Slashdot Mirror


GNU Carnivore With Perl Data Lookup

Kallahar writes: "Inspired by the FBI's DCS1000: Carnivore is a networked art project in two parts. The first part is Carnivore Server, an application which performs packet-sniffing on a specific local area network and serves the resulting data stream via the net. The second part consists of an unlimited number of client applications which tap into this data stream and interpret it in creative ways."

161 comments

  1. Chaos theory at work by cculianu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I always love art that is based on chaotic systems. It's really cool how order can arise from chaos, and vice-versa.

    1. Re:Chaos theory at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh you
      Lockheed

    2. Re:Chaos theory at work by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      I'm terribly afraid of this falling into the wrong hands. If the FBI got it, who knows what true character may be revealed at the expense of rights...

      Hello, Sen. Helms, we've been monitoring traffic from your office this evening and, well, it creates a picture of a troll, over and over again...

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:Chaos theory at work by Fizzlewhiff · · Score: 1

      The programmer will still have the creative input on how the data is interpreted - what gets rendered and what slips through. Regardless, it is an interesting project. I just hope no one takes the code and uses it for evil. :)

      --

      'Same speed C but faster'
    4. Re: Chaos theory at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm just waiting for the chaos over whether to call this Carnivore or GNU/Carnivore... :) Where's the flame war?

  2. Fuck off by Strom+Thurmond+(R-SC · · Score: -1

    I will type for a few seconds...

    --

    Strom Thurmond; the dean of the US Senate...
    the deadest fart on slashdot.

    1. Re:Fuck off by Strom+Thurmond+(R-SC · · Score: -1

      Suck-o-Riffic...
      |.- - - -- - - -.| | | | Eat My Nuts | | | | _ _ _ _ __ _ | ' - -- . . - - - ' | _|/ | ." ". | /(o)-(o)\ /_)| / | |_)| '- | \_)\ '.___.' / |\/|_ | \ \_/ / _| '/ |_\ \.___./ \ ) / \ \_/\__/\__ ==| \ \ /\ /\ `\ | \ \\// \ | `\ /\ / | ; | \____/ | | |

      --

      Strom Thurmond; the dean of the US Senate...
      the deadest fart on slashdot.

  3. FIRST POST by anal-johnson · · Score: -1

    turd wranglers!

  4. 1st Po....wait.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    2562371th post.

    Darn. I hate this new # system.

  5. "creative ways" by Nyphur · · Score: 0

    Just how "creative" is this system going to be? Is it going to be the intruiging kind of creative, or the exploitable kind of creative?

    --
    1. Re:"creative ways" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By posting all your information in your signature, you are just asking to be spammed to hell. Yea, I'm kind of bored.

  6. test by LinuxLuddite · · Score: -1

    test

  7. Is "art project" a euphemism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought Carnivore was a really bad packet sniffing program used by the FBI to monitor terrorist cells. Has GNU been infiltrated? Or are they simply showing their stripes?

  8. Arnold says: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    "STOP IT!"

  9. Slow Down, Cowboy! by anal-johnson · · Score: -1

    awww, fuck

    Slashdot requires you to wait 2 minutes between each successful posting of a comment to allow everyone a fair chance at posting a comment.

    It's been 1 minute since you last successfully posted a comment

  10. First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    FP Bitches

  11. Lets Hope by JohnHegarty · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "performs packet-sniffing on a specific local area network"

    lets hope no one is look at naughty pictues... might give an effect which is less than random, and a bit more 18+

    1. Re:Lets Hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty cool pics to link off the first page.

  12. is an open source Carnivore more acceptable? by fetta · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One of the critiques that I've seen of the FBI's Carnivore was that it required an ISP to install a "black box" on their network about which the ISP knew very little.

    Would an open source Carnivore be more palatable to the ISP community? The privacy implications remain, of course, but if the U.S. government adopted an open source program would ISPs be more willing to implement it?

    --
    ** The opinions expressed here are my own, and do not reflect those of my employers - past, present, or future**
    1. Re:is an open source Carnivore more acceptable? by dattaway · · Score: 2

      What is on this black box? Does it use Windows as its operating system? Complete with the IIS web server?

    2. Re:is an open source Carnivore more acceptable? by LinuxHam · · Score: 2

      check out Altivore.

      I wonder how many tech-saavy parents would use it to monitor their kid's activities.

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    3. Re:is an open source Carnivore more acceptable? by jhines · · Score: 1

      I think so, but a better question would be is it going to acceptable to the court system? I mean, if you the ISP can change the code, how can it be insured that the software hasn't been tinkered with, to produce in-accurate results?

      Maybe I'm watching too many laywer shows on TV, but it seems to me a defense attorney would have a field day attacking the credibility of the evidence produced.

    4. Re:is an open source Carnivore more acceptable? by hawkfan · · Score: 1

      You've got a good point, it's easy enough to spoof network traffic outside the "black box" however. I doubt any of it would be admissible, if not easily discredited.

    5. Re:is an open source Carnivore more acceptable? by _Mustang · · Score: 2

      if you the ISP can change the code, how can it be insured that the software hasn't been tinkered with, to produce in-accurate results

      Certainly an interesting point. But then we can ask the question, does source equal binary? I think it's reasonable to say that any changes to the source code can be detected by differences in the binary output. In this type of situation I think the value of having open code is the ability to audit the system.
      Of I'm with the author of this thread's parent - why exactly is an OPEN-SOURCE carnivore more acceptable..??

    6. Re:is an open source Carnivore more acceptable? by jorbettis · · Score: 2
      I mean, if you the ISP can change the code, how can it be insured that the software hasn't been tinkered with, to produce in-accurate results?

      The FBI could take MD5 checksums of all the binaries on the system before giving it to the ISP, then it could simply check the checksums when it gets it back.

      Of course, if the ISP couldn't be trusted with the binaries, I don't think the ISP could be trusted not to tinker with the datafiles that they generate ether.

      --

      Jordan Bettis

      ``Wherever you go, there's another stupid sigfile quote.''
  13. omfg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    This is going to get someone in A LOT of trouble!

  14. The Truth About Geekizoid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Geekizoid is owned by the Jews..

    Seriously, it's hosted in Tel Aviv, Israel.

    The Jews have taken over the troll and crapflood community. OMFG. Those bastards control the media and everything. And now they own the trolls and crapflooders. This is fucking horrible.

    1. Re:The Truth About Geekizoid by zulux · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      is owned by the Jews..
      Those bastards control the media and everything.


      IF the 'Jews' controll the 'media and everything,' as you put it - then my hat is off to them as they have been running the country and the media pretty well. Maby we should have more Jewish people in control if they are doing such a good job.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    2. Re:The Truth About Geekizoid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      While I applaud your attempt at a come-back, saying that the media and the country are well-run is NOT the way to do it.

    3. Re:The Truth About Geekizoid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      (Sorry for feeding this troll.)

      And if people like you were to run 'the country', most of us would be either dead or starving by now.

  15. glaring security problems by JohnHegarty · · Score: 3, Informative

    On November 17th, a draft version of a review of Carnivore, the FBI tool for monitoring Internet traffic, was made available to the public. This review was performed by members of the ITT Research Institute in Lanham, Maryland and is 127 pages long. In the Executive Summary, the review makes several recommendations for ways in which Carnivore must be improved, in order to protect individual privacy and assuage concerns about the potential for unauthorized use.....
    ....

    .....
    In other words, they found a flawed product, which can currently be easily manipulated to gather information beyond that authorized in a court order. They believe the flaws are fixable and have made recommendations as to what needs to be done, including eventually releasing the source, but not until some glaring security problems have been fixed first.............
    Read on here:
    http://www.lwn.net/2000/1207/security.php3

    1. Re:glaring security problems by blair1q · · Score: 2

      Court order?

      What would they need that for?

      They have a GPL!

      Oops. Maybe they don't...

      --Blair
      "The net is not secure. The net is not secure. The net is not secure."

    2. Re:glaring security problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      October 19, 2001

      Ex-postal worker jailed for fecal fight

      EMPIRE - A disgruntled United States Postal worker was jailed in lieu of $1 million bond Thursday after former co-workers told police he attacked them with three buckets of animal feces.

      James Beal, of Empire, faces charges in Leelanau County of assault and malicious destruction of property and has also been indicted on federal charges in Grand Rapids. The Michigan State Police and the U.S. Postal Service are investigating.

      Beal, a recently terminated employee, entered a mail sorting room at the Empire Post Office at around 10:30 a.m. Thursday and threw three buckets of feces at four workers and on the contents of the room, according to the state police.

