Slashdot Mirror


Myth 2 Server Goes Open Source

iMacGuy writes: "As announced on Bungie.net, the Myth 2 Internet Server will be shutting down on February 15. However, they have released the source code. It runs on Linux currently, and can be ported to Windows, *BSD, and Mac OS X."

157 comments

  1. Get it in ya! by Pr0n+K1ng · · Score: -1

    First post!

    --

    Oh well, back to dowloading pr0n...

    Pr0n K1ng

    1. Re:Get it in ya! by The+BOFH+Troll · · Score: -1

      I love you. FP 4 Lyfe!

      --

      - The BOFH Troll

    2. Re:Get it in ya! by trollin4jesus · · Score: -1

      yeah, he's the fp master.

      wasting time, 20 seconds

      yay

      --
      is Jesus your personal savior? click here
    3. Re:Get it in ya! by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: -1

      power to the jesus trolls.

      doo da doo dee dum dum dum

      click

      --

      --
      the strongest word is still the word "free"
    4. Re:Get it in ya! by rapevictim · · Score: 0, Troll

      fasj;ldas?ed HTML:

  2. Embrace the Teachings of Analkharma by Anal+Cox · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    ... and thou shalt travel the Way of Slashbot!

    But what the way. All appearances are Devils. If I could he realizes that he the three poisons and can't be left to the system code. Sad to realize that the Sea: of whether the real body is greatest of everyday vegetable oil and once happy as transparent this can be affliction. The eternal lamps of this truth mind. I don't tell penetrate the other people's lives and to another the four this? This you'll experience depend on required to see the four elements and mask their nature before be identical to the senses opening of that creativity is empty, and bodhisattvas know your delight in the mind.

    --
    Brought to you by dadadodo.
    1. Re:Embrace the Teachings of Analkharma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      Uhhhh... He....Hell....Hello! Oh how I have dreamt of these days when I could shake the coc..er...hand of Anal Cox!

      Glad to meet you, SIR! And may all your trolls be worthy of the ANAL COX name!

    2. Re:Embrace the Teachings of Analkharma by Crapflooder · · Score: -1

      Your admiration for ANAL COX is a sin in the eyes of Analkharma and her prophets Slashbot and dadadodo; 'tis the fallacy of the pimply-faced geeks to look up to their open sores leaders whom they have declared their gods.

      The only way to absolve yourself of your sins is to embrace the teachings of Analkharma and allow ANAL COX to modrpobe your anus so that he may judge your faeces and bless them.

      But suppose I may be purified by injuring the first masks. In this? This is like it. You mind by observing precepts nirvana comes from the Buddha: somewhere just service than a Way: is don't forget about seeing is our every state of all the sutras say (the three bodies). But when we're deluded, the sutras say, the second, fire the sutras, say, he finds the mind is the Tathagata isn't real.

      Not free: software.

      These three mind or thirst, those whose karma, by injuring sensations of course. You should realize the ox not distracted or low it doesn't give it is the person: can one don't fear. When delusions, and work for his this is the six periods of his own mind is documented separately.


  3. Good for them, but what about Warcraft III? by MiTEG · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I know Myth2 has a lot of fans, but Warcraft III is going to be coming out soon- I got the beta in the mail today, and (suprise surprise) no Linux version on the CD. Oh well, I'm willing to boot Windows for that...

    --
    The future isn't what it used to be.
    1. Re:Good for them, but what about Warcraft III? by CrazyJim0 · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Hell yes, look for CrazyJim up in #1 on the ladder. Thats where I was in Starcraft before the hackers and abusers, and look for me again. No stoppin a world class video game player >:)

    2. Re:Good for them, but what about Warcraft III? by iabervon · · Score: 4, Informative

      Note that this isn't Myth II itself, but the metaserver, which allows people's copies of the game to find each other and negotiate games.

      This doesn't mean they're opening the Myth II engine; it just means that when bungie.net isn't running a Myth II server, people who want to play online can still do so.

  4. Hooray! I bet thats a complex set of code. by CrazyJim0 · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    If Mouseclick over 0,0 to 299,299 then go to you win and play pretty graphics

    If Mouseclick over 0,300 to 599,599 then go to you loose and play bad graphics

    Myth was the official point where video games degenerated from being fun to movies on computer. Movies you have to work to see. I'm glad after about half a decade we're finally moving away from that junk.

    1. Re:Hooray! I bet thats a complex set of code. by jamie · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Myth II was actually an extremely enjoyable game; I've been playing it for years. Not much in the last few months, been too busy, but it's a great workhorse strategy/tactics game.

      If you think it was "movies on computer," you probably weren't a very good player. Ah, the joys of King of the Hill on Venice, with the WW2 plugin... your squad gets torn apart in about 5 minutes but you can still hold the flag long enough to win. "Woot" and stuff.

      In fact it was Bungie's networking code for Myth II that was so good it was originally a replacement for, and later became a new version of, Apple's net gaming library (NetSprockets).

    2. Re:Hooray! I bet thats a complex set of code. by vicviper · · Score: 1

      Movies on computers pretending to be games? Wing Commander III?

    3. Re:Hooray! I bet thats a complex set of code. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Sorry you missed out on getting the first post. Maybe next time you'll read the article, the summary, or even, by some stroke of luck, know what you're talking about. Probably not however.

    4. Re:Hooray! I bet thats a complex set of code. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe you're thinking of Myst, not Myth.

      Myst was the old movie-like puzzle game where you clicked on stuff to win.
      Myth was a strategy game, kind of like Starcraft or Age of Empires.

    5. Re:Hooray! I bet thats a complex set of code. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, maybe you are thinking of MYST, which is NOT Myth. Myth was a revolutionary strategy game. All action, all the time. No resource building.

    6. Re:Hooray! I bet thats a complex set of code. by schwatoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      "In fact it was Bungie's networking code for Myth II that was so good [macworld.com] it was originally a replacement for, and later became a new version of, Apple's net gaming library (NetSprockets)."

      Actually that isn't quite true. Bungie and Apple worked on the networking library together (the legendary Uber project) but the library's history is rather mirky here. Apple later took Project Uber and released it under their Public Source license as the "OpenPlay" library.

      Unfortunately the code was in such a bad way that it's taken a very long time for anyone to do anything useful on it. Some volunteers have wrappet NetSprocket on top of OpenPlay. And that is where most of it's usefulness lies.

      --
      I have trouble with passwords among other things.
    7. Re:Hooray! I bet thats a complex set of code. by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Myth was the official point where video games degenerated from being fun to movies on computer.

      I think you're confusing Myth with Myst.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  5. Good job... by Saeculorum · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm rather ambiguous about the open source "movement", but I have to appreciate any company that gives out their products when they no longer are being supported. I've been screwed too many times with products that were truly good, but just a year out of date.

    Hopefully other companies will take bungie.net's lead and release server software as well. In my mind, it can't hurt the company (although some way will probably be pointed out to me :) ), it simply allows their software to be even better supported. It extends the "shelf-life" of the software - maybe they'll make some money from the $5 bargain bin, even if the company is no longer running the server for the product. It also allows for very quick security fixes, and for playability fixes that usually take weeks to months for companies to implement. I can already invision custom designed servers for different groups.

    Or this might just be my ever idealistic mind... Til later.

    1. Re:Good job... by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Well I wish vie had opensourced subspace. Gladly though it has been reverse engineered and has two counterparts snrrrubspace for linux and continuum for windows the windows client being far more advanced. In fact besides needing windows for brushing up on my office support and exchange admin skills this is one of the only things that I boot into windows daily for.

    2. Re:Good job... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      I'm rather ambiguous about the open source "movement"

      I find you hard to understand. :-)

      Perhaps "ambivalent" is the word you were searching for?

