Hillary, confirmed by three witnesses)
https://www.theguardian.com/wo...

'Confirmed' by the couple who originally reported the incident, and a campaign worker who later turned out wasn't even in the room and claims to have overheard through a door.

Hillary said publicly that her mentor is Robert Byrd, former KKK leader.

You apparently don't realize that Byrd publicly denounced and apologized for his former ties to the KKK and went on to support the Civil Rights and Voting Rights acts. Jesus, even the NAACP released a statement after his death praising his work later in life to advance civil liberties.

Before you decide to believe the worst of someone, it's worth checking your facts.

Show some actual evidence, or STFU.

Happy to oblige.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Islam is a religion.

It's also a political ideology that seeks to impose its values on others.

but the Muslims I've known are quite reasonable and hardly ever go on jihaidic shooting sprees

Sure, there are plenty of moderate Muslims. But even then a large number of them do not share Western values.

Most Muslims, like most Christians and most Buddhists, want to live their own reasonably peaceful lives.

Islam at its core is an expansionist and violent religion, unlike Buddhism, and unlike the actual gospels of Christianity (even if there was a period of authoritarian theocracy). That's why Islam has bloody borders.

They may provide political support for things I find despicable, but that's not a serious problem, given the numbers that are fleeing to the West.

Given all the problems caused by just a tiny percentage, why do you think it's a good idea to increase it? Islam is a fundamental threat to the West.

Oh, bother...

http://www.theonion.com/video/...
or
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

Watch out for the Special bus!

Have you not heard this guy speak? Just to pick one example of the hundreds of him acting as Putin's personal apologist.

they are orders of magnitude less dangerous than the assholes you already see on the road every day! Like the moron I saw trying to ride his bicycle down I-5 in downtown Portland during rush hour the other day...

I would say the same thing if I were envious of the bicyclist passing all that stopped traffic! Like that scene from Office Space.

But really, what's so dangerous about bicycling past a bunch of stopped cars? As long as the person isn't riding in the door zone..

they are orders of magnitude less dangerous than the assholes you already see on the road every day! Like the moron I saw trying to ride his bicycle down I-5 in downtown Portland during rush hour the other day...

I would say the same thing if I were envious of the bicyclist passing all that stopped traffic! Like that scene from Office Space.

But really, what's so dangerous about bicycling past a bunch of stopped cars? As long as the person isn't riding in the door zone..

they are orders of magnitude less dangerous than the assholes you already see on the road every day! Like the moron I saw trying to ride his bicycle down I-5 in downtown Portland during rush hour the other day...

I would say the same thing if I were envious of the bicyclist passing all that stopped traffic! Like that scene from Office Space.

But really, what's so dangerous about bicycling past a bunch of stopped cars? As long as the person isn't riding in the door zone..

Just miles from your doorstep, hundreds of machines are given weapons and trained to kill. The government calls it the Army, but a more alarmist name would be... The Killbot Factory.

Simpsons did it first.

BTW, the first batch of Obama emails are out: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-...

They're boring, though. Wait for later dumps.

Also, please remember that it may be illegal to view the emails unless you have CNN authorization. You can learn a lot from CNN, like the fact that we already have congressional term limits. Someone might want to let Wikipedia know about that.

BTW, the first batch of Obama emails are out: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-...

They're boring, though. Wait for later dumps.

Also, please remember that it may be illegal to view the emails unless you have CNN authorization. You can learn a lot from CNN, like the fact that we already have congressional term limits. Someone might want to let Wikipedia know about that.

And remember, it is illegal for you to read the leaked Clinton/DNC emails on Wikileaks. Your only legal option is to let CNN tell you what they say and what this means.

It was not oxidation. It was just the spring connectors wearing out. The SNES and N64 were top loading. The Famicom also did not suffer from those issues either (same tech as the NES) as it was also top loading.

Blowing on it did nothing. It was the act of pulling out and putting back in that did the trick. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

If anything we need more 'right wing hack jobs' as you put it, to uncover and expose more of the lies like the one used to blame the cause of Benghazi on a youtube video and pin it on some poor patsy, that in turn led to the discovery of the secretary of state storing SAP level top information on private servers and being proved a complete liar, and the DOJ and FBI being DNC pawns rather than being committed to the public's interest.

