Slashdot Mirror


Slovenian e-Government

rakerman writes "In its October 20th issue the Economist reports from Ljubljana that 'Slovenia may be Europe's most Internetted government', including 'holding most of its cabinet meetings online'. There is some information at the Slovenian e-government site, in particular check out their detailed strategy for e-commerce in public administration." I''ve read the article; very well done.

178 comments

  1. article? by DzugZug · · Score: 1

    Does anyone have a link to the article? It's hard to find anything on the slovinian site.

    1. Re:article? by JavaPriest · · Score: 1

      On the Economist site searches for "Solvenia" or "e-government" give no results. Maybe this article was from the printed version.

    2. Re:article? by Trepidity · · Score: 2

      That's because you spelled "Slovenia" wrong. When you search for its correct spelling, the article referred to comes up. But a subscription to the printed version of the magazine is required to view it freely. It's here.

      FWIW, all articles from the print version of the Economist are available online.

    3. Re:article? by JavaPriest · · Score: 1

      Sorry for the typo, I guess I made the same mistake on the search-engine.

  2. FINALLY GOVERNMENT with a Brain!! by brockn · · Score: 0

    Maybe some government officals will come to understand us Nerds now...

    Brock

    --
    -- http://www.safeproxy.org - Free Anonymous Web Surfing
  3. My favorite link... by tonyc.com · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...was the one to the Slovenian association of tourist farms. Being a Nashvillian, I've often wondered where those brightly-colored perennial oddities are grown. Now I know!

    1. Re:My favorite link... by markmoss · · Score: 2

      tourist farms... Being a Nashvillian, I've often wondered where those brightly-colored perennial oddities are grown. I grew up in a resort area in Michigan. I think they're manufactured in Detroit, probably in the old Edsel factory. 8-)

  4. not even EU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey, we have the first e-goverment! wow, not even in the EU and leading the way already.. hehe, now we only need to qualify for the soccer WCup :o)

    1. Re:not even EU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we only need to qualify for the soccer WCup :o)

      No way! If your team doesn't improve dramatically until wednesday, it will be 6-0 for Romania... :-D

    2. Re:not even EU by neoshroom · · Score: 1
      hey, we have the first e-goverment! wow, not even in the EU and leading the way already

      Acctually they are in the EU and the UN. Read their FAQ.

      --
      Big apple, new Yorik, undig it, something's unrotting in Edenmark.
    3. Re:not even EU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are not in EU.

    4. Re:not even EU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      btu we're getting closer

    5. Re:not even EU by kavboj · · Score: 1

      Je..s EU sam da u fuzbalu zmagamo...

  5. Taking technology too far? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I think this is a case of taking technology too far. You know real face-to-face human interaction is really under-rated these days!!

    1. Re:Taking technology too far? by tbone1 · · Score: 1
      You know real face-to-face human interaction is really under-rated these days!!

      I'd say that depends on the human with whom you are interacting. YMMV.

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
  6. Re:Solvenia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    slovenia is in the middle of europe (below austria and next to italy) and you can only blame yourself to not know geography further than your garden

  7. Posted By Hemos by Jeff+Probst · · Score: 1
    I've read the article; very well done
    as opposed to not reading the article before posting?

    i guess that would make sense

    1. Re:Posted By Hemos by Kelsevinal · · Score: 1

      Apparently you're new to Slashdot. Reading the article before posting is the exception, NOT the rule.

    2. Re:Posted By Hemos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that was my point

  8. So is it an act of war to slashdot it? by ConsumedByTV · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's timing out for me at the moment, so is this an act of war?
    :)

    --


    "Not my manner of thinking but the manner of thinking of others has been the source of my unhappiness." - M
  9. I've thought about it, and I have one question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that Slovenian or Serbo-Croatian?

  10. the Economist article online by Trepidity · · Score: 4, Informative

    For those of you with Economist subscriptions, you can view the article online (for free) here to avoid having to search through your printed issue.

    For those without Economist subscriptions, you can either buy access for $2.95 to this article, pay $4.95 for a week of access to the online archives, or buy a subscription...FWIW it's the only magazine I still subscribe to in printed form, as it's the only one still worth my money (Rolling Stone and Newsweek having long since become virtually worthless).

    1. Re:the Economist article online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I agree that The Economist is the best magazine around. And it is the only magazine to which I subscribe. But maybe Newsweek is changing.

      Of all the reading I did on the terrorist attacks, there were only two articles that I thought did a genuinely good job. One of them was in Newsweek. I was surprised about this; the article, though, was written by a new editor, who seems to be good. So maybe Newsweek is changing.

      (The other good article was, incredibly, a Slashdot comment.)

  11. to Anonymous coward by giany · · Score: 5, Funny

    Solvenia? (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 12, @04:57AM (#2552888) WHere the hell is slovenia and why should we care?
    On the map, I cannot find the World Trade Center buildings in New York, but I can find Slovenia. So why should I care about things that does`nt exist in reality?! Sorry, but America is not always the first in every E-shit. Perhaps E-war would be the net big thing for America, but not for Europe. In Europe people DO use their brain in the right way and in Europe people DO care for their own business, so in the Europe, there are NO terrorist attacks. Here`s a little MAP that you`ve been probably using until now. Maybe you should get your self a new map and maybe then you will find Slovenia there.

    1. Re:to Anonymous coward by hostage89 · · Score: 0
      In Europe people DO use their brain in the right way and in Europe people DO care for their own business, so in the Europe, there are NO terrorist attacks.



      So... what do you call the IRA then?

    2. Re:to Anonymous coward by giany · · Score: 1

      IRA ..... aaah ...... they haven`t destroy any big building and their acts are localized on the North Ireland. In Spain there are some little terrorist acts commited from time to time but all of them are strictly localized. Other parts of Europe are safe.

    3. Re:to Anonymous coward by The+Qube · · Score: 2, Informative
      ROFL :-)

      But, anyway, it's probaby not his fault. Unless a map/atlas is pretty recent, it would not include Slovenia.

      Slovenia was a part of the former Yugoslavia and gained it's independence in mid 1991.

      It is a small country, bordering with Italy, Austria, Hungry and Croatia, with a small access to the Adriatic Sea.

      CIA World Factbook: Slovenia

      --

      "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win."

    4. Re:to Anonymous coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you trolling?
      Try doing some research.

    5. Re:to Anonymous coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I know the original poster was a troll, and you fell for it, but still...

      I call the IRA murdering scum. One of my friends was on call doing network support for a client in London docklands when the IRA bombed it. Another friend was working in a shopping centre (aka shopping mall ;-) when it was evacuated because of IRA bombs. Maybe its just getting to me this morning because I watched "The Devils Own" for the first time last night and found the American slant interesting to say the least. I doubt Hollywood would look at it in quite the same way if the story had been about a Muslim fundamentalist who kills Americans, instead of a Catholic fundamentalist who kills British.

    6. Re:to Anonymous coward by giany · · Score: 1

      Please, reply with some acts or else - shut up.

    7. Re:to Anonymous coward by imrdkl · · Score: 2

      Good grief. no terrorist attacks? C'mon, one of the first things recognized after 9.11 was our naivete' in these things. Certainly the Adriatic states have experience with terrorism, in some forms. At the same time, they might argue that it was a result of a struggle for freedom that gave rise to terrorism, and that would be cool. But we wonder still if the freedom is truly liberty, or just better segregation of the ethnicity. We hope for the former in all countries, whether you believe it or not.

    8. Re:to Anonymous coward by Dave+Bowman · · Score: 0

      As opposed to trailor trash that can't hold a tought any longer than a golfish? :)

      Come now, get off the "US supremacy" bandwagon, and give the Europeans a chance. After all, we are descendants of the people they didn't really want over there - so they seem to have some sense ;)

      And, as far as worthwile maps go - be free to check with any Merkin that has ever been to that part of the world (and better yet, specifically to Slovenia). I'm sure that you would get no coment other than "great", "wonderfull", "when can I go back", "those fuckers are so rich", and similar things.

      Let's not diss people you've never met, and don't know the first thing about.

      But then again, it's easy to do if you're living in a trailor and posting as an anonymous coward... right?

    9. Re:to Anonymous coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Murdering scum? What about the history of rape and pilliage done in the name of the English crown all over the world, not to mention their own backyard? The IRA are only getting even and the body count is just about equal now.

      The English are far, far worse... Although now that Blair is Bush's lapdog the pussies are no threat.

      And just so you know, I'm Australian.

    10. Re:to Anonymous coward by osiris · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      no terrorist attacks in europe? heard of the ira?

      i guess because it isnt america, this news was heard much outside of the UK but here are some bbc links:

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk/england/newsid _1636000/1636953.stm
      http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk/england/newsid _1636000/1636919.stm
      http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk/newsid_1471000 /1471770.stm
      http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk/northern_irela nd/newsid_1471000/1471373.stm

      oh and here is a link for all you people that think cctv is useless

    11. Re:to Anonymous coward by DullTrev · · Score: 1

      Manchester, 15 June, 1996. "One million square feet of shopping space was wiped out when the 3,300lb bomb exploded". It took years to rebuild. Have a look at this BBC page for some info on other British IRA campaigns.

