Slashdot Mirror


Slashback: Rumination, Apologies, Kisses

This is Slashback. Read it before it's wrong again. Find out more about Mandrake's new honcho, the neurons firing in the American legal system's brains on Napster, Yet Another Cool GPLization, and Larry's new toy.

View the meal from which the soundbite was extracted! Jim Tyre writes: "When Slashdot reported on the preliminary injunction against Napster, and then on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals' stay of that injunction, a missing piece was the actual ruling by the lower court, since it was an oral ruling from the bench, and a transcript had not yet been made available. C|Net now has the transcript here, and it makes for good reading for those interested in what the court's thinking was, not just the result."

On second thought, I'd rather not dance. Andreas writes: "As reported by the Heise Newsticker The German company CMG, which threatened to sue over the use of their registered name SAMBA, has stepped down from their plans. Nice to see at least some kind of clueness."

The article is in German, but the fish renders it quite intelligible.

If you want a kiss from CmdrTaco, you must be this big ... ClubNation writes: "Empeg have released their MP3 car player download software under the GPL. Before now you could only get an i386 binary for Linux, but now the source should build on pretty much anything with GCC or another good Posix C++ compiler with STL. I've heard on the empeg BBS that it builds out of the box on PPC and someone's working on a native Mac version.

You can get the code from their Web site or from their Geek Site which is also pretty cool and has a photo of CmdrTaco and Hemos in the photo album!"

And even though companies like Aiwa and Kenwood are selling MP3 head-units, the Empeg has one of the coolest industrial designs I've seen in anything for a long time. When I am a bazillionaire, I will put the Mark XXII in my Escort;)

So, in layman's terms, what might these projects be? Robert McMillan writes: "Linux Magazine has an interview with the brand new CEO of MandrakeSoft, Henri Poole. In it, he says that Tucows has apologized to his company about the Penguin Payola controversy. Poole also hints at some new open source projects that MandrakeSoft will be sponsoring in the next year and talks about what former CEO Jacques Le Marois will be doing now."

And now it's time for a mini, mini, mini review: invisik writes: "I got my NIC (New Internet Computer) yesterday. It's definitely a Linux box, running Netscape Navigator (browser only) 4.73, in 800x600 (can't change it). Connects easily to their ISP, your ISP, or your ethernet connection (DHCP or static IP). Has some utilities to make life easier, telnet, ssh, citrix, vnc, IRC clients. Also some games, solitaire, etc, etc. Speed is good, it doesn't really have much running on it to bog it down, though. And there's a little red light that flashed when it seen network activity--pretty cool. Not too bad for $199 if you really need some decent connectivity to your office (ssh/citrix/telnet) which I'd guess most other Internet terminal-type devices lack ..."

185 comments

  1. Re:Empeg by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    I'd think having the source would be great if you buy the player, and want to encode with something else besides MP3 later on (I've forgotten the name of the mp3 replacement /. has stories on from time to time).

    You could also change the menus around, and really tweak the whole system however you liked!! If only you could do that with every product you buy...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  2. Napster; Pirate or Privateer? by Nanookanano · · Score: 3

    Indeed, 'nature abhors a vacuum,' and 'some things are too good to last.' Napster served an important and positive market function by responding to a new media and demand. It stimulate market interest in soft copies of a vast resource of older music that existed below the threshold of profitablilty. Now that the corporate world (and thus the legal world) have taken attention to this new frontier, Napster will fade away and the Columbia Music type services will pave-over this once wild eutopia.

    --
    "..don't you eat that yellow snow."
    1. Re:Napster; Pirate or Privateer? by chasec · · Score: 3

      I disagree; while commercial services may become popular, Napster and other file-sharing services will never go away. Look at opennap or gnutella. I don't think these will go away anytime soon. A quick look at gnapster shows 46 opennap servers available. Gnutella has many thousands of hosts.
      Whether or not piracy is legal, it is unstoppable.

  3. Re:Empeg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    you mean ogg vorbis?

  4. Re:The bias is subtle and broad, if anything by Ketzer · · Score: 1

    The problem with your comment is that you seem to confuse law with ethics. Whats legal may be unethical and whats illegal may be ethical.

    No, this is not a problem with the previous comment. It's not the job of the courts to enforce ethics, and I would be terrified if it was. Imagine you're a woman who has an unwanted pregnancy. You go to a clinic and get an abortion, which is completely legal. Next thing you know you're in court being sentenced by a judge and jury who believe what you did was unethical.

    The question of ethics came into play before Napster opened their service. They had to decide whether the Napster service was ethical. It came into play when the RIAA decided to sue them. The RIAA had to decide if Napster was ethical. If they found Napster to be ethical, they had to decide if it was ethical to sue them for doing something ethical. Once RIAA decided to sue, ethics became irrelevant. It's now a question of law, and law alone.

    That's what the courts are there for. Ethics vary from person to person, and the courts are not there to ensure you are treated ethically. They are there to ensure you are treated fairly. To ensure that you are treated exactly the same as anyone else in your position would be, and in a manner that is set in writing so there should be no doubt of what will happen to you. If you feel they have failed in this, point out their failures in terms of places where they failed to comply with the law, not places where you feel they acted unethically.

  5. Re:NICs are the future by NNKK · · Score: 1
    errr have to agree and disagree

    IMHO NC's are the concept, not the ultimate result (so to speak)

    Yes, NC's are a GREAT idea for the average person who wants to use a computer for things like research, general web browsing, and even some word processing, but in their current form yes I do think they are too limited.

    What I think we need to focus on is not "How stupidly simple can we make this?" but rather "How stupidly EASY can we make this?" Some of you might be saying "What? that's the same thing!" no, it's not.

    You can make it stupidly easy without making it simple... the "easy" part needs to be in the User Interface, NOT the components themselves (although a quick redesign of the way a few things connect to eachother would be advisable *cough*jumpers*cough*POWER CABLES*cough*) because if we make the very lowest levels of the computer extreamly simple, we may wind up with a sitation where there is an abundant supply of computers for the average person, but few for someone like me, who can't STAND not being able to screw up my system easily :)

    And one other thing: the case, please for the love of god make computer cases easier to open and shut :)

  6. Re:Yeah and you just want to screw PC users right? by ichimunki · · Score: 1

    Why do you keep posting the same thing over and over? Your point of view is incredibly myopic and serves to prevent the growth of computing. Rather than insist that we use your computing model of the itty bitty desktop, why not let us get on with the business of working from our lame terminals which hook up to the real machines?

    So what about the person who has a little brother nagging him to let him play SimRoadKill while mom is telling him to hurry up so she can check her e-mail while dad is asking for the computer so he can check the prices of gizmos at buy.com... that person is not going to get his history paper written at all. And those other folks are going to have to wait... But I know! We'll buy them all PCs, we're RICH!

    --
    I do not have a signature
  7. Re:NIC does nfs? by mcmay · · Score: 1
    The NIC doesn't do NFS (or SMB, for that matter) out of the box.

    I've been maintaining the NICfit site, and one of the concepts I've been toying with has been to create "personality discs" for the NIC. I'm thinking the NIC is going to catch on, once they're ready to meet demand, and their current OS catches up with the others (it looks like they were planning on Mozilla, but Mozilla fell short, so they hacked in Navigator 4.73...), but I can see a whole lot of uses for a machine like this that are as easy as flipping a new disc in the drive. I don't think the hardware is ready for games, per se, but certainly there's more than one group out there who'd like to make their configuration management a little easier by burning a copy of a Linux install that can't be hacked...

    The other project we've got designs on is a kernel with NFS and SMB, mpg123, busybox, and so on, to run in flash and free up the CD-ROM for MP3s as well. There's room for more, certainly, such as support for any cheap, USB-based wireless options that show up with Linux support.

    The thinknic-tech and thinknic lists on eGroups are dreaming up new NIC projects, and I'm keeping track of them on the NICfit projects page...

  8. Re:NIC sounds like a neat lab frob! by Seth+Cohn · · Score: 1

    Yes to static IPs... yes to no keyboard too.

    --
    Help achieve Liberty in your lifetime - join the Free State Project - http://www.freestateproject.org
  9. Re:NIC...Good Idea? by Tsujigiri · · Score: 1
    Probably had to go the way of the dodo when they decided not to put any hard drive into it. Programs like Netscape Communicator have to put the e-mail *somewhere* local while you're reading it. I think IMAP might get around this, but anything based on POP can't work without a HD.

    Not necessarily. Netscape has the option to download all mail on connect, leave messages on the server and to delete on server when deleted locally. This all would mean that email could be stored onto a virtual disk that could be reset each time you turned the system on.

    --

    "I'll take the red pill. No! Blue! AAAaaaahhhhhhhhh"
    - Monty Python meets the Matrix

  10. Re:The bias is subtle and broad, if anything by Ketzer · · Score: 1

    Napster has definitely violated the letter of the law, [All rights reserved. Unauthorized duplication, hiring, lending public performance, and broadcasting is a violation of applicable laws.]

    But Napster hasn't duplicated, hired, lent public performance, or broadcast anything. All Napster has done is taken information created by users, (file indexes and connection information) stored that information in a large database, and made that database available for queries by users.

    There is apparently some law that forbids contributing to copyright infringement. I don't like that, but it kind of makes sense. It's illegal to be an accomplice in a murder, why not make it illegal to be an accomplice in a copyright violation?

    There is also apparently another law (fair use) that says that in certain circumstances, you can make copies of copyrighted material without it being infringement. This, it seems, is the key to Napster's legal defense. The problem is that fair use is a very complex and somewhat subjective law. I would like to see this law, preferrably condensed into some simple for that I could understand, since I suspect the full text of it contains much legal terminology I would be unfamiliar with. But what I am clear on, is that intent is important in fair use, so intent is relevant to Napster's defense.

    Unfortunately, it sounds like their intent was pretty bad. The impression I get is that several internal documents were submitted as evidence in which Napster founders talk about how they expect it to be used chiefly as a piracy tool. This brings me back to wondering about whether the manufacturers of radar-detectors expect them to be used cheifly to avoid cops while speeding, but perhaps they actually are illegal, and the government has simply chosen not to prosecute.

    Before I read this article, I was completely convinced that the courts should find in Napster's favor. But the judge made some excellent points, and I was unaware of the internal letters. Now, I think I have changed my mind a bit. If Napster was founded in any spirit other than to profit from piracy, then I would side with them. As it is, I think they should have come up with some research to show that they have actually helped RIAA, and convinced RIAA not to sue in light of this research, or convinced the judge that they have not caused RIAA any damages. It appears they attempted the latter, and were unsuccessful. Either their research was flawed, or the judge was in error. I must say I don't have all the facts needed to decide which.

    If their research really was invalid, then Napster really is essentially intent on stealing from the RIAA (albeit in a very roundabout way) and they should pay damages and cease their illegal activity. If their research was valid, then I feel this, not fair use, should be their key argument (that no damages gives no cause for lawsuit) both in the current suit and the appeal, and I hope the judge finds in their favor.

  11. Re:Just Curious... by Seth+Cohn · · Score: 1

    Yes. Bug netzero to release it. It exists. It works on Linux. You can only get it with the NIC right now.

    --
    Help achieve Liberty in your lifetime - join the Free State Project - http://www.freestateproject.org
  12. If I know Larry, and actually I do... by bradbury · · Score: 1

    ... then Oracle (or another LJE bootstrapped company) will keep reinventing the NIC over and over and over again, until Windows dies the death it deserves.

    Not that I hate windows mind you, I actually use it on most of my machines (in large part because X is such a pain to get running on anything but "known" video cards...), but as Larry has suggested the quality of the software leaves a lot to be desired. Just try running ~4 dozen processes and see what happens to process startups and response time... Microsoft is "working" on this bug as I type...

    Do you think the NIC only runs in a constrained video mode because they couldn't figure out how to configure X otherwise... :-)

    Seriously though, if it puts the net into the hands of young people it is a big step forward.

  13. Re:Ah, the NIC... (sounds neat but the resolution) by Seth+Cohn · · Score: 1

    1) DVD: replace the CD with one. it's just a laptop CD drive.

    2) It'll do 1024x768, just not the stock CD version. they went for 'common' monitor size/freq

    --
    Help achieve Liberty in your lifetime - join the Free State Project - http://www.freestateproject.org
  14. Re:NIC...Good Idea? by K8Fan · · Score: 2
    The one problem I have with the current trend of promoting easy-to-use tools to those who need them is that the Internet is being populated by those who do not know what they are doing, are (sometimes) gullible, and cheapen connectivity for the rest of us.

    It's far too late to complain about that. I had people complaining about all the clueless newbies when I got on the Net in 1988. Face it - it's september all year round now.

    I know many people who think the Internet is America Online.

    That's your job, to educate. I've rescued many people from AOL, and gotten them onto free services or with real ISPs. But sometimes they are too far gone, and don't want to abandon their AOL e-mail address. Sort of like the way old prisoners become attached to the prisons they are in.

