Slashdot Mirror


Audio Download: Linux Kernel to be on Radio

cyber_rigger writes: "The Linux Kernel is to have a (spoken) reading on Radio Free Linux and some other regular radio station throughout the world. http://radioqualia.va.com.au/freeradiolinux/ I guess this makes Linux offically 'free as in speech.' 'The Linux kernel contains 4,141,432 lines of code. Reading the entire kernel will take an estimated 14253.43 hours, or 593.89 days. Free Radio Linux begins transmission on February 3, 2002, the fourth anniversary of the term "Open Source."'" If only the mysterious numbers stations would open their source as well.

110 of 161 comments (clear)

  1. no human is reading this... who will listen? by Gunstick · · Score: 1

    This is done via computer generated speach.
    Will there be anyone listening?
    Or will someone go and have a computer listen to the transmission and turn it back into code :-)

    George

    --
    Atari rules... ermm... ruled.
    1. Re:no human is reading this... who will listen? by noelmc · · Score: 1

      Exactely! I won't! There'll probably be a sharp rise in listeners for the novelty value for a very short time, immediately followed by a large sharp and permanent downturn in listernership because this is the most inane and stupid use of technology that must surely have ever come about! I'm so happy for the people involved that they have so little to do with their lives that they could set up this trash. They could provide useful content - instead they provide this! Its such a pity! Radio has such potential, its a shame to see this squandered.

  2. bahaha by Blymie · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Oh yeah, this is really useful :PPP

    Even art, if to be appreciated, has to be observed. If you can call this art.

    How lame ;P

  3. Number Stations on DMOZ by hardcode · · Score: 2

    Try http://search.dmoz.org/cgi-bin/search?search=numbe r+stations for more info on number stations...

    I'm not a karma whore I'm a karma whores mate and I'm only whoring karma cos tha karma whore is late

    1. Re:Number Stations on DMOZ by hardcode · · Score: 1

      Of course that should be http://search.dmoz.org/cgi-bin/search?search=numbe r+stations

      or:

      http://slashdot.org/articles/00/05/27/1735225.sh tm l
      http://www.shmoo.com/numbers/
      http://www.dxing.com/numbers.htm
      http://havana.iwsp.com/radio/numbers.html

      I'll preview it this time ;)

      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes.
      - Dr. Warren Jackson, Director, UTCS

    2. Re:Number Stations on DMOZ by Eil · · Score: 2


      No sites matching your query were found in the Open Directory.

      Try your search on one of these search engines that incorporate Open Directory data in their results:

      Netscape
      Google
      AOL
      Lycos

  4. advance ET IT by lightray · · Score: 1

    Excellent! now those little green men out there in other planetary systems will receive something useful in the radio transmissions from earth instead of endless daytime TV re-runs... but how many thousands of years will it take to get there?

  5. Can they keep up? by Duncan3 · · Score: 1

    Can they even generate speech fast enough to keep up with the huge patches?

    --
    - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
  6. I wonder by Nobody+Real · · Score: 1

    Is it going to try to read it off like words or will it spell everything out? And what about code comments?

  7. What Kernel revision? by mESSDan · · Score: 4, Funny

    Also, can we submit bug reports to the radio station now? Heh.

    --

    -- Dan
    1. Re:What Kernel revision? by Lord+Sauron · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah. And instead of the top 10 hits, they have the top ten patches.

    2. Re:What Kernel revision? by Molina+the+Bofh · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah. I imagine some guy calling the radio station:

      DJ: Hi, you're live now. What's your name?

      guy: David.

      DJ: And what music do you want, son ?

      guy: I want the preemptible kernel patch.

      DJ: Oh, so you like low latency, uh ?

      guy: Yep. I sure do.

      DJ: Ok, here it goes. We'll now play Preemptible Kernel Patch Opus 1, No. 1. Trio Sonata in E Minor

      --

      -
      Roses are #FF0000, Violets are #0000FF, find / -name '*base*' |xargs chown -R us && mv zig greatjustice
    3. Re:What Kernel revision? by falzer · · Score: 1

      DJ: Ok, here it goes. We'll now play Preemptible Kernel Patch Opus 1, No. 1. Trio Sonata in E Minor

      ...with Linus Torvalds, Alan Cox, and Robert M. Love on the keyboards.

