Slashdot Mirror


Better Looking Linux: Tungsten Graphics

Several folks have e-mailed about the formation of Tungsten Graphics, which is composed of quite a number of ex-Precision Insighters. Linuxgames is carrying a bit of a conversation with Frank LaMonica, the CEO of the new company. They've got a contract with Red Hat already in place. Frank's statement summarizes what they are doing well: "The work we are doing involves Mesa ? and XFree86, including both 2D and 3D multi-screen technology, and we are working very closely with the OpenGL ? ARB to maintain the integrity of the OpenGL API. We believe that OpenGL 2.0 needs more industry support, so we are working to help generate that support. DRI ? technology is still in its infancy, and TG plans to help bring it to full fruition. Our first step in that goal is to significantly improve the existing open source DRI driver for the Radeon chipset. That driver is tentatively scheduled for release in late spring or early summer of 2002. "

164 comments

  1. [?] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a lot of question marks. You know, Everything 2 doesn't really appreciate getting Slashdotted. It's not like their advertising revenue is pouring in anyway, and you just make the site lag.

    1. Re:[?] by Sarcasm_Orgasm · · Score: 0

      but if they didn't use [?]'s how would we know what stuff means? we aren't all lifeless geeks like youself who have time to type in everything2.com & search, i myself spend several minutes a day with my blowup partner, & i also make time to spend with the birds at the park..

      --
      Special people have long socks, ride short buses, & invent witty sigs.
  2. Graphics expertise and their website by awgy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Its not that their website doesn't serve its purpose, but the Tungsten Graphics site doesn't quite instill any security in my mind of their graphics experience. Granted, hardware and DRI-related issues generally don't require good graphical design, but someone should at least offer them a logo.

    --
    Kein Mitleid für die Mehrheit.
    1. Re:Graphics expertise and their website by randumb_surfer · · Score: 3, Funny

      After looking at your site I don't think they'll be coming to you for site design assistance.

    2. Re:Graphics expertise and their website by Quizme2000 · · Score: 2

      Maybe they changed their website to a more slashdotting compatabile design. They are also dealing with alot of different browsers hitting their site. Hey its simple, fast, and IMHO suited very well for its purpose. Hell I bet its valid html code. If you want bloat, fancy graphics, and bandwidth hogging webpages please go here.

      --
      "Get them before they get....
    3. Re:Graphics expertise and their website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen. Just the facts, ma'm

    4. Re:Graphics expertise and their website by ptrourke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You lose that bet. It's (probably hand-encoded) HTML3.2, but with empty alt attributes, and a number of other validity problems (a lot of them merely typos). Not well formed, either. Looks to me like it's a placeholder written by someone who has the skills but lacks the time. Expect something better to pop up eventually. See for yourself: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.tungs tengraphics.com/

    5. Re:Graphics expertise and their website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Have you noticed most engineering firms have crappy website? They're engineers for god's sake, not some unemployed slacking web-designers.

    6. Re:Graphics expertise and their website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHA, I was just about to post that.. and it was said on the first damn post! That site is pretty sad :)

    7. Re:Graphics expertise and their website by Quizme2000 · · Score: 2

      I too went a checked it out on the HTML validy tool. But then I went and checked my own webpage too. Ouch. Anywahy, working for a startup that hasn't been funding with millions of dollars, the website is a very low priority for non-internet related technologies.

      --
      "Get them before they get....
    8. Re:Graphics expertise and their website by Merlin42 · · Score: 1

      To me it looks like they just took the PI site and simplified quite a bit.

    9. Re:Graphics expertise and their website by Jobe_br · · Score: 2

      Contrary to what others are writing, I agree with this poster. Regardless of if you're intending to be working with graphics or not, if you intend to be taken seriously, a design is essential. A simple 2-3 page site (which is what it looks like they currently have) plus maybe a released template that they can use to add their own pages later doesn't have to cost $20K.

      Creating sites that load quickly (for the target audience), are most compatible across browsers (including text console apps such as Lynx, if desired) and are low-load for the server (to sustain a slashdot effect) are what professional interactive agencies are called on to do. My company (shameless plug) answers that call and answers it well (say what you will about our own site, which doesn't get nearly as much time invested in it as our client's sites do).

      For something like Tungsten, I'd say that having a page that loads in Lynx isn't nearly as important as having a page that looks professional and inspires trust in this brand new company. And while many, many slashdotters will be going to their site from Linux workstations using Mozilla, Galeon, Konqueror, or Opera, the visits that probably matter most to the executives at the moment are those coming in on IE, from other executives sitting in plush offices with money to invest!

    10. Re:Graphics expertise and their website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Companies that deal with specialized engineering firms see web fluff as needless garbage. They know the value of the engineering talent that's being made available. This is a new company that will obviously put more content on the site as it is developed. Give it some time!

    11. Re:Graphics expertise and their website by ptrourke · · Score: 1

      I too went a checked it out on the HTML validy tool. But then I went and checked my own webpage too. Ouch. Anywahy, working for a startup that hasn't been funding with millions of dollars, the website is a very low priority for non-internet related technologies.

      Exactly. I find validity problems on my personal pages all the time - even occasionally on the pages I do for a living. But I've had years to refine those pages, and that's what they pay me for. I can't blame a startup that doesn't want to add a web developer to their startup costs, and I can't blame an engineer who's only got 3 hours to put up a site for the company if the pages are a little ugly.

  3. Swordfish by pimpinmonk · · Score: 1

    The work we are doing involves Mesa? and XFree86, including both 2D and 3D multi-screen technology
    If this means they can make me something similar to that [fake] multi-screen, 2D and 3D GUI in Swordfish, I will be the happiest person ever. Although I love blackbox, I would like something a little more "advanced"...
  4. Isn't the abbreviation wrong? by kawlyn · · Score: 4, Funny

    On the web page it's TG, but shouldn't it be WG?

    --

    When someone yells "Stop" or goes limp, or taps out, the fight is over.
    1. Re:Isn't the abbreviation wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wang grabbing?
      wookie grease?
      womanly grunts?

    2. Re:Isn't the abbreviation wrong? by rlowe69 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >> On the web page it's TG, but shouldn't it be WG?

      >wang grabbing?
      >wookie grease?
      >womanly grunts?


      *sigh* ... W is the chemical symbol for the element Tungsten - incidentally, the W stands for wolfram. Don't they teach basic chemistry in high school these days? Maybe I'm just biting a troll ...

      --
      ----- rL
    3. Re:Isn't the abbreviation wrong? by Webmoth · · Score: 2

      wanting goatse?

      (sorry... it had to be said)

      --
      Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
    4. Re:Isn't the abbreviation wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *sigh* ... W is the chemical symbol for the element Tungsten [tungsten.com] - incidentally, the W stands for wolfram. Don't they teach basic chemistry in high school these days? Maybe I'm just biting a troll ...

      Now, if we were the kind of geeks who knew that sort of stuff, we wouldn't be reading a hip and with-it website like Slashdot, now would we?

      :-)

      -ac

  5. Here is to wishing.. by Erasei · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We believe that OpenGL 2.0 needs more industry support

    I would +love+ to see this happen, especially in the gaming area. I know we (the /. readers and karma whores like myself) all talk about how great Linux is, and for the most part, I agree. I would not replace my Slackware server for any version of Windows, ever. But I still run a Windows desktop, purely for gaming. That is really all I do on my home desktop, is play games. I would love to be able to play those same games on a *nix machine.

