Slashdot Mirror


NiP Wins Counter-Strike CPL

raskolnik writes: "Ninjas in Pyjamas beat out Xtreme3 in a *very* close series of matches to win the $50,000 purse at the CPL today. Coverage is on ShackES and Domain of Games. Congrats to both clans!" $50,000 isn't quite a NASCAR purse, but nothing to sneeze at. When will this be on ESPN?

195 comments

  1. About the same time.... by Bob_Robertson · · Score: 1

    ...that Sumo is broadcast on ESPN, live.

    "Sport" is in the mind of the beholder. or It's all subjective anyway. Or something anyway.

    The South Koreans have been "playing computer games" for money for years.

    Bob-

    --
    The Ludwig von Mises Institute. The reasoning individuals economics
    1. Re:About the same time.... by hooded1 · · Score: 2

      yo they do broadcast Sumo on ESPN2. I was flippin through the channels and was pretty surprsied to see it

      --
      A rabbit in the hand is worth 4 in the cage
    2. Re:About the same time.... by BakaMark · · Score: 1
      The South Koreans have been "playing computer games" for money for years.

      Resulting in gangs visiting people in Internet Cafes to beat them up. Only because a member of the gang was beaten in an online game.

    3. Re:About the same time.... by irony+nazi · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Multiplayer FPS video games would make great spectator events. There are many funny things that happen that could be replayed from the first-person perspective or from a floating third person perspective.

      I'm thinking tribes... 2-3 people crossing the field to assault the NME base and they skirmish with a group of defenders. Very interesting indeed!!

      --

      Bringing irony to the Slash-masses
    4. Re:About the same time.... by Debillitatus · · Score: 1
      ...that Sumo is broadcast on ESPN, live.

      Well, Sumo is broadcast on ESPN now. I don't know whether or not it's live, but if it were live, it would be in the middle of the night, which is when ESPN broadcats Sumo. So who knows?

      --

      Come on, give it up, that's

    5. Re:About the same time.... by mancxvi · · Score: 1

      And how is that different from soccer riots? People fighting physically over a game doesn't demonize the sport.

    6. Re:About the same time.... by BakaMark · · Score: 1
      The activity of beating people up because they are better than someone else at something is nothing really new. Soccer riots are usually between the fans, and don't involve the players (most of the time). The players are sometimes told to "not get excited" by sucessfully/unsucessfully pulling off "anything" on the field, because it will result in fighting in the stadium afterwards between the fans of the two teams.

      This does not mean that players don't get caught up in activities that involve people being "professionally" killed afterwards. There was a case of one goal keeper being "eliminated" after accidentally scoring a goal for the other side in a soccer match.

      In the Korean on-line case, people have been bashed and killed due to the results of the on-line game. The people who run the game servers had to implement security measures such as fingerprint locks and regular auditing to prevent their own personnel from accessing the game servers and altering the game after accepting bribes from players.

      In both the soccer match and on-line games above, there was always prestiege at stake more than anything else. There was probably money at stake as well (although it is not as possible in the case of the on-line game).

      In a "game" such as that described in the original story posted, there is the potential gambling to take place.

    7. Re:About the same time.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Controlling an NPC to show the best camera angle should be part of it. Seeing the eyes through the of the players is nice and all but especially without peripheral vision it's all a bit hard to follow.

    8. Re:About the same time.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, but I would like to make one correction. Counter-strike is not a sport.

    9. Re:About the same time.... by dead+sun · · Score: 1
      No, it'll happen when people care. I have a friend who worked for Diamond Underground's little online broadcast, announcing games, and while it was a pretty interesting concept, about the only people who would show up to watch were either those waiting for their match to start (and be announced by another announcer, or him as the case may be) or clans who were going to be playing against one of the clans currently playing in the broadcast game.

      The thing was witty, interesting, and fast, as these were good players and my friend had no shortage of snide comments to make about peoples' choices of weapons, etc. There just wasn't any real interest, so the thing got canned.

      --
      If not now, when?
    10. Re:About the same time.... by dman123 · · Score: 1
      Sumo will never be broadcast live on American TV. (now watch me eat my words) The pace is w a y... t o o... s l o w for that. The ESPN broadcasts cut out all the non-fighting. I think they get a whole 15 day tournament into 1 hour (with commercials). Not that I've tried translating any of the announcer-commenting between the actual matches, but just imagine something even less exciting than Pat Summerall trying to think of a story about a NL pitcher with a 0.097 batting average while he's "scratching himself" after taking four or five trips out of the batter's box because he's so nervous that he's 0-2 on pitches from The Big Unit.

      Sure, there are die-hard sumo fans, but a lot of people just can't handle the downtime. [putting on flame-resistant suit] Looking at the spectators, one wonders if the average sumo fan in Japan is anything less than 50.

      NHK is not known for its flashy sports broadcasting or special effects. Now if FOX ever got license to carry the tournaments...

      --

      --
      dman123 forever!
      Filtering out the -1s and 0s since 1999.
    11. Re:About the same time.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but Team Fortress Classic is. :P

    12. Re:About the same time.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Half-life, and it's mods (including Counter-strike), has a feature called HLTV, which allows an HLTV server to connect to a match and rebroadcast the match to a number of other spectators (and/or more HLTV servers).

      When you connect to an HLTV server, you have a number of options, including an overhead map view that shows representations of every player's location, first and third person chase cams, and free-roaming mode. While in first/third/roaming mode you can have the map as an inset, or you can have first/third/roaming mode as an inset on the map screen.

      As a bonus, all of these options are available from a demo recorded off of the HLTV server, as well, which has been put into use extensively for dealing with cheating allegations, at least in TFC (another HL mod) leagues, and removes a lot of the burden of forcing individuals to record demos for such purposes (as long as the HLTV server stays connected and continues recording).

      A combination of spectators connected to an HLTV server could be ideal for broadcasting, though it may take some time before enough people are competant in spectating matches to broadcast larger games (like TFC, which utilizes 16-20 players (8-10 per team) rather than CS' usual 10 players (5 per team)). There's nothing quite like watching the start of a TFC match on one of the more open maps, though, floating over the center of the map to watch each team's offense come flying out after the enemy's flag.

    13. Re:About the same time.... by Debillitatus · · Score: 1

      Hell, if people will watch NASCAR, they'll watch damn near anything...

      --

      Come on, give it up, that's

  2. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll
    NiP Wins Counter-Strike CPL

    What? WTF is NiP? WTF is CPL?

    I don't know about any of you, but this story is the most pointless one I've seen in days. I'm going to go do something else.. someone yell if anything that doesn't suck happens. Or, if she's a good-looking blonde, yell if something does suck.. ;)

    1. Re:Huh? by NetNinja · · Score: 0

      Yes I would also like to know what is CPL?

    2. Re:Huh? by Daemosthenes · · Score: 1

      Quick note,

      CPL = Cyberathlete Professional League

      NiP=Ninjas in Pyjamas, a counterstrike clan (i.e. a group of players banded together into a team)

    3. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HA! labelled a "troll" because you don't (know / waste time on) a silly computer game. thats real lame, fellas.

    4. Re:Huh? by keflex · · Score: 1

      Nope, rated "troll" because he made a stupid remark, not because he didn't know. Idiot.

      --


      My karma is -1 because I don't use AC posting. LOL.
    5. Re:Huh? by Shadowcaster · · Score: 1

      Fuck. I wish I hadn't posted that anon now. It figures that when I troll on purpose (and post anon) it gets a +1 in the end. *sigh*

    6. Re:Huh? by Shadowcaster · · Score: 1
      Ok then smart guy. Explain to us all, in your infinite wisdom, why my anon post there got one strike against, and two for?

      Perhaps it's something that needed to be said? Nah, more likely it echoed the feelings of those particular moderators. ;P

    7. Re:Huh? by keflex · · Score: 1

      We all know the moderators here are idiots too. That's why SlashDot had to implement "meta-moderating" =P.

      --


      My karma is -1 because I don't use AC posting. LOL.
  3. NiP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They must have won extra points for the name.

