Slashdot Mirror


Molecule Sized Transistors

IceFoot writes "Bell Labs announced it has created organic transistors with a single-molecule channel length, more than a factor of ten smaller than anything that has been demonstrated even with the most advanced lithography techniques. The really cool part is the transistors assemble themselves: the molecules do the work of finding the electrodes and attaching themselves. Webcast on Wednesday, October 17, 2001 at 3:00 p.m. Eastern time"

132 comments

  1. Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    God created these when he invented viruses.

    Slash Doter
    (Back from hiatus!)

    1. Re:Old news by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 3, Funny

      True. God did invent this - and it appears that IBM's closing the gap. A giant tower of technology reaching for the heavens with IBM at the peak. It's only a matter of time before programmers around the world are struck down with a curse of multiple languages and different protocols so that they will no longer be able to communi....aw crap.

    2. Re:Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prediction: The next tech holy war will be about how many transistors will fit on the head of a pin.

  2. Okay I'll beat all the trolls to the punch by SiliconJesus · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Imagine a Beowulf of these! Mod me down - I deserve it :P

    --
    Clinton made me a Republican. Bush made me a Libertarian. Trump is making me question reality.
  3. /. = Greedy Capitalist Pigs ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe now my $%#$%#$ Lucent stock will be worth something again.

    1. Re:/. = Greedy Capitalist Pigs ? by mtrupe · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and maybe now Naperville's tech community will be employed again.

  4. Step one accomplished... by InfinityWpi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now for step 2: Can we do this and make it cost-efficient?

    And Step 3: Can we make new things with this that we couldn't before, or will this just help us shrink down current things?

    And Step 4: How can this make us more money (only the salespeople worry about this one)?

    And don't forget Step 5: How can this get us laid (only the engineers typically worry about that one)?

    1. Re:Step one accomplished... by IdleMindUI · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Step 6: How will this improve pr0n (the engineers will also be worried about this one)?

    2. Re:Step one accomplished... by recursiv · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      And don't forget Step 5: How can this get us laid

      This one is simple. By building a virtual molecule-sized orifice that can accomodate our diminuitive members!

      --
      I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
    3. Re:Step one accomplished... by Bonker · · Score: 2

      Can we make new things with this that we couldn't before, or will this just help us shrink down current things?

      Assuming these get cheap enough for research purposes in the near future, imagine a few pounds worth of sub-cellular sized nodes arranged in a neural net processing pattern, maybe attached to some video and audio imput.

      I see into minds, you see, and you have no idea how complicated they are. -- Isaac Asimov

      --
      The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    4. Re:Step one accomplished... by wdavies · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Heh, I bet neither Zhenan Bao and Hendrik Schon have a problem with Step 5 : She's the cutest looking real geek since Pattie Maes, and he's a poster boy for germanic Ski Instructors everywhere...

      Winton

      Mod this down, it deserves it, but I couldn't help it :)

    5. Re:Step one accomplished... by Computer! · · Score: 1

      Step 3: Well, yes and no. Yes we will do more calculations in a smaller space than ever before. We've been doing that for a while now. Wether or not we will do anything truly revolutionary depends on visionaries in the software biz. The SETI@home project is a good example of revolutionary application of computer technology. Some imaging stuff was unthought-of at the time. Other than that, honestly no. Most likely this new technology will be used to kill people when placed in smarter guns. Sad, but true.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    6. Re:Step one accomplished... by InadequateCamel · · Score: 1

      The only substantial difference between this and the currently used transistors from a materials point of view is the organic component, and that is dirt cheap and easy to make in a lab. If there isn't significant deviations from current designs, ie. "Oh yeah, this requires 95% rhodium backings" then the costs should be comparable.

    7. Re:Step one accomplished... by baxissimo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      That should be "nanotube-dick".

    8. Re:Step one accomplished... by ThatComputerGuy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Nice (read: foolish) of you to admit that, but speak for yourself, buddy...

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    9. Re:Step one accomplished... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Other than that, honestly no. Most likely this new technology will be used to kill people when placed in smarter guns...

      ... or water ...

      >Sad, but true.

  5. Transistors assemble themselves? by recursiv · · Score: 0, Redundant

    What is this? Some sort of bizzarro-fantasy land where transistors assemble themselves? I doubt it!

