Slashdot Mirror


Onstar Navigation System to Deliver In-Car Spam

pneuma_66 writes: "According to the New York Times (Free reg, don't cha know) navigation systems, like OnStar, are planning to deliver ads based on the car's location. For example, the system will 'notify' the driver of sales in nearby stores. The vp of OnStar says "The privacy and the confidentiality of our subscribers are of the utmost importance", well lets see how the big companies play with this new wealth of information."

182 comments

  1. Well Well Spam even while travelling! by itsnotme · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, apparently now you cant run to your car to hide from all that spam you get from the USPS and your email and your AOL email.. They've now got you! you go camping with your car, you're still going to get spammed.. seems to me that they've got every corner of the earth to be now non-spam-free.. unless you do go hiking into the wilderness.. but heck.. maybe they've got some trees hooked up to the net so you'll be spammed in the wilderness now too!

    Isnt there any end to this spamfest?

    Moderation Totals: Funny=+1 Insightful=+1 SpamComplaint=-1

    1. Re:Well Well Spam even while travelling! by TMacPhail · · Score: 1, Informative

      The best way to battle spam is to create a hotmail account to have the spam delivered to. Whenever you sign up to something online you use that account unless you trust them not to spam you or sell your address. I do this and I believe I only once got spammed at my regular e-mail address.

    2. Re:Well Well Spam even while travelling! by praedor · · Score: 2

      That USED to be a valid use of Hotmail, but now with the forced "gift" from M$ of a passport account, it is no longer useful. Of course, I suppose it would be cool if you created the account (and thus received the passport account) from a TOTALLY bogus persona then it wouldn't matter. Nail M$ Snotmail servers with your spam all your want - jut do NOT give them real information when you signup.

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    3. Re:Well Well Spam even while travelling! by TMacPhail · · Score: 1

      Of course, why give out the real information when it will be of no use or benefit to you for doing so?

  2. I get enough spam from these people as it is by buckeyeguy · · Score: 3, Insightful
    GM must think that OnStar is a big new cash cow, because since I bought my 2001 Grand Prix, they've not let up on the junk snail mail to home... wish they'd get the message.

    Online spam in the car? Ouch

    --
    I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
    1. Re:I get enough spam from these people as it is by uncleFester · · Score: 2

      It's not OnStar; it's GM. I have a GM credit card to rack up the points, and I get a small tonnage of GM-related spam daily as well.

      .. and I drive a Toyota too.. heh.

      -'fester

      --
      -'fester
  3. This will last right up until the first accident by Dredd13 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Picture the scenario, you're concentrating on where you're going, because you've never been there before, its hectic traffic, somewhere in the city, where the ordeal of keeping track of pedestrians and cars is enough to deal with. Suddenly, your attention is jolted elsewhere by a voice in your car (you're alone), you take your eyes off the road to find the source of voice which says "Up ahead on the right is Foobar's. Foobar's is having a sale on diapers right now!"... by the time you realize its a crummy OnStar ad, and return your attention to the road, it's too late to notice the bicyclist chewing on your grill.

    So when the bicyclist sues you, and you in turn pin it on OnStar, that's when this shit will be nipped in the bud.

  4. RTFA by dieman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Its only happening when you use their 'virtual advisor' service. Yeah, you pay for it. but its not going to be interrupting your service use. If you dont like it, dont buy it. duh!

    --
    -- dieman - Scott Dier
    1. Re:RTFA by VA+Software · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "it's not going to be interrupting your service use"

      The article is not very clear. I assumed it would interrupt based on ...

      "Of course, drivers listen to unsolicited
      commercial messages every day on their car
      radios, with no fuss


      Their theory is that because we're being advertised at already, we obviously have no problems with being advertised some more.

      I, for one, am quite capable of switching to a different station when the ads start. These new-fangled radios with their presets and memories make channel hopping easy.

      --

      ---
      http://slashdot.org/moderation.shtml
  5. will that even work... by jeffy124 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... seriously. Will that work? Oftentimes there will only be one person in the car and hence he/she wont be able to look down to see the ad. Besides, with the way people drive these days, wno one will have time to stop for a sale anyway.

    Now something more realistic (if it isnt there already) would be having the system allow a user to query information about nearby hotels, malls, restaurants, etc.

    --
    The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    1. Re:will that even work... by yesthatguy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Oftentimes there will only be one person in the car and hence he/she wont be able to look down to see the ad.

      OnStar is a voice system, not computer/LCD. There's a little button that basically places a cellphone call to a directory service, and also sends your GPS location. From there, you're talking to a real person (or, as in the case of ads, listening to a recording, like on the radio). There won't be a requirement to look anywhere in order to receive the information.

      Now something more realistic (if it isnt there already) would be having the system allow a user to query information about nearby hotels, malls, restaurants, etc.

      That's pretty much what OnStar's good for right now, aside from auto-calling in an emergency. You can press the OnStar button, and ask somebody where there's a hotel, gas station, movie theater, italian restaurant (and I think they can even make reservations), or as in an example another poster provided, the nearest tittie bar.

      --
      Yes! That guy!
    2. Re:will that even work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great visual, some OnStar operator receiving a call requesting "the nearest tittie bar."

    3. Re:will that even work... by jeffy124 · · Score: 1

      ok, i must be thinking of some other system that does have a display concole. thanks for clarifying

      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
  6. Onstar Navigation System to Deliver In-Car Spam by byran+lei · · Score: 1

    Wonder how Batman is going to react to this. Joker will love it for obvious reasons.

  7. This is stupid. by anotherone · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but people pay for this OnStar service. And they feel the need to make more money by selling ads in people's cars?

    I read something in Analog SF recently that involved a household robot that you could get for free, in exchange for having it spout ads all the time. ("You are out of window cleaning fluid. I suggest you buy Windex! Streak free cleaning bla bla bla...") Maybe if they gave you the OnStar service free, or at a reduced rate, the incar ads wouldn't be so bad... but even then, this is kind of a bad idea.

    We'll see how the market likes this.

    --
    Username taken, please choose another one.
    1. Re:This is stupid. by yesthatguy · · Score: 2

      People pay for cable television, but I don't hear too much complaining about commercial breaks on ESPN/TNT/other cable stations. I think it may be something people will just have to get used to. Just signing up for the basic OnStar service won't get you any advertisements, but if you want things like stock quotes, you may just have to live with hearing an ad for Fidelity Investments.

      --
      Yes! That guy!
    2. Re:This is stupid. by AntiNorm · · Score: 2

      People pay for cable television, but I don't hear too much complaining about commercial breaks on ESPN/TNT/other cable stations

      Correction. You pay for the right to access the local cable company's network. You are not paying ESPN/CSPAN/TWC, or even the producers of the programs they run, for the right to watch what they are putting out. They provide this service to you at no charge, and in return, you "agree" to watch their commercials. It's somewhat like electricity -- you can have the lines going into your house, but unless there is somebody on the other end of those lines to provide 'content', it won't do you a damn bit of good. The analogy is that you are paying for the lines here with $$$, but are paying for the actual service with your eyes.

      --

      I pledge allegiance to the flag...
      of the Corporate States of America...
  8. OMG by G00F · · Score: 1

    Advertising is really getting awfull. I can see a huge suit going over this. And I hoep so. Buy a product, and then they advertise to you!

    --
    The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive
    1. Re:OMG by Black+Rabbit · · Score: 1

      What's the difference between this and the myriads of people already who pay big bucks to wear tshirts or whatever that has a huge corporate logo on it? I've never been able to fathom that one, and have gone so far as to mention to some tshirt salesmen that, since they would have to pay to adverize on a billboard or the side of a bus, they should pay _me_ to show off their Coke logo or something.

  9. What about the monthly fee? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this in lieu of the $10/month fee for the service?

    If so, I can go for that.

    1. Re:What about the monthly fee? by buckeyeguy · · Score: 1

      $10 a month??? Try about $39 a month... as another poster mentioned, about $399 per year, depending on what package you choose. GM won't waive that fat fee, not for putting up with ads or anything.

      --
      I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
    2. Re:What about the monthly fee? by Stone+Rhino · · Score: 1

      $399 a year is not $39 a month, more like 33.25 a month. At $39 a month, it would be $468 dollars a year. That's a $69 difference, enough to buy you a better brain.

      --


      Remember, there were no nuclear weapons before women were allowed to vote.
    3. Re:What about the monthly fee? by Denial+of+Cervix · · Score: 0

      $399 a year is not $39 a month..

      The rates from the Onstar site, for those who'd rather post before Googling.

      DoC

  10. Pay them, and STILL get spam? by EvilStein · · Score: 3, Funny

    I bet they're going to try the same tired line of "Well, in this dynamic market, we need to experiment with sources of revenue..blabla..."

    They're *already* charging people something like $399/yr, in addition to the stuff being installed on your vehicle,and NOW they're going to try throwing ADVERTISEMENTS at you?

    Screw *that* - I'll just drive around with my happy Garmin eTrex GPS unit. At least it doesn't feel the need to inform me of a sale at Macy's.

    On the flip side, Onstar really CAN find most anything. Our crazy friend Bill called Onstar and asked "Where's the nearest tittie bar?" and we had the answer within seconds. Gotta love that kind of service. :-)

    1. Re:Pay them, and STILL get spam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      This service is free for the first year and only $150 a year after that. Right now on some of the car websites there is a bigger concern that police and the IRS will be able to get the tracking data of where you've been. Just like the story about the guy who had his bank account drained by a rental car company for his alleged speeding. On Star, to some, is just another form of big brother watching ou every move.

