Slashdot Mirror


Encryption For All Sponsored by German Govt.

fiffilinus writes: "The German Ministry of Economics uses the CeBIT computer fair as a forum to propagate its GnuPP (Gnu Privacy Project -- I know, it is *not* GPG, but GPG is part of the package) encryption package to the public, giving away CD-roms with the package. The CeBIT press release can be found here. The download for those who can't make it to CeBIT is here. The package is available in English too, but the page itself has to be put through the fish, as usual. Finally a government that moves in the right direction ..."

200 comments

  1. Remember... by webword · · Score: 2

    ...sponsorship is not the same thing as ownership.

  2. WATCH OUT by smkndrkn · · Score: 1, Troll

    The government could have put a BACK DOOR into this package rendering all your cryptographically-delivered pr0n viewable by the evil empire!

    --
    ======== In the future, everything will be artificial. ========
    1. Re:WATCH OUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please remember the following: not all governments in the world have the same aims than the one of the United States.
      We all know, the common spy projects by the CIA.

    2. Re:WATCH OUT by phaze3000 · · Score: 2
      Yes, they might have.

      Of course, by giving you the source they've also given you the opportunity to check for backdoors.

      --
      Blaming GW Bush for the Iraq war is like blaming Ronald McDonald for the poor quality of food.
    3. Re:WATCH OUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Thank you, Mr. Geek, for stating the obvious.

      Why is it certain people lack a sense of humor to such a degree that they feel they must analyze the joke in order to make some idiotic political point, just to make sure people get it?

      Or maybe they just feel such an extreme need to beat people over the head with their political views that no joke can be made without sneaking in some political point. "Yes, what your baby did was amusing. But did you know that if you had exercised your abortion rights it wouldn't have happened at all?"

      I hate lamers.

    4. Re:WATCH OUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're not giving anyone anything. "GnuPP" is just three available packages (GPA, WinPP and GnuPG) all lumped together in one installer for the sake of convenience. It isn't even anything new, really, it's just the government there collecting up a few readily available packages and stamping it with a new name. Why would the government give out the binaries, when the programs are already available from trusted sites? Who knows. I'd start comparing the executables to the downloadable versions elsewhere, though, if I were you.

    5. Re:WATCH OUT by thomas.galvin · · Score: 1

      There is a depressing tend of someone saying something innaccurate, getting called on it, then having some AC pipe up and say "it was just a joke. Duh." Jokes should be funny.

    6. Re:WATCH OUT by CakerX · · Score: 1
      so please shoot yourself, NOW

    7. Re:WATCH OUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So glad we have no racism here.

    8. Re:WATCH OUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah... as opposed to the US government who WOULD NEVER DREAM of using technology to spy on encrypted emails... hahaha

  3. Re:lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Until MS start watching them closely.

  4. Re:lol by garrett791 · · Score: 1

    He said the government was moving in the right direction, not solving all the world's problems. Remember, the longest journey begins with a single step.

  5. Govt's by molywi · · Score: 0

    All governments have their + and -. Germany seems to be into "common sense", open source and linux. Just few weeks ago there was an article on /. about Germany's government converting all government boxes to Linux. ..... too bad US government has all old people in there not willing to change their thinking to keep up with technology.....

  6. But what's their motive? by 91degrees · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    We all know that the prupose of personal cryptography is to hide sensitive information from a ccorrupt government. This has always been the case, and this is why the government keeps trying to prevent it from becming common.

    So why would the government of Germany want their citizens to talk without knowing what they arte talking about? In itself it doesn't make sense.

    The only possible anser is that they have developed a high speed decryption computer, and can read everything. They feel people will feel safer sending emails, and give away more.

    Don;t let them get away with it. Change your encryption algorithm. PGP is broken!

    1. Re:But what's their motive? by dytin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So why would the government of Germany want their citizens to talk without knowing what they arte talking about? In itself it doesn't make sense.

      The same question can be asked as as to why our founding fathers gave us the bill of rights. I guess that sometimes people are just nice. Sometimes, very rarely, the governmrnt does the right thing.

    2. Re:But what's their motive? by phaze3000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yet more evidence, if any was needed, that /. really needs a '-1 Needlessly paranoid' moderation item.

      --
      Blaming GW Bush for the Iraq war is like blaming Ronald McDonald for the poor quality of food.
    3. Re:But what's their motive? by cperciva · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So why would the government of Germany want their citizens to talk without knowing what they arte talking about? In itself it doesn't make sense.

      It does make sense: The German government is more concerned about the US government snooping on German citizens than it is about being able to do such snooping itself. It's a case of finding the lesser of two evils; they evidently decided that not being able to snoop on their citizens was less of a problem than having the US government snoop on their citizens.

    4. Re:But what's their motive? by Mr+Windows · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The purpose of personal cryptography is to hide sensitive information from anyone who you don't want to read it; not just the Government. Various EU countries want strong encryption in order to protect European companies' trade secrets from (say) large foreign governments with big eavesdropping projects (what can I mean??).

      Open source software is becoming more supported by EU countries for political reasons (Government should use non-proprietary tools), social reasons (open access), quality reasons (speaks for itself), and so on. There is quite a lot of money being spent on open-source development by various EU agencies, the German government being just one example of many. Sadly the UK government is in Microsoft's pocket at the moment :(

    5. Re:But what's their motive? by __past__ · · Score: 2
      So why would the government of Germany want their citizens to talk without knowing what they arte talking about? In itself it doesn't make sense.

      It's not that they want strong crypto for their citizens, but for their companies. It's the minister of economics who is a supporter of crypto and open source, while the minister of inner affairs basically tries to cut down all of the citizens democratic rights , including that of privacy.

      Believe me, though there are some cool things going on here in germany (like the Bundestag getting equipped with linux servers), it's not all roses

    6. Re:But what's their motive? by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 2
      So why would the government of Germany want their citizens to talk without knowing what they arte talking about? In itself it doesn't make sense.

      The only possible anser is that they have developed a high speed decryption computer, and can read everything. They feel people will feel safer sending emails, and give away more.


      Maybe they are getting ready for WW III, and don't want the embarassment of having their encryption totally cracked again.

    7. Re:But what's their motive? by CakerX · · Score: 1

      personal encryption is not primarly to keep information from the goverment, but to keep information away hackers/script kiddies/packetsniffers/etc... And guarrantee privacy. If it keeps an evil goverment from finding out your plans/information, good, but that is not the primary use/need. Also, goverments should not be able to access private systems period unless a prior warrent has been obtained.

    8. Re:But what's their motive? by Genghis+Troll · · Score: 0, Funny

      If these German citizens have done nothing wrong, then they have nothing to worry about when the US government snoops on them.

    9. Re:But what's their motive? by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      He.

      Mind if I scarf that for my .sig collection?

      Mart
      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    10. Re:But what's their motive? by phaze3000 · · Score: 1

      Go right ahead.. :)

      --
      Blaming GW Bush for the Iraq war is like blaming Ronald McDonald for the poor quality of food.
    11. Re:But what's their motive? by uhlmann · · Score: 1

      They have. Especially corporations whose trade secrets are stolen. The tool is
      Echelon.

    12. Re:But what's their motive? by Jester99 · · Score: 1

      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't after you.

    13. Re:But what's their motive? by CMBurns · · Score: 1

      Well, Mr. Troll, so maybe you have nothing against german institutions spying on you, eh?

      C. M. Burns

  7. USA behind the times ... again by emptybody · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why is it that we need to go to Germany to get software to protect our freedom of speech?

    What is wrong with this picture?

    --
    comment directly in my journal
    1. Re:USA behind the times ... again by missi · · Score: 1

      i didn't get this

    2. Re:USA behind the times ... again by Sunda666 · · Score: 1

      Thats because GERMANS don't have the kind of media industry USA have. There is no MPAG or RIAG, at least in the same terms as in USA.

      Good form them.

      --


      ``If a program can't rewrite its own code, what good is it?'' - Mel
    3. Re:USA behind the times ... again by Drakin · · Score: 1

      The post is playing on the association that (small) minds make between Germany as a country and the Nationalist party (more commonly known as nazi) which controled Germany decades ago, as well as with the association with America is the home of the free, with various "freedoms" that have been enjoyed by americans in the past are now being limited in various ways.

    4. Re:USA behind the times ... again by dj28 · · Score: 2

      What? I don't quite get that post. Are you saying there wasn't free speech in Germany immediately before encryption? And what does this have to do with any other citizens using encryption? To the best of my knowledge, the rest of western europe (or the americas) doesn't forbid their citizens from using the exact same encryption technology; They just don't go handing it out on CDs. So enlighten me, what does this have to do with free speech? I believe this is a matter of government sponsorship rather than freedom of speech. It wasn't outlawed to begin with.

    5. Re:USA behind the times ... again by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      "Why is it that we need to go to Germany to get software to protect our freedom of speech?"

      Because you aren't clever enough to type 'apt-get install gnupg', I suppose.

      Gnu Privacy Guard is readily available in the USA.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    6. Re:USA behind the times ... again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      You don't have freedom of speech in Germany.

      Protection of privacy and Freedom of speech are not the same concept.

    7. Re:USA behind the times ... again by missi · · Score: 0

      *lol*
      how can you judge this?
      you probably don't even know where germany lives.

    8. Re:USA behind the times ... again by tsa · · Score: 1

      Just because something isn't forbidden it doesn't mean a government has thought about it. Here is a government that shows it's people that not only encryption may be used, but they also support it. That's a very good sign, compared to what's happening in the so-called 'land of the free' nowadays.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    9. Re:USA behind the times ... again by dj28 · · Score: 2

      I don't quite get that logic though. You talk like encryption is illegal in America. I think this is just needless bashing perpetuated by this "community." Here in the USA, it is legal to use encryption. Just because they don't hand it to you on a CD doesn't mean that it isn't encouraged. I think a lot of people in this "community" need to get a grasp of reality rather than living in a fantasy world where they think the government is out to get them all the time. Encryption is legal in the rest of western europe and America.

    10. Re:USA behind the times ... again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, US-introverted naive/puerile (take your pick) fuckwit. This is encryption supported BY THE GOVERNMENT-- in the USA, the CIA would love nothing more than to read your every thought and drag you away for even making a notion of "boy, I'd like to kill him".
      ;).
      God. Americans are funny that way, they have to be the best at everything and of everything; don't they? Here's a clue for you: Shut the fuck up and realize you aren't, there are other powers in the fields you forced your crap into.

    11. Re:USA behind the times ... again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Post-second world war prejudices, that's what's wrong. Grow up.

    12. Re:USA behind the times ... again by Drakin · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm a disgrace to the American people... my ancestors stopped in the US and promptly left for Canada without settleing.

      Sheesh. The net is a global place.

      But, on to your comment. While the US government does have some nationalists as rabid as what the hard core Nazi's were, they however don't have the control or the leadership that the aforementioned group did.

      Does the US have the possibility of makeing some of the same mistakes as Germany did under the nazi's? Perhaps. But, I for one thing that the people of the United states would take action long before anything truely horrific happened.

    13. Re:USA behind the times ... again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It lives in Germany. Duh.
      Everybody knows where Germany lives!

    14. Re:USA behind the times ... again by SerpentMage · · Score: 2

      Ever heard of Bertelsman? One of the big five. They are based in Germany. Or how about Krichgroup? Another big one (but about to go bankrupt)

      The difference in the media industry between the US and Germany is ZIP, ZILCH NADA... Global corporatization took care of any differences that did exist!!!

      Globalism is good, but global corporatization is not so good!!!

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    15. Re:USA behind the times ... again by J'raxis · · Score: 1

      Gnu Privacy Guard is readily available in the USA... but downloaded from non-us.debian.org.

      However ironic, that was irrelevant. The point the original poster was trying to make, I believe, is in Germany they have government-sanctioned encryption being distributed to the masses. In the U.S. we still have quirky export regulations, we have the government trying to pass various limiting laws (backdoors, key escrow, etc.), and we have no widely-available, widely-used encryption software, let alone coming from the government itself.

