Slashdot Mirror


Reduce, Reuse, Recycle

An Anonymous Coward writes "Out in Oakland, CA a group is taking donated PC's and breathing new life into them with Linux. They turn around and donate the computers to schools, build POVRAY render farms (with MOSIX) and generally promote Linux."

209 comments

  1. Microsoft are u listening !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope IBM or microsoft don't file any anti-law suit against them !!

    1. Re:Microsoft are u listening !!! by Jippy_ · · Score: 1
      I hope IBM or microsoft don't file any anti-law suit against them !!

      For what? When did it become illegal to take computer parts from two broken machines and put them together to make one working machine? If they were keeping copies of Windows on the machine without also handing over the licence to that copy of Windows, then there would be a problem.

      I kind of like this. Microsoft sued all those people from non-profit organizations that donated used computers (with Windows on them) because of licensing issues. Now people are saying "Fine.. If Microsoft is going to give me trouble about this, I'll just bootfuck Windows and install something else". Excellent. Suing those people wasn't the smartest idea, eh Microsoft?

      =-Jippy

    2. Re:Microsoft are u listening !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft is welcome to try we could use another slashdotting

  2. Cool program by NoahsMyBro · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's a pretty neat program - reuses the old tech, trains the unskilled volunteers in an up-and-coming technology (Linux), AND produces more Linux-skilled workers, increasing Linux's mindshare.

    Sounds good to me.

    1. Re:Cool program by EvilAlien · · Score: 2
      "ACCRC is a self-sustaining, self-funded organization that trains unemployed, unskilled volunteer workers how to build and maintain Linux computers"

      Why does that scare me? A non-profit training organization that takes the unemployed (lots of people are unemployed, this isn't the scary part) and unskilled people in the art of system administration? Damn. How about unemployed and skilled volunteers? There has to be more too this, otherwise I don't see how the program could churn out admins ready to work in a production enterprise environment. We've got enough junior hacks in the industry who think they know how to run Linux properly... "Hey! I know Lunix, hire me to run yer servors and computors, I am Linuxconf Certified"... *shudder*

      Maybe its a <sarcasm>cleverly hidden school for 31337 hAx0rs who will run a flotilla of platforms useful for waves of DDoS attacks</sarcasm>

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    2. Re:Cool program by chez69 · · Score: 0

      So nobody is allowed to learn a new skill?

      becomming a good system admin requires experience more then anything. They can't get a job doing it without having some training. Or would you prefer they sit on their ass an collect unemploymnent checks?

      --
      PHP is the solution of choice for relaying mysql errors to web users.
    3. Re:Cool program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well look at http://www.freegeek.org/ for portland's one and only recycling experiment.

  3. But... by adam613 · · Score: 1, Troll

    This is probably illegal if any of the donated computers had Windoze.

    1. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not if you bring the original OEM CD along with the computer. Anyways, who cares about breaking stupid legalese EULAs? Nobody reads them, you have to hire an expensive lawyer to understand them and clicking a button to continue an install for a program you already bought is not a valid contract in any court I've watched on TV ;) It'll probably be squashed soundly in court if it ever gets there. People should not bow down to FUD. If they do, they deserve being fucked.

    2. Re:But... by Hyperfrog · · Score: 2, Interesting
      What an absolute crock of shit!
      Warn customers that acquiring the PC "naked" exposes them to the possibility of unwittingly purchasing pirated software. Explain the risks: technical troubles, upgrade problems, viruses and the law. Politely decline to expose your buyers or their businesses to such troubles.
      1: Warn customers - Yes, do warn them about buying into a monopoly.
      2: "Naked" - So? You need an OS.. it's your business what you do with the hardware you purchased.
      3: "exposes them to the possibility of unwittingly purchasing pirated software": Which has more pirates... those for linux or windows?
      4: Technical troubles: I'm not even going to comment, after all this is MICROSOFT saying this.
      5: Upgrade problems *cough* *splutter*
      6: Viruses. I really can't believe microsoft, #1 willing (outlook?) distributer of viruses is saying this
      7: ..and the law (says the company who calls down the law upon its customers and who's EULA is unreadable by anyone but a barister)
      8: I'll translate the last bit: Tell them to buy windows or we'll stop supplying you.

      Three cheers to this group and their efforts to promote Linux. I hope they convert many people to the Power that is Linux. This article has impressed me so much that I'm going to donate towards this scheme: It's a hell of a lot better than paying the annual M$ tax. Cheer's to an organisation that is 100% Microsoft Free

      --
      Move faster
    3. Re:But... by Kierthos · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In a word, bullshit.

      If I take a computer I own, format the hard drive with an electromagnet, and donate it to a public school with a free copy of a Linux distro, what the screaming Hell(tm) does it matter that it once had Windows on it?

      1) I am not giving them Windows. I am giving them the hardware.
      2) I am not encouraging them to steal a copy of Windows in any way, shape or form.
      3) Microsoft does not own the computer. They never did. It was my computer, therefore it's entirely my choice what to do with it.

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    4. Re:But... by rongage · · Score: 1

      If I take a computer I own, format the hard drive with an electromagnet, and donate it to a public school with a free copy of a Linux distro, what the screaming Hell(tm) does it matter that it once had Windows on it?

      Well, with any modern hard drive, if you format it with an electro-magnet, you may as well throw the drive into the landfill. You see, there is one platter on the drive that contains the "servo track". This servo track is how the read/write heads know where on the disk they are. Without a servo track, the drive will not be able to seek, and you won't be able to read or write to it. Erasing with an electro-magnet is indiscriminate enough to erase the servo track along with the data tracks.

      --
      Ron Gage - Westland, MI
    5. Re:But... by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      You know what I meant. Most school-teachers will not have the know-how to try and recover the information on the hard-drive, so it really doesn't matter how I reformat the silly thing, assuming I don't reduce it to utter uselessness. I just prefer the electromagnet comment.

      Still, my point stands. If Windows is no longer the OS on the computer, cannot be recovered from the hard-drive, and another OS (insert random Linux distro) has been installed, Microsoft can yell and scream all it wants, but it is not losing any money on this.

      At worst, they are just not gaining any more money. One copy of Windows was sold on the computer. That copy no longer exists. If the donor wants another copy of Windows he can either use a back-up of the OS (which, gee, should be allowed by Fair Use) or he can buy another copy.

      Microsoft's greed should not preclude the noble gesture that is getting computers to schools that need them.

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    6. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > This is probably illegal [slashdot.org] if any of the donated computers had Windoze.

      Not illegal to take a PC with Windows installed on it and replace the Windows install with a Linux (or whatever) install. The originally-installed Windows OS can't be used on any other PC, true enough (wierd enough), but that doesn't have any effects on the legality of replacing a Windows install with something else.

    7. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, dude, the drive heads _are_ electromagnets.

    8. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually I'm a volunteer at ACCRC, we used military spec magnetic tape degaussers to wipe all equipment that comes in. (to protect the privacy of those who donate hardware)

    9. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good idea, although if the donations include IDE drives, that will most likely cause all kinds of nastiness. Modern drives aren't really designed to be re-lowlevel-formatted.

    10. Re:But... by phliar · · Score: 2
      This is probably illegal if any of the donated computers had Windoze.
      Only if you believe Bill's FUD.

      --
      Unlimited growth == Cancer.
  4. Impressive by agm · · Score: 2, Funny

    It takes a fair bit to impress me, but this article does. "ACCRC is a self-sustaining, self-funded organization that trains unemployed, unskilled volunteer workers how to build and maintain Linux computers" They must get their money from somewhere to be able to afford a 38,000 square foot complex. Good on them.

    1. Re:Impressive by jbloggs · · Score: 0

      the land was big, but cheap. it's not exactly in a high-profile area.

    2. Re:Impressive by kent_eh · · Score: 1

      The question that pops into my mind is:
      Are there any other operations like this around (and if not, why not), and where do I go to voulenteer?

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    3. Re:Impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We get or funds from the sale of scrap. We also end up with more monitors than we have working computers. We sell the surplus after making our placements for the month.

      Also we are in a very funky 38,000 square foot building (its cheap)

    4. Re:Impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You wouldn't want to be driving in this part of town in your brand new Mercedes.

    5. Re:Impressive by GnuAge · · Score: 1

      I work with a Bay Area group called
      Infomed that fixes up donated Pentium class computers and sends them
      to Cuba, where they are distributed to medical clinics, allowing health care
      workers to access medical databases, journal abstracts, data on supplies and services, email, etc. And unlike the ACCRC we will even pick
      up working machines and won't charge you $5.