      --
      Trev - used to be interesting. Honest.
    12. Re:to Anonymous coward by giany · · Score: 1, Informative

      More British citizen were killed in the September 11 attacks than in all of the terrorist attacks in the history of IRA. Thats quite a difference, isn`t it ?

    13. Re:to Anonymous coward by savaget · · Score: 2

      Recent Maps of Slovenia:here

    14. Re:to Anonymous coward by markmoss · · Score: 2

      IRA ..... aaah ...... they haven`t destroy any big building and their acts are localized on the North Ireland. The IRA is not restricted to North Ireland, they set off a bomb in England every few weeks. Mostly they are small bombs that don't kill or maim very many people, but there have been so many of them... Their goal seems to be to kill just enough Brits each time to remain a continual irritation, and it seems to be working; the English have removed most of the public waste receptacles because these have been a favorite place to drop off a small bomb. Maybe the 9/11 attacks killed more Brits, but the IRA has kept them from feeling safe in their own country for at least a century...

      As for the rest of Europe, take Germany as an example: The Bader-Meinhoff gang was a small but quite violent terrorist organization, which took over a decade to round up. That leaves the Germans with two more problems: foreign (mostly mid-Eastern) terrorists, and German neo-nazi gangs. Apparently foreign terrorists have blown up German nightclubs to get American servicemen, planted a bomb in an airplane to explode over Scotland, and frequently pass through Germany on their way to commit mayhem elsewhere. The neo-nazis beat up and sometimes kill foreign workers -- maybe they are upset about being cut out of the toilet-cleaning jobs?

    15. Re:to Anonymous coward by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Hello, little idiot. With reference to the IRA, they carried out numerous attacks in (then) West Germany and the Netherlands in the 1980s, many more in Britain (the bigger island on the right, i.e., not Northern Ireland). As for property damage, may I refer you to Canary Wharf? The bombing of Manchester not too long ago? You are a fool. And by the way, I'm Irish -- and feel nothing but disgust for PIRA, IRA, CIRA, RIRA and their alphabet soup colleagues on the "other" side. Sickening, murdering, thuggish scum who cheapen the name of those they purport to represent.

    16. Re:to Anonymous coward by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. The IRA murdered some 2,400 British citizens between August 1969 and the present day.

    17. Re:to Anonymous coward by gidds · · Score: 0
      ...the IRA...

      ...who you Americans finance. (Or at least, have done, for a long time.) Thanks, America.

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    18. Re:to Anonymous coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually Slovenia's war for independance was pretty much 10 days long withlittle fighting. It's a very peaceful place with little crime. People still have communist ideas if they don't live close to the border or near Ljubjana (misspelled but pronounced Lu blan uh). No terrorist threat I know of. I have family in Nova Gorcia and the standerd of living their is actually higher than here (plus most companies offer you like a month vacation time).

  12. Hmm, so maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slovenia Introduction Top of Page
    Background: In 1918 the Slovenes joined the Serbs and Croats in forming a new nation, renamed Yugoslavia in 1929. After World War II, Slovenia became a republic of the renewed Yugoslavia, which though communist, distanced itself from Moscow's rule. Dissatisfied with the exercise of power of the majority Serbs, the Slovenes succeeded in establishing their independence in 1991. Historical ties to Western Europe, a strong economy, and a stable democracy make Slovenia a leading candidate for future membership in the EU and NATO.
    Slovenia Geography Top of Page
    Location: Southeastern Europe, eastern Alps bordering the Adriatic Sea, between Austria and Croatia
    Geographic coordinates: 46 00 N, 15 00 E
    Map references: Europe
    Area: total: 20,253 sq km

    land: 20,253 sq km

    water: 0 sq km
    Area - comparative: slightly smaller than New Jersey
    Land boundaries: total: 1,165 km

    border countries: Austria 330 km, Croatia 501 km, Italy 232 km, Hungary 102 km
    Coastline: 46.6 km
    Maritime claims: NA
    Climate: Mediterranean climate on the coast, continental climate with mild to hot summers and cold winters in the plateaus and valleys to the east
    Terrain: a short coastal strip on the Adriatic, an alpine mountain region adjacent to Italy and Austria, mixed mountain and valleys with numerous rivers to the east
    Elevation extremes: lowest point: Adriatic Sea 0 m

    highest point: Triglav 2,864 m
    Natural resources: lignite coal, lead, zinc, mercury, uranium, silver, hydropower
    Land use: arable land: 12%

    permanent crops: 3%

    permanent pastures: 24%

    forests and woodland: 54%

    other: 7% (1996 est.)
    Irrigated land: 20 sq km (1993 est.)
    Natural hazards: flooding and earthquakes
    Environment - current issues: Sava River polluted with domestic and industrial waste; pollution of coastal waters with heavy metals and toxic chemicals; forest damage near Koper from air pollution (originating at metallurgical and chemical plants) and resulting acid rain
    Environment - international agreements: party to: Air Pollution, Air Pollution-Sulphur 94, Biodiversity, Climate Change, Endangered Species, Hazardous Wastes, Law of the Sea, Marine Dumping, Nuclear Test Ban, Ozone Layer Protection, Ship Pollution, Wetlands

    signed, but not ratified: Air Pollution-Persistent Organic Pollutants, Climate Change-Kyoto Protocol
    Slovenia People Top of Page
    Population: 1,930,132 (July 2001 est.)
    Age structure: 0-14 years: 16.09% (male 159,428; female 151,134)

    15-64 years: 69.61% (male 681,333; female 662,170)

    65 years and over: 14.3% (male 101,354; female 174,713) (2001 est.)
    Population growth rate: 0.14% (2001 est.)
    Birth rate: 9.32 births/1,000 population (2001 est.)
    Death rate: 9.98 deaths/1,000 population (2001 est.)
    Net migration rate: 2.11 migrant(s)/1,000 population (2001 est.)
    Sex ratio: at birth: 1.06 male(s)/female

    under 15 years: 1.05 male(s)/female

    15-64 years: 1.03 male(s)/female

    65 years and over: 0.58 male(s)/female

    total population: 0.95 male(s)/female (2001 est.)
    Infant mortality rate: 4.51 deaths/1,000 live births (2001 est.)
    Life expectancy at birth: total population: 75.08 years

    male: 71.2 years

    female: 79.17 years (2001 est.)
    Total fertility rate: 1.28 children born/woman (2001 est.)
    HIV/AIDS - adult prevalence rate: 0.02% (1999 est.)
    HIV/AIDS - people living with HIV/AIDS: 200 (1999 est.)
    HIV/AIDS - deaths: less than 100 (1999 est.)
    Nationality: noun: Slovene(s)

    adjective: Slovenian
    Ethnic groups: Slovene 88%, Croat 3%, Serb 2%, Bosniak 1%, Yugoslav 0.6%, Hungarian 0.4%, other 5% (1991)
    Religions: Roman Catholic 68.8%, Uniate Catholic 2%, Lutheran 1%, Muslim 1%, atheist 4.3%, other 22.9%
    Languages: Slovenian 91%, Serbo-Croatian 6%, other 3%
    Literacy: definition: NA

    total population: 99%

    male: NA%

    female: NA%
    Slovenia Government Top of Page
    Country name: conventional long form: Republic of Slovenia