    2. Re:Pay them, and STILL get spam? by Lostman · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh my god.. what a new concept... how original..

      These guys want you to pay for their service AND serve advertisements to you? I am betting in a few weeks we will see how AOL has filed suit against Onstar for stealing their business practices... they would be right of course -- who could claim prior art against AOL's practices?

    3. Re:Pay them, and STILL get spam? by gilroy · · Score: 1, Redundant
      Blockquoth the poster:

      These guys want you to pay for their service AND serve advertisements to you? I am betting in a few weeks we will see how AOL has filed suit against Onstar for stealing their business practices... they would be right of course -- who could claim prior art against AOL's practices?

      Premium cable channels? :)
  11. no pop-ups? by jeffy124 · · Score: 1

    The article indicates no pop up ads. That's a relief for me as a driver - i dont want an ad suddenly blocking my vision of the road. But like Internet ads, they didnt start off with pop ups either - so the question is how long until the ad appears on my windshield via heads up displays?

    --
    The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    1. Re:no pop-ups? by mangu · · Score: 2

      Well, for security reasons, the pop-ups shouldn't block you vision. But what if they are coded to parts where you can't see the road? Instead of seeing the hood, you could see ads. And in rainy weather, pop-ups following the wipers would be the most effective way to focus the customer's attention.

    2. Re:no pop-ups? by jeffy124 · · Score: 2

      hmm, now there's an interesting thought. maybe keep it to the passenger side of the car would also work.

      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
  12. You are a fucking idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    A moron that gets distracted like that shouldn't have a license. What if the idiot looked at the car radio because it was a DJ on the radio? Sue the radio station. What if he looked around for a the guy out his window selling flowers. Sue the dirty hippie. What if his cell phone rang? Sue the cell phone company.

    You're logic is flawed. Quit being a karma whore.

    1. Re:You are a fucking idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      always fun to see how nerds have the guts to feel big when, they are sitting a home in front of the monitor...

    2. Re:You are a fucking idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fighting over the internet is like competing in the special olympics...

      Even if you win, you're still a retard.

      (Unknown)

  13. Let's see here... by trilucid · · Score: 3, Funny

    This might not be all bad... take an example scenario for instance:

    1. VA Linux, err... Systems... err, whatever they are nowaways sells all customer information on every /. user in existence to the OnStar folks.

    2. Geeks everywhere are suddenly constantly notified (in that pleasant feminine voice) of valuable chances to spend their money:
    • "There is a strip club off to your left. Those women like geeks."

    • "Adult video store just around the corner!"

    • "That iMac girl is real, and she's giving out table dances at the Fun Club downtown at eight o'clock!"

    • "Your boss just installed Windows XP across the company network. Your BSD server is gone. Wouldn't you like to purchase a firearm at Ed's Discount Sawn-offs tonight?"

    The possibilities are limitless. :)

    1. Re:Let's see here... by linzeal · · Score: 0
      Maybe it would be better if it said something to the effect of "Your carefully configured BSD/Samba Server is now a defualt windows 2k installation with no IIS patches."

      Actually happened at a dot com I worked at because someone did not have the root password on the weekend and he knew all the Hardrives besides the OS were fat32. He wanted to host his 10 gig porn/mp3/warez collection for pirate points before the whole company went under.

  14. If done right, it might actually be useful by ppetru · · Score: 1

    I too have a knee-jerk reaction to advertising, however I think I would love to have such a service done right, and delivered into my car. I don't know about you, but I think that being in an unknown area and getting notified of nearby restaurants/shops/whatever is kinda neat.

    Don't forget advertising's original goal: to get the word out about products.

    --

    Petru
    1. Re:If done right, it might actually be useful by TotallyUseless · · Score: 2

      As I understand it, you can already contact Onstar and get this kind of information as it is now. It doesn't automatically notify you of course, but all you have to do is push a button and ask for directions to restaurants etc

      --

      Time for some tasty Shiner Bock!
  15. Re:Well Well Spam even while travelling! -Addition by itsnotme · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah and I forgot to add.. if they're putting spam in cars.. your new bicycle at this rate will probably have spam too, and it'll be powered by you pedalling! Think it'll end there? How about that baby stroller you bought.. gee it'll be spamming you and it'll be powered by you pushing it!

    The spam industry's never going to let you go..

  16. We finally have it! by jeffy124 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    OPT-IN MARKETING!!!! I never thought I'd see the day merketers ask me if I want to see ads. Read the article and you shall see - the spamming requires you to sign up. Of course one already pays soemthing like 400/year for it, so i dont know how many people will jump for joy over this. Maybe if they cut the fee for signing up they'll get some people who will live with ads.

    --
    The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    1. Re:We finally have it! by Legion303 · · Score: 1
      But we have opt-in marketing now. At least, we do according to the roughly 5-10 spamming fuckheads per day who take pains to inform me: "THIS IS NOT SPAM! You have received this valuable information because you signed up for it!"

      The day I sign up for marketers telling me what's on "sale" is the day Satan builds a snowman.

      -Legion

  17. It will work... by SerpentMage · · Score: 1

    Ok while I hate to say that this is spam and all spam is bad, it will work...

    Let me explain why. Right now there is a certain amount of noise, much like a radio. But now imagine a radio that can custom tailor information based on your location.

    I have a GPS system in my car and I LOVE IT!!! I never have to read another map. And in Europe the GPS system is REALLY accurate. What I would love to do is tell my system that I am interested in buying something in the next week. And if I drive past a store that has that something tell me. Or if I need that something right away tell me. The point is that I would really like this even though it is spam.

    I think the difference with this spam and other spam is that this is pin point spam that may actually be relevant on the spur of the moment.

    --

    "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
    "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    1. Re:It will work... by Pope · · Score: 1
      I never have to read another map.

      I see. Does a GPS tell you which roads are one way only, or where the next highway interchange is?

      I fail to see why you think not having to read maps anymore is such a great thing. I've been stopped twice in the last month by delivery truck drivers asking me where a street is. I asked them for their map so I could show them how to get there, but neither had one in the cab. That's pretty pathetic.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    2. Re:It will work... by AntiNorm · · Score: 2

      Does a GPS tell you which roads are one way only, or where the next highway interchange is?

      Some do.

      --

      I pledge allegiance to the flag...
      of the Corporate States of America...
    3. Re:It will work... by evilmonkey_666 · · Score: 1

      "Does a GPS tell you which roads are one way only, or where the next highway interchange is?
      "

      duh.. yes!

      --


      - PS. This is what part of the alphabet would look like if Q and R where eliminated.
    4. Re:It will work... by SerpentMage · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually mine does... I know which roads are one way, where round abouts are, which side streets to avoid, etc. And if there is a traffic jam coming up I can punch in the distance and it will automatically reroute me to next best route.

      Because of this GPS system I absolutely refuse to buy another car without it.

      What I even love about my GPS is when I get lost (did not turn off when I should have) my GPS will automatically reroute me and figure out when I will arrive there. The ETA is really cool because it tells me on a long haul when I will arrive...

      Ok I could go on for hours, but the few thousand Euros are worth every penny...

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    5. Re:It will work... by SerpentMage · · Score: 1

      BTW if those folks did not have a working GPS system then there are two things to consider. First the maps in the US are not as well kept up-to-date as in Europe. But second and most importantly THERE IS A HUGE DIFFERENCE between a good GPS and a sucky GPS. And it is really dependent on the money, but not entirely. You need to do some research and find out which one was rated best.

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
  18. AOL/OnStar collaboration by Man+of+E · · Score: 3, Funny
    Drive by the post office... You've got mail!
    Drive by Harvard University... Get your PhD degree!
    Drive by the bank... Make $$$ Fast!
    Drive by the swimming pool... Get wet pussy now!

    Thanks to OnStar and AOL, my daily commute is finally going to become fun again!

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une sig
    1. Re:AOL/OnStar collaboration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 funny.

      I received "Dripping wet college coeds (free for life)" spam moments before reading that.

      I had a question about the coeds though ... can't I have one just for the evening? I don't really want to support one for ever...

    2. Re:AOL/OnStar collaboration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ahem...

      Drive by the post office... You've got invoices !!
      Drive by Harvard.. loose a few years failing your PhD degree !!
      Drive by the bank... pay said invoices !!
      Drive by the swimming pool... get arrested for harasement !!

      Have fun :-)

  19. How's this different from radio? by mangu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't mean the technical differences, but the fact that you are getting advertisements you didn't request. I suppose the next step will be to create the "Onstar Silver" system, where you can configure the type of ads you want to get, "Onstar Gold", where you can make queries about the nearest restaurants, etc, and the "Onstar Platinum" where you are given the choice of not receiving any ads.

    1. Re:How's this different from radio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RDS (Radio Data Services) is even more similar and has been implemented in many countries for 10 years or so, DAB (Digital Radio) goes further.

    2. Re:How's this different from radio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DAB is here now the BBC redesigned their site.

    3. Re:How's this different from radio? by Erris · · Score: 1

      It's not that much different from radio, exept that it tracks your position and your responsiveness to adverts. Soon however, we can imagine that it will take a license to run such services so that the federal government can collect $500,000 per year from those running this new "information service" in each city. Count on only a few privalidged people, and Uncle Sam thanks to the Patriot Act, knowing where you go. So you see, the future is the past but better. Have a nice day.