      (By widely-available, widely-used I mean something available to and used by the masses; Im sure all us Linux users MD5 our passwords and use SSH, but we make up, what, 1% of the countrys population?)

    16. Re:USA behind the times ... again by mvdwege · · Score: 2
      GERMANS don't have the kind of media industry USA have.

      I have two words for you: Springer Verlag.

      Another poster already mentioned Bertelsmann and Leo Kirch, but those two are I believe not as political as Springer. Springer is bad, especially since they couple yellow journalism with a high popular appeal (Bild Zeitung) with a definite right-wing political agenda. They used be quite extreme, I'd say they're merely conservative now.

      I am not 100% sure though. Any German readers who can enlighten us?

      Mart
      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    17. Re:USA behind the times ... again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Europe for the last 50 years has been a better, freer place to live than nearly any other place in the world, especially the USA.

    18. Re:USA behind the times ... again by Kruemelmo · · Score: 1

      > Any German readers who can enlighten us?

      What you write is quite exactly the truth. Of course we have a big media industry. We don't have Holywood, though; I guess that's the difference.

    19. Re:USA behind the times ... again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must get your news from Disney.

      The US govt has long been 'out to get us' in terms of obtaining the info they want at any time.

      "While we as a society have always recognized law enforcement's need to obtain investigative information upon presentation of a judicial warrant, we have never accepted the notion that the success of such a search must be guaranteed..."--letter from Marc Rotenberg and David Sobel of the Electronic Privacy Information Center to Congressman Jack Brooks, Oct 6 1994

      Remember the unsucessful FBI "Operation Root Canal" campaign, where they quietly persuaded telecommunications companies to put FBI-friendly backdoors on EVERYTHING!!?

      In a draft of their [FBI] wiretap bill, all encryption not authorized would have been been banned. In 1991, the NSA and the CIA agreed that this would be too controversial. Then the Clipper chip came around, etc. Parts of the US govt care none about privacy rights of citizens. If you don't associate that with "out to get you", then you are just plain stupid. Do you even know the differences between various forms of encryption? Why do you think that the US is using 30 year old encryption algorithm standards? They don't want us to have that (fourth ammendment) freedom.

      Europe has been ahead of ths US in this. Just like dozens of countries in Europe are legalizing or decriminalizing drugs far before the US will, as well as how Europe generally has banned the death penalty while the US is still among China, Afganistan, Iraq, etc. in alowing it.

      In a 1998 New York Times study, the US was found to be virtually alone among free, industrialized nations in attempting to control the right of its citizens to keep their digital communication and information private. Countries that had followed the FBI's lead and imposed domestic controls on encryption included China, Pakistan, Russia, Singapore, Israel, and Belarus. Other than that, almost every democratic, industialized nation in the world permitted their citizens to use, manufacture, and sell encryption technology without any legal limits.

      Whereas plenty of members of our govt support and encourage encryption, but they are mainly elected. (This is good for the long run) The parts to watch out for are obviously the FBI, CIA, NSA, etc.

  8. The Problem is... by guamman · · Score: 1

    Somehow, I doubt the government's good intentions. If they are supplying encryption, free to everyone, it must be for some reason. I would conjecture either because it has a backdoor that the government already knows about. Or, the strength of the encryption is within their grasp to crack and therefore, this free program will inhibit further encryption growth and research. Who would want to spend money on something, if it's already free? This doesn't sound like a pure philanthropic endeavor.

    1. Re:The Problem is... by cREW+oNE · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Spoken like a true American!

      --

      +++ATH0

    2. Re:The Problem is... by missi · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yes, I think the problems is that he thinks just because the us government spies upon their people every government does.

    3. Re:The Problem is... by Mr+Windows · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It might seem incredible, but in this case the government is acting on behalf of the people. Almost as if it felt that it might be accountable in some way, or as if there was some connection between the people and the government...

    4. Re:The Problem is... by Aanallein · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Somehow, I doubt the government's good intentions.

      I actually am serious about the following. I've seen more people here express the same sentiment. Do you people really not trust government in general that much? I know I don't trust the American goverment either, but here in Europe we don't have the feeling we need something like a right to bear arms to defend ourselves from the government. The government still consists of people. People we choose, and people who work for us, the people. Sure, politicians are politicians, no matter where they are, but there are enough checks and balances that I don't think anyone in Europe seriously thinks the government is working more for its own good, rather than for that of the people it's serving.
      Yet from what I observe, there are very few people anywhere in the world who believe the government of the USA to do the same.

      Now I wonder... Does this make people believe that Europeans are naive, that our governments are just as bad? Or do you actually trust the American government after all? (And if not, doesn't that say something very significant about that government?) Or did you never realize a government can actually work for the good of the people, providing them security not only from itself, but also from other governments which aren't to be trusted as much (Echelon, Carnivore, ...)?

      I'm trying to ask this as non-offensively as possible, while still pointing to where I think the differences can be found. If you are offended, please, realize that was not the intent of this post. I simply really wonder about how you people from across the pond look at trusting both your own government and other governments.

    5. Re:The Problem is... by CakerX · · Score: 3, Interesting

      what the fuck is everyones problem, why does everyone assume every move made by every goverment everywhere is evil. Come on, this is a good move done by a goverment for once. you should stop looking for hidden motives and enjoy the fact that somewhere out there there is a goverment not run by a deush-bag from texas who values a 1984 style goverment. Germany is making an already free technology more available to its citizens. I will give the German gov a BIG thumbs up about this one. No doubt there are many coders that will check to make sure there is no backdoor in the software, and if there is, you'll hear about tommorow on theregister.co.uk and /. the day after that.

      Also another big thumbs up to germany from going from nazisim in WW2 to where they are today.

      why is everyone so god damn paranoid, if you guys hit the ol' pipe without me I am gonna be pissed

    6. Re:The Problem is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do not forget the ignorant part! It is after all, OPEN SOURCE, hence the openness of the source code (read: source is avail for download). Backdoor my proprietary code butt!

    7. Re:The Problem is... by oakbox · · Score: 1

      I'm 'merican. I'm pretty friggin' proud of that. But though I like my country, I'm also really aware that the Government of the United States doesn't really give a damn about anything but its own perpetuation. The US government lies to its citizens on a regular basis about . . . well, just about everything.
      But MOST citizens tolerate this because they just don't want to know the truth. Whatever else is the case, the Shitty Foreign Policies mean that back in the heartland of the good ole US of A, things are rosy and fluffy and happy. And as long as the SFP's keep it that way, the government can do just about anything it wants to. That is the "WHY" in your general US citizen's double-think. "My government lies to me." - "My government is looking out for me."

      Now, having said all that. I think the German government is on the Up and Up. I don't, personally, think that every government in the world is as corrupt as the USA's.

      John Q. Americano

      --
      Not just answers, the correct questions.
    8. Re:The Problem is... by SerpentMage · · Score: 2

      Having lived on both sides of the pond I have to say that I am North American and distrustful of governments. In Germany, France, etc people are trustful and look to the government for guidance.

      >>but there are enough checks and balances that I don't think anyone in Europe seriously thinks the government is working more for its own good, rather than for that of the people it's serving.

      You are kidding right?

      Have you looked at the laundered money going through the individual political parties in Germany and France? For example stats in Germany (Speigel TV March 17, 2002) say that there are officially 220 corruption cases. Think about it OFFICIAL CORRUPTION SCANDALS!!! Corruption in the sense of faking, changing, laundering, etc!!!

      Have you see how the German government for work faked the numbers to make it look like the government was actually doing something?

      Have you heard of the move by the German government to not consider people over 50 unemployed but in pre-retirement? This way the the unemployment numbers would look better...

      Did you see the how Volkswagon and Mercedes would not sell or service their own cars not bought in Germany? And the government did NOTHING! Why corruption...

      Sorry, but European governments do NOT always look in the best interest of the people. I DO LIKE the skepticism bred into you living in Canada and the US.

      But I do see hope in Mario Monti.. He is the "DOJ" of Europe and HE IS changing things for the better. He is slapping fines and changing business practices, even when the governments are not HAPPY!!!

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    9. Re:The Problem is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      being the savvy individual that you obviously are, perhaps you could use the system to send emails thru, feeding the enemy false information..

      oh, just a sec.. i forgot... the war ended 60 odd years ago...

    10. Re:The Problem is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to learn to spell douche-bag.

    11. Re:The Problem is... by Tardigrade · · Score: 1

      Or do you actually trust the American government after all? (And if not, doesn't that say something very significant about that government?)

      Or it might just say something about the volume of naysayers about said government.

    12. Re:The Problem is... by Kphrak · · Score: 1

      "Everybody's problem" is that America was founded on a distrust of the government. And the majority of Slashdot is American.

      It's not recent events that have made us mistrust the government (although that sure as hell didn't make us trust it any further). Keep in mind that America used to be a colony that had gotten very angry at the arrogance of the government of a country thousands of miles away that said, "We won't provide much in the way of benefits...but keep those taxes coming!"

      Britain needed to pay off a war against France that had been fought much of the time in America. "Well, we fought for the colonies, surely they'll accept higher taxes". If they'd been careful about it, been a little more diplomatic, and not pissed people off, we might still have Kings and Queens on our coins, but they weren't, and the rest is history. When we gave ourselves the right to bear arms, free speech, and so on, we were still thinking, however unconsciously, as a colony, and these rights were designed to protect us from the government (that "right to bear arms" rule? It's NOT just for criminals...although that fact often gets neglected). The same planning went into the formation of the three branches of government.

      Some liberals on here might say, "Oh, these rights were just to pacify the people. The ones who really wanted to be in control, and got it, were the 'aristocracy'." I'm not disagreeing, but the mentality of the time was such that the "American aristocracy" would have gotten it anyway without argument; it was just the Way Things Were Done....and anyway, once liberty has been fixed upon as a goal, it's hard to dissuade people without a disturbance (check your local history book for several such disturbances before the Bill of Rights was drafted). The point is still valid.

      And that, CakerX, is my long-winded explanation of "what the fuck is everyone's problem", as you put it. I think Germany's idea is great, but if there's one thing Americans have learned, it's to question all governments' motives. All the time.

      --

      There's no sig like this sig anywhere near this sig, so this must be the sig.
  9. fishy translations by JDizzy · · Score: 2

    The fish is a bit weird on the translations. Anyone got a link for a better translation engine?

    Isn't Brazil another goverment that has been known to enbrace open source? However embracing open source, and pushing open source warez to your population is another. This sets a new presedence in that regard.

    I think here in the USA, the goverment would rather do the oposite. Like the key escro stuff a few years ago, and now the DMCA.

    --
    It isn't a lie if you belive it.
    1. Re:fishy translations by Sunda666 · · Score: 1

      Some federal units here (Brazil) embrace open-source, mostly in left-wing governed states. But AFAIK, the penetration of OSS here is pitiful.

      Since everyone pirates windoze/office/corel/games freely, there is no (monetary) incentive to go OSS.

      OSS is widely used in state universities and some schools too, thanks to some OSS martyrs we have ;-)

      --


      ``If a program can't rewrite its own code, what good is it?'' - Mel
  10. slashdotted allready by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Redundant
    CeBIT: Federal German Ministry of Economics Forces E-mail Encryption

    At the CeBIT the Federal German Ministry of Economics distributes for free the mail encryption program GnuPP 1.1 complete with manual. The mail roboter Adele shall provide a lead-in to the issue by practising the krypto mail communication together with the user.

    The Federal German Ministry of Economics is supporting the open source project GnuPP (GNU Privacy Project) since the year 2000. With that the Ministry wants to provide the development of a cryptography infrastructure that does not depend on manufacturers, that is safe and corresponds to international standards. It would not be recommended to use standard software in security sensitive areas and the Ministry explicitly warns to do so in its press release. Only the open source principle allows the user to look at the complete programming of a software, and that means security to the greatest extent.