    conventional short form: Slovenia

    local long form: Republika Slovenija

    local short form: Slovenija
    Government type: parliamentary democratic republic
    Capital: Ljubljana
    Administrative divisions: 136 municipalities (obcine, singular - obcina) and 11 urban municipalities* (mestne obcine , singular - mestna obcina ) Ajdovscina, Beltinci, Bled, Bohinj, Borovnica, Bovec, Brda, Brezice, Brezovica, Cankova-Tisina, Celje*, Cerklje na Gorenjskem, Cerknica, Cerkno, Crensovci, Crna na Koroskem, Crnomelj, Destrnik-Trnovska Vas, Divaca, Dobrepolje, Dobrova-Horjul-Polhov Gradec, Dol pri Ljubljani, Domzale, Dornava, Dravograd, Duplek, Gorenja Vas-Poljane, Gorisnica, Gornja Radgona, Gornji Grad, Gornji Petrovci, Grosuplje, Hodos Salovci, Hrastnik, Hrpelje-Kozina, Idrija, Ig, Ilirska Bistrica, Ivancna Gorica, Izola, Jesenice, Jursinci, Kamnik, Kanal, Kidricevo, Kobarid, Kobilje, Kocevje, Komen, Koper*, Kozje, Kranj*, Kranjska Gora, Krsko, Kungota, Kuzma, Lasko, Lenart, Lendava, Litija, Ljubljana*, Ljubno, Ljutomer, Logatec, Loska Dolina, Loski Potok, Luce, Lukovica, Majsperk, Maribor*, Medvode, Menges, Metlika, Mezica, Miren-Kostanjevica, Mislinja, Moravce, Moravske Toplice, Mozirje, Murska Sobota*, Muta, Naklo, Nazarje, Nova Gorica*, Novo Mesto*, Odranci, Ormoz, Osilnica, Pesnica, Piran, Pivka, Podcetrtek, Podvelka-Ribnica, Postojna, Preddvor, Ptuj*, Puconci, Race-Fram, Radece, Radenci, Radlje ob Dravi, Radovljica, Ravne-Prevalje, Ribnica, Rogasevci, Rogaska Slatina, Rogatec, Ruse, Semic, Sencur, Sentilj, Sentjernej, Sentjur pri Celju, Sevnica, Sezana, Skocjan, Skofja Loka, Skofljica, Slovenj Gradec*, Slovenska Bistrica, Slovenske Konjice, Smarje pri Jelsah, Smartno ob Paki, Sostanj, Starse, Store, Sveti Jurij, Tolmin, Trbovlje, Trebnje, Trzic, Turnisce, Velenje*, Velike Lasce, Videm, Vipava, Vitanje, Vodice, Vojnik, Vrhnika, Vuzenica, Zagorje ob Savi, Zalec, Zavrc, Zelezniki, Ziri, Zrece

    note: there may be 45 more municipalities
    Independence: 25 June 1991 (from Yugoslavia)
    National holiday: Independence Day/Statehood Day, 25 June (1991)
    Constitution: adopted 23 December 1991, effective 23 December 1991
    Legal system: based on civil law system
    Suffrage: 18 years of age; universal (16 years of age, if employed)
    Executive branch: chief of state: President Milan KUCAN (since 22 April 1990)

    head of government: Prime Minister Janez DRNOVSEK (since 15 October 2000);

    cabinet: Council of Ministers nominated by the prime minister and elected by the National Assembly

    elections: president elected by popular vote for a five-year term; election last held 24 November 1997 (next to be held NA 2002); following National Assembly elections, the leader of the majority party or the leader of a majority coalition is usually nominated to become prime minister by the president and elected by the National Assembly; election last held 15 October 2000 (next to be held NA October 2004)

    election results: Milan KUCAN elected president; percent of vote - Milan KUCAN 56.3%, Janez PODOBNIK 18%; Janez DRNOVSEK elected prime minister; percent of National Assembly vote - NA
    Legislative branch: unicameral National Assembly or Drzavni Zbor (90 seats, 40 are directly elected and 50 are selected on a proportional basis; note - the numbers of directly elected and proportionally elected seats varies with each election; members are elected by popular vote to serve four-year terms)

    elections: National Assembly - last held 15 October 2000 (next to be held NA October 2004)

    election results: percent of vote by party - LDS 36%, SDS 16%, ZLSD 12%, SLS/SKD 10%, NSI 9%, SMS 4%, SNS 4%, DeSUS 5%, other 4%; seats by party - LDS 34, SDS 14, ZLDS 11, SLS/SKD 9, NSI 8, SMS 4, SNS 4, DeSUS 4, other 2

    note: the National Council or Drzavni Svet is an advisory body with limited legislative powers; it may propose laws and ask to review any National Assembly decisions; in the election of NA November 1997, 40 members were elected to represent local, professional, and socioeconomic interests (next election to be held in the fall of 2002)
    Judicial branch: Supreme Court (judges are elected by the National Assembly on the recommendation of the Judicial Council); Constitutional Court (judges elected for nine-year terms by the National Assembly and nominated by the president)
    Political parties and leaders: Democratic Party of Retired (Persons) of Slovenia or DeSUS [Janko KUSAR]; Liberal Democratic or LDS [Janez DRNOVSEK, chairman]; New Slovenia or NSI [Andrej BAJUK, chairman]; Slovene National Party or SNS [Zmago JELINCIC, chairman]; Slovene People's Party or SLS (Slovenian People's Party or SLS and Slovenian Christian Democrats or SKD merged in April 2000) [Franc ZAGOZEN, chairman]; Slovene Youth Party or SMS [leader NA]; Social Democratic Party of Slovenia or SDS [Janez JANSA, chairman]; United List of Social Democrats (former Communists and allies) or ZLSD [Borut PAHOR, chairman]
    Political pressure groups and leaders: NA
    International organization participation: ABEDA, ACCT (observer), BIS, CCC, CE, CEI, EAPC, EBRD, ECE, EU (applicant), FAO, IADB, IAEA, IBRD, ICAO, ICRM, IDA, IFC, IFRCS, ILO, IMF, IMO, Intelsat (nonsignatory user), Interpol, IOC, IOM, ISO, ITU, NAM (guest), NSG, OPCW, OSCE, PFP, UN, UNCTAD, UNESCO, UNFICYP, UNIDO, UNTAET, UNTSO, UPU, WEU (associate partner), WHO, WIPO, WMO, WToO, WTrO
    Diplomatic representation in the US: chief of mission: Ambassador Davorin KRACUN

    chancery: 1525 New Hampshire Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20036

    telephone: [1] (202) 667-5363

    FAX: [1] (202) 667-4563

    consulate(s) general: New York

    consulate(s): Cleveland
    Diplomatic representation from the US: chief of mission: Ambassador Nancy ELY-RAPHEL

    embassy: Presernova 31, SI-1000 Ljubljana

    mailing address: P. O. Box 254, Presernova 31, 1000 Ljubljana; American Embassy Ljubljana, Department of State, Washington, DC 20521-7140

    telephone: [386] (01) 200-5500

    FAX: [386] (01) 200-5555
    Flag description: three equal horizontal bands of white (top), blue, and red, with the Slovenian seal (a shield with the image of Triglav, Slovenia's highest peak, in white against a blue background at the center; beneath it are two wavy blue lines depicting seas and rivers, and above it are three six-pointed stars arranged in an inverted triangle which are taken from the coat of arms of the Counts of Celje, the great Slovene dynastic house of the late 14th and early 15th centuries); the seal is located in the upper hoist side of the flag centered in the white and blue bands
    Slovenia Economy Top of Page
    Economy - overview: Although Slovenia enjoys one of the highest GDPs per capita among the transition economies of Central Europe, it needs to speed up the privatization process and the dismantling of restrictions on foreign investment. About 45% of the economy remains in state hands, and the level of foreign direct investment inflows as a percent of GDP is the lowest in the region. Analysts are predicting between 4.0% and 4.2% growth for 2001. Export growth is expected to slow in 2001 and 2002 as EU markets soften. Inflation rose from 6.1% to 8.9% in 2000 and remains a matter of concern.
    GDP: purchasing power parity - $22.9 billion (2000 est.)
    GDP - real growth rate: 4.5% (2000 est.)
    GDP - per capita: purchasing power parity - $12,000 (2000 est.)
    GDP - composition by sector: agriculture: 4%

    industry: 35%

    services: 61% (1999 est.)
    Population below poverty line: NA%
    Household income or consumption by percentage share: lowest 10%: 3.2%

    highest 10%: 20.7% (1995)
    Inflation rate (consumer prices): 8.9% (2000 est.)
    Labor force: 857,400
    Labor force - by occupation: agriculture NA%, industry NA%, services NA%
    Unemployment rate: 7.1% (1997 est.)
    Budget: revenues: $8.11 billion

    expenditures: $8.32 billion, including capital expenditures of $NA (1997 est.)
    Industries: ferrous metallurgy and rolling mill products, aluminum reduction and rolled products, lead and zinc smelting, electronics (including military electronics), trucks, electric power equipment, wood products, textiles, chemicals, machine tools
    Industrial production growth rate: 6.2% (2000)
    Electricity - production: 12.451 billion kWh (1999)
    Electricity - production by source: fossil fuel: 34.44%

    hydro: 29.58%

    nuclear: 35.98%

    other: 0% (1999)
    Electricity - consumption: 10.024 billion kWh (1999)
    Electricity - exports: 2.2 billion kWh (1999)
    Electricity - imports: 645 million kWh (1999)
    Agriculture - products: potatoes, hops, wheat, sugar beets, corn, grapes; cattle, sheep, poultry
    Exports: $8.9 billion (f.o.b., 2000)
    Exports - commodities: manufactured goods, machinery and transport equipment, chemicals, food
    Exports - partners: Germany 31%, Italy 14%, Croatia 8%, Austria 7%, France 6% (1999)
    Imports: $9.9 billion (f.o.b., 2000)
    Imports - commodities: machinery and transport equipment, manufactured goods, chemicals, fuels and lubricants, food
    Imports - partners: Germany 21%, Italy 17%, France 11%, Austria 8%, Croatia 4%, Hungary, Russia (1999)
    Debt - external: $6.2 billion (2000)
    Economic aid - recipient: ODA, $5 million (1993)
    Currency: tolar (SIT)
    Currency code: SIT
    Exchange rates: tolars per US dollar - 225.93 (January 2001), 222.66 (2000), 181.77 (1999), 166.13 (1998), 159.69 (1997), 135.36 (1996)
    Fiscal year: calendar year
    Slovenia Communications Top of Page
    Telephones - main lines in use: 722,000 (1997)
    Telephones - mobile cellular: 1 million (2000)
    Telephone system: general assessment: NA