    Then maybe I wouldn't feel slightly guilty for pirating windows.. naaah.. I don't feel guilty.

    I realize that this article was covering far more than just games.. but I know games are what we are all thinking when we hear the terms 'OpenGL' and '3D'.

    --
    visit my free wallpaper collection, wp.erasei.com
    1. Re:Here is to wishing.. by FortKnox · · Score: 1

      The only way for Linux to become a gaming platform, is for a company to release a game on linux only, then doing some marketing and make a playable demo on Windows to get players enticed about it. I almost went out and bought a PS2, when I first played the "Oni" demo. What changed my mind? They released it on windows.

      The likely-hood of this happening, is slim, seeing that you can make more money on Windows. But it may work if a buncha hobbiests get together (can't be open source, cause someone will just make a windows port)...
      Heh... my idea comes down to proprietary software... go figure...

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    2. Re:Here is to wishing.. by Comrade+Pikachu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Gaming? Naah...not I.

      Some of us actually use this stuff for work. I speak of animators, modelers, chemists and mathematicians. The entertainment industry (3D animation for film, television, and those games you enjoy) is extremely competitive. Thanks to the legacy of IRIX, there is a solid Unix culture there. This is the one area where Linux on the desktop has a serious competitive advantage!

    3. Re:Here is to wishing.. by Tower · · Score: 1

      > I almost went out and bought a PS2, when I first played the "Oni" demo. What changed my mind? They released it on windows.

      This is also the reason that I haven't purchased a game console since the Sega Genesis... Especially since I tend to stick to sports games (and a few multiplayer RTSs). When the same sports game is available for a PC and a console, the price for the PC is significantly less, and you can get roster updates and game patches *far* more easily on the PC (sometimes not at all for the console) - well, the decision is already made...

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
    4. Re:Here is to wishing.. by PotatoHead · · Score: 2

      Oh yeah. Someone rumored that some big SGI names are involved. This can only be a good thing. Graphics on an IRIX box are great compared to the other UNIXes.

    5. Re:Here is to wishing.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree for the most part, but I don't think it should simply be a bunch of hobbiest.

      I spent some time at a gaming shop this summer and something I learned is games take alot money to produce.

      What would be really nice is to see some big companies like IBM back a project like this.
      Sure IBM is not a game company, but they have been backing linux.

      Putting some money into linux only games would not be a big money maker for them in the short term, but switching users away from M$ is a nice long term goal.

    6. Re:Here is to wishing.. by geekster · · Score: 1

      I had this attitude once. To only release my games for linux (not that they are gonna pull over any gamers, even if I finish one). But then I realized what it is I like most about Linux. It's the choice and freedom.

      For me this would go against what we're fighting for. But yeah, there's a chance it'd work. It would take more than a couple of exclusive games though.

    7. Re:Here is to wishing.. by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 2

      The problem is, Direct3D has the game market about sewn up. Except for those holdouts over at id, the PC game industry has pretty much standardized on Direct3d version X.Y (whatever it is this week). We may have bought OpenGL some time but in a few years I see Fahrenheit repeating itself where OpenGL is subsumed entirely as a "legacy" layer on top of Direct3D, especially as the game market pulls more clout in the overall 3D scene.

      --
      N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
  6. OSS Radeon Drivers. by reaper20 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Thanks guys, we all know we can't rely on ATI for decent drivers - for anything. Heh.

    1. Re:OSS Radeon Drivers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are they bothering? Shouldn't ATI be at least funding the development of drivers? Where is the business plan in writing open source drivers for a proprietory video card company if you arent funded by them?

      ati drivers suck, nvidia may be closed source but at least it works...

    2. Re:OSS Radeon Drivers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ATI *has* been funding the development of drivers for a couple years now. They're just not doing it themselves.

  7. Wayne Hallat? Where are you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MAN?!

  8. advertisement? by mrroot · · Score: 1

    Is this an advertisement for Tungsten Graphics? I mean, what is the story here? OK, so they are a consulting company who specialzes in graphics. Got it.

    --
    I Heart Sorting Networks
    1. Re:advertisement? by cduffy · · Score: 2

      The formation of a new company specializing in some aspect of open source that affects people (like video device support!) is news. Further, since those of us who've been around a while know the people involved (like Brian Paul), it's interesting to know that our friends (acquaintances, whatever) have found New And Interesting work.

    2. Re:advertisement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its important because this is the resurrection of Precision Insight after VA bought and killed it.

  9. Unoriginal name... by svara · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Wolfram is the german word for tungsten - After Wolfram research, tungsten graphics. Pretty unoriginal, there are so many other elements.

    What about Plutonium graphics?

    1. Re:Unoriginal name... by ghamerly · · Score: 1

      Wolfram Research is named after its founder, Stephen Wolfram, not for the element Tungsten. See this site. So "Tungsten Graphics" isn't copying anything here.

    2. Re:Unoriginal name... by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 2

      It is very difficult to tell if this person is (A) trying to be funny, or (B) really, really uptight.

    3. Re:Unoriginal name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time I hear the word Tungsten, I'm reminded of that Simpsons episode where the pipe looking display told Bart "Tungsten, I NEED TUNGSTEN TO LIIIVVVVVVE".

  10. Will graphics be getting closer kernel ties? by Flarners · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I've gotten the impression that the reason many cards (including my Matrox G400) underperform in Linux compared to Windows is due to the fact that the majority of the 3D talk is done in userspace, outside of the kernel. NVidia has chosen to completely bypass DRI and throw their entire driver into the kernel, which produces equal or better performance in Linux compared to Windows, at the expense of numerous stability problems (especially on multiprocessor boxes).

    So, what I'd like to know is, is there a happy medium between userspace code in the X server and driver code in the kernel than can provide adequate performance without sacrificing stability? Right now, Linux 3D support is at either one end of the spectrum or the other: Stable yet slow DRI, or unstable yet blazingly fast kernel drivers. I would love to dump Windows for all my Unreal Tournament and Tribes 2 gaming needs, and am a loyal Loki customer, but I hate having to put up with either regular crashes or a large drop in performance. Hopefully, these Tungsten folk will find the best compromise.

    --
    "The problem with the French is that they don't have a word for 'entrepeneur'." -George W. Bush
    1. Re:Will graphics be getting closer kernel ties? by BlueGecko · · Score: 4, Interesting

      IIRC, BeOS's video drivers were in user space, and seeing as that was a media OS, I'm assuming that there's some merit to keeping such drivers out of the kernel. The trick more likely has to do with the fact that Linux lacks real-time scheduling and the extremely low-cost context switches that were absolutely essential on an OS so pervasively threaded as Be, so I honestly do not know if such a solution would be practical in Linux without a major rewrite of the scheduler, etc.

    2. Re:Will graphics be getting closer kernel ties? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A major rewrite of the scheduler is planned for 2.5.

    3. Re:Will graphics be getting closer kernel ties? by cpeterso · · Score: 2, Flamebait

      A major rewrite of the scheduler is planned for every new Linux kernel. Plus a rewrite of the VM, NFS, SCSI, VFS layer. Linux is getting greater all the time. That's why they have to keep rewriting it.

      The NT kernel has not changed much since NT 3.51 in the earlier 90s, yet Linux is still losing benchmarks against NT.