    Apart from the software the package of the Ministry contains a two-piece manual that is completely new written and designed. With the help of this manual even laypersons shall be able to clear the first hurdle of e-mail encryption. And something else is new: "Adele" (adele@gnupp.org), an exercise roboter for practising the procedure of encryption and decryption as often as the entry-level user will need it. Adele reacts to sent-in public keys and encrypted e-mails, sends its own public key, and answers to encrypted and decrypted incoming e-mails. In this way a dialog between correspondence partners is formed so that entry-level users can practise transactions of e-mail encryption "like in real life" and may gain confidence in the safety of this procedure.

    At the CeBIT one can get the GnuPP package (manual with CD-ROM) for free at the stands of the Federal German Ministry of Economics. During the entire fair the Ministry also provides presentations and advisory service for free.

    For background informations and details on the fair please surf tecCHANNEL.DE and read our big CeBIT Special (German only, please bear with us). Moreover we have compiled for you all CeBIT news in category-specific news channels. (jlu/bmu)

    Federal German Ministry of Economics: pavilion11, stand D25

    Pavillon D / 11, stands 76 and 5


    1. Re:slashdotted allready by glitch! · · Score: 2

      And something else is new: "Adele" (adele@gnupp.org), an exercise roboter for practising the procedure of encryption and decryption as often as the entry-level user will need it.

      Cool! This could make it very easy and comfortable for a beginner to get the hang of using encryption. It might be inconvenient or embarrassing for some to send many test messages to friends, so this would make it easy (even fun?) This could also help new users get acquainted with with the idea of key servers.

      This is an excellent idea, folks :-)

      --
      A dingo ate my sig...
  11. Re:lol by Mayor+McPenisman · · Score: 0

    Wherez all the trollz?

    Jesus, at least I got a link in dailyrotten.com today. The one about the U of I election being won by two comic strip characters.

    --
    [[Ay fukkand lyke ane furious Fornicatour]]
  12. Security Concerns (Echelon) & Self-Promotion by Donny+Smith · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Their primary motive is to let German individuals and corporations protect themselves from Echelon and similar projects.
    Which makes me think - no wonder France and Germany have their own Linux distributions and the U.K. doesn't! A grain of security concerns, a grain of national pride, and perhaps a grain of software nationalism, etc...
    Get the funny part of the press release (I think they kind of screwed up the translation):
    ---------
    ...is safe and corresponds to international standards. It would not be recommended (sic!) to use standard software in security sensitive areas and the Ministry explicitly warns to do so in its press release.
    ---------

    And of course they can't push MS products at CeBIT, it wouldn't help them in any way. But they had to do something and Linux has always made a good means for low-cost self promotion ...

  13. Re:But what's their motive? ..maybe authentication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all this crypto stuff is not only to hide things. since we all know how easy it is to alter an email header, cryptography allows you to authenticate yourself by signing your emails 'n stuff. more cryptographic authentication 'in the wild' could encourage more the sceptic fellow men to use emails. maybe that's a part of the motiv. on the other hand, industrial espionage is still en vogue.

  14. Software Patents? by guerby · · Score: 3, Interesting

    With a few thousands illegal patents delivered by europe software patent factory, it would be fun to count how many patents this government sponsored software infringes :). Hopefully some German politicians clearly said no to patents. After France, there's hope to get a software patents free Europe if Germany officials say no too.

  15. Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by Bonker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    First they decided to get rid of Windows in the government and are moving to OSS for all government IT installations if I remember correctly. Now they're promoting hard encryption for all their citezens. This seems like a government that truly cares about the rights of its citzens, especially where privacy and technology are concerned.

    What is the catch? What makes Germany less or more desireable for people who are concerned about their rights as they relate to technology, privacy, or otherwise?

    I know there are some english speaking Germans reading /. Enlighten us, please...

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    1. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by Coolfish · · Score: 3, Insightful

      i think germania realized that in order to prevent anything resembling what happened with Hitler and the Nazis, the citizens must be free to think as they want, must be able to go on with their lives with the privacy and freedom that all humans deserve.

      It seems the bigger a mistake is, the greater an opportunity there is to grow and learn from that mistake.

    2. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      What makes Germany less or more desireable for people who are concerned about their rights as they relate to technology, privacy, or otherwise?

      For what it's worth, when I visited some relatives in Germany about 8 years ago (?), my uncle mentioned a couple of laws that I found absolutely astounding. First, it was illegal to leave your car (and house? Can't remember) unlocked for any period of time. If you are making multiple trips, you are required to lock the car between each trip. That's just the law (don't know if it was local or what).

      I was also amazed to learn that you have to get permission from the government in order to start a business. You see, they feel that too much competition in a particular area is bad for those local businesses, so they restrict how many of a particular business type can be in an area. After all, they can't have a business go bankrupt! That might cause job loss (never mind the inefficiency that it breeds).

      I've been to Europe a couple of times in a number of countries. There is no question that Europe is a great place to visit, but there's no way I would ever live there. They have absolutely no concept of freedom.

      The US takes a lot of flack, but there's no doubt the US is the most free country in the world. Not to mention that it has by far the best highway system in the world. :) Europe SUCKS when it comes to having sufficient road signs to mark the highways. You really get spoiled in the US with 3 signs before every exit.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    3. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by missi · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I think most of the germans (government officials included) understood that to prevent anything similar to the 3rd reich, they have to secure the peoples ability to communicate their ideas no matter if somebody likes them or not.



      For the german government it is far more important to protect the german people and companies from being spied at by competitors or foreign governments than to keep the hypothetical ability to spy on their own people. something that would never get through anyways. privacy is a very important point for german courts and media.

    4. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 3, Informative

      i think germania realized that in order to prevent anything resembling what happened with Hitler and the Nazis, the citizens must be free to think as they want, must be able to go on with their lives with the privacy and freedom that all humans deserve.

      Ironically, you are free to think anything you want -- except if it has to do with Nazism. The Nazi party is banned in Germany. Understandable given the history, but German is hardly the home of free thinkers.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    5. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I dont think that the main reason for this state-sponsored encryption project here in Germany is that our politicians are "nicer" or more concerned about our rights (although one must admit that "big brother" is far less powerful compared to, lets say the UK...). What the German Government fears is espionage like Echelon etc. A lot of people in the US seem to forget or dont know, that a lot of german companies are leaders in their field. Daimler (-Chrysler) is by no means the most important one. Take the pharmaceutical / chemical industry for example, the fact that world leaders like Bayer, Boehringer, Hoechst etc with hundreds of thousands of employees worldwide have an ".Inc" at the end of their name (in the US), shouldnt disguise the fact that these are german companies. Same thing with the optical industry: the optical systems in the really large terrestrial observatories and even in the HUBBLE are german. Or Siemens, which is very big in (micro-) electronics and has the biggest market share in the mobile telephone market in important markets like Asia and there especially China. German companies lose tens of billions of dollars worth of contracts every year to foreign companies because of espionage. Thats the main reason for pushing (open source!, so theoretically no back door, I think they are really sincere) cryptography and banning M$ Products from goverment use (up to now, only the servers are switched to Linux. But Im sure that the desktops will follow in a few years).

    6. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by JanneM · · Score: 1

      About that business thing: the only restriction I know about is regarding urban planning, and that can restrict where you're allowed to have certain kinds of businesses in certain places. This especially goes for hazardous activities (like gas stations), and food sales.

      Saying that you need permission to start a business is way, [i]way[/i] overstating it; the local urban plan doesn't allow you to put your fast-food restaurant at a certain spot - well, just put it somewhere else. And for most business activities, there's no such concerns at all. You can start your software enterprise wherever you want.

      /Janne

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    7. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by Cynical_Dude · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Being from Germany, maybe I can describe my perceptions of the "local angle" here.

      The German Government is likely less altruistic than people suspect here. The danger is clearly for German/European businesses being spied upon by you-know-who.

      If you read the original release, you'll notice (near the bottom) the initiative is by the ministry of economics. They are trying to create awareness for IT security in the German corporate environment.

      Maybe German politicians figured out that criminals (political radicals, organized crime, etc.) are already using crypto, so they have little to lose by having businesses adopt crypto on a large scale...

      Your mileage may vary, just my 0.02, yadda yadda...

    8. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by __past__ · · Score: 5, Informative
      I am an "english speaking German reading /.", so i'll bite...

      First, they aren't "moving to OSS for all government". The Bundestag will use Linux as servers (including authentication etc.), while the clients will get WinXP. Other federal institutions do pretty much what they want to.

      Second, the german government does most certainly not care so much about civil rights as you may think. Especially after 9/11 (and yes, I know the WTC wasn't exactly a german institution, but most germans seem to have forgot) there was quite a great backslash in civil rights, especially regarding privacy.

      For example, a few days after, the minister of inner affairs (?) Otto Schily proposed that police should have the right to know about any of your banking transactions. Also, they started the "Rasterfahndung", meaning that they would get all information about "suspect" persons - mostly muslimic students - from all kinds of sources, including their universities, power suppliers, post offices etc. Of course, some people noticed that this was unconstitutional, but well, who cares...

      Another incident was some guy proposing to force ISPs to block certain sites, which some ISPs promply did (including some universities), althoug the guy proposing it did not have any authority to force it.

      Even before, there's a long record of not-so-privacy-respecting incidents. One of the funnier ones was a law that tried to force ISPs to keep every piece of data their customers sent and recieved for IIRC 7 years, while of course guaranteeing confidentality when passing over this data to the police. Of course, the ISPs protested, if only because of the costs of keeping such an amount of data.

      It's hard to compare the situation between two countries, scince most people just know one of them good enough, but germany if definitely not a civil rights paradise.

    9. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by Aanallein · · Score: 1

      They have absolutely no concept of freedom.

      Oh, so that must be why for example the Netherlands have legalized euthanasia, legalized softdrugs, legalized abortion, etc, etc. (And the lowest rates of problems because of it anywhere in the world.) There's freedom and freedom, you know. Personally I'd prefer living in a country where citizens are trusted with freedom to make their own choices, rather than living in a country where freedom consists of being allowed to have the feeling you can defend yourself from your government.

      A silly law like being forced to lock your car doesn't change that. As for the protectionism of small businesses - a lot has changed with the European Union solidifying. I think you're a wee bit too hasty with judging and entire continent based on a very narrow view you had a long time ago.

    10. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by waferhead · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I spent over a month in Germany last year, working at a customer site.

      The Germans generally (at least the young to middle aged ones) are mostly tech savvy, have a clue about politics, and actually care.

      Perhaps their government reflects the population?

      Or maybe it's the beer. Yeah. Beer...Munchen ROCKS.

    11. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by Cadre · · Score: 1
      Not to mention that it has by far the best highway system in the world. :) Europe SUCKS when it comes to having sufficient road signs to mark the highways. You really get spoiled in the US with 3 signs before every exit.

      From what I've read in my various german car enthusasiast magazines (and this was from awhile ago, so I may be mistaken, anyone with actual knowledge confirm/deny?), the engineers working make a point to make the highways more driver friendly[0] (ie: no decreasing radius turns, all roads above ~50 Kph are divided). But then again, I live in PA where you're lucky if a curve on a road is on-camber (let alone wide enough for two cars (this doesn't include the oil-tanker SUVs)). Ah but that's my rant...

      [0] - And by driver I mean someone who enjoys 'spirited' driving, not your typical 'soccer mom' driver.

      --
      All editorial writers ever do is come down from the hill after the battle is over and shoot the wounded.
    12. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by __past__ · · Score: 3, Informative
      The Nazi party is banned in Germany.
      Note, however, that it is not the only banned party. The communist party got banned as well, e.g..

