Slashdot Mirror

What I'm afraid of is how they'll handle the challenging mission to depict a growing boy like Will who only has his two sisters and mother around while dealing with adolescent urges. Back in the time of the original series, no one would ever think to talk about something like that. These days, that's all they'll think about.

Eh, what am I thinking... they'll make Will gay and Dr. Smith his lover, which would explain why the others don't kill Smith on about day two or three.

Part 2 of 3

What I'm afraid of is how they'll handle the challenging mission to depict a growing boy like Will who only has his two sisters and mother around while dealing with adolescent urges. Back in the time of the original series, no one would ever think to talk about something like that. These days, that's all they'll think about.

Eh, what am I thinking... they'll make Will gay and Dr. Smith his lover, which would explain why the others don't kill Smith on about day two or three.

Not far off from an idea that was just about on everyone's mind. Years ago, Howard Stern interviewed an adult Billy Mumy with comedian Billy West constantly interrupting with pedo-impersonations of Dr. Smith drooling over fond memories of the actor's childhood days. Mumy said Jonathan Harris understood the humour, but could never be on his program because of it.

Ron Wyden, Oregon

Just curious... How do you blame him for failing to do a job when he was being told bald faced lies? This was the impetus for Snowden's whistle blowing.

Oh god, kill me now.

I'd rather watch reruns of Johnny Quest or Clutch Cargo. Or Speed Racer (the original crappy cartoon), which was the absolute worst piece of shit ever to hit the airwaves.

Clutch Cargo, with Spinner and Paddlefoot! That show creeped me out. no real movement, only superimposed video lips. Maybe it could be used for punishment today.

"If you don't pick up you're room, you're going to have to sit on this couch and watch Clutch Cargo!"

Please - no reboot!

Oh god, kill me now.

I'd rather watch reruns of Johnny Quest or Clutch Cargo. Or Speed Racer (the original crappy cartoon), which was the absolute worst piece of shit ever to hit the airwaves.

Clutch Cargo, with Spinner and Paddlefoot! That show creeped me out. no real movement, only superimposed video lips. Maybe it could be used for punishment today.

"If you don't pick up you're room, you're going to have to sit on this couch and watch Clutch Cargo!"

Please - no reboot!

Oh god, kill me now.

I'd rather watch reruns of Johnny Quest or Clutch Cargo. Or Speed Racer (the original crappy cartoon), which was the absolute worst piece of shit ever to hit the airwaves.

Clutch Cargo, with Spinner and Paddlefoot! That show creeped me out. no real movement, only superimposed video lips. Maybe it could be used for punishment today.

"If you don't pick up you're room, you're going to have to sit on this couch and watch Clutch Cargo!"

Please - no reboot!

I was a little kid when I saw that show, and even then, it was obvious it was a piece of crap.
The bottom of the barrel, we scrape it here.

Yeah, it was dreadful, no two ways about it. It sucked miserably.

What next, "My Mother, the Car"?

Oh god, kill me now.

I'd rather watch reruns of Johnny Quest or Clutch Cargo. Or Speed Racer (the original crappy cartoon), which was the absolute worst piece of shit ever to hit the airwaves.

I was a little kid when I saw that show, and even then, it was obvious it was a piece of crap.
The bottom of the barrel, we scrape it here.

Yeah, it was dreadful, no two ways about it. It sucked miserably.

What next, "My Mother, the Car"?

Oh god, kill me now.

I'd rather watch reruns of Johnny Quest or Clutch Cargo. Or Speed Racer (the original crappy cartoon), which was the absolute worst piece of shit ever to hit the airwaves.

I was a little kid when I saw that show, and even then, it was obvious it was a piece of crap.
The bottom of the barrel, we scrape it here.

Yeah, it was dreadful, no two ways about it. It sucked miserably.

What next, "My Mother, the Car"?

Oh god, kill me now.

I'd rather watch reruns of Johnny Quest or Clutch Cargo. Or Speed Racer (the original crappy cartoon), which was the absolute worst piece of shit ever to hit the airwaves.

Video

If you've never seen it, take a look! Live long and prosper

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

They spy on everyone. Instead of concentrating on real threats they consider everyone a threat.