  4. ESPN? by Quasar1999 · · Score: 2, Funny

    When will this be on ESPN?
    As soon as there are judges, and those judges can be bribed... and there's a special on the judges being bribed on abc, nbc, cbs, and any other major network... then and only then will it be a sport good enough for ESPN to carry it...

    --

    ---
    Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
  5. There's money in games? by zaius · · Score: 3, Funny
    I always figured the best way to make a sucessful living would be to go into baseball, law, or medicine.

    Screw that, I'm going to go buy a copy of half-life...

    1. Re:There's money in games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's been _some_ money in gaming for the last several years, ever since an iD guy's red Ferrarri went up for grabs. There are prize tournaments every so often, usually in the $10,000 - 50,000 range, but you have to be very very very very good, and you're extremely unlikely to win any given tournament twice.

    2. Re:There's money in games? by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, I recall fifteen years ago the prediction in some gaming magazine that the next year would see the rise of the professional video game player, and this was directed at arcade game players.

      Still waiting...

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  6. excellent round by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have to give it to X3...They won some close OT games, and came back from the losers bracket to almost win this thing. In fact, they were a mere second or two from forcing this game into overtime when the man they had defusing the bomb got killed. The only game that was possibly better than the championship game was possibly WEW's crazy comeback.

    That said, I don't think that computer games are going to be on ESPN anytime soon, although it's interesting to note that the championships of online games do tend to nearly always be very close and the best games of the tourney. You can always expect a very good championship game, and it's round-like nature makes for some very suspenseful moments during the match. Hats off to both teams.

    Mike

    1. Re:excellent round by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously, you didnt read ANY of the writeups.

      X3 did not come back from the losers bracket to face NiP. And yes, this event has already been covered by ESPN (not sure when it airs)

      www.shackes.com has plenty of writeups of the happenings, along with pictures (and even a picture of ESPN interviewing frank)

    2. Re:excellent round by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you talking about? Of course X3 came back from the losers bracket to face NiP. That is why they played 3 games against each other. Go to domainofgames to see the entire match history. We did coverage on every game and have all the demos. Or read our post about NiP winning. It makes it very obvious they came back from the loser's bracket :)

      --Sling_Blade

  7. But the important question is... by jawad · · Score: 0, Troll

    The important question was, do these ninjas eat pancakes? I have no respect for any ninja that does not eat pancakes, for pancakes are the staple of the proper ninja diet. The rest of us will have to suffice with hot grits (down our pants, no less).

  8. CS on ESPN by mjed · · Score: 1

    ESPN2 broadcasted a Magic the Gathering Tournament a while back. CS is more of a sport than that. But what exactly is a sport these days?

    --
    I'm a repairman in an imperfect world.
    1. Re:CS on ESPN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is a sport? Well, I think the ass end of what a sport is would probably be Curling. What's up with that game?

    2. Re:CS on ESPN by CaseyB · · Score: 1
      Curling is bowling on ice. You Americans call THAT a sport.

      I think curling is still a step up from race-walking.

    3. Re:CS on ESPN by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 1

      Curling is bowling on ice. You Americans call THAT a sport.

      Very few of us do that. (Oh, so that's what "curling" is!)

      As a side note, we don't call bowling a sport either. Bowling is what you do when your options are 1) drinking beer and 2) bowling and drinking beer.

    4. Re:CS on ESPN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      huh? im in austria, can i get ESPN or ESPN2 here? i was in australia for a while, over there i could et it through cable TV...

    5. Re:CS on ESPN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More frightening than that, ESPN2 actually signed a contract to broadcast an entire season's worth of Magic: The Gathering tournaments, 8 in total IIRC.

      *sigh*

      I should have learned to play cards better, then I could be a TV star...

    6. Re:CS on ESPN by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      I don't know, some of the original Quake (I) ctf matches would have been much more rivetting than a card game.

      "We now go back to Blue's flag area, where a quadded 8x has just cleared the base and stolen the flag...."

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  9. Someone has tried it already. by AltGrendel · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I forget who, but some cable channel tried televising this sort of thing. Turned out to be very boring. All they did was setup a couple of cameras to show the contestants. They should have tapped into the video out. THEN it COULD have been interesting.

    But they won't think of that, will they.

    Yea, right.

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

    1. Re:Someone has tried it already. by zaius · · Score: 2

      The only things they could show with the video out would be the player's perspectives. It would be more interesting if they could show it like we would watch football or baseball--from a distant third person, all-seing perspective.

    2. Re:Someone has tried it already. by crisco · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Half-Life's engine does this now, they have assorted spectator modes that allow first person, third person following, free flying mode and a map overview mode with little icons for each player. Valve software has also set up spectator mode proxy software that allows lots of people to watch a feed.(But you might already know that and be talking about something else).

      The real trick would be taking multiple streams of this and editing it in with some good commentary. Think NFL style, with the replays, different camera angles, etc. You could probably do it on a low budget, just taking the time to make it flow and make it slightly interesting to someone that might be a gamer but not real familiar with CS. But you can't oversimplify, you alienate your core audience of hardcore gamers.

      --

      Bleh!

    3. Re:Someone has tried it already. by Vess+V. · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That wouldn't be that hard... just let several "camerapeople" in as observers, and tap their video-outs. And you can have one at CT base, one at T base, a couple at the most strategic spots on the map and a couple following the action, and continually alternate the view among all of them, including the players when appropriate.

    4. Re:Someone has tried it already. by British · · Score: 2

      The Sci Fi channel had some show based on some game with racing spaceships, in BattleTech style hardware.

      You eventualy got the most BORING show with THE nerdiest contestants ever.

    5. Re:Someone has tried it already. by Rura+Penthe · · Score: 2

      It's called HLTV and it is in use by quite a few CS servers out there already. You log into the HLTV server and you watch from a bunch of different angles as a spectator and you can get overhead view maps that show where everyone is and how they're moving, etc. That + a static movement behind every living player movement choice would make it the most interesting.

    6. Re:Someone has tried it already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real trick would be taking multiple streams of this and editing it in with some good commentary.

      Here is an article by some people that have already done that.

    7. Re:Someone has tried it already. by jrockway · · Score: 1

      Whoa. What would stop me from setting up two boxen, watching a CS game on one, and playing in the same game on the other. Talk about an advantage!

      --
      My other car is first.
    8. Re:Someone has tried it already. by Kefabi · · Score: 4, Informative

      The real trick would be taking multiple streams of this and editing it in with some good commentary. Think NFL style, with the replays, different camera angles, etc. You could probably do it on a low budget, just taking the time to make it flow and make it slightly interesting to someone that might be a gamer but not real familiar with CS. But you can't oversimplify, you alienate your core audience of hardcore gamers.


      Why do you think StarCraft has been so popular in Korea for so long?

      You don't just watch a game of StarCraft, you watch a whole program. Filmed in advance and edited.

      You got the contestent stats (Win-Lose streaks), and "announcers" who can observe the whole map and comment on strategies, see possible problems for a player, and perhaps even explain of why a player is doing something.

      StarCraft becomes a lot more fun to watch when you have a close battle between two players, and the anouncer points out that one of the players has something up their sleeve that the other player doesn't know. If the second player can survive whatever surprise attack is coming and win the match, it's even more fun. Many times they'll do that whole Picture-in-Picture thing and show the players face so the audience can see his/her reaction when a surprise attack comes. Hell, some of my friends laugh when I talk about StarCraft announcers "writing" on the screen to explain strategies much the same way football and basketball announcers "write" on the screen to explain plays.

      The same amount of work is put into a show about Diablo II or Lineage or whatever other game that is being televised in Korea.

      If you can explain to people watching a Counter-Strike game on TV that this is NOT a mass of people running together and randomly shooting each other, if you can explain that there IS strategy on both sides, and show exactly HOW the players are working together to win, it becomes more fun than just watching virtual people shoot each other.

      Ideally, you'd have announcers who have a clue about the game with access to a map of the entire level be able to explain to the casual person why one team one and the other lost. When someone puts that much effort into televising one of these gaming sessions, you'll see that persons won't be bored and will actually enjoy watching.

