Slashdot Mirror


Enigma

Peter Wayner writes: "In all of the scary stories Hollywood circulates about copyright piracy, nothing could be scarier that the gang of file swapping, copyright circumventing hackers in the new movie 'Enigma'. They laugh and love a bit, but mainly they spend their time building a big whirring and clicking machine to smash a copyright protection mechanism. When the machine delivers, they put the results into a Gnutella-like file sharing system called Ultra so their friends can track down the original artists and kill them." (Read on for the rest of Peter's review.)

Ooops. Wrong generation and wrong spin. "Enigma" is about good codebreakers -- the mathematicians and clerks of Great Britain's Bletchley Park who helped the Allied cause during World War II by breaking the German coding machine known as "Enigma." It's a wonderful story that's been told as non-fiction several times before by serious historians. This time around, the former newspaper columnist Robert Harris created a thinly fictionalized novel filled with composite characters based on reality. While the result is not factually perfect, it is close enough to capture the dangerous era. Abandoning the literal truth also allowed him to build a richly plotted yarn that evolves cleanly and smoothly.

The film closely follows the novel, although it does eliminate a few of the more subtle complexities. It was wildly popular in Britain when it was released there last year, probably because the story is told with gorgeously detailed sets dressed with nostalgia for a time of British patriotism and success. The film's costumes are lavish, the extras are everywhere, and the look is close enough to reality that the best complaint one ex-translator stationed at Bletchley Park could offer was that the canteen in the film was much nicer. Even Mick Jagger, one of the film's producer, couldn't resist the spirit and gave himself a cameo appearance as an officer relaxing in a club.

This film could represent the cultural high point for codeslinging nerds and other Slashdot types. Jagger produced this film with another cultural icon, Saturday Night Live's Lorne Michaels. If you secretly spend your days dreaming of strutting around the stage like Mick Jagger, you can now take some pride in the fact that Mick Jagger spent at least a few days dreaming of playing a code geek. And why not? According to one of the characters, the women go weak in the knees when they get to talk to codebreakers like the protagonist, Tom Jericho (Dougray Scott).

This movie is about sex and mathematics and the crucial satisfaction that comes from understanding the depth of their power. The two main threads of the film track Tom Jericho's search for 1) a missing lover (Saffron Burroughs) and 2) a new way to break the Germans' four rotor, Naval Enigma system known as Shark. His lover may have been mixed up in Germany's sudden decision to abandon the old codes and all of this must be untangled or else the war could be lost. Tom Stoppard, the screenwriter also responsible for Shakespeare In Love, weaves these two threads together with car chases, kissing, train whistles, moonlit nights, illicit file swapping and a few other romantic chords.

It seems like a lot of things happen in four days, but we must remember that this plays out in an era when people weren't couch potatoes taught that ignoring advertising is forbidden. The pacing is the biggest problem with the film because there's too much action packed into 117 minutes, leaving some transitions a bit confusing. The jumps are often too quick and in some places it's hard to know when the flashbacks begin and end.

Despite that, there's much for a geek to love in this movie. Both the Enigma machine and the cryptanalytic attack developed by the British are described in fairly good detail. We learn, perhaps too quickly, that much of the game is finding a crib, a term the codebreakers used to refer to a word or phrase that must be somewhere in the scrambled message. A weather broadcast, for instance, would include the word "rainy" on a wet day and the codebreakers would examine the possible combinations that might produce that word. That was one weakness the folks at Bletchley Park were able to exploit before Jericho's girlfriend disappeared.

Some of the other mathematical details are accurate but not explained in enough detail to be easily understood. Once the crib was identified, the codebreakers relied heavily on the fact that the Enigma machine could not encode one letter into itself. This weakness allowed them to eliminate many of the potential cribs quickly. Then they spent their time looking for potential "loops" in the coding. In a simple case, a loop is formed when the letter A is encoded as an R and a few letters later, an R is encoded as an A. Most of the loops are a chain of several letters strung out in an odd combination. This pencil-and-paper work by the codebreaker is turned over to a big machine that uses the loops to eliminate many of the potential positions of the rotors. The rest are tested quickly with plenty of whirring and clicking. On a good day, and there were many of them, the right settings for the rotors popped out and let the Allies read the encrypted traffic.

You get to see all of this in action, although the film does not describe much of it in the hopes of sparing those unanointed with the knee-weakening, code smashing gene. It's not really fair for me to concentrate on the machines and ignore the actors because most of the movie revolves around the emotional battles for the characters and their conflicting desires. These passions are well-constructed and intelligently arranged. Dougray Scott plays the mathematician with enough dash and sophistication while Kate Winslet fills out the role of the mousey clerk and co-conspirator. The real star is Jeremy Northam, who plays a sophisticated Foreign Office spy with the right amount of oily charm. He, like everyone else in this movie, is fighting a private little war which may or may not fit in with the larger battle between the Allied and Axis forces.

Some of these battles are so crucial to the plot that it's impossible to comment on them without spoiling the ending. For this reason, I'm including several links for you to click after seeing the movie ( first, second, and third.) as well as a sentence encrypted with an Enigma simulator:

FBZ DDE NZA DJN PNI POH YBF NJR QFP DDZ TVP IHN YSJ IXX UAH YXF BZT ZXW BXS GES GYD IFO VXQ KHU LMA SYX YEG MGK

Using Enigma as a digital rights management device is not new-- Harris includes an encrypted dedication in the novel-- but it raises an interesting question: Is the movie and its detailed description of breaking the Enigma in violation of the DMCA? Is the extra detail in the movie just a cookbook for those who want to pirate the sentence I encrypted above? If so, should I be able to shut it down? While some reviewers may dream of writing something so powerful that it closes a movie immediately, I would hate to do it to this one. It's a pretty, nostalgic thriller that makes a good date movie--especially if you happen to be a knee-weakening, codebreaking type.

Peter Wayner's latest books are Disappearing Cryptography, an exploration about how to disguise information and Translucent Databases, a practical description of how to use encryption algorithms to protect sensitive information like credit cards and medical records. If they ever get made into a movie, he wants to be played by Keanu Reeves -- the one who played Ted "Theodore" Logan, not the one who played Neo.

312 comments

  1. read Cryptonomicon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just had to throw that in there.

  2. woah..... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

    Timothy, you had me there for a second, I was about ready to march down the the MPAA and kick there Arses for making such a wicked movie.

    almost as bad as puting Linus's last name on a computer criminal in swordfish.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  3. Another book on the topic... by lord_dragonsfyre · · Score: 5, Informative

    ... is, of course, Stephenson's much-loved Cryptonomicon.

    I can't help thinking, though, that as much as many of us love to make the comparison, no court in America would accept that cracking enemy cyphers falls under the DMCA.

    Peace,

    James Vogel.

    --
    "I have spread my dreams under your feet, Tread softly, because you tread on my dreams." - W. B. Yeats.
    1. Re:Another book on the topic... by QuodEratDemonstratum · · Score: 1

      no court in America would accept

      During a time of war, no court would accept the complaint from the enemy that would be needed to initiate a court case.

    2. Re:Another book on the topic... by djweis · · Score: 1

      If they made a movie of Cryptonomicon, I would watch it in a second. Is there any chance of it happening?

    3. Re:Another book on the topic... by lynx_user_abroad · · Score: 1
      If you don't start developing your code breaking ability before the war begins, the war will likely end (with you as the loser) before you can even make it to court to file the complaint.

      --

      The thing about things we don't know is we often don't know we don't know them.

    4. Re:Another book on the topic... by gosand · · Score: 5, Informative
      Not to mention Alan Turing: The Enigma by Andrew Hodges. I haven't gotten around to reading it yet, but it is sitting on my shelf just begging to be read. I have heard it is good.

      There is also a good chapter or two on the Enigma cracking in The Code Book by Simon Singh.

      The review of this movie that I saw said it was good, but not quite what it could have been, considering how incredible the actual story was.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    5. Re:Another book on the topic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Alan Turing: The Enigma by Andrew Hodges. I haven't gotten around to reading it yet, but it is sitting on my shelf just begging to be read.

      What's it saying? "I'll suck your dick if you read me?"

    6. Re:Another book on the topic... by RapaNui · · Score: 2, Informative

      I found 'Codebreakers - the inside story of Bletchley Park" (Hinsley & Stripp) pretty good.
      It is best read in concert with the Enigma chapters in Singh's 'The Code Book', though, as they leave the technical description of Enigma 'till fairly late in the book,
      so in some of the early chapters you have _no_ idea what they're talking about until you skip forward a bit.

    7. Re:Another book on the topic... by snol · · Score: 1

      Much as it'd be cool, I suspect it's such a long book that the movie would either leave out too much or be way too long. Seriously, there are how many subplots? each of which could easily be a two hour movie on its own.

    8. Re:Another book on the topic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, an exceedingly fine work on many, many levels. Not only has Stephenson captured the culture of cryptography in the Enigma/Ultra era, he has nailed modern day geekdom perfectly.

      A must read.

    9. Re:Another book on the topic... by gilroy · · Score: 2
      Blockquoth the poster:

      If they made a movie of Cryptonomicon, I would watch it in a second

      ... but it would probably make more sense if you watched it in about 2 hrs, like the rest of us.


      Then again, being a Neal Stephenson work, maybe not... :)

    10. Re:Another book on the topic... by 56ker · · Score: 2

      I've found most of the article written/ TV about/ books about Enigma seem to concentrate on telling the story and gloss over the details of how they actually cracked the code. It's good to see a film for once that doesn't shy away from introducing the subject of mathematics to its audience.

  4. interesting approach by tps12 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I have to say, I'm struck by the approach taken by the review. Most readers aren't going to click through to the full review, taking the snippet on the front page to be a summary.

    In this case it is an irrelevent rant that needlessly attacks Hollywood studios. I would argue that this editorial content almost certainly does not belong in a movie review (which should be studio-agnostic, IMO), and without doubt should not be representing the review on the main page.

    This doesn't even address the fact that comparing Gnutella users to the codebreakers in WW2 is a stretch, at best. Remember, those guys invented the computer in order to defeat Nazis. This is very different from sharing one's collection of Beck songs and downloading Simpsons episodes.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:interesting approach by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This doesn't even address the fact that comparing Gnutella users to the codebreakers in WW2 is a stretch, at best. Remember, those guys invented the computer in order to defeat Nazis. This is very different from sharing one's collection of Beck songs and downloading Simpsons episodes.

      Not that I agree with them but a great many Gnutella users think that they're using it to defeat Nazis too. It's just that their definition of Nazis is based on greedy businessmen in Hollywood rather than fascist murderers in wartime Germany.

      Oh, and by the way, the code breakers at Bletchley Park didn't invent the computer - Charles Babbage did that a great many years earlier.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    2. Re:interesting approach by tps12 · · Score: 3, Funny
      It's just that their definition of Nazis is based on greedy businessmen in Hollywood rather than fascist murderers in wartime Germany.

      I could define Nazis to mean bran muffins, and fight fascism during breakfast.

      --

      Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    3. Re:interesting approach by lildogie · · Score: 4, Informative

      Charles invented the stored-program computer, but Blechley Park built the first electronic one. Theirs predated ENIAC, but it was secret, so the ENIAC builders thought they were first. See "The Code Book" by Simon Singh.

    4. Re:interesting approach by dunstan · · Score: 4, Informative

      Bollocks. The computers used *were* invented at Bletchley Park. Alan Turing invented the Bombes, and Tommy Flowers invented Colossus. And this was all years before Eniac BTW. But history missed out on this, because Churchill had everything from Bletchley Park destroyed at the end of the war - presumably to stop it from possible falling into Stalin's hands.

      Dunstan

      --
      The last scintilla of doubt just rode out of town
    5. Re:interesting approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds tasty!

      But seriously, there is a little more evidence to the "media companies are nazis" argument than the "bran muffins are nazis" one.

    6. Re:interesting approach by Galvatron · · Score: 2

      Damn straight, the article intro is, simply put, bullshit. It's also important to remember that, outside of the context of a war, shooting large numbers of people with a gun is about the most evil thing one can do, but no one tries to make the argument that "because it was okay to do this to the Nazis in WWII, it's okay to do it to Hollywood today." Well, no one aside from that dumbfuck with the .sig saying that Osama should have bombed Hollywood and Disneyland.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    7. Re:interesting approach by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Remember, those guys invented the computer in order to defeat Nazis."

      I didn't realize Babbage was so long-lived...

    8. Re:interesting approach by elefantstn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's the problem with /. If you seriously think that the systematic murder of six million plus the engulfing of the entire world into a disastrous war is morally equivalent to charging $5 too much for a CD and/or arresting two probably innocent encryption-breakers, you need to reevaluate your priorities.

      --
      If it ain't broke, you need more software.
    9. Re:interesting approach by tps12 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, there is no "evidence" for this claim. By comparing media conglomerates to Nazis, you trivialize the horrors of the Holocaust. It is not even an issue of degree; there is simply no context in which fighting file-sharing can be likened to genocide.

      --

      Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    10. Re:interesting approach by Jonathan_S · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Alan Turing invented the Bombes"

      Err, no. The Polish Code breakers invented Bombes long before Blechley Park started really trying to crack the German codes. It was only when the enigma machines got an additional roter that the Poles turned over their designs for the bombes to the British, becuase the Poles didn't have the resources to build the much greater number of bombes that would now be needed.
      Also they wanted to get the code breaking ability out of their county before the pending German invasion.

    11. Re:interesting approach by Arandir · · Score: 1

      Did the brave freedom loving geeks at Bletchly Park download the Colossus from the internet? It took blood, sweat, toil and tears to break the Enigma code. It takes nothing more than a finger click to swap the Backhole Boys.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    12. Re:interesting approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Inellectual genocide perhaps.. Not that it compares in the same context, but if you begin controling ones actions expression etc. It can begin a nasty cycle. Before the Nazis killed 6million people. They started taking away their rights slowly. Rights of expression were among the first, artists were silenced, art was locked away, and not allowed to be seen.
      The comparisons are still not equal, but there is a cominality. The people behind the nazi movment in germany would have been the elitists, and thats who these RIAA/MPAA people are. They are trying to impose their view of america on all americans. We're to be a consumer class, while the corporate mogules make the decisions for the rest of us.

      Again. The MPAA/RIAA have not killed 6 million people, but they are commiting a crime against humanity.

    13. Re:interesting approach by tps12 · · Score: 1
      The MPAA/RIAA have not killed 6 million people, but they are commiting a crime against humanity.

      Sorry, not buying it. The (MP|RI)AA is an industry group with no authority over anything. They lobby Congress, but that's it. The Nazi party was a government lead by an all-powerful dictator. Industry groups can whine all they want, they are still not going to send stormtroopers to my house. If you are looking for evil and crimes against humanity, Congress is the bad guy if and when it bows to the requests of the industry groups.

      --

      Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    14. Re:interesting approach by nolife · · Score: 1

      I agree with your priority statement but what do you mean by:

      That's the problem with /.