Close. You are the terrorist. You are the threat. That is why they feel it's necessary to spy on everyone. This "You are a Terrorist (Du bist Terrorist) German, English Subtitles": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdIA0jeW-24

Fear not, the Clintons have made 'getting in on the act' their career. Bill Clinton picked up the neocon script back in 1998, stating that Iraq had WMD and Saddam had to be deposed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Some reading about Hillary's favorite neocons (having become one herself):

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07...
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06...
https://consortiumnews.com/201...

Okay, so you simply think that the Arctic Death Spiral and the Methane Time Bomb is just a bunch of nonsense, that these reportsArctic Methane Emergency Group.

Okay, so you simply think that the Arctic Death Spiral and the Methane Time Bomb is just a bunch of nonsense, that these reportsArctic Methane Emergency Group.

Okay, so you simply think that the Arctic Death Spiral and the Methane Time Bomb is just a bunch of nonsense, that these reportsArctic Methane Emergency Group.

Do you wonder why they bothered to form a group called the Arctic Methane Emergency Group? Just so they could meet and drink tea?
The data presented here is extremely compelling, as is this.

Do you wonder why they bothered to form a group called the Arctic Methane Emergency Group? Just so they could meet and drink tea?
The data presented here is extremely compelling, as is this.

The problem is NOT CO2, it is the Methane that is released from methane hydrates on the sea floor when the Arctic Sea ice melts. Arctic Methane Emergency Group
Arctic Death Spiral and the Methane Time Bomb"
Doomsday 2020: Arctic Methane Melting Now
The Arctic Climate Threat No one is Talking About

The problem is NOT CO2, it is the Methane that is released from methane hydrates on the sea floor when the Arctic Sea ice melts. Arctic Methane Emergency Group
Arctic Death Spiral and the Methane Time Bomb"
Doomsday 2020: Arctic Methane Melting Now
The Arctic Climate Threat No one is Talking About

Oh look, a other muslim apologist getting moded up by the ignorant 'progressive' crowd. How typical.. "The religion is not the problem!", "Islam mean peace and love", "Politician and terrorist are abusing the pure faith of peaceful worshipper", "We need more Islam to counter islamist terrorist!".

I use to believe that crap, but not any more. The longer we tolerate Islam the less peoples will believe it and eventually the West will wake up. It will end horribly because of peoples like you that let the crisis grow that big. We could have avert the inevitable by stopping importing more Muslim immigrant and deporting the bigot we have already. This would have preserve peace. Muslim apologist, like you, that object to simple solution that preserve life and respect individuals are making the upcoming genocide inevitable. Fuck you.

This is your future. If you support that future just say so; I am sure there will be room for you in the boat deporting all these sick fuck to Saudi Arabia.

"If the surveillance programs don't stop terrorist attacks, there's not much use in having them (unless that's not really the reason you want them)."

But that is where you are wrong...

The (mass surveillance) by the NSA and abuse by law enforcement is just more part and parcel of state suppression of dissent against corporate interests. They're worried that the more people are going to wake up and corporate centers like the US and canada may be among those who also awaken. See this vid with Zbigniew Brzezinski, former United States National Security Advisor.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7ZyJw_cHJY

Brezinski at a press conference

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWTIZBCQ79g

Snowden on terrorism/spying.

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/video/2015/sep/25/edward-snowden-treaty-glenn-greenwald-mass-surveillance-terrorism-video

"If the surveillance programs don't stop terrorist attacks, there's not much use in having them (unless that's not really the reason you want them)."

But that is where you are wrong...

The (mass surveillance) by the NSA and abuse by law enforcement is just more part and parcel of state suppression of dissent against corporate interests. They're worried that the more people are going to wake up and corporate centers like the US and canada may be among those who also awaken. See this vid with Zbigniew Brzezinski, former United States National Security Advisor.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7ZyJw_cHJY

Brezinski at a press conference

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWTIZBCQ79g

Snowden on terrorism/spying.

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/video/2015/sep/25/edward-snowden-treaty-glenn-greenwald-mass-surveillance-terrorism-video

Exploiting Emotions About Paris to Blame Snowden, Distract from Actual Culprits Who Empowered ISIS

There is NO "War on Terror"
--

PROTHERO: Do you believe this crap, Dascombe? DASCOMBE: It's not our job to believe it, Lewis. Our job is to tell the people –

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

I don't know who of them is worse.

LOLS.