    --
    "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
  15. That's it! by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    That's the one I was thinking of - and I like the wireless connection as well...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  16. Re:NIC...Good Idea? by bcaulf · · Score: 1

    What's this about a small set of repetitive tasks? This system is powerful enough for full remote access to hosts, and that means you can run anything you want.

  17. Re:People want control not lock in by Seth+Cohn · · Score: 1

    Not at all. If you come out with a similar box, upgrading would be easy. If anything, this make the 'computer' a truly appliance like thing.

    Gee, I'm not locked into my toaster, or my oven, am I? I can junk the NIC and get something else IF something else is better. Remember, I'm not storing anything on the NIC (except a few bookmarks etc) So I'm totally free to use anything else instead. Try that on the average computer (Oh, I need to backup 10 gigs before I send my computer in to be replaced/fixed. Oops)

    --
    Help achieve Liberty in your lifetime - join the Free State Project - http://www.freestateproject.org
  18. Re:Music - new advertising venue by kawlyn · · Score: 1

    been done. I have an old Sigue Sigue Sputnik album with ads dor ID magazine And Vidal Sassoon Hair stuff.

    --

    When someone yells "Stop" or goes limp, or taps out, the fight is over.
  19. Re:Ah, the NIC... by Seth+Cohn · · Score: 1

    It comes with ssh, telnet, VNC, citrix, irc, and you can Xhost +/- it, so you can use it as a Xterminal.

    It's missing a few toys (network sound, etc) but give them some time. It DOES include mpg123 and an ogg player too.

    --
    Help achieve Liberty in your lifetime - join the Free State Project - http://www.freestateproject.org
  20. Re:NIC...Good Idea? by Seth+Cohn · · Score: 1

    Webmail for now. Hotmail or Yahoo, for instance.

    I understand the plans include adding an IMAP mail program (no local storage, so POP tends to be out)

    That is one beauty of this: get a CD in the mail, and bingo, you are upgraded. So adding a IMAP program wouldn't be too hard.

    --
    Help achieve Liberty in your lifetime - join the Free State Project - http://www.freestateproject.org
  21. Re:what about the browser? by Seth+Cohn · · Score: 1

    Control alt delete will do this (kill netscape and restart)

    Also, just reboot, it only takes 1-2 minutes to reboot.

    --
    Help achieve Liberty in your lifetime - join the Free State Project - http://www.freestateproject.org
  22. Re:Those NICs are neat, BUT... by Seth+Cohn · · Score: 1

    Done, asked for, it's coming. They will throw it onto a ftp site ASAP....

    --
    Help achieve Liberty in your lifetime - join the Free State Project - http://www.freestateproject.org
  23. Re:imac by Buttercup · · Score: 3

    You could probably repackage the iMac as a network computer for $325... maybe call it the iSore.

    MJP

    --
    Don't try that "protecting the children" shit you people use to keep the tits and bad words off my TV. --Seanbaby
  24. Re:I'm sold by pixel.jonah · · Score: 1

    it already has 10/100 ethernet!

  25. Empeg: If only... by WayneGayle · · Score: 1

    ...it had a cd player/ripper with it. I'd love to buy a new cd, go to the car and have it copied and saved to my car's hard-drive while driving home listening to it. Then I just leave the cd at home and listen to it whenever i want while the car has it too.
    -WG

    --

    "America, I smoke marijuana every chance I get."
  26. Supermount - arggh.. by afxgrin · · Score: 1

    i've been running mandrake now for several months. everything was running rather well and i was quite impressed compared to other distro's i've tried... the red hat compatibility is nice - especially for rpm's when it comes down to dependencies and such... but yes - supermount is VERY nice... until this last week where my old FAT32 harddrive that i just haven't bothered to format yet is no longer recognized by supermount for no reason whatsoever.. and now i can't get it to mount the traditional way. argh. i think it may have just died. :) if only on the install it would properly install my GLdrivers it would be perfect :)

  27. Point out the absurdity of the Napster suits!!! by stuyman · · Score: 5
    I've been seriously considering this for a while, and given how all these decisions appear to go, I think it may be time to execute. What does anyone think of getting a class action together and suing the makers of ziploc baggies?

    The makers of this heinous product have given the common criminals of the world a fairly powerful method of drug storage and distribution. Ziplocs not only keep the drug in, but also keep out moisture! They help you to avoid being caught by limiting the odors that the drug emits. They can be used as a protective device when smuggling drugs in your intestinal tract!

    It's about time they were sued for contributory drug trafficking. Either A) They'd lose, and we'd no for sure that freedom is dead or B) They'd win, and we'd have proved the absurdity of the Napster suits. A manufacturer or programmer should be held liable for direct damage from the product. (Ziplocks coated with benzene before packaging would kill people, and it'd be there fault, but it would be your fault if you stored crack in it.) Likewise, Napster should be responsible if their software is actually a virus, but not if other people violate the law. What happened to the common carrier concept?

    The way telephone companies preserve their rights and avoid liability is by not censoring anything. As soon as they do, they become liable for anything they don't censor. By simply carrying any sound, they aren't forced to be police. That's what the police are for.

    Sue ziploc!! together we will win the battle against stupid lawsuits (or possibly just get lots of cash from ziploc).

    --
    Q:Doctor, how many autopsies have you performed on dead people?
    A:All my autopsies have been performed on dead peop
    1. Re:Point out the absurdity of the Napster suits!!! by Tony+Shepps · · Score: 2

      You laugh, but it's happened. A north NJ manufacturer of cologne bottles was prosecuted as a drug paraphernalia manufacturer. His little bottles had become the container of choice for crack. I think he got 30 years.
      --

    2. Re:Point out the absurdity of the Napster suits!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, Patel may have given the Napster team what they needed. An important point is that the members of RIAA are price-colluding companies which wish to extend their unfair contracts and muscle to the internet.
      I assume that it is quite legal to call them price-colluding. I am not certain how the record companies settled with the DOJ.

      Therefore Patel is holding back possible new business models. The proof of this fact is apparent in the price structures enjoyed by the record companies, the very long time it took to enter internet distribution, etc. Neither the public nor the artists are served by these leeches, the true criminals in nice suits.

    3. Re:Point out the absurdity of the Napster suits!!! by davonds · · Score: 1

      The problem with your argument is that at no time has Ziplock ever advertised their product as designed for the specific use of drug dealers, or the transportation of drugs. For a matter of fact, Ziplock has made no public statements at all promoting their product for use in the drug trade. On the other hand, Napster's stated and advertised primary use is for the sharing of copyrighted materials. This is why Napster is being sued, and not Microsoft or IBM, as the primary function of a computer is not the free exchange of copyrighted materials, and in a court case would be considered an abuse of the product.

  28. Re:what about the browser? by am+2k · · Score: 1
    Maybe they should have included wmNetscapeKiller...

    From the page:

    wmNetscapeKiller is a WindowMaker dockapp for killing Netscape when it freezes (so many times) !
    Just one click on this dockapp : Netscape will be shut down and restart ! You can now (version 0.3) specify the program to kill and if you want to restart it or not.

  29. nic - possibilities . . by alhaz · · Score: 2

    What i really wonder about where this box is concerned is if the bios can be convinced to boot the 4 megs of flash.

    I mean, since it includes netscape and realplayer, it's probably Cyrix MediaGX or Geode based. So it's pretty plain jane stuff.

    The "4 megs EEPROM" is probably some sort of linear disk-on-chip. I have access to programmers for those sorts of things at work, and 4 megs is plenty to boot a minimal (say, router & mp3) system.

    Does anybody have info on the guts and the bios?

    --
    This is just like television, only you can see much further.
    1. Re:nic - possibilities . . by Tet · · Score: 2
      4 megs is plenty to boot a minimal (say, router & mp3) system.

      But with only one ethernet card, and no options for adding more (unless you go for some kind of USB->ethernet nastiness), you're not going to have much of a router. That's the main reason I'm not going to be buying one. It'd make a great little firewall box, if only I could get two network cards into it.

      --
      "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
    2. Re:nic - possibilities . . by grahamwest · · Score: 1

      We used a MediaGX board for Pinball 2000. We used the standard BIOS on the board too, since it knows how to do all the chip initialisation and also things like how to configure the memory controller for the specific type of memory you have installed so you get the best performance.

      You can use either the video BIOS or network BIOS extension areas in the memory map. If there is valid data in them the system BIOS will call out to them at various points in its boot sequence. Now, these windows are very small (32k I think), but of course if your EEPROM is on a PCI card and memory-mapped, your 32k boot ROM can download code into system RAM for execution once the BIOS finishes doing its stuff.

      --
      Graham
    3. Re:nic - possibilities . . by alhaz · · Score: 2

      Why in the hell would you want a router and MP3 player on the same system? Sorry the network is so slow today Boss, it must be that damm Seti @ Home screensaver thing on the print server and that stack of CDs that the router is ripping!

      Ahh, earth to anonymous coward. We have one ethernet and one (soft) 56k modem in the box. Clearly, this isn't a business solution in the first place.

      What's more, a 266mhz Cyrix MediaGX kicks the pants off the Mips cpu in, say, a Cisco 7206/VXR. And that's a $20,000 router.

      I look at this like it's hobby junk. It's got to be lower power consumption than the DEC Multia currently driving my network, and faster too.

      I get the impression you've never even attempted to build a router from scratch. You really don't need a lot of cpu horsepower. Most of the stuff from Cisco, etc, tops out at about 200mhz, and those things are running BGP. If you're just doing simple static stuff, 99% of the time, your cpu is going to be idle. Why waste the cycles on a non-critical system?

      --
      This is just like television, only you can see much further.
    4. Re:nic - possibilities . . by Hoyt · · Score: 1
      It would be trivial to get the FREESCO dial-up router installed on it. The problem wold be getting the modules to work with the FREESCO version of the kernel.

      But it should be possible.

      --

      What if the Hokey Pokey _is_ what it's all about?

  30. Re: NIC Browser selection by rowdygator · · Score: 1
    At least they got the OS right, even though having Netscape as your only browser will not be the best Internet Experience!!

    Everyone keeps bashing their decision to include Netscape as their browser. While Netscape is not perfect, I would like to know what they SHOULD have used.

    MS Internet explorer? Only in fantasy land, since they are running Linux
    Mozilla? They would never want to use a product still in beta
    Opera? Perhaps, but its not as familiar to people.
    Lynx? Yeah, right.

    So, what SHOULD they have used? I think Netscape was probably their best choice.

    --
    I don't need no steenkin sig...
  31. Re:Ah, the NIC... (sounds neat but the resolution) by Mike1024 · · Score: 1

    Hey,

    I wondered about this... by my testing, it looks like you were right. Here's what I did:

    I had to find a relitavely popular website. One that had publicbly viewable stats. I went for http://www.geocities.com/walters_mission/. If you look at the site, apparently it had, like, a million hits so it seems like a good stats source to me. Obviously, it isn't a totally representative cross-section of teh internet-using population, but it's good enouth for our reasons.

    Decided on this site, I looked at it's system stats. Here are the stats for Resolution.

    Res -> Count -> % of total
    800x600 -> 139348 -> 41.32%
    1024x768 -> 124705 -> 36.98%
    1280x1024 -> 23333 -> 6.92%
    1152x864 -> 17569 -> 5.21%
    640x480 -> 17142 -> 5.08%
    Other -> 9909 -> 2.93%
    1600x1200 -> 5170 -> 1.53%

    So yes, most people do use 800x600, but 1024x768 isn't at all far behind. 16bpp was the top colour depth too. Good call.

    Michael


    ...another insightless comment from Michael Tandy.

    --
    "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
  32. Re:Ah, the NIC... (sounds neat but the resolution) by MHQ13 · · Score: 1

    I installed a 2.5" HDD in my NIC and, with a bit of BIOS tweaking, I was able to get 1024x768x16bit color.

  33. Re:Those NICs are neat, BUT... by Seth+Cohn · · Score: 1

    BTW, yes they do, if they distribute it in any manner, they have to give source. Go read the GPL.

    They modified blackbox, they will give sources for it. They didn't modify VNC (for instance) they must still give sources for it.

    --
    Help achieve Liberty in your lifetime - join the Free State Project - http://www.freestateproject.org
  34. Re:And another obvious difference is... by K8Fan · · Score: 2
    Take the Xerox lawsuit. They were sued because they aided in the duplication of copyrighted printed materials.

    Historical point? In the early days Xerox was like Napster. They got a percentage of every copy made. It wasn't until the Japanese started making cheap copy machines that Xerox dropped that. See Dealers Of Lightning".

    --
    "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
  35. Re:The bias is subtle and broad, if anything by HamNRye · · Score: 2

    The judge in this case is not given a responsibility to decidde ethics, only law. Our current law does not recognize the ethical value of destroying large corporations...