    --
    I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
    1. Re:Transistors assemble themselves? by taniwha · · Score: 2, Interesting

      nope - self assembling molecules .... it's one of the areas where the nano-tech people have been working for a while - some molecules will sidle up and stand next to a similar one they happen to run into, pretty soon you have a sheet of them (assuming you have a nice substrate) ....

    2. Re:Transistors assemble themselves? by babymac · · Score: 1
      Bacteria and cells making copies of themselves? Ludicrous!
      Bizarro-world, indeed...nitwit.
      Never forget: if nature can do it, we can too. It just takes time and ingenuity.

      --
      "War makes me sad." - Me
  6. Molecular Intelligence by Renraku · · Score: 0, Troll

    We're essentially making bacteria here. They're intelligent to an extent, and should probably be watched/controlled for safety reasons. Imagine if the wrong person got a hold of a vat of this stuff. He could cross one with a bacterium or similarly-sized molecule of toxin for the ultimate method of delivery for a biological/chemical attack. Otherwise, its a great idea.

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    1. Re:Molecular Intelligence by mskfisher · · Score: 1

      Bacteria? Where do you get that?
      Chemical compounds will often attach themselves to a substrate - some chipfabs use a similar technique to grow transistors, but it's done with a high-pressure silicon vapor.
      This has nothing to do with bacteria at all. No DNA, no mitochondria.

      I dunno why I'm falling for this troll.

      --
      0x0D 0x0A
    2. Re:Molecular Intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My water auto-assembles itself into a crystal lattice when I put it in the freezer. So water molecules are intelligent to an extent, and should probably be watched/controlled for safety reasons. Jeez.

    3. Re:Molecular Intelligence by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Yet again, your ignorance is beyong belief.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Molecular Intelligence by tsarina · · Score: 1

      Bacteria already create themselves. They divide. Unless they were looking to infect all the people who work with transistors by switching the transistors with bacteria or something, I don't really see your point. There are much more effective ways to conduct a biological/chemical attack.

      --

      ________
      "And if the fool, or the pig, are of a different opinion...." -- J.S. Mill
    5. Re:Molecular Intelligence by copec · · Score: 0, Troll

      Imagine if they formed a collective intellegance with the abilities of computers!

      AHHHH!!!!

      FREAKAZOID! FREAKZOID!

    6. Re:Molecular Intelligence by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      > We're essentially making bacteria. They're intelligent [...], and should [...] be watched/controlled [...] the wrong person [...] could cross one with a bacterium

      Yes! I warned them about the same thing when they invented electricity. It's essentially lightning we're making here. It's dangerous when it hits a tree or a person. Imaging the wrong person getting hold of 'electricity' and throwing it across the sky towards your house while making very loud noises!

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    7. Re:Molecular Intelligence by Renraku · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I stand corrected after being flamed straight to Hell. Thanks for the insight, but it could have been given without such sharp remarks.

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    8. Re:Molecular Intelligence by Morbid+Curiosity · · Score: 1
      I stand corrected after being flamed straight to Hell. Thanks for the insight, but it could have been given without such sharp remarks.

      Don't worry, at least no-one's trying to shut down your arcology and do nasty things with AI-controlled nanites.

      [checks his watch]

      Yet. :-)

  7. Makes you wonder by btempleton · · Score: 1

    If Moore was a pessimist?

    --
    Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
    1. Re:Makes you wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm, yeah Moore is alive you retard.

  8. Help it's stuck to my fingers .... by taniwha · · Score: 2, Funny

    I should never have let the PR people make me put this silly molecule model together with superglue ....

  9. Mr. Moore by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So how do we get smaller than this? Smaller molecules? Atoms? Sub-atomic particles? Photons?

    It just seems like there is a finite limit to how small we can make these things, and it looks like we're approaching that limit, so where to next? Get rid of transistors all together and use a different method? Optical matricies that perform switching functions? Who knows, but I know I'm excited to find out what happens next.

    1. Re:Mr. Moore by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 1

      One-molecule logic gates. Then, one-molecule FPGA's. Then one-molecule processors. Then one-molecule computers. Then one-molecule beowulf clusters. Then we will be like unto gods.

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
    2. Re:Mr. Moore by Jogar+the+Barbarian · · Score: 1

      I'd guess that we would store the bulk of the processor hardware in a pocket dimension (a la a tesseract, or a superstring dimension). Essentially the only thing you would need in the Real world would be the interface, and whatever hardware is needed to provide the dimensional interface.

