Slashdot Mirror


Review of the Handspring Treo

axlrosen writes: "Walter Mossberg of the Wall Street Journal reviews the new Handspring Treo, and loves it. 'For the past week, I have been carrying around a new hand-held, wireless device that is simultaneously the best personal digital assistant I have ever used and the most capable cellphone.'"

251 comments

  1. joy by Cinematique · · Score: 2, Insightful

    another pointless cell phone. how about making the networks better before trying to make kick-ass phones?

    1. Re:joy by laserjet · · Score: 2

      I totally agree with you. While new phones might be cool and ABLE to access the internet (limited as they may be), the existing cell network was not designed to this, and as anyone knows who has surfed the web on a phone or similar device, it SUCKS. When they come out with a network with decent speeds for data, then things like this will b worth their price.

      I used to have a net-enabled phone. I found it so worthless I stopped using it. Everytime I tried to access something, it just takes forever. I have settled with the Motorola P935 Two-way pager/pda and am much happier.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    2. Re:joy by simong · · Score: 1

      Hey, our networks are fine. Shoulda listened to the old world...

    3. Re:joy by shadowj · · Score: 1

      Yes, existing networks suck, but Handspring says that soon after the Treo's introduction they will offer a software upgrade to enable GPRS. While GPRS is something less than blindingly fast, it does offer improved speed (up to 56K), and, more importantly, "always-on" data services.

      --

      --Larry

      Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence

  2. Too bad by chancycat · · Score: 1
    Too bad that the color version won't be available to real consumers for ... how long? 2Q 2002?

    Ack!

    --
    Evan - needs to hit preview before submitting
    1. Re:Too bad by simm_s · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I would not even consider buying a cell/phone pda unless it was color and thinner than the treo.

    2. Re:Too bad by citizenv · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You people crack me up. Contrary to your idealistic view, the vast majority of cellphones have simple monochrome screens. And while color PDA's (like Sony's N610C) are starting to get cheap enough to be widely used by average consumers (as opposed to 'prosumers'), many people still use monochrome PDA's. I have both a cellphone and monochrome PDA; the Treo makes perfect sense for consolidating the number of devices I need to carry around. Also, instead of having two different address books, I'll have all my contacts in one unified book. What's not to love?

    3. Re:Too bad by chancycat · · Score: 1

      Nothing's not to love. It's already a great product by my read.

      I do think though that the average |slashdot| consumer (meaning someone like me, who is still more of an average consumer than a WSJ tech editor) would like the option for color available concurently with the B/W option at initial release. Side-by-side shopping and all that.

      --
      Evan - needs to hit preview before submitting
    4. Re:Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For now, I have to agree. But when high speed wireless of one type or another becomes available and cheap, I want color. Streaming pr0n needs color.

    5. Re:Too bad by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      This gadget looks to improve on my Kyocera 6035 in a number of ways:

      -smaller form factor
      -keyboard option
      -simpler, sturdier design (earpiece only on the flip)

      My personal challenge to all of these manufacturers is to support all major standards, so I can take the phone to Europe.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  3. Goodie by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think we have to work more on improving cellular and digital networks around the country/world before we get excited over some fancy new phone that can make a 5 course meal if you press *2211. What good is a phone like this if you don't have service? I live in Connecticut, and my StarTac doesn't work in my house, at my office, intermittently in NYC streets, and never in a subway train. Cool phones are great, but more service would be better.

    1. Re:Goodie by Fnkmaster · · Score: 2

      I honestly have no idea what you are talking about. Connecticut, I agree, is a wasteland. Mostly this is the fault of municipalities like Greenwich that don't want too many cell towers mucking up the multimillion dollar estate landscape. I have no problems whatsoever on NYC streets. I have Voicestream. SprintPCS seems to be mostly okay too, as far as I can tell (many friends of mine have it). I don't WANT cell phones to work in a packed subway train - it's just downright rude to have loud conversations on your cell phone on public transportation.

    2. Re:Goodie by Namarrgon · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Who says it's a one-or-the-other choice? How does a fancy new phone being available exclude you personally from having good service?

      Why is it that, everytime something new is announced, someone always complains that this thing is no good because they don't have what they want yet?

      --
      Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
    3. Re:Goodie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So is it rude to have any kind of conversation on public transportation, or is it only rude when the evesdroppers can't hear the other side of the conversation?

      anonymous cow

    4. Re:Goodie by btellier · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Oooohhh.. sounds like someone is jealous of us Greenwichites. You're probably from Norwalk or some other godforsaken cesspool of lower-middle class scum like yourself. Besides, we put all our cell phone towers in Stamford, but our multi-million dollar 10 story mansions block all transmitions due to the high concentraion of precious metals within.

    5. Re:Goodie by Felinoid · · Score: 1

      He may be under the (false) impression this is a universal problem.
      If that were the case then new fancy phones are a hard sell. Why bother when service is bad?

      Around where I live the phone works at home, work, and everywhere in between.
      I would presume it works at the store etc but the phone sucks... It's old...
      (Phone shuts off a lot for lack of battery power about 1 hour after a full charg... thats when it's not being used...)
      The phone that got stolen was much better..

      That and the niceness of having a PDA/phone system is why ordered a visor phone...
      (Like cheap cell phones it's free with service activation... Oh boy.. so when they eventually deside to ship it.... one month later... I guess everybody is getting phones for christmass)

      --
      I don't actually exist.
    6. Re:Goodie by bteeter · · Score: 1
      Absolutely. I live in Northern Virginia and commute to Downtown Washington, DC every day via the Metro (our subway). My phone is spotty in Virginia, doesn't work in some buildings, and doesn't work at all in the Subway. Its not the company either - we switched cell companies about a year ago - we had the same problems we have now.

      It is just amazing to be that this area is supposed to be one of the most high-tech in the country, yet you cannot use a cell phone half the places you go.

      Take care,

      Brian
      --
      Want a Free Palm m100?

    7. Re:Goodie by MoNickels · · Score: 2

      Sorry to say, buddy, but you've got a shitty phone or a bad service provider. I suggest you switch one or the other, or both. My phone (a sweet little Nokia) works like a champ with Voicestream in places where my Ericsson with AT&T got zero signal bars. Hell, I can take calls in some of the shallower subway stations. But service in a subway train? That's only possible on the elevated trains: parts of the 7, F, N, 1-9, 4-5-6, J-M-Z and B, and probably on the LIRR and Metro North above aground, at least until we get leaky cell antennas in all the tunnels.

      --

      Wordnik, a dictionary project which aims to collect

    8. Re:Goodie by Fnkmaster · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      LOL. I hope you are kidding. First of all, I like the blatant classism - cute. Secondly, no, I am from Manhattan - I own an apartment on 66th and Broadway. I also have a place in Boston, where I spend most of my time these days, since I graduated from Harvard here a few years ago. I spent my Thanksgiving at my uncle's house on Round Hill Road in Greenwich. So you see, I don't think I count as lower middle class. I have never even been to Norwalk - the only places in Connecticut I've spent any time at all are Westport and Greenwich, except for going to the Harvard-Yale game in New Haven.

    9. Re:Goodie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you were born with a silver spoon so far in your mouth it was poking out your ass, wern't you?

      Say mwuah! to Mummy & Daddy!

    10. Re:Goodie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations, you sure are better than the rest of us. There's no way we'll enjoy the finer things in life, because we can't possibly figure out how to get around you vast expanses of crap. It's really too bad too, we'll never be able to afford things like Microsoft® Windows because we're not good enough. Oh well, I guess that life was meant for you and your kind. Me, I'll just have to settle for actual happiness, c'est la vie.

      -James Sarrett
      dinosaur@aztec.asu.edu
      (I really wish I could remember my /. ID)

    11. Re:Goodie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in southern california and i have service from cingular wireless. i have service only when i am on the road. i have no signal when i'm at home or at work.. it's frustrating really. i cannot change service because no one else offer gsm in this area.

  4. Yet another... by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Yet another one of these fine toys in a comoditized market. Heard on the way in that Palm is hacking off (or will be soon) another 18% of their workforce. I'm not complaning, mind you, far from it, but it's increasingly fascinating to see such a pace of innovation and roll-out while the cell phone and hand held markets are flat or imploding.

    I guess it's something like treading water until the boom comes back and everyone needs one of these again.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Yet another... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, and until guvment and industries address consumer
      privacy issues, I'd encourage people to minimize
      their utilization of this type of bullsh*t

  5. other hybrids by nate1138 · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's sad to see something like this just coming out in the US. This and the VisorPhone, and the Kyocera palm phone are really the only PDA/Phone combos available here. I had the Kyocera, and it was terrible. This just pales in comparison to iMode, even without the buggy 3G enhancements they just rolled out. When will we get some decent wireless data service?? Japan has color, video, IM, web, games, and just plain awesome looking phones, and we get a cell/palm hybrid. yeah......

    --
    Where's my lobbyist? Right here.
    1. Re:other hybrids by WhyCause · · Score: 5, Insightful
      When will we get some decent wireless data service?? Japan has color, video, IM, web, games, and just plain awesome looking phones, and we get a cell/palm hybrid. yeah...

      One thing you fail to realize, I (and others in the US, thus, partially, the lack of the option) don't want super-integrated, ultra-bitchin', mega-color, web-surfin' on a screen that is 2" by 2". What I really want is an easy way to hook my computer (whether that be a handheld, laptop, whatever) into my cell phone so that I can dial into any service I want, not just the distilled pablum that the cell-phone companies try to shove down my throat because someone paid them an ass-load of cash. I've seen the 'wireless web', and it's just ugly. I didn't even use it during the free trial period. God knows I'm not going to pay for it.

      I don't want integrated everything because something always gets left out in the process. Whether it's ease of use, ability to expand, ability to use it on a plane ("sir, you'll have to turn off your phone," what then?), easy to find batteries, what have you.

      Damn, where did all that vitreol come from. That was a little more brutal than I intended. The message is, however, clear. I don't care about having ready access to movies and audio and internet on my cell phone because I have much better means of accessing it already available virtually everywhere.

    2. Re:other hybrids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      it's not from a lack of technology, it's a lack of interest. US residents is used to doing everything from their desktops, including surfing the web etc... Japanese and Europeans aren't used to this and that leads into...
      Why are cell phones much more popular in Europe/Japan? Because land-lines are much less popular because of the per-minute rates etc... they don't have that unlimited local calls

      which leads into the fancy-schmancy cell phones they have... they aren't used to using dial-up to reach the web... that's too expensive. so they *only* have internet access through their cell-phones...

      these are generalities, of course... there are exceptions

    3. Re:other hybrids by Haeleth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why are cell phones much more popular in Europe/Japan? Because land-lines are much less popular because of the per-minute rates etc... they don't have that unlimited local calls

      Why are cell phones less popular in America? I've heard rumours that Americans have to pay to receive calls. I hope it's not true, but if it is, it's something that needs fixing.

      which leads into the fancy-schmancy cell phones they have... they aren't used to using dial-up to reach the web... that's too expensive. so they *only* have internet access through their cell-phones...

      That may be true for Japan, but it certainly isn't for Europe. By and large we don't access the internet on our mobiles, and we do by dialup.

      I appreciate that you're talking mostly about Japan, of course. Just a European perspective. :)

    4. Re:other hybrids by nate1138 · · Score: 2

      Well, that's you. I for one would like a medium screen sized unit, (like the lengthwise clamshell that nokia showed off), in color, with all the connectivity I could possibly ask for. And as for carrying around two devices, why bother when one (good) integrated unit can do the job with fewer pieces of crap to tote around with me. On top of that, iMode phones mostly have a java runtime, J2ME, that will allow me to write my own network apps to access whatever the hell I want, given the time to code it. Did you miss the fact that these units are wildly popular in places that have the infrastructure to support them?? Our networks suck and our providers don't give a damn that it sucks. And they aren't going to do anything about it until (IF) 3G rolls out. And given the problems NTT DoCoMo (arguably the worlds most competent provider) has had with it, I suspect it'll be at least 2 or 3 years before it hits here. I'm just sick and tired of all the cool toys going overseas because we are stuck with an inferior system....

      --
      Where's my lobbyist? Right here.
    5. Re:other hybrids by kellin · · Score: 0

      Its mostly true. The only way you don't ever pay for incoming calls is if you get a call from a cell phone on the same company service you're on. The other way is that they offer free minutes during off peak hours, after 7 pm and on the weekends. This magic number is slowly going up, as companies vie for customers. Course, once you break that magic number, they bend you over, hard.

      What irks me, more than anything, is that I can't use my fucking Verizon phone on the east coast (I'm in California). I was in NYC in August and it was *completely* useless. I dont want to know how much more they'd charge me for nationwide service, I dont need it but twice a year.. ehh, this is off topic now anyway.

      --
      GWB to President of Brazil - "You have blacks, too?"
    6. Re:other hybrids by biostatman · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the Samsung I300? It is a color palm pilot that is much smaller than the kyocera model (saw a demo model in Circuit City). Go to samsung and check it out. Doesn't have the video & such, but you can browse, do email, even use the other palm functions while you talk as it has a speakerphone. Pretty cool if you ask me...