      You can contact us at dave@cubasolidarity.net to arrange a pick up in the
      South Bay or biow@cubasolidarity.net if you are located in the East Bay,
      North Bay or San Francisco.

      We can also use help fixing up the donated machines, if you are so inclined.
      However, unlike ACCRC, we don't put an operating system on the machines; we just make sure
      the boxes are posting (with sufficient RAM, drives and occasionally NICs
      and modems) and that the hard drives are formatted to protect the donors'
      privacy.

    6. Re:Impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What infomed doesn't tell you is that accrc was a primary donor until infomed tried to restrict accrc's right to free speech.

      Sorry dave but you support fascists.

  5. 850 MHz by MrBlack · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Linux cluster is 30 Athlon 850MHz PCs and up to 350 recently refurbished PCs that are Pentium 166 or better
    I sure hope the 850 MHz Athlons weren't donated by anyone....until this week my main home machine has been an PII 300. If the Athlons were rescued from landfill that makes me feel _really_ inadequate.

    1. Re:850 MHz by rapid+prototype · · Score: 1

      okay try running distributed.net or anything which needs integer performance. use hammers for nails, screwdrivers for screws.

      of course, a G4 eats through integers even faster than an athlon...

      -rp

  6. FUD, FUD, FUD by bildstorm · · Score: 1

    That's assuming we believed any of that FUD.

    Maybe we should start buying the Wal-Mart OS-free machines. I'd love to see Microsoft try to take Wal-Mart on over that.

    --
    The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it. - G.B. Shaw
    1. Re:FUD, FUD, FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe we should start buying the Wal-Mart OS-free machines. I'd love to see Microsoft try to take Wal-Mart on over that.

      I bought two of 'em, and for the price they aren't bad. They must be enjoying some success with them. They started out offering 5 models. Now they're offering 12.

  7. Site of actual organization by DeadSea · · Score: 5, Informative
    Here is a link directly to the The Alameda County Computer Resource Center who are the folks that are doing the recycling. From their website, they charge $5 to take most computers. Their website has some broken links on the front page. You can probably figure out how to get to their donate page, but the link there is broken. It looks like you would have to bring the computer in to them, they don't have an address posted where you can mail it. (Too bad for us slashdot folks who aren't in CA).

    There site navigation is totally borked so here are all the links on the site I could find:
    Home
    About
    Donations
    Internships
    Press

    1. Re:Site of actual organization by Miles · · Score: 1

      Well, you can find the map and address details at: http://www.accrc.org/p2.htm

      The address details are copied below.

      The ACCRC is located at 5725 International BLVD. Building D.
      Oakland, CA 94621

      Mailing Address:
      P.O. Box 2167
      Oakland CA 94621

    2. Re:Site of actual organization by mateub · · Score: 3, Informative
      DeadSea wrote:

      Too bad for us slashdot folks who aren't in CA

      Well, there are other such efforts in the world. In Portland, OR, there is a group called FreeGeek that does the same thing.

      There was an earlier Slashdot story that mentioned some other places to donate PC's: this one

      adéu,
      Mateu

      --
      "And we're happy here, but we live in fear, we've seen a lot of temples crumble..." - Concrete Blonde
    3. Re:Site of actual organization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is a link directly to the The Alameda County Computer Resource Center [accrc.org] who are the folks that are doing the recycling.

      I think it's here


    4. Re:Site of actual organization by 56ker · · Score: 2

      This reminds me of a group at my local university that was collecting old PCs for free, then selling them to students.

  8. Re:850 MHz - inadequate by MrBlack · · Score: 5, Funny

    as does my inability to close italics properly :)

  9. Looking to the future... by Handpaper · · Score: 1

    I think one of the greatest benefits of this program will be to get Linux into schools - showing a whole generation that there are alternatives to M$.

    1. Re:Looking to the future... by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      ...are alternatives to M$.

      Yeah there is Apple. All my schools from KG to grade 10 used Apples with System5/6/7.

      I think unless you put a flashy gui on Linux no 6 yr old is going to want to use it. If anything it will push kids away from computers.

      If you are going to put a flashy pretty gui on Linux you might as well use MacOS [or winXP] anyways!

      The only benefit to Linux for schools is that it is free. However, being free and shitty is not a good selling point.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:Looking to the future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to being expensive and shitty? *cough* *apple* *cough*

    3. Re:Looking to the future... by suicidal · · Score: 1

      Oh, that's great thinking. Teach the kids to use systems that are practically useless because "it's easier". Lets make sure we don't move into Algebra or Trig later because that might take some effort. So what if it will benefit them, it might be hard.

      Requiring effort, and being shitty, are two VERY different things. Having a knowledge of multiple diverse operating environments is a GOOD thing.

      P.S. Schools teach more than just 6 year olds...

    4. Re:Looking to the future... by Khaed · · Score: 1

      I think unless you put a flashy gui on Linux no 6 yr old is going to want to use it. If anything it will push kids away from computers.

      You are wrong. I was around 6, and my school had old green-and-black Apple IIs(I think). Two years later, my dad bought a computer. DOS only.
      I had no problem using it. It ran some games, I could type out stuff and print it, and never crashed.
      KDE, Gnome, etc are all GUIs. They may not(by default, anyway) be as "flashy" as XP and Mac OS.

    5. Re:Looking to the future... by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Teach the kids to use systems that are practically useless because "it's easier".

      /me stepping on ladder to reach your high horse.

      Well first off who said Windows or MacOS are useless? I do all of my x86 and GBA development on a WinXP box with zero troubles at all [in fact I use GNU tools!].

      The problem is alot of the merits of Linux are meaningless to kids [even teenagers e.g. script kiddies]. I mean will an 8 yr old kid care much if the OS is pre-emptively multi-tasking math blaster?

      Like I said, if someone made a gui for Linux worth while [I hear KDE is fairly well done] then I'd say "all the more reason to go". But there are still tons of problems

      1. You have to re-train teachers how to use Linux now.
      2. Alot of educational software runs in either MacOS or Win32
      3. Kids will be without computers for at least a few weeks while the highly trained CSA's rebuild the networks.

      Sure in a perfect world you'd see little kids wearing ThinkGeek instead of Tommy Hillfiger but thats just not likely to happen.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    6. Re:Looking to the future... by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Same here but its not like you had todo any work. You put the disk in a boot the computer up. [Try teaching a kid how to use VIC-20 commands to load from tape.. not fun at first].

      The point is Linux is not a "boot game off disk" OS. Unless you make a GUI you're gonna have a kid at

      user@room117: play game
      file not found
      user@room117: play game now
      file not found
      user@room117: I want my mommy!
      etc...

      I say a group should put together a school edition of Linux. That would rock. e.g. get a word processor, paint program, KDE, etc... put it in an EASY to install distro and voila schools can now *begin* to think about switching over.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    7. Re:Looking to the future... by Steveftoth · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I never would to have learned how to use a computer without a flashy gui!
      --- begin rant ---
      Back when I was a kid the Commadore 64 used a text prompt, and we liked it! I loaded program off cassette tapes that broke and took 20 minutes to load a program, and we liked it!

      The thing I don't like about gui's is that they don't teach you how to think! They only show you one way of doing things and if a program can't do something then you have to go and find another program that will do it for you. We shouldn't be teaching kids how to use windows, we should be teaching them to compute, to explore all the different things that computers can do instead of forsing them down a strict path of Windows domination.

      Teach kids how to change things they don't like, you can't do this with windows, but with open source you can. And if you think that kids can't program, go and talk to all the 10-16 year olds that have started their own projects.
      --- end rant ---

    8. Re:Looking to the future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well.

      1) Using Linux will save schools money on software.
      2) Using Linux will save schools on hardware.
      3) Using Linux will save schools on support costs.

      I know this because I have worked with several school districts. Most use Novell Netware for file/print services and Microsoft solutions for internet stuff. I could go into detail on how they would be saving money but I'll just say this:

      My customers are averaging 250 days of continuous, non-managed uptime. Ever heard of the Maytag man? That's me.

    9. Re:Looking to the future... by Steveftoth · · Score: 2

      BTW, where are all these teachers that actually know how to use computers? All the teachers I know either don't use them, or just use them to check their friggin email. They don't actually teach teachers anymore, they just throw them some technology and hope that they learn how to use it. The problem is that for every dollar spent BUYING software or hardware, about ten cents is spent on training.

      Also, have you ever heard that most teachers (at least in america) get insane amounts of time off? Maybe they could use that time to train these people.