    domestic: 100% digital (2000)

    international: NA
    Radio broadcast stations: AM 17, FM 160, shortwave 0 (1998)
    Radios: 805,000 (1997)
    Television broadcast stations: 48 (2001)
    Televisions: 710,000 (1997)
    Internet country code: .si
    Internet Service Providers (ISPs): 11 (2000)
    Internet users: 460,000 (1999)
    Slovenia Transportation Top of Page
    Railways: total: 1,201 km

    standard gauge: 1,201 km 1.435-m gauge (489 km electrified) (1999)
    Highways: total: 19,586 km

    paved: 17,745 km (including 249 km of expressways)

    unpaved: 1,841 km (1998 est.)
    Waterways: NA
    Pipelines: crude oil 290 km; natural gas 305 km
    Ports and harbors: Izola, Koper, Piran
    Airports: 14 (2000 est.)
    Airports - with paved runways: total: 6

    over 3,047 m: 1

    2,438 to 3,047 m: 1

    1,524 to 2,437 m: 1

    914 to 1,523 m: 2

    under 914 m: 1 (2000 est.)
    Airports - with unpaved runways: total: 8

    1,524 to 2,437 m: 2

    914 to 1,523 m: 2

    under 914 m: 4 (2000 est.)
    Slovenia Military Top of Page
    Military branches: Slovenian Army (includes Air and Naval Forces)
    Military manpower - military age: 19 years of age
    Military manpower - availability: males age 15-49: 523,336 (2001 est.)
    Military manpower - fit for military service: males age 15-49: 416,237 (2001 est.)
    Military manpower - reaching military age annually: males: 14,513 (2001 est.)
    Military expenditures - dollar figure: $370 million (FY00)
    Military expenditures - percent of GDP: 1.7% (FY00)
    Slovenia Transnational Issues Top of Page
    Disputes - international: progress with Croatia on discussions of adjustments to land boundary, but problems remain in defining maritime boundary in Gulf of Piran; Austria has minor dispute with Slovenia over nuclear power plants and post-World War II treatment of German-speaking minorities
    Illicit drugs: minor transit point for cocaine and Southwest Asian heroin bound for Western Europe, and for precursor chemicals

  13. Re:I've thought about it, and I have one question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All my crapflooding comes from here : www.matkurja.com/, I just searched Google.

  14. Re:Can you imagine... by giany · · Score: 1

    So what`s so funny here ?!?

  15. Re:Solvenia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is it with you Americans? That you are ignorant and rude is bad enough, but that you are proud of it really disturbs me.

  16. Re:Solvenia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    What is it with you Brits? That you're flaming homosexual pedophiles is bad enough, but that you're proud of it really disturbs me.

  17. E-commerce strategy by randal_hicks · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Their detailed strategy will certainly take some time to digest (and perhaps several cups of coffee). Interesting post though... perhaps their smaller size allows them to take such giant steps. My country (US) seems like it keeps tripping over its own feet whenever it attempts to deal with technology. Hopefully Slovenia will show the rest of the world a thing or three...

  18. Estonian eGovrnment in english by antik2001 · · Score: 1

    http://www.riik.ee/en/

    1. Re:Estonian eGovrnment in english by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.riik.ee/valitsus/viis/synd.html

  19. intresting thought by jjshoe · · Score: 2, Interesting
    i being a tax paying computer using civilian in the us i could see a use for a more computer-ized governemnt.

    take for instance a state law that might get passed. you want to let your representivitve know how you feel about a certain subject. so you write him letters and send him email and corrospond with him. great. then you find out in the news papers that he's decided to vote for the opposite when he told you something completly else.


    what i am trying to get at here is lets say they want to pass parking tickets on red cars only for the state of georgia... so people of smalltown georgia log on to their local representives page and enter in a an internet uid and password which were assigned at the latest voter registration or came in the mail. they then vote how they feal on the issue and include a comment. likewise, all the representives would do the same to the state. now then the small town people of georgia feal more involved and can see the results much quicker. think of this for the national election. people could log on securely and vote. people with out computers could go to librarys since most are equiped with computers. and all though a paper trail would be nice for such things as we saw in the last election paper or not if someone wants to buy the election they will.


    but there are other advantages... say you want to move somewhere, you could go to their local page and see how the town votes and feels on certain subjects and see if you fit in that area


    perhaps this is all a pipe dream, but i think it would be wonderfull to see

    --
    -- botsex is {grep;touch;strip;unzip;head;mount} /dev/girl -t {wet;fsck;fsck;yes;yes;yes;umount} {/de
    1. Re:intresting thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the hell do we need representatives, if we can express our opinions directly. It's time to rethink the very paradigm of democracy.

    2. Re:intresting thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lets take this a bit further :

      Imagine a country where every citizen is given access to some form of network device, to the extent that it is as common as a telephone (now if only we could find 16 million Audrey's). Public access points are also provided for the homeless and people who are travelling. From these network devices they are able to propose new bills, and vote on them on a daily (or weekly maybe) basis. In this land the goverment is actually just the software running this system, the maintanance/dev/tech support guys, and the randomly selected bunch of citizens who are generously paid for a year to audit all these blokes. A small group of leaders are selected on a yearly basis to deal with emergencies and crap that is important but mind bogglingly boring (like budgets).

      And what do we get, about as close as i can see to achieving REAL democracy as opposed to the dodgy, hideously flawed represantative 'democracy' that most supposedly democratic countries currently use. (IMHO.....)

      Now who's gonna spot the holes, cause i know they're there.

    3. Re:intresting thought by jjshoe · · Score: 1

      actualy, i realy like this...

      allthough the common american i dont think would like the idea of being controlled by a 'machine' i think most americans would forget the fact that it's all based on everyone elses opinion. other then that i cant think of anything

      --
      -- botsex is {grep;touch;strip;unzip;head;mount} /dev/girl -t {wet;fsck;fsck;yes;yes;yes;umount} {/de
  20. Here's the link... by tonyc.com · · Score: 2, Funny

    The article is here, but only if you have a subscription to The Economist. You can get the >60% academic discount by subscribing here.

    Oddly, the subscription form doesn't ask if you're a student. Apparently, as far as The Economist is concerned, it's all academic.

  21. copyright violation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Full Text:
    (Copyright 2001 The Economist Newspaper Ltd. All rights reserved.)

    Slovenia may be Europe's most Internetted government

    DIMITRIJ RUPEL, the foreign minister of Slovenia, a small country at the eastern end of the Alps that managed to slide peacefully out of what was Yugoslavia and into something that more closely resembles Austria, enjoys showing visitors round his office. At one end sits a computer wired to the Slovenian secret-service mainframe. Mr Rupel says he is one of only four people in the country who get messages on such a machine. They come twice a day, and he must read them at a sitting. "There's no way to save them or print them out," he explains.

    At the other end of his office, a slinky black laptop takes pride of place on his desk. Mr Rupel boots it up and shows off a software system that allows him access to almost everything and everyone he needs in the Slovenian government. In between promoting Slovenia's bid to join the European Union and NATO Mr Rupel says he taps away on his laptop for up to three hours a day. In the mornings he shoots off messages to other ministers and answers e-mail from ordinary citizens. In the evenings he sometimes pecks out a column with his personal view of world diplomacy which he then pastes on to the Slovenian foreign ministry's own website.

    His office, like those of other Slovenian ministers, is almost paperless. Every official document comes to him electronically. Mr Rupel used to lug a "pile of papers half a metre high" to cabinet meetings. Now he takes only his laptop.

    That is, if he goes at all: Slovenia is pioneering electronic government by holding most of its cabinet meetings online. Each of the country's 15 cabinet ministers receives cabinet business over a secure system. A message informs them of the topic under discussion-- say, privatisation--and lets them vote by clicking a button. They can attach a note and send it to other cabinet colleagues or, if deviousness seems called for, cut their colleagues out of the loop and just message the prime minister, Janez Drnovsek.

    The technology, Mr Rupel concedes, has some snags. It is a grind: ministers feel obliged to log on and vote in e-cabinet sessions even when on holiday. No more waffling either. In the good old days of paper, a flustered minister could claim not to have received the relevant document. Now the all-knowing system records exactly which files ministers receive--and when and whether they open them.