  8. 593.89 days == 1.63 years == quite long by Shiny+Metal+S. · · Score: 2, Informative
    The Linux kernel contains 4,141,432 lines of code. Reading the entire kernel will take an estimated 14253.43 hours, or 593.89 days.
    After 593.89 days it's going to be quite out of date...

    Will they also read patches while they arrive?

    --

    ~shiny
    WILL HACK FOR $$$

  9. Why ??? by JohnHegarty · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Can anyone think of any reason for this?

    And does anyone plan to listen for more than 30 seconds?

    1. Re:Why ??? by $uperjay · · Score: 1

      If I describe to you, in detail, the plans for top-secret U.S. weaponry (you know, stealth jets and the like) it's still considered treason. Or rather, terrorism, since I'm not American. The code is being read; that does not automatically validate it as free speech in the eyes of the law.

    2. Re:Why ??? by $uperjay · · Score: 1

      Their target audience, apparently, does not include people capable of critical thinking.

    3. Re:Why ??? by nusuth · · Score: 2
      That is, because in order to get access to this information you'll basically sign a document in which you give up certain constitutional rights like free speech. If I haven't signed such a document it's perfectly OK for me to publish them.

      So if you could get such information from a high rank officer and supply it to China, you wouldn't be a spy, right?

      --

      Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room!

    4. Re:Why ??? by mcubed · · Score: 1
      What's the big deal about proving that it is speech? There's a big difference between "speech" and "protected speech." The argument that computer code is automatically protected speech was already shot full of holes in the 2600 DMCA violation case. If this is the reason, it's a waste of time.

      --------

      --
      "No live organism can continue for long to exist sanely under conditions of absolute reality;..."
    5. Re:Why ??? by mcubed · · Score: 1

      That's because it was never presented properly. The 2600 team screwed up.

      --
      "No live organism can continue for long to exist sanely under conditions of absolute reality;..."
    6. Re:Why ??? by mcubed · · Score: 1
      That's because it was never presented properly. The 2600 team screwed up.

      How could you possibly "properly" present an arguement that computer code is subject to the highest level of First Amendment scrutiny? Trying to make that claim at all is a screw-up because it's patently false.

      -----

      --
      "No live organism can continue for long to exist sanely under conditions of absolute reality;..."
    7. Re:Why ??? by cduffy · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. Code that serves a political function or demonstrates a point should be legally viewed as political speech, which is what it is. What's most immediately needed, anyhow, is not necessarily the "highest level" of First Amentment scrutiny, but merely the same level of protection that would be provided were the exact same instructions codified in written English. I'm certain you can see this as a reasonable request.

      Certainly, claiming that *all* code should be viewed as political speech is patently false -- but you build a strawman in portraying that as the position of those you oppose.

  10. WTF? by $uperjay · · Score: 1, Troll

    I dare someone to give me an explanation of why this isn't a total waste of time and effort. Shouldn't you geeks be jamming these spare cycles into some distributed whatchama-fuck, like SETI@home, protein research, or at least crypto?

  11. And we thought Linus took a while. by minus23 · · Score: 2, Funny

    And we thought Torvalds took a while to get the new kernals out!

  12. In other news today... by Pollux · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...the PI channel, a channel dedicated to dictating the sequencial numbers of pi, went off the air today. Apparently, their Neilson ratings dropped to zero five seconds after they went on the air. No later had the digits "1415926" been read before the plug was pulled.

    "I don't understand," says Ira Tional, promotional manager of the PI channel. "I thought everyone loved pi, and they could now get it 24-7!" Tional thought that perhaps if they had started the channel with guest stars doing the reading, such as Drew Carey or Britany Spears, the PI channel wouldn't have come to such an abbrupt halt. "But for some reason, they told me I was being too irrational."

    1. Re:In other news today... by RC514 · · Score: 1

      Maybe if they had just played PI as sound (base 16384) their ratings wouldn't suck. There's some pretty neat stuff in there. Sure, there's a lot of rubbish in between, but...

      --

    2. Re:In other news today... by wsloand · · Score: 5, Funny

      "I thought everyone loved pi, and they could now get it 24-7!"