Can't handle the truth that the DNC has been on the wrong side of EVERY important issue EVERY time. They still are. Look up Dixicrats, >90% of those "conservatives that went to the GOP" as you claimed went back to the DNC for life. Including KKK Grand Cyclops Robert Byrd and Al Gore Sr., both held in high regard by the DNC until their death.

So, your only come back was to "revise history" to make your point and lie. LOL. While complaining about revisionist history. LOL.

Video showing ALL Dixicrats and what party they ended up with. I'm sure if what you said is true it would be trivial for you to show all the Segregationist Dixicrats that went to the GOP. Not sure why they would go there since the GOP was the one that passed the Civil Rights act in the first place.

You lied and got caught. LOL

Seems to me this could help the sport more than hurt it. If the guidance is more visible, it makes it more interesting to spectators. Something that swerves is more fun to watch than something that mostly stays in a straight line.

The problem is you can make rocks do this and this. The thrower is irrelevant on a shot like that since even a moderate sweeper can put the rock wherever they want. The skill and precision of the throwers is the big draw of the sport, along with the sweepers working like crazy to cause a moderate difference. With those brooms you end up turning it into a weird game of chess.

Note that the brooms from that video were never actually released to market, they were just used to spark the controversy as a demonstration of what could be done.

In fact both those brooms and the sweeping technique used were likely illegal under the previous rules.

Seems to me this could help the sport more than hurt it. If the guidance is more visible, it makes it more interesting to spectators. Something that swerves is more fun to watch than something that mostly stays in a straight line.

The problem is you can make rocks do this and this. The thrower is irrelevant on a shot like that since even a moderate sweeper can put the rock wherever they want. The skill and precision of the throwers is the big draw of the sport, along with the sweepers working like crazy to cause a moderate difference. With those brooms you end up turning it into a weird game of chess.

Note that the brooms from that video were never actually released to market, they were just used to spark the controversy as a demonstration of what could be done.

In fact both those brooms and the sweeping technique used were likely illegal under the previous rules.

What's your fondest memory of Bill Gates Blue Screen-of-death that could?

The Olympic one is excellent, though I'd also have to go for the classic demo of Windows 98 which actually had Bill Gates standing right there when it happened.

Bill: "... That must be why we're not shipping Windows 98 yet..."

Absolutely, Bill. Absolutely.

Unfortunately... you did ship that (though 98 wasn't that bad). But then Windows ME. And then Vista. And then Windows 8. You keep doing it.

Sorry for the lengthy post but I've been following this very closely since is started and the media account has been highly misleading so far.

Basically this is largely a controversy involving two companies, BalancePlus (BP), a long established broom manufacturer, and Hardline (HL), a company that's been around for about 5 years and is built around their broom.

Both companies sponsor teams, that's the major way they market equipment since brush effectiveness is really hard to evaluate, so often the only way a club curler will trust a broom is if they know elite curlers are using it.

Hardline's broom was a big step technologically. There's a number of nice features but a couple are the fact it's very light (you can sweep a lot faster), and instead of sweeping with a woven fabric there's a diamond pattern applied to the fabric that seals it against moisture (brooms become less effective when they're wet).

Now no one really heard much of Hardline for the first few years but then last year they sponsored some of the top young teams and a couple of those teams had breakthrough seasons and started winning a lot. It could just be because they were young teams poised for a breakthrough, or it could be because the brooms gave them a huge advantage. Either way a lot of elite curlers started looking at the brooms and thinking they were really good, some decided to try getting Hardline sponsorship, some pushed their own sponsors to design comparable brooms, and others may have started thinking the brooms were too effective and were detracting from the skill of the game.

Now jump to October of this year and people are suddenly talking about a players meeting that happened in Toronto and some agreement among top curlers. Eventually over the next week the news starts leaking out. There was a big World Curling Tour event with a lot of the top teams including those sponsored by both BalancePlus (BP) and Hardline (HL). The BP teams came with a special kind brush that was doing ridiculous things, they could make a rock that would normally curl 6 feet one way fall 4 feet the other way, or make a draw run completely straight, the brooms also destroyed the ice in the process. Everyone present could see that whatever they were using shouldn't be allowed in the sport. Either way the BP teams said they'd stop using their brooms if the HL teams stopped using theirs.

