Slashdot Mirror


Driving from Alaska to Siberia

Pelerin writes "The team from the Ice Challenger project are driving from Alaska to Provodanya, in Siberia; across the 56-mile field of ice floes that each winter "joins" America and Russia. At the last minute the Russian authorities have denied the entry permit but the crew says they're on track to reach the Big Diomedes islands, which lie across the date line, thereby proving it's possible to do this. This feat is not as easy as it sounds due to the harsh Artic winter conditions, and the fact that the ice floes themselves are drifting at a pretty good clip. It takes a specially built vehicle to tackle this adventure. Geek quotient: pretty high :)" If you just want to drive to Alaska, you might go with Philip Greenspun. And if these guys don't make the trip to Russia this year, they might not get a chance. Update: 04/08 12:21 GMT by T : DrShrink adds to the story: "The two made it to Siberia, however were turned back due to not gaining permission to enter Russian territory."

182 comments

  1. Ouch by BrianGa · · Score: 3, Funny

    I hope your car's heater is working...

    1. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and melt the ice and fall into the ocean?!?

    2. Re:Ouch by LinuxInDallas · · Score: 1

      Ummm, or maybe some insulation between the cabin and the lower portion of the craft. Besides, if they are moving along through the ice they won't sit in any one place for long. Surely the ice won't melt in that amount of time.

    3. Re:Ouch by parliboy · · Score: 1
      Not the most brilliant decision:

      Hey Cletus, all this Arctic Ocean ice is makin' me cold. Let's turn up the heat a lit--

      -=SPLASH=-

      --
      "You're never ready, just less unprepared."
    4. Re:Ouch by Gulthek · · Score: 2

      Yeah it would be good if their engine is running. ;-)

    5. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I give up, you again only proved your inability to have a meaningful logical conversation.

      Talk to me when you have your head out of your fucking ass.

  2. My childhood dream by rosewood · · Score: 2

    I love roadtrips. Damn, I love roadtrips. I have always thought it would be really cool to drive from Tierra del Fuego to South Africa. (Stopping throughout Asia, Russia, Europe, etc.) However, other then the sheer amount of time it would take, this crossing area was another big obstical. Quite frankly, I think a bridge that was passable over the pacific would just be damn cool. DAMN cool!

    1. Re:My childhood dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "However, other then the sheer amount of time it would take..."

      Huh? What language are you speaking?

      Oh ... wait. Did you mean, "However, other THAN the sheer amount of time it would take...."

      No, that can't be right. You couldn't possibly be that
      NO CARRIER

    2. Re:My childhood dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite frankly, I think a bridge that was passable over the pacific would just be damn cool. DAMN cool!

      How about a tunnel, would that be ok?

  3. not as easy as it sounds? by MiTEG · · Score: 2
    This feat is not as easy as it sounds


    This doesn't sound very easy at all to me. I don't usually think of Alaska and Siberia being connected, and I'd imagine crossing the ice between them would be quite hazardous.

    --
    The future isn't what it used to be.
    1. Re:not as easy as it sounds? by GMontag · · Score: 2

      Well, he is referring to this hysteria that the north polar icecap has been reduced to slush already.

      Obviously, from the photos on the websites mentioned (except for the LATimes hysterical sky falling/cap melting article), the area where the crossig is being attempted is solid and rugged.

      As for others that expand the hysteria to all of this being caused by humans, well that is just another item for snopes.com to deal with.

    2. Re:not as easy as it sounds? by markmoss · · Score: 2

      The Bering Strait is ice-covered, but IIRC it's never really solid. The currents are too strong, so the ice keeps moving, in the form of lots of solid slabs grinding together. The trick is not to fall into the cracks between floes and not to get tipped over by the ridges, etc., raised by collisions between floes. A really big "snowmobile" would help with the first two problems, but it can't be too big or you'll run the risk of smaller floes sinking under the weight.

      Also, there's the problem of navigating on floes that are drifting at several mph. Does GPS work well up there? The worst navigation error would be to wind up on a floe drifting away from the rest.

    3. Re:not as easy as it sounds? by GMontag · · Score: 2

      Ahh, thanks for the info and hope you get modded up as informative!

      Does GPS work well up there?

      GPS will work fine, should be little problem picking up 3+ satellites (only need a 4th for altitude and you already kow you are at sea level for real) and your GPS plots you to a real location that without the errors introduced by other nav. methods.

  4. International Date Line by cscx · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...they're on track to reach the Big Diomedes islands, which lie across the date line, thereby proving it's possible to do this. This feat is not as easy as it sounds...

    I think they are overanalyzing this. To cross the International Date Line regardless of weather, one would only need a time machine...

    1. Re:International Date Line by "Zow" · · Score: 2

      Or just wait at most 24 hours.

    2. Re:International Date Line by goldspider · · Score: 4, Funny
      International Date Line... that looks suspciciously like all those $200.00 phone calls that mysteriously find their way onto my bill every month...

      I know it's offtopic, but I couldn't resist it.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
  5. Oops by cscx · · Score: 1

    The words "time machine" were supposed to link to here. Sue me for not clicking Preview :)

    1. Re:Oops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will and I'll win.
      Bitch.

  6. commuting by CmdrTaco+(editor) · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who knows, this may set a new trend for rectruiting firms in Alaska. Work in Alaska by day, live in cheap Siberia by night! On paper, a 56 mile commute doesn't seem so bad... they'd only tell you that it's over a field of ice floes after you sign the deal. Of course, this section of Alaska probably has less than a burdgeoning tech industry.

    1. Re:commuting by Zarf · · Score: 2

      Don't laugh. I lived in Alaska for many years and knew folks who went to the University of Alaska in Fairbanks by day and commuted 60 or so miles to thier ultra cheap log cabins by night. Cabins with no plumbing mind you. You'd be surprized where you'll find techies and what they'll cook up... no plumbing but they had electricity and phone somehow. I hear you can even get Cable broadband now in some of he small communities along the Al-Can highway.

      Ofcourse I'm living in Bavaria now so I don't keep up with things Alaskan as much as I should.

      --
      [signature]
  7. Similarly Across Antarctica by jacobb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I saw a TLC program a month or so ago, where they used some specialized trucks to drive accross antarctica... They had some problems with huge ravines and blown tyres, frozen motor oil, etc. etc. but they made it.
    Note: it _could_ have been the arctic, i forget now... but it's awesome all the same.

    1. Re:Similarly Across Antarctica by ScumBiker · · Score: 2

      It was the antartic. They used, IIRC, big Toyota Land Cruisers with very fat tires set to something like 4psi. They also had these really long extension bars front and back to keep the from falling into bottomless ice cracks. For the most part it looked no much worse than a simple drive to the store, at least like a drive to the store here in Wisconsin...

      It looks like a fun adventure crossing the Bering Strait. I really like the screw propulsion. I don't think those guys are going to have any real issues, other than politcal.

      --
      --- Think of it as evolution in action ---
  8. Better than dogsledding... by higuy48 · · Score: 1

    At least it's shorter than the Iditarod. In the Tri-state area (New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and more), there was a mock contest running on the local sports radio station that had tickets to sit on one of the sleds at the Iditarod for the entire race. Of course, they also promised that they would do all of the winners' work and homework and the like, so it was pretty easy to spot (I happen to be very gullible).

    --
    And now, for a sig that's a complete copout.
  9. Just think of the new commercials this will bring! by webprogrammer · · Score: 1, Funny

    Truck on snowy mountainpeak.
    Truck in middle of desert on 5,000 ft verticle igneous intrusion.
    Truck standing valiently atop glacial ice peak.
    Truck conquering lunar crater.
    ...
    Truck dodging Russian customs officials after traversing Bering Strait.

    --
    Tim ODonnell (trying to be the most
  10. Access Denied by beowulf_26 · · Score: 5, Funny

    They fail to mention the reason that the Russians denied access was because their sattelite intelligence showed that the "specially built vehicle" was going to deposit four Tanyas and an Engineer.

    --

    --I hate big sigs.
    1. Re:Access Denied by rosewood · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I am truely sorry I am banned from moderating and I wish I had some mod points

      This made me giggle like a girl

    2. Re:Access Denied by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Funny

      "They fail to mention the reason that the Russians denied access was because their sattelite intelligence showed that the "specially built vehicle" was going to deposit four Tanyas and an Engineer. "

      Well they do have a legit concern. Thanks to Edison, they could no longer legally build Tesla Coils.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  11. A crazy new invention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Two brothers in North Carolina have apparently developed a new transportation device, which allows you to move through the air. They're calling this vehicle an aeroplane, or plane for short. Initial tests look very promising, and some of the designs look good.