      Oh, and scince you seem to worry, there are still more than enough nazis aroung here, thank you. They still manage to kill a foreigner or to destroy a jewish cemetary once month or so. Of course, the good times of the early nineties are over, where nazis sieged a house inhabited mostly by vietnamese guest-workers for three days in Rostock, having fun with molotow-cocktails, applauded by their Volksgenossen, protected by the police, and supported by the free press.

      It's not as if nazis weren't still a real problem in germany, you know.

    13. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by __past__ · · Score: 2
      The Germans generally (at least the young to middle aged ones) are mostly tech savvy, have a clue about politics, and actually care.

      Would you mind telling where you've been exactly, so I can move there? (Or could it be that people slashdotters meet working at a customer site could be more tech savy then the avarage?)

      Munchen ROCKS.
      Ick - forget what I said about moving. I'll just drink beer and stay where I am :)
    14. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      They still manage to kill a foreigner or to destroy a jewish cemetary once month or so.

      No one says that should be legal. However actions should be illegal. It's generally a mistake to make thoughts illegal. The US has its share of Nazis as well, but they are just laughed at rather than banned. Guess what would happen if they were suddenly banned? Right -- they would get power from the negative attention, and suddenly would become the "cool thing" for the amateur anarchists.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    15. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by tempmpi · · Score: 3, Informative

      For what it's worth, when I visited some relatives in Germany about 8 years ago (?), my uncle mentioned a couple of laws that I found absolutely astounding. First, it was illegal to leave your car (and house? Can't remember) unlocked for any period of time. If you are making multiple trips, you are required to lock the car between each trip. That's just the law (don't know if it was local or what).

      I live in Germany and I must say that these laws are something like US sex laws, laws that maybe really exist but nobody cares about them.

      I've been to Europe a couple of times in a number of countries. There is no question that Europe is a great place to visit, but there's no way I would ever live there. They have absolutely no concept of freedom.

      People get much more freedom in most european countries. Look at the Human Freedom Index by the UN. Other Source here.

      Not to mention that it has by far the best highway system in the world.

      Never heard about the German Autobahn ? The german highway system where you can drive your car without a speed limit ?

      --
      Jan
    16. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by greenrd · · Score: 1
      Maybe German politicians figured out that criminals (political radicals,

      Huh? Are you calling me a criminal?

    17. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by Ford+Fulkerson · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I've been to Europe a couple of times in a number of countries. There is no question that Europe is a great place to visit, but there's no way I would ever live there. They have absolutely no concept of freedom.

      Funny. I live in Europe and that's the exact same feeling I have about the US.

      --

      Somewhere in the heavens... they are waiting.
    18. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by LD50 · · Score: 1

      Obviously someone tried to bullshit you.
      There has definitely never been a law in germany that says that you have to lock your car or your house. Neiter do you need a permission to start a business.
      No concept of freedom? I think this is not true as either. At least germany doesn't have something like the NSA or FBI, eavesdropping on your communication channels regularly. Doing such things here is very complicated for the police or the government because of very strict laws that protect your privacy.

    19. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For what it's worth, when I visited some relatives in Germany about 8 years ago (?), my uncle mentioned a couple of laws that I found absolutely astounding. First, it was illegal to leave your car (and house? Can't remember) unlocked for any period of time. If you are making multiple trips, you are required to lock the car between each trip. That's just the law (don't know if it was local or what).

      Of course it's *not* illegal to leave your house, car or bike unlocked for any given period of time. I guess what your uncle meant to say (or what you were supposed to understand) is that you will not receive any refunds by your insurance if you leave, say, your car unlocked and someone decides to steal it. That's not equal to 'illegel' though. So I can ensure you that you will definitely not get busted while leaveing your car unlocked in front of a German cop.

      I was also amazed to learn that you have to get permission from the government in order to start a business. You see, they feel that too much competition in a particular area is bad for those local businesses, so they restrict how many of a particular business type can be in an area. After all, they can't have a business go bankrupt! That might cause job loss (never mind the inefficiency that it breeds).

      Not exactly, though I must admit partially true. You have to get your company registered by the government in order to guarantee that only people truly intenting to start a business get to do so. Besides, what's huge critiques in Germany is the fact that the process of establishing a business has become massively complicated for years which makes a lot of people refrain from becoming entrepreneurial.

      I've been to Europe a couple of times in a number of countries. There is no question that Europe is a great place to visit, but there's no way I would ever live there. They have absolutely no concept of freedom.

      Well there's the clash between the US and most European Countries in terms of what's called "Freedom", i.e., I don't consider the 'right' to use a weapon to be compatible with freedom. And I'm not going into detail concerning what I think about Bush politics and why I wouldn't want to live in the US either since this is getting way too offtopic.

      I just intended to make some 'German' points clear.

    20. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      legalized euthanasia

      Which is a bad idea, because it corrupts the medical community. If you want to commit suicide, go ahead and do it, but don't corrupt MY medical care.

      legalized softdrugs

      Extremely arguable as to whether the produces more freedom from the non-drug users who have to deal with the druggies.

      legalized abortion

      That doesn't produce all that much freedom for the child, now does it? If a country had a law that said you could terminate any child under five years old at the parent's discretion, would that make that country have more "freedom"?

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    21. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      People get much more freedom in most european countries. Look at the Human Freedom Index [huppi.com] by the UN. Other Source here.

      The UN is the last organization I would use to measure my freedom. That report is so overly simplistic as to be laughable. For example, they seem to think that fewer government demonstrations is better -- when the exact opposite is probably closer to the truth (how many demonstrations do you think they have in Iraq)?

      The german highway system where you can drive your car without a speed limit ?

      That's the one positive, but I was mostly referring to navigation.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    22. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Europe and that's the exact same feeling I have about the US.

      That's like saying, "Funny, my prison has beautiful padded bars and the guards take care of all my needs. All you have is that big dangerous world -- and you think that YOU'RE free! What a dope!"

    23. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by Mr+Windows · · Score: 1
      ...the German Autobahn ? The german highway system where you can drive your car without a speed limit
      Actually, There are speed limits, albeit "temporary" or recommended ones, some as low as 100 km/h.
    24. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by janolder · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Odd, as a native German having lived in Germany until 1995, I can't recall any laws that require you to lock your car or your house. Your relatives might have confused this with requirementes of their specific insurance company. Indeed, most German insurance companies will not cover theft if the car was unlocked at the time of being stolen. But this is certainly not a law by any stretch of the imagination.

      As for having to obtain permission from the government to start a business... For most types of businesses, you only need to go to the local mayor's office, pay $15 and off you go. I've done it myself in order to start a consulting business. As other posters have pointed out, the only restriction is the location for certain types of business that impact the neighborhood. Like brothels, car shops, chemical plants, etc. In this respect, Germany uses zoning much like most of the US.

      Having lived in both countries, the amount of freedom you have in either place depends on the subject matter. A few examples:

      a) Certain unions in the US have much more power to restrict and constrict businesses than German unions do.

      b) On the other hand, the German crafts laws are incredibly restrictive and certainly stifle competition. Fortunately, it looks like the EU will put an end to this hundreds of years old nonsense.

      c) As for encryption and copy protection circumvention, Germany's laws have traditionally been far more liberal than the US's. Due to pressure from the US this is changing, sadly.

      d) Prostitution is legal in Germany. Illegal in most of the US.

      e) Any moron can carry a gun in the US. German gun laws are very restrictive.

      f) There is no issue with nakedness on public beaches in Germany.

      g) There is no issue with nakedness on TV in Germany.

      h) There is no issue with nakedness in printed form in public places. (It is usually too cold for actual nakedness in public places. But there is no law against that either - unless a public disturbance is caused, by a flasher, for example)

      The list goes on. On the whole, I prefer the US which is why I moved here a while back. But the statement that the US is more free than other countries requires some qualifiers.

    25. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by CakerX · · Score: 1

      hrmmm, softdrugs = pot/shrooms/hash

      nothing to harmfull, neither cause side effects too much worse than alcohol, none are as addictive as alcohol(us is littered with drunks more than any other country)

      Legalized Abortion- woman's right to choose. once a baby is living, still in the womb its part of the mother... plus in case you haven't noticed we have a fucking population problem, who are you to tell a mother she has to keep a kid she didn't want/can't afford/will probably abuse. Think of the kid, what type of life would the kid have...Don't give me that "you don't know what that kid is going to be" cause we all know what happens...especially to teen parents...don't forget that, you can preech birth control/absenece all you fucking want but teenagers are not going to listen, you remeber being a teen right??? Some might, but there will always be teenagers having unprotected sex, I do not agree with it, but it is futile to try, not to mention in most cases harrassing/aggravating...

      Legalized Euthinasia - again we have a population problem, letting people who are hopelessly ill and WANT TO DIE kill themselves would help.

    26. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by starmarble · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately they didn't throw out all of Windows. In fact it was quite a small move to Linux. They just decided to put Linux on all 150 server machines of the Bundestag (the german parliament and all attached facilities). The approx. 1000 desktop machines will be upgraded to Windows XP next year. But apparently it was a quite close decision to keep Windows on the desktops and mostly only because it was feared that some users would not get along with the new environment and and thus require more support resources (IT staff that is) than are available.

      PGP and other free encryption software is sponsored by Germany for a couple of years now (I think PGP sponsoring started about 6 years ago).
      Privacy is sort of a holy thing to us germans. There are a lot of laws protecting privacy.
      For example in every goverment institution there has to be someone responsible for the protection of the privacy of the citizens (Most goverment institutions have access to huge amounts of citizen data of course and this guy has to make sure that this data is not misused).
      There are also strong laws requiring companies not to misuse, distribute or sell customer information without your consent...

      Unfortunately software patents are a completely other matter. The situation isn't as bad as in the US but the lobby isn't sleeping here either.
      The lobby is trying to get the European Parliament and Senate to adopt and pass a law implementing software patents and stricter copyright laws. A law passed by the European parliament has then to be implemented in every single European country :-(
      But as it seems France is starting to oppose this law and Germany isn't that much backing it up also - there is hope yet.

      THE CATCH IS (here I can only speak of Germany not of Europe)...
      The Unions are too strong in Germany. That alone is not nessecarily a bad thing but unfortunately the unions are very conservative and unwilling to move also!!!
      They have sort of a dogma which says sort of "force the employee to work less long so the companies are forced to employ more people and thus battle unemployment". In the metal working branch (cars and so on) there is the 37,5 hour week and they are aiming for 35h (but with higher salaries of course).
      They say that the companies make good profits every year and thus have the money to do so - of course not looking at the global picture where there are foreign companies making even bigger profits.
      The worst is that they fight againt every attempt to make the job market more flexible. The basic things like tying part of the salary to the annual performance of the company and things like that.
      The are so-called (badly translated) blancket-coverage-tariff-treaties requiring every company affected by the one of the unions to pay the same for a certain type of employee - and allowing NEARLY NO flexibility if one of these companies is currently in bad shape...
      Also you cannot "hire and fire" but that I consider generally a good thing as it forces companies to think about business models and strategies. A manager who messed up cannot just cut costs and give the impression of "actively doing something" about the problems by just fireing of 20% of the employees. (This is one of the badest habits I know of in the US - one which might crush more companies that it rescues)

      Now imagine the IT department of BMW (i.e. metal working union) where the union tries to get everybody to work no more that 37,5 hours...
      Of course this is not happening (outsource the IT and it's not metal working anymore) but this doesn't say that the unions are not trying...

      Also there are high social taxes on the salary of every employee (part is deducted directly from the salary, part is to be payed by the employer for every employee).
      Generally the social net is a good thing but it's current structure is outdated and requires too much money for too very/bad results. There is NO "quality assurance" for the social work of the department of employment. Their job is to find available jobs for unemployed people and/or help them learn and qualify for new jobs.
      And this they do very badly (and with high costs) at the moment...

      So it's like everywhere - some things are much better and some are much worse. I personally wouldn't want to work (or more important live) in the US for more than a few years - (I had my experiences in working in "the Valley", thank you).
      On the other side this is most likely true for Americans working in Europe, too...

