Slashdot Mirror


5.2 Earthquake Shakes Up SF Bay Area

Joe Kaz wrote in (along with a number of other concerned folks): "There was a 5.2 Earthquake in Gilroy, CA, 70 miles south of San Francisco. The epicenter was 4.7 miles below surface. It lasted for about 10 seconds, and it did seem like a long time. Everything shook for a while, and it was a little scary. No reports of damage yet. Hope everyone is ok." I've got a report from my sisters father-in-law in gilroy (the epicenter) and he barely noticed it. Nate Oostendorp noted that "My stereo shook a little" in Walnut Creek. The SF Gate story on the quake notes that there are some phones out in some small parts of San Jose. The usgs has an event monitoring page if you are interested.

136 of 587 comments (clear)

  1. Damage Report from New Jersey.. by Loki_1929 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Didn't feel a thing. No apparent damage. No injuries. Carry on.

    --
    -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
    1. Re:Damage Report from New Jersey.. by Pogue+Mahone · · Score: 3, Funny

      Is that free as in speech, free as in beer, or free() as in malloc()?

      --
      Every bloody emperor has his hand up history's skirt [Peter Hammill/VdGG]
    2. Re:Damage Report from New Jersey.. by Pogue+Mahone · · Score: 2

      No, I'm deadly serious. If it had been a joke, I would have inserted a smiley.

      --
      Every bloody emperor has his hand up history's skirt [Peter Hammill/VdGG]
    3. Re:Damage Report from New Jersey.. by ShavenYak · · Score: 2

      Notice the original poster was from New Jersey. His 'damage report' should have mentioned how bad the Devils sucked, as they were destroyed by the former Hartford Whalers. How humiliating that must have been.

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    4. Re:Damage Report from New Jersey.. by Pogue+Mahone · · Score: 2

      Nope.... sorry

      --
      Every bloody emperor has his hand up history's skirt [Peter Hammill/VdGG]
  2. No big deal on peninsula by aralin · · Score: 2

    On the peninsula, between SF and SJ it was barely felt. The house shook a bit, but just two fast shakes and nothing more. Definitely not making any damage and hardly waking up anyone who was already asleep.

    --
    If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    1. Re:No big deal on peninsula by aralin · · Score: 2

      I'm just next to you in San Carlos and didn't seem any special to me. Maybe its just that I am not used to earthquakes, but if I'd be asleep I would not know there was any. Not even a picture moved...

      --
      If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    2. Re:No big deal on peninsula by tftp · · Score: 2

      In Santa Clara (10 miles west from SJ) it was felt, but caused no damage or inconvenience.

  3. 5.2 is not so scary by ObviousGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Until an earthquake's magnitude rises above 6.5, it's really not so bad.

    Buildings that cannot withstand a 5.2 earthquake should be investigated.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:5.2 is not so scary by Loki_1929 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Buildings that cannot withstand a 5.2 earthquake should be investigated.

      What's to investigate? The pile of rubble?
      Here, I shall provide you with a thorough investigation report:

      engineer1: "Shit, that was only a 5.2, and that building collapsed. I didn't even spill my coffee."

      engineer2: "Gee, sucks to be them. Oh well."

      engineer1: "Want to grab a burger?"

      engineer2: "Ok."

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
    2. Re:5.2 is not so scary by ObviousGuy · · Score: 2

      Wouldn't you like to know what construction company built a collapsed building?

      --
      I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    3. Re:5.2 is not so scary by flewp · · Score: 2

      I was watching the Colorado and San Jose hockey game, and one of the announcers noticed it. The other thought it was from the fans on their feet when the action got intense. I didn't even see anything shake, no players fell to the ground, so it doesn't seem like anything big. Then again, it was in San Jose (not sure how far that is from Gilroy.

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
    4. Re:5.2 is not so scary by yomahz · · Score: 3, Insightful


      Until an earthquake's magnitude rises above 6.5, it's really not so bad.

      Buildings that cannot withstand a 5.2 earthquake should be investigated.


      Not true... there are so many more factors to take into consideration when it comes to earthquakes. The depth, the type (rollers are much worse), the distance, etc.

      --
      "A mind is a terrible thing to taste."
    5. Re:5.2 is not so scary by Kris_J · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not to mention the geography and geology of the location. Reflections off large underground rock formations and "liquifaction" are a couple of the more serious problems during an earthquake.

    6. Re:5.2 is not so scary by Peyna · · Score: 2

      The problem with the building codes is old buildings. Like the building I live in right now could in no way be built today the way it stands, but they can't make them tear it down or force them to spend millions of dollars to bring it up to code either.

      --
      What?
    7. Re:5.2 is not so scary by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 2

      Buildings that cannot withstand a 5.2 earthquake should be investigated.

      That might be difficult...

    8. Re:5.2 is not so scary by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 2

      "Yeah, except a building that fails to survive a 5.2 earthquake is likely a termite-infested tool shed that was held together with scotch tape."

      I use duct tape on my termite-infested shed- no problems.

      graspee

  4. Oh, just a 5.2? by hackman · · Score: 5, Funny

    No worries, seen worse. Be a good Californian and go back to bed.

    Heh. Course I live in Oregon now so I bet if they had a 5.2 out here everyone would be out on the street talking about how scared they were.

    --
    __ No registration required to read this message. They did it in the Matrix.
    1. Re:Oh, just a 5.2? by big_hairy_mama · · Score: 2

      So oregon folk are soft are they?

      Drove home to Seattle from San Fran just yesterday (lucky?) and I distinctly remember saying as I passed through Oregon, "What the fuck? These pussies have a 55mph speed limit!" So yes, Oregonians are soft.

      But I suppose you can't be softer than Seattle in a snowstorm -- the whole city breaks down in a god damn eighth of an inch.

    2. Re:Oh, just a 5.2? by KillboyPHD · · Score: 2, Funny

      Course I live in Oregon now so I bet if they had a 5.2 out here everyone would be out on the street talking about how scared they were.

      Course, they do that when the sun comes out too...

      --
      Bah weep granah, weep ninny bong!
    3. Re:Oh, just a 5.2? by big_hairy_mama · · Score: 2

      The limit is 65

      On parts of I-5 near the California border, it's 55 or 50. Granted, these parts are in the mountains, but going 75 in Cali and dropping 20 on the same roads seems strange.