    I think something like this would be incredibly useful for getting from Alaska to Sibera both easily and quickly. Ice is very slippery! Perhaps one day you could even fly from major US cities such as New York to major Russian cities like Moscow. Give it a century, and these aeroplanes will be everywhere!

    1. Re:A crazy new invention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh god, so funny.

    2. Re:A crazy new invention by istartedi · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but when they pull up to the Siberian equivalent of 7-11 for a hot cup of coffee, there will be no place to park. Actually come to think of it, what with globalization and all, the Siberian equivalent of 7-11 is probably... 7-11.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    3. Re:A crazy new invention by kwishot · · Score: 2

      As if they'd get away with parking that massive vehicle they designed!
      That thing looks like it would rip up more ground than a tank or bulldozer!
      -kwishot

    4. Re:A crazy new invention by Ozymandias_KoK · · Score: 1

      What a crap idea this is. It ranks right up there with Cold Fusion in terms of absolute unbelievability. Next you'll be saying you could fly into outer space, right?

  12. Who is that in picture 7? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at the front of the visible cork screw in picture 7. Looks like a face... two eyes, eyebrows and a nose. The mouth is hidden beneath the clump of snow.

    http://www.joannavestey.com/assets/images/comice im g07.jpg

  13. "Driving"? by Wheel+Of+Fish · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If they're floating on water some of the time, are they really "driving" from Alaska to Siberia? If that thing were to navigate across a lake, I wouldn't say it's done the impossible by "driving" across the lake. If it did the whole thing while touching solid ice, it'd make more sense.

    I'm not saying that this isn't an amazing feat; on the contrary, I think the term makes it seem like what they're doing is easy, and we may all be able to do it soon enough. I'm still waiting for word on when that giant bridge is gonna go up.

    1. Re:"Driving"? by rlwhite · · Score: 1

      I wish the article had been more detailed on this point. Are they 100% planning to "drive" over water to make the trip, or is that ability just a safety precaution?

    2. Re:"Driving"? by dufke · · Score: 1

      Well, that thing doesn't look all that seaworthy, even though it floats, so I hope there's plenty of ice for them...

      --
      __
      Comment submitted. There will be a delay before you understand what you posted.
    3. Re:"Driving"? by FFFish · · Score: 2

      You'd think a hovercraft would be a better vehicle, too.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    4. Re:"Driving"? by Lord+of+the+Files · · Score: 1

      I think the idea is that if the ice breaks up beneath them they can climb back onto solid ice. Otherwise this would all be kind of silly. We've had boats that can navigate icey water for years.

      --

      God does not play dice - Einstein

      Not only does God play dice, he sometimes throws them where they

    5. Re:"Driving"? by supermoose · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, my hovercraft is full of eels. We were forced to go to plan B.

      Hey, who scratched my record?!

    6. Re:"Driving"? by armb · · Score: 2

      > You'd think a hovercraft would be a better vehicle, too.

      Looks like they're going over pretty lumpy stuff at times, could be tough on skirts. These things have tracks as well as the screw things.
      Fans would probably need deicing systems which will reduce the efficiency.

      --
      rant
  14. Amphibious vehicle? by PhotoGuy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While it looks like quite an amazing feat regardless, there are some pictures of that special vehicle floating in water; if it is amphibious, it kind of streteches the definition of "driving" across. If at times you're floating, it is sort of like taking a boat when necessary.

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  15. I can see it now ... by long_john_stewart_mi · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... They're halfway across the 'bridge': Bill: "This bridge is pretty shaky, who was the engineer of this thing?" Ted (looks at travel guide): "God." Bill: "Oh, he's good. Well then it must be safe..." *Ice shifting in background* Good luck!

    --
    ...oOOo..'(_)'..oOOo...
  16. Heh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where are the enviro types with their global warming now???

  17. Oh come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    And if these guys don't make the trip to Russia this year, they might not get a chance.

    As recent slashdot reply posts have pointed out, that whole global warming thing is natural. The L.A. Times article you link to at the end of the post makes it seem all unusual that artic life has changed significantly in the past 20 years. We all know there's nothing wrong with owning and driving cars, living in single family homes as opposed to multifamily buildings (condos, apartments) or having as many kids as we feel like. Stop linking to articles that imply people might possibly be doing something harmful to the environment and reducing our chances for long term human habitation by living as selfishly as we are. Geez.

  18. Oh my... by OgdEnigmaX · · Score: 5, Funny

    For the love of God, or Webster, or both Funk and Wagnalls, it's Arctic, not Artic.

    A little review...

    Artic

    Arctic

    Artic

    Arctic

    Sheesh.

    1. Re:Oh my... by istartedi · · Score: 2

      Oh for the love of God, or King James, or Shakespeare, it's "thou" not "you". A hundred years from now people may read "Arctic" in some old book and the teacher will inform her students that "this is the archaic spelling of Artic".

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    2. Re:Oh my... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THs rite du! N bodz knead tht foop spelznin sht! Its all ote woars! Get wiz tha tiems, luzr!

    3. Re:Oh my... by NonSequor · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I'm completely in favor of bringing back "thou." You may have noticed various attempts at pluralizing "you." These efforts are pointless as "you" is already plural. "Thou" is the singular form. At some point in the past the speakers of the English language collectively decided to be excessively polite and address everone using the more formal "you." So now we refer to a party with whom we are speaking by means of a plural pronoun, regardless of whether or not more than one person is being addressed.

      By the way, a comparison using Google as an ad hoc measure of the popularity of a spelling of a word showed "arctic" to be vastly more common than "artic." "Artic" is little more than a common misspelling of "arctic."

      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
    4. Re:Oh my... by istartedi · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm completely in favor of bringing back "thou." You may have noticed various attempts at pluralizing "you." These efforts are pointless as "you" is already plural.

      That's why I'm so glad to live in Virginia, where I can use "you" (or better yet, y') for the singular and "y'all" for a group. In more formal settings, "you all" is applied to the group. If it's a crowd full of snobs, just use "you" and assume they can deduce the meaning from context. You can also use "everybody" to refer to a group of snobs. Unless they are also grammar nazis, they will assume that "everybody" is short for "everybody in the room". Of course, if you have to speak to a room full of Yankee grammar nazis, may God have mercy on your soul. Maybe some day those Yankee bumpkins will figure out how to talk. :)

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    5. Re:Oh my... by Zemran · · Score: 1

      Artic is usually a type of vehicle (not this one), an abreviation for articulated.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    6. Re:Oh my... by JimMcCusker · · Score: 1

      My wife is a Yankee grammar nazi. "You" works just fine for everything. (Isn't context great?)

    7. Re:Oh my... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, "you" used to be more formal (both singular and plural) than plural. the plural of "thou" is "ye" (I think).
      I live in Boston, where I hear "you's". It makes me shiver.
      On the other hand, I'm a well-educated student and to me "you guys" sounds like a completely natural plural in any informal context, even when I am addressing a group of girls.
      (
      transcription of an IM:
      Me: Hi.
      Girl: Hi.
      Me: how are you?
      Girl: okay. you?
      Me: not bad. do anything intersting today?
      Girl: saw a movie with my friend amy. you?
      Me: just worked on my research paper. what did you guys see?
      Girl: A Beautiful Mind
      Me: oh? I've seen that. It won an oscar you know...
      Girl: yeah.
      Me: did you hear about some of the scandal around that --
      etc.
      etc.
      etc.
      Just note how completely natural "you guys" is to refer to a girl and her female friend. In this context [but not usually] I might also have said "what did you two see?" but it sounds less natural to me than the "simple" plural of "you guys".
      )

    8. Re:Oh my... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmm, I thought it was "y'all" for singular use, and "all y'all" for groups. :)

  19. Downplayed link at the bottom of the article by woodix · · Score: 1, Interesting
    I consider myself a political fence rider--let me just get that out there now. The latimes article at the end of the article just sucked the life out of me. It directly describes the weird discomfort of a way of life ending(?)--certainly changing. 'Figure those people have been there 2500 years. They've adapted to the worst imaginable environment on earth and suddenly within a decade, it's all different! That's just beyond my comprehension.