      If only they had realized that people can only take pi about 22/7. 24/7 is just more than people want it.

    3. Re:In other news today... by psb777 · · Score: 1

      "I don't understand," says Ira Tional, promotional manager of the PI channel. "I thought everyone loved pi, and they could now get it 24-7!"


      Wrong! You can now get it 22/7, approximately.

      --
      Paul Beardsell
    4. Re:In other news today... by divbyzero · · Score: 1, Redundant

      ROTFL! I wish I had moderator points today. Thanks!

      --
      But my grandest creation, as history will tell,
      Was Firefrorefiddle, the Fiend of the Fell.
    5. Re:In other news today... by Dwonis · · Score: 2

      22/7 is inaccurate after the second decimal place.

    6. Re:In other news today... by Destacona · · Score: 1

      simply brilliant.

    7. Re:In other news today... by joshuac · · Score: 1

      22/7 is inaccurate after the second decimal place.

      geesh, it was meant as humor, not for calculating orbits.

  13. It's nothing new after all. by Shiny+Metal+S. · · Score: 1
    It reminds me the good ol' days when I was recording ZX Spectrum games played on radio.

    But it was in a machine readable form, so a little bit more advanced technology...

    --

    ~shiny
    WILL HACK FOR $$$

  14. link for numbers station by odaiwai · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Why is the link for the 'numbers station' pointing to slashdot.org?

    dave

    1. Re:link for numbers station by minus23 · · Score: 1

      Because the URL for the link is actually (href= ""). Most browsers asume that you just want to stay where you are in that situation. It isn't *actually* pointing to Slashdot. Even still though I imagine it was not intentional.

  15. Minimalist Art. by minus23 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Personally I think this is great. In a minimalist sort of way I really dig these sorts of things. I dig monitors in my room that show the airplanes in the skies. ... I dig 4 measure beat clips playing on a speaker in the corner in the bathroom really softly. ... I dig old laptops playing Sim City (black and white) with the time slowed down to real-time... or on normal and let people check on the village when they come over and visit. I could see myself setting up a little speaker somewhere just to play back the linux kernal. I am actually excited. :)

    1. Re:Minimalist Art. by wackybrit · · Score: 1

      I dig old laptops playing Sim City (black and white) with the time slowed down to real-time... or on normal and let people check on the village when they come over and visit.

      Whoa! That is a really cool idea. Just get an old Mac Classic or a nice looking ultra-old PC laptop, run up SimCity, and keep it running as a form of artificial life. Nice talking point for the living room ;-)

  16. what kernel ? by XPulga · · Score: 5, Funny
    turns radio on

    slash kernel slash sched dot c slash asterisk line break asterisk (...) 1998-12-28 Implemented better SMP scheduling by Ingo Molnar

    Dang! It's the vanilla kernel where are user mode Linux and Alan's cool toys ?

    switches station

    ...Then Iluvatar arose, and the Ainur perceived that he smiled; and he lifted up his left hand, and a new theme began amid the storm...

    Silmarillion. Spoken. Again.

    switches station again

    eight dot three four six minus a dash greather than c zero wb zero yn dot eat...

    Yay, they've got Reiser in this one, but they're still reciteing the console driver, it'll be 3 days before we get to the filesystem

    switches stations frantically

    hash include less-than linux slash config dot h NO NO GET OUT OF HERE WHAT ARE YOU DOING ?

    Hello, I am Richard M. Stallman and you are being deceived, for it takes much more than a kernel to get a computer going. Here are 3 billion lines of GNU code that this radio hasn't read aloud yet. [DOOR SLAMS] Tee hee, and how do you think you get those tiny little icons on the screen ? Here's the XFree86 source to be read.

    turns off radio, goes to slashdot, picks cowboyneal option on poll

    1. Re:what kernel ? by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I haven't tuned in as of yet (just woke up at work and cannot find the power supply for my speakers), but it seems to me that they would be reading the algorithym, not the code.

      Reading the code symbol for symbol would seem to me to be slightly, well, geeky. But not in that good way.

      On a side note, has anyone thought about calling Guiness ( the records guys, not the beer guys) for a note in The Book? This has to be the longest online reading ever.