    4. Re:Oh, just a 5.2? by 56ker · · Score: 2

      In England we have similar phrases about people from Birmingham.

    5. Re:Oh, just a 5.2? by big_hairy_mama · · Score: 2

      I'm talking about the limit :) I made the trip from San Fran to Seattle in 12 hours including lunch and dinner, if that's any indication of how little the limit means to me.

  5. Why? by Ghoser777 · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    Okay, forget karma or what not for a second. Honestly, why is this on slashdot? I'm not sure I approve of reporting minor earthquakes in San Francisco when I know hundreds of people die every day or so in huge catastrophes across the world. I'm an American, but I'm a little sick of this American-centric view of what's important. Either all minor disasters get reported, or none of them.

    F-bacher

    --
    James Tiberius Kirk: "Spock, the women on your planet are logical. No other planet in the galaxy can make that claim."
  6. Re:Is this a joke? by rhizome · · Score: 2

    The shaking radiates in waves from the epicenter (which is deep in the earth, to boot), so there is rarely as much shaking at the epicenter as in surrounding cities. It's just that common epicenters get the side effect of skewed roads and cracked foundations from the fault motion. :)

    --
    When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
  7. Parochial Rant Approaching! by Debillitatus · · Score: 2
    This is why the East Coast kicks all the ass in the world, really.

    Ok, flamebait aside, I still find it amazing that people can deal with this stuff on a regular basis. I've been through quakes a few times, and I have absolutely no desire to repeat the experience.

    How on earth do all you Californians deal with it? I would be heading out on the next flight.

    Give me nor-easters and rude subway drivers any day...;-)

    --

    Come on, give it up, that's

    1. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by n6mod · · Score: 2

      It's simple. The east coast sucks for one fundamental reason. Your oceans are broken. Here on the proper coast, the sun sets over the ocean. This is one of those romantice devices that chicks go for. (Oh, wait, this is /. Never mind.)

      I'm told that the sun rises over the oceans on that coast, but I've never been up that early.

      Besides, you had a 5.0 near Plattsburgh last month, so save the "we don't have earthquakes" crap.

      (And no, I won't claim we don't have tornados here. We do. There was one a few years ago that destroyed a couple of hot tubs. ;)

      --
      You have violated Robot's Rules of Order and will be asked to leave the future immediately.
    2. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by corebreech · · Score: 2

      No way to know whether they're rude or not either, unless, like, they run you over or something.

    3. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by wdr1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How on earth do all you Californians deal with it?

      When I grew up in the Midwest, it was Severe Thunderstorms, Snow Storms, Floods, and Tornados.

      If I lived on the East Coast, I'd worry about Hurricanes.

      I live on the West Coast and it's Earthquakes.

      Pick your poison.

      -Bill

      --
      SlashSig Karma: Excellent (mostly affected by moderatio
    4. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by yomahz · · Score: 2

      How on earth do all you Californians deal with it? I would be heading out on the next flight.

      I just yawn and go back to sleep :)

      --
      "A mind is a terrible thing to taste."
    5. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by NaturePhotog · · Score: 2

      The greatest recorded earthquake in the contiguous United States was located in Missouri, not a place that usually comes to mind when one thinks "earthquake."
      New Madrid quake, estimated to be an 8.0. It apparently rang church bells as far away as Boston, MA. Read more about it here.

      As far as this one went, it rattled the house a bit here in Oakland (~60 miles NNE of Gilroy), which rattled the cats more than a little.

    6. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by Peyna · · Score: 2

      As a person from the midwest, you don't get much warning about tornados either. Especially when there are a ton of severe storms all the time, you can very well head to the basement for each one. Many people in the midwest live too far from tornado sirens as well. Tornados are pretty fickle too.

      --
      What?
    7. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by sconeu · · Score: 2

      Give me a break. The few times you NY guys have quakes, the network news anchors are all over it like the end of the world. I've seen them do that for a 3.3. A BLOODY 3.3 fer G-d's sake! Out here, for a 3.3, we say, "OK, who farted?"

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    8. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by sconeu · · Score: 2

      Besides... the safest place to be in an earthquake is somewhere else (obviously). But... if you can't be somewhere else, L.A. (and the SF Bay area) are probably the best places to be. They know quakes are coming, the building codes take that into account. Buildings in CA are designed to hold up to quakes... They may be broken afterwards, but they don't fall down on top of you. We learned our lesson back in '71.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    9. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by CynicTheHedgehog · · Score: 2

      Hurricanes rarely even come near the northeast. And you have a good week of prior notice before they land. When I lived in Cali we had mudslides, wildfires, earthquakes, riots, and the occasional typhoon heading in from the Pacific. I live in Florida and I'll take sunny skies and the occasional cat-3 hurricane over that any day.

    10. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by n6mod · · Score: 2

      I was wondering if Rochester felt that one. When I went to RIT ('90-92), Loma Prieta was fresh in everyone's minds, and I was constantly asked about it. As if surviving that quake somehow defined my existence.

      Nice to know they have a data point now. ;)

      --
      You have violated Robot's Rules of Order and will be asked to leave the future immediately.
    11. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by jafac · · Score: 2

      don't forget the killer bees and high-speed car chases.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    12. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by jafac · · Score: 2

      Even worse, east-coast cities, and Chicago and Milwaukee all have the distinction of being laid out backwards. Body of water to the East of downtown, Suburbs to the West.
      Such that, commuters have to drive Eastward towards the city in the morning, blinding morning sunlight in their eyes, and then turn around and drive Westwards towards the suburbs in the evenings.

      It's gotta do some nasty things to one's stress levels trying to drive rush hour twice a day blinded by low angle sunlight.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    13. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2
      Yeah, those blizzards and hurricanes must be great fun.

      You don't get strong blizzards and hurricanes in the same places. Hurricanes require warm climates. And blizzards don't damage buildings much if at all - stay inside and you are fine. Dealing with a blizzard is a cakewalk.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    14. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2

      The biggest natural disaster in LA isn't the earthquakes. It's the idiotic notion of trying to get an arid desert to suppport such a large population. Thus you have erosion problems up the yin-yang on the occasions where it does rain and people lose their yards in mudslides, and you have to pipe in every last drop out of the Colorado River, hundreds of miles away, so the river doesn't even reach the coast in Mexico anymore.

