Slashdot Mirror


Caldera Prices Its IPO

A reader writes, "Caldera has priced its IPO. See here in Wideopen for what little there is to read about it. " Summary: $7-9 expected range of price, while selling 5 million shares. Update: 02/26 01:31 by R : Slightly deeper story at News.com.

129 comments

  1. Looks like everyone and their mother by Pfhor · · Score: 0

    Is doing the IPO biz. Caldera makes a great Business distro of linux (OpenLinux) that is easy and simple to install, and it lets you play tetris during the install process.
    My dad is actually running.
    BTW, 1st post

    1. Re:Looks like everyone and their mother by Pfhor · · Score: 1

      Sorry, My dad is actually running it on his old packard bell, was too excited about being a 1st post to finish.
      Hopefully this will bring in some nice cash for Caldera, to work on making a great distro for people such as my dad, who wants to run linux, but is still a little intimidated by the debian install process.

  2. hmmm.... by Issue9mm · · Score: 2

    So that means it'll open to the public at what... $30? I'd really like to purchase some of this, but I don't really see it happening (not by fault of them, but by my own. Same reason I don't own any RedHat or VA).

    Well, Just realized that my first sentence was the only relevant thought I had on the matter, so, I'll just take this time to congratulate them, and wish them a very well IPO.

  3. Nothing Compared To by OpenSpace · · Score: 2

    This is noting compared to linux-pets.com's expected price.

  4. Better link w/more info by Brento · · Score: 4

    For a more in-depth look at the IPO, click here for IPO.com's filing.

    --
    What's your damage, Heather?
  5. Slightly off: the icon by vanza · · Score: 1

    I don't know you guys, but when I look the icon created for Caldera, it reminds me much more of Disney than Caldera...

    Look, the blue part catches my attention immediately, and it looks so much like Mickey's ear. =)

    (This must be the result of working saturday mornings... my brain does not work properly in this period.)


    --
    Marcelo Vanzin
    --
    Marcelo Vanzin
    1. Re:Slightly off: the icon by Brento · · Score: 1

      I thought it was an amusing cross between Corel and Disney the first time I saw it, as if Mickey is leaning over into the C in Corel.

      --
      What's your damage, Heather?
  6. Moderators! by ubertroll · · Score: 0

    M o d e r a t o r s , I l o v e you . Ple a s e m o d e r a t e m e d o w n . A n d t ell m e: W h e r e' s th e h i g h s co r e li s t f o r neg a t i v e ka rm a?

  7. The rise and fall of the Linux IPO by Brento · · Score: 5

    Have you checked the stock prices on Linux stocks lately? Sure, a lot of people who got in quick made a great buck, but anybody who bought after the first month is really getting clobbered.

    RedHat - opened at $7, rocketed to $151, now $68.
    VA Linux - opened at $30, rocketed to $320, now at $113.
    Cobalt - opened at $22, rocketed to $172, now $104.

    This sends a message to Wall Street - get in fast on Linux IPO's, and then dump them on the unwitting public. It also sends a subliminal message about Linux as a whole - that it's not a long-term option, only a short-term one. (I'm not saying I agree, but that's the subliminal message.)

    --
    What's your damage, Heather?
    1. Re:The rise and fall of the Linux IPO by mangu · · Score: 3
      Actually, RedHat reached a peak of $300. I think the prices you mention are averages. And the actual price for the public at the opening was around $45. But, anyway, buying at $45 and selling less than a year later for $68 is not so bad.

      In the end it boils down to dividends. You can't live on buying low and selling high, in the long run you'll take losses as well as gains. These huge initial gains and later losses are typical of all hi-tech papers, Yahoo and Amazon have similar price histories. But if those companies keep year after year of steady losses and no dividends there's no way their prices will ever go up again.

    2. Re:The rise and fall of the Linux IPO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Red Hat went up to over $300/share, dropped to around $280/share, then split. The $68/share value is for a split stock. If you want to get an unsplit value, it's actually $136/share.

      VA is hovering around $120/share. By hovering, I mean it's stabilized. Stabilizing at a value that high is not a bad thing. People who got in on the IPO are still $90/share ahead at that price.

      Cobalt? To be honest, of all the Linux stocks I'd have to say I'm least interested in Cobalt. I'm glad they're doing well, but I think their business is a big yawn. I think devices like Qubes and Raqs are fads (especially Qubes), and tiny embedded systems are actually the wave of the future. I hope Cobalt does well before this market hits, though. It's just now getting a lot of attention, so...

    3. Re:The rise and fall of the Linux IPO by lnovak · · Score: 1

      As you say, if you got in quick you made a great buck. Those who bought for the long term play still have time to do so.

      I sure everyone here believes in the long term viability of these companies.

      --
      suffering from pronoia
    4. Re:The rise and fall of the Linux IPO by evilquaker · · Score: 1
      Two corrections:

      1. VA Linux priced at $30, but started trading at $300. It hit an intra-day high of $320 on its first day of trading.
      2. RedHat split 2:1 on Jan. 10. It's actual peak was around $300 in early December. In addition, as late as November (it IPO'ed in August (?)), it was trading for less than $50 (split-adjusted).

        You can see all of the details at: Yahoo!.

      --
      To within half a percent, pi seconds is a nanocentury. -- Tom Duff
    5. Re:The rise and fall of the Linux IPO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also remember that RedHat stock has split already so it is effectively twice the value it is currently trading at. That is for those who already owned stock anyway

    6. Re:The rise and fall of the Linux IPO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually redhat has split, so you have to multiply by 2 to compare its present price to its IPO price.

    7. Re:The rise and fall of the Linux IPO by Jeff+Knox · · Score: 1

      It does not boil down to dividends. Thats idiotic. Personally, if they decide to pay me 5 cents a share dividends based on , say, they make 15cents a share, I would have to have millions of shares for it to be worth anything. And then it wouldnt be very much at all, like 50K, thats nothing to someone with that much shares. And yes, you can live on buying low and selling high, thast the only way to make money. I could of sold LNUX at 131 or so a two days ago, and bougt back like 110. Thats is 21 x However many shares I have. Thats where the money is made, certainly not on dividends.

      --
      Jeff Knox
    8. Re:The rise and fall of the Linux IPO by osu-neko · · Score: 1
      But, anyway, buying at $45 and selling less than a year later for $68 is not so bad.

      Especially when you remember the stock split, so if you bought 100 shares at $45 then, you'd be selling 200 shares at $68 now.

      --

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    9. Re:The rise and fall of the Linux IPO by Animats · · Score: 2
      RedHat - opened at $7, rocketed to $151, now $68.
      VA Linux - opened at $30, rocketed to $320, now at $113.
      Cobalt - opened at $22, rocketed to $172, now $104.

      All three of those Linux stocks peaked around December, and are now tanking. So Wall Street seems to think that the Linux fad is over. That was quick.

      The Caldera IPO is somewhat less ambitious, but it's still one of those "we're selling a few percent of the company but want more for it than we're now worth." deals. There are over 20 million shares of Caldera around, and they're selling about 5 million. Noorda will still own a majority of the stock after the IPO.

    10. Re:The rise and fall of the Linux IPO by elflord · · Score: 2
      In the end it boils down to dividends.

      Take a look at how the S&P and the Dow Jones have been doing recently. Take a look at how the perofrmance of these indices compare to dividend yields of dividend stocks-- how many companies can you name with a dividend yield of more than 5% ? Many dividend stocks do not perform much better than savings accounts if you only consider the dividend yields. Something like an index fund ( or any solid mutual fund ) will not only have a modest dividend yield but also have some growth. What this tells us is that if the average Joe sticks money into a diversidied portfolio ( or mutual fund ), the chances are that they will make money.

