Slashdot Mirror


Information Security On An Olympic Scale

jeffy124 writes: "Wired is running a story about the man in charge of securing the computer systems at the Salt Lake City Olympic Games next February. Matt McClung discusses how he's withstanding an 'overhype' in the media on the possibility getting his systems cracked and what he's doing to prevent it in the first place. With 4500 PCs and 550 servers, that shall be a daunting task, especially given the reliability problems at the '96 Atlanta games."

160 comments

  1. Server to Desktop ratio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Seems rather high. Is this Microsoft at work?

    1. Re:Server to Desktop ratio by homer_ca · · Score: 2, Informative

      Those servers aren't just for their internal network. They are hosting the Olympic website too.

    2. Re:Server to Desktop ratio by stylewagon · · Score: 1

      Yup. W2K + IIS/5.0

      Survey says "Uptime not so good".

      --

      *** I am the real stylewagon

    3. Re:Server to Desktop ratio by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 2

      Funny how the downward slope just happens to coincide with when they switched from Linux and Solaris to W2K. Well, maybe they're getting the bugs out. Or something.

      --
      "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
    4. Re:Server to Desktop ratio by instinctdesign · · Score: 2, Informative
      Yup, its at least partially MS. Check out this article about the software from InternetWorld for details. A quote:
      The sites will run on Microsoft's Windows 2000 Datacenter Edition, the company's high availability, highly scalable server OS. The software will run on hundreds of Compaq ProLiant 8500 servers, each with eight 700-MHz Xeon processors and 4 GB of RAM.
      --
      forma3
    5. Re:Server to Desktop ratio by Hekman · · Score: 1

      The article that you are quoting here has everything to do with hosting the WEB site for the games, and nothing to do with the intranet that does results reporting and timing. This has nothing to do with the actual results and information systems.

      --
      ---- nohup: appending output to `/nev/dull'
    6. Re:Server to Desktop ratio by instinctdesign · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know. Thats why I said "its at least partially MS" and not "it is MS."

      --
      forma3
  2. Is this the right man for the job? by gmhowell · · Score: 4, Insightful
    McClung said the Salt Lake City Olympic computer system, comprised of 4,500 PCs and 550 servers, is the most complex network he's ever seen.


    Urmmm... I work in a small company (50 employees) so I've never seen really big networks. But somehow, 2000 computers doesn't seem like that compares in any way to various military and Fortune 500 networks. By an order or two of magnitude.

    So, is somebody who has never seen (let alone worked with) this many machines the right guy for the job? Sounds like he is in over his head a bit.

    (Now, if this IS an incredibly huge/large network, please bitchslap me)
    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    1. Re:Is this the right man for the job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      First, 4500 + 550 != 2000, it equals 5050. As to your main point, I think you're right- big networks are on the scale of 50,000 PCs, not 5000. Still, 5000 is quite a few, and not something to sneer at. IIRC, Google uses somewhere around that number.

    2. Re:Is this the right man for the job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Math wizard, don't you mean 5000 computers?

    3. Re:Is this the right man for the job? by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Interesting
      • I work in a small company (50 employees) so I've never seen really big networks. But somehow, 2000 computers doesn't seem like [that many]

      5000+, not 2000. But 50 is an interesting number. It's approaching the limit of systems that one guy can set up and physically keep track of.

      Once you're over that number, you're delegating and trusting your minions and (heh heh) your users not to screw it up. The best initial setup in the world won't help if Vinny Volunteer decides to start screwing with it. If I was setting this up (god forbid), I'd be looking to install absolutely minimal systems with no floppy (or locked floppy), no CD-ROM and perhaps even (gasp) diskless workstations that boot from the network.

      If I was really freaked about security, I might even take a leaf out of Microsoft's book and ponder security through obscurity. Windows - no thanks. Every Joe Backoffice thinks he knows how to fiddle with that. Linux would be better, but Linux users tend to be tinkerers, and they might have a stab at BSD as well. MacOS - god knows if you can lock that down. Strange thought, but how about OS/2? Or even something wierder like VMS? Runs on a toaster, solid as a rock, you'd need nuts the size of Nebraska to try fiddling with it.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    4. Re:Is this the right man for the job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This is typical of the way things work in Utah.

      He's only in that position because:

      1. He's related to the person that hires for that position.
      2. He's Mormon.
      3. He's a Mormon "returned missionary."
      4. His parents called and asked for him to get the job. (Yes, it does happen in Utah...all the time.)

    5. Re:Is this the right man for the job? by gmhowell · · Score: 2

      We've actually got two people (myself and another) doing the computer stuff here. Both of us know not to touch stuff we are clueless about. It works fairly well, except that sometimes a user has a problem, and the first person to get the call has to get the other to fix it. But, with only 50, it's not too bad.

      Given that this is a fairly short term thing (the computer setup for the olympics) I must say that adding security through obscurity as another layer is probably a good idea. In no way should anyone count on it, but it can't hurt. What would really help would be to document everything for release later, so that it can be reviewed prior to 2004.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    6. Re:Is this the right man for the job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    7. Re:Is this the right man for the job? by itachi · · Score: 1

      Just FYI, Mac OS X is about as easy/difficult to lock down as FreeBSD. Give or take NetInfo. And netbooting makes it easy to dodge Vinny Volunteer's efforts. All of a sudden, the iMac makes so much more sense - no floppy drive, you can keep the OS on a locked down server...

      itachi

    8. Re:Is this the right man for the job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      All four points are incorrect. I'm the one who hired him.

    9. Re:Is this the right man for the job? by gorf · · Score: 1

      Trouble is, that if it works, then people might use the system in future Olympics.

      Which would make the security by obscurity feature completely useless, as it won't be obscure any more (people intent on doing things will be able to get hold of more info over four years).

      Except people will continue touting that success (if there was any) as a reason to use the system again, ignoring one of the reasons it worked in the first place (assuming it did).

      Just a thought :-)

    10. Re:Is this the right man for the job? by spudnic · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Maybe this IS security through obscurity. Maybe the article is just a front for what will actually be running on the servers. "Let's tell them we'll be running W2K and have all of the service fingerprints report as though we actually where, but then install xxxxxxx"

      It could be. ;)

      .

      --
      load "linux",8,1
    11. Re:Is this the right man for the job? by uberdood · · Score: 2

      But somehow, 2000 computers doesn't seem like that compares in any way to various military and Fortune 500 networks.

      Or, for the more obvious - the college network. Just the dorms at a big school exceed 2000 computers, let alone labs, offices...