      On second thought, call the beer guys too. It might be harder to understand, but it would be a hellava lot more fun. And I can always get the written transcripts later:)

      --
      I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    2. Re:what kernel ? by r+a+d+i+o+q+u+a+l+i · · Score: 1

      mind if we quote yr comment on the free radio linux site?

      --
      frequency shifting paradigms in streaming audio
    3. Re:what kernel ? by pizen · · Score: 2, Informative

      On a side note, has anyone thought about calling Guiness ( the records guys, not the beer guys) for a note in The Book? This has to be the longest online reading ever.

      Just a little OT history lesson. The Guinness book guys are the Guinness beer guys. The idea came about when Sir Hugh Beaver, managing directory for the Guinness Brewery, went to a shooting party where he became involved in a discussion as to what was the fastest game bird in England. He had the idea for a book, Published by Guinness, that would provide the answers to these sorts of questions would be perfect. The first edition was published in 1955.

      "Wherever people congregate to talk, they will argue, and sometimes the joy lies in the arguing and would be lost if there were any definite answer. But more often the argument takes place on a dispute of fact, and it can be very exasperating if there is no immediate means of settling the argument. Who was the first to swim the Channel? Where is England's deepest well, or Scotland's highest tree, or Ireland's oldest church? How many died in history's worst rail crash? Who gained the biggest majority in Parliament? What is the highest point in our country? What is the greatest weight a man has ever lifted? And so on. How much heat these innocent questions can raise! Guinness in producing this book hopes that it may assist in resolving many such disputes, and may, we hope, turn heat into light."
      - Rt. Hon. the Earl of Iveagh, Chairman of Guinness.

    4. Re:what kernel ? by timbck2 · · Score: 1

      >Reading the code symbol for symbol would seem to me to be slightly, well, geeky.

      Am I the only person who sees the irony in this? In what way would reading the algorithm *not* be "geeky"?

      --
      Absurdity: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion. -- Ambrose Bierce
  17. 'Regular radio stations'? by 0123456789 · · Score: 1

    How on Earth did they persuade regular radio stations to go along with this?

  18. Whaaaat? by damas · · Score: 4, Funny

    Kernel.org is down again?

  19. Well hot shit! by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know what I'M gonna be listening to for the next year and a half.

    Before this, it was test patterns. I consider this a lateral move.

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  20. I wonder... by Briareos · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just how many people will be listening to this all day long, waiting to hear "fsck me gently with a chainsaw" (arch/sparc/kernel/ptrace.c) on public radio for the first time? ^_^

    Also, how long will it then take before "concerned parents" get the project off the air? >_<

    np: Phonem - Decay (Arovane/Phonem - Aer (Valid))

    --

    "I'm not anti-anything, I'm anti-everything, it fits better." - Sole

  21. Not that good by komet · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I listened in for a bit and it was very confusing. The punctuation marks especially have very confusing names and not enough pause between them. =( came out as: equals..... signpar-en-the-sis ... very confusing. And why "traditional hyphen"?

    It also mispronounced "Linus Torvalds". How hard would it have been to sample Linus' name properly?

    Of course, these are all things that can be improved as time goes on and I do hope they will actually do so.

    --
    Any technology which is distinguishable from magic is not sufficiently advanced.
    1. Re:Not that good by koekepeer · · Score: 1

      They don't even need to sample it:

      ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/SillySound s/ english.au

      But anyway, this is a complete waste of time. My god, can't people find something more usefull to do with their lives...

  22. d'oh! by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    disregard that post, I misread the /. page

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  23. Code and Weird comments by Jenova · · Score: 1

    Is that radio station going to read the f*** word in the code or just bleep it out?

    :)

  24. Um, this stream is being encoded by... winamp? by prs · · Score: 1
    Doesn't using non-`free as in speech' software to encode the stream kind of defeat the whole point of this..?

    ``For encoding we are using the free Oddsock DSP plugin for Winamp. This encoder converts the live audio input from the speech.bot into a streaming Ogg Vorbis file. This file is then sent as a 'continuous stream' to the server.''
  25. Needs Scratchin' by heretic108 · · Score: 1

    I had a listen, and it's a bit bland. Hard to listen to.

    It needs a bit of spice - a drum loop, some samples, and a bit of scratching. Give it a bit of 'old school' Hip-Hop.

    f-f-f-for

    LEFT paren

    i-i-i-i

    equals
    z-z-z-zero
    s-s-s-semicolon !
    ...