      However it's important to invest in companies with a good business model ( not like Redhat ). Companies that don't and wont turn operating profits are simply put, bubbles. On the other hand, promising companies that are experiencing steady earnings growth can make good investments, dividend or no dividend.

      live on buying low and selling high, in the long run you'll take losses as well as gains.

      Yes, but if you gain on average, then that's not a problem. If you're talking about day trading, then I agree. However, there is a case to be made for investing in growth stocks with solid financial performance and a good business strategy.

      These huge initial gains and later losses are typical of all hi-tech papers, Yahoo and Amazon have similar price histories.

      These companies have poor financial records. One needs to consider not just possible stock increase -- it's important also to check that the price increases are driven by earnings increases and not hype. In the case of internet bubble stocks, the companies not only aren't experiencing solid earnings growth, they aren't even able to run at an operating profit.

  8. Did anybody get the letter yet? by cyberdonny · · Score: 1

    .

    1. Re:Did anybody get the letter yet? by psycho-r-us · · Score: 1

      just the Employees - doesn't seem that the rest of the crowd has seen anything / or heard of any e-mail creeping into their box . . I haven't seen a thing .. but that doesn't mean a thing.. RHAT & LNUX shares were hard to come by . . . but well worth the hassle .. matched wits with the brokers, and I prevailed..

  9. You're wrong... these are typical situations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    The market responded appropriately... most IPO's
    are hype and eventually the market finds an
    appropriate level. VA popped at a ridiculously
    overvalued level and quickly came down to earth.

  10. Caldera is a bad investment - here's why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    They are going to go down in flames with Lineo.
    Caldera is too closely associated with the
    intellectual property folks to be taken seriously.

    No, they're not as bad as Linux One, but they are
    still a generally suspicious group of people.

    However, they do a great job of integrating with
    Novell networks.

    1. Re:Caldera is a bad investment - here's why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before playing armchair lawyer next time, try to read the documents you're obviously alluding to (the GPL, for instance). There is nothing wrong with IP as long as it does not violate existing licenses. Lineo is not violating anything. They're providing a service (alterations to O/Ses for embedded systems are not trivial; if you were doing the work, you'd want some compensation as well), they're keeping the free portions free, and they're making their own plug-ins proprietary. That's legal.

      You probably wouldn't know what to do with Lineo's extensions to the Linux kernel anyway. (And what about the open source stuff they're doing, like that Box thing and the tiny login that Eric Anderson mentioned a few days back? Seems to me they're giving back to Linux.)

    2. Re:Caldera is a bad investment - here's why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      However, they do a great job of integrating with Novell networks.

      I was working for an orginization that is largely a Novell shop that was looking to integrate Linux into the mix. Caldera and RedHat where both evaluted. Some interesting points came up:

      • RedHat provided a convent way to choose the IPX frame type. Caldera OpenLinux defaulted to an incorrect IPX frame type and spit out a continual stream of errors to the console. The rc scripts had to be modified by hand to fix this.
      • Integrating authenitication to NDS via the PAM module (take your pick: Netware, LDAP or RADIUS) was easiest with RedHat. The material was already available in a precompiled format for RedHat. Caldera OpenLinux didn't provide anything for authenticating to OpenLinux via Netware passwords. To make matters worse, the much smaller Caldera user base doesn't seem to provide much in the way of third party binaries which where compiled and tested specifically with OpenLinux libraries.
      • Netware for Linux sucked in performance and has not been maintained. The NDS support in Caldera's Netware for Linux is badly out of date and tends to be the scape goat for DS related problems when calling Novell for support. Hence, Netware for Linux is best run in it's own independent and out-dated DS v6 tree. Also, once you remove the NDS advantage to Caldera Netware for Linux since it's NDS support sucks, it has not advantage in comparison to the MARS Netware emulator that ships with RedHat. MARS has both a performance and open-source advantages over the Caldera product.
      • Novell's DDNS/DHCP product is administored via a Java application much the same as ConsoleOne. But the install program for the Java application is a Win32 application. Neither Novell or Caldera has made any effort to make such platform independant administration pieces easier to install on Linux. There is no advantage to Caldera over RedHat in attempting to get Novell Java applications running on Linux.
      • The Linux 2.2 kernel already has NDS authenication support and Linux 2.4 continues to improve on this. The standard kernel support is available under open source and can continue to improve via peer review by the open source community. Caldera has kept even it's nkfs kernel module in secret for a long time causing customers to be locked into the specific kernel version that Caldera provides to take advantage of Caldera's Novell support. While Caldera has gotten around to releasing the nkfs kernel module source code, it remains so poorly documented that improving it would be more work the doing a complette rewrite.
      There are also other issues not related to Novell that make OpenLinux a very poor choice:

      • RedHat has been quick to respond to CERT advisories. OpenLinux has been on a slow maintaince schedule. Even security issues are left unresolved for weeks. Customers who subscribed to Caldera's yearly software maintance found their quarterly update CDs to always arrive months after the expected release dates.
      • RedHat honors it's software maintance agreements. Caldera provided a year long software maintance agreement which was supposed to cover ALL updates (both major or minor) over the entire year which was started with the orginization in October of 1998. When Caldera released OpenLinux v2.3 in September of 1999, they declaired all yearly maintaince agreements to be expired and did not ship the v2.3 update in accordance to the maintaince agreement license they authored.
      • Caldera has a reputation of being a poor player with the open source community. One of the horror stories was Caldera's "commitment" to contributing to the WINE project be short lived when they gain rights to distribute WABI. The contributions that they told the WINE members they would provide where never released. (And their support of WABI was not all that great either, even declairing all those running X servers in 16-bit mode to be unsupported).

      With all the advances the Linux community is making on their own, Caldera is loosing all compettive edge. One of the very few right moves done by Caldera Systems was declairing the Caldera would provide support for Netware for Linux running on RedHat. If they dropped OpenLinux and focused providing *REAL* support for product offering to be run on the commerically recognized distributions (RedHat, SuSE, TurboLinux, etc) then they might be worth re-investigating. As it stands right now, their ability to support OpenLinux is lacking and their ability to deal with other Linux offerings seem to be suffering along with it.

  11. Split adjusted! by cyberdonny · · Score: 3
    > Actually, RedHat reached a peak of $300. I think the prices you mention are averages.

    Nope. Brento's prices are adjusted for the split that happened in early January. Those $45 were before the split and would be $22.5 split adjusted. Thus, even at today's pricing, that's still the triple!

    > In the end it boils down to dividends...But if those companies keep year after year of steady losses and no dividends there's no way their prices will ever go up again.

    Actually, not quite true either. There is one (in)famous company which never paid any dividends, but nevertheless gained value year after year. Yes, it is indeed that company that we all love to hate...

    1. Re:Split adjusted! by SimonK · · Score: 2

      In general fast growing companies are not expected to pay dividends. The stock market prefers them to invest the money instead, in the expectation of future profits.

      In practice, paying dividends is getting increasingly rare across the board.You could interpret this either as an indication of a very rapidly growing economy or an insane stock market.

  12. COBT = great daytrading stock by cyberdonny · · Score: 1
    > Cobalt? To be honest, of all the Linux stocks I'd have to say I'm least interested in Cobalt. I'm glad they're doing well, but I think their business is a big yawn.

    Cobalt is a great daytrading stock. I bought some end of January for 75 1/16, left for a skying holiday, and back home, I sold them for 120 1/8 ;-). Right now, it occasionnally drops back to 100 only to come back to 120 the day after. Great ride!

  13. Caldera sux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I unfortunately bought their dumb box. The support was no help at all, they just referred me to hyperlinks I had already read and that did not help. You have to buy their stupid books to figure anything out if the install program doesn't do everything right (the manual they send is as worthless as the manual that comes with M$ windows). Big waste of money, but I was a newbie who bought the press about how easy it installs, and I wanted to get up and running fast. Oh well, now I know better and I learned a lot about Linux trying to figure their crap out.