BP then released a statement talking about how they'd been told the HL brooms were doing unnatural things to the rocks, so they investigated and found they used "directional fabric" (no one know what this means). So BP says they did this stunt to show that if they really wanted they could make a broom so effective it would wreck the sport but that they really felt that no one should use directional fabric (this was mixed in with all sorts of shots at the HL broom).

So within a week of this event there was an agreement that the HL sponsored teams would flip their brushing material inside out (it's just a cover with ordinary fabric on the underside). If the diamond pattern was "directional fabric" they'd just have an ordinary fabric. Of course they kept on winning and so people decided it must be something else. This seems to the motivation behind the World Curling Federation ruling that bans the texturing HL used on their fabric (supposedly the "directional fabric") and some other extra modifications to make the brush head firmer.

Here's the problem, there's absolutely no actual evidence that's been presented that the HL brooms are any different than other brushes, the only thing BP released is the two videos of their own demo brooms doing unnatural things. No one has ever shown HL brooms doing the same (and there's a lot of people who have them). In fact they only actual test I've heard of involved two teams trying to sort it out by testing with both brooms at some event. The test finished with both brushes perfor

Sorry for the lengthy post but I've been following this very closely since is started and the media account has been highly misleading so far.

Basically this is largely a controversy involving two companies, BalancePlus (BP), a long established broom manufacturer, and Hardline (HL), a company that's been around for about 5 years and is built around their broom.

Both companies sponsor teams, that's the major way they market equipment since brush effectiveness is really hard to evaluate, so often the only way a club curler will trust a broom is if they know elite curlers are using it.

Hardline's broom was a big step technologically. There's a number of nice features but a couple are the fact it's very light (you can sweep a lot faster), and instead of sweeping with a woven fabric there's a diamond pattern applied to the fabric that seals it against moisture (brooms become less effective when they're wet).

Now no one really heard much of Hardline for the first few years but then last year they sponsored some of the top young teams and a couple of those teams had breakthrough seasons and started winning a lot. It could just be because they were young teams poised for a breakthrough, or it could be because the brooms gave them a huge advantage. Either way a lot of elite curlers started looking at the brooms and thinking they were really good, some decided to try getting Hardline sponsorship, some pushed their own sponsors to design comparable brooms, and others may have started thinking the brooms were too effective and were detracting from the skill of the game.

Now jump to October of this year and people are suddenly talking about a players meeting that happened in Toronto and some agreement among top curlers. Eventually over the next week the news starts leaking out. There was a big World Curling Tour event with a lot of the top teams including those sponsored by both BalancePlus (BP) and Hardline (HL). The BP teams came with a special kind brush that was doing ridiculous things, they could make a rock that would normally curl 6 feet one way fall 4 feet the other way, or make a draw run completely straight, the brooms also destroyed the ice in the process. Everyone present could see that whatever they were using shouldn't be allowed in the sport. Either way the BP teams said they'd stop using their brooms if the HL teams stopped using theirs.

BP then released a statement talking about how they'd been told the HL brooms were doing unnatural things to the rocks, so they investigated and found they used "directional fabric" (no one know what this means). So BP says they did this stunt to show that if they really wanted they could make a broom so effective it would wreck the sport but that they really felt that no one should use directional fabric (this was mixed in with all sorts of shots at the HL broom).

So within a week of this event there was an agreement that the HL sponsored teams would flip their brushing material inside out (it's just a cover with ordinary fabric on the underside). If the diamond pattern was "directional fabric" they'd just have an ordinary fabric. Of course they kept on winning and so people decided it must be something else. This seems to the motivation behind the World Curling Federation ruling that bans the texturing HL used on their fabric (supposedly the "directional fabric") and some other extra modifications to make the brush head firmer.

Here's the problem, there's absolutely no actual evidence that's been presented that the HL brooms are any different than other brushes, the only thing BP released is the two videos of their own demo brooms doing unnatural things. No one has ever shown HL brooms doing the same (and there's a lot of people who have them). In fact they only actual test I've heard of involved two teams trying to sort it out by testing with both brooms at some event. The test finished with both brushes perfor

Or use a $600 CNC router to mill and drill a PCB.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=na9-USi_hZQ

Does that mean they can keep up my videos that don't violate copyright without me having to do anything?

Bomb dogs are a much greater threat than horses: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Yes none of this generations systems has any significant backwards compatibility.