      Anyone living in a freakin' desert should *not* waste water on having a nice green lawn. If you didn't want sand and sgraggly scrub brush for your yard, you shouldn't have chosen to live where that's what the climate tends to produce.

      Still prefer the East coast? Nah, but I prefer that part of the West Coast that actually has a livable temperate climate, essentially everything north of San Fran is okay. And there you start to get the *really* fun natural disasters - a few thousand or so years of nothing and then BAM, the top of one of the Cascade Mountains literally explodes. (Mt Saint Helens wasn't that unique an event for the area. It's the standard pattern for how those volcanoes tend to go. Terrifying, but it leaves behind the most beautiful landscape imaginable after the area recovers. Ever seen Crater Lake?)

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  8. Reporting your observations by zavyman · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you felt the quake, or if you were in the area and didn't feel it, be sure to record your observations here so that the data can be displayed and analyzed.

    It's amazing to see 700 responses be recorded in about 20 some minutes, and more data just helps the cause of the USGS. It was minor up here near the bay, but hey, it was my first :) You can access the current map as well.

  9. Sunnyvale by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 2
    We're about 40 miles from the epicenter here. It was kind of long, which was the only worrying thing about it. When it doesn't stop right away, you worry that it's going to get worse before it stops.

    But really, amplitude-wise it was no great shakes.

    --
    And the brethren went away edified.
    1. Re:Sunnyvale by zephc · · Score: 2

      I too am in sunnyvale, and i heard the TV sitting here on my desk shaking just a little, but didn't feel it in my seat

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
  10. report your experiences to the USGS by molo · · Score: 5, Informative


    http://pasadena.wr.usgs.gov/shake/ca/STORE/X4013 33 64/ciim_form.html

    Go there if you are in the area of the quake. Report what you felt. Don't make shit up, don't troll the USGS.

    I felt some moderate shaking. Biggest quake I've ever been in, but I just moved to Palo Alto from New York. Neat, but scary.

    --
    Using your sig line to advertise for friends is lame.
    1. Re:report your experiences to the USGS by yomahz · · Score: 4, Funny


      Go there if you are in the area of the quake. Report what you felt. Don't make shit up, don't troll the USGS


      Hmmm.. you just told the trolls on /. not to go troll the USGS. I feel sorry for those guys tonight :) Smooth move.

      --
      "A mind is a terrible thing to taste."
    2. Re:report your experiences to the USGS by nettdata · · Score: 5, Funny

      I felt some moderate shaking.

      Don't worry... I've felt some shaky moderation myself.

      Oh, wait...

      --



      $0.02 (CDN)
  11. Re:I know what caused the quake... by servanya · · Score: 2, Funny

    WOW....I felt it here in Portland, OR.
    Wait a sec...no, that was just my g/f rolling out of bed. Nevermind.

  12. It was felt at the hockey game by Erbo · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Fox Sports Net broadcasters John Kelly and Peter McNab sure felt that one from the broadcast booth of the Compaq Center (soon to be the "HP Pavilion") in San Jose, where the Colorado Avalanche were dueling with the San Jose Sharks in a hotly-contested playoff game (Game 6, Sharks led series 3-2).

    The quake hit in the 3rd period, while the Avs and Sharks were tied 1-1 (both goals having come in the 2nd, within 30 seconds of one another). It may have jolted the announcers, but it sure didn't faze goaltenders Evgeni Nabokov or Patrick Roy, who never let anything through in that period. The game was finally decided in OT, on a goal by Avs forward Peter "The Great" Forsberg, winning the game 2-1 and sending the series back to Pepsi Center in Denver for Game 7.

    GO AVS!

    --
    Be who you are...and be it in style!
  13. Yup, I felt it too by Eugenia+Loli · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am in Foster City, 75 km away from the Epicenter. Yup, I felt it. First thing I did was to shout "Sweetieeee, wake up!" to my husband who has *just* gone to sleep. But it only lasted for 10 secs or so, so it was not too bad.

    In Greece I've seen worse that this quake.

    And in fact, I was feeling like it would be a quake today. In Greece, (older) people have three things to undedify earthquakes that are going to happen in the next few hours:
    1. If the climate is unsusally dryly hot and it feels weird to your.. ears (there is an unusual sound of silence, a low pitch sound that masks the other small sounds). It is a different sort of heat. It is like humid heat, but very dry at the same time. I can't explain it better in words, sorry.
    2. If for some weird reason, while you just sit somewhere fine and daddy, your ear just "blocks", like it does when water gets inside when you are in the bath or something.
    3. If the dogs just bark all day, and no matter what you do to them, they just don't stop barking.

    At least these are the ways older people in Greece get a clue about nature's surprises.

    1. Re:Yup, I felt it too by Vess+V. · · Score: 4, Funny
      Yup, I felt it. First thing I did was to shout "Sweetieeee, wake up!" to my husband who has *just* gone to sleep. But it only lasted for 10 secs or so, so it was not too bad.

      Heh heh... gotta love out-of-context excerpts.

    2. Re:Yup, I felt it too by n6mod · · Score: 2

      2. If for some weird reason, while you just sit somewhere fine and daddy, your ear just "blocks", like it does when water gets inside when you are in the bath or something.

      Funny you mention this. Especially on the way home, I had a hell of a time keeping my ears cleared. I just blamed it on allergies. ;)

      Of course, I'm still having trouble, so either it is allergies, or that was just a foreshock...

      --
      You have violated Robot's Rules of Order and will be asked to leave the future immediately.
    3. Re:Yup, I felt it too by Eugenia+Loli · · Score: 2

      Yes, I was replying to a Slashdot comment when the earthquake happened... :o)
      Five minutes later, I was commenting again here on Slashdot, reporting the earthquake. :)

  14. Is this by doubtless · · Score: 2, Funny

    a news for nerds? or a slow news day? or maybe another evidence for the stranglets? hee-hee

    --
    geek page at KY speaks
  15. Watch It! by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Funny

    When the BIG one comes, all the land east of the San Andreas (or mebbe Hayward) Fault will slide off into the Atlantic. Betcha wish ya were in sunny ... uh ... cool and windy (and often foggy during the summer) Santa Cruz, eh? :-)

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  16. Re:Northridge by Eric+Smith · · Score: 2, Informative
    A 5.2 *is* enough to cause serious damage to buildings and a good chance of death, if you're in an area with a building code that doesn't require construction that is earthquake-safe.