    --
    -- In the beginning was the WORD, and the WORD was UNSIGNED, and the main(){} was without form and void...
  26. General public by jsse · · Score: 1, Redundant

    would have thought this is a x-rate channel when they hear this:

    arch/sparc/kernel/process.c: /* fuck me plenty */

    1. Re:General public by be-fan · · Score: 2

      Dude, what is it about the SPARC maintainer? All the obscene stuff in the kernel is in arch/sparc.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  27. Needs Scratchin' (corrected) by heretic108 · · Score: 1

    I had a listen, and it's a bit bland. Hard to listen to.

    It needs a bit of spice - a drum loop, some samples, and a bit of scratching. Give it a bit of 'old school' Hip-Hop.

    [boom blat]
    [bo-boom-boom-blat]
    f-f-f-for [blat]
    [bo-boom-boom-blat]
    LEFT paren [blat]
    [bo-boom-boom-blat]
    i-i-i-i [blat]
    [bo-boom-boom-blat]
    equals [blat]
    [bo-boom-boom-blat]
    z-z-z-zero
    [scratch-hctarcs-scratch-hctarcs]
    s-s-s-semicolon !

    --
    -- In the beginning was the WORD, and the WORD was UNSIGNED, and the main(){} was without form and void...
  28. Woah... by James+Foster · · Score: 1

    593.89 days?!? I sure hope they have commercial/toilet breaks!

  29. Microsoft's response... by alvi · · Score: 1

    ...should be a radio station that reads Windows binary hexcode.

    That way they could prove that there are situations when there's no real difference between open source and closed source. It's both gibberish (as a radio show, that is).

    1. Re:Microsoft's response... by uncl_bob · · Score: 1

      I fully agree, it is a completely idiotic idea.

  30. Only in the USA... by iangoldby · · Score: 1, Insightful

    (I know I'll get mod'ed down for this, but please don't just write this off as an anti-american troll before reading it. Some of my best friends are american.)

    Only in the United States of America could anyone think that this is a good idea. How is it that anyone can think that a symbolic action like this could change the reality of whether the kernal is actually 'Free Speech' or not?

    It strikes me as in some ways similar to those people who secretly walk along an overgrown and disused public right-of-way once every 20 years just to make sure it can't be closed down. It doesn't actually achieve anything - it's just fiddling about with legal technicalities.

    Why only the United States? Well, similar things might happen here in the UK, but we have not yet become quite such a litigation- and legally-obsessed nation as the USA. Also, the US preoccupation with 'free speech' is something most Brits just don't get.

    Ok, now watch all that hard-earned karma evaporate...

    1. Re:Only in the USA... by Howie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As far is I know, speech isn't legally protected in the UK. The 'preoccupation' is that the constitution of the US is one of very few constitutions that works by restricting the government rather than the people, as I understand it (I'm neither an American or a political scientist) - this make it interesting, and worth following.

      Similar things do happen in the UK, and what happens is everyone grumbles about it for a while but not enough for things to change. Witness the handful of privacy/freedom restricting ("criminal justice/public order") laws of the last 10 years or so.

      --
      "don't fall into the fallacy of believing that Perl can solve social problems. Maybe Perl 6 can, but that's a ways off"
    2. Re:Only in the USA... by r+a+d+i+o+q+u+a+l+i · · Score: 1

      sorry to pop your bubble but we live in the UK

      :-)

      eset(r a d i o q u a l i a)

      --
      frequency shifting paradigms in streaming audio
    3. Re:Only in the USA... by LeftOfCentre · · Score: 1

      The constitutions of most western countries restrict the government and provide free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association etc. In many cases dating back hundreds of years. I don't think the US is special in this regard, however it could be that the UK is since it lacks a written constitution.

  31. Re:magic numbers + the synth sux by abdulwahid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was disappointed by the bad speech encoding. I had expected in 2002 you'd actually be able to synthesize a voice that sounds close to human or at least be understandable. The old amiga 500 had a utility that was much more understandable than this is.