      ... Just my ten-thousand bits ...

    27. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by Syberghost · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Anybody who thinks Germany is a bastion of freedom should try having a child by a German woman while living there, and then moving to the United States.

      There's a very good chance your children won't be allowed to come with you, even if your wife does.

    28. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by kopper187 · · Score: 1

      "It's generally a mistake to make thoughts illegal."

      And quite impossible. I can think anything thing I want without you ever knowing what I was thinking about. Though cannot be banned, restriced, or made illegal. Speech, writing, etc., are only means of sharing our thoughts and it is that which becomes restricted.

      There is no right more basic, and inalienable and though of free though. Why? Cause there is no possible way, short of brain-washing, to prevent a person from thinking about any giving topic, idea, etc.. A government might try to prevent certain ideals, but in reality, they will not succede.

      What's more frightening is the notion that some people actually beleive that any person or govenment could restrict such activity. Have we, as a human race, become that submissive to our leaders?

    29. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by kopper187 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunelaty, I cannot edit the previous post, which was submitted when I wanted to preview it. There are a few obvious mistakes, but, of course, that is why I edit first.

      Why is it that we can't edit our own posts? (or can we and I am to retarded to figure out how?)

    30. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by J'raxis · · Score: 1

      I think most of the germans (government officials included) understood that to prevent anything similar to the 3rd reich, they have to secure the peoples ability to communicate their ideas no matter if somebody likes them or not.

      Youre right, the Germans do want to prevent a Third (Fourth?) Reich from happening again. But theyve tried to do this by, um, banning Nazi-related speech or expression (as has France and many other countries, remember the Yahoo case?). Therefore I doubt that they believe that they have to secure the peoples ability to communicate their ideas no matter if somebody likes them or not after all, encryption is only going to help spread Nazi literature, not hinder it. Maybe this will show them how rediculous censorship laws are; people can already freely get Nazi literature, laws or not, now theyll be able to do so and completely evade the government.

    31. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by Jetifi · · Score: 2
      a law that tried to force ISPs to keep every piece of data their customers sent and recieved for IIRC 7 years

      You're referring to data retention laws. It's an EU-wide thing. NCIS (UK crime intel) stole a march on everyone. They want to retain records of communication not the communication itself. The supposed reasons are for establishing alibis(yeah right), etc., as this applies to GSM location data too.

      After 911 there was a proposal levelled at the EU parliament, can't find the link.

    32. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      freakn eurotrash...
      shouldn't you be killing some babies while all doped up...then kill yourself...

    33. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > That's like saying my prison has beautiful padded bars and the guards take care of
      > all my needs. All you have is that big dangerous world -- and you think that YOU'RE free! What a dope!"

      Yeah, it's really strange that Americans think they're free. That's something I've never understood. "Land of the free..." - Huh? Which freedom? The freedom to wear a gun? Great. And what else?!?

    34. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by J'raxis · · Score: 1
      Using number of demonstrations as a measure of a countrys standing makes sense, if youre only comparing countries where demonstrations are permitted. Clearly, if country A and country B both permit open demonstrations, and A only has one a month, and B has a hundred, A has a clearly less-aggrieved populace. So its completely acceptable to compare the U.S. and any other countries which allow demonstrations, and whoever comes out lowest, probably is the country with the least-upset people. If you mix in countries that outlaw public dissent, then youve just gone and messed everything up. :) Obviously theyll score lowest.

      I think you could put countries in this order, from worst to best:

      1. A country where no one is allowed to complain.
      2. A country where everyone is allowed, and does so.
      3. A country where everyone is allowed, but doesnt need to.
    35. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by tempmpi · · Score: 2

      The UN is the last organization I would use to measure my freedom. That report is so overly simplistic as to be laughable.

      You are right: The report is really simplistic, but a report that uses more complex criteria wouldn't necessarily be better.Freedom is something that is very difficult to meassure.
      But are you really sure that the US is the most free country in the world ? I do not want to say that Germany or Sweden like the US suggests is the most free country in the world, but I think it is dumb to just write things like but there's no doubt the US is the most free country in the world. If you write things like that, you should at least explain why you think that. In the US you must fear capital punishment. Nazi people can say what they think, but communists got big problems when they said what they were thinking during the McCarthy time. I wouldn't say the US is the most free country in the world, I think sweden is a really good guess from the UN.

      --
      Jan
    36. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by Get+Behind+the+Mule · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I know there are some english speaking Germans reading /. Enlighten us, please...


      Would you settle for an American who has lived in Germany for over fifteen years?

      I have to agree with an earlier poster who suggested that by and large, German citizens are better educated and far and away more interested in politics and civil rights issues than Americans are. Hate to have to say that about my countrymen, but it's true. And ultimately, it's history that's responsible for that. Germans only have to look back one generation to see a time when they abandoned all respect for freedom, and it brought on unparalleled disaster. As a result, very many Germans today have a strong sense of responsibility to history that requires their active interest in politics and civil rights. Unfortunately, I miss this sense of duty among too many people in the US.

      And another issue is simply fact that weak encryption and weak privacy policy is largely an interest of the United States, and hardly any one else shares the interest. It is widely suspected that American spooks are monitoring communications in countries like Germany, and they don't like it. Naturally, this kind of policy is precisely what they can and should do about it.

      Having said all that, I must add that there are some laws and ideas I find very weird, especially concerning freedom of speech. The most astounding of all: You can prosecuted in Germany for insulting someone! You can criticize someone as sharply as you like, but if you utter something unconstructive such as "You're an asshole," you can be taken to court.

      What's worse is that the penalty's are more severe if the insult is directed at a civil servant, such as a policeman or a bureaucrat.

      I could rant on about this for a few more pages, but I think I'll just leave it there.
    37. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by J'raxis · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Legalized Abortion ...

      Dont try to argue this with someone from the United States who has already taken an anti-abortion stance. Youll never convince them. Never. Weve had this debate raging, and these same arguments tossed about, since the Roe v. Wade court case back in the 1970s when abortion was made legal, and we still have a huge population that will not listen to you, no matter how realistic and obvious your claims are. All that matters to them is that when two cells come together suddenly you have a real, live, 100% human being, because they read it in some book somewhere and their god told them to.

      I tend to just stay away from arguing shit like this (another topic you dont want to argue with us Americans is gun rights, youll get nowhere even faster), youll get nowhere and will probably all be modded down for flamebaiting anyway, like Im probably going to be for this comment.

    38. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Counterexample: Berkeley, California


      I live near Berkeley, and I can personally attest to the fact that there's a relatively "major" demonstration at least once a month.


      These are not people who are particularly oppressed.

    39. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by J'raxis · · Score: 1

      What are they demonstrating about? They may not be oppressed in your opinion, or even in the opinion of everyone else, but they probably feel that they are oppressed. Or are they just going out and having a demonstration because theyre bored?

      Anyway, that doesnt remove the fact that we have, very frequently, actual, meaningful protests in this country, by people who actually have actual grievances to protest about. Civil rights protests, anti-war protests, the anti-WTO demonstrations, labor strikes, just to name a few. If you can find a country that doesnt have most of these protests (but would allow them if they were to happen), I think you could easily say theyve found a country with a generally happier populace.

    40. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To enlighten you a bit
      ( as obviously you seem kinda uninformed )

      Germany DID NOT ban the Nazi party for no reason.
      Actually, the gov'ment is checking wheter they should be banned or not.

      There is a kinda big discussion going at the moment.
      (do a quick google search for "V-Man Skandal" and run the results through the fish)

      Anyways, what is forbidden by the goverment are some Gestures/phrases/relicts from the third reich, such as Hitlers "Mein Kampf" or the phrase "Sieg heil!".

      And about those... well last time i checked the US Goverment pressed ebay to ban any material relating to the attack on World Trade Centers - Do you think this is any better than banning the third reich?

      Wake up, you aren't any better than we are, as well as we aren't any better than you.
      Every country has things that are good and things that are bad, its just a matter of wheter you notice them or not.

      my 2 cents

      (and no, i don't care about spell checking)

    41. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by TyFoN · · Score: 1
      I've been to Europe a couple of times in a number of countries. There is no question that Europe is a great place to visit, but there's no way I would ever live there. They have absolutely no concept of freedom.

      Where i live in Norway our goverment is a coalition of Liberals, Christian Democrats and Høyre (Right). Høyre is dominant, but this is not your normal right-wing party. Their slogan is "Frihet under ansvar", which means freedom with the responsibilities that come with that. It's a individualistic party which puts the single person in center.
      Christian Democrats are almost the same, but with a christian touch :) (They still allow female gay priests and the like). Our finance minister is gay too. Abortion is legal as long as you do it before 12 weeks. The upper limit for jail is 21 years and 10 years watch.

      I'd say we have pretty much freedom here. And now drug legalization is on the agenda.

    42. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      All that matters to them is that when two cells come together suddenly you have a real, live, 100% human being, because they read it in some book somewhere and their god told them to.

      Incidently, I'm an agnostic. Religion has nothing to do with this issue, although people (on both sides, such as yourself) use religion as a weapon.

      I believe simply because it is the Truth. Life begins at conception, because it can begin no where else. Anywhere else is totally arbitrary. (And no, you can't use cognition as a measurement, because cognition does not begin at birth).

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    43. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by swillden · · Score: 1

      Because the moderation system only works if the content of posts doesn't change. It would probably be okay, however, if you could edit your own posts that have not yet been moderated.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    44. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      Well, you've managed to master all the cliches.

      Legalized Abortion- woman's right to choose.

      There is no "right to kill your children", as much as certain people want you to believe.

      plus in case you haven't noticed we have a fucking population problem,

      Uh, no we don't. And if you haven't noticed, birth rates are going down. It's estimated the world population will stabilize around 2050 or 2100.

      who are you to tell a mother she has to keep a kid she didn't want/can't afford/will probably abuse.

      Who are you to tell parents that they can't kill their two year old because it costs too much money?

      If they don't want the kid, put it up for adoption. But it's pretty arrogant of you to presume to decide which children are better off dead.

      don't forget that, you can preech birth control/absenece all you fucking want but teenagers are not going to listen, you remeber being a teen right???

      It's irrelevent whether they listen or not. That's like saying, "You can preach all you want that teenagers aren't supposed to commit burglaries, but they're not going to listen". That doesn't mean we still don't put them in jail. Just like it's not the child's fault if a teenager gets pregnant. If she gets pregnant, she has the birth. A human life is worth more than her convenience.

      again we have a population problem, letting people who are hopelessly ill and WANT TO DIE kill themselves would help.

      THERE IS NO LAW AGAINST SUICIDE. Let me repeat that: THERE IS NO LAW AGAINST SUICIDE. However, it's a HUGE mistake to give doctors a conflict of interest between saving lives and taking lives, particularly when we already have pressures to pull the plug in cases of organ donation.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    45. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CakerX: Quite.

      On the topic of abortion, it's a woman's right to make her own decision. Not some random slashdotter/religious nut/passerby's decision, her own. If you believe it's a bad and immoral thing, avoid doing so yourself. Just because it's legal doesn't mean you _have_ to do it. If you think you'd go to hell for doing it, don't; if you think somebody else will go to hell for doing it, would you please just let them make that decision themselves?!

      One should avoid asking stupid questions about 'whether abortion is pro-freedom for the child' (ridiculous, unfeeling, dumb question!). A common reason for requiring an abortion is as a result of rape. I realise it's probably difficult for your average slashdotter to imagine that situation, but the idea of having to spend nine months pregnant followed by twenty years looking after the child of a guy who raped you is something in which most people ought to see the horrific side.

      Naturally it's not something that most coders probably spend time worrying about... but next time bear in mind that this happens, regularly; women have to make these decisions, often not due to their own negligence but due to some guy who thinks rape is somehow justified.