      --
      3. Profit!
      2. ???
      1. On Soviet Slashdot, a Beowulf cluster of alien Natalie Portman overlords welcomes YOU!
  10. Liked the quote by IdIoTt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    where it said that this discovery would be a historical "bookend" in the transistor world.
    I wonder if this will prove to be true, or if, like so many feats of miniaturization, be proven incorrect further down the line.

    And God said, "Let there be Windows"
    And behold, the earth was without form and void,
    save a giant blue glow upon the heavens.

    1. Re:Liked the quote by daghlian · · Score: 1

      Actually, you could probably make a transistor out of a single molecule but it's not clear how you would connect it to anything. The nice thing about this technique is not so much that single molecules are involved, but rather that this is a cheap way to get a very uniform, very thin layer of insulator.

      Smaller, thinner layers of insulator are possible maybe, but 1/1000000000 meter is about as small as layers made out of atoms and molecules are going to get. In other words, one molecule thick is as good as chemistry can do even in principle. Hence the "bookend" comment, probably.

      --

      One of these days/I'm going to cut you into little pieces.

  11. And what are the specs? by wowbagger · · Score: 5, Informative

    What is the transconductance? The maximum switching speed? The gain/bandwidth product? In short, where are all the specs on this transistor that a real engineer would need to evaluate it?

    I don't care if you can make a transistor with a gate length of .1 Planck length, if the thing only has gain below 1 Hz it won't be very useful.

    Until Bell releases some more data on how this device can perform, don't get too excited....

    1. Re:And what are the specs? by UberNex · · Score: 1

      Well actually this tech is years away from being usable for a "real engineer" it was only just demonstrated to work. Before everyone go screaming for "engineering data" please, remember, people still have to finish thier research on this stuff before there is any "practical" applications. Sheesh, as if having to fend off all the posts about "could BEC be used as a switching device" Just leave it to /.ies to rate any accomplishment on it's ability to be put into thier pet project...

      No .sig found. Terminating user

    2. Re:And what are the specs? by RestiffBard · · Score: 3, Funny

      buy a subscription to nature. I think they only cost a shitload.

      shitload n. more of a thing than i have at any one time

      --
      - /* dead coders leave no comments */
    3. Re:And what are the specs? by jtra · · Score: 1
      But if they are easy to make then imagine highly parallel procesor that still fit your palm-size computer.

      Or big memories (static, no capacitors). Wasn't there article about solid state memories as replacement for harddrives on /. recently?

      --
      -- Wanna textmode user interface for ruby? http://freshmeat.net/projects/jttui/
    4. Re:And what are the specs? by kettch · · Score: 2

      Also, am i missing something, or did they not say how they could get these things to form into the structure necessary for processing? They did say that they could attach themselves to electrodes, but that won't help quake run at 10,000 fps.

      Although, the fact that they are organic is very interesting. Imagine, organic molecules with the processor's structure coded into their DNA, all you do is go down to the local computer parts store and pick up an eyedropper. then you put it's contents into a little dish lined with electrodes on your mother board. Next throw on some Miracle Grow, and wait overnight.

      --
      Opportunities multiply as they are seized. --Sun-Tzu
    5. Re:And what are the specs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're confusing "organic molecule" with "cell". An organic molecule is just a molecule containing carbon.

    6. Re:And what are the specs? by bugg · · Score: 3, Informative
      I think he's not confusing organic molecule with cell, but rather organic molecule with protein.

      If you had a transistors that were proteins then yes, they could in theory be produced by a cell, i.e. the transistors would not have to be cellular for his dream to come true.

      --
      -bugg
    7. Re:And what are the specs? by kettch · · Score: 2

      Yeah, i know what i was mistaking it for. YOU try to read/understand/respond to articles after YOU'VE been completing a project for a class for the last 48 hours straight. (which means that i probably was dreaming)

      Web pages are easy to write, but only if you allow enough time to complete the CGI backend, and test, and bigfix, and retest...etc...

      BTW, thanks for getting through to my caffeine addled brain.

      --
      Opportunities multiply as they are seized. --Sun-Tzu
  12. Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go flip a burger open source geek, I'm starving over here! :)

  13. I think just pretty boy did it by OO7david · · Score: 1

    I mean, look, what credit did Zhenan Bao get besides holding that damn model?