      You are included and a participant in the /. cluster-f**k as much as anyone else. You are not here in some 'third party' stance looking in from the outside..
      I hate to break it to you but you are as much a part of /. as anyone else is.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    15. Re:interesting approach by haa...jesus+christ · · Score: 1

      Can someone explain to me how Gnutella users could be foolish enough to compare business people (women are greedy too :) with Nazis?

    16. Re:interesting approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      They've had enough power to help get the DMCA approved. And someone has already gone to jail for that. He was denied his freedoms for writing software that is perfectly legal in his own country.

      Storm Troopers took him out of a convention.
      http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01 /07/17/130226 &mode=thread

      It may not be the immediate authority to get things done. Congress had nothing to do with passing the DMCA. This law was adopted without democratic process.

    17. Re:interesting approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comparing the style of two types of evil is not the same as equating their height on some totem pole of evil.

    18. Re:interesting approach by tps12 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Congress had nothing to do with passing the DMCA.

      Okay, I understand what you are trying to suggest, but by definition Congress did indeed have everything to do with passing the DMCA.

      Still, you are misplacing blame. As a rational, capitalist organization, the $x$yAA will buy legislation as long as it is for sale. Even if you hunted down its members, every other industry group will do the same. Your task will be complete when you have destroyed all industry.

      The correct approach is to either force Congress to be "good" (easier said than done), or to remove Congress's power altogether. The federal government is too big to meet the needs of its subjects, and now serves only to extend its own influence.

      States and local governments need to pass anti-DMCA laws that nullify the DMCA as permitted by the 10th Amendment. The federal government is seizing power not granted it by the Constitution. Attacking the MPAA and RIAA is a waste of time.

      Oh, and even Congress isn't comparable to National Socialism.

      ;)

      --

      Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    19. Re:interesting approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with your mention of congress. The problem is that we do not have "People" representing us. We have politicians.

      I think the battle needs to be fought on both grounds. Yes we need to change our government to start serving the people again. Lobbyists should be nullified. Citizens organizations should take their place. Corporations have no citizenship, yet they can influence policy and laws beyond any citizen.

      Campaign finance should be paid for by citizens, not Corporations. This would eliminate the greedy little bastards from buying elections. And perhaps we will end up having representitives with our intrests in mind in office.

      We also need to challenge these laws. Copy the heck out of everything. Trade ebooks, music, mpegs. Which is already happening.

      I like the idea of states passing their own anti-dmca laws. The only problem is the greedy bastards are there already. It will be a smaller battle, but very possible.

    20. Re:interesting approach by tps12 · · Score: 1

      Take off every law. For great justice.

      --

      Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    21. Re:interesting approach by Grax · · Score: 1

      And by watching westerns you trivialize the plight of the native americans, and by pointing fingers at the Nazis without acknowledging the genocide in Hiroshima and Nagasaki you trivialize the horrors there.

      Lighten up. Many horrible things have happened throughout time and undoubtably many more will happen. All you can do is see to it that you are not the one doing them and do your best to prevent others from doing them.

    22. Re:interesting approach by Xcott+R13,+3(0,R4) · · Score: 1
      Hey, the people who figure out how to crack copy protection methods are not "sharing ... Beck songs and downloading Simpsons episodes." either. They're cryptologists, whose work is important to the development of security systems.

      You're falsely confusing those who cryptanalyze security systems with those who use the results to break the law---a common misrepresentation of the scientific community by copyright brokers and their apologists.

    23. Re:interesting approach by juliao · · Score: 2
      It's not about charging USD 5 for a CD or not.

      I don't even care, I haven't bought a CD _or_ downloaded music in months, but I still care very much about my right, as a researcher, to do my work, to seek my limits, to test the work of my peers. And yes, that involves codebreaking, too.

      If you let things like the DMCA go on, next thing you know you'll be saying that searching for vulnerabilities in a piece of software is against the law.
      And where does that leave you? If you cannot search, you cannot find causes, if you do not find causes, you cannot find fixes, if you can't find fixes, you are own3d, 4ever.

      Welcome to the Digital Millenium, buster.

    24. Re:interesting approach by dhogaza · · Score: 2
      The Polish invented the bombes, while in France where they'd fled after Germany had flattened already flat-enough Poland. That's why it's spelled "bombe" not "bomb", among other things.

      They delivered a replica they'd built of the original version of the machine (a 3-rotor clone used by the Army and Luftwaffe, not the 4-rotor version used by the Navy, and not stolen from the Germans as has been so frequently reported) plus their plans to link up three of them to help crack codes.

      The Poles had already cracked the German Army's use of Enigma before they arrived in France. Sheer mathematical brilliance, aided by pre-war training of German operators who the Poles correctly guessed used successive keys (AAA, AAB etc) enabled them to figure out weaknesses in the encryption.

      Their manual techniques (based on stacks of paper with defined patterns of holes) worked but was, of course, very slow. The Bombes sped things up and of course the electronic computers built by the British sped things up even more.

      The four-rotor Navy version took much more computational power and the Navy frequently switched rotors, were much smarter about key management, and in general made life rough for Bletchly Park.

  5. Whoops by The+Cat · · Score: 1

    Someone's been watching the History Channel again...

  6. Slashdot FUD? by Chibi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, what's the point of using a purposefully misleading intro paragraph? Slashdot is where I learned of the acronym "FUD" ("Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt," for those who do not know) but it seems like putting a misleading intro like this will help spread it, rather than help stop it.

    How many people do you think will only read the main page, and go away thinking it's the truth? Yeah, it's their own fault for not reading the entire story, but everyone is guilty of this from time to time.

    --
    If all you have are silver bullets, everything looks like a werewolf.
    1. Re:Slashdot FUD? by RealTimeFreeAgent · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the "Could this movie be a violation of the DMCA" strawman. Yeah, I'm sure the Nazi leaders are going to rise from the grave, have any living members of the Enigma decoding team arrested and convicted using an ex post facto reading of the DMCA.

      --
      "You get what you pay for after all." --
    2. Re:Slashdot FUD? by rodentia · · Score: 2

      I thought it rather refreshing to lead off with such a bald troll.

      --
      illegitimii non ingravare
    3. Re:Slashdot FUD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's their own fault for not reading the entire story

      Especially since a lot of Slashdot regulars do not like to read the movie reviews, since they often contain spoilers. Of course, said regulars should also be used to the BS FUD that Slashdot itself spreads, but whatever...

    4. Re:Slashdot FUD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chris almighty, it was a joke. Laugh, chuckles, or come up with something funnier.

    5. Re:Slashdot FUD? by Malc · · Score: 1

      I thought it was pretty funny. It was obviously not true: Hollywood is incapable of producing anything so technically accurate, even when to portray people in a bad light. The opening paragraph sucked me in to see what the real story was about. The whole thing is good because it is about a film that sounds reasonably accurate. I think it was well written!

    6. Re:Slashdot FUD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's of course just a way to lead off the inevitable 'so do we like MPAA this week?' comments. They can then say, hey, we took a stab at them in the summary. Now go watch the movie and support your local chapter of the MPAA!

    7. Re:Slashdot FUD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's their own fault for not reading the entire story, but everyone is guilty of this from time to time.

      Guilty? I'm a pretty big slashdot addict, but even I can't read every single story. Timothy is the only guilty party here. He should be made an honorary member of the troll council for a troll like that.

    8. Re:Slashdot FUD? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2
      I found it rather witty, even though I did feel deceived. The intro was plausible enough to pass a 2-second inspection. It would have been much worse, though, had the joke been less funny, misspelled, you name it. Rather shocking that timothy posted this one, as he's usually the worst about posting misleading stories, endless duplicates, etc. Seems the one who submitted the article wrote the lurid intro; timothy just made the editorial decision to post it.

      I bet when they look at the logs for this story, and see how many extra hits it got, a light bulb will pop up in someone's head.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    9. Re:Slashdot FUD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many people do you think will only read the main page, and go away thinking it's the truth?

      Oh god, oh god - somewhere in Hollywood, an MPAA producer is reading this and thinking "Hmmmm, yeah", and starts ringing screenwriters....

    10. Re:Slashdot FUD? by rde · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How many people do you think will only read the main page, and go away thinking it's the truth?
      Two points about this:
      1. It's on /. That doesn't make it the truth, irrespective of how many paragraphs you read.
      2. It's about a movie. If you go to see it based on a review you didn't read, you deserve to be disappointed.
      3. It's a movie about codebreaking, and it's called Enigma. How much of a clue do you need?
      4. I meant three points.

    11. Re:Slashdot FUD? by wdr1 · · Score: 2

      Rather shocking that timothy posted this one, as he's usually the worst about posting misleading stories, endless duplicates, etc.

      You don't know what a relief it is to hear someone else say that. For the longest time, I thought it was just me who had problems with Timothy.

      I wonder though, do others really care or is it simply a case of everyone-is-going-to-bother-someone?

      I.e. some folks here seem to like Katz, some don't, and many feel strongly one way or the other. Is Timothy simply my Katz and I should quit complaining? Or is he really a really bad editor? Are there big Timothy fans out there? Are there other people who, like me, would really like to see him move from a Slashdot Editor to a regular member?

      -Bill

      BTW, Yes, I realize this is off-topic, or can be peceived as a troll, etc. But then again, these are the discussion boards of Slashdot, and sometimes Off-Topic is appropiate. Some of the best threads I remember from the hey-days of Usenet were the ones, that by strictist definition, were "off-topic" ones. Anyway, mod me down I guess, if you feel that strongly that this converstation shouldn't even take place.

      --
      SlashSig Karma: Excellent (mostly affected by moderatio
    12. Re:Slashdot FUD? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      No, you're right... timothy is a boob. However, slashdot editorships are not awarded on merit and, to my knowledge, one has never been revoked.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  7. But is it better than Cryptonomicon? by MeepMeep · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was hoping Neal (Stephenson) would have been able to get Crypto made into a movie...perhaps it would be redundant now.

    I just wanted to see who they would cast as America Shaftoe! (and maybe Glory too, except for the leprosy...)

    1. Re:But is it better than Cryptonomicon? by connorbd · · Score: 2

      One other thought... was Qwghlm a caricature of some location that actually exists in the UK or was it a total figment of Stephenson's imagination like the TWA 800 ceiling ornament?

      /Brian

    2. Re:But is it better than Cryptonomicon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I just wanted to see who they would cast as America Shaftoe! (and maybe Glory too, except for the leprosy...)



      Hey, thanks retard. I started reading the book a couple of days ago. Do you not grasp the concept of putting a spoiler warning? It's not hard.

    3. Re:But is it better than Cryptonomicon? by Si+F. · · Score: 1

      Similar to the Hebrides (heb-rid-ees, not heb-rides) a bunch of islands off north west scotland.

      Just google for hebrides if you're interested.

    4. Re:But is it better than Cryptonomicon? by banky · · Score: 2

      As I understand it, it's a caricature of Wales and the Welsh. Since most of the locations in the book are based on his piece for Wired, where he went around the world tracking the laying of fiber-optic data lines, he had plenty of first-hand experience in the Phillipines, the South Pacific, and other places.

      --
      ZOMG I WOULD LOVE TO KNOW ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS ON MACINTOSH VERSUS WINDOWS, VI VERSUS EMACS, AND HOW YOU'RE NOT A DORK
    5. Re:But is it better than Cryptonomicon? by banky · · Score: 2

      You've got at least 3 movies in there - maybe since trilogies are hot right now, someone could do it.

      And knowing Hollywood, they'd screw up the casting. Tara Reid as America or something. The nice part (to me) about the characters is, none of them are especially Hollywood (unlike, say, The Matrix, an anime flick rendered with humans).

      --
      ZOMG I WOULD LOVE TO KNOW ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS ON MACINTOSH VERSUS WINDOWS, VI VERSUS EMACS, AND HOW YOU'RE NOT A DORK
    6. Re:But is it better than Cryptonomicon? by BitHive · · Score: 0
      I wouldn't want to see any of Stephenson's books made into movies! Why? Because I love them!

      When was the last time a movie came close to doing justice to a good book? I still have a bad taste in my mouth from Sphere. I would not want the breathtaking mindscapes Stephenson's writing creates for me to be supplanted by some cheap Hollywood 120-minute piece of excrement.

      What happens when you take huge, complex, beautiful books like Cryptonomicon and try to make them into movies? Well, take a look at LOTR. I never read the books, but my distinct impression was that they took a much larger and more engrossing story, stripped it to its essentials, and still had trouble fitting the resulting weakened skeleton into three hours.

    7. Re:But is it better than Cryptonomicon? by sql*kitten · · Score: 2

      I just wanted to see who they would cast as America Shaftoe!

      My vote is for Dina Meyer. Or Rachel Weisz.

  8. Re:WTF? by gowen · · Score: 5, Funny
    God, you're an idiot.
    Thank you, Friedrich Nietzsche...
    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  9. DMCA violation by jpm242 · · Score: 5, Funny

    You bet it is, I wouldn't be surprised if Hitler takes this to the courts!

    JP

    --
    --- Worst tagline ever.
    1. Re:DMCA violation by dazed-n-confused · · Score: 2

      You bet it is, I wouldn't be surprised if Hitler takes this to the courts!

      Not the first time American moviemakers have been worried about Herr Hitler and IP litigation: the song the German soldiers sing before the rousing Marseilleise scene in "Casablanca" (1942)is "Die Wacht am Rhein" (never a Nazi favourite), rather than the far more appropriate "Horst Wessel Lied," because the latter was still in copyright...

    2. Re:DMCA violation by gotan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Interesting enough Hitlers Book "Mein Kampf" ("My Fight") is kind of forbidden in Germany. This is done by using the copyright that lies with Bavaria (one german state), they just insist on their copyright and refuse to print the book. The copyright outside of germany isn't in their control though (i believe it lies with some britain company), so it can be printed elsewhere.

      All this is not very effective (there's still some copies about in old attics, most are probably 'imported' from outside) and does more to propagate the book by mystifying it than to avoid it's distribution. It would make far more sense to distribute annotated copies to demonstrate what a load of bullshit the book is (there's an artist reading and commenting selected passages from the book, doing just that).

      As for the Horst Wessel Lied: it's forbidden in Germany, performing it in public will get you in trouble (and rightly so), ID-soft replaced it in their german version of Wolfenstein, and even films critical of the 3rd reich will probably run into legal troubles in germany if they include it. Also it's apparently covered by some complex copyrights.

      --
      "By the way if anyone here is in advertising or marketing... kill yourself." -- Bill Hicks
    3. Re:DMCA violation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did you know?!

      After his escape from the encircling Allied forces, he had radical reconstructive surgery and now goes by the name of Jack Valenti...

  10. NAZI's and DMCA by quantaman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can just imagine Hitler waving the DMCA at the British during WWII when they finally cracked the Enigma! Still interesting to think about how the NAZI's would of felt about the DMCA. Control of the flow of information and ownership of information (and everything else) is a basic principal of any fascist state. I don't think the NAZI's would look too lightly on any sort of circumvention devices.