    4. Re:Will graphics be getting closer kernel ties? by BillWhite · · Score: 2, Informative

      FWIW, both the 3Dfx and ATI OpenGL Windows drivers were in user space in Windows. The way it works there is that the driver asks the 2D display driver for a memory buffer, the driver fills the memory buffer in with commands, most of which have the form "draw a triangle", and then the driver submits the buffer of commands to the hardware through a kernel interface. This is the way the ATI Rage128 drivers worked, and the 3Dfx V3 and V5 drivers worked. In fact, for OpenGL, you could use the Visual C++ debugger to debug the driver. DirectX is under the Win32 mutex, so debugging it is a big PITA, and required SoftICE.

      My guess would be that they are exactly the same now. The problem with Linux performance is not that the driver is in user space, but that the driver, Mesa, is not very efficient.

    5. Re:Will graphics be getting closer kernel ties? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The current Linux scheduler is almost exactly the same as the one released in 1991. The VFS layer has never been rewritten, and the NFS server has been rewritten to go from a user-space server to a kernel-space server. As for the SCSI layer, it hasn't been rewritten, but oh man does it ever need it.

      So lets review. You got 1/5 right (the VM). Perhaps you shouldn't be posting.

      Now compare against NT. 3.51 to 4.0 was a near complete rewrite including MAJOR architectural changes. They went from a near pure microkernel design to a hybrid design. The network stack got much finer grained locking. The scheduler was also rewritten somewhere between 3.51 and 2000.

      Just because you can't see the huge changes in NT doesn't mean they're not happening. Of course, evidently you can't see the changes in Linux either, even though the source is freely available.

      As far as benchmarks go, the only industry standard benchmarks I've seen accredited results for both platforms on the same hardware is SPECWeb, where Linux/TUX soundly spanked 2000/IIS/SWC.

    6. Re:Will graphics be getting closer kernel ties? by be-fan · · Score: 2

      *Very* off-base. NVIDIA's drivers are regular GLX modules loaded by the X server in userspace. They simply use a different (but functionally equivilant in terms of protection) scheme than DRI to bang registers and interrupts on the card. The stability issues are due to other problems (to be fair, though, I have been using them for a long time and Galeon and AbiWord have crashed numerous times while the NVIDIA drivers have never frozen the kernel or even X).

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    7. Re:Will graphics be getting closer kernel ties? by be-fan · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, BeOS splits up the video drivers. The low level work that *has* to be done in the kernel (like handling interrupts) is done in kernel space. The high level work (everything else, including drawing) is done by the X server (from userspace) directly manipulating the registers on the card. This is actually faster than putting the driver in the kernel because you don't have to make a slow system call to do drawing. The major bottleneck in the system is that you have to communicate between the X server and the application.
      Ideally, processors would implement protection mechanisms similar to the x86 segmentation method. That method let you define 4 protection rings, and allowed code to access certain segments based on the privelege level of the segment containing the code. That way, everything could be done in the application. The app code would have a privlege level of 3, so it couldn't trash kernel or windowing system data. The window system would have a privelege level of 1 or 2, so it could access its data and the applications, but couldn't trash kernel data. The kernel would have a privelege of 0, so it could access anything and be safe from other code. Using such a mechanism, it would be possible to make everything (including windowing operations and system calls) require no more time than a simple function call.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    8. Re:Will graphics be getting closer kernel ties? by Mr.+Shiny+And+New · · Score: 1

      Gee... according to Linus the scheduler has never been rewritten, and the scheduler is performing just fine. Some people complain that it could do better on large multi-processor boxes, but then NT doesn't do so well on those boxes either.

      Also, NT4 had some major changes in that the video drivers were moved INTO the kernel.

    9. Re:Will graphics be getting closer kernel ties? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BeOS has no X server...

    10. Re:Will graphics be getting closer kernel ties? by be-fan · · Score: 2

      First, it does have an X server port. Second, it has the app_server, which does essentially the same thing.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  11. Re:Racism in Linux Must End!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a troll, but there's some truth. Why are there no BLACK Slashdot editors?

  12. We've been waiting by MADCOWbeserk · · Score: 0

    This is great news, finally OpenGL will gain some ground and Linux will get better graphics.
    "At first they are hitting the Radeon driver" This means they rewrite drivers (hopefully with manufacturer support) and take advantage of some of the hardware acceleration and features we've been missing.
    I don't know how many new games this will bring. But I am sure the KDE and Gnome people are salivating at the possibilities. Animated translucent menus, anybody?

    1. Re:We've been waiting by MisterBlister · · Score: 1
      This is great news, finally OpenGL will gain some ground...

      I'll believe it when I see it. I don't mean to be flamey or rain on anyone's parade, but as a 3D programmer I've been hearing how great OpenGL 2.0, OpenML, etc will be..

      I've read specs, read committee meeting discussions ad naseum; but I still don't have any API to program to or even what looks like the beginnings of consenseus among the ARB members.

      In the meantime Microsoft is going fullsteam ahead with Direct3D (and the rest of DX) 9, adding in the latest features, fixing the last remaining issues with DX8 (don't kid yourself, its a great API; if anyone quotes Carmack's 5 year old .plan I will kill their mother).

      Meanwhile, if I choose to use OpenGL I'm stuck with vendors who implement things different (yes, there are benefits to OpenGL's open extention architecture, but only if the vendors play nice, which they haven't been..), no standard for shading languages (until OpenGL 2.0..and considering how long it took OpenGL 1.2 to be well supported over OpenGL 1.1 I wouldn't hold my breath and fuck you ATI, for lagging on implementing NV's shading extentions and forcing coders to write to two seperate interfaces!), etc, etc.

      Sometimes a strong authority is better than a committe, and this is one of those situations, IMO.

    2. Re:We've been waiting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If you want to fuck someone, fuck NVIDIA. They have offered licensing terms for NV_vertex_program that are impossible for most of the industry to accept, and have repeatedly claimed IP on all vertex programming APIs while refusing to identify what that IP is, so that the ARB and other vendors can avoid it.

      NVIDIA has also engaged in a great deal of spin control and has jerked other vendors around by saying they'd changed their position and were offering the extension up without any conditions, then suddenly reversing course after work on a unified interface had been underway for months.

      Their recent offer of NV_vertex_program under license to Brian Paul must be looked at very sceptically in light of their past history.

    3. Re:We've been waiting by MADCOWbeserk · · Score: 0

      Lets give a hand to Matrox, for not being involved. And they actually write drivers for linux....

  13. And they do what again???? by rhost89 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    If their web site is any indication of their graphical prowass, then be afraid....be very afraid.

    --
    I will bend your mind with my spoon
    1. Re:And they do what again???? by technomancerX · · Score: 2

      And designing a website has what to do with writing drivers for video cards???

      --
      .technomancer
  14. This sounds promising... by Krapangor · · Score: 1

    but without "compatibility" to standard of the beast, don't call it's name, "DirectX", we won't see much games ported.
    Loki hadn't great business success and most major game companies will refrain from porting to linux as long this needs expensive porting. The profit margins aren't that big in the gaming industry. The linux desktop community is not big enough to justify larger investments.