    Fortunately in California the building code does require this, so a 5.2 isn't likely to be a problem unless you happen to be very close or at a point where the P-waves and S-waves reinforce.

  17. Felt it in SoMa by 1984 · · Score: 2

    Apparently there have actually been four events. First one was an "Is this an earthquake?" That gave way directly to the 5.2 shake, which lasted a few seconds before diminishing. Whole-building motion, and you could feeling the building twisting and deforming. But no apparent damage, and subsided quickly.

    http://earthquake.usgs.gov/recenteqsUS/Maps/US2/ 36 . 8.-123.-121.html

    Couple of aftershocks (they say) but they were much lighter, at around 2.5, and weren't felt here (at least, not by me in a quiet apartment...)

  18. 5.2 Earthquake Shakes Up SF Bay Area by Cardhore · · Score: 2

    NOooooooo! Not the SourceForge Bay Area!!! i hope my projects are backed up

  19. Earthquake 5.2 by InsaneCreator · · Score: 2

    Earthquake 5.2 - the new Linux disto of choice!

  20. Random! by sulli · · Score: 2
    really, you have a five digit uid and you didn't know that?

    Actually I think it's pretty damn interesting. The article poll too (an underutilized feature in slashdot, imho).

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  21. NHL Sharks Game by cdf12345 · · Score: 2

    I was just watching ESPN, and they're like "We've had an earthquake and we'll be back for the third period. The game was almost over.

    Glad to see that not even earthquakes will stop a hockey game!

    --
    Chicago2600.net more than a lifestyle, its a survival trait.
  22. Re:Nate is in Walnut Creek? by oldzoot · · Score: 2

    WalNut Crik???? Danville????
    I am in Antioch, but kindly leave my sausage alone.... ;)

    --
    enough is too much
  23. Re:In other news... by n6mod · · Score: 2

    As there is probably more rain in Vancouver, WA then there is in Vancouver, BC...

    Sorry, I couldn't resist.

    --
    You have violated Robot's Rules of Order and will be asked to leave the future immediately.
  24. Don't click that USGS link by harvardian · · Score: 2

    First thing I thought when I saw the story was "ooh, I'll click on the event monitoring page." Then, as the page took a while to load up, I suddenly realized that idiots like me were slashdotting a very important resource.

  25. Once again, the Gummint websites rule by nosferatu-man · · Score: 2

    I've been checking that USGS earthquake page since I moved to California a couple of years ago. The only two website worth reading these days are the CDC and the USGS. I'm proud of my tax money going to provide such in-depth time wasting. Carry on, beloved Federal agencies.

    'jfb

    --
    To spur "enterprise Linux," Big Bang, the distributed two-phase commit.
  26. :-) perfect for an earthquake virgin like me :-) by asa · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This was the perfect earthquake for an earthquake virgin like me. It was just strong enough to know that it wasn't my imagination but not so strong that anyone got hurt or any property got damaged. I'm in Redwood City, CA and it was a thrilling experience.

    --Asa

  27. John Katz? by _bobs.pizza_ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Did anybody else out there read this story late at night and see "John Katz" instead of "Joe Kaz", and wonder why he didn't post the story himself? Of course, even in my bleary-eyed state I knew it wasn't Katz posting, as it was only a paragraph of text.

  28. How it felt to me. by juuri · · Score: 3, Interesting

    First off I live in one of the super windy portions of the San Francisco. Wind funnels down market and the various hills so that I experience regular wind blasts.

    This was just like a normal wind blast, in that my huge windows pushed in and the pressure changed in the room. Then instead of slowly going back out like normal the windows shot out REALLY changing the air pressure in the room. It was at this point that I realized it wasn't just a normal blast of wind. Then the TV shook, the shelves moved and the windows came back at me.

    Basically it felt to me like a roller coaster... gentle turn (rolling sensation), jolt (hard turn), roll, roll, and a sigh as it was over. Stuff shook but nothing too special and nothing was broke. I also happen to live in a new building designed to handle big earthquakes.

    The cool thing was looking out my windows and watching the city light up as everyone turned on their lights and went to their own windows.

    --
    --- I do not moderate.
  29. Re:What if it was Ice Hockey? by DeeKayWon · · Score: 2
    Number one, it was ice hockey. It was game 6 of the Colorado/San Jose series.

    Number two, of course if the ice was damaged severely enough, the game would be suspended and postponed.

  30. Re:Slashdot before CNN? by Rakarra · · Score: 2

    CNN has it under the US section. It's not a large enough story to make it to the front page.

  31. Just California Weather by rossz · · Score: 2

    This is not news. It happens all the time. The only thing exciting about it is watching the reaction of the tourists.

    --
    -- Will program for bandwidth
  32. Can't understand the hysteria by evilviper · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Many years back, we had a 7.4 earthquake followed by a 6.5 aftershock, and many other aftershocks of decreasing intensity. The death count? One person who had a heart attack because of it.

    Everyone will like to say that they're more devastating when they are in heavily populated areas. That's completely untrue. They're more devestating when they are in areas where buildings are made extremely cheaply. I had a very large TV jump off of a table and about 5 feet across the room. I had a set of shelves with quite a load on them shake so hard that they damaged the wally they were up against. And in all of that, not a single bit of structural damage. Not a single bridge needed the slightest of repairs (and we've got plenty of those).

    Then, a year later, a 6.4 earthquake hits Los Angeles, dozens of people die, several bridges collapse, and buildings collapse. It's simple folks. If you live somewhere that every contractor is cutting corners, even a small quake will destroy everything in sight.

    I'd been through a hurricane when I was living back east. I'd rather have 8.0 earthquakes every week, than a hurricane once a decade. Hell, earthquakes really don't do any significant damage. If you were driving, you wouldn't even know that there was an earthquake.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:Can't understand the hysteria by evilviper · · Score: 2

      Congats, you get your wish.