      Police responded to the post office within minutes and provided security at the post office and surveillance of Beal's residence. Beal surrendered peacefully at around 12:30 p.m. after police made telephone contact with him.

      No injuries were reported and decontamination was handled by the United States Postal Hazardous Materials Team from Grand Rapids.

    3. Re:glaring security problems by Genghis+Troll · · Score: -1

      Three buckets.. you've got to admire that. Most people would've settled for one, or even just a baggie full. Three buckets!

  16. Disappointment... by Xerithane · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have to say, I am severely disappointed that they don't have a Matrix-style display. To have a realistic matrix display that contains real information about network data would just rock. Warm and fuzzy all over.

    --
    Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    1. Re:Disappointment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

      so fucking make one, you jackass. That's the only benefit of GNU in the first place.

    2. Re:Disappointment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you go make a pop-up window with 40px red characters that says "Accessing secret data files" and repeats it in a robotic female voice everytime you hack into the CIA's computers, you lame fuck.

    3. Re:Disappointment... by MrEd · · Score: 1

      So write one! That's the beauty of open source, innit?

      --

      Wah!

    4. Re:Disappointment... by ninewands · · Score: 1

      The whole point of the project is NOT the data collection. If you had READ the site, the object of collecting the data is to use it as input to user-written clients for "artistic" visualization of chaotic data streams.

      That doesn't change the fact that I, personally, think this falls in the category of YARBI (Yet Another REALLY Bad Idea(TM)).

    5. Re:Disappointment... by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      My point was, if I was working on a project it would be the first display. And, I really have enough projects I'm working on thanks.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    6. Re:Disappointment... by Xerithane · · Score: 1
      I did read the site. Why do you think I was talking about the Matrix display. It is a piece of art that is fed through real-time data.


      Of course, if you actually READ my post you would have gathered that.


      I'm just people care that you think it's a bad idea, too. Maybe you should go spend your efforts lobbying congress instead of posting stupid comments on slashdot?

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
  17. All net traffic now under Carnivore surveillance? by Spootnik · · Score: 1, Informative

    If you are nervous about your messages being intercepted, get yourself a implementation of PGP and use it religiously. If you are really feeling paranoid, get the source code to 'Gnu Privacy Guard' and compile your own copy.

    I am part-owner of one ISP, and know personally top network administrators for at least a dozen other providers, both major and minor. None of them have 'Carnivore' or other government-mandated software or hardware on their networks.

    The Feds did make a one-time request of several major providers to scan their logs for email with a certain set of 'From' addresses, but there is no new ongoing traffic analysis at individual ISPs.

    There is absolutely no privacy left on the Net any more. None. Keep that in mind when you rant. That's what crypto is for. Ranting on Slashdot is by it's very nature, about as public as you can get.

  18. ummagumma by Bilton · · Score: -1

    get it on.

  19. DMCA by agrapa · · Score: 1

    Coudn't this count as an attempt to reverse-engineer the communication protocol of networked applications and therefore be breaking the DMCA??

    1. Re:DMCA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it could not, troll.

  20. Computer Art or Programmer Art? by Posiks · · Score: 1

    Seems to me this is more about the programmer creatively setting up a was for a computer to place overlayed text or randomly grabbed images into a layout. I don't see the computer making many of the artistic decisions, except maybe applying the color wheel maybe?

    --
    Posiks
    1. Re:Computer Art or Programmer Art? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      stop posting the same shit over and over asshole.

  21. How I became gay, by CmdrTaco. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    This is a true story of my first introduction to being gay.

    In the summer of my 10th year JonKatz and his parents moved in next door to my folks. He was 14 at that time and would be starting Junior High in the fall. JonKatz was not what you would call knock down handsome, perhaps a 7 or 8 on a scale of 1 to 10. He had, as I remember, dark hair -brown or black - and nice brown eyes. A husky build, not fat, but sturdy for his age.
    During the winter we would mess around a bit, snowball fights and such, because we were the only non-adults on our block. I was a bit afraid of JonKatz but at the same time admired him "as the older man".
    When the next summer came (I being 11 and he was 15) we were more comfortable with each other, even though he was so much older. One day, all our parents being at work, JonKatz told me to come into the garage because he wanted "to show you something."
    When we got in there he told me to drop my pants which I did, with some reluctance. After they were down around my ankles he slipped his hands into the waist-band on each of my hips and slid my shorts down to reveal my boytool.
    I had been experimenting with myself for several months, mostly in the bathtub, and, while my uncut cock was still only about 3" long it could
    get nice and hard. Also my ballsac was not fully developed yet so it was not too large either.
    When JonKatz had me exposed he reached down and began playing with my cock, sliding the foreskin back and forth and squeezing it. Of course, it began to respond and when he had it hard he knelt down in front of me and took everything into his mouth. I can almost still feel the shiver that went down my back as his warm, wet mouth engulfed my hard tool and my tight ballsac. I could feel his nose pressed against my pelvis where my pubes would appear in a few years.
    While he was working his mouth on the front he had spread the cheeks of my young ass and worked one of his fingers into the hole, slipping it in and out.
    Presently, he stood up and unfastened his pants and dropped them to to floor. He was not wearing any undershorts so his 5" hardon was immediately visible to my astonished eyes. It looked huge compared with mine.
    "Now, you do to me what I did to you", he said. I noticed that there was a drop of colorless fluid beginning to emerge from the slit in the end of his cock but had no idea what it was. I knelt down in front of his and touched the tip with my tongue. "Put it in your mouth." I opened my lips and carefully took the tip of the head between them.
    "Not like that", he whispered, "like this." And with that he put his hands behind my head and thrust his pelvis forward to push his hard meat into my mouth. When I started to gag he pulled back enough that I was able to accept his cock comfortably. Then he began moving his lower body in the time honored way until I got the idea of how to move my head back and forth, sliding my tongue up and down the underside of his hard shaft.
    Suddenly, he gave a groan and a lurch and I felt something hot and slightly salty spurt into my mouth. It surprised me so that I automatically swallowed (not for the last time by any means!). That was the first time JonKatz and I sucked each other but certainly not the end. As I mentioned before, all our parents worked so we were pretty much left alone during the week. There were many times we would spend time together, either in his room or in mine, when we would strip down naked and play and suck for an hour or more at a time. On warm summer nights we would sneak out to the backyard, strip and lay in the grass making love to each other.
    We got so we could time our climax and shoot our cum at almost the same moment. Yes, my "manhood" arrived while JonKatz was still available - at the age of about 12 and a half, as I recall. In fact, JonKatz drank my first explosion - gad, that was a shaker! JonKatz got my cock to expand to its final 6.5" while his increased to a bit over 7.
    When he was 18, JonKatz went into the Army. I saw him once on furlogh and got a Christmas card one year. That was the last I ever heard from him. I have no idea if he is still alive or not but I often think of him when I am jacking my meat and wish I could relive those summer days with my first love.

    1. Re:How I became gay, by CmdrTaco. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      that was hot.

  22. I got some art for you, cocksmoker! by Strom+Thurmond+(R-SC · · Score: -1

    |.- - - -- - - -.| | | | Blow Me! | | | | _ _ _ _ __ _ | ' - -- . . - - - ' | _|/ | ." ". | /(o)-(o)\ /_)| / | |_)| '- | \_)\ '.___.' / |\/|_ | \ \_/ / _| '/ |_\ \.___./ \ ) / \ \_/\__/\__ ==| \ \ /\ /\ `\ | \ \\// \ | `\ /\ / | ; | \____/ | | |

    --

    Strom Thurmond; the dean of the US Senate...
    the deadest fart on slashdot.