Yes see;
http://www.techeblog.com/index...

and

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

No but Sony and Microsoft seem to think we are.

Or Jeremy Clarkson

Here, wiseass. Don't come back unless you have scientifically based evidence refuting what is in that video, which consists of dozens of actual scientists giving their evidence. Now, personally from your fellow human, I can tell you to fuck off and die.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

And NASCAR demands that all the cars be about as identical as possible, giving rise to the 200 mph traffic jam effect. Yeah, that's fun.

What are you whining about? Looks fun to me.

Fun, like taste in music, is in the eyes of the beerholder.

Case in point: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

So no, the "mohammedic brutalism" will not be carried with them - they've seen what life under a Caliphate is like and they want the hell out of there.

The problem with this, is their children or grandchildren will fall right back into blowing people up and sawing heads off in their new countries as soon as there is any societal stress, loss of a job, whatever.

The "religion" (more of a death-cult) has that feature built in, it will spontaneously create people willing to die to advance the cause of the death-cult.

What the West Needs to Know This video explains how and why this happens, using the koran as the source along with former guys who were about to blow people up.

Don't give up to the fallacy that Islam is the problem. The problem is that the middle east is a prime location for proxy wars and it happens that Islam is the dominant religion there. Should them have been Christians, Jews or even Buddhists that it wouldn't have been different.

Sorry, islam is the problem. See below. And, you assertion that buddists and Christians would do this stuff is a flat out bold faced lie. Yes, we all know there were abortion bombings, but when was the last time christians sawed off someone's head, burned them alive, threw them off a building because they were homosexuals? Do christians take sex slaves? Beat their wives, separate their females because they are dirty and mutilate their female children? For muzzies, that was _last_week_ if not today. You are going to have to dig around for a while to find cases of other religions doing that, and when you do find them, it'll be a few, and far between and a long time ago.

1400 Year Secret

What the West Needs to Know

The Myth that Radicals are a Minority in islam

Don't give up to the fallacy that Islam is the problem. The problem is that the middle east is a prime location for proxy wars and it happens that Islam is the dominant religion there. Should them have been Christians, Jews or even Buddhists that it wouldn't have been different.

Sorry, islam is the problem. See below. And, you assertion that buddists and Christians would do this stuff is a flat out bold faced lie. Yes, we all know there were abortion bombings, but when was the last time christians sawed off someone's head, burned them alive, threw them off a building because they were homosexuals? Do christians take sex slaves? Beat their wives, separate their females because they are dirty and mutilate their female children? For muzzies, that was _last_week_ if not today. You are going to have to dig around for a while to find cases of other religions doing that, and when you do find them, it'll be a few, and far between and a long time ago.

1400 Year Secret

What the West Needs to Know

The Myth that Radicals are a Minority in islam

Don't give up to the fallacy that Islam is the problem. The problem is that the middle east is a prime location for proxy wars and it happens that Islam is the dominant religion there. Should them have been Christians, Jews or even Buddhists that it wouldn't have been different.

Sorry, islam is the problem. See below. And, you assertion that buddists and Christians would do this stuff is a flat out bold faced lie. Yes, we all know there were abortion bombings, but when was the last time christians sawed off someone's head, burned them alive, threw them off a building because they were homosexuals? Do christians take sex slaves? Beat their wives, separate their females because they are dirty and mutilate their female children? For muzzies, that was _last_week_ if not today. You are going to have to dig around for a while to find cases of other religions doing that, and when you do find them, it'll be a few, and far between and a long time ago.

1400 Year Secret

What the West Needs to Know

The Myth that Radicals are a Minority in islam

The problem is that the middle east is a prime location for proxy wars and it happens that Islam is the dominant religion there.

No, it's not a case of "it happens that Islam", because these wars are waged in the name of Islam. Hey, even imams in Europe preach hatred against others.

Close, but not quite there.

Not in name of islam. "islam" means "submit" as in you submit, and you go kill those that don't submit.

islam IS war.

Here:

1400 Year Secret

What the West Needs to Know

The Myth that Radicals are a Minority in islam

The problem is that the middle east is a prime location for proxy wars and it happens that Islam is the dominant religion there.

No, it's not a case of "it happens that Islam", because these wars are waged in the name of Islam. Hey, even imams in Europe preach hatred against others.