    9. Re:Someone has tried it already. by staticdragon · · Score: 1

      HLTV generally has a built in 3 minute delay to prevnt just that :P

    10. Re:Someone has tried it already. by Sabalon · · Score: 2

      People have been doing this kinda thing for a while. I know in ChaosDM for Quake2 people would connect and follow their character, but have the chase cam facing them so they could always see behind them.

      Hmmm...perhaps I should setup another machine at home at night. The students at the help desk would really get an ass-whopping then :)

    11. Re:Someone has tried it already. by jrockway · · Score: 1

      That's really smart. And I wouldn't have thought of it :(

      --
      My other car is first.
    12. Re:Someone has tried it already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is few seconds lag between what you see on the spectator proxy and the actual game, I believe it's something like 8 to 10 seconds at times.

    13. Re:Someone has tried it already. by Sabalon · · Score: 1

      Yup...but not on the spectator modes built into the games, which is what I was talking about. Then again, I have enough trouble seeing whats going on with one monitor...two would be instant death!

  10. ESPN by MisterBlister · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It'll be on ESPN approximately...never.

    There's a ton of issues with online gaming that will relegate it to niche status at best for the foreseeable future.

    One of the biggest issues is that the game of choice changes too often due to progressing technology -- compare this to baseball (or even newer sports) where the rules and gameplay remain relatively the same..In the gaming world, the game of choice changes about once every year, or two years at the most. This causes a few problems, one is that it is very confusing to spectators who don't play these games themselves and two is that it limits the options for having 'star players' ala basketball, etc.. Today's top CS players aren't likely to be the top players of tomorrow's game-of-choice. Very few 'pro level' game players dominate in more than one game, as the short history of this activity has shown.

    Secondly, gaming just doesn't have much potential as a mainstream spectator sport. Sure, people that play these games all the time might appreciate the skill involved in winning the top gaming tournaments, but to people who don't play these games, they have no basis for understanding this skill. In traditional sports they can still be impressed by the human factors involved -- eg. "wow that guy jumps real high", or "wow that guy runs real fast". When it comes to gaming, there's no context for them to make any relationship like that unless they game quite a lot themselves, thus the spectator potential is very limited.

    1. Re:ESPN by Samrobb · · Score: 2
      Secondly, gaming just doesn't have much potential as a mainstream spectator sport.

      If all you do is hook up a video feed from a random Q3 deathmatch, well, yah, you're absolutely right.

      When something like this becomes popular (and I think it will, eventually), it will be because someone realizes that these type of competitions aren't "games&quot - they're an opportunity for some really interesting, interactive, ongoing entertainment that's less like a football game and more like a series of made-for-tv fantasy movies.

      Just thinking in terms of CTF: you could have level designers cranking out all-new CTF levels (huge ones, too!) each week. Use different themes - say, ancient-Aztec-jungle motif week1, hard-boiled-detective genre week2, etc. Put NPCs in the game, and make them real NPCs - hire bush-league gamer/actors to play the role of the mad scientist who betrays the team, the lone good cop who assists them, etc. Give the players goals other than "frag the most poeple" - for example, there might be a scenario where there are a slew of NPCs attending an event in a museum, and the players are secret agents trying to find an assassin out to kill one of the NPCs.

      Now that you're got the elements of great stories, record every player's (and NPC's) display, and a few key non-player viewpoints... that's what the director is for. When you're done, edit and package - heck; you can do whatever you want to the "footage" - maybe part of what you "capture" is just wireframe, and the finished product looks 10x better than what they players saw when they were "there", because you throw some really expensive hardware at rendering to make it look "real" in that otherworldly, unreal way... Hey, you could even have guest appearances (imagine a STNG based game where Picard was played, of course, by Patrick Stewart...).

      Voila, you have Star Trek meets Big Brother meets WWF. Hard to see how that could avoid becomming a hit.

      --
      "Great men are not always wise: neither do the aged understand judgement." Job 32:9
    2. Re:ESPN by Boiling_point_ · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Sure, people that play these games all the time might appreciate the skill involved in winning the top gaming tournaments, but to people who don't play these games, they have no basis for understanding this skill. In traditional sports they can still be impressed by the human factors involved -- eg. "wow that guy jumps real high", or "wow that guy runs real fast".
      There are plenty of sports with "specific" skills that aren't immediately apparent to the casual observer - think of batting techniques in Cricket, or the teamwork needed for many sports, especially football(s). Not knowing "how" someone is really good isn't always crucial to enjoying watching them play.

      For Counter-Strike, I believe the most accessible, enjoyable aspect is seeing the teams work coherently - this is a difficult thing to capture from a third-person perspective, so would require expert commentary to work well.

      There's nothing about online gaming per se that is non-teeveeable - that's why the term "spectator sport" was invented: to differentiate certain sports from other, boring-to-watch ones.

      Think for a moment about how the impact of television has affected the rules of many sports - different scoring systems, rounds timed to fit timeslots (eg. day/night Cricket was invented by the media) Granted, there are limitations with current games that will prevent them from getting airtime on Sundays, but that will change once someone designs a game both for players' and spectators' enjoyment from the ground up.
      --
      "If you create user accounts, by default, they will have an account type of Administrator with no password." KB Q293834
    3. Re:ESPN by brandon · · Score: 1

      Sign me up for the tryouts for a nationally ranked CTF/Team Fortress league! I'll be more than happy to compete, especially if I can get one of those $10mil contracts for 5 years of game playing! Oh, the wonders of the future and what it holds for a high-tech way of life...

      :-)

    4. Re:ESPN by dangermouse · · Score: 2
      Umm... I distinctly remember seeing a Magic: The Gathering tournament on one of the ESPN stations (may have been ESPN2) a couple of years back.

      Never say never.

    5. Re:ESPN by tshak · · Score: 2

      In the gaming world, the game of choice changes about once every year, or two years at the most. This causes a few problems...

      Not really. CS has been going for 2.5 years and is most likely to continue strong for another year. Sure, I play more advanced games like Ghost Recon, and eventually Unreal 2 CTF, but nothing beats a good 'ol game of CS. Actually, at my old office we still played Doom via "Doom Legacy" - it was very fun. I would anticipate that if gaming competition was more mainstream that the dominant game would be a lot less volitile. As long as there where regular upgrades to keep it fresh (like Half-Life/CS), I don't forsee your concern to be a stumbling block for computer game competition.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    6. Re:ESPN by zeno_2 · · Score: 1

      Oh please, there are new gameshows every year (think, who wants to be a millionare, weakest link, the mole, survivor, temptation island, fear factor, and im sure im missing some) and people love the stuff. Im not saying they will like watching counterstrike, but the tv viewing population can adjust pretty quickly =).

      I think you are much closer on your second point, I could see this on something like tech tv before I would see it on espn. Tech tv already has an audience that probably has a computer, and a larger portion of them will have known something about the latest fad in 3d gaming. The only people I know that watch espn are the middle aged male members of the family, im sure if they could get it directly piped in their heads they would. I doubt they would really be too interested in watching a game of counterstrike.

    7. Re:ESPN by startled · · Score: 2

      "It'll be on ESPN approximately...never."

      I could attack the logic of your argument, and debate the fine points of tastes in sports, but I'll just take the easy way out: it's already been on ESPN. Bet you didn't expect your prediction to be false before you wrote it, eh?

    8. Re:ESPN by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1
      top CS players aren't likely to be the top players of tomorrow's game-of-choice

      Turnover of participants doesn't mean there can't be an audience. After all, in college sports, the longest anyone can stick around is four years, but plenty of people watch that.
      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
    9. Re:ESPN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pro Gaming has already been covered on ESPN/2.

      Sorry Mr.Blister

    10. Re:ESPN by Kefabi · · Score: 1

      One of the biggest issues is that the game of choice changes too often due to progressing technology -- compare this to baseball (or even newer sports) where the rules and gameplay remain relatively the same..In the gaming world, the game of choice changes about once every year, or two years at the most.