  23. Slashdot Love Triangle Revealed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait


    BRINGING JonKatz ALONG

    CmdrTaco answered the doorbell, saw Hemos, and turned around
    walking away and clapping his hands.
    "Hot damn! Got some juicy porn flicks for us tonight,
    buddy."
    "Hope so," Hemos said, ushering a third guy in, then closing
    the door. CmdrTaco turned.
    "Uh, who's this?"
    "That's JonKatz. He's a queer," Hemos stated flatly, taking
    off his jacket and throwing it over a chair.
    "What?" CmdrTaco frowned, looking JonKatz up and down. "Uh,
    what'd you bring a queer along for?"
    "Instead of sitting there like a couple of idgits with our
    hands down our pants, I figured we'd do it up good. Strip down
    and let him lick us while we watch porn."
    "You're weird, man!" CmdrTaco shook his head.
    "Nuts. You'd like to lick CmdrTaco's cock and balls, wouldn't
    you, JonKatz?"
    JonKatz stood there nervously, staring directly at CmdrTaco's
    crotch. "Unh huh."
    "See, I told ya."
    "I don't care. I ain't gonna let no faggot mess with me!"
    "Suit yourself. You'll change your mind once you see him
    working me over. He's got a wicked tongue. A real special
    talent. Besides that, he's a nasty little punk. You like doing
    nasty things, doncha, JonKatz?"
    JonKatz nodded up and down, a stupid smile on his face.
    "Whadda you mean, nasty? Cocksuckin' another dude is nasty
    enough."
    Hemos took CmdrTaco by the shoulders and turned him around.
    "JonKatz, how'd you like to ram your tongue up my buddy's hairy
    butthole? Look good to ya?"
    JonKatz's eyes lit up and his tongue did an obscene little
    swirl. "YOU BET!"
    "WHAT?!" CmdrTaco cried.
    "Pop a tape in, man. I'm ready to get started." He began to
    remove his pants and shirt. "JonKatz sucks assholes, dude. JonKatz
    loves to suck assholes. Wait'll you see him sucking mine out."
    "Are you doped up or what? I don't wanna see him suckin'
    your shithole, man!"
    "Oh, you Hemos, buddy. Then you'll throw your legs up and
    beg him to drill his tongue up your keester."
    "Hey, do what you want. Just stay down at that end of the
    couch, okay?"
    Hemos sat bare-assed on the couch, sprawling his legs out.
    CmdrTaco took a few furtive glances at his buddy's nakedness, then
    averted his eyes as he pushed the remote. He sighed disgustedly
    when JonKatz also took his clothes off, although he was somewhat
    glad the guy wasn't some ugly old troll.
    "Hey, JonKatz," Hemos said, fiddling with his balls, "go and
    bring us all beers."
    JonKatz hopped up and went into the kitchen.
    "Are you serious?!" CmdrTaco hissed after he left.
    "Trust me, man. Just treat him like a punk slave. He'll do
    anything you say. Come on, take your fuckin' clothes off and
    get into it."
    Reluctantly, CmdrTaco began to strip. When JonKatz came back, he
    saw CmdrTaco's big cock and whistled appraisingly. CmdrTaco blushed.
    "Nice big honker, hunh, JonKatz?" Hemos said, looking his
    buddy's cock over. "Got you drooling, thinking about the two
    big loads you're gonna get? We used to jerk each other off when
    we were kids. CmdrTaco shoots a big wad."
    "Jeez, don't tell him that!" CmdrTaco cried.
    "Why not? You do."
    "I don't mean that, I mean...the other."
    "Cripes, you've turned into such a pussy. Ever jerked off
    with your straight buddies when you were younger, JonKatz?"
    "Sure. All the time. Then I started sucking 'em. They dug
    it, but then they eventually gave me the heave-ho."
    "Stupid fucks," Hemos growled, taking a swig of his beer. He
    leaned over and rustled JonKatz's hair. "I wouldn't have done
    that. I would have fed you cock all through junior high and
    high school. Some guys just don't know when they've got
    something cooking. Woah, nice pussy! Get a load of the meat on
    that fucker, too. Bet you'd like to sucker the jizz outta that
    guy's balls, hunh, JonKatz?"
    "Yeah, but I'd really to suck his hairy asshole!" JonKatz
    replied.
    "Bet he'd let ya. You really get off on bungs, doncha? You
    like smelling 'em, too, doncha? Sure dig sniffin' mine. I was
    pretty ripe the other day, wasn't I?" His cock was up hard and
    he was fisting it slowly.
    "You sure were...real ripe!"
    "But you liked it that way, didn't you?"
    "I sure did, Hemos! Got a stinky one tonight?"
    "Better than stinky, man. That's why I'm sitting on my
    shirt. Don't wanna get any butt slime on CmdrTaco's couch." He
    chuckled while CmdrTaco gasped.
    "Aw, that's filthy, man! Are you sitting there with a
    shitty asshole?"
    "Hey, I'm on an old shirt. Relax."
    "Are you saying that queer...licks shitty assholes?!"
    "I don't know. This is the first time I've offered it to
    him dirty. JonKatz, you still wanna suck my ass?"
    "Absolutely!" JonKatz gushed, crawling between Hemos's legs.
    "I'll lick it clean for you. I like 'em kinda raunchy, but
    if there's shit on it I don't mind licking it off."
    "If CmdrTaco lifted his legs up and he had a ring of crap
    all around his hole, would you lick it off for him?"
    "Sure. I'd eat CmdrTaco's shit. I mean, I'd lick it off his
    asshole."
    "Here, lick it off mine. No sense messing up this shirt."
    He grabbed his knees and pulled them back. CmdrTaco stared in shock
    as JonKatz stuck his face up to Hemos's butt and began to sniff
    and lick his hairy ass. "Watch this, CmdrTaco."
    "Jeez, what about the movie?" CmdrTaco whined.
    "Fuck the video. This is real. Watch how he licks off my
    shithole."
    JonKatz's tongue was bathing Hemos's entire crack. He loved
    the smelly thing and soon had his tongue circling Hemos's shitty
    hole. Hemos even reached down and pulled his cheeks apart,
    letting the astonished CmdrTaco get a good peek. CmdrTaco couldn't help
    staring as JonKatz cleaned his buddy's dirty crapper.
    "Oh, this is the life!" Hemos moaned, throwing his head back
    and glancing over at CmdrTaco. "When something gets dirty, just
    have your personal slave lick it. He cleans my armpits and even
    sucks the grunge from between my toes. He'll do anything you
    ask him to, CmdrTaco. Just tell him what you want."
    "Yeah, what if I wanted to SHIT on him?!" CmdrTaco snarled in
    contempt.
    "Go ahead. Hell, shit in his mouth if you want. Yeah, I'd
    like to see that myself. You'd let CmdrTaco take a shit in your
    mouth if I wanted, wouldn't you, JonKatz?"
    "Um, gee, I guess so, Hemos, if you wanted me to. I've never
    done that...sucked on a turd, I mean. I'd rather do it to you,
    Hemos. For the first one, anyway."
    "See, what'd I tell you? Well, I might be all shitted out,
    so maybe we'll have to postpone the turdsuck for another time.
    But suck me out real good, JonKatz. Maybe there's a leftover
    turdball up there. If you can suck one out, there's a good
    chance we can get CmdrTaco to take a poop for you."
    "You're insane!" CmdrTaco cried, shaking his head. But he
    continued to watch JonKatz eat out his buddy's splayed bunghole
    ...keeping a close eye out for any turdballs that might come
    flying out. Not that he particularly wanted to see one.
    "Mmmm, clean me out. Eat that shitty hole. Aw, look at him
    slopping out my turdhole, CmdrTaco. Lots of shitjuice going down
    his throat and he's happy as all fuck."
    "Gee, Hemos, maybe he'd like to drink your enema," CmdrTaco said
    sarcastically. "Oh, that's too demented to even suggest!"
    "NO!" JonKatz piped up.
    Hemos laughed. "Naw, that's more perverted than fun."
    "I'm sorry I even mentioned it," CmdrTaco whined.
    "Oooh, he's gettin' my hole loosened up. Maybe if I bear
    down. If I plop out a little turd in his mouth, Hemos you go
    through with it, CmdrTaco?"
    "You know, just to show you how disgusting this all is, I
    just might. Yeah, I'll fuckin' shit in his mouth, just so
    you'll have to smell my shit!"
    "Wouldn't be the first time, pal. I've followed you in the
    bathroom before. You suck and I'll push, JonKatz. If that doesn't
    work, maybe you can scoop some out with your fingers."
    "I don't mind eating your shit off my fingers, Hemos," JonKatz
    said, "but it won't be the same as a big turd in my mouth."
    "You're right. Bad idea. Unless you just wanna scoop some
    out anyway."
    "Why can't you guys just do some normal cocksucking and
    forget the shit?"
    "Yeah, my hole's clean. Crawl over and see if CmdrTaco's ready
    to let you lick his prick."
    CmdrTaco had a stiff rail in his hand, despite everything else.
    He sighed in resignation, and pushed his boner down between his
    spread legs, letting the eager JonKatz lick the crown.
    "Uh, yeah, that's okay. What the hell. I've let a couple
    fags go down on me in the past. Go ahead and suck it if you
    want."
    "That's the spirit, CmdrTaco! But let him treat you, don't go
    blowing your load too soon. And when you're ready, just lift
    your legs and tell him to lick your ass."
    After JonKatz slobbered over CmdrTaco's knob and teased up and
    down his shaft for a while, CmdrTaco was getting turned on much too
    fast. He pulled his cock from JonKatz's mouth and lifted his
    thighs.
    "Alright," he sighed with false reluctance, "Go on. Might
    as well get my ass sucked for all this baloney you're putting
    me through." He stared at the ceiling--a feined attempt to
    disassociate himself from what was happening.
    "Aw, poor baby," Hemos chuckled, making CmdrTaco laugh, too.
    Then CmdrTaco let out a quiet little gasp as JonKatz's wet tongue
    began to circle his hairy anus.
    "Ah, fuck!" He lifted his thighs more and held his knees
    back. "If you're gonna eat out my shithole, man, go for it! Oh,
    god, I didn't know I was so sensitive down there. Oh, that's a
    great sensation!"
    "You got him hooked, JonKatz baby," Hemos cried, getting down
    on the floor to watch. "Make him squirm. Lick that hairy
    stinkhole and show him whose tongue is boss. Make him quiver
    like you did me that first time. Look at him holding those legs
    back, offering everything he's got. Eat that smelly hole!" Hemos
    looked up at CmdrTaco and winked. "Kinda neat having a faggot
    between your cheeks cleaning out your shitty asshole, isn't it?
    And the best part is he likes the way you smell down there and
    he likes the way you taste. He's gonna ram his long tongue up
    your hot turdhole and try to lick out your steamy rectum!"
    Then he turned back to JonKatz. "How's he taste?"
    "Oh, he's delicious! And his smell doesn't go away after
    licking it, cause it's so hairy, I guess. Best smelling asshole
    I ever smelled. I could keep my nose in here for a week!"
    "Well, buddy, guess your shit does stink better than mine."
    "Oh, that's, I mean..." JonKatz stammered, "I still love
    yours, Hemos."
    "Heh. Just eat. I know enough about bungsuckers to know
    that the sweetest asshole in the world is the one they happen to
    be eating out at the moment." He sat down next to CmdrTaco, raised
    his own legs, then grabbed CmdrTaco's hand and wrapped it around
    his prick while taking CmdrTaco's big cock in hand. Then he
    grinned. "Hell, we might as well trade handjobs while he
    tickles our innards."
    CmdrTaco was about to take his hand away, but the feel and
    texture of his buddy's cock felt comfortably familiar. "Guess
    one more time wouldn't hurt."
    "Hell, I never did want to stop. Even after we started
    getting chicks, I could have gone for a wild meat-beating with
    you now and then. And it's a lot safer now."
    "How's that?"
    "Well, with a cocksucker to do our bidding, we won't be
    tempted to try it out."
    "I never was tempted to try that!" CmdrTaco said defensively.
    "Fuck you and the big balls you rode in on! I thought about
    it, and I know you did, too. We were both just too chicken,
    that's all."
    "Yeah. Well, good thing we got a cocksucker, right?"
    "Right. How's your bunghole feeling?"
    "Ah, good! Makes me think about something else we never
    tried." He chuckled.
    "Hey, we're big boys now. You can stick it up my hole if I
    can stick it up yours! And JonKatz can suck our cocks clean!"
    "Fuck each other like a bitch, hunh?"
    "Yep. Then we can both fuck JonKatz."
    "And I'll still lick your pricks clean!" JonKatz blurted out,
    smiling.