    In smaller cases, internet copyright infringement has already shut down smaller businesses. And the RIAA's entire point is that people are downloading songs/albums that they would have bought otherwise. That is the issue that the judge must rule on.

    Fair use does not permit you to copy an entire work. Read "The letter U and the numeral 2: Fair Use and copyright." by the band Negativland. Tone Loc was sued by Van Halen for the use of a guitar riff from "Jamie's Crying". Just a riff! Not the whole song.

    But it looks as though we might as well be debating the existance of God...

  36. Re:Is the Empeg wasted in a car? by HamNRye · · Score: 2

    Actually, at the prices good computer speakers go for nowadays, I get the little bookshelf stereos and hook them up. At $200, they're pricey, but less than the Bose acoustimass....

    Add ihn the Auto DJ feature or a good playlist, it's better than a CD player at parties....

  37. Re:And the obvious difference is... by FalseConsciousness · · Score: 1

    Try radar detectors then. I mean what can you say about a product with the brand name "Fuzzbuster"? It would be as if Napster had decided to name themselves "MusicThief" instead.

  38. NIC does nfs? by MyAss · · Score: 1

    anyone know if NIC can mount nfs partitions... Also can it remeber them and automatically mount them on boot up (/etc/fstab)? Also I'm assuming you can boot any bootable cdrom... which means you can make your own custome OS right?

    --

    They misunderestimated me. -- George W. Bush
    1. Re:NIC does nfs? by cjsnell · · Score: 1

      Since the NIC has an ethernet adapter and runs Linux, NFS should be no problem at all. The only question is: did they include NFS support in the kernel and did they include the NFS-related utilities?

  39. Re:Is the Empeg wasted in a car? by Mikeytsi · · Score: 1
    Or how about a stereo??? How many mp3 devices are there for a stereo setup?

    That's one of the primary reasons it has those nifty RCA's and separate power supply, so you can plug it in and use it at home. One of these suckers would be just fantastic for a small Party DJ business, by the way.

    --
    I've been called a "Fucking Dick" by better people than you.
  40. Application for Renewel of amazon.com domain name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Network Solutions, Inc
    505 Huntmar Park Drive
    Herndon, VA 20170
    April 1, 2000

    Mr. Jeff Bezos
    President and Chief Executive Officer
    Amazon.com, inc.
    P.O. Box 81226
    Seattle, WA 98108-1226

    Subject:Application for Renewel of amazon.com domain name

    Dear Mr. Bezos:

    We recently received your application for renewal of the"amazon.com" domain name for your company, Amazon.com, inc.Unfortunately, we must reject your application, and assign you an alternate domain name instead; for the reasons outlined below.

    As you are no doubt aware, the .com top-level domain isintended for use by for-profit corporations.Many such corporations are registered with Network Solutions, and this policy is unchanged.

    However, it has come to our attention, as evidenced by recent SEC filings on behalf of Amazon.com, inc., that your company has yet to turn a profit.As such, Amazon.com, inc. no longer qualifies for a domain name in the ".com"hierarchy.However, based on your financial performance, you do qualify for membership in the ".org" domain; which is intended for non-profit organizations.Unless there are any objections from you or your representative, Network Solutions will assign Amazon.com, inc. the new domain name "amazon.com.org". (We would have assigned the shorter "amazon.org" domain, but that domain is currently assigned to a website for the San Fransisco lesbian community.)

    To be frank; we were gravely concerned about the amount of money that amazon.com, inc. has been losing.We were seriously considering assigning a name in the ".gov" domain based on the current rate that your corporation is losing money.However, as Amazon.com, inc. is a publicly-traded corporation, and policy reserves the .gov domain for organizations that are in fact governmental agencies, it was determined felt that this would not be appropriate.

    This change in your domain name registration only affects your Internet domain name as assigned by Network Solutions; and no way impairs your right tocontinue to do business under the trademark of "Amazon.com".If and when Amazon.com, inc. becomes a profitable enterprise; we willbe happy to reconsider granting you once again the domain name "amazon.com", assuming it is still available.

    This change shall take effect within the next thirty (30) days, at which point the "amazon.com" name will be decomissioned.You have until then to notify customers and business partners.Effective immediately, and for the length of the thirty-day transition period; both names wlll be registered to Amazon.com, inc.

    If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact our customer service department.

    Sincerely,

    Jim Rutt
    Chief Executive Officer
    Network Solutions, Inc.


    )

  41. The NIC and FreeBSD by cjsnell · · Score: 1

    I'm wondering if there would be any problems running FreeBSD on this thing. I'm guessing not.

    What I'd like to do is to make a custom FreeBSD boot CD that mounted / and a swap partition via NFS. The only difficulty I see would be making a custom boot CD that mounted its NFS mounts after booting the kernel. The stock Linux-based CD appears to use the CD as /.

    I'm guessing, since the NIC uses a software modem, that FreeBSD users would be limited to ethernet, since USB modem support under FreeBSD is not ready for mainstream use at this time. This probably wouldn't be a big deal, though.

    Add a USB NIC (like the LinkSys EtherFast 10/100 that I have on this laptop) and you'd have a cheap little firewall/router.

    Perhaps in future versions, they will add boot-over-network support to the BIOS so that one can forgoe the CD-ROM completely. This would be wonderful for college computer labs, where you needed to deploy hundreds of cheap machines quickly.

  42. Ah, the NIC... by Rombuu · · Score: 5

    Oracle is going to keep reinventing the "Network Computer" until people decide to actually start buying them, aren't they?

    --

    DrLunch.com The site that tells you what's for lunch!
    1. Re:Ah, the NIC... by alleria · · Score: 1

      LOL, that's what Microsoft does!

      (Well, not necessarily buy, but at least use. Witness IE, DirectX, err, even Windows itself.)

    2. Re:Ah, the NIC... by Tet · · Score: 2
      Oracle is going to keep reinventing the "Network Computer" until people decide to actually start buying them, aren't they?

      Yes, but I don't know why they keep aiming for the home market. The commercial world is desperate to get away from the high maintenance MS desktops they have now, and a network computer is perfect to achieve this. Yet Oracle still insist on aiming for the home market, where there isn't enough bandwidth for the things to work at their full potential. At least this time, they've got slightly more of a clue (apps on CD, rather than downloaded on demand).

      --
      "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
    3. Re:Ah, the NIC... by geist42 · · Score: 3

      I just recently bought one of these as well, just to see what it was about. Arrived in the mail a few days ago, pretty small little thing, but it was up on the internet in about 2 minutes. Theres really not much to it, first thing i did after hooking it up was to take it apart of course, small little 8x8 inch motherboard, its got a pentium looking processor there (socket 7 it looks like), along with a standard pc100 DIMM, a laptop cdrom (hooked up with a standard IDE cable, ill tell you why thats important in a bit.) and whats this.. A normal Award bios chip. This got me thinking.. I hope someone can help, or at least tell me im nuts, but I have an extra motherboard here, with a flashable bios award chip, looks the same size and all. I figure I can take the bios chip that came with the NIC, take it out, and take a brand new flashed bios chip, hook up a hard drive to the ide cable, and wala. Ive had this idea in my head the day I got it, but havent been able to work on it yet. I figure I can get some sort of generic award bios, which should let me in there to tell it what hard drive it has, and bootup to a small and cheap linux box. If anyone is interested in this, post back, ill put up a review of it after im done, if anyone else does it lemme know! (by the way the thing gets damn hot!) I might have it up on www.bahemut.com if I get a chance, been very busy lately though.

      ----------

      Geist

      --
      The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he doesn't exist.
    4. Re:Ah, the NIC... by Klaruz · · Score: 1

      It's already an xterminal. Think of it as a linux box with no hard drive that runs off a cdrom, it already has a modem, ethernet, etc. I think net booting it wouldn't be a problem either.

    5. Re:Ah, the NIC... by Stradenko · · Score: 1

      I got one of these suckers for my dad (all he does is check stocks quotes) in trade for his p75 box.
      It's nifty, after setting it up for him I thought about getting one for myself - put it in my living room or something and have it for guests.

    6. Re:Ah, the NIC... by Seth+Cohn · · Score: 2

      The bios will work fine without a flash.
      It's a standard bios.

      This ain't an I-opener, and unlike the I-opener, the thinknic guys are very helpful.

      add a HD if you want, but why? No challenge, and the space and PS aren't up to it. CD or flash is much more fun to play with and hack around on.

      The motherboard should be overclockable, so take out the cyrix 266 and put in something stronger, etc... that might be fun. etc...etc...

      --
      Help achieve Liberty in your lifetime - join the Free State Project - http://www.freestateproject.org
    7. Re:Ah, the NIC... by ibbey · · Score: 1

      So what would be involved in setting this up as an x-terminal? If it's easy, this could be a VERY cool toy...

  43. Re:Ah, the NIC... (sounds neat but the resolution) by Nick+Mitchell · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be possible, then, to burn your own CD with the modifications to XF86Config?

  44. 1024x768 by cjsnell · · Score: 1

    I'm guessing that the reason why invisik couldn't get his/her NIC to run at a higher resolution is because the XF86Config file has 800x600 only and since its on a read-only CD, it can't be changed. I'm sure if you burned your own CD with an improved XF86Config, that this would not be a problem. What kind of graphics board only supports 800x600x16? A 1Mb card? I'll bet it has something better.

    1. Re:1024x768 by Hoyt · · Score: 1

      It uses the SiS 5597 chipset and can share up to 4MB of memory for video. It should be capable of 1024x768.

      Actually, yoiu are correct since there is only the choice of the smaller screen size available in the XF86Config file. Could it have been so hard to have included it?

      --

      What if the Hokey Pokey _is_ what it's all about?

  45. Napster - key point was SUPERVISION by Seth+Finkelstein · · Score: 3
    The court: But plaintiffs have argued, and I think persuasively, that defendant is capable of exercising supervisory powers over its service.
    This is a key element of the ruling. Napster was not just providing a device, with no assocation with the user after a sale. To wit:
    Although defendant, as I said, contends that it is technologically difficult to distinguish copyrighted and authorized from not copyrighted or copyrighted and unauthorized, defendant has taken great paints to inform the court about methods it uses for blocking users about whom rights holders complain. The defendant can in fact police, and will have to given the nature of its program and the very purposes of it, police its service. And the court finds that, in fact, the defendant does have the right and ability to supervise.
  46. Re:hmmm, reading that judges... by shayne321 · · Score: 1

    .... whackin' yer cluestick? :)

    --
    Today I didn't even have to use my AK; I got to say it was a good day -- Icecube
  47. Re:Ah, the NIC... (sounds neat but the resolution) by tshak · · Score: 1

    My question is, since it's got USB, can I not expand the storage to use it to store my own data with say a Zip 250? IMHO it would have been smart to include drivers of popular USB storage devices so that one can download their own APPS.

    --

    There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
  48. Re:NIC...Good Idea? by smolix · · Score: 1

    This is what Netscape probably will be good for.
    Except for the usual crashes it makes a good mailing program.

  49. Re:What I Love Mandrake For by java_sucks · · Score: 1

    Sorry to hear about your problems with Mandrake. I bought 7.1 ( $30 bucks..can't beat that ) a few weeks ago and had it installed and running in about a half hour. The install was the most painless install I've ever had. It found my parallel zip drive and created a mount point for it, it configured X perfectly for my generic video card and generic monitor... the only thing it missed was my network card. (non PCI so I couldn't blame it). I gave it an A++ for the install.

    The only problem I've had was when I used Drakconf to try to change my resolution. It flaked out pretty bad and I had to hack the XF86Config by hand to get X back...All in all I would recommend Mandrake to anybody who wants to try Linux, especially a newbie.

  50. Re:Napster - tool of the common theif. by Logan · · Score: 2
    Ban the crowbars!

    Possession of legal software such as Napster should only be punished when a crime is proven to have been committed.

    logan

  51. Support for PCTEL modems? by smolix · · Score: 1

    A close look at the website of the NIC box reveals that they are using a PCTEL softmodem. Anyone knows whether such linux drivers are generally available (PCTEL said they wouldn't sell to the public)?

    1. Re:Support for PCTEL modems? by cetan · · Score: 2

      The "Linmdoem" pages here should provide more than enough info on the subject.

      google is always your friend. :)

      --
      In Soviet Russia...michael would be rotting in Siberia!
  52. Re:NIC...Good Idea? by pheonix · · Score: 1

    The review indicated that only the web browsing component was installed, ergo no Communicator...that's what I'm confused about.

  53. Re:Application for Renewel of amazon.com domain na by rumba · · Score: 1

    http://www.com.org is already taken, so you cannot designate amazon.com.org to them. You are an ingrate, but a somewhat amusing ingrate.

  54. Napster court analogy humor by Seth+Finkelstein · · Score: 3
    This was hilarious - regarding an amount of a bond to be posted:
    Ramos: I begin by reference to your honor's analogy about the orphan asking for the mercy of the court. This is the orphan not only asking for the mercy of the court but asking the court for compensation for the loss of the parents the orphan killed.
  55. Judge Patel by Elvis+Maximus · · Score: 2

    From the ruling:

    [Songs available on Napster] are, in fact, uploaded or downloaded, or at least can be and generally are, in their entirety.