      --
      For the love of $DEITY, loose != not win!!!!!
    7. Re:other hybrids by Jahf · · Score: 2, Informative
      I've heard rumours that Americans have to pay to receive calls. I hope it's not true, but if it is, it's something that needs fixing.

      Generally speaking, in the states we start paying for outbound wireless calls as soon as we initiate the call. For incoming calls most services give you the first minute free (to decide whether you want to take the call) and then pay the same rate as outbound calls.

      In many cases, we even have to pay for the minutes used to check our voicemail (which I find much more offensive than having to pay for the incoming calls).

      However, unlike many portions of Europe, our landline systems are completely free for any inbound and outbound local area calls. This makes a difference in that we can call our ISP from a landline and stay connected for hundreds of hours each month and often incur no charge over the standard phone line cost (between $10US and $20US per month) and the ISP cost (between $0US and $25US per month). To my understanding, in Europe you often get ISP service essentially for free, but have to pay per minute outbound fees on your landline.

      Everything is a compromise and everyone gets their money in the end.

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    8. Re:other hybrids by imrdkl · · Score: 1
      It's really only about protocols. iMode has one, GSM has one, and PCI has one. They compete for attention, and acceptance. Theres only one eventual winner, of course, but noone is willing to give up.

      The best designs are not compatible into the US market, because it just takes too much extra weight, heat, and bulk to build phones which are world-usable. With the exception of a few GSM1800/1900 phones out there, I dont think many of the players are too interested. They are much too busy trying to fit G2.5 G3, CDMA and every other over-hyped protocol through the eye of the needle right now.

      I guess I'm just a voice/SMS guy, at heart.

    9. Re:other hybrids by jcostom · · Score: 2

      It's a GSM 900/1900 handset. So order one from the US and get it shipped to you. As long as you've got GSM 900 service (and you purchase a unit that's not simlocked), you'll be fine.

      --

      The unsig!
    10. Re:other hybrids by MtViewGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One thing you fail to realize, I (and others in the US, thus, partially, the lack of the option) don't want super-integrated, ultra-bitchin', mega-color, web-surfin' on a screen that is 2" by 2". What I really want is an easy way to hook my computer (whether that be a handheld, laptop, whatever) into my cell phone so that I can dial into any service I want, not just the distilled pablum that the cell-phone companies try to shove down my throat because someone paid them an ass-load of cash. I've seen the 'wireless web', and it's just ugly. I didn't even use it during the free trial period. God knows I'm not going to pay for it.

      That is exactly why the iMode concept isn't going to fly in the USA. Who wants a screen that is essentially a tiny cartoon-like color display that is not that useful? For American cellphone users, they'd rather wait for larger displays with full Palm OS functionality on their 3G phones so at least the cellphone have some real functionality for a change. The other thing Americans will probably want is the cdma2000 digital cellular format so high-speed data transfers over cellullar connections (read at least 256 kilobits per second bi-directional) becomes useful for laptop users.

    11. Re:other hybrids by Cutriss · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'll bite. What makes the Kyocera 6035 so terrible? My girlfriend and I were looking at getting one for Christmas. Personally, we think the Treo is butt-ugly, and the Kyocera looks much sleeker and easier to work with. The VisorPhone is practically right out, unless you use the headset exclusively. But please - Tell me what's wrong with the Kyocera.

      --
      "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
    12. Re:other hybrids by afidel · · Score: 1, Redundant

      the problem that everyone is missing is that one of the most frequent times I use my palm is.... when I'm on the phone. I use it to note meetings I've just made, to check when I have free time, to take down that number I just got off my voicemail etc. How do I do that when the screen is pressed to my cheek because I'm listening to the phone ??

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    13. Re:other hybrids by Moofie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Had you read the article, you'd know that a headset is included.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    14. Re:other hybrids by sessamoid · · Score: 2

      In yet another "RTFA" comment, the article also notes that it comes with a speakerphone as well, so you can use both the organizer functions and the phone functions at the same time.

      --
      "No, no, no. Don't tug on that. You never know what it might be attached to."
    15. Re:other hybrids by Sokie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've seen the 'wireless web', and it's just ugly. I didn't even use it during the free trial period. God knows I'm not going to pay for it.

      You *obviously* haven't discovered WAP porn (or WAPr0n as I like to call it). My roomate has a WAP phone and WAPr0n is the coolest thing I've seen someone do with a cell phone.

      --
      ------
      Where are the slash-groupies? I distinctly remember being promised slash-groupies!
    16. Re:other hybrids by singularity · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree. I would much rather be able to hook my laptop or PDA up to my cell phone and use that.

      My current phone is a Samsung SCH-3500 on Sprint's network. I bought it because I read it got good reception and did everything I wanted it to - voice dialing, and Caller-ID I can see without flipping the phone open. It is also small enough that I can keep it in my pocket during the day.

      There is going to be a struggle to figure out what size screen everyone wants. If it is such a useful product (phone, PDA, etc.) that I am going to keep it on my person every hour of the day, it had better be small enough that I can do so comfortably. At the same time, if it is going to do everything, I want to do those things (browse the web, check contact information, and take notes) in comfort. This generally means a large enough screen and a decent input device.

      These two things are always going to be at odds with each other. About the only soultion I can come up with is either a highly-foldable screen or some sort of projection device (the hologram-type imaging you see in SciFi movies).

      I have my Samsung phone and my Handspring Visor Neo. Until someone comes up with a device integrating those those with the form-factor of the phone (or even smaller) and with the screen size of the Visor, I will stick with the seperate parts.

      --
      - (c) 2018 Hank Zimmerman
    17. Re:other hybrids by dublin · · Score: 3, Informative

      I had the Kyocera, and it was terrible.

      You don't explain your complaint with it, but I've had one for a few months and it's quite simply the best and most functional piece of electronic gear I've ever owned. It's small, rugged, integrates phone and Palm functions quite well,is completely compatible with all the Palm software I use, some of which dates back to the original 1000 (only one program, ToDo+, needed a new version, free for registered users), and the batteries last darn near forever. If you took away all my electronics and computers one by one, the Kyocera 6035 would be the last thing left, and you'd have to fight me for it.

      By the way, there are other choices: Samsung has a new Palm phone out with a larger screen - the smaller screen is my only (minor) complaint about the Kyocera.

      I agree with others that say they don't want and won't pay for the ridiculous Japanese 3G foo-foo of movies and animated icons on a tiny screen. A faster data connection and a real web browser would be nice, but I can't think of much else I'd want. I'm not even considering the Linux-based handhelds for a while - It's nice to be able to get all kinds of things to run on them, but unfortunately, none of them are capable of doing the basics nearly so well as the Palm, so I'll stick with what works...

      --
      "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
    18. Re:other hybrids by dublin · · Score: 2

      Two good reasons for integrating these two (at least for me):

      1. I wound up carrying both my Palm Pro and Qualcomm ThinPhone everywhere anyway, and I got tired of carrying two boxes around.

      2. After living with the Kyocera 6035, I would never, ever want to go back to a phone that didn't have all my contact information in it. *All* my numbers are at hand and dialable with a tap or two. I never wish I'd programmed another number in the phone or have to change it in two places. Sometimes integration doesn't provide real value - but here it does. Phone + Palm = BIG WIN

      --
      "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
    19. Re:other hybrids by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      Spare me the BS.

      There is nothing wrong with combine 2 or more technologies if it's done properly. Infact. If nothing was ever integrated, technology would die (or slow down to a crawl).

      Don't bother mentioning web-clipping. It's available on PalmOS already, so whether it's bad or not should be left out of the argument.

      The fact is. They have combines 2 technologies. And done a good job of it. Hence, this new device has more capabilities that a seperate cellphone and PDA.

      I hope you never listen to music, browse the web, check e-mail, chat with friends, do word processing on the same computer. Because that would make you a hypocrite.

      Intergrating techologies is important. The problems only occur when it's not done properly.

    20. Re:other hybrids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WAP WAP WAP

      ahhahahahahaha

    21. Re:other hybrids by jeff67 · · Score: 1
      [
      I had the Kyocera, and it was terrible.
      Details! What was terrible about it?
    22. Re:other hybrids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you should stop molesting high school kids and get a real job some day, you fucking loser. Or, is refreshing Slashdot 832 times a day more important?

    23. Re:other hybrids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. I would much rather be able to hook my laptop or PDA up to my cell phone and use that.

      My current phone is a Samsung SCH-3500 on Sprint's network. I bought it because I read it got good reception and did everything I wanted it to - voice dialing, and Caller-ID I can see without flipping the phone open. It is also small enough that I can keep it in my pocket during the day.

      There is going to be a struggle to figure out what size screen everyone wants. If it is such a useful product (phone, PDA, etc.) that I am going to keep it on my person every hour of the day, it had better be small enough that I can do so comfortably. At the same time, if it is going to do everything, I want to do those things (browse the web, check contact information, and take notes) in comfort. This generally means a large enough screen and a decent input device.

      These two things are always going to be at odds with each other. About the only soultion I can come up with is either a highly-foldable screen or some sort of projection device (the hologram-type imaging you see in SciFi movies).

      I have my Samsung phone and my Handspring Visor Neo. Until someone comes up with a device integrating those those with the form-factor of the phone (or even smaller) and with the screen size of the Visor, I will stick with the seperate parts.

  6. Price by The+Gardener · · Score: 1

    The Treo is a world phone. It works on the GSM standard and is equipped for use in both the U.S. and Europe. In the U.S., it will work with carriers like VoiceStream and Cingular.

    Yeah, GSM. So I spend $400-$600 on a cell phone/organizer, plus steep monthly fees for cell phone/internet access. And to top it off, I'm locked into GSM, which here in the USA isn't exactly the leading protocol.

    The Gardener

    --
    --
    1. Re:Price by jyellis · · Score: 2, Informative

      The GSM model is coming out first. However, according to Palm Developers Program, the CDMA model is soon to follow. That will allow the phone to work with services such as Sprint PCS. So keep your pants on. Personally, its the best combo Palm/phone I've seen and I'm willing to switch to Cingular to free up a pocket.

      You say you have to pay steep monthly fees for cell phone/internet access. However, you pay only about $10/month more than normal cell phone service as opposed to paying Palm.net or something of the sort $20 or $30 a month for internet access for your Palm on top of your cell phone service. If $10/month is too steep for you, the Treo will still be a great combination of a Palm w/o internet and a cell phone.

  7. Point of View by thinmac · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My boss and I were looking at these this morning on handspring's site, and we came to the conclusion that they either look really good or really bad, depending on your point of view.

    For PDA users, this is great because it's smaller than you're PDA and it's also a phone, so you don't have to carry another device.

    Most phone users, though, don't have a PDA, so they won't get to carry fewer devices, and the form factor really sucks in comparison to the newer phones on the market. Plus, if a PDA was something they wanted to have, they'd have gotten one in addition to a phone already. Why carry something as bulky as my phone a year ago just to have a set of features I don't really want or need?

    For me, this looks pretty cool. For most of the people I work with, it's just bulky and expensive.

    1. Re:Point of View by Jahf · · Score: 1
      This post deserved a "3: Insightful"?

      So they won't buy the phone. I have never felt Handspring was marketing to the masses with any of their products. Maybe to the majority of Palm users, but no one I know would consider that to be "the masses".

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
  8. Dumb dumb dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    When will it be understood that this kind of phone is never going to be useful?

    Too big to be a good phone. Too small to be a decent PDA.

    It's a large clunky prototype of what is to come. I assure you the future isn't in handsets.

  9. Oppenheimer's Ghost by Exmet+Paff+Daxx · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Scientists are so fascinated with the possibility that they can that they never stop to think if they should.

    Traffic Deaths due to Cell Phone Drivers continue to rise, as the total dead begins to approach the figure posted by Mohammed Atta. And still we have hands-free device laws in exactly zero states.

    Enter Handspring with a slick, convenient cellphone integrated with a PDA. A live wire for streaming Internet content, beamed directly to the driver's seat of the person pushing a Chevy Suburban down the freeway ahead of you in rush hour traffic. A cell phone which requires two hands to operate in PDA mode is now in the hands of the millions of American drivers who refuse to stop pinning a cell phone to their ear while driving.

    Please understand that I'm not attempting to bash the technology. I only wish that companies like Handspring would consider the impact of their actions before unleashing something like this on innocent commuters. Anyone with a rush hour commute knows that people irresponsible enough to weave through traffic talking on a cell phone exist and are numerous. And they will buy this phone, take both hands off the wheel, and practice "Graffiti" at 60 miles per hour.

    Does anyone know how hard it would be to make a cell phone deactivate itself if it starts moving faster than 40 miles per hour? Could you perhaps triangulate the three nearest PCS towers?

    --
    If guns kill people, then CmdrTaco's keyboard misspells words.
    1. Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 2

      And still we have hands-free device laws in exactly zero states.

      Not true.