    1. Re:Slashdot Love Triangle Revealed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      dude, that's fucked up

    2. Re:Slashdot Love Triangle Revealed... by DivineOb · · Score: -1

      That shit was fucking hilarious

      --

      I must burn in hell, suffer and pay for my sins
      But Gods the one who's losing, Satan always wins!

  24. Been there, done that...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Years ago when Linux 2C tips had just started, I published a little script to periodicly generate random wallpaper by tiling gifs plucked out of the netscape cache........

    Judging by the amount of feedback I got the concept was quite popular.

  25. Carnivore server? by mwalker · · Score: 3, Funny

    Carnivore Server is a set of Perl scripts running on top of tcpdump

    You know, sadly, this is probably far more sophisticated than the actual Carnivore system.

    Good grief.

    1. Re:Carnivore server? by imrdkl · · Score: 1
      this is probably far more sophisticated than the actual Carnivore system

      I recall hearing Larry once allude that he did some work for the "Iowa Farm Boys", before (or sometime during?) his stint at JPL.

      But that was also before Perl, at least as we know it, I guess.

      Otoh, maybe he taught 'em a few tricks. :-)

    2. Re:Carnivore server? by Fizzlewhiff · · Score: 1

      If it is like other government developed sofware I've seen it's written in VB with very large buttons, all bold all caps text, and a clever color scheme.

      --

      'Same speed C but faster'
  26. Re:All net traffic now under Carnivore surveillanc by zmooc · · Score: 1
    If you are really feeling paranoid, get the source code to 'Gnu Privacy Guard [gnupg.org]' and compile your own copy.

    This would offcourse hardly be any safer if you'd not audit all the code before compiling it:)

    --
    0x or or snor perron?!
  27. More Info by Monkey-Man · · Score: 1

    Here is some more information about the artwork (NYTimes login required blah blah blah blah)

  28. So the FBI couldn't get ISPs to Install Carnivore by bstrahm · · Score: 2

    So they release a "Art Project" that convinces people to install a box on a bunch of networks, join an IRC channel and dump packets...

    And this is a good thing because ...

    ???

  29. Probably needs hardware by imrdkl · · Score: 1
    To be useful for anything which could impose on your "liberties". Although perl never has ceased to amaze me.

    Would need to be some kind of no-hop-added router, I guess. (I know IPF can do this, but parsing packet content is a bigger job than just reading headers, especially at the major nodes)

    Like others have wisely said, if your unsure, encrypt with your own keys. Everyone sniffs around these days, run ipmon for fun!

  30. Re:All net traffic now under Carnivore surveillanc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree.. I know that with what is happening lately with terrorism in our country, the fbi wants to implement anything they can to track any potential criminals.. but with all this "tracking" going on, and with no one having any privacy left at all, i wonder how many times people will be under suspicion for something when they really didn't do anything wrong at all.

  31. Wireless networks are very vulnerable to this by gentlewizard · · Score: 2
    "an application which performs packet-sniffing on a specific local area network"

    Imagine setting up a dual-homed, 802.11b equipped laptop near a major business, then using this art project to broadcast what you hear to the world.

    Scary!
    1. Re:Wireless networks are very vulnerable to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Redundant

      Imagine setting up a dual-homed, 802.11b equipped laptop near a major business, then using this art project to broadcast what you hear to the world.

      Wow! Even better, imagine a Beowulf cluster of these things!

  32. Want to cause havoc with their monitoring? by The+FooMiester · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Send your friends some streams of /dev/random They'll waste a few cpu-hours trying to decrypt each. If everyone did this, all monitoring of traffic would either be very expensive or very worthless.



    Start secret message:
    s^O(^S^XltkA@[1^Z;
    end secret message

    --
    The previous has been a secret message to my comrades.
    1. Re:Want to cause havoc with their monitoring? by Alan · · Score: 2

      Hell, there's so much spam and ads and flash streams on the net these days it's almost as good :)

    2. Re:Want to cause havoc with their monitoring? by Arandir · · Score: 3, Informative

      Remember "The Prisoner"? In one episode they briefly mentioned "jamming" to disrupt the activities of the warders. A later episode, "Hammer into Anvil", showed awesome jamming in practice.

      "Prisoner" style jamming would be stuff like secretly passing (real) grocery lists, abruptly changing your well known hobbies, getting a post office box that you only use for two of your four magazine subscriptions, etc. Makes the warders think you're up so something so they expend effort trying to figure it out.

      So what would "Carnivore" style jamming be? It can't be just randomness, and it has to be at least semi-legitimate. Posting signed and encrypted random streams won't count, because it's not real. And it can't get you in real trouble. One idea: create a PGP key for "Anonymous Coward", and sign all of your AC posts to Slashdot with it. Another: always use a signature tag composed of 26 randomly selected letters, all lowercase.

      The key to getting jamming to work is for all the jammers to respond appopriately to other jammers. When one jammer sends you a PGP signed grocery list, send him or her your chocolate cheesecake recipe.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    3. Re:Want to cause havoc with their monitoring? by flonker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This happened to me about four years ago. I posted a message to Usenet (my first post to alt.discordia, among other groups), with a .sig containing "Filter bait: He will assassinate the president, but needs the password." followed by RC4 in 3 lines of Perl. The secret service obtained my (unlisted) home phone number, probably from my university, (probably not entirely legal, but I'm not pushing it,) and called me up at the ungodly hour of 9AM to question me about my website. They were referring to this post, which they had found using Dejanews.

      My point being, I'm a bit afraid of the run of the mill agents having access to technical anti-privacy nukes that they don't quite know how to use.