    This is a bad sign: clearly Judge Patel has never actually used Napster.

    -

    --

    -
    Give me liberty or give me something of equal or lesser value from your glossy 32-page catalog.

  56. Re:And the obvious difference is... by AME · · Score: 2
    That's an interesting parallel, except that it isn't very parallel.

    In the case of Slim Jims, they are used frequently for legal purposes. It would be difficult to argue that 99.97% of Slim Jim use is illegal. A lot of criminals do use them, but it doesn't make up the overwhelming majority of use in the same way that Napster is overwhelmingly used for illegal purposes.

    Napster does have a legal use, but very, very, very (very, very) few always use it legally and that's unlikely to change.

    --

    --
    "I have a good idea why it's hard to verify programs. They're usually wrong." --Manuel Blum, FOCS 94
  57. Re:Empeg by phrenzy · · Score: 1
    Has anyone considered getting this thing to work with airport/lucent wireless NICs yet

    Yep, our chief tech has an Airport Bridge in his Miata, connected to his empeg, and can download music to it as if it were on the local net. There are lots of potential applications for this technology, which is backed up with a neat wakeup and task schedule facility (so you can do timed stuff without running your car battery flat).

    Example - get your PC to drag down internet news or market reports before you wake up and transfer them to your car, for listening on the morning commute.

    rob@empeg.com

    --
    -- Freddie Starr ate my empeg
  58. A nation of shoplifters by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
    Fair enough, and an accurate reading of current laws- however, you're missing something on a deeper level.

    One shoplifter is a criminal.

    A hundred shoplifters is a jail.

    A thousand shoplifters is a prison.

    A nation of shoplifters- is a new law.


    Politicians forget this at their peril. Judges? Judges don't need to understand it- it's not really their place to change the rules so ostentatiously. The politicians are the ones who have to be aware of situations like this.

    Expect it to continue to be a hot topic-for-the-common-man and great potential-vote-getter. Already politicians are looking askance at the RIAA side for making absurd claims (such as that the Home Recording Act means nothing and conveys no permissions to copy). Add to this the amount of cheap positive publicity available to politicians aligning themselves with that 'nation of shoplifters', many of whom may be perfect selfish one-issue voters, and there's little chance the rules will remain the same.

    1. Re:A nation of shoplifters by Cannonball · · Score: 2

      Oh that's right, so many of us 19-30 year olds vote so very often that we, alone, could unseat a judge. SUUUUUREE. Just like we could vote in a president. The fallacy that if "everyone voted, we'd win" goes back to the Simpsons (everything in this life does) episode where Bart runs for class president. Sure he's gonna win, he's got all the polls...but then only Martin and his buddy vote and guess who's president? As an age-group we don't vote enough. I've voted every time I've had the option since I turned eighteen, but how many of my compatriots in college did? Maybe 20%. 1 in 5. IF I'm lucky. Pathetic, isn't it? The judges aren't changing the rules "ostentatiously" they're just enforcing the ones we already have. I don't think Dubya is gonna get up on the stand and say "I wanna Free Napster" neither is Gore, for that matter. It's all sans-point if you ask me.

      --
      So there I was. Naked. In a refrigerator. With a potroast on my knees. Smokin a cigar. That's when it got REALLY weird.
  59. Re:College students with money to pay the RIAA? by substrate · · Score: 3
    For a realistic survey they should've picked a suitable sized random population of music listeners who uses Napster and an equal sized random population of music listners who don't use Napster. I'm not too sure the results would've been any more favourable for the "But it encourages us to buy your CD's" argument, but thats just my personal statistics looking at highly payed engineer and computer scientist friends.

    Considering the quantity of beer consumed by college students, pleading poverty doesn't hold a whole lot of water though. It also doesn't excuse copywrite violation, music isn't a necessity and the radio is free as are most local bands if you bother to go to the bars where they play.

  60. Re:NIC...Good Idea? by for(;;); · · Score: 2

    > On that note, where's the ability to read email?

    Er, stick a paper clip in the CDROM hole. Take out the CD. Put in whatever bootable CD you want (Linux, windows, BSD, ProDOS-86...). Intentionally or not, they've allowed the things to be easily hackable.
    -------

    --

    "Whatever happened to fair use?"
    -- Duff-Man
  61. Napster ruling - something flawed? by Proteus · · Score: 5
    Having read the transcript, I find that the judge, though seemingly having a small amount of bias toward the RIAA, did its best to make a fair ruling. That's not to say I agree with it.

    Particularly troubling is the Court's assertion that a personal computer does not constitute a home audio recording device. This could raise the issue of recording MP3's for personal use could come under fire. Besides that, since a PC can be (and commonly is) used to record audio, I think it falls well into the definition of a Home Audio Recording Device. If you doubt it's common, why does Windows include Sound Recorder??

    That one comment is enough to make me a bit wary of the Judge's technical understanding of what is at stake in the Napster trials.

    All of that said, I do think Napster et al will have a hard time showing that their primary purpose is noninfringing -- they shot themselves in the foot by advertising thier capacity to allow users to infringe. I think it would be in thier best interest to show why someone who legally owns a song (i.e. on CD) would download rather than rip an MP3. I think that case could be made: with my DSL, I can download a song much faster than I can rip and encode!

    --

    --
    We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
    1. Re:Napster ruling - something flawed? by theNAM666 · · Score: 1
      Particularly troubling is the Court's assertion that a personal computer does not constitute a home audio recording device.

      I believe the issue in question is whether a personal computer constitutes a digital home audio recording device under the statutory terms of the home recording act. If it did, it might be further restricted, because it was not protected as a general-purpose device. See the Diamond RIO case, where the RIO narrowly escaped restrictions because it was not a serial copy device (one way, onto the RIO, only).

      The designers of the home recording act specifically excluded computers from the definition -- because the act's restrictions would have hobbled computer manufacturers. Under these purely legal terms, a home computer clearly is not a home audio recording device, because it can do so much more :).

    2. Re:Napster ruling - something flawed? by Proteus · · Score: 1
      I believe the issue in question is whether a personal computer constitutes a digital home audio recording device under the statutory terms of the home recording act.

      According to the transcript, the judge indicated that the court did not find the PC to be a home audio recording device. While the issue at hand may have been whether it was digital, the court found that it is not any kind of home audio recording device.

      --

      --
      We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
    3. Re:Napster ruling - something flawed? by chriscrick · · Score: 1
      The reason that a computer is not considered a home audio recording device is that computers were specifically excluded from the Act that defines them. If this were not the case, every hard drive, Zip disk and CD-R manufacturer would be required by law to kick back a percentage of sales to the RIAA to cover potential copyright infringement losses. When the law was being written, computer manufacturers successfully argued that this was absurd, and so they were excluded.

      Chris

    4. Re:Napster ruling - something flawed? by american_bongo · · Score: 1

      Truthfully, this makes no sense to me at all. I know a LOT of artists who's work is almost COMPLETELY done on a computer. For instance, there's Shpongle who does all his magic with a g3/300 and Logic Pro Platinum.

      Truthfully, the cases done on a local level really mean shit. What's going to happen is, whoever loses will appeal, and it'll go to the state supreme court. Then whoever loses that, will appeal, and it'll go to the national Supreme Court. Then the Supreme Court will decide, but by then (it'll be a good 3-4 years) Napster will be irrelevant because everyone will have moved on to a better service. The Napster case is not landmark, nor will its impact really effect the trade of MP3's on the net, and furthermore, anything else like VCD's or software, because there will always be services that allow us to trade whatever we want anonymously. These cases only force us to be more discrete and more vigilant in designing software that doesn't allow one person/company/business to be placed for blame for copyright infringement and piracy.

    5. Re:Napster ruling - something flawed? by Gog_Magog · · Score: 1

      The judge was citing a specific act when saying a PC doesn't constitute a Home Audio device. The judge has no leway in the definition, the Act does the defining.

  62. Re:imac by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 2

    You know I had a thought about Imac's earlier and your post reminded me of it...

    6 (or 7) years ago my high school (which I was a junior in way back then) finally upgraded their computers to something a bit more modern and bought newer macs to replace their aged aple IIe's. These PC's were one unit (monitor and cpu/inards in one box) and only had a keyboard that could conenct to them (they even lacked network ports). They also only had a CD-rom drive and floppy...

    The thought is besides the support for USB (which had yet to be invented then) and the fact they had a floppy (which was required for the schools use, becuase of those tiny 500 Mb HD's mostly) they were just like Imacs without the funky colored cases... So why was the Imac a 'new' concept...? Funky colors? Lack of that floppy? USB?

    Maybe it's just me, but I don't see those as being soemthign that make the Imac new and not the same old thing made current...

    --
    we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
  63. Re: I want a C-64 like NIC!!! by ogre2112 · · Score: 1

    Hard Drive (10GB) $99
    Monitor (15") $129
    Motherboard (Cheapo) $99

    $327, just under the price of your "Full blown
    computer". Where do you shop? You must get
    some great deals. :-\

  64. Translation (slightly OT) by TJamieson · · Score: 3

    Just wanted to say, I've found when visiting non-english sites that FreeTranslation works better than the Fish. http://www.freetranslation.com for those interested.

    --
    For the last time, PIN Number and ATM Machine are redundancies!
  65. Re:Bias by NaughtyEddie · · Score: 2
    Did you read your own quote?

    I don't think any of them are ... what you would call without flaw.

    The judge specifically denies the validity of the evidence claiming Napster harmed record sales; he also denies the validity of the evidence claiming Napster helped record sales. This evidence was not part of his decision.

    You're the biased one, my friend. You misread that one quite badly.

    --

    --
    It's a .88 magnum -- it goes through schools.
    -- Danny Vermin
  66. Re:GPLNet - the GNU freedom by streetlawyer · · Score: 2
    I wrote the original troll, and believe it or not, it was actually relevant and satirical at the time -- the story was about the proliferation of Gnutella/Freenet type schemes (why the /. crowd seem to love Gnutella when they're clearly ripping off the FSF by pretending to be Gnu when they ain't is beyond me, btw). I am, shall we say, not pleased that my intellectual property (which is mine, btw, as clearly admitted by Slashdot in their disclaimer) is being abused in this way and turned into spam. I've asked Malda et al politely to do something about this abuse, but so far no luck -- I think they don't realise that while Microsoft cares about the bad publicity associated with getting tough, I don't.

    In answer to your question, my original half-assed idea would be that, if you'd developed a product after ripping off GPL code, but added proprietary extensions to that code, you might want to distribute your derivative product as freeware, to build up a user base who could then be locked in. But you'd want to do so anonymously, so that the FSF could never prove it was you that had distributed it (proprietary derivative works for internal use are OK). So you could pay a fee to the GPLNet gateway (me) and we'd do your dirty work, untraceably. The revenue model doesn't really work, but nor does FreeNet's.

    But the really important point here is the violation of my property rights. I didn't mind this spam in the past, but they've now stolen something that belongs to me. I hold VA Linux, the owner of this site, responsible.

  67. cluster NIC? by friscolr · · Score: 1
    I've done no cost studies for this, but does anyone else know if the NIC would be a good, cheap solution for clustering? $200 per node for a PII 266, all you'd have to do is burn the right cd's for them.

    also, to the people who recieved one: are the chips upgradeable?


    -f

  68. shoplifters of the world... by dash2 · · Score: 1

    all together now:

    learn to love me
    assemble the ways
    now, today, tomorrow and always
    my only weakness is a list of crimes
    my only weakness is, well, never mind....


    ----------------------------------
    What are the weapons of happiness?

  69. networked lawnmower by dash2 · · Score: 1

    "gee, imagine a Beowulf cluster of _those_."
    ----------------------------------
    What are the weapons of happiness?

  70. Music - new advertising venue by ch-chuck · · Score: 2

    What musicians should do is start placing ads in the songs and charging advertisers for 'ears' -
    That's Right! Just give the music away (with a small fee for cd's and physical media) but start each number off with a smartly targeted advert for a meal at McDonalds or whatever, paid for by McD, make it short enough that reaching for the advance button isn't worth it - and bury the ad in the song somewhere unexpected, so you've just d/l'd the latest Metallica track and say 1.25 minutes in the music fades a little and Lars comes on with a pitch for Spencers Gifts or something...... That oughta please everyone. Well, at least folks would have to go thru the trouble of editing it out and leaving a abrupt inexplicable transition so that it's obvious something was cut.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  71. Re:Is the Empeg wasted in a car? by Wiwi+Jumbo · · Score: 1

    True, but wouldn't that only work for a computer that was close to the stereo???