    I think that was the first time I ever read something and thought "Crap, it could all be CO and Methane by the time my unborn kids are old enough to drive." That's some scary shit to think at 22.


    These are the kind of environmental articles that get my attention. It's not some steven seagal-like attempt to blame it all on big business nor an impassioned plea to adopt neo-luddite policies. It offers no solution (at least it hadn't when I got to the point I could no longer read it). It just throws out the facts and leaves and unspoken challenge to do something about it.


    Who the fuck knows what's going on with our planet, but until we can figure out a way to break free of this solar system, maybe we should be taking better care of the place. Maybe that's just me though and I should be modded down for being a flamebait-throwing, karma seeking troll.


    I just wanted to go on record there.....

    1. Re:Downplayed link at the bottom of the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I live in OR, on the coast. Whale watching is a major tourist trap down here. Everyone down here has noted (including scientists) that the population of grey whales has rebounded significantly this year, and their health is MUCH better.

      Despite the rather fatalist view of the article, there is a LOT of fluctuation in nature, and really, we're only beginning to notice it now, methinks, because we're far enough along in our record keeping...

    2. Re:Downplayed link at the bottom of the article by lie+as+cliche · · Score: 1, Insightful
      I wanted to write in with the same sentiment, that it's ironic that the most significant story on /. today is a link added almost as an afterthought. Look at some of the other stories up today... A new JPG standard? A PC made out of a toolbox? The frigging ice on the planet is melting and we're going to end up washed up, for pete's sake! I know the tech-friendly demographic of people on /. who seldom see the big blue room are inclined to downplay the environmental impact tech has, but the mindset demonstrated here is simply staggering.



      That having been said, what we do about this `unspoken challenge' seems to be the nub of the matter. Personally, I'm all for tech. I just think it could be approached differently. It's much easier for media and environmentalist groups to trace the symptom of ecological devastation to tech and industry, but that's just another symptom.

      The real killer here is that there is so much tech and industry. There has to be, to fulfill society's collective demand. There wouldn't be so much demand if there weren't so much society. There's too many people, people! How much more simple could it be? People write it off as an insoluble problem so easily, and then turn around and do work like this on human cloning, conveniently forgetting and contributing the problem they'd written off as supposedly insoluble.

      Fact is, it isn't insoluble. It'll be solved, if nothing else, when we grow to the planet's limit, pushing out every species `useless' to us in the process, and face starvation in the midst of an ecological backlash. So the problem will be solved sooner or later; the only thing we get to choose is how.

      Stop breeding! Would it really be so bad, a few generations where two people get together and produce a total of one offspring? Every time a suburban couple gets together and says to one another, "How many children do you want, dear? Six? Seven?" what they're really saying is, "It doesn't matter in the grand scheme of things how many children we produce. It's a decision we can base purely on our individual preference. It'll just mean bulldozing a few more acres of rainforest somewhere, that's all. And we can do as we like with them, they do belong to mankind after all." More specious Manifest Destiny reasoning. These are the people who believe that life survives by going to the supermarket. Just because we've taken to living in large boxes and don't have to look at it doesn't mean we aren't part of the food chain. Not that there's much of one left, as we're destroying biodiversity at an alarming pace, meaning that when the climate does shift as it's doing there won't be enough species able to cope or adapt to continue a viable natural food chain. So many millions of years of natural selection, gone in just a few thousand years. But that's okay, because in the meantime we can breed without a second thought, carry our toolbox PC's to LAN parties, and hovercraft across the Northwest Passage area when it melts in a few years. I'm sorry, but if you want my participation in such massive devastation I'd need a much better bribe than that. Honestly, most of the people in our society aren't even happy with the lives they have from such destruction. Hardly seems worth it, does it?



      For an extremely insightful look at our society's mindset, and an examination of how it impacts the world, I highly recommend Ishmael by Daniel Quinn. Life-changing stuff.

    3. Re:Downplayed link at the bottom of the article by Snafoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Really. I had the opposite reaction; I found that article to be precisely the sort of maudlin self-contradictory guck that makes me question my staunch (medium-far) leftist politics.

      The article runs: Scientists are chatting up the elders of this ancient people to better understand how warm weather is destroying 2500 years of tradition; but, wait, at least on the Siberian side of things, the Soviets got there first, and all the elders that actually knew anything about hunting are all dead; the current batch has only been going at this hunting thing since the death of the Soviet Union; oh, and a few centuries back the Artic was waaay warmer than it was until recently, and the climate swing killed a bunch of guys then, too; but it's all really sad and stuff that more scientists aren't willing to forsake their precious 'facts and figures' to really *talk* to these wonderful, hardy, precious little men and women.

      *Bleech*. Yet another make-work puff-piece assignment for a journalist who apparently knows that any contradiction can make sense if you tart it up in the right sort of narrative.

      I could go on. However, I'll close with one final question: Why in God's name do Americans still refer to the Inuit as 'Eskimos'? It shows all the social sensitivity of 'negro' or 'indian'.

      --
      - undoware.ca
    4. Re:Downplayed link at the bottom of the article by Galvatron · · Score: 2
      Industrialized nations are already down to simple replacement breeding (I believe the US runs a little high due to our continued agriculture, something like 2.4 kids/couple, but it's counterbalanced by countries like Sweden and Japan that run as low as 1.8. 2.1 is considered replacement). Population is continuing to grow because live expectancy continues rising, but we are definately headed towards a steady state within the next 20 years.


      The problem is MENA and sub-Saharan Africa. The MENA countries are in some ways bigger problems, because they are by and large uppper-middle class countries (though they've slipped in recent years), so they have low infant mortality rates, but they have not experienced the drop in fertility that Asia did during its rise to industrialization. Sub-Saharan Africa is a different problem; they're still poor, so they have an abysmally low life expectancy, but they make up for it by having an absurdly high number of children (Nigeria has a fertility rate of over 8! Can you even imagine that, if the AVERAGE woman in America had 8 children, to say nothing of the statistical outliers).


      So, all you folks who want us to breed less, you're preaching to the choir. Women in industrialized countries are just too busy to want to take care of a half dozen children. As the costs for having children rises (both real money spent for things like education, and the potential income sacrificed by women staying home to look after the kids), families will choose to have fewer kids. You can see it happening in the world today, and as incomes rise, it will just keep happening.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    5. Re:Downplayed link at the bottom of the article by NoData · · Score: 1

      Stop breeding! Would it really be so bad, a few generations where two people get together and produce a total of one offspring?

      While I agree with your sentiments, the problem ain't the average Slashdot reader. Check out the Population Reference Bureau". Especially useful is their DataFinder feature. Compare stats for "developed" vs. "less-developed" world regions. The developed world has a birth rate of 11 (per 1000 people) vs. a death rate of 10. That's just about replacement breeding, with a project 4% increase by 2050. Less-developed regions, on the other hand, have a birth rate of 25 vs. a death rate of 8...giving you a 58% projected population increase by 2050! That's staggering. There's similar differences by economic class within developed regions (poorer people breeding much more than wealthier people).

    6. Re:Downplayed link at the bottom of the article by renehollan · · Score: 3, Informative
      Why in God's name do Americans still refer to the Inuit as 'Eskimos'? It shows all the social sensitivity of 'negro' or 'indian'.

      As a Canadian living (legally) in the U.S.A., I've asked a few people that when they used the term "Eskimo". I explained, that it essentially means "eater of raw meat", and while true to an extent, is regarded as an insult (heck, I like steak tartare too). Canadians have used the more politically correct term "Inuit" for quite some time now. The response I get is usually one of shock and ignorance: "Really? I didn't know that!" suggesting that any offence is unintentional. I usually explain the difference and let people chose what terms to use in the future. (I'm not about to be the political correctness police).

      --
      You could've hired me.
    7. Re:Downplayed link at the bottom of the article by Com2Kid · · Score: 2

      Of course all of that fails to explain why more and more houses / condos / apartment complexs keep on being built. . . . (not to mention quickly occupied)

      If there are no more 'new' people then why the hell are houses being torn down and apartment complexs then put up and filled to the brim so damn quickly?