      --
      DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
    4. Re:How's this different from radio? by ReadParse · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The difference from radio is enormous, and I struggle to imagine how anybody could make the comparison.

      Radio is free. As you probably know, the government licenses broadcasters to use the airwaves, because the bandwidth is so limited (I mean bandwidth in the radio sense). This is also why the goverment tightly regulates that industry, limiting programming and requiring a certain amount of public service, such as news and other public service announcements.

      Why would anybody do this? Because it's a fantastic tool that you can't just go out and buy or manufacturer. Within the government restrictions, you can provide whatever programming people want to hear and also play advertisements, which pays for all of the programming, and pays for everything else. Without commercials, radio doesn't exist.

      No, you didn't "request" the ad. You turned on the radio and listened to the station's programming. This is not a new arrangement, and you knew the rules going in. Radio stations play commercials... that's the way it is. Before anybody mentions their local "commercial free" station as a response to this, any radio station of that sort only exists because it's a "sister station" of another station that DOES play commercials, and news, and PSAs, and everything else that the government and financial considerations require.

      Back to OnStar. Having read the New York Times article, I have a different and more accurate understanding of it then the Slashdot headline provided. This is not as much "ads you didn't request", as it is information that you have specified you are interested in.

    5. Re:How's this different from radio? by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      With OnStar, you pay hundreds of dollars per year to use the service. With radio, you pay exactly $0 to use it (except for the hardware costs.)

      Because you're already paying, OnStar shouldn't have to bombard you with ad content. But radio, on the other hand, I don't if they play ads because I'm not paying the stations money. And I can just mute the radio for the annoying ads.

    6. Re:How's this different from radio? by praedor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The BIGGEST difference is that no one knows when you are listening to radio, or even who you are. Your radio listening cannot be tied to you or your vehicle, etc. With OnStar, your vehicle is specifically and explicitely known, and with that YOU are known. A specific advert or move on your part in response to an add is instantly known of and tied to you directly in time and space. HUGE difference.

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
  20. A Database to Snoop With? by Ieshan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah, but here's the real question.

    Supposing OnStar can track where your car is, can't it also track acceleration and velocity and all that? I mean, supposing there's a sale at a Bob's Stores. It flashes the Ad.

    Now, supposing you slow down and turn into the Bob's Stores parking lot. OnStar, technically, could save this information as specific to your vehicle. An entry in their big database that says "Customer 84392 will respond to advertising in this catagory."

    What it all seems like is one big cyber-snoop service, tracking where you really are and advertising towards your patterns. A waste of car battery just like the new limewire ads are a waste of processing power.

    Now, OnStar could say they won't do this, but you know it'll happen. It's a perfect advertising scheme. They'd know exactly what kind of driver and shopper you were dependant on what stores and advertisements you listened to and responded to.

    Ieshan
    Predictor at Large

    1. Re:A Database to Snoop With? by wass · · Score: 2
      I was thinking the same thing.

      I'm wondering if they'll change their advertisement volume/tone-of-voice depending on the drivers habits, too. For example, when websites don't generate enough ad clickthru's, they start putting big fscking obnoxious ads on the page. If the OnStar people find out enough folks aren't suddenly stopping by radio shack to get the newest batteries on sale, I wonder if they'll make the voice louder and more obnoxious. akin to web ads.

      But of course, OnStar is a service people pay for, so if they get really annoying, people will just stop buying it. Don't know if you already bought a car with it if you can cancel service.

      --

      make world, not war

    2. Re:A Database to Snoop With? by Peyna · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Quote from the article: OnStar, by far the biggest service with 1.5 million users, says it makes note of a car's location only in an emergency or when a driver makes contact with the service. The OnStar system is built into many G.M. models and the high-end Honda Acura models; the service is free for the first year.

      "The privacy and the confidentiality of our subscribers are of the utmost importance," said Don Butler, the OnStar vice president in charge of the new Virtual Advisor service. "We're not going to be in a situation where we are tracking the location of a vehicle. We just don't think that's what consumers are looking for."


      If you read more, it sounds like they don't keep track at all where you go, so it would take quite a change to catalogue the travel of 1.5 million vehicles, updating every second.


      Apparently, OnStar does not have "their big database" that you speak of.


      Besides, this isn't advertising like you know it, the article mentions telling the person the gas station in the area with the lowest price, and maybe if the person was asked to be notified if they past a store with something they were looking for in stock. I doubt it is going to bombard with a plethora of advertisements everytime you drive by a Walmart. For one, it is too distracting to the driver, and they know people don't want that. You can't sell a product people don't want.

      --
      What?
    3. Re:A Database to Snoop With? by OpenB2C · · Score: 1

      That's a good point.. can they target ads to an individual car? If so, this could be a great service.

      The evil of advertising is not that it's so frequent or intrusive, but that it's so frequently intrusive and *irrelevant*.

      If OnStar kept a database of my likes and dislikes, and only targeted ads based on my preferences.. that's not spam, that's valuable information! I like Seafood. If I drive into a new city, and I get a list of seafood restaurants nearby with Zagats reviews, that's VALUABLE! If it shows me McDonalds Filet-o-fish ads, it's history. Even more valuable would be listing the closest stores that have a particular product I'm looking for *in stock*.

      I doubt very much that this is what the OnStar ads will be like today, but you can imagine such a service being implemented in the not so distant future.

    4. Re:A Database to Snoop With? by mochan_s · · Score: 1

      Slashdot has a large database of information on what you post (and maybe also which topics you clicked on and how long you spent reading them and so on). I don't know why you are so concerned about where you will be spending your money getting out of your control. And I don't know why advertisers think that obtrusive advertising will gain anything. Drivers would probably psychologically associate anger with the product and reject even if maybe the best one out there. Last of all, local FM stations are almost the same. They advertise local sales, don't they?

    5. Re:A Database to Snoop With? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What it all seems like is one big cyber-snoop service [...]

      Oooo, a conspiracy theory on Slashdot, how shocking! You forgot to mention the part where after they track your car, men in black suits assault you, ask you for pages of personal information, turn your pockets inside out, loot your trunk, restrict your freedoms, sleep with your wife, overwater your plants, starve your dog, and then bring you to the Illuminati headquarters where you scan your brain and then put a GPS satellite tracking module in your skull.

      You, sir, are an idiot.

    6. Re:A Database to Snoop With? by gilroy · · Score: 1, Redundant
      Blockquoth the poster:

      The evil of advertising is not that it's so frequent or intrusive, but that it's so frequently intrusive and *irrelevant*.

      I disagree. I feel that the evil of advertising is exactly that it's so frequent and so intrusive. I know it makes me un-American but there really are times I'd rather not be thinking about how to spend my money the fastest.


      If I drive into a new city, and I get a list of seafood restaurants nearby with Zagats reviews, that's VALUABLE!

      I disagree again. If I can query a database and say "Give me some seafood restaurants nearby" -- that is, if I as a user initiate a search -- then the service can be valuable. If OnStar or whoever simply decides "Hey, he might want some food now", then it's just pointless and intrusive.
    7. Re:A Database to Snoop With? by FrozedSolid · · Score: 0

      Okay, I don't seem to understand this at all. You aren't required to BUY an onstar gizmo in your car. If you don't want it, don't buy it. If Customer #84392 likes to go to Bob's Stores, and this has helped them find Bob's Stores, this is a Good Thing (TM). Also, a misconception, it merely shows a logo or advertisement in the onstar console, there is no voice beconing you. I think there is a little bit too much paranoia. It's amazing how easy some people don't seem to realize the obvious. If you don't want it, you don't need it, don't buy it.

      -Scott

      --
      When all freedom is outlawed only the outlaws have freedom
    8. Re:A Database to Snoop With? by OpenB2C · · Score: 1

      I agree that indiscriminate advertising is intrusive (and as I mentioned, frequently irrelevant). I agree that people have the right to initiate a search.

      The point I wanted to make is that it doesn't need to be indiscriminate and that people don't have to spend an inordinate amount of time searching for what they want. There has to be some common ground between companies that have products and services to offer and individuals who have needs to be met.

      It's going to take more than a GPS receiver in OnStar to understand what my needs are as a consumer. The only way that's going to happen is if I tell them what I want. And it's not going to make me spend more, just help me find the things that I'm going to buy anyways, while saving me the time of querying databases all day or viewing boring, mindless ads.

      Ads on OnStar, or any other application for that matter, will always be pointless unless we take a more proactive role in how they're relayed. Oh, and I think it's "all or nothing".. Either ads should be informative, or not sent at all.

    9. Re:A Database to Snoop With? by tchapin · · Score: 1
      You buy OnStar monthly. There are two levels: Premium, and Safety, or something like that. Safety gives you emergency car unlocking, roadside assistance, automatic ambulance call if airbags deploy, and car tracking if the car is stolen. Premium gives you the worthless "concierge" services (directions, tickets, purchasing items, etc).

      You can also sign up for two voice-activated services for an extra monthly fee: voice dialing and a TellMe-like personal portal type of thing. The voice dialing is kind of cool. I believe that the voice portal isn't so hot.

      Here's their webpage with all the info.

      All GM cars (Saabs included) come with one year of Premium service 'free'. I don't believe that the premium services are worth the cost currently. Most of the operators are pretty stupid.