    2. Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost by M_Talon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I only wish that companies like Handspring would consider the impact of their actions before unleashing something like this on innocent commuters.

      I do agree that driving while distracted is a bad thing. I curse at more cellphone yakking drivers a day than anything else. But to say that the manufacturers of the device are to blame? I can't abide by that logic. The devices aren't to blame, it's the stupidity of the user. I tried talking on a cell phone and driving ONCE...and I realized how my driving suffered, so I never did it again. It seems some people are unable to make that logical jump, or they're unwilling to sacrifice that "convenience" to possibly save their life or someone else's.

      Aside from that part of the argument, I don't see how a Treo makes the situation worse. Cell phones already exist, as do PDAs. Any of the above behavior is already out there, and I don't think the Treo's audience is Joe Blow. Most average folk won't pony up $400 for a phone when (insert phone company name here) is giving them away with service. Two handed dialing? Maybe that'll make em realize how stupid phone use and driving put together are when they can't dial without releasing the wheel.

      --
      Electronic Frontier Foundation for online civil rights information
    3. Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost by RevAaron · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No state may have such laws, but many cities do.

      And while I hate the idiots that are talking on the phone while they're driving, you also have to face the facts. Wish I could find a reference, but on the news around a year ago, I saw some statistics about the apparent causes of accidents. Number one cause was food, at 21%, I believe. Futzing with the radio was at 11%, methinks. Should there be laws against eating while driving, or having a stereo which has no on-wheel controls?

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    4. Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      I tried talking on a cell phone and driving ONCE...and I realized how my driving suffered, so I never did it again. It seems some people are unable to make that logical jump, or they're unwilling to sacrifice that "convenience" to possibly save their life or someone else's.

      Or maybe they're just not your identical twin, and therefore handle it differently than you do. I'm sick of the attitude that just because you can't do something responsibly, no one else can, and therefore it has to be all or none for everyone. And it has to be legislated that way.

      There's no doubt some people are unable to drive and talk on the phone at the same time, yet do it anyway. These same people are the ones who would find something else just as stupid to do, given the chance. Treat the consequences of their actions... if they get in a wreck because they aren't driving responsibly (phone or otherwise), arrest them for battery or something worse. Make the core of what's wrong with their behaviour something that they want to avoid, not specific manifestations of it. Radios, makeup, TVs, magazines, lunch, etc. can all be every bit as distracting and irresponsible (but don't have to be, either).

      Some of us are quite capable of focusing our attention correctly, however, even while talking. Hell, I'm honestly a better driver when I'm on the phone, because I'm very conscious of the fact it could distract me and take pains to make sure it doesn't. And anytime the driving gets at all hairy, the phone goes on the passenger seat, no matter who is on the other end.

    5. Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So did you actually read the article you linked to? It gives a few good reasons why cell phone usage in cars should not be banned.

    6. Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost by scratch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Please give some sources for the numbers quoted above.

      Until then, I think a recent study at the University of Utah is getting to the heart of the matter. In short, they found that it's the interactive nature of conversation that's the real distraction. Tuning the radio, eating fries, etc, are just fundamentally different than
      talking to people.

      That said, the new Treo looks damn cool.

    7. Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost by AtaruMoroboshi · · Score: 1

      > Does anyone know how hard it would be to make a
      > cell phone deactivate itself if it starts
      > moving faster than 40 miles per hour? Could you
      > perhaps triangulate the three nearest PCS
      > towers?

      Yeah, and when I'm on a train or am the PASSENGER in a car, what good is that?

      Then again, on the train, i wish people would shut the **** up!

    8. Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost by thesolo · · Score: 2

      Should there be laws against eating while driving, or having a stereo which has no on-wheel controls?

      Actually, several cities are trying to do just that. Also, there are currently several unofficial restrictions to eating while driving. For example, try driving past a police officer while drinking from a container without using a straw. Believe it or not, in many places, you'll be ticketed. Food for thought; keep it in mind the next time you bring a coffee travel mug in the car while driving.

      I can't find any good references right now, but I know for a fact that in my town and the areas around it, you will get fined if you are drinking from something like a covered mug or soda can while driving. They group it along with driver obstruction laws, such as having a radar detector attached via suction cups to your windshield, which is also illegal here.

    9. Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost by tshak · · Score: 2

      I tried talking on a cell phone and driving ONCE...and I realized how my driving suffered,...

      I drive and talk all the time. However, I have both hands on the wheel (headset) and most all of my dialing is voice activated. This is no different then talking to someone in your front seat (which may be a distraction too!).

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    10. Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost by thesolo · · Score: 2

      I'm sick of the attitude that just because you can't do something responsibly, no one else can, and therefore it has to be all or none for everyone. And it has to be legislated that way.

      Unfortunately, until people in general are more intelligent about their limits and their actions, that is the way its going to be. Why should I be at risk in my car because the guy next to me won't admit to himself that he isn't a good driver while he is on his cell phone?

      Also, it should be noted that just because you think you are a capable, responsible driver even when talking on a cell phone, chances are you aren't. Every distraction in the car, whether it be your hot cup of coffee, your cell phone, the amazing guitar solo that you have to play air guitar to with one hand, is just that: a distraction. Each one decreases your reaction time. Sure, if you are a person with good reflexes, that time negligible, but eventually it won't be. And at that point, you'll most likely be one of the people who isn't admitting their limits. And then the cycle repeats.

      As much as I dislike the government dictating how we live our lives, things that become deadly weapons in the hands of irresponsible people most likely do need legislation.

    11. Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost by RevAaron · · Score: 2

      Fundamentally different, but still causing a lot of accidents. Talking to other people in the car was on that list as well, however, it was smaller than playing with the radio and eating. Wish I could find the citation- I believe cell phones were at a low 2-4%.

      I'm not impressed by the Treo myself. Nothing against it per se, but I am not big on cell phones, or Palm devices really. As soon as I can get a card for my Newton or iPAQ that allows me to get real wireless net access for a low cost per month, I'll be impressed. Doesn't even have to be fast- I'll take 2KB/s. But as long as these services are expensive as they are, I just don't find reason to get excited.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    12. Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, New York State has hands-free laws. On the books as of November 1.

    13. Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost by Miguelito · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, puh-lease.

      The accidents that can be shown to have been caused by cellphone usage are still a tiny fraction of accidents. Most studies I've read say it's something like 2%, which is far below a lot of other distractions. If you're going to outlaw cellphone usage, how about:
      - Talking to others in the car. (I see people so into a conversation they're all over the road).
      - Eating/Drinking.
      - Fiddling with the stereo.
      - Putting on makeup
      - Shaving.
      - Driving while tired.
      etc...

      Hell, you can buy a car with a fucking TV in it these days! How screwed up is that? And don't tell me it's just for the kiddies in the back seat, I've seen plenty of models where the TV is far enough forward that it could easily be a distraction to the driver.

      How about people start taking some responsibility for their actions for a change? If you can't handle a phone and drive at the same time, then don't do it. I know that I can, as long as it's a short conversation that doesn't require much thought (i.e. I'm going to the store, need anything?).

      Cell phone usage in cars when related to accidents is getting a horrible rap for 2 reasons:

      1. Yes, some buffoons can't handle the phone and drive... then again, there's a pretty damn high percentage of people on the road that can't drive worth a damn even without distractions. I'd rather get those people off the road before outlawing cellphones.

      2. The cell phone users are the easiest to see in comparison to most other distractions. It's really easy to see them holding a phone up to their ear for minutes at a time.

      --
      - My favorite error message: xscreensaver, running on an old Sparc 5 w/ 8bit color: bsod: Couldn't allocate color Blue
    14. Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm sick of the attitude that just because you can't do something responsibly, no one else can, and therefore it has to be all or none for everyone. And it has to be legislated that way.

      Unfortunately, until people in general are more intelligent about their limits and their actions, that is the way its going to be.

      If people in general aren't intelligent enough about their limits and actions to do the right thing, why do you think that a government popularly elected by those same people is going to get it right?

      Also, it should be noted that just because you think you are a capable, responsible driver even when talking on a cell phone, chances are you aren't.

      Yes, that's a nice, safe answer, isn't it? It doesn't even require any pesky facts or knowledge of me or my driving behaviour.

      The real fact is that on some of my longer drives to and from jobs early in the morning or late at night, being able to call people on the phone is one of the only things that keeps me alert and away from dosing at the wheel. When I am awake, my reaction time is much better than when I am falling asleep. Why do you think truckers value their CBs so much? And no, doping myself up with caffeine is not an option, for health reasons. Even if it was, taking any kind of stimulants is going to have an adverse reaction on my rational response time anyway.

      It's just never as simple as some people want to make it. Stop telling complete strangers what their lives and capabilities are like based on your observation of a few road rage soccer moms in their SUVs.

    15. Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Tuning the radio, eating fries, etc, are just
      > fundamentally different than talking to people.

      And they too cause fatal accidents.

    16. Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost by CoyoteGuy · · Score: 1

      What we really need to do is have a bright red light on the back of all new cars that would warn others around them that they are talking on a cell phone. I would steer clear of anyone with the light on.

      --
      Slashdot.. Land of nerds, trolls, and FlameBait..
    17. Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      Actually, New York has become the first to implement a statewide ban

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    18. Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost by sessamoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm going to have to disagree that it's the same as having a conversation with somebody next to you in the car.

      Phone conversations are traditionally continuous and uninterrupted. We've all been trained to use them that way, and the people on the other side of the conversation expect it as well. Phone conversations take up higher priorities (re-nice'd if you will) in our brain than conversations with other passengers.

      Other passengers are far more likely to accept and expect breaks in the conversation due to traffic and driving issues. They often will break the conversation themselves to warn of impending dangers. You don't feel bad about not answering for a while if something needs attention while talking to a passenger, as usually they know what caused the delay.

      Phone conversations are inherently more dangerous because we're expected to and pretty much always do devote more of our attention to them.

      --
      "No, no, no. Don't tug on that. You never know what it might be attached to."
    19. Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost by greydmiyu · · Score: 1

      I learned about it from the LP story here:
      http://www.lp.org/press/archive.php?function=vie w& record=213

      Which references this report:
      http://www.aaafts.org/pdf/distraction.pdf

      Stats are on page 4.

      --
      -- Grey d'Miyu, not just another pretty color.
    20. Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost by Malc · · Score: 2

      "Should there be laws against eating while driving, or having a stereo which has no on-wheel controls? "

      In some places, it is illegal: http://news.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/n ews/2000/10/07/nbot07.xml. Oh, and if you hadn't guessed, you're only allowed to use a hands-free phone when you're driving in Britain too.

      As somebody who used to cycle to work, I can tell you who were the most dangerous drivers (i.e. the ones who scared the shit out of me the most and came closest to hitting me): really old people, and people on cell phones. Really old people are another story though: they're second only to 16 year olds in the US for causing fatal crashes.

    21. Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost by avm · · Score: 1

      In NY, using a cellphone in a car without a handsfree kit is illegal, or at least that's what they say on those signs above the highways in the NY Metro area and points east. Of course, this is pretty much unenforceable since there are so many loons doing it (including NY State police!).

      I do share the concern from a commuter's point of view, however. My motorcycle is my primary mode of transportation, and I've had my share of close calls from cell-phoning oblivious idiots. There's nothing like a 2-ton cage bunting you onto the shoulder to ruin that nice-day-life-is-great feeling on a sunny morning.

    22. Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost by tshak · · Score: 2

      I guess it just depends on the person. It's the complete opposite for me. I'm a person who always gives eye contact. When I'm sitting next to someone, I have to really discipline myself so that I don't turn my head while I'm speaking with them. When I'm on the phone, I don't have the distraction of a physical person, and I'm keeping my eyes on the road.

      It's all about mental priorities. Regardless of who you're talking to, or by what medium, you must learn how to focus on driving. Before the days of headsets, I actually found myself dropping the phone while driving because I needed to focus and use both hands (for a left turn, or something). It's not the end of the world if you have to call the person back or have them wait while you cross a busy intersection - it's just too bad most cell phone [ab]users don't realise this.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    23. Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost by scratch · · Score: 1

      The numbers in the story on the libertarians page, here, are from all accidents by reason or contributing factors. Is anyone surprised that more accidents involved fiddling with the stereo than talking on a phone? If more people change radio stations than use cell phones while driving, which I'm betting is true, then this pretty much goes to follow.

      The real question, and let's just narrow it down to these two groups radio users vs. cell phone users, which group had a higher accident rate (e.g. number of accidents / number of users)? Research tends to indicate that cell phone users are *more likely* to be involved in accidents than Big Mac eaters, cd changers, etc.

      And really, this isn't an issue that I'm all that worked up over. I'm just taking issue with what are obviously the wrong numbers being bandied about as if they're meaningful.