    --
    I stole this Sig
    1. Re:NAZI's and DMCA by peddrenth · · Score: 2, Informative

      The original codebreaking was never in question here, the author's point is:

      One of the uses to which this movie can be put is to decode something which the reviewer used to copy-protect his work. (remember, the infringing use does not have to be the primary use of a circumvention device)

      With a copy of this movie, I would be able to do something illegal (i.e. read and copy a paragraph of encrypted text) which would not be otherwise possible.

      Now, everyone check your browser settings. If it caches any pages, I'm suing you all for copying this post.

    2. Re:NAZI's and DMCA by Erasmus+Darwin · · Score: 4, Insightful
      "Control of the flow of information and ownership of information (and everything else) is a basic principal of any fascist state."

      And complete lack of control/ownership of information (and everything else) is a basic principal of any anarchistic state.

      Any government requires citizens to give up certain freedoms in order to exist. For example, I am generally prohibited from walking into a busy shopping mall and firing a gun into the air. The goal is to walk the careful balance between too many freedoms (allowing people to randomly shoot people on the street, allowing strangers to wander through your house at 3 am) and too few freedoms (disallowing political dissent, making all property owned by the state).

      It's unfair to reject the notion of controlling information simply because it's something that fascists took to the extreme. You're welcome to argue that the current information control in "free" countries is too far towards the fascist side, but that requires a more detailed, relative judgement.

      To further make the point, incarceration of law breakers is also a basic principal of any fascist state. And yet that doesn't make our jail system inherently wrong.

      All that being said, I do believe that the DMCA does go too far at times. I do not, however, disagree with the underlying motive of reducing copyright infringement.

    3. Re:NAZI's and DMCA by Malc · · Score: 1

      Why would they bother with such a law? They already demonstrated in many other situations that they didn't need courts as they were happy to send around jack-booted stormtroopers to take people away in the middle of the night, are just whip up hysteria and let the people deal with it.

    4. Re:NAZI's and DMCA by steveha · · Score: 2

      All that being said, I do believe that the DMCA does go too far at times. I do not, however, disagree with the underlying motive of reducing copyright infringement.

      The problem with the DMCA is that it is overly broad: you don't have to be accused of infringing copyright, you don't have to be accused even of thinking about infringing copyright, you can be accused of having the tools that would allow you to infringe copyright. If those tools have another, legal use, well, too bad.

      To be precise, the DMCA forbids you to have anything that can be used to break digital rights management. If we accept the idea that someone might use Enigma to encode content to protect their digital rights, then we can argue that a movie which shows how to crack enigma is illegal under the DMCA. This is preposterous, of course, which is why the DMCA itself is preposterous.

      I am not a lawyer, but it seems to me that the DMCA does not forbid the Enigma movie now... but if someone were to use Enigma to protect content, then the movie could arguably become contraband under the DMCA. If you really worried about the DMCA, you had better not ever crack any encryption of any sort, or talk about it. Now that's what I call a "chilling effect" on free speech!

      By the way, it isn't maybe such a stretch to think that someone might use Enigma to protect content; the laughably weak ROT13 scheme has already been used to "protect" PDF files. Dmitry Skylarov spent some time in prison in the US, and part of the reason was that he presented a lecture on how to crack the ROT13 protection on a PDF file.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    5. Re:NAZI's and DMCA by Cyno · · Score: 1

      Doesn't it seem ironic that now Hollywood and the MPAA, a set of corporations which I heard were largely controlled by Jewish interests, promotes something almost as fascist as Nazism.

    6. Re:NAZI's and DMCA by broody · · Score: 1

      And complete lack of control/ownership of information (and everything else) is a basic principal of any anarchistic state.

      So are you just dismissing Anarcho-Capitalism or just listening to Indymedia's lame FAQ too much?

      --
      ~~ What's stopping you?
    7. Re:NAZI's and DMCA by Cyno · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Actually nothing prevents you or anyone else from walking into a busy shopping mall and firing a gun in the air. Even the most strict laws and the best police force could not prevent such a thing. If you wanted to do that. Safety is an illusion. It always has been and always will be. Freedom is not.

      Too few freedoms? Political dissent: voting for a non bi-partisan party. Property: taxes due to the states on all property. Who do you think own your property? The public with one voice can take back any freedoms it chooses. A person does not have that liberty. How much freedom would you give up to exist peacefully with your neighbors?

      I would choose to move before I would give up my freedom of speech or right to bare arms. And if those were taken from me and I could not find a place on this earth to get them back I might just take it out on the closest society, depending on circumstance.

      The answer is relatively simple. In a free society everyone can do whatever they want as long as they don't hurt anyone else. If they hurt someone else they need to face legal consequences for their actions, these have already been drawn out in laws. Its really that simple. Unfortunately corporations would like to punish people when they haven't hurt anyone, and that's where the conflict with freedom comes in.

      To relate this back to the topic, its like human error when administrating computers. Computers can be secured with enough planning by competent engineers. However, when Joe Smith works on his system he likes to enable telnet and several other security holes because he doesn't know any better. Similarly we have many politicians voting for laws that take freedoms away from citizens because they're playing Joe Smith, skimming over the bills and voting whichever way makes them the most money because they don't know any better. Its not about money. Its about happiness, life and liberty. But this is what you get when you let your finance department run your networks.

    8. Re:NAZI's and DMCA by westfirst · · Score: 2

      but if someone were to use Enigma to protect content, then the movie could arguably become contraband under the DMCA

      The author explicitly uses the Enigma system to protect a sentence! So it's happened.

    9. Re:NAZI's and DMCA by skymester · · Score: 1

      There was death penalty on listening to an british (enemy) radio station during the war in Germany. So much about flow of information.

    10. Re:NAZI's and DMCA by Erasmus+Darwin · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "So are you just dismissing Anarcho-Capitalism"

      The problem with that is that everything becomes contract law. Suddenly, you've offloaded the "protect the IP" burden on to the already hated licensing agreement.

      Pro: This would probably require an upfront, formally signed contract rather than the "break the seal to indicate acceptance" bullshit.

      Con: The contract would have to be worded such that all damages caused by secondary violators (i.e. people who redistribute the work obtained from the original violator) is recoverable from the primary violator. Since the secondary violators haven't signed the contract, there's nothing to stop them from "legally" redistributing the work.

      Con: Weak legal IP protection mechanisms encourage content producers to use elaborate copy protection systems.

      Con: Weak overall IP protection discourages commercial interests from entering an IP-based venture. While some people would herald the influx of indie artists working off busking-type systems, there's really nothing to stop such artists from doing that already.

      Pro: Artists will focus more on live performances, using freely distributed music as a means of advertising.

      Con: Other IP ventures don't have the equivilent of concerts. Books would even lose the hardcopy advantage, since anyone with a printing press could theoretically start churning out cheaper, professionally printed copies, provided they can get their hands on the book without signing the accompanying license agreement.

    11. Re:NAZI's and DMCA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [[For example, I am generally prohibited from walking into a busy shopping mall and firing a gun into the air.]]

      You are, I believe, prohibited from firing a gun into the air just about anywhere. What goes up, must come down. I have no idea of the laws concerning shopping malls outfitted with proper berms in the food court.

    12. Re:NAZI's and DMCA by aminorex · · Score: 2

      Freedom of information is the sine qua non of democracy:
      It is impossible to make a free decision on the basis of
      controlled information; without freedom of information,
      the government is illegitimate.

      The US is now a facist oligarchy, in which a seething mass
      of media wonks, intelligence hacks, and monied interests
      battle for ever increasing shares of the power once reserved
      to the electorate. There can be no democracy in the US because
      there is no effective dissemination of the crucial pertinent
      facts regarding current events, and because the state has
      systematically indoctrinated the plebians into a willing
      servitude, through the state schools and the allied media.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    13. Re:NAZI's and DMCA by BlueFashoo · · Score: 1

      Perhaps this movie should be encoded with enigma.

      --
      Nice Marmot
    14. Re:NAZI's and DMCA by broody · · Score: 1

      LOL.

      I was not advocating Anarcho-Capitalism at all, nor have I ever done so. The orginal post was either under the false impression that all forms of Anarchism involve the elimination of private property or was trying to play the ideological purity test game.

      --
      ~~ What's stopping you?
  11. Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This movie is about sex and mathematics..

    I'm not even gonna say it ;)

    1. Re:Wow. by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2
      This movie is about sex and mathematics.. I'm not even gonna say it ;)
      What? Divide her legs and multiply?

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
  12. English, know it much? by DirkDaring · · Score: 1

    "In all of the scary stories Hollywood circulates about copyright piracy, nothing could be scarier that the gang of file swapping, copyright circumventing hackers in the new movie 'Enigma'."

    ...in the new movie 'Emigma' WHAT? That they... WHAT!?

    Complete your damn sentence!

    1. Re:English, know it much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently the spelling of Enigma has changed. -Don't bitch about grammar if you can't spell.

    2. Re:English, know it much? by Wildcat+J · · Score: 1
      I believe that's actually a typo rather than an incomplete sentence. I think he meant "nothing could be could be scarier than the gang of file swapping, copyright circumventing hackers..."

      -J

    3. Re:English, know it much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but 't' and 'n' are not very close to each other on the keyboard (unless its not qwerty, which is possible).

      I could see typo if it read "nothing could be scarier tham" or "nothing could be scarier thah" or something. But a 't'?

    4. Re:English, know it much? by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 2

      Indeed, T and N are right next to each other on the Dvorak layout.

      graspee

    5. Re:English, know it much? by oomcow · · Score: 1

      That is a complete sentence.

      Nothing (subject) could be (verb) scarier (adjective ).

      Don't be distracted by the other somewhat awkward clauses in the sentence.

    6. Re:English, know it much? by oldsk8r · · Score: 1

      The correct term is 'literal', not 'typo'.

  13. Gosh, I'm glad this is about WWII... by Qwerpafw · · Score: 0, Insightful

    When I read the beginning of the review on the main page, i thought it was some nightmarish procution dreamed up by the DMCA nazis in the music/viedo industry. Actually, I got pretty worked up about by the time i clecked "Read More..." I was all ready to post a giant rant about the MPAA, the RIAA, and how they suck ass.

    While I am sure that this serves as a terrific attention-getting device, in the future try not to have such blatantly BS and non-factual headlines. Its deception for the purpose of getting hits, something I didn't think slashdot would stoop to. And its "Bait and Switch," kinda, in that you come expecting something, see the add, then actually read something else.

    That said, it looks like a great film. Maybe I'll go see it, though I am pretty well read on the enigma story as it is. Of course, I saw LoTR, so thats a cheesy argument ;)

    1. Re:Gosh, I'm glad this is about WWII... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While slightly bad taste, I think it was just a lame attempt at some satire. Maybe they need a disclaimer when it's not so obvious to everyone?

    2. Re:Gosh, I'm glad this is about WWII... by redhatbox · · Score: 5, Funny


      "While I am sure that this serves as a terrific attention-getting device, in the future try not to have such blatantly BS and non-factual headlines. Its deception for the purpose of getting hits, something I didn't think slashdot would stoop to. And its "Bait and Switch," kinda, in that you come expecting something, see the add, then actually read something else."

      (shakes head) Funny... I actually found the intro paragraph *humorous*. Sure, it's bound to increase clickthroughs and pageviews (and bandwidth used by millions of /.ers, and the national deficit, and my dick size, errr... never mind). I say "more power to 'em", because it was meant to be funny for God's sake.

      Was the humor factor really lost on that many people? Maybe this is just Monday Syndrome.

    3. Re:Gosh, I'm glad this is about WWII... by natefaerber · · Score: 2, Insightful

      At what point was the summary "blatantly BS" or "non-factual"? I don't even think it was that misleading. Just because it caught your eye and made you think something else doesn't mean it was wrong. I don't see the words DMCA or MPAA in that summary. It was your preconceived notions that filled in the rest of the story before reading the review. The "BS" is in your head.

      I think the movie sounds a lot more exciting with that type of description. It was very poignant but still true to the plot.

      --
      -- My HARDWARE, My CHOICE.
    4. Re:Gosh, I'm glad this is about WWII... by Eccles · · Score: 1

      (shakes head) Funny... I actually found the intro paragraph *humorous*.

      It's Bell's Second Law of the Internet (used to be Usenet, when I came up with it in the late 80's): No matter how facetious or satirical you are, someone will take you seriously.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  14. Alan Turing by sspacepyro · · Score: 1

    It's too bad it sounds like it left out the most important player in the whole operation - Alan Turing.

    1. Re:Alan Turing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, of course. He was homosexual, and everybody knows that the only homosexuals allowed in movies are either blatant queens or people dying from incurable diseases.

    2. Re:Alan Turing by Dante · · Score: 1

      I agree; and the fact that he way gay probably had somthing to do with that. I think thats a shame, romance and gay still don't mix in Hollywood's minds.

      There was a play on Turing though.BREAKING THE CODE I allways wanted to see it. Derek Jacobi rocks!

      --
      "think of it as evolution in action"
    3. Re:Alan Turing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well of course. I mean, they'd have a hard time making the fact that he was gay "Socially acceptable". Much easier to leave him out entirely. They managed to white wash Nash's sexuality, and look at the piece of crap movie that turned out there. Just a bunch of hollywood fluff for the masses.

    4. Re:Alan Turing by Dante · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree; and the fact that he way gay probably had somthing to do with that. I think thats a shame, romance and gay still don't mix in Hollywood's minds.

      There was a play on Turing though.BREAKING THE CODE I allways wanted to see it. Derek Jacobi rocks!

      BTW I own a first addition American of the Hodges book.

      --
      "think of it as evolution in action"
    5. Re:Alan Turing by gwernol · · Score: 2

      I agree; and the fact that he way gay probably had somthing to do with that. I think thats a shame, romance and gay still don't mix in Hollywood's minds.

      I agree - the film makers were looking for a way to turn the story of the Bletchley Park codebreakers into a romance, so "obviously" the leading man had to go after the girl. It is a shame.

      There was a play on Turing though.BREAKING THE CODE [turing.org.uk] I allways wanted to see it. Derek Jacobi rocks!

      I was lucky enough to see Jacobi in Breaking the Code when I lived in the UK. He was, indeed, excellent as AMT. I was also lucky enough to meet Robin Gandy who was one of Turning's students and a major mathematician in his own right. Its a crime that Turing was harried into an early suicide; we can only wonder what he might have achieved if he had lived.

      --
      Sailing over the event horizon
    6. Re:Alan Turing by Dante · · Score: 1

      I was lucky enough to see Jacobi in Breaking the Code when I lived in the UK.


      You suck!... no realy :>

      I wish I could have seen it, Oh well, that is a worthy think for a review on Slashdot.

      I was also lucky enough to meet Robin Gandy [turing.org.uk] who was one of Turning's students and a major mathematician in his own right.

      And let me guess you knew Penrose too.