      In that sort of situation, the woman is left with two choices; the morning-after pill, or abortion, and as the name suggests the morning-after pill implies that she's able (calm/self-possessed enough, for one thing) to get hold of such a chemical in the next 24 to 48 hours.

      To sum up: shut up about freedom of the child. Understand the possible situations before leaping in with silly ideas.

    46. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by J'raxis · · Score: 1

      But why at conception? Are the cells that join together to create this life at that point not alive until then? Of course they are alive. So life begins earlier. But its not human life then, its only an egg or a sperm cell. The question, therefore, is when does it become a human life? I say it cannot be considered a human life until it is self-sustaining (Im not sure when this happens, but its usually at least 36 months after conception). Killing a small cluster of cells a couple days or a week or so after conception is no different than killing any other collection of cells (such as bacteria or a parasite, which we do every day).

      And yes, I admit I use religion as a weapon against the people who argue based on religion, because most religions are so damned ridiculous. They may hold some moral values (thou shalt not kill, thou shalt not steal, ) that I believe are good, but the rest of the dogma is so ridiculous and contradictory as to make the religion as a whole suspect. Ad hominem attacks dont belong in an argument based solely on logic, but theres a certain point after hearing the same, baseless arguments repeated (well, based only in something I already take as nonsense), that the only response is STFU.

      Like I said, this is a difference of opinion that is really not resolvable. You offer an explanation based on Truth while saying anything else is arbitrary, yet you offer no evidence of why your Truth is not arbitrary itself. I offer my own statements of when I believe human life most likely begins, but you could probably consider that arbitrary also, if you reject the arguments I used to arrive at it. This goes nowhere.

    47. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      But why at conception? Are the cells that join together to create this life at that point not alive until then?

      Because that's where you get a unique human with potential to grow into a cognitively unique individual, which is why a sperm cell dying is not an "abortion".

      You offer an explanation based on "Truth" while saying anything else is arbitrary, yet you offer no evidence of why your Truth is not arbitrary itself.

      Because mine is the "least arbibitary". When is a cell cluster "self sustaining"? Should morality depend on technology? And what does "self sustaining" mean? Able to feed itself?

      And yes, I admit I use religion as a weapon against the people who argue based on religion,

      But you're the only one who's mentioned religion. Whoever brings up first is the one who has sacrificed logic in the argument.

      Like I said, this is a difference of opinion that is really not resolvable.

      One could have said that about slavery back in the 1700s. "You and I are just going to have to disagree on whether black people are really human or not. If you don't like slavery, that's fine, don't own slaves. But don't presume to tell me how I should think".

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    48. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by mother_superius · · Score: 1

      wait... anarchists are Nazis?

      How drunk are you?

    49. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      > First, they aren't "moving to OSS for all government". The Bundestag will use Linux as servers (including authentication etc.), while the clients will get WinXP. Other federal institutions do pretty much what they want to.

      The initiative of the BSI suggested to replace Workstations OS as well with Open Source, though. At least one source seduced to mix this up.

      The backlash in civil rights was hard by letter of the law but comparably low by execution. Thereby enabling far more gov-fscking-you than they actually do and lowering the outcry about those laws.

      > Another incident was some guy proposing to force ISPs to block certain sites, which some ISPs promply did (including some universities), althoug the guy proposing it did not have any authority to force it.

      That is wrong. It was not related to 9/11. The guy proposing it had the right to do it and the right to enforce it by one law, but not by another. As soon as that contradiction is resolved, we will be clear (of whatever is wiped away with it, freedom or censoship). That EU stuff takes some time to ooze through to nations laws.

      But doubtless that Juergen Buessow IS a sick prick of rarely known magnitude.

      I know both systems better than a fair amount of their respective inhabitants concerning civil rights. Remember, though, them are the ones who have the right to vote. Civil rights are better in rare spots in the US, but overall money buys you anything there.

      Germany is not a paradise rights wise sometimes, cause it is moving towards the U$A.

    50. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't bother giving them their freedom because they're not going to give you yours. Not that I support a government deciding what should be banned on my behalf. I support good people bashing the shit out of the fucking fashes.

    51. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      > There is no "right to kill your children", as much as certain people want you to believe.

      Children BREATHE. You argue about a cluster of stem cells occasionally which is basically a plant of clones (call them twins if you like). If you post your address here I will send you a copy of each I aborted.

      >> plus in case you haven't noticed we have a fucking population problem,

      > Uh, no we don't. And if you haven't noticed, birth rates are going down. It's estimated the world population will stabilize around 2050 or 2100.

      What does one have to do with the other? Or are you one of those, who live in the land of freedom (e.g. California) in the world of the US President?

      There are other countries, would you mind every Chinese eat an egg for breakfast every morning?

      (If You dont know, the chickens for that will eat up the world's resources).

      > Who are you to tell parents that they can't kill their two year old because it costs too much money?

      Who talks about two year olds?

      > If they don't want the kid, put it up for adoption.

      You are not a woman and You never were pregnant.

      > It's irrelevent whether they listen or not.

      It is basically irrelevant for WOMEN if you listen, think or care. They do with their body as they see fit. Or is Your tapeworm under the protection of animals laws?

      > THERE IS NO LAW AGAINST SUICIDE.

      You clearly missed the point called REALITY. Some people need assistance in commiting suicide. They need help, not necessarily on doctors. Let alone them having conflicts. I work in a hospital and Your point is moot here.

      All those American Gunlovers preaching about suicide of others and abortion, just as if they didnt have enough people in the schools to shoot at while teen aged.

    52. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      No, self-proclaimed "anarchists" typically try and find whatever political movement is opposite from whatever is in power so they can think of themselves as "underground cool".

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    53. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      Children BREATHE.

      They don't a minute before they are born. Should abortions be allowed 1 minute before they are born?

      There are other countries, would you mind every Chinese eat an egg for breakfast every morning?

      It's called supply and demand. If there is a demand for eggs that exceed supply, prices rise. People eat them who can afford them.

      Who talks about two year olds?

      Please read the context.

      You are not a woman and You never were pregnant.

      Totally irrelevent. I don't have to be a black person or a slave owner to know slavery is wrong.

      It is basically irrelevant for WOMEN if you listen, think or care.

      For now, you are right, just as it was irrelevent from someone to believe slavery was wrong in the 17th century. That doesn't mean slavery was right, however.

      They do with their body as they see fit.

      No, they can't. Once they get pregnant, the body is jointly owned by the mother and child. That is simply biology. Since reproduction requires a host body, therefore, there is a natural right to the host body once pregnancy takes place.

      Some people need assistance in commiting suicide. They need help, not necessarily on doctors.

      Fine, if people want to create a completely different institution other than medical institutions for assisted suicide, I would be in favor. But the debate is never couched in those terms.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    54. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by mother_superius · · Score: 1

      I'll agree with the fact that many who identify with Nazis are just trying to rebel against something... but how are they anarchists?

      I get the point, even though the way it's put doesn't make much sense.

    55. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      I'll agree with the fact that many who identify with Nazis are just trying to rebel against something... but how are they anarchists?

      Anarchism doesn't necessarily only mean "a belief in no government at all".

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    56. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      On the topic of abortion, it's a woman's right to make her own decision. Not some random slashdotter/religious nut/passerby's decision, her own. If you believe it's a bad and immoral thing, avoid doing so yourself. Just because it's legal doesn't mean you _have_ to do it.

      On the topic of slavery, it's a person's right to make their own decision. Not some random person's decision, their own. If you believe it's a bad and immoral thing, avoid doing so yourself. Just because it's legal doesn't mean you _have_ to own slaves.

      If you think you'd go to hell for doing it, don't; if you think somebody else will go to hell for doing it, would you please just let them make that decision themselves?!

      Religion is totally irrelevent to the question of abortion.

      A common reason for requiring an abortion is as a result of rape.

      While I sympathize with the emotional trauma of a rape victim, it's not the child's fault that it was created through a violent act. There is clearly no easy answer to this, but I don't think the answer is killing the child.

      ...followed by twenty years looking after the child of a guy who raped you is something in which most people ought to see the horrific side.

      Adoption.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    57. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by jcr · · Score: 2

      Ironically, you are free to think anything you want -- except if it has to do with Nazism.

      Well, you can still *think* what you want there, but they'll lock you up for denying the holocaust. Some American Nazi prick found this out a few years back..

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    58. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      Actually, there is a forth option: A country where everyone is allowed, but is either culturally frowned upon, or has significant legal restrictions. The US is culturally very "agitated" -- the public is not shy about demonstrating against something, anything. I think to do a valid comparison, you have to look in-depth at what people are protesting. Heck, look at Slashdot -- the average Slashdotter is complaining because they they can't steal music. That's a far cry from complaining about 50% unemployment or food rationing or military government takeovers or something.

      As an American, I think I can safely say that Americans are probably the most spoiled rotten populace in the world. The average American (particularly the average Slashdotter) have no clue what real restrictions in freedom are all about.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    59. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by Andreas+Rueckert · · Score: 1

      German govt. is also supporting Opensource in other ways. I.e. by providing Berlios.

    60. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by aCC · · Score: 1

      [...]protected by the police, and supported by the free press.

      This is just complete bullshit. It is true that the right-wing extremists (they weren't really nazis by definition) didn't get stopped early enough by the police. But saying that the police protected them is just clearly wrong.

      Saying that the free press supported them is such a complete nonsense that you would probably get sued because of this. There was a huge outcry throughout the country, throughout every newspaper (even the more nationalists ones, if you can call them that in comparison to say Sun in Britain). Huge demonstrations started, people got sacked, the police got stricter and the press was demanding more force against the right-wing people.

      So, please stop just spreading this complete, insulting nonsense and check the facts next time.

    61. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by Moritz+Moeller+-+Her · · Score: 2

      [...]protected by the police, and supported by
      [...]the free press.

      Everything else you said was true. But some protesters in Rostock were arrested by the police. They were not protected. In fact the police chief stepped back from office because the police had not acted adaequately. (Which is understandable, they were communist trained people's police, all of this happened only two years after the wall came down).

      The free press was shocked and a mass movement with big numbers of demonstrators marched thru every major city in Germany, carrying candles in their hands. "Lichtermärsche"

      --
      Moritz
    62. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by achim · · Score: 1
      For what it's worth, when I visited some relatives in Germany about 8 years ago (?), my uncle mentioned a couple of laws that I found absolutely astounding. First, it was illegal to leave your car (and house? Can't remember) unlocked for any period of time. If you are making multiple trips, you are required to lock the car between each trip. That's just the law (don't know if it was local or what).

      It guess someone mixed up laws and insurance requirements. AFAIK there is now law requiring you to lock your car (or house) - but don't try to get money from the insurance if they can prove you didn't lock it. But that should be the same elsewhere, I think?

      BTW: Here is one of the more bothersome insurance requirements: If you get a bike insurance you must not leave your bike in front your own house but are obliged to lock it into to the cellar. As a consequence, of course, no insuranced bikes are "ever" stolen in front of anyone's house but always in front of pubs/friends houses/whatever...

    63. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by raahul_da_man · · Score: 1

      legalized euthanasia

      >Which is a bad idea, because it corrupts the >medical community. If you want to commit suicide, >go ahead and do it, but don't corrupt MY medical >care.

      YOUR medical care is already corrupt. Regardless of your steadfast deliberate ignorance, Euthanasia happens quite often in hospitals. Legalising it helps save the doctors from the legal consequeces rather than the *wink wink* solution we have now.

      I think that every person has the right to live or die as they chose, and if they cannot comit suicide unassisted they may very well need help.

      legalized softdrugs

      >Extremely arguable as to whether the produces >more freedom from the non-drug users who have to >deal with the druggies.

      I'm going to argue with you on this, even though I fully agree. I hate people who treat the drugs problem as if it can be dealt with the current methods.

      There are only two methods to pursue:

      Legalisation

      Tough enforcement - This is the method I favour. This involves among others:

      1.) Social ostracisation - treating drug users as citizens without any rights.
      2.) Execution of dealers as in Malaysia.
      3.) Compulsory univeral blood tests and firing based on positive responces.