    24. Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

      I'd personally be pissed if they passed laws against eating and driving. I fucking work 60-80 hours a week, 16 hours a day, between two jobs. The only time I get to eat is on the drive between jobs and that usually consists of stopping at Wendy's and scarfing it down at red lights and straightaways. However, I'm also eating "one-handed" foods, I could see some argument against eating, say, a big bowl of chili or the like. From personal experience, I drive a lot while Drowsy (see 16 hour work days), which is even more dangerous than drinking. When I catch myself falling asleep at the wheel, I start looking for a parking lot to pull into, and then usually have to worry about the fucking rent-a-cops coming to harass me out. Bastards. It's not like anyone is shopping at 5AM and I usually need about 30 minutes before I'm fine enough to drive again. but that's another story.

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    25. Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost by qasama · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Sorry to say this but the idiot in front of you on his cell phone will just find something else to do if you remove it from his use. It's not the cell phone that's the problem, it's his complete lack of moral development.

      He doesn't understand that there is anyone else out there besides him. Laws about hands free don't solve the crux issue which is his lack of morals. He's not thought about and understood consequences of his decisions...or he doesn't care.

      I'm going to not talk on my phone because when I become distracted I might kill someone through my reduced reaction time

      So while you might solve the preceived issue through legislation... you will not solve the issue which is that people don't think about the consequences of their actions when they are behind the wheel.

      For Instance take these examples...

      the guy who went flying around the curve on I-95 below Hanscom Field in the inside lane at 85 on my way to work this morning seems to have a similar problem...

      Or the Saab who did the four lane sweep out of US3 onto 128...

      Or the lady with her kids bouncing around in the back of her minivan on rte 62 yesterday afternoon...

      Or the guy I watched eating a burger as we were both going through the Hooksett tolls on Saturday...

      or mayhaps the State Trooper on the Pike last thursday who while seeming in no legal rush was flying West from Allston-Brighton at 80+ MPH suspicously close to shift change...

      Or mayhaps the owner of the El-Camino with Maine tags I parked next to at Dunkin' Donuts this morning that had bald tires...

      Or mayhaps the low riding, detailed out Ford Contour with the stereo pumping out the latest hip-hop jam I had the joy of sitting next to at a light in Woburn a week past on a warm day...

      Laws about hands free don't solve the issue that these drivers got their licenses out of cracker jack boxes and obviously didn't learn the potential impact of their actions.

      Personally I didn't really realize myself until years after I got my license. I mean I knew it intellectually... and I follow the law... but it did not sink in on that gutt level.

      For me the transition from an intellectual knowledge to that gutt knowledge happened when I watched from a house in Castine Maine the Hancock County Mounties scrape a young kid off a guard-rail on Maine Route 166 when he tried to take his bike around a steep curve at 110 while inebriated. People just don't realize till it affects them. I really think we should make it a requirement for kids getting their license to help clean up one traffic accident.

      So while cell phones usage while driving may be a great campaign issue for politicians in seach of re-election (calling Swifty). It side steps the real issue which is that many drivers on the road today (and not just those in New England) don't really have a sense of what the impact of some of their preceived minor actions might be, the loss of their lives or even more sadly some innocent bystanders

    26. Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That really depends on the individual. I've ridden with drivers and passengers who don't know how to drive while having a regular conversation. And anyone I call while driving knows I'm on the road, and knows if I stop talking they just have to wait. If the road needs my full attention I often just toss the phone in the passenger seat and leave it there til I can get back to it.

    27. Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost by brownja · · Score: 1

      Since it's too much for most people to THINK before they post, i know it'll be impossible to get people to research before they post. NY has a hands free cellular law.

      Slashdot, where strong opinion trumps logic and reason.

    28. Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone know how hard it would be to make a cell phone deactivate itself if it starts moving faster than 40 miles per hour?

      Hmmm ... how about we refine that search for cell phones moving greater than 40mph and located in the driver's seat. For myself, I'm quite happy to see passengers using cell phones.

    29. Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost by stripes · · Score: 2
      Does anyone know how hard it would be to make a cell phone deactivate itself if it starts moving faster than 40 miles per hour? Could you perhaps triangulate the three nearest PCS towers?

      I doubt it would be that hard since if you are going 40MPH you are probably changing cells pretty quickly and you can base it on that. However it is a bad idea. Why are you preventing the passengers from using the phone? Or the guy that got kidnapped and stuck in a trunk?

  10. hot new handheld by corbettw · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So much for Taco Bell's foray into the tech sector, someone else can now boast of having the hot new handheld.

    Cory

    --
    God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  11. phone/PDA integration by Myko · · Score: 1, Insightful

    No metion of how well the PDA and native phone functions integrate. The Kyocera Palm OS phone is BAD at this, as you can't dial numbers out of synced contacts.

    Anyone know how this unit handles this?

    1. Re:phone/PDA integration by crankbear · · Score: 2, Informative
      The Kyocera Palm OS phone is BAD at this, as you can't dial numbers out of synced contacts.

      Yes you can. I have one. You can do it either from the address book or from the jog rocker thingy on the side. It's how I call people.

      This thing likely works in a very similar fashion (I notice they also have the jog thingy on the side). Unfortunately, as so many people have already pointed out, CDMA is the ruling technology in the states, even if they're not yet close to 3G.

      I did hear an odd rumor about AT&T wireless perhaps moving from TDMA to GSM, but that's probably not reliable.

      The real problem with the kyocera is that it's basically an okay phone attached to an okay PDA. It does neither particularly well, and does integration slightly worse.

      That said, I wouldn't give mine up. Half the people I know only call me, and the other half only email me. And most of that time, I'm not at home or work.

    2. Re:phone/PDA integration by ScooterComputer · · Score: 1
      I did hear an odd rumor about AT&T wireless perhaps moving from TDMA to GSM, but that's probably not reliable.

      Not rumor, it's happening. AT&T Wireless has already begun deploying GSM equipment. At first is going to be a premium service for those who want "international" phones/numbers. Then it will be rolled out nationwide. They found that the cost to 3G (or 2.5 for that matter) TDMA was cost-prohibitive, and that going the GSM route would provide a less expensive upgrade path. You'd think some moron at AT&T WS would have dreamt that up a couple of years ago, but I guess they were too busy burning through our money.

      --
      Scott
      "Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid."
    3. Re:phone/PDA integration by smammon · · Score: 1

      WRONG! I have a Kycera and love it - and YES YOU CAN dial from the contacts - it requires a very tricky and technical tap on the phone number.

      I wanna see you get a page, talk to the user, re-start an AIX printer. Then check the start time for the movie you're going to see and have your wife straigten out your schedule with your phone buster.

      This device freed me of carying a pager, cell, pda and sometimes laptop. I'll never go back!

      --
      "Smile, listen, agree, and then do whatever the fuck you wanted to do anyway." ~Robert Downey Jr.
    4. Re:phone/PDA integration by Miguelito · · Score: 1

      They found that the cost to 3G (or 2.5 for that matter) TDMA was cost-prohibitive, and that going the GSM route would provide a less expensive upgrade path.

      It's probably more like the cost to make TDMA into a 3G product was horrid, and AT&T would rather burn in hell before switching to CDMA. But that's just my opinion. :P

      --
      - My favorite error message: xscreensaver, running on an old Sparc 5 w/ 8bit color: bsod: Couldn't allocate color Blue
    5. Re:phone/PDA integration by DevNull+Ogre · · Score: 1

      The reviewer does mention the integration. He even talks about the handy search feature.

    6. Re:phone/PDA integration by pauljlucas · · Score: 1
      The Kyocera Palm OS phone is BAD at this, as you can't dial numbers out of synced contacts.

      If by "synced contacts" you mean the Address Book app, then you are wrong: you certainly can dial directly from it just by tapping on the phone number.

      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
  12. What's a PDA? by badvilbel · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I think I've heard of those...

  13. Idiot (RANT) by crumbz · · Score: 0, Troll

    WARNING: This is a rant.

    Walter Mossberg is an idiot. Meaning I don't think I have ever agreed with one of his gadget reviews with the exeption of the original Handspring Visor. Why would you use this retardo phone. I wouldn't be caught dead with it. Check out the 3G phones from DoCoMo for great portable devices in this category. (although they have software bugs, the hardware is tremendous.)

    Dumb guy, dumber phone.

    Unless you think that big is the new small....

    1. Re:Idiot (RANT) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i thought this was funny.

    2. Re:Idiot (RANT) by brogdon · · Score: 2

      Jerkin!

      --


      This tagline is umop apisdn.
  14. But does it do Linux? by DaoudaW · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'll ask the question everyone is thinking. Has it been hacked. How does it do Linux?

    1. Re:But does it do Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why in the world would you want a cell phone to do Linux? Linux is great a server. It's not so good as an everyday desktop. And put on anything handheld, it's absolutely pointless. I don't want to have to log in to my cell phone.

    2. Re:But does it do Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because after this many years, I think in terms of Unix tools and utitities. When I want to do something like organize my todo list, my fingers instinctively try to do it the Unix way. I want to be efficient and just use what I know, not something else. It's like when I'm in Word after a hacking session in vi and keep trying to hit esc and navigate the vi way instead of the stupid mouse clicky way.

      And also because Linux is nice and open source and hackable and if I don't like how something works I can change it. This can be even more useful on a PDA than it would be elsewhere.

      And also because my workstations run Linux and I want easy interoperability, using the standard tools I use for interoperability between those workstations. I don't want something that makes me run Outlook Express.

    3. Re:But does it do Linux? by laserjet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Uhh... first of all it's not out yet, so it probably hasn't been hacked, second, I (and I think most people) don't care what OS my phone/pda uses as long as it is easy to use and intuitive.

      An operating system is just a platform. Who care's about the platform on something that only has a few functions? personally I would rather have it run Palm OS rather than linux because I know Palm has a very nice and stable OS, and there are tons of programs for the Palm. Why you would put linux on something like this is beyond me.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    4. Re:But does it do Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Because after this many years, I think in terms of Unix tools and utitities. When I want to do something like organize my todo list, my fingers instinctively try to do it the Unix way. I want to be efficient and just use what I know, not something else. It's like when I'm in Word after a hacking session in vi and keep trying to hit esc and navigate the vi way instead of the stupid mouse clicky way.

      And also because Linux is nice and open source and hackable and if I don't like how something works I can change it. This can be even more useful on a PDA than it would be elsewhere.

      And also because my workstations run Linux and I want easy interoperability, using the standard tools I use for interoperability between those workstations. I don't want something that makes me run Outlook Express.

    5. Re:But does it do Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no idea why this reply is appearing for both of these comments, I only replied to the first one.

      Slashdot requires you to wait 20 seconds between hitting 'reply' and submitting a comment.

      It's been 17 seconds since you hit 'reply'!

      If you this error seems to be incorrect, please provide the following in your report to SourceForge.net:

      * Browser type
      * User ID/Nickname or AC
      * What steps caused this error
      * Whether or not you know your ISP to be using a proxy or some sort of service that gives you an IP that others are using simultaneously.
      * How many posts to this form you successfully submitted during the day

      * Please choose 'formkeys' for the category!
      Thank you.

    6. Re:But does it do Linux? by slugfro · · Score: 1

      Uhhhh.....I'm not good at math or english but that looked like two questions to me.

      --

      -- Find the Truth...
    7. Re:But does it do Linux? by metis · · Score: 5, Funny
      I really don't get it. I spent the last year getting my oven and fridge run linux. Finally, this thansgiving dinner, I astounded everyone when I typed

      tar -xzf /fridge/turkey.tgz /
      && echo 380 > /proc/oven/preheat /
      && cat turkey > /dev/oven

      e Voila! dinner is done without me entering the kitchen.

      And you're telling me you don't care!?

      --
      -- look, cheese ahoy!
    8. Re:But does it do Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just clicked the Turkey in My Fridge and dragged it into My Oven. I got a popup in the status bar when it was done.

    9. Re:But does it do Linux? by bcilfone · · Score: 1

      cat turkey? I think I'll just stick with cranberry sauce!

    10. Re:But does it do Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duhhhh, we'll probably have to wait for it to be released before anybody can grab one to hack.

    11. Re:But does it do Linux? by sangretoro · · Score: 1
      Because it's Free (as in speech), powerful, and extendible. Your opinions of Linux asside, many people do care about putting linux on device, especially if they can interface with there computers.

      Imagine hooking up you PDA to your home/office computer network as just another system,. Imagine not only running the same commands, but the same programs you run everyday on your home/office computer on your PDA! And then imagine customizing your PDA to do whatever you want. You know that little pet peeve you have with the way the software works? The way this or that iss designed? Well, you can get rid of it!

  15. design by Doppler00 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I think the design is very well done expect for perhaps the keypad. I don't understand why they continue to arrange alphanumeric characters in a QWERTY arrangement on such a small keyboard, when a different layout would make much more sense. The auto word complete feature mentioned though is a good idea (Windows CE had this). Also, the resolution of the LCDs used in these things are very low and it makes text readablity difficult. That is one reason I prefer the windows devices (240x320 resolution) over the palm models. Finally, I believe that the ability to be able to access a document or search for information from anywhere is very important. If I have a question, I want to be able to go to Google and find the answer within 30 seconds. Will this be possible with the bandwidth and limited screen space that this device has?