    8. Re:Downplayed link at the bottom of the article by lie+as+cliche · · Score: 1
      and the climate swing killed a bunch of guys then, too;



      Could be. They disappeared. Could've been like the Vikings during the cold snap, who moved south into Europe on their neighbors, who moved in on their neghbors, who... yeah. Or like several other cultures in warmer regions, such as the Maya and, if memory serves, the Inca, who had great stone structures that are the only things that stand as a testament to the fact that they were there. Neighboring peoples refer to (I think it's the Maya) as "those who left". Not entirely discouraging to imagine of a civilization that had its problems, but was still socially cohesive enough to pick up and head somewhere else for a new kind of life when their ways didn't work.



      I do see what you mean about a puff-piece though. And like most articles it sells itself on being sensationalistic, even if this one is slyly so. I don't think the mercantilism behind the article necessarily negates the ecological situation though.



      Why in God's name do Americans still refer to the Inuit as 'Eskimos'? It shows all the social sensitivity of 'negro' or 'indian'.



      My guess? For the same reason journalists refer to someone by name, add a comma, and tell the reader who the heck this person is. Considering how often Inuit are referred to by the media, and the average level of education, `Eskimo' is something the people of this culture recognize (if as nothing but where all those Eskimo Pies come from).

    9. Re:Downplayed link at the bottom of the article by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2

      Hrm. I think I see what you mean about the article, but I didn't feel like it was that bad. It seemed like the journalist presented all the different facts without blaming anybody at all. And without making the contradiction that you describe.

      And the journalist was trying to explain why the locals sometimes distrust the scientists. Well explained. Facts were presented, not a position. It seems like a trite, sad story because what is actually happening is a sad story. The descriptions of previous climate swings killing other people is there precisely to suggest that there might not be a good solution.

      Iduno. Maybe I'm just used to college-grade maudlin guck, so professional-grade maudlin guck fools me completely. I liked the article a lot.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    10. Re:Downplayed link at the bottom of the article by lie+as+cliche · · Score: 1
      Interesting thought. It may sound harsh, but maybe if we stopped sending food to the multitudes in the "less-developed" regions they'd stop breeding so much. It wouldn't seem they're managing it themselves.



      Thanks for the data, definately worth checking out. Kind of ironic given your /. nick.

    11. Re:Downplayed link at the bottom of the article by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2

      Um, my guess is that it isn't the Mayans that disappeared. At least, they didn't disappear completely, because there are still Mayans. I've met quite a few. And some of them didn't move very far: If my recollection serves, a few thousand full blood Mayans still live in the Yucatan peninsula.

      They're getting pretty well integrated, so I'm sure Mayan genes have spread around quite a bit. You might have met Mayan descendants in the US.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    12. Re:Downplayed link at the bottom of the article by cpeterso · · Score: 2


      The other posters were just talking about people breeding. In the USA, I've read that most population increase is from people immigrating from other countries.

    13. Re:Downplayed link at the bottom of the article by lie+as+cliche · · Score: 1

      Ah, then I did misremember who it was. Thanks.

    14. Re:Downplayed link at the bottom of the article by Fiver-rah · · Score: 1
      The problem is MENA and sub-Saharan Africa.

      I don't dispute that birth rates in less developed countries is higher. However, if I choose to have one child, think about the resources this child will consume. Computers, rides to school, movies, music, ballet class. Education. My time; my spouse's time. 15+ years of educators' time. All the books I can find. Fresh food shipped from Brazil. Thousands of dollars of health care. Any opportunity that I can give this child, I will.

      Now think about the resources a child born in Uganda will consume. Okay, really think about it. If its lucky, food on a regular basis. If its lucky, a set of clothing that fits, and a couple shots.

      The comment that we here in the developed world should think about our breeding is not without merit. It's true that other places have more kids. But they're using so much less. Now, I can't do a whole lot about women in Nigeria who have, on average, eight kids.

      But I can recognize that if I choose to have kids here, I'm placing a bigger burden on the planet with my one than all eight of that woman's.

      --
      Read Bujold. Free (as in
    15. Re:Downplayed link at the bottom of the article by Ozymandias_KoK · · Score: 1

      ...but they're using so much less... What you are failing to realize is that eventually that poor Ugandan child (multiplied rather a lot of course, plus all the other countries where it will have analogues) will eventually get pissed off about the lack of resources they have. Thanks to export of Western culture, they will hear of this wonderful place where the streets are made of gold, nobody has to work, and everything is given to you. They'll either come to where they think that place is and in all likelihood, be unable to find that world, or simply hate from afar. They'll be pissed off and resentful. More folks who don't like the west and would be more than happy to have it pulled down from it's high horse. It's not simply resource consumption where this causes a problem. Marx may have been off on some things, but it doesn't take a genius to see that widening gaps between haves and have nots causes a problem.

    16. Re:Downplayed link at the bottom of the article by psaltes · · Score: 3, Informative

      > I explained, that it essentially means "eater of raw meat".

      This probably isn't true though so many people believe it that it might as well be. It in reality probably describes something to do with the lacing of a snowshoe, and is from the Algonquin language Montagnais rather than an Abenake dialect as was originally believed.

      See more or less any online dictionary for more information, also some more detail at:

      here

      If you haven't dealt with Algonquin languages before, the 'Goddard' mentioned there is essentially the most reknown Algonquinist there is. If there is anyone who is able to correctly speak on things as difficult as dead Algonquin languages it is he.

      Of course since the word is perceived as offensive already, there is little else we can do but treat it as offensive. Words such as Inuit are perhaps more accurate, anyways.

      It is very rare that a native american tribe actually (historically) has a name for itself; hence so many of them are named by other tribes, resulting in persistant (sometimes true) rumors about the insulting nature of these names. (Most that are still around have of course adopted names from some source by now)

    17. Re:Downplayed link at the bottom of the article by Phanatic1a · · Score: 2

      It shows all the social sensitivity of 'negro' or 'indian'.


      You mean, like the "American Indian Movement"?

      "Native American" is a catch-all term invented by the US Department of the Interior that lumps together peoples as disparate as Inuit, Samoans, Nez Perce, Yuma, and Seneca. "Indian" is a *more* specific term, as it generally doesn't include various Polynesians and Micronesians and folks from tribes outside the continental US.

      I've neber known an Indian who was offended by the term "Indian"; those who take offense to that term seem mostly to be well-meaning but self-important staunch white leftists who wouldn't know the difference between a Susquehanna and an Apache. "Native American" is generally to be avoided, but what they'd really rather for you to call them is their real name.

    18. Re:Downplayed link at the bottom of the article by e5z8652 · · Score: 1

      Well, "Inuit" isn't exactly proper for all groups either (see the AFN site). The Alaskan "Natives who are not Aleuts or American Indians" would be Alutiiq, Inupiaq or Yupik. Not Inuit. Why would you want to impose the word Inuit on them when that's not what they call their own people?

      --

      null sig

    19. Re:Downplayed link at the bottom of the article by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      Doesn't explain the number of white middle class'ers who keep on mowing over everything. . . . (literaly and figurativly)

      The pop numbers may say they are all immigrants, but I see most of the new development going up in white middle class neighborhoods. . . .

      Not to mention all the f*cking condos!

    20. Re:Downplayed link at the bottom of the article by renehollan · · Score: 2

      Thanks for the correction and references. "Eskimo" as "eater of raw meat" was taught as fact to school children in 1970s Quebec. I should probably have verified my sources better.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    21. Re:Downplayed link at the bottom of the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I spent much of the second grade in a BIA school in Unalakleet (Southeast corner of NOrton Sound). The kids there referred to themselves as Eskimo when speaking English. I believe that their grandparents referred to them as Inupiat, though I may be miss-remembering. That was more than 30 years ago. The folks I know today who still live out in the villages call themselves Eskimo; I don't hear anyone speaking anything but English today. I have never before heard any suggestion that this preferred name was insulting.
      Why in God's name do Americans still refer to the Inuit as 'Eskimos'? It shows all the social sensitivity of 'negro' or 'indian'.
      Today we usually refer to Black people as Black, but that's very recent. Respectable Black people called themselves Negro, and exepcted other races to do the same, until 20 to 30 years ago, and I have met older folks who still prefer to be called Negro. I have never heard that meant as an insult, though I have heard the young and foolish take it that way. The version nigger, on the other hand, has always been taken (and meant) as an insult. I have only known a few Indians, and they all called themselves Indians if they weren't specifying a tribe. You'd think that if they found that insulting, they'd have mentioned it to me.