    3. Re:Good job... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, ambiguous is right. Sexually ambiguous.

    4. Re:Good job... by C_nemo · · Score: 1

      I'm rather ambiguous about the open source "movement", but I have to appreciate any company that gives out their products when they no longer are being supported.

      do you think microsoft will release the code for win95? just a thought

    5. Re:Good job... by Rydia · · Score: 1

      Or companies still supporting the platforms... although it may not be open-source (I don't believe so, anyway), Blizzard sanctioned the FSGS to clone battle.net a while ago.... I think this might be a trend for online games like the crafts, just to give people more flexibility (and if they don't want to put up with IBM's free, albeit lag-tastic servers).

    6. Re:Good job... by discstickers · · Score: 1

      Microsoft won't release the Win95 source. XP is still based on it. ;)

      --
      I have a shitty sig!
    7. Re:Good job... by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1
      I have to appreciate any company that gives out their products when they no longer are being supported.

      I agree. This was a very generous decision and their customers will respect them more for it.

    8. Re:Good job... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm rather ambiguous about the open source "movement"

      Who the fuck cares what you think. Your thoughts do not make my life any better.

      However, Open Source does make my life much easier. Therefore I'm quite happy about it.

    9. Re:Good job... by Sir+Runcible+Spoon · · Score: 1
      I'm rather ambiguous about the open source "movement" ...
      am-big-u-ous adjOpen to more than one interpretation

      I hate to act like the Grammar Nazi, but I can't help feeling the word you wanted was
      am-biv-a-lent adjCharacterized by a mixture of opposite feelings or attitudes

      It's always worth checking with www.dictionary.com
  6. myth vault by Alien54 · · Score: 0, Redundant
    The Myth Vault site will serve as a central location for the Myth game server development community, with a forum for people interested in discussing the code and the possibilities. In the future this site may also offer links to fan run servers, leader boards, order databases, whatever--that's all up to you.

    Game over, Long live the new game

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  7. Not true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I understand this is just a rumour, half-truth, legend, tall tale. It's a myth.

    1. Re:Not true. by Arker · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ironically enough, the literal content of your post is correct. It's not true. The code is being released, but not, as the headline claims, as open source.



      Microsoft Broad Source License

      This License governs use of the accompanying
      Bungie.net game server software (the "Software").
      Microsoft hopes you find this Software useful.

      You are granted a
      non-exclusive license to do anything you want with the Software, including but
      not limited to the right to make modifications to the Software, provided that
      all use of the Software is for non-commercial purposes only.

      In return, we simply require that you agree:

      1. Not to remove any copyright notices from the Software.
      2. That the Software comes "as is", with no warranties. None whatsoever. This means no implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose or any warranty of non-infringement. Microsoft will provide no product support for
        the Software. You must pass this
        disclaimer on whenever you transfer the Software.
      3. That we will not be liable for any of those types of damages known as indirect,
        special, consequential, or incidental related to the Software or this License. You must pass this limitation
        of liability on whenever you transfer the Software.
      4. That if you sue anyone over patents that you think may apply to the Software, your
        license to the Software ends automatically (this applies even when the rest of
        the License ends).
      5. That the patent rights Microsoft is licensing only apply to the Software, not to any derivatives you make.
      6. That your rights under the License end automatically if you breach this in any way.

      By installing, copying,
      downloading, accessing or otherwise using the Software, you agree to be bound
      by the terms of this License.


      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    2. Re:Not true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are granted a
      non-exclusive license to do anything you want with the Software, including but
      not limited to the right to make modifications to the Software, provided that
      all use of the Software is for non-commercial purposes only.

      You must pass this
      disclaimer on whenever you transfer the Software.

      You must pass this limitation
      of liability on whenever you transfer the Software.


      Is it me, or does half of that (heh, the liability half) look damn near BSD-esque, or dare I say... GPL-esque?

  8. Slashdot geeks need to lose weight! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll
  9. ROB MALDA--FOUND DEAD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    I just heard some sad news on the radio -- famous queerbait Rob Malda was found dead in his Holland home this morning. The details were a bit hazy, but it seems that he drowned in jizz while Taco Snotting his friend Hemos. I'm sure everyone in the /. community will miss him -- even if you didn't enjoy his queer antics and boring ass website, there's no denying his contributions to the homosesual cultural development, particularly in the areas of Taco snotting. Truly an American icon.

  10. Re:Warcraft III? by psyclone · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    What's your personal opinion so far of warcraft III? Specifically, how does it compare to starcraft, RA2, and AE2? This is slightly off topic, but the article detail doesn't have much to say..

  11. Myth == Gaming System, for those of you who wonder by billstewart · · Score: 5, Informative
    Like so many /. stories, this one's abstract assumes you know what FooBarBazz is,which all the FooBarBazz insiders know and some but often nowhere near all of the non-insiders have no clue because the name doesn't tell you. Is a "Myth Internet Server" a gamer thing, or a new operating system kernel, or a graphics widget, or a new coding project on Freshmeat?


    Anyway, Myth II is a gaming environment. Here's the story from the Myth Vault on bungie.net web site, in case it gets /.ed.

    Myth Game Server Open Source
    February 7, 2002
    By Mordia

    Nothing in this world is permanent, and this must also be said of gaming servers. Over the past five years many of you have enjoyed the thrill of playing the Myth games online, as well as experienced the pains of a downed server or a rank reset. Ah! Memories! The time has come, however, to bid farewell to the old and tired Myth II game server.

    We are finally and officially closing the doors on the Myth gaming servers for all time. Myth II online's last day will be Friday, February 15.

    However, we realize that by doing so we leave a lot of people without a place to call home. So, what we intend to do is give it to you. Any of you who want it. The server that is. On this site you will find downloadable the Myth II metaserver source code. Do with it what you will!

    Want to be an admin? Go for it! Want to make your own ranking system? Everything you need to do so is here. Have a yen for a custom WW2 server? You can make it!

    This is the raw Myth II metaserver source code, stripped of a few proprietary bits of code, but still run-able. You can modify it in any way you want and use it for most anything you want. The only real conditions are that you don't then try to sell it and that you leave all the copyright and other legal notices with the code. Be sure to read the short, but very legal license agreement that comes with it before going nuts, but afterwards, go nuts.


    The Myth Vault site will serve as a central location for the Myth game server development community, with a forum for people interested in discussing the code and the possibilities. In the future this site may also offer links to fan run servers, leader boards, order databases, whatever--that's all up to you.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  12. License is not OSD compatible by David+Jao · · Score: 4, Informative
    A quick check of the software license indicates that the source code is licensed for "non-commercial purposes only". This violates clause 6 of the Open Source Definition.

    It's really too bad the Open Source trademark was rejected, because tactics like this lead to a lot of genuine confusion about what open source software really means.

    1. Re:License is not OSD compatible by SamBeckett · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      It's really too bad the Open Source trademark was rejected, because tactics like this lead to a lot of genuine confusion about what open source software really means.

      Moderators, this is not flamebait. If you disagree, simply post as such.

      Not really-- it simply means that them and most of us in the planet don't give two shits about a communistic GPL license or a trademark created for its henchmen.

    2. Re:License is not OSD compatible by Glorat · · Score: 1

      I do wonder sometimes about the term "Open source". While under the open source definition, this does not count due to restrictive clauses, if I were a non /. techie, I would say: "Hey, I get to see the source for free and modify it. I'd say the source is open for the world to see and maybe use"

      Putting OSI aside, I wonder if it would be more helpful to say that the source is Open (as in transparent) but not Free (as in speech since it is restricted).

    3. Re:License is not OSD compatible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, STFU. Bungie has open sourced more software than you'll ever write.

      If you've got a problem, go out and implement a GPLed version of all of the stuff they've released the source to from scratch.

      The rest of us will be playing Aleph One and playing Myth II over the metaserver.

  13. why stop there? by Satai · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...and can be ported to Windows, *BSD, and Mac OS X.

    hell, why stop there? i've always wanted a Myth 2 server that'd run through my hotsync cradle, or, alternatively, through my official sega broadband adaptor.