    I don't know about the Amiga but I had an old TI99-4A that had a speech synthesis module. It was quite good at reading most words but had a built in list of words it could read. You could get it to read other words but it meant that you had to express the word in a special way so that the module could pronounce it properly. That really defeats the point of text to speech.

    I think text to speech has come on a long way since those days but it seems like slow progress which is due to the complexity of the subject. There is a good open source text to speech engine called Festival. You can test it with your own text here

    .
    --
    perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10);'
  32. Fork here : by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

    i've decided that the kernel just doesn;t do what I want so I'm forking the broadcast.

    /jk

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  33. No...but kind've spooky by srand · · Score: 1

    Eeeeek.....I was not expecting it to be a
    computer-generated voice! That was creepy!

    On the other hand, it would sound pretty interesting as background to industrial/techno songs or maybe some Pink Floyd (which I'm sure it will be used for in not too long a while).

  34. What a waste of time... by weave · · Score: 4, Insightful
    This seems a horrible waste of resources. And what do they hope to gain or prove by this?

    I'd be more impressed if they steered the bot so it began reading out loud the DeCSS code and other forbidden code over and over. Then it really would be about free speech...

    1. Re:What a waste of time... by AnalogBoy · · Score: 2

      Apparently Linux Zealots like to think they are being persecuted.

      By the time this code is finished, the kernel will be quite obsolete.

  35. Will it be... by Shanep · · Score: 2

    gzip'ed or bzip2'ed? (that's a joke BTW, for the dork who is going to no doubt take me seriously and reply at length.)

    Perhaps if someone piped their radio through their speech recognition software, to get this transmission back into some compilable form, we might be able to finally get back to legendary Microsoft stability. (now this, is sarcasm.)

    --
    War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
  36. numbers stations by discogravy · · Score: 2

    i don't know what the "numbers stations" link was supposed to be, but i'm pretty sure it's referencing the shortwave stations that are the subject of the conet project. If anyone knows of some online recordings of these, I'd love to hear them, but I'm not going to shell out $$ to listen to people read numbers.

    1. Re:numbers stations by Beautyon · · Score: 2

      Goto:

      http://www.ibmpcug.co.uk/~irdial/catfix.htm

      Where you can download the entire Conet Project. Be sure to buy a t-shirt or a physical copy if you liked it.

      --
      ATH0 Bitcoin: 1DnwFLXczVZV8kLJbMYoheUrpqHesjxrSi
  37. Why not Gutenberg? by heyetv · · Score: 4, Interesting



    Why the linux kernel???

    Why not start reading from the Project Gutenberg files instead, something that would support 'open' and 'free' concepts, but at the same time be useful and improving...

    1. Re:Why not Gutenberg? by taxman_10m · · Score: 1

      Using radio to actually broadcast something intelligible? Are you insane? Without every station pumping out mind numbingly bad music every second of every day the world would descend into chaos. I wouldn't want that on my conscience, would you?

  38. It sounds like ... by myster0n · · Score: 1

    It sounds like the new Radiohead album ;-)

    --
    Nobody believes the official spokesman, but everybody trusts an unidentified source. -- Ron Nesen
  39. Voice Synthesizer? by mrfiddlehead · · Score: 1
    I hope they have the sense to have a voice synthesiser 'read' out the code, if the participants really feel that this is an important project. The whole endeavour sounds to be a bit dumb. And if they really want to emulate the 'numbers' stations they'll have to use a one time pad to encrypt the 'message'.

    It's all codswallop this morning ... where's my goddamned newspaper!!??!!

    --
    :wq
  40. I listened for a bit ... by pyramid+termite · · Score: 2

    ... and I'm not sure what that bit about the Illodium Q-36 Explosive Space Modulator was all about. That voice sounds familiar though ...

  41. Icecast2 is pretty impressive by Querty · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm surprised noone has notices that the station still hasn't been slashdotted! They are streaming with the experimental icecast2 server. I'd say that's pretty impressive.

    Thanks to all who are making this possible. Especially Monty, Ogg/Vorbis rocks!

  42. OT: Your sig is a lie by partingshot · · Score: 1, Offtopic


    I believe that quote belongs to Tannenbaum.
    Its from Computer Networks: Third Edition.

    "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway."

    See ERCB: Computer Networks X 2 for more info.