    1. Re:design by daviddennis · · Score: 2

      Have you seen the screen of the Sony colour CLIE models? It runs at double the resolution of the regular Palm, and it shows - the screen is just stunning.

      I saw it in Fry's and fell deeply in lust with it; pity I'm so good at losing tiny but horrendously expensive electronic devices ...

      D

    2. Re:design by foo+fighter · · Score: 1

      >I don't understand why they continue to arrange
      >alphanumeric characters in a QWERTY arrangement
      >on such a small keyboard, when a different layout
      >would make much more sense.

      It makes sense to me. I'm a touch typist, and I absolutely refuse to use any keyboard that is not QWERTY, even if, no, especially if it's on a small device like this.

      Having to search for the letters is a pain in the butt, especially when the labels are so tiny. I know where the letter 'o' is supposed to be, so I shouldn't have to hunt it down on a non-standard keyboard.

      --
      obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
    3. Re:design by abhinavnath · · Score: 1

      > Finally, I believe that the ability to be able
      > to access a document or search for information
      > from anywhere is very important. If I have a
      > question, I want to be able to go to Google and
      > find the answer within 30 seconds. Will this be
      > possible with the bandwidth and limited screen
      > space that this device has?

      I believe the Treo comes with Handspring's Blazer web browser. I've used Blazer on Palm emulators, and it does a good job of rendering simple pages like google on small screens. (I think google also has a PDA optimized page at www.google.com/palm)

      --
      My other sig is also a .Porsche
    4. Re:design by shadowj · · Score: 1
      I've used Blazer on Palm emulators, and it does a good job of rendering simple pages like google on small screens. (I think google also has a PDA optimized page at www.google.com/palm)

      I use Blazer on my Visorphone. Yes, Blazer does a great job rendering web sites on that little screen, but you don't need that capability for Google searches. The default home page, optimized for a Palm-sized screen, includes a Google search field!
      --

      --Larry

      Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence

  16. jet packs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It's the 21st century. Where, I ask, is my Jet Pack?

  17. $399 by Maskirovka · · Score: 0, Redundant

    New slashdot Poll
    Just got a $400 rebate from purchase of 300 hours of unlimted action with my Microsoft RealDoll. I think I'll spend it on

    1) ipod

    2) Treo

    3) 3com 4 port wall plate

    4) Xbox w/ hacking tools

    5) A night with John Romero

    1. Re:$399 by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      This wasn't funny as a comment on the 3Com story, and it's not funny here.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    2. Re:$399 by crumbz · · Score: 1

      Glock 21 .45ACP

      at least that's on my list....

      or

      PS2
      Grand Theft Auto 3
      Metal Gear Solid 2

      Yeah baby.

    3. Re:$399 by laserjet · · Score: 2

      Polls don't belong in comments. They belong in the... poll section. You're not funny. It wasn't funny the first time in the 3com article.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    4. Re:$399 by Maskirovka · · Score: 1

      My comedy teacher told me that one in every ten jokes are funny...so I still have eight tries left!

      Maskirovka

      I like jokes.
      -Woz

    5. Re:$399 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Glock 21 .45ACP


      You have low self-esteem problems, don't you?

    6. Re:$399 by crumbz · · Score: 1

      Meow.

  18. ALMOST there by MikeyNg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Note to Handspring (and whomever else):

    Add voice recognition capability!


    How many people have phones now that you can add voice tags to people's numbers? This should actually be rather easy to implement in the Treo, I'd imagine. (I didn't see it explicitly stated in the review.) Imagine just saying someone's name, and their business card comes up and it asks you if you want to dial their number. Sounds like a winning deal to me.


    Other than that, add some Bluetooth or 802.11b capability in there. Then I can use this as an uplink for my laptop. Or I can beam business cards with RF instead of IR. Or imagine being able to zap someone your business card through SMS. That's another cool feature.


    These devices are ALMOST there. We're almost to convergence, and I think I'll wait a generation or two and take another serious look at it.

    --
    Where the wind blows, the tumbleweed goes.
    1. Re:ALMOST there by foo+fighter · · Score: 1

      I think voice recognition is as useful with this device as it would be on a typical cellphone. By either jog-scrolling a couple lines, or even better, by typing the first couple characters on the device you have the name right there.

      I haven't used the cellphone feature before, but I'd be worried about calling my boss when some guy walking by me on the street happens to say "Dave". It's the same problem you run into using voice recognition in a busy office.

      --
      obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
    2. Re:ALMOST there by Karrade · · Score: 2, Informative

      >Or imagine being able to zap someone your business card through SMS. That's another cool feature.

      FYI Nokia phones already support this capability.

    3. Re:ALMOST there by stu_coates · · Score: 1

      voice tags to people's numbers

      A number of Motorola phones have this already and it works quite well (in my experience).

      My service provider (Orange) also has a service called WildFire which works on voice recognition... it allows you to dial numbers in your phone book or other numbers by just saying the number... it's great when you're driving with a handsfree kit attached (not that I would know as this is frowned upon by the local law!). WildFire also manages voice mails by voice commands too... you do feel quite silly initially, talking to the service, but after a while you get used to it.

    4. Re:ALMOST there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read the info at handspring's site, it says it'll move at 9600 but the OS will be patched when GPRS becomes available. This would push it up to 28.8k . My question is: Is it integrated to the point where I could write a firewall/ad filter for it? Also playing mp3's to the handsfree earphone would be nice on the subway.
      Since I have the Motorola GSM with the voice recognition and a IIIxe I'll probably wait a generation or two also. 802.11b would be make this a vicious hack toy. Also if the IR port is the same as the Visors, it can also be used as your remote control (can you say fun at the sports bar?).

    5. Re:ALMOST there by dublin · · Score: 2

      The Kyocera Smart Phone (6035) does this now, and it works quite well. Right down to asking you if you'd like to call so-and-so if it's not entirely sure what you said.) Although I don't know for sure, the new Samsung Palm phone probably has voice dialing as well, as most of thier regular phones have had it for some time...

      --
      "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
  19. Handspring limits by castellan · · Score: 2, Informative

    Treo: Great toy features
    - hardware keyboard (Treo 180) OR grafitti (Treo 180g) but no sense of which is cheaper.
    - 8 hour battery life: This seems short for either a cell phone OR a pda.
    - only GSM network -- great everywhere but US, where it can be called "OK" at best.

    It's not really there yet: only 16MB of RAM, not upgradeable, and no plans for a springboard module for EITHER additional RAM OR an MP3 player. Too bad: That would be useful integration!

    1. Re:Handspring limits by Lish · · Score: 2, Informative

      hardware keyboard (Treo 180) OR grafitti (Treo 180g) but no sense of which is cheaper

      They cost the same. It's purely personal preference as to which you get.

      8 hour battery life: This seems short for either a cell phone OR a pda

      Where did you get that number? It's 2.5 hours talk time, 60 hours standby time, which is quite reasonable. Look here.

      --
      "This message is composed of 100% recycled electrons."
  20. Samsung I300 vs. Handspring Treo by lnxslak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well what can I say, SPH-I300 vs. Treo. I should think that SPH-I300 easily tops most any pda/phone currently on the market. Allbeit the I300 is not compatible with 3G networks, but come on we barely have 2.5 networks... lets face north-america is quite far behind when it comes to cellphone technology. I live in canada, and we have only one major GSM provider.

    I'd like to see this Treo mate with a SCP-6000 and see what happens. Also has anyone noticed the likeness between this Treo and the old Motorola I1000-plus phones. But its definately a step in the right direction.

    Fighting for Peace, is Like Fucking for Virginity.

    --
    Fighting for Peace, is like Fucking for Virginity.
    1. Re:Samsung I300 vs. Handspring Treo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Long time listener, first time caller...

      I just bought a Samsung I300, I love it. Go to Best Buy and make them put it in your hand, at 6oz and smaller than a gameboy advance you'll love it. Sure it's passive color, but other than that it's perfect. I'm wondering if I can get the ram upgraded, my coworker had his upped on a Prism with GSM phone to 16MB. But that unit is too bulky to throw in your pocket. The I300 fits, it uses grafitti.

      An earlier post mentioned voice recognition. Sprint PCS offers it as a centralized service, my older Samsung recognized up to ten names, but I found it to be a feature I never used, prefering to just find names in the call log. The I300 does support voice memos with a nicely integrated palm app, and when lower area which is normally not LCD on palm os devices is, although the expanded area is only used by the phone number screen.

      It's worth checking out, IMHO.

  21. Looks great. by foo+fighter · · Score: 1

    This looks like a nice, solid product.

    I like the keyboard, I'm curious how the Graffiti works. Do you just write anywhere on the screen, or do you have to bring up a writing area?

    It's too bad they don't have a springboard slot. If this could take my Soundsgood MP3 player and my GPS it would really sweeten the deal.

    This looks like a great upgrade to my current Visor. I was going to get a springboard phone just before I ended up moving to North Dakota where Handspring didn't have coverage. If their coverage expands, this will let me finally stop having to carry a cell and a PDA.

    And 16MB of memory, lord what will I do with it all? I'm doing great with 2!

    --
    obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
    1. Re:Looks great. by jyellis · · Score: 1

      Its keyboard and Graffiti. Its keyboard or Graffiti. The keyboard occupies the area where Graffiti would be. However, if you opt for the keyboard version, you can get a program that will allow you to type graffiti anywhere on the screen.

  22. Incoming!! by sphealey · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Yeah, GSM. So I spend $400-$600 on a cell phone/organizer, plus steep monthly fees for cell phone/internet access. And to top it off, I'm locked into GSM, which here in the USA isn't exactly the leading protocol.
    Just to preempt the tidal wave of comments from our EC friends:
    • While having a single standard is a good thing, having competition among multiple technologies is also a good thing
    • Many US cell networks were built before GSM was created, and must provide legacy support for the older standards

      In terms of voice quality, no system out there beats the original Motorola analog

      While GSM is an impressive technical and political achievement, do remember that one of its unstated purposes was to prevent Motorola from dominating the EC mobile market the way it dominated the US, and to give Ericsson, Nokia, etc. a competitive edge. In this it succeeded, with assistance from poor management at Motorola of course

    sPh
    1. Re:Incoming!! by czardonic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      having competition among multiple technologies is also a good thing

      In the early stages yes. But, in instances like this, the longer that "competition" persists, the more detrimental it is to the development of the market.

      As long as the standard is not controlled by a single entity (for its own profit), it is better to have a SINGLE standard.

      --
      Takahashi Rumiko made beats! DON, taku, DON, taku. . .
    2. Re:Incoming!! by Brummund · · Score: 2
      In terms of voice quality, no system out there beats the original Motorola analog

      And of course, real audiophiles use grammaphone players and vinyl records. Hey, who needs this CD and DVD shit?

      :-)

    3. Re:Incoming!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You have obviously not spent much time in europe. The quality of the GSM phone system over there varies from good to incredible.

      I took a train from Amsterdam to Benelux and down through bavaria and finally on to austria. Signal coverage was excellent, voice quality was excellent (better than anything in North America I have eperienced so far), and that is including coverage in buildings and on the train.

      I have been to europe about 20 times in the last 7 years and the phone system never fails to impress me.

    4. Re:Incoming!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EC? Sir, you must live 1 decade ago. And, I believe your totally off on the Mot angle. Mot was always a hardware company, it was the mobile phone companies that drove the industry, all your baby bells, your Sprints and so on. Not Mot. Your anology might be better suited for something like NTT Docomo.

      PS: I work for Mot, and non of what's said here represents their views.

    5. Re:Incoming!! by chihowa · · Score: 1

      While I agree that GSM (in particular) and other digital systems in cell phones are in the adequate to excellent range, so far as voice goes, and excel way past analog in terms of transmission of digital data, it is not going to be able to compare to the voice quality of an analog signal (within a reasonable range of the cell tower). If you liked your GSM phone over an analog phone, then you were either in an area with a very poor signal, or you were using a very poor quality phone. Of course I always prefered the fuzz in the background of analog to the chirps and cuts of digital when you just can't get a good signal, so my standard may be different! (I still prefer vinyl to CDs any day of the week)

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    6. Re:Incoming!! by sphealey · · Score: 2
      While I agree that GSM (in particular) and other digital systems in cell phones are in the adequate to excellent range, so far as voice goes
      Personally, I think that digital cell phones are an experiment to see how many customers can be persuaded to pay a large amount of money for terrible quality of service. Anyone who remembers the sound quality of the pre-breakup Bell Companies (in North America circa 1970 - 1980) should be laughing at the description of digital cell quality as "excellent". I would put digital cell at no better than 2.5 on the 1-4 scale, and more often it is around 1 or even 0.5. Remember - the chirps, pops, clicks, cutouts, and other digital artifacts count too.