      I have a feeling that quote that will haunt McClung forever, sort of like the 640k one for Billy Boy.

      --
      "Population 1,656"
  3. Not that hard... by RollingThunder · · Score: 5, Interesting

    just don't hook one single system up to the Internet. Establish a private network (not VPN - actually private) for the entire thing.

    Use dedicated hosting boxes, with ALL DYNAMIC FUNCTIONS OFF, that run NOTHING but the http server on the public interface. The secure FTP server runs on a dialup connection that only connects to the private network, with hardware authentication of the modems to each other.

    Choose a bare-bones http server, with no bells and whistles. Both IIS and Apache are out. Maybe thttpd? Not familiar enough with it, to be honest.

    Yes, you're going to have to work around not having dynamic portions or ubiquitous connectivity, but you're having to choose, flexibility or security.

    Would this make for an enjoyable online olympics? Probably not, but that wasn't really what the story addressed. :)

    1. Re:Not that hard... by gmhowell · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There is no reason not to serve basic layouts (menubars, graphics, etc.) from thttpd, khttpd, or some of that sort. Let the 'content' be in the form of single stories placed within the framework. Run/served from a different machine.

      I mean, this is hardly rocket science, and it certainly isn't grounbreaking. It's merely applying existing tech and solutions.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    2. Re:Not that hard... by O2n · · Score: 1

      Choose a bare-bones http server, with no bells and whistles. Both IIS and Apache are out. Maybe thttpd?

      publicfile is a good choice for both http and ftp.

    3. Re:Not that hard... by Michael_Jarvis · · Score: 1
      Choose a bare-bones http server, with no bells and whistles. Both IIS and Apache are out. Maybe thttpd? Not familiar enough with it, to be honest.

      I see no reason not to use Apache, as long as it is properly configured. Using thttpd would work too, but you wouldn't be able to do as much IMHO.

    4. Re:Not that hard... by Chagrin · · Score: 1

      I think the point of view that you're looking at this from is incorrect. You need to assess the risks of what happens when someone finds an open switch port and plugs their laptop into it -- in addition to worrying about remote DOS or intrusions via the internet.

      --

      I/O Error G-17: Aborting Installation

    5. Re:Not that hard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank You:
      There is no reason NOT to use apache, and a lot of reasons why you probably should if you know what you are doing with it.
      I can think of a lot of things not to do when running Apache(ssi, insecure cgi, php, dav) but
      not many reasons not to use it.

    6. Re:Not that hard... by RollingThunder · · Score: 2

      Very good point there, and I feel like a schmuck for forgetting that. :)

      I know that cisco switches can be configured in a very paranoid setup, so that if the mac address changes, it locks the port. That's one method to attack the problem, but ye gods, the manpower that'd take....

    7. Re:Not that hard... by tuxlove · · Score: 1

      just don't hook one single system up to the Internet. Establish a private network (not VPN - actually private) for the entire thing.

      I realize you were being somewhat tongue-in-cheek, but what about internal security? All it takes is for someone to tap into the network at any one of thousands of potential points, or to insert a virus-infected floppy into one of the 5000 nodes, and they score. And if they use wireless anywhere at all, it's open season.

      You can't have physical security *everywhere* on the network, because presumably it stretches across a large open area. If someone wants to tap in bad enough, they will. There has to be significant internal security so that soft chewy center becomes hard-boiled, making it harder for intruders to break through from the inside.

      I agree with you on most of the other stuff tho.

    8. Re:Not that hard... by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 1

      also regarding IPing that network. Use DHCP - but map a specific addy to each MAC of each machine. Then if for somereason a MAC comes online that is not in the table - blacklist it.

      dedicate 25 or more of those 550 servers to traffic logging (actually prolly more like 150) and dump all logs to line printers.

      Im sure carnivore and eschelon will be in full effect during this. So stay off the phone. Learn to speak gibberish.

  4. Winning the gold for America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    This can't be right...

    1337 h4x0r5 5cH001 r0x0r5

    (Must be an Eastern Europe immigrant...)

  5. Not much there... by thrash_ · · Score: 0, Troll

    Mainly a fluff piece. Pretty skimpy on the details.

    1. Re:Not much there... by instinctdesign · · Score: 1
      Shame this got marked "troll," he's pretty much right. This quote best sums up the article unfortunately:
      McClung declined to give specifics about the system...
      Though some of the information is also in the Wired article, check out this Sema press release that gives a few more details. Also check out this article on Internet week focusing more on the software being used. Some what off-topic, though still interesting never the less is this CNN article on planning for a potential cyber-attack scenario during the Olympics.
      --
      forma3
  6. Olympic Security in Atlanta was a joke by CokeBear · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Olympic Security in Atlanta was a joke.
    I was a relatively low level voluteer, assigned to a specific area at a single venue. My badge said as much in codes that every security person was supposed to know.

    I was able to access behind the scenes areas, chat with athletes and celebrities, watch events at other venues, all without a single question from a security person. (Most of them were volunteers too). Even when I was out of my uniform, all I had to do was flash my badge and I was never denied access to even the most sensitive areas. Part of it has to do with attitude of course. If you act like you belong, they assume you do, and I consider myself a Master of Social Engineering, but even then, I should have at least been questioned when I walked into the athletes change area. (There were none there).

    I'm pretty sure that Salt Lake City will be more secure, if only because of all the money being poured into it now. But what they need to realize is no matter how many $B you spend on security, you still need people with the balls to say "I'm sorry sir, your badge doesn't allow you in this area" and to stick to it.

    --
    Reality has a liberal bias
    1. Re:Olympic Security in Atlanta was a joke by czardonic · · Score: 1

      Olympic Security in Atlanta was a joke.

      No shit.

      --
      Takahashi Rumiko made beats! DON, taku, DON, taku. . .
    2. Re:Olympic Security in Atlanta was a joke by geekoid · · Score: 2

      more importantly, you need supervisor who will back you when you make a decesion based on policy.
      I worked as a security gaurd in college, and it sucks to be told that nobody is allowed in without a badge, and then get fired for not letting a VP in who doesn't have a badge.

      In hollywood, shortly after 9/11, there was a studio security guy who wouldn;t lket Spielberg on the lot with out his badge, even though he knew it was Spielberg. After much digging around, he found his badge, then later sent the gaurd a 100 bucks for a job well done!
      thats the attitude that creates good security.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Olympic Security in Atlanta was a joke by zoombah · · Score: 1

      Part of it has to do with attitude of course. If you act like you belong, they assume you do, and I consider myself a Master of Social Engineering

      Only on slashdot can one call social interaction social engineering :)

    4. Re:Olympic Security in Atlanta was a joke by Syberghost · · Score: 2

      OTOH, a buddy of mine bought a pin from some guy on the street, and ended up face first in the concrete with half a dozen Secret Service agents standing on his extremities. Seems the pin was property of the SS, only to be worn by their agents.