      StarCraft: Still a top game in Korea. Released 1998. Almost going for 4 years now.

      Counter-Strike: I was playing this my senior year in High School, during 1999. Almost been 3 years now.

      It seems now that the lifetime of a game is a bit longer than it was previously. Also, franchises can get rabid fans in way less than the 1-2 years you talk about. Once a game type is picked up by people (FPS, RTS, RPG, whatever...) GOOD newer games that are released will be picked up even faster than before.

      Secondly, gaming just doesn't have much potential as a mainstream spectator sport.

      Just because you haven't seen video games become mainstream in the US doesn't mean it doesn't do so in other countries. Again, Korea is the best example of this, with a few people making livings by playing computer games, and many televised matches, and even a few channels devoted to computer gaming.

      In the US, gaming is just a ho-hum side entertainment thing for when you're bored. In other places, gaming is perfered sport. On par with football/basketball/baseball here. Not everyone thinks and acts and behaves like an American.

    11. Re:ESPN by lysurgon · · Score: 1

      Secondly, gaming just doesn't have much potential as a mainstream spectator sport.

      I think if you take a longer view on things, this might not be the case. Sure videogames are changing rapidly, but not as rapidly as they used to. The interface paradigm of the FPS is almost static, and the real advances are in nuances like physics, maps, and teamplay options.

      Give it 10 years, when 90% of the 18-30 year old male market will have at least spent a few hours with Doom (if not a few months with Quake Team Arena 7 - Tournament Edition), and you'll have an audience that can appriciate gaming as a sport. It's just a matter of cultural penetration.

      I think you'll see videogames becoming more and more dissimilar as they become more and more advances forms of entertainment. Some lending themselves more to high-energy televization, others lending themselves to "history channel"-esque retrospectives.

      As the art and science of the whole affair matures, games driven by storytelling (RPGs, esp MMORPGs) will capture one audience in one way, while strategy diven games (Starcraft, Civilization, et al) will capture another, and action games (i.e. FPS) will capture a third.

      If a critical mass of people become involved enough in a form of entertainment, someone will capitalize on that cultural circumstance by creating celeberties and rituals. It's a process as old as humanity.

    12. Re:ESPN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      One of the biggest issues is that the game of choice changes too often due to progressing technology -- compare this to baseball (or even newer sports) where the rules and gameplay remain relatively the same..In the gaming world, the game of choice changes about once every year, or two years at the most. This causes a few problems, one is that it is very confusing to spectators who don't play these games themselves and two is that it limits the options for having 'star players' ala basketball, etc.. Today's top CS players aren't likely to be the top players of tomorrow's game-of-choice. Very few 'pro level' game players dominate in more than one game, as the short history of this activity has shown.

      You seem to imply that FPS have made a huge difference since wolfenstein. This is why I don't play them, I beat doom. I beat it when it came out, I really don't want to play it again even if it does look better and I can aim up.

      But that's beside the point, just because you change playing fields doesn't change the game all that much. And just because your playing CS vs Tribes vs Quake, its still team combat in somebody's field and one persons field may be prettier than the other.

  11. Regional Tournaments by Kronik+Gamer · · Score: 1

    Perhaps an easy way to get videogaming into the mainstream media is to have more frequent, local tournaments that are actually advertised. A few massive LANs would be great for tournaments too(They don't call me Kronik Gamer for nothing). Someone needs to set up a website dedicated to setting up these kinds of tournaments, and then advertise to the many gaming websites on the net. That would be a good start!

    1. Re:Regional Tournaments by gladbach · · Score: 1

      its called http://www.lanparty.com I even am part of the staff at www.capitolpunishment.org a washington dc non profit bi anual party. all proceeds go to charity.

      --
      "Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms,
  12. was a great final too by gladbach · · Score: 1

    while it will probably never reach the fame and prestige of outdoor sports, I am amazed every time how skilled some people are at playing video games. I saw gameplay and skill a large cut above what I have ever seen at a lan or over the internet. too bad all the hltv servers broadcasting the matches kept crashing.... maybe they shouldnt have run them on windows boxen heh.

    --
    "Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms,
  13. TV? no. by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

    First, when the largest technical site has over half the people not knowing whats going on, (and me a former super-gamer), there's no way this will make espn. Maybe a real game like UT

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
    1 John 4:14
    1. Re:TV? no. by jallen02 · · Score: 1

      Uhm, Counter-Strike online community is bigger than UT....

      Jeremy

  14. Once again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Slashdot makes it clear English is no longer the dominant language on the net. Honestly, do the editors here have no concept at all of making their stories comprehensible to people who can't read their bloody minds???

  15. ESPN? by PhoenxHwk · · Score: 1

    ESPN? Oh come on, we all know that ESPN2 is where all the cool stuff like the X-games is!

    What I'm really waiting for is one of those Discovery Channel specials (complete with British narrator) about the tactics employed where they dissect every little movement like the battles of WWII.

  16. Can someone please translate? by cshotton · · Score: 1, Troll
    This has to be a joke! CPL? NiP? Even the articles linked to by this story give absolutely no clue what this is about. Clearly it must be some secret code used by pale, pasty little nerd boys who bask in the blue glow of a CRT, thumbs and eyes twitching in some strange little simulated universe where their pathetic lives simulate real worth.

    Unfortunately, I was pathetic enough to click on this thread to see what the heck it was about and I still don't know...

    --

    Shut up and eat your vegetables!!!
    1. Re:Can someone please translate? by gladbach · · Score: 1

      www.thecpl.com cyber athlete professional league.

      nip is the name of the winning team. Ninjas in Pyjamas from stokholm. http://fake-design.com/nip/

      second place team was called X3 http://www.k3mfx.com/x3/index.htm

      --
      "Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms,
    2. Re:Can someone please translate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly it must be some secret code used by pale, pasty little nerd boys who bask in the blue glow of a CRT, thumbs and eyes twitching in some strange little simulated universe where their pathetic lives simulate real worth.

      What, did you get redirected from MSNBC to here somehow? This is Slashdot! Of course the people reading it are pasty little nerd boys. Read the logo dumbass.

    3. Re:Can someone please translate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just because you are interested in computers and the like does not explicitly refrain you from having a social life!!!

      just a thought.

    4. Re:Can someone please translate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry about it. If you don't know what this is about, you wouldn't care anyway. For that matter, I DO know what this is about, and I don't care.

    5. Re:Can someone please translate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cyber Athlete??? Is this the pasty nerds' way of trying to attain the status of "athlete" that they loathed but secretly desired in high school?

  17. Cool.. by Sk3lt · · Score: 1

    This would be cool :)

    I just had a LAN party 2 nights ago and spent the whole day and night have CS battles... damn its a cool game but its really hard, I got my ass fragged alot.

    I found the best way was sometimes just to grab a shotgun with a kevlar vest and helmet and just go out there and do it all "Chow yun Fat style" ;)

    Worked as I scored 3 kills in 1 min :)

  18. I would rather not be involved in this by sstrick · · Score: 2

    If you read the coverage on Domain Of Games it talks about stealing the internals of a guys computer and ripping the transistors off his motherboard to wreck it. All because he confessed to cheating a few years earlier.

    Not the sort of people I would like to hang around with. Can anyone say immature?

    --

    "Do you think we could wipe out world hunger forever if scientists figured out how to make AOL's Free CD's edible?"-
    1. Re:I would rather not be involved in this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah. what transistors? the ones that glow?

    2. Re:I would rather not be involved in this by sstrick · · Score: 2

      Just quoting the interview. Read it yourself.

      --

      "Do you think we could wipe out world hunger forever if scientists figured out how to make AOL's Free CD's edible?"-
    3. Re:I would rather not be involved in this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      This 1 instance is the first time anything like this has ever happened at one of these events. I think it should be obvious by the way people responded to it on Domain of Games that this was WAY overboard and no one is happy with it. Most of his stuff was returned. Please don't judge an entire group of people by the acts of a few misguided individuals. If I was to judge football by the guys in front of me drunk off their ass I would say that anyone who liked football was a disgusting inbred hick. That's not true, and niether is it true that video gamers are violent or geeky. The fact that no one got thier ass kicked for doing that is proof enough of Funk's restraint.