      While I don't have as much experience travelling in Europe, I do spend plenty of time talking to my EC coworkers, and I can't say I am impressed on that score either. Sorry.

      sPh

    7. Re:Incoming!! by sphealey · · Score: 2
      And of course, real audiophiles use grammaphone players and vinyl records. Hey, who needs this CD and DVD shit?
      Well, I have always lusted after a vaccumn tube preamp ;-)

      Seriously, there is no law of nature that says that if there are two ways to accomplish a task, one analog and one digital, the digital way will necessarily be superior. Most of the advantage of programmable digital electronics lies in the greater flexibility of feature and manufacturing changes, not necessarily usability or quality improvements for the consumer.

      sPh

  23. You must walk before you can fly by fireboy1919 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This, like many innovations, is just another step. Handsprings are slightly more modular than other forms of PDAs, while still having the minimal power consumption associated with palm pilots.

    Many people, including myself, believe that the next frontier of technology is small, portable devices that communicate with each other wirelessly, though each device has a specialized function.

    In order to make that happen, we need to start with devices such as handhelds - which CAN be easily specialized through software, and which have readily available wireless capability.

    Its true that its "Just another handheld," similar to all of the other handhelds, but its more functional. Its not like another model car, which is exactly like the previous model, except that its "new and improved" (i.e. new and the current fashion); this is another piece of the puzzle.

    And IT DOES MATTER that its slightly more functional. The advent of the 386 chipset allowed a whole new class of problems to be solvable that where previously too slow to do research - I know that this is the case for my field, which is computer vision. As time progresses, even more problems are being researched.

    I'm looking forward to using technology such as this -perhaps even this model - in the near future (when it becomes pretty inexpensive - perhaps two or three years from now) as a module for home automation - it would be just about perfect for the purpose.

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  24. This is still cooler... by kaimiike1970 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I want this instead:

    Yopy

    So if you are listening Santa...

    --


    Do a google search before posting.
    1. Re:This is still cooler... by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 1

      You haven't been nice, according to my list.

      Coal for you this year.

      Dancin Santa

  25. Sharp's new PDA just released by cbowland · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Its called the SL-5000D Zaurus PDA and is currently for developers only.

    And yes, it does run linux (2.4 to be exact) along with PalmTop, QT, and Personal Java.

    --

    Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day.
    Teach him to eat and he will fish forever.

  26. SprintPCS Service - Samsung SPH-I300 avaliable now by MooRogue · · Score: 5, Informative

    I just picked up the Samsung SPH-I300 avaliable with SprintPCS last weekend.

    It's a color PalmOS, 8MB memory which is shorter and narrower then my Palm Vx, though just slightly thicker. It does have the ability to dial from the sync'ed address book, and all the usual PalmOS features.

    And it's avaliable now, though you may have to search a little to find it at a SprintPCS store. From what I can see, it has all the features the Treo has and more, except the physical buttons

    More information on the phone can be found at http://samsungusa.com/i300/

  27. how about instead by Bongzilla · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ... someone create a new product that will keep people unemployed. Or how about the government and wall street do their jobs and take care of the u.s. economy?

    Sorry just my retarded ramblings...

    --

    ;///////////////////////////////////////////////// /
    1. Re:how about instead by Bongzilla · · Score: 0, Offtopic


      Sorry, I meant to say, "that will keep people _employed_."

      Obviously what I said wouldn't be too difficult given the current economic climate.

      --

      ;///////////////////////////////////////////////// /
    2. Re:how about instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Truly you are a retarded.

      I'm glad you said it yourself.

  28. The reason for QWERTY.. by brunes69 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... is simple. It's what people are used to, and what they expect. I know exactly where to find a "A", or an "R", on a QWERTY keyboard. I don't want to have to re-learn this just for my handheld.

    1. Re:The reason for QWERTY.. by Jason+Earl · · Score: 3, Funny

      One of the major reasons that I got into computing is that I can't alphabetize for crap. Most people know intuitively whether W comes before or after T, but I actually have to think about it. However, after years of typing at a QWERTY keyboard QWERTY has become part of my subconscious. I can guarantee you that if they were to arrange the keys in alphabetical order I would quickly find myself singing the ABC song in order to find the 'M' key. That would be bad.

      And don't give me any crap about how "learning another keyboard layout is easy." I have tried. Apparently my brain is miswired for this sort of thing.

    2. Re:The reason for QWERTY.. by faichai · · Score: 1
      Shit. Can some people really do as you describe? I've always had to sing the ABC song when it comes to sorting things alpabetically. Sometimes I'm amazed by things that some people can do automatically, while others have to think and work it out, regardless of intelligence level.

      For example it still takes me a good few seconds to tell the time on analogue watch. Since I've had a digital from age 5+, I missed that crucial period where that kind of thing installs itself as an automatic reflex.

    3. Re:The reason for QWERTY.. by DudemanX · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the curse of being intelligent. We use our brains to store more important things than stuff that'll take not but a few seconds to figure out. I sadly enough have to take a few seconds on left and right. It would be so much easier if people would just look at my hand when I yell, "THAT WAY!"

      Dudeman

    4. Re:The reason for QWERTY.. by fodi · · Score: 0

      yeah, like I can remember all the moves for Tekken 2 and Tekken 3, Street Fighter 2(yep, still... ALL the moves), etc...

      but I still can't use pointers in C !!! No matter how many texts/tutorials I read, my brain just doesn't get it!

    5. Re:The reason for QWERTY.. by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2

      LOL, I don't know if it has anything to do with being intelligent or not, but whatever it is we must be wired the same way. Every time I hear the word "right" I have to suppress the urge to put my hand over my heart (I learned which hand was my right one pledging allegiance to the flag :). Even worse, I spent quite a bit of my youth sailing and my friends would further complicate things by using the words "port" and "starboard." The only way I can remember which is left and right is to remember that port and left have the same amount of letters (and are the same thing if you are facing forward in the boat).

      No wonder I have such an aversion to directions.

    6. Re:The reason for QWERTY.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of writing code like this:

      int *fooptr;

      Write it like this:

      int* fooptr;

      Think about the variable as an int pointer (or whatever data type) and you'll find that it becomes much easier to understand what the datatype is supposed to do and how to reference it. At least it helped me.

      See Stroustrup for more examples of this style.

      The one drawback is that if you have multiple pointer declarations you'll have to either break each onto its own line or revert to using the old style:

      int* pfoo, *pbar, *pbaz;

      or

      int* pfoo;
      int* pbar;
      int* pbaz;

      It all becomes the same assembly code anyway, so it's up to you.

  29. Not really a world phone by JeffL · · Score: 2, Informative
    Once again, a bit shortsighted, because I can't believe this is a design limitation. The Treo comes in two models 900/1900 (US) and 900/1800 (Europe/Asia). There are 900/1800/1900 tri-band phones out there for much cheaper than $400...

    I can mostly deal with it being a GSM only device, and not have TDMA or CDMA, but calling it a dual-band world phone is pretty much an outright lie. Yeah, its a "world phone" if you never travel across oceans.

    I still might get one if the service plans are good, but being able to go to the UK and stick a £10 Virgin pay as you go sim card in it would make the thing a true winner.

    1. Re:Not really a world phone by George+Walker+Bush · · Score: 2, Insightful

      what are you talking about? GSM 900 *IS* used pretty much everywhere in the world. The only GSM 1800 only networks are in scattered places in India, as I recall.

      --
      George W. Bush
      President, United States of America
    2. Re:Not really a world phone by jcostom · · Score: 2
      FYI - there ARE GSM 1800 networks in the UK as well. Orange and One2One come to mind.

      There are also GSM 900 nets of course too, namely BT and Vodafone.

      --

      The unsig!
    3. Re:Not really a world phone by phayes · · Score: 1

      I beg to differ, there are GSM 1800 networks in France, Germany, England, Italy, Spain, Norway, i.e.: througout europe.

      1800 nets were deployed in europe before the rest of the world. While 900 was the original frequency that was GSM developped for, 1800 has advantages in urban environments (smaller cell size) that make it better adapted to the dense urban environment.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    4. Re:Not really a world phone by haakon · · Score: 1

      Australia's networks do both 900 and 1800, if you have a 900MHz phone it will cope in Australia but if it can do 1800MHz as well you will get better coverage and less dropouts

  30. Color coming mid 2002 by wareadams · · Score: 2, Informative

    I hadn't heard it until I went to Handspring's web site after reading the article, but a color version is due "mid 2002." It's the Treo 270. No real details other than it has a color screen and will be $599.

  31. GSM (growing in the US) by Fencepost · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I believe that several of the TDMA carriers are planning on switching to GSM over the next couple of years.

    Here's a ZDNet article from late October about Cingular's plans to do so; the article mentions that Verizon is considering doing the same:

    Analysts and industry insiders say the Cingular announcement Tuesday coupled with a possible switch by Verizon could swing enough new customers into GSM-based networks to ensure it remains the dominant global standard.
    --
    fencepost
    just a little off
    1. Re:GSM (growing in the US) by nazgul · · Score: 1

      Most of the TDMA carriers in the US are going to be migrating to GSM 900. ATT Wireless has already started this migration in a few markets, and plans on converting the rest of it's network as quickly as possible.

      Cingular already running GSM in some of it's Pac Bell markets.

  32. Re: Keyboard interface. by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

    You can not actually touch type using such a small keyboard though and you are limited to looking at the keys and then pressing the letter you want. They may as well place them in a logical order. BTW I type exclusively in Dvorak, learning a new keyboard does not take very long.

  33. Good thing... by rar · · Score: 1

    Every Treo communicator comes with Blazer(tm)--the award-winning wireless web browser

    Good thing: If this trend with 'web-browser in your hand computer thingy' catches on, perhaps sites starts providing pages which I can surf without resorting to Netscape 4.5:s "future proof" mode (view source, cut, paste).

    Why Netscape 4.5? In digital unix you kind of take what's offered to you... :-)

  34. And only $400 to $600!? by Sarcasmooo! · · Score: 0, Troll

    WOW, what a bargain. Well I know what I'm gonna use mine for! "Reminder: call smelly guy in front of my apartment and comment that 'While the cost of this device might be enough to save people like you, I'm sure the unecessary convenience it offers me will one day be as valuable as the lives of multiple human beings.'" Homeless people have cellphones, right?

    (Disclaimer: No one wants to force you to spend your money helping people not die instead of buying insanely priced doo-hickeys that you don't need, but I reserve the right to make fun of you for choosing not to in such a rediculously extreme example as buying things like this. As always, it's just my opinion.)

    1. Re:And only $400 to $600!? by marcsiry · · Score: 2

      And I reserve the right to castigate you for not selling your computer and disconnecting your ISP in order to divert the money to the homeless, as your doctrine apparently states you should.

      When you're no longer posting on Slashdot I'll believe that you've lived up to the courage of your convictions ;-)

      --
      Marc Siry || interactive media professional, motorcycle enthusiast ||
    2. Re:And only $400 to $600!? by Sarcasmooo! · · Score: 2

      Bah. I'm not an extremist, just a realist. I said 'rediculous', didn't I? I see this gadget as a rediculous example. I don't see my computer or my internet access that way, because I've learned more from it than I learned in my 4 years of highschool. You'd probably agree that internet access is no more a luxury than a phoneline. Or at least, that it should be by being provided to low income areas and schools.

    3. Re:And only $400 to $600!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      1) learn to spell

      2) realize that you look like a typical leftist fool, deciding that the things that you have are "necessary" whilst the things that others have are "unnecessary luxuries".

    4. Re:And only $400 to $600!? by Sarcasmooo! · · Score: 1

      Well you've got it all figured out obviously. I must've spelled well enough for you to read what I was saying, and beyond that it really doersn't matter to someone who would use the name "Sarcasmooo!" (me). As far as being a 'leftist' with 'necessary' things, I'm a kid between highschool and college who can't afford luxuries. My dad bought me my TV when I was 15, and I bought my computer with money left to me in a will when I turned 18. This christmas I would be asking my family to spend money on charity instead of gifts for me, but I get antsy about looking self-righteous in front of pricks like yourself, so I just take what I get to the salvation army or wherever else it can go. And politics seems to be the last great haven for bigotry; I'm not a person with an individual mind and opinions, I'm a 'leftist fool'. Let's just cut the shit and go back to 'nigger, kike, etc' ok?

    5. Re:And only $400 to $600!? by czardonic · · Score: 1

      You've never heard of an Internet Cafe? Or better yet, a Public Library with internet access?

      You must be some kind of self-absorbed eletist to assume that everyone on the Net owns their own equipment.

      --
      Takahashi Rumiko made beats! DON, taku, DON, taku. . .
    6. Re:And only $400 to $600!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a kid between highschool and college

      Then maybe you should learn how to spell. Thanks.

    7. Re:And only $400 to $600!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You truly are the new Jesus.

    8. Re:And only $400 to $600!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I take it back. You're just a fool.

  35. iPod by foo+fighter · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think for their next iPod, Apple should add a couple features:

    1) Cellphone that works with all the cell networks
    in the world.

    2) 802.11x or whatever that new superfast wireless
    standard is that works with 802.11b, v.92 modem,
    Gigabit ethernet, and the LCD backlight should be
    able to blink morse code.

    3) Military GPS accurate to 1"

    4) A keyboard and also hand recognition (but not
    graffiti crap, REAL hand recognition). And voice
    recognition.