    --
    Anonymous posts are filtered.
  43. Re:OT: Your sig is a lie by hardcode · · Score: 1

    Not mine, fortune(6) from OpenBSD 2.9, is that a bug Theo would like to hear about? *grin*

    "Unix is not a "A-ha" experience, it is more of a "holy-shit" experience."
    - Colin McFadyen in alt.folklore.computers

  44. What the hell is the point?? by t_allardyce · · Score: 3, Funny

    To fund it, their gonna hide advertising in the code - e.g. "printf("This kernel sponsered by Pepsi, for a coders everywhere");"

    After the first month, all the advertisers will pull out because the listener base = 5.

    When they've finished, someone will ring up telling them that they made a mistake in line 2,432,243 it was "x" instead of "y".

    And Microsoft will probably have something to say about it all being evil...

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  45. Wasteful? by PhotoGuy · · Score: 2

    I gotta say, I'm all for cool and geeky ideas for their own sake. But this just strikes me as a major waste of time, effort, and especially bandwidth.

    It'd take a lot of spam mail to equate to an audiobroad cast that long.

    -me

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    1. Re:Wasteful? by PhotoGuy · · Score: 2

      D'oh! The new touchpad driver on this laptop is a little sensitive; I submitted before finishing :-)

      I was going to say that they could have devoted the same time, effort, and bandwidth to something like broadcast text from the Gutenberg project, and done something useful (as well as novel).

      -me

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  46. Shorthand Writers Wanted.... by Anaplexian · · Score: 1

    In other news, TimepassTown placed signs outside Redmond stating that it urgently needed shorthand writers, who would work for about a year of two in twelve hour shifts.

  47. God by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    That's the stupidest Thing I've heard in a long time.
    What's the point?

    1. Re:God by cecil36 · · Score: 1

      I agree. Makes me wonder what else the people who set up the project do to pay the bills and feed themselves.

  48. Finally, we prove ourselves by wowbagger · · Score: 2

    Don't you all see, this is what it is going to take to prove to the rest of the universe that we actually are worth talking to.

    The first interstellar message we receive will start out:

    RCS file: /cvs/linux-2.4-xfs/linux/Makefile,v
    retrieving revision 1.146
    diff -r1.146 Makefile

  49. I'm really impressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just when I think I've finally, after much effort, understood how navel-staring and just plain stupid the Linux crowd can get, they prove me wrong.

    1. Re:I'm really impressed by DaCool42 · · Score: 1

      Oh it gets much worse.....

      The best part is that we do it just to make other people think we're insane.

      --

      ----
      All of whose base are belong to the what-now?
  50. Linux radio by jhines · · Score: 1

    It would be interesting to have a radio talk show, which could be carried on the web, that would take a single module per episode, and discuss it.

    Today on Linux radio weekly we have the module blah.c for discussion, joining us are, so and so.

    A bit of discussion, and open up to some questions. Could be quite educational

    1. Re:Linux radio by r+a+d+i+o+q+u+a+l+i · · Score: 1

      grtngz, yep, we are planning to do this actually. a kind of net.radio talkshow / roundtable, isolating modules, even specific routines. we may rope in our colleagues, talkaoke to produce the talk show for us ... .hh radioqualia

      --
      frequency shifting paradigms in streaming audio
    2. Re:Linux radio by wedgegeck · · Score: 1

      I'll be sure to listen in-- especially with isolated code and commentary-- perhaps a dvd release will be in order?

  51. Perhaps this could be useful. by Recovery1 · · Score: 1

    I was just thinking about the atomic time signal that is sent around the globe and how clocks set themselves to the signals.

    Perhaps we could download and install new kernels and mods just by tuning in the channel. Perfect for newbies or the dialup-bandwidth challenged.

  52. /* Kernel Marketing Patch */ by Grax · · Score: 3, Funny

    /*
    USB support sponsored by
    KFC - Try the Kernel's special recipe today
    Pepsi - The Choice of a GNU Generation
    Raid - Kills bugs dead
    */

  53. Re:Linux must be perfect and free of bugs now, the by AnalogBoy · · Score: 1, Redundant

    amen.

    IMHO, this is a tremendous waste of resources.

  54. Background noise? by Refrag · · Score: 2

    What is with all of the background noise? It sounds like it is on a loop instead of being real noise. Are they just trying to make it sound like a cool "Contact" sort of transmission?