      >legalized abortion

      >That doesn't produce all that much freedom for >the child, now does it? If a country had a law >that said you could terminate any child under >five years old at the parent's discretion, would >that make that country have more "freedom"?

      Intellectual honesty here. I myself am not in favour of abortion. I much rather prefer dodging the issue and concentrate on preventing pregnancy in the first place.

      If I was a woman however, I would state that this was my body, and my choice whether to give birth or not. Your method of claiming this is wrong, and claiming the right to dictate to people what to do with their own bodies is just wrong. I refuse to allow anyone, least of all you, the power to dictate what is right.

    64. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by achim · · Score: 1

      IMHO the question about the beginning of life is one that cannot be answered by science. Life is no scientifically defined term. It is always a matter of interpretation, based on our background.
      E.g., for jews, life begins, when the first part of the baby is visible at birth. That's why they have so lax (from our POV) laws regarding stem cell research.

    65. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Reality Master? Cock Master, more like.

    66. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      Reality Master? Cock Master, more like.

      Well, in all modesty I have to admit the Reality Master is well endowed.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    67. Re:Hmmm... Germany is looking better and better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the topic of slavery: It isn't legal. Therefore your comment is idiotic and pointless. Were it legal, then that would be a perfectly sensible comment to make.

      Of course, slavery, though I see you would prefer not to admit it, is a clear-cut issue by comparison. Skin colour is a lousy reason to differentiate between people - basically down to differences in the number of melanin granules in the keratinocytes.

      On the other hand, abortion comes down to whether or not one makes the difference between a 50 million million cell organism and a couple of cells with potential.

      You ever had a wet dream? Ever wasted a sperm? Seems irrelevant, frankly - who the hell cares about sperm? I know... it's fertilised, so it's different... but anyway.

      I'm glad you sympathise with rape victims. :)

      But as for 'adoption'...

      Pregnancy is not an easy thing. It causes irreparable strain on the body. It is not something to take lightly. Think about that rape victim who you sympathise with (remember, rape causes depression, guilt, and feelings of helplessness), coping with the attack, morning sickness, headaches, back aches, breathing problems, insomnia and permanent fatigue, together with the fact of nine months' disruption of their lives and probably large medical bills to pay, all to finance the poor unfortunate child sown by a particularly evil male.

      Pregnancy is a shock to the body. It is not something that one can merely 'let happen' over nine months.

      Some women - like me - have problems such as heart disease or high blood pressure that essentially mean that pregnancy is unlikely to be safe more than once or twice, and invariably end in Caesarian section. My mother has the same problem; her first pregnancy nearly killed her and did kill the baby. That's a lot to chance even in a loving relationship with a supportive partner...

      Probably it seems to you that all this is an overreaction, which is fine; personally, rape and its aftermath changed my opinion a little on this - though fortunately I didn't have to consider abortion. The fact is, even given all of these factors most rape victims choose against abortion anyway - but that still leaves a good percentage who choose otherwise. I feel that it should be their choice. It's not a decision to be chosen lightly, in either direction.

      In a way, though, you're right - if one follows your conclusions on the beginning of life, at least. There should be a better way. I wish there was. Abortion is moderately barbaric and often causes about as much depression as the original rape... But that better way would involve not requiring the mother to carry the child to term... whilst removing the guilt of killing. I look forward to seeing somebody invent it.

  16. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just hope the German goverment is realeasing a bug-free product. What all the people that are going to vote next time say if they realise that their goverment sponsored a security tool that missed to be secure itself?

  17. Another CD by Tomcat666 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Ministry for Security and Information Technology has another CD on their CeBIT stand - and for free (I guess "as in beer") order. I don't know if that's the same CD, but this one is about security in Internet/eMail, too.

    Here's the link from the BSI: http://www.bsi.de/presse/aktuell/sich_cd.htm.

    --
    Two Worlds - One Sun [Spirit]
  18. How about. . . by forand · · Score: 1

    While I agree that cryptography CAN be used to hide sensitive information from a corrupt government that is by far not the only use: Encryption of sensitive business information that is sent through email, financial documents you don't want someone who steals your laptop to have access to, or personal notes that you don't want others who may use your workstation to see, that is just to enumerate a few. While the press release says that the German government does not recommend their software in "security sensitive areas" but since the product is open source one could imagine that this is only the first step in createing a heir to the PGP throne, which may be in need as NAI trys to dump that section. Government conspiracies are nothing new but it seems unlikely that they would create a new program(when one exists), make it open source, and expect people to flock to it like seagulls to food.

  19. Yah, but this is the German govt. by WinPimp2K · · Score: 1

    You may recall (if not google can help you find out), that the German govt was a tad upset over the Echelon flap and the British RIPA law. The degree of regulatory control the German gubmint already has over everday life in Germany is pretty darn impressive. Perhaps someone from Germany could weigh in with an opinion?

    I'm sure if the gubmint wants to crack down on their radical right (aka neo-nazis) or outlawed religious organizations (aka COS) they won't find the nature of the encryption employed by those organizations a major problem in prosecuting the lawbreakers.

    I'm not saying they don't have their own bunch of control freaks in their gubmint over there, but they also have a certain amount of recent history in favor of encryption - simply to prevent other governments from spying on their citizens (especially their corporate citizens) Face it, they recognize they have a lot to lose from "corporate espionage" if it makes German corps less competitive.

    --

    You either believe in rational thought or you don't
    1. Re:Yah, but this is the German govt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The degree of regulatory control the German gubmint already has over everday life in Germany is pretty darn impressive.

      I can't imagine which regulations you are talking about. Germany is a democracy and of course we have rules and regulations and institutions to assure they are not being violated.

      Personally I feel less regulated, or more free (?), here in Europe than in the States.

      Please specify what you mean.

      I'm not saying they don't have their own bunch of control freaks in their gubmint over there, but they also have a certain amount of recent history in favor of encryption.

      There is an active lobby of people in our political landscape who push the protection of data privacy as a civil right. Encryption is one part of the strategy. Laws protecting the citizens privacy another.

      And yes, I also think that our government fears that their citizens and companies are being spied upon by other countries.

      BTW: If there is a way to break PGP, the NSA will be the first.
      -rolf

  20. Re:lol by Performer+Guy · · Score: 2

    That is less naive than you are foolishly cynical. But being cynical is chic I suppose, reguardless of how asinine the position you have to adopt is.

  21. Re:There are cons too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Nitpick.

    In germany, the "banned" games are really just put on an "index". These games aren't banned per se -- they can still be bought and sold. They just cannot be advertised or promoted in any way shape or form -- this includes being on visible shelf in a store.

    It's not like you can't get them, it's just that it's harder.

  22. Re:There are cons too by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Although most younger Germans are very friendly to Americans, many of the older folks are downright hostile. If you start speaking to them in English, they walk away.

    Maybe those folks didn't speak English? It is Germany, you know. :)

    To tell you the truth, I didn't encounter any of that when I was there. The people seemed really friendly. Of course, I have blond-haired blue-eyed German genes in me, but my attitude still screams "American!" from a mile away. :)

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  23. Re:Can't believe they're supporting this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bah, this is as old and stale as a Jay Leno monologue. Get some new material.

  24. Re:There are cons too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If someone walked up to you and started speaking in a language you didn't understand, what would you do? If you shrugged your shoulders and walked away would that make you a "bigot"?

  25. Liberty by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Europe has changed in 8 years. I don't know whether these laws in Germany have changed or not, though I suspect the EU mandated they be removed since they were in effect protectionist.

    That being said, sometimes a bit of regulation is a good thing. If the gov't makes rules to force businesses to prove their product work and deliver what the commercial says, is that an infringement of liberty? Right now, you can buy a $5 blender at kmart that will work - once. The stronger consumer rights in (parts of?) Europe mandates warranties that keep such scams off the market. Things cost a bit more, but they appear to be working better and for longer than the stash I bought when I lived in the States.

    Basically, more liberty for the consumer, less for the business. I believe that businesses that abuse their liberties should have those taken away, just like what happens when the citizens behave irresponsibly.

    --

    Stop the brainwash

    1. Re:Liberty by broody · · Score: 1

      Right now, you can buy a $5 blender at kmart that will work - once.

      In a word, bullshit.

      Not only will you not find any such blender at Kmart but the GSA publishes a manual that would easily get your satisfication and money back in such a case. If your getting poor quality purchases you need to RTFM about being a intellegent consumer. No government can save you from your own stupidity. Just call your local and state consumer protection offices and stop acting like a victim.

      Oh the flamebait...

      --
      ~~ What's stopping you?
    2. Re:Liberty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bull shit is two words

    3. Re:Liberty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've been trolled.

    4. Re:Liberty by broody · · Score: 1

      It depends on how one means it.

      --
      ~~ What's stopping you?
  26. Re:lol by Performer+Guy · · Score: 2

    Ha ha. Your expletives merely serve to illustrate that you should up your prozac dose.

    What's your suggestion? No governments?

    Apart from the obvious fact that more that just governments out there want to look at your data, without them well, there'd be no government, at least until someone next door marched in.

    None of this makes the German move one in the wrong direction whether or not governments are the primary source of concern. They probably shouldn't be, but we all need our bogey men I suppose.

  27. Encryption for All? Spronsored by German Govt.?! by NowIveSeenItAllGuy · · Score: 0

    Now I've seen it all!

    --
    Appended to the end of comments I post? 120 chars?!
  28. Re:There are cons too by BlueWonder · · Score: 3, Informative
    Censorship. Ironically enough, Germany has no First Amendment and you are not guaranteed free speech.

    While Germany does not have a First Amendment, it does have an "Artikel 5 Absatz 1 Grundgesetz". Here is my attempt to translate it to English:

    Everyone has the right to freely state and distribute his opinion in spoken, written or imaged form and to obtain information from publicly available sources without limit. The freedom of the press and the freedom of reporting on radio and TV are granted. There is no censonship.

  29. Bible belt book bonfires, anyone? by santeri · · Score: 1
    Guess what would happen if they were suddenly banned? Right -- they would get power from the negative attention, and suddenly would become the "cool thing" for the amateur anarchists.

    Heh, "cool thing" like teaching of evolution in schools or offering of evolutionary literature in libraries in certain Southern US states has become, I could imagine. Or showing tits in telly anywhere in the land of the "free".

    --
    ______________
    OTTERS RULE.
  30. There will probably be no back door... by danro · · Score: 1

    ...because it is in Germanys interest to strengthen the privacy of it's citizens and businesses.
    With the whole Echelon thing going on (and the EU has officially expressed it's concern about this. For example it is very concerned that the US government "leaks" sensitive info to corps in order to give them a competitive edge.)

    So in this case it seems that the european governments has a common interest with the tin foil hat community.
    There is really no reason to be paranoid, and it will probably boost encryption and security concerns in european corporations, when governments actually endorse it.
    Do not underestimate the power of this! It is clearly a Good Thing (tm)

    And if strong encryption is standard in Europa, the US will follow sooner or later...

    I work for a government agency in a small european country, and I for one welcomes this. It will make my daily evangelization a lot easier.

    --

    "First lesson," Jon said. "Stick them with the pointy end."
  31. Germany must have learned some lessons by CodeWheeney · · Score: 3, Funny

    This article made me laugh as I thought of the fact that one of the main reasons the allies in WW II were able to decript and read Enigma traffic was that the Nazis were convinced that it was unbreakable. Germany is learning a lesson from history and going with a reviewable protocol and implementation, it would seem. Then again, human factors played an important role in breaking Enigma, and I would figure similar poor use of even modern cryptography could lead folks of an intellect similar to those who broke enigma to break selected PGP, GnuPP traffic.

    That also makes me wanna quote Vizzini from the Princess Bride: "Inconceivable". I wonder if the German high command ever had that thought.