    5) It's screen should be color and widescreen
    format so I can watch my cracked DVDs on it.

    6) It should run linux, but have virtual machines
    so it can also run Palm and Windows apps. Oh, and
    a gameboy advance emulator.

    7) The battery should last at least a week,
    preferably two.

    8) None of this SDMI crap. I can put on and take
    off anything. In fact, it should have a video and
    audio in, so I can take input straight from my DVD
    player into the device and share them with my
    friends.

    9) It should be the same size it is now, and still
    use firewire.

    10) Flash card, Smartmedia, multimedia card and
    PCMCIA slots.

    Oh, and I won't pay more than $150 for it.

    That'd be cool! ;-)

    --
    obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
    1. Re:iPod by sporty · · Score: 2, Funny

      would you like fries with that?

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

  36. Battery life etc. by Indomitus · · Score: 1

    Where did you see 8hour battery life? Here's the section from the article that you seem to have missed (as did the person who modded you up to 'Informative' it seems):

    Battery life is adequate. As a phone, the Treo gets about 2.5 hours of talk time and 60 hours of standby time. With the phone function turned off, it gets about three weeks of battery life as an organizer.

    60 hours of standby cellphone time is better than my current phone and 3 weeks PDA time is pretty darn good too.

    Also, the Treo is meant to be pretty small, adding a Springboard on would add quite a bit of size and weight to it. If you want a Springboard slot, get a Visor.

  37. Antennas - A Pet Peeve by uberdave · · Score: 1

    &ltrant&gt
    Why do cell phones and these things have external antennas? It's not as if the case is metal. I'm sure they could find enough room inside the case to place that stubbly little wart of an antenna if they really wanted to. (Say along the edge of the flip up lid.)
    &lt/rant&gt

    1. Re:Antennas - A Pet Peeve by Conan+the+Grammarian · · Score: 1

      I'll bet it's like the "antenna" on the Palm VII. It would have been simple for them to put a nice, thin, flat fractal antenna inside the case, but instead they put it in that wobbly little strip of plastic. You HAVE to extend the antenna for the thing to work. Why did they do it that way? To make you a walking advertisement for wireless Palms. Marketing triumphs over engineering - again.

    2. Re:Antennas - A Pet Peeve by Anemophilous+Coward · · Score: 2

      One thing nice about external antennas is it allows the user to extend it away from themself. I know that the debate over them causing cancer and such is still up for grabs (given all other variables involved), but it is nice to have the radiated pattern of waves angled a bit farther out from your head.

      That's a good feature of Star Tac phones. The angled flip-piece and extended antenna radiate very little into your brain. Cancer notwithstanding, less radiation bouncing that close to you can only be better for you.

      I personally don't like phones with no extendable antenna for this very reason. Just some thoughts.

      - A non-productive mind is with absolutely zero balance.
      - AC

    3. Re:Antennas - A Pet Peeve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My job is designing those internal antennas. The development of internal antennas is very labor intensive, and production, though cheaper per unit, requires more expensive tooling. This phone probably has too small projected volumes to justify the non-recurring engineering expense of developing and tooling an internal antenna. They just won't sell enough units (at a cheaper antenna price) to recover the extra development cost.
      Without going into a dissertation, I'll just say that RF and SAR (absorption by the head) performance of a properly implemented internal antenna is comparable to, or even better than, an external antenna.

    4. Re:Antennas - A Pet Peeve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I did some consulting at Ericsson the said that in the US you needed an external antenna for marketing reasons. On some models like the T28, they added a dummy antenna for the US models only.

    5. Re:Antennas - A Pet Peeve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of them are actually placebos

  38. Reference for this: by Chagrin · · Score: 2, Informative

    North Carolina performed such a study. A take on it can be found on the Libertarian Party web site.

    I'm not a Libertarian, but if they use PHP they can't be all bad.

    ..well, ok, they could use some help from the Demoronizer though.

    --

    I/O Error G-17: Aborting Installation

  39. train and noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    easy solution...move to a city where a car is pratical and avoid urban planner designed mass transit systems.

    Oh yea, avoid the 1.5 hour commute each way also.

  40. Handwriting recognition. (OT?) by WasterDave · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Rant: Handwriting recognition. It'll never work. It can't ever work. People can't read my handwriting. I can't read my handwriting and consequently I've given up doing it for anything more important than a shopping list. And I usually fail to get something at the shops for exactly this reason.

    I like that PDA's are sprouting keyboards, and I like the idea of attempting to use a Zaurus or similar for my email, but I'll probably be waiting for a Symbian based phone+pda combination. Once again, bring it on, the money's sitting in my bank account waiting for you to make things that don't suck.

    Dave

    --
    I write a blog now, you should be afraid.
    1. Re:Handwriting recognition. (OT?) by ObligatoryUserName · · Score: 1

      Ummm... I really wish I could say this in a way that didn't sound like a flame, but if no one including yourself can read your handwriting, isn't it possible that you don't know how to write? Oh sure, in one sense you know how, you know what shape all the letters are supposed to have, but you don't know how to form those shapes with your own hand. That's not the fault of the people writing the software, that's the fault of your elementary school teachers.

    2. Re:Handwriting recognition. (OT?) by WasterDave · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I know. You're right, and it's not a flame.

      that's the fault of your elementary school teachers

      Aparrently my intake at my first primary school, for one reason or another, consisted entirely of kids that could already write. Myself excluded. Consquently I was never taught to write and ended up guessing. Badly.

      Hey! I got modded down, shocker!

      Dave

      --
      I write a blog now, you should be afraid.
  41. Nice but what's it's battery life? by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    I have a Qualicomm QPC it never leaves the cradle and it hasn't had service for almost a year now. You know the Qualicomm phone with the palm pilot in it.

    Battery life sucked, the unit expected to be placed on it's cradle 3-5 times a day (It will completely recharge in 30 minutes) and if you left digital land your freshly charged battery died within minutes on standby or seconds in a call.

    If this unit cannot give me 2 days without needing a charge (which means within 3 months it will need daily charging due to battery life loss) It is worthless.

    I really hope they have improved the battery life or at least offer a battery backpack for those of us that use a phone to death and dont sit at a desk most of the day.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  42. That's it, Slashdot.. Whore yourself out.. by sudog · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    How much did they pay you for this "endorsement"?

    bah..

  43. Neat idea, but... by keath_milligan · · Score: 1

    Cell-phone/PDA combos are a neat idea, but until there is a major advancement in display technology, either the phone is going to be too big or the screen is going to be too small. Not even the whiz-bang new Japanese phones address this.

  44. Most interesting innovation from the PDA market by kawaichan · · Score: 1

    This is probably the most interesting innnovation from the PDA market for a long time now. The launch of the new PocketPC from MS is not that nice to begin with, it was basically a non events.

    Speaking of lack of Innovation, Palm has been doing nothing but staring at the wall for the past year, I am one of those that own a m505, it's cool but it is but no means innovative.

    Palm was suppose to come out the Palm m705 (bascially a smaller form vector version of the illfated Palm VII), I am pretty sure they canned that thing probably because when they see Tero is going to murder it like crazy.

    Tero is an innovative PDA/Phone hybird, not because they understand the lack of graffit, form factor, ease of use is the key for that market segment.

    Now, I have a question to ask, unless you are a diehard Tero fan without a PDA, why don't you just get a really crappy cellphone then hook it up to your PDA? It's probably cheaper too.

    --

    kawai
  45. Re: Battery Life by mrgoat · · Score: 1
    I can see it now, on the data center floor:

    Ring...

    Click, conversation starts with Cisco...

    *FUCK!*

    Crashing noises as network guy tries to find batteries...

    *FUCK!*

    More crashing noises as network guy tries to mess with tiny plastic plate on back of Treo, beefy fingers dropping batteries and plastic parts everywhere.

    *FUCK!*

    Sounds of Treo being used as a hockey puck because when palm devices lose power, they lose really important things like your Cisco engineer's callback and trouble ticket numbers.

    MORAL: when palm/handspring figures out that thing called flash or NV RAM, and comes out with easy to change batteries (like cell phones), then the product may become appealing in a work environment.

    --

    'Hail Eris, baby, hail Eris...pfffffffttt.' *cough* 'Yeah.'
  46. Re: Keyboard interface. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, but most of us don't give a damn which keyboard layout we use and instinctively know where to find keys on a QWERTY keyboard. The point is not how easy it is to use another keyboard layout, the point is that only typing freaks care.

  47. PDA/802.11b/VOIP instead of cell phone(s) by jaydho · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My CIS teacher today was talking about using 802.11b in lieu of Excite@Home and what not (he may be getting cut off tomorrow.) That got me to thinking about an iPaq/Yopy (or any of the other linux/pocket pc capable PDA's), 802.11b PCMCIA/CompactFlash card and a VOIP application, all combined with a nice NAN (Neighborhood Area Network.)

    About 5 linksys WAPS ($139 a Piece on Pricewatch) would cover our entire campus (I have my own personal one but it just covers the dorm.) Anyway, carrying around a little PDA (or using your laptop) would give you nice voice/video/data as long as you were in range, spread those WAP puppies around the city and that would be pretty pimp. Imagine roaming with nice speeds anywhere in town.

    That brings me to the point where I am clueless. Can anybody help, how do you provide seamless transitions between WAPs? I'd hate to be downloading a file and wander out of one WAPs range, can another closeby pick me up seamlessly? (I know I can connect to either, but can it switch automatically without interrupting communcation?) Linux seems to usually be the most ahead in these types of bleeding edge apps... Anybody have any URLs?

    worldLOG Connecting the lives of friends and family.

    My sig, http://www.jdhodges.com

  48. Re:SprintPCS Service - Samsung SPH-I300 avaliable by tekrex · · Score: 1

    Except that it's huge compared to the Treo and has no cover for the screen.

  49. DUMBASS is more like it. by tekrex · · Score: 3, Informative

    What a dork, call this a flame if you want but have you even held one of these things??? Obviously not since you are complaining about how big it is. The Treo is a good bit smaller then the standard Nokia, which is the number one phone on the market. Heck, except for it's antenna, it's smaller then my wallet.

    Get a clue before you post. Some fool might think you know what your talking about.

    1. Re:DUMBASS is more like it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Smaller then the standard Nokia" != small.

      Handheld phones are out. Way out. They are dangerous and awkward and bulky and have no future.

      The Treo is DOA. Just like Kyocera's, just like Nokia's phone/PDA.

  50. I like the Kyocera Smartphone by pauljlucas · · Score: 1

    I've owned my Kyocera Smartphone for several months now and I really like it. They've done a good job at integrating a Palm and a phone. I couldn't care less about color, video, IM, web, and games. I also happen to like the look of the Smartphone.

    --
    If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
  51. Re:Handwriting recognition. (OT?) - Newton? by lwdupont · · Score: 1

    I hate to say, the last Newton Apple produced had excellent handwriting recognition.

    I'd love to have a Palm with that code it in..

  52. Re:ALMOST there: Samsung i300 has limited vr by UnanimousCoward · · Score: 1

    Note that you can store a limited number of voice-activated phone numbers with the Samsung i300, another phone/Palm alternative...

    --
    Twelve-and-three-quarter inches. Unyielding. This wand belonged to Bellatrix Lestrange.
  53. Re:SprintPCS Service - Samsung SPH-I300 avaliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    huge compared to the treo? you know not what you speak of. the i300 is smaller than any other palm/phone combo on the market.

    oh, and it's color.

    oh, and it has a speaker phone.

    oh, and it's under 5 ounces.

  54. Re:SprintPCS Service - Samsung SPH-I300 avaliable by MooRogue · · Score: 2, Informative

    > Except that it's huge compared to the Treo and has no cover for the screen.

    Emmm... no.

    Treo: 4.3" x 2.7" x 0.7", 5.4 oz
    I300: 4.9" x 2.28" x 0.82", 6.0 oz

    I wouldn't say that it is huge compared to the Treo... 0.6" longer, 0.4" narrower and 0.12" thicker.

    Though, yes, there is no cover for the screen. That's what screen protectors and cases are for :)

    Of course, the I300 is avaliable now, while the color Treo is still half a year away

  55. Wireless prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The WSJ article is a bit light on the technical stuff... "The initial models will be upgradeable to work with faster phone networks due late next year" means that they'll have a GPRS patch available and the "push" e-mail being (what I assume are) the M-services being pushed by the GSMA. And though it's a "world phone," it only has two of the three frequency bands that exist around the globe.

    There's no mention of the little "gotchas" such as data service fees: $5/mo + $0.15/min modem access (Cingular) or for GPRS (yes, it's out there, but not much) it's $15 for the first 500k plus $0.07 for each subsequent k (Cingular) or $20/5M + $5/M (Voicestream). And we won't even go into roaming fees. Note the vast disparity in pricing between Voicestream and Cingular.