      The real problem isn't what computer system we use in the schools, it's that we just don't care about education anymore. Maybe America never did, but here in the land of the free, I think that the only reason we think we are free is because we are too stupid to realize how trapped and shackled we truly are.

    10. Re:Looking to the future... by Steveftoth · · Score: 2

      What's so intutive about a GUI? How is a flashing button any better then a command prompt? I'll tell you, the difference is that a GUI LIMITS YOUR OPTIONS.

      What if instead of a flashing cursor, you printed out a small list of commands before every prompt?

      cd ls fortune netscape
      user@localhost / >

      Repeat after me, computers are not intutive, computers are not intutive. They are not easy to use and they are hard and intimidating to beginners no matter what. The difference between a CLI and a GUI is that a GUI limits your options to those on the screen so that you always see what you have done and what oyu can do next ( at least in a GOOD GUI ). A CLI throws all that away to speed up the process of working if you actually know what you want to do next.

      Children are very smart, they just need some sort of stimulation and feedback. Unlike adults, they are more likley to play with things just to play. While adults get fustrated when things don't go the way that they think that they should.

      Only geeks are willing to spend the time playing with these infernal machines to get them to do what they want.

    11. Re:Looking to the future... by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      I don't know if you recall grade school but at ours you had "computer time" each week. You get around 45 mins a week to play any educational game you want.

      The purpose of those 45 mins was to get used to using a computer [Apple II then later on it was Mac IIsi] while doing something school related.

      Just learning to be l33t and a h4x0r doesn't count as an "educational event".

      While I agree that kids are smart they could make better use of their time by using an interface that is easy to pick up. That and kids can type alot slower than they can click.

      It may seem that using a console is a good way to get them to learn how to type its not the be-all of the world. I'd rather have the kids learn their times tables on a computer than sit at a prompt and figure out what a "path" is. Its a matter of using the time wisely.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    12. Re:Looking to the future... by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      1) Using Linux will save schools money on software.

      True, but switching won't be free.

      2) Using Linux will save schools on hardware.

      How so? As long as they stop buying Dell computers that are pre-enabled with WinXP they won't lose any money. I mean the cost of my PC was not influenced by the cost of windows simply because a box of parts doesn't require an OS :-)

      3) Using Linux will save schools on support costs.

      This is complete and utter BS. Sure the OS may be stable and not go down but the # of calls trying to figure out cryptic prompts and error messages will tripple.

      Not only that but loads of educational software exists for Win32 and MacOS already. Just installing linux is not enough for a school. You need encyclopedias, atlas programs, desktop editing tools, video editing tools, etc, etc, etc...

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  10. Many groups doing this by Gibbys+Box+of+Trix · · Score: 3, Informative

    I thought this sounded familiar... seems there are many groups working in this worthwhile way. Google directory links a few here.

    If you don't live in the Oakland area there may be a group near you who you can either volunteer to help, or donate those old PCs gathering dust in the attic.

    If you can't find anyone near you, why not go it alone? I installed Linux on an old box and gave it to the neighbours kid, with a bashed up old 15" monitor from the local tip.

    1. Re:Many groups doing this by FreeMath · · Score: 2

      If you're in the Atlanta area, Check out FreeBytes.

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
    2. Re:Many groups doing this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Say mah nig, I's be hella straight from Oaktown. Fo' reals doo. Mah pahtnuhz be straight chillin, puffin' a phat spliff an' gaffelin' dem' dumbass white boyz.

      We's responsible fo' MC Hammer nigga! We gots da' bomb ass bitches, ho's an' tricks! Mah bitches use to get me some chicken an' waffles from Roscoe's but they's straight up closed down doo.

      Aww heww yeeah! Peace.

  11. OH GOD NO! by GutBomb · · Score: 4, Funny

    Incidentally, Johnathan and Alan show that nothing is too old or useless for us. if you have anything strange or odd that you don't know what to do with. Give it to us.

    I hope my wife doesn't see this site. she will try to donate my he-man figures.

    1. Re:OH GOD NO! by Guido69 · · Score: 1

      I hope MY wife doesn't see this. She will probably try to donate ME.

      --
      - If we aren't supposed to eat animals, then why are they made out of meat? - Steven Wright
  12. What an excellent idea... by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 5, Funny
    Kudos to everyone involved. But hey:

    "We recently turned down donations of an aircraft carrier and a 727", says executive director James Burgett. "But we are ready to handle a 727 the next time one is offered."

    C'mon, guys...we were this close to having the Linux Air Force!

    "Roger, Blue Leader, this is Blue 6...I'm taking another pass at Redmond." "Stay on target, Blue 6, stay on target..."

    1. Re:What an excellent idea... by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 3, Funny

      How about:

      "Roger, RedHat Leader, this is RedHat 7.3...I'm taking another pass at Redmond." "Stay on target, RedHat 7.3, stay on target..."

    2. Re:What an excellent idea... by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 1

      Dang! I bow to you, sir...that's definitely more betterish (tm).

    3. Re:What an excellent idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ooh ooh! Can I be Group Captain Mandrake?

      :)

    4. Re:What an excellent idea... by sharkey · · Score: 3, Funny

      You worry about those lawyers, I'LL worry about the MBR.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    5. Re:What an excellent idea... by Fat+Casper · · Score: 2
      Negative, Ghostrider; the pattern is full. If you want another run, get in at the end of the queue.

      --
      I spent a year in Iraq looking for WMD and all I found was this lousy sig.
  13. Re:Bahahaha! - Supply & Demand by saphena · · Score: 1

    Who knows? Maybe the law of supply and demand will triumph once again and, given over-supply of Linux people with implicit shortfall of Windows newbies, demand for Linux will increase!

  14. I used to work for them by kipple · · Score: 5, Interesting

    before I had to go back to italy to serve the army. It was an excellent opportunity to learn, I was taking care with other people of the beowulf cluster - and the rendering speed was impressing, around 12 seconds to render the 'famous' pvm x-vase when the cluster was around 60 nodes.
    the interesting part was that there were little optimization on the network and on the linux - it was a standard redhat 6.2 kernel, and the computers were just put on a shelf, connected, booted with a floppy that got the image from the network and self-installed the machine, rebooted, and you had a node ready for rendering.

    on the other hand, the people working there were the most easy-going and honest I've seen so far - there were no hypocricy going on, and basically there was a place for anyone in it - still without too much trouble.

    just wanted to share that with you guys, in case you wondered if such a non profit company was really working - it is. definitively.

    anyone wanting to start something like that in norther italy? :)

    cheers

    --
    -- There are two kind of sysadmins: Paranoids and Losers. (adapted from D. Bach)
    1. Re:I used to work for them by sketerpot · · Score: 1
      For those interested, Pov-Ray is a freeware raytracer, it is pretty good quality, and it runs on many systems, including Linux and Windows.

      Just clarifying the reference.

    2. Re:I used to work for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey kipple please e-mail me at james@accrc.org we have lost your contact info

  15. Linux and Schools by kvn299 · · Score: 5, Informative

    As a former educator who worked in a "resource-challenged" school district, I applaud these types of programs. Unfortunately, often schools like the one I worked in would get money thrown at us for certain tech projects, but since there was often no follow-through or training, the money was pretty much wasted, or used for other purposes deemed more important by the school administrators.

    It seems this organization not only refurbishes the computer, but also trains people to do it as well. If Linux is ever to get a foothold in schools, it will take a lot more effort than just donating X number of computers with Linux preinstalled. The community will have to invest time in making sure those computers are filling the need and that people on site are trained and commmitted to maintaining them.

    Linux and public schools seem like a match made in heaven. Even though Microsoft gives a lot of lipservice (and money, you do have to give them some credit) to supporting schools, it still doesn't make sense to spend that kind of money on Windows licenses. One could make the argument that exposing students to an alternative like Linux will improve their technology skills (they're still gonna get the Windows exposure, no matter what's used in the schools).

    Just my 2cents.

    1. Re:Linux and Schools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want to start a group of volunteers who will
      do just that; teaching and maintaining Linux
      computers for schools.

      I live in Oakland, an area where there is a strong
      need for teachers with CS skills, and I work in
      the hi-tech industry and have a lot of friends
      who are warming up to the idea of starting, not
      a LUG, but a Linux Teaching Group.

      I am currently looking for people with contacts
      to schools and people with Linux skills and the
      desire to make a difference.