    --
    Owner of a Mensa membership card.
  15. Not very supportive of Open source by A+Commentor · · Score: 5, Interesting
    We believe that some code MUST be open source, other code can go either way, and some, especially at the lowest levels of hardware and the code within applications, can be completely closed with no loss of benefit to the industry or its customers.

    Didn't we have to face this problem before with some of the video card (S3?) manufactures that refused to give out programming information... Code to control hardware should be open just like any of the other code.

    --

    Looking for any old 8-bit Heathkit/Zenith software/hardware - http://heathkit.garlanger.com

    1. Re:Not very supportive of Open source by Transient0 · · Score: 1

      i must admit that statement seemd rather odd to me as well. It's true that depending on the application the benefits to be gained from opening the source can be greater or lesser. But there is no code that can be completely closed without some loss of benefit to the industry and customer.

      At the very least you have to acknowledge that your code may be buggy and that there may be a user who would like to fix the bug themselves for personal use. This can happen at ANY level of code.

      This statement is a little ominous, it seems to foreshadow a possible intention of further developing some current open source graphics code and perhaps closing it at a later date... something to keep an eye out for.

    2. Re:Not very supportive of Open source by MisterBlister · · Score: 1
      The more open code, the better; but expecting low-level hardware programming info and specs these days is kind of naive. Hardware companies are IP-mad and increasingly unwilling to publish any of this information. Until someone comes up with some viable means of "Free (as in speech) Hardware", which is pretty unlikely as most of us don't have our own chip foundries in-house, its just going to get worse and worse.

      The real world options are: #1, use very old hardware, with published specs; #2, concede that extremely low-level stuff like device drivers might have to be closed source and learn to work around that while keeping as much code as we possibly can Open; #3, stick head in sand.

    3. Re:Not very supportive of Open source by MrHat · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Nice find - they have this completely reversed.

      People should *demand* that code closest to the hardware is open source. Look at it this way: a company collapses and takes with it a base of code. Would you rather it be a driver at the core of your display subsystem, or your text editor? One product has alternatives that don't render your existing hardware useless.

      Did you buy into the Circuit City Divx thing? No? Then you shouldn't go for this kind of crap either. Companies that get my money are the ones that aren't afraid of full disclosure.

      IIRC, a similar issue with print drivers was the driving force in the establishment of the GNU project.

    4. Re:Not very supportive of Open source by MadAhab · · Score: 4, Insightful
      There is one way, and only one way, to completely close code with no loss to the customers, and that is to put that code in hardware and have open specs for interacting with it.

      Anything else means that you can be stranded by the vendor.

      --
      Expanding a vast wasteland since 1996.
    5. Re:Not very supportive of Open source by CrazyBrett · · Score: 1
      But there is no code that can be completely closed without some loss of benefit to the industry and customer.


      Hmm... let me see if I can refute this. While the "open source is always better" philosophy works well at the application layer, it seems to break down as you get lower and lower in the system.

      The omnipresent consequence of open source is multiple incarnations of the same basic functionality. Indeed, this is touted as one of the benefits of open source; you can change the code to add new features or fix bugs. But it becomes a penalty whenever someone has to interoperate with that piece of code. This is why we have elaborate configure scripts, even for portability to the same OS. Now imagine if everyone wrote their own video drivers! Remember the days when games had to include drivers for every device they intended to support? This would be an undertaking of the same magnitude, as applications would need to include special code to interface with every driver they wanted to support.

      At such a low level, I'd argue that open source practices might cause more harm than good. Common interfaces are generally a very good thing.

      -- Brett
    6. Re:Not very supportive of Open source by 4of12 · · Score: 2

      ...code in hardware and have open specs for interacting with it.

      Yessir.

      I've often said the same:

      • open up and describe fully the interface.
      • go ahead, tweak and tune your proprietary black box implementation
      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    7. Re:Not very supportive of Open source by ClosedSource · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "open up and describe fully the interface.

      go ahead, tweak and tune your proprietary black box implementation"

      I agree, but I think this argument can also apply to APIs and other higher-level SW interfaces. I'd rather a fully described API without source code then a poorly documented API with source code. You can learn a lot looking at source but it's not always the most efficient method of getting your work done.

    8. Re:Not very supportive of Open source by damiam · · Score: 1

      And since when can open source software not provide a common interface?

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    9. Re:Not very supportive of Open source by Ogerman · · Score: 2

      It'd be nice, but we don't need "Free Hardware" as a prerequisite for open source drivers. It's more a problem of misunderstanding of braindead management who don't realize that the only thing of possible value to their competitors is in the silicon itself. Open Source or not, driver software is pretty easy to reverse engineer.

      If these people are going to write closed source ATI drivers, I'm not interested. They want me to stick untrusted binaries into the kernel? Forget it! Sounds like another bunch of traitors who weren't innovative enough to devise an Open Source business model. Oh well, we can always reverse engineer their drivers can't we?

    10. Re:Not very supportive of Open source by 4of12 · · Score: 2

      Yes, I, too, would rather have a fully-described API w/o src than a poorly-documented API w/ src.

      But your point got me to thinking about how 98% of the APIs are insufficiently documented, to the point where the ugly necessity of looking at someone else's source is often the only recourse.

      And the standard for "fully-described" is high.

      Frequently the exposed API will intimate that X is how you do some particular task, but the implementation is so sucky that doing W, Y, and Z turns out to be practically better from the standpoint of performance, memory, complexity, etc.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    11. Re:Not very supportive of Open source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I don't see that happenning much with vendor kernels.

      After all, it's just opengl, sometimes with chipset specific extensions.

      I can't remember seeing any open gl bugs posted to lkml for vendor kernels. Not to say that it doesn't happen, just that I don't recall it happenning very much so far.

  16. Imporving the Radeon driver... by wbattestilli · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Would be great!!!

    I would really love to buy a radeon for my Linux workstation, but nVidia provides superior dirvers. I would like to philosophically take a stand and reject nVidia for their refusal to release specs but I need complete and efficient drivers. The radeon currently cannot compete with nVidia on linux (or windows) even though the radeon is likely better hardware.

    1. Re:Imporving the Radeon driver... by xigshill · · Score: 1

      Ahh, but it can ;-) The 7500 is about as fast as the GeForce 3 Ti 500 under linux, and the 8500 will be even faster... See: http://www.xig.com/Pages/Atop/CardIndividualSuppor tSpec/ATI-IndividualCards/Radeon7500.html -jon

  17. Re:Racism in Linux Must End!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i can give you many examples. here is one. also, this guy told me he used linux. and last but not least i use linux. any more proof needed?

  18. Expect impressive products by KnightStalker · · Score: 2

    ... whatever they might be. You can't complain about a development team that includes the guy in charge of XFree86 *and* the developer of Mesa. This could definitely lead to some cool software :-)

    --
    * And remember, it's spelled N-e-t-s-c-a-p-e, but it's pronounced "Mozilla."
  19. 3D-X by Transient0 · · Score: 1

    An interesting idea. Any true 3D Desktop/Window Manager would of course be a hugely unnecessary memory and processing hog and most practical users would not be interested.

    But still... if this research project will lead to more advanced and more closely integrated OpenGL, than a 3D windows manager may become practical on higher end machines. It may still just be a toy, but it would be a really pretty toy. Things like that, sad to say, are the sort of things that might start winning more of the home market over to linux(not to mention the advanced game support that is sure to come with independent openGL development and research).