      As a previous poster pointed out, Inuit aren't found in the parts of Alaska where I have lived. Perhaps they've allowed their traditions to be subverted by liberal pseudo-intellectuals. The folks here in Alaska aren't so eager to take offence as you are suggesting.

    22. Re:Downplayed link at the bottom of the article by psaltes · · Score: 2

      Oh I don't think it's really your fault or under your control that you made that mistake - as the link I gave suggests near the bottom of it, more or less all of Canada switched to near official use of 'inuit' because of the common belief (and pressure from Inuit political groups) that 'eskimo' did mean 'eater of raw meat'. I don't imagine you're alone among Canadians, and most Americans who know anything about the word probably believe the same.

      Language myths like these have a strange way of spreading very easily, and being totally unkillable once they do. There is something very believable about strange claims about little known languages.

    23. Re:Downplayed link at the bottom of the article by sudog · · Score: 1

      It's more likened to "eater of human flesh". Calling an inuit an Eskimo is like calling him a dirty cannibal. Eskimo is a term that caught on because the northern-most Indians were afraid of the Inuit and their bizarre practices because they thought Inuit ate Indians.

      Inuit hate that it's caught on to the rest of the world.

  20. It's been done; and road trips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    disclaimer: I live in Alaska

    I don't live close to while they're traveling, but there's plenty of informal knowledge around about many Alaska Natives who would travel between Big and Little Diomede Island (not "Big Diomede Islands" - Big is theirs; little is ours) to visit family even during the height of the cold war.

    Preferred method of transport was snowmobile or boat. It was frowned upon, but nobody is exactly around to enforce it.

    But if you want a road trip, here you go:

    http://www.millenniumadventure.com - drove to 130+ countries in a bright yellow Mercedes!

    http://www.markandmichelle.com/russia.htm - Another Siberian trip

    There's two more that I'm aware of - a drive from London to New York, sponsored by Opel, first to drive across Siberia in Winter, and another one where they drove across Siberia in a funky old English sports car. Links anyone?

    -Matt

    1. Re:It's been done; and road trips by Junta · · Score: 2

      About the first one, they never crossed the Beiring Strait, and judging by their route and the car they took, they put the thing on boat or plane to cross the Pacific Ocean (didn't read that part, but look at the route..) Certainly nothing to be scoffed at, I couldn't stand to go that far in a car (though this is basically a rich guy taking a 3 year road trip, at least it isn't *too* pampered.... except the fact he can afford to go off for three years and do this...)

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    2. Re:It's been done; and road trips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those two links were just improbable (in the "Ignoble" sense) road trips involving significant travel through Siberia for our readers' amusement. I didn't mean to imply that they had crossed the Bering Straight.

      I do believe that the "London to New York" gang did succeed, but I haven't been able to find the link. I recall it took quite a few Google whacks to find it the first time I saw it.

      -Matt

  21. Taking the Tunnel. by Alien54 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    They could always wait and take the Bering Straight Tunnel when it is completed.

    After the completion of the English Channel Tunnel, this is now seen to be at least in the realm of possibility.

    Heck, there has been some discussion on this already.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:Taking the Tunnel. by Galvatron · · Score: 2

      It looks like the group linked to wants the Bering Straights tunnel to be rail-only, so no driving after all. In fact, it looks like it's intended for commercial traffic, not for the general public at all. Good thing too, because being rail-only, you'd have to get Amtrak running trains up there, which put bluntly, ain't gonna happen. They're actually seeking congressional approval to shut down juat about all their lines except the Northeast corridor from Boston to Philadelphia.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    2. Re:Taking the Tunnel. by danielrose · · Score: 1

      Why only Amtrak? Are you discounting Russian trains and transport?

      --
      i hate pansy republicans
    3. Re:Taking the Tunnel. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool! Now the Russians get cheap Marlboros and Levis, and we get a steady stream of teenage prostitutes hitchhiking their way to Hollywood (which is already overrun with Russian vice).

    4. Re:Taking the Tunnel. by knabar · · Score: 1
      This web site (http://www.arctic.net/~snnr/tunnel/index.html) must be one of the most outdated ones I have seen recently. It is referring in several places to a presentation to be held in July 1997...

      But then again, the plan started in 1906, so what are 5 years without update?

    5. Re:Taking the Tunnel. by Ozymandias_KoK · · Score: 1

      Things must be going very well for them, not being able to stop the work to update some silly site. :)

  22. What the hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After three years of virtual ignorage, suddenly Taco is posting. The new wife must not be working out as well as he thought it would.

    1. Re:What the hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      It's just some dipshit who created an account to look like CmdrTaco, look at his user id. CmdrTaco (editor).

  23. Re:Take the Slashdot Pledge! by sinserve · · Score: 0

    Cute, but what does it have to do with the story? Here is an on-topic version:


    1) I will not club seals in our way to Serbia.
    2) I will not fart in the van, again.
    3) I will not call the iniut tribes "ice niggers".
    4) I will not tent a boner, during my sleep.
    5) I will tell no more southpark jokes.
    6) I will not try to anchor the arctic, and stop it from drifting away from Canada.
    7) Wayne Gretzky does not live in the arctic, I will stop yelling his name.
    8) Tux is best left in his habitat, I will not try to touch him.
    9) No, that Dolphin sex FAQ does not apply to whales.
    10) Dude, where is my car?


    --

  24. They had better get a move on .... by bigsteve@dstc · · Score: 1

    ... before global warming melts all of the ice.

    Just think, they could set a world record for driving from New York to Paris that would last
    for a thousand years or so.

    1. Re:They had better get a move on .... by BigBadVoodooDaddy · · Score: 1
      ... before global warming melts all of the ice.

      that should be Global Coincidence

      frankly, it's not just a coincidence... it's an incredible coincidence

  25. what was I thinking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course Taco wouldn't post to his own site. And if he did, it would be in all caps, bold and auto-5'd. And misspelled. And irrelevant.

  26. Re:Take the Slashdot Pledge! by rehannan · · Score: 1
    8) Tux is best left in his habitat, I will not try to touch him.
    Sorry to burst your bubble, but Tux lives in the antarctic.
  27. The jerks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does every country have to be a jerk about this srot of thing? A frigging guy wants to fly his baloon over the country and they deny him. A guy wants to see if he can get from alaska to russia and they deny him. I mean christ! What is their problem? If the US wants to spy on them they have better ways of doing so than by sending some freaking millionaire in his baloon or some team of researchers who just want to arrive at the coast, turn around and come back.

    1. Re:The jerks... by MyNameIsFred · · Score: 2, Informative
      Sometimes these countries have legitimate concerns.

      For example, the media played up the "Balloon Spy" thing, but the Chinese had other concerns. Specifically, their air traffic control system is extremely limited. Large areas of China are not covered by radar. To prevent accidents, they carefully schedule flights. The Chinese were concerned that allowing an uncontrolled balloon to fly through their air routes was too dangerous.

      For the Russians, I could guess that they don't want to have the responsiblity for rescuing these guys if something goes wrong. Sure its easy to say it's the driver's neck, and that they could sign some release. But who wants the bad PR. I can see it now, weeping relatives on CNN begging the Russians for assistance. The Russians holding up a signed release. Guess who wins.

      From a beaurcrat's point of view, these decisions are easy -- piss off a handful of people or risk world condemnation.

    2. Re:The jerks... by yuri_kiryanov · · Score: 1

      Did they ask for visa? Sometimes Americans or British do not understand they need a visa in Russia

    3. Re:The jerks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did, were denied, but decided to go anyway.

    4. Re:The jerks... by Ozymandias_KoK · · Score: 1

      If you really think the Russians (government, that is!) care too much about some foreigners getting themselves killed in what any fool would recognize is a potentially dangerous situation, you are forgetting how little they cared about quite a few of their own citizens who died in some freezing water not too long ago...

  28. oops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One the last road trips mentioned was sponsored by Ford's European operations; not Opel. oops!

    -Matt

  29. The Great Race by GrouchoMarx · · Score: 3, Funny

    Jack Lemmon and Tony Curtis already did this, as I recall. Well, they floated across. :-)

    --

    --GrouchoMarx
    Card-carrying member of the EFF, FSF, and ACLU. Are you?