      I am posting as AC, but remove animals and
      underscores from my address and I can be contacted
      on sjuels_redherring@yahoo.com

      /Soren

  16. Stop Recycling! by BigMucho · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I remember when I was in elementary school; we went on field trip to the local computer recycling plant. Once there, they brain-washed us into believing that if we recycled computers, instead of making new ones, the world would be a cleaner place.

    Don't believe it!! Computer recycling plants destroy the environment! C.R.P.'s routinely dump more effluents into the atmosphere and water table than most large industrial plants!

    The truth must be told!

    1. Re:Stop Recycling! by k98sven · · Score: 1

      C.R.P.'s routinely dump more effluents into the atmosphere and water table than most large industrial plants!

      Maybe.. but the relevant comparison here is if they dump
      more effulents into the atmosphere and water table than most large landfills.

    2. Re:Stop Recycling! by BigMucho · · Score: 1

      You guys REALLY need to get a sense of humor.

  17. Toronto... by swagr · · Score: 3, Informative

    We do that
    here and
    here.

    --

    -... --- .-. . -.. ..--..
    1. Re:Toronto... by punchdrunk · · Score: 1

      Except that according to the BIG GIANT NOTICE on top of the linux.ca website they are closed. And the website is frozen as of March 2000.

    2. Re:Toronto... by Tim+Doran · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Y'know, I've tried three times over the last few years to contact ReBoot to donate my considerable PC skills. Never any response. Voicemail, email... nada.

      What does it take? It's shit like this that holds volunteer organizations back.

    3. Re:Toronto... by 3Bees · · Score: 1

      We did that too:
      www.foxhillresource.org
      Oh wait, that site doesn't exist anymore. Now I remember. We set up a bunch of computers by holding two night a week classes and training the kids and the parents together how to build machines from scratch (not literally, but from donated parts) and how to install and run Linux (RedHat 6.2 in this case) as well as how to use the Internet, type, etc. Built a fairly decent lab in the basement of their apartment building in FoxHill NJ. Then we ran into problems...

      You see, these machines cost money to run, and the dsl line cost money too. While old computers are fairly easy to find, money is not and these folks didn't have any of it. That and more fundamental problems like trying not to get shot or beaten by cops occupied a lot of their time. So, when we volunteers could no longer afford to come down there all the time, the site disappeared.

      The problems with these types of operations are the same problems that many groups from the Peace Corps on down have faced for years: maintenance. Until the kids/adults/whoever is being trained on these machines are able to make enough money themelves through the use of the machines to keep them running, they going to eventually fall by the wayside.

      --
      "I think we should tax people who stand in water! " - Mr. Gumby
  18. What do they update with? by L-Wave · · Score: 1

    Just curious, but what the heck do they update it with? I tried "reviving" an old pentium 133 with 32 meg ram....every installer I tried complained that there wasnt enough ram, and that they require a minimum of 64megs. Although...i did not try slackware which might be what I need. hmm.... okay I think I answered my own question, so thanks! =)

    --
    I SURVIVED THE GREAT SLASHDOT BLACKOUT OF 2002!
    1. Re:What do they update with? by morbid · · Score: 0

      Yes, you should have tried Slackware. Runs fine on a P100. You can install it including with X and GCC in just under 200 megs of disk space. Haven't tried ZipSlack though. You only need ~100 megs of drive space for that. 32 megs of RAM should be plenty, especially with the 2.2.x kernel.

      --
      I'm out of my tree just now but please feel free to leave a banana.
    2. Re:What do they update with? by ipour · · Score: 1

      I had exactly the same problem - newer distributions of Linux seem to expect more out of the hardware, so the installations work, but are extremely slow, or they don't work at all. Not to mention the winmodem problem - if you have an old computer, you probably need an older external modem as well.

    3. Re:What do they update with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried "reviving" an old pentium 133 with 32 meg ram....every installer I tried complained that there wasnt enough ram, and that they require a minimum of 64megs.
      Debian installed fine on my 40Mb 133, and is apparently OK with 32Mb. I've heard tell of people installing it on 8Mb machines, too, but this involved mounting the HDD on another machine first.

    4. Re:What do they update with? by rakeswell · · Score: 1

      I just installed Slackware on a Pentium 75Mhz with 32 MB RAM. No problems. In the past I had Red Hat running on that box as well. My advice: Install in text mode, and while you can install the KDE/Gnome libraries, if you *must* use a GUI desktop, use something like Blackbox, AfterStep, Icewm, whatever, just so long as it's lightweight. That box makes a great NFS/SSH/FTP server, BTW...

      --
      All one has to do is hit the right keys at the right time and the instrument plays itself. - Johann Sebastian Bach
    5. Re:What do they update with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've installed Red Hat 7.1 and 7.2 from CD-RW discs on a Pentium 90 with 32 MB of RAM with no problems. It does fail to load the graphical install and falls back to the text mode installer. It also prompts to create temporary swap space on the disk for the installer to use. It installed fine and I got X to load and run reasonably well.

    6. Re:What do they update with? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I don't know the minimum requirments for the latest versions of Slackware, but the older versions would work on almost anything.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    7. Re:What do they update with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I installed Debian 2.2 on an 8-Mb 486/66 (my firewall box until this week) directly from floppy and then ethernet, with a small kernel compiled on another machine. dselect basically took all day to run (too big, constantly swapping) but once it was installed and running it was fine.

    8. Re:What do they update with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our minimum placement machine has 64 meg and 2 gigs. suse's yast installer works just fine

    9. Re:What do they update with? by Rebel+Patriot · · Score: 2

      As of Slackware 8.0, you can still install it on a laptop without a cd-rom or nic with only 4 megs of RAM (using a Plip connection). I believe 7.1 can be installed entirely from floppy disks.

      --
      Slackware forever. Honestly, what else would you trust when it absolutely positively has to be stable, secure, and easy
    10. Re:What do they update with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I maintain and setup the cluster at ACCRC, the install we use is redhat 7.2 stripped down. To install you insert a boot floppy which dhcp's, then uses a custom fdisk utility I wrote, creates a 400 meg ext2 partition, then the rest of the disk as swap, then mkfs's the ext2 drive and formats the swap, nfs mounts a directory on our fileserver, untars the appropriate tarball (optimized for i586,i686) which contains the stripped redhat 7.2 files, then installs an optimized kernel for whatever processor (based on MMX features mostly), then lilo's the drive so it will boot, then it beeps annoyingly to let you know its done. We also netboot all the machines possible, I've got openMosix running on a single floppy as well.

      oh, btw, we use openMosix, not Mosix, Mosix is no longer GPL. Mosche Bar rocks

  19. good enough fol linux? by anshil · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't like that taste, yes linux is far more efficient with resources than win2k or xp. However only making it public by allowing it to run on lame machines also makes a bad reputation.

    One day one student will say, "all linux boxes I worked on were lame-ass". Because they runned on some old Pentium 166, while the windoze of course just had to have the new 1.5 GHz processors, with 40x cdrom speed.

    I remember a friend telling me that installing his linux told so much longer than the winxp. Of course! He installed linux on an old PC with a quad 4x speed cdrom, but winXP on one with a 32x cdrom. Now who wonders....

    Same with people "trying" linux they give it a 512MB partition on the harddisk and nearly no swap drive, while windows is allowed to take the other 20GB. Now who wonders why you have that less hard disk space available on linux... (or just run it in some linux emulator at all)

    --

    --
    Karma 50, and all I got was this lousy T-Shirt.
    1. Re:good enough fol linux? by Hyperfrog · · Score: 1

      Yes, Linux is far more efficient.. to the point where running it on a 'lame' computer is better than windows. My P166 over there in the corner has FreeBSD (4.5!) and Staroffice and it sure as hell runs a lot better than if it had windows 95 or 98 on it.

      How about you take out the HDD one day, swap it with a blank one, and get him to run windows.. from installation to using it with office. Better leave a whole day for this activity though, cause you're going to need it.

      --
      Move faster
    2. Re:good enough fol linux? by jbloggs · · Score: 0

      you're missing the point....it's not that "that linux box was lame", but rather, "wow, i got to use a computer where otherwise i would not have had a chance to"

    3. Re:good enough fol linux? by zulux · · Score: 2

      However only making it public by allowing it to run on lame machines also makes a bad reputation.

      I uderstand your sentiments, but I'm starting not to care about what the Lexus-crowd thinks about Linux and free software.

      Here's an amusing story:
      We do competitive bids on services/projects, and one of our prospects decided to do some due diligence on one of our bids that contained OpenBSD. We'll he wasen't amused with the funny-looking pufferfish. Microsoft doesen't have pufferfish.