    4. Re:Want to cause havoc with their monitoring? by kigrwik · · Score: 1

      > When one jammer sends you a PGP signed grocery list, send him or her your chocolate
      > cheesecake recipe.

      Hmm, I'm not sure. *My* chocolate cheesecake would be considered as a terrorist weapon in many countries...

      --
      -- don't discount flying pigs until you have good air defense
    5. Re:Want to cause havoc with their monitoring? by smcv · · Score: 1

      It occurs to me that a real terrorist would be using elaborately hidden, near-undetectable codeword systems about now. Counterstrike players, on the other hand, will cheerfully keep talking about terrorists with AK-47s planting bombs, taking hostages and assassinating the President... I wonder how the Carnivore operators cope with that one?

  33. Slashdot should have checked the info. by Nicopa · · Score: 1
    According to the cite referenced (quoting):


    For those interested in downloading code from the NASA Classics Collection,
    you should be aware that we are currently required to charge a fee for the
    software. We are working with the people from NASA to try to "open" this
    software to enable downloads without fees, at least for private,
    non-commercial use.


    So there's no public domain software.
    1. Re:Slashdot should have checked the info. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong article?

  34. Nothing to Worry About by Sir+Troll-a-lot · · Score: 0, Troll

    The FBI's carnivore is based on proven technology. This anarchist's version of software is that open-source garbage. It will take someone 2 years to figure out how to install it, then they'll have to wait 3 more for the next release.

    1. Re:Nothing to Worry About by ninewands · · Score: 1

      Actually, it took me one command (# apt-get install tcpdump) to install tcpdump, and about 10 minutes reading the man page to learn how to use it ...

      As for the next release, IIRC, the debian package has been updated about 5 times since I installed woody back in February, including minor version changes (i.e., it's not all package-tweaking noise).

  35. artistic security hole by vanyel · · Score: 1

    Are the algorithms used to generate the "art" one-way or reversible? I.e. is this art project a security hole of its own by allowing the original datastream to be resurrected?

    1. Re:artistic security hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey now theres an idea!

      Take this further and maybe we could 'reverse' the old masters and find out what was flipping around the net during the renaisance.

      This is what chaos theory is all about.....no?....oh well, just don't tell the investors.

  36. Free spyware!! by tuxlove · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While I suppose this software could be used for legitimate security purposes, much as programs like Snort which monitor your network, the potential for abuse is great. By providing network administrators with a tool for sifting through network traffic for fun tidbits like email messages and other personal communications, the bar has been raised in the battle for privacy. Tools like this will make it that much easier for your ISP or employer to spy on you unless you take great precautions like encrypting everything. Since that's not always feasible, I guess we need to accept that there's no such thing as privacy on the net.

    Of course that was always the case, but in the past it's been similar to the "school of fish" mode of defense. By schooling, fish reduce their chance of being singled out by predators. In a group of a million fish, the chance of any particular one of them getting eaten by a shark is small. One could liken this scenario to the millions of Internet users. But now, with tools like Carnivore, you can catch all of the fish at once and devour them at your leisure.

    I think I see why it's named Carnivore.

    1. Re:Free spyware!! by minkeyboodle · · Score: 1
      I guess we need to accept that there's no such thing as privacy on the net.

      I agree completely! I've always accepted this. Nobody ever promised privacy on the net (unless you're talking about encryption, but even then, is it perfect? And who's willing to promise?). Asking for privacy on the net is like asking for privacy on an interstate highway.

      By schooling, fish reduce their chance of being singled out by predators. In a group of a million fish, the chance of any particular one of them getting eaten by a shark is small.

      Unless the shark has a really big mouth.

    2. Re:Free spyware!! by brer_rabbit · · Score: 1

      uh, this is really just based around tcpdump, which is standard / available for lots of *nix distributions. Did you even go to the website? It's an artsy fartsy project.

    3. Re:Free spyware!! by Cato+the+Elder · · Score: 1

      I hardly think that this enhances the spy potential of the average sysadmin. After all, it's just Perl scripts running tcpdump, and it's not like those aren't already available.

      It won't help your ISP at all--it is designed for the output from an ETHERNET packet sniffer, and your ISP is almost certainly using fiber. Your "shool of fish" defense is illusory as well. One of the things computers do really really well is filter large amounts of data, picking a fish out of a school. Even the FBI's Carnivore wasn't startling because of its tech, but because it was going to be installed in formerly open waters.

      I also doubt this will ever be usefull for "security", although network analysis certainly can be (see the Intrusion Detection Working Group of the IETF). However, it might be possible to write a client that gives you traffic analysis that could be used to make your network more effecient. Sniffing is legitimate for more than just security--network flow design and protocol debugging are actually probably more widespread.

      I'm still not sure I really like this program, though. As the artist says in his NY Times interview, he wants people to become more comfortable with the idea of survellience. I'm not sure I like that. On the other hand, it might decrease the demonization of packet sniffers, which would be a good thing. On the gripping hand, it's out there, check and see if it's running on _your_ network.

    4. Re:Free spyware!! by aiken_d · · Score: 2

      Well, I think it's more along the lines of Brin's Transparent Society idea: as long as the feds are going to have access to every byte sent on the net, damage to civil liberties can be minimized if *everyone* has access to that same information.

      That way there's no mystery about what can/cannot be inferred from the data. There's no special class of people who have access to sniff every byte of communication you or anyone else sends. It levels the playing field at "no privacy for anyone, to anyone" which ironically enough is better for society than "no privacy for anyone, to the government"

      Interesting, and worthwhile, idea.

      -b

      --
      If I wanted a sig I would have filled in that stupid box.
    5. Re:Free spyware!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that this program DOES NOT DO THAT AT ALL. IT IS ONLY USEFULL ON A LOCAL NETWORK. I'm glad you read Brin, but TRY READING ABOUT WHAT THE GODDAMN POST IS ABOUT

    6. Re:Free spyware!! by perky · · Score: 1
      By providing network administrators with a tool for sifting through network traffic for fun tidbits like email messages and other personal communications, the bar has been raised in the battle for privacy.

      ever heard of a packet sniffer? Like TCPdump? which is all this is, parsed by a perl script. If you had bothered to read the site you'd see that all this does is re-serve the input of a packet sniffer and is inteded as some kind of comment on the public natuire of information etc. It has not raised any privacy bar. In fact if it makes people aware of privacy issues, it has probably helped. All the functionality provided is superseeded by other tools.

      --
      "The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
    7. Re:Free spyware!! by ninewands · · Score: 1

      IMHO, if you are sending personal e-mail of a sensitive nature over your employer's network, you are somewhere between an idiot and a fool on the intelligence scale. It's a well-established legal precedent that the network and ALL the data on it belong to the employer, and as a natural consequence, employees have NO right to privacy against employer snooping.

    8. Re:Free spyware!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes! Go Moties!

    9. Re:Free spyware!! by aiken_d · · Score: 1

      Um, this probably isn't even worth replying to, but for the record (and in similarly idiotic shouting): DUH. DO YOU THINK, MAYBE, IT WOULD BE POSSIBLE TO NETWORK A BUNCH OF THESE SYSTEMS TOGETHER? LIKE, WITH THE INTERNET?

      Does this moron really think the Carnivore system somehow magicly reads packets off of remote networks?

      (Slashdot needs a "Post Idiotically" checkbox for people like this)

      Cheers
      -b

      --
      If I wanted a sig I would have filled in that stupid box.
    10. Re:Free spyware!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That idea is stomach-turningly bad. Everyone has a few intolerant neighbors, each of whom have a feasible number of people to spy on for expression of unpopular ideas, along with means of persecution that are unavailable or undesirable to the government (who have bigger fish to fry anyway). Only privacy can maintain a pluralistic society.

    11. Re:Free spyware!! by aiken_d · · Score: 1

      I agree that privacy is the first choice, and should be fought for. However, given the choice of limited privacy (in that corporations / the government / the elite can spy on you to their hearts' content, but you can't check up on them) or no privacy for anyone, I have to think that the no privacy for anyone option is preferable.

      After all, many of those nosey intolerant neighbors might have a change of heart if you could look right back into their bedrooms.

      Cheers
      -b

      --
      If I wanted a sig I would have filled in that stupid box.
    12. Re:Free spyware!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, this "moron" thinks Carnivore gets data off a much higher bandwith pipe than ethernet offers. That's why they want to put it at ISPs. Carnivore (FBI version) doesn't snoop packets on the LAN. Although networking a bunch of the systems together would give you an open soceity--except that since it would be listening on the LAN, if you controlled the router going outwards you could still fuck with the outgoing IRC stream. Oh, and the Post Anonymously checkbox works just fine for posts where you don't want to bother being tolerant.