      So that pin was really secure. Probably while the backpack bomb was being planted on the other end of the block...

    5. Re:Olympic Security in Atlanta was a joke by heliocentric · · Score: 2

      Do you have linkage to info about that tale? If I were to reference it conversation saying a CNN article told me so sounds way better than a /. poster told me so. However, I think tabloid TV (read: eXtrak, ET, etc...) probably ranks some where below /.

      --
      Wheeeee
    6. Re:Olympic Security in Atlanta was a joke by heliocentric · · Score: 2

      Only on slashdot can one call social interaction social engineering :)

      You should read the 2600 magazine a little more often - it's not just a term used on /. - it came from someplace else.

      --
      Wheeeee
    7. Re:Olympic Security in Atlanta was a joke by abischof · · Score: 1
      • Only on slashdot can one call social interaction social engineering :)
      As another poster mentioned, this isn't just a "Slashdot term". See also the Jargon File's definition for social engineering.
      --

      Alex Bischoff
      HTML/CSS coder for hire

    8. Re:Olympic Security in Atlanta was a joke by Foogle · · Score: 2

      Uh, der. He was making fun of the fact that most posters here are total losers, and can barely interact socially, let alone 'engineer'.

    9. Re:Olympic Security in Atlanta was a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was *Steven Fucking Spielberg* for cryin' out loud! There are rules, and then there are brains. Use your fucking brain!
      There is nothing I hate more than people who blindly follow rules without thinking. How many fucked up things have happened in history because someone was "just following orders"?

    10. Re:Olympic Security in Atlanta was a joke by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2

      The Spielberg story may be an urban legend... I seem to recall having heard it too...

      I used to work for a defense contractor, in a classified area. Access list was need-to-know, and visitors were to be escorted at all times. Policy was to challenge all unknown people. Someone once challenged the division president (no, he wasn't on the list ... no need-to-know), and got an attaboy for it.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    11. Re:Olympic Security in Atlanta was a joke by Lefty2446 · · Score: 0

      *Steven Fucking Spielberg* Works in the movie industry dosn't he? How easy would it be for someone to make a latex mask?

    12. Re:Olympic Security in Atlanta was a joke by Binary+Boy · · Score: 1

      There was a very similar tale about Dylan on his recent tour at a venue in Oregon or Washington, but this was confirmed and reported in numerous papers.

      Dylan attempted to get back to a private area after the show and was denied entrance by several guards (who may or may not have recognized him but wouldn't budge).

      Their manager congratulated them all, though I don't know that they got cash. Dylan was incensed but I'm sure he got over it!

    13. Re:Olympic Security in Atlanta was a joke by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Actually, I know someone in his office and got the story that way. I believe them, but I don't blame you for not believing me! ;)

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    14. Re:Olympic Security in Atlanta was a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, i know!

      i was referring to how slashdotters think of social experiences as social engineering, simply because they've only heard of the latter!

      christ you are so thickheaded.

  7. hmm by Quasar1999 · · Score: 2

    The man in charge of the security? Is it just me or does this seem like they are setting up a fall guy for the inevitable failure of their network security... Give the guys name out well in advance so we have someone to blame when everything gets hacked...

    Pretty smart...

    --

    ---
    Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
  8. Tip for McClung... by The+Paradox · · Score: 1

    ...Don't use Winblows, use OpenBSD. All your security worries will just vanish into the night. :D

    --
    Pain(n): when you're telnetting into a box doing somethin cool, and some luser calls for help with a 'critical error' ad
    1. Re:Tip for McClung... by ocelotbob · · Score: 2, Informative
      Don't use Winblows, use OpenBSD. All your security worries will just vanish into the night. :D

      Not true. While OpenBSD is infinitely more secure than windows, thats only a small portion of the problem. You've got to train people to use decent passwords, audit the data so that you can tell exactly where the info is coming from, and design a contingency plan so that if someone does get through, the damage done is minimal. OBSD may be a better foundation, but it's far from being a magic bullet. Much of OpenBSDs security comes from the fact that the admins start with a sense of paranoia; it's very possible to have the same security level with other OSes, its just you've got to know what you're doing.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

  9. The Cracker Olympics? by 13013dobbs · · Score: 1

    Sounds like they have a good site set-up for the Cracker Olympics. If they don't secure those well, they might have the Cracker Olympics held there as well. :)

    --

    No replies made to AC posts. Please log in.

    1. Re:The Cracker Olympics? by Havokmon · · Score: 1

      At first I thought you were referring to some KKK thing...

      Been listening to too much ManCow..

      --
      "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
    2. Re:The Cracker Olympics? by heliocentric · · Score: 2

      Saltine or Ritz?

      What kinds of topings did you have in mind? The cheese variety or maybe something along the lines of Seafood Sald?

      Oh wait, maybe I need to askin h4x0r speek:

      541+in3 0r R1+2?

      --
      Wheeeee
    3. Re:The Cracker Olympics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Cracker Olympics.

      Isn't that the truth.

  10. Re:Frist Toast! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you aware that it is impossible to hold a plosive?

  11. Re:ah, yes, salt lake city... by Lee+Cremeans · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Actually, it's NOT technically okay to have a dozen wives (I won't go into the details), but you'd never know the difference from some of the loonies I hear live out in the boonies.

    -lee...and what the hell do you do with 60 kids, anyway?

  12. Oh sure by eclectric · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    They post this drivel with no content, but not my post from the *same* website about selling the Moon.

    Anywho, who really cares about this? It will go away when the winter games are over. It'll be amusing if it gets hacked. Probably, an anthrax scare or two (or 463) will get much more news attention.

    Nerds do not care about the olympics. The olympics test how much Weight Gain 4000 a single person can consume and not have their liver fail (at least before the games.)

    I still can't see why this was posted. This is a tiny network. Is it even critical? The games will still be playable if every single machine decides to melt.

    Let's go back to our normal posts, mainly, 23 ways to bitch about MS.

    1. Re:Oh sure by czardonic · · Score: 1

      Come on man, these sound like entertaining hacks:

      Olympic "insiders" were said to be worried that hackers would disrupt the Games by placing false press releases on the official website, change scores by accessing the computerized scoreboard system and disrupt the Games by tinkering with the system that handled the transport and traffic systems.