    1. Re:Caldera sux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess you would have learned a lot more with one of the other distributions given that Caldera's OpenLinux is RECOGNIZED as one of the most newbie friendly Linux products around!

    2. Re:Caldera sux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, I would have, eg. what's in the O'Reilly books much more closely matches Red Hat than OpenLinux. Caldera is great if the installation works flawlessly and you don't ever want to change anything (ie., you want a M$ Windows type experience).

  14. Caldera's Revenue is Flat, Not a Good Sign by jonathansamuel · · Score: 3
    According to an article on CNET
    Caldera Systems had revenue of $553,000 for the quarter ended Jan. 31, 2000, a slight increase over the $538,000 garnered in the same quarter a year ago, the company said.
    The market values Linux companies highly because they are supposed to be experiencing massive revenue growth. But Caldera has hardly grown at all in the past year, if this statistic is any indication.
    --

    Marjo Wycam, Master of the Programming Arts
    1. Re:Caldera's Revenue is Flat, Not a Good Sign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to look closer at the numbers. I just looked at their revised S-1 (I'm hoping to get in on the IPO :) and found some things that could explain this.

      First off, the quarter ended just before the release date of a new product. I would imagine people who knew about the release of this product (eServer) and wanted OpenLinux would wait until the product was released. Besides, the buzz is that another product (a desktop one) is soon to be released as well. Considering that the money last year came from a new product and the "flat" income this year came at the end of a product's life, I'd say that's not too bad.

      Also, the revenue (according to the S-1) shifted noticeably from retail to services. Seeing as how they're moving in a service direction (like all Linux companies are), this shows positive growth in the area they're getting into. Also not too bad.

      Sure, the numbers are still low, but there are qualifications to the numbers that must be looked at. Just like with the recent VA disclosure, looking at the face value of the numbers can be misleading.

      Just my $0.02.

  15. VC's dump most IPO shares on FIRST DAY by rambone · · Score: 2

    This is why you see things like all of Amazon's stock changing hands four times in its first week. The VC's get in at prices you wouldn't believe and get out before you can even place a trade.

    1. Re:VC's dump most IPO shares on FIRST DAY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the underwriters usually impose a 180 day lockout on the VCs and execs. Those early trades are usually DSP and some corporate investors. The price volatility that occurs is because there is often only a small supply of the shares available to trade.

    2. Re:VC's dump most IPO shares on FIRST DAY by Kit+Cosper · · Score: 2
      Actually this is not at all true.

      All early investors and employees are bound by a lockup agreement. The underwriters demand
      this as a condition of their participation in the IPO.

      This keeps the market from being flooded from the outset.

      Generally the VC firms pass their stock back to the investors in the VC funds, who tend to hold
      things long-term. The initial activity on an IPO is simply people flipping the stock back and forth
      trying to maximize their gain.

      Red Hat's lockup period just ended, which is a likely contributor to the recent slide from the mid 90's
      to the 68.5 that it closed at yesterday. VA just released earnings last week that were misinterpreted
      on several fronts. You can see the details on the investor relations page.

      The stock market is a complex beast and doesn't lend itself to simple or absolute explainations.

      --Kit

      --
      Former Inmate, VA Linux Sanitarium
  16. Re:Yesterday the Nation Wept. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess it's okay to assume someone speaks your language when you make the decision to shoot them.

  17. Caldera, or Mickey Mouse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Look at that logo. If you see the 'C' as background rather than foreground, then the inside of the 'C' looks like Mickey Mouse's right ear, with the rest of his face disappearing over the horizion. Seriously! That logo says one thing to me, and one thing only: Disney World Domination.

  18. That logo... by Tim+Behrendsen · · Score: 3

    Does anyone else see a partial Micky Mouse painted on a globe whenever they see that logo?

    Given Disney's litigiousness, I predict a future lawsuit. :)


    --

    1. Re:That logo... by dwdyer · · Score: 1

      YES! I replied to this thread only for that reason! I tried to figure out why the Masters of Slashdot used a Disney logo, and it took about a solid minute of staring at it before I saw the "C". It's eerie.

      --
      -dwd-
    2. Re:That logo... by Otter · · Score: 2

      Yes!

      It reminds me of the Mickey Mouse o n the side of blue G3's that spurred the constant rumors of an Apple/Disney merger. I assume the arrival of the G4 put an end to that.

    3. Re:That logo... by osu-neko · · Score: 1
      Does anyone else see a partial Micky Mouse painted on a globe whenever they see that logo?

      ARGH!!! I didn't, until you mentioned it! Now that's what I see every time I glance at it, and I hate Disney! Thanks a lot...

      --

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    4. Re:That logo... by Northern+Hunter · · Score: 1

      That's a 'C'?!?!

      Ooohhhh yeah.... I guess so. But the 'reflection' in it's upper right quadrant makes me think it's a spherical 3d shape, and so a 'flat C' gets translated into a red ocean around a blue continent. It doesn't make sense to have a 'flatish' C 'on' a spherical object.

      I think they should have gone with another graphics arts firm to come up with a logo. Even after all this, their logo doesn't "speak" to me.

      Heyyyy! Is that a 'G' in the Gnome logo? I never noticed that before.. :)

    5. Re:That logo... by Spunk · · Score: 1
      Absolutely ...

      I thought it was Mickey at first, and only after clicking on it did I realize that it was a letter C.

    6. Re:That logo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone else see Sam of Sam and Max hiding in the lower shadow in the G3 picture?

    7. Re:That logo... by joshy · · Score: 1

      actually, i once walked through a disney Imagineering hallway and saw a picture of a water atom that they had blown up. it looked just like Mickey with the large oxygen atom in the middle and the two H's as ears! perhaps disney is going to claim copyright on 2/3 of the world's surface now.

      --
      Prop me up beside the jukebox if I die.
  19. Disney World Domination - stock market by ch-chuck · · Score: 2

    is what it looked like to me, yes it does.

    In related matters, it may be a not so good time for IPO's, the market in general appears to have peaked around last Dec., and economists are talking about 'soft landings' again - don't think I've heard that for several years. And I can't beleive Greenspan said he sees "no sign of inflation" with a straight face - he obviously doesn't pump his own gas into the limo! When they worry about price rises and jack up interest rates bonds perform better than stocks.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    1. Re:Disney World Domination - stock market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it seems to be only the Dow that's slowing (read: brick-and-mortar). . .the Nasdaq (tech-heavy) ain't doing bad at all. in fact, the nasdaq has made similar gains to Dow's losses since December. people are still pouring money into these guys.

    2. Re:Disney World Domination - stock market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And I can't beleive Greenspan said he sees "no sign of inflation" with a straight face - he obviously doesn't pump his own gas into the limo!

      Gas prices are up because oil prices are up, and oil prices are up because of OPEC. What economists worry about are wage-price spirals, which we are almost definitely not seeing now.

      -cwk.

  20. Somewhat related news by spaceorb · · Score: 2

    Due to Caldera's distant relationship with Novell, I thought it would be worthwhile to point out that they are rele asing NDS and GroupWise for Linux. I think something like this could hype up the value of Caldera and RedHat stocks, and might offer these companies some way to actually make money.

  21. This is why caldera scares me by dieman · · Score: 2

    Its a Disney logo in disguise! check here AHHHHH!

    --
    -- dieman - Scott Dier
  22. The only word anybody heard was "gun" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1


    The police claim to have said something, but nobody still alive remembers hearing it, except for the four guys who were trying to talk their way out of prison.

    The "shouted" part is your own interpolation, trying to make your story sound better even as you were writing it. Typical logic: "My version of events must be true; if it were not, I'd be a jackass, and that's unacceptable. Therefore, anything which tends to support my version must be true, so if I make stuff up, I'm really just 'remembering' facts that I haven't heard yet". Or something like that.