      Thanks for the additional info!
      --
      "think of it as evolution in action"
    7. Re:Alan Turing by Laplace · · Score: 2

      Enigma broken without him? That might be a bit of a stretch. You can thank the Poles for doing most of the tough work. They spent a lot of time breaking Enigma codes before they were invaded, while France and Britian sat on their thumbs and looked worried.

      --
      The middle mind speaks!
    8. Re:Alan Turing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Attention Turing lovers:
      • FAGS
      • NOT ALLOWED IN HISTORICAL FILMS.
      Deal with it. Try sticking you penis into a place it was made to go, instead of a shit hole you freaks. Gag.
    9. Re:Alan Turing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Turing wasn't in the book either, and - I think - for literary reasons, not because of anxiety about a homophobic reactions. Indeed there have already been a couple of British films about Turing.

      Simply put, Harris was striving to capture the feel of Bletchley and codebreaking, and to write a gripping novel, rather than to provide a history. In many ways, the the Tom Jericho character *is* based on Turing (in terms of character rather than actions), but by fictionalising it, Harris can have him do things that Turing never did without upsetting the purists.

      Read the book. As well as being a great suspense novel, it also provides a great view of life in wartime England.

      Harry

    10. Re:Alan Turing by panurge · · Score: 1

      What makes the omission worse is that Turing was at Princeton for a while, and it may have been while there that he saw how electronics could be used to build logic circuits. Don't only leave out Bletchley's chief genius, folks, leave out the one who had a Transatlantic dimension. I'm now awaiting the next Hollywood Bible epic - in which a sympathetic group of GIs rescue the Israelites from Egypt (no Moses, of course. Too Jewish.)

      --
      Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    11. Re:Alan Turing by gwernol · · Score: 2

      Enigma broken without him? That might be a bit of a stretch. You can thank the Poles for doing most of the tough work. They spent a lot of time breaking Enigma codes before they were invaded, while France and Britian sat on their thumbs and looked worried.

      I don't think so. The mathematical analysis to break the code was largely a joint effort of which Turning was a part. But the important part was the ability to reproduce the crack in a mechanical way, given that the code rotated every 24 hours and effectively had to be rebroken each time. Even once you know the algorithm to break a code, it couldn't in practice be done in anywhere near real time without a computer. So Turing effectively built a computer to very quickly do the math and break a code.

      Without the machine, codes would have taken months to break, making the unencoded information essentially useless. I think Turing's achievement, which also laid the foundation for most of modern computation, was indeed essential to the war effort. Without it the breaking of the Enigma code would have been an interesting academic exercise only.

      --
      Sailing over the event horizon
    12. Re:Alan Turing by Laplace · · Score: 2

      Machines to automate the code breaking process were developed, but most were mechanical and operated by humans who cranked away until one of them broke the code for the day. Sometimes the code fell quickly, other times it never was. Computers were developed during this time to aid in the cracking of the code, and Turing did play a large role in this.

      For the most part, once the mechanics of Enigma were established (for the early Enigma codes, mostly the work of the Poles), cracking German codes was done by brute force.

      --
      The middle mind speaks!
    13. Re:Alan Turing by seldolivaw · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Maybe the reason so many stories seem to leave out Turing's role (Cryptonomicon is a wonderful exception) is the distasteful and appalling way he met his death. Turing was gay (and fairly openly so, for the time). The government put him through a number of disgusting "conversion therapies" (including electroshock, etc. if I recall correctly) and he eventually took his own life. It is an appalling abuse of human rights by the British government, and perpetrated against a man who single-handedly did an enormous amount to help end the war.

    14. Re:Alan Turing by gwernol · · Score: 1

      You suck!... no realy :>

      I wish I could have seen it.


      Grins.

      I was also lucky enough to meet Robin Gandy [turing.org.uk] who was one of Turning's students and a major mathematician in his own right.

      And let me guess you knew Penrose too.


      I only met Penrose once, and it was brief. I happen to take issue with the fundamental thesis that underlies his work, and I think its antithetical to Turing's work. So, its probably a good thing that I've never had a chance to really tell him what I think :-)

      I have met Douglas Hofstader too, while I'm in name-dropping mode. His work is brilliant.

      --
      Sailing over the event horizon
    15. Re:Alan Turing by brook · · Score: 1

      Yes, this seems wrong to me as well. There is a very good play called "Breaking the Code" by Hugh Whitemore (1986), that starred Derek Jacoby in the London and New York premiers. It may have used material from the above biography, I can't remember. I think I'll pass on this movie, and Tom Stoppard is my favorite playwright. Anyone who would ignore the heroism and tragedy of Alan Turing is not a person I care to hear from on this subject.

    16. Re:Alan Turing by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 2
      I agree--the film makers were looking for a way to turn the story of the Bletchley Park codebreakers into a romance, so "obviously" the leading man had to go after the girl.

      Hey--most of us are heterosexual. Guys don't want to see two guys falling in love; gals don't want to see two gals falling in love. Why waste money on such a thing? I want to see some a guy and a girl fall in love. And so do the vast majority of men and women.

      Now, turning it into a romance in the first place is the bit I find dubious. Why bother? Why must every movie have a love interest?

    17. Re:Alan Turing by kubrick · · Score: 2

      Hey--most of us are heterosexual. Guys don't want to see two guys falling in love; gals don't want to see two gals falling in love. Why waste money on such a thing? I want to see some a guy and a girl fall in love. And so do the vast majority of men and women.

      I think you're generalising wildly there.

      I'd rather see an accurate rendition of history instead of having everything whitewashed into some heterosexual fantasy. And I'd hope that more people than you think are open-minded enough to believe that the love that exists between two men, or that between two women, is just as valid and worthy of portrayal as that between a man and a woman.

      Heck, given societal attitudes towards homosexual relationships, there's probably more scope for dramatic incidents, tragedy, etc...

      I do agree that a movie about codebreaking definitely doesn't need a romance, though. :)

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    18. Re:Alan Turing by armb · · Score: 2

      > In many ways, the the Tom Jericho character *is* based on Turing (in terms of character rather than actions)

      In some ways, yes. But making him be the hero of a straight romance instead of being persecuted for his homosexuality is a _major_ difference.

      Incidentally, Bletchley Park is now a museum. (The movie wasn't filmed there and doesn't recreate it (as you say, it's capturing the feel rather than trying to be a history)).
      http://www.bletchleypark.org.uk/

      The secret they uncover in the film is real. I don't know how much was known at the time or whether it was mentioned in Enigma traffic.
      http://www.cia.gov/csi/studies/winter99- 00/art6.ht ml

      --
      rant
  15. intro copy by Alien54 · · Score: 2
    the intro copy probably was as funny as PetsorFood.com

    no, actually that place is funnier, if a bit sick.

    I think the PBS documentary on Enigma was probably more on the money, but not as viable for Hollywood type profit motives.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  16. Hmmm by Gizzmonic · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I balk at your comparison between Big Media and the Nazis. And l33t H4x0rz vs. Bletchley Park? Todebreakers of that time don't have too much in common with today's copyright-circumventing hackers.

    The fictional encomium to hacking (the Cryptonomicon) tries to draw a parallel, but let's not forget that the codebreakers of WW2 were trying to save their country. They didn't think "information wants to be free"-as a matter of fact, the fact that Enigma was broken was one of the most jealously guarded secrets of the war.

    Today's hackers (or "crackers" if you prefer) are mostly motivated by challenge and ego. Although there is a mythological character called "the good hacker," he coincides with reality about as much as the "honorable thief."

    --
    (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    1. Re:Hmmm by happyhippy · · Score: 1

      The code breakers at Betchley Park didnt even know what they going to work at when they were interviewed. Some were asked to complete crosswords in interviews.

    2. Re:Hmmm by danro · · Score: 2

      Today's hackers (or "crackers" if you prefer) are mostly motivated by challenge and ego

      Have you ever met a matematician?
      Because the sentence above seems to be a pretty accurate description of most I met...
      ...and I am sure that goes for the chums at Bletchley Park too.
      Saving their country was probably just a perk to them.
      (Albeit a really nice one.)

      --

      "First lesson," Jon said. "Stick them with the pointy end."
  17. [offtopic]Re:But is it better than Cryptonomicon? by forkboy · · Score: 1

    I had Willem Dafoe cast as Shaftoe in the mental casting of this book that I invariably perform on books that I read. This is way before Spiderman was even announced...I just pictured the character in my head as looking and acting like Dafoe's character in Platoon.

    --
    This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
  18. http://www.enigma-themovie.com by codeonezero · · Score: 1

    That's the right link to the Enigma move site. Not http://www.enigmathemovie.com

    --

    ....
    int main (void) { ... }

  19. Re:Out of Date Already by dirvish · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It is a historical account. How could it be out of date?

  20. Society Only Appreciates Scientists In Movies by GuyMannDude · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This movie may dramatize the codebreakers as sex symbols and symbols of power but this was certainly not the case in real life. Consider the case of brilliant Alan Turing. He essentially led the effort to break the Engima code. How did society repay him? He was an outcast for being an "out" homosexual. He was harrassed throughout his life (read more). The British government let the professional and personal attacks on him continue because they didn't want to reveal his role in helping to crack the code, even years after the war was over. Unable to accept the fact that the same government he did an incredible service for now actively attacked him, he committed suicide. The "we need to keep his role secret" excuse is rediculous. No one raised a stink when Churchil published his memoroirs, which were filled with sensitive material.

    I don't suppose the true story of Turing made it into this film at all.

    GMD

    1. Re:Society Only Appreciates Scientists In Movies by blamanj · · Score: 2

      I don't suppose the true story of Turing made it into this film at all.

      According to IMDB, there's no character named "Turing" at all, so unless they all have fictionalized names, he doesn't even play a part.

      It would be sad, though, if he was left out completely, and there wasn't a least a character who "represented" him.

    2. Re:Society Only Appreciates Scientists In Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      riiiight. so you realize society would be basically nowhere close to where it is now without all the homo's in the past who have contributed so much? Newton, for instance? There's a ton more. Get your head out of the ground. I've said it before and I'll say it again, the main reason people lash out at gays is because they have issues with their own sexuality. They hate the fact that gays have accepted what they are, and live with it, and don't deny themselves. You probably go around saying how gays choose to be gay, since you obviously have "chosen" to be straight. well honey, it's gonna hit you sooner or later in your miserable life that denying who you are is a self destructive illness, and it aint gonna get you anywhere except for a public bathroom late at night getting anonymous blowjobs from other closeted pricks, while your wifey is at home getting ploughed by the mailman.

    3. Re:Society Only Appreciates Scientists In Movies by clion999 · · Score: 1

      According to one of the links above , Turing was one of the codebreakers who served as a model for the protagonist. They left out the gayness, however, because the protogonist was obviously ga-ga over a girl.

    4. Re:Society Only Appreciates Scientists In Movies by Dante · · Score: 1

      Not into this film; but there was a play and a "television movie" staring Derek Jacobi. Breaking the Code

      --
      "think of it as evolution in action"
    5. Re:Society Only Appreciates Scientists In Movies by Coolfish · · Score: 2

      um, maybe you should do some research before you say stuff. the majority of pedos are STRAIGHT men. I for one find "kid rape" highly disgusting, and support severe laws to ensure that anyone who abuses a child sexually gets the maximum jail time.

      for the record:
      "You can't let gays near children; since they can't reproduce, they recruit. And they are all pedophiles.

      Statistics show that the vast majority of sexual abuse is committed by men against women, usually within the heterosexual family structure. Pedophiles are criminals who derive illicit pleasure from sexual abuse of children, and whose adult sexual attractions are almost always to members of the opposite sex. Most sexual abuse of children occurs at the hands of parents or relatives. Lies perpetuate stereotypes that are then used to deny gay people our rights. It is wrong to deny rights based on these myths. "
      From http://www.ifas.org/fw/9408/rhetoric.html
      (emphas is mine)

      and another thing: gays do not recruit. The only people who forced me to go against my sexual orientation were straight people, who actively bash gays.

    6. Re:Society Only Appreciates Scientists In Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Com'ere, ya big lug. You're just so cute when you make retarded analogies.

      People lash out against paedophiles because they do harmful things to children. People lash out at homosexual men not to protect other men, but because it bothers them. Why does it bother them? That's the question, and he's suggesting that for at least some men it's because they are unsure of their own sexuality, and they don't like that, so they transfer that dislike to someone else who represents the things they don't like about themselves. Logically, straight men should be happy that other men aren't interested in women. There's more to go around that way.

    7. Re:Society Only Appreciates Scientists In Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Consider the case of brilliant Alan Turing. He essentially led the effort to break the Engima code. How did society repay him? He was an outcast for being an "out" homosexual.

      What the hell does his sexual preference have to do with anything? What's with you people and making it a big show whenever someone is gay. Why don't you just treat every one the same way?

      Sickening.

    8. Re:Society Only Appreciates Scientists In Movies by Cyno · · Score: 1
      I for one find "kid rape" highly disgusting

      Interesting. I find "adult/kid sex" highly arousing, my feelings towards rape depend on its nature ("scene" vs. "nonconsensual"). Although I'd never have sex with a minor because it is illegal. I was a kid once, believe it or not, and I thought about having sex with adults, then. I fail to see how it would have hurt me as long as they didn't nonconsentually rape me. I think its important to be brutally honest about this topic.

    9. Re:Society Only Appreciates Scientists In Movies by Coolfish · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The fact is that maybe if people knew that gays contribute to society like everyone else, then people hopefully wouldn't be so uptight about them. I'd love it if everyone was treated the same way, but take a look at the posts and you'll see a lot of hatred towards gays, and that's why we make a big stink when one of our own is dismissed simply because of his sexual orientation.

    10. Re:Society Only Appreciates Scientists In Movies by Coolfish · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      kids shouldn't be exposed to that. sex is a highly involved activity, both mentally and physically, which children are not ready for. just like doing drugs, driving a car, fighting wars, etc etc. children should live in a world of bliss where they can be shielded from all that grown up stuff, where they can enjoy life without all the pains and turmoil that adults have to endure.

    11. Re:Society Only Appreciates Scientists In Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sheesh... they could've just made him ga-ga over a guy. If you're using Turing as a model for the character, it would make a lot more sense.

    12. Re:Society Only Appreciates Scientists In Movies by Cyno · · Score: 1

      I agree. But there are a lot of adults that aren't mentally or physically ready to be exposed to sex or drugs. The time when it is appropriate is different for each of us. But if we didn't have all these hangups about sex I bet it wouldn't hurt a 16 year old to experiment with some cute older lady he meets innocently and consentually. Nor would it hurt a 19 year old to wait a few years before experimenting. I fear that most people don't know the truth about sex or drugs and all these lies they've been told will only cause problems when they become adults and attempt to act grown up. No one should ever have to fight in a war. That is NOT part of life. And driving a car is one of the rare situations when extreme responsibility is required. Something only an adult can provide. But that's not to say that a 14 year old can't be that responsible or carry adult status, while a 22 year old might still be immature and irresponsible.