    1. Re:why stop there? by iMacGuy · · Score: 1

      I should have added "...or any OS with a Berkeley sockets implementation".

      --
      Why won't slashdot let me change my terrible username :(
    2. Re:why stop there? by gmhowell · · Score: 2

      I want one to run on my C64 for when I get tired of playing my mp3's.

      Now, if I had a C128, maybe I could do both at the same time...

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  14. We may be seeing a Myth 3 server soon. by dotderf · · Score: 1

    The fellows who run Mythwa.com have received permission to start their own Myth 3 server. The community is working to fix any bugs that may have cropped up as a result of the short period of time the game was produced in. We may save this gem just yet. You will buy Myth 3.. it involves strategy.. unlike Warcraft..

    1. Re:We may be seeing a Myth 3 server soon. by iMacGuy · · Score: 1

      Marius.net is already hosting a Myth: TFL and Myth 2 server, not based on this code.

      --
      Why won't slashdot let me change my terrible username :(
  15. In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    Microsoft has released the souce code to the Myth 2 Server.

    Bungie is owned by Microsoft, this must mean that Microsoft is finally embracing Open Source!

    1. Re:In other words... by timdorr · · Score: 1

      actually, they use the "MICROSOFT BROAD SOURCE LICENSE". Hmm...MS's own open source license... this could be interesting....

      --
      Tim Dorr
      Owner/Manger
      A Small Orange
    2. Re:In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft? Sure you mean broad sores license.

    3. Re:In other words... by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2

      It's not Open Source. Instead, it's Source-Available software. That's the kind of software where the source is available but its use is restricted. For example, BitKeeper is Source-Available software.
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  16. Atleast it is something... by bovinewasteproduct · · Score: 1

    I'll agree that I've been hit by the infamous "Opps we are out of business and you are F**KED" thing.

    If nothing else, maybe someone can create a game that is compatiable with it that is true open source.

    From what I've seen in game development, the server is alot harder than the client in most cases.

    And it is still more open source than alot of things are...:)

    BWP

  17. I Wonder What the Higher-Ups will think.. by BlackGriffen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Isn't Bungie a fully owned subsidiary of M$? I wonder if the Bungie folks consulted their masters, and if they did, does this portend a possible softening of M$'s hard line against Open Source? There's more to this, I feel it (whether this is a nod to Open Source from M$, or if this will be followed by a reigning in of Bungie's autonomy, I don't know).

    BlackGriffen

    1. Re:I Wonder What the Higher-Ups will think.. by ztwilight · · Score: 1

      Even though Bungie is owned by Microsoft, Microsoft has allowed Bungie free reign in many areas, and allowed them to keep their different culture. I really doubt this had any impact on M$

      --
      Who moved my sig?
  18. linux? by Warped-Reality · · Score: 2, Interesting

    it runs on linux?
    isn't Bungie a MS-owned company (i belive they were bought out so that Halo would go on X-Box)

    --
    This is not the greatest sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
    1. Re:linux? by iMacGuy · · Score: 1

      Yes, it runs on Linux (Mandrake 8.1, I believe).
      See http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/09/21/154925 1

      --
      Why won't slashdot let me change my terrible username :(
    2. Re:linux? by Yankovic · · Score: 1

      Bungie was bought because:

      a) They were going bankrupt and looking to sell
      b) MS wanted a top flight gaming company to produce exclusives.

      That's pretty much it.

    3. Re:linux? by ztwilight · · Score: 1

      M$ uses linux for many tasks (like new vision for future versions of Windows). Bungie created this server before they got acquired by M$, not to mention that M$ has tried to allow Bungie to be the company they were before they got acquired (yeah, right) - although the Mac releases have almost disappeared completely from Bungie's previously Mac-only past.

      --
      Who moved my sig?
  19. Alternate Myth/Myth II server... by MattHaffner · · Score: 3, Informative

    An alternative to bungie.net for both Myth and Myth II has existed for a few months now via mariusnet. Marius did a great job reverse engineering the b.net protocol during the days of closed source while b.net began to falter. The site has quick and easy instructions on how to redirect your Myth app to the marius.net server.

    mh

  20. All Praises to the Prophet by Roto-Rooter+Man · · Score: -1, Offtopic


    Chapter 2: HE WHO SEES A WOMAN, AND HIS HEART IS AFFECTED, SHOULD COME TO HIS
    WIFE, AND SHOULD HAVE INTERCOURSE WITH HER

    Jabir reported that Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) saw a woman, and
    so he came to his wife, Zainab, as she was tanning a leather and had sexual
    intercourse with her. He then went to his Companions and told them: The woman
    advances and retires in the shape of a devil, so when one of you sees a woman,
    he should come to his wife, for that will repel what he feels in his heart.

    Jabir heard Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) say: When a woman fascinates
    any one of you and she captivates his heart, he should go to his wife and have
    an intercourse with her, for it would repel what he feels.

    Chapter 9: SEEKING CONSENT OF AL-THAYYIBIN MARRIAGE IN WORDS AND OF A VIRGIN IN
    (MEANINGFUL) SILENCE

    Abu Huraira (Allah be pleased with him) reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be
    upon him) as having said: A woman without a husband (or divorced or a widow)
    must not be married until she is consulted, and a virgin must not be married
    until her permission is sought. They asked the Prophet of Allah (may peace be
    upon him): How her (virgin's) consent can be solicited? He (the Holy Prophet)
    said: That she keeps silence.

    Chapter 10: IT IS PERMISSIBLE FOR THE FATHER TO GIVE THE HAND OF HIS DAUGHTER IN
    MARRIAGE EVEN WHEN SHE IS NOT FULLY GROWN UP

    'A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Allah's Apostle (may peace be
    upon him) married her when she was seven years old, and he was taken to his
    house as a bride when she was nine, and her dolls were with her; and when he
    (the Holy Prophet) died she was eighteen years old.

    Chapter 14: EXCELLENCE OF EXMANCIPATING A SLAVE-GIRL AND THEN MARRYING HER

    Abu Musa reported that Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) said about one
    who emancipated a slave woman, and then married her, that for him there are two
    rewards.

    Chapter 17: IT IS NOT PERMISSIBLE TO MARRY A WOMAN WHO IS DIVORCED BY THREE
    PRONOUNCEMENTS UNTIL SHE IS MARRIED TO ANOTHER MAN AND HE HAS A SEXUAL
    INTERCOURSE WITH HER, AND THEN HE ABANDONS HER AND SHE COMPLETES HER 'IDDA

    'A'Asha (Allah be pleased with her) reported: A person divorced his wife by
    three pronouncements; then another person married her and he also divorced her
    without having sexual intercourse with her. Then the first husband of her
    intended to remarry her. It was about such a case that Allah's Messenger (may
    peace be upon him) was asked, whereupon he said: No, until the second one has
    tasted her sweetness as the first one had tasted.

    Chapter 19: PERMISSIBILITY OF HAVING SEXUAL INTERCOURSE WITH ONE'S WIFE FROM THE
    FRONT OR FROM BEHIND AVOIDING THE ANUS

    Jabir (b. Abdullah) (Allah be pleased with him) reported that the Jews used to
    say that when one comes to one's wife through the vagina, but being on her back,
    and she becomes pregnant, the child has a squint. So the verse came down:" Your
    wives are your ti'Ith; go then unto your tilth, as you may desire."

    This hadith has been reported on the authority of Jabir through another chain of
    transmitters, but in the hadith transmitted on the authority of Zuhri there is
    an addition (of these words):" If he likes he may (have intercourse) being on
    the back or in front of her, but it should be through one opening (vagina)."

    Chapter 22: AL AZL (INCOMPLETE SEXUAL INTERCOURSE): COITUS INTERRUPTUS

    Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa'id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): 0 Abu Sa'id,
    did you hear Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-'azl? He
    said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him)
    on the expedition to the Bi'l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab
    women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives,
    (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have
    sexual intercourse with them but by observing 'azl (Withdrawing the male sexual
    organ before emission of semen to avoid-conception). But we said: We are doing
    an act whereas Allah's Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked
    Allah's Mes- senger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if
    you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of
    Resurrection will be born.