    It's a shame you feel you have to resort to this bullshit, because the reason they started shooting was actually close enough to common sense that it convinced a jury: Diallo started pulling out his wallet (a mistake, but not bizarre or stupid: Most of us keep ID in our wallets). One of the cops slipped and fell, quite accidentally and nothing to do with Diallo. Meanwhile, one of the cops mistook Diallo's wallet for a gun (in classroom demonstrations of human perceptions under stress, people have mistaken bananas for guns) and yelled "gun". At the same time, of course, another of the cops was falling, and the rest put 0.9 and 0.7 together and got 2. The cops' story, and it is a plausible one, was that it was a coincidence and bad judgement in a tense situation, and they fucked up. Myself, I happen to think their perception of potential danger may have been considerably greater than it needed to have been, due to the fact that Diallo was black. I could be wrong about that, but I've known a couple of NYPD officers, one of them (a close relative) quite well, and it's not far-fetched. Racist attitudes are not universal among NYPD officers by any means, but they are not rare.

    Finally, there is no law on the books anywhere in the United States which provides for a summary death penalty for moving when a cop says "freeze". Okay? That, in and of itself, was not sufficient cause to shoot the guy. The only case in which a cop is legally justified in using deadly force is if s/he has reason to believe that his or her life, or that of a bystander, is in immediate danger. They shot Diallo because they thought he was shooting at them: He had something dark in his hand, and one of the officers fell. There was no gunshot, obviously, but when they saw him go for his back pocket (the wallet, remember) they probably went into adrenaline overdrive: perceptions and thought processes are altered in that state.

    Don't try to smear bullshit all over this: They fucked up royally and killed an innocent man. Their defense attorneys said that, and they said it themselves. It's the truth. They were acquitted because the law allows for the fact that the police are sometimes required to make snap decisions involving deadly force under great pressure, and sometimes they fuck up. When that happens, we drag them into court, make a big fuss about it, and we hope that the jury makes the right call: Was it a mistake that any reasonable person could easily have made in the same circumstances? Was it a stupid mistake? Or was it just plain murder? The jury here seems to have thought it was a mistake they might have made themselves. I'm not certain that they were right about that, but I tend to lean in that direction.

    1. Re:The only word anybody heard was "gun" by MattXVI · · Score: 0
      You're positively psycho. I didn't defend the cops. Just corrected the post. They did indeed yell first. It's clear you're just findning an excuse to grandstand. Why don't you find an AOL board or someting more appropriate to your powers of analysis?

      It's a good thing you're not a NYC cop. You're exhibiting more pent-up anger and disproportionate reaction than the cops you're criticizing.

      --
      When I'm singing a ballad and a pair of underwear lands on my head, I hate that. It really kills the mood.
      -Tom Jones
    2. Re:The only word anybody heard was "gun" by Evangelion · · Score: 0


      God, I am so fucking sick of this reaction.


      Person A: "There is something deeply fucked up in the world, let's try at least make people aware of it, in the vain hopes that we can make the world a better place."


      Person B (who doesn't want to think about the problem): "Dude, you have some serious issues. You have some sort of anger control problem don't you? I bet something happened to you in your childhood to make you this way. Maybe you should deal with your own issues first."


      The message, of course, is don't even bother trying to make the world a better place, because it's pointless and requires effort, and you won't change anything anyway. Just relax, chill, watch TV, Buy More and Be Happy.


      disproportionate reaction


      Fuck off - a man was riddled with 41 bullets for taking out his fucking wallet. If that's not worth getting upset about, then what is? But, of course, you don't want your happy little world disturbed, and so you'd be glad if everything that you didn't want to see was simply removed from your private playground of a weblog so you don't have to think about it.


    3. Re:The only word anybody heard was "gun" by MattXVI · · Score: 0

      Yes, it was an upsetting tragedy. But the cops were unanimously acquitted by a jury of their peers - almost half of whom were minorities who would, presumably, be quite sensitive to the implications of roving white cops mindlessly killing an innocent black man. Mourn the death, but get off my ass.

      --
      When I'm singing a ballad and a pair of underwear lands on my head, I hate that. It really kills the mood.
      -Tom Jones
    4. Re:The only word anybody heard was "gun" by GenCuster · · Score: 1

      No, he was only hit 19 times, in 41 bullets fired. That shows the desperation, chaos, and split second reasoning that has been argued from the start. This is a tragedy on two fronts, first a young man is dead, that is tragic. However, it is also tragic that four men, have been tarred with as lynches, even after a jury has ruled they did nothing wrong.

      Nate Custer

      --
      "The poet presents his thoughts festively, on the carriage of rhythm; usually because they could not walk" Nietzsche
    5. Re:The only word anybody heard was "gun" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever tried shooting a gun? 19 out of 41 is very accurate shooting. They, the police officers in this case, did something wrong. They shot a man for being black. Avoid the spin--this is what happened. What's tragic, besides the death, is the lack of justice. Murder is murder. Amadou's death was murder. The murder was racist. Juries decide cases based on the law. Guess who writes the law. Police officers are very intimately tied to the legislatures who make the laws. Concerning murder, the law says murder is legal for a police officer to commit. So the jury did act correctly. The law is not justice. The law needs to be changed.

    6. Re:The only word anybody heard was "gun" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a tragedy. Murdered because of your skin color. Laws must be changed. No one's on your ass; you choose to come here. Go away.

    7. Re:The only word anybody heard was "gun" by warmi · · Score: 0

      The fact that perception of danger was greater because this guy was black has nothing to do with racism !!!
      It is blacks who created this perception by engaging in crimes therefore it is natural for police officer to be on higher alert in this kind of situation.
      I am not saying white people do not commit crimes, but statistics speak the truth.

    8. Re:The only word anybody heard was "gun" by MattXVI · · Score: 0

      Pinhead, nobody asked you to come here either. But unlike you, anonymous shit for brains, I've been here for two years, log in, and defend my comments. Anybody who thinks Diallo was murdered for being black is probably too embarrassed by his stupidity to have a username. Four blacks on the jury had the opportunity to find the cops guilty of racist murder. They saw all of the evidence. You didn't. And they voted to acquit.

      --
      When I'm singing a ballad and a pair of underwear lands on my head, I hate that. It really kills the mood.
      -Tom Jones
    9. Re:The only word anybody heard was "gun" by Lazarus-- · · Score: 1

      Yes, it was an upsetting tragedy. But the cops were unanimously acquitted by a jury of their peers What makes you reasonably think that has anything at all to do with them being let off. Do you think jurors aren't pressured in the deicisions they make. Noone, especially the minorities want to see this type of thing happen. The laws are built around protecting the defendent; not the person who lies dead. Jurors can't take the law into their own hands. They don't want to be there in the first place, and the mixed opinions between the jurors causes confusion between themselves anyway. The system doesn't work to the benefit of society, it works to the benefit of the indvidual (esp. cops), despite guilt or innoncence. Don't feed me garbage about unanimaously acquited by a jury of "their" peers. They have no choice but to vote unamiously in a murder case. The battle of injustice isn't just fought within the system, it's fought on the outside as well. -Anton

    10. Re:The only word anybody heard was "gun" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got crack?

    11. Re:The only word anybody heard was "gun" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're the pinhead, racist shitpie!! Diallo was murdered for no other reason then being a black male, and all your attempts to defend the indefensible is just crap. No wonder the Chinese commies are able to wave the America's human rights violations in our faces every time we try to bring up theirs. Hmmmm maybe we should mind our own goddam business and clean our own house before we go poking our noses into someone elses???

    12. Re:The only word anybody heard was "gun" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a dumbfuck you are, HoMeY.

  23. This is funny! by EverCode · · Score: 1

    You guys are loons, but it is still funny.

    Caldera is the only Linux I have had crash on me.

