Slashdot Mirror


Dashboard Linux

zebziggle writes "The dashPC has Global Positioning (GPS) and Navigation, DVDs, Games (Quake 3, SoF, UT), Address book database, etc. It can run any programs that will run on an Intel/AMD i686 class computer. There is a Basic Stamp micro-controller that interfaces the Linux box to the car ignition for controlled boot/shutdown." The article says Linux, but that screenshot tells a different story. The website has other stuff and a lot more pictures.

164 of 249 comments (clear)

  1. what's better? by blugecko · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now when I get hit on my bike again by a car, instead of the old "i was on my cell" they will "i was in the middle of recompiling my kernel..." to the officer

    --
    Lysergic Acid Diethylamide, not just chemistry, reality!
    1. Re:what's better? by Jburkholder · · Score: 2, Funny

      More like "I was installing a service pack" from the looks of the screenshot?

    2. Re:what's better? by Jerf · · Score: 2

      Don't forget to use "nice" while recompiling the kernel, or your ABS braking and power steering will get really laggy, which can cause fatal "oops"es.

  2. Jetta Coupe? by Julius+X · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In addition the the screenshots that look a whole lot like Windows to me....I noticed that on the features page it shows a car which isn't even available in the US (yet the car has Florida Plates)---the Jetta 2 Door!

    Something about this site seems awfully fishy.

    --

    -Julius X
    remove "-whatkindofspamdoyoutakemefor-" from email to send
    1. Re:Jetta Coupe? by AtomicSushi · · Score: 1

      The Jetta 2 door is indeed available
      in the US...or was. I wasn't very popular, so VW dropped it when the did the JettaIII.

      http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/8783/coupehis to ry.html

      That car, however, IS a sedan.

    2. Re:Jetta Coupe? by Milican · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The listed software includes VMware. So it looks like your windows theories are true, but only by emulation.

      JOhn

    3. Re:Jetta Coupe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Idiot.. You should read before opening your mouth. He is running win98 under vmware for some of the software (just gps according to the page).

      Also can clearly see the front door handle in one of the pictures with the back door open.

      The only thing that make this site fishy is that your head is buried in silt.

      This site and the information is one of the best uses for linux on pc equipment. I saw it a while back and is an arguement that if done right linux can be very user friendly.

      Overall this is a great hack.

    4. Re:Jetta Coupe? by Buran · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      The Jetta coupe does exist as a concept only but isn't going to get built for the 4th generation A platform vehicles.

      The photo on the "features" page is a modified form of a photograph of that VW concept car . It was painted a lovely blue we don't get here in the US -- Jazz Blue. (A few Jazz Blue Golfs did make it as close as Canada, though. And you can get the color -- renamed -- on the Audi S4.)

      I can't seem to find a valid URL for the original photo at the moment, unfortunately.

      Jetta coupes existed for the first- and second-generation models only. They might come back for Generation 5, though. Who knows?

    5. Re:Jetta Coupe? by milkmandan9 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Coupe? I can clearly see a rear door in the "pictures" section of the webpage (3rd row, 3rd pic over).

      They could be using two cars...but even in that case, at least one of them is a sedan.

    6. Re:Jetta Coupe? by vax · · Score: 1, Funny

      If i had one of these in my car, i have a hard time beliving i would actually drive anywhere.. who needs a apartment when you have your server in your car = ) all i would add is 802.11 and a cup holder.. (god knows it probly is the only thing is doesnt come with) hehe, yea go out and by a Gremlin and put one of these in it.. talk about spending more on the system than the car = ) heh. i would get one but i bet my insurance would go up right? I can see it now "well sir it appears since you have FreeBSD running on your dashboard we are going to have to charge you an extra 50 dollars a month in insurance due to "stability" issues".. but hey at least it would be crashing when you were in the middle of rush hour.. i can see it now 10 year old hacker arrested for causing 1000 BSODs during rush hour, imagine the clean up on that wreak.
      just my 2 cents
      VAX

    7. Re:Jetta Coupe? by Keith+Russell · · Score: 2



      Volkswagen officially called it the Coupe Study CJ. And I think that's the color Audi calls Nogaro Blue.

      </karmawhore>

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
    8. Re:Jetta Coupe? by Julius+X · · Score: 2

      You should pay attention to whom you call an idiot.

      I did read the whole site, dumbass. The site claims that VMware was used only for GPS equipment for Win98, yet the desktop shows Windoze clearly being used for other purposes as well...including Winamp/MP3 playing.

      WIth all that work on WIndows, it makes you wonder why he even installed windows.

      As for the Jetta Coupe ordeal, the PICTURES clearly show a sedan, but the features with the "beauty" shots clearly shows a Coupe....with him trying to show how nice a car he has, you'd figure he'd actually show HIS car! (Notice he never takes any pictures of the exterior of his own car--lowered suspension my ass.)

      --

      -Julius X
      remove "-whatkindofspamdoyoutakemefor-" from email to send
    9. Re:Jetta Coupe? by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

      To clarify:

      The original version of the "dashpc" ran Windows (as pictured in the parallaxinc website). That was about 2 years ago. It now runs linux.

      The "features" picture was just a picture of a Jetta that I found on the internet. I didn't feel like "rolling my own picture of a Jetta" when there are plenty on the web. I didn't note the 2 door until after it had been added to the site. 99.9% of people don't "attack" the nonsensical details as you do.

      I haven't taken any pictures of the "exterior" of the car because that hasn't been my focus. The car is Volkswagen Jetta. Big deal. They are all over the place. My focus is on the dashpc, which resides on the..... interior. I will add a picture of the exterior of the car so that I can prove "beyond a shadow of a reasonable doubt" that the car is indeed: A Jetta. Woo! Hopefully, you'll be able to get some sleep finally. It appears you've lost a lot of it due to these details...

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    10. Re:Jetta Coupe? by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

      You sir are absolutely correct! I did have to remove the cupholder to put in the LCD screen. If only I could've had 1 more vertical inch they could have happily coexisted (however, the cupholder would be above the LCD which would have me worried 24-7.

      Keen eye...!

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    11. Re:Jetta Coupe? by Julius+X · · Score: 1

      LOL. People make way too big a deal about this stuff. Slashdot is about conversation....and I'd say many more people around here pick up much stupider details than I would ever consider. So lay off dude.

      I haven't lost any sleep, other than what I normally lose due to a bad work schedule. I really could care less about how your car actually looks. If it was a two-door, then I would say cool...that's all. Chill.

      --

      -Julius X
      remove "-whatkindofspamdoyoutakemefor-" from email to send
  3. Beowulf? by czardonic · · Score: 4, Funny

    Imagine a ten car pile-up of these!

    --
    Takahashi Rumiko made beats! DON, taku, DON, taku. . .
    1. Re:Beowulf? by BamaRob · · Score: 1

      Someone mod this up. That is FUNNY!

    2. Re:Beowulf? by Bobby+Orr · · Score: 1

      is that what the network neighborhood icon is for?

  4. Frame style? by JThaddeus · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Are you sure he didnt just pick a Windoz look-alike frame style? His site says Red Hat Linux 7.1

    --
    "Love is a familiar; Love is a devil: there is no evil angel but Love." --William Shakespeare ('Love's Labors Lost')
    1. Re:Frame style? by nuintari · · Score: 2

      One screenshot has Hollywood Magic Plus DVD software in it, its windows software, and they claim VMWare, but I seriously doubt DVD playing works all that well through a virtual machine. VMWare struggles to make office seem peppy on all but the newest machines.