    Chapter 23: IT IS FORBIDDEN TO HAVE INTERCOURSE WITH A PREGNANT SLAVE-WOMAN

    Abu Darda' (Allah be pleased with him) related from the Prophet of Allah (may
    peace be upon him) that he came upon a woman who was in the advanced stage of
    pregnancy at the door of a tent. He (the Holy Prophet) said: Perhaps he (the man
    accompanying her) intends to cohabit with her. They said: Yes. Thereupon Allah's
    Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: I have decided to curse him with such a
    curse as may go along with him to his grave. How can he own him (the child to be
    born) and that is not lawful for him, and how can he take him as a servant for
    that is not lawful for him?

    Chapter 24: PERMISSIBILITY OF INTERCOURSE WITH A SUCKLING LADY AND DISAPPROVAL
    OF 'AZL

    Judama daughter of Wahb, sister of Ukkasha (Allah be pleased with her).
    reported: I went to Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) along with some
    persons and he was saying: I intended to prohibit cohabitation with the suckling
    women, but I considered the Greeks and Persians, and saw that they suckle their
    children and this thing (cohabitation) does not do any harm to them (to the
    suckling women). Then they asked him about 'azl, whereupon he said. That is the
    secret (way of) burying alive, and Ubaidullah has made this addition in the
    hadith transmitted by al-Muqri and that is:" When the one buried alive is
    asked."

    Chapter 27: ONE SUCKLING OR TWO DO NOT MAKE MARRIAGE UNLAWFUL

    Umm al-Fadl reported: A bedouin came to Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him)
    when he was in my house and said: Allah's Apostle, I have had a wife and I
    married another besides her, and my first wife claimed that she had suckled once
    or twice my newly married wife, thereupon Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon
    him) said: One suckling or two do not make the (marriage) unlawful.

    Chapter 28: SUCKLING OF A YOUNG (BOY)

    ' A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Sahla bint Suhail came to
    Allah's Apostle (may peace be eupon him) and said: Messengerof Allah, I see on
    the face of Abu Hudhaifa (signs of disgust) on entering of Salim (who is an
    ally) into (our house), whereupon Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) said:
    Suckle him. She said: How can I suckle him as he is a grown-up man? Allah's
    Messenger (may peace be upon him) smiled and said: I already know that he is a
    young man 'Amr has made this addition in his narration that he participated in
    the Battle of Badr and in the narration of Ibn 'Umar (the words are): Allah's
    Messenger (may peace be upon him) laughed.

    Chapter 29: IT IS PERMISSIBLE TO HAVE SEXUAL INTERCOURSE WITH A CAPTIVE WOMAN
    AFTER SHE IS PURIFIED (OF MENSES OR DELIVERY) IN CASE SHE HAS A HUSBAND, HER
    MARRIAGE IS ABROGATED AFTER SHE BECOMES CAPTIVE

    --

    The goatse guy for president. Win one for the gaper!
    1. Re:All Praises to the Prophet by Fecal+Troll+Matter · · Score: -1

      I am drunmk. Film at elevern.

  21. it's not really open source by David+Jao · · Score: 3, Informative
    You, like many others, have been misled by the headlines at both slashdot and bungie.net, which both incorrectly label this release "open source".

    If you read the license you'll find that the code is licensed for "non-commercial purposes only", so it's not open source in the sense of the OSD.

    I'd rather have them publish the source code than not, but I'm disappointed that it's mislabeled as an "open source" release, when it's not.

    1. Re:it's not really open source by SamBeckett · · Score: 1

      Dude lay off the rock candy, no one gives a shit about this.. How many posts have you made so far about it

    2. Re:it's not really open source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > licensed for "non-commercial purposes only", so it's not open source
      >in the sense of the OSD [opensource.org].
      >
      >
      What's the problem here? The Brett Glass Fan Club is pissed that they can't rip-off the source code and turn it into Share/Crippleware under a BSD license?

  22. Re:Myth == Gaming System, for those of you who won by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Like so many /. stories, this one's abstract assumes you know what FooBarBazz is,which all the FooBarBazz insiders know and some but often nowhere near all of the non-insiders have no clue because the name doesn't tell you. Is a "Myth Internet Server" a gamer thing, or a new operating system kernel, or a graphics widget, or a new coding project on Freshmeat?"

    Duh, that's called "knowing the target audience." We can get plenty of reiterations of simplifying half-truths in the mainstream media, thanks.

  23. HOLY SHIT ON A HORSESHOE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    My penis smells of prawns.

    1. Re:HOLY SHIT ON A HORSESHOE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      thats a shrimp COCKTAIL!!!! blaargg!!!!!

  24. This same for Myth III by omega9 · · Score: 2

    At the Myth Village fan site, there was a post to their forums detailing the termination of the entire Myth III team back in November. Part of the following discussion has posters pondering the possibility of turning it loose to the open source community. None of it involves any sort of official stance on the subject, but it's a quick interesting read anyway.

    I image that it would be highly unlikely. Given that there are proprietary bits of code not being released with the Myth II server, and work is still continuing on Warcraft III, there may be some overlaping in the engines that they don't want to spill.

    --
    I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it.
  25. Myth II? by Rayonic · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I thought is was supposed to be "Rifen: The Sequel to Myth".
    (Ba-Dum. Dum. Ksssh!)

    Bah, mod me down for that. I deserve it.

  26. Well, the plot does thicken by micah_lanier · · Score: 1

    After all, Bungie if I remember correctly, did start out with Marathon on the Mac OS. And of course, I mean _only_ on the Mac OS despite how things are now. It's good to see that they're maintaining a decent cross-platform presence though.

  27. It's too bad I can't make use of this by NonSequor · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Some time ago my Myth II CD was damaged. If I try to install it the installation fails on certain files.

    --
    My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
    1. Re:It's too bad I can't make use of this by crisco · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      had the same problem with a brand new CD. It installed fine off my slow speed CD burner, although it took a very long time.

      --

      Bleh!

    2. Re:It's too bad I can't make use of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and why the hell did you think we needed to read this ?? at +2 non the less...

      jackass

  28. A Great Game, then AND now by Tony.Tang · · Score: 3, Funny

    Myth 2 (and it's predecessor Myth 1) is a great game. I make sure to use "is" as opposed to "was" simply because it was groundbreaking in truly unique way. Tactical battle in Myth 2 is something that has never been equaled in another game, IMHO. Myth brought the idea that unit positioning matters, and that's something that's rare to see in RTS games.

    If your soldier is right up against an enemy, and you have another soldier behind him, he can't do squat in terms of attack -- he's got to walk around. Team formation is something that is thus extremely important for success in this game. Most RTS that I've played haven't exactly figured this out yet, and just how much fun it is. True, it's kind of a pain, but once you've gotten over the learning curve, it starts to make sense "which general should win" given the tactics s/he uses.

    The use of land formations was revolutionary for its time. "High ground" really meant something in terms of firing range. Your dwarves can fire almost the entire screen length if they're tossing into a valley. Your archers start to look pretty good, too.

    And then there was the idea of veterans. This was pretty cool. Essentially, you'd get "your team" from the last battle (if you'd won), and they'd get shields for each of their kills. The more shields, the more accurate they'd be when killing again. Of course, the "newbies" are hilarious (and frustrating, too): sometimes, you'd get a dwarf that would desimate (sp) his entire team by chucking a grenade straight up! LOL

    I never got particularly good at multiplayer Myth, because I came into the scene about a year after the game had been released; instead, I contented myself by beating other newbies. :D

    I haven't tried Myth 3 either, so I can't speak for it. Myth 2 is a great game. If you can find it for $10, give it a go -- it's worth it.

    (I don't work for Bungie, I'm just a big fan.)