    EC

    --

    EverCode
    1. Re:This is funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just tried to send you an email, but it bounced back. How about some specifics. Given that OpenLinux is developed to be more stable that your standard bag-o-bits distribution, I would be curious to know the details rather than a quick dismissal of Caldera.

  24. Caldera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wow, know what i could go for? a big caldera of hot grits, poured down my pants. thank you.

  25. IPO = Goodbye Business, Hello Casino by Asterisk · · Score: 2

    This is likely the end of Caldera as a viable Linux vendor. The moment any company issues an IPO, they cease to be an economically signifigant business. The main impetus of their activity becomes financial activity - playing the stock market - and ceases to be competitively providing goods and services to the market. And the people who founded the company, with the original intent of earning profit by selling a quality Linux distribution, will no longer be the actual owners of the company. Their policy will now be determined by a corporate bureaucracy at the behest of stockholders, whose main purpose in investing is to gain a short term profit without regard for the actual business operations of the company. The stock market is anti-Capitalistic, anti-Individualistic, and detrimental to the economy. Caldera has, in issuing its IPO, handed the company over to the practical equivalent of Las Vegas gamblers.

    1. Re:IPO = Goodbye Business, Hello Casino by Glowing+Fish · · Score: 1

      The other day, while drifting off to sleep, I suddenly realized in a flash: a market economy can't be a capitalistic economy. So the Stock Market is anti-market (funny, huh?) but not anti-Capitalistic.

      The reason for this is, is that in a full market economy, the competing firms aren't considered to have any control over supply or price, so that if they either cut production or drive up price they will be undersold by their competitos. This leads to businesses making profits only equal to regional elasticisity, technology growth or other small factors. And with no profit, no capital is generated.

      The ideal economy varies a little from market in that the competing firms can control price enough to make a little capital to embark on new projects, and therefore make better products. When they can control the price enough to make huge profits heedless of consumer choice, everyone suffers, especially when those profits turn into capital to finance products that are totally irrational...such as the Great Wall of China or Windows NT as a real network server. Micro$oft may be the first monopoly in the history of capitalism to embark on econonmy damaging irrational egotistic ventures that used to be the province of insane despots.

      The upshot of this is that I agree with you mostly...the stock market is currently throwing their money around without regard to what will really help the economy. But it can still be used as it should be, to help finance new projects. And the guys at Caldera, being good Mormoms with good values, probably won't be getting corrupted, I hope.

      --
      Hopefully I didn't put any [] around my words.
  26. Off topic but funny by ch-chuck · · Score: 3

    Always liked this 'rags-to-riches' story:

    A golf caddy asked a patron how he'd earned his fortune. The Billionaire replied, "Son, it was the depths of the depression in the 30's. I was down to my last nickle. One morning I bought an apple with that nickle and polished it all day. At the end of the day I sold it for 6 cents. The next day I did the same, an after a week could afford 2 apples. This went on for several months, at the end of which I'd earned a grand sum of $4.38. Then my wife's father died and left us 3 million dollars".

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  27. Caldera's disregard for the GPL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I think it is great that Linux is being recognized by the stock market. I wouldn't be surprised if Caldera ended up doing well. I would be surprised if they took the time to give contributor to Caldera OpenLinux a chance to get in on the pre-IPO. The thing I notice most about Caldera at tradeshows is their complette disregard for the requirements of redistributing GPL works. When they hand out CDs containing only the binaries to GPL works, they are unable to answer one simple question: "Where is the written offer for the source code?" If Caldera took the time to actually read the GPL, they would find that when choosing not to redistribute the source code with the binaries that they MUST provide a written offer for the source code. Of course, they are also willing to demostrate that they don't care. When contacted by a contributor about a removal of the code he holds copyright on, Caldera refuses to either contact him back or honor the request. The thing that surprised me most about the LinuxOne issues was that LinuxOne was at least willing to get back to people about their GPL violations. Caldera Systems on the other hand is above all that.

    Btw, ever trying reading the "GPL" work from Caldera called nkfs. It is so badly documented, it doesn't even state the intended major and minor numbers of the required character device to use it. If your going to claim to release code under the GPL then at least leave the comments in instead of obfuscating the code!

    1. Re:Caldera's disregard for the GPL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you just copy this same post everytime there is a story about Caldera? If you take a look at the CDs they give away at recent trade shows you see either a sticker on the clamshell or the source location is actually burned on the silkscreen. Of course, thinking ftp.calderasystems.com might be too much of a stretch for you as well! Good luck to Caldera, they've contributed and advanced Linux in ways many don't realize. Wish I could get in on this.

    2. Re:Caldera's disregard for the GPL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't use Caldera personally, but I have owned a few copies of it. It always included a source CD. You are an uninformed troll.

    3. Re:Caldera's disregard for the GPL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I said before, Caldera Systems has not considered GPL violations to be important enough to return notices on. They haven't returned my email or my phone calls. The situation still stands that the last time I saw them at a trade show they where clearly taking part in violating the terms of redistribution listed in the GPL. They have my email address and phone number. If they had bothered to take the time to comply with the GPL then I don't see why they wouldn't bother to contact back one of the people that assist in developing a package which makes up their flagship product.

  28. Caldera will be the first major distro to fall by rambone · · Score: 2
    Of all of the production linux shops I go to, one thing they all have in common is the distro they aren't running - Caldera.

    This isn't to say that it isn't of high quality, but simply that Caldera has been outmarketed and outpromoted by Red Hat.

    I just don't see how Caldera can make a go of it unless they drop their witless marketing department and really start working on getting Caldera into more places that matter.

  29. Unfortunately, Caldera must IPO or be left behind by rambone · · Score: 2
    Caldera is already slipping off of the radar as RedHat bulks up and outmarkets them.

    Caldera's only hope at avoiding complete irrelevancy is to bulk up with some quick cash and either start marketing their product for real, or make aquisitions that give it a reason to exist.

  30. Yes, it is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In America people speak English. If you don't know any English you damn well better learn it quickly. Besides, when a cop shouts ANYTHING to you forcefully the last thing anybody but a criminal would do is run. What you SHOULD do is FREEZE. I would've expected them to shoot me as well if I tried to run away and I'm white! Only people with something to hide would run away from a cop.

    1. Re:Yes, it is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No running took place. Good troll though.

  31. Re:The cops were justified by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately, you are racist.

  32. So low? by rngadam · · Score: 1

    Can somebody explain to me why they start so low when they'll obviously be over 50$ the first day? It doesn't make sense.

    Is Lineo included in this? If so, it might be a good investment.

  33. Bzzzzzzzzzzt. Wrong. Red Hat Opened at about $48 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It only split once, so that's 22 bucks. The only pure linux play is Red Hat. VA is box maker and service provider wannabe and is wasting their capital on overpaying for aquisitions. Cobalt is also a box player that just uses linux.
    Go long on Red Hat !!!

  34. Can Linux really make any money? by be-fan · · Score: 1

    I really don't know if any of the Linux companies are worth their massive stock valuations. Companies like amazon.com also aren't worth it, but have to potential to be. Linux however, probably doesn't have the potential to make anyone any money. How does a Linux company make money? By selling support, right? Yet, how many companies actually use the support from their OS provider? Most have support contracts for their hardware, but software issues are usually handled by internal IT staff. Companies like SUN and SGI can make money by giving their OS away because they have hardware to sell. Caldera on the other hand, only make money from the distro and from any support it sells. That means a company that previously bought 100 copies of NT from MS, can now just buy 1 copy of Linux from cheapbytes.com. Its not like they used MS support anyway, they just had their IT guy fix it. Thus the market for a corperate linux distro shrinks from everyone who uses the OS, to those who use the OS, but can't install it themselves and can't afford IT staff. Thats a very small piece of the market. Another way for the company to make money would be to write propriatory extensions for Linux. Caldera actually tried this before with Caldera Linux 1.3. Of course it failed. In the wide open world of Linux, proriatory Linux extensions won't fly. This can easily be seen in Redhat. You'd think that a company that entirely owns the corperate linux market would be making money? Redhat is losing something like $35 million a year. As for VA Linux, what the hell are they thinking? Why would I buy from some upstart Linux company when I can get systems from Dell, a proven, reliable company that actually has good service and support! Believe it or not, corperate types don't buy into the labor of love that is Linux. They are business, and they will do whatever makes sense, not what makes them feel good by helping out some upstart linux company.