  30. There's more thann just Old and New in the world by sasha328 · · Score: 2

    I couldn't copy the text because it is done in Flash, but I was disappointed to see this narrow view of our planet postulated in "Old World" = Europe, and "New World"= The Americas. What has happened to Africa and Australia? Would they be old or new or really really old (as in Australia, which is probably the oldest continent).
    Also, they want to establish an Overland Race around the world from New York to London, wouldn't it be more challenging to go New York to, say Johannesburg?

  31. ...Am I sleeping?? by dmouritsendk · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I now this is completely redundant to this story and everything. But i just had to post a comment, somewhere....

    I JUST SAW A M$ BANNER ON /.

    Pinch me somebody.. please..

  32. Driving from America to Asia by Peale · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I must say, I think that's totally cool. I can't believe they denied the entry permit, however.

    It's a shame they couldn't make a permanant roadway (I know, I know, it's 56 miles, but it'd still be cool.

    1. Re:Driving from America to Asia by WetCat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, making a permanent roadway will benefit only US and Chukotka, because
      Chukotka itself has no reliable connections (no hard-surface roads, no railroads) with Russia
      mainland.

    2. Re:Driving from America to Asia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is currently no roadway to Nome, the closest settled point on our mainland (and no road to our state capital of Juneau, for that matter). Not to mention from the mainland to Little Diomede Island. On the Russian side, the closest thing you have is the Trans-Siberian Railway, but that's in Vladivostok - not too close.

      So a 56-mile permanent roadway would be unconnected with the rest of the road systems on either side, and all in all would be pretty useless. :)

      -Matt

    3. Re:Driving from America to Asia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To connect to where? There isn't a road system on either side.

    4. Re:Driving from America to Asia by mpe · · Score: 2

      Actually, making a permanent roadway will benefit only US and Chukotka, because Chukotka itself has no reliable connections (no hard-surface roads, no railroads) with Russia mainland.

      Except there is no way you can build a permenant roadway over pack ice. The only way of doing it is by all terrain vehicles.

  33. Canadian Winters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    In Canada the winters have been changing pretty drastically in the past decade.

    I'm 18 years old. I've lived above and below the Arctic Circle, mostly in the Maritimes.

    All of the winters in Canada have been following strange patterns. A really harsh, cold, brutal winter, with a cool summer, followed by a warm winter with lots of freezing rain, followed by a boiling summer, then back to the brutal winter.

    This didn't happen before. I've also noticed much more drastic weather changes then before; especially out East. Normally the Atlantic ocean is a stabilizer, keeping temperatures normal. When I was in St. John's a couple of years ago we had a day in the summer where it was -10(C, for all you Americans) in the morning, and +25 in the afternoon. This was Newfoundland, right on the ocean. Truly terrifying.

    I don't think that the issue here any more is who/ what caused this crazy weather; it might just be the way the world works, it might be man-made global warming. What we have to do now is plan for it; the ice melting creates a lot more problems then the guys in Ottawa or Washington suspect.

    It changes the weather, so the farmers, it causes animals to change their migratory patterns (anyone else in Canada notice the geese leaving at wierd times now?), which causes the hunting and fishing industries to change, which cause the food industries and all of their subsidaries to compensate, etc. etc.

    In a couple of years things will never be the same.

    1. Re:Canadian Winters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I've also noticed much more drastic weather changes then before..."

      Canadian education must be worse than I thought. You apparently don't know the difference between "then" and "than". Here's a quick lesson:

      THEN : used to assert an order or chronology. Example:

      1) "Mary ate a donut, and THEN ate Roger's ferret."

      THAN : used to form a comparison or denote an exception. Examples:

      1) "Igor elected to kill his neighbor with a pipe wrench, rather THAN a chainsaw."

      2) "Other THAN an addiction to cheesy-poofs, the nun had no bad habits."

      Not obvious enough? The single case for the use of the word "then" should make correct usage obvious, even to a moose with a head injury.

      Repeat after me, "if it has nothing to do with time or sequence, the required word is 'THAN'".

      You're welcome.

    2. Re:Canadian Winters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously, your sarcasm over a typo must have been triggered by a deep (and well-founded) inferiority complex over your own US education.

    3. Re:Canadian Winters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was stationed at Tin City, Alaska, and it would seem to me that this COULD be possible, if they could negotiate the "pressure ridges" - I suppose one of those remote airplanes or drones would be handy to probe ahead and select a path.... Assuming the distance is 56 miles, they would really have to travel more then 250 miles as they would find they would have a lot of doubling back to do if they made a wrong turn and got trapped.

  34. vehicle not that special by yzquxnet · · Score: 1

    A snocat that floats, big whoop. Here the snowland there are zillions of them running around grooming trails for skiers and snowmobiliers. Other than some add ons it seems pretty OEM to me.

  35. Except Greenspun spammed my ass! by sudog · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    There was a message I sent to him with a tailored from: address--I do this regularly in order to track down where my emails are being harvested from. And lo! The email address I used to send perfectly legitimate, polite inquiries to the guy is suddenly spammed with a load of email? What, is he whoring out his private address box/inbox now? Or is this guy--a self-described computer-savvy individual, going to claim he's been hacked? Give me a break.

    Why would I want to travel anywhere with someone like that? Lame!

    1. Re:Except Greenspun spammed my ass! by nucal · · Score: 1

      I'd rather hook up with Eve Andersson in Guatemala.

  36. its still not as cool as any of the new macs by Dokushoka · · Score: 1

    But it does look kind of fun =)

  37. Re:Just think of the new commercials this will bri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God I hate those ads. Why don't they tell us about the car's features, instead of photoshopped images of a car on top of Mt. Shuksun.

  38. Faggots on bikes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There they go, a pack of faggots in stretch pants whooshing down the walkway. The sign says "no bikes" but the gay parade ignores the signs, running down walkers right and left. Where are they going? What's the hurry? Are they going to a Nambla meeting or a Circle jerk? Why are they dressed in black and yellow spandex? Perhaps it's a code, like the petite little ear rings they wear. When you see the "pack" swarm into a public restroom, don't you worry for your childeren? Something must be done. We must cure these "gay" bicylists of their perversions BY ANY MEANS POSSIBLE. Won't you do your part? This weekend, vow to "take down" the fag bicylists in your community. Enlist your neighbor, and YOUR KIDS WILL THANK YOU.

  39. Things for you to do today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Stick your head in an oven.
    2. Turn it on.

  40. Junkyard Wars next project? by jackb_guppy · · Score: 1

    The machine looks like a thing from Junkyard Wars... Just alot prettier.

    It better be for 200,000 pounds.

  41. Myth of the "Ice Bridge" and Migration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...the 56-mile field of ice floes that each winter "joins" America and Russia."

    Gee, if it happens now, then it must've happened every winter, for years, going back.

    That means anyone could've walked to North America anytime in the past 1,000,000 years without having to wait for an ice age.

    Which is why several of the earliest signs of man in North and South America pre-date the ice age by several millenia....

    Have Canoe, Will Continent Hop

  42. You Can't Believe?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I think MORE western tourists and other folks need to be denied permit to enter Russia, so that they maybe look at how THEIR countries deal with us. I am a Russian studiing in Canada. I can SEE the U.S. from my Residence's window. Yet, I can't go there. Guess why. No, I don't want to settle there. I just want to hike around the Finger Lakes in NY. You guys are so used to the fact that you can go anywhere while not letting all those "inferior" people into your countries! This has to come to an end. The more publicity such refusals receive, the better.

    1. Re:You Can't Believe?! by npietraniec · · Score: 1

      We're an entire country of immigrants... seesh.

  43. All long tunnels are rail-only by coyote-san · · Score: 3, Informative

    All long tunnels are rail-only. There are several problems with letting people operate their own vehicles in long tunnels:

    1) you have to vent the exhaust fumes. You can use forced air on short tunnels under rivers, and vent tunnels under mountains, but the Bering Strait tunnel is far too long for that.

    2) individually operated vehicles mean that you'll have accidents. It's difficult to send emergency crews 20 miles into a tunnel.

    3) individually operated vehicles mean that you'll have idiots who run out of gas, or have mechanical breakdowns, etc.

    Customs is also much easier with rail systems on either side. Each country can handle customs at the rail station on its own side, there's never any concern about traffic backing up into the tunnel if you only have a limited number of electric trains that shuttle back and forth through the tunnel. With vehicular traffic, you would really need to have each country operate its customs offices in the other country, with a clear shot on the other side.