    If you could get rid of the hard drives, and hook it up over network, you wouldn't have to duplicate mp3's to it, or need to fiddle with the computer when you didn't want to. (And let's face it, only a real geek, wants to play with the computer during a party... unless of course it's that kinda of party. ;) You would need to leave the PC on, but most early adopters probably wouldn't mind that too much. (And it would give me a better reason then SETI to leave my box on. :)

    Wiwi
    "I trust in my abilities,

    --
    Wiwi
    "I trust in my abilities,
    but I want more then they offer"
  72. Re:NIC to the rescue by DeadSea · · Score: 1
    One of the features of a network computer is that it has no hard drive. The thing boots the operating system off a CD. The few local files that it saves (ie Netscape bookmarks) are stored on a piece of flash memory connected to an IDE channel.

    I mean, it would be nice and all to have an mp3 player in your car that couldn't play mp3s unless your car was plugged into your network.

  73. Re:NIC...Good Idea? by DeadSea · · Score: 1
    My boss just got one of these things and he is considering setting up our sales force with something like this.

    Consider the advantages:

    • No hard drive. The system cannot be corrupted by people installing software. Quite a plus for windows boxes with no access control
    • Boots off a CD. Anytime your sales staff needs new software, you just issue new CDRs to everybody
    • Ease of use. For example, you can always turn the thing off just by hitting the power button
    Of course, this would only work for those with a small set of repetitive tasks that they need a computer for. You would also need the network resources to support it all.
  74. Those NICs are neat, BUT... by Evaner · · Score: 2

    ...it's only good for Internet surfing. If they add StarOffice, you hook up a USB printer (if Linux supports them, I'm not sure, and I'm too lazy to look) and it'd be perfect as a machine for granny. They've got 490MB still left on their system CD, so it's feasable...

    ...wait a second...this smells fishy. Aren't they breaking GPL somehow? I know it sounds weird, but they don't give you a system SOURCE CD! RMS will be furious if he finds out about this! ;-)

    All in all, that NIC is a neat idea! It even has a NIC, so you can hook up your cable modem to it as well! (Get it, the NIC has a NIC...har har har?)

    ----

    --
    Toora Loora Toora Loo Rye Aye
    1. Re:Those NICs are neat, BUT... by Klaruz · · Score: 1

      ...wait a second...this smells fishy. Aren't they breaking GPL somehow? I know it sounds weird, but they don't give you a system SOURCE CD! RMS will be furious if he finds out about this! ;-)

      Has anybody written oracle asking for the source of the programs they've modified? If not we shouldn't complain, all they have to do is provide source on demand, not include it if you don't need it, or post it on an ftp/web server.

    2. Re:Those NICs are neat, BUT... by Klaruz · · Score: 1

      If they have not modified the software in any way, only compiled it, do they have to give you the source?

      No, that's why I said "the source of the packages they've modified."

    3. Re:Those NICs are neat, BUT... by Hoyt · · Score: 1

      Does modifying scripts count? It shouldn't since they are plain text and contain the original lines commented out.

      --

      What if the Hokey Pokey _is_ what it's all about?

  75. And the obvious difference is... by god_of_the_machine · · Score: 1

    ... do I need to bother mentioning it? Napster was created for the distribution of illegal music copies, and its primary function is to distribute illegal music copies. Yes, it has other uses, but they are minor and nearly irrelavent.

    Ziploc was created to package food products, and its primary function is to package food products. Yes, it has other uses, but they are minor and nearly irrelavent.

    Steal your music, for all I care... but don't pretend that it's the same as using Ziploc bags.

    -rt-

    --

    -rt-
    ** Evil Canadians are taking over the world. Learn about the conspiracy
    1. Re:And the obvious difference is... by technos · · Score: 2

      Slim Jims.

      They were created so car theives could pop your door lock. Theives invented them, and their primary purpose was to break and enter/grand theft.

      Legal. Why? Because there was a legal use; So police, emergency personel and the average schmo could unlock his car without keys.

      That's the way it has worked in meatspace, and the way it should stay on the 'net.

      --
      .sig: Now legally binding!
    2. Re:And the obvious difference is... by Snard · · Score: 3

      Are you sure about this? I just bought a Slim Jim and tried opening someone's car door with it, and it just gets all mushed up and stuff. And it doesn't even taste good anymore. Perfectly good wasted of a buck, if you ask me.

      Maybe I should have let it sit out in the sun for a week to get harder or something.

      --
      - Mike
    3. Re:And the obvious difference is... by HamNRye · · Score: 2

      That "bong" is spelled 'bhong' just for starters, and were designed in times when cannabis was legal. And furthermore, their primary use is for the smoking of tabac and other herbal smoking mixes. Also, in many places and states the selling of bhongs is illegal as well as possession. Here in Richmond, owning a bhong is punishable by a $500 fine. Used or not used.

      The one inch square bags are also excellent for the storage of various herbs etc...

      But the debate rages in another direction:

      Napster from it's initiation was designed for the piracy of music, advertised itself as "The Place" to steal music, and then covered their pages and FAQ's with lines about how the recording industry can't stop them etc...

      If ziplock baggies had a big starburst on the front of the package stating "Now keeps Pot 30% fresher!" and had a logo of a little Joint hanging out in his ziplock "pad", they'd probably run into some problems with the law.

      Slim Jim's are not advertised as "The quickest way to Drive Off your Dream Car", neither are Paper Clips advertised for picking locks on desks, coffee filters are not advertised as the best hash filter you'll find. Even the darn horoscopes in 7-11 are not audacious enough to advertise "Glass Case makes ideal crack pipe!".

      Anything can be used to commit a crime in one way or another but they do not advertise them as such because they realize that there will be repercussions. Why did Napster take off while Gnutella has lingered in the "What's that?" bin?? Because they not only based their service around the theft, they provided easy to follow instructions and tech support. That does make them accomplices.

      Look at L0phtcrack... Is that advertised as the latest greatest hacking utility?? Do they have instructions for attaching to port 139 and getting the Sam DB?? No, it is a security utility for checking your own orginizations passwords. (So they say... L0phtcrack and NetBus are the best computer programs since grep and more...)

      The real truth of this is that a nation of shoplifters are mad at the security guard for busting them. I bet alot of the same people bitch about not getting paid for shareware, etc... (The rest either have no thoughts worth stealing [i.e. 99.9% of the world] or believe in free software and wonder if some big company is stealing from his code.) Even those in the last category should frown on Napster for the way they "protect" copyrights etc...

      If Napster had tried to copyright "A file sharing system based on a database of user files across the internet" this forum would be full of rabid protest. Now it's just a bunch of kids who don't want their cookie jar taken away.

      The problem with Napster is not function, but form.

      ~Jason

      Put an end to the post office! That's who delivers my seeds! http://www.hempqc.com

    4. Re:And the obvious difference is... by echo-e · · Score: 1

      but he's right... it has never mattered in the past that something was used primarily for illegal practices, just that it had some practical legal use. forget about "Ziploc" and think about those little tiny half inch square baggies that are useless for anything other than storing a tab of LSD...or the 1 inch square bags that are perfect for nothing but about twenty bucks of weed...or what about pipes in general? and its not just drugs.... what about weapons? they are made to physical hurt or kill people. what about cell phone scanners and cable descramblers and all the publications that explain how to make bombs...

      the list goes on and on.

      what is the difference between downloading napster and buying a bong in regards to my potential to commit a crime?

    5. Re:And the obvious difference is... by Y · · Score: 1

      What about weapons? I think America needs tougher gun control laws. There is no reason anyone should need an automatic assault rifle to take down a deer on a hunting trip. If you need that much firepower to kill an animal, you're a piss poor hunter. I would draw the line at regular hunting rifles and maybe a small set of handguns for those homeowners who insist on protecting themselves. Anything else goes beyond what is necessary for self-defense or hunting.

      What good are cell phone scanners except as a tool to spy on your neighbors? And I have never seen anyone use a bong for anything but marijuana.

      Napster, likewise, exists explicitly for the purpose of trading mp3s. They have stated on their website that you won't have to sift through pages of unknown artists, so any argument about Napster providing exposure to underground artists is bullshit. Despite the RIAA's inherently evil nature, Napster doesn't have a leg to stand on.

      What is the difference between downloading napster and buying a bong or an assault rifle with regards to crime potential? Not much. Their primary uses all amount to something criminal because none of them have practical legal use. Unless, of course, you can convince me otherwise.

      > Mike

      --
      "There is no culture in computer science, only cults." - M. Felleisen
  76. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  77. "POSIX C++ compiler" by seebs · · Score: 2

    Uh-huh. And a POSIX SCSI cable, I suppose?

    Hint: POSIX only does Unixy standards. Language specs are generally ANSI, ISO, or both.

    --
    My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    1. Re:"POSIX C++ compiler" by seebs · · Score: 3

      POSIX doesn't specify compilers. You mean an ANSI/ISO compiler with a POSIX library.

      Compiler and library are, fairly often, separate tools.

      It's dimly possible that POSIX has special C++ bindings, but so far as I know, they still just use the POSIX C bindings, and rely on the link-compatability with C++.

      There is no such thing as POSIX C++. There is such a thing as ISO C++ on a POSIX system, but that's subtly different.

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
  78. Re:College students with money to pay the RIAA? by AethericFlux · · Score: 1
    I'm not too sure the results would've been any more favourable for the "But it encourages us to buy your CD's" argument

    The point I was making is that it's not a monetary loss if the people involved wouldn't have made the purchase anyway. The very few mp3s that I have (that aren't from my own cd collection) are from cds that I would never actually pay money for.

    Considering the quantity of beer consumed by college students, pleading poverty doesn't hold a whole lot of water though.

    Possibly, but I'm from Australia, and most of my friends attending college won't come out to a club on the basis that they can't afford the $5 door charge. That's about the price of two glasses of beer.. not that I'd drink the stuff.

    music isn't a necessity and the radio is free as are most local bands

    Music is a necessity and where I'm from, radio stations means recycled top 40 tunes. I'll stick to music with taste, thanks.

  79. Re: I want a C-64 like NIC!!! by Kirkoff · · Score: 1

    At a local computer store, they're selling used PCs for $199 ($299 about 2mo ago) they're PPro/200's with 32 MB or 64 MB of ECC RAM, and 2GB or 4GB scsi disks. You can also put in another PPro if you want. $199 w/ a cheap moniter gets you close. Good luck on finding 64/4... --Josh

    --
    There are exactly 42,935,718 letter sized sheets in a square mile.
  80. Re:Your Sig by Wah · · Score: 1

    it's more of a "point" thing and will probably disappear soon, but point taken, more bass in the voice.

    --

    --
    +&x
  81. Re:GPLNet - the GNU freedom by Wah · · Score: 1

    oh, and in a completely off-topic note (not that it matters) it seems moderation has been turned off in a karmic sense. good riddance.

    --

    --
    +&x
  82. And the past and the present by LuckyLuke58 · · Score: 1

    I keep hearing people criticizing NC's, saying that they'll never catch on, blah blah blah.

    But the concept is not at all new, it's basically the "dumb terminal" revisited, and in one form or another, this method of network computing has been used for decades, and used a lot - people just don't seem to notice it, because they don't explicitly get called NC's when they're used. For example when I was studying Comp Sci our sys admin set up a lab of 50 PC's running slackware with X, using NFS to mount home dirs off the server. In concept, that's basically a lab of NC's. This sort of thing has been in common practice for about the last 20 years, and will continue to be.

  83. Re:And another obvious difference is... by K8Fan · · Score: 2

    Yes, thanks for the correction. I was typing quicker than I was thinking. The Xerox sales force got some fractional percentage of the sale price of the machine for each copy made on that machine. Each machine had a counter, and every month some guy in a crisp white shirt would "read the meter".

    --
    "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
  84. Re:Quantity of beer... by substrate · · Score: 1
    No such luck here, I'm Canadian. 11 bucks for the last pitcher of beer I had while in university. On the other hand I actually drank good beer as opposed to Milwaukee's Best or whatever else is on sale for 6 bucks per case of 24.

    The point is that no matter how cheap you remember everything else being there were other non-essential expenses. College students choose where they spend the money (and most College students I knew had extensive if estoric CD collections). If they're spending less on CD's now and there is a correlation between this and mp3 then it's pretty fair to say that mp3 hurts profits in that market segment.

  85. Re:The bias is subtle and broad, if anything by jamused · · Score: 1

    Since the appeals court struck down the injunction, and in particular specifically overruled the line of reasoning that the judge was taking (that what people are doing with Napster can't fall under fair use since computers aren't audio recording devices under the law), I guess it's not so clear-cut that Napster has violated the letter of the law.

  86. Re:Ah, the NIC... (sounds neat but the resolution) by Grab · · Score: 1

    This just gives you a cheap little server you can stick in a corner, maybe give it an old 14" monitor in case you ever need to look at it, and forget about it. If you're just going to use it as a server, you're hardly ever going to look at it, so what do you need a 1600x1200 true-colour display for?

    Grab.