      I was speaking of nothridge in fact, but I have no idea about the Loma Prieta quake you refer to.

      In fact, your very uninformed post prompted me to do a slight bit of research. The quake I was refering to is the Landers Calif. quake in 1992. I found out that according to the USGS the earthquake was in fact a 7.6, and the aftershock a 6.7. The death toll was not 1, but in fact 3. Property damage was 92 million, which is a far cry from the $10 Billion caused by the SMALL northridge quake (but that was my whole point in the first place).

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:Can't understand the hysteria by Dahan · · Score: 2

      Landers is out in the desert and isn't a densely populated area. I don't think you can compare damage to Northridge or Loma Prieta--there probably isn't $10 billion worth of stuff out there to damage :P (and do you mean you don't know what the Loma Prieta quake is? If so, I'd say you're very uninformed yourself...)

    3. Re:Can't understand the hysteria by evilviper · · Score: 2
      Landers is out in the desert and isn't a densely populated area.


      Did you even READ my first post? I specifically addressed this fact.

      We may not have as many buildings as LA or SF, but we've still got plenty of them. We have several bridges in this area as well. Just because it's not as dense, doesn't mean the differences should be as broad. Practically no damage to any buildings in a 7.6 quake, and just about every building within 50 miles damaged in the Northridge quake. But again, I shouldn't need to say this. I already covered this, as you should know.

      As for not knowing about the Loma Prieta quake, that only means I didn't identify the quake with the name. But, if it makes you feel better you are welcome to throw around baseless insults. Of course, you are the one who thought I was refering to a 1989 & 1994 quake as 'a year apart'.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    4. Re:Can't understand the hysteria by Dahan · · Score: 2
      We may not have as many buildings as LA or SF, but we've still got plenty of them.

      Yup, plenty of buildings around there. A real bustling place it is.

      Of course, you are the one who thought I was refering to a 1989 & 1994 quake as 'a year apart'.

      Where did I do that? I think you're the one who's not doing the reading.

    5. Re:Can't understand the hysteria by evilviper · · Score: 2
      Well, first off I don't live in Landers, I do live rather nearby. The majority of the damage in the ridgcrest quake wasn't near the epicenter anyhow, but that's besides the point.

      Where did I do that?


      Me: Then, a year later, a 6.4 earthquake hits Los Angeles

      You: I hope you're not talking about loma prieta and northridge respectively.

      Well, post whatever reply you wish. I'm getting rather tired of the conversation. I'll be happy to let you have the last word...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:Can't understand the hysteria by jafac · · Score: 2

      I live in Landers, and that quake knocked my pickup truck off it's cinder blocks.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    7. Re:Can't understand the hysteria by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2

      The Richter scale is not the only factor in how damaging an earthquake is to the buildings in the area. Saying that a 6.5 quake must necessarily be easier to build for than a 7.4 quake isn't true.

      The magnitude of a quake is only one single measure. There's also measures of what the waveform looks like. Saying a 7.4 earthquake is always more damaging than a 6.5 is like saying a 74 decibel sound is always more deafening than a 65 decibel sound. (even if one is a low-pitch drone almost outside your hearing range and the other is a high-pitched crying baby.)

      The LA quakes and the SF quakes tend not to have the same "pitch", so to speak.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  33. Re:I live in Cupertino by Dicky · · Score: 2
    Israel and Russia are not earthquake hot zones

    I hate to tell you, but parts of Israel are somewhat earthquake-prone. I lived in Jerusalem for a few months back in 94/95, and I apparently slept through an earthquake which woke up my 3 room-mates. Not a big one, but bigger than we tend to get here in the UK :-) Wasn't there a big earthquake in the 1920s which caused a lot of damage in S'fat? What do you think the Jordan valley is, if not a fault line?

    And Russia is so mind-bogglingly big that I bet there are some areas which are hot zones...

    --
    Paranoia isn't an infectious condition, it's a way of life
  34. Here's a better title by xant · · Score: 5, Funny

    5.2 Earthquake Barely Nudges San Francisco

    Are we going to start reporting heavy rainfall in Hawaii next?

    --
    It's rare that you're presented with a knob whose only two positions are Make History and Flee Your Glorious Destiny.
    1. Re:Here's a better title by wdavies · · Score: 2

      F*ck, certainly that tropical rainstorm last night coming back from the WWW11 in Honolulu was more scary !!!

      I was at the Sharks/Avs game and didn't feel a thing -- indistinguishable from the general crowd cheering effect - or maybe I was just concentrating on the game too much.

      Winton

  35. Re:"Did the earth move for you too, honey?" by Peyna · · Score: 2

    Sort of like my geology teacher told me. All the geologists in CA live up in the granite on the mountains and what not. Everyone else lives out on mud and silt, so when the earthquakes come, they sure feel it.

    This is why St. Louis is really a bad place to live, it's all mud and silt around the Mississippi, and a prime place for an earthquake (was a real big one there about 100 years ago maybe?). If a major earthquake happened there, the ground is so unstable that it would probably level the city.

    Basically just repeating what you said, it's not the strength of the earthquake, but what's under you that determines how much damage is done.

    --
    What?
  36. Story Time by Monkelectric · · Score: 5, Funny
    please reply with your funny earthquake stories :)

    here's mine, northridge earthquake, I dont remember exactly the date, but I wsa playing Wing Commander I or II, I dont remember which, and I had *just* blown up some huge ass ship, a carrier I think -> My speakers are blasting the sound of the ship exploding, and at that percise moment the earthquake begins, and as the ground begins to rumble Im thinking, "holy shit thats a great sound effect", then I realize whats going on and dash to the doorframe where your supposed to be in an earthquake. I think I ended up loosing the level to, got attacked while my ship was unmanned :)

    --

    Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    1. Re:Story Time by sconeu · · Score: 2

      , northridge earthquake, I dont remember exactly the date

      17 Jan 1994, 0431 PST.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re:Story Time by isorox · · Score: 2

      got attacked while my ship was unmanned :)

      Damn those kilrathi! Do they have no honor?