      --

      --Nuintari

      slashdot : where an opinion can be wrong.

    2. Re:Frame style? by lukekb · · Score: 1

      ummm... Hollywood Magic Plus is hardware card... it does all the decoding in hardware not software... its not going to put any real strain the CPU. nice try

    3. Re:Frame style? by gol64738 · · Score: 1

      you haven't checked out vmware 3.0 yet. it screams faster than win4lin, plus hardware support. woohoo!

    4. Re:Frame style? by nuintari · · Score: 2

      yes, I own the card. the software used with the card is what they are running, and I seriously doubt that you can play dvd's in hardware or software over vmware.

      --

      --Nuintari

      slashdot : where an opinion can be wrong.

  5. Stuck at a green light. by TechnoLust · · Score: 1
    I can people to get out of my way when the light turns green now. I can just imagine if they start a game of Quake everytime they get stuck at a red light. I'm about as wired as you can get, but even I draw the line at that.

    On the other hand, for kids in the back seat with head phones, maybe quiet trips will make a comeback.

    --
    "Da ist ein Technölüst in mein Unterpanten!"
  6. Driver distractions by Lewisham · · Score: 4, Funny

    Do drivers really need any more distractions? They're supposed to be watching the road, rather than whomping through pedestrians. Why the hell would you want to play UT in the car? Frag a few people at the traffic lights? The real kicker is that it doesn't actually run when the engine is off. Hooray!
    However, the rather pointless walnut styling on the keyboard really sells the thing to me :)

    1. Re:Driver distractions by bhsx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He very clearly states that it's there for his passengers. He does not use it while driving. It's more of a toy to show off to friends/co-workers. He's been working on this a long time, I'm suprised he hasn't been /.ed earlier. Kudos and Hoorah, I know I'm inspired. :)

      --
      put the what in the where?
    2. Re:Driver distractions by Russ+Steffen · · Score: 1

      I SO want to play Grand Theft Auto 3 when I'm driving...

    3. Re:Driver distractions by S5o · · Score: 2, Funny

      There are always naysayers whenever Linux achieves something good. I say Linux needs MORE driver support, regardless of the consequences. If it takes a few dented bumpers to get a SANE interface to my Scanjet, well, dems the breaks.

    4. Re:Driver distractions by Lewisham · · Score: 1

      Hah, you're right :) But "inventors", "innovators", "crazies" or however they wish to call themselves keep making this stuff, and it is just a matter of time before someone gets battered. And, in the UK at least, even if you were caught using it, you'd still get less time in the chokey than manslaughter (don't know how they say it in the US: killing without premeditation), despite the fact it amounts to the same thing.

      Anyway, who said there was anything bad with identikit responses? ;)

  7. The Next Step by Talisman · · Score: 5, Funny

    What with all the automobile modifications for running computers, the next logical step is to simply replace the windshield with a monitor.

    Cameras mounted on the front of the car would provide the driver with images from the road. The rest of the 'screen' could be divided into whatever the user(s) would like.

    Say the passenger wants to play Quake, he opens a window and plays it on the right side, while the screen in the middle plays The Lion King for the kids in the back.

    This would also allow stronger bodies on cars, as the composite used in place of windows would be far stronger than glass.

    Talisman

    --

    "Study your math, kids. Key to the universe." -The Archangel Gabriel
    1. Re:The Next Step by Lewisham · · Score: 2, Interesting

      On the idiot box I saw something like this, where a small HUD was projected to the corner of the windscreen, which screened thermal imagery to the driver to be used in conditions of poor visibility. Worryingly, I would doubt it took long for some fool to post on the Internet how to turn it into a DVD player, causing people everywhere to crash their cars at the nail-biting final scene...
      I think a full on windscreen display would be a bit OTT. By the time that comes viable, the cars will be flying themselves :)

    2. Re:The Next Step by defMan · · Score: 1

      Exactly how many trust do you have in technology. I love the idea but if some circuitry failed i'd like it to be returned to normal see-trough glass automatically.
      You don't wanna see your binary-only nvidia driver blow up on you when driving (or X for that matter).

    3. Re:The Next Step by Wells2k · · Score: 1

      So what happens when the vehicle loses power while driving?

      I can see it now. The monitors go blank, you can't see a thing out the window, and you are driving down the Interstate at 85 miles an hour. What do you do? Crash, that's what.

      Also, I can imagine that people who suffer from claustrophobia would have a hard time in a vehicle such as this, no matter if they are seeing the outside through a virtual method.

      I guess I just do not see the use of virtual monitors in vehicles happening for some time to come. Glass is cheap, and can be strengthened to provide quite a bit of protection.

    4. Re:The Next Step by Talisman · · Score: 1

      Have a glass window embedded in the composite for just such an emergency. Like tanks have the vision slits.

      --

      "Study your math, kids. Key to the universe." -The Archangel Gabriel
    5. Re:The Next Step by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Cool idea. I've often thought of something similar for a car, but I've since thought that a Heads Up Display would be better suited for the purpose of displaying video on the windshield. Everything you mentioned could easily be done with a heads up display, and I think it would also end up looking cooler and being safer.

      (Actually my idea I had was about 7 years ago, while I was a major trekkie, was for a car that looked like and worked like a ST:TNG shuttlecraft. I had blueprints and everything, but somewhere along the lines I grew up :) ).

    6. Re:The Next Step by brer_rabbit · · Score: 5, Funny

      And after that, the next obvious thing is to replace the mouse with the steering wheel. And wire up the gear shifter as a joystick.

      It's all fun and games until someone *thinks* they're playing Carmageddon but they're really driving around the Target parking lot at 80 mph...

    7. Re:The Next Step by milkmandan9 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Besides the obvious safety considerations (what happens if the monitor dies or if a nicely-sized rock manages to punch a hole straight through the camera lens?), there are many advantages to having nothing besides a piece of glass in your way.

      First off, the windshield is big enough that if any significant portion of the glass gets damaged enough so that you can't see it, you generally can see enough to pull over to the side of the road. Glass is ungodly simple this way--if you critically damage part of it, the whole thing isn't going to fail.

      Secondly, glass is relatively easy to fix and cheap to replace: A new windshield runs for around $200. Any camera/monitor combo would likely cost tens of times as much. What's more, even if you've got a chasm-of-doom running down the middle of your windshield, you can still drive (albeit not terribly legally). With a cam/monitor combo, a dead camera means a useless car.

      Lastly, and most importantly, is the human factor. The human optical system is a very complex systems that's been honed for tens of thousands of years to process lots of bits of information at once. When I'm driving down the freeway at 75mph, maybe ten or twenty car-lengths behind someone, I can feel if I'm getting closer or farther away from them, despite there being a speed difference of only a couple of mph. Most peoples' eyes are also much sharper than most LCD screens (we won't discuss CRTs -- they're big, heavy, and a major safety hazard -- would you like a vacuum-filled glass tube in front of your head when you get in a wreck?) I've seen camera-and-LCD rear-view mirror replacements, and I haven't been impressed. Even at high resolutions, there's a lack of detail and intuitive connection to the image. It's the same feeling as looking through a periscope--your mind loses its connection to the object that you're looking at. You don't have any of those problems with glass.