    Change has been rapid. Pavel Gantar, the minister for all things high-tech, recalls buying his first computer in Munich in 1985 and having to smuggle it back to Ljubljana when it was part of a communist state. "An age ago," he says wistfully. Even a couple of years ago most ministers were computer-illiterate, so they had to let their secretaries handle their e-mails. Now, reckons Mr Gantar, all of them personally attend to their mailboxes.

    Things really took off when Mr Drnovsek, a communist-turned- social-democrat who has been prime minister with a small break since 1992, discovered the Internet. "When he e-mails you," admits one minister, "you'd better work out how to reply."

    What next? Slovenian ministers already complain of having their evenings at home in front of the football interrupted by the vibrating of their mobile phone, with a text message reminding them of the next day's e-cabinet business. The prime minister is apparently not averse to text-messaging ministers himself.

    So will virtual cabinet meetings completely replace the real thing? Mr Gantar thinks not. "Body language means a lot and e-mail obscures that." The cabinet still meets face to face every Thursday to thrash out issues unresolved online, though some ministers usually attend from afar, by videophone.

  22. E-school counselors by imrdkl · · Score: 2
    Their e-schools sound interesting. Public access internet for the less-developed locations in the country.

    They propose that the "counselors" in these places may come from the military, which is perhaps concerning. Or, maybe I'm just a karma whore. heh.

    The baltic states are still quite difficult for me to keep straight in my head, I confess. The Slovenians have distinguished themselves with this "e-government".

    1. Re:E-school counselors by Kraft · · Score: 2, Informative

      The baltic states are still quite difficult for me to keep straight in my head, I confess.

      Not quite sure what you meant, but just so there is not confusion, the Baltic States include Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania - not Slovenia.

      --

      -Kraft
      Live and let live
    2. Re:E-school counselors by imrdkl · · Score: 2
      the Baltic States include Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania

      Er, yea. I meant the Adriatic, of course. <b>.

      Things are complicated down there, too. But thank you for setting that straight.

    3. Re:E-school counselors by imrdkl · · Score: 1
      Hey, wait a minute here.... he gets modded up for correcting me, but I dont get squat for my original (and insightful, I might add) post?

      C'mon, what up? :)

    4. Re:E-school counselors by matija · · Score: 1

      You misinterpreted the sentence about the counselors. It's not that the military would be counselors - it's that counselors might be people who serve as counselors INSTEAD of being drafted into the military.

      Other things people might be doing instead of serving in the military is helping in old folk's homes, being junior ambulance attendants, or being forrest observers for the firefighters.

      --
      Duct tape + WD40 => DevOps
  23. small, "newer" and flexible by Vspirit · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Changing our infrastructures, Governments included, is easier in smaller organisations than larger ones. This I believe is one of the main reasons, that smaller organisations are better suited for innovations and why larger organisations follow, incorporate and acquire them in order not to become obsolete and replaced.

    If major changes are to be expected in the way we live and organize ourselves, then I believe the chance for that is higher by supporting and learning from the smaller entities (on their terms), compared to start dancing with the big old lady.

    1. Re:small, "newer" and flexible by urbi · · Score: 1

      Well, so you're actually suggesting that
      some big organization like the U.S. "incorporates
      and acquires"
      the small entity Slovenia? I don't think the Slovenian shareholders
      will approve. Though a hostile takeover is also
      an option - maybe there are still some
      aircraft carriers left in the area after the Kosovo war? ;-)

  24. Not for "old" countries by JavaPriest · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I guess that Slovenia could make this happen thanks to it being such a "young" state. I don't know exactly how long they are independent by now but it should not be much more than ten years.

    Older countries (or more generally, organizations), with a tradition of paper, will only be able to move toward e-government very slowly. Primarily because people are reluctant to change in general, but paper also makes a lot of "excuses" possible (see article). Another big issue is that a lot of people require signatures, mostly to be backed up and blame someone else in case something goes wrong. As digital signatures still aren't accepted here (in Europe) normal (paper) signatures are still required.

    In my organization, some people even make paper copies of e-mails in order to classify them in an ordner...just because they have done so (classifying "normal" mail) for years!

    1. Re:Not for "old" countries by Chocky2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not just the country that's young, it's government as a whole is relatively young with lots of senior ministers in their early-mid 40s. This combined with, as you say, Slovenia being so young a state, means that you've got a fairly young and visionary government and a people who aren't afraid of change - two things that most western nations lack.

    2. Re:Not for "old" countries by pcbob · · Score: 1

      Yeah I agree that it's much easier for them than for "older" countries, but you have to give it to the Slovenians that they are quite inovative. While SFRY (old Yugoslavia) still existed they were pretty much their own world when compared to other south slav republics.
      I know that there even were comercial specificaly targeting Slovenia. Eg. some car repair tool - Slovenian version contained super models being beutiful and showing off the tool in question, whereas comercial for the other Republics was dirty handyman showing how tough the tool was.
      For reference I'm from Serbia.

  25. Been There by mESSDan · · Score: 1
    In its October 20th issue the Economist reports from Ljubljana
    Ljubljana? I've been there, but only after I've had a few beers.
    --

    -- Dan
  26. E-govt my *bleep* by YanIsa · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm from Slovenia. I can tell you that the article is a nice coup for the Slovenian govt marketing dept and pretty much nothing else.

    Yes, I can find all the government departments on the net. Yes, there is an "internet ministry". Yes, they all have a nice matching spiffy web graphics. Yes, I can access all the laws online.

    So what?
    Can I file my tax returns via the net? No.

    Can I contact govt officials via the net _and get an answer_? No.

    Can I do anything via the net instead of waiting in a queue? Nope.

    Did they abolish the monopoly on leased lines and voice communications, held by a company that the govt ownes? Are the voice calls and modem calls cheap? Can I choose my phone operator? No, no, and no.

    To top it off, due to the 9/11 terrorist strikes the govt has now usurped the right to check all email (and other forms of communications) without a court order - a thing constitutionally possible just in a state of emergency (read war). Does the parliamentary commision that keep tabs on the police actions object? Nope.

    Unfortunately, this is just another example of pretending to give more control to the public while in fact reducing it.

    Yan

    ---
    Hello, Mr. Govt Man.

    --
    I think this line's only filler
    1. Re:E-govt my *bleep* by imrdkl · · Score: 2
      I can tell you that the article is a nice coup for the Slovenian govt marketing dept

      This wouldn't be in the "tradition" of the Economist. They generally tell it like it is, imho. Perhaps they have been duped by a cool website, but I detect a very, very slight odor of sour grapes here.

    2. Re:E-govt my *bleep* by YanIsa · · Score: 1

      How could it be sour grapes if I'm Slovenian?

      I would _love_ everything in that article to be true. I hear Utopia is a fine place to live. However, most of the things listed (free email accounts, free internet access for undeveloped regions etc) are pre-election promises that have not moved one step toward fulfillment in the year since the election. Including the tax returns that another poster mentioned - the last thing heard about that was the annulation of the contract with Microsoft when the public discovered that MS kindly sponsored a lengthy excursion to Britain to "check out how they do e-govt with MS solutions" for a fair number of govt officials. Thanks to that, the soonest it could be implemented is 2003.

      Yan

      --
      I think this line's only filler
    3. Re:E-govt my *bleep* by Trepidity · · Score: 2

      Yes, I can access all the laws online.

      While you certainly have some valid complaints, I think this particular fact alone makes it worth quite a bit. Information about laws is quite possibly one of the most important things a government can provide.

      I'm not sure; does the US even provide all its laws online?

  27. Slovenia attacked by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1

    Slovenia was attacked by a phenomenon called the Slashdot Effect. The government was left paralyzed and devastated by this formidable weapon.

    It's about time Slashdot started bringing down governments!

  28. E-govt my *bleep* : not here by JavaPriest · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here in Belgium government is serious about e-government. As from next year, businesses will be able to file tax returns via the web. We already can contact government officials *and* get an answer (most of the time, anyway). A lot of official law-related stuff (including new law publishing) is done via the web. Some government contracting is done via e-commerce.

    So I guess it's time the Economist writes an article about e-government in Belgium ;-). Still, I think we have a long way to go before we can really say we have an e-government here. But we are on the right way. For those interested: here's the root link for the Belgian Federal Government on-line.

  29. Re:Solvenia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe it's because we're hated all over the world and have recently been brutally attacked for no reason. Is that enough?

  30. Re:Solvenia? by Dave+Bowman · · Score: 0

    No, actually, being rude, obnoxious and ignorant is EXACTLY the reason you got attacked.

  31. Not the first time by Dexter77 · · Score: 1

    Most of the ex-communist countries have nowadays bragged about their achievements. It's just a show off. Being "the most networked goverment" does not nullify the other areas where their country is still in mid 20th century. Have any of you guys visited Slovakia recently? I have, and I can say there are million things that should be made better before moving to the modern problems like the Internet.

    It's pretty sad to see a goverment laying tax money to an Internet project when 70% of the country's population have never even used the Internet.