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    1. Re:Can Linux really make any money? by Dionysus · · Score: 1

      I agree. And the really big customers go for IBM, who has a really good support aparatus in place (especially if you have more than one type of hardware).

      --
      Je ne parle pas francais.
    2. Re:Can Linux really make any money? by sirinek · · Score: 1
      I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and not claim you are trolling, thoughif I had moderator access, I would be tempted to mark your post as such. I will reply for the benefit of the other readers.

      I'm not sure how you think no one uses the support structure from their OS. While its true that pretty much no one calls on Microsoft when problems go wrong (lets not open up that can of worms) in any UNIX (and I dont differentiate between Linux and Unix) shop, support is of key importance. Most critical systems these days are running under some flavor of unix.

      I will use Sun as an example, because maintaining those systems is how I make a living.

      We have an extensive support contract with Sun, both with their hardware *and* software. If we encounter a bug or some other problem in software, we want answers quick. Dont give me any of this usenet bullshit, I want a paid professional on the other side of the phone when there is a computer problem of critical importance affecting my business. The same goes for hardware. I work for a major international exchange, we take our IT support issues seriously. I dont doubt that millions of other companies of all sizes are the same way.

      So to wrap things up, as Linux matures and more companies begin to adopt it for critical functions, you better bet your ass that the support structure for Linux will improve and become a big source of revenue. True, IBM and other pre-Linux companies will have a share of that market, but there is no reason at all to claim RedHat, VA, Caldera, or other so-called "Linux Companies" cannot profit and become successful on a support-based model.

      siri

    3. Re:Can Linux really make any money? by be-fan · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure about the statistics of how many companies are in the position of having extensive support contracts, so I may be wrong as to the size of the support market, but my post really wasn't about companies like Sun anyway. Thats not the market the Linux in its present form is targeting. Instead Caldera and Redhat are mainly targeting the smaller server and workstation business, ie. everyone who uses NT. I can bet you that most shops that use NT have their own IT staff handle things, not MS staff. In the future, when Linux makes inroads in the high end, selling support might make sense, but in the market that Linux is in now, selling support is not a very good business proposition.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    4. Re:Can Linux really make any money? by haggar · · Score: 1

      Very true.

      As another aspect of the same phenomenon, let me tell you why my comapny uses HP-UX systems, instead of SGI or Sun (even though SGI and Sun are pretty big, aren't they). So, I work for this really huge company that has customers wolrdwide. We cannot afford to use Sun or SGI because, even though they are big UNIX vendors, they don't have quite worldwide support. And that is of critical importance for this market. HP has covered the globe pretty well, so you can expect the same level of support in South Africa and in China, UK and Egypt, Russia and USA. And that matters.
      This is the market Linux can't penetrate now, but it might in the future, thanks to the support of IBM, Novell and HP.

      --
      Sigged!
    5. Re:Can Linux really make any money? by Tony-A · · Score: 1

      Why do you think IBM has been supporting Linux? Look a few years down the road. The computers get bigger, faster, more complicated. There are more ways to get it wrong, and the interactions get more subtle. Hackers handle a part of the problem space that IBM and big iron cannot. With journaling file systems now under GPL, how long before hackers with surplus 486 boxen and bad disks try to see what it takes to fubar a system, and then fix things so it can't happen in the future. I cannot imagine IBM doing that in a closed, secret test facility. Wrong image for the company. I get the impression that the influx of capital into the Linux companies is being used to shore up the infrastructure and cure some of the grungy problems that require paid help.

      Is there money to be made from Linux? Consider if the software you are using were GPL'd (free speech) and downloadable free (beer), would your company drop the HP support? I didn't think so. ;-)

  35. Nope -- Lineo is not included [was: So low?] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lineo is a totally seperate company, and if/when it has an IPO it will be a totally seperate deal.

  36. Method to Participate in Directed Share Program by foo_48120 · · Score: 4
    I downloaded the Caldera IPO filing on Edgar to try to see how to participate in the Directed Share Program. I found that you need to open an account with Wit Capital (Their site is jsp :) )

    The specific text from the filing is on page 69 and 70 of the document, on my printed copy it was pages 74 and 75 of 393...

    They say half of the 10% Directed Share Program goes to company employees and insiders and the other half to the Linux community via a program at Wit Capital. Apart from needing to fund a $2,000 account at Wit Capital, there is no more information about the program. I have an email in to ask of this at Wit.

    Anyone have more details?

    Here goes:

    Directed Share Program. At our request, the underwriters have reserved for sale, at the initial public offering price, up to ten percent of the shares of common stock offered in this offering under a directed share program. We currently expect that approximately half of these shares will be offered to directors, officers, employees, business associates, and related persons of Caldera Systems pursuant to a directed share program being administered by FleetBoston Robertson Stephens Inc., and that approximately half of these shares, pursuant to a directed share program being administered by Wit Capital Corporation, will be offered to open source software developers and other persons that we believe have contributed to the success of the open source software community and to the growth of Caldera Systems. We cannot assure you that any of the reserved shares will be so purchased. The number of shares of common stock available for sale to the general public in this offering will be reduced by the number of reserved shares sold. Any reserved shares not purchased will be offered to the general public on the same basis as the other shares offered in this offering.

    Purchases of the reserved shares pursuant to the directed share program administered by Wit Capital are to be made through an account at Wit Capital in accordance with Wit Capital's procedures for opening an account and transacting in securities. In addition, Wit Capital is an underwriter of additional shares in the offering. A prospectus in electronic format is being made available on an Internet web site maintained by Wit Capital. In addition, all dealers purchasing common shares from Wit Capital in this offering have agreed to make a prospectus in electronic format available on a web site maintained by each of them. Other than the prospectus in electronic format, the information on the web site and any information contained on any other web site maintained by Wit Capital or any dealer purchasing common shares from it is not part of this prospectus or the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, has not been approved or endorsed by us or any underwriter in its capacity as underwriter and should not be relied on by prospective investors. The National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. approved the membership of Wit Capital on September 4, 1997. Since that time, Wit Capital has acted as a co-lead managing underwriter on one offering, a co-managing underwriter on 61 offerings and a dealer on 107 offerings.

    1. Re:Method to Participate in Directed Share Program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Odds are they'll do things like RedHat and VA did by emailing people who are eligible for the directed shares program with instructions on where to send the forms etc... I'm not worried about opening an account anywhere til I get the letter.

  37. Mickey's Ears by lfd · · Score: 1

    That interpretation must be highly cultural. To me it looks more like a heart or the African continent ;)

    --
    Going on means going far, going far means returning. Tao te Ching
  38. Re:The cops were justified by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It used to be that blacks knew enough not to fuck with the men in blue. When they told you to jump, you jumped. When they told you to get your ass on the ground so they could cuff you, you'd get down. Now you got these fucking teenage punks shooting up their schools, raping their teachers, killing each other on the streets and then actually drawing guns on the POLICE! WTF do you expect the cops to do when they see a black guy? These little bastards running around today have NO respect for the law anymore. As a white man I get VERY nervous anytime I have to enter a black neighborhood even to drive through it.

    Remaining Nazi crap flushed.