    8. Re:The Next Step by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      What with all the automobile modifications for running computers, the next logical step is to simply replace the windshield with a monitor.
      Yeah, like in the old "Spectrum Pursuit Vehicles"!!! (From this page)...
    9. Re:The Next Step by taliver · · Score: 1

      It would be much safer if you turned the driver around, had himfacing the rear of the vehicle. Now head on collisions could have a lot of crumple space, and rear collisions would be the problem.

      However, the steering wheel doesn't need to be physically linked to the wheels, so you could have force feedback elecronically, and not have to worry about it being pushed into your chest during an accident.

      However, I guess it comes down to a person in a high velocity box. There are only so many configurations.

      --

      I demand a million helicopters and a DOLLAR!

    10. Re:The Next Step by crashcheval · · Score: 1

      The idea sounds interesting, but I think there would be a major problem if the system crashes. Or, it could give a whole new meaning to the term.

    11. Re:The Next Step by zhensel · · Score: 2

      Check out this review of the honda insight - http://www.arstechnica.com/reviews/3q00/honda/insi ght-1.html ... the guy modded the car and replaced the side mirrors with ccd cameras linked to displays to the sides of the stearing wheel. They also mounted a windmill to charge the battery :)

      The info about the mods is on the 4th page - http://www.arstechnica.com/reviews/3q00/honda/insi ght-4.html

    12. Re:The Next Step by brandon · · Score: 1

      Your last points are good, but a camera won't cost $2000 to do this, and having a dual camera system failover, would fix the problem of a shattered lens. You could put glass 6 inches infront of each camera, and if one glass gets shattered, it costs $20.00 to buy another 4x4 inch glass window that's infront of the camera, now the only othe thing to worry about is lens flare, but that can be taken care of with software I would bet.

    13. Re:The Next Step by athakur999 · · Score: 1
      The human optical system is a very complex systems that's been honed for tens of thousands of years to process lots of bits of information at once.

      The biggest problem I can see with replacing a windshield with a camera is that you lose your stereoscopic vision. I haven't see any good way of replicating it either that doesn't hamper anything else.
      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    14. Re:The Next Step by guru_steve · · Score: 2

      Imagine that... if you replaced the windshield with a "monitor," that'd sure bring a whole new meaning to the Blue Screen of Death!

      Rendundant, yes; but it had to be said!

    15. Re:The Next Step by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      we won't discuss CRTs -- they're big, heavy, and a major safety hazard -- would you like a vacuum-filled glass tube in front of your head when you get in a wreck?)
      Everyone who drives a Riveria from the years 1989-1996 do. That center system is a 9" monocrome tube.

      They are very safe, and work better in a vehicle that isnt in the warm south.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    16. Re:The Next Step by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I know it's off topic, but new car windshields can easily have close to $1000 list price. Older car's windshields cost less. It is in part to the age, size of windshield and how much money they think they can get for it.

      But otherwise your point remains and I agree.

    17. Re:The Next Step by Snowfox · · Score: 3, Funny
      What with all the automobile modifications for running computers, the next logical step is to simply replace the windshield with a monitor.

      Cameras mounted on the front of the car would provide the driver with images from the road. The rest of the 'screen' could be divided into whatever the user(s) would like.

      That's all very well and good until you swerve to avoid a fucking X10 popup and end up taking out some poor grannie crossing the road.com.

    18. Re:The Next Step by cdh · · Score: 1

      Yes, the newer Cadillacs have this exact thing. It has a night vision system via a HUD. See it at Cadillac's web site.

    19. Re:The Next Step by milkmandan9 · · Score: 1

      Normally I don't respond to ACs.

      But I've been playing with Lexan recently.

      First: Lexan discolors in sunlight. It's not exceptionally quick, but it will discolor after a year or two.

      Second: Lexan scratches--easily. Granted, you can get the specially-coated stuff, but that's really expensive...which brings me to:

      Third: Lexan is really really expensive. The bullet-proof stuff you speak of is between $85/sq.ft and $115/sq.ft. Figure 3x5' windshield--that's 15 sq.ft, or $1275 for just the raw, unformed, uncut, unpolished, and non-scratchproof Lexan. The government can afford that for their ~$30 million F-16...but I'm not paying it on my $13k Kia. Even at 1/4", you're looking at $200 for the raw materials, and you still need to replace it every two years.

      Fourth: It's used already on race-cars. The DOT hasn't approved it for street use (although they've been known to make very bone-headed moves in the past.) It's used for a bunch of stuff. It's not being used on cars. Glass does a nice job (especially considering that it shatters into tiny bits to let your head poke through instead of making your head splatter all over the inside). I like glass.

    20. Re:The Next Step by _UnderTow_ · · Score: 1

      I don't see how this is the next logical step.

      Some people can break a glass with their voice, but the simplest way to break one is to pick it up and drop it on the floor.

      Glass windshields work, period. They are cheap to manufacture, and cheap to replace. There is absolutely no reason to replace them with a gigantic monitor. Perhaps making windshields out of something more durable than glass (such as whatever material is used for bullet-proof windows) would be logical, depending on how much it costs (i have no idea).

    21. Re:The Next Step by spencerogden · · Score: 1

      I don't think any one was suggesting Lexan windshields. They were suggesting lexan protection for the cameras.

    22. Re:The Next Step by armb · · Score: 2

      > It would be much safer if you turned the driver around, had him facing the rear of the vehicle.

      Do we get the rest of the cool SPV features with that?

      http://members.tripod.com/chris_bishop_ca/page28 .h tml

      --
      rant
  8. Re:Jetta Coupe? -Amendment by Julius+X · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I forgot to mention that its not just the widgets...but the Winamp/Nullsoft for Windows icons too.

    And WHO in their right minds uses fake woodgrain on a Jetta? That makes the entire car look sooo cheezy!

    --

    -Julius X
    remove "-whatkindofspamdoyoutakemefor-" from email to send
  9. redundant -1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    it's allready mentioned in the blurb lazerbrain...

  10. Games!?!?! by Xenopax · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hope they come out with a driving game for this.

  11. The software page mentions VmWare by defMan · · Score: 1

    The software page talks about vmware and win98 being installed for the GPS/Street Atlas software. On the screen shot they might have taken the windows view, although it seems to be running just a bit more then GPS software there.
    Is there no good Linux GPS/Atlas stuff out there? Maybe someone should give them a pointer to it.

    1. Re:The software page mentions VmWare by pa-guy · · Score: 2, Informative
      GpsDrive works really well.

      GPSDrive HOMEPAGE

    2. Re:The software page mentions VmWare by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

      Dude, you are a god. Thanks sooo much for that link. Last time I checked there was no good GPS software for linux. I'm soooo stoked. I can finally drop Windows 100%.

      A sincere Thank you!!! (no kidding)

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
  12. Read this! by wiredog · · Score: 4, Informative

    Article about the dangers of car PC's and cell phones use while driving.

    1. Re:Read this! by nuintari · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They wanna outlaw talking on cell phones while driving, with good cause. Then someone comes along and inventsd "mobile quake 3 for the really bvored driver!"

      God we're dumb.

      --

      --Nuintari

      slashdot : where an opinion can be wrong.