    Man Encryption -> Nazis -> Princess Bride. I didn't get enough sleep.

    --
    C8H10N4O2 | Developer > Code
    1. Re:Germany must have learned some lessons by Catmeat · · Score: 1
      It get's better. The reason the Germans adopted Enigma in the first place was they discovered that the British and French had comprehensively smashed all their codes in WW-1, they where thus keen to adopt new technology to prevent this happening again.

      It could be argued that history is actually repeating itself twice.

  32. Download yourself! by BrynM · · Score: 1

    From the translation:
    The GPA - Source texts can download you here.
    The "you" was actually a link! There I was thinking I was a sentient being, when all I am is gpa-0.5.0.tar.gz. Oh well. Can someone out there untar me?

    --
    US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    1. Re:Download yourself! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you have to unzip first...

      rh

  33. What if... by sheldon · · Score: 2

    What if I want to buy a Blender that only needs to work once, and all I have is $5? In America I have that choice, but you are saying in Europe I do not?

    That's not my definition of consumer freedom.

    1. Re:What if... by jnievele · · Score: 1

      Uh... you misunderstood him. He said that the 5$ Blender in the US will work oonly once, and then break.

      The 5$ Blender in Europe, however, will come with a warranty, meaning that it will HAVE to work for a specific time without breaking, otherwise you get your money back.

    2. Re:What if... by sheldon · · Score: 2

      "Things cost a bit more, but they appear to be working better and for longer than the stash I bought when I lived in the States."

      No, he said it would cost more than $5 in Europe, but would work better.

      My point was that in the US I have options. I can choose to spend little for disposable items, or I can spend more for durable items. In Europe I'd be screwed and would not be able to afford the luxury of a blender.

  34. Re:There are cons too by csmiller · · Score: 1

    Have you considered that it is very impolite, when abroad, to start a conversation in English, without trying the local language first? Even ifyou can only manage 'Hello, do you speak English Please?'
    If English wasn't my first language, I'd be inclined to ignore someone who started talking to me in English, or even reply 'Sprechen Du Deutsch?'

    --
    It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity. --- Albert Einstein
  35. Think of this : by aepervius · · Score: 1

    If there 200 known corruption affair and the spiegels speak of it, then our justice system and journalistic system are working good. Think of this too : the average german is as corrupt as the average austrlian as the average US-american. It is in the nature of Man to exploit cituation of power. Now how many affair of corruption is there investigated at the moment in USA ?

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:Think of this : by SerpentMage · · Score: 2

      BTW I am German (lived in Canada and the US for 20 years, but currently live in Switzerland).

      Back to the issue, No....

      Europeans tend to be more corrupt than North American's... Seriously!

      It is partially because of the social system which is a system of one party taking advantage of the other. For example in Europe you pay a ton of tax, people hide their money left right and center. In North America people tend to be pretty honest about taxes. Ok North Americans hide a few cents here and there, but nobody does outright tax evasion.

      As an example of scandal. I lived in France and people cheated on their taxes and entered lower amounts than was written on their income slips. Think about it. The government can check that SO easy and yet they cheat. And once when at a dentist the guy asked cash or invoice? I said what is the difference? Cash you get better service and we send the money to a tax haven. Invoice you get ok service. That is corruption!

      Or consider the problem of robbery in the UK? People buy and sell stolen goods and they think it is ok so long as the robbery was from a company.

      Or consider how Germans will eat all day at an all you can eat bar. Notice that they do not exist much in Germany? There is a reason. My cousin starved himself for two days so that he could sit all day at an all you can eat bar. That was when companies tried all you can eats for a short time.

      My point is that Europeans have a funny attitude to "good" behaviour. They tend to push the line and do not do what is accepted behaviour. This is also why North Americans tend to find Europeans rude.

      Not to say that North American's are perfect, they tend to be too prude and extreme in things (drinking in public, anti-smoking and fat free anything). But that is a topic for another day.

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
  36. Re:There are cons too by KieranElby · · Score: 1

    > Everyone has the right to freely state and distribute his opinion in spoken, written or imaged form and to obtain information from publicly available sources without limit. The freedom of the press and the freedom of reporting on radio and TV are granted. There is no censorship.

    However, this right seems to be overridden by other laws.

    For example, it is illegal to deny the extermination of the Jews occurred in Germany. So surely there is censorship?

    While this example is perhaps understandable, it does seem slightly odd to need to legislate against the demonstrably false opinion of a small group of ignorant and bigoted people.

  37. The Catch Is by Fefe · · Score: 1

    that the German government still listens too much to the US government and the MPAA mafia. They didn't do much against the back-to-the-stone-age "Cybercrime Convention", for example. Also, the European Patent Office is in Germany. And on no other country citizens pay as much "taxes for the poor artists" on CD-Rs, CD-R media, tapes, scanners etc. And soon on computers, too.

    Also, the taxes are quite high (not as high as Scandinavia, though).

  38. Re:Security Concerns (Echelon) & Self-Promotio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you have to be told that France and Germany, unlike G.B. do not speak English when the distributions were started? As far as I know, they still don't speak English...

  39. bullsh*t by karm13 · · Score: 1
    the onlything that might potentially happen is that your kid will get a letter from germany when it is 18, stating it has to do it's military service.
    that happened once, and as far as i know the guy (only males can be drafted) didn't have to do it, and everybody was making fun of the situation.

    there are thousands of children with german mothers and american fathers, and _of course_ they are free to live with their parents, wherever that may be. i personally knew a girl like that, moved to the us when her dad was transferred. no problem.

    --

    --
    making up good sigs is a hard thing to do.
    1. Re:bullsh*t by Syberghost · · Score: 2

      I personally know a couple having this problem. I didn't pull it out of my ass.

      Their lawyer is handling several couples in this boat.

      The fact that most of them don't have this problem doesn't mean it isn't a chronic problem. Two US Presidential administrations have been involved in this particular case.

  40. and better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because it does happen only if the parents are drug addicts or whatever...

  41. Re:There are cons too by karm13 · · Score: 2, Informative

    that is because the first -- and thus most important -- article reads "the dignity of humans is untouchable" (well, my translation :) ) and so it overrides the no censorship part.
    for example, stating that there was no holocaust is considered touching the dignity of those who were murdered in concentration camps.
    good thing.

    --

    --
    making up good sigs is a hard thing to do.
  42. euthanasia / suicide by karm13 · · Score: 1
    there is quite a difference between euthanasia and suicide.
    some people are not able to kill themselves. euthanasia usually is applied if someone who is going to die anyway preferres to die with dignity instead of slowly perishing through months of pain.
    my sister's a nurse. they actually get asked by some patiants to "let them die", but it's illegal here, so they have to watch them suffer as the patiants often can't do it themselves.

    but hey, if god lets them die slowly and painfully, they proberbly deserved it, right?

    --

    --
    making up good sigs is a hard thing to do.
  43. Re:There are cons too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Have you considered that it is very impolite, when abroad, to start a conversation in English, without trying the local language first?

    German IS FUCKING HARD, I have to admit. I can wipe away 99.9% of native speakers by just arguing anything I want in Germany. But I do know only little about that language. And I only spoke to the first guard of the first door. but behind him there were more guards so mighty that even that guard was not even able to even look at them....

    > Sprechen Du Deutsch?

    Funny enough, that is wrong.

    Just dont care, go ahead to young people in Germany and speak English. They will understand that better than any broken and accent prone German you try, except if they know b4 you are learning.

  44. Blame Nixon for that one by Grue · · Score: 1
    A lot of the mistrust of govt. in the US can be traced right back to Tricky Dick. It's a shame.

    Here's a great quote from William S. Burroughs (I believe):

    "I think that Richard Nixon will go down in history as a true folk hero, who struck a vital blow to the whole diseased concept of the revered image and gave the American virtue of irreverence and skepticism back to the people." -- William S. Burroughs, explaining how a man like George W. Bush might possibly be considered serious presidential material, in, "A Word to the Wise Guy," from The Adding Machine (1985)

    Josh

  45. $ whereis paranoia by remoford · · Score: 1

    Is there any reason we are to trust the german govt. any more than we do the NSA? I'm not sure I trust either. Not that I want to support uncooperation but I say lets keep our guard up.

    1. Re:$ whereis paranoia by jnievele · · Score: 1

      GnuPP is Open Source... so you can check its safety without having to trust any government.

      Now, if only the NSA would publish the sources of Echelon... ;-)

  46. NPD != NSDAP by harmonica · · Score: 2

    Germany DID NOT ban the Nazi party for no reason. Actually, the gov'ment is checking wheter (sic) they should be banned or not.

    The NPD - an existing right-extremist German party, which you are obviously referring to, because the German government is currently trying to have it banned - is not the same thing as the NSDAP, which was the Nazi party during the Third Reich.

    The NSDAP, on the other hand, has been forbidden. See the Verbotsgesetz.

  47. Way, way, way OT by jacrawf · · Score: 1
    When is a cell cluster "self sustaining"?

    Somewhere around the latter half of the third trimester, usually. Most babies can be born prematurely during that time and still have a somewhat reasonable chance of good health and survival if given the proper care. Aborting any time after 24 weeks of pregnancy is very chancy and only done if the woman's health is otherwise in a greater risk from the abortion not being performed than from performing it.

    I'd say self-sustaining for a baby would be the ability to remain alive when breathing air, and metabolizing nutrients orally or (in extreme cases as is sometimes necessary with humans of the more adult variety) intraveinously, and is provided warmth and care. Extremely premature babies, especially those born before being 24 weeks old, don't often stand a chance of survival outside of the womb, even with specialised medical assistence. Those born after, often do, though it must be admitted that in their adult lives they are often plagued with myriad health problems.

    Should morality depend on technology?

    Whether or not you think morality should depend on technology is immaterial. Historically, morality does depend on technology more specifically, the knowledge attained as a byproduct of scientific and technological advancement. Perhaps to a smaller or greater degree, but that's a fact.

    If you dig through the literature, you can find all kinds of stories of people being harrassed, persecuted, and even murdered for things such as catching a disease which no one understood at the time and believed was the result of being in league with the devil or some such nonsense. These days, we know what causes a vast majority of these diseases thanks to advances in medical science, and it has, thus far, had nothing to do with being in league with Satan.

    We consider sexual licentiousness a much less morally wrong or questionable thing (indeed, some even encourage it!) throughout most of the western world in large part due to the advent of birth control, a technology which allowed women to have more control of their reproductive systems.

    If you think really hard about it, I'll bet you can find even more examples. A good starting point might be James Burke's Connections television programmes that play on The Discovery Channel from time to time.

    Whoever brings up [religion] first is the one who has sacrificed logic in the argument.

    That's an overgeneralization and therefore patently false. I have known plenty of atheists and agnostics who use specious and otherwise ill-founded arguments when discussing certain topics. Likewise, I have known highly religious people who use solid and defendable facts in their arguments that don't always wholly utilize dogma, even if they make reference to it.

    Don't think that just because you aren't a religious person that you're less fallible in arguments of morality than someone who is. Anyone who has really seriously considered their position on an argument doesn't speak of 'Truth'; they speak of facts. So far, you're as full of hogwash as anyone else who has posted in this thread.

    Your username, unfortunately, does not suit you.

    And boy, oh boy is this way off topic...

  48. Re:Security Concerns (Echelon) & Self-Promotio by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

    Hi Anonymous Coward,

    >Do you have to be told that France and Germany,
    >unlike G.B. do not speak English when the
    > distributions were started?

    Yes, but I also understand that if I wanted, say, Chinese laguage on my desktop, it would be cheaper to localize PO files and contribute to, say, KDE L18N, than to create and maintain my own home-grown Linux distribution.

    If the German and French market can support a home grown distribution (support in the profit sense), the U.K. market should be capable of it too, but we see no U.K. Linux distributions. It can't be explained soley by localization problems.

  49. Re:Open Source PP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And think about the open sores penis. Ouch!