    13. Re:Society Only Appreciates Scientists In Movies by TrevorB · · Score: 3, Insightful

      (don't mod down... take a calm, deep breath... then reply rationally...)

      OK, explain to me why homosexuality intrinsicly has to do with "sex" more than hetrosexuality does? It's not like society tries to ban "Titanic" for being a hetrosexual love story, and I'm sure parents took their kids to that movie...

      People committing suicide becuase they're ostracized becuase of their orientation is very MUCH something relevant to kids. Hell, gay teens need good role models in movies and on TV.

      I don't think anyone's suggesting that we make "Turing Porn" here... it's very easy to portray a character as out without involving "sex".

      If you raise kids in a bubble, without teaching them ABOUT sex, drugs, cars, wars, what are they going to do about it when they are confronted with it? They need to be given the time and knowledge to come to an understanding on their own.

    14. Re:Society Only Appreciates Scientists In Movies by waldeaux · · Score: 2

      So, by your (non-)logic, non-heterosexual relatives of a child should be cast out of the family until they're no longer minors?

      Of course, you never stopped to consider how much heterosexual sexual innuendo is around us 24/7 from things on TV to subliminal shapes on boxes of Ritz crackers...

      The standard suggestion applies here: go TALK to your non-heterosexual family members, neighbors, co-workers, friends, and acquaintences. They'll help you get over all of these issues.

    15. Re:Society Only Appreciates Scientists In Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Unable to accept the fact that the same government he did an incredible service for now actively attacked him, he committed suicide

      He had other reasons to commit suicide. The govt forced him to follow a hormone treatment that had a huge physical impact.

      And turing didn't only helped solving the enigma code. He basically founded the theorical computer science.

      Moron govt. And moron filemakers, as he isn't even in the movie...

    16. Re:Society Only Appreciates Scientists In Movies by Coolfish · · Score: 2

      mod that guy up..

      i hope you realize though i was talking about something else (see the parent post to which i was actually responding) and not about exposing children to homosexuality (any more so than they are overexposed to heterosexuality right now).

      hell, if i had known about gays like Turing, life would probably have been much simpler for me. If I had known that

      Turing
      Nash (although he denies it, he's obviously at least bi )
      Newton
      Tchaikovsky
      good grief, if anyone can think of anymore, please follow-up to this?

      were all gay, I probably would not have had such a major problem accepting my sexuality for such a long time. Gay teens have it incredibly tough (their suicide rate is 4 times higher than straight teens) and having gay role models like those above is definately necessary. So when Hollywood goes out of its way to take away those roll models, they are doing everyone a disservice.

    17. Re:Society Only Appreciates Scientists In Movies by BryceH · · Score: 1

      When i first read this i thought +5 Funny .. then i realized you were serious. Ever notice how kids that were heavily shielded while they were supposed to be growing up generaly _go wild_ when they get the first smell of freedom (college comes to mind). Children should not be shielded from the real world. A parents purpose is to help the child grow up so that they can deal with "all that grown up stuff". if they are not aware of "grown up stuff" they will never grow up. And tell me, wouldnt you rather be the one answering your childs real tough questions before their peer group gets a chance to?

      --
      "Shut up brain or ill stab you with a Q-tip" Homer Simpson
    18. Re:Society Only Appreciates Scientists In Movies by Coolfish · · Score: 2

      okay, first off i think a lot of people mis-read my post.. this is evidenced by your post and the others. And I agree with you guys, but only if you didn't read the post that I was actually responding to, which was about HAVING SEX WITH CHILDREN. Not exposing children to sex, but actually doing it WITH them. That is what I have an objection to.

      People, please read all the posts not just the ones that are modded up.

    19. Re:Society Only Appreciates Scientists In Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I believe pedophiles are more frequently attracted to boys than girls (both is also common). Actual pedophiles are attracted to children who have not physically matured sexually as opposed to children who are below the age of consent but sexually developed - in the latter case having sex with them is abuse, but not pedophilia. People like to lump things together, especially unpleasant things that they don't want to understand.

      Anyway, I wouldn't classify a pedophile as gay or straight, but as an entirely different sexual orientation.

    20. Re:Society Only Appreciates Scientists In Movies by TrevorB · · Score: 1

      Oh geez, I thought you were replying directly to the parent node of the thread. Sorry about taking your message out of context, that's what I get for browsing at a threshold...

    21. Re:Society Only Appreciates Scientists In Movies by BryceH · · Score: 1

      i did mis-read. sorry :)

      --
      "Shut up brain or ill stab you with a Q-tip" Homer Simpson
    22. Re:Society Only Appreciates Scientists In Movies by TrevorB · · Score: 1

      Reading other confused posters, I might suggest quoting and italicizing relevant comments in the post you're replying to, particularily if you're pretty sure they're gonna get modded down to -1... :)

    23. Re:Society Only Appreciates Scientists In Movies by CTachyon · · Score: 1

      Given that the government basically gave Turing three options:

      • Go to jail for life
      • Take breast-growing and male-libido-impairing injections of estrogen for life
      • Commit suicide (the implicit out)

      ... I can't say I wouldn't have done the same in his place, although I probably would have tried to immigrate to a more gay-friendly country first. It's really a shame, too, as some of his most brilliant work was in the latter part of his life.

      --
      Range Voting: preference intensity matters
    24. Re:Society Only Appreciates Scientists In Movies by TrevorB · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's very sobering to realize that many of us owe our very existance to Alan Turing.

      In the Nova special "Breaking the Code", they speculated that Turing's work probably cut WW2 down by about 2 years. My father was born in 1945, and my Grandfather fought at the Battle of Casino in Italy in 1944.

      Without Turing, my Dad might not have even been born (spare me quantum causality arguments about butterfly wings or Churchill sneezing. :)

      Turing deserves praise for his work and recognition for how he was abandoned by the UK govt, even if it's posthomously and 50 years after his death.

    25. Re:Society Only Appreciates Scientists In Movies by Pansy · · Score: 0

      Someone please LART this SOB

      --
      People are the problem, stop procreation now!
    26. Re:Society Only Appreciates Scientists In Movies by JWhitlock · · Score: 3, Interesting
      One of the reasons that the British government was quiet about Turing's role was that they wanted to keep it a secret that the Enigma machines had been compromised. According to a book on the subject (The Codebreakers, Kahn, 1996, ISBN 0-684-83130-9):

      The great story of the solution of the Enigma machine ... remained a tightly held secret for almost 30 years. ... The British government insisted upon this because it had given the thousands of Enigma machines that it had gathered up after the end of the war to its former colonies as they gained independence and needed secure systems of communication.

      Is this a nobler excuse than the "we don't want to bother helping a homo" excuse? Not really, but it might put a different perspective on Turing's tragic life.

    27. Re:Society Only Appreciates Scientists In Movies by RangerSpeedBumpp · · Score: 1

      I wanted to bring up the same point. This movie offends me since it not only whitewashes the homeosexual persecution of Turing, but it gives him a girlfriend and a love story subplot. You might as well give Mother Theresa a hunky boyfriend in a dramatized movie with lots of car chases through the streets of Calcutta.

    28. Re:Society Only Appreciates Scientists In Movies by plierhead · · Score: 1

      Actually if you read Churchill's memoirs (hard work, there are 5 volumes of them and much of it is quoted direct from pretty dry official utterances) you will find there is not a single mention of Enigma anywhere, not, from memory, of Ultra. Churchill gave virtually nothing away in them about the importance of code breaking to the allied effort, because this information was still secret when he wrote.

      --

      [x] auto-moderate all posts by this user as insightful

    29. Re:Society Only Appreciates Scientists In Movies by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2

      I've read Churchill's 6-volume history of WW2, which was done in the early 1950's, and in it he seems to pussyfoot around the issues of codebreaking, refering to it only obliquely, talking occasioanlly about knowing where the Germans were going to be next by way of "special intelligence" techniques. The word "Enigma" didn't even appear. Now, one might imagine that this is because the books were written at a very vague high-level, except that they *did* go into a lot of detail about a lot of other science projects being funded by the war effort, like the atom bomb, and all sorts of radar jamming and misdirection techniques. (Including a long-winded explanation of something that I think is what we call "chaff" today - a bunch of aluminum strips at just the right length to match the German radar wavelength, dropped from a few plane sto flutter down, would show up as a large group of planes on German radar screens, and this method was used to redirect fighter defenses to bogus locations as a diversionary measure, including during the landing on Normady. Great care was also made in the books to describe the fact that British radar engineers reverse-engineeed one of the German navigational radar becons used by nighttime bombers, and figured out how to not just jam it, but actually deflect the beacon a few degrees to trick bombers into dropping their payload onto empty fields instead of cities.

      And yet, with all of that, no mention was made of Enigma, which should have equal or greater prominience to those projects.

      So I do think there really was something to the claim that the Brits did't want to reveal too much about Enigma and that's why they kept silent about Turing's involvement.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    30. Re:Society Only Appreciates Scientists In Movies by RangerSpeedBumpp · · Score: 1

      What the hell does his sexual preference have to do with anything? What's with you people and making it a big show whenever someone is gay.

      Imagine if you're watching a story about the american revolution. And George Washington and Ben Franklin are sleeping together. Would that bother you? It would bother me. I don't care who's gay and who's not gay, but I do care when they change history and ignore aspects of the story that deserve some attention.

    31. Re:Society Only Appreciates Scientists In Movies by deRais · · Score: 1

      > The "we need to keep his role secret" excuse is rediculous.

      The British Government needed to keep the fact that they had broken the Enigma code secret because they were selling the technology to their allies, like Australia, after the war.

  21. Get a grip, man! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It was a pretty dumb idea for a teaser, but to accuse /. of using the teaser to spread FUD is even dumber.

    No one of any value to society is going to act solely on a one-paragraph blurb on /., and everyone else who reads it will get curious and either read the rest of the review or get suspicious when the story isn't backed up by other news sources.

  22. False advertising by Ichoran · · Score: 1, Redundant

    That is absolutely the worst introductory paragraph for a review that I have ever seen. I am not fond of the DMCA either, but don't you think that the opening paragraph describing the review should have at least some resemblance to what the movie is actually about?

    I am very disappointed in Slashdot (timothy in particular) for using that first paragraph as the summary on the main page. If you're going to publish the review at all, for heaven's sake, take the time to write two sentences describing the review, or excerpt a useful section, instead of using the useless and misleading first paragraph! Here, I'll do it for you:

    Peter Waner reviews Enigma, writing "Enigma" is about good codebreakers -- the mathematicians and clerks of Great Britain's Bletchley Park who helped the Allied cause during World War II by breaking the German coding machine known as "Enigma." (Read on for the rest of Peter's review.)

    1. Re:False advertising by eyegor · · Score: 1

      Not a bad job tweaking us. I was all ready to start howling about "evil hollywood". The movie described in the opening paragraph won't be out until later this summer.

      --

      Don't anthropomorphize computers, they don't like it.
  23. National Cryptologic Museum has an Enigma by dwheeler · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you're interested in cryptography, and you can get to Maryland (USA), visit the National Cryptologic Museum. Among other things, they have an Enigma there. If you can't go and visit yourself, here's their picture and a short description of the Enigma. They have lots of other exhibits too, and there's no entrance fee. Last time I visited, they even let you play with an Enigma, so you could encrypt and decrypt messages with it.

    --
    - David A. Wheeler (see my Secure Programming HOWTO)
    1. Re:National Cryptologic Museum has an Enigma by clion999 · · Score: 1

      I have to agree. The museum could be much better if the NSA let their guys declassify things, but it's still quite good.

    2. Re:National Cryptologic Museum has an Enigma by LMCBoy · · Score: 2

      I agree, it's a really cool museum. They have several enigma machines, though, not just one, and (part of) a giant codebreaking computer used in the United States during WW2, based on a Turing design, IIRC.

      I caught part of a guided tour last time I was there. The tour guide said that next year the Korean War section would be much more interesting...because stuff from that era would finally be declassified (!)

      It's on 295 (Baltimore-Washington Parkway), right next to the NSA.

      --
      Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
  24. -1, Troll by foobar104 · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    I really, really wish you could moderate stories as well as comments.

    1. Re:-1, Troll by gooberguy · · Score: 1

      Kuro5hin allows users to moderate stories and comments. It's a little more democratic than /.

      D/\ Gooberguy

      --


      Karma: Meh (Mostly from meh.)
  25. Ambitious Subject by Mignon · · Score: 2, Funny
    This movie is about sex and mathematics and the crucial satisfaction that comes from understanding the depth of their power.

    Sex and mathematics?

    1. Re:Ambitious Subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, Multiplication.

      Zoober

  26. The Real Story by instinctdesign · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've heard good things about the film, and hopefully it will get to a screen near me. I would also highly recommend, if your interested in documentaries about the real story, Nova's excellent "Breaking the Code."

    Its really amazing some of the details that people never hear about breaking the Enigma code. One quick fact/story that I remember (obviously paraphrased and correct me if I make any errors, its been a bit since I last saw it): One of the first versions of the Enigma code that the British were able to crack, was the Luftwaffe code. How? To set up the machine to decode the enigma code, you needed to base the rotors off a three letter unencrypted sequence and another three letters that were encrypted. Unfortunately for the Germans, the operators got lazy all too often. If the first three letters were HIL, any guess what the next three encrypted were? Yup, TER, spelling out "Hitler." Other operators would use their names or their girlfriend's. It wasn't that the code was flawed, it took the German operators, inadvertently of course, to help the British break their own enigma.

    Its in many ways analogous to the great majority of system problems now, open ports, unpatched software, etc. Any system can be nearly perfect, until you add a human to run it. ;-)

    --
    forma3
    1. Re:The Real Story by Yankovic · · Score: 0, Troll

      who the fuck is hilter?

    2. Re:The Real Story by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      Mr. Hilter was the National Bocalist candidate from North Minehead.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    3. Re:The Real Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the first three letters were HIL, any guess what the next three encrypted were? Yup, TER, spelling out "Hitler."

      No, that spells HILTER.

    4. Re:The Real Story by instinctdesign · · Score: 1

      "HIL" Ok, yes... heh, messed up that one. You get the point anyhow. :P

      --
      forma3
    5. Re:The Real Story by NewbieV · · Score: 1

      Paging Mr. Hilter... Mr Bimmler... the Monty Python routine

      Yes, offtopic... but irresistible!

      --


      "For every right, an equal responsibility..."
    6. Re:The Real Story by uk_greg · · Score: 1

      More information on WWII code breaking efforts can be found in the following story:

      http://www.activedayton.com/ddn/local/projects/e ni gma/enigma_index.html

      Here's an excerpt:

      "Since the early 1970s, much attention has been given to the early Polish and British successes in cracking the Enigma code. The Poles called their first decoding machine a "Bomba," perhaps after the brand of ice cream cones favored by the codebreakers. Operating from the famed codebreaking school at Bletchley Park outside of London, the Brits refined and further mechanized the device, based on the theoretical work of mathematician Alan Turing. They dubbed their device a "bombe."