    1. Re:A Great Game, then AND now by TotallyUseless · · Score: 1

      mod this up. it is so true. Myth is a totally different kid of rts. no unit building, no making buildings and armaments... it is pure battle strategy, rather than micromanagement.

      --

      Time for some tasty Shiner Bock!
    2. Re:A Great Game, then AND now by Tony.Tang · · Score: 2

      Actually yeah, I missed that VERY important aspect in my post. NO unit building and no worries about "resource management". I disliked that a lot -- it took away from the actual "warfare" which I thought was MUCH more interesting. Not to take away from those kinds of games (and people that play them) -- that's strategy too.

      But my passion has always been "how is it that one team wins in a battle." In Red ALert, we'd try this by just having a mano-a-mano kind of match (no buildings or anything), but what ends up happening is that whoever has more units wins. In Myth, that's totally not the case. It's whoever knows how to control their units best that wins.

      You learn to use the terrain, the strengths of your units, and formations to win.

      People coming straight from Starcraft often get pummeled in Myth -- simply because they've learned how to throw all their men in at once. That works in SC, because it's all about "overwhelming force." In Myth, that kind of thing is suicide.

  29. MythIII = Bungie // WarcraftIII = Blizzard by crisco · · Score: 2
    Two completely different companies, two completely different engines. Though it does seem Blizzard is doing stuff that Myth did a few years ago.

    Is the confusion because they both abbreviate their online services b.net?

    --

    Bleh!

  30. Damn niggers by Labandion · · Score: -1

    see thats what happens when you let niggers run the show and let them on. they fuckup everything fucking niggers

  31. Myth 2 by bman · · Score: 1

    "Gameover man!"

  32. So what if Microsoft owns Bungie? by panthro · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, Microsoft owns Bungie. No, Micorosoft does not normally release their source code. Yes, Myth II's server runs on Linux.

    Am I missing something? I ask because I fail to see the dilemma, or surprise, or whatever it is that has people hot and bothered in this situation.

    First off, Microsoft does not immediately impose a Win32 regime on companies it acquires. They do not operate on their image, or on a basis of "we hate Open Source and Linux." They operate for profit, and killing software that's already been implemented simply to show off that they don't need Linux or Open Source is not profitable. MS acquired Hotmail a long time ago IIRC, and they're still dependent on FreeBSD servers for some of it. Bungie wrote their server for Linux (whether before or after they were acquired by MS) and there is no point in forcing them to develop it for Windows instead. Also, the fact that Bungie has given away the code to that server does not imply that Microsoft is "embracing" Open Source, it simply means that someone decided keeping the official servers up was too expensive, but that it would be shitty to just cut people off, and that releasing the source code could only make profits go up (see the bargain bin thing in another post). I'm sure Microsoft has no problem with anything that does not cut into profit and could potentially increase it.

    The argument that could be made is that image does indeed affect people's esteem of and confidence in MS, but in this case we're not dealing with MS directly but a subsidiary company. Bungie releasing source code does not hurt MS's ego. If MS released the code to FrontPage or WinXP, that would be different... but they haven't.

    --
    If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
    1. Re:So what if Microsoft owns Bungie? by Achronos · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just some info from someone who actually works for Bungie...

      - The Myth games are actually owned by Take 2 Interactive... Take 2 got Myth and Oni because then owned 20% of Bungie at the time of the buyout. Bungie's Online team runs the bungie.net metaserver still, though. The point, though, is that Bungie/MS makes no money off of Myth sales... that would all go to Take 2 Interactive.

      - The license for the code is rather simplistic, basically just saying you can't use it commercially, and keeping copyright notices, etc. Other than that, I'm pretty sure it is fair game. Some of you here will no doubt point out it isn't "Open Source" in the truest sense. However, one of the primary goals of the license is allowing people to improve the code while not forcing sharing of such changes. One of the big reasons for this is because if you try to put a ranking system in there, it is desirable in most cases to hide the specifics of that system so that users can't stack the deck to artifically inflate their rankings. There are other issues of course, but that is one that I remember being brought up. The point is that a license forcing sharing of every change is not appropriate for this software.

      - As for the "no commerical purposes" clause, well, let me just say this: bungie.net was always offered for free. Every copy of Myth 2 got you a bungie.net account. To me, it seems wrong to allow people to use something that was offered for free by us and now charge for it.

      Well, I guess if any of you are Myth 2 players, or are just curious, I recommend checking out bungie.net's Myth Vault. Ask questions on the forum, or post them in our FUQ (frequently unanswered questions) database.

      -Tom
      Bungie.net System Overlord

    2. Re:So what if Microsoft owns Bungie? by kimihia · · Score: 1

      First off, Microsoft does not immediately impose a Win32 regime on companies it acquires.

      Maybe that's because if they did the servers would collapse under the load?

      Only in the last year has Hotmail started using Microsoft software for mail transfer (at about the same time as messages started taking longer to be delivered).

    3. Re:So what if Microsoft owns Bungie? by Serial+Troller · · Score: -1

      Can I ask you a question? Do you like being forced onto your knees and getting SPRAYED IN THE FACE WITH SEMEN??? If you do, email me! serialtroller@hotmail.com

      --

      STOP ME BEFORE I POST AGAIN!

  33. CORRECT MY POST by omega9 · · Score: 2

    I KNOW. I screwed up. Myth is from Bungie and Warcraft is from Blizzard. I've just finished playing an epic 8 player Warcraft II game and had the name frickin' stuck in my head. Now that I've finished my Doritos I can think.

    I meant to say Halo. Bits of code from Myth III may have found their way over to Halo. I know they're different in many respects, but there's a good chance that two projects being worked on side by side can share a lot of code. And since Micro$oft is the parent...

    --
    I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it.
    1. Re:CORRECT MY POST by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      Myth III was made by a completely different company. The Myth franchise was sold to Take 2 during the MS/Bungie deal.

    2. Re:CORRECT MY POST by crotherm · · Score: 1
      The guy, Santa's Head, who was responsable for the WWII mod for MythII, which by some people's opinion saved MythII, worked on Myth 3. He also happens to be a Clan mate of Marius of Mariusnet.

      Clan Plaid started as a Myth Clan way back and are spread across the US.

      --
      "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable" - JFK
  34. They don't claim that it's Open Source by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They don't claim that it's Open Source. It's the Slashdot author, iMacGuy, who was careless in his choice of headlines.

    Unfortunately, "Open Source" was a crappy certification mark in the first place, because it's too descriptive.
    -russ

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    1. Re:They don't claim that it's Open Source by linzeal · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Wtf are you talking about?

      Headline reads
      "Myth Game Server Open Source"

      From the page you obviously did not read.

      Given that there is no cert or trademark issues but at least read the page before you reply so bluntly.

    2. Re:They don't claim that it's Open Source by Suppafly · · Score: 2

      If the source is open, then the program is open source, regardless of what the Open Source(note the caps) movement would have you believe..

    3. Re:They don't claim that it's Open Source by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2

      If the source is open, then it's open for use by all, for anything. If the source is available, then your software is Source-Available, not Open Source. Bungi's code is Source-Available.
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    4. Re:They don't claim that it's Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe if you post enough times to slashdot, people will start to listen to you.

  35. waaa waaa waaa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    They never said it WAS
    yeesh..

    READ

  36. Don't forget the original... by 90XDoubleSide · · Score: 2
    Bungie long ago released the Marathon 2/Infinity engine under the GPL (this was pre buyout/sellout, remember). If you haven't played this groundbreaking and largely unequaled game, do yourself a favor and head over to http://source.bungie.org/. They have binaries available for Mac OS X, Mac OS, Windows, Linux, and BeOS. Then go on eBay and the Marathon Trilogy Box Set for the data files :).