    3. Re:Story Time by freakinPsycho · · Score: 2

      I was sitting at my desk at home when this struck. Unfortunatly, my desk isn't the most stable thing. I'm a ways from the epicenter (~40 miles or so, SF) but the building definatly shook (it doesn't help that I'm in the top floor).

      First reaction: Steady the monitors!

      --
      "All the things I really like to do are either immoral, illegal, or fattening."
      - Alexandar Woolcot
  37. Seismograph data is up by Animats · · Score: 2
    The Rapid Instrumental Intensity Map for this event is up (after some initial problems causing the wrong map area to be displayed). Note that in addition to the epicenter near Gilroy, there was some additional activity near Palo Alto. The intensity values indicate that little to no damage should be expected. I'm in Palo Alto, and the effects were very minor.

    There's an EDIS Bulletin on the quake, but it's a routine report, with a priority too low to generate an E-mail message from EDIS. No indications of any significant emergencies to be dealt with.

    Press reports indicate that several plates fell down at a china outlet store in Gilroy, and a coffee pot was damaged at the Gilroy Rodeway Inn.

    For some reason, phone service in San Jose was affected. Unclear why.

  38. Re:Seattle next? by Peyna · · Score: 2

    There are hundreds upon hundreds of mild quakes every single day. If the usgs website calms down, go take a look at them all.

    --
    What?
  39. earthquake newbie, 7th floor hotel room by mjh · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I normally occupy the East Coast, but I'm traveling on businesss, and an earthquake is a strange experience for me. But I definately felt it. Basically, from up here on the 7th floor, in Walnut Creek, it felt like someone took the room and was rocking it back and forth. The amount of motion was very small, and very gentle. But the fact that the entire room was moving was very strange and disquieting.

    I've often said, as an east coaster, that I'd like to feel an earthquake. Well now that I have, I have two reactions.

    1. Not nearly as exciting as I'd anticipated it would be.
    2. Not nearly as calm as I'd anticipated I would be.

    IOW, I was scared more than was appropriate for the size of this thing. Thank GOD that they make the building able to survive this kind of thing. As I think about it, the fact that an 8 story building was gently rocking back and forth (probably about 1/2 inch in both directions), and didn't fall is pretty amazing.

    Want to simulate it? Have someone go up to your wheeled chair and wiggle it back and forth at a rate of about 3-4Hz. Now, imagine that the desk that you're leaning on, and the floor that you have your feet on is also moving.

    --
    Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
  40. Ob:Spoiler Warning by xrayspx · · Score: 2

    Hope Slashdot didn't ruin anyones day in CA by posting this, since we east coast people will find out so far before them.

  41. Priorities by blair1q · · Score: 2

    Gilroy?

    Is the garlic okay?

    How about the motorcycles?

    --Blair
    "The only other thing they make there is trouble for politicians wanting to create a freeway to the east..."

  42. Two separate quakes? by doorbot.com · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm in San Francisco and it seemed to me that there was two separate quakes, separated by about 10 seconds.

    The first wasn't that bad, a "trembler" (for a native San Franciscan like me I guess this is up to 5 or so :)). Then another one a bit longer but about the same magnitude.

    Having experienced the 1989 quake, I was expecting a huge (main) shock after the second one (two in a row isn't good...). Nothing yet, but perhaps later tonight or even tomorrow we might get something more.

    The worst part is after a large quake and you're trying to fall sleep, but now you're senses are heightened, and you can feel every little aftershock. And while you're laying in your bed, you're looking up at the ceiling afraid it's going to fall on you the next minute (you've already calculated how much time you'll have to toss back the sheets and dive to safety). All the while, each movement you make makes you tense; you think it's another aftershock.

    I'd rather have earthquakes, though, than tornados, blizzards, or hurricanes.

    By the way, if you live in Oakland, Berkeley or Alameda, and you're paranoid... the San Andreas fault isn't predicted to let loose for quite a while. But you're sitting right on the Hayward fault and it's expected to slip "soon" meaning the next 10 - 30 years.

  43. Re:A More Official Way of Measuring... by Peyna · · Score: 2

    The Intensity Scale is a far better measurement of the actual effects of an earthquake than the richter scale. The richter scale is simply a measurement of wave size, which may or may not have anything to do with damage/loss of life. The Intensity Scale gives factors such as the geography of the area some weight, and helps to determine how a 5.2 can kill 10,000 people in one place and no one somewhere else, even with the same constructed buildings.

    If you can come up with a better way to quantify that, let me know.

    --
    What?
  44. Earthquake / disaster / Burning Man kit ready? by geekotourist · · Score: 5, Informative
    If you felt it- you know that feeling you had at the 14th second, as you were starting to wonder if this was a big one, thinking about those 32 remaining (or at least ambulatory) survivors of the 60 second long 1906 quake (estimated 8.3), and then it stopped... the Sharks game wasn't even interrupted. But we know that sometime over the next 30 years, it'll start up the same, and then get worse.

    So, just as daylight savings time supposedly reminds us to change our smoke detector batteries (because otherwise that annoying 'low battery' beeping always start at 4am), tiny earthquakes remind us about our earthquake kits and preparation. Includes...

    • 3+ days of food, water, clothing, tools (ability to turn off the gas if needed) flashlights etc etc.
    • especially if you're female: comfortable clothing in your car, with a good change of shoes (vs hiking in high heels)
    • knowing where your important papers and backup disks are (some sites advise having copies in a bag you can grab on the way out), and having copies in a safe / safety deposit box.
    • cell phone always charged and gas tank always at least 1/2 full

    And unless you live in Scottsdale, AZ, don't feel smug about the safety of your own location- St. Louis has had an 8.0, and New York State has seen 6.0's.

  45. Most important question by YeOldeGnurd · · Score: 2

    Is the garlic crop okay? I wanna go to the garlic festival this year!

    --
    ...Nothing interesting here. Just move along...
  46. Oh yeah, and its raining here in Luxembourg!! by trellick · · Score: 2, Flamebait


    Sorry people, I don't think that a local 'weather' report is worthy of a /. report, however groundbreaking you may think it is [excuse the pun!.

    I'm as about concerned about minor quakes in the US as I sure most /. readers are concerned about rainfall in Europe.