      With a little education, I was able to show him that the funny little pufferfish, doesen't BSOD, and doesen't have hardly any security holes.

      He now has the set of OpenBSD 2.9 stickers that you get when you order CDs from Theo et al.

      Just give a little bit of education and thinks will work out fine. If not, then screw them. Laugh when they get rooted, send their money to bill, and put up with BSOD's.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    4. Re:good enough fol linux? by KC7GR · · Score: 1

      I don't like that taste, yes linux is far more efficient with resources than win2k or xp. However only making it public by allowing it to run on lame machines also makes a bad reputation.

      ---

      You just contradicted yourself. "Far more efficient with resources" means that Linux (or any other *nix for that matter) doesn't NEED as much in the way of resources on those same "lame" machines to run rings around Redmond. You say the INSTALL took longer: I wonder how well the OS itself ran overall AFTER install? And how much more robust it was than anything Billy-boy and his gang ever turned out?

      No machine is "lame" in my eyes if it lets someone discover that the Way of Bill is not the only option, and teaches something about networking and such along the way. Criminys, my NIS server is a MicroVAX (NetBSD based) that I saved from the local landfill! How "lame" is it to cut back on filling said landfill? Or any other for that matter?

      No "bad reputation" here. If anything, just the opposite. Think about it: If Linux runs as well as it does on these older, slower systems, that should definitely make people wonder how much quicker it might be on a much newer box.

      --

      Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

      Blue Feather Technologies

    5. Re:good enough fol linux? by Alexander+Poquet · · Score: 1

      It's also worth noting that, due to the dismal funding afforded our schools, they _always_ have obsolete hardware. The local middle school still has Apple IIe's and Macintosh LCIIs in abundance; they work, why throw them away to pay for newer hardware that they can't afford?

      I think that most people complain about how slow the machines are, rather that how slow the OS is, because they know that schools can very rarely afford top of the line equipment.

      And consider how much Apple in the schools benefitted Apple as a company -- students, using Macs in their computer labs, wanted Macs at home. The same sort of thing could happen with Linux.

      The other thing: Linux is not inherently harder to use than Windows, Mac, or any other platform. It's simply a matter of what you're used to -- back before GUIs, everyone ran CLIs and people simply accepted that as "the way". Not that Linux is CLI-only, but I'm just illustrating: it's what you're used to that makes ease of use.

      So it's easy to see that early exposure to Linux in schools will familiarize students with the Tao of Linux, and even if they don't use it at home, they will not feel daunted by it later in life. Which means that when Old Bill and his stringent disregard for their rights or his highway robbery prices get them down, they won't have problems using Linux.

      A good thing, IMHO.

  20. ? No-one bothers to check linujournal.com? by Diabolical · · Score: 2

    This article was on linuxjournal yesterday.. and now it's up at /. ???

    Boy.. talk about slow newsgaring...

    For what it's worth, the centre is running on volunteers. If you happen to live nearby why not go and help a hand... i would like to know what their "bussiness model" is. Here in the Netherlands we do not have something similar while we really could use one.. Perhaps something to start up here as well...

    1. Re:? No-one bothers to check linujournal.com? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      on a smale scale(mostly due to lack of space-even the space they are using now is being threatened with eviction) recycling old computers with linux and giving them away is done in the netherlands by the ascii computer collective (http://squat.net/ascii). if you know of a 38,000 sq ft space somewhere in the amsterdam area....don't hesitate to contact them!

  21. The downside to this by acoustix · · Score: 2

    is that the schools will be charged by microsoft for the computers because they are capable of running windows.

    Oh well.

    --
    "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    1. Re:The downside to this by Kierthos · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Um, how? Like Microsoft is going to send someone to every school to count the number of computers? And it's not like the computers are running Windows...

      It would be like a health inspector fining a restaurant for having eggs kept too warm when the restaurant doesn't even have eggs.

      Inspector: "That's a $200 fine. That area of the kitchen is too warm to store eggs in."

      Restaraunt Manager: "But we don't store eggs there. In fact, there isn't an egg in the entire restaurant!"

      I: "Doesn't matter. You could store eggs there, and that's all that counts."

      Bollocks.

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    2. Re:The downside to this by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      Unfortunately, this appears to be exactly what Microsoft is doing. Here's the article summary:

      from the must-eat-more-money dept.
      razvedchik writes: "As reported in this article in the Portland, OR newspaper, The Oregonian, Microsoft is pressuring 24 school districts in the northwest to agree to their Microsoft School Agreement licensing scheme or undergo an audit in 60 days. Multnomah ESD, which covers the greater Portland area and has around 25,000 computers, has to either decide to accept the license at about $500,000 or undergo the audit which it does not have time to prepare for. Of significant interest is the fact that a significant majority of these schools are experimenting with using Linux. Multnomah ESD has its own thin-client Linux distro called K12LTSP."


      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    3. Re:The downside to this by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      Refuse to allow Microsoft employees to enter until and unless they show cause to a judge that there might be a violation. Or arrest them for trespassing. Microsoft does not have the right to enter property just because you have a copy of Windows on your computers.

      Hell(tm), schools are usually incredibly restrictive about allowing people onto the grounds who normally do not have a right or obligation to be there. Claim security issues.

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    4. Re:The downside to this by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Heh, for once, think of the childeren ;)

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
  22. It's Happening by Col.+Panic · · Score: 2

    When Linus built the kernel it was so he could run it on a 386. Now that ability of running on old, available, otherwise defunct hardware is going to make Linux permeate the world.

    Total world domination is just around the corner :)

  23. Re:But... Bullshit! by Guido69 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Q&A #1 from MS's donated computer FUD...

    "Q. Why should a donor include the operating system with their PC donation?"

    "A. It is a legal requirement that pre-installed operating systems remain with a machine for the life of the machine. If a company or individual donates a machine to your school, it must be donated with the operating system that was installed on the PC."

    Bullshit! This is just MS FUD twisting the language of their EULA, which they assert is a legal document. True, per the EULA, you cannot move an OEM license to another PC. But that has nothing to do with any legal requirement that the license must transfer with the PC.

    --
    - If we aren't supposed to eat animals, then why are they made out of meat? - Steven Wright
  24. Reusing old computers destroys the environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You hook up 10 486dx2's to make a povray render farm. It consumes 10 times as much power to do the same job as a modern intel chip. Not only did you waste your time, energy, and networking hardware; you just contributed to the fact that you local nuclear or coal power plant has to chug that extra electricity,
    just to help you "reduce, reuse, and recycle".

    Does that make any sense?

    1. Re:Reusing old computers destroys the environment by Col.+Panic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They aren't using 486DX2's - they are using Athlon 850's and P166's or better.

      And when children are in school learning how to use a computer, any computer beats no computer.

    2. Re:Reusing old computers destroys the environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You are right that old hardware for a POV render farm is a poor environemental decision. However, a classroom full of 486dx2's will chug less 'lectricity than a room full of 2.2GHz P4's.

    3. Re:Reusing old computers destroys the environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You hook up 10 486dx2's to make a povray render farm. It consumes 10 times as much power to do the same job as a modern intel chip. Not only did you waste your time, energy, and networking hardware; you just contributed to the fact that you local nuclear or coal power plant has to chug that extra electricity,
      just to help you "reduce, reuse, and recycle".

      That wouldn't make a bit of sense. MAybe that's why they aren't doing it. You might find it interesting to read the article. The article tells us that they have:

      ... 30 Athlon 850MHz PCs and up to 350 recently refurbished PCs that are Pentium 166 or better. Rather than throwing away cycles on test diagnostics, the cluster performs useful work as a POVRAY-based renderfarm while the units are undergoing burn-in.


      I.e., they have a useful render farm and augment it with cycles which would otherwise go to waste.

    4. Re:Reusing old computers destroys the environment by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      if only it where so cut and dry, eh?
      thats 10 computers not in a land fill, 10 computers not seeping toxic chemicals into the ground water, its teaching someone how to do a cluster, its teaching people that they can use old equipment to get the same power as new.
      That means fewer new computers that need to be made, which mean your saving production energy and production by products.

      I doubt its actually 10 times more power, but you point is certianly a valid concern that should be put in with as many factors as possible. Its also a concern that often gets overlooked.

      It is important to rememer that computer are dreadfully toxic to the enviroment in all phases of their life cycle.

      now if I can only figure out an after market need for monitor glass, I'd have it made.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:Reusing old computers destroys the environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually all the p166 machines are "burn in" machines, which is where we have them run for 72 hours at least before they leave the door to test the hardware, etc.

      they have to be run, so they might as well be doing something useful.