    BOB: Check out Quake version "n" running on my windows box!
    FRED: yeah, that's pretty cool, but here's Quake version "n" running on my Linux box(faster i might add) and check out how COOL my desktop is.

  20. Is either one that bad for you? by cduffy · · Score: 1

    What's your box? I've had zilch stability problems on my machine running nvidia's GeForce 3 drivers (admittedly, it's a uniprocessor box), and before I switched to this card from a Voodoo 3 I found the performance difference between Linux and Windows reasonable even when noticable. (On the other hand, I'm fully aware of the Matrox performance not being all that hot... presuming that was the drivers rather than the card; when I had a G200 I didn't have any Windows install)

    I've seen friends' boxen be unstable with nvidia's drivers, which causes me to suspect that it varies somewhat with the motherboard in use.

    This raises two questions:

    1. Is your motherboard one of those against which the GeForce drivers are unstable?

    2. Is your video card one of those against which the DRI-backed performance isn't up to par?

    I suppose it'd be possible to rig a system to count context switches drivers leaning more heavily on userspace code and with Nvidia's and see if the difference between kernel and userspace is the real hangup; my suspicion is that it's not.

    1. Re:Is either one that bad for you? by cduffy · · Score: 3, Informative

      why would someone buy a nice card and then waste it's features in linux? It's not like you can play any games properly in it!

      Beg pardon -- playing Tribes 2 at 1600x1200 with a perceptibly perfect framerate is somehow improper?

    2. Re:Is either one that bad for you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fagot

  21. Marketing fluff. by Xenopax · · Score: 1, Troll

    Why did this even get onto slashdot? All this company has right now is a bunch of marketing fluff. For example:

    As major contributors to three standard graphics initiatives (XFree86, Mesa/OpenGL, DRI), we are in a unique position to assure our clients that any development we participate in will integrate seamlessly with all major Linux distributions.

    Unique position!?!?!?! Integrate seamlessly!?!?!?! OpenGL!?!?!?! XFree86!?!?!?! Holy crap, where do I sign? Reading though thier site I couldn't find any useful information, just a bunch of marketing material. Why do companies like this get onto slashdot when the only thing they have done is master the art of throwing around buzz-words (or did I answer my own question...)

  22. Radeon? by tempest303 · · Score: 2

    I wonder what they mean by the "Radeon chipset"? Is this just for the "classic" Radeons, or for the new 7500/8500 series? While I've got a legacy Radeon, I really hope the support is for the new series - I'd love to see cutting edge cards like the Radeon 8500 get the support it deserves in Linux, and I'd pay for the privilege. (You listening, ATI? :)

    1. Re:Radeon? by chris_oat · · Score: 1

      i you're willing to pay, then you can buy the firegl/radeon8800 card. this has all the features of the r8500 and comes with excellent linux drivers.

  23. Sheesh....lame industry naming trends. by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 1

    What, was "Wolfram Graphics" taken?

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

    1. Re:Sheesh....lame industry naming trends. by Mindjiver · · Score: 1

      Im gonna be labedled a troll here. But...

      Stop bashing these guys! Atleast they are doing some newsworthy unlike you! Why not make some good tiles for you damn site instead of trolling slashdot and making lame comments. Just stop or go away, please.

      --
      I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!
    2. Re:Sheesh....lame industry naming trends. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Halleluya! You are so correct, dude!

    3. Re:Sheesh....lame industry naming trends. by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 1, Offtopic



      Every time someone whines, "Go make more tiles for us, Bowie!" i'm that much less inclined to actually do so.

      Despite apperances to the contrary, I have a sense of humor. My comment wasnt meant as a "slam" of their efforts, but I do appreciate you expecting the worst from me, that oh-so-evil guy who pissed you off a year ago when I flipped VA the bird and walked away. Well, guess what. Everyone else did the same thing a month ago. Go label them pariahs. I'll foot the bill for the ink.

      In the meantime, cool down and wise up. It wont hurt, I promise.

      --
      Bowie J. Poag

    4. Re:Sheesh....lame industry naming trends. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, it took me a while to remember who you were, I am happy to find Propaganda again, I hadn't seen any in about a half year. Your tiles and anti-VA news rock.

    5. Re:Sheesh....lame industry naming trends. by joib · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe it was too close to "Wolfram Research", the company behind Mathematica.

  24. Look out nvidia. by Penguinoflight · · Score: 3, Insightful

    With the Radeon 7500 (the one with the technical stuff to smash a geforce 3), nvidia will likely see a loss in it's sales to linux users. The Radeon 7500 is actually a radeon 64mb ddr that goes a lot faster. The radeon 8500 on the other hand is another generation, too bad it's not supported yet.

    To be frank, if it weren't for the heat that nvidia cards produce, I'd probably get one. I just can't afford to have my server go down because a GPU overheated and pumped the case tempurature to 120 degrees. I don't want a video card that has a fan for something other than cosmetics.

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
    1 John 4:14
    1. Re:Look out nvidia. by tweek · · Score: 1

      What in the hell do you need a card like that in a SERVER for? Buy the cheapest agp or pci card you can find and stick it in there.

      If you have a server that's doing more than serving, you shouldn't be running one.

      --
      "Fighting the underpants gnomes since 1998!" "Bruce Schneier knows the state of schroedinger's cat"
    2. Re:Look out nvidia. by Xoro · · Score: 1

      First, I agree with what the above poster says about the card in your server. If you don't just decide on price, the only shopping point is 2d driver stability.

      Second, if it's more of a home server++ thing, the Geforce 2 MX 200 has decent 3d performance with only 4w heat dissapation. If you need maximum 3d performance in your (ahem) server, the GF3 is only 15 watts. The extra 10 watts can be easily made up by chosing your hard disks carfully, adding a case fan, etc. Unless this ultra-stable mission critical server is also running a pair of overclocked XPs...

      --
      Kill, Tux, kill!
    3. Re:Look out nvidia. by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      What if it is an X Server????? X Servers do need good graphics cards in them to be any good.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    4. Re:Look out nvidia. by Kaa · · Score: 1

      To be frank, if it weren't for the heat that nvidia cards produce, I'd probably get one. I just can't afford to have my server go down because a GPU overheated and pumped the case tempurature to 120 degrees

      Just what kind of a server do you have? GeForce cards have a single purpose in life, and that is to run 3D games. Period.

      If you are running what we usually call a server (you know, the one that cannot go down), why in the world would you need a GeForce in it? And if it's a gaming machine, it CAN go down. Maybe you don't think so, but trust me, it won't crash that strange thing we call reality. ;-)

      --

      Kaa
      Kaa's Law: In any sufficiently large group of people most are idiots.
  25. This technology has been around for years! by Carrion · · Score: 5, Funny

    Tungsten graphics is usually low resolution, about 0.25 DPI. It's also got high power consumption and therefore heat dissipation, around 25-90W/pixel. If you want colour, triple those numbers. You wouldn't want one of these displays on your workstation, believe me!
    Still, it's often used due to it's scaleability; I've seen dozens of companies use them in the major cities, ever since I was a kid.
    Slashdot is behind it's times, posting articles of old technologies, well-known in the advertising business!

    For those more interested in the technology, each pixel is made out of a usually pear shaped glass bubble. A tungsten spool is inserted, and the air is removed from the bubble causing a vacuum. When electricity is sent through the spool it starts glowing brightly so that light is emitted. The absence of oxygen from the vacuum keeps the tungsten from oxidating, making it last much longer. By variating the current through the spool, you can increase or decrease the brightness of the pixel.