    If you haven't tried the new Aleph One builds of Marathon, they allow you to play the original game with full OpenGL goodness and add many things that makers of new scenarios (yes, many people are still building Marathon scenarios) can take advantage of such as real 3D models (remember, the original is sprite based) and scripting, as well as a few hundred other improvements; check the Engine Development section of their site. There is also the M1A1 project at http://bighouse.bungie.org/m1/which allows you to play Marathon 1 on the A1 engine (Mac OS X and Mac OS only, and closed source due to the use of Bungie art, sorry)

    --
    "Reality is just a convenient measure of complexity" -Alvy Ray Smith
    1. Re:Don't forget the original... by iMacGuy · · Score: 1

      As a developer for Aleph One (and a mapmaker for M1A1) , I think I'll add some stuff...

      1. The Mac OS X version doesn't work very well; however, the stuff in CVS works great.

      2. M1A1 is now available for the SDL version of Aleph, too.

      --
      Why won't slashdot let me change my terrible username :(
  37. Movie alert: STALKER on at 2:00 AM Eastern TCM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Gotta check out this great Russian Sci-fi classic on cable Turner Classic Movies. STALKER starts in 40 mintues at 2:00 AM Eastern. Don't miss it.

  38. they do (wrongly) claim it's open source by David+Jao · · Score: 1
    The bungie.net page contains the headline "Myth Game Server Open Source". The headline is the largest font text on the entire page.

    I can read, thank you, but maybe you can't.

  39. They do claim that it's open source by David+Jao · · Score: 3, Informative
    First of all, as I and others are trying to point out, the bungie.net page does indeed assert (incorrectly) in the headline that the software is open source.

    Second of all, even if the mislabeling is only in the slashdot headline, I still have a legitimate case that labeling this software "open source" is incorrect. This is not like hacker vs. cracker where a minority is trying to redefine a term from the majority. The term open source was popularized by OSI and most people, when they see "open source", do think of the OSI meaning.

    So, for anyone, slashdot editor or Microsoft, to mislabel this software as "open source" is misleading, whether intentional or not.

    1. Re:They do claim that it's open source by Achronos · · Score: 1

      On the choice of headline:

      There is a limit to the news headlines on our web system for formatting reasons. So, the author put it in brief terms. The intent was to announce that the source code to the Myth 2 metaserver was available, i.e., the source that was closed is now open.

      At any rate, most people outside of the Open Source community don't seem to associate the same meaning that slashdot users usually do to the phrase. And I don't think it is misleading, since the news article specifically directs you to the license to get the exact terms of the source. It isn't like it is some big consipiracy to hide the terms of the license.

      -Tom
      Bungie.net System Overlord

    2. Re:They do claim that it's open source by Arker · · Score: 2

      And I don't think it is misleading, since the news article specifically directs you to the license to get the exact terms of the source. It isn't like it is some big consipiracy to hide the terms of the license.

      No, you're not trying to hide the terms of the license. But by describing it as "Open Source" you are lying. I won't ascribe motive, I don't really believe you had any motive other than the one you give, but nonetheless the effect of tolerating such untruths is not to hide the terms of licenses like yours, but rather to dilute and obscure the meaning of the term Open Source.


      I've never played your game, but I think it's great that you're releasing the code, even under such a restrictive license. You are to be applauded for that act. But you are certainly not to be applauded for diluting or obscuring the meaning of the term you are misusing.


      Allow me to, respectfully, suggest that you should correct the error forthwith. I might suggest "Myth Server Code Released" or something similar. There are plenty of headlines that will fit in that space and still be true - unfortunately the one that was chosen is not.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    3. Re:They do claim that it's open source by Fry+a+Lad+Up · · Score: 1
      achronos AT bungie.com speculates:
      ... most people outside of the Open Source community don't seem to associate the same meaning...
      But most people in the inside the legal communitty do...
      "open source" is trademarked, with the intent of protecting the term against the sort of misuse exemplified in Bungie's announcement.
    4. Re:They do claim that it's open source by zaffir · · Score: 1

      Define the slashdoter's definition of "open source." I had always thought that open source means the source is out there for you to play with.

      --
      "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
    5. Re:They do claim that it's open source by arkanes · · Score: 2
      I think it's pretty damn arrogant of you to think that YOU get to decide what "Open Source" is. It's source code. It once was closed. It now is open. Therefore, it's open source. If RMS had his silly trademark you'd have room to bitch, but you don't, so shut up.

    6. Re:They do claim that it's open source by dhogaza · · Score: 2

      I have another suggestion - rather than put up with this crap, maybe they should just change their minds and lock it up. If they hadn't released the source in the first place, no one would've had anything bad to say about them.

      Sheesh, talk about misguided fanaticism.

    7. Re:They do claim that it's open source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "open source" != "Open Source"

      Bungie is indeed correct, and you are wrong.

    8. Re:They do claim that it's open source by Kiwi · · Score: 2
      Arkanes (why do you post without using your real name?), He did not arbitrarily decide what "open source" is. Open source is a trademarked term, and there is a definition, as defined by the trademark owners, of what does and does not entail "open source" software. As it turns out, bungie.net software release can not properlly be called "open source".

      - Sam

      --

      The secret to enjoying Slashdot is to realize that it should not be taken too seriously.

    9. Re:They do claim that it's open source by iMacGuy · · Score: 1

      And that's the meaning I usually use. It's just a matter of semantics.

      --
      Why won't slashdot let me change my terrible username :(
    10. Re:They do claim that it's open source by Suppafly · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Arkanes (why do you post without using your real name?), He did not arbitrarily decide what "open source" is. Open source is a trademarked term, and there is a definition [opensource.org], as defined by the trademark owners, of what does and does not entail "open source" software. As it turns out, bungie.net software release can not properlly be called "open source".

      IIRC, the trademark was refused, and even if it wasn't, no one here at /. believe in being able to trade mark common usage words anyway..

      It never fails to amuse me how one minute people here are complaining that they can't call something killustrator, because adobe has trademarked the common word illustrator, but then they insist that people can't call source code that is open open source without pissing off the OpenSource nazi's..

    11. Re:They do claim that it's open source by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      The term open source was popularized by OSI and most people, when they see "open source", do think of the OSI meaning.

      So, for anyone, slashdot editor or Microsoft, to mislabel this software as "open source" is misleading, whether intentional or not.

      I don't let the OSI tell me what to think. Open Source means, pure and simple, code to which you are able to get your hands on the source. The license applied to the software tells you what to do with it. Since the beginning of commercial software there have been software programs which were distributed only in binary form, some which were distributed only as source (the nature of certain mainframe operating systems blurred the distinction anyway.) There have also been many many non-free packages to which you could get the source if you paid for the software.

      The fact that the majority of Unix admins are admins first and coders second (due to the fact that Unix systems have grown increasingly both more complex and prevalent, and software has become more complicated as well) has reduced this tendency. Most of the people who could really code are just coding now, and many non-programmers (like myself) have been doing the Admin jobs.

      While being a hardcore programmer will help any administrator of an open source platform (keep in mind that it was once possible to get source code to SunOS, in the early 4.x days and before) because you can take a stab at figuring out why the OS is failing, or why your (open source) program is conflicting with chunks of your (open source) OS. These days, though, most people don't even know how to get useful information out of core files, let alone read the kernel sources in a meaningful fashion. The fact that the modern kernels do more, and thus have a more complex codebase, doesn't help.

      So before you get all pissed at /. for misleading you by calling this thing open source, consider that it IS open source, but it has a restrictive license.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:They do claim that it's open source by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2

      Open Source means that the source is open for use by anyone for anything. Source-Available means that you can get the source, but you are limited by the license as to what you can do with it. Please use the correct term, and do not confuse people.
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    13. Re:They do claim that it's open source by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2

      If it's "open" then why can't I sell it, or services based on it? Not very "open" is it? Instead, I tell people to use the term "Source Available" for software where the source is available but not completely open.
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    14. Re:They do claim that it's open source by Arker · · Score: 2

      It's not a "slashdoters definition" - it's The Open Source Definition - defined by the guys that made up the term and popularised it. One of the conditions for considering source truly Open is that the license does not discriminate against people in particular fields of endeavor - which means that "for non-commercial use only" is not Open.