  14. hot digiity by mjackso1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Finally, a silver lining behind the huge cloud that is the ownership of Lucent stock...

    1. Re:hot digiity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if they patent it now, it'll just become useful and usable in 17 years as their patent wears off...

    2. Re:hot digiity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those of us who work for Lucent know that the researchers will be disinterested as soon as the papers are written, then management will decide that they can get promotions faster if they don't actually USE new technology.

      Shortly thereafter the three guys will get their posters up on the patent wall outside the Summit Bank on the 2nd floor, near the sign that lists the number of patents we've filed this year.

      Then they'll lay off another 30k people, and IBM will make a fortune selling the same technology that we abandoned.

  15. I saw the webcast by CmdrTroll · · Score: 5, Interesting
    My employer has a substantial stake in the chip business, and most of us from the Custom ASIC department huddled around a large monitor over lunch today to watch this. Their techniques are fascinating and may someday revolutionize the way we build circuits.

    However, the thing that they do not mention in the announcement is that Bell Labs continues to have problems with the chemical bonds between molecules decaying quickly on these transistors. It is similar to the problems that plague engineers of DNA processors, another cutting-edge-but-hopelessly-broken technology. In fact, despite all of these new achievements that promise to revolutionize the industry, silicon is still king and will be king for many years to come.

    -CT

  16. Where are have the good electrodes gone? by 12agnarok · · Score: 4, Funny

    The really cool part is the transistors assemble themselves: the molecules do the work of finding the electrodes and attaching themselves

    Great, now even my transistor will find a significant other before I do.

  17. Now, can it... by jmu1 · · Score: 1

    control any Assitant Directors of the FBI, Skinner style?
    Yes, this was somewhat offtopic, but it does have to do with nano-tech... so sue me. hehe

  18. Transistors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the size of Katz's balls!!

    1. Re:Transistors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought he didn't have any?!?!

  19. How many? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many can I put in a chip the size of a pea?
    How much would it cost?

    Could I use them to give me (inside my head) more RAM

  20. great! by TheMMaster · · Score: 1

    Just pour some yoghurt over a thin plate of glass and let your processor grow!

    --
    Fighting for peace is like fucking for virginity
  21. awesome timing by /. once again.... by jeffy124 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Webcast on Wednesday, October 17, 2001 at 3:00 p.m. Eastern time

    [flame]It only got posted on the front page at 4:20 Eastern. Awesome timing as usual.[/flame]

    --
    The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    1. Re:awesome timing by /. once again.... by Guillaume+Ross · · Score: 1

      DAMN! I always keep forgetting ;)

    2. Re:awesome timing by /. once again.... by recursiv · · Score: 1

      It could have been on purpose. Can you imagine what would have happened to that poor little webcast if it were posted 2 hours earlier?

      *sizzle*

      --
      I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
  22. (parent is troll) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod the parent down. We are not "essentially making bacteria". How stupid. Organic chemistry life.

  23. Reliability by BlackGriffen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    With single molecule transistors, wouldn't there be reliability concerns? After all, the uncertainty principle could wreak havoc on a circuit that is too small. Both information processing and durability would be hampered.

    BlackGriffen

    1. Re:Reliability by Fastball · · Score: 2, Informative

      Defect tolerance is central to the science of nanotechnology and addresses the very concern you raised. Essentially, when you're working with stuff this small, you assume that some things are going to be defective. The real juicy idea is writing software for these kinds of systems that assumes a certain amount of defects and works around them. Try writing a garbage collector for that!

    2. Re:Reliability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With single molecule transistors, wouldn't there be reliability concerns? After all, the uncertainty principle could wreak havoc on a circuit that is too small. Both information processing and durability would be hampered.

      Good, sell it to Microsoft.

  24. Built in obselete feature by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: 2, Funny

    It biodegrades within 6 months forcing an upgrade :D

    --
    ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
  25. Organic transistors by sulli · · Score: 3, Funny

    So now there will be an "Organic" aisle at Fry's, with pretty green labels and much higher prices?

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:Organic transistors by iforgotmyfirstlogon · · Score: 3, Funny

      I thought that was the "Macintosh" section...

      - Freed

      "Don't label me flamebait, I own 5 Macs myself."