      But by the spring of 1942, the German navy was again operating in total secrecy and with a vengeance, thanks to an upgrading of their Enigma machines. With the British Ultra effort stumped and the Germans dispatching ever more submarines to the Atlantic, the Allies feared they would lose ships to the wolfpacks faster than they could be replaced.

      North Atlantic sinkings more than quadrupled in the last half of 1942 compared to the last half of 1941 -- from 600,000 tons to 2.6 million tons. "And each of the nearly 500 ships sunk in those six months," wrote military historian David Kahn in Seizing the Enigma, "meant more freezing deaths in the middle of the ocean, more widows, more fatherless children, less food for some toddler, less ammunition for some soldier, less fuel for some plane -- and the prospect of prolonging those miseries."

      The Enigma was like a typewriter that encoded messages by scrambling each keystroke through a series of rotors. It could generate billions upon billions of possible letter combinations.

      But unbeknownst to the Germans, the Poles and the Brits had been able to crack the three-rotor Enigma machine, relying in part on captured German documents. But when the German Navy added a fourth rotor on Feb. 1, 1942, the number of possible combinations for producing any one letter overwhelmed their decrypting abilities.

      Under increasing pressure from the U.S. Navy, which had been kept in the dark while soaring numbers of its ships and sailors were lost to the wolfpacks, the British finally relinquished their control over Ultra and told the Americans to give it a go.

      What was needed, and in a hurry, was a high-speed decoding machine that could run through all the possible Enigma combinations at heretofore unheard-of speeds -- a machine that the British had been working on since late 1941 without success."

      I highly recommend this story - it does a great job on both a personal and a technical level.

    7. Re:The Real Story by Watts+Martin · · Score: 2

      If the first three letters were HIL, any guess what the next three encrypted were, Yup, TER, spelling out "Hitler."

      Now, most of us would think that spells HILTER, but we're not brilliant mathemeticians like Alan Turnig!

    8. Re:the real story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was 3 Polish mathematicians....Zygalski, Rozycki and Rejewski. But it was Rejewski who realized that the Germans had been stupid enough to use ABCD as the order round the rotor.

      Sylvia

  27. Alan Turing by gwernol · · Score: 5, Informative

    My biggest concern about the movie, which I haven't yet had the chance to see, is that it seems to miss out the role of Alan Turing. Turing, for those who don't know, was one of the founders of computing. He lead the team that built one of the first digital computers and developed the theoretical foundation for all of modern computing. He is an absolutely key figure in 20th. century science, perhaps as important as Einstein.

    He was also a leading figure at Bletchely Park and it is highly doubtful that Enigma would have been broken without him. If you were to single out one figure as the key to breaking the code it has to be Turing.

    So its worrying that a film of this critical moment in world history seems to muddy the role of Turing. Andrew Hodges who wrote the review I link to, wrote an excellent biography of Turing that should be required reading for anyone who considers themselves even remotely a geek. Turing achieved more in his sadly shortened life than most of us could dream of. The fact that the story of Bletchley Park has been turned into a film that excludes Turing is truly sad.

    --
    Sailing over the event horizon
  28. Well... by mugnyte · · Score: 1

    It's almost the same, excepts "artists" isn't the real term - say "soldiers". Ultra is the war effort kiddies. You get the rest. Hence Paragraph 1 is relevant, but a bit of teaser.

    The movie seems interesting. Is it me, or would a serious 2 hours spent on just the cracking of the code have been more entertaining? I understand the made-for-TV versions are there (probably better), but there's something important to give the public a sense of just how difficult, important and exciting hacking can be. And I'm not talking about having numbers and letters glow as in A Beautiful Mind - sheesh.

    With that said, by the time these are well-documented, they are old. I don't expect a movie of The Cuckoo's Egg or the fun of the young Doug Hofstadler's (sp.) GEB.

    If this movies gets some attention, maybe Wolfenstien v?.0 will have an Engima machine in there somewhere, althought I don't expect it to beyond a puzzle of Myst-level.

    mug

  29. A few minor changes by return+42 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Producer: What a great idea! Let's tell the story of how brilliant hackers cracked the German codes and won WWII. Oh, wait, little problem here. The chief hacker was (gasp) a poofter. Horrors! The audience won't like that!

    Writer: I know! We'll fictionalize it, then we can have a nice straight protagonist, the audience will like it, and we'll still get to tell a cool story!

    Someone way down on the totem pole: But isn't that kind of dishonoring the memory of the genius who actually did the work?

    Producer: (Hands over ears) LA LA LA LA I can't hear you...

    1. Re:A few minor changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a good point, but I think we should remember that Alan Turing wasn't the only genius there. According to one link in the piece, the protagonist is a mixture of about three or four people.

      Plus, if you ask me Saffron Burroughs is pretty skinny and flat chested. So maybe that's their way of paying homage....

    2. Re:A few minor changes by Schaffner · · Score: 1

      Why does every book or movie done about Bletchley Park have to be about Turing or even mention Turing? There were a lot of other people involved with the cracking of Enigma besides him.

    3. Re:A few minor changes by Coolfish · · Score: 2

      well, maybe if you knew a little about the man, you'd see that without him the story would have been pretty different - eg, the war would probably have gone on a lot longer, and who knows if we would have won?

      it's like looking at the million man marche, sheesh why do they always have to bring up that martin luther king guy? Weren't tehre like a million other people? MAybe, but he played a key role, dontcha think?

    4. Re:A few minor changes by Schrodinger's+Mouse · · Score: 1

      The Million Man March was led by Louis Farrakhan in 1996. Huge difference.

      --

      *****

      There are many people in this country who, through no fault of their own, are sane.

    5. Re:A few minor changes by Coolfish · · Score: 2

      I stand corrected :) See, it's important to know your history, and when a film comes out and takes giant leeway with the actual truth, then history becomes distorted.

      Thanks again :)

  30. Role of the Poles by dunstan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We Brits often complain about how war films are slanted to play up the American involvement because that's where the money for the films comes from (cf Memphis Belle). After the British release I heard an interesting radio interview where a Polish veteran was complaining about how the Poles don't get a proper share of the glory in this story.

    [minor spoiler alert] The point he was making was that not only did the Poles find the machine in the first place, but if they hadn't kept quiet about it for the duration of the war then Hitler would have abandoned Enigma much sooner, or at least have had an inkling that his communications were being intercepted. But the secrecy surrounding the codebreaking operation was so good from *all* parties that Rommel went to his grave cursing the spy who was giving away information from his signals back to Germany.

    There was an excellent series on Channel 4 about the operation about three years ago, and I would assume that it has been aired on PBS (though maybe not because it isn't exactly complimentery towards our American allies). Enigma makes the whole subject into a story, but the subject also bears telling in a documentary style.

    Dunstan

    --
    The last scintilla of doubt just rode out of town
    1. Re:Role of the Poles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC, there was something about the Polish secret service in Stephenson's book.

    2. Re:Role of the Poles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      The Poles are mentioned briefly at the beginning. They provided an Enigma machine for Bletchley.

    3. Re:Role of the Poles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the city bus ride home from my summer job one day c. 1981, I was going over a S/370 dump of my assember program. The older gentleman sitting beside me remarked that the dump looked similar to the code breaking he used to do during "the war". Obviously an opener for a great conversation, but I was too much of an AC to follow through.
      -- Still an AC.

    4. Re:Role of the Poles by danro · · Score: 1

      You should kick yourself! hard!
      I wish I had a chance to talk to one of those "geek heroes".
      Probably almost all dead by now...

      --

      "First lesson," Jon said. "Stick them with the pointy end."
    5. Re:Role of the Poles by henben · · Score: 1
      In fact, the Poles made even more of a contribution than you've said.

      Polish mathematicians actually broke an earlier, weaker version of Enigma. It was only when a change in the procedure was made (a different or extra rotor I think) that they stopped being able to read it. Even then, they had a way to break it using specially perforated sheets but not the resources to make them.

      IIRC, Polish intelligence found the mole who leaked Enigma operating manuals too - not sure about this bit.

      My source for this is the history of Enigma by Hugh Sebag-Montefiore, ISBN 0753811308. My source for this is

    6. Re:Role of the Poles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe that it was a couple of years ago that the British goverment presented the original Enigma machine that the poles built, back to the polish government.

      I think it was presented by Prince Charles.. need to look this up cause I cant exactly remember.

      And as for how all the polish jokes started.. I have heard many times that this was infact during the war.

    7. Re:Role of the Poles by halflinger_n · · Score: 1
      IIRC the Poles tried to sell a version of the Enigma machine to the French, and then to the British a couple of times BEFORE the start of the 2nd World War.

      Neither group was interested at that time.

      If was only after the begining of hostilities (with the invasion of Poland) that the Poles out gave it to the British out of desperation that no one was going to be able to use it. (They saw that they would be unable to use the it themselves by then).

  31. Re:[offtopic]Re:But is it better than Cryptonomico by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you've got the wrong shaftoe. The thought of Willem Dafoe in drag just scares me...

    America, not Douglas MacArthur.

  32. What?! by Transcendent · · Score: 0, Redundant

    How does this guy pull off trying to make a link between the Enigma machine and Gnutella?

    Sure, both are going against some sort of protection, but seriously, do you want to get your story posted that bad that you have to throw in something about Copywrite protection and the DMCA? This entire article was pointless....

    1. Re:What?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but if you throw in something about CopyRIGHT or CopyLEFT, I'm sure it would get posted =]

  33. Gnutella is compared to Ultra by clion999 · · Score: 1

    Ultra was the general mechanism for distributing the intercepts. It was a complicated, very secret group that went out of its way to avoid letting the Nazis know that the codes were broken. They were sharing files.

    Gnutella is one of the most decentralized file sharing systems. So it has the potential to be the most secret. I suppose a better comparison might be to the warez traders.

  34. This film is like rewriting the life of JFK.. by happyhippy · · Score: 1
    ...and making him a commie pheadophiliac homosexual.

    A bad movie trying to solely cash in and not honour the actual people it pretends to.

    And to my knowledge it didnt do well here in the UK either.

  35. So, let us summarize by motek · · Score: 1

    Turing: gone.
    The Poles: absent.
    The vilian: A Pole working at Bletchley Park(beep! there were none in the Real Life!), sspying for the Nazis.

    And you call it 'slightly fictionalized'? That's a fine spin, thank you very much!

    -m-

    --
    I would like to die like my grandfather did - sleeping. And not screaming in terror, like his passengers.
  36. All's fair in love and warez. by blair1q · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Law can't stop crime. Law can only direct authority to apprehend and punish criminals.

    Just thought I'd mention that.

    --Blair

    1. Re:All's fair in love and warez. by blair1q · · Score: 2

      More clueless moderators.

      Must be clueless moderator week on /.

      Only 44 more karma points to go before you've wanked me to 0.

      --Blair

  37. Invention of the Computer by Baldrson · · Score: 3, Interesting
  38. Re:WTF? by anomaly · · Score: 2

    Thanks, I didn't see the original comment, but I laughed out loud when I saw the response. Sadly, my guess is that too few will enjoy the irony in your posting.

    Kudos.

    Regards,
    Anomaly

    --
    But Herr Heisenberg, how does the electron know when I'm looking?
  39. I loved it..... by diorio · · Score: 1

    ....seeing as I haven't seen any comments or opinions about the movie....I loved it. Kate Winslet does a great job as the mousey/nerdy girl and I would kill my whole family to spend one night with Saffron Burrows! While the reviewer is correct that they do speak about how they broke the codes and the lingo is right on.....I still could have used a little more info on that half of the plot....it was more love story than code breaking 75/25 split. Go see it, it's worth your time. (my mom even loved it)
    .

    --
    Ignored Since 1973
  40. Re:Out of Date Already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Retard. Red Hat 7.2 codename "Enigma" and Red Hat 7.3 codename "Valhalla"

  41. Wish There Was An Alan Turing Film by GuyMannDude · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The true story of Alan Turing (see my post below) is a fascinating, albeit disturbing story. Y'know, it's too bad that Hollywood would never make a movie about him and the battles that he faced. I mean, Hollywood is notorious for copying successful movies. When Star Wars came out, everyone was making space films and TV shows. Now that Spider-man is a big hit, there's going to be a slew of comic book movies. I wish that the success of "A Beautiful Mind" would convince Hollywood that there are some fascinating stories about brilliant scientists and the incredible challenges they faced. There are a lot of fascinating stories out there.

    GMD

    1. Re:Wish There Was An Alan Turing Film by oliphaunt · · Score: 2

      Unfortuantely "Beautiful Mind" didn't make $115 million in its first week of release. Or its second. It had to run for two whole months to get close to the opening weekend receipts from Spiderman.

      How is that any measure of success, when the game is to get the most asses in seats in the shortest period of time? Sure, Beautiful stayed in the top ten far longer than, say, Harry Potter, but it's easy to see that Harry has so far earned more than twice as much. Meanwhile, Beautiful is about to get caught by "Ice Age," which is a mindless cartoon.

      People don't see movies because they want to think. Hollywood has recognized this, and tailors their production accordingly.

      --




      Humpty Dumpty was pushed.
    2. Re:Wish There Was An Alan Turing Film by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there was a film about him, actually. it was shown as a miniseries on PBS in the states a few years ago.

    3. Re:Wish There Was An Alan Turing Film by koogydelbbog · · Score: 1

      http://us.imdb.com/Title?0115749

      Breaking the Code (1996) (TV)

      A biography of the English mathematician Alan Turing, who was one of the inventors of the digital computer and one of the key figures in the breaking of the Enigma code, used by the Germans to send secret orders to their U-boats in World War II. Turing was also a homosexual in Britain at a time when this was illegal, besides being a security risk.

      Summary written by Will Gilbert {wgilbert@uwaterloo.ca}

      (based on a long running play iirc)

      hth
      andy

  42. Re:Wow. I will by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe we'll get to see Dr. Turing getting hot with 18 year old boys.

  43. Nazi leaders aren't the only ones on the line by clion999 · · Score: 1

    The movie makers might be sued by anyone using the Enigma as a copyright protection mechanism. The reviewer is one such person. Talk about a review that could shut down a movie!

  44. William Tutte by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Here's a story about William Tutte who also worked at Bletchley, but he worked on breaking FISH. I went to what was probably his last lecture, about three months ago.

    1. Re:William Tutte by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was at the first lecture at UW in which he discussed what he did during the War.

  45. Godwin's Law by scotch · · Score: 1, Funny
    End of discussion. Next article, please.

    --
    XML causes global warming.
    1. Re:Godwin's Law by aiabx · · Score: 1

      Interesting point. Whem we're discussing the Nazis, do we invoke Godwin's Law when someone mentions motorcycle helmets, or maybe gun control?
      -aiabx

      --
      Just this guy, you know?
  46. then, are most people using computers... by simpl3x · · Score: 1

    or elaborate vcr's? why is the enteratainment industry attacking the general purpose computer? i don't own a tv or a vcr, but i do watch movies on my laptop, and listen to music--all paid for, thank you. it is only relevant in that hollywood makes it relevant. they seem to have found that digital distribution allows for better quality, but it has those pesky qualities which they would like to get rid of. get out of my sandbox!