      --Sling_Blade

    4. Re:I would rather not be involved in this by sstrick · · Score: 1

      Well said.

      Point taken.

      --

      "Do you think we could wipe out world hunger forever if scientists figured out how to make AOL's Free CD's edible?"-
    5. Re:I would rather not be involved in this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      id say the fact that no one got their ass kicked is proof enough that someones a bitch.

    6. Re:I would rather not be involved in this by keflex · · Score: 1

      Actually, I believe that the vandalism occurred more because of his gaming attitude (cocky, egotistical, liar), rather than his previous history of cheating.

      --


      My karma is -1 because I don't use AC posting. LOL.
  19. Shack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was on the shack www.shacknews.com (parent of www.shackes.com) when it came to a screeching halt...just checked and and see why.. damn you slashdot! Damn you to hell!

  20. It's on right now... in Korea by RollingThunder · · Score: 4, Informative

    I was in Korea from Sept 7-14 (what a GREAT time to be travelling.... oy) and the wierdest/coolest thing I saw while I was there was a TV channel dedicated to competetive game playing.

    While I was there, I saw Tribes 2, Starcraft, what looked like Street Fighter (insert version here), Ghost Recon, Counterstrike, and several other games I didn't recognize at all.

    1. Re:It's on right now... in Korea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yeah, and $50,000 isn't even that large a prize in Korean terms. Lots of top SC players from North America and elsewhere go over to play professionally. It's hard to understand exactly why Koreans are so addicted to competitive gaming, but someone should figure it out, and try and get this sort of thing going in the rest of the world. If it works in Korea, why can't it work elsewhere?

    2. Re:It's on right now... in Korea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Greeks eat goat balls maybe if we study them the whole world can enjoy eating the balls of young lambs for food. The Japanese make some of the most disturbing porno in the world yet they cannot show pubes maybe we can duplicate that here. Every culture has its own quirks, you cannot just study these eccentricites and replicate them in other cultures so easily.

    3. Re:It's on right now... in Korea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The trolls get more insightfull by the day.... something must be sick at the heart of slashdot.

    4. Re:It's on right now... in Korea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is just that the anonymous posters are now smarter than most registered users, who happen to be stunning idiots.

  21. I totally know dude! by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 2, Funny

    The other day I was watching TV and they had all kinds of shit! The NBA, GPA, NFL, MLB, shit I can't even remember all teh other crazy ass names. The whole world must be run by these pasty little nerd boys!! Forget my pants, who ate my sarcasm sign?

    --

    --

    WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
  22. Cyberathelete Professional League by cicatrix1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    For the uninitiated, CPL stands for Cyberathelete Professional League. This story is about the recent competition (indeed, world championship) for the uber popular Half-Life modification, CounterStrike.

    --

    I know more than you drink.
  23. Where Does the Award $ Come From? by idonotexist · · Score: 1

    Curious... $50k for the winner and the follow-up teams get a good chunk of change. Where does the $ come from? Bake sales?

    --
    "There ought to be limits to freedom"
    1. Re:Where Does the Award $ Come From? by forkboy · · Score: 1

      Same place the money for just about ANY tournament comes from....sponsors.

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
  24. It was on ESPN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Point in fact people, this CPL tournament WAS covered by ESPN.

    1. Re:It was on ESPN by gladbach · · Score: 1

      what kind of moderator would mod down the fact that it was covered on espn???

      --
      "Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms,
  25. Re:NASCAR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Long live F1 racing! Where you do more then just turn left.

    Oh yeah, where the car is the *only* determining factor in the results.

    Watch WRC if you wanna see real drivers.

  26. Coverage by Steve+Gibson · · Score: 5, Informative

    ... posting since /. broke my webserver ...

    Well, I've got ShackES/Shacknews (I own the pages) running on a temporary server that couldnt quite handle any additional traffic, much less a /. link. Getting that poor thing to respond at all would just be futile...

    But, if ShackES was actually working you would see that the event was featured on CNN Headline News for a live 3+ minute interview and ESPN and several local TV stations were there at the event.

    Once ShackES/Shacknews are up and running again (probably late tonight?) there are links to a video stream of the CNN interview and info on the ESPN etc coverage that was there.

    Also btw, WCG also went on this weekend, they spread out about $250,000 in cash for their tournament, CPL did $150,000 cash and another $100,000 in prizes (including a car).

    Half a million worth of prizes going out to people playing computer games in one weekend, cant say I would have expected that one.

    --
    -Steve Gibson
    Shacknews.com
    1. Re:Coverage by k9-quaint · · Score: 1

      I tipped off slashdot about ShackES right after I heard you were using a temp server. =)

      P.S. you are a poohead

  27. Re:Coverage (Mod him up!) by Roofus · · Score: 1

    Go Steve!

    I never knew you had an account on here =)

  28. More niche than Lumberjacking and BoardBreaking? by glrotate · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I think there is a small, but large enough, market to make presenting this feasable. Hopefully ESPN2 will find a way to package it properly and get it on the air.

  29. Re:Not a sport by rhakka · · Score: 1

    competitions, thus "sporting", just like chess is, except you're blowing people up and basically staging miniature battles.

    Please; it's inevitable that gaming will hit major broadcast time. As graphics improve, and the games look more realistic, who WOULDN'T want to watch combat in action? It might not be real soldiers in afghanistan (ask the news channels what wars do for their ratings) but sporting focused games like Unreal Tournament, Quake and Counter Strike are all the beginnings of what will ultimately sublimate regular sporting events.

    Really, what would you choose; watching guys running around with little balls, or ROBOT GLADIATORS ON THREE CHANNELS NOW, or full fledged tactical level combat action? Seriously, is there a question here?

    Or will it have to wait until we're physically doing this stuff in "holodecks"? no way. Within the next 5 years you'll see major broadcast of gaming events from in-game camera perspectives... nostradamus has spoken.

  30. PUNCH /. IN TEH FACE!!! by TheBigDinK · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    He has a low UID too. Not surprising. =)

    I demand the return of my shack dammit!

  31. Re:PUNCH /. IN TEH FACE!!! by Blah3 · · Score: 0

    Pickle.

  32. Re:Microsoft runs BSD! by norculf · · Score: 1

    Even at Microsoft, they believe in using the best tool for the job. Get over it.

  33. The CPL (probably more than you want to know) by shlamo · · Score: 5, Informative

    Alright, for all of you who seem pretty uneducated about the Cyberathletes Professional League [thecpl.com] I'll try to fill you in. The CPL was formed several years ago (right around when StarCraft was the hottest game on everybody's list).

    Generally there are several tournament's a year (one in the winter, one in the summer). This past event is held in Texas where some other tournaments are held as well (QuakeCon for one). Each CPL tournament has a featured game. This tournament's game was Counter-Strike.

    The event hosts a Bring Your Own Computer Area, (for those who want to frag all through the night) as well as workshops, (HardOCP had one this year on overclocking) prize raffles/giveaways, and of course the tournaments.

    This year there was also an Alien vs. Predator 2 Deathmatch tourney going on too. (Fatality of Quake3Arena fame wiped the floor with everyone and won a Ford Focus with a custom AVP2 paintjob) See Adrenaline Vault and TheCPL for photos.

    The CStrike tourney was a 5 on 5 clan competition and players from all over the world come to compete in it. The prize money for the tournament totals to some $150,000 dollars and comes almost entirely from Sponsors. The fees that they charge for admission into the tournament go mostly to cover the expenses of the hotel, setup, etc. And while a $50,000 US purse may sound like a lot, after it gets divided 5 ways to $10,000 minus the cost of Food and Board and Airfare (When applicable) you might be a little bit surprised when you don't have as much money as you thought you had. And that really only applies to the winner! There are tons of people who come a long way and don't even make it into the top 100. But if the money were all the tournament was about then I think a lot of people wouldn't even bother going to one of these events. The tournament is mostly about having fun and working on becoming better at Video Games (LAN differs quite a bit from Online play).