    This is not /. news.

    trellick

    1. Re:Oh yeah, and its raining here in Luxembourg!! by Ziviyr · · Score: 2

      I survived it, it'd better be news! :-)

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  47. Re:i havent felt a good quake... by sconeu · · Score: 2

    See, that's the difference. Loma Prieta wasn't under a major urban area. Northridge was sitting right under some of the most highly developed real estate in So Cal.

    In '94, I was 3 miles away from Ground Zero.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  48. 5.2 doesn't mean anything without more info by jesterzog · · Score: 2

    Not true... there are so many more factors to take into consideration when it comes to earthquakes. The depth, the type (rollers are much worse), the distance, etc.

    I couldn't agree more.

    We had a 6.9 here on the 21st of August last year, and people barely felt a thing. A few months before that there was a bigger one (somewhere in the 7's) that's unfortunately rolled off the linked page. Again, not much was felt at all.

    There wasn't any notable damage in either of them. This could partly be put down to the very strict local building codes that are there in anticipation of a big Earthquake being due, but that hardly made a difference in these cases.

    5.2 doesn't mean anything. There could be a very destructive 5.2 earthquake, or all the other factors could combine to make it almost invisible.

  49. Re:A More Official Way of Measuring... by sconeu · · Score: 2

    Sorry, dude, but someone from LA is just as qualified as an SF'ian, and probably more qualified than a Nevadan. Or didn't you hear of Long Beach '33, Sylmar '71, Whittier Narrows '87, or Northridge '94?

    Fscking Bay Area elitists.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  50. Was at the shark tank in san jose by Archfeld · · Score: 2

    and we felt it during the game. We lost 2-1 on OT....damn avalanche :(

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  51. I was at the San Jose Arena by shafty · · Score: 2, Funny

    watching the Sharks. At first I thought it was another "we will rock you" chant starting up, but I knew it was something big when the concrete stands began to wobble. I looked up and watched the rafter lights sway for a few seconds while hoping the tremors didn't escalate. No damage or injuries. Regretfully the refs didn't get hurt...those blind jackasses costed the Sharks the game.

  52. Re:I Feel Your Pain by big_hairy_mama · · Score: 3

    Dunno about everyone else, I'd say that was pretty big. Here in Seattle, I felt it in a major way even while driving 60mph (thought I had a flat tire, and when I got out and checked, I thought I was just really dizzy, that is until I heard on the news what happend). There were several buildings/walls that collapsed or were irreparably damaged. Didn't you even here about the damage to the capitol building in Olympia?

    So it wasn't huge, but it's one I'll remember for a while... certainly bigger than this whimpy one today :)

  53. Re:AUSTRALIA by BluBrick · · Score: 2, Funny
    due to the location of the teutonic plates around it


    I have this image of blond-haired, blue-eyed, continents goosestepping their way around the globe :)

    --
    Ahh - My eye!
    The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
  54. True Story by commodoresloat · · Score: 5, Funny

    LA a couple years ago, about 4AM, a long roller, centered around Joshua Tree if I recall correctly.... I had just fallen asleep in the arms of a hottie I had met the night before.... The quake woke us up and kept going, and we wound up huddling naked under the doorway scared but aroused. When the shaking finally stopped, the phone rang.

    It was my girlfriend, who called to see if I was OK.

    I've never been so fucking busted.

    1. Re:True Story by sahala · · Score: 2
      It was my girlfriend, who called to see if I was OK.

      I've never been so fucking busted.

      And how were you busted? Not that I'm condoning dishonesty, but couldn't you have just said a quick "I-am-ok-will-call-you-back-in-a-bit-so-i-can-make -sure-everything-else-is-ok"?

  55. 1 significant affect by martissimo · · Score: 2

    Seems some water flow patterns at the Gilroy Hot Springs may have changed a bit.

    This is a beautiful area that many people in the bay area take advantage of, and it is also a very historically significant site.

    Following WWII when Japanese-American citizens were released from internment camps many of them spent a good deal of time at Gilroy-Yamato attempting to re-enter society, bit of a overview here

    The land was recently sold to the Nature Conservancy (ie. about a month ago), but is still being ran by the seller until the conservancy is ready to take over...

    From what i understand they have some serious problems right now tonight, yes no major structures have fallen, and no lives are lost, but this is practically a sacred site to many Japanese-Americans, and a beautifull one in any case to others... would be a shame to see it suffer any ill consequences as are being reported

  56. Re:AUSTRALIA by ross.w · · Score: 2

    That doesn't mean we don't have them, just ask anyone living in Newcastle about 12 years ago.

    Problem is, because we don't have many earthquakes, the codes aren't as strict, therefore when we DO have them, even a little one can cause damage.

    --
    If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
  57. So Why Do People Continue to STAY There? by Vortran · · Score: 2

    My, Lord! This is a wake up call. LEAVE already. When the big one hits, it will make 9/11 look like a little bump in the road. It will affect the computer industry drastically and everyone will wail and whine like banshees.

    I love southern CA.. it's warm and beautiful! but I would NEVER live there! People.. check this: there are at least FOUR MAJOR faults running through or near the SF bay area. They WILL give way.

    Remember how upset everyone was when the bay bridge collapsed? Well.. DUH! You LIVE ON A FAULT!! and they built a major suspension bridge on a fault. Brilliant.

    When beaches are infested or contaminated, they put up a sign and a big fence around the place and people DON'T GO THERE.

    I just don't get why people aren't leaving in droves. They are living on the edge.. literally. My wife's aunt lives out there and I've asked this same thing and she admits it's foolish to stay, but can't give a rational answer for not leaving. It may cost her her life. Is it worth it?

    Vortran out

    --
    Knowledge is like ignorance.. too much can be just as bad as not enough.
  58. The sun also sets over lake Erie.... by ThomasMis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's funny that you should say that it's romantic for the sun to set over large bodies of water. Here on the east side of Cleveland, the coast takes a northeast bent along lake erie. Therefore, in the evening, the sun sets over the lake for us. What takes the romance out of the sun gently falling into the slow rolling waves of lake erie is the fact that the lake is so polluted with heavy metals. State health advisories are constantly posted asking that the very old, very young, and pregnant should not eat lake erie fish. Our fish have the proud distinction of being riddled with tumors. It's really sad. When you take a boat trip out to the lake erie islands, and look down into the deeper parts of the lake, it looks so clear and beautiful, it's a shame that if you dive in for a swim, it's going to do you more harm than good.