      Tiny network, maybe, but the world's eyes will be upon it. If anything, this story makes the Olympics more of a point of interest for those that would ordinarily ignore it.

      --
      Takahashi Rumiko made beats! DON, taku, DON, taku. . .
    2. Re:Oh sure by fishebulb · · Score: 1

      testify. the olympic games is a joke. the performance enhancing drugs that dont even have a name yet, the bribes, the dictatorship control of the board. the olympic games is the perfect example of everything that is wrong with the world. it hasnt been about national pride in years. its about packing advertisements everwhere, bending rules, etc.

  13. Gobs of servers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I never really understood the need for hundreds of servers for a task like this, especially for the public website. There is no need for true dynamic content when they can come 99.9% as close with static content on a small farm of servers that's continually updated (say, on a 5 minute interval) by one or two dynamic "feeder" servers. Granted, they'll want one or two backup machines for every production machine, but that's far from a server farm warehouse. Sounds to me like a large scale "because we can" project moreso than a conservative project.

    1. Re:Gobs of servers? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      this is because almost all 'webmasters' are clueless sots.
      theres nothing like throwing 10 dollars at a 1 dollar solution, sheesh.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Gobs of servers? by robi2106 · · Score: 1

      I was wondering why they had listed such a huge number. I am guessing that Microsft has massive involvement in the games. This means a lot of different computers doing jobs. Like the parent post says, I bet they could eliminate net access for all the inside machines and KISS by only have the scores and stats updated every 5 min or so. Another poster linked to netcraft, and that is some scary stats. IIS yeash. I am just waiting for this to come crashing down. If that does happen, may be _finally_ the average Joe Six Pack of US and other nations will get a clue about MS's crappy software.

      robi

    3. Re:Gobs of servers? by slockhar · · Score: 1

      Who reads the results on the weeb dynamically anyway? Isn't that what the tele is for?

    4. Re:Gobs of servers? by aengblom · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but the Olympics is somewhat unique in that the most recent websites have strived to over real time content. IE. you can find out the times or a marathon, swim contest, or what have you. I don't know how much this takes, but certainly 5 minute updates isn't what this is about.

      --


      So close and yet so far from the world's perfect ID number
    5. Re:Gobs of servers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Realtime isn't the way to look at it. Replicating only the changes over 5000 static boxes won't take long on a gigabye network. That each page isn't fed from a db doesn't matter. Replicating only the changes is very quick and when you're comparing that to the overhead of mirroring a db anyway it's a few seconds here or there for a much faster system.

      For the web Realtime sucks.

  14. Re:ah, yes, salt lake city... by SquierStrat · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Actually, legally it's not okay, it's just kind of...overlooked. Also, what kind of nut would want a dozen wives? One, as I can see it, is a little difficult to handle, much less 12! Also, what business is it of the government's how many wives a person has?!?! If they have no sanity, and want 12 that should be there...warped but legal right. Also, instead of worrying about who is bribing the IOC officials, maybe one should worry about the fact that they are taking the bribes. Aside from that, Salt Lake City seems like a fairly nice venue, so no need to complain to much! :-)

    --
    Derek Greene
  15. Real-world reliability? by MikeLRoy · · Score: 1

    IT security is all fine and dandy for scoring and such, but what about real-world things? I can recall that in Atlanta, the very few busses actually ran at the end of the games (the rest broke down from overuse). Also, things like logistics, feeding people, etc, that were poorly orgainized and often failed. Imagine all the problems they'll be having with things other then IT!

    --
    -Michael Roy Some people are like Slinkies. Not really useful, but you can't help smiling when you see one tumble down
  16. IBM passed on the job by Lumpish+Scholar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... because they wanted to control it all, including everything on the Olympics.com Web site.

    http://www.forbes.com/2000/08/23/feat.html

    --
    Stupid job ads, weird spam, occasional insight at
    1. Re:IBM passed on the job by Kanasta · · Score: 2

      I worked at the 2000 olympics. From what I understand, all the sponsors give their services and all they get in return are signage rights and hopefully enough publicity to generate enough increase in sales to make up the money.

      It's amazing that so many companies compete to give their time and money away for coverage like this.

    2. Re:IBM passed on the job by swb · · Score: 2

      It's not amazing when you figure in all the free, hard-to-get-into event tickets, lodging and other on-site goodies the senior execs that donate stuff get in return, in addition to signage.

      Remember that whenever there's a corporate giveaway there's somebody getting a blowjob for it. It doesn't happen on hopes of increased sales.

  17. A chance to win... by Swannie · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hmm... with a little hacking, and I could be the first person in my family to win a gold medal for figure skating.

    Swannie

    --
    :q!
    1. Re:A chance to win... by sharkey · · Score: 2

      Make sure to protect your virtual kneecap! Those texture-mapped crow-bars can really put a stop to your dream.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  18. Re:ah, yes, salt lake city... by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1

    and what the hell do you do with 60 kids, anyway?

    With enough pelts, you can make a stunning fur coat.

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  19. Atlanta's problems... by SquierStrat · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Atlanta has issues all of the place due to the city government. Anything they touch is just f*cked up all over the place! Well, they touched the olympics and the olympic computer systems back in '96, and well you saw the results. Just be glad you don't have to live with said government. :-)

    --
    Derek Greene
  20. Re:ah, yes, salt lake city... by fishebulb · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    that always has been common practice for the olympics, (not saying its okay) so its not just a salt lake city problem. also what is the problem with having a dozen wives? in the moral sense it may be wrong (i personally dont care if someone else does it) but why is it legally wrong? where does it supposidly harm society etc? stop pushing your personal morals onto others that dont want them

  21. He didn't say it was the LARGEST... by Tsar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...only that it was the most complex network he'd ever seen.

    Personally, I can think of some rather complex topologies for even a twelve-computer network, even ignoring multi-homing possibilities. Depending on how the network structure is designed, as well as how many other networkable devices are involved and how they are connected (I'd assume a rather large contingent of wireless devices as well), this network might well be more complex than anything you or I have seen or even visualized.

  22. Remember Atlanta? by Grelli · · Score: 2, Insightful
    My memory may be fuzzy, but I seem to remember there being a small explosion at the Atlanta games.

    The reason I bring this up is that the article mentions the "great hack of 2000" where it was thought that the Sydney Olympics network would be compromised.

    Given the current state of affairs, current legislation, and this soon to be widely publicised network, are we going to be seeing any "Terrorist Attacks" against these games? Seems that it would be a very convenient situation for the US gov to prove the neccesity of the U.S.A. legislation just recently passed.