      --
      "Coffee should be black as hell, strong as death, and sweet as love." -Turkish Proverb
  26. Miniaturization and power (Question) by supabeast! · · Score: 2

    Ok, I can definately see how this is cool, both in terms of miniaturization and the number of transistors that can fit into large spaces (Such as big-assed Pentium IV CPUs.).

    What I want to know is; how does power consumption scale in regards to transistor miniaturization? If I can make a chip require ten times less space, how much less power will it need? If size and power scale ~equally, how does this mean that Dragonball CPUs will soon be crammed into watches?

    1. Re:Miniaturization and power (Question) by ProfMoriarty · · Score: 1
      does this mean that Dragonball CPUs will soon be crammed into watches?

      Nahhh ... gotta get the color camera out of the way first. :)

      On a serious note, would static be even more dangerous of shorting out the circuits?

      --
      Karma? Karma? I don't need no stinkin' karma.
    2. Re:Miniaturization and power (Question) by brer_rabbit · · Score: 2, Informative
      What I want to know is; how does power consumption scale in regards to transistor miniaturization?

      it depends, if they're running at higher frequencies the power usage will increase. Plus with smaller transistors they usually pack more on a circuit, so more power is required.

      However, the power required to switch a transistor is proportional to the *square* of the voltage, so if you can lower the voltage required you've got a big win. And with smaller feature size (miniaturization) they might lower the operating voltage a bit. So the answer is....it depends.

  27. Molecular Transistors have already been done by caesar-auf-nihil · · Score: 5, Informative

    While the work done at Bell labs does indeed look unique, this experiment and breakthrough has technically already been done by Prof. James Tour (at Rice University) and Prof. Mark Reid of Yale who, in a very high-tech experiment, showed that a single molecule can conduct. It was similar to the structure shown in the Bell labs work, except it was one benzene rather than two. Tour and Reid also used self-assembly to get the molecules to line up to check conductance. The work was published in Science in late 1999.
    Further, Tour and his group have synthesized molecular transistors (he calls them "Moleisters") about a year and a half ago. Unfortunately, I can't bring up his web pages to find the reference to the papers.

    --
    -When going for broke, go for Ithaca!
    1. Re:Molecular Transistors have already been done by redzebra · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here's the reference :-)

      http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/pubs/trans/9904/87p ro c04-reed.html

      -- red.

    2. Re:Molecular Transistors have already been done by redzebra · · Score: 1

      oop's a space popped up in the middle, sorry

      http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/pubs/trans/9904/87p ro c04-reed.html
      -- red.

    3. Re:Molecular Transistors have already been done by redzebra · · Score: 1

      Ok what the hell is going on ? I enter this url without a space between the o and c and used old/plain text mode. Verified it twice but it
      reappears back each time ... grrr . (so its proc04-reed.html at the end of the url for those who didn't notice the gap)

    4. Re:Molecular Transistors have already been done by dgroskind · · Score: 1

      oop's a space popped up in the middle, sorry

      You can avoid the problem by embeding the link in an html anchor tag and specify "HTML formatted" instead of Plain Old Text:

      Here's the link

      At least, I've never had a problem.

  28. bah.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares?.. I mean really, show me a working processor instead of molecule sized transistors... Unless i want a walkman the size of a penny, what's the use of this?

  29. I hate em... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate transistors.

  30. ERR! BELL DIDN'T DO ANYTHING! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This annoys me; Bell really didn't do any of this research, they did *ALL* the work.

    . ac

  31. Shape of turn-on curve... by dpilot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wonder what the shape of the turn-on curve is like?

    Modern short-channel MOSFETs are an ungainly compromise between being on and off. We can manipulate the threshold voltage, but so far we can't change the shape of the turn-on (essentially the gain) curve very well. The practical upshot is that modern transistors are perched somewhere between leaking too much DC current and not being strong enough to drive signals with the strength we need.

    At the moment, there is no such thing as low-power, high-performance deep submicron logic. It's the nature of the transistor, not the clock speed.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  32. Quantum Thingies by Greyfox · · Score: 2
    Which store multiple states in very small things.

    I'm sure there will always be room for more.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Quantum Thingies by babymac · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You're not too far off base! Some research has been done that suggests that an infinite amount of data can be stored within the wave of a SINGLE electron! Check it out:

      http://www.eet.com/story/OEG20000831S0019

      --
      "War makes me sad." - Me
    2. Re:Quantum Thingies by einhverfr · · Score: 2

      OK. Warning: Unicode follows:

      The main problem with quantum computers is contianed in the follong equasion:
      xpÖh

      The real problem is why? Why is Planck's constant roughly equal to the product of the imprecisions of the position and velocity. Is this due to quantum "noise" or some other form.