  47. urrgh by Da3m0n · · Score: 0

    Damn you for getting my hopes up!

  48. speaking of which... by bilbobuggins · · Score: 1

    so what happens when i download a copy of this?
    do the nazis sue Kazaa?

  49. Origin of Polack Jokes by dmaxwell · · Score: 2

    The Polish government in exile was based in Britain and their surviving pilots flew with the RAF and the Army Air Corps. Most of these guys were tall, blond-haired, blue-eyed, dashing and had "cute" accents. Needless to say, they got all of the girls when they happened to be around. The piqued American personnel started telling Polack Jokes........

    1. Re:Origin of Polack Jokes by CrosseyedPainless · · Score: 2

      I heard the origin of the "Stupid Polack" of joke fame was based on the perceived intelligence of a country that sent cavalry troops against the German panzers during the Blitzkrieg.

    2. Re:Origin of Polack Jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, considering the girls had to choose between fag Brits and macho Polish, I think they won hands down.

      BTW, didn't english girls coined the term "Polish sausage"?

    3. Re:Origin of Polack Jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What should they have done?
      You do know what hapened to all "untermenchen" in Poland after they lost, don't you?

    4. Re:Origin of Polack Jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ...which is of course something that never actually happened other than in a post-WWII *Polish* movie... Another great misconception, which so easily propagate themselves.

      If memory serves (based on a documentary I once saw) the actual event that DID happen went something like this:

      o a Polish cavalery unit found itself suddenly in front of a group of German tanks, at a fairly close range
      o flanked from both sides by other German units
      o in a flash manuver decided to charge in the _direction_ of the tanks (not AT the tanks) to quickly shorten the distance and prevent the tanks from firing its main guns (too close of a range)
      o due to poor terrain conditions the tanks were not expected to (and indeed had trouble with) turning around quick enough to catch up with the cavalery unit trying to escape the encirclement.
      o according to the documentary the manuver worked better then expected and the unit lost only few men to the machine gun fire and lived another day to fight in another encounter

  50. Shifting battlegrounds by kirkjobsluder · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know that I keep bringing this up but perhaps the best history of military cryptoanalysis in print is The Codebreakers by David Kahn. It devotes about four novel length chapters to World War II cryptography alone and also describes the first cryptographic war for the airwaves during World War I.



    it also points out that one of the big revolutions in military cryptography was the coordination of code making and code breaking. The only way to make a good code is to try to break it. Knowledge of practical code breaking was never intended to be distributed outside of military circles, even to the point where the National Security Agency attempted to block publication of The Codebreakers for even revealing obsolete historical details of World War II cryptoanalysis. As a result the comparison between military cryptoanalysts and copyright crackers is a bit overdrawn. Many of the codebreakers were also involved and creating and testing military codes to hide information from the public.

  51. Not FUD at all by dipfan · · Score: 2

    I thought it was pretty good, and I'm afraid to say that I was only mildly surprised to think that Hollywood might make a movie like that....

    Anyway, it wasn't a purposefully misleading paragraph, it was making a very valid, and effective, point. Hats off to all involved.

    1. Re:Not FUD at all by tcc · · Score: 2

      I'd tend to second that, you know it's a movie, you know it's a review, if you don't well now you know.

      Good journalism is also catching the interest of the reader. This worked for me and I had the exact same reaction than you "heck hollywood releasing something like that? Its probably going to have a twist and a big moral issue with how bad file swapping is and other BS, let's read on" :)

      This I find amusing, compared to april 1st when all the subjects were totally lame. Anyways, obviously when you have 100,000s of readers, you will never get everybody on your side, you'll always do something good, excellent and bad at the same time.

      Anyways, I've found that amusing.

      --
      --- Metamoderating abusive downgraders since my 300th post.
  52. Yes it did, and more... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought it was mush. Infeasible plot (actually, the plot jusified the name, since I didn't know what was going on most of the time. Not telling the viewer what's going on is a cheap way to keep them in suspense), wussy nerd as main male character, dumpy nerd as main female character. Not enough history (which led me to believe that they wre making loads of it up), not enough technology, embarrassing sex. A bad "whodunnit" costume drama pretending to be something else.

    1. Re:Yes it did, and more... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should just stick to "Independence Day" and "Water World" then...
      I'm sure a man with your demanding cultural taste would apprechiate them immensly.

  53. the DMCA by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 2
    I agree with you 100%, but I would like to add to that. I think the DMCA takes the control of information to a level much like that of a fascist state. Just look at all the legitimate things it has been wreaking havok upon, decss, ebook decrypting, crypto research, bnetd, google/xenu.net, etc.(there's quite a few more, but I can only name so many off the top of my head)

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
  54. Re:[offtopic]Re:But is it better than Cryptonomico by Darby · · Score: 1

    The thought of Willem Dafoe in drag just scares me...

    Then don't watch Boondock Saints.
    If you can get over that brief part, it's an awesome movie though.

  55. Cat got my tongue by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 3, Funny

    I remember seeing this at the cinema last year, and thinking: "It had better have a lot of either codebreaking or Kate Winslet Naked".

    Unfortunately, while codebreaking and Miss Winslet are present, neither is revealed in enough depth to be interesting.

    The only thing that saved the film for me was the period detail.

    graspee

  56. You bum! You gave away the movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never do this on slashdot Never Never

  57. Re:[offtopic]Re:But is it better than Cryptonomico by connorbd · · Score: 2

    Yeah... real creepy idea...

    Don't forget -- Doug and Amy Shaftoe are 1/2 and 1/4 Filipino, respectively. The actresses playing them would have to at least be able to look Eurasian.

    Doug Shaftoe would be a difficult call -- Keanu Reeves (part Chinese), maybe, if he bulked up a lot and had some aging makeup. (Dean Cain comes to mind as well, but even though he's part Japanese he doesn't look it.) Amy Shaftoe... maybe Sandra Bullock, even though she's not Asian at all. She could definitely pull the part off, though; unlike a lot of other actresses that get the kinds of comedic roles she goes after (Cameron Diaz and the like) she can be gritty enough for the part.

    Unfortunately I'd have to reread Cryptonomicon for other ideas; Randy in particular has never really been a character I could picture.

    /Brian

  58. Ummm... wait a sec... by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wrong generation and wrong spin. "Enigma" is about good codebreakers -- the mathematicians and clerks of Great Britain's Bletchley Park who helped the Allied cause during World War II by breaking...

    I thought Dante and Randal were in New Jersey...

    Maybe I'm wrong.

    --
    I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
    I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
  59. Re:[offtopic]Re:But is it better than Cryptonomico by GargoyleMT · · Score: 1

    You're scared of Willem Dafoe in drag? Watch Boondock Saints, he plays a gay, eccentric FBI agent. I don't think it's out on DVD yet, or at least widely released in the states, so it may be ab it hard to acquire.

  60. 5, Troll by sulli · · Score: 1

    indeed. I thought the lead was hilarious.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  61. Interview with Jack Good by mikosullivan · · Score: 2

    If you're interested in Enigma you'll probably find this interview with Jack Good very interesting.

    --
    Miko O'Sullivan
  62. Wildly popular in Britain by kristan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I hate to nitpick and complain (well, I guess I don't or I wouldn't be doing this) but I can assure you all that the film was not "wildly" popular here in Britain. While it may not have been a flop exactly, it was as close to "straight to video" as you can get...

    --
    --- There's no place like 127.0.0.1
  63. sigh.. by Cenam · · Score: 0

    ..it sounded intresting until i clicked 'read more'.

    --

    The Truth: There is no string:)
  64. American "History" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Enigma was cracked by a team led by a gay man. The film "U471" was actually about a *British* sub. Hollywood is re-writing history to exclude those who actually made it in favor of "accessible" American heroes.

    Does anyone *care* what someone who accepts Hollywood-as-truthteller has to say? People that stupid seldom actually get off the couch long enough to act based on their bad information. To my foreign brethren I say this - Relax. Have a beverage. No one of significance in America believes the trash coming out of Hollywood any more than y'all do.

    Flame on!

  65. My new theory. by mindstrm · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    My new theory on underground music.

    Stard sending small monetary donations to the artists you like, along with a letter explaining how you like digital music online, it's so convenient, etc.., but how you don't want to rip off the artists. Also explain that rather than buy the music in the store, where the record company keeps most of hte cash, you would rather just send them some directly. THey get more fromj you than they would through the record company, and you aren't participating in a business model you don't like.

    At least they won't be able to say you are ripping off the artist. You are just ripping off the recording industry.

  66. Tom Stoppard, playwright by extra88 · · Score: 3, Informative
    He's written for multiple media but I think he is still considered primarily a playwright. He is probably best known for his play Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead. It's a good sign to see his name on a writing credit.

    I found a decent page about his various works. A Tom Stoppard Bibliography

    1. Re:Tom Stoppard, playwright by Kalani · · Score: 1

      He also wrote Arcadia, which I personally consider his masterpiece. In any case, any person who sees either Arcadia or R&G are Dead will understand that Stoppard generally has a firm grasp on the technical concepts that he integrates into his stories.

      --
      ___
      The ends are ape-chosen, only the means are man's. -- Aldous Huxley
  67. DMCA? by tuxlove · · Score: 1

    Huh? How can this movie be in violation of the DMCA? The account of Enigma and how Ultra and the Polish cracked it is old hat. It's been published many times, long before there ever was a DMCA. And Enigma technology is in the public domain - nobody "owns" it. And if someone was silly enough to actually use the Enigma algorithm in a commercial product these days, when there are numerous other better forms of encryption in the public domain to use, it still wouldn't matter. Publishing general information on a well-known algorithm is not the same as reverse-engineering someone's implementation of that algorithm and publishing that information.

    I guess he just had to throw the obligatory YRO question in there.

  68. BBC America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Best thing we have going here besides PBS, BBC America.

  69. Re:wont someone think of the children? by Coolfish · · Score: 2

    But that's not to say that a 14 year old can't be that responsible or carry adult status, while a 22 year old might still be immature and irresponsible

    while that may be true, i think it's safe to say the vast majority of children have not yet developed both mentally and physically enought to be ready for sexual encounters. And by sexual encounters I don't mean being taught about sexuality in school, I mean actual physical encounters. "majority rules" is appropriate in this case - the simple fact is that most children are not ready for sex, they can't make the decision for themselves, so it should not be permitted.

    Society is protecting the children in this case, and although in some cases the children don't need protecting, in most cases they do.

    p.s. all this is coming from a queer. (that oughta keep the moderators at bay. :P )

  70. Babbage did not invent the computer by Ashurbanipal · · Score: 2, Informative
    WIAKywbfatw wrote:
    Oh, and by the way, the code breakers at Bletchley Park didn't invent the computer - Charles Babbage did that a great many years earlier.
    No, the computer was invented long before Babbage. We know from the Ankythera Mechanism that at least one computer existed circa 87 BC. There is historical evidence to suggest that other, more complicated mechanical computers were built by the ancients; but the Ankythera device is the oldest extant machine. You can't play Quake on it, but it's still a computer.
  71. Lazy AND dyslesic by Pac · · Score: 2

    I believe this german coders were the same ones that afterwards were send to the famous "LCWC ESFN" battalion in the Russian Front. The "Lazy Coders Who Can't Even Spell the Fuher's Name" battalion were famous for its bright collored uniforms and its high turnover.

  72. Wrong URL for the movie website by Kazir · · Score: 2, Informative

    > The film closely follows the novel, although
    The link here incorrectly points to:
    http://www.enigmathemovie.com/

    The correct link is:
    http://www.enigma-themovie.com/

    Thanks Google!

  73. Re:the REAL origin of Polack Jokes by Ashurbanipal · · Score: 1



    You dummy, all the Polack jokes are created and disseminated by the telephone companies.

    They're always driving Poles into the ground.

  74. Roger Ebert mentions this also by scubacuda · · Score: 1

    In his review, Roger Ebert mentions this also.

  75. DMCA/Enigma by henben · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Whatever you think of the DMCA/P2P apps issue, it's a totally different thing from the effort to break Enigma. Defending fair use is important, but hardly in the same league as defending the free world from the Nazis.

    Your lame, forced comparison cheapens the achievement of the Bletchley Park codebreakers and the Allied troops who risked their lives to capture Enigma material.

    It also makes you look like a whining tosser who thinks his right to download an MP3 is as important as the rights and freedoms won in WWII.

    I think the DMCA is bad too, but for fuck's sake, don't do this kind of thing again.

    1. Re:DMCA/Enigma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're being too literal or too thin-skinned or too strange. Fascist states always try to stop the spread of information. Freedom loving states encourage it.

      You look like a whining tosser to me because I can invoke the memory of the dead just as easily. They didn't slave away to create one of the first programmable computers just to watch general computers banned by Hollywood out of fear.

    2. Re:DMCA/Enigma by juliao · · Score: 2
      Outlawing cryptography because of the DMCA will effectively undermine any nations capability to crack the next code the next Hitler tries to use.

      Ban crypto, stop people from researching and creating circumvention devices for academic purposes, and you may never have sufficient cryptographers to empower you if the need should arise.

      On the other hand, I don't see India or China or the Arab Nations rushing to implement their own version of DMCA...

    3. Re:DMCA/Enigma by henben · · Score: 1

      >Outlawing cryptography because of the DMCA will effectively undermine any nations capability to crack the next code the next Hitler tries to use. Come off it. I don't think the NSA or GCHQ are going to be bound by copyright law.

    4. Re:DMCA/Enigma by juliao · · Score: 2

      The NSA will have to recruit people from somewhere. If you start imposing limits on crypto research then you'll soon stop having cryptography classes on universities.
      Cryptographers will still exist, but they will be "locked" into working for either the NSA/etc or any kind of criminal organization.
      If you reduce the total number of cryptographers, you effectively reduce the number of good cryptographers around.
      Did Blowfish/Twofish/Rijndael/RSA/whatever get created inside or outside the government?

  76. Inaccuracy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Enigma was broken by the Polish.


    2. Turing was a homosexual.

  77. Illicit file swapping? by r101 · · Score: 1
    Tom Stoppard, the screenwriter also responsible for Shakespeare In Love, weaves these two threads together with car chases, kissing, train whistles, moonlit nights, illicit file swapping and a few other romantic chords.

    Illicit file swapping? Better not tell the MPAA about this.

  78. DMCA... by JonWan · · Score: 1

    Will the movie be a violation of the DMCA? Hmmm, maybe, maybe not. I wonder what would happen if you built your own Enigma Machine and wrote a book about the process? Like this : www.enigma-replica.com

  79. Redundant ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would not stop anybody on slashdot :)

  80. Re:WTF? by bnjf · · Score: 1


    I think he meant "God" as an interjection.