    1. Re:Remember Atlanta? by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, the Ancient Greeks were more civilized than we are today. They slaughtered each other most of the time, but during the Olympics, they ceased all hostilities. No one would dare to disturb the Olympics.

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
    2. Re:Remember Atlanta? by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2

      That's because the Olympics were religious in nature, and the gods would nail their asses to the wall if they messed with them.

      Today, you've got people who want to kill in the name of G-d, so of course they'll try to mess with the Olympics.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
  23. Re:ah, yes, salt lake city... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, polygamy is a just another lifestyle choice! Those guys were probably born with a gene that led them to choose multiple wives! So lay off, ya polygamyphobe!

  24. Rule Number 1 by darrad · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Secure the equipment!!!!

    If the guy from Atlanta was right, it does absolutely no good to put up firewalls, anti-virus, or intrusion detection. If any volunteer can take his limited badge and walk anywhere in the complex, then someone could volunteer, camp out around the IT room(s) and do their work from the inside.

    And then there is the ever present wireless links. Walk into the games with a laptop loaded with packet sniffers and a wireless NIC and wallah!!...you have all the info you need, even if you don't hack from inside the games, you have still obtained the needed info to go sit at home and go to work.

    I cannot believe that security was that bad at the '96 games, but I am not really all that surprised.

    1. Re:Rule Number 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >wallah!!...

      You're kidding, right? You walk around saying "wallah!!..."? Ever notice those people covering their mouths trying not to snicker behind your back when you do that?

      It's a French word. It means something. Using a phonetic approximation makes you sound/look like an ape.

      It's in the dictionary, look it up and don't try to use big words if you don't know what they really are or what they mean.

      voilà (vwä-lä`)

      interj. Used to call attention to or express satisfaction with a thing shown or accomplished: Mix the ingredients, chill, andvoilà!a light, tasty dessert.

      [French : voi, second person sing. imperative of voir, to see (from Old French. See voyeur) +, there (from Old
      French la, lai, probably from Latin

    2. Re:Rule Number 1 by darrad · · Score: 1

      Pardon Mwa,

      My french is terrible, so is my english...

      what can I say.....

      Thank you

    3. Re:Rule Number 1 by ivrcti · · Score: 1

      As always, a wee bit of social engineering, a wee bit of readily available code and "wahlah" mischief in the making! Until you're really serious about it, security is strictly for the executive summary.

  25. Re:ah, yes, salt lake city... by greebly · · Score: 3, Interesting
    In case you have been asleep for the last year, a certain Mr. Green just got busted for that very thing, and was sentenced in June.

    No, it isn't legal to have more than one wife in Utah, and hasn't been since before the territory of Utah achieved statehood in 1896 (which was one of the conditions of statehood).

    Also, although scandalous, bribing IOC officials was found to be the standard fare for most host-site hopefuls. Utah wasn't the first to do so. Utah was just the first to be prosecuted. IOC officials from previous years admitted to such.

    Check your facts before you troll.

    __
    Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup...

    --
    Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy, and taste good with ketchup.
  26. Security already not so great by imrdkl · · Score: 4, Informative
    Just looking at the Saltlake official webpage, I see only one link which uses encryption, and that's the signup link so that you can download a screensaver and get some kind of updates. Theres a tremendous amount of javascript there, and it's clearly being served already from M$.

    We might already be too late to help them. :-/

    1. Re:Security already not so great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph?&site=www.salt lake2002.com

      The site www.saltlake2002.com is running Microsoft-IIS/5.0 on Windows 2000.

    2. Re:Security already not so great by imrdkl · · Score: 0, Redundant
      Wow. This link really tells a story. Looks like they switched from Solaris and Linux, around July, and since then don't have an uptime worth a darn.

      A clean and stable games is one of the most important things we can do right now.

    3. Re:Security already not so great by imrdkl · · Score: 1
      Flamebait? Good grief, not even the athlete's own web is on SSL. It's friggin' Basic Auth.

      I aint tryin' to bash anyone here, just looking at ways to maybe help. I'd be happy to volunteer some time for this, if I lived closer to SLC.

      Is there no way we can help with this in a nice way?

    4. Re:Security already not so great by Ryu2 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      What are you talking about? It's certainly reassuring to me that they're using a real OS backed by a large stable vendor, not some hobbyist crap like Linux.

      --
      There's 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
    5. Re:Security already not so great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph/?mode_u=off&mo de_w=on&site=www.saltlake2002.com

      "The site www.saltlake2002.com is running Microsoft-IIS/5.0 on Windows 2000."

    6. Re:Security already not so great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, I kinda posted that as the FIRST reply to the parent post, you stupid blind dumb fuck.

  27. The Test by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 5, Funny
    OK, after they've got all rigged up and ready to go, they're ready for

    The Ultimate Test

    Fill the servers up with pr0n and serve it to the public, for free! If it withstands that, the Olympics will be a piece of cake.

    Hey, I'm serious ...

    --
    Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
    1. Re:The Test by jandrese · · Score: 2

      Screw porn. Fill the servers up with DivX movies/anime and MP3 files. Then announce it on Slashdot. That is the ultimate test of bandwidth.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:The Test by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 1

      Let's agree on pr0n, DivX and mp3s. But putting it on /. is no good idea, could bring the whole net down ...

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
    3. Re:The Test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Porn is illegal in Utah.

      But...Utah is the state with the highest rate of software piracy.

  28. But the Chinese can't ski! by javaaddikt · · Score: 0, Troll

    Brent Lundberg: Oddly enough, Jim, the Chinese seem to have delt a crushing blow to the U.S. and Swiss top downhill contenders with times up to 45 seconds lower.
    Jim: But the Chinese can't ski!

    meanwhile in Beijing:
    Xing Zhang: Muhahahahahahahaha

  29. This is *not* the place! (rant!) ;-) by Deagol · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    I work at the University of Utah. I'm no Mormon, but I wish these Olympic assholes would just get the fuck out of my life.

    We, the taxpayers, have had to fund more shit -- all in the name of the Olympics and World Peace -- only to get little in return. Yeah, we have wider highways, but they're already as congested as they were before I-15 construction began. We have a light rail in town, but they had to up sales tax for that (and I'm sure it won't go back down when its done). The U. just lost a few thousand parking lots to accomodate the games -- and I'm sure all of you University admins know how parking on a large campus already sucks.

    I'm so sick of these fucking Olympic organizations. The IOC and the SLOC (with phony Mr Romney at the helm), are are a bunch of corporate whores who rape the local communities for getting a few bucks in return.