    1. Re:This technology has been around for years! by MisterBlister · · Score: 1
      At first i kind of assumed this was a joke, but then I read the whole thing and if it is a joke, there's no funny to be found in it.

      Was it meant as a joke, or have readers not only stopped reading the articles referenced, but the Slashdot writeups as well?

      Are people just reading the HEADLINE and then posting these days?

      Sheesh.

    2. Re:This technology has been around for years! by Tower · · Score: 1

      It would have been funnier without the last paragraph... sort of the "explaining the joke makes it no longer funny" syndrome.

      Up until then, it was amusing...

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
    3. Re:This technology has been around for years! by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      Subtle, tongue in cheek, overdrawn humor is lost on you then. The funniest aspect of this post is not the post itself, but that it got moderated up as "Interesting", meaning that some idiot out there with moderation points bought it.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    4. Re:This technology has been around for years! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean something like this? http://www.americaslibrary.gov/assets/jb/jb_0727_e idlitz_3_e.jpg

    5. Re:This technology has been around for years! by BitterOak · · Score: 1
      Isn't this exactly how a light bulb works? If so, how is tungsten graphics different from a conventional incandescent light bulb?

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    6. Re:This technology has been around for years! by spitzak · · Score: 2

      Static displays of arbitrary shape and complexity can be created using off-the-shelf components. These are very popular for Christmas decorations on the exteriors of houses.

    7. Re:This technology has been around for years! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know it is a bit complicated to follow, but let me try to help you:

      In the tungsten graphics technology, the pixels are making use of fairly recent (though not cutting edge) technology. The use of an evacuated, SiO2-based pixel container and good purity, elemental tungsten, connected to a time-controlled (60Hz) power source is what truly distinguishes the tungsten pixels from mere lightbulbs. Lightbulbs are just glass bottles with a wire inside that you plug into the wall.

      Hope this helps!

    8. Re:This technology has been around for years! by Tower · · Score: 1

      >Subtle, tongue in cheek, overdrawn humor is lost on you then
      Well, I usually catch the subtle, tongue in cheek stuff, but the overdrawn stuff just makes me weary :)

      The fact that an "Interesting" was wasted on that is a little more sad than anything...

      Too many levels of Meta-Meta-humor, I suppose... it'll be great when someone M2s the "Interesting" as "Fair" - what a hoot ;)

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
    9. Re:This technology has been around for years! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course this technology is out of date and has been replaced by halogen Graphics, and even Neon Graphics, which can also be vector based, has set the standard for irridescent display technology.

  26. Re:Racism in Linux Must End!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still can't make up my mind...is this post a joke?? If not, here's my 2 cents:

    Redhat offered that Microsoft should give all of it's "donated resources to the schools" in the form of hardware while Redhat would to provide all the software and support free for all of the schools involved? I'd say that's helping. A lot.

    Linux is free to everyone, children included.

    Samba: it's just a play on the SMB (Server Message Block) acronym. It's also a dance, which hardly constitutes as racism. I could be wrong on that, but I highly doubt that any racism was exerted when choosing the name, it was probably more to be cute and memorable.

    And about Apache, it's one of the more widely used webservers around, so it's much more of a compliment rather than anything else. I'd love to have such a widely respected and well known piece of software named after me! It's also not a web browser, it's a webserver.

    I applaud you bringing these facts to light, but I'm unsure that you are aware of many of the facts behind Linux, it's politics and users, and seem to be seeking it only as a scapegoat.

  27. ati radeon with amd 760 might work?!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this mean that I might get my radeon 64ddr to work on my giga-byte motherboard(GA-7XDR)? Apparently the problem is with DRI support on the AMD 76x chipsets..

    I wouldn't have bought this combo had I known about the problems, but I thought I had done my research!

  28. damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I'm sad. I saw the title and was excited. I thought "Finally! An alternative to the MacOS X snazzy plastic buttons. Tungsten! Mmmm. I bet that looks really cooool". Then I read some more. Jabber jabber. Jibber jibber. Jibbery jabbery.

  29. 2D performance of current Radeon drivers is awful by Thagg · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The current DRI Radeon drivers are fine for 3D, providing pretty much the full power of the machine to the Linux world -- but the 2D performance is awful. Why, you might ask? Because when ATI contracted with VA Linux to create the drivers, they only funded development of 3D, and didn't specify that the 2D performance should be accelerated.


    This turns out to be a real problem in the visual effects community -- a lot of our work depends on having good, fast 2D. Film frames, after all, are still just 2D images.


    I hope that this new driver they speak of, and future drivers, recognize this. We'll see. At this point, we have to by nVidia boards, even while the drivers are closed-source, they provide pretty good 2D support.


    thad

    --
    I love Mondays. On a Monday, anything is possible.
  30. Precision Insight by 4of12 · · Score: 3

    Am I correct in my impression that Precision Insight included some of the more famous names from SGI and that some of these same people would be part of Tungsten Graphics?

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
    1. Re:Precision Insight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no..
      thats nvidia

    2. Re:Precision Insight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, you're wrong.

    3. Re:Precision Insight by 4of12 · · Score: 2

      no..
      thats nvidia


      My mistake. My apologies.

      Maybe that talent pool has something to do with nvidia's successes in the market, although I would not discount the importance of intelligent management, either.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
  31. AGP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i just want someone to tell me why my agpgart halts my whole computer... i haven't been able to find a single person to give me any kind of answer.

    1. Re:AGP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because your computer sucks. It doesnt do this to the 90% out ther ethat actually have quality hardware.

  32. What the hell is he talking about? by waldoj · · Score: 2

    The work we are doing involves Mesa? and XFree86, including both 2D and 3D multi-screen technology, and we are working very closely with the OpenGL? ARB to maintain the integrity of the OpenGL API. We believe that OpenGL 2.0 needs more industry support, so we are working to help generate that support. DRI? technology is still in its infancy, and TG plans to help bring it to full fruition. Our first step in that goal is to significantly improve the existing open source DRI driver for the Radeon chipset. That driver is tentatively scheduled for release in late spring or early summer of 2002.

    I'm no moron. I own a handful of computers, Mac and Linux, I've built a few dozen machines in my time, and I managed to configure X on them when necessary. That said, what the hell does this mean?

    Really. I'm asking.

    -Waldo Jaquith

    1. Re:What the hell is he talking about? by MrHat · · Score: 1

      It means they're building more shiny things.

    2. Re:What the hell is he talking about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out their website and follow the links. They are using pretty standard terms that are very familiar to everyone who knows about graphics.

    3. Re:What the hell is he talking about? by talonyx · · Score: 2

      The work we are doing involves Mesa? and XFree86, including both 2D and 3D multi-screen technology, and we are working very closely with the OpenGL? ARB to maintain the integrity of the OpenGL API.

      -- Mesa is an OpenGL compatible 3D API. Xfree86 is a free version of the X Windowing System.
      Multi-screen technology is when two video cards (or one, with DualHead) and two screens are tied together on the same desktop.
      The statements about OpenGL simply mean Tungsten is going to make sure their products remain compatible with OpenGL.

      We believe that OpenGL 2.0 needs more industry support, so we are working to help generate that support.