    2. Re:Read this! by aridhol · · Score: 2
      It isn't for the driver, it's for the passengers.

      It's supposed to be for the passengers. However, he also admits (in the FAQ) that he does use it sometimes while driving. And if these started making it into Joe Driver's car, you know that drivers will start using it, no matter the intention. It already happens - I quite regularly see people using their laptops in cars.
      --
      I can't say that I don't give a fuck. I've just run out of fuck to give.
    3. Re:Read this! by Quizme2000 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Great, now Bill Gates can say open source movement can kill.
      When somebody gets hit when the driver's attention is distracted by the radio, phone, or tv it is an accident that was 100% avoidable in the eyes of the law. Just having this rig in your car makes you liable for any accident your in, and any would be theif walking pass your ride. If this is for passenger use Only(?) it fine, just like the game systems/TVs in minivans. Adding anything to the dashboard that distracts the driver is extremly dangerous period. Voice activitation and HUD won't solve the problem either, its still distracts.
      IMHO when automated driving systems become standard (which they will) then I'll have no problem with the driver of the SUV fragging the scrpit kiddie in the minivan.

      --
      "Get them before they get....
    4. Re:Read this! by kurowski · · Score: 1

      the article that you link to not only exploits cumulative round-off errors in order to magnify a point, but it's also overly simplistic. i routinely dial my cell phone one handed while at a stop light, and i don't always finish dialing by the time the light turns green. regardless, i notice the light turn green as it changes and proceed to accelerate as i continue dialing. either his statement that human attention is "not multithreaded" is wrong, or i've got dialing down to a reflex. also, i then turn on the speakerphone, set the phone on my passenger seat, and hold a conversation while driving through downtown boston, swerving to avoid bicyclists, stopping suddenly as people ahead of me run red lights, and rerouting to avoid congestion. all while carrying on that phone conversation. so, perhaps while the author has a hard time talking and driving, i don't.

      outlawing cell phones in cars because they're a distraction? fucking retarded idea- what's next, outlawing passengers? luckily the author doesn't go that far, he just advises those building in-car devices to take driving into account when figuring out price/performance trade-offs.

  13. He's running VMWare - Windows 98 by tmhsiao · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you look at the dashpc.com site, he mentions that he's running VMWare for Windows 98 access to the GPS software.

    --
    "My God...It's full of ads!" -Fry, about the Internet, Futurama
    1. Re:He's running VMWare - Windows 98 by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      and the reason is because all of the current gps/mapping software projects for linux are completely dead.

      mayko xmap is gone, the open source xmap called hugo is gone, and noone will use the free map database (tiger line) for their map sources.

      Linux fails miserably in the land of navigation and mapping, and unfortunately it will stay that way for a really long time.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:He's running VMWare - Windows 98 by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      and he doesnt have to.
      I just tried it and YES Delorme 5 works fine under wine with the delorme tripmate.

      so the added costs and overhead for vmware and winsomething is overhead that was never needed.

      Windows is not needed on this machine for any reason.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  14. Re:Wow, a dashboard linux box running windows, ama by ethereal · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Hmm, just like the Best Buy circular I got yesterday - the front was all about a Sony Vaio Pentium 4 with Windows XP, but of course the screen shot was showing Mac OS (and not OS X either). You may have seen it - the screenshot was an email program with a mail being composed about getting one of the new N'Sync bobble-head (there's a redundant statement) dolls. If technology companies can't get their ads straight, it's no wonder that the rest of the world is so confused about what's what.

    --

    Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

  15. question... by turbine216 · · Score: 1

    did anybody catch anything on either site that explains how the realtime weather information got in there? There's no mention of a mobile data link, other than GPS. Is GPS capable of relaying this type of information?

    1. Re:question... by bergeron76 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The weather and traffic data are gathered when the car is still in the garage via 802.11

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    2. Re:question... by Ledge · · Score: 2, Funny

      There is a REALLY long retractable spool of cat5 with amplifiers every so often mounted on the rear bumper. Works fine as long as you return home using the same route that you used to get to work.

      --
      If it ain't a Model M, it's a piece of crap.
    3. Re:question... by turbine216 · · Score: 2

      did you just make that up? Nothing on the site indicates that the box has WiFi built in. It mentions a 10/100 ethernet card, but i would imagine that it's only for VERY occasional file transfers, involving removal of the box.

    4. Re:question... by Jestyr · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah.
      He looks ouside the window.. instant weather updates :P

    5. Re:question... by petree · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if this is what is allowing for realtime weather because their site has been /.ed

      But anyways, you could do this sort of thing using traditional radio and/or shortwave. I have seen an alarm clock that could tell you the forcast (not just play that radio station, but it had a display) and the current conditions outside. The ability to include something like this in a car-based computer would most likely not add more than 15-20 to the total cost because there would be no need for a dedicated display.

      This would be a function most people would actually use on the AutoPC.

      P.S. It still makes me sick that people would actually want Windows CE running on their car stereo, let alone full blown Wnidows98 running in their dash board PC....

    6. Re:question... by bartle · · Score: 2

      did you just make that up? Nothing on the site indicates that the box has WiFi built in.

      It's on his News page. The 10/25/01 entry had the following:

      The screen resolution on the display is limited to 640x480 so I've decided to drop the window manager. I'm going to use perl/Tk to roll my own UI. I put a few pictures at the bottom of the pictures page. I'm currently downloading the images (via 802.11) for weather and traffic before I leave the parking garage. By the time I get out of the parking garage, the system has booted, the network connection is live, and the system pulls the images off the web. In addition, the car uploads the latest GPS coordinates, so if the car ever disappears, the authorities can recover it. Since ricochet went down, I'll have to figure out another way to do the wireless connectivity. I'm thinking about cellular at this point, but I'm not sure just yet. The user interface is coming along nicely. I also added a radio card to the system. It was killing me not having talk radio on my way in to work. The Hauppauge cards have a coax connector which is why I chose it.

      Sometimes, when I'm stopped at a red light, I can get an ethernet connection. I must be jumping on to someones 802.11 base unit. All your 802.11 base are belong to us.

  16. Beowulf Clustering Anyone? by Catiline · · Score: 1

    Take a large dose of computing power, throw in a dash of hackerism how-to, and top with a smattering of WiFi... beowulf supercomputing on the (real) highway!!!
    Now those long, traffic-jam laden commutes might not be so bad for society after all- just add a little distributed computing.

  17. couple it with a "heads-up" display... by motherfuckin_spork · · Score: 2, Funny
    and get confused as to whether or not your shooting at the sniper in the tower or the Navigator cutting you off...

    --
    Nope, not me, I must be someone else...
  18. Ho-Hum, Friday afternoon ... by ReidMaynard · · Score: 5, Funny
    Please note: This system was designed for the enjoyment of my passengers.

    *My* passengers are to busy praying not to die, while I navigate my bmw @ 2xSpeed Limit speeds.

    --
    -- www.globaltics.net

    Political discussion for a new world

    1. Re:Ho-Hum, Friday afternoon ... by studboy · · Score: 1

      are they? remind them that lights timed for 30mph are also timed for 60!

    2. Re:Ho-Hum, Friday afternoon ... by ReidMaynard · · Score: 1

      well, I *do* have unusually small pinky-toe toenails.....

      as a PS, Truthfully, I only drive really fast by myself.

      --
      -- www.globaltics.net

      Political discussion for a new world

  19. wowowow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    can you imagine a Steppenwolf Cluster of these??? Now *that's* a magic car-pet ride!!!

  20. Hey is that... hmmm... by The+Bungi · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I can't tell a lot from the screenshots other than a default Win desktop with some Winamp shortcuts. I was wondering if this is that "Mobile Windows" thing from Microsoft that is supposed to be specific for automobiles? OTOH this looks more like a standard small-footprint PC than anything else.