      Of course, the whole universe could be one gigantic quantum computer and we could just be programs.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    3. Re:Quantum Thingies by Fyndo · · Score: 1

      Why? Because the position and momentum operators don't commute, so an eigenstate of one is not an eigenstate of the other. Thus a particle cannot have a well-defined position and momentum at the same time.

  33. step 5: by psychalgia · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    oh yeah, I work with a hot asian chick... sweet. Unless you're her...

    --

    ________________________________________________

  34. I'm just glad there was a woman in the story... by Uttles · · Score: 0, Troll

    As a computer engineer, I'm glad to see that some electronics engineering is now featuring women. Granted, this particular one could have been more attractive, but the point is we see innovation, and we see a woman as part of it, and that's good. I remember in school we had 4 women in the entire class of about 150 computer engineers. 1 of those was non-Indian, and displayed attractive qualities like not having body odor and not having a beard. Maybe if more stories like this come out, more women will do Comp E and future Comp E's can enjoy the presence of attractive females while in college (without spending all of their money downtown.)

    --

    ~ now you know
    1. Re:I'm just glad there was a woman in the story... by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      > I'm glad to see [...] engineering women
      > non-Indian [...] body odor [...] beard
      > Maybe [...] more women will do Engineering
      > and engineers can enjoy attractive females
      > without spending [...] money downtown (apparently on rental-women)

      Gee, something tells me if this is how you talk to those women you still won't be getting dates.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    2. Re:I'm just glad there was a woman in the story... by Uttles · · Score: 1

      Hey, I was expressing my concern for future engineers, never said anything about me. Don't worry though, I do just fine, thanks.

      --

      ~ now you know
    3. Re:I'm just glad there was a woman in the story... by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

      Ahem..

      There is nothing wrong with that woman. For all you know she could run linux on her desktop, smb share her mp3s, and kick ass in counterstrike.

      -
      I like a woman with a head on her shoulders. I hate necks. - Steve Martin

  35. What is that she is carrying? by bflong · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Why is Zhenan Bao carrying around all those balls wired to each other?
    If she leaves that at home, will she forget how to put these molecules together?
    Why doesn't she just get the directions tattooed onto the back of her hand if she needs that kind of help?

    --
    Why is it so hot? Where am I going? What am I doing in this handbasket?
  36. Optical Logic Devices by Bonker · · Score: 2

    Mind you, I'm no mathemitician, but the limiting factor that has created the science of binary logic (which shouldn't be confused with pure Boolean logic) is the fact that transistors operate in two states when used as logic gates. On or Off. 1 or 0. Powers of 2 are so important to computer people because that's the way our machines think.

    It's going to be much easier to build a decimal or hexidecial adder/math device with optical components since light can be controlled more precisely than electricity. This is, assuming of course, that the process can be carried out on a truly optical chip. Currently the only benefit to optical technology when used inside a logic system is speed of transmission.

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
  37. Question by Patrick+Cable+II · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Did Zhenan Bao carry around that molecule all the time, like in the pictures?
    -
    Patrick Cable II.

  38. uncertainty principle by daghlian · · Score: 2, Informative

    Do not worry about Heisenberg's uncertainty principle.

    Self-assembling layers that are one-molecule thick are really common and very stable. Examples include cell walls (I know where several trillion are), soap bubbles, etc.

    Thermal fluctuations have many orders of magnitude more energy (1/40 kT, where k is Boltzmann's constant) than the quantum mechanical fluctuations associated with the uncertainty principle. Since room temperature doesn't make these things fall apart we can immediately stop worrying about quantum fluctuations. Also, 1 nm is big enough that quantum tunneling of electrons isn't a problem, especially at 5 V (or whatever they use in chips). The scanning tunneling microscope uses gaps that are ten times smaller and voltage differences that are thousands of times larger.

    --

    One of these days/I'm going to cut you into little pieces.

    1. Re:uncertainty principle by HiThere · · Score: 2

      I doubt they'll use 5 V. 5 mV is more likely.