We definitely need another 'right wing hack job' to uncover the extent of the role that Bob Creamer had in the conspiracy to commit violence at political rallies, and why exactly he was such a regular visitor to the white house, and who he was taking his marching orders from. We need to know the extent at how the DNC provoked the riots in Chicago, as well as the rioting in places like Ferguson via their BLM attack dogs, and the campaign to stir up racial tension to the point where innocent police officers are being gunned down and ambushed and killed. Furthermore, we need another 'right wing hack job' to uncover the extent that the DNC violated campaign finance laws, as shown by the DNC leaks, to funnel money directly to Clinton's campaign.

Why? Because as seen by how not one single Congressional Democrat voted to find Brian Pagliano in contempt of congress, for being a no show to a congressional summons, it is clear they have no interests whatsoever in policing their own. People wonder why there had to be half a dozen congressional inquiries into Benghazi to get anywhere at all, well, that's why, because the partisan hacks are on both sides, including the media, leaving those of us with an interest in the truth to have to fend for ourselves.

Bottom line, if Trump gets in, we get Trey Gowdy as attorney general, who is completely unlike this passive aggressive, tarmac-meeting weasel that won't even commit to saying that speeding is illegal, who might get to the bottom of some of these questions. There's your reach around for you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

You could also just try google. It's not like democrats having dead people vote and busing minorities from polling place to polling place is any big secret.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Watch this https://www.youtube.com/watch?.... What more needs to be said.

Samsung can hardly take all of them down if people keep putting them up.

I suspect something happened to the parachute just before jettisoning - e.g. rope breaking/twisting, chute tearing/burning that caused the lander to tumble, and so the rockets switched off as they weren't pointing against the forces on the lander that the accelerometers were reading.
Look at JPL's Mars parachute test in 2014 that ripped the parachute https://www.youtube.com/watch?....

is this the one? https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

I would normally tell you to read transcripts and watch tapes. Since time is rather short and there is much to learn, let me point you to a Philosophy show who also dabbles in the journalism so lacking in media today.

Just a word of caution: Since the media is so biased it may seem shocking to the system to get a different view. Taking the red pill as it were. Always, check sources if you are in doubt. Stefan provides them all, but may be found easier on his web site compared to Youtube.

Oh Jesus what a load of horse shit. That channel is clearly Pro-Trump/Anti-Hillary so how would you expect to get impartial material from that?
I could only sit through the first few minutes, but nothing was presented as fact, it was all pro-Trump rhetoric. The easiest measure of bias is see whether the content contains both pro and cons message from both sides. If it's 100% pro Hillary it can't be trusted, and if it 100% pro Trump it can't be trusted.
Here's an example of what you should be looking for: http://www.politifact.com/
Real, measurable and impartial facts of both sides, not just one side's opinion.

Faithful Muslims like this?

It will still be years before any driverless car (note that lvl 5 autonomous driving means "no driver needed", i.e. stuff like "summoning your empty car to wherever you are right now") can handle a situation like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... - this is not just about detecting lanes and checking GPS data, the car would need to actually detect that there is a traffic cop actively regulating the traffic and then understand hand signs. Since it would be a bit silly to expect the car to be able to do that, we would need a completely new traffic control infrastructure (i.e. transmitters everywhere - and I mean everywhere, even non main roads) to send information to and from autonomous cars. Or what if this happens and the map data has not been updated yet, will all autonomous cars then drive right into whatever danger lies ahead? http://i.istockimg.com/file_th...

A video of part of the speech is here. From 2:17 to 2:29: "What we need to simultaneously - you know, secure our borders with technology, personnel, physical barriers if necessary in some places - and we need to have tougher employer sanctions ..."

Sorry, I messed up the last link. A video of part of the speech is here. From 2:17 to 2:29: "What we need to simultaneously - you know, secure our borders with technology, personnel, physical barriers if necessary in some places - and we need to have tougher employer sanctions ..."

"To make sense of all of this data, a new onboard computer with more than 40 times the computing power of the previous generation runs the new Tesla-developed neural net for vision, sonar and radar processing software."
https://www.tesla.com/blog/all...