    --
    I have a website. It's about Macs.
    1. Re:Background noise? by DaCool42 · · Score: 1

      I dunno, but it's really annoying. Almost sounds like they have a speaker playing it and put a mic beside it, and the computer has a noisy fan.

      --

      ----
      All of whose base are belong to the what-now?
  55. Re:OT: Your sig is a lie by partingshot · · Score: 1

    I'll let you submit it. ;)

    --
    Anonymous posts are filtered.
  56. A silly idea.... by Fenris2001 · · Score: 2

    OK, you could use this as a rather inefficient way of getting software to remote area - have a text-to-speech program "read" the code, broadcast it on the radio, and tape it at your location. Then, play the recording back to a voice-recognition program (should be easier if the speech was computer-generated). You could probably even do this a double speed or more, right? Only, how the heck do you implement error correcting?

    --
    ---------------
    Vpered na Mars!
  57. Cool... by Garion911 · · Score: 1

    I'm sure the people with various diabilities will love this.. Now they can start submitting patches and the like! Just will be a bit out of date, but lets see Windows have accessibility like this!

    --
    Slashdot is like Playboy: I read it for the articles
  58. I'm auditioning for this!!! by erroneus · · Score: 4, Funny

    I want to play the part of a memory manager or an interrupt handler. That'd be SO COOL!

  59. Nifty. by Mister+Snee · · Score: 1

    I can't help thinking this is really cool in a sick sort of way, but you'd hope they could have used a text-to-speech that sounded a bit nicer...

  60. Lyrics/Tabs? by XRayX · · Score: 2

    Anyone knows where to get the Lyrics and/or Tabs for this? I want to do a PunkRock-Cover of it...
    X

    --
    Boycot? Blackout? Subscriptions?
    I don't care!
  61. Repetitive garbage by kputnam · · Score: 1
    This is the stupidest things I have listened to since Windows' 2000 text to speech reading the swap file, but I am going to use it with XMMS Wake Up as my alarm clock, nothing could make me want to get out of bed and shut it off more than this.

    vertical bar d vertical bar... f vertical bar f vertical bar f vertical bar ... plus sign hyphen minus plus sign hyphen minus plus sign hyphen minus plus sign hyphen minus vertical bar vertical bar veritcal b vertical bar b verictal bar...

  62. Re:no prob,I have a transcript of the broadcast by Mr.+Piccolo · · Score: 1

    No, that is not the transcript.

    The transcript reads like this:

    Three point one four one five nine two six... Oh, I've just been handed a note from our program director that we are to be preempted permanently by Loveline. This is John Doe signing off.

    --
    Glückwünsche, haben Sie Slashdot ermordet, indem Sie zum korporativen Druck beugten und Subskriptionen einlei
  63. Wow! by Victors+Monster · · Score: 1

    What a nice gesture, for Stephen Hawking to read the whole thing!

  64. Special guests by nookieman · · Score: 1

    This will be big. Soon loads of famous people will call in to read small parts.

    --
    sigfault. comment dumped.
  65. Re:You have a point. by Fnurk · · Score: 1

    WTF? :)

    Are you serious? If not id mod you +1 troll if i could. But then againg you probably are serious...

  66. Re:a loophole? by DaCool42 · · Score: 1

    People have made songs with DeCSS for lyrics

    --

    ----
    All of whose base are belong to the what-now?
  67. WTF!?!?!?! by DaCool42 · · Score: 1

    I was listening and it just started doing weird electronic beep beats and a guy starting talking in the background?! I think they are trying for the alien mysterious tranmission thing.

    --

    ----
    All of whose base are belong to the what-now?
  68. Hawking by weeeeeww · · Score: 1

    Geez, doesn't Steven Hawking have anything better to do with his time???? :)

  69. Um ... right. by JoeGee · · Score: 1
    This reminds me of an episode of Mork and Mindy, where Mork is watching a test pattern. Mindy changes the channel. Mork says to her:

    "Why are you changing that?! It's the most popular program on my planet!!"

    On an aside, the voice just changed for me to some synthetic woman. Is Ananova moonlighting?
    --

    Get off my virtual lawn, you damned virtual kids!