    One of the most amazing things about this tournament was the ability for Counter-Strike enthusiasts to be able to watch the Tournament on the internet with Half-Life. By joining a specially designed server, up to 80,000 people could have watched the final round (there were only 40 of 128 slots filled on the server I was on)
    here's some info:

    Speakeasy.net, Valve Software Launch 11 City Half-Life TV Network First-ever PC Game Broadcast Network built to support 80,000 Simultaneous Viewers Seattle - Broadband ISP Speakeasy.net and Kirkland based game developer Valve Software announced today the first ever launch of a fully national broadcast network of live video game coverage. The inaugural use of this network will give tens of thousands of viewers from around the world the best-possible spectator experience for the $150,000 Counter-Strike World Championships this week in Dallas, TX. The World Championships represent the largest of such competitions ever and is produced by the Dallas-based Cyberathlete Professional League. Speakeasy has partnered with Valve Software to support the largest broadcast installation ever using Valve's Half-Life TV server software. The software allows for anyone with a broadband connection and PC to connect to a live game and watch their favorite teams play as if they were playing along side them. Teams from Seattle to Sweden are flying in to compete in the four-day event; thousands more will stay home and watch the competition unfold live on the Speakeasy Network.

    "Broadcasting the CPL finals to 80,000 viewers is an incredible achievement and a huge advance in our efforts to bring competitive gaming, and gaming in general, further into the mainstream," said Doug Lombardi, director of marketing at Valve. Spectators will be able to tune in to a live broadcast of the match simply by using their PC and installation of Half-Life, and will have the option of 11 different locations to choose from to guarantee the best experience.

    "We have customers that are running cable from their PC to a large screen TV just to watch this," said Edward Bender, Director of Online Gaming for Speakeasy.net. "I think this event will definitely get more people to recognize competitive gaming as a spectator sport." Counter-Strike, the number one online action game in the world, is a team-based multiplayer game built atop Valve's award-winning game engine. Valve released the multicast spectator technology (aka Half-Life TV) as a free update earlier this year.

    Read about how to use HLTV @- http://www.cs-extreme.net/guides/HLTV/HLTV.asp

    I think we're not at the stage yet where this should be considered Professional Gaming. I don't think anyone can make a true living off of winnings from the CPL. Maybe someday it will reach that point, and this is a great step to getting there. Sorry for the long post! Hope it helped some of you learn about professional gaming.

    1. Re:The CPL (probably more than you want to know) by gladbach · · Score: 1

      it didnt come close to hitting 80,000 and all the servers kept crashing because of the load....

      not sure if it was the servers, or routers that were teh cause though. having them run on windows probably didnt help though....

      http://mollusk.speakeasy.net/pix/lastmatch.JPG

      --
      "Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms,
  34. Re:Coverage (Mod him up!) by ZoeSch · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    There's a lot of people who have accounts on both /. and shacknews (Like myself or the infamous klerck).

    Not surprising at all :]

    --
    I hate to agree with davecrazy but...
  35. Pro Gaming is becoming a sport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More and more people are beginning to see that professional computer gaming is a real sport. The event in Dallas over this weekend (which I did not attend mind you -- it doesent pay quite well enough for me to practice months for (YET!!)), was huge. Over 50,000 people spectated the event over HLTV (Watch the game being played LIVE on your screen -- a very cool technology). The purse for the clan who won (NiP) is $50,000 split between 5 people. Not a LOT of money mind you, but remember the sport is only now being given the attention it deserves. When the NFL started, its players rarely had $10k/year salaries.

    As for the ESPN part, ESPN along with other major news companies were at the event, cameras in hand, reporters in front of them.

    Also Angel Munoz, the CPL event organizer for this event, was interviewed by CNN. Find it here (wmv format :I)

    More CPL Media Info

    Major companies sponsoring the event are Intel, Logitech, and more. People are throwing some serious money and effort towards the sport.

    And No, I dont work for the CPL, nor do I agree with everything they decide to say or do, however I am a strong advocate to seeing professional gaming being presented as a sport. It takes more talent than football, baseball, etc. It really is in the same league competitively, just not financially and commercially yet.

    1. Re:Pro Gaming is becoming a sport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THIS IS NOT A SPORT!!!!

      hello??

      playing video games in your room is NOT a sport. repeat this sentence 3 times a day till you are cured.

    2. Re:Pro Gaming is becoming a sport by keflex · · Score: 1

      Hehe... guess this is not a sport because you suck at it...

      --


      My karma is -1 because I don't use AC posting. LOL.
  36. Re:NASCAR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually you have to go fast, go fast whilst turning left, go fast, go fast whilst turning left, lather, rinse, repeat. (That last part was a joke that may go over slashdot readers' heads as it is a reference to the instructions on shampoo bottles.)

    If you just go fast on the straights you won't win.

    There's also a large component that deals with race management (efficiently using fuel and tires, fast pit stops) as well as the whole make sure you're on the lead lap when the yellow flag rears it ugly head.

    Here's some analogies:
    F1:Futbol
    Nascar:Football (maybe wrestling...)
    WRC:Rugby

    They're all fun- just different. It's easy to say something is boring and lame while sitting in your aeron chair, but go to a race, drink some millers, chill with the fans and you'll have fun.

  37. Re:NASCAR? by gladbach · · Score: 1

    a lot of this reminds me of the reason people go to the kentucky derby.... they dont go to watch horses run. they go to party and have fun. make a couple bets, and go get wasted in the in field. then you go get wasted again at the parties afterwards while also trying to get laid.

    huge lan parties are just for geeks trying to do teh same thing. unfortunately they are all sausage fests so that pretty much kills their chances so they play a lot of video games.

    --
    "Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms,
  38. More niche than the National Spelling Bee? by wrinkledshirt · · Score: 1

    I can't imagine you couldn't get a larger audience to watch a CS championship match than you could to get a bunch of weird-looking home-schooled kids with lisps trying to spell "mellifluous".

    --

    --------
    Bleah! Heh heh heh... BLEAH BLEAH!!! Ha ha ha ha...

  39. Re:PUNCH /. IN TEH FACE!!! by verbatim · · Score: 1

    Having a low UID just shows you were on /. when it was still cool. Now it means about the same as karma... zlich. (I migrated myself over to the shack, and have ignored this account mostly).

    :)

    Humbily awaiting the return of the shack...

    --
    Price, Quality, Time. Pick none. What, you thought you had a choice?
  40. I only have this to say... by AFCArchvile · · Score: 0, Troll
    YOU BASTARDS!!

    I go and find a much more suitable news site, and now you go and slashdot it. I guess that's the thanks I get from the elitist nerdy schmucks who think that They Might Be Giants are the best musicians around.



    Therefore, since I can't stand the forum section of this website any longer, I hereby retire this account, with a karma of at least 46 (worst case, and I know that some of you pompous Slashdotters with mod points will lunge at the negative moderations like anons at a fresh thread). As for the heartless hinds who are clicking and clicking on the ShackES link, I hope your workstation segfaults or gets a kernel panic within the next week.


    Besides, Xian is more interesting than John Carmack is. At least he presents his sense of humor to us.

    --
    "Ancillary does not mean you get to rule the world." --U.S. Circuit Judge Harry Edwards, speaking to the FCC's lawyer
    1. Re:I only have this to say... by ZoeSch · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Fucking Slashdotters

      -Xian

      ???? :]

      --
      I hate to agree with davecrazy but...
    2. Re:I only have this to say... by verbatim · · Score: 1

      You know, that is starting to wear thin. Really thin.

      --
      Price, Quality, Time. Pick none. What, you thought you had a choice?
    3. Re:I only have this to say... by sexninja · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      OMG LINUX!!