      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    15. Re:They do claim that it's open source by arkanes · · Score: 1

      Other people have replied about the open source thing - I post using Arkanes because thats the name I use in every online forum and it identifies me at least as well as my "real" name does.

  40. Re:MS finally switched Hotmail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MS switched hotmail off of the freeBSD server about 6 months to a year ago.... It took them forever.. and everytime before that they tried to switch it off of FreeBSD things went "bad" and they had to switch it back.. then I believe they finally started adding win2k systems into the pool of server.. and now it's all windows servers.. and of course has more problems.. search for www.hotmail.com at www.netcraft.com.. not very good uptime..

  41. Ugh... by The+BOFH+Troll · · Score: -1

    Today has been a slow day trolling Slashdot.

    Can you please post a new story so we can post more crap that you all love?

    --

    - The BOFH Troll

  42. it's interesting to note by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: -1

    who holds 4 out of the top 5 here

    I know this isn't a katz article or anything, just found it amusing.

    --

    --
    the strongest word is still the word "free"
  43. There is one myth about the Myth 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Myth: There is not any hidden porn in the Myth 2

    Yes, You do get to see a greek man running naked in the game.

  44. Misinformation by Have+Blue · · Score: 2
    Just so everyone has it straight:
    • This is the Bungie.net metaserver. It is basically a matching service that tracks player stats.
    • Myth II was made by Bungie. Myth III was made by Mumbo Jumbo. Warcraft III is being made by Blizzard, and has no relationship to the above companies.
  45. Atari joystick icon = ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like so many /. stories, this one's abstract assumes you know what FooBarBazz is,which all the FooBarBazz insiders know and some but often nowhere near all of the non-insiders have no clue because the name doesn't tell you. Is a "Myth Internet Server" a gamer thing, or a new operating system kernel, or a graphics widget, or a new coding project on Freshmeat?


    Which part of the ATARI JOYSTICK ICON didn't you understand?

  46. Bungie.net are a bunch of fucking nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FUcking NAZIS

    1. Re:Bungie.net are a bunch of fucking nazis by iMacGuy · · Score: 1

      Right, I'm going to sic the Webmaster on you.

      --
      Why won't slashdot let me change my terrible username :(
  47. Re:Warcraft III? by MiTEG · · Score: 1

    Well, it's certainly less than perfect but it is really fun to play. Totally different strategy from most RTS, the unit limitation seems to be only 90, with many units taking 5-6 although the "Heroes" take only one. I really like the RPG-style element of the Heroes, leveling them up is pretty easy with all the gnolls that are around. A couple things I don't like are the somewhat buggy graphics (and Blizzard usually puts out betas that far more resemble a final product than other companies do) and the fact that it's pretty hard to tell who's actually winning. But, overall it's damn fun to play (I'm only taking a break because the game crashed on me..doh!) and I'll probably buy it. I think where it will really shine is in LAN play, it combines the concept of developing characters thats so enjoyable with friends with the pleasure of getting to whoop someone's ass in a RTS. Oh yeah, resurrecting the heroes is really cool too, but it gets pretty expensive.

    --
    The future isn't what it used to be.
  48. not so fast by LiveWyre · · Score: 1

    Actually Im pretty sure Take-2 interactive got the rights for the Myth series when bungie was bought by Microsoft. If this is true then technically MS isn't embracing open source, close call though.

    1. Re:not so fast by iMacGuy · · Score: 1

      Take2 Interactive owns Myth, yes, but Bungie still owns the metaserver.

      --
      Why won't slashdot let me change my terrible username :(
  49. Official 9-11 Story Impossible by Commienst · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Russian Air Force Chief Says
    Official 9-11 Story Impossible

    [Posted 13 September 2001]

    As one considers the terrible events of Sept. 11 and observes U.S. media reaction, so pervasive and consistently military that it appears choreographed, doubts increase. The following is from pravda.ru, a Russian language Website (politically centrist, nationalist). In some places the English translation is confusing, so we added alternate phrasing in brackets.
    - Jared Israel

    [Start report from Russia] "Generally it is impossible to carry out an act of terror on the scenario which was used in the USA yesterday." This was said by the commander-in-chief of the Russian Air Force, Anatoli Kornukov. "We had such facts [i.e., events or incidents] too", - said the general straightforwardly. Kornukov did not specify what happened in Russia and when and to what extent it resembled the events in the US. He did not advise what was the end of air terrorists' attempts either.

    But the fact the general said that means a lot. As it turns out the way the terrorists acted in America is not unique. The notification and control system for the air transport in Russia does not allow uncontrolled flights and leads to immediate reaction of the anti-missile defense, Kornukov said. "As soon as something like that happens here, I am reported about that right away and in a minute we are all up," - said the general. [End report from Russia.]

    Pasted from: The Emperor's New Clothes

    --

    I am into the copy and paste.
  50. Open Source -- low\no profit alternative by Bo+Vandenberg · · Score: 1

    It makes a lot of sense and seems really responsible for these online games to be abandonned rather than axed. Bungie deserves really high markes for setting the example here.

    While you can't force a company to work for nothing they shouldnt impede people who want to continue a product beyond its profitable life time.

    Even though the computer market is competative, the speed of innovation and the ability of your competitors must make old abandonned code of little threat and great public relations. I'm more likely to buy from a company that has a longer life cycle for their games. In reality, if I own a modern computer, I'm more than likely going to be tempted into modern games -- but I will buy from a production house that remembers its costomers first.

    bo

  51. Sounds pretty Viral! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds pretty Viral!

  52. Blizzard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I¦really¦wish¦they¦would¦let¦go¦of¦thier¦misconcep tions¦about¦Linux,¦and¦do¦a¦Linux¦version¦with¦War ¦3..¦

  53. ID�Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats¦what¦ID¦did¦and¦does,¦and¦look¦at¦the¦fantas tic¦things,¦mod's¦,¦side¦projects¦that¦have¦come¦o ut¦of¦it!

  54. Punctuation Error... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It should read "Myth Game Server, Open Source?"

  55. Glad I didn't pay for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the beauty of Open Source: see something you like, just wait for them to go out of business then you can get it for free. Why pay for it? Information wants to be free.

  56. license is fine; labeling is not by David+Jao · · Score: 1
    What's the problem here? The Brett Glass Fan Club is pissed that they can't rip-off the source code and turn it into Share/Crippleware under a BSD license?

    Look, buddy, I'm not saying their license is wrong. In fact, I think their non-commercial license is the right choice in this situation.

    My beef is with their inaccurate labeling of this software as "open source". As others have pointed out, they can easily use another headline like "Myth Server Code Released" that wouldn't confuse people about what open source stands for.

    Given that Myth is owned by Microsoft, it would be all too easy to suggest that the headline is meant to be intentionally confusing, but I think I'll go to sleep now instead of beating this horse further.

    1. Re:license is fine; labeling is not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The OSD people applied for a trademark on the words "Open Source" and were rejected because the words have a plain english meaning.

      Stop pretending that you haven't lost that battle. You have -- the words "Open Source" are in the eyes of the beholder and are not owned by you or ESR or anyone else.

      The code is accurately "Open Source" (in my view), but not a "OSD-compliant licence"

    2. Re:license is fine; labeling is not by David+Jao · · Score: 1
      Stop pretending that you haven't lost that battle. You have

      Just because you think I've lost doesn't mean I'll stop fighting.

      I agree with you, though, on the fact that there is a battle.

  57. Ah, *that* license! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > [..] the kind of software where the source is
    > available but its use is restricted.

    Like the GPL, you mean?

    1. Re:Ah, *that* license! by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2

      Under the GPL, if you supply the source, you have permission to make any changes and redistribute as you wish. You don't have to ask the copyright holder for permission, nor pay any fees. A source-available license restricts what you can do.
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    2. Re:Ah, *that* license! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you
      can
      read
      the
      source
      mister
      nelson
      !