Close, but not quite there.

Not in name of islam. "islam" means "submit" as in you submit, and you go kill those that don't submit.

islam IS war.

Here:

1400 Year Secret

What the West Needs to Know

The Myth that Radicals are a Minority in islam

The problem is that the middle east is a prime location for proxy wars and it happens that Islam is the dominant religion there.

No, it's not a case of "it happens that Islam", because these wars are waged in the name of Islam. Hey, even imams in Europe preach hatred against others.

Close, but not quite there.

Not in name of islam. "islam" means "submit" as in you submit, and you go kill those that don't submit.

islam IS war.

Here:

1400 Year Secret

What the West Needs to Know

The Myth that Radicals are a Minority in islam

From your referenced article "The ISIS economy and its fighters predominantly rely on the production and sale of seized energy assets"

Which begs the question of why they still have ANY drilling or production capability at this point, as rigs and refineries are stable, visible targets.

"Grossing as much as $40 million or more over the past two years, ISIS has accepted funding from government or private sources in the oil-rich nations of Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Kuwait—and a large network of private donors, including Persian Gulf royalty, businessmen and wealthy families."

Which leads to another question of if we know this, we do we not take action against said donors and the countries allowing it to happen (Qatar and Kuwait, according to the same article)?

The answer is this. Lots of people in power (both money, and politics) want it to happen.

You can't create a socialist state if people are happy, content, and capable of defending themselves. You have to make them defenseless by martial law, regular laws, and through fear. The fastest way to do that is have the excuse of fear.

Our president is a sniveling, groveling, bitch. There is no spine to come from anywhere. For the next several years, get used to the fact that islam and other bullshit will run rampant in Eurasia and Africa.

Lastly, there's a particularly big problem with islam in that the average young liberal pansy on the street has no clue and is willfully ignorant of what islam is.

1400 Year Secret

What the West Needs to Know

The Myth that Radicals are a Minority in islam

From your referenced article "The ISIS economy and its fighters predominantly rely on the production and sale of seized energy assets"

Which begs the question of why they still have ANY drilling or production capability at this point, as rigs and refineries are stable, visible targets.

"Grossing as much as $40 million or more over the past two years, ISIS has accepted funding from government or private sources in the oil-rich nations of Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Kuwait—and a large network of private donors, including Persian Gulf royalty, businessmen and wealthy families."

Which leads to another question of if we know this, we do we not take action against said donors and the countries allowing it to happen (Qatar and Kuwait, according to the same article)?

The answer is this. Lots of people in power (both money, and politics) want it to happen.

You can't create a socialist state if people are happy, content, and capable of defending themselves. You have to make them defenseless by martial law, regular laws, and through fear. The fastest way to do that is have the excuse of fear.

Our president is a sniveling, groveling, bitch. There is no spine to come from anywhere. For the next several years, get used to the fact that islam and other bullshit will run rampant in Eurasia and Africa.

Lastly, there's a particularly big problem with islam in that the average young liberal pansy on the street has no clue and is willfully ignorant of what islam is.

1400 Year Secret

What the West Needs to Know

The Myth that Radicals are a Minority in islam

From your referenced article "The ISIS economy and its fighters predominantly rely on the production and sale of seized energy assets"

Which begs the question of why they still have ANY drilling or production capability at this point, as rigs and refineries are stable, visible targets.

"Grossing as much as $40 million or more over the past two years, ISIS has accepted funding from government or private sources in the oil-rich nations of Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Kuwait—and a large network of private donors, including Persian Gulf royalty, businessmen and wealthy families."

Which leads to another question of if we know this, we do we not take action against said donors and the countries allowing it to happen (Qatar and Kuwait, according to the same article)?

The answer is this. Lots of people in power (both money, and politics) want it to happen.

You can't create a socialist state if people are happy, content, and capable of defending themselves. You have to make them defenseless by martial law, regular laws, and through fear. The fastest way to do that is have the excuse of fear.

Our president is a sniveling, groveling, bitch. There is no spine to come from anywhere. For the next several years, get used to the fact that islam and other bullshit will run rampant in Eurasia and Africa.

Lastly, there's a particularly big problem with islam in that the average young liberal pansy on the street has no clue and is willfully ignorant of what islam is.

1400 Year Secret

What the West Needs to Know

The Myth that Radicals are a Minority in islam