      I expect these things will eventually be useful as implants. Think of it as a VERY high bandwidth link to a computer :-)

      I was reading the other day about some other things that "aren't quite ready for prime time" but should fit right in here. Neurons cultured on layers of silicon. Engines that can turn blood sugar into electricity. Specialized robots that can slide into a cell and self-assemble. (No real time control proposed here. Just do what you're designed for where you are targeted. This one uses chemical targeting, either custom designed [look for a molecule like this: ..], or specialized [i.e., other special methods I don't remember]. Uses include drug dispensing and apoptosis (sp.), i.e., killing off the targeted cells [think cancer].)

      But if you merge those ideas with a computer built from molecular circuits... Live Action 3D with SmelloVision isn't even in the ballpark.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    2. Re:uncertainty principle by Fyndo · · Score: 1

      5 mV? you have to be out of your mind. That implies a 5meV gap for the electrons. That's the thermal energy of particles around 60 degrees kelvin (cooler than liquid nitrogen). Getting an electronic state that small is near impossible. Getting a vibrational state that small is near impossible. No, gaps of closer to 1-5 V are much, much, more likely.

  39. MOD THIS TROLL DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This post was offensive on more levels than it had words.

    (Besides, I thought Bao was a babe... I wouldn't throw her out of bed for staying up too late reading.)

  40. Wired Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this came out yesterday. (the wired article :)

  41. you know what that means... by AssFace · · Score: 1

    soon... molecule sized phones.

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
  42. We've got good news and bad news... by hoggoth · · Score: 4, Funny

    The good news:
    Bell Labs scientists Zhenan Bao and Hendrik Schon have fabricated molecular-scale organic transistors.

    The bad news:
    As you can see in the picture, they are REALLY BIG molecules!

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  43. but the higher level stuff remains shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes! Let's use this technology in IA-64 powering Microsoft .NET server!

    Farewell, Alpha, your demise is a fair testament to profit-driven society.

    Please, what's the point in all this research, if history has just shown us that when it comes to the final result, all the great minds are laid off before a Great design sees the light of day?
    (worse, the parent company will ship its developers off to Intel, the company which is slowly approaching Microsoft in the "buy and burn the competition" strategy, and the behemoth will falsely claim it actually uses any of the newly owned technology)
    Thank goodness for Free software, where innovation at least has the _potential_ without the need for pockets deeper than the pits beyond the Gates of Hell...

  44. Sounds good but what about.... by MBCook · · Score: 2, Funny

    OK, this sounds good but I think that there is one problem: with my luck my chip would be defective. And then I wouldn't be able to return it because it had a "genetic defect" and I'm not allowed to "discriminate" on that basis. Of course, with organic chips the term "virus" will take on a whole new meaning.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
  45. Coming soon! by sirgoran · · Score: 2

    To a surgical center near you.

    Molecule sized cell phones implanted while you wait!
    GPS tracking implanted while you wait!
    PS9 seems to be closer than you think!

    But really. This is a great advance. It could lead to pacemakers or other medical equipment less likely to be rejected by the body and also last longer.Very good news indeed.

    Goran

    --
    Carpe Scrotum - The only way to deal with your competition.
  46. transistors shamsistors by SirSlud · · Score: 2

    I'm in love! .. at least her invention will help me run my 'how the hell do lush/pothead programmer/musicians meet hot molecular physicists' algorithm. (Yeah, it sucks, UD turned down my application to turn the problem into a UD Job ... )

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
  47. wrong-o by shoez · · Score: 1

    Electricity can always be split up into individual electrons, but light sometimes acts as a wave, and is thus harder to manipulate in small increments.

    And kudos on realizing the whole 'powers of 2' thing. That had us all stumped for a while.

    --

    Infinity + 1
    1. Re:wrong-o by tjb · · Score: 1

      Even a single electron will act like a wave in the dual-slit experiment. Individual or not has nothing to do with it.

      For a good explanation of this phenomena, I sugest feynman's QED.

      Tim

  48. Vague and Over-Hyped by DumbSwede · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Hopefully one day, one of these things will have the promised impact on computing, but like many promised breakthroughs, this report leaves many details vague.

    molecular-scale transistors that rival conventional silicon transistors in performance
    And rival here means what? Slower, but will become faster; Slower, but less power? Aren't we aiming for superior in all facets, not just size?

    factor of ten smaller...
    A Million Times Smaller Than a Grain of Sand

    In what dimensions? Width, Area, Volume? What are the actual dimensions, and not just the molecule switch, but the whole gate arrangement?