    If so then it's probably nothing new - just clever wiring and some GPS software.

    I have to say though, the keyboard seems mighty stupid. And games??? I mean, maybe in a traffic jam but I can't see the point.

    Devices like these need to be voice controlled, if anything. Actually, someone needs to come up with an input device that can be mounted in the steering wheel and functions as both a mouse and basic keyboard, maybe even support for gestures and so on.

    Oh, and definitely put the display in a HUD or something. More people have died from looking down to change the radio station than hit by trains at intersections =)

    1. Re:Hey is that... hmmm... by laserjet · · Score: 2

      I wish you would read at least some of the article. he clearly states that the system is for passengers while he is driving, not to fuck with when he is driving. any person that has a brain knows that would be very dangerous. if i were a passenger, i would love to play wolfenstein while on a roadtrip.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    2. Re:Hey is that... hmmm... by The+Bungi · · Score: 1

      if i were a passenger, i would love to play wolfenstein while on a roadtrip.

      No doubt you would.

  21. Transform a traffic jam into a party? by AchilleTalon · · Score: 1
    Add wirless networking capabilities and each traffic jam will transform into a huge gaming party.

    Anyway, there is many practical uses for this. However, a sticker should state: "Don't surf and drive!"

    --
    Achille Talon
    Hop!
  22. it uses windows for the atlas by ChimChim · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Am i the only one who visited the "software" section of the site? for everyone's benefit:

    * Red Hat Linux 7.1
    * M$ Windows 98 installed on VMWare for Linux (used only for GPS/Street Atlas RWE)
    * VMWare for Linux

    * XMMS (Linux)
    * StreetAtlas Road Warrior Edition

    so the answer is: yes, indeed the screens do look like windows, because they are.

    christian.

  23. See Comment... by ijx · · Score: 2
  24. Windows in the screenshot, Linux in the text? by grnbrg · · Score: 1

    It might be that the screenshots are of a "proof-of-concept" prototype that had Win98 loaded, but Linux will be loaded on the "production" version...

    If (as has been previously suggested) this is not much more than a mini-PC with some additional extra stuff to manage a graceful shutdown, then replacing a full Win98 install with a Linux install should not be too difficult.

    And he wouldn't have to may the M$ tax.

    Just my C$0.02...

    grnbrg

  25. Single DIN GPS by sct · · Score: 1

    What I am looking for is a single DIN GPS system.

    I have a WRX with an area for a gauge pod on the dash that could hold a single din unit, I saw someone had mounted a Kenwood there.

    Does anyone know if such a beast exists?

    1. Re:Single DIN GPS by LennyNero · · Score: 1

      There are single DIN GPSes but unfortunately you will probably not like their prices, as they are designed for small aircraft, and being FAA rated means that they cost several thousand.

  26. GPS Quake by EccentricAnomaly · · Score: 1

    Seems like the GPS could be used as an alternate controller for Quake.... Then head on out to your neighborhood salt flats... Actually, you could do this now with a GPS and a laptop :)

    --
    There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can count in binary and those who can't.
    1. Re:GPS Quake by Captain_Frisk · · Score: 2

      The biggest problem here is refresh rate. Otherwise your idea is pretty cool. Probably want to use it to run doom instead, because mouselook in your car might be tough.

  27. Nifty by chihowa · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is great.
    I've put a system in my car that does a few of these things. It's based on a regular x86 system, but uses straight DC-DC for power (eats less power). The BASIC STAMP I used (BS2-SX) is set up to power up the computer on ignition and it can start the car on a signal from the computer, as well. I'm in the process of setting my trunk button on my keyless entry to turn on the computer instead. I have a 5" LCD (no touchscreen yet!) and tiny keyboard (keypad next to the LCD, too).
    So far it has integratio with my GPS: moving map, output to my stereo, 802.11b (to work on it from my home, transfer music, etc), and the beginning of an interface to my car's CPU and testing system.
    I'm using a big deep-cycle battery to power it (charges from car) when the car isn't on, but I really just want to make it more low-power from the bottom up. My car is pretty light-weight anyway (RX-7), so I'd like to lose the battery eventually.
    This is mostly spare parts and home-built electronics, though, so I spent less than $200 on it as it is. My entire CD collection is in it in fairly high bitrate mp3/ogg files.
    Once the car CPU interface is complete, I can have all sorts of useless realtime stats to look at instead of the road!
    Now I just need retractable wings and I'm set. (Maybe oil-slick and caltrops, too!)

    --
    If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    1. Re:Nifty by Conan+the+Grammarian · · Score: 1

      What's the IP address? Let me know when you'll be driving so I can hack your ignition.

    2. Re:Nifty by laserjet · · Score: 2

      127.0.0.1

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    3. Re:Nifty by Conan+the+Grammarian · · Score: 1

      Aha! I hacked it, and MAN was it easy - your security sucks. Well, let's see... you've got all kinds of kiddie porn and Britney Spears MP3s on your hard drive - and hey! That's my term paper! How did you get that?

  28. Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You can watch a DVD, make a call, or play Half life while running over pedestirans...

    I can not wait till cars start to fly and we have them start to hit buildings and fall from the sky so distracted drivers can kill people by the score. Because one or two at time is what we seem to be limited to now...

  29. What we REALLY need . . . by cjpez · · Score: 5, Funny
    A bunch of us were talking once about how keen it'd be to actually have Linux RUNNING your car. As in, replace whatever's in the "little black box" with Linux.

    So you'd actually have /dev/engine, /dev/wheel[0123] . . . Some stuff under /proc to report stats and the like. You'd have things like "steerd" running in the background to handle steering. Get a remote interet connection up and you could even SSH into your car to diagnose engine problems! Think of the possibilities!

    You could even use the standard Linux sound structure to deal with your car's audio system. /dev/audio and the like. Have mpg123 for mp3s, some cd player to deal with CDs. Heck, since we're doing mp3s now, you could actually serve mp3s up to OTHER cars running Linux! We could probably hack up Gnutella to do some keen P2P stuff. ("Damn, I forgot my NIN CD at home. But wait! That Honda over there is sharing them! Great!")

    Of course, then you've gotta worry about people h4x0ring into your car. That'd bite. We'd have to make sure there's some pretty thorough iptables rules going on . . . And what happens if your kernel panics? Doh! Probably not the best situation to be running a "testing" kernel on. I can see the website now: "Well, the bug that was causing engine meltdowns was fixed in 2.5.13-pre5, so I suggest everyone upgrade . . ."

    Gives a whole new meaning to the whole "no warranty implied" thing, eh? Would you want the preemptible kernel patches on that thing?

    So what do most cars actually run on, anyway?

    1. Re:What we REALLY need . . . by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 1

      So what do most cars actually run on, anyway?

      Embedded RTOSs I'm guessing. Mostly custom made.

      Anyways, I'd hate to have linux running on my system, imagine if steerd segfaulted, or my car got h4x0rd by an 31337 5kR1p7 K1dd13.

    2. Re:What we REALLY need . . . by mindstrm · · Score: 2

      Cars *actually* run on pure, native instructions, for some kind of embedded processor. They may use an RTOS....who knows.
      I certainly woudl not want linux running my car.

    3. Re:What we REALLY need . . . by Casca · · Score: 1

      Just don't upgrade to kernel 2.4.14...

      --
      Casca
    4. Re:What we REALLY need . . . by cjpez · · Score: 1
      heh.