So what you're saying is... the cpu is a neural net processor, a learning computer.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Don't get angry at me man, I'm agreeing with you that Trump would never try to monetize the job. You made a fantastic point there which is obviously based in reality and backed up by all of the behavior we've witnessed from Donald J. Trump over the past 30 or 40 years (video evidence of Donald Trump helping someone), and as you can clearly see from my comment I am agreeing with you. I'm not mocking it in any way. Just spitballing here.

On the one hand we have Hillary trading uranium rights for CGI donations, and on the other we have... well. you don't like Trump. Do you have a college degree? Ask for your money back.

Let me guess. You're actually planning on casting a vote for one of the two historically bad candidates that have been shat out in front of you by an awful system, but you think I'm the idiot. Truly, I shrink from the might of your intellect.

I would normally tell you to read transcripts and watch tapes. Since time is rather short and there is much to learn, let me point you to a Philosophy show who also dabbles in the journalism so lacking in media today.

Just a word of caution: Since the media is so biased it may seem shocking to the system to get a different view. Taking the red pill as it were. Always, check sources if you are in doubt. Stefan provides them all, but may be found easier on his web site compared to Youtube.

The pedantry is strong with this one...

Almost as strong as the lack of logic.

A person who goes to work exchanges work for money.

A bribed person exchanges something that the person doing the bribing either wants out, or wants to remain secret.

I do however suspect that our not quite accurate pedants, really, really, really love Android phones, Samsung in particular, hate Apple, and are trying to obscure the argument and the truth that the Galaxy Note 7 is a rather dangerous device.

So they do what every person backed into a corner does. They deflect by trying to change the subject.

More of the happy Samsungs and their side effects here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?... The fire starting~ 7:03 is interesting, being caught burning. Lot's of popping smoke and flames.

Some folks have taken the time honored tactic of denying the problem exists, as happened in here early on. Problem is, with security cams all over creation, its a little difficult to play the deny, deny, deny game any more. Even the replacement phones catch fire.

In my opinion, Trump is a loudmouth not unlike Howard Stern, and definitely should not be president. When it comes to RACIST remarks, these are some of the comments I've come across:
Calling employees "n*gger" (Hillary)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Calling people "f*cking Jew bastard" (Hillary, confirmed by three witnesses)
https://www.theguardian.com/wo...

Hillary said publicly that her mentor is Robert Byrd, former KKK leader.

That idiot trump *has* talked about building a wall; Hillary actually voted to do so.

What bothers me much, much more, though, is the condescension of Hillary and friends towards my family. It *really* bothers me that they tell my daughter, in effect, "we'll give you an extra ten points on this test since you're black, and obviously black people like you are too stupid to actually learn the material like we white people can do". The hidden, implied racism and bigotry that runs deep in all of their policies is infuriating to me. When my daughter hears Hillary call someone a "n*gger" or a "f*cking Jew bastard", I explain to my daughter that Hillary is wrong, very wrong. Some people are stupid and say stupid things; that's simple enough to understand and accept. But when the entire school system, through college, is predicated on the assumption that my daughters complexion makes her less capable, it's harder to convincingly explain that EVERYONE setting school policy are ALL morons. I'm sure she will at times wonder if they are right; and that saddens and angers me tremendously.

Sparta? This... this is Sparta, you say? Then... then... YES! YES!

\_(oo)_/

They brought news about the trash can mac "pro." What else could be done?

1. Where there's one there's more.

2. Why does it matter? Even one is damning.

3. CNN is lying to you.

It has to do with focused and diffused modes of the brain. In focused mode, you're using neuro pathways that are already established to perform a task you already know how to do. Diffused mode is where you're trying to subconsciously use untapped areas of your brain to gain that creative ah-ha moment to do something you've not done before. Most people can't be in both modes at the same time, much like optical illusions where you can't discern two different pictures superimposed in the same image. https://upload.wikimedia.org/w...

While you need to perform these mini breaks you should only do them after focusing on a certain task for, say, 25 minutes to maintain productivity and keep procrastination from creeping into your workflow. Then you take a break to let your mind wander and allow your subconscious to use other areas to help gain insight on your overall task.