  37. Wow, that's a GREAT idea by UltraBot2K1 · · Score: -1, Troll
    Next, you'll be telling me someone is using concentration camps and crematoria in a creative art project. Celebrating the elimination of our civil rights is never in good taste.


    Plus, by creating tools that could potentially be used to circumvent our rights, these "artists" are in fact collaborators. There are no two ways about it.

    --

    Slashdot: Open Source, Closed Minds.

  38. Re:All net traffic now under Carnivore surveillanc by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2

    Plus, you need to build your own compiler, starting with hand-built machine code and bootstrapping your way up (see the classic C Compiler hack).

    Of course, you then need to build your own processor to ensure there are no hacks in the processor too...

    --
    Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
  39. Where are the clients? by mxpengin · · Score: 1

    I searched all the web site , and couldn't find the clients :(
    Examples are cute, but where is the software ?

    --
    "We all know Linux is great...it does infinite loops in 5 seconds." -- Linus
    1. Re:Where are the clients? by smunt · · Score: 1

      They are having lots of fun I guess. Being slashdotted, they gather much extra information.

  40. I think it's funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems that the purpose of this project is to make fun of the FBI. Interpretting the data in creative ways is exactly what we assume the FBI would do with the captured data anyways.

    Plus, "well, it's not an invasion of privacy, it's just art" is a nice spin to "well, it's not an invasion of privacy, it's just security."

  41. This is as much of an art projects as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Handing out guns to school kids and calling the blood splatters "art".

    1. Re:This is as much of an art projects as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      `you` == lo.tekk ugly fat korporat zerv

  42. Cool art... by ackthpt · · Score: 2

    This stuff is more enjoyable to look at than most of what's on the walls at the Guggenheim!

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Cool art... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the second image has steganographic data

  43. This is too freakin' scary by I+Am+The+Owl · · Score: 1
    Sure, you would like to think that this is going to be some kind of pretty model of chaotic systems, but it is really GNU giving their blessing to government spyware.

    Now not only do you have the Feds watching everything you do online, but you also have the approval of those who claim to fight for your "freedom". What a joke, indeed. It is time that we, the freedom-loving citizens of the Internet, teach these people that it is not ever acceptable to watch other peoples' network traffic. This is a violation of privacy pure and simple and if we need cause a great disturbance in protest against such a thing, then so be it. We will retain our right to privacy.

    --

    --sdem
    1. Re:This is too freakin' scary by bstrahm · · Score: 2

      Ok... Where do you see a right to privacy on the internet in general ???
      I can not point to any protocol standard that says you have such a right.
      Your packets travel over the internet through other administrative domains that you do not control... What makes you think you have privacy there ?

      Now if you want privacy get PGP/FreeSWAN/isakmpd/etc. and make it so your packets have no meaning to any but the destination. Until then NEVER assume you have privacy...

    2. Re:This is too freakin' scary by liquidsin · · Score: 1

      The same thing that makes me think that using a phone should be private: the constitution. Last I checked, Americans had a right to privacy. How about we put a tap on your phone, broadcast the conversations, and call it art? Those are, after all, not private land lines you're using. Nor, do I imagine, do you own a private satellite, so why don't we capture your cell calls too. Whether you call it art or not, it's still eavesdropping. If this thing hadn't been GPL'd, people here would be all over it, whining about their privacy. Let's see MS release this and watch the pigs squeal. And no, I'm not trolling...

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    3. Re:This is too freakin' scary by sqlrob · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the right to privacy is not in the Constitution.

    4. Re:This is too freakin' scary by I+Am+The+Owl · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should avail yourself of the facts before you go shooting your mouth off like that. I really hope you aren't an American, because your lack of konwledge about our constitution is appalling.

      --

      --sdem
    5. Re:This is too freakin' scary by sqlrob · · Score: 2


      If you freely give something to the government, there is ZERO Constitutional protection on that information.

      The Constitution (4th) just says the government can't take information from you. Doesn't say a damn thing about what they already have.

      Kindly tell me where in the Constitution it says that they can't freely publish your tax records for example.

      The 9th and 10th are the only ones that can remotely be considered protecting privacy, but those aren't enforced worth crap.

  44. I'm waiting for FBI@home by glebite · · Score: 2

    Just imagine it - due to the wild success of the SETI@home and protein folding efforts, the FBI has decided that they too can distribute the loads of finding nefarious people in the world.

    And, with the MPAA and RIAA @home supplemental modules, your MP3s will be reported directly to the master FBI server...

    --
    I donate all spillover Karma to the charity of my choice... Ada was still a babe despite what people may say...
    1. Re:I'm waiting for FBI@home by sharkey · · Score: 2

      Well, FBI@home could hardly be more clueless than Comcast@home, and they probably have better funding as well. As long as I can get my high-speed pr0n, well...

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  45. Re:All net traffic now under Carnivore surveillanc by vsavatar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As much as I'd like to, very few, if any people I know have any idea how to decrypt PGP messages. The problem with PGP is you have to have one side to encrypt it and the other side to decrypt it, and since a lot of my friends, family members, and clients are 100% computer illiterate, it does not lend itself to being a realistic solution. I think all messages should, by default, be encrypted by all SMTP servers before they leave the network and be decrypted by the receiving SMTP servers before delivery, by using one of RSA's lovely encryption mechanisms, but that's just me.

  46. Carnivore is one place open source ain't great by btempleton · · Score: 2

    Sad to say, while there were many compelling arguments for open sourcing Carnivore so that the public could see if the FBI's boxes could be trusted, there is a major downside.

    You've just given Carnivore tools to the Chinese, The Iraqis and all the other oppressive governments of the world. Even though buying a network sniffer and configuring it was within their power before, this makes it easier.

    And whatever fears I may have (and they are many) about the U.S. government and its agents abusing their powers, they are nothing compared to the fears I have about those other powers.

    What we needed was two things. One was source review of the boxes the goverment uses by a wide range of trusted people, and two was a free as in free beer tool for U.S. ISPs so they can use it as an excuse to refuse a carnovore box on their ISP in the first place.

    --
    Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
    1. Re:Carnivore is one place open source ain't great by swordgeek · · Score: 2

      In a word, BULLSHIT!

      Why do you think that espionage is still a booming practice in the world? Because it's a great way for "them" to steal "our" technology! They've already got it, my friend!

      Besides, Carnivore was never a secret from governments--just from citizens. What good purpose is there in keeping it secret from a country's own populace.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    2. Re:Carnivore is one place open source ain't great by jhines · · Score: 1

      As it has been pointed out, the tools exist to sniff ALL the packets on a network segment, what makes Carnivore is that it makes it easier to meet US court requirements for evidence.

      If your are the admin of the networks system, which in totalitan regimes, you are, you have total control over the access and routing and logging of packets. You don't need carnivore, you just have the routers log all packets to from specific IPs.

      Carnivore exists because in the USA, the govt doesn't have 100% of the network.

    3. Re:Carnivore is one place open source ain't great by btempleton · · Score: 2

      Because it's never a black and white, 1 and 0 matter. We like open source software because the users maintain it and keep it high quality, and we can fix the bugs in it. We can also be more confident in its security if we compile it ourselves.

      But this is one piece of software I don't want to be easier to use, and maintained at higher quality. Most of us are never going to use it ourselves.

      But I do want to be sure it's not got hidden holes, so there is a dilemma. But the right answer may be in some mix, not the pure open source model.

      And you're dreaming if you think the spooks who take and enhance this software here or elsewhere are going to contribute back their modifications, GPL or no GPL.

      --
      Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
    4. Re:Carnivore is one place open source ain't great by btempleton · · Score: 2

      That's not quite true. In many regimes the network centers are still run by private individuals and even corporations. Many totalitarian states still have private companies.

      The question is how easy do we make it. I don't know about this GNU carnivore but one thing FBI's Carnivore/DCS1000 does is track DHCP and radius traffic so that it associates IP addresses with real userids. Not something you can as easily do with a standard router.

      Instead of writing tools to make it easy to snoop, we should be writing opportunistic crypto tools to make it harder.

      --
      Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
    5. Re:Carnivore is one place open source ain't great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get your point. China and Iraq have no civil liberties so we should sacrafice even more of ours?

    6. Re:Carnivore is one place open source ain't great by Ashcrow · · Score: 1

      It's not to tough to create a carnivore clone or another packet sniffing unit/program if you set your mind to it. Let us not forget that a lot of good programmers come from the countries you pointed out this project gives information to. The university I attended for CS was manily middle easterners doing there Masters.