      Todd

      --
      -- !todd erases a red dot! I steal music on the internet.
    10. Re:A Database to Snoop With? by tacocat · · Score: 1

      You are forgetting the latitude accuracy of the GPS systems that are in use today. The resolution that they offer, along with the transmission delay of that information across the network compared to a vehicle traveling at posted speeds means that the ad would arrive several 100 to several 1000 yards past the point of interest. Furthermore, you would have no gaurantee that this would be accurate for Bob's Store or the dude next door.

    11. Re:A Database to Snoop With? by praedor · · Score: 2

      That personal information about your likes and dislikes is part of a larger puzzle...YOU. Such information can be used to create a profile of you in your entirety, not just your shopping habits. The more information, seemingly irrelevant, that a single entity or group of collaborating entities obtain, the easier it is to piece together a FULL personal profile on you that goes well beyond your like of good coffee or music CDs.


      There is a balance that can get seriously out of whack with this personal information. The good thing (tm) of having your interests served by targeted advertising of only that stuff you are interested in is counter-balanced by a wider evil of a corporate entity (or bad player(s) within such an entity) creating a full personal profile on you as a person.


      Since it appears that you have no problem with this idea, perhaps you would permit me to rumage through your drawers, checkbook, bank statements, library, software, diary or journal, and a record all your phonecalls? I promise I wont do anything with any information I obtain. I just want to know EXACTLY who you are without the filter of your personal idea of who you are. I may, on occassion, use the information to manipulate you into doing something I would like you to do but that is as far as it goes, I promise.

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    12. Re:A Database to Snoop With? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      All GM cars (Saabs included) come with one year of Premium service 'free'. I don't believe that the premium services are worth the cost currently. Most of the operators are pretty stupid.

      My 2001 Impala didn't. No OnStar, and thank god.

      For $399/year, I can get a regular cellphone, a bunch of decent street maps, and a spare key to keep in my wallet. And I don't have Chevrolet tracking me. I can make phone calls. And nobody unlocks my car unless I want it unlocked. (Slim jims and Z-Tools supposedly don't work on the Impalas. That's the claim, but I'm a little skeptical.)

  21. Driving By Spam... by Cylix · · Score: 5, Funny

    Lost again! Drat!

    Oh please OnStar gods help me!

    "Hello, OnStar BOFH here"

    Yeah, I'm lost, I'm trying to find 1234 Bovine...

    "No Problem Sir..."
    ""
    "Up on your right there is a WalMart, do you see it?"

    Uh, yeah, sure... but what...

    "Pull into the parking lot so I might give you some indepth instructional proceedures."

    OK...

    "WalMart is having a special on Remington Pump Shotguns, they normally retail for..."

    Wait, I need to get to...

    "Sure, proceed north for 3 miles and I'll alert you when you reach THAT destination."

    "On your right is a StarBucks giving a special discount to OnStar Customers!"

    I really really need to get to 1234 bovine...
    There is a really important meeting that I must attend, if I don't make it, it could mean the end of my career and all dreams!

    "Oh that sounds important..."
    ""
    ""

    Um, sir, this looks like the same walmart I was at an hour ago. My god, the meeting is over... I'm ruined! What is your problem!

    "You've reached WalMart, home of the Wally arsenal collection! Your profile suggests this would be perfect"

    AAAAARGG!

    How much were those shotguns?

    --
    "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    1. Re:Driving By Spam... by selectspec · · Score: 2

      The sad part is that this guy was driving a car without the OnStar system.

      --

      Someone you trust is one of us.

    2. Re:Driving By Spam... by Black+Rabbit · · Score: 2, Funny

      First thing I would have done after pulling into the Walmart? Go in a buy something, of course!

      A map and a pair of sidecutters.

  22. Re:No, YOU are a fucking idiot by Dredd13 · · Score: 3, Troll
    Let's see: Radio - doesn't just spontaneously make noise after being silent. The driver of a car generally knows his radio is on and isn't distracted by it. The "guy selling flowers" is, of course, one of the various pedestrians and road objects the driver is "being aware of", and I hate to break it to you, but people HAVE gotten into legal entanglements because of cell phones going off, and there's various levels of anal-retentiveness surrounding cel-phones and driving....

    Think first, then post, it'll make you seem a lot smarter.

  23. Onstar Navigation System to Deliver in-Car Spam by mummers · · Score: 1

    Certainly opens a few possible 'revenue opportunities' for those in the advertising sector. Whether it will catch on is another matter. From a commercial standpoint it's great to advertise to those most likely to buy from you (and if they are nearby, so much the better).

    However it's going to be difficult to sell advertising space to reach, lets say, the one unfortunate bastard in the whole state who has bought Onstar and happens to pass by everyday as he leaves his house...

    And anyway, as a private individual, I abhor the idea of yet more corporate 'throat-stuffing' as I go about my daily business.

    --
    --This isn't a man who is leaving with his head between his legs.
  24. They had that on Knight Rider by selectspec · · Score: 3, Funny

    .

    K.I.T. Michael, there's a 40% discount sale at the "Spank Your Pants" Adult Bookstore in that strip mall to the right.

    M. Knight Excellent Kit! Go to "pursuit" mode.

    --

    Someone you trust is one of us.

    1. Re:They had that on Knight Rider by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      My only question is this: can I get hot grits with those pants? Tee hee hee. >8-)

  25. My ad... by tcd004 · · Score: 1

    Come to Chuck's Garage. We'll disconnect this bloody thing.

    Run in fear! Buy Tickets! It's Harry Potter's box office.
    tcd004

  26. Car Talk by ian_po · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Mod this as off-topic if you want. This week on the NPR radio show CarTalk, The lady who's voice they use for *OnStar(tm) called up and talked with Tom & Ray. Apparently GM buys the OnStar service from another company. The lady spoke about how advanced the voice regognition was and that the text to voice (that uses her voice) does not sound like your average: "At. The. Tone. Deposit. Thirty. Five. Cents." This voice tech seems like the only cool thing that the /. crowd would even care about.

    The lady who called herself "Mary-Mac" said that she was just in Silicon Valley laying down more voice takes for OnStar, in addition to the thousands she has already done. I would not be surprised if they were finishing up this new spam stuff. And while the call was very self promoting, she also agreed with the hosts Click and Clack that you should pull over when using your cell phone. She even nice enough give them an OnStar-ish sound bite.

    You should check out CarTalk, it is on your local NPR stations on the weekends and last week's show can be heard during the week on their website. The hosts regualarly beat up on GM and OnStar, so much so they almost talk about it every week now.

    1. Re:Car Talk by imrdkl · · Score: 1

      For anyone who hasn't heard CarTalk, it's a true bit of radio-americana. They have a Real Audio archive of their shows on the website. Tom and Ray (the hosts) are both MIT grads, so their opinions are not only nerdy, but also quite often right, when it comes to auto-tech.

  27. 'adult' stores by igotmybfg · · Score: 1

    Scenario: A man is driving the family to a nice dinner in the minivan. He drives past a shady section of town. Suddenly, an advert for a nearby adult 'alternative lifestyle' gentlemen's club that he frequents comes on the speakers. It's even displayed on the navigation screen. At the very end, the announcer quickly says the terms and conditions, then says that the ad was chosen because of the number of times his car has been parked close to the store.

  28. Great sign me up! by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2

    Wahoo! I don't have enough spam as it is. Think about this. You wake up in the morning, take a shower, check email before you head to work and are instantly bombarded with spam. %90 of the messages you received are spam and are mostly for disgusting porn sites. You then go to your car hear nothing but ads on the radio, your On-star then goes off every 30 seconds with annoying ads as you drive near a mall or downtown district. For me, living in New York city, I bet it will probably go off every 10 seconds where I am constantly surrounded by stores! Then you get to work and guess what? Then you get even more spam. Your corporate email will be loaded with spam and your co-workers with beepers will receive spam! Imagine being at work when your beeper goes off displaying spam and you or your employer has to pay $.15 for each spam ad you receive! I just can't take it anymore! This is becoming a sad reality. I hear the old Monty Python song spam going off in my head right now as I type this.

    If I had one of these things in my car, I would probably rip it out with my own bare hands! How intrusive can you get! With email you can just ignore it or click on it and delete it. But with verbal harassment's ...oops I mean verbal spam that you can not shut off its, its 100 times as worse. Thats right. You can't turn On-star off! It will just go on and on to your ears go deaf or you go nuts! If On-star ever does this they will commit corporate. No one would possible want a constant spam machine in there cars. I do not like distractions when I am driving. Especially ones that are verbal. All I have to say is that I am sorry for On-star owners who are reading this right now.

    I remember not too long ago that you can have your access to the internet could be terminated for spamming. You could be flamed or kicked out of a newsgroup for spamming only a single spam ad. Seriously. Spamming was very bad. Just ask any old timer. The internet and especially the newsgroups section of it were created for schools and institutions to share and exchange ideas and to promote learning. Today its being banned from schools thanks to porn spams. I was on dejanews recently and I saw actual pedophile spam ads. If I had kids I definitely would not want them to log on to the newsgroups today. What a shame.

  29. On a sidenote... by MS · · Score: 1
    The european union has decided that:
    • sending spam via SMS to cellular phones is illegal (strange: the sender aka spammer will pay the bill)
    • sending spam via e-mail is legal (here the innocent receiver has to pay the BIG part of the bandwith involved)
    • persistent cookies are illegal (only session cookies are allowed)
    • nothing about spyware (as if it were less intrusive than cookies!!!)
    More here: Heise Online

    long live our clueless politicians!

    ms

  30. First reaction by rossz · · Score: 2

    My first reaction was now they've gone and completely screwed up a good product. I was considering getting one of these but if they're going to bombard me with ads, forget it.