    This whole thing really pisses me off, if you haven't figured that out by now. If the network is hacked, I'll be laughing my ass off. I'm gonna fly my Corporate Flag on my car when I crawl through downtown traffic when I'm on my way to/from work during the "games". Not that it'll change anything, but at least I'll feel better.

  30. obviously you've never dealt with streaming before by Frothy+Walrus · · Score: 1, Insightful

    these are the Olympic websites, which implies that there will be many live video feeds and even more saved clips. your "proposed solution" is very simplistic, failing to take into account the enormous bandwidth requirements (the condition which separates this network from any other generic Big Net).

    for something like this, you need to think about multihoming (Akamai-style), server location, special hosting... sorry, can't just set up a few Linux servers in the phone room and call it quits.

  31. Re:ah, yes, salt lake city... by Deagol · · Score: 1
    Well, they recently convicted a guy of welfare fraud. Serves 'im right, too. If I guy wants to boink 12 women, and those women have such low self-esteem as to need the arrangement, the more power too them.

    However, I will not tollerate the State supporting the children via welfare with my taxes.

  32. And the winners are... by Spackler · · Score: 2

    And now for our ceremony:

    Gold medal - France - l'intrus d'élite vous possède

    Silver medal - Spain - el hacker de la élite le posee

    Bronze medal - USA - 133t h4x0r 0wnz joo!!!!

  33. Anyone else catch this one? by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 1

    From the article:
    McClung declined to give specifics about the system, but said the network is protected by standard security methods such as firewalls and a virus detection application.

    See? Security thru obscurity!! It's working already!

    Whadda ya mean we "have to wait until after the Olympics are over?"

    Aw, man!

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
  34. This might be all useless. by Krapangor · · Score: 0, Troll

    Why they need computers connected to the internet at the olympic games ?
    They need of course some data storage facilities for the information about the sportsmen, events, scores etc. But I don't see why these computers must be connected to the internet. The 100 meter runners will be very unlikely to surf on the net while stetting up the newest world record.
    And personally i doubt that people who do so much sport can use computers without being helped.
    We all know that strong physical action reduces the amount of oxygen in the brain killing thousand of nervous cells like alcohol.
    They claim that they want to present the scores on the net, but this is just the useless usual internet hype. Which person who uses the internet is interested in sports ? Nobody, really. You might now say that there is AOL these days but you can't access the whole internet with AOL so this is no point.

    This is a very good example how the goverments money is wasted all over I think next they'll raise our taxes and make us pay. These sports dudes don't need an expensive internet access and i wouldn't be surprised if these admin guys are the brothers-in-law of some sports burocrats in Washington, Alabama.

    BTW: I weigh 200 lbs, does anyone know how to loose some weight ?

    --
    Owner of a Mensa membership card.
    1. Re:This might be all useless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eat less. thats the #1 way to loose weight.

    2. Re:This might be all useless. by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2

      Dude, perhaps you have heard of the website that generally runs during the Olympics? You know, the one that gives (semi-)realtime results, so you don't have to wait five days for NBC to get its act together?

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    3. Re:This might be all useless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Exercise is the only way to lose weight. Taking away nutrition (diet) will retain your current metabolism speed while starving your body. You need to speed your metabolism up by exercising. Go to a second hand shop and get a book with lots of exercise poses.

      As with any goal it helps to write it down a regular programme with milestones along the way. If you've got some personal problems in motivating yourself to keep to the programme then recognise that and get yourself help.

      Good luck

  35. Java by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CrossCountryJava will be an event in next Olympic - much better than PerlBobsled.

  36. Summary of all the above posts by Hector73 · · Score: 1

    I apologize in advance for my trolling, but anytime we have a server farm article, you can pretty much sum up all the posts as:

    40% M$ sucks. Use Linux,BSD for all the servers.
    30% Matt McClung [insert name here] is not me and, as such, a moron.
    15% First post, Stephen King is dead, grammer cop, and goatsex.
    10% Trolls ... just like this post :-)
    5% Informative posts.

  37. Re:This is *not* the place! (rant!) ;-) by sianide · · Score: 0

    I have to agree with you. My sister is a student at the University of Utah. She got kicked out of her room so some fucking athelete can stay there. Landlords are raising the fucking rent/kicking out tennants in hopes that the familys will rent their apartments. And on top of that The construction in downtown SLC is horrible.

    I hope the fucking olmypics fall flat on their asses.

    --
    .::[sianide]::.
  38. A Spectacle will always bring Spectators by Xunker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... and what is more spectacular than the Olympics?

    The Utah-based company where my day-job is has had a hand in the ticket sales side of the Winter Olies and I've noticed that whenever something this big comes around, people come out of the woodwork to make it go wrong or atleast cause general mayhem.

    A lot of people don't like the olympics, and a lot downright hate it to the point where they'll do anything they can to sabatage it including -- you guessed it -- hitting my company so that tickets cannot be sold online for the events.

    Now that they're imminently upon us things have calmed down a bit, but a while ago not a day would go by that we didn't get DOS'ed, Skript Kiddie'd and even had a near hit/miss with a domain hijacking, and a lot of the action carried nice little messages saying things like "death to those who promote globalization" and soforth. I can feel for Matt in this, especially since in a little over 2 months it's going to be his systems on centre stage along with the atheletes. The Olympics are too high-profile of a target for anyone lacking in self-esteem to pass up becuase it'll so "so 31337" to say "I changed the name of a frech competitor to 'Le Shithead' on the statz page! W00h00!"

    Maybe in 2004 Firewall configuration should be made an Olympic sport?

    --
    Hilary Rosen's speech was about her love of money and her desire to roll around naked in a pile of money.
  39. Re:FP!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please note: You just posted Germanys most famous classic citation.
    If you want to post this again, please inpersonate the orginial creator of this phrase:
    J.W. Goethe
    Trolls must have a certain cultural quality.

  40. Anyone else going? Anyone else care? by Otter · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Since the moment they announced Salt Lake would be getting the Olympics, I've been planning to be at the men's moguls contest. I had bad luck in the lottery but was able to pick up a ticket in the regular sale to go with the one's I'd already gotten for women's downhill (Picabo's back!), women's halfpipe, luge, XC, hockey and pairs skating. I've got a plane ticket, a couch on which to crash and am getting more stoked by the day. The only letdown is that Jonny Moseley seems to have given up his FIS career to devote more time to groupies and big air contests.