  87. Re:Ah, the NIC... (sounds neat but the resolution) by Royster · · Score: 1

    It's my understanding that the filesystem resides primarially on the CD which is not removable during normal operations. I expect that you could NFS mount your filesystem from a server and free up the CD, but a standalone system couldn't run without the system CD in place.

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous sig, unfortunately the sig limit is too small to contain i
  88. Re:The bias is subtle and broad, if anything by Dervak · · Score: 1

    The problem with your comment is that you seem to confuse law with ethics. Whats legal may be unethical and whats illegal may be ethical. IMO copyright infringement is clearly ethical, as long as you, the copier, do not make a profit by it.

    Why is it ethical? Because there are only winners here. You get something you wouldnt otherwise have, and the copyright holder loses nothing, as long as you wouldnt have bought it in case copying had been impossible.

    It is different if you sell illegal copies, because then the copyright holder loses business from people who otherwise would have been paying customers.

    Why do we love the laws against spam and rail against the laws against theft? I guess that we're just not the victims.....

    Spam is an irritant and bandwidth-hog for all, but copyright laws are only good for a minority of the population, and bad for a majority.

    And BTW, for the umpteenth time, copyright infringement != theft. Even the legal system recognizes this - thats why theres two different fscking terms for it! In theft, someone must be bereaved of something. This does not happen in case of copying. Potential profits do not qualify; if they did Acme Cola could claim you "steal" from them since you choose not to buy their cola...

    Perhaps we should just phrase it "All technology is good except that which can be used to spy on or annoy me. If the technology harms a large enough corporation it's even better."

    Actually it is (IMO) good if a certain technology harms a large enough corporation. Large corporations are dangerous for the rights of common people, by their largeness alone. Large corporations have the depths of pockets needed for almost any kind of abuse of the system, and they have no qualms about doing so.

    Corporations do not exist to serve the people, only to make profit for the shareholders, and if it can increase the profits so screw the environment, working conditions and health risk concerns. Corporations do not even have the pitiful checks and balances the political system has. IMO one of the worst mistakes of our current capitalism is that it allows corporations to become arbitrarily large. Already big business contol mainstream media and buy any laws they want, and it is sure to become worse in the future. So yes, anything harming big corporations is good.

    /Dervak

  89. Is the Empeg wasted in a car? by Wiwi+Jumbo · · Score: 2

    It seems really cool... but surely there are better uses then a car!

    Hell, with a 200MMX, I could use one that fit's in a drive bay! (Tho' if I could pay for one, I could pay for a better processor....)

    Or how about a stereo??? How many mp3 devices are there for a stereo setup?

    Wiwi
    "I trust in my abilities,

    --
    Wiwi
    "I trust in my abilities,
    but I want more then they offer"
    1. Re:Is the Empeg wasted in a car? by HamNRye · · Score: 1

      At those prices you could just buy a computer.

      MP3 devices for stereo setup?? There's (again) the PC... An 1/8" to 2 male RCA y cable does the trick...

  90. Re: I want a C-64 like NIC!!! by technos · · Score: 2

    Let's be a bit more complete, eh? Case, ram, etc?

    8G HD, Quantum (discontinued), new: $41
    Monitor, Komodo, 15", bought new with rebate: $99
    M571 mobo, Alladin, SS7, new: $27
    32M PC66 SDRAM, used but tested: $34
    AMD K6-II 475, used but tested: $25
    Cheap mid-tower: $40
    Sales Tax (Michigan): $15.96
    _______________________
    Total: $281.96


    You can do a bit better if you pick and choose.

    --
    .sig: Now legally binding!
  91. Re:Application for Renewel of amazon.com domain na by technos · · Score: 1

    It was funny the first time, and ordinarily I'd
    'flame on' on this pass, but it has finally gotten
    the recognition it deserved in the first place.

    Okay, so it needs at least another +1, Funny to
    get that, but it's on it's way, right? ;)

    --
    .sig: Now legally binding!
  92. Re:College students with money to pay the RIAA? by .sig · · Score: 1

    Well, once again us poor college students are being stereotyped by everyone ner the sun. Is it any wonder that we're always protesting something?
    I was one of those typical "poor college students" who spent about $200 a month on alcohol and $20 on food; I sure would have liked to get that kind of free ride from Mommy and Daddy. (And I'm not stupid enough for credit card debt, another rarity apparently.) By the time I graduated just last may I had managed to download about 3 songs off of napster, all of which I owned.
    But I digress... my point is that college students are just as diverse, if not more so, than pretty much every other group out there.
    At least where I went to college, I'm sure yours is/was/will be different

    --
    -Space for rent
  93. Re:NIC...Good Idea? by Mutok · · Score: 1

    The one problem I have with the current trend of promoting easy-to-use tools to those who need them is that the Internet is being populated by those who do not know what they are doing, are (sometimes) gullible, and cheapen connectivity for the rest of us. I know many people who think the Internet is America Online.

  94. NIC by Hoyt · · Score: 2

    Mine arrived Friday. Very cool: Netscape with Flash, Realplayer. It uses a PCTEL software modem, a PCnet ethernet chip, SoundPro sound chip, SiS 5597 chipset and an SiS 7001 USB chip. The boared is a mini-ATX with a 100 Watt power supply; the case is about the size of a phone book.

    The coolest part is the 4MB EEPROM - it is configured as /dev/hdb1 and the CDROM is mounted as /dev/hda. You can access the BIOS on boot-up with "delete". Setting up a dial-up connection or a LAN connection is easy. It should be trivial to replace the CD-ROM with a hard drive, but there is no room in the case.

    You boot up into Netscape and remain there. The NIC uses the Blackbox window manager, but it just displays a pretty graphic in the root window - no right or left click choices to make except re-start browser.

    With only 190 MB of stuff on the CDROM itself, it would be easy to add programs you want, change default values, etc., and burn a new CD-ROM. There may be some copyright issues with the NIC software, however. You should even be able to make a DOS bootable CD and load DOS-based games (Quake anyone?).

    I was able to boot DemoLinux on it, but without the drivers, The sound, modem asnd ethernet wouldn't work. It would be pretty easy to hack DemoLinux to include the drivers and produce a full Linux with StarOffice.

    I was able to open an xterm from my main box on teh NIC and display X apps on it remotely. It does suffer from font server problems, however. IF the video is capable of 1024x768 @ 72 Hz, it could make a great X Terminal.

    I hope to have some pics up at the Peninsula Linux Users Group website before long.

    --

    What if the Hokey Pokey _is_ what it's all about?

  95. Sweet! MyNewB2B.com for $199! by PDHoss · · Score: 2

    It's definately a Linux box, running Netscape Navigator ...

    Cool. Now that I have a Java webserver, I'll start working on my IPO ;)

    It's as mean as kicking a puppy, but I couldn't help myself.

    PDHoss


    ======================================
    --
    ======================================
    Writers get in shape by pumping irony.
  96. Re:Application for Renewel of amazon.com domain na by Grahf666 · · Score: 1

    Is this real? If it is, I'll bet Amazon goes for amazon.net. They are allowed to have that, aren't they?

    Better yet! Maybe they'll sue the lesbians for domain name squatting! :P

  97. Actually the obvious difference is ... by HerrNewton · · Score: 2

    That Glad, makers of Ziplock(tm) baggies, doesn't have a list of places where you can buy drugs in their baggies.

    ----

    --

    ----
    Am I the only one who thinks Microsoft is a misnomer? Perhaps Macrosoft would be a better fit?
  98. the NIC by nomadic · · Score: 2

    You know, I'd pay $199 just for a nethack terminal.
    --

  99. Re:And another obvious difference is... by Pope · · Score: 2

    Sony did NOT invent VHS. They invented the Betamax, which had higher quality than JVC's format. (and yes, I've done side-by-side testing, so don't try to refute the facts)
    As for small Ziploc bags, their great for storing all the little figures that come with Shogun, a game no geek household should be without.

    Pope

    Freedom is Slavery! Ignorance is Strength! Monopolies offer Choice!

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  100. The bias is subtle and broad, if anything by slashTadhg · · Score: 3

    I don't think the judge is biased in the narrow sense, but rather in the larger sense in that she is a conservative (not in the sense of 'Republican') who will simply interpret the law according to previous cases and the current laws--without regard to larger issues, such as constitutional limits on the powers of copyright, or examination of how these laws are getting out of hand. And that's not all a judge's role is, in fact. Judges can and have made larger, more sweeping, statements. But Patel isn't of that mold, I suspect. Here's a pretty key statement, in my opinion:

    "I cannot essentially sit by [because the infringement is hard to justify], and plaintiffs are entitled to enforce their copyright rights and not have them infringed just because the nature of the technology is such that it's too hard to identify."

    This is a fairly sweeping statement. Basically, this would allow the copyright-holders to enforce their copyrights against anything. Including the net as a whole. This is another area where the judge is not, in my opinion, considering the implications of the current state of copyright law. Also, no consideration anywhere is made of the good that the Napster service provides to the community in general. Again, a conservative and narrow view, focused on money and profit, because that's the traditional focus of this kind of case. That's not entirely Patel's fault, of course.

    Another thing that interests me is the fact that intent is considered, quite explicitly, by Patel. I didn't realize that the intent of the creators of a device could have such a large part to play in the legal fate of that device. If Napster had been created in all innocence of infringement issues, would it have a stronger defense? Or can intent merely be used as ammunition for the plaintiffs? It's hard, at this point, to imagine innocence or in fact almost anything being a viable argument, based on intent, for the defense. Which again is more of a systemic issue--one that Patel is not that concerned with, in my opinion. Naturally this brings up some of the weaknesses of the judicial system in general, but I won't address that here.

    So, what's next? If difficulty-of-enforcement is no defense, what networks are safe? The only real defense that the net itself has is that it is distributed, that it is really really big (in terms of numbers using) and that it was around for quite some time before an suits were brought against it (which would give it some defense in the intent stakes, and make it seem more like a victim of late-coming abusive users than a collaborator in copyright infringement). But any new network is it real trouble, because it doesn't have any of those defenses, and proving innocence of intent will be almost impossible. So, the copyright rulings have an additional chilling factor on technological development as well as the already-existing one on free speech; cf. cases concerning parody in particular. It would seem that the only real hope is for some titanic ruling (such as one against the entire Internet) that dramatically shows up the deleterious effects of the current 'IP' laws, and thus brings about a radical shift in direction. I'm not holding my breath.

    The final page of the transcript, showing Patel's exchanges with the attorneys, supports the above view. Patel (and I suspect she is in the mainstream of American judicial opinion here) considers Napster (and probably any other new thing that comes along and facilitates copyright infringement) to be a genie let out of the bottle. And she considers it the responsibility of Napster, the company, to put it back in the bottle. In other words, any new thing that is created that can be used to infringe copyright is going to be forced, judicially, to deal with that use or cease operation. That may sound reasonable at first, but look at it more closely and think again. Copyright infringement is very easy to do these days, due to the massive efforts put in by interested parties to extend the concept of copyright. What this ruling, and the laws that made it possible, essentially do is give to the major interested parties (MPAA, RIAA, etc.) the power to veto new technologies.

    ('Hey look, I've created a device that can duplicate anything! An end to poverty! An end to hunger! An end--what? You're representing who? What do you mean, an injunction?')

    1. Re:The bias is subtle and broad, if anything by Enjolras · · Score: 1

      First, many judges in the lower courts are quite wary of making any sweeping changes inconsistent with previous rulings. The most important thing at this level is consistency of rulings. At a higher level (on appeal) the courts, because there are fewer adverserial courts, are given (loosely, given by tradition) control to make the sweeping constitutional interpetations you describe.

      I think this is an expected, and fair ruling at this level. These are issues destined for a higher court, and I fully expect the fight to go all the way to the top. Where in my opinion, the RIAA will also prevail.

    2. Re:The bias is subtle and broad, if anything by HamNRye · · Score: 4

      Another thing that interests me is the fact that intent is considered, quite explicitly, by Patel. I didn?t realize that the intent of the creators of a device could have such a large part to play in the legal fate of that device. If Napster had been created in all innocence of infringement issues, would it have a stronger defense?

      Gosh, that seems pretty reasonable to me... The issue that we're debating is not the legality etc..., but the state of the injunction. Since their primary intent and raison'd'etre is music piracy, should the site be shut down while we consider the legality of this? Yes. If their primary intent and business was the sharing of (non-copyrighted) cookie recipes, can you justify the shutting down of the entire site?? They are not being blamed for an unexpected side effect, or unintentional use, but for designing and promoting a tool to be used for theft. From your comment it would seem you are not a total stranger to law, isn't this considered "malice and forethought"??

      At this point I would like to point out that I refer to it as theft because that is what it is under modern law.