    My second reaction, upon seeing it is opt-in, is who's stupid enough to sign up for this?

    --
    -- Will program for bandwidth
    1. Re:First reaction by aozilla · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My second reaction, upon seeing it is opt-in, is who's stupid enough to sign up for this?

      The yellow pages is opt-in advertising, but people still use it every day to find out the locations of certain types of stores. All they have to do is get a large enough number of stores to participate so that I can say "Onstar, where is the nearest pizza place. Place an order for a large pepperoni pie.", and there will be plent of people signing up for it. Hell, I'd probably consider signing up for it, if it was free like the yellow pages.

      --
      ok then your [sic] infringing on my copyright! Could you as [sic] me next time before STEALING my comments for your own?
  31. Too weird by Mike+McTernan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    All the in car nav systems I have seen/used always pop up a box warning the driver not to use the system while driving. I guess this allows the manufacturer to disclaim liability problems that might happen for accidents with claims like "I was looking at my nav system when I hit x..."

    So on the one hand we are discouraged to use the device then driving around, and to only look it at to get directions, but now the device is going to be advertising junk - trying to get our attention?

    Seems like a liable case waiting to happen, unless it only displays spam when the vehicle is detected to be stationary (which would make the spam low volume->not spam).

    --
    -- Mike
  32. Yea but... by imrdkl · · Score: 1
    Will it find me a parking space, park my car, watch the kids, and beep loudly at me until I find the right door to the sellers location?

    No? Then I ain't stoppin in the middle of town.

  33. where have we heard that before? by Erris · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Cable TV is worth the money because it is advert free! The picture is much better too, especially since they've gone digital.

    Why should I complain? Look at all the great stuff that would not exist if companies were not permitted to shove stuff down our throats all day. Highway billboards, McDonalds, top 40 music, alternative top 40 music, Hollywood, children's cereal that cost more per pound than steak, three large and valuable TV fanchises owned by GE, Westinghouse and Disney, artificial grape flavor, the list of quality additions to all our lives goes on and on. With databases they can target those of us who don't buy such shit for extermination. This is a great day and we are one step closer to thar really cool car, Kit pimp addition. Thank you OnStar for proving that there will be one less place to hide.

    I can't wait for the new home emergency service with opt in adverts. Just imagine your $400/year burgalar alarm shouting things at you. I'm over awed. I can't wait for it's integration into the Homaland Security sytem so the Federal Government can make sure I'm safe too. This is all so cool. Gadget future, just like predicted in 1984.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
    1. Re:where have we heard that before? by yesthatguy · · Score: 2

      Cable TV is advertisement free? Not where I live. I suppose it may be different where you are (UK, I'd guess, if I had to guess, because I've only heard British people use 'advert' as short for 'advertisement'. In America, it's most often 'ad'), but here cable TV has just as many commercials as regular TV, except if you go to "premium" channels like HBO, for which you pay additional fees. The only real draw of cable is that you have a greater selection of programming than the (around) 10 regular broadcast stations in one market.

      --
      Yes! That guy!
    2. Re:where have we heard that before? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod as flamebait/troll/OT

    3. Re:where have we heard that before? by Erris · · Score: 1

      Correct, cable tv is not advert free. Next time I'll put in the sarcasm tag. I use the word advert for it's similarity to pervert and invert. The real words share the same roots.

      --
      DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
    4. Re:where have we heard that before? by CtrlPhreak · · Score: 1

      somebody missed the sarcasm train...

      --
      WikiAfterDark.com It's a sex wiki, go now!
    5. Re:where have we heard that before? by TGK · · Score: 2

      And hense Tivo. Yep, I can see it now "OnStrVo"

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
  34. Didn't one commercial have by GISboy · · Score: 1

    On-Star in the Bat Mobile?

    Duh-nun-nunna-duh-nuh-nunna BAT SPAM!!!

    --
    If it is not on fire, it is a software problem.
  35. Spam? by Ando[evilmedic] · · Score: 1

    But it's not spam!

    It's "targetted advertising." :-)

  36. Re:Well Well Spam even while travelling! -Addition by ncc74656 · · Score: 3, Funny
    your new bicycle at this rate will probably have spam too, and it'll be powered by you pedalling!
    ...and who's under the impression that no costs are incurred by receiving spam? "It took me forever to get across town on my bike because of all the goddamn spam that kept flooding in on my Acme bike computer..."

    How long before procmail gets ported to OnStar? Hey, Linux has been ported to everything under the sun; why not procmail?

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  37. i'd have it torn out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is why, if i were ever to buy a car with OnStar, i would drive it right straight from the dealership to the nearest good auto electronics place and tell the man, "if you can get that shite out without destroying the interior, you can keep the electronics of it *and* i'll pay you for the effort".

    well, maybe i'd ask the guy if i could buy the GPS receiver off him. that might be a fun thing to play with. but the rest he could keep.

  38. Information you can use! by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 4, Funny

    Judging on the areas I have to drive through to get to work, I'll be receiving lots and lots of ads for where I can buy the purest heroin and the cheapest automatic weapons...

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  39. And you HAVE to buy it. by e_n_d_o · · Score: 2

    If you want to buy an LT model truck or sport ute (LT = heated, pleather, power seats in addition to all other options on truck), you have to get OnStar. There is no way for me to purchase the GM vehicle I want without buying onstar, and then having the burden of removing it and ordering a panel for the next trim level down to fill the hole.

    1. Re:And you HAVE to buy it. by goethean · · Score: 1

      If you buy an SUV, you deserved to be spammed while driving.

      --

      _____
      God is only experiencing itself -- Nisargadatta Maharaj
    2. Re:And you HAVE to buy it. by Peyna · · Score: 1

      The OnStar that is on most pickup trucks and SUVs, isn't the one with the pretty screen and Internet access, that is usually an additional charge ontop of your standard OnStar services. You may want to check into which OnStar package you are getting in those trucks. Most OnStar is just your standard help line and gps, stuff like that, but no Internet access.

      --
      What?
    3. Re:And you HAVE to buy it. by Peyna · · Score: 1

      Also, unless you pay the $200-$300 a year fee to use OnStar services (which the $200 package is mostly emergency services). You don't get to use it. I would actually assume the OnStar device itself doesn't add to the cost of that package much, and may even be included free as far as pricing is concerned, so by not using it, you aren't losing anything.

      --
      What?
    4. Re:And you HAVE to buy it. by dangermouse · · Score: 1

      No shit. Anyone who buys a luxury truck...

    5. Re:And you HAVE to buy it. by e_n_d_o · · Score: 1

      No shit. Anyone who buys a luxury truck...

      Exactly what is the problem that you have with me owning a "luxury" pickup?

      Is it because it gets 5mpg less than your car, sit stoo high, or am I just going against the "active lifestyle" theme of pickup ownership by having ordered mine with leather seats and ass warmers?

      Who are you to question what kind of vehicle someone else drives?

    6. Re:And you HAVE to buy it. by goethean · · Score: 1

      Exactly what is the problem that you have with me owning a "luxury" pickup?

      Oh nothing at all! Let me guess, you talk incessantly on a phome while driving too?

      --

      _____
      God is only experiencing itself -- Nisargadatta Maharaj
  40. This is how this is different from the radio. by Gendou · · Score: 2

    You can turn your radio off.

  41. This is not spam. by Gutboy_Barrelhouse · · Score: 0, Troll
    From spam.abuse.net:

    "Spam is flooding the Internet with many copies of the same message, in an attempt to force the message on people who would not otherwise choose to receive it."

    From the Net Abuse FAQ:

    "The term "spam," as used on this newsgroup, means "the same article (or essentially the same article) posted an unacceptably high number of times to one or more newsgroups." CONTENT IS IRRELEVANT. 'Spam' doesn't mean "ads." It doesn't mean "abuse." It doesn't mean "posts whose content I object to."

  42. Not a big deal by interiot · · Score: 2

    This isn't really that big of a deal, just play a soft but distinctive seris of tones before the ad starts playing, so the user knows what's coming. I do the same thing with my text-to-speech television show reminder, and I don't have a problem unless the music is turned up so loud that I miss the intro tones.

    1. Re:Not a big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..and those tones will then be used by "us" do change the channel - or equivalent, so they'll try not to have any indication the ads are coming....

    2. Re:Not a big deal by DickBreath · · Score: 2

      just play a soft but distinctive seris of tones before the ad starts playing, so the user knows what's coming

      But if this were to happen, it would provide the perfect anti-spam filtering pattern match, or trigger.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  43. Hey my radio does that too! by Kevinv · · Score: 1

    I go to another town and hear advertising for that town! Yeah!

    Of course for some reason the radio stations don't seem to need to track my every movement, or make me pay to recieve their ads, but hey this is progress!

  44. free onstar, yay! by psychalgia · · Score: 1

    well thats cool, now sicne onstar is lining its pockets with ad money, it will be a free service...right, right??? RIGHT?!

    i cant tell you how badly this sits with me...

    --

    ________________________________________________

  45. What's the benifit to the consumer? by interiot · · Score: 2
    Seriously... usually advertising helps pay for something the user gets for free... eg. TV shows, access to mapquest, things like that.