    6. Re:Reusing old computers destroys the environment by Ziviyr · · Score: 2

      I think slower computers are better for learning. Gives a much better view of whats going on inside.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    7. Re:Reusing old computers destroys the environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can mix the glass with clean glass in a 70% clean glass 30% leaded glass and be legal and safe for non-food bearing glass items. (makes kickass window glass)

  25. I had this idea a while back by zetes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Some time ago I thought about taking older computers from the University and turning them into machines for the unfortunate in my town. The only problem I had was that Windows 95/98 costs money and normal people might not be able to use a Linux box. However, with the features X has nowadays and the idea of maybe giving them to schools instead of (or in addition to) just people/families in the city, I think it could work. Now if I could just get startup money... HAH!
    (this is the correct story for this reply, btw)

    --
    2+2=5 for extremely large values of 2
  26. Beowolf Cluster by Chayce · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Can you Imagain a beowolf cluster of... wait they did that...

    Can you imagina a beowolf cluster of 727s?!

    --
    I like replies better than Karma, even if they are flames, because that tells me I got someone thinking.
  27. Computer Angels by skribe · · Score: 3, Interesting
    There's a group in Perth, Western Australia that does something similar. They collect used computer equipment, repair and refurbish it, load linux and assorted applications and then donate it to people in the community who would be otherwise unable to afford a computer. A great idea.

    They're called Computer Angels

    --
    Blog
  28. Recycling is last because it doesn't work. by xtal · · Score: 2

    Reduce and Reuse. Those are the hard ones, but they have an effect. Nobody likes reducing or reusing, however.

    Most brainwashed green people who recycle assume it goes away magically when they put it in the dumpster. They fail to take into account all the energy and oil that needs to be used to truck the recyclables around; the subsidies that need to be given to make it viable; the fact that nasty chemical and industrial processes need to be used to reclaim materials (paper is the best. breaking down processed paper is nasty, check out a pulp mill). The end result is that you've consumed more energy in recycling the good than producing a new good, and it's the energy consumption on this planet that's a problem. Beer bottles, on the other hand, are more than viable to recycle. Wanna know why? Because they're not melted. They're just cleaned, i.e. reused. If you had to melt them, it'd be cheaper to make new ones.

    If you care about the environment, find a way to stop commuting and work from home. Not driving your car a few days a week will have an order of magnitude more effect then recycling plastic bottles.

    Not that it matters, have a look around, wonder what happens when oil gets scarce, and how hard people are working on fusion. Note to americans: $2/gal gasoline prices are not sustainable, dependance on foreign oil reserves is not a good thing.

    --
    ..don't panic
    1. Re:Recycling is last because it doesn't work. by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 2

      The end result is that you've consumed more energy in recycling the good than producing a new good

      You're one of those people who like to be contrary just for the sake of being contrary, even if it means being flamingly wrong. Recycling of aluminum, for example, was started by aluminum companies, because it takes much, much less power to recycle aluminum than to process raw bauxite. Ditto for glass, paper, and scrap metal recycling. Plastics are a different story, in that they're harder to recycle and the result is much lower grade. That's why you see contrivances such as recycled soda bottle pullovers and park benches. But to say across the board that recycling uses more engergy than to create new goods from scratch? No. That has never been remotely true.

      Certainly, reducing and reusing are still much more important. And most people don't want to hear anything about them, especially fanatical computer purchasers ("I absolutely need a new PC, because my 1.2GHz machine only gets 126fps in Quake III").

    2. Re:Recycling is last because it doesn't work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live near the Coors glass recycling plant here in WheatRidge, Colorado. I can most definitively say that beer bottles here are sorted into similar colors, then crushed, melted into new bottles at the Ball glass plant, then shipped up the road to Golden to be filled with rocky Mountian Gold (yeah, I know. pfft. erk, etc.). Maybe this is not the case every where, but I'm also pretty sure tha Anheisuer (SP!) Busch, just north of Fort Collins does the same thing. Very little of their glass (for both companies) is freshly produced anymore I believe. Al on the other hand, well that's a different story. There is *alot* of money to be made in metal recycling, especially copper and Aluminum.

    3. Re:Recycling is last because it doesn't work. by xtal · · Score: 2

      Aluminum and metals are a rare exception and then only in some cases. I'm not an idiot. The aluminum cans are actually debateable too, IF you have to drive them yourself to a recycling facility instead of collecting them in one location.

      Flamingly wrong? Show me some numbers that show me that recycling paper or plastic make any kind of energy sense. Recycling paper is STUPID. Burn it, bury it, and plant a new tree. Recycling plastic is stupid. Use less, or re-use what you have, and if you really care about the environment, reduce your consumption of petroleum products any way you can - because once they're used up, we're going to start burning coal.

      My point is (and yes, I like to get people fired up) is that most of the time, it makes SENSE to throw things away. Residential waste is a small fraction of the garbage produced anyhow - industrial waste is a exponentially larger problem. If you need to use more energy (oil), then you're probably just shuffling the pollution around than doing any good. Thermodynamics is dismal stuff.

      And, relative to other concerns facing our world - specifically, reducing petroleum consumption to a sustainable level, and/or finding a real alternative (and hint, solar and wind don't come close), recycling an aluminum can is a joke that just makes people feel better about driving their SUV back and forth between the suburbs and work.

      --
      ..don't panic
    4. Re:Recycling is last because it doesn't work. by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 2

      Residential waste is a small fraction of the garbage produced anyhow

      Well then why even bother to reduce or reuse? Who cares! All those giant landfill outside of major cities are irrelevant!

    5. Re:Recycling is last because it doesn't work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey bucky just to give ya a heads up.

      200 tons a month is industrial scale waste. Also the shit is toxic. Long term toxic, mutagenic,carcinogenic crap. Removal even if it takes resources is imperative.

      As for it taking resources, yes it does, no doubt about it. But it takes less every year as we optimize operations and we are actually looking at becoming energy positive through co-generation from our plastic and paper recovery streams. Please don't assume that the management of a 1.2 million dollar a year (self funding but not above donations) organisation is completly inept. I would agree with you that there are enviromental stances that put warm fuzziness ahead of common sense. We are not those people.

      You on the other hand from your stance are at best short-sighted and shallow. At worst mind numbingly stupid.

    6. Re:Recycling is last because it doesn't work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      High gold content in electronics. Also platinum group metals. Circuit boards are classed as high grade gold ore. Old procs have stupid amounts of gold. Take a look at a p-pro or p-60/66. Yes it is gold alloy

  29. For thos who aren't familiar with Pov-Ray by docbrown42 · · Score: 2, Informative

    www.povray.org

    If you want to see some example of what can be done with Pov-Ray, check out my site at docbrown.net and click on "Portfolios"-"Renderings".

    -Ed

    --
    Ed Wedig
    Graphic design services
    docbrown.net
    1. Re:For thos who aren't familiar with Pov-Ray by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, all I saw was a piece of a puzzle and "Click here to get the plugin" under it.

    2. Re:For thos who aren't familiar with Pov-Ray by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey Ed.
      See you next Friday.

  30. Getting warmer... by rocjoe71 · · Score: 1

    ... I tend to recycle my own PCs but what do I do with all these useless CDRs I've coastered over the years?

    --
    Height: 38U, Weight: 0 Newtons, Eyes: #0000FF, OS: Gray Matter 1.0 (Alpha)
    1. Re:Getting warmer... by ahfoo · · Score: 2

      Hey DIY fan!
      Check this out.
      It's actually about PET plastic, but should be workable for polyacrylate as well. I've welded them together with solering irons, works great.
      If you want to see a hardcore plan for using CDs, then check this one. I aint fucking around when it comes to recycling used CDs, or plastic bottles for that matter.

    2. Re:Getting warmer... by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      but what do I do with all these useless CDRs I've coastered over the years?

      Make a big sculpture, sell it for alot of money, and buy a rig that doesn't make coasters without the help of crashes or abort buttons.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  31. Amazing concept by bsdparasite · · Score: 1
    This is so amazing. These guys are doing society so much of good, it pains me to see guys like MSFT ripping people off..

  32. Life for POV-Ray! by PovRayMan · · Score: 1

    So I just loaded up /. for the first time in a while only to see the words "POVRAY render farms"

    My heart swooned joyfully. There is still life in POV-Ray :)

    Please note my name :)

    1. Re:Life for POV-Ray! by mrbester · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Just a shame that the renders aren't publicly available...