    A good switch perhaps, but it looks as though it is still hooked up to conventional circuitry, unless I'm reading there diagram incorrectly. This isn't so much nano-technology, as a nano-coating on existing technology. Self assembly doesn't impress me in a coating.

    Self-assemble the paths in and out of the circuit and then we'll talk.

  49. It was only a matter of time... by emmetropia · · Score: 1

    Organic transistors? This could suggest that Bell has been working with an outside company. Can anyone remember "Ch-ch-ch-chia"

  50. Cool guy by psyborg · · Score: 1

    Hendrik is a cool guy. I remember meeting him a couple of years ago because I'm acquainted with his girlfriend. When I asked him about his surely interesting job at Bell Labs, he told me that it really wasn't anything special:

    "I basically just go through lots of samples of different materials, connect each one to electrodes, and see if it conducts. Nothing too exciting." I guess now I know what understatement means.

    --
    -- PsyBorg
  51. In theory it's all well and good... by Rob.Mathers · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Really, when are these things ever going to be put to use. IMHO, there are two major issues that will prevent these being used in any kind of circuitboard. First, the issue of crosstalk. At the molecular level, especially with the "self-assemblage," there's no way that major crosstalk could be avoided. Secondly, what happens when one of these things breaks down? Obviously it's not going to be easy to fix, and the whole circuit board would need replacing. Don't get me wrong, this is quite cool, but it's always good to keep one foot on the ground when you're reaching for the sky.

    --

    My other sig is funny!
  52. You notice that... by Albion · · Score: 1

    Microsoft Labs never makes discoveries like this.
    Where's the "innovation"?

    1. Re:You notice that... by de+Selby · · Score: 1

      They did discover how to put a blank check into a license agreement....

    2. Re:You notice that... by Bren · · Score: 1

      I think all the really interesting discoveries are in hardware. Microsoft is mostly a software company. That's probably why.

  53. Wrong-o^2 by MarkusQ · · Score: 2
    Electricity can always be split up into individual electrons, but light sometimes acts as a wave, and is thus harder to manipulate in small increments.

    Uh, not quite. Single electrons have half-integer spin and thus obey the pauli exclusion principle, while photons (spin zero) obey bose-einstein statistics. This makes electrons "avoid" each other while photons "congrigate" (condense). But both may be viewed as either waves or as particles, and the WP duality per se has no effect on their behaviour.

    -- MarkusQ

  54. +1 Funny on the MQR standard by MarkusQ · · Score: 2
    One-molecule logic gates. Then, one-molecule FPGA's. Then one-molecule processors. Then one-molecule computers. Then one-molecule beowulf clusters. Then we will be like unto gods.

    To paraphrase Harlan Ellison, I have no mod points, and I must laugh.

    -- MarkusQ

  55. It's a real shame. by zerofoo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Scientist: Looky here, isn't this cool!

    Lucent Exec: That's nice, but how will this help me sell more telephone systems?

    Scientist: AAAAARGH! I feel like dilbert you PHB! I'm going to work for IBM research! At least their innovations eventually turn into products!

    Lucent Exec: Good ridance! You can join those damn Unix guys. I'm going to play golf....

  56. Interesting by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    This is truly Geek cool!

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  57. True by definition? by Nindalf · · Score: 1

    You might be able to make sub-atomic switching devices, but they wouldn't properly be called "transistors." Then again, these might be stretching the term a bit. At least they work on electrons, though.

  58. Moore, law-inventing-type-person, found dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    #include troll.h

    Just heard some sad news on talk radio this
    evening. [Yadda yadda yadda...]
    Even if you didn't enjoy his law, there's no
    denying his contributions to geek culture.
    Truly an Internet icon.

  59. "You have the bridge, Mr. Data" by chemguru · · Score: 1


    Could this mean the creation of Neural Network pathways are closer than we think?

    --
    --Chemguru
  60. First apps? by MackBob24 · · Score: 1

    There's got to be something that comes before this (they always say the PDAs are first): "While the molecular transistor technology is still in its infancy, the scientists expect that the first applications of organic semiconductors will be in flexible flat screens-PDAs, for instance, that could be folded up and put in a pants pocket. Ultrafast, ultracheap, plastic microprocessors would likely follow many years later." See Small Times