    Will the price of OnStar be lower because of this? Or will this end up being another thing like cable, where you pay an enourmous amount of money for something that used to be done for free to the enduser, but now you pay AND get commercials.

  46. Re:frost piss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now let me cut these niggerz up and show them where the fuck i'm comming from.

  47. Re:No, YOU are a fucking idiot by Lars+T. · · Score: 2, Troll
    Radio - doesn't just spontaneously make noise after being silent. The driver of a car generally knows his radio is on and isn't distracted by it.

    Many car radios in germany have a feature that recognizes when there is traffic information on a (user-) selected station, and automatically turn the volume up and switch to that station (if you listen to a different one or tape or CD). When the info is over, things go back to what they were before. Some background info

    So if a driver doesn't know his radio better than his nav system (actually even then), he could be quite irritatet by both. It certainly anoyed me a couple of times, when the radio began yelling traffic info at me.

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  48. Jesus... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you pay for a whole fucking car and they still have to spam you?

    I see a future where spam is mandatory, everywhere, all the time, and its omnipresent pressure will make for a rather effective form of populace control. Big brother will not be the government, but the corporations which control it.

  49. MODERATORS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whats the fuck up with this? The parent is posting his flames at +2. Cock head.

  50. Re: signature addition (off-topic) by Guru2Newbie · · Score: 1

    --If you give a person a fish, they'll fish for a day. But if you train them to fish, they'll fish for a lifetime.

    ...and if you sell fake fishing licenses you can afford to buy a boat!

  51. Man your ugly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've just checked out your home page, and fuck, you sir, are ugly!

  52. On Road Spam by Alien54 · · Score: 2
    If I had a car that could use the Onstar system, I would deliberately tell them that I would not want spam, or else to cancel the account before I drove the car through the show room window

    Actually, it would make a wonderful scene for a subplot in a movie. Yes I can see it - someone wins a year in a house from the future - the Microsoft house that wakes you up everytime you get spam. And the final escape to the car where it decides to use the "follow you everywhere" feature for email and messages. complete with the tech support who insist that this is a feature and all the rest.

    Someone should be able to hone some sort of open source movie script to fine effect.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:On Road Spam by Tackhead · · Score: 1, Troll
      > If I had a car that could use the Onstar system, I would deliberately tell them that I would not want spam, or else to cancel the account before I drove the car through the show room window

      I think you have the order reversed.

      If I had a car with OnStar and got spammed, I'd drive it through the showroom window first (hopefully crushing a cute baby or pregnant woman to death in the process), and then sue the bejeezus out of GM and the advertiser on the grounds that the spam distracted me. A few billion dollars in damages will shut these pigfucking marketroids down pronto, or at least convince potential advertisers to stay the fuck out of my car.

      Surely if it's illegal for me to distract myself with a cell phone, but it ought to be just as illegal for my car manufacturer to distract me with spam, no? (That's why I hope there's a preggo or sprog in the showroom when I hit it, it'll spur the congresscritters to stop the advertising in our cars, "for the chilllllllldrun!" With any luck, I can get the next-of-kin to join me as plaintiffs in the suit!)

  53. And in other news... by t_allardyce · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    United Airlines has said today that to increase lost revenue from recent events, it has decided to start sponsoring terrorism. The airline will soon place adverts on their new bullet-proof doors and on the tail fin - which experts say, is the most likely part of the plane to survive in a crash. Also, prospective terrorists will be given cash back if they agree to promote inflight purchases when hi-jacking "This plane is now under control of the Al'Quaeda terrorist group, please remember, Pepsi-Cola(tm) is available on the inflight trolly for a discounted price, buy now, before we crash into the whitehouse. Did I also mention 'Jones Funeral Services'? yes, for a special promotion, Jones are offering 3 pine-wood coffins for the price of 1!!! (buy now, while limbs intact)"

    (see, you can't call me a karma whore, im about to get modded to -50)

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  54. simple solution by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Dont buy Onstar. Buy an aftermarket Nav system that isn't going to rob you blind monthly and then for the quarterly navigation disc updates. (Nothing like a forced upgrade.. your navdisks are too old, please replace them with a newer version...)

    There are several Car computing/navigation systems out there. Hell if you want one that is cheap but the first one out there buy an autopc off of ebay. (Dont pay any more than $600.00 for a new one with gps and nav... I've seen them at the "super deals that cost $5.00 to get in" around here for $550.00 with software.)

    The biggest problem with most of these navigation systems is that they use the really crappy maps from navtech corperation.. They make the worst map database on the planet... if the city is below 1,000,000 in population it isn't on the disc. and errors will stay there for years before they fix them.

    The best nav-system I saw was a Q-pc car computing platform running linux and then running delorme with wine... it rocked, and the 4 year old disc database was perfectly useable if you were interested in addresses or routes...

    only problem is that the Q-pc with display is about $3000.00.... ICK... anyone have a nice 4.5 inch 800X600 TFT lcd that can withstand -60degF and has touchscreen? I'll design the vehicle mounted computer. :-)

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:simple solution by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > anyone have a nice 4.5 inch 800X600 TFT lcd that can withstand -60degF and has touchscreen?

      Dude, where the hell do you drive, Antarctica? :-)

      (Remember, the device remains in the car, so "windchill" doesn't matter - only ambient temperature. I'd be more worried about the upper limit, as a car with windows closed can easily break 140F.)

    2. Re:simple solution by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      close enough. michigan....
      Last winter we got to -15F I'd like an LCD that is actually useable below freezing.. instead of the slight ghost I get for the first 20 minutes in the morning.
      Minnesota is worse.. hell the top 1/3 of the States get's danged cold, and canada..... well summer is 3 weeks of bad sledding for them.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  55. Re: signature addition (off-topic) by mummers · · Score: 1

    Off-topic, most certainly is.


    By the way, what do you want a boat for? Can't you walk on water like the rest of us? Tsk, tsk.

    --
    --This isn't a man who is leaving with his head between his legs.
  56. Two levels of service? by Robber+Baron · · Score: 2

    Bet they're thinking of offering two levels of service: A more costly ad-free one and a less expensive spam saturated one.

    --

    You're using her as bait, Master!

  57. Every system can be hacked... by lostchicken · · Score: 1

    Now that OnStar exports the real-time location data, there must be a rather massive data stream somewhere.

    Now suppose I were to intercept that stream. I've always been able to find out data about your car from the DMV (tag #s, VIN, etc). I could then filter that stream for YOUR car, and know where you are at all times. Perhaps I could track you, and notice that you go down a country road everyday on the way to work.

    It is a known method of the Mafia to kill people by placing a bomb in a road, and blowing up your car. Now, I could use that data stream to set up my device in a pothole on that country road without ever following you. Nobody ever sees me. I arm the mine with an RF link when you get near it, and it's all over.

    --
    -twb
  58. In other news... by MBCook · · Score: 2, Informative

    In other news tonight, over 75% of OnStar subscribers are considdering canceling the service, or maybe just driving into the store window "to your left that has a great sale on plus size jeanes."

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
  59. OnStar - has a 70% NON-renwal rate... by quanta · · Score: 1, Redundant

    According to a poll at saab.com, 70% of current OnStar users do NOT plan on renewing their service after the first free year.
    I know I won't - it's cute, but not worth the $$. They want $0.50/min for cell phone use on top of the annual fee! The GPS data is only available to the call center and the thing can't even set the time in the car!
    This debacle was obviously created by a Marketing committe.

  60. Targeted ads? Targeted customers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, there's usually several routes to a destination, unless it's mostly along so mething like a freeway.

    You need to get from A to B, and could pass through C, D, E or F to get there. It now becomes a bidding war between advertsers at C, D, E and F to pay your nav software company to drive you past their location and be advertised at.

    Not only are you getting opportunistic shoppers, they are driving themselves to you, when they meant to go elsewhere.

    Of course, the city council might have something to say about the new road usage patterns. They would *not* like a procession of cars parading through residential neighbourhoods because the drivers are slavishly following nav software.

    Now, why don't we take this further? In a trip of 5km, you really won't notice an extra 100m or so. Call this the "fuzz factor". An advertiser can pay a "fuzz fee" to have the route extended on a dollars-per-meter basis to bring in people who would not normally have passed on the "shortest path" route.

    It's a feature to enhance your driving experience, therefore is good and you should be thanking the advertisers for the privelege of buying their products.

    Why not? That's the basis of most IE and Windows "features" and the MS attitude to complaints about them.

    Glen Harris
    astfgl@iamnota.org

  61. Not that bad of and idea, but... by FKell · · Score: 0, Redundant

    the concern is that now a database will know when and where I shop (not that certian places don't already have that, but still, I prefer to use cash and not give my name if asked).

    I don't know, its just getting harder and harder to not have your daily activities tracked anymore.

  62. Not to be a Luddite, but... by rknop · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...this just confirms that "a map" may be the best navigation system out there, if only because it's quiet.

    And "a book" may be the best way to read a book, because you can carry it with you and read it wherever, even without violating the law.

    What I'm afraid of is the day where you can't get 99% of the books in paper, and where cars come with always-on navigation and "security monitoring" systems which blare ads at you without your ability to stop it.

    I'm not afraid of technology. I'm afraid of the dunderheads we have running our world, and what they will do with technology (or anything else).