      Judges are taught to observe the "Letter of Law" as well as the "Spirit of Law", IMHO, Napster has definitely violated the letter of the law, [All rights reserved. Unauthorized duplication, hiring, lending public performance, and broadcasting is a violation of applicable laws.] and is treading a fine line with the spirit of the law. By conservative we mean to say she more closely observes the letter of the law, as opposed to the spirit of the law. Napster is trying to turn this in to a debate of copyright laws, but in reality they are simply trying to profit from an illegal trade. (Isn't that the CIA's job??)

      The point is that they tread shaky legal ground in this arena and they have the audacity to tease the lions. If you reverse engineer a program to figure out why it crashes your system is that different than doing it to sell a "pirated" version?? I do believe so. What happened with Napster was not an unexpected consequence, but the design and purpose of the system.

      Why do we love the laws against spam and rail against the laws against theft? I guess that we're just not the victims.....

      Perhaps we should just phrase it "All technology is good except that which can be used to spy on or annoy me. If the technology harms a large enough corporation it's even better."

      ~Jason

      "I'm not biased, just consistent in my position."

  101. Re:Ah, the NIC... (sounds neat but the resolution) by timothy · · Score: 2

    The NIC sounds good for a lot of thing, but has two big problems, IMO:

    1) If I'm going to have a little hang-on-network / sit on counter Anything Box, I greedily want it to play DVDs.

    2) The resolution. If it can't do XGA, I dunno if it's worth it. It's just not an 800x600 world any more ...

    It's still very tempting as a public terminal for the common room in my apt, so my two roommates can check their email from it ... hmmm.

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  102. NICs are the future by oh+shoot · · Score: 2

    It's good to see Oracle still working on NCs. This kind of specialized device really is the way of the future. When the American consumer culture grows up and starts thinking, Oracle will be there waiting.

    Think NCs are too limited to be useful? How come your TV doesn't also cut your grass? Exactly.

    --Jeff

    1. Re:NICs are the future by evanbd · · Score: 3
      My TV does...sorta...

      After much duct tape, electrical tape, solder, etc. My ride-on lawnmower now has HDTV, a DVD player, and 5.1 Dolby Digital surround sound. It also has a NIC running over 802.11b to the home network and internet connection, all properly hacked together off the lawnmower alternator. The power was unclean at first, but that got fixed after only 3 computers and 2 DVD players. The TV seems to not like the bumps, and is slowly getting more staticky (sp?). Oh yeah, I decided I needed a splashguard after that incident with the neighbor's cat, so now it's waterproof too. Anyway, my wife is now telling me to stop mowing the lawn all the time. I can't decide whether I just shouldn't mow it three times a week or if she's just mad about the rosebush. But all in all, not too bad. Lemme know if you want more details.

      ---

  103. Empeg by iElucidate · · Score: 2

    This is an absolutely awesome MP3 system for the car. It is custom built to fit neatly into a standard stereo port, plug in to your speakers, draw power, etc. Very nice job, even includes a cool little remote and some neat software for display on the little LCD.

    I wonder what the use of the software is without the player. I mean, are you really gonna spend the thousands to make your own, or what? Of course, I'm always all for GPLing everything in sight, but is this really that important? There is no indication that I know of that the company is open to outside modifications of their code.

  104. Re:Network computers are the work of the devil by carlos_benj · · Score: 2
    Anytime a group of people start trying to subdivide the tasks a computer can/cannot do it is fairly frightening.

    You must be easily frightened.

    Many people don't want a multi-purpose, do-all, end-all device. It is often a valid idea to dedicate a box to a single function (firewall for instance). If my mom only wants to access email from home, why buy an $800.00 box that can do more than she wants when a $200.00 box will suffice?

    --

    --

    As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

  105. Perspective, perspective, perspective by gunner800 · · Score: 3

    Would suing over the SAMBA name seem so clueless in Germany?


    My mom is not a Karma whore!

    1. Re:Perspective, perspective, perspective by Evangelion · · Score: 2


      It wasn't clueless, it was a standard trademark 'infringment' (or whatever it's called when someone steps on your trademark) suit. Two pieces of networking software with the same name, one who has the trademark registered to them. You're just being treated to some of /.'s off-the-cuff bias.

      --

  106. I want a C-64 like NIC!!! by ndfa · · Score: 1

    Just a keyboard will do fine thanks! and if you can hook it up to the TV!!!

    Apple is the only company that i know that thinks outside the box, this thing is still black an old looking (a little like old Sparc 2's).

    And the specs, hell you could make a full blown computer for that much (330 bucks with monitor)!!

    And its still ugly___

    At least they got the OS right, even though having Netscape as your only browser will not be the best Internet Experience!!

    --
    Non-Deterministic Finite Automata
  107. New recording devices automaticly illegal? by Donavan · · Score: 1

    "And also, under the 9th Circuit law, neither computers nor hard drives are audio home recording devices, nor is there anything else in this case that involves Napster that is an audio home recording device within the meaning of the statute"

    Guess what folks... Based on this line in the judges decision usage of a mini-disc recorder to record tracks of your CDs is probably now illegal after all. When the laws were written mini-discs didn't exist as a home recording device either.

  108. NIC to the rescue by Kalrand · · Score: 3

    Hmm... All we need is a NIC running a GNU mp3 player stapeled to my dashboard and WHAMO!

    Instant car mp3 player.

    Kalrand

    -the voice of reason

  109. Armed revolt, man! by revscat · · Score: 1

    No such luck here, I'm Canadian. 11 bucks for the last pitcher of beer I had while in university.

    That would cause me to take up arms against my oppressors! 11 bucks? For a pitcher? Holy christ! They're not that expensive at titty bars around here! And I'm talking the medium grade beer, too, not the cheap Milwaukee's Beast or Lone Star. Stuff like Bass or Shiner. Yeah.

    Actually, I bet most of you haven't heard of Shiner... It's a Texas brew...

    Rev.
  110. Re:what about the browser? by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

    I remember on campus (FSU) when we tried to get a dos prompt when all we had was Netscape. We actually changed the "program association" for a .gif file to "command.com". then when you right clicked on an image and hit "open" you had command.com (and thus debug, type, etc). Might be a similiar hack (or crack or whatever) in the Linux ver.

    --
    Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
  111. Bias by DustyHodges · · Score: 2

    As to the fourth factor, plaintiffs have produced evidence that Napster use harms the market for the copyrighted work in at least two ways, and we've had a number of studies, and I will spell out in the order the problems with some of those studies. I don't think any of them are, you know, what you would call without flaw.

    I think that this is good proof of the judge not paying ay attention to Napster in this case. Everything I have seen from this case has involved the judge being already prejudiced, and attacking napster. Every study that has shown that Napster depletes music sales has been paid for by the RIAA. Napster does increase music sales, and the RIAA is ust trying to obfuscate the facts with their pre-paid judge. Napster, until they get an honest, objective judge, doesn't stand a chance.

    1. Re:Bias by Magius_AR · · Score: 1

      Dude, there's obvious bias...
      The judge is CLEARLY uninformed (and most likely a technophobe as well)
      Its not that Napster hasn't proven its point either (which I think they could have gone about better anyhow)...its that the judge/court/law/whatever is UNWILLING to LISTEN. I don't know how many times the damn judge interrupted Boies when he was talking in that excerpt.
      Such requests as "fix it overnight" and "sure, just filter out the bad stuff" obviously shows that this guy is either a complete technological nitwit, or that the courts are doing nothing except intentionally aiming to shut Napster down.
      If its the former (technological ineptitude), which I suspect, I think it could have easily been avoided had Napster's lawyers been smart enough to actually "humor" their dumbed-down audience...instead of using terms like "peer-to-peer" and throwing techical diagrams or code at ppl who obviously probly can't even turn a computer on, they should have simply used analogies that the court could understand...like the comparison of Napster being just like internet search engines, etc.
      A "dummy" grounds for comparison would have went a long way in the Napster case.
      *smirk* maybe you just have to print all debatable code on shirts nowadays to get any of those legal computer illiterates out there to actually grow a brain.

    2. Re:Bias by The+Cookie+Monster · · Score: 1

      That may be true of the first way, but Napster definitely harms their market the second way - I would choose Napster over some lame attempt by the recording industry to enter the online music scene.

      If napster wasn't there, we wouldn't have a choice, and would have to use whatever constrained system the music industry came up with, one that would probably exist soley to preverse their current business model (but that's a sidetrack).

  112. Re:And another obvious difference is... by Dr.Diablo · · Score: 1

    Actually, if you decide to go with a Xerox service contract, you DO pay for each copy that comes out of the machine.

    Can't say about the sales guys getting a piece of that action though.

    The Doctor is Out... (Making the copies!)

  113. Hmmm... by Benwick · · Score: 1

    I'd love to know how, in the Samba article, the babel fish translated "Roland Lindemann" to "Roland lime tree man".

    Superman In Need: Oh, Oh Lime Tree Man, how can I ever repay you?
    Lime Tree Man: Oh, you don't need to guv. It's all in a days work for... Lime Tree Man!
    Three Supermen: Our Hero!
    Voiceover: Yes! whenever lime trees are endangered, or menaced by international communism, Lime Tree Man is ready!

  114. Careful - it's already illegal to sell spray paint by uqbar · · Score: 1

    Please don't give Chicago's city government any more ideas! They've already banned spray paint sales, and hanging out on street corners is called "gang loitering."

  115. Re:what about the browser? by Hoyt · · Score: 1

    There is a menu option that kills Netscape and retsarts it. They thought this out pretty well.

    --

    What if the Hokey Pokey _is_ what it's all about?

  116. Re:Napster ruling - something flawed? (legal use) by Kris_J · · Score: 2
    "...show why someone who legally owns a song (i.e. on CD) would download rather than rip..."
    I have done this on several occasions where I have a scratch or error on a CD. Two example I can think of are the Vangelis version of the Bladerunner soundtrack and the Foo Fighters' Color and the Shape CD - both of these CDs in my collection skip at a particular point. In one case I downloaded the file, in another a friend also had the CD so I was able to quickly grab a copy of the damaged track.

    There. Anyone in the current legal battles reading this? Anyone?

  117. Re:NIC...Good Idea? by necama · · Score: 1

    > On that note, where's the ability to read email?

    Probably had to go the way of the dodo when they decided not to put any hard drive into it. Programs like Netscape Communicator have to put the e-mail *somewhere* local while you're reading it. I think IMAP might get around this, but anything based on POP can't work without a HD.

  118. No Doubt about it: It's Baitin' by Rares+Marian · · Score: 1

    Sure sounds interesting. But Freenet already does that and more like protecting your ISPs from being fscked when it's you who should be.

    Besides stopping the spread is not something I care about. It's impossible period anonymous or fully disclosed. It's not something I worry much about.

    Attempt to make claims against me as to rights I have regarding stuff I have PAID for or CREATED and you'll be seeing me in court.

    --
    The message on the other side of this sig is false.
  119. Re:NIC...Good Idea? by dramaley · · Score: 1

    I think the NIC was meant for school and similar environments where for security and anal retentiveness reasons you don't necessarily want people running a mail client.

    I work at a library and recently we purchased a NIC for evaulation. The first thing i looked for when booting it for the first time was whether there was an e-mail client. I was glad there wasn't because if there was i would have had to rebuild the CD without the e-mail client. The powers that be who set computer usage policy want patrons to be able to use the web for research, not to spend all day chatting on e-mail. I don't quite understand this since e-mail can also be a research tool, but my opinion doesn't matter since i don't set the policies.

    --
    ----- "I'm still sane on three planets and two moons."
  120. Re:NIC...Good Idea? by jmkaza · · Score: 1

    Right, like the Internet's sole purpose is for us geeks to have something to do. Average users, people who want nothing more than to chat with friends or swap recipes, make up a vast majority of internet users. They create the demand for shopping sites and easy to use tools, which provide programmers, web designers, and network technicians with jobs. Non-knowledge users don't cheapen connectivity, they keep us employed.

  121. And another obvious difference is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3

    If you people would bother to read the RIAA response to Napster's stay request, you'd see the clear difference.

    Take the Xerox lawsuit. They were sued because they aided in the duplication of copyrighted printed materials. Same with the Sony lawsuit - their VHS technology allowed the reproduction of television transmissions, and allowed the duplication of copyrighted casettes.

    The difference being - Sony and Xerox sell a consumer good. At the point of sale, their involvement in the use of the product ends. They don't have a wire going into their boxes from their headquarters feeding it copyrighted stuff - they just say "Here you go, do what you want."

    Napster, on the other hand, is involved during the entire process. They own the client, and they own the servers that allow the sharing of files. If they would've been more like Gnutella where client connects to another client with no middleman servers, RIAA probably wouldn't have as strong of a case. Instead, they opened themselves to liability by incorporating a business solely to aid in the distribution of copyrighted materials.

  122. Just Curious... by Judg3 · · Score: 1

    When does NetZero allow anything other then Windows to connect to it? I know there were password revealers and the like for *nix that allowed us to see see what our true l/p for nz was and log in, but it only would stay up for like 5 mins, 10 tops.
    Tried to chekc out NZ's website but the DOWNLOAD page was broken.. Still didnt find anything that said "Hey guys, we support linux now". So is this something limited ONLY to the nic?