      But on a serious note, what's wrong with 2.4.14 besides having to patch loop.c by hand? Kernel Newsflash doesn't have anything to say about it, and I haven't had problems with it myself (haven't had time to get up to 2.4.16 yet) . . .

    5. Re:What we REALLY need . . . by Wreck · · Score: 2
      A sys admin at NASA where I worked for a while had the following vanity tag:


      DEV CAR


      My normal reaction to vanity tags is "loser"... this is the only one I have ever envied.

  30. Just a few questions by xah · · Score: 1
    I have just a few questions.

    First, can it download my e-mail? Second, can it read my e-mail, and maybe e-books, to me, using a text to speech synthesizer? Third, can it read it to me in a pleasing female voice?

    --
    I am not a lawyer. Do not take my words as legal advice. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney.
  31. Priceless... by thrillbert · · Score: 5, Funny

    In-Dash PC emmulating windows: US$1,000

    802.11b Wireless LAN card: US$120

    Airsnort: Free

    Sending a WinPopUp that says "YOU ARE AN IDIOT" to the moron who just cut you off: Priceless

    For some things there are hand signals, for everything else, there's Linux.

  32. Needs a heads-up display by Nooface · · Score: 1

    This would be much more useful with a headsup display.

    --

    Nooface
    In Search of the Post-PC Interface
  33. Scripting this baby by tangent3 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Anyone care to write a parallel parking script for this?

    cat "right 30" > /dev/wheel
    cat "25" > /dev/accelerator
    sleep 2
    cat "0" > /dev/accelerator
    cat "left 30" > /dev/wheel
    cat "reverse" > /dev/gear

    1. Re:Scripting this baby by downundarob · · Score: 1

      Dont foget to parse the locale, or you will have us left-hand drive countries parking on the centre line.

  34. So if most of your apps are Windows... by fmaxwell · · Score: 2, Troll

    Why run Linux when your GPS software and other apps are native Windows apps? Just so you can say "Look at me! I'm one of the l33T linux dudez!"?

    If you want to run Quake, UT, Winamp (or equivalent), and commercial GPS mapping software, you need Windows, not Linux. Of course, there's always someone with a really big hammer, a square peg, and a round hole...

    1. Re:So if most of your apps are Windows... by gol64738 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      isn't it obvious? since linux is open, it's a lot more configurable.
      let's say he only wanted certain processes starting or stopping at particular times?
      what if he wanted to run his choice of a journaling filesystem and wanted to tweak it for speed?
      what if he wanted to run a webserver and database server without having to waste money on any licenses?

      let's see you hack a unsupported touchscreen display into windows, hahaha.

      look, with linux (and vmware) he has the best of both worlds PLUS ultimate configurability. he can make his car computer do whatever he wants.
      if he were to install only windows, boy would he be limiting the power of his project.

    2. Re:So if most of your apps are Windows... by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      No, if I want Quake, UT, and MP3s, I'll run Linux, not Windows. Every single one of those programs run under Linux, quite well, mind you. And I bet if he ran a recent version of wine, he'd be able to run the GPS software as well. Yeah, you need a fine chisel to work around the rough edges, but far from the big hammer you seem to recommend. Linux is much more capable of running in this situation than you seem to think.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    3. Re:So if most of your apps are Windows... by Milican · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well the article mentions some logic tied into the auxilliary power on the car. If he is using Linux he can design a rudimentary program which will shutdown the OS nicely when the car is shutoff (aux power off). If he is using Windows the task isn't trivial. Thats just one reason to use Linux. Good question though. The appropriate tool should always be used for the task at hand.

      JOhn

    4. Re:So if most of your apps are Windows... by Howie · · Score: 2

      let's say he only wanted certain processes starting or stopping at particular times?

      As long as the process is a linux process and not a windows one.

      let's see you hack a unsupported touchscreen display into windows, hahaha.

      since when does anyone release a device without windows drivers? The only people who have those sorts of problems are non-windows users (and XP users currently I guess), or those that built their own gear.

      Besides, generating appropriate mouseup and mousedown events using SendMessage isn't too hard if you really wanted to do it.

      --
      "don't fall into the fallacy of believing that Perl can solve social problems. Maybe Perl 6 can, but that's a ways off"
    5. Re:So if most of your apps are Windows... by sir99 · · Score: 1

      dude, that's the third time you posted that comment in the last few months! wtf? Troll.

      --
      The ocean parts and the meteors come down
      Laid out in amber, baby.
    6. Re:So if most of your apps are Windows... by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      Well the article mentions some logic tied into the auxilliary power on the car. If he is using Linux he can design a rudimentary program which will shutdown the OS nicely when the car is shutoff (aux power off). If he is using Windows the task isn't trivial.

      Ever seen what windows does when hooked to a smart UPS? Windows shuts down based on relay closures in uninterruptable power supplies, so he would have zero software to design for Windows.

    7. Re:So if most of your apps are Windows... by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      what if he wanted to run a webserver and database server without having to waste money on any licenses?

      Then he could run any number of them that are available for Windows. My favorite free web server for Windows is Savant. There's probably as much free Windows software as there is free Linux software.

      Why would he run a web server when the thing is not connected to the web and has no IP address?

      what if he wanted to run his choice of a journaling filesystem and wanted to tweak it for speed?

      Then he needs a life. It's a dashboard toy. Use NTFS with Windows 2000 and be done with it.

      look, with linux (and vmware) he has the best of both worlds PLUS ultimate configurability. he can make his car computer do whatever he wants.

      No, he has a compatability mess and grotesque wasting of CPU horsepower.

      if he were to install only windows, boy would he be limiting the power of his project.

      What a boatload of penguin shit! There's not a single thing of consequence that he would need to do in a dashboard PC that can't be accomplished just as well under Windows as under Linux.

      He can't even get decent GPS mapping software that runs under Linux.

    8. Re:So if most of your apps are Windows... by gol64738 · · Score: 1

      what's the point of a proper shutdown?
      i've had a linux machine in my car (mp3 player) for six months now.

      i've used both SGI's XFS and EXT3. the machine is *never* shut down properly and i don't have a single problem with my filesystem.

    9. Re:So if most of your apps are Windows... by Milican · · Score: 2

      Thats a good idea, and I had thought about that. If the designer of this system was to do this he would have to build a basic UPS interface to present to Windows. However, what is the standard for building the simplest, most basic UPS device? What is the standard for communicating to Windows you are a UPS device? I'm not sure. It may be really simple. It may require a microcontroller (pic or otherwise) to implement on the UPS device side. I'm not really sure. Both solutions require that you know serial port communications and electronics interfacing. The Windows solution would require that knowledge and the knowledge of UPS systems. Both would work. I feel more comfortable implementing this in Linux, but thats just me. I still think doing the job in Linux would be easier because I can get access to the serial ports with no problem in Linux (IMHO a pain in the ass in Win32), and I can roll my own circuitry in Linux without having to implement the UPS interface and protocol (whatever they may be). Clearly though, like all solutions there is more than one path.

      JOhn

    10. Re:So if most of your apps are Windows... by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      dude, that's the third time you posted that comment in the last few months! wtf? Troll.

      Let's find out who's trolling: Provide links to my supposedly identical comments.

    11. Re:So if most of your apps are Windows... by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

      What a boatload of penguin shit! There's not a single thing of consequence that he would need to do in a dashboard PC that can't be accomplished just as well under Windows as under Linux.