    Meanwhile, the Olympics are going to be held in the US in two months and as far as I can tell, no one besides me cares. I've seen a handful of commercials but there's absolutely no buzz. And judging from the tickets the organizers keep pleading for me to buy (men's hockey medal round games, women's skating long program, other really high-profile events) they're having a lot of trouble moving tickets.There was the bribery scandal a few years back (as if that wasn't how every previous Olympics was offered) and now the fuss about terrorism, but are people really bothered by that? I suppose the WTC attack, and the subsequent war and anthrax have driven everything else out of peoples' minds.

    Come on, like terrorists are really coming to Utah to blow up a bobsled run? I've eaten plenty of meals in the McDonalds you see in the pictures of the Jerusalem bombing last Saturday -- I can't bring myself to get too worried about going to Snowbird.

    1. Re:Anyone else going? Anyone else care? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Maybe they should charge less?
      I would also like to point the the Olympics are not supposed to be about the money.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Anyone else going? Anyone else care? by ellem · · Score: 2

      they have the Olympics ever 40 days or something now. Used to only be on Leap Year, no wonder it isn't special. The have pro atheletes competing, no wonder no one cares. The whole thing is like a Visa commercial, it's interesting for 30 seconds and then you forget all about it.

      --
      This .sig is fake but accurate.
    3. Re:Anyone else going? Anyone else care? by mudder · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I wouldn't be too worried about going to Snowbird either, considering the fact that : THE OLYMPICS AREN'T AT SNOWBIRD. For someone so excited about going, I'm surprised you don't even know the venues

    4. Re:Anyone else going? Anyone else care? by drsquare · · Score: 1

      The reason no-one cares is because the Olypmics are boring. Who wants to sit on a crap seat all day watching sports like running and the long-jump? All the decent sports like football are taken up by the World Cup etc, so only the crap sports are left.

      Yes, the Olypics has football etc, but only worthless friendly tournaments. The trouble with including so many sports, is that there's no real focus, no excitement. Whereas other sports have standalone tournaments, the Olypmics has loads of little sports, so there's nothing to really get excited about.

      And as for the traditional sports such as athletics, they have their own tournaments anyway. The Olympics is pointless. And then they have the cheek to charge fucking extortionate amounts to get in. The Commonweath Games (A sort of cut-down version of the Olympics for Commonwealth counties) are in Manchester soon, and for the same reasons I won't be going to see them.

    5. Re:Anyone else going? Anyone else care? by blisspix · · Score: 1

      in comparison to Sydney 2000, every Olympics after will be put to shame. We Aussies gave such a huge response to such a successful games that everything else pales in comparison!

      I'm surprised Salt Lake hasn't decided to hire every IT person that worked on the Sydney systems. They ran like a charm. My dad was working during the games, his job was to make sure that the backup of the backup didn't go down. nice!

  41. how was it done in the early 80s? by segmond · · Score: 1

    4500 pcs, 550 serverS?
    how many computers were used in the 70's and 80's, why is it just getting more complex?
    in 2020 they will need, 50,000 computers despite the fact that computer of those areas will be 100x faster and with more storage device.

    --
    ------ Curiosity killed the cat. {satisfaction brought it back | it didn't die ignorant | lack of it is killing mankind
  42. These scores just in... by ellem · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph?&site=www.salt lake2002.com

    Bronze == Solaris with 144.81 days of up time
    Silver == Linux with 130.78 days of uptime
    and the winner and still champion of the world in the Network Server Crash
    Gold == Win2k with and astounding 28.8 days of uptime!

    Way to go Microsoft you've proven again that innovation and crashes go hand in hand.

    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
  43. Re:This is *not* the place! (rant!) ;-) by gmhowell · · Score: 2

    I live near Baltimore/Washington, and say a prayer of thanks every time we don't get the Olympics. I mean, we just built about $1billion in stadiums (two in Baltimore, one near DC) and, uhh... We haven't gotten quite that much benefit out of them. I can only imagine the insanity of the Olympic games.

    My cousin lived near Atlanta. Had a bunch of leave saved up (gov't job). Took it all during the games. She wasn't alone.

    (BTW, nice flag)

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  44. Re:ah, yes, salt lake city... by Havokmon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Yeah, seven is pretty much the max. Any higher and the mathmatics involved in determining who's sleeping in what bed beyond next week become too tedious.

    --
    "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  45. For correspondents to file reports by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 1

    All the reports, thousands of them, will be filing hourly reports from the games back to their editors. I'm not sure how they plan to do it, but I suspect they'll use the provided "public" terminals so they can fire off results and other tidbits to those waiting at home. I don't suppose they'd let reports jack in with their own laptops, too much security risk there.

    --
    -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
  46. Use Mac! No Mac Web Server on os9 ever was hacked! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He should use a mac if he wants real security.

    There are hundreds of published exploits on Bug Traq for all OS's except mac.

    Thats why the US Army uses WebStar on a Mac for security.

    The mac has no command line to exploit from.

    The mac is always running at root (kernel is rarely enterred and only done so using Gary Davidian's birthday in a particular register) But because all code is root, mac programmers take time to do things correctly.

    The mac (os9 and older) cant execute a file merely because it is named a particular filename extension. It needs a resource fork. No mac web servers normally create these forks, nor do most helper apps that store data files. A mac data file cannot execute, it has one fork.

    The mac is usually programmed using pascal style strings using a length limiting byte. Not ansi c library c strings. In fact the roms use these strings nearly exclusively. Pasacl straings cannot be used to exploit buffer overruns as in unix or pc code.

    The mac stores return addresses differently than the lame way intel compilers set them up. This too helps prevent buffer stack exploits.

    The Mac web servers, (such as WebStar), never execute cgis except from areas they should and the files are further limited by their file type. A mac file type is not easily spoofed or hacked from an app, it is determined by what compiled code sends the mac os when a file is created.

    There are many more reasone that the mac web servers running standard WebStar is never exploitable remotely over the internet.

    It has never been done, in any version of these tools and mac OS 9.1 or older.

    Admittedly Mac OS X is BSD unix, but no sane mac web admin would ever want to use it. In fact Apple had to release three patches to Mac OS X exploits already!!!!!! Some were hilarious mistakes.

    This olympic admin is a fool for choosing the worng hardware and OS.

    Anyone will be able to break into his servers, if they are up enough weeks. Heck, you only need to read Bug Traq and then pounce Once the news is released after the short blackout tie period. If the news blackout is too long, then hanging out on IRC will yield some good info regardless.

  47. amero-centric by child_of_mercy · · Score: 2

    ahem

    since the 96 games (in america), and the upcoming games, in America there have been two other olympiads that may have gone unnoticed (perhaps due to not being held in America?).

    And while I'm sure they had their hairy moments in the back-room the tech side seemed to run OK...