    1. Re:Not the first time by 3jon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      This discussion is about Slovenia, not Slovakia.

    2. Re:Not the first time by pcbob · · Score: 1

      Err, the article is about Slovenia, not Slovakia. Slovenians, while not being the richest country in the world, are not doing bad either. They had the least bad effects of "communism" from all former Yugoslav states.

    3. Re:Not the first time by viceversa · · Score: 1

      It would be interesting to know some which are the areas that are per your opinion "still in mid 20th century", which are "the million things that should be made better before.." plus what is your source of "70%". Can you provide that info? I'd assume you are non-Slovenian citizen being kind of short with information. That can be tolerated. If you are SI citizen you might consider moving to the country that's more suitable for you - the country where everything is "one mouse click away", the country that also known as PromisE Land. So... what's gonna be?

    4. Re:Not the first time by vidarh · · Score: 3, Insightful
      First, lots of people have already pointed out that you're talking about the wrong country. Secondly, you are making the assumption that spending money on internet projects is a pure cost for the government, without justifying it in any way.

      Spending money on getting the government online can have many positive effects, among them cutting costs in printing and distributing material, cutting travel costs, reducing time spent distributing material, and so on.

      And even if you discount positive effects from using the net itself, just using the net will translate to increased revenues for local companies and increased employment.

      I have no idea whether those two in total add up to enough that they make Slovenias e-government project worth it, but discounting it outright without evaluating the above just because a relatively poor country is using money on internet related projects is shortsighted at best.

    5. Re:Not the first time by hatchet · · Score: 1

      I'm from Slovenia.. and the most recent research shows 30% people of ALL population are using internet.
      I won't comment political stuff here... all I can say is, that Slovenia is much safer and individual friendly than U.S.

    6. Re:Not the first time by giany · · Score: 1

      I knew that Americans are very bad in Geography. And I knew that Americans are very bad in History. And I knew that Americans are very bad in Logic. Now I know that Americans are very bad at SPELLING !!!!!!! Do you see the difference between SLOVENIA and SLOVAKIA ? Obviously not. Too bad for you.

    7. Re:Not the first time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      S tem se tudi jaz 100% strinjam.
      Morda je cas, da sloveniziramo internet.
      Saj je nas in Kitajcev skupaj vec kot miljardo :o)

      Kar beri slashdot, Slovenec... kje pa je zadnja oddaja Radio Gage? Iskal sem na

      http://realsrv.rtvslo.si:81/cgi-perl/realbrowser _n l.pl/G2/razvedrilni_in_sportni_program/

      a nic ze par tednov. A ne oddaja vec?

      (ne morem po radiu preverit saj sem trenutno v ZDA).

      Zivjo vsem!

    8. Re:Not the first time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do not blame yourself by knowing so little about geography. DO NOT judge countries you have not visited yet; it is obvious you have not been in Slovenia otherwise you would know the difference between Slovakia and Slovenia!

  32. Re:the Economist article online (off topic) by imrdkl · · Score: 1
    FWIW it's the only magazine I still subscribe to in printed form

    I almost subscribed, but just then they relegated their tech section to the quarterly issue, and I changed my mind. The tech section was quite good.

    Geez, I'm posting alot of off-topic on this thread. Not a good day for karma, methinks.

  33. Quote by JavaPriest · · Score: 1

    Like Dalziel said in an episode of the great police series 'Dalziel and Pascoe' I recently saw:

    I'm not here to solve all the injustce in the world, love.

  34. Oct. 20? News? by dayL8 · · Score: 1

    Wow, the Economist had an interesting blurb about e-government nearly a month ago (the magazine comes out before the cover date) and it makes Slashdot today? Hey, last week they did a whole special report on "the next society". I bet they've printed some pretty good stuff this week too...

    The Economist is a truly interesting news magazine. It's worth reading. I'm beginning to have my doubts about /.

    --
    The real problem is entropy.
  35. Seems like Portugal is a lot better by jneves · · Score: 1

    At least through this questions:

    Can I file my tax returns via the net? Yes.

    Can I contact govt officials via the net _and get an answer_? Some of them.

    Can I get the contact of govt officials via the net ? Yes.

    Can I do anything via the net instead of waiting in a queue? Yes. Mainly related with creating companies, but there are somethings.

    Did they abolish the monopoly on leased lines and voice communications, held by a company that the govt ownes? Are the voice calls and modem calls cheap? Can I choose my phone operator? Officialy (if not in practice), no (when compared with USA) and yes.

  36. Re:Slavenia? Wot a retarded country!! by CaptnMArk · · Score: 1

    But we have a great F1 commentator ;)

  37. Scary.... by Peridriga · · Score: 2, Funny

    Since we just /. 'd their site, didn't we just shut down the Slovenian government????

  38. to all the stupid geeks in the United States by giany · · Score: 1

    Slovenia is a country, where your "democratic" president Bush met "democratic" president Putin for the first time. Geography is not a bad thing ;-)

  39. Re:I've thought about it, and I have one question. by emir · · Score: 1

    that was slovenian.

    there is no language called serbo-croatian. there is serbian that is spoken in serbia and there is croatian that is spoken in croatia.

    --
    -- http://electronicintifada.net --
  40. Slovenia by limeymax · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hey..I seem to remember the same claim being made about Estonia. In both cases though, it's a lot easier to do with a small country (and BTW, both countries are great to visit - Ljubljana is a happening place and Talinn is just beautiful). It's easy to forget that in the 80s, France was way ahead of everyone with the Minitel system..it was proprietary, cumbersome and basic, but it worked.

  41. Government services online... by TilRock · · Score: 1

    I think it'll be great if/when they get most governmental services online. I think making it quick and easy to do stuff like vote in presedential or local government elections would definately be a positive thing. Politicians could also easily take polls on certain issues to help determine public opinion on the topic, which may help in determining what type of laws to pass, how they should be written, etc. etc. I wonder if they will ever get this far or will people be too afraid that the system could be hacked or somehow exploited? Seems though that it could be much more secure than the system we have in place now.

    Here in Indiana they have quite a few online services available. I have renewed my car registration and paid for my plates online for the past two years. A few clicks of the mouse and my plates are in the mailbox in a week.

  42. Belgian IQ: 100 / Slovenian IQ: 95 by nukebuddy · · Score: 1

    JavaPriest wrote:

    Here in Belgium government is serious about e-government. As from next year, businesses will be able to file tax returns via the web. We already can contact government officials *and* get an answer (most of the time, anyway). A lot of official law-related stuff (including new law publishing) is done via the web. Some government contracting is done via e-commerce.

    Well, it's no wonder. You Belgians have a 5 point average IQ advantage over the Slovenians. (Scroll down to see country IQ table.)

    Belgian average IQ: 100
    Slovenian average IQ: 95

    -nukebuddy

    1. Re:Belgian IQ: 100 / Slovenian IQ: 95 by nukebuddy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Dave Bowman wrote:
      Is thi IQ measured using the Cattel scale or the Stanford-Binet scale?

      World average = 100
      Standard deviation = 15

      -nukebuddy

    2. Re:Belgian IQ: 100 / Slovenian IQ: 95 by Dave+Bowman · · Score: 0

      Yes, thankyou, but I still don't know which measurment scale is used :) A person with an IQ of 153 on Cattel has an IQ of "only" 135 on Stanford-Binet ;)

      And, many thanks for the -1 moderaton. I think i'll go off and cry in a corner ;)

    3. Re:Belgian IQ: 100 / Slovenian IQ: 95 by nukebuddy · · Score: 1

      Dave Bowman wrote:
      Yes, thankyou, but I still don't know which measurment scale is used :) A person with an IQ of 153 on Cattel has an IQ of "only" 135 on Stanford-Binet ;) (Text repeated here because of moderation abuse. --Chris)

      Cattell and Stanford-Binet are not measurement scales. IQ tests are normed to various standard deviations. The usual SD is 15 points and they all use a mean, as far as I'm aware, of 100. The Stanford-Binet is normed to an SD of 15 and the Cattell is normed to an SD of 24 (so IQ 124 on the Cattell = IQ 115 on the Stanford-Binet; both of those scores mean your raw test score is above exactly 84.13% of those of the sample population because both of these scores mean your raw score is exactly one standard deviation above the mean).

      Since the table of national average IQs Richard Lynn published in his book, _IQ and the Wealth of Nations_, uses a mean of 100 points and a standard deviation of 15 points (i.e. the SD Stanford-Binet tests are normed to), the difference between the national average IQ in Belgium (100 points) and the national average IQ in Slovenia (95 points) is 1/3 standard deviation.

      This means there is very little difference in numbers of average IQ (IQ 100) citizens between the two nations. The average Belgian has an IQ higher than that of 50% of the world population -- the average Slovenian has an IQ higher than that of 38% of the world population. 50% of Belgians have an IQ above the world average -- 38% of Slovenians have an IQ above the world average.