      Sure there is: The most notably being that I can't trim down my kernel to effectively reduce my boot time by a significant percentage. I haven't done this yet so I can't provide empirical data, however, I know for a fact that I can't change the Windows 2k kernel/hooks. If for no reason than that I've made my decision to use an "open source" operating system, and I'm ultimately happy. Having started the project on Windows (my initial creation), I've seen both sides and I can say that "linux works better [in this application]". I've gotten more support and tips from "those open-source types" than I could've possibly dreamed of from the "closed source or Microsoft" crowd. Consider your argument defeated and go busy yourself with a system reboot or something.

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    12. Re:So if most of your apps are Windows... by gol64738 · · Score: 1

      Why would he run a web server when the thing is not connected to the web and has no IP address?
      the thing has a wireless network built in. how bout customizing a php app running on apache that allows him customize and move files around? the possibilities are endless.

      Then he needs a life. It's a dashboard toy. Use NTFS with Windows 2000 and be done with it.
      ooh, sick. you're just used to having to 'make do'. get away from windows and that concept will change for you.

      What a boatload of penguin shit! There's not a single thing of consequence that he would need to do in a dashboard PC that can't be accomplished just as well under Windows as under Linux.
      you don't really think that's true do you? sheesh, after reading that last comment, i've just realized i've been trolled in. please disregard.

    13. Re:So if most of your apps are Windows... by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      What a boatload of penguin shit! There's not a single thing of consequence that he would need to do in a dashboard PC that can't be accomplished just as well under Windows as under Linux.

      you don't really think that's true do you?


      Yes. Prove me wrong.

    14. Re:So if most of your apps are Windows... by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      However, what is the standard for building the simplest, most basic UPS device?

      One relay across two pins of a 9-pin D serial port.

    15. Re:So if most of your apps are Windows... by gol64738 · · Score: 1

      Yes. Prove me wrong.

      ok, lets see you tweak your windows kernel for maximum performance for the task at hand. enough said.

  35. Re:Basic Stamp? by gol64738 · · Score: 1

    Other than that, i still think it's just stupid.

    the must be a reason why you're so negative about this project. i've set up a similar system in my GTI and now cannot live without it.

    you either own a piece of shit of a car, or you're angry because you've been unsuccessful in your projects.

  36. Carmegeddon by schporto · · Score: 4, Funny

    So you can play Carmegeddon while driving? There's just something inherently screwy about that. Or playing a racing game while stuck in a traffic jam. Yesh the irony.
    -cpd

  37. Something else I want it to do.. by jcr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My car was stolen a few months ago, and I got it back after about five weeks. From now on, when my car starts up, I want it to note where it is, take a picture of whoever's starting it up, and upload that information to a hidden FTP directory at my ISP.

    The next time some asshole takes my car, I want to be able to e-mail their picture and location to the SFPD.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Something else I want it to do.. by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Why not just take the thief for a ride? You could ssh into your car and drive him hurtling towards a military base. With the heightened security and the trigger happy 18 year old guards I'm certain you will get your insurance to sport you a brand new car.

    2. Re:Something else I want it to do.. by jcr · · Score: 2

      I'd install the camera in the dash, and use a pinhole lens. There wouldn't be any way for the perp to know it was there unless he dismantled the instrument panel.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    3. Re:Something else I want it to do.. by ericski · · Score: 1

      How about putting one of those GPS cards in it and have the location uploaded in near real time?

  38. This... by Samuel+Hughes · · Score: 1

    brings a whole new meaning to "Fatal Error."

  39. More info at www.dashpc.com !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    No wonder everyone is confused - the original link points to an article that only mentions Christopher's project. Full site can be found at http://www.dashpc.com where he explains everything! (from where to get that flat screen to why he uses windows running on top of linux)
    Please mod up so other people can actually find useful info.
    P.S. Is anyone else pissed at VW for not bringing their in-dash navigation system that is available for Passat in Europe?

  40. Re:Basic Stamp? by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    Maybe they used the STAMP because it was readily available, and easy to make changes to while in development?

  41. More reasons to get in an accident by djsable · · Score: 4, Funny

    Jesus Christ, why not just paint over the windows with black spray paint, and go driving around in the mall. You won't be using the windows to see, between a computer, a dvd player, and a cell phone, why bother with such lame things as WATCHING WHERE YOU'RE DRIVING.

    badger

  42. Re:Basic Stamp? by Xawen · · Score: 1

    The basic stamp is used to turn the thing on and shut it down, how much speed does it need??? Basic is easy to learn and painless to use for small applicaitons like this. Why would you go through the trouble of using something so much more complicated to do such a simple task. 16k is a lot of memory just to send a signal to the motherboard that the key changed position. I thought it was a pretty good idea myself...

  43. security and holding your own by ghoting · · Score: 1

    In previous articles folks were talking about how their own DashPCs were lifted from their car. It seems the most inviting thing to the thief (from the outside) would be that fancy LCD.

    So I've been thinking about this. Some implementations are for relatively simple things like MP3 playing. Would it be possible to use, say, your Visor or Palm that's collecting dust and use its infrared or some other wireless protocol to make it: 1) Act as a remote; and 2) Act as a display? When you leave the car, you bring your hand-held with you, and the only thing Johnny Momo sees from the outside is your stock stereo. It's above and beyond me how you'd do this, but it seems trivial compared to what some folks have already done.

    --
    Let's show this prehistoric bitch how we do things downtown.
    1. Re:security and holding your own by pa-guy · · Score: 1

      I use the palmamp plugin for xmms. Works great.

  44. What an incredible waste by _pi-away · · Score: 1

    I mean, that looks really damn cool, but it's in a goddamn jetta!

    --

    "The crows seemed to be calling his name, thought Caw."
  45. How long will the drives hold up by Reefa · · Score: 1

    I have thought of hooking up a PC in my car, but since I live in Chicago and I have have always wondered if the HDDs would be able to withstand the potholes in the road...ie will I start seeing a lot of bad sectors and read/write errors ?

    R

  46. New meaning by MeNeXT · · Score: 1
    to a systems crash!

    --
    DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
  47. Unlike most slashdot readers. by eclectric · · Score: 1

    Some people actually have passengers in their cars.

  48. yeah, that perl script... by Erris · · Score: 2
    might not do to good under 98:

    #!/usr/bin/perl
    open(INFILE,"while () {
    if ($_ eq "[SHUTDOWN]\r\n") {
    exec("/sbin/shutdown -h now");
    }
    }

    Let's see!

    H:\>perl
    'PERL' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
    operable program or batch file.

    There you have it.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
    1. Re:yeah, that perl script... by jedrek · · Score: 2

      oh yeah...

      C:\>perl -V
      Summary of my perl5 (revision 5 version 6 subversion 1) configuration:
      Platform:
      osname=MSWin32, osvers=4.0, archname=MSWin32-x86-multi-thread

      I also run '.pl' files as executables from the command line, without even having tu add the .pl. (ie. hello.pl will run if I type 'hello')

      Besides, like 300 other people have mentioned (because they read the article) - the guy was running VMWare on Linux...

      sheeh

  49. Mirror by Smirks · · Score: 1

    Mirror available here.

  50. Imagine a huge, empty field... by Dog+and+Pony · · Score: 1

    Then you imagine a car with too much horsepower, with Quake controlled by the wheel, the gas pedal, etc. All of which are still connected to their usual stuff as well. And the engine is running, the tank is filled.