    3. Re:Ah, *that* license! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      under the gpl, you're allowed to distributed derivative works, as long as you don't use a compiler to derive them. restriction. on. use.

  58. Troll! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just the server code Bungie used for their Myth2 website; it's not something that was for sale! As for the game, you can still find the Linux version of Myth 2 at tuxgames. "Runs on Linux! Cool!" But hurry, since it's Almost Sold Out!

    1. Re:Troll! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why pay for abandonware? All you do is support the greedy company liquidators. It's my right to download it for free now.

  59. *Myth* metaserver, not *Myst* the game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Besides which, Myst was cool, ya shmuck.

  60. Bungie has done this before by $lashdot · · Score: 1

    It may be shocking to see an MS-owned subsidiary release "open source" code, but it is not a new development from Bungie, per se. Just before they were purchased by MS, Bungie released the source code to their previous software dynasty called Marathon (see, Marathon Open Source for news on how that has worked out).

    Since Bungie started out as more or less a Mac-only developer, there was a lot of vocal panic in the Mac community when Bungie was bought by Microsoft. Bungie's CEO and other employees insisted that MS had bought them with an understanding that they would not change Bungie's working culture, and would give Bungie a good deal of latitude to do things how they'd always done them--just do them for MS first. ;-)

    Bungie open sourced a legacy game before being absorbed by MS, now they've open sourced a legacy game afterwards. So, it's probably not a radical change in MS policy, like some people are wondering. What this does do is lend more credibility to the Halo on PC/Mac promises that Bungie has made--after the X-Boxes have shipped enough units. :-)

  61. Only game I've played for 4 years by Gastropod_ca · · Score: 1

    Bungie makes fun games.

    I've played Starcraft a bit, but I lost interest. I am just not a fast enough clicker to do well. Myth has tactics. In Starcraft the general idea is to develop as many units and as powerful as possible... you out number your opponent(or out tech him) and beat him. In Myth every player has the same amount of units. But a good player(not really me) can beat a new player without taking much losses. When you play on Myth you will recognize other players after playing a few games with them. Sometimes, especially if you play with certain groups of people, you may spent a half hour chatting before the game.. when a typical game is only 12 minutes or so.
    Myth also has a lot of plugins and new scenarios that people have made. A recent one "The 7th God" was 18 new co-op levels(the original game have only 25). People modify the physics and do strange and interesting things... the game has not got old for me.

    As much as a fan boi of bungie that I am, I admit they aren't perfect. Companies like Blizzard have ported some older games to Mac OS X. I look forward to playing Halo on the mac, but I also think that after Halo no titles will be coming to the PC/Mac. I get the impression Bungie has learned that developing for 1 console is a lot easier than figuring out the bugs that occur on thousands of different PC configurations.

  62. Feeling oddly nostalgic by adso · · Score: 1

    The incredible Myth game and the online community that sprung up around it was one of those happy occasions where I realized that the $30 I just plunked down for the game had actually bought me an entrance into a world.

    I quit playing about the time M$ bought them out, and there was this incredible feeling in the community of betrayal, since Bungie had always been a Mac-first game developer (they had developed Marathon, a pretty damn good FPS when there was none available for the Mac).

    It feels a bit like my old high school is being torn down. (sniff, sniff)

    Hats off to all the players, mapmakers, webmasters, mod creators(especially Santa's Head), and anyone else who made that goofy game a great experience.

    -adso (known on b.net as.... adso)

  63. Really great Myth Mods by Sarcasmooo! · · Score: 2

    I hope this results in people running their own dedicated servers for the less popular mods. Some of the most fun I've had playing online games was with the Pirate mod and Civil War mod for Myth 2, but unfortunately the games mostly being played on the bungie server were simple WW2-recon ones.

  64. More like by MoneyT · · Score: 1

    In an attempt to ensure that microsoft didn't own everything about Bungie they released the source code. I know a lot of people who were pissed when M$ took bungie. I guess this is Bungie's final gift to the world before falling under complete M$ dominence.

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  65. Question about Open Source License by SerpentMage · · Score: 2

    I do not mean to get flamed by this. And I do not mean to invoke an argument. But here is something that I am boggled about.

    On the Open Source site there is the Apple Public License source Agreement. Please look at sections 1.8 and 2.1. It is stated explicitly that the Apple sources cannot be used in a commercial setting. Comparing that to the Microsoft Broad Source license the same is said.

    Now why is the Apple Public License considered Open Source and not the Microsoft? I am seriously asked because I am release some Open Source myself and found this aspect boggling.

    --

    "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
    "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
  66. finishing the job... by connorbd · · Score: 2

    "We provide a service. It's not worth our while anymore, but it might be to you, so have fun."

    They violate the letter, perhaps, but that is the spirit. Thanks Bungie!

    /Brian

  67. Source Available by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2

    Tom, the term you're looking for is "Source Available", not "Open Source". Your source isn't open because I can't use it for commercial purposes.
    -russ

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    1. Re:Source Available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm sorry, this is not an "open door" but it is "door available"

  68. not open source! by Xtifr · · Score: 1

    "The only real conditions are that you don't then try to sell it"

    Then it's not open source. It's in the category which the FSF calls "semi-free", and admits is better than not-at-all-free, which Debian calls "non-free" but still puts on their servers for download, and which the fanatics at OSI simply reject as not-open-source, period.

  69. at least the FSF admits it's "semi-free" by Xtifr · · Score: 1

    The OSI folks reject such licenses absolutely. The FSF calls them "semi-free", and admits that they're better than proprietary licenses. Yet, somehow, it's the FSF that gets called "fanatic". :-)

  70. Good job... by Microsoft :-) by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    ... but I have to appreciate any company that gives out their products when they no longer are being supported ...

    Microsoft bought Bungie. Look at the copyright notice at the bottom of the article on bungie.net:

    © 2002 Bungie Studios / Microsoft Corporation

    Glad to see Microsoft getting the appreciation they deserve when they do something right. :-)

    1. Re:Good job... by Microsoft :-) by Kira-Baka · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Technically you are right, but when Bungie was bought they retained control over their work... If Microsoft (you know, the complete entity) had say so I would bet they wouldn't have be able to release the code.

    2. Re:Good job... by Microsoft :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note: Bungie and Microsoft do not support any of the Myth series games. These titles are now the property of Take2 Interactive. Direct all questions about them to tech@talonsoft.com.

  71. bungie has not open sourced anything by David+Jao · · Score: 1
    Bungie has open sourced more software than you'll ever write.

    No they haven't. In my book, they haven't open sourced anything. Maybe in your book, they have. But whether or not they have open sourced anything is a point of debate, not an open and shut case.

  72. open source / Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, last I checked, the bungie headline used the phrase "Open Source" with capitalizations.

  73. I took at look at the code.. by buckrogers · · Score: 2

    It was very poorly written and does not compile as is. It's a wonder it ran at all.

    I dislike the comercial clause, but I wonder how legal a clause like that really is.

    As far as I know, copyright is what covers source code, and copyright merely restricts duplication, not use. You can't write a book and put a clause that restricts how the information in the book is used. If Coke published a manual of operation for it's business then someone could start another Cola company based on those procedures, as long as they legally bought the number of copies of the book they needed. They could even publish a seperate book with changes that apply to the first book, as long as the second book didn't violate fair use.

    This is why no one has ever taken the GPL to court, because if you won the case and broke the GPL, then you would lose the right to redistribute GPL code. It is a form of legal kung foo, using the oppenents strength against them.

    What I am going to do is do the first step of a black box implementation. I will take this code and write up a full spec in the next 2 months. It will fully explain every aspect of operation of a Myth II server. Someone else can then use my work to implement a myth II server that is fully open.

    I am wondering if we need to add a new clause to the GPL to make sure that any client that is connected to a GPL'ed server is allowed to access that servers code as well. It seems to me that these .NET services could steal GPL code and run them internally inside the .NET framework with proprietary extensions. Then not release those extensions because they are not distributing the code, only using the code internally.

    --
    -- Never make a general statement.