    You know, mentalities such as the one displayed above are why we need a real New Black Panther Party. Not the pointless exercise in empty ranting and anti-semitism currently headed by that loser Khalid Muhammad in New York. A REAL one, which will be willing to defend Afrikan people in the 'hood against ALL of the street gangs, including the one in Blue. Face it, people, we are as a race being destroyed by the sort of animals who believe exactly as the bigoted trash who posted above does: that we Afrikans are sub-human, etc. If we are ever to be free, then we must be prepared to organize and fight for that freedom. Yes, we may die, but the facts are that the white supremacists will one day soon try to kill us all anyway--if events like Diallo's murder can happen in a time when the economy is going strong and most people are supposidly content, what will happen when things go bad and scapegoats need to be found? All it will take is one bad depression with the attendant spike in crime and in the name of Law and Order we'll be getting herded into the ovens. Think it can't happen here? Read what that Nazi above wrote again, read some of the remarks Guliani, Pat Buchanan and other like them have made; go look at what some of the laws the so-called "War On Drugs (tm)" have wrought in this country in the realm of personal freedom and then tell me again that, given the proper conditions, what happened in Germany 50-60 years ago couldn't happen here. Yes, we may die--but the time will come when we MUST be willing to fight and die, to take as many of the enemy with us as we can before going to join our ancestors. We CAN do it, you know. The blood of Shaka, of Tewodros, of Menelik II--victor of Adwa against the European colonialist armies--runs in our veins. We CAN do it. We CAN win. We need only unite, and recognize the power which lies in our hands.

  39. Return to 1930's (1860's even) by new500 · · Score: 1
    Who believe this Bull (market) suffer at the hands of latter day James Fisks

    From london Financial Times Thursday Feb 24,article on Egg, a UK internet bank which is loosing money fast by enticing depositors with rates it cannot support (cant a city full of bond traders tell this is screwed?) says :

    "In the short term no doubt, the Pru [Prudential, Egg's owners, a British insurer] will ensure Egg's stock flies. An engineered stock squeeze would certainly help, and predictably, Prudential is planning to list just 15 - 25% of the capital"

    After the US saw its whole people belittled (and a world economy brought to its knees) by such machinations, simple manipulations such as those employed by Fisk were outlawed. Previous to Fisks demise, Vanderbuilt had been hailed as building a great empire upon such tricks. People will be in awe at such money - this is the nature of money. It has power over people who work for it. However it seems that we are no longer awake in vigilance against even the most puerile of deceptions.

    1. Re:Return to 1930's (1860's even) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I think it's great that people are enthusiastic about Linux (and ebiz) stocks, these things are way overvalued. This is pointed out, and frequently. No one is listening. There is too much money to be made speculating.

      Another depressingly familiar thing to read is the Memoirs of Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds by Charles MacKay.

      It's nice while the boom lasts, however.

  40. Stock Squeeze (why wont my links post correctly?) by new500 · · Score: 1
  41. fskng link - dont ask why it doesnt work please by new500 · · Score: 1

    http://search.ft.com/search/multi/globalarchive.js p?query=lex+Prudential&docId=00022400112 2&searchCat=1&offset=6&query=a href="http://search.ft.com/search/multi/globalarch

  42. The prices he mentions are split-adjusted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Remember, RHAT split 2-1 on January 10, 2000.

    It's true that the highest price ever paid was $302.625 on December 8, 1999. This was before the split.

    There are two ways to think about splits. The first way is to say "the peak was $302.625 (before a 2:1 split)". This gets awkward because of all the conversions.

    The second way is to adjust for the split by converting all the historical numbers to their values in terms of today's shares. So I would say: "the peak was $151.3125". That makes it easy to compare the peak price to recent prices.

    People on Wall Street and the financial press report this way almost all the time. If you go to finance.yahoo.com and look at a graph of RHAT prices for the past six months, there won't be a giant gap on the day of the split. Instead, every number from before the day of the split has been adjusted, and there is a little marker on split day.

    Using this split adjustment, RHAT's offering price was $7 (not $14); the first public trade was $21 (not $42); and so on.

    Let's go over your hypothetical situation. Suppose John Q. Linuxlover bought 1000 shares RHAT on the first day of trading. He paid $42 per share. Suppose he bailed out yesterday at $68 per share. It looks like he made about 60%. Not bad.

    But wait! He didn't sell 1000 shares yesterday -- he had 2000 shares to sell, because RHAT split 2:1 on January 10! So he actually received $136,000 for his $42,000 investment, or about 230%.

    The "split-adjusted" way to look at it is: after the split, John Q. Linuxlover owns 2000 shares of RHAT, which he paid only $21 per share for (same $42,000 basis, notice). Then it's easy to see that everyone who bought at $21 and sold at $68 made about 230%.

    You can always recover the raw historical numbers if you need them. But usually it's better to use these split-adjusted numbers because they enable you to make correct comparisons a lot more easily. And that's what the original poster was doing.

  43. So learn the language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Well, first, if I'm going to live in a country, I'm going to study its language.

    And second, when four guys are pointing guns at me and yelling something I don't understand, I'm going to freeze! I don't care if they're speaking Farsi, Tagalog, or Old Low Dutch!

    Not that this excuses the cops in any way. Just what I would do in a similar situation.

    1. Re:So learn the language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He did freeze. That's what he was shot for.

  44. Cool, I already have a Wit Capital account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    After the RHAT IPO, I opened a Wit account with a deposit of $2000, just in case something like this happened.

    I wonder what CALD's participation amount will be? I expect they will get 1000 to 2000 participants, and they are reserving $4,000,000 worth of stock. That works out to $2000 to $4000 per participant (ballpark). For comparison, RHAT's participation amount was $5600 and LNUX was $4200.

    I think I'll send another check in to Wit today. If it doesn't work out at least they are paying me interest on the account.

    Open your Wit account today, guys! And learn where your nearest Fedex office is, and how to do a wire transfer into the Wit account!

  45. "The Letter" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I'm wondering if they are going to do like RH and VA did with their respective IPOs. I got the RH letter and ignored it (doh) but cashed in on VA (woo hoo)... and then this mail came in from someone at Caldera Systems.

    It was addressed to a bunch of people. One of them was me, one I recognize from the kernel sources, and the rest are nobody in particular. She asked for city, state, zip code, and phone number since they were "updating their files and records"... strange, since I've never purchased anything from them.

    So, I figure they may be building up to something very interesting. It's been 2 weeks since that mail, so I'm not as sure anymore. Anyone know for sure?

    1. Re:"The Letter" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I too got "A Letter" about them updating thier addressbook, and just now realized they were going to IPO. Luckily I replied to the letter that very day with my home addy and phone number.

      Interestingly thought, there were 7 email addresses on the letter I got, and 3 of them I knew right away were errors. I do know all 7 people the email was addressed to, but there was one on there I looked at and went "him?" and pondered the fact that I knew his address had changed over a year ago.

      I will say this, if you pick the top 5 names that come to your head when you think of Linux, at least 2 of them were addressed in the letter I got. I was VERY flattered to be getting the same email as one of them, VERY flattered...

      And I had NO clue what it was about, other than a pain in the rear records keeping thing. Now I am wondering, is this the building of the mailing list for the IPO letter... and if so, Wooo Dawgies... I better start saveing some money up NOW!

  46. Re:The cops were justified by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, if you want to be all gung-ho Afrikan, I'd be willing to buy you a one-way cruise in a cargo hold BACK to Africa. Get the fuck out of my country if you don't like it! We'll send you back to Africa with the other spear chuckers and you can be happy all day infecting each other with AIDS and dancing to your jungle drums. I REALLY wish there would've been more of an effort to send more of you back to Liberia when we had the chance.

  47. Re:The cops were justified by ArtWhore.Z · · Score: 1

    wow, dont let your digressions circumscribe you...

    --
    This Unix stuff is like, really neat n stuff!
  48. Caldera poor quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I went the Caldera route.

    It has no libcrypt files, you can't recompile anything.