      These are not important differences. The important differences lie towards the high and low scoring extremes of the populations. The most capable members of the world population are those who score 3 standard deviations (IQ 145 on the Stanford-Binet) or higher above the world mean. 0.13% of Belgian score this high or higher while only 0.05% of Slovenics score this high or higher. These highly capable Belgians outnumber their equally highly capable Slovenian compatriats (per-capita-wise) by a ratio of over 5 to 2 (a bit more than 5 highly capable Belgians for every 2 highly capable Slovenians -- if we draw equally sized random samples from the two populations).

      This extreme difference in numbers of highly capable persons per equal unit of population could be an important factor in explaining the difference any differences in technological advancement between the two nations.

      -nukebuddy

  43. I don't agree about Newsweek by haggar · · Score: 1

    I just happened to buy a copy last week, and it was great. For example, there was an article about a journalist that managed to get fake IDs in Afghanistan, including documents that make her eligiable to polical asile in the west. (freaking scary, means many of the political refugees in the west may well be terrorists).

    --
    Sigged!
  44. Re:Slavenia? Wot a retarded country!! by viceversa · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ..first learn how to spell Slovenia that talk about retardation.

  45. Re:I've thought about it, and I have one question. by vidarh · · Score: 2

    You're partly wrong: "Serbo-Croatian Serbo-Croatian , language belonging to the South Slavic group of the Slavic subfamily of the Indo-European family of languages (see Slavic languages ). Although it is actually one language, Serbo-Croatian is designated as Serbian when spoken by Serbs (mostly belonging to the Orthodox Eastern Church) and written in a form of the Cyrillic alphabet, but as Croatian when spoken by Croats (mostly Roman Catholics) and written in a modified version of the Roman alphabet." (From Lycos Reference)

  46. Re:Solvenia? by tbone1 · · Score: 1
    What is it with you Americans? That you are ignorant and rude is bad enough, but that you are proud of it really disturbs me.

    Considering how most of us are at least partially of European descent, we come by it honestly.

    Besides, being "ignorant, rude and proud of it" sounds very French, based on my time in that country.

    --

    The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
  47. What a moron.... by Mr.Ned · · Score: 1

    I'm humor-impaired and can't tell if giany is kidding or just being anti-US, so I'll ditch the humor. Being US-centric is not good, but being a jerk to those who are is worse.

    In France there are Algerian terrorists. So much so that a local group of students decided to avoid Paris on their tour of France. They have had a huge problem with these guys.

    In England/Ireland you have the IRA. They might not have destroyed big buildings, but since when is big-building-destruction the qualification for terrorist? Isn't bombing subways terrorism? I seem to remember hearing a while ago about terrorism in London. Long time ago, though, don't keep up with British news. Oh - ever heard the U2 song Sunday Bloody Sunday? You should.

    In Spain you have some group with an acronym that I can't remember off the top of my head. They're a Basque separationalist group. They leave bombs outside of banks, in dance clubs, near government agencies. They're not 'time to time', they happen fairly frequently. They're 'localized' to about 1/4th of the country.

    Germany, in case if you were off somewhere in the few days following the 11th, made several arrests. Seems like a bunch of terrorists related to the attacks were hiding out in there.

    Gee, that seems to be the major European countries. Pretty terrorist-free. Mmm hmm.

    [quote]
    In Europe people DO use their brain in the right way and in Europe people DO care for their own business, so in the Europe, there are NO terrorist attacks.
    [/quote]

    So we Americans use our brain in the wrong way, we don't care about our business? I'd say we care a little too much for our business and not enough for everyone else's, which is the problem. US = uneducated about the rest of the world is pretty common. Well, it's not really that we're uneducated, we just don't keep up with current events in other countries.

    1. Re:What a moron.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The basque independence "terrorist group" is the ETA in english the meaning is Basque Homeland and Liberty. After Franco they haven't done very much but they really should be independant as they are a Pre-IndoEuropean people who had their own laws and government, they never really became part of Spain but the Spanish in the 1500s started taxing them for their imports (they where the first people to bring chocolate and tobacco to europe) and they sorta dissolved into spain. But they kept out invaders for hundreds of years (Romans, Arabs, Christians trying to conquer Muslim Spain.) they had/have their own culture not so much religion after they became christian in the 1600s before they had there own "pagan" belief system

  48. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Heritage Foundation's Index of Economic Freedom came out today. Slovenia, alas, dropped in status from having a "mostly free" economy to a "mostly unfree" economy. It seems they need to get their priorities in order.

    1. Re:In other news... by viceversa · · Score: 1

      Is the Index of Economic Freedom the only valid to perform economic freedom assesments? Are there any other orgs that provide such a services? Well, it'd be definetly interesting to check at least couple of them, otherwise such an information could be treated as.... monopolistic? Somebody should do a homework here. Would that be you?

  49. [OT] nothern ireland by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    i do not support violence..

    but, the violence in Northern Ireland over the last 25 years was as a direct result of Britains policies in Northern Ireland since the partitioning of Ireland in 1922.

    There was institutional discrimination against the catholic community in Northern Ireland, and the govt in England turned a complete blind eye to it. In the 1960s unemployment amongst catholics was at 30 to 40%, while only at 10ish% for protestants. The Police force, business, the institutions of regional government were all dominated by the Protestant/Unionist community in Northern Ireland, and for the most part they used their power to oppress the catholic/nationalist minority. All with a blind eye turned by the UK government in England, or even it's approval.

    So some of this oppressed minority people turned to violence. not a solution i would condone, but neither can you condone what went on in Northern Ireland post-WWII in the name of the United Kingdom.

    Note that there also were many out of this community who tried peaceful means to change their plight. They'd hold peaceful civil rights marches. And they'd be met and beaten by the RUC, or on one occasion mown down by British paratroopers. (Bloody Sunday Jan 30 1972, Derry, 13 civilians shot dead by the Para's).

    NI was a mess, a brutal mess and it produced some brutal people who committed some terrible acts. But the cause of it all was british actions and inaction.

    there does seem to be light at the end tunnel now though. they've gotten it down to politicians throwing words at each other, rather than bombs.

    anyway...

    --
    I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
  50. Re:I've thought about it, and I have one question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, essentially the language called serbo-croatian, was official language of former Yugoslavia and was constructed of Serbian (mainly) and Croatian language. Two mentioned languages differ on many accounts and are essentialy two different languages. Though they ARE similar, so native Croatian speakercan can understand native Serbian speaker, and vice versa, there will be understanding problems if you are foreigner who learned one of those languages.
    Those languages are similar between, as they are both similar to Slovakian (not Slovenian), but that are still three different languages.
    Slovenian is again more different to those three mentioned above.

  51. Re:to Anonymous coward - Maps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you need the map of Slovenia, i have a better one, it's only availeble in Slovenian language, and it's part of E-Government ...and it really rocks .... HERE .. it has all kinds of maps ... U can even search by a house number .. and you will find it .. u even have a picture (from the plane)of each house .... BTW.: Slovenia IS NOT in EU and NATO, but it is one of the top candidates

    Greetings from Slovenia

  52. Re:I've thought about it, and I have one question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Serbo-Croatian is less ONE language than English is. Do you know the difference between British, American, Australian, etc? OK, well, the difference between Croatian and Serbian is a bit smaller in pronounciation, but bigger in writing: as you mention they use TWO DIFFERENT ALPHABETS...

  53. Re:"E-govt my *bleep*" mb *bleep* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm from Slovenia too

    My answer to U:

    Can I file my tax returns via the net? They are working on it (insider info)...
    PS: DDV (Added value tax (i think))- they've "set it up" faster then most all of other countries (insider info)

    Can I contact govt officials via the net _and get an answer_? Contact - YES .. Answer Maybe (Even if you mail your dad he has a possibility to not write back to you :)

    Can I do anything via the net instead of waiting in a queue? Actualy the are, but if you are slovenian, check out the slovenian version of the page, they ARE a some things that u can do via net (for example: Medical Insurence for travelling in other countries,...) ...LOOK AROUND... and they have some usefull tools that i sometimes use ....

    About monopoly on leased lines and voice communications.. well .. u know it ... they are beggining to abolish it (but slowly) ... I HATE THAT TOO :)

  54. I understand now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aaaaah! OK!
    I always wondered why Ethiopia did not have its government online!
    I always thought that it was because they have other priorities (like finding something to eat for example)...
    Thank you to open my eyes!!!

    No, seriously, could you please explain me where you see any links between online government and average IQ!

  55. Is it? by grid+geek · · Score: 1

    From experience with government departments its often a case of being sent to different departments, organisations, local, regional national government etc. and everytime it's always just for basic stuff. What I mean is the systems are usually there for historical reasons and get built on rather than redesigned which suggests a large amount of wasted effort.