    America is not the ENTIRE world you know.

    --
    'There is a Light that never goes out.'
    1. Re:amero-centric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "America is not the ENTIRE world you know."

      No, but we run it.

    2. Re:amero-centric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not Canada ... but there are exceptions to every rule.

      T&P

    3. Re:amero-centric by child_of_mercy · · Score: 2

      you'd think in that case that you'd want to be paying more attention to what goes on in it?

      --
      'There is a Light that never goes out.'
  48. Re:ah, yes, salt lake city... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone who tries to "defend" that hick, backward state of Utah is out of it.

    They don't call them Utahrds for nothing.

  49. Re:Security already not so great, but uptimes are! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, just look at the improved uptimes they have got since they switched OS. Maybe I will switch tooo.

  50. why the need for such high security? by alexmeaden · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry but this is only a sporting event. It's not as though the security of it is that important. And besides, why would crackers want to attack such an event - what information would there be to steal/alter?

    1. Re:why the need for such high security? by TheMightyZog · · Score: 1

      Because it's there.

  51. English Only? by Mad+Man · · Score: 1

    In addition to what has been said about size of the network vs. complexity here;

    Would the fact that English may not the only language used by the users add to the complexity?

  52. Re:Use Mac! No Mac Web Server on os9 ever was hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right-on.

  53. Physical Security by icejai · · Score: 0

    What steps are they taking to stop punks from running around the place clipping network cables? Forget clipping, even just scoring a cable in some discreet location would have a team of security specialists scratching their heads for a while. I bet a biatch with a pair of scissors or an exacto knife could do more long-lasting damage than any kind of DoS attack.

    This should be a real concern, given the level of lax security given to volunteers as mentioned in the above posts.

  54. What has javascript has to do with security? by Dog+and+Pony · · Score: 1

    I don't get it.

    What has javascripts to do with anything?

    What has not using https on a *public* site has to do with security on the network that is being set up?

    And I don't even see the point with pointing out the asp pages. Granted, that is a poor choice for security *if* the admins aren't very thourough and alert, but that has still nothing to do with what will come, has it?

    1. Re:What has javascript has to do with security? by imrdkl · · Score: 1
      So certain are you.

      Of course not. It seems this issue has been discussed before, and that I am in over my head. I will shutup now.

    2. Re:What has javascript has to do with security? by Dog+and+Pony · · Score: 1

      Actually, that is my stupid signature. Sorry about that one. In this case, it was misplaced. :)

  55. Re:The Test++ by Dog+and+Pony · · Score: 1

    Put the p0rn and stuff up for half a day, then turn on the security measures... not *that* will be the real test.

    My bet is that a regular stopwatch at a few bucks will be well enough to measure the time it will stand. Hehe.

  56. The Olympics is terrible. by drsquare · · Score: 1

    ... and what is more spectacular than the Olympics?

    Erm, the World Cup? The European Championships? The FA Cup final? Face it, the Olympics is shit. People only watch it because of the hype. Who wants to sit there for hours on end watching countless rounds of long jump and 400m? Why does the Olympics revolve round such dull sports?

    No-one ever rushes out to buy a paper, and flicks to the back page to find out who won the latest game of javelin or 100m hurdles. How can people get so excited about something they'd rank lower than paint drying the rest of the year?

    It's completely absurd.

    1. Re:The Olympics is terrible. by styrotech · · Score: 1

      You're right, but at least the winter version is slightly more exciting than the summer one. At least for some of the athletes - ie skiing, snowboarding, luge etc.

  57. Stop it, enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok dude, we have all read it before.. we dont care.. just post somthing informative. Stop wasting everyone's time with it. You think its great to be a troll.. ha.. wait a couple years... make the L on your forehead

  58. Re:This is *not* the place! (rant!) ;-) by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2

    We'll take 'em! The last time we had them here in L.A., the traffic got BETTER, not worse!!!!!

    --
    Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
  59. Re:ah, yes, salt lake city... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess that explains why half of California has moved in....

  60. Mitt Romney's password is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    No need to hack. From my 9th floor apt I can see into the windows of SLOC's offices. Easy to watch them type in their passwords every day. And yes, they do use insecure wireless networks. It interferes regularly with mine. Some say I have a 'snipers view'.

    Personally, I'm looking forward to a great party. A couple hundred thousand women I haven't hit on yet coming voluntarily to my town. But these slimy olympics people need to get the fuck out of town the very next day after closing ceremonies.

    FBI troll: Mitt Romney' password is ******* and he eats pringles potato chips like they were olympic bribes. He regularly entertains, uhhh, 'guests' late at night. What he keeps in his top, right side drawer is also very interesting. I'm not a terrorist, just an american who will make $$$ for what I know from wathcing through the windows. Is that Larry Flynt calling?

  61. Re:FP!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Arbeit Macht Frei

    -Birkenau Betty

  62. A little info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Posting anonymously since I work there.

    There are a lot of comments about the number of servers being used. While I can't comment on how many machines MSNBC will be using to host the web site, there are a large number of systems internal to the games that most people will never see. On-venue results and commentator systems at ten plus venues, games managment systems, central systems (Olympic intranet, print distribution, press feed, etc), the servers that allow all of these systems to talk to each other, plus many other systems that I'm forgetting at the moment. With many of these systems having two backup servers, it adds up quickly. True, it may be a lot of hardware to throw at it, but it's a high profile project. And it's not all Microsoft. Many of the central systems are running on Unix.

  63. Re:This is *not* the place! (rant!) ;-) by TheMightyZog · · Score: 1

    Yeah, feel better as you're one of the people clogging traffic instead of using the new light rail line going from downtown to the university. The university contributed a large chunk of money to that project. Try using it in eleven days when it goes into service.

  64. Misunderstanding by Hekman · · Score: 1

    I think that most people reading this thread have a common misunderstanding about what all of those systems will be used for. None of the 500 servers that were mentioned are used for serving web pages. All of them, however, are used for accreditation, information diffusion, Xerox printing, commentator information systems, and other necessary mission-critical servers.

    MSNBC (read NBC) is an official sponsor of the Games, and as such are maintaining the Olympic website as part of their sponsorship agreement, hence the use of W2K and IIS/5.0.

    I can assure you that there are many different types of technologies doing the REAL work behind the scenes.

    --
    ---- nohup: appending output to `/nev/dull'
  65. Re:BTW: I weigh 200 lbs, does anyone know how to l by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amputate a leg. Legs are quite heavy, so you'll lose a lot of weight all at once.

    If you're still too heavy, try another limb.