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
  33. i also used to volunteer for them.... by jbloggs · · Score: 0

    that was one of the coolest places i've ever volunteered. i did it a long time ago before they moved to oakland, pre-render farm, etc...but it was still amazing. you walk into this big warehouse, full of relics from the past that you haven't heard of in the past 5-10 years. companies that had only one super-proprietary, really weird product before they went out of business, and it was sitting right in front of you. a total geek's heaven. it used to be that working for them, your payment would be "james, can i take this vt220 terminal home?" they liked it because you could off load all the stuff they couldn't donate, and you liked it because you'd end up with amazingly cool random junk!

    it's still cool today, and i encourage anyone in the bay area to go volunteer for them on the weekends.

  34. Even in Canada by Greedo · · Score: 2, Informative

    Reboot.ca and the Linux Volunteer Group have been around for quite a while.

    They do good work.

    --
    Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
  35. Typical Microsoft dishonesty by tgibbs · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is just a typical example of Microsoft being intentionally misleading. What the *law* says is that you can't donate your PC to the school with Windows on it and keep a copy of operating system for installation on another PC. Of course, in practice this is largely irrelevant, as Microsoft's agreements with computer manufacturers make it nearly impossible to buy a PC without Windows, so who would want an extra copy of an obsolete version? But Microsoft manages to explain this in such a way as to give the false impression that you (or the school) cannot simply erase Windows, destroy the license and the Windows disks, and install LINUX.

    1. Re:Typical Microsoft dishonesty by Kierthos · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh wait, I want M$ to try and fine someone for this, that way the potential donor can bring a harrassment suit and fraud case against them.

      Hey, M$, look over here, I'm giving a computer away... please come and try something.

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
  36. Re:But... Bullshit! by mrbester · · Score: 1

    Define a "machine". I've got an official copy of Windows 95 that I originally had on a 486DX4-100. I upgraded it to a P233, changing the case while I was at it. The only thing that remained of the original was the hard drives and monitor. I then donated it to a school when I upgraded further. I paid for Windows, I'm keeping it. The school didn't want it, they already had loads of copies. They just wanted hardware. Having a finely tuned Win95 installation (oxymoron I know) was icing on the cake for them. Did I break this "legal requirement"? No. It was mine to do what I liked with and fsck off M$ if they think differently.

    --
    "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
  37. Gatorade just lost a customer by ScrewTivo · · Score: 1

    Nothing like being a bad neighbor to a group like this.

  38. And also theres . . . by SirTicksAlot · · Score: 1

    Another site looks like they are doing this for even older machines to build Linux routers and firewalls for those who have broadband. Not a bad idea.

  39. Free Geek by healy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Portland Oregon has a great non-profit that does this sort of thing as well: Free Geek

    --
    "Jesus saves sinners...and redeems them for valuable coupons"
  40. You forgot the Gatorade page! by RobinH · · Score: 1

    I found this page in there:
    Gatorade is a bad neighbour.

    --
    "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
  41. Turned down an aircrat carrier?!?!?!?! by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

    DIBS!!!! Turned it down?!?! I just dont believe that.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
    1. Re:Turned down an aircrat carrier?!?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was partialy stripped and disfunctional.

      Was offered as scrap steel and had profound enviromental issues

    2. Re:Turned down an aircrat carrier?!?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn. IT still woulda been cool.

  42. Destroying Data Before Donating Your PC by ltsmash · · Score: 1

    Recently a family-member donated her old PC to a charity organization. She kept lots of sensitive information on it, including most of her finances. To destroy the data, I formatted the hard-drive, overwrote the hard-drive once with random-data, then reinstalled windows. I wonder if the security experts on here believe this is sufficient for destroying data. And if not, what is sufficient?

    1. Re:Destroying Data Before Donating Your PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting AC for the obvious reasons....

      No, what you did was not adequate to guarantee complete data wipeage. A crack team of spooks with a megabucks budget could probably recover quite a bit of goodies off that drive. But why would they? Unless Auntie was a KGB sleeper or a DOE engineer from mainland China, who gives a shit? You've spoiled it for the common lowlife thieves, and you don't need to worry about the KGB (I don't think).

      What is adequate? Twenty-four hours in a kiln. Now take that aluminum foil thingie off your head and go get some sleep.

    2. Re:Destroying Data Before Donating Your PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to be paranoid, I'd suggest overwriting at least 7 times. Supposedly the magnetic fields can still be "read" with specialised equipment, up to about the 7th scrambling.

      What you described is probably ok for general stuff, as you can't just read it off with a raw disk reader. Not good enough for really sensitive stuff tho.

    3. Re:Destroying Data Before Donating Your PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we (ACCRC) use a military spec magnetic degausser to wipe the contents of the drives.

      no need to waste time overwriting data.

    4. Re:Destroying Data Before Donating Your PC by Ziviyr · · Score: 2

      Thats good for casual protection, I think you're supposed to do the random writing over 25 times nowadays though for the paranoid.

      I've hear other people prefer to drill a hole through the drive.

      Yet others disassemble it, wipe off the oxide and burn the rags and stomp up and down on the remains and put it in a canister of nuclear waste and bury it in a volcano.

      I think mailing it to the sun would suffice.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  43. other projects by BOFH_org · · Score: 1
    I'm a volunteer at Puscii. Puscii is a internet workspace where people can use the internet for free.
    this helps people who can't afford a computer very well.
    Puscii is built out of old hardware like 486's, slow pentiums, sparcstations, old alpha's and even an ultrasparc. all machines run linux
    people are very content with the service we provide.
    the only thing which costs money is the coffee (30 eurocents)
    for more info, please visit the website
    http://squat.net/puscii/

    have a nice day
    BOFH_org

    1. Re:other projects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crikey, you could've picked a better name, eh?

      I mean PUSCII? "Linux? Oh, yeah, that yellow oozing OS..."

    2. Re:other projects by Omnifarious · · Score: 2

      Don't you feel horrible exposing all these people who previously didn't have to deal with the intense RF radiation of a computer and monitor to debilitating RF radiation?

  44. Re:Many groups doing this - Freegeek.org by casio282 · · Score: 1

    Yup. Check out Free Geek -- they're a non-profit organization in portland oregon that has a similar program. It's all volunteer-based, and volunteers get free salvaged/reassembled linux machines and training. All in all a very nice system.

    --

    :wq
  45. Uh... Electricity production by JCMay · · Score: 1

    Uses coal. If I remember correctly, it's the #1 fuel for power generating plants.

    If you ever visit Orlando, drive east on SR-520 (the Bee Line). About halfway out, look to your left. That is a coal-fired plant.

    Near Atlanta? Plant Wansly is coal-fired. So is McDonnough. I may be wrong, but all power generation plants in Georgia besides Votgle and Hatch I think are coal-fired. (Hatch and Votgle are nuclear)

    Closer to where I live, between Cocoa and Titusville are two gas-fired power generation plants. Natural gas. To the south in Fort Pierce is a nuclear plant. Another nuclear plant is in Crystal River. FPL and other Florida generators seem to be more diversified in their fuel choices.

    As for recycling, I do it because I pay to do it. Every month on my city water/waste bill is a line item for recycling. If I'm paying for the pick-up, I might as well make use of it. Don't get me started on the ethics of PAYING for a recycling service. It's obvious that it doesn't work if the pubplic has to PAY for the privelige of recycling!

    1. Re:Uh... Electricity production by suicidal · · Score: 1

      Two words: Nuclear Power.

    2. Re:Uh... Electricity production by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weird... We get a dollar off our monthly garbage bill if we recycle (any amount too, even a piece of newspaper). I always try to put something out each week so that I get that buck.

    3. Re:Uh... Electricity production by xtal · · Score: 2

      Coal fired plants abound. But they're a joke compared to the pollution that'll be generated if you need to run the transportation infrastructure off of electrics. Your average car easily uses around 100kW of power (in terms of energy production from gasoline). A performance car could easily double that, and a truck even moreso. Generating that much power from coal would blacken the skies.

      --
      ..don't panic
  46. Re:850 MHz - inadequate by yatest5 · · Score: 1

    as does my inability to close italics properly :)

    as is your ability to form a grammatically correct sentence ;-)

    --
    • Mod parent up! [a] by Anonymous Coward (Score:5) Thurs, June 31, @13:37
  47. Re:Butt... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People should not bow down to FUD. If they do, they deserve being fucked.

    Perhaps bending over for FUD is a better description...