    Man, what a ride. :)

    Then for the ultimate rush, the magic mushroom and the extra life, try navigating out from an ugly, cluttered and foreign-tounged bloat-portal. using Konquerer attached to the same navigation system. :)

  51. major design problem by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The LCD he uses for the dash will last exactly 1 week in any US location above mid-ohio.
    LCD's die when they freeze and most every LCD from his listed source are rated only down to 20 degrees F michigan get's to -1 -2 on a regular basis every winter (except this winter, it was 65 yesterday) and in minnesota it gets to -15 at least twice.

    the best choice for an LCD is something designed for vehicle use which has a wide temperature range. Nothing from his supplier is useable in a vehicle in the upper 40% of the northern hemisphere.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:major design problem by glass_window · · Score: 1

      well duh, look at the license plates! they're florida!

  52. It needs better games by bluestar · · Score: 1

    The right game for this is, of course, Carmageddon.

    --
    "The cost of freedom is eternal vigilance." -Thomas Jefferson
  53. Hmm, seems like it could use some work... by bigfnb · · Score: 1

    I think I can do one better. For fun, I hacked my Dodge Avenger. Starting by adding one of Kenwood's highly featured KDC-X917 radios. Plus CD Changer. Then got the hacked the din pinout for the cdchanger. Then hooked the dinpin out to a pic16c57, allowing me a little expansion. From the Pic, I go to a homebrew 500mhz machine, running linux, also hooked to the "aux" input on the CD changer, giving me yet another source on the radio. When on Aux on the radio, the left and right(skip buttons) then control my MP3 player. Anyone else with similair setups, or am I the only one with too much free time on my hands? When I get some info pics, I'll post them...

  54. GTA by WyldOne · · Score: 1

    Just don't ever put on Grand Theft Auto 1,2 or 3.. just too much temptation.

    --

    make Linux, not Microsoft. sin(beast) = -0.809016994374947424102293417182819
  55. VMWare by itwerx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    He's got Win98 running under VMWare.
    (Did you even look at the links?)
    Cool setup, actually. Too bad he had to have M$ just for the GPS support (DeLorme).

    1. Re:VMWare by Jburkholder · · Score: 1

      >Did you even look at the links?)

      uh, yeah... eventually

      thanks

  56. Depth perception by Minupla · · Score: 2

    Interestingly enough, everyone has mentioned BSODs, etc, but has missed the big reason for not replacing a windshield with a monitor, probably because most of you take it for granted. You won't get depth perception with a monitor screen. It's amazing how much more difficult someone who uses depth perception day in and day out finds it when it's removed. For example, try this test. Hold your fingers pointing towards themselves at about 3/4 your total arm length at different distances away from you. Now touch them together. Now try the same trick, starting with your hands beside you, but before you hold them up, close one eye.

    Kids: Don't try driving your parents' car with one eye closed.

    I've never had depth perception, and I'm here to tell you I leave a lot more space when I'm driving then most people because of it.

    --
    On the whole, I find that I prefer Slashdot posts to twitter ones because I don't get limited to 140 chars before
  57. Forgot something by WyldOne · · Score: 1

    sleep 2
    cat "STOP!" >/dev/accelerator

    --

    make Linux, not Microsoft. sin(beast) = -0.809016994374947424102293417182819
  58. 802.11b by sPaKr · · Score: 1


    Where is the wireless card? This thing needs to have a wireless card so if someone brings their laptop along they can share mp3's and more. Also it would be kickass to write a discovery protocal across wifi, so as Im cruisin down the high way I can message the hot chick in the other lane. The other thing its missing is the built in cell phone and backup batteries. You need to be able to call into car no even if somone cuts the electrical and get fix via GPS, that way your smart bomb can target a car thief in seconds.

  59. Imported... by itwerx · · Score: 1

    ...duh! You've probably never seen a real BMW either (the ones with the Werke symbol on the corner of the trunk).
    Lots of guys in the service get stationed overseas, pick up sweet Euro cars and bring 'em home. (And they can make a killing shipping American muscle cars over there too).

  60. The commercial has a new Meatloaf song by ChicagoFan · · Score: 1

    The company that makes dashPC has hired Meatloaf to provide a theme song for their product: "Paradise by the Dashboard Linux".

    (moderation: -9, agonizingly-painful wordplay)

    ChicagoFan

  61. Re:Wow, a dashboard linux box running windows, ama by thpdg · · Score: 1

    No, look again. It's running 9x, and the email window is pasted into the shot. It has a start button but a Mac title bar in the program. (assuming it's the same Best Buy ad) Morons... "I need a coookie..."

    --

    -Patrick

    "They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we."

  62. Where the windows screenies really come from... by tordia · · Score: 1
    If you check out the FAQ from the dashpc website, the second question is:
    Does the car run Windows or Linux?
    It runs linux. The first generation of it had windows installed. On the other hand, the first generation was a 10.4" LCD screen too.

    I'm guessing that's where the screenshots of the Windows desktop come from.

    Further down there's also this question, which explains why he made the switch:
    What plugins do you use with Winamp?
    I no longer use Winamp. I use XMMS for linux now. Windows sucks. Period. But you knew that already.

    Yes, we did know that already. :)

    --

    Frogs are primitive animals - so the occasional extra toe is not that unusual. But this is very unusual.

  63. Re:Wow, a dashboard linux box running windows, ama by ethereal · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, I'll look when I get home. If so, that's an even lamer ad than I'd thought. Some ad agency had to fake a Mac email program and paste it onto a Windows computer. I can't believe they went to so much work to make their advertisement incorrect - it boggles the mind.

    --

    Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

  64. Had to be said. . . by "Zow" · · Score: 2

    This would give an all new meaning to system crash.

    I know, I know. I'm just lucky there isn't a "Punny (-1)" moderation category.

    -"Zow"

  65. Re:Basic Stamp? by EvlPenguin · · Score: 1

    Uhm.... as I said there is a big difference between basic (the language) and the bs stamp (an actual board, with sevral chips and lots of supporting components). With PICs, you can program the chips in basic, but you must compile it first, which even the average windows luser can do. Not to mention that the Stamp costs (retail) around $50 more than a single chip. Plus there are the other advantages of a single chip (low power consumption, less points of failure, smaller boards), and they can still be reprogrammed if need be over a three-wire serial interface (Vss, Vdd, signal). The 16K ram size was just one of the variations. If you look on microchip.com you'll see that there is a wide variety down to 1K if you only needed that much...

    Ugh. Forget it... no offense, but you are clearly not knowledgable about this type of thing. I just think a 8 (or 16) pin PLCC or S mount chip and a resonator is preferable to a 2"x4" board (see reasons above).

    --

    --
    #nohup cat /dev/dsp > /dev/hda & killall -9 getty
  66. Re:Basic Stamp? by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

    I designed the dashpc, and I agree with you fully. Now I am at the refinement stage and I'm looking into using a PIC to replace the BS2. The learning curve on the PIC was too steep (in asm) and at the time I just wanted to "do" this project. The BS2 was simple and cheap, so I went with it. As I make the transition to a PIC, if you'd like to offer any assistance, I'd be much obliged. Contact me via the site, or my email above.

    --
    Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
  67. Details, details!!! by livitup · · Score: 1

    So where are the details for the Basic Stamp so we can build one of these ourselves? Some programming instructions for the Stamp or a circuit diagram would be cool.

  68. Does this mean? by RMBWebmaster · · Score: 1

    Does this mean I can play gta while driving? :)