    -Rob

  63. and now Mozilla's spamming my servers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And, naturally, Mozilla is now spamming my web servers with requests for that darn IE-style "favicon.ico" crap in the latest 0.9.7 nightlies. IE at least only does it when people bookmark the page. Konqueror had had the same doubly rude behavior as Mozilla for a while, but almost nobody seems to use Konq.

    I'd use the LINK element if I wanted browsers requesting icon files that don't exist.

    1. Re:and now Mozilla's spamming my servers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's nothing. The "monkey see, monkey do" twits over in the GNOME camp look like they want to get even more obnoxious than IE in this regard.

      66.69.231.151 - - [15/Nov/2001:07:25:47 -0600] "PROPFIND /favicon.ico HTTP/1.0" 404 335 "-" "gnome-vfs/1.0.3"
      66.69.231.151 - - [15/Nov/2001:07:25:47 -0600] "GET /favicon.ico HTTP/1.0" 404 335 "-" "gnome-vfs/1.0.3"
      (repeat 3 more times)

      What the hell is that crap?

  64. Re:Well Well Spam even while travelling! -Addition by scott1853 · · Score: 2

    Wait until they figure out how to take control of your car and make you stop at a location. At that point they'd make you get out, lock the doors for 15 minutes, and not let you back in until you show the in-car camera your receipt.

  65. Throw that junk in the garbage. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 2

    Well, you know what I'm gonna do, right? If I ever get a car with On Star, that thing is coming off. Even before the smog stuff.

  66. bigs companies deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what are you high?

    urm 'big companies' have been 'spamming' since postal mail was invented you idiot, it's an accepted form of advertisement in every realm but the net, annnnnd guess why that is.

    do a quick cross check of the maintainers of the black hole and rbl list and their stakes in 'email advertising' companies.

    and oh, MSN and yahoo both love spam, you just have to pay them for the right to do it.

    grow up and look around, the anti-spam movement is being spearheaded by people who spam, they just want you to pay for it.

  67. How it works by GMwrench · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Let me preface I'm a Chevrolet mechanic.
    First Onstar uses the car's speakers. It stops the radio feed then the Onstar operator can speak to you through them. I don't think GM will brake into the radio signal just to send an add, sense this will only piss off paying customers. You have to pay for Onstar. The first year is free but after that it's a subscription.
    Now how it works. It has 3 parts a GPS sender, a cell phone receiver, and a control module. The GPS sensor records the car's position. The control module calls the Onstar center every 10 minutes if memory serves. It will also send messages such as the air bag has gone off and the operator can call you assuming you still have power. There are also blue Onstar and red emergency buttons you can press to initiate a call.
    Now there is a lot of Big Brother things that can be done with this system but I don?t think Spam is one that GM would stoop to. However I wouldn?t do anything illegal in an Onstar equipped vehicle.

  68. Very misleading write-up by CaptainSuperBoy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, OnStar is NOT going to deliver in-car spam. If you read the article, you'd read that 'OnStar, by far the biggest service with 1.5 million users, says it makes note of a car's location only in an emergency or when a driver makes contact with the service.' 'OnStar seems more interested in advertising that is tied to content.' The title of this story is blatantly incorrect, and the write-up is very misleading.

    Onstar is considering putting ads that are related to their content, such as ads for a brokerage if you're getting stock quotes. That's pretty far from 'in-car spam' based on tracking your location.

    The only thing in the article that resembles this is the 'gas station locator' by Wingcast, a service which hasn't even been launched yet. It would notify you when your car runs low on gas, and give you directions to gas stations. It's a useful feature, and I'm sure you'll have to sign up for it before they send you gas station ads.

    Personally I'd object to ads mixed in with a service that I paid good money for, even if they're not based on your location. For a few hundred dollars a year, I expect a service that's free of annoyances. A gas station locator isn't an annoyance, it's a feature.

  69. Pushing by Faux_Pseudo · · Score: 3, Informative

    In the ad world this is known as pushing. The concept is to put ads where you never got them before. Cell phone, pager, and car when the radio is off, etc. They want you to see ads in church, on the beach, in the shower, and NASA is working on allowing commercial sponsorship of space missions. Can you see the Pepsi logo on the side of a rocket? I can.
    It will get much worse. You know that networked refrigerator they keep telling us is going to come? It too will have ads.
    Free software has ads. Spending on advertising is going down as people become trained to ignore them. Just 10 years ago there where 2 less minutes of commercials per 30 minutes of programming. You now see 6 times the number of ads you did 10 years ago (sorry can't think of the source).

    Ads are getting more intrusive by the day. Remember when you would get your receipt and it would have coupons on the back? Those are too easy to tune out. Now you get a separate piece of paper with coupons on it.

    You used to buy something and it would come with a free gift. That free gift has turned into a discount somewhere else. More advertising.

    When will this change? It won't. What can you do to avoid all of this? Nothing. Well nothing unless you live like I do, which is not recommended.
    o Text based browser.
    o No pager
    o No cell phone
    o TV is not plugged in
    o no VCR
    o no DVD
    o Listen to NPR, the ads here are even getting an out of hand for "commercial free programming"
    o don't own a car
    You see fewer ads on the bus because you can bury your head in a book and not have you eyes locked on the road where all those billboards, A-frame signs, and faux-hot-air balloons are.
    o Don't shop at the big stores. Hit the thrift stores and antique stores.
    o Eat at mom and pop places and not places with BigThemePark adverts on the tray liners, YBotherBox adds on the drinks and movie tie ins on the to go bags.
    o and the list goes on.

    To explain, no there is too much, let me sum up: This should come as no surprise.

    1. Re:Pushing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there's also another trend, tightly coupled to increasing the ads: more and more companies are relying not on the product but on some deceptive marketing scheme. More and more of these ads are trying to sell you something with a fine print,hoping that you wouldn't notice a trap they have prepared. Consumers are trained to look for these traps everywhere - if you don't see the trap, it's only because you don't notice it.

      As a result, the society becomes more and more anxious and hostile, where everyone is on a constant alert. Another effect is getting used to constant lies and unfair business. In fact, constant lying has already becaue a de-facto standard, it's not considered immoral - every salesperson is expected to lie, it's normal to lie at the job interview, etc.

  70. tracking your car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So if they can track where your car is, I wonder if they will track what stores it is parked outside of? For example, you may go to the strip club for a couple hours each night. The next day, after picking the other people you car pool with, you drive past a Sex Store, and OnStar notifies you that they have a sale on videos and edible panties.

  71. Re:No, YOU are a fucking idiot by DragonPup · · Score: 0, Troll

    The difference between radio and the onstar thing is that the radio does NOT spontaniously turn itself on. You expect to hear stuff from it. you do not expect to hear OnStar speaking to you, so it is more distracting than the radiio in that respect. Plus, if a OnStar customer has no clue this is going to happen driving down a busy street with no one else in the car at the time they are likely to be freaked out hearing a voice within the car speaking to them.

    Jusy myt opinion anyways...
    -Henry

    --
    "Useless organic meatbag" -HK-47
  72. OnStar... a michigan company by mupi · · Score: 0
    OnStar, based in Troy, Michigan, is an in-vehicle safety, security, and information service that uses GPS and cellular technology to connect the vehicle and driver to a remote OnStar Center, where advisors are available 24 hours per day to assist with anything from emergency situations to convenience requests to personal escort services.

    In case you're wondering... no, this post has no point.

  73. How companies will use the info? by Mordak · · Score: 1

    "...well lets see how the big companies play with this new wealth of information." -- As if you really need to ask that question. Although I'm sure it was done so facetiously. When will it all stop? Will it ever stop? Probably not. As long as there is money to be made, Big Business will be there to capture their unfair share of it.

  74. Great. Now abusive flamers get to post at +1. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And people wonder why Slashdot is going downhill.

  75. TellMe has ads now by Animats · · Score: 2
    Dial TellMe at 1-800-555-8355, say "driving directions", and get driving directions interspersed with ads. Even worse, sometimes you get the ads even though the driving directions system is down.

    TellMe also offers movie tickets via Fandango, which in my experience has something go wrong in almost every transaction. (Today: six minutes of voice interaction and credit card entry leads to "an unexpected error occured, transferring you to customer service... wait time at least ten minutes...").

    I think the challenge of the post-Internet era is to re-implement the better ideas so that they don't suck.

    1. Re:TellMe has ads now by rlangis · · Score: 1

      I think the challenge of the post-Internet era is to re-implement the better ideas so that they don't suck.

      Whoa, hold on! We're already in the 'post-Internet era'? When did this happen? Cripes, nobody tells me NOTHIN'!

      --
      GIR: I'm going to sing the Doom song now. Doom doom doom doom doom doom de-doom doom doom doom doom doom doom...
  76. I worked at OnStar, so here's a bunch of info. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, I'm going to post this anonymously, since I'm not sure if any part of this is proprietary information, and I did sign an NDA-ish thing when I hired in. I don't think so, but you can't be too careful.

    I work for EDS, which does technical infrastructure for the call centers and staffs the Michigan center with operators (advisors, as they're called for OnStar). The other call center is in Charlotte and is staffed by another personnel company: Sitel. I hired in as on OnStar enrollment advisor in July 1999, which means I didn't provide the end-user navigation and emergency support and stuff, but I put the customer information into the database and remotely configured the vehicle components. I did enrollements for OnStar until October 2000, where I switched over to doing enrollments for Lexus Link, which is exactly the same as OnStar, but has a different name. Also, it's, you know, in Lexus cars (or just one so far, actually). I left for a different job last month, so my information might be slightly out of date, but not significantly, surely.