The following videos from Barbara Oakley explain it a lot better. She also explains why multitasking is not good for focused mode thinking.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Google Talk (1 hour)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

TEDx Talk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

It has to do with focused and diffused modes of the brain. In focused mode, you're using neuro pathways that are already established to perform a task you already know how to do. Diffused mode is where you're trying to subconsciously use untapped areas of your brain to gain that creative ah-ha moment to do something you've not done before. Most people can't be in both modes at the same time, much like optical illusions where you can't discern two different pictures superimposed in the same image. https://upload.wikimedia.org/w...

While you need to perform these mini breaks you should only do them after focusing on a certain task for, say, 25 minutes to maintain productivity and keep procrastination from creeping into your workflow. Then you take a break to let your mind wander and allow your subconscious to use other areas to help gain insight on your overall task.

The following videos from Barbara Oakley explain it a lot better. She also explains why multitasking is not good for focused mode thinking.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Google Talk (1 hour)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

TEDx Talk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

It has to do with focused and diffused modes of the brain. In focused mode, you're using neuro pathways that are already established to perform a task you already know how to do. Diffused mode is where you're trying to subconsciously use untapped areas of your brain to gain that creative ah-ha moment to do something you've not done before. Most people can't be in both modes at the same time, much like optical illusions where you can't discern two different pictures superimposed in the same image. https://upload.wikimedia.org/w...

While you need to perform these mini breaks you should only do them after focusing on a certain task for, say, 25 minutes to maintain productivity and keep procrastination from creeping into your workflow. Then you take a break to let your mind wander and allow your subconscious to use other areas to help gain insight on your overall task.

The following videos from Barbara Oakley explain it a lot better. She also explains why multitasking is not good for focused mode thinking.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Google Talk (1 hour)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

TEDx Talk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

It has to do with focused and diffused modes of the brain. In focused mode, you're using neuro pathways that are already established to perform a task you already know how to do. Diffused mode is where you're trying to subconsciously use untapped areas of your brain to gain that creative ah-ha moment to do something you've not done before. Most people can't be in both modes at the same time, much like optical illusions where you can't discern two different pictures superimposed in the same image. https://upload.wikimedia.org/w...

While you need to perform these mini breaks you should only do them after focusing on a certain task for, say, 25 minutes to maintain productivity and keep procrastination from creeping into your workflow. Then you take a break to let your mind wander and allow your subconscious to use other areas to help gain insight on your overall task.

The following videos from Barbara Oakley explain it a lot better. She also explains why multitasking is not good for focused mode thinking.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Google Talk (1 hour)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

TEDx Talk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Why not both ?

As an aside, can you imagine the unholy shitstorm that would be making the rounds if any of this were happening to Apple ?

Exploding iPhones... The internet might not cope with that, and then Apple bribing people to keep quiet about the whole thing ? We might have a singularity event...

Look at what those fuckers from Apple have done. https://www.youtube.com/watch?... A man's new iphone 7, caught on fire, and burnt this Jeep up. Rumors it was caused by the lack of a headphone jack.

Oh silly me, I was wrong, it was a Galaxy Note 7.

you'd think the same if you just googled the blogs yourself

While the far left spouts their own brand of bullshit, they rarely work this hard to tear down every reputable source that disagrees. Why is that?

Yes you do. You just said you don't trust the evil right-wing blogs. Who exactly do you think is going to bother compiling evidence that left-wing fact-checking sites are biased? Left-wingers? Of course not! So if I linked to a site exposing the bias of Politifact, you'd just dismiss it and attack the source, which would necessarily be right-wing. So why bother? You've already made up your mind.

Just for the hell of it though, this is the kind of crap that annoys us: Bernie Sanders' statistic on black, Hispanic unemployment has merit, but may be out of date: Mostly True

Trump misleadingly puts black youth unemployment rate at 59 percent: Mostly False

Unemployment statistics are notoriously flaky because of the definition of "unemployed." Both men took liberties with the numbers to make a point: that lots of minorities are not working and need help. But when Bernie does it his numbers "have merit" and are "mostly true." When Trump does it he's "misleading" and "mostly false." Fuck you politifact.