    7. Re:Carnivore is one place open source ain't great by btempleton · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Of course. The question is, why make it easier for them? Half of why we want open source is to make our programs better. We don't want these privacy invading programs to be better and easier to use! That's quite different from our goals on most packages.

      We do want to be sure that they aren't snooping on us improperly, and some feel that if they are open source, that means we can check for that sort of thing. But in fact, that's possibly a big mistake.

      We can verify that the open source version is OK, but as you point out, there are people who can modify the code. And it's a lot easier to take the open source snooper and add patches to it to take out the safeguards than it is to write one without safeguards from scratch. This is really quite different from the goals of open source.

      The people who take out the safeguards won't tell you they did it, nor will they contribute their patches. Nor will they follow the GPL.

      When the FBI shows up with a DCS1000 Carnivore, they just attach a black box to your ethernet. They claim it's even wired so it can read, and not write, to your ethernet. But you don't get to inspect it, or check MD5s on the binaries to assure they were inspected to behave well.

      Now, I like the idea of a free tool for ISPs so they can install it to comply with warrants and thus refuse the police black box. But what advantage is gained by that being open source. It would be nice if it's free to the ISPs, with source available if you sign a contract, but that's about it.

      I'm also concerned that since secuity at ISPs is not super high (some run IIS for chrisakes) that it's not that hard for anybody, even a script kiddie to break in to a machine on my ISP's ethernet, and then get another script based on this open source snooper you want to snoop me. Forget the feds, these guys are worse.

      So I want to work to encrypt all my traffic but I can't yet, so I hope to not make it easier for the snoops.

      Not that it should be illegal or anything to release this package. I just want to argue that it's not a great idea. It doesn't match the reasons we like open source.

      --
      Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
  47. That's odd.. by RadioheadKid · · Score: 1

    I always thought GNUs were herbavores...learn something new every day...

    KidA

    --
    "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." -Homer Simpson
  48. Re:All net traffic now under Carnivore surveillanc by Arandir · · Score: 2

    There is absolutely no privacy left on the Net any more. None. Keep that in mind when you rant. That's what crypto is for.

    PGP, GnuPG, or whatever public key crypto you use, enables you to sign, verify, encrypt or decrypt documents. That's it. It's not an anonymizer. You can use them to keep your personal communications private, but they're useless for public posts on Slashdot. What good's a post on Slashdot that no one can read?

    Now a PGP based mailing list would be a very Good Thing(tm). Encrypt your messages to the list server, which then sends it out encrypted for each subscriber.

    --
    A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  49. go audio by bpetal · · Score: 1
    How to do this with sound?

    I've often thought of vocalizing my lan. Does anyone know where to start to realize tcp packets as sounds?

    1. Re:go audio by jkerman · · Score: 1

      http://peep.sourceforge.net/

  50. Re:All net traffic now under Carnivore surveillanc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1

    Ok.

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use

    iQA/AwUBO9n6FOgdudoliF6NEQJLdgCfTNY0q4J2v15vMdts gV oww12N31MAn3bz
    bVeoMECtVIHLkx9CGKL7WCKV
    =2sZe
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  51. Ha! by DrCode · · Score: 2

    eythay illway evernay igurefay isthay outway!

  52. the life of a drug dealer on slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Killa Hills 10304

    Life of a drug dealer

    Killa hills 10304

    Restaurants on a stake-out

    So order the food to take out

    Chaos, outside a spark steakhouse

    Maintain the power, I feel the deal's gon' sour

    Nigga Mr. Wedding, late a fuckin' half hour

    N' his man who bought land from Tony Starks

    While he was contractin' bricklayin' jobs in city parks

    He's a lone shark, bitches raise a grand to a finger

    In a garment that's stretched, got it sewn like Singer

    Cuz all that talk blasphemy this kid after me

    For the heist, in a Burlington coat factory

    Fuck it, he turned snake so my nigga Cash stole his copilot

    Who used to drive like sacks of blow on this remote

    Area, we label Dead Man's Island

    Two hundred miles South from Thailand

    Right off the docks, I got the various custom made yachts

    Burial plots, for my niggaz hit with fatal shots

    There's no need for us to spray up the scene

    I use less men, more powerful shit for my team

    Like my man Muhammad from Afghanistan

    Grew up in Iran, the nigga runs a neighborhood newsstand

    A wild Middle Eastern, bomb specialist

    Intiated, at eleven to be a terrorist

    He set bombs in bottles of champagne

    N' when niggaz popped the cork, niggaz lost half they brains


    Like this ex-worker, tried to smuggle a half a key

    In his left leg, even underwent surgery

    They say his pirate-limp gave him away

    As the feds rushed him, comin' through U.S. Customs

    Now look who's on the witness stand singin', a well known soprano

    A smash hit from Sammy Gravano

    Here's the plan minimum for the hit, two hundred grand

    Half time at the game blastin' niggaz out the stands

    The sharp-shooters hit the prosecutor, judges are sent

    Photographs of they wives takin' baths

    Along with briefcase filled with one point five, that's the bribe

    Take it or commit suicide

    First rule, anyone who schemes on the gold in Syria

    I want they small intestines ripped from the interior

    I got a price for those jewels, ship 'em freight cargo

    Don't forget to launder the cream through Wells Fargo

    Ricans processin' for the call of Costa Rica

    Four hundred barrels of ether

    Two hundred pounds of reefer

    N' fifty immigrants with fake Visas

    Life of a drug dealer

    Killa hills, 10304

    The saga continues

    the gza knows who did it!

  53. woohoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh yay! X just crashed in the middle of a huge download, that just rocks so much...

    open source stable...shea ok...

    Windows XP doesn't randomly die after a massive swapp-o-rama...even thought i have 256 megs of ram...

    X on Linux sure does though...

    1. Re:woohoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't blame it on XFree86 when your dogfood
      kernel poops out on you. Upgrade to FreeBSD.

    2. Re:woohoo! by ninewands · · Score: 1

      Well, then, I'd guess that your X-server is misconfigured, because X on my Linux box crashes so rarely that I can't remember when it happened.

    3. Re:woohoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ya sure that's what they all say...misconfigured my ass...

      One of the best parts of open source is the awsome excuses...

      If your software blows (most open source software does) then just blame the user...

      "Well it works for me, sure you have totally different hardware and it could be on a completely different architecture from me running completely different apps, but since mine only crashes once in a while, then i'm sure it must be your fault..."

      haha, open source, the leading innovator in making excuses...

  54. Another memepool.com post by arson1 · · Score: 1

    I swear, about 5 stories a week on slashdot are straight from memepool.com and the submitters never credit the site.

    --


    --
    Don't sweat the petty things, and don't pet the sweaty things.
    1. Re:Another memepool.com post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So true! It's not rare for me to read Slashdot for the first time in a day and find the front page peppered with purple links that memepool had already pointed me to...

  55. first gpl is dung post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Redundant

    GPL considered harmful.... Yes, the explicit purpose of the GPL is to hurt programmers' livelihoods. See Richard Stallman's essay, "The GNU Manifesto," for a frank statement that this is the case. Mr. Stallman does not care whether the programmers harmed by the GPL are working for Microsoft or trying to eke out an honest living despite Microsoft; he wishes to put all of them out of business. Trouble is, it's much easier to hurt the little guy than it is to hurt Microsoft, so guess who suffers?

    It is, in fact, ironic just how much the FSF's strategies resemble those of Microsoft.

    Microsoft seeks to put other companies such as Netscape out of business by giving away free equivalents of every product they make. The Free Software Foundation seeks to put other companies out of business by giving away free equivalents of every products they make.

    Bill Gates has all the money he wants but is motivated by a lust for power and control. Richard Stallman has all of the money he wants but is motivated by a lust for power and control.

    Microsoft has a vast hoard of software whose development and licensing it controls. The FSF has an even larger hoard of software whose development and licensing it controls.

    Meet the new boss -- same as the old boss.

    1. Re:first gpl is dung post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL! Good one!

  56. hhmm by CompuBOb · · Score: 1

    ok.. everyone try to slashdot uhh slashdot.org on my mark.. 1...2...3...GO!
    ahh dident work.

    --
    Daddy would you like some sausage?
  57. Re:All net traffic now under Carnivore surveillanc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use

    Does this mean if I use my laptop with this version of PGP "freeware" at my employer's location whilst on the clock, a BSA raid could net another violation?

  58. You mean Karnivore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's Mr. GNU/Karnivore to you, buster. ;)

  59. Carnivore @ Home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So... When can we expect Carnivore@Home? Personally, I'm kinda tired of Seti@Home...