  48. Re:850 MHz - inadequate by sporty · · Score: 2

    I'm insulted by your sig ;P ;)

    --

    -
    ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

  49. Re:But... Bullshit! by suicidal · · Score: 1

    In the past the company I work for discussed that point with Microsoft who told them that the case was the definitive point that could not change. So all upgrades had to keep the same case. Everything else could change, but unless we wanted to buy a new license, the case had to remain.

  50. Re:But... Bullshit! by Kierthos · · Score: 1

    Windows almost certainly defines 'machine' differently then most people considering how little you can change on a box running XP before it thinks that you're "stealing" from the Evil Overlords in the Lands of Redmond (where the darkness lies).

    Not that the majority of regular /. readers consider anything M$ likes to be of major concern.

    Kierthos

    --
    Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
  51. Re:850 MHz - inadequate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reading from the previous post, his reads correctly....yours doesn't.

    So sit down and shut up.

  52. Re:Thank SUSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually we got approx 30,000 comercial packages of suse 7.0.

  53. Re:But... Bullshit! by Guido69 · · Score: 1

    MS's definition of a "machine" in this context is very grey and not documented. At all. Intentionally. They want you to be scared and unsure and just buy another license "to be safe".

    Was it an OEM or a retail box license? The install key to an OEM '95 license has "OEM" somewhere in it, usually following the pattern xxxxx-OEM-xxxxxxx-xxxxx.

    OEM licenses usually come with a machine and are tied to that machine at purchase. You can upgrade that hardware all you want (probably best to keep a paper trail), but the license remains tied to that machine. If you give the machine away, your license to the OS is no longer valid. It is effectively transferred to whomever you gave the box, whether you told them about it or not.

    Retail box licenses are completely different. As long as you only have it installed on one machine at any given time, you can move it from box to box.

    --
    - If we aren't supposed to eat animals, then why are they made out of meat? - Steven Wright
  54. This place is just as cool as it sounds. by VonGuard · · Score: 1

    Well, i've been working at the ACCRC For over a year and a half now. It's a terrific place. Most of our volunteers come from the homeless shelter next to our building. It's amazing how much people can leanr when they're immersed in technology so completely.

    A couple of answers to previously proposed questions. The Athlon 850's and motherboards for them were graciously donated by AMD for use in our cluster. They also gave us a good deal of PC100 dimms to help us expand the cluster. 3Com donated all of our switches and ethernet cards.

    Microsoft has never contacted us, nor are they likely to. I find it highly unlikely that they would attempt to shut us down because we distribute Linux. SuSe Gave us 30,000 boxed copies of 7.0 in its various incarnations, and this is the OS we distribute. We'd love to get any other distributions we could, but for now, we will use SuSe because we have a buttload of it.

    Now, some related links! Webcams In the Ministry of Truth, AKA the media lab at the ACCRC.

    Buy Shit from the ACCRC here. Extremely disorganized, just like the warehouse is.

    Anyone in the bay area is invited to come by and check us out. We are open from 10-5 weekdays and 12-5 saturdays. We invite anyone to volunteer, no matter what your skill level is. Also, if you would like to send us your equipment for a donation and a tax write-off, send it to our street address, not our post office box.

    Thank you ve5ry much for all your enthusiasm. We need volunteers badly! Volunteers get digging rights!!!!

    --
    Don't Crease the Weasel!
  55. The PovRay team by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The PovRay team are my heroes!!!

    And, they are to release Povay 3.5 any day now!!! Release candidate 2 (RC2) is out!

    Read more at www.povy

    1. Re:The PovRay team by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      www.povray.org ...

  56. An M$ free operation? by mobydobius · · Score: 1
    So if this is a "100% Microsoft Free organization", why does their website have the following meta-tag info:
    <meta content="MSHTML 5.00.2314.1000" name=GENERATOR>
    I saw it when I was trying to figure out why half of their links were broken...
    --

    "I like to wear big boy pants."
    1. Re:An M$ free operation? by VonGuard · · Score: 1

      OK, first of all just because we don't use M$ doesn't mean your browsers aren't made by M$.

      Secondly, what are these dead links you people keep refering to? I think our server's just being crushed under the weight of all you slashdoters.

      --
      Don't Crease the Weasel!
    2. Re:An M$ free operation? by mobydobius · · Score: 2
      Touche on your first point!

      On your second question, you have a lot of links that look like this:
      <a href="http:/p3.htm">blah</a>
      instead of this:
      <a href="/p3.htm">blah</a>
      So I keep getting sent to http://p3.html, which does not exist.
      --

      "I like to wear big boy pants."
    3. Re:An M$ free operation? by VonGuard · · Score: 1

      OK, thanks for the heads up. Fixed all those dead links.

      --
      Don't Crease the Weasel!
    4. Re:An M$ free operation? by mobydobius · · Score: 1

      No problem. Don't forget the gatorade.html broken links, though. BTW that gatorade.html page is a riot.

      --

      "I like to wear big boy pants."
    5. Re:An M$ free operation? by VonGuard · · Score: 1

      OKie doke. Thanks a bunch for all the typo catches. I fixed all of em, even the Scuzzy, movie, and wishlist page.

      --
      Don't Crease the Weasel!
  57. much the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the place i used to work at did much the same thing. problem was whenever we sent a school a machine with linux on it, the IT guy of that school would be on the phone with us the next day wanting instructions on how to put windows on it.

    -sigh-

  58. greendisk.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    org org org

    check this place out...i'm just readying my first shipment of aol/msn/win3.11 install disks :)
    j

  59. Australians donating Linux boxes by timelady · · Score: 1

    At Computerbank Australia Inc, we take donated hardware and build Debian Linux boxes for donation to low income, disadvantaged individuals and groups.

    http://www.computerbank.org.au/

    --
    Nothing - well thats something.
    1. Re:Australians donating Linux boxes by laptop006 · · Score: 1

      As a volunteer to computerbank victoria, naturally I have to add my 2c.

      At CBV we have a very intresting custom debian install, fully prompted and able to be done by (comparativly) non-technical people. We also have all sorts of old and cool hardware to play with :-).

      --
      /* FUCK - The F-word is here so that you can grep for it */
  60. Re:Let me break it down for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As the exec director of accrc and a punk from the late 70's let me break it down for you.

    You are a poser and a waste of protein.

    Please remove your head from your anus.

  61. Taking World Domination Seriously... by billstewart · · Score: 2
    OK, not *that* seriously....


    Might have been a good meeting room, though, or you could set up your Beowulf Cluster on a slightly larger Viking Dragon Boat than Mr. Beowulf himself used. :-)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  62. Re: Computer Angels - mindfill not landfill by tsukusenai · · Score: 1

    Computer Angels' volunteers and members are a diverse group including a chef, electronics engineers and technicians, office administrators, painters, teachers, artists, retirees and the usual suspects, i.e. programmers and those interested in tweaking computer hardware :) With so many different backgrounds, skills and time available makes for an interesting mix of ideas and projects.

    Computer equipment that cannot be refurbished into a desktop Linux box, may be used for a firewall, router, or developing an electronics project using embedded Linux.

    Many of our volunteers are hoarders and are very reluctant to pass *stuff* to the recycler - "_it_ might be useful for something", is the usual refrain. If it is unusual or antique we may have the opportunity to provide the Computer Museum with an exhibit.

    Yes, we have FUN, and the best part is contributing and participating in a community that is enthused about Open Source, Linux and reduce/reuse/recycle.

    ACCRC is terrific inspiration, and I can see that we are going to need a larger premises.

  63. Re:Impressive - oregon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well look at http://www.freegeek.org/ for portland's one and only recycling experiment

  64. Anyone know something similiar in Germany by peb2713 · · Score: 1

    Triggered by that and a couple of good experiences in the not so far past a question:
    does someone know something like this in Germany? Or, if nothing exists, who would be willing to get something similiar rolling over here?
    I'm based in Munich and working for ... ah ... a tech company
    peb

    1. Re:Anyone know something similiar in Germany by peb2713 · · Score: 1
      I forgot ... get in touch w/ me on


      recycle@eberl.com

    2. Re:Anyone know something similiar in Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have an sister program in zwiecau (sp)

    3. Re:Anyone know something similiar in Germany by peb2713 · · Score: 1

      I'd appreciate this hint - any more details possible? (there are around 30 recyclers there in Zwickau, I've already tried to identify the sister program but - duh - that's a tedious task.

  65. Negative by thelizman · · Score: 1

    on that flyby, the pattern is full...