    Tweak Apache to work with PHP? Nope. The stock .xinitrc is broken, a newbie can only log in as root. Don't like it? Go pound sand. Kppp dialer totally broken, but you can't recompile, remember, no libcrypt.

    Newbies expect key bindings to work like they do in Winders. The bindings are broken worse than RH, and no way to fix.

    Their tech support is just abysmally bad. It just couldn't get worse. I tell newbies to buy SUSE.

    It ain't marketing killing them, it's the lousy technical quality.

    1. Re:Caldera poor quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What version of OpenLinux did you get? 1.1?

      Good grief, live in the now. The problems with libraries are long gone (libcrypt has been included in the last two versions). .xinitrc was never broken, but in one older version if you dinked with the X configuration xauth would need an adjustment. Apache not working with PHP? That's a new one on me. And the only way a newbie would not be able to log in as anyone but root is if he/she is so dismally dim that no account other than root's was set up during installation. That's not an OpenLinux problem; that's a stupidity problem.

      Maybe Windows or MacOS would be better for you.

      (Newbies buy SuSE? You must be joking. Even trade rags say SuSE is a techie distribution and not one for newbies. Red Hat, OpenLinux, and Corel are the only distros I've heard are newbie oriented.)

  49. Re:The cops were justified by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    blah blah blah blah go BACK to Africa blah blah blah blah Get the fuck out of my country if you don't like it blah blah blah etc

    (Remaining verbal farts deleted)

    You make me laugh, caveboy. When The Day finally arrives--and you know it will--you will be among the first against the wall.

    See you soon.

  50. Re:The cops were justified by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, nice Troll! But you only get a 7 out of 10 on my Troll-o-meter, however. You shoulda used the N-word for a top score. Better luck next time.

  51. you really are racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:you really are racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whether or not he is a racist, what he said is certainly true.

  52. Too bad your good points were mixed w/racist stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I have absolutely no respect for a race that puts up with that shit and then on top of it all says it is their CULTURE. Then they have the nerve to blame *US* for slavery that happened 200 years ago! Sorry, but my grandparents were northern farmers.. a) slavery was illegal there, b) they couldn't AFFORD slaves even if they COULD get them. I am sick and tired of being constantly brow-beaten with this stupid black history shit making an attempt to pin the blame of slavery on every white American.

    I agree with this and suing the goddamn brits who started it all. I hate getting lumped in with those fucking limies. My ancestors immigrated from Ireland as indentured servants, and a lot of them were treated worse than slaves (their brit masters didn't own them, they weren't property, so why take care of them? "Who cares if they die just before they've worked off what they owe me"). Of course if they had stayed there they'd have the brits aiming machine guns at them to this day. Then my family lived in a northern border state during the 1800s and actually helped slaves escape to canada. But some guy sees me and gives me shit for being whitey.

  53. Re:The cops were justified by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not going to bother refuting your anecdotal evidence, because anecdotes are useless. According to my knowledge, American African Americans are on average 15, points below the bell curve (85 pts). However, several studies were conducted with African Americans that had a higher percentage of European heritage, and no marked difference was found in the mean IQ of those people. You can draw your own conclusions from that. There have been several studies done with black children who were adopted into white families, however those studies aren't to great because the children were adopted at varying ages and some had other mental and physical problem (probably from a drug-addict mother). A study of black children adopted in to upper-middle class homes soon after birth ( 1 month), free of mental abnormalities, and whose mothers did not abuse harmful substances during pregnancy would be very interesting.

  54. Re:Why tech stocks don't pay dividends by elflord · · Score: 2
    Tech stocks typically have P/E ratios of over 60 unless the company in questionis in big trouble. This means that it is impossible for the companies to pay decent dividends -- more than a 1.7% dividend would use up all the companies annual profit. On the other hand, big established companies that aren't experiencing rapid earnings growth and consequently carrying more realistic P/E levels are more prone to paying dividends.

  55. Which trading company? by Mock · · Score: 1

    Now that many of the slashdot readers have experienced the magic of IPOs, I'm wondering what their experiences have been with trading companies?

    Are the online trading companies worth it?

  56. Re:The cops were justified by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "No, thankfully we still have our 2nd ammendment. Whites will hunt down the blacks and kill them all if they started organizing against white society. BELIEVE ME. We have access to nice military hardware.. you niggers have spears and shit."

    Fat lot of good your nice military hardware did you in Vietnam, eh, asshole? I'm white, buttfuck, and YOU believe ME--if losers like you decided to start shit most White and Black and all other Americans would be the ones joining together to hunt YOU down, just like the F.B.I. puts the smack down on all your little "militias" whenever they try to launch their stupid "Racial (un)Holy War." Both you and "citizen_bongo" can go back to your compound and wack off to Mein Kampf some more, and leave us normal people alone.

  57. Research, not trading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Placing the trade is merely the last step in a long process.

    First you have to know the company very well. Then you have to understand the influence on its stock. Then you have to believe that you know better than the market about what the stock price should be. Then you trade.

    All the $10 online brokers in the world are approximately the same. Use them to place your trades. But for your own sake, learn how to read the financial statements of a company. Learn how EDGAR works and what the statements are and how to read them.

    Analogy time: buying an account from an ISP with 5 megabytes of web space doesn't make your web site hot. What makes your web site hot is the knowledge and work that you put into it. Hitting the "ftp" button (or however you upload your pages to your ISP) is just the last mechanical step. Similarly, hitting the "place order" button on an online broker is just the last mechanical step.

    The research you do will determine whether you make money with an online broker or not.

    If you don't know where to start, let me put in a plug for The Motley Fool.

  58. Guess who's in the army? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Have a look at who's actually holding the guns sometime, dumbass.

    I can't believe I'm posting this ... this thread is so fucked up ...

  59. Re:Yesterday the Nation Wept. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh shut the fuck up and go back to AOL.

  60. Ransom Love's Initial Public Offering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More info direct from Ransom; On Caldera's Site .

  61. Re:The cops were justified by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Oh, please.

    All you neo-nazis can do whenever you want to race-bait is whip out either the Bell Curve or some book written in 1919, for God's sake. What's next, ya gonna start quoting from Thomas Dixon's "The Clansmen?" Yeah, that's some unbiased sources, allright. Most modern biology books won't work for you because they refute everything you say, but then they were all written by race-mixers and Jews so they don't count, right? Grow a brain.

  62. Re:Poor marksmanship by Lazarus-- · · Score: 1

    a budget increase for the police? are you slap fucking mad. I think it's a clear case of the blue suits needing to take less action and direct attention to the greater problem of fixing fundamental problems of society. Simplicity is genuis, throwing more money at problems won't help only create more. Haven't we had enough? Anton.

  63. Dividends? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must be kidding.

  64. Murder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Concerning murder, the law says murder is legal for a police officer to commit."

    Show me this law. You cannot. You are stupid.

  65. Yes, people did get "the letter" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have sent out "the letter" to certain people. They apparently have two separate programs; a US one and an international one. Not sure how they chose the people to include, but it does seem to be more limited.

    Slashdot probably got tired of posting about every new IPO that comes along. Well, ok; they got tired of posting stories about it more than once.

    1. Re:Yes, people did get "the letter" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What day was "the letter" sent out?

    2. Re:Yes, people did get "the letter" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know when they sent their fist batch out. Some people that I know did receive them as late as Friday.

      The first deadline that has to be met for the US program is coming up Monday, so I don't expect too many more...

    3. Re:Yes, people did get "the letter" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What broker sent the letter out and what were the terms of the ipo?

    4. Re:Yes, people did get "the letter" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After all of the years I've played with linux, not to be invited...I'm hurt. Would someone please take pitty on me and send me a copy of the invitation so I can start my future off right for once and make my Dad proud. schalopski@hotmail.com PS: I passed on VA Linux's invitation. Guess I should of paid more attention.

    5. Re:Yes, people did get "the letter" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grow up.