  60. Re:All net traffic now under Carnivore surveillanc by ConsumedByTV · · Score: 2

    Doesnt it seem just a little creepy that they (http://www.bsa.org/)have a globe with a (C)opy right sign on it?

    --


    "Not my manner of thinking but the manner of thinking of others has been the source of my unhappiness." - M
  61. YMCA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    The YMCA has nothing to do with this

  62. Why You Should Use Encryption by goingware · · Score: 2
    C'mon, even my Aunt Peggy understands that gentleman don't read each other's mail.

    --
    -- Could you use my software consulting serv
  63. Re:All net traffic now under Carnivore surveillanc by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 1
    Plus, you need to build your own compiler

    No, but you do need to use a compiler that hasn't been hacked in the manner described by your link. I submit that it is possible to do this without building the compiler myself.

  64. Fickle by KFury · · Score: 2

    Wow, 45 days from seeing Carnivore as a horseman of the apocalypse to striving to make a more effective open source version.

  65. But is it "art"? by Jamie+Zawinski · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I did this better in webcollage years ago. But of course I didn't call myself an Artist Collective, and I didn't put out a press release, so no article in the Times for me, darn. I guess that's why webcollage is a ``hack'' rather than an ``art project.''

    I swear, one of these days I'm gonna apply for a federal grant to hack on xscreensaver . I've seen people get money for worse things . All you have to do is swallow your sanity and gag up an artist statement of some kind, and the literati will take you seriously: if you cloak it in pretentiousness, the most trivial piece of eye candy can become a Serious Work, full of Insight And Meaning!

    The problem with art is artists. My goal has long been to eliminate the artist from the creative process.

    1. Re:But is it "art"? by u2zoo · · Score: 1

      how is this flamebait? It is so far (as of 12:17am) the best post on this topic . .

    2. Re:But is it "art"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I swear

      = bad 4 juur m9nd.konta!ner

      > I swear

      da+da

      > I swear

      read [0+1] book

      > The problem with art is artists. My goal has long
      > been to eliminate the artist from the creative
      > process.

      [0+1] m9nd uould alzough not!z dzat `art` _|_
      `creative process`

  66. Re:All net traffic now under Carnivore surveillanc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But that's the whole point. Unless you've vetted the compiler you don't know what's been hacked into it!

    And if you build a compiler using a different compiler, you have the same problem. Therefore, you need to bootstrap your own compiler!

  67. Re:So the FBI couldn't get ISPs to Install Carnivo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're art fags... logic isn't one of their strong points.

  68. Re:All net traffic now under Carnivore surveillanc by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 1
    But that's the whole point. Unless you've vetted the compiler you don't know what's been hacked into it!

    Yes, exactly. I don't know about you, but it's much easier for me to vet my compilers than it is for me to write them from scratch.

    The process is greatly simplified by the fact that you can often use the same compiler to compile itself; yes, you have to start with a precompiled one, but simply compare the vetted one with the precompiled one to determine if the precompiled one has been compromised.

    In fact, I would go so far as to claim that most people vet their compilers already. Their standards simply vary quite a bit in thoroughness from our own.

  69. Re:All net traffic now under Carnivore surveillanc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is absolutely no privacy left on the Net any more. None. Keep that in mind when you rant. That's what crypto is for. Ranting on Slashdot is by it's very nature, about as public as you can get.

    I have to say, I fear you people way more than I fear the government. It's people like you that bombed Oklahoma City.

  70. Open-source Carnivore == Dsniff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To call this retarded hack an open-source Carnivore is totally ridiculous, as jwz says.

    See Dsniff for a collection of free, open-source tools even more powerful than Carnivore:

    http://www.monkey.org/~dugsong/dsniff/

    and without all the artsy-fartsy pretense...

  71. Proof that... by rlwhite · · Score: 1

    ...adding GNU to a name just makes it silly.

    In other news, Richard Stallman is considering changing the GNU Project's name to Monty Python and hawking its software as parodies of the real stuff.

  72. Weird Intentions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find rather strange that a software developped to snoop on other people's private matters seek 'linux community' approval by releasing it GPL?

    This will be a GREAT tool for people to just try & snoop on everybody else :D

    What's the big deal, bad guys are not going to send an e-mail with their attack plans.

  73. bzzt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    diff/ my dear, = dzat {
    . [0+0] m9nd declard `webcollage` art / non-art

    . `Jamie Zawinski` == jealous

    . (`Jamie Zawinski`) => `carnivore` prjkt !=
    (group) => `webcollage`
    }

    . `Jamie Zawinski` == jealous

    bzzt!

    . `Jamie Zawinski` == jealous

    bzzt!

    . `Jamie Zawinski` == jealous

    bzzt!

    . `Jamie Zawinski` == jealous

  74. 1001 zm!lz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ++

    may ! add

    = `Jamie Zawinskie` expzct
    (lo.tekk korporat zerv) => Times 2
    ztart look!ng 16384 ueb pagz 4rom
    [normalement] _!ll!terate ++
    zlf-obzeSSd ['!' = obzeSSd u!z
    be!ng obsessiv ] !nelegant
    programm9rs [ any fool can program
    a computer and most do ]
    uen zrch!ng 4 `works ov art` _+?
    g!gglb!t

  75. Re:All net traffic now under Carnivore surveillanc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My little brother is THE admin at a major co. that provides web hosting and marketing services, I asked him about carnivore about a year ago and he said "I could tell you but then I'd have to kill you." I let the subject drop.

    Maybe your friends are just doing you a favor and you don't realise it, or maybe it doesn't realy work yet, only a select few know and nobody's talking.

  76. Re:All net traffic now under Carnivore surveillanc by smcv · · Score: 1

    OK, fine, try GnuPG then. It's an open source implementation of the OpenPGP standard, and doesn't have US export restrictions (because it's German, and importing foreign encryption munitions _into_ the US is fine). It and recent PGP versions should be fully compatible (by default, it doesn't quite implement the OpenPGP standard, for compatibility with older PGP versions, but you can set it to pedantic standards-compliance mode if you want a fully correct implementation).

  77. Cygwin? by The+Pi-Guy · · Score: 1

    Will this compile on Cygwin? I don't think TCPDump will, or will it? I'll take a look later. I also own a copy of flash, mebbe I'll write something cool as a vis client..... I'll post my results later. --j0shua

  78. Re:All net traffic now under Carnivore surveillanc by The+Pi-Guy · · Score: 1

    --- BEGIN PI-GUY ENCRYPTED MESSAGE ---
    lasdkasldAlaskd;sdkHasl;djasAdakls! Casd;AsaNlk alsYlaksdfOalskdfsdfUasdflj jklRlkjaEajksAalskjDasdklj alskdjTadslkjHlasdjIalsdjSladjs?lasdj
    --- END PI-GUY ENCRYPTED MESSAGE ---
    HINT: Look at the caps...

  79. So join the project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you think it's so trivial, join the project and add your collage as a client--that's the whole point. Maybe you'd wow all those naive artists with your programming skill. Maybe you'd fall flat on your face. And maybe, just maybe, you and the artists might get along and produce a really good piece of collaborative software art.

  80. I see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you wrote a program, and then a bunch of other people made a better version, and now you're whining about them getting all the attention.

    Funny that an ex-Netscape guy still believes in first-mover advantage.

  81. Doing the work for them... by supabeast! · · Score: 2

    Is it just me, or would anyone else be entirely unsurprised if the FBI discontinues development of carnivore and its successors, and swtiches to GNU carnivore? After all, now they have a similar application developed by experts all over the world, and they can review all of the code for backdoors. Hell, I can see governments all over the world picking up this program and abusing it to the detriment of humanity worldwide. I hate to say it, but this is one project that I wish had never happened, and will not miss if it dies out.

  82. Did anyone read the post or the web site? by jacobito · · Score: 2

    This isn't an "open source version of the FBI's Carnivore," and it's not a "GNU Carnivore." It's an art project inspired by the FBI's Carnivore, and it has nothing to do with monitoring internet usage or violating anyone's privacy. Basically, this Carnivore project serves up data culled from tcpdump, and then clients use the data to generate intriguing and sometimes beautiful audio or visual art. Go check it out; it's very cool.

  83. Graphical warning... ;) by PaulWilkinson · · Score: 1

    Maybe this could be configured to detect virus attacks and draw a few skulls in a window to inform you...

    That might stimulate a few lax sysadmins when bosses see their boxen showing jolly rogers.. ;)

    ---
    Paul

  84. All net traffic now under Spootnik surveillance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are nervous about your Usenet posts being intercepted by Spootnik, please moderate him into oblivion.