    That's a standard practice already, e.g., US Customs clears passengers at many Canadian airports instead of clearing them stateside, but it's always preferable to operate customs on your own territory due to jurisdictional issues.

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
    1. Re:All long tunnels are rail-only by mark_lybarger · · Score: 2

      i definately agree that having controlled transportation through a long tunnel has many advantage, but..:

      1. are you saying that exhaust fumes from the controlled transportation (CT) will not need to be exhausted or vented?

      2/3. CT vehicles can also have accidents and mechanical problems. the frequency isn't as great, but the impact when it happens is devistating. when a plane headed for houston then on to Phoenix is grounded for repairs for 2 hours,lots of people are impacted.

      i've taken a train acroos from canada to the US, and the customs isn't any easier than at the drive up window. when you arrive at customs with 300 other people arriveing at the same time, people have to wait. and the train doesn't re-leave untill all people are checked again.

  44. You don't need a special vehicle... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, just wait until summer, and go in a fuckin' boat.

  45. Driving Mr. Greenspun by Mike626 · · Score: 1, Funny

    You know, it might be my general mood just now, but after reading Greenspun's job offer, I am outraged.

    He'll be flying around in a quarter million dollar airplane, while some schmoe schleps around driving his books, bicycles and dog bed for thousands of miles all summer long? Not only that, but when he's around, his serf will sleep in a tent outside?

    Sounds like a great way to spend the summer. What a jackass.

    --
    http//injoke.org -- Culling The Interesting
    1. Re:Driving Mr. Greenspun by f0rthguy · · Score: 1

      Indeed. As I posted to a list:

      Still looking after a forced departure from aD?

      Have you lost all self-respect? Are you in need of a regular insults?
      Get your kicks from listening to the crazed rantings of a pompous asshole?
      Do you envy Francis from "Malcolm in the Middle"?

      Well, fret not young masochist, as your ship has come in.

      http://philip.greenspun.com/flying/alaska-job

      Highlights include:
      - Sitting hours on end in plush comfort behind the wheel of a Winnebago
      - Hooking up and unhooking RV
      - Ridding the RV of human waste products (cleaning out the shit)
      - Filling RV with gasoline, oil, and LP gas
      - Comfy bed on the ground next to the RV
      - Philip's companionship

      Those with any dignity at all need not apply.

      [If you know Philip like some of us know Philip, this really wasn't too much of a surprise.]

    2. Re:Driving Mr. Greenspun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You will notice that Greenspun says nothing about paying the person to drive the RV ... "all expenses" will be covered and "a cash bonus" may be given on completion. Yeah, right. Like what was given to Greenspun's employees and investors: nothing.

      Why isn't this scam artist in prison?

    3. Re:Driving Mr. Greenspun by cheekymonkey_68 · · Score: 2

      Loosen up dude. You're just jealous that he's 38 and retired ,and able to go swanning off in his own airplane.

      Some of us would be happy to just get a cheap holiday somewhere scenic, away from our wife, children and computers for a while, and rest our tired eyes away from our CRT focused life.

      The thought of making that journey sounds cool, you could start you're own web blog about it and really brush up on your photography.

      I think having to drive the SUV for a free holiday is a pretty good trade off.

      It sure sounds like a good way to spend the summer to me.

      Well I've applied and I'm sure he'll get thousands more applicants.

    4. Re:Driving Mr. Greenspun by Pathetic+Coward · · Score: 1

      Some of us would be happy to just get a cheap holiday

      Cheap is right. You won't be paid. And it will hardly be a holiday: you'll be working 18 hours a day and will have no chance to do this "web log" and "photography" you envision. Do you think that this is for your benefit?

      Amazing. Even now, Greenspun continues to find suckers.

    5. Re:Driving Mr. Greenspun by sudog · · Score: 1

      Well, the guy did sell one of my email addresses. So however rich he thinks he is, he's obviously "not rich enough."

    6. Re:Driving Mr. Greenspun by sudog · · Score: 1

      Try this: It's a winnebago. You ever drive a house on wheels? It's not an SUV, buddy and you can't take it offroading.

  46. That isn't driving. by thufir · · Score: 1

    It is a boat with wheels. In many pictures they are floating in water. Definatly nothing special except maybe because it is a first.

  47. Cold...Damn Cold by NickisGod.com · · Score: 1

    This oughta' do wonders for the ole' karma, but...

    I think I'll stick to living here in South Florida, thank you very much.

    -1

  48. Who will be there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you really think that the Russians are watching for trucks to drive across the ocean? I bet there isn't going to be a customs official that would see them. they probably will have to look pretty hard to find anybody on either side.

  49. You must be Canadian by evilninja · · Score: 1

    "Eskimo" is a term that is generally only offensive to native (Inuit) Canadians. Elsewhere, it is a (generally) non-offensice term used to encompass both the Aleut and Inuit people.

  50. Read the article a couple of times, warm when? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As far as I can tell, the only mention of warming was after the last ice age, 10,000 years ago.
    And it was more like it went from really freakin cold (so cold that there was the land bridge from receding waters)
    - to close to what we have today.
    That means the culture is at least that old - pretty old for humans.
    The other place warmth is mentioned is that after the Soviets were gone there was no more heat.
    I assume that means manufactured industrial type, not a climate change.

  51. Best way to do it by epseps · · Score: 5, Informative

    It would be expensive and dangerous. You would need a REAL SUV with a winch, extra fuel and would need permission and armed escorts through Peru (some of the land is occupied by Sendera Luminoso) and then you may have to go through some sketchy areas occupied by the FARC in Columbia. (the FARC would love to kidnap an adventurous traveler, but they rarely kill foreigners...but you might get caught in the crossfire of the Columbian army and the FARC). Also no real roads exist in the Putomayo district of Columbia nor are they really "roads" in the tradtional sense in Northern Columbia or southern Panama (also FARC and ELN hangouts). Once you went from Panama to Mexico hopefully the worst problems you would have would be repairs, gas and bribes. Through these countries you might have to register the car with the police upon both entering and exiting the country and have proof of insureance that is valid in all of them ($$$).

    After that it would be smoothe sailing from I-5 in San Diego up to (I think) Homer Alaska...asside from the 'migra' agents searching the hell out of your vehicle. Once you get to Homer, you'd have problems. The Provedeniya route is limited, the best bet would be to sell the car in Alaska and head by boat to Dutch Harbor. There you could try booking a bearth on a Russian cargo ship to Madagan Siberia or Vladivostok. Try to buy a Toyota HiLux (the Taliban drove them, and they are the staple of every third world country with a different diffinition of the word "road"). The best would be to get to Magadan because then you could drive to Yakutsk but be prepared to get special permission from the Russians to enter in Madagan...a bribe might succeed). Last I heard, Yakutsk to Irkutsk was still drivable in the winter but sketchy during the summer (permafrost...drop by the museum of permafrost studies in Yakutsk and enjoy "milk tar" with the locals) from there, you would probably be prevented by the army from driving further (but who would not want to see Lake Baikal in Irkutsk?) by this time you would have already accumalated enough 'macho points' and a massive credit card debt so you could just continue on to Moscow with the Trans-Siberian railroad or you might want to pay through the nose and get your HiLux put on the train to let you off in Ekaterinburg and drive through there to the Black Sea. When there you would have the tough choice of proceeding through Russia through Georgia (civil war with muslim fundies in the north), Armenia (occasional war with Azerbaijan) and Turkey (war with PKK) or go the long way of Ukraine (bribes), Romania (Bribes), Bulgaria (beatings and bribes) and Turkey (shitty drivers...no bribes).

    Istanbul is cool, hang out there for a while at a youth hostel, make Australian girls lust after you.

    From there your only choice is to drive through Syria. Hope you can get the car through and hope you don't have a Jewish sounding name or have been to Isreal (they will call it 'Occupied Palestine'..use that term to not get your car confiscated).

    You Cannot drive from Syria to Lebanon to Isreal, so your best bet is to go through Jordan (use 'Occupied Palestine' as the term again to get some tea. The term for bribe is 'Baksheesh' offer it by asking if there is any way that they can help you).

    Going from Jordan to Isreal should be doable. Be prepared to answer alot of questions from the IDF, explain to them that you are a nutball with alot of money or so into debt that you hope to be killed in Africa.