    ----------------------------------

    --
    Looking for hardware (Currently need: Large Etch-a-Sketch) Have one? See my journal!
  123. Network computers are the work of the devil by sips · · Score: 1

    A computer is supposed to be a multipurpose device not a specific one. Anytime a group of people start trying to subdivide the tasks a computer can/cannot do it is fairly frightening. Grasp this: suppose they get rid of the component for internet access to a cheap machine that would leave consoles to rule the game market and the cost of the "PC" would skyrocket because everyone would buy some crappy computer. Software distribution is a better goal for the internet as well as information gathering and storage. Personal communications and the like the subsidiary goals that were added on to the internet as we now see it.

    --
    Respond to s
  124. People want control not lock in by sips · · Score: 1

    This will lock people into one type of device and will be a bitch to upgrade

    --
    Respond to s
    1. Re:People want control not lock in by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      This device will not be a "bitch to upgrade". If you go to the site, you will see that there is no hard drive. The entire OS and all applications reside on the CD which must be mounted during use. If you think it is a "bitch" to change out one CD for another, I think you might want to avoid electronics altogether.

      --
      I do not have a signature
  125. Re: With Netscape?? by antidigerati · · Score: 1

    But why did they have to go and muck it up with Netscape?

    If they were trying to streamline the machine they would have been better off to just cycle through some images on the desktop wallpaper. At least you would have a chance to see something before falling asleep.

    Mind you.. if they had waited for Mozilla... well.. lets just not go there.

    antidigerati (auntie digerati)(NT digerati)

  126. Napster - tool of the common theif. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2
    I wish slashdot would just stop giving Napster publicity. Their illegal and antisocial software thrives on the oxygen of publicity. Slashdot seems so keen to take sides here.

    I am a musician (quite well known, so posting anonymously) and I am sick to the depth of my stomach of these criminals stealing my art and depriving me of my rightful rewards.

    How would Commander Taco and Cow-Boy Neil like it if I stood outside their house giving away free crowbars to any passing criminal, so they could break into the 'geek compound' ?

    Napster is exactly the same.

    In the UK there is a law against 'going equipped' to comitt a crime. Posession of illegal software like napster should be punished, and punished severely. Nothing less than a custodial sentance will send the message - Music Piracy == COMMON THEFT.

  127. Re: With Netscape?? by Rendus · · Score: 2

    The OS is on CD-ROM. Why wait when you can start market penetration, and release a patch? Sounds sort of like most games of late, doesn't it?

  128. I'm sold by Anomalous+Canard · · Score: 1

    I need a compact computer for my wife to use on our home network. I'm tired of her tying up the fast desktop with the big monitor to read email and load webpages. As soon as I confirm that I'll take a NIC (I see USB, so that should suffice) I'll be ponying up my $199. I don't even need the monitor (which is extra).
    --
    Anomalous: deviating from what is usual, normal, or expected

    --
    Anomalous: deviating from what is usual, normal, or expected
    Canard: a false or unfounded repor
  129. College students with money to pay the RIAA? by AethericFlux · · Score: 5
    But selecting out college students, I don't think was inappropriate and, therefore, does not negate the entire study.

    Sure... pick the market segment most technologically able and with the lowest income, and then whinge about the fact that they don't buy your music.
    'OK... I just won't bother eating for a week, then I can buy myself a CD.'
    yay.

  130. Re:Ah, the NIC... (sounds neat but the resolution) by jallen02 · · Score: 1

    What kind of world is it??

    The typical user runs in 800x600 with 16bpp color or less.

    This is based on real world demographics I have used from about 50 million page views of 'non'-geek oriented websites.. meaning stuff your average consumer makes it to.

    800x600 further more is sufficient for those tasks.. anyways my two cents.

    Jeremy


    If you think education is expensive, try ignornace

  131. Apple sues everyone! by tenzig_112 · · Score: 1

    From now on, anyone purchasing an Apple product will be named in a reverse class-action suit. A court order will be packaged with the unit itself. www.ridiculopathy.com

  132. Yeah and you just want to screw PC users right? by sips · · Score: 1

    Well one point against you is that the internet is not a passive medium like TV is (and no HDTV dosn't appear to have changed this). Also you have to realize that things like this have been tried (remember WebTV?). People who are going to want internet access want to have all the benefits that come with internet access. If I want to have my own say email program and not the one that the company wants me to have what do I do? What if I wand to to digital videwo editing in my spare time? What about playing games that are a little more complex than mario or donkeykong 64? Modern PCs beat most things into the ground. What about the person who wants to play games do differential equations, chemical modeling, write a paper for his history class, type a memo, and do all this in an afternoon on one box? That's right it just dosn't work. I have seen what people do when they want to screw others. Take a look at the next generation of various calculators that I was pricing just today from hewlett packard. They are adding wizbang features that havn't decreased in price or preformance at all. So what happens? Well the price keeps rising and never sinking. That is just crap. Also the history of industry in the US would tent to eliminate this idea as well. Consider the concept of interchangeable parts that can do the job wheather they are from one group manufacturing them or 700. Those parts have traditionally fit together and worked nicely. That is what people want. Also planned obscelescence(sp) isn't exactly what people want to deal with when they have say 5-10 different machines that cost over $100 USD. That's why the PC was created to prevent fractioning of the world and get people do handle things like a swiss army knife.

    --
    Respond to s
  133. There are things more important than looking good by sips · · Score: 1

    Looking good should be an afterthought and not a design goal

    --
    Respond to s
  134. Um... telnet = e-mail?? by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 1
    It says the NIC can telnet. Anyone with a shell account can read e-mail using pine or whatever. Hell, if your ISP won't give you shell access you might as well be using webmail anyway.

    For that matter, if you don't like web browsing using Navigator, you can always use lynx :-)

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
  135. Re: Obvious Troll by ichimunki · · Score: 1

    God forbid that we build machines specifically for gaming so that the rest of us can get back to computing. :)

    This device is an excellent terminal/client device for real computers (i.e. not PCs). This is an affordable, well-configured client box. Creating a different CD with a modified OS might even be possible, opening the door for third party upgrades once the hardware is in place. Even so, upgrades are problem free, since the upgrade CD isn't an installer-- it is the upgrade.

    As to the price of the "PC" going up? Even if this were true/likely, add together the price of the NIC and a Sega Dreamcast and tell me if your computer cost that much. As you will learn if you take any introductory economics class, specialization leads to efficiency-- which can lead to lower prices. Frankly, I'd rather spend less for two machines that did what I wanted, than more for just one. Special bonus: with two machines, your friends/family can use one, while you use the other.

    --
    I do not have a signature
  136. NIC sounds like a neat lab frob! by billstewart · · Score: 2

    I've got a network testing/development lab, and a
    $200 little box that goes "ping" sounds amazingly useful. Does anybody know if it'll run without a keyboard (at least after it's first configured)? Can you give them static IP addresses, or do they always need DHCP?

    I've got other ways to solve the problem - half a dozen doorstop Pentium60 boxes, but they take a lot of rack space, need keyboards and mice, make noise, and occasionally want to have monitors on them, and I've got enough other things to do with them that a couple of NICs would be a real asset. (Also, they're cheap enough I might be able to buy them on the "cheap parts and junk" budget instead of the "more bureaucracy required" budget :-)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  137. Re:Ah, the NIC... (sounds neat but the resolution) by mengel · · Score: 1
    I took a look at the preceding AC's web page, which is here, and he has excellent information on "fixing" the NIC, like:
    • booting it with a RedHat 6.2 CD...
    • getting a bash shell
    • fixing font sizes
    --
    - "History shows again and again how nature points out the folly of men" -- Blue Oyster Cult, 'Godzilla'
  138. Money by age by mosch · · Score: 2

    Well, according to this portion of the census, the median net worth of all households is about $38k, but for those under 35 years, it's under $6k. There aren't any age/DPI statistics that I can find, but the age/income charts seem to agree with the net worth statements noting that in households headed by 15-24 year olds, the average income is $23,564, but in $25-34 year olds, it's $40,069. This would seem to imply that people over the college age make more money than people in college.

    Remember that the "HUGE" amount of money somebody is making in college probably is fractional to what their future salary will be, and while $1k/month is a huge allowance, it's nothing compared to the salary of a college grad, especially for college grads who go to schools where $1k/month allowances are common.


    ----------------------------
  139. NIC comments from someone who 0wNs one by Seth+Cohn · · Score: 3

    Got a NIC in the first shipment. Added a bash shell hack the first night. Posted screenshots to the website the first night. (http://www.bestkungfu.com/nicfit)

    It's a cute little box, and for the price, quite reasonable. Try to build a thin client cheaper, and you'd be hard pressed. Yes, you could add a harddrive, but WHY?

    Runs Linux, quite nicely. It's a homebrew, not based on anyone else's distro. This from the horse's mouth...

    The 4 meg is an IDE flash disk, and it's a little daughterboard. You could remove it and use it elsewhere (hint hint)

    The guys at Thinknic are GREAT... and they have been VERY very supportive and more on the mailing list(s). Everything we could wish for and more.

    As for the GPL, they ARE going to release source... already asked for it, and it's been assured to me they will be taking care of it. In fact, I told them that a /. thread was gonna happen on it. Gee, I love when I'm right (too easy to predict /. these days)

    Tonight I cracked the root password for the box, so I not only own one, I 0wN one. (grin)

    Personally, I want to see additional CD and flash stuff developed for it. It's happening now... check out the mailing lists for more details (egroups.com)

    Larry has a hit on his hands. I can see lots of people and companies buying these. Custom CDs will be used by companies, making upgrading a breeze. Schools, hotels, libraries, other public places will benefit from a cheap and useful terminal that won't be easily broken.

    Summary: Recommended. Highly. Cheap and good.

    --
    Help achieve Liberty in your lifetime - join the Free State Project - http://www.freestateproject.org
  140. Quantity of beer... by mosch · · Score: 2

    Well, if your college days were anything like mine, a keg of beer cost less than my average bartab these days. Remember $6 cases of beer. and $8 1.75 liter bottles of vodka? When I was in college it wasn't even a decision, 3.5 liters of vodka, or one cd. The vodka was crystal palace, not grey goose or vox. the "good" gin was beefeater, not sapphire. And appleton estate for rum? nah, the best we ever had was the trusty captain. I'm also quite certain that our champagne was never PJ, Moet, Dom or Cristall. And don't forget frat parties... depending on which school I pick, they were either 100% free, or about $3, all you could drink. If I drank my current beverages in college quantity, my checking account would give out long before my liver did. Remember that when you're saying that the ability to get plastered == the ability to afford cds.
    ----------------------------

  141. NIC...Good Idea? by pheonix · · Score: 3

    Personally, I think this is a brilliant idea. As a internet connected "appliance" for people like my grandparents (who are vaguely interested in this "newfangled internet thing") or those who have no real need or desire for a PC, but wish to get email and browse the web.

    On that note, where's the ability to read email? You'd only be able to use web based email as far as I can tell with this. That seems like a mistake. How much more difficult would it have been to add the ability to use NS Communicator and have one piece of functionality added? It wouldn't have added much overhead, space, or difficulty, so far as I can tell.

    Any ideas why they didn't include something of that nature?

  142. hmmm, reading that judges... by Wah · · Score: 1

    ...opinion and reasoning, makes me think another cluestick needs whackin'. Guess what I'm doing tonight?

    --

    --
    +&x
  143. What I Love Mandrake For by Hrunting · · Score: 5

    To be honest, I've never had much success with Mandrake (I've tried to install their distro both by FTP and from a CD image numerous times and always had it fail for some non-user-related error (a crash, a failed dependency, something). However, they most unheralded project which they currently support and use has got to be Supermount. The new author (forget his name) has managed to update the patches all the way up to 2.3.99pre5, and those patches should work with the latest 2.4.0test kernels as well.

    What does supermount do? Basically, it virtually mounts your filesystems and then monitors the drives to see whether or not they should be really mounted. This means that you can mount the floppy drive as supermountfs, stick in a floppy, access the drive, remove the floppy, stick in a new floppy, access the drive, etc. etc. Basic removeable media flexibility, just like other OSs. It's something that Linux desperately needs to allow it to compete in the desktop market, and it isn't a kludge like autofs.

    I've used it for quite some time with no problems, but Mandrake continues to help maintain this when it needs to and their distro has included it for quite some time. I may not be able to use Mandrake, but at least I can use some of their efforts.

  144. what about the browser? by jCaT · · Score: 2

    I use netscape 4.73 to surf the web, and I can't say I find it to be 100% reliable. The same can be said about just any browser I suppose, but is someone not familiar with computers going to figure out how to pop open a terminal and type 'killall -9 netscape'? Other than that, I'm bout ready to buy one myself!