      ---This is pretty clear; the almost-industry-standard OpenGL is being updated to version 2.0 very slowly, and Tungsten is going to try to get this in gear.

      DRI? technology is still in its infancy, and TG plans to help bring it to full fruition.

      --DRI = Direct Rendering Infrastructure, Xfree86 4.0+'s method of allowing programs to render directly to hardware acceleration, with fewer API layers and bagges.

      Our first step in that goal is to significantly improve the existing open source DRI driver for the Radeon chipset. That driver is tentatively scheduled for release in late spring or early summer of 2002.

      -- They want to fix the drivers. :D

    4. Re:What the hell is he talking about? by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 2

      You're missing the point. They use a bunch of graphics buzzwords and technologies but they don't actually say what they are doing. I don't think the original poster was confused about the technologies themselves.

    5. Re:What the hell is he talking about? by waldoj · · Score: 1

      I don't think the original poster was confused about the technologies themselves.

      Actually, I really was confused. I mean, I agree with you that it's ridiculous that their statement was so buzzword-laden, but I really and truly didn't understand what they were talking about. My thanks for the translation. :)

      -Waldo Jaquith

  33. Who these guys are by kingdon · · Score: 2

    I'll agree that the website or the other linked material don't really go beyond the fluff, so let me try to explain why this matters. Frank and most of the other people involved in this have been going to the Linux shows and writing XFree86 drivers for Red Hat and stuff like that since at least, well, 1996 or so (probably longer). Then the Linux Hype Effect sucked them into VA Linux and spat them out the other side (hopefully it had its rewards, although I don't know how much stock they got or when/whether they sold it). Now they are going back to their roots - a small technically oriented company. I expect to see more of this - lots of good companies went through much upheaval in the days of the Linux Hype Effect and so now we should see things realigning in a more stable, sustainable configuration.

  34. Re:Racism in Linux Must End!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Linux is free to everyone, children included.
    Dude, I think you need to read the GPL.
  35. Tungsten is a bad choice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate to be the bearer of bad tidings, but tungsten is a bad choice for a digital application, especially for high-speed data transmission which is necessary for high-end graphics. Also, it's a bad choice for displays.

    Couple of reasons, tungsten doesn't have steep enough attack/decay slope (goes light and dark too slowly) limiting the maximum bandwidth, and it also is extremely energy inefficient, putting out a lot of heat for a little light.

    (Score:-1, waaaaaaay Offtopic)

  36. Used ATI in the last year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone bitches about ATI's 'sucky' drivers but almost everyone that complains is using a Nvidia card. The current Radeon drivers are rock solid. Personally, I have not had any problems with my Radeon DDR since it was new.

    Besides.....if Nvidias drivers are so good why does everyone use leaked beta drivers to solve problems?

    1. Re:Used ATI in the last year? by swright · · Score: 1

      Gald you've had so much luck.... here;'s a short summary of my problems....

      - most DVDs skip with 30 second pauses every 5 minutes.

      - every time I upgrade the drivers DVDs won't play AT ALL (entire computer locks up hard on play)

      - TV pausing/playing/recording; great quality but randomly hangs, randomly stalls picture and plays only sound, randomly goes into a 30frameorso loop for ever...

      it's fine for gaming mind, just shite for all the things that I actually bought the card for (its a Radeon All-In-Wonder btw)

    2. Re:Used ATI in the last year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a bigger power supply for your computer you whining suck. That is the true source of all your supposed video problems.

    3. Re:Used ATI in the last year? by ahaning · · Score: 1

      I have a Radeon VE, and it does work very well (1600x1200@24bit and 75Hz on a Samsung 900IFT) on X 4.1.0. My main gripe is that I need to use the DVI->VGA adapter in order to use it on my CRT. I don't suppose it would be all that clearer if it was directly on the VGA, but it would be nice.

      I guess it's also a little slow at moving windows around opaquely in FVWM2. But I think that's a combined result of no DirectX, X just being slow (assuming DirectX is what allows Windows to move windows opaquely so well), and FVWM2 being slow at moving windows opaquely (BlackBox and WindowMaker are speedier).

      Other than that, 2D is pretty good and GL apps run really well. Maybe not as well as they could, but acceptably well.

      --
      Withdrawal before climax is very ineffective and those who try this are usually called "parents."
    4. Re:Used ATI in the last year? by swright · · Score: 1

      yeah? the PSU in that box (PII 400, 1 hard drive, 1 DVD drive, 1 network card) is the same rating as that in my workstation....

      dual 1Ghz PIII, 3 hard drives (+1 drive cooler), CDRW, TV card, 2 x NICs).

      I know PSUs differ in quality and output, but even so.....

      (and why does DVD/TV use more than 3D???)

    5. Re:Used ATI in the last year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, it's probably *not* your power supply, but a DVD drive has an electric motor spinning the disk. Whammo, power drain. And even worse, it's "spiky", not drawing power all the time, but only for a period of time while you're accessing it, whereas the 3D hardware is a conventional silicon chip design that draws a fairly steady amount of power, +/- small variations due to actual logic, but those average out.

    6. Re:Used ATI in the last year? by swright · · Score: 1

      mm fair point - but while it may explain some of it, why would it affect DVDs intermittently (surely they spin constantly while playing - the problem affected some DVDs all the time, some some of the time and some hardly ever), and that shouldnt affect normal TV usage...

  37. Better Graphics support not better looking by vtechpilot · · Score: 1

    I don't care how good the graphics libraries are, Linux apps will still be Butt-Ugly as long as developers (myself included - Kylix Yea!) continue writing Butt-Ugly apps.

    Then again I've made some damn ugly Windows apps too.

    --
    Slashdot is an anagram for Has Dolts, and I am Dolt number 468543
  38. Re:Here is to wishing.. (amen!) by PotatoHead · · Score: 3, Informative

    OpenGL is not just about games, though I play them along with everyone else :)

    Mcad, Scientific Vis. , Simulation are some applications that depend on OpenGL right now. There is a *lot* of pressure to move some of these to the win32 graphics API to gain the economics of scale that surround the Intel platform.

    In the MCAD area, OpenGL is widely used because the big players are still cross platform. Over the last few years, there has been little real Linux interest, and little UNIX interest. Almost every one starting new with MCAD was starting on win32.

    This year has been different. People are asking about MCAD on Linux and UNIX. Seems that some of the backlash we all have postulated about here is beginning to happen. (about goddam time!)

    One interesting approach has been to put in win32 MCAD because it is cheaper than UNIX, maybe use a UNIX backend and hope to migrate to Linux when things come together in the near future. Hearing this stuff is huge and indicates to me that Tungsten is in the right place at the right time.

    Good quality X servers can at least take advantage of back-end UNIX compute servers. Enough people do this and realize the administrative and support advantages and Linux native ports will follow.

    So here's to hoping for next year. OpenOffice will continue to get capable, Linux graphics will get strong and compare more favorably to highend implementations like IRIX, and some ancillary applications will appear to make technical computing on Linux a reality outside the developer and adademic communities.