    Isreal to Egypt...probably doable, depending on the politics at the time. But from Egypt it will be tricky.

    You may be able to cross into the Sudan from Egypt at Wadi Halfa but the Sudan is kinda pissed at the US right now (marry a Swiss person in Istanbul if you can...they have an excellent dental plan as well) and US citizens are forbidden from entering Libya by the US state department (I hear the Libyans don't stamp your passport but also don't like the fact that you have been in Isreal) This is where your trip would most likely stop without getting on a plane. If you could cross in the Sudan you would be stopped by the military as you got near the South, where they have been having a civil war for about 20 years and what little roads exist are probably unpassable. In Libya you would have to drive at night through the Sahara along routes used by illigal immigrant smugglers from Niger....Lots of bandits, and the desert might kill you before you got to Niamy or Mali.

    You also couldn't get around The Democratic Republic of Congo, due to poor roads and "Africa's World War" going on. It is also unlikely that you would be able to get past Rwanda, Burundi and Uganda as well.

    Not to worry though , going to Isreal would have stopped you from getting this far to begin with.

    I pulled my hair out planning this trip a few years ago, but I was not going to drive, just try to see how far I could get without using an airplane while seeing as much land as possible.

    Plan a short version of the trip and you'll have a blast. Traveling is great.

    1. Re:Best way to do it by ykiwi · · Score: 1

      check out horizonsunlimited.com. motorcyclists have been doing this for years.

      been done before many times.

      cheers from panama heading south...

  52. Re:Take the Slashdot Pledge! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One correction. This is Slashdot, so #10 would be "Dude, warez my car?"

  53. build a bridge by Barbarian · · Score: 2

    Why not build a bridge? There's a 8 mile bridge over icy waters in Canada

    http://www.confederationbridge.com/en/accueil/inde x.htm

  54. Hmm.. by supermoose · · Score: 1
    It takes a specially built vehicle to tackle this adventure.

    As well as a really, really big snow shovel and a 50,000-pound bag of salt.

    "Hey Jim, got the drive cleared yet?"
    "$&%^$!!!!"
    "OK, I'll just wait here then."

  55. I'm sure this has already been done. by tezmc · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure if this has been posted by anyone else yet, but I'm certain this has already been done.

    There was a TV programme on a few years back here in the UK in which, IIRC, a group of celebs known for being the rugged expedition type, along with explorers and such drove from London to New York in several Landrovers.

    They got permission to drive through the service tunnel of the channel tunnel, through Europe, Russia, Siberia, across the ice, through alaska and then down across the states to New York.

    I think one of the celebs was Peter Duncan... He of Duncan dares fame.

    Dammit, just have to remember what it was called now.

    1. Re:I'm sure this has already been done. by Deaths+Hand · · Score: 1

      The T.V. programme that you were referring to was called "The Big Trip" and was shown on ITV.

  56. Arctic Ice Melting may be a problem by billstewart · · Score: 2

    There's been a lot of press lately about not only Antarctic ice shelf collapses but also Arctic ice melting. It's causing serious problems for seals, polar bears that eat seals, and Inuit and Siberians who hunt seals and whales, as well as for anybody sailing up there.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  57. Exclusionary Flash-only sites suck mightily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can posters please label exclusionary Flash-only
    sites as such, so we can avoid them like the
    plague they are.

  58. Re:"thee"s and "thou"s by Savage+Henry+Matisse · · Score: 2

    The difference between "thou" and "you" has nothing to do with number. It's all about familiarity: "thou" is the familiar form (used with pals, family and subordinates) and "you" is the formal form (used with strangers, superiors, etc.) It's exactly like the difference between "tu" and "usted." Both "thou" and "you" can function as singular or plural, although in a group situation you'll tend to use the more formal form (this goes for contintental Spanish as well as early modern English)-- probably erring on the side of safety (wouldn't want the serfs thinking you like 'em.)

    --
    Much Love,
    "S"HM
    *****
    (I refuse to spellcheck out of contempt for your belief system)
  59. Re:Driving across Africa is quite common, actually by mks113 · · Score: 2, Informative
    But I'd be hesitant to do it with an Israel stamp in my passport.

    See This Site for one example, he mentions several others he met doing the same thing.

    A couple other notes: A "Hi-Lux" is basically a 4-runner. The Land Cruiser is the flagship and the real workhorse.

    One option that I've heard of that works for entering internationally blacklisted countries is to have two passports. Most of the people I've know have had duel citizenship, but others have just managed to get a second passport "somehow". Usually that is only effective if you plan to reenter the "somewhat friendly" country after your visit to the "unfriendly" country. I knew this to be used from Zimbabwe to South Africa back when ZA was the censured country. The main passport only showed entry and exit to Zimbabwe. The "reserve" passport had lots of border crossings from Zimbabwe to South Africa.

  60. oh yeah.. by epseps · · Score: 1

    I looked at the map and for some reason I forgot about Ethiopia. Still I bet the roads suck to high hell for most of the route.

    The HiLux is a 4 runner? hmmm...When I was in Haiti this December (got out right before the attempted coup) I was amazed at the Hilux...traveling the pothole system that passes for highways there (all dirt, except from PAP to SDQ) Stacked with people and livestock...Uncomfortable but amazing.

  61. Failing to plan... by shine · · Score: 0

    is planning to fail. Gots to talk to those Ruskies first.

    ~S

  62. Re:The billion dollar brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Harry Palmer movie (not my favorite HP movie)
    culminated in a Texan industrialist
    attempting to invade Russian with a
    bunch of troops across a big ice floe.
    (I started to think it was the bering strait,
    but then remembered more detail)
    Maybe the Russians bitterly remember that
    flick. Fist raised in the air "PAAALLLMEEERRR!!"

  63. Already done... and thousands of years ago at that by freest · · Score: 1

    It's the same bering straight that people have been crossing with sleds... It's said that native americans may have migrated from asia over the bering straight thousands of years ago (http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/chavez/hinojosa/chican o125/map_1.html) So why build a 200000 worth of lunar lander?

  64. alaska to siberia by frisc · · Score: 0

    I've lived in Alaska for 30 years and wintered over in Barrow, Alaska. The natives snowmachine anywhere and everywhere. Visiting relatives in Russia is commonplace. In whiteouts. Without compasses. Figure.

  65. no one will see this by now, but... by darkwhite · · Score: 2

    It's Provideniya, not provodanya.

    afaik all those places on the Russian shore of the Bering strait primarily serve as Air Force bases.

    --

    [an error occurred while processing this directive]
  66. get some perspective by Preposterous+Coward · · Score: 2
    Study a little history and/or geology. Climate changes. Humans have adapted their lifestyles to these changing climates for a long time. Realizing that the climate is changing, and that this will have cultural impacts, isn't by itself reason to freak out.

    Look, I live in Seattle -- a city which, just 10,000 years ago, was buried under a sheet of ice three thousand feet thick.

    Or consider Greenland, which is quite inhospitable today but was inhabited by the Vikings in the unusually warm period about a thousand years ago. Then things started to get colder again, and all the (relatively few by modern standards) people who were living there died off. They went through almost the exact reverse of the situation you are describing, but the cause of that climate change was certainly not the actions of humans.

    Note that I'm not making any statements about the degree to which global warming is occurring, how much humans are contributing to it, or how much we should do about it. All I'm saying is that when you say "that's [i.e. climate change on the order of a decade or two] beyond my comprehension," you ought to realize that this is hardly the first time such things have occurred and will certainly not be the last. The planet is a dynamic system, and changes are the norm, not the exception.

    --

    "Biped! Good cranial development. Evidently considerable human ancestry."
  67. Re:Take the Slashdot Pledge! by Kirkoff · · Score: 2

    Well, how about Pokey The Penguin Then? They're after my Arctic Circle Candy!!

    --Josh

    --
    There are exactly 42,935,718 letter sized sheets in a square mile.
  68. Hmph... by Dirk+Pitt · · Score: 2
    The Land Cruiser is the flagship and the real workhorse

    I'd say that the Land Rover is the real workhorse of OR driving. Entering SA with a Japanese car? Pish.

    (teasing all my friends who own _very_ well made Toyota SUVs ;-) )

    DP
    97 Disco
    94 D90

  69. should be illegal. by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 2

    They could be used to commit crimes.

    If you're not against the airlines, you're with the terrorists.

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.