    Nor does he speculate about the poor likelihood of a timely GPRS rollout. Voicestream has it already, but you can only get it on the West Coast if you're in Washington- the Pacific-Bell (California & Nevada) side of Cingular isn't well known for its infrastructure, so who knows if it'll be available locally even by the time the Treo update is available.

    So, yeah, the hardware and software are nice and the thing is nice as both a phone (though I'd probably prefer bigger dialing buttons) and PDA if you like the Palm OS (though he doesn't go into how much smaller the screen is compared to a normal Palm or Handspring Visor), but using the thing to its full wireless capability can get expensive. And considering that the GPRS support isn't yet available, the wireless capability is partially vaporware.

  56. Not double.. quadruple by jonabbey · · Score: 2

    The high-res CLIE models (both monochrome and color) actually run at 4 times the resolution.. 2x in both dimensions.

  57. How does this fit in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does this differ at the end (besides the fact that it works in the U.S.) from the Nokia 7650 (http://www.nokia.com/phones/7650/index.html) or even from a traditional Nokia Communicator ? This is not a troll but honestly, any insight would be appreciated.

  58. Re: not dumb, just misunderstood by Vspirit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I agree, the future isn't in the handsets, its in the wearables.

    But I disagree that the size should matter.
    Size doesn't matter, usage and implementation does.

    I believe we will see even smaller devices that will succeed, but not just for any application or in any environment.

    In the US and many other places you can forget about any 'real' data communication using a pda device until the service issue has been sorted out. But in Europe where GSM is good and you can almost smell the 3G networks, and Japan where the networks are extraordinaire, its the other way around. The service is there. We scream for devices that are not just a mobile phone with a game and some SMS features. Here the market are ripe, so if the American manufacturers wants some business, all they need to do is deliver the advances products and launch it here with the same initiatives they would have done in the States. But mark my words if they are not going for keeps they should rather stay away and leave it up to japs and eurotrash such as yours truely :)

    Here we have the service and even if the device is the size of a wristwatch, if only implemented with the right applications to suit the environment, it will rock the blueeyed danish and swedish blondes panties off.

    my favourite fantasy, should I have the opportunity, would be my own personal modified version of the wristwatch from IBM labs in Zurich which are equipped with microphone, bluetoothed earplugs, linux, sandisc flashcard, 1.3inches color display and camera combined with webservices applications for advanced management (and later on blessed with a projector or visor and 'virtual keyboard'). Even without the wishware in the parantheses you would have a client device that in collaboration with web services would give you so many new advantages to make you daily life simpler and more organized, that leaves you with more time for real fun.

    imagine the applications with the programmable device connected to the internet utilizing administration and communication software that sorts and organize all the information and makes it available to and for you, on your command.

    when the IBM wristwatch with linux was covered here on slashdot a while back I posted some of my fantasies as well and I made a small note about if IBM, Nokia, Ericsson should be interested, I would be happy to cooperate. Amazingly some good IBM professor from Zurich wrote me an email encouraging me to take contact. Greetings to you, if you should read this again. I would love to at least initiate some sort of communication regarding the subject. Unfortunately I lost your address when my thinkpad's harddrive suddenly said: NO MORE. so just to leave it up to mr. chance here is my address again: caspera@sophistic.com

    Why did I just write all this again?

  59. Can't wait for wearables by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, I can't wait for a handheld with wearable microdisplay and a twiddler. One that's light and cool and doesn't alter my metabolism.

  60. Re: Keyboard interface. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fact that you "type exclusively in Dvorak" merely labels you as a gullible idiot, who's opinion on the matter is worthless.

  61. Too bulky, better solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I used to carry a RIM pager for mobile email, my visor for PDA purposes and a cellphone.

    I thought the TREO would solve my problems, but I took one look at it, and forget it, its ugly, bulky and a jack of all trades, master of none.

    I decided to go against waiting for it, and instead got a Visor Edge and a Red-M Blade Bluetooth springboard and bought a Ericcson T39 GSM phone.

    Now I have mobile e-mail and internet access on my visor with my cellphone in my pocket.

    I make a call on my cellphone and use it handsfree with the bluetooth headset. If I'm not driving, I can use my visor and talk on the phone.

    On top of it all, the T39 works with pay-per-use SIMS in Europe and Asia, and has worked well in London and Hong Kong for me.

    Its kept my devices small and the cellphone in my pocket. (T39 is VERY small phone)

    I recommend this to anyone who can put up with Voicestream as a cellular voice subscriber.

    I will switch to AT&T or Cingular once their GSM networks are up and running.

    good luck.
    (connected so I don't go to the office...)

  62. Where will the processor power come from? by ColGraff · · Score: 2

    I don't know about bluetooth, but voice recognition needs a crazy amount of CPU oomph (to use a technical term). I could see it on an ipag, but on a 30something mhz dragonball? I don't want to say I don't believe it can be done, but I'm a little skeptical. Also, I seem to recall the PalmOS being designed for a PDA that would be running fairly lightweight, simple apps. Is that OS the right choice for a PDA if you want to do this? EPOC ER5 runs on PDAs with processing power similar to that of a high-end PalmOS machine, but also provides multitasking and better memory management.

    Just my uninformed, ignorant, kneejerk responses (as I'm sure dozens of people will be telling me very shortly.)

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
    1. Re:Where will the processor power come from? by MikeyNg · · Score: 1

      There's already voice tags on alot of cell phones already out there. It's more along the lines of you saying the same phrase several times and it'll remember that, rather than being able to remember 1,000's of words and able to decipher your speech and use its own vocabulary. With the added RAM from the PDA side of it, I can see voice tags being easy to implement in such a device. They're already in a bunch of phones.

      --
      Where the wind blows, the tumbleweed goes.
  63. ATTN MOD POINT OWNERS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please mod this pathetic peice of shiet down.

  64. They need to fix the lights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a VisorPhone. I like it. I'd rather have the Treo, of course, but I won't even consider one until they fix an annoying problem: the light.

    The top of the Treo looks exactly like the top of the VisorPhone. There is an on/off button, a light, and a ringer switch. The on/off button is irrelevant, and should probably be removed, but the light is what bugs me.

    The light can be blinking green, blinking red, solid green, or solid red. Only one of these are useful. It blinks green if it has service, blinks red if it doesn't, and is solid when it is charging (green is fully charged).

    The lights *should* be:
    - solid red if out of service or off
    - blinking red if running out of juice
    - blinking green if you missed a call, or have voice mail, or an alarm has gone off, with bonus points if it blinks in a pattern to indicate how many calls you missed
    - solid green if connected

    The lights *should not* indicate:
    - if the phone is charging or charged, because I already know that it's charging if it is in the cradle
    - if the phone is on, because I don't need a night-light when I sleep

    I hope they will improve the user interface with these changes. The fact that they made a Treo shows that they care, even a little bit.

  65. I think Verizon wired the DC Metro by brassrat77 · · Score: 2

    but I agree coverage in NoVA, at least for ATT and Nortel, sucks with holes and drop-outs in the damndest places. (Like Tyson's Corner, a MAJOR office and retail development area that's basically an "edge city", or areas in sight of AOL and MCI Worldcomm.) I'm sure, however, that the coverage near congressional and FCC staffers overseeing the cellular industry is first-rate.

  66. Re: Battery Life by mgblst · · Score: 1

    Sounds of Treo being used as a hockey puck because when palm devices lose power, they lose really important things like your Cisco engineer's callback and trouble ticket numbers.

    You are right of course, but the palm does have a significant advantage over mobile phones. It can backup the info on your pc, so even if you lose it, you can retain all your info.

  67. but you can't use it on a plane! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    while i've been longing for an integrated cell phone + pda, they have a big drawback for travellers: you can't use them on airplanes at all.

    yep, that's right, no playing traffic, pocket rogue, tetris or solitare on the airplanes. you still need to carry something seperate for that.

    1. Re:but you can't use it on a plane! by jeff67 · · Score: 1

      This WSJ article says "You can also run the organizer functions with the phone functionality turned off..."

      You just have to convince the flight attendant.

  68. Samsung SPH-I300 by Angerson · · Score: 1

    I picked up a Samsung SPH-I300 at my local Best Buy two weeks ago, if for nothing else because the sales drone offered me 24 months 0% financing and the Sprint rep was willing to throw in 2 free Palm M100s and a $30 rebate. It was a sweet deal for a sweet... phone... or is it a PDA? Hard to say really. And I think that's where these convergence devices are going to be stuck just until they figure out exactly what it is they want to be.

    I'm not saying that I don't love my SPH-I300, because I really do. It's a really wonderful little Palm (160x240, Virtual Graffiti, slim form factor, weighs around 6 oz.) and being able to check my e-mail and have (albeit slow) wireless web access is really an amazing thing. But it certainly doesn't excel as a phone. It's not nearly as durable or as tiny as I like my phones and the virtual keypad is, well, not as good as a real thing.

    It is, however, a good compromise for those of us that need a PDA and have very limited phone use -which, in my opinion, is really the only market for these $500 PDA-Phone combos anyway. If you're looking to buy one of these devices and are expecting to get a phone with PDA capabilities, you're bound to be disappointed.

  69. (Score: -1, Off Topic, Mindless Drivel)

    I went through the McDonalds drive-through with a friend a few days ago. After the order the guy asked me if I wanted to try a Chocolate Sunday.

    'twas the first time I've ever heard them not mention the word fries. Maybe it's just me not going there much. Maybe it's just new in NZ or something.

    I was almost going to ask him if it was free, since he said try, as if they where giving them away as free samples or something. But then I remembered it's not a good idea to mess with the staff at food places when you buying your food there.

    1. Re:OT by Tuzanor · · Score: 2

      the "do you want fires with that" line is SO old. Now its "do you want that in a combo?"

  70. Re:SprintPCS Service - Samsung SPH-I300 avaliable by dublin · · Score: 2

    One other difference worth mentioning: The Treo is available ONLY as a GSM CancerPhone, while the Samsung and it's Kyocera cousin work with the much more biologically friendly CDMA.

    (CDMA is also much better for mobile data connections because of its soft handoff capability, which allows the phone to "talk" to multiple cells simultaneously to produce a smooth transition rahter than the abrupt switchover used by other systems.)

    --
    "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
  71. Re: Battery Life by Moofie · · Score: 1

    The Treo uses an internal, rechargeable battery pack, not AAA's. Even with my ancient Palm III, though, I have never ever ever lost ANY data during a battery swap. Ever. As long as you get the batteries back in there within about a minute, you're fine. My friend once zapped all his contacts by installing the batteries backwards, though...so don't be a dumbass and do that. Worst case scenario? Sync the thing before you swap batteries...then it just doesn't matter if the thing zaps itself to hell.

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  72. Against headaches? by mutende · · Score: 2

    Hrm, Treo is also a Danish pain killer.

    --
    Unselfish actions pay back better
  73. Saw one at Comdex already. by Anemophilous+Coward · · Score: 2

    Seemed ok. I agree with others that the networks around here need more improvement for these convergent devices to really take off.

    My main rant with this is the keyboard - too small for my tastes. Perhaps it's big fingers, but it was *not* very ergonomic for me, and that lowered my impression of the overall product. I had to really concentrate to work the buttons. I would probably rather fight the Graffiti system (or tap a virtual keypad) then try and punch on that keyboard. But then again maybe if you have small fingers, or really sharp nails, it might work good for you.

    I didn't see that new 'sideways' Nokia phone (at Comdex) with keys on either side of the screen (I'm sure it was there). But I would gather that *might* be better as the keys could be spaced a bit farther apart. Or, they could be close together and have more of them (which gives the same result). I'm not sure, I wish I spent the time to check that.

    Anyway, some food for thought for those of you with larger digits.

    - A non-productive mind is with absolutely zero balance.
    - AC

  74. Siemens SX45 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    u have to try similar newbie from Siemens but runs Pocket PC: http://www.my-siemens.com/SX45.

  75. I want one by Tha_Zanthrax · · Score: 1

    The Treo is a really cool device, but you'll have to make some decisions: Keyboard or graffiti pad, get it now or wait for the color screen.

    Probably i'll never get one, I'm from Holland and all of the cool stuff isn't available here: You can only buy an AIBO directly from Sony, I can't find the Kyosera Smartphone anywhere and my guess for the Treo is that I won't be able to get my hands on one.

  76. Miss the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Network vendors have been wanting mobile companies etc. to upgrade their networks for a couple of years. Unfortunately, the phones to drive consumers to be interested have not been available. Mobile operators have to have consumer revenue to build bigger/better networks. Now that there are phones which are driving 2.5/3G it is more likely that the newer networks will happen.

  77. Re: Keyboard interface. by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

    No, it means I took a few minutes of time to do research and I know type 20WPM faster than most people. I now spend less time typing than most people do. Try different things. It doesn't hurt.

  78. Remote Control by gwoodie7 · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised that there is nothing out on the market for this device as well as any other wireless PDA that would allow remote control of a PC. Something like PC Anywhere running on a device like this would be very useful. I know Carbon Copy (now out of business) had a version that would run on Windows CE devices, but I never heard much about it. Does anyone know of any other programs that would allow wireless remote control of a PC.