  81. Read Cryptonomicon by Neal Stephenson by Jon+Howard · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It isn't a factual account of Turing's experiences, nor of WW2 in general, but it's a well-written book set during WW2 (not entirely), with a heavy focus on cryptography. The reason I bring it up is tat it is so bent on cryptography (who'd have guessed?), and Enigma has a cameo.

    Cryptonomicon is engaging, I had great difficulty putting it down, though the instructional detail used to describe various technical feats compelled me to set it aside for a minute to give them a go myself. Stephenson has a solid grasp on many technical concepts, even if he doesn't get all of them 100% correct (you'll get no spoilers from me!).

    All of that, and he even observes Turing's professed sexual preference in a much more honest (read: less inverted) manner.

  82. DMCA? by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    Is the movie and its detailed description of breaking the Enigma in violation of the DMCA?

    I hope not, i plan to make a film about how russian programmers did their bit for the anti-capitalist/globalist/pigs war and hacked the SSSCA DRM system. Then they put the results on the internet so people could hunt down and kill the evil Friz Hollings and his army.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  83. Re:[offtopic]Re:But is it better than Cryptonomico by MadAhab · · Score: 1

    I thought the older shaftoe was 100% american... for him i could see willem dafoe, though i mentally had someone who looks, now that i think of it, like the drug-dealing kid's neo-nazi dad from american beauty. amy i dunno. there aren't many amerasian actresses i can think of - i think the tilly girls would qualify except they're half *candadian* haha and jennifer's too nutty and meg is a little too old now - but amerasians can look all kinds of ways as adults, so there's *some* leeway. john cusak could get away with it, but sandra bullock is about as american looking as you can possibly get.

    --
    Expanding a vast wasteland since 1996.
  84. Dayton, Ohio not Bletchley Park by Modular · · Score: 1

    Here are some links that tell the story of how the improved Enigma was broken by the efforts of the National Cash Register Co. (NCR).
    Dayton's Code Breakers
    the American Bombe Project

  85. the real story by KingPrad · · Score: 2, Informative
    If they had done their homework better they would know the Engima was broken by a lone polish mathematician. Only when Poland was invaded did Poland tell other countries they had been reading the code for years. Up till then, no one had believed it possible.

    The British then set up the team to extend the work and deal with the increasing complexity of the Enigma machines. Yes, they made awesome breakthroughs, but the Polish did the basic work much earlier.

    --
    Stop the Slashdot Effect! Don't read the articles!
  86. lashing out at gays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the main reason people lash out at gays is because they have issues with their own sexuality

    One could make an infinite list of counter-examples, with analogies to other forms of behavior that are not approved by society as a whole. For instance, I'm not sure I could bake bread very well, do I lash out at bakers?

    The true reason why people lash out at gays is because the behavior of homosexuals is so utterly alien to a normal, i.e. heterosexual, man that gay behavior is seen as menacing in a general way. It's a normal survival instinct to fear/hate/fight what is alien.

    I do not agree with some people who appreciate certain forms of art, or music, or jobs, etc, but I can understand that there are different sorts of people, with different tastes. I may not feel much sexual attraction for some women, who may be attractive to other men, and vice-versa. Homosexuality, on the other hand, is absolutely different. There's a very well defined line between being a man and a woman. I feel absolutely no sexual attraction to any man.

    Gays claiming that men who don't like gays are actually closet homosexuals themselves are just ridiculous. It may be a popular theory among gays, but, for society at large, it only contributes to alienating gays even more. There may be a small fringe of undecided men, but the average heterosexual man is sure of his own heterosexuality.

    The best approach for you to be more accepted by society would be something like this: "yes, we know we are different, we don't know why this is so, but it just happens to be like that. Please, understand that, apart from our sexual habits, we are exactly like any other human beings".

    1. Re:lashing out at gays by Coolfish · · Score: 2

      For instance, I'm not sure I could bake bread very well, do I lash out at bakers?

      I don't know, do you?

      It's a normal survival instinct to fear/hate/fight what is alien.

      a survival instinct? I could see how it might be normal to fear spiders or tigers or bears, but your average homosexual is not exactly life threatening. Humans are sentient animals and must use not just their emotions, but their thoughts, to see realize whether their fears are grounded in survival instincts, or for other reasons. People of different races/skin color might seem alien, is it normal to feat/hate/fight them? No, it's racist.

      I feel absolutely no sexual attraction to any man.

      It's interesting how often this pops up when conversing with someone about this, specifically with someone who is homophobic. They make it a point to point out that they are not attracted to men. Who are you trying to prove this to? Me? Or yourself? Did I ask?

      I thought the theory was bullshit myself. Turns out my own life is a perfect example of the theory, though. In fact ask a bunch of gay men, and you'll see a lot of them initially "coped" with being gay by forcefully denying it, and by acting out against others. "The best defence is a good offence" does apply, I'm living proof.

      I do wonder where you get your "average heterosexual man is sure of his own heterosexuality." Ever hear of Kinsley? His studies indicate that this ISN'T the case, that most people could be categorizied as bisexual, but with a heavier tendency towards one particular sex.

      Your last paragraph is interesting and shows that you aren't the typical gay-basher. But I want you to realize one thing - my orientation isn't a "sexual habit". It's not something I saw in a magazine and thought I would do for fun in my spare time. It is something I fought with for many years. It is something I hid from myself, and from others. It is something that led me to contemplate suicide (although obviously I chose to not take that path, thankfully). It is something that made me very unhappy for the most part of my life, until I chose to accept who I am, and that I couldn't change that for the rest of the world. It is part of me, and one others go out of their way to bash homosexuality, they are bashing me.

  87. Re:[offtopic]Re:But is it better than Cryptonomico by Si+F. · · Score: 1

    Nothing against Sandra Bullock, but she hardly looks the part.

    How about Lexa Doig?

  88. Re:[offtopic]Re:But is it better than Cryptonomico by connorbd · · Score: 2

    Well, yeah, heavy makeup...

    Bobby Shaftoe, yes. Doug Shaftoe is half-Filipino, though, so he would look quite Asian. Jennifer Tilly actually did come to mind, but she's so completely wrong for the part I didn't bother to bring her up myself; Amy comes off as being rather younger, to begin with, and probably a lot tougher-looking -- a few tats, IIRC, for one thing -- whereas Jennifer Tilly is a bit too curvy and bimboish.

    /Brian

  89. woah? by Kasreyn · · Score: 2

    I thought he pointed out he wasn't INTERESTED in Keanu Reeves as Neo, dammit!

    ^_^

    -Kasreyn

    --
    Kasreyn: Cheerfully playing the part of Devil's Advocate to hairtrigger /. flamers since 1999.
  90. Re:wont someone think of the children? by Cyno · · Score: 1

    Ah, American soceity is protecting what it percieves as its children. There are some societies that understand sexuality and don't have such absolute laws. In Holland, for example, I heard anyone over the age of 13 is a consenting adult. Personally I feel it is the responsibility of the parent to protect their children. But American's tend to not agree.

    That being said I understand where you are coming from. But I have an 18 year old sister. Just because its legal for her to have sex doesn't mean its ok. She's pregnant. How did this happen? Not enough sexual education? I know she has attended at least a couple classes in high school. This is the result of a lack of parental responsibility and the bombardment of lies about drugs and sex that our media sends to our kids with the government's support. Sometimes I think she'd be better off if she grew up in a different country with a different family that wasn't raised on American values.

  91. The Problem WIth The Intro by meggito · · Score: 2

    The only problem with the intro is that instead of being funny, it was misleading. Why? Because something like that would not surprise many of us. Well, not much more than the disney channel airing cartoons aimed at kids to explain why trading music is illegal. In fact, I'm kind of curious why they haven't done it. It seems like the perfect ploy, using their influence on the movies to bend everyone to their will. Oh wait, they're allready doing that...

    Seriously though, look for something like this in the makings. Except that the file swappers and reverse engineerers will, of course, be the 50 year old villains who much be stopped by a group of pre-teen children.

  92. Re:Ummm... wait a sec... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I thought Dante and Randal were in New Jersey...

    Ha ha! He said the word "clerks" which also was the name of a popular movie several years ago. Very witty!

    I noticed you said the name "Dante". Hey, how could he be in New Jersey when he lived hundreds of years ago and wrote a book called _Inferno_?

    Isn't this absolutely hilarious of me to say?

    I better stop before I bust a gut.
  93. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really hope you were just being an ASS and you didn't actually think that was a useful thing to say.

  94. A good thing no US studio bought the rights by tschild · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...or we'd have the story transposed to an US setting, never mind history.

  95. All your base by rat7307 · · Score: 1

    Mechanic: "Somebody set up us the bombes".

    My apologies for dredging this up!!

    --
    Burma?
  96. Tom Stoppard by logical1010 · · Score: 1

    Tom Stoppard, the screenwriter also responsible for Shakespeare In Love, weaves these two threads together with car chases, kissing, train whistles, moonlit nights, illicit file swapping and a few other romantic chords.

    Another great flick by Tom is the fantastically funny, existentialist film Rosencrantz and Gildenstern are Dead. Based on his play of the same name. Definitly in my top five.

    --
    There is something wonderful in seeing a wrong-headed majority assailed by truth. ~John Kenneth Galbraith
  97. Heh, you don't need a giant machine to do that... by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 2

    Just a black marker!

    http://www.chip.de/praxis_wissen/praxis_wissen_8 72 5919.html

    --
    Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
  98. Glad to see it made it to the states... by HaggiZ · · Score: 1

    I saw this several months ago now and loved it, I think it's available on DVD here now so I will have to go buy it.

    I'm not sure if it was a straight to DVD release over there, but if memory serves Mr. Jagger and those responsible for distribution originally agreed not to release this film in the US because they deemed that it would go over the head of most Americans.

    Personally I was horrified that such a decision was made, but after seeing the results on Slashdot a couple of weeks ago of the general knownledge of all things scientific over there, it seems to be that the Slashdot crowd is a very vocal minority. I guess it costs a lot to release, and difficult to re-coup with that kind of audience.

    Regardless it is a very good film, and it's great you guys can finally see it. I suggest anyone with the slightest interest in cryptography, mathematics, or just wants to see where things have come from.... check this one out asap.

    1. Re:Glad to see it made it to the states... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the film is going through a limited release in the US. Something like 150 screens so far, but the film appears to be a 'sleeper' which means they make continue releasing the film through the fall to the smaller markets.

      Jagger did make the comment that he thought it might be too smart for the US audiences, but it was always planned to be released in theaters here.

      I've been waiting ages to see this film. I only have 2 weeks more to wait.

      Sylvia

  99. How Turing Died by babyruth · · Score: 1

    He died by eating an apple dipped in cyanide (so I was told in my intro CS class...)

  100. Sex and mathematics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surely you've heard the story of Polly Nomial?

  101. You trolled, I'll bite... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dyslesic

    I believe this german coders were

    Fuher's

    battalion were famous for its

    collored

    Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.

  102. Bill and Ted and their most excellent adventures by Raffi+Spock · · Score: 1

    > one who played Ted "Theodore" Logan, not the
    > one who played Neo.


    Shut up, Ted.

    --
    Quid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
    Anything said in Latin, sounds profound.
  103. Anarchistic State is an oxymoron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anarchy is the absence of a State, therefore the notion of an Anarchistic State is a contradiction of terms.

    Far from being a political philosophy as commonly understood, anarchism is principally a moral philosophy which disdains aggression. The common confusion among the general public between anarchism and nihilism leads writers like yourself to posit the idea of bomb throwing anarchists (or anarchist gunmen discharging their firearms randomly in shopping malls).

    There is a spectrum of philosophy ranging from the extreme moral position of the pacifists (a species of anarchism which goes even further than rejecting aggression) to the fence-straddling libertarians (who countenance retaliatory force) to the political extremes of fascism which prevail in most states.

  104. Wrong Link by ReadParse · · Score: 2

    The official movie site link is here. The original left out the hyphen.

    1. Re:Wrong Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually both links are correct.
      http://www.enigmathefilm.com/ is the US site.
      http://www.enigma-themovie.com/ is the UK site.

      Sylvia - who didn't bother to take time to register

  105. Genius vs High Intelligence by hfk · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of the two hour PBS/Nova documentary on the Enigma effort at Bletchley Park and something one of the still living (American) scientists said about Turing and his genius. He said that, upon learning of the invention or idea of a very intelligent mind, one could sense that given enough time and resources the same invention/idea might occur to one's self. However, upon learning of the invention/idea of a genius the likes of Turing's one sensed immediately that such an invention/idea was beyond reach, regardless of the time and resources available. I got the impression that the old scientist believed that ideas of Turing's sort sprung from an entirely different place than the ideas that most of us have. In that sense, the wellspring of mathematical/techinical genius resembles the wellspring of artistic genius: like Turing, Beethoven, Michelangelo, Shakespeare and others have all created works that are far beyond the achievements of less divinely gifted contemporaries.

    I was touched by the old man's obvious awe of Turing: he chose not to play Salieri to Turing's Mozart.

    It was very moving statement, in a 'geekish' way.

  106. Did you catch the not-so-subtle dig at Hollywood? by The+Famous+Druid · · Score: 1
    In the film there's a character who refers to the incident where the Royal Navy boarded a U-boat in an attempt to get a navy-style Enigma. This is the incident that Hollywood 'corrected' by making the heroes good-old-yankee-boys.



    Reminds me of the old movie about the life of Alexander Graham Bell, where James Stewart played the title role, with no attempt at a Scots accent.

    --
    Quidquid Latine dictum sit, altum videtur (anything said in Latin sounds important)
  107. Rommel actually went to his grave... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...having taken poison in the backseat of a car after Hitler gave him the choice of dying as a hero, in which case Rommel's family would live, or else being executed as one of the conspirators who tried to off Hitler.

  108. December 1932 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's when Polish cryptographers working in Psary near Warsaw broke the Enigma code. They later delivered Enigma to the Brits, so they could then continue work and decipher Nazi transmisions and thus win the WWII. Without the work one by Poles, there would be many more casualties and the Royal Navy would have lots much more ships.

    Read the letters of the Ambassador of the Republic of Poland here and here.

    There are many other things that Brits like to keep secret, like the destruction of the Armia Krajowa (Polish Home Army, the largest organized undercover military structure that operated in Europe during the WWII) Archives of Espionage Reports sent to the Brits over the course of WWII.

    This film is remotely close to the historic truth.

  109. Am i wrong or is this old news? by vic2000 · · Score: 0

    Is it my idea or was this movie shown almost 10 months ago in the UK?

  110. Not quite true by gruntvald · · Score: 1

    He died, while dressed in womens clothing, attempting to asphyxiate himself with a noose, to "get off". Oh, wait a minute, that wasn't the noble Turing, that was an MP - a member of the British Parliament, in the late 80's. doh! Funny how the British Govt. changed it's "policy" when it was their own rectums involved ....