  39. Forget better looking linux, how about... by 47Ronin · · Score: 1

    Beautiful BSD in a glowing blue box! Yes, Mac OSX in a modified case...

    http://www.kentsalas.com/blueiceG4/p5.asp

    --
    Those who laugh at you for you having a Mac.. are the people who constantly call you to fix their PC.
  40. Looks pretty familiar. by booch · · Score: 2

    Compare these 2 web pages:

    Precision Insight Team
    Tungsten Graphics Team

    --
    Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
  41. What about people who just want a nice GUI? by HanzoSan · · Score: 2



    Besides specialized uses like that, the linux gui can really use some help. It cant even do transparency properly, and you can forget about genie effects.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:What about people who just want a nice GUI? by vandan · · Score: 2

      You should check out Enlightenment - both 0.16.5 and 0.17.

  42. exile by K0R$+h4x0r+ru1z · · Score: 0

    I know.

    Why the fuck don't they make a bomb ass game just for Linux? And don't say fucking Tuxracer.

  43. Radeon drivers by j3110 · · Score: 1

    Oh great, my radeon will be obsolete by then! :) NVidia will have released SpaceHeater 4 GTS (Using the plasma state of mass to increase core temperature and power draw by another 120%. Gonna have to run a drive connector to the vidcard) Then ATI will have released something decent to try to compete, but won't have time to write the drivers for it either. Maybe the Radeon drivers will be good enough to make up the difference :)

    --
    Karma Clown
  44. Accelerated X totally outperforms XFree w/DRI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want very fast and quality 3d graphics support under linux, solaris x86, or freebsd you go with accelerated x. XiG has rewritten the whole thing for their new software and the performance is AWESOME. You can see a comparison between accelx and xfree dri on the xig website. The price isnt too bad, it is worth it to me at least.

  45. Desktop software is a dead end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I consider anything to do with desktop graphics a dead end. Even if handheld appliances are just a fad, this is the wrong time to put an investment into desktop graphics.

    1. Re:Desktop software is a dead end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say it's time we started a new Linux company to create SOHO machines with Linux. We can call it SOHO Linux, or, maybe, just HOHO Linux, in keeping with the Christmas season. We can later go public, suck off a bunch of money from all the people who don't know Linux from Preparation H, and then RIP with tons of cash to reinvest in MS.

  46. Old news by mallan · · Score: 2, Informative

    The NVIDIA stability problems are old news. Yes, for the first 6 months they were available, they had some stability issues. Just because they stated in their README that they were having stability issues on multiprocessor boxes 18 months ago does not mean the stability issues exist today.

    I only use dual processor boxes. I have a dual processor box at home, and we've got 11 dual processor Linux boxes at work. All use NVIDIA hardware, and all of them are very, very stable. Our lab does flight simulators and scientific visualization, so the machines get heavy 3D use on a daily basis. I havn't had any NVIDIA Linux box lock up in about a year.

    Most of the people I've talked to who are having stability problems with the NVIDIA cards under Linux have either a cheap motherboard or an inadequate power supply. No driver in the world can compensate for either of these.

    --
    "Good people drink good beer"
  47. 7500 is classic. by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

    The 7500, impressive as it is in benchmarks is actually the same chip as the radeon "classic", only faster. The radeon 8500 on the other hand is completely different, and 2d doesn't even work with the old drivers.

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
    1 John 4:14
  48. wow, big deal. by mister_sparkle · · Score: 1
    Wow, another "company" with a great business plan. Drivers for Linux gaming! As we are all aware, Linux has a huge share of the gaming market. I know that when my little sister wanted to get into gaming, she ran right out and grabbed a copy of Debian! After the simple, user-friendly installation, she easily configured her X server, and understood what it was about right off the bat. It was then a piece of cake for her to figure out how to use IRC, get the latest drivers for her video card in a tarball from some IRC channel, install them, and update her config file by hand. She then went to our local CompUSA, stopped by the Linux gaming section (there are so many to choose from!), and got started.

    Come on, people. Who cares. Linux was never meant to be a stellar gaming system. If only you could look past your blind hatred of Microsoft and realize that Linux is never going to be the gaming platform of choice. Too bad these guys are wasting their efforts for something that really isn't going to pay off. But hey, it's on /., so it must be important!!!

  49. Confusing by krackbebe · · Score: 1

    All of this changing of companies, without nary a profit in sight, is confusing to a layperson such as myself who is simply trying to create a roadmap for my IT department.

    It's hard to recommend Linux when there is so much confusion in the sector. I think I'll be sticking to tried and true software, which I know I can depend to be there years into the future. Doesn't seem like Linux fits the bill at this point.

    1. Re:Confusing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, the "other" software may be tried, but is it really true? I switched to Linux on my home desktop about a year ago. Before that, my only experience with a *nix system was email via pine over telnet, and chmod 655 to the cgi scripts on my free website.
      If I was being paid to work 8 hrs per day deploying the system I built up in my house.... oh man, I'd have taken over the world by now. I'm not going to begin listing my problems with the Mac and Win OS's... from registries to half-assed scripting languages, to.... yes, even a lack of software to do certain things. I don't think Linux has any problems that other OS's don't!

  50. Great! by smash · · Score: 1

    Now I can have all 20 or so x-terms in fully openGL rendered, light-sourced 3d :P

    Personally, i think trying to design a 3d user-interface is pointless until we have some sort of 3d display device (I'm thinking holographic projector of some sort)

    I do hope they get accelerated OpenGL more commonplace/easy to set up though - this is currently one of *the* major things holding back linux gaming...

    smash

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  51. Arleen LaMonica, CPA, Financial Controller by Sarcasm_Orgasm · · Score: 0

    Arleen LaMonica holds my cock in her hand and gives Moorhead then an entire State University. She is a licensed CPA (Cock Pussy Ass) demonstrator. Over the past fifteen years, her sexual experiences have inlcuded spanking on all major areas of here fine ass. Previous John's include Coopers and Lybrand, Blue cunt and Blue Balls, United Ass Entertainment, Life Partners Group, Vibrant Graphics, Precision Insight, and the Office of Attorney General for the State of Texas (Don't mess with Texas). Arleen's outside interests are as diverse as her work experience -- everything from gourmet cock, fine 69'ing, and classical music to playing with herself, bicycling her partner, and skiing naked. These days, most of her time goes to her pre-school age Pet monkey, Morgan, who is a ride to enjoy.

    --
    Special people have long socks, ride short buses, & invent witty sigs.
  52. Re:Racism in Linux Must End!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Straight from the GPL preamble:

    ...the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change free software--to make sure the software is free for all its users....

    All its users -> children included. What, exactly, are you reading??

    Also, as many know, Free -> Freedom (source code available to you, you're able to change it, etc.), not free of charge (although it does often happen to be). Which was the type of freedom we're talking about here.

    And if you thought I was referring to price, then in contrast to other alternative OSes, a grand portion of code for linux is free, so I still don't get how you think Linux cannot be free to children.

    What I'm saying is that any school could download most distros (i.e. Redhat), and install it free of charge. What is it, exactly, that you don't understand about that?

  53. If you find this... by Mindjiver · · Score: 1

    I could care less about VA and that you flipped the bird on them.. whatever that means. Im just tired of seeing you making stupid comments.. thats all.

    --
    I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!
  54. Re:2D performance of current Radeon drivers is awf by xigshill · · Score: 1

    The current DRI Radeon drivers are horrible in 3D too, and don't go anywhere near taking full advantage of the hardware. I know - we've tested it: Radeon 64 benchmarks. Note: I work for Xi Graphics, an evil, closed source, Xserver company. ;-) -jon