    Anyway, it's important to know how the hardware works. Basically, you've got 2 major components and a couple antennas. The first component they call the Vehicle Communications Unit (VCU), which is a cellular transceiver that sends and receives all the necessary information and commands to and from the OnStar center. The other main component is the Vehicle Interface Unit (VIU), which interfaces with the airbag, anti-theft, door locks, etc. The VIU also contains the GPS receiver, which continuously updates the vehicle location and also stores the last ten known locations to disk in case the GPS is unable to reach a satellite.

    The OnStar unit is not constantly in contact with the center, and I don't think that would be possible since the VCU communicates through analog cellular towers, which would quickly become overloaded if they were all activated all the time. The only satellite communication that takes place is between the GPS receiver and the orbiting satellites. The actual location info is sent with the rest of the data (including voice) over the cellular network. This cellular network is, by the way, provided by Verizon in every market where they have analog cellular towers, which is just about all of them (Cingular and Verizon split the A and B sides in most analog cell markets).

    For General Motors to know the location of a vehicle, it has to be connected to a workstation at an OnStar center. This connection can be initiated by the driver if they press the regular OnStar key or the emergency key, or the vehicle will connect automatically if the airbag deploys or the vehicle alarm goes off without being reset. Lexus cars also include a backup battery in case the battery is damaged in a front-end collision, but regular OnStar does not have this capability. Connection can also be established from the OnStar center. It is possible to connect to a vehicle and track its location or unlock its doors without the driver's knowledge or permission. The tracking of the vehicle without notification is used to recover stolen vehicles. It is not, however, possible to establish a voice connection to the non-Lexus car without the driver accepting the call. If the driver does not press the button with the white dot, it is not possible for General Motors or anyone else to speak to the passengers or hear what is being said in the car. Lexus Link, on the other hand, allows voice connections to be made without the driver's consent, though doing so mutes the car radio, so the driver will likely be aware anyway.

    OnStar does not, by the way, include any kind of screen or other onboard navigation, so any ads that the Virtual Advisor service gives will be audio only. OnStar's navigation services are utilized by connecting to the center and being routed to your location by a live advisor. Drivers are not able to see any sort of map or other readout.

    OnStar's customer information is stored on a large, slow, Oracle database. When I hired in, advisors used a custom application written in VB to navigate customers, retrieve information, and send commands. They've been gradually switching everyone over to a new application written in Java, which is slow, buggy, and difficult to use, all at the same time. The plan was to have everyone use the new application, except that the remote door unlock feature currently doesn't work unless you use the old app.

    OnStar comes preinstalled on a whole bunch of GM (inlcuding Saab) cars, as well as Acuras and Lexuses. GM is trying to line up more OEMs all the time. OnStar used to be available as an installed option, but it is now only available as a factory option. Early, early, OnStar systems were actual handset phones, but those haven't been available new for quite some time. The current hardware is designed by Hughes and manufactured in Mexico by Delphi, and then sent to the factory where it is installed. Lexus and Saab cars have their units installed at the port when they arrive from overseas. To my knowledge, the Cadillac Catera has the OnStar system installed in the factory in Germany before it is shipped over, but I'm not sure of that.

    There are two levels of OnStar service: Premium and Safety & Security. Premium is the good stuff, where you can call in and get directions and get someone to call ahead to restaurants and make you reservations and stuff like that, as well as all of the S&S services. Safety & Security is the stripped down service, where you can get the emergency services, stolen car tracking, remote door unlock -- all the boring stuff. Cadillacs come with one free year of the Premium service, and Saabs come with 3 months of Premium. Every other car with OnStar comes with one year of the Safety & Security, though it's possible to upgrade to Premium for $200. Tons of people who buy, say, a Pontiac that has OnStar in it will call assuming they can get directions or reservations or somesuch, and then become quite upset when they are hit up for two hundred bucks. After the free year is up, you can pay $199/year for S&S or $399/year for Premium.

    To get the Virtual Advisor service that all this hubub about ads is about, you also have to sign up for OnStar's Personal Calling service. This allows you to make cellular phone calls through the OnStar system, though with no keypad you have to dial using a voice recognition unit. You have to prepay cellular minutes to have this work, the cheapest package being $19.99 for 30 minutes that will expire in two months whether used or not. I believe if you're willing to pay this ridiculous amount, I think you can get Virtual Advisor for no additional cost, assuming it's available in your area. Far as I can tell, if you're signed up for Virtual Advisor in any capacity, you will get these unsolicited ads. The current interface for customizing the Virtual Advisor doesn't have any relevant functionality, and the NYTimes article doesn't seem to suggest that an option will exist to have the rest of VA but not the ads. Basically, I think it's safe to assume that GM will do what they think they can get away with. If the ads start to hurt their customer base, they'll cut them back. If nobody gets upset, they'll remain.

    There are certainly security and privacy concerns with the OnStar system, considering what it's capable of. It's not very useful for the third party, I wouldn't think, unless they had access to the OnStar database as well, since the data transmitted doesn't have any customer-specific information to speak of. GM has thus far been unwilling to track vehicles without the owner's permission unless given a court order, but it's really up to them. Same thing with door unlocks and database information and whatnot. It's all been safe so far, but who can say what will happen in the future. Right now, the biggest impediment to using the OnStar system in "big-brother" ways is the fact that it just plain doesn't work too well. There are daily outages in service, underpaid and undermotivated advisors, long waits at certain times of the day, and bad hardware to contend with.

    Other than that, the best advice I can give to current OnStar users is to ask the advisor who comes on the line where they're located. If they say North Carolina, hang up and call back until you get someone in Michigan. Trust me, it's a huge difference. Anyway, hope this wasn't too long, but I figured some people here might be interested in this kind of info.

  77. Antique Pentium Laptop + GPS = ad-free nav system by kobotronic · · Score: 1

    My Pontiac has a dashboard Garmin GPS connected to an old 133MHz pentium laptop stashed under the seat. I can pull it out and place it on the passenger seat to interact with it. Mostly I just upload the navigation data from Street Atlas to the dashboard GPS since its display is quite adequate for most road navigation. This system is obviously not embedded into the dashboard and radio system as the nice luxury sedan solutions, but then it also didn't cost neither an arm or a leg. Look on eBay for old GPS receivers and laptops, there's tons of them. I recommend Delorme Street Atlas - you get good reliable maps and there's no subscription fee or ads or anything.

  78. I work for OnStar by tacocat · · Score: 1

    I work them and know exactly what they do with the vehicle and the capabilities of the OnStar system from the telephony, database, and internet connectivity and can say with some degree of certainty without even reading this article that this is 99% BULLSHIT in it's purest form.

    Yes, they can do funky stuff with locating the vehicle and tracking speed, direction, blah blah blah... But this can only be done when the driver asks for it. The code simply does not exist to be able to initiate this. The proof is in the large number of requests we get to locate some drug dealers car by the local Enforcement Agency and we have to decline the offer. We get multiple supeona's every day on this.

    As for spam in the vehicle... The technology isn't practical at this point in time. Could it be done, everything *could* be done eventually. But to track someone's location and pump them with ads is not a realistic technology for years to come. By then, who knows what the ethics or business rules will be.

    This article sucks! I think we should be more paranoid about the other problems we have with technology today. This is merely a pathetic diversion. And no, I am not going to get a bonus for doing the 'corporate shill' think.

    I could give a twip less about any of this, it's just that I *know* what's going on and am sick of the Chicken Little stories that are running around in the news media. Do you realized I don't take sugar doughnuts into work because they might leave behind a "mysterious white powder"? bleah!

  79. Im already paying, i dont need this crap by suedehed · · Score: 0

    You know, I bought my 2001 Tahoe, which acme with 1 year of free Onstar.. never used it, have no need. But then NY decided to impose the cell phone ban, and i figured i would renew it for at least another year.. just in case i needed to use the cell feature. If the start spamming me with ads, Im going to ask for my money back. Its bad enough i find 20 flyers on my car every night when I get off the train, then get home to about 500 peices of junk mail, and then have to sift through email... i dont need it in the car..sorry onstar

  80. Spam from the sky by fdisk3hs · · Score: 1

    How long will it be till HBO has commercials, along with the same concept that puts ads all over AOL's PAY internet connection software? Makes you want to pirate all of it...

  81. AOL can sue MPAA for the commericals before movies by eris_crow · · Score: 1

    Oh wait! That won't happen because AOL-Time-Warner-CNN-Netscape is a member of MPAA.

    Curses! Foiled again!

  82. Turn it off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't want to hear the radio advertisements, turn it off.

    You don't want to hear the advertisements, turn off on-star. If they do implement advertisements, then there should be an option to completely turn it off, and use only the on-star feature.

    Just my 2 rubles.

    hooverrepairN0@SPAMhotmail.com

    1. Re:Turn it off by interiot · · Score: 2

      If no option is provided, it should be a trivial hack to add a toggle switch to turn the speaker on and off, since the only time the user would want the speaker on is immediately after pressing the OnStar button to get assistance.

  83. I don't know what lists you are on: by Mynn · · Score: 1
    %90 of the messages you received are spam and are mostly for disgusting porn sites.

    I generally get the good porn site spam. Mostly.
    --

    Face it, people are stupid, and the internet is the place where they all meet.