Barack Obama issued a decree "demanding that every public school now allow grown men and boys into the little girls’ bathroom." False. And why is it false? Because Transgender boys aren't girls. Fuck you politifact.

They do this kind of biased garbage, or just cherry-pick which claims they're going to examine. Ignore Hillary's lies/screw-ups, only "fact check" her true statements. Ignore Trump's true statements. Only "fact check" his lies/screw-ups. Then use these biased results for propaganda. "According to unbiased politifact, everything Trump says is a lie but Queen Hillary tells the truth!" Bull shit.

While the far left spouts their own brand of bullshit, they rarely work this hard to tear down every reputable source that disagrees. Why is that?

Yes they do. The very first attack the left goes for when presented with an alternative viewpoint is ad hominem, attack the source, discredit, defame, poison the well, muddy the waters. Breitbart could have a perfectly well-sourced, factual article, but no leftist will read it. "It's Breitbart! Run!"

WikiLeaks reveals DNC corruption. "It's teh ebil Russians don't look WikiLeaks is bad now it's illegal to look also they're fake can't we drone strike this guy?!?!"

O'Keefe puts out his undercover videos showing damning evidence of DNC political operatives inciting riots, commiting violence, staging violence, and committing voter fraud. "Ah mah gerd O'Keefe is discredited his videos were fake!" No they weren't. Yeah, he edited them for humor, but the court vindicated his actual points. While he didn't dress up as a pimp while talking to ACORN, he absolutely presented himself as one during the interviews. The content of the undercover video and the conclusions drawn were entirely accurate. But because of a humorous "false" edit he's forever defamed and discredited to the left. Bet they'll keep watching CNN, though. They'd never do anything like that.

Don't give me this "the left doesn't tear down" opposing sources. That's the left's entire arsenal. RACIST SEXIST XENOPHOBE HOMOPHOBE ISLAMOPHOBE LITERALLY DOUBLE MEGA HITLER. Why do you think that is? Is it maybe because any actual scrutiny of the underlying premises of their ideology causes their worldview to fall apart?

I recommend you to study this even more closely, but here are some of the completely unbelievable things in this smear attempt against Assange:

"Their yellowpages site says they have been in business 5 years. http://www.yellowpages.com/hou...
Ok so how many times has this link been shared on reddit? I googled the URL specific to this site, and it's only come up three times. All within the last 24 hours."

"This shady dating site claims to be the "ONLY Dating Site to ever partner with the UN Initiative" (Now that's fucking odd...) AND THEY JUST GOT KICKED OUT OF THE UN FIVE DAYS AGO?!?!"

"Todd Hammonds LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/to... (It's fucking nothing) But it does say he lives in SF. I'm in the Bay Area also, I could pay a visit to offices if we can actually find any legitimate offices...
Their Dating Site Eventbrite page. Only one event for the fastest growing dating website that has married 3,000 people since 2011???
Here is the LinkedIn of "Kate Hogan," this is the person who wrote the "Press Release" about ToddAndClare accusing Assange of sexual misconduct. https://www.linkedin.com/in/ka...
Of course she's got only 1 connection, and no other real information anywhere. Also, the phone number listed in the press release rings twice and then immediately disconnects. But it doesn't give a recording, it just says "call failed" I've never really experienced that. Anyway you'd think that someone who just put out a press release regarding the UN and Assange would have a working phone!
http://www.prweb.com/releases/...
Here's their bullshit subreddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/todda... (No posts in three months)
Here's their weird "book" that they wrote about starting their company 5 years ago. Notice how every review is exactly 189 days old and all are very short and positive. This is shilling no doubt about it. http://www.barnesandnoble.com/..."

"How can their site, registered 20 sep 2015, claim 3000 marriages by November 2 2015? http://m.imgur.com/6BqmZPY https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=..."

"Thanks to /u/ChrissFinn for linking the email from Wikileaks that ToddAndClare originally sent to Assange to get all this started. They offer him $1 million dollars to do some sort of commercial. This is obviously a scam because they don't have a million dollars, they don't even have a legitimate mailing address or working fucking phone numbers! This was a set up from the very beginning!"