    Why do we have to go in, collect a form, find the other forms needed, queue up and submit them and then wait for information to come back? It would be easier to do it all online and far less boring for the workers. Imagine, no driving to the office, no queueing, no wasted time and the whole system automated. I could even do it in my lunch break from my desktop rather than giving up several hours of my time.

    I don't disagree about face to face sometimes being necessary (i.e. in complex cases) but it should be restricted to that. People get bored if they have to do the same thing again and again for years, make their lives interesting and it benefits everyone. Freedom through Technology!

    Now of course all we need is secure digital identification which everyone has and is acceptable to their government, widespread access to the Web/on-line services and a forward looking government.

  56. Ljubljana is the least internetted ... by Shabazz · · Score: 1

    I recently came back from a visit in Central Europe. Along the way I spent some time in Slovenia. It's ironic that the government is so wired, because it's near impossible to find a computer with internet access in the capital, Ljubljana.

    Everyone I asked knew of only one computer and it was in the hotel. It's amazing how many people relied on one computer for their internet usage. I guess it's possible that everyone has internet at home and there is little need for internet cafes.

    I have been in some out of the way places where it's been a lot easier to get online. Go figure.

    1. Re:Ljubljana is the least internetted ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      next time checkout cyberpipe ..this is a new cyber cafe with a lot of other things ....it was opened recently ...

      I agree that they aren't many cybercaffes in Slovenia, but mostly if u ask real computer freaks in the town, they know how and where to surf for free ...

      Most of the people in Slovenia surf from home or at job .... and the youth from schools and faculties of course ......

      I hope it will be better soon..

      As i saw in summer, they have computers on rest stations on highways ... they have internet acces where you can check your mail......

      The problem is or was that comunitions were monopoled .... we had only one Telecomunitation company few years ago ... so the concurents aren't strong enough ......

      but the fact is ...

      There could & should be more Public Internet Access Points available ....

  57. hey i'm from slovenia by Anaki+SkyHawk · · Score: 0

    it's pretty neat here, only 2M people, you can walk to the president and ask him things personaly.. .. any we all have computers at home yes. SiOL is now wide spreading aDSL (the whole country is covered) heh

  58. internet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what you get, when the whole country is connected with one isp, which has a mere 310 Mbit connection to the outside world...my internet connection was lagging all day :( But hey...I could read the e-gov site, since it's only 6 hops away ;)

    1. Re:internet... by giany · · Score: 1

      HERE is a list of *only one* ISP in Slovenia. Write this kind of shit somewhere else.

  59. Take a look at Singapore! by adrianzhong · · Score: 1

    Well, in Singapore, the government and most statutory boards host their services online, accessible to all with an internet connection and proper identification.

    From a central portal: http://www.gov.sg you can do practically anything from registering a business, a patent, sign up for National Service (conscription), apply for a provisional driving license, file your taxes, check your CPF (a kind of social security), apply for public housing, register on the list of voters, and practically everything that you might want to do as a citizen.

    Besides this, Singapore boasts a computer literate judiciary. Most judicial documents are electronically transmitted, if possible. That probably contributes to singapore having one of the most efficient judicial system in the world:
    http://www.gov.sg/judiciary/subct/justout/ar2000 /a chieve2.pdf

    And of course, statutory boards communicate with each other electronically. this allows services to be integrated so that for instance the IRAS (IRS in singapore) can check with the housing board what kind of property you own, the Army can check your performance in school, and so on.

    Not everything works perfectly of course.. the usual problems with getting government online and interconnected. But we try.

    So I hope you will understand why i'm not especially impressed by this article. =)

    1. Re:Take a look at Singapore! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Singapore is a fscking dictatorship. 1984 magnified.

  60. I bet they're not running Windows... by nick_burns · · Score: 1

    and I'll have a tattoo on my butt until they switch.

    1. Re:I bet they're not running Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tehy are running java server pages so you know M$FT doesn't own them like they own Most countries!

  61. Re:I've thought about it, and I have one question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    phew. just don't go mentioning this to any serbs or croats out there :P. serbo-croatian *was* an artificial language - it existed only in school books. this language died along with the former country, yugoslavia.

  62. No terrorist attacks in Europe? by bigdreamer · · Score: 1
  63. I'm learning Slovenian by tmark · · Score: 2

    A good friend of mine is of Slovenian and in an effort to bring me up to speed with the Slovenian govt's E-initiatives, she has been teaching me Slovenian. I thought I'd pass on what I've learned so far; spellings are phonetic (haven't learned how to read yet)

    Ocusee moya clobasa (Taste my sausage)

    Hochesh egrat tap-tap (Do you want to play tap-tap)

    Yasmeeslin da bom coohil yitseh (I think I'm going to cook some eggs - note: 'cook some eggs' is a euphemism for farting)

    That's all I've learned so far, but I'm eager to learn more about this beautiful language !

    1. Re:I'm learning Slovenian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please try to keep posts on topic.

    2. Re:I'm learning Slovenian by Devilee · · Score: 1

      No no the right way to write those is: Okusi mojo klobaso - taste my sausage Hoèes igrati tap-tap - do you want to play tap-tap Jaz mislim, da bom skuhal jajca - I think I'm going to cooke some eggs

  64. Re:More Info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    STFU tu loj eden ... pa kaj mate sploh s kickboxingom ko pa niti clani kickboxing zveze niste ... ne si tu gori sramote delati z takim LAME POSTom .... k nekaj brezveze neko reklamo gor dajes ko je taktak 99% bralcev ne razume

    U ASSHOLE

  65. Re:I've thought about it, and I have one question. by shallot · · Score: 1
  66. Re:Solvenia? by giany · · Score: 1

    Are you sure that there has been no reason? Maybe because of the Palestina problems? That`s just one of them. Take care of your own business and everything will be ok. There is no country on the world that need to be the world cop. America probably wants to be the world cop. Bad police department, very bad. Too many casualties. Another plane? The same city? Not a terrorist attack? I think that`s no freedom. Unfortunately. What goes around, comes around. Unfortunately. I`m mourning with you guys, but stop being so ignorant and rude to everything that is not from America. There is a world on the other side of the ocean. And it`s a beautiful one. With a history. If you know what I mean.

  67. Re:I've thought about it, and I have one question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually Croat is not the same as Serbo-Croation because Serbo-Croation is Serbian Spoken in southern Croatia!

  68. US Should Follow Their Example by dugger · · Score: 1

    The article mentions that they use the internet for most of their cabinet meetings. After obvious recent events, the US Gov't should do the same.

    Not just cabinet meetings, but all congressional activity. We've got the technology to do so, and if Govnet ever becomes a reality, such a thing should definitely be explored. Why, you ask? What would happen if Washington DC where anihilated by [insert terrorist activity here] during a legislative session? No more senators or representatives, presidents, or the many organizations vital to the operation of our country that are headquartered in DC.

    What would our country do with no Federal leaders to turn to? So the Vice President is holed up in a cave somewhere. Now we have one leader overseeing everything! Use your imagination - the panic, the anarchy.

    Talk about a total dismantling of our society.

  69. US laws online by jonbrewer · · Score: 2

    It's rough. The US Code is online, but it's a miserable read. Find it here: www.access.gpo.gov/congress/cong013.html.

    Laws in progress (and insane shit that thankfully never makes it into law) can be found at thomas.loc.gov.

    Too many hours browsing this shit will drive you crazy, make you want to move to Belgium. :-)

  70. and I know why... by pompomtom · · Score: 1
    On the map, I cannot find the World Trade Center buildings in New York,


    Someone blew them up.
    --

    Buckets,

    pompomtom

    "There's an exception to every rule. Except for some rules"
  71. Re:Solvenia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am not British.

    Why do Americans think that anyone that isn't American is British? Fluency in more than one language is quite common - outside the U.S., that is.

  72. Re:Romania... by kavboj · · Score: 1

    He he..Look who's talking:)..You little poor guy!

  73. Re:I've thought about it, and I have one question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Actually Croat is not the same as Serbo-Croation because Serbo-Croation is Serbian Spoken in southern Croatia!

    Say, was Srebrenica not enough a massacre?

  74. virtual states by KunstCleaver · · Score: 1

    not only that,
    but it is home of the world's first virtual state:

    http://www.ljudmila.org/embassy/

    --
    "The direction controls are the same in Nethack as they are in vi." "Yeah, I hardly ever die in vi anymore."
  75. IRA ..... aaah ...... they haven`t destroy any big building and their acts are localized on the North Ireland. In Spain there are some little terrorist acts commited from time to time but all of them are strictly localized. Other parts of Europe are safe.

    ETA is "localized" to any city of Spain they want and some spots in France where they reside, train and rob explosives.

    And recently the police has informed that ETA planned to mark their comeback to killinng in 1999 by blowing up Torre Picasso in Madrid. But the tons of explosives couldn't arrive.

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
  76. Re:Romania... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slovenia:Romunia 2:1 ! ! !