  41. Man, my ass is stinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I don't know what's going on, maybe it was something I ate or I didn't wipe well earlier, but my ass is STINKING today. I could smell it when I was sitting on the couch watching TV this afternoon. I guess I could take a shower, but I'm one lazy mofo. I've just been carefull not to do any scratching so my fingers don't get all stinky. Must have been something I ate - even my farts are curling the hairs in my nose. Maybe I had a fart that came with some extra, I don't know. But I haven't felt any squishing or chaffing so I don't think that's the case. All I know is that I can smell ASS - serious ass! I mean, like, public restroom ass. When I fart, the room smells like restroom ass, and I don't mean all mediciny but more like when you walk into a Wal-Mart stall. Good think I wear black underwear for days like today.

  42. Re:Buncha Nips. by TMacPhail · · Score: 1

    Q2 or Q3 style BFG?

  43. Re:What you you do with 50 grand? by PhuCknuT · · Score: 1

    You don't want to eat 50 grand, 100 Grand is much better.

  44. Magic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember when a Magic the Gathering tourney was on ESPN. While it's a lot of fun to play, the tourney was about as fun to watch as watching paint dry. I think a lot of viewer acceptance has to do with presentation. Witness Battlebots! So if the network powers that be decide to make a go of professional gaming, they better not let it look like they're on a goof. About the best thing they could do is hire a good mix of ad agents, "style" experts, and intelligent gamers to come up with a game plan (pardon the pun). Something like that should not ever be done on a shoestring. Has anyone heard anything about the new game channel?

  45. Re:What you you do with 50 grand? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fuck you

    you are extremely stupid

    that is MONEY!!!

    only dumbfuck eat money.

  46. Re:Important Warning about viewing in -1 Nested mo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Taco,

    A filter please.

    Thanks,Matthew

  47. The Geek stereotype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find it funny to see all these people pointing and laughing at what they percieve as geeks. It is somewhat ironic considering anyone associated with a technology job these days has probably been pigeon holed that way themselves before. I find it ESPECIALLY ironic considering it says "News for nerds" up in the top lefthand corner of this site. Is this just your way of making yourself feel better about it? Just because these guys are having fun with technology doesn't make them any more geeks than you are. Just like you they come from all walks of life. Just like you they may joke about being a nerd sometimes. But Just like you they hate being seriously called geeks just because someone is too lazy to find out more about them and gets high off that sort of thing. The fact is video games have become more popular than ANY type of sport with the young people of today. EVERY new generation is growing up holding a video game controller these days. If you think that the stereotype of a gamer geek is going to apply to the people of tomorrow then you are sadly mistaken.

    --James "Sling_Blade" Lewis
    Domain of Games

  48. Re:Not a sport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Americans, along with the rest of the world, know that you are only playing a glorified version of pac-man or pong. These are computer games, not to be confused with REAL LIFE.

    Real "sports" involve athleticism, working out and training, and most important of all, encourage physical fitness (much needed in our obese society)

    calling your video game a "sport" is the saddest things i ever heard.

    now go take out the trash before your father gets home.

  49. Re:WHY THE FUCK DONT I GET STORIES POSTED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aye laddy.

  50. Re:Not a sport by rhakka · · Score: 1

    yes, and the couch potato at home should really care that the sport he's watching, and let's not forget that it's SPECTATION that drives income in sports, not the sport itself, is not *actually* sweaty guys on a playing field?

    please. like i said, there are remote control robots on three stations now; gaming isn't far behind.

    but what you're basically saying is, yes, it will have to wait until we're doing it live in 3-D simulations, because then it will actually be people doing it physically?

    maybe you're right, but I think that's a really, really fine line to draw.

    Look at the top quake players; they follow training schedules, eat right, but they excercise their minds, not their bodies. speed and accuracy of reflex are the skills involved, and the line between physical and mental are extremely blurred there.

    Perhaps *you* don't find it interesting; I would wager you don't know the first thing about organized team gaming. The tactics at work rival that of any organized competition in the world, the action is far more dazzling because it's not constrained by "real world" physics... it's only a matter of time.

    But you go watch your grown men smacking balls around and jumping on each other if that's what you're into. in a few years you'll see it on ESPN 5 while the first four channels are action you'd never be able to distinguish from real life sitting there with your beer, watching it all passively on your TV.

    Grow up; sports of any kind that currently exist promote athleticism only in those that compete; and the millions of people watching the game don't necessarily *ever* play it.

  51. Re:Not a sport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at the top quake players; they follow training schedules, eat right, but they excercise their minds, not their bodies

    HA! you show me one quake player who eats better than any high school athelete... and playing video games to exrcise your mind??? TRY CONVERSATION!!! or a book, most anything is better than the repetitiveness of a video game!

    Grow up; sports of any kind that currently exist promote athleticism only in those that compete; and the millions of people watching the game don't necessarily *ever* play it.

    maybe you don't play the sports you watch, and i'd agree that millions of Americans don't necessarily play them either. but i do, and so do all my friends. Maybe more people should? This would definately reduce your risk of heart disease, among many other ailments...

  52. other things on ESPN2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if espn2 can show magic the gathering, why not professional counter-strike? CS is at least halfway interesting to watch

  53. Re:Not a sport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God damn you fucking owned him. Funny as hell :0)

  54. Re:Hear hear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If all you can think of is a Microsoft joke when the topic isn't even computers then you shouldn't be breeding.

  55. Re:WHY THE FUCK DONT I GET STORIES POSTED by ubugly2 · · Score: 1

    That is correct.the slashdot editors hold spelling,grammer and punctuation in vary high reguard

  56. Re:Not a sport by rhakka · · Score: 1

    HA! you show me one quake player who eats better than any high school athelete

    -go read about the #1 Quake 1v1 deathmatcher. He follows a regimen just like any other athlete, minus the steroids and potential physical injury in game. You ever have a day where you feel "not quite on?"... that's what he trains to avoid; to be lightning sharp. Not to throw balls further, or run faster, but to process and respond with blazing intensity. The *video game* doesn't excercise his mind; he excercises it to excel in his competition. Again, like chess, which is a world competition, but much more intense.

    and playing video games to exrcise your mind??? TRY CONVERSATION!!! or a book, most anything is better than the repetitiveness of a video game!

    -Repetitiveness? Was pac-man the last game you played? Have you EVER played a team game online? I doubt it. Check out Capture the Flag for Unreal Tournament; you have a "field", the rules of the game are programmed, and you and your teammates try to "run" the flag from one side to the other; sounds kinda like football doesn't it? Oh wait, football fields come in one variety, not dozens, they don't have "guns", all they can do is line up, throw balls and run. Boy that must be repetitive, huh? But it's not; they have plays and strategies and no two games are alike; Just like online team gaming.

    maybe you don't play the sports you watch, and i'd agree that millions of Americans don't necessarily play them either. but i do, and so do all my friends. Maybe more people should? This would definately reduce your risk of heart disease, among many other ailments...

    -Yeah, sports are popular and televised because they reduce your risk of heart disease, how foolish of me not to make that connection before. Just cause someone plays games doesn't mean they don't go outside man, not that this comment had a damn thing to do with the topic at hand. Anyway, I don't *watch* sports, I *play* them.. online.

  57. Re:Not a sport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am doing work in computer graphics as a student and one of my potential thoughts for a career is game development. But, if I have to be constantly exposed to the type of people who consider games a sport and want to watch them on TV, I doubt I could stand it for very long.

    Games are fun. I like playing Civ 3 of Black and White at night before I go to bed. I like playing FPS games with friends (that I know in real life.) And I enjoy seeing new console systems as much as the next guy, but this is ridiculous. If you want to really be an expert in team assualts and what not try joining the special forces or short of that, join a paintball leauge.

  58. NiP? by Suppafly · · Score: 1

    are they like the older, tougher Bananas in Pajama's that are always coming down the stairs?