" all users images are cropped and mirrored and can be reverse google image searched to other locations. Plus none of the employees seem to exist. Email between Jullian and T&C.com https://wikileaks.org/IMG/pdf/... -Honeypot to get him to accept russian funds and discredit his leaks, failed, so they accused him of pedophilia instead. When searched for. The ToddandClare business location is actually identical to this company "Premise Data Corporation" https://local.yahoo.com/info-1... Here you can view its team page http://www.premise.com/ourteam... Who's board of directors has guess who "Larry Summers" Who goes by "Lawrence Summers" in "The Center for American Progress" Superpac

Rapping children.

This is why spelling is important!

I took credit for having unprotected sex with Jessica Alba.

Sorry, but your cover story isn't holding up.

I can guess what and WHO your Progressive self has really been doing .

And please turn down your Rick James Super Freak.

But why? Why use something other than a grease pen on a white board?

At a minimum, a football team at least also needs a Xerox machine.

Brilliant!

Make a short skit, act it out, take the CC output and redo the skit with the new words.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Don't worry, I actually covered that in a comment to my own submission, which is the first post on this story.

Also, let's linkify that: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

There's actually a much less thoroughly linked or explained version of the story that beat mine. I wonder which one they'll post, if any? I guess I should've quoted the full story, though so it doesn't get burred.

Democrat Operatives Caused Violence at Trump Rallies, Framed Sanders Supporters

A new video has come out detailing how Democratic operatives created violence at Trump rallies. You may remember that they then framed Sanders supporters for those protests. This video is notable because one of the operatives, Zulema Rodriguez, can be identified in videos of the Arizona protests at 17:35 in this independent video as well as at 10:30 in the first video link. Furthermore, you look at the FEC records of disbursements to her and see that she was paid by MoveOn.org. Finally, this again can be corroborated with the Wikileaks dump, specifically this email. For those too lazy to browse all the links, you can see Zulema's appearance in both videos in this image and note that it's the same person down to the tiny mole on her chest.

Sources:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?... - Confession caught on video for Zulema and others.
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/san... - Old news report showing the 'split' between real & fake Sanders supporters.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... - Old video showing this lady at the AZ protests (and lying, etc.)
https://beta.fec.gov/data/disb... - FED disbursement data showing her payments from MoveOn.org
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-... - Wikileaks email regarding the strategy they were using.
https://i.sli.mg/dNBRek.png - A handy image to help you compare her appearance in the confession & the AZ protest videos. Note the same mole on her chest.

There's actually a much less thoroughly linked or explained version of the story that beat mine. I wonder which one they'll post, if any? I guess I should've quoted the full story, though so it doesn't get burred.

Democrat Operatives Caused Violence at Trump Rallies, Framed Sanders Supporters

A new video has come out detailing how Democratic operatives created violence at Trump rallies. You may remember that they then framed Sanders supporters for those protests. This video is notable because one of the operatives, Zulema Rodriguez, can be identified in videos of the Arizona protests at 17:35 in this independent video as well as at 10:30 in the first video link. Furthermore, you look at the FEC records of disbursements to her and see that she was paid by MoveOn.org. Finally, this again can be corroborated with the Wikileaks dump, specifically this email. For those too lazy to browse all the links, you can see Zulema's appearance in both videos in this image and note that it's the same person down to the tiny mole on her chest.

Sources:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?... - Confession caught on video for Zulema and others.
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/san... - Old news report showing the 'split' between real & fake Sanders supporters.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... - Old video showing this lady at the AZ protests (and lying, etc.)
https://beta.fec.gov/data/disb... - FED disbursement data showing her payments from MoveOn.org
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-... - Wikileaks email regarding the strategy they were using.
https://i.sli.mg/dNBRek.png - A handy image to help you compare her appearance in the confession & the AZ protest videos. Note the same mole on her chest.

Why should anyone trust Microsoft? They lie about surveillance, they lie about being "open", they lied about Windows 10 install options, they lied about Windows Tablet having a bigger screen than iPad, they lied to Steve Jobs about their GUI plans in the 80s, etc.

640 lies oughtta be enough for anyone. Ignore them by now.

Just to begin with, they have been working on this for a while...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...