  59. Re: ESPN and Future by jradkowski · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am a writer for Challenge-us.com a hardcore gamer site. Ive been gaming competetively for roughly 2 years now and yes $50k is nothing to sneeze at but it wasnt the most ever awarded. A $150k purse _WAS_ the most. (approx a year-year and half ago) This, however, was the first major Counter Strike Tourney so far and I am guessing many more to come. (None so far have matched up to this scale) While I am not a Counter Strike (CS) Player I have kept an open mind about it, even though I am a hard core quake3er and what I saw today on HLTV was amazing. The games were well played and I also like what control the spectator got in watching. Now step back and think of this... CS is a FREE MOD for HL. Yes FREE, and it gets this much attention and is this large, its just baffling that they don't have more problems then they already do.

    On the net there are quite a few bots and hacks out that some of the filtering doesnt get. Its slowly being changed but from what I saw today as far as gaming and teamplay and fun I think I will be playing counter strike a bit more then I do already.

    As for ESPN... their cameras WERE there and yes it will be airing sometime in a special I think. As for gaming TV... its already in the works/reality. G4 was announced by Comcast and should be available soon!!!! I will definately be ordering that channel when its available, should be interesting to see how much they cover. (Consoles to hardcore gaming I am assuming)

    Joe Radkowski
    aka
    D|S-Syn

  60. Re:PUNCH /. IN TEH FACE!!! by Saeger · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    *NUKED*

    --
    Power to the Peaceful
  61. TK's don't count by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

    Remember that - it's easy to rack up kills, when you start out shooting your teammembers.

    --
    We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    1. Re:TK's don't count by Sk3lt · · Score: 1

      nah we had it make it minus a kill every time you killed a member and also if you killed a team-member 3 times then you got booted off the game.

  62. Magic the Gathering by NeuroKoan · · Score: 1

    Your argument is great, execpt for one thing, I got to see a Magic the Gathering Tournament on ESPN2 a few years back. Never say never. Absolute statements are always wrong.

    --

    "However," replied the universe, "The fact has not created in me A sense of obligation."
  63. When will this be on... cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.g4media.com/

    try that. Starts in April 2002. I can't wait.

    (for the lazy: it's a video game channel, hopefully they will show some of the bigger tournaments :)

  64. And in other, completely ignored news... by Aardappel · · Score: 1

    Slackers win the north european "smackdown" quakeworld competition over L, with a 3-1 win.

    http://www.challenge-eu.com/smackdown/north/

  65. Re:Buncha Nips. by keflex · · Score: 0, Troll

    One acronym: AWM

    --


    My karma is -1 because I don't use AC posting. LOL.
  66. What about World Cyber Games? by Otis_INF · · Score: 2

    They've just ended: http://www.worldcybergames.com, held in South Korea, with competitions in Counterstrike among other games with competitors from 37 countries. I think, with a pricemoney of $300,000.- , the WCG is a more important game event than the CPL.

    --
    Never underestimate the relief of true separation of Religion and State.
    1. Re:What about World Cyber Games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The World Cyber Games had more money because they are based in Korea, a country completely obsessed with video games. Also, The CPL focused on 1 game, while the World Cyber Games spread itself over everything. The World Cyber Games was much less organized as well. When given a choice between the two competitions, most CS players went to The CPL. I don't think it is fair to call The WCG the most important after all that.

      --Sling_Blade

  67. Re:CRITICAL FACTS THAT YOU WON'T LEARN IN SCHOOL by keflex · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This is modded as "interesting" instead of "troll" or "flamebait" because...?

    --


    My karma is -1 because I don't use AC posting. LOL.
  68. what is CPL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CPL is at http://www.thecpl.com)

    Coverage - http://www.avault.com/events/wce/

    Domain of Games - http://www.domainofgames.com/

  69. CPL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CPL is the Cyberathlete Professional League
    www.thecpl.com

    Best general coverage was at the Adrenaline Vault
    www.avault.com

    Best detailed coverage at Domain of Games
    www.domainofgames.com

  70. Re: ESPN and Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A $150k purse _WAS_ the most. (approx a year-year and half ago)

    What event was that?

  71. You want commentary? by CheechBG · · Score: 1

    Hey, if Hollywood can hire John Madden and Pat Summerall to overlay commentary on Keanu Reeves, I'm sure the CPL can have them lay down some phrases at the matches. Hot damn, I can just hear it...

    (Madden scribbling furiously on his e-chalkboard) "So you have this guy charging up the middle with his deagle, when the defender on the other sides NAILS his with his AWM. WHAP. Then you have the newbie over there at the bombsite who drops the bomb off target. Doink. Now here comes the entire NiP offense to run over the n00b. Now that's some Counter-Strike ownage."

    Or it could just be me. :)

  72. actually... by gdoliner · · Score: 2, Informative

    espn was at this tournament recording footage for airing at a later, undetermined date.

  73. ESPN shows... sports? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All this talkf of ESPN showing sports... do they still do that? They can show professional computer gaming, and yet more 'traditional' sports that have been around for centuries, are in the Olympic games, can't make it on air at all (fencing for example).

    seems a bit scewed to me...

  74. SportsCenter is the milestone by davidhan · · Score: 1

    I'm sure eventually some high-stakes gaming competition will make it on a ESPN channel if it hasn't already. The real milestone will be when it makes SportsCenter. I remember seeing Sumo highlights on SC before, so why not CPL?

  75. Re: ESPN and Future by jradkowski · · Score: 1

    Correction :) $100k was the most given out in a 'Pro Gaming' tourney :)

    linkage:

    http://www.avault.com/razercpl/index.asp?p=tourn am ent

    It was a quake3 1v1 tourney, which has been the game of pro gamers for the last year-year and half till Counter Strike Became the game of the CPL. I was thinking of $150k because the CPL announced last year that there would be a quake3 1v1 $150k tourney in december as their 'big thing' but around march they backed out of that statement and started the switch to CS.

    Joe

  76. Re:Not a sport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want to convince me that video games are fun and exciting and involve skill and strategy... well, you are preaching to the choir. I can't tell you how many times I've been up WAY too late playing my house mates in some insane quake 3 game...

    but the fact of the matter is: "sports" are for athletes. Period.

    If online gaming were ever displayed on espn, espn2, or espn102 for that matter, it would only be for jocks and frat boys to make fun of the total lame ass geeks who dedicated oh so many dateless friday nights to perfecting their camping techniques, passing up the extra twinkie or so in the hopes that their fat ass fingers could hit the w,a,s,d keys as fast as possible. And, oh yeah, one out of every 100,000 or so might make a few grand out of it. The frat boy jock types would be laughing their heads off at home, with their hot ass girlfriends that they got while you were playing video games!

  77. Re:Not a sport by rhakka · · Score: 1

    when they weren't busy beating them for being too slow with the beer.

    who cares?

    "sports" are not for atheletes at all. Chess is a multi million dollar worldwide competition. Whether you want to call it "sport" or "competition" or whatever is completely immaterial; the difference is, there is visible action in gaming, and it's getting more realistic every year.

    You seriously think when you can't tell whether a player model is a human being or pixels on a screen, that the origin is somehow going to affect the spectator?

    No way. Even *if* it only caught the "star trek" crowd, that's more than enough to make it a success. The jocks can go suck down protein shakes and grow beerguts at 25 just like those oh so sedentary video gamers. So what.

    All the "lame ass geeks" do is make fun of grown men putting on stretch pants and jumping into big piles of other grown men. Does that change anything? no. Do the frat boy jocks have a damn thing to do with this topic? no. Do more than one out of 100,000 make any money in their sports? Probably not.

    Plus, I'm a "lame ass geek" who's girlfriend used to be the captain of the cheerleading squad, so :P hehe.

  78. Re:CRITICAL FACTS THAT YOU WON'T LEARN IN SCHOOL by rosewood · · Score: 1

    Some people may find it interesting that so much time would be spent on something that stupid! I know I found it interesting ... now insightful you would have to wonder about...

  79. Re:Buncha Nips. by keflex · · Score: 0

    Lol. This is a troll because the mod doesn't know what I'm talking about. Might as well label it flamebait too...

    --


    My karma is -1 because I don't use AC posting. LOL.
  80. Re:CRITICAL FACTS THAT YOU WON'T LEARN IN SCHOOL by afree87 · · Score: 1

    16. The author of the parent post is a complete and total idiot.