    On a more ontopic note, Cleveland had two 5 point earthquakes in my lifetime (the last one happened three years ago I think?) I must admit, neither were much to get excited about. My computer monitor shook like hell, but I just thought it was because the washer was acting up.

    --
    Check out my podcast: DreamStation.cc Video Game Show
    1. Re:The sun also sets over lake Erie.... by Cruciform · · Score: 2

      Would that be the one we felt in Toronto as well in late '98? I was on the 10th floor of an office building and suddenly the floor was moving beneath my feet. I'd been through picture-rattlers before, but this was really cool :) All the cubicles were rocking and it felt like standing in a boat when there's gentle waves.
      The first guess we had as to what happened was that a natural gas pipe blew up in the parking garage... earthquakes just don't happen enough to be the first thing on people's minds. So someone turned on a radio, and we heard the Earthquake reported on the news. No big deal, no injuries :) Lots of fun though. :)

  59. Re:Fun ride in Mountain View by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2

    I certainly felt it, too.

    I first felt a slow rolling motion, then suddenly a more severe rolling motion. It lasted about 25 seconds or so. If you live on relatively soft land (like I do), you certainly will feel it.

  60. A 5.2 in California is nothing by barzok · · Score: 2

    Yet the 5.0 we had in upstate NY last month went unposted on /. We shook for almost 30 seconds.

    5.0 is a big deal around here, and anything much stronger will start doing serious damage to our non-quake-ready buildings.

  61. Curious: Post Quake Behavior Mods by 4of12 · · Score: 2

    So, after a quake like this, are there changes in human behavior that you can notice?

    1. Vacancy rates for apartments in high rises go up?
    2. Slight net exodus of people, as measured by U-Haul 1-way rentals?
    3. Traffic slows down as drivers don't want to be "tossed" off the road, bridge?
    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  62. this just in... by night_flyer · · Score: 2

    3 killed in Joplin over the weekend because of sevear thunderstorms and flash flooding, Washington DC has another tornado...

    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
  63. Achtung! Ist Nicht Der Loma Prieta! by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Funny
    Achtung!

    Ist nicht der Loma Prieta, machen Sie nichts mit das paniken fleein. Die Erde quakken ist eine kleine bumpen in der nacht, nichts mehr. Nicht outen das fenster liepen und schkrimmen das sky ist gefallen, alzo nichts mit das auto gestuffen mit alles pozezens und zu Iowa gemoven. Just sitzen und watchen das USGS geslashdotten.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  64. Epicenter vs. Focus by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm probably not the first person to say it, but...

    "The epicenter was 4.7 miles below surface."

    BUZZ! Wrong! The epicenter is by definition on the surface. The focus is what was 4.7 miles below the surface.

    Now then, why is this particular earthquake generating news (just another Californian earthquake), but the one in New York state a few weeks ago didn't?

  65. no subject by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 5, Funny

    I submitted this story three weeks ago but it was rejected.

    graspee

    1. Re:no subject by guttentag · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but you got it backwards. You said sky was falling. And don't think we're gonna believe you next time...

  66. M5's kill hundreds in central Asia by peter303 · · Score: 2

    It doesn't take much to knock down a shoddily constructed village like those you see in Afghanistan. It is a tribute to American preparedness that Loma Prieta (1989) and Northridge (1994) killed about 50 each, while similar size quakes in Japan, India and Turkey the past few years kill 5,000 - 10,000. Still we can do better.

  67. That explains it... by stubear · · Score: 2

    ...Joe Simpson and Skip Caray(the Atlanta Braves baseball announcers on TBS) mentioned they felt an earthquake during the SF Giants and Atlanta Braves game last night. Out of nowhere the two started talking about feeling the tremors and joking about the crew in the mobile prodction studio truck.

  68. Obviously reported by non natives by kolding · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why even bother to report a 5.2 in California? I've slept through 5.2's. It's only people from Boston who worry about earthquakes that small. Now a 5.2 in Boston(where all the buildings would probably fall down), that would be news. But a 5.2 in California, yawn. It's not worth getting out of bed for anything beneath a 6.

    1. Re:Obviously reported by non natives by WebMasterJoe · · Score: 2

      Actually, there was a 5.1 last month in New York. It woke me up, and I looked out the window to see if the cars fell off the road, and then I went back to sleep. I'm really surprised that a 5.2 in CA made slashdot though, since the 5.1 I felt was not that bad, and I'm in NY where they're much less common, what with the whole lack-of-a-pacific-ring thing...

      --
      I really hate signatures, but go to my website.
  69. You know you've been in California too long... by Nyckname · · Score: 4, Funny

    when you not only refer to the geologists they interview on the news after earthquakes by their first names only, but you have your favorite.

    cheers

  70. Re:OT: Brian Evenson by Loki_1929 · · Score: 2

    Actually, I made it up on the spot. I've never heard of "The Din of Celestial Birds", nor "Altman's Tongue".

    Big books with big words scare me.

    --
    -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
  71. Earthquake Story by Peale · · Score: 2

    Okay, so when an earthquake happens in California, which is a normal thing to happen, it's posted on the front page, but when an earthquake shakes the northeast (which hasn't happened since 1983) it's not news? What's up with that?

  72. I *live* in Gilroy... by WildBill1941 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    And let me tell you, that quake was big. Not as big as the Loma Prieta quake, but large, nonetheless. Looking at the USGS map at the USGS, it appears that the epicenter was in the mountains just south of our house.

    At the beginning, it felt like someone drove a semi into the side of the house. At first, I thought, "What the FSCK???", and then realized it was a quake. My pregnant wife and 2-year old daughter were on the couch with me, watching the end of Dinotopia. I grabbed the kid, stood up, and reached down to assist my wife, all the while things are falling and breaking around me. By the time I reached the archway in that room, the quake had ended, and we had LOTS of broken pictureframes and other things tossed out of cupboards.

    My office took the brunt of the quake in our home, with all my DVDs, books, and software flying off the shelves and piling itself in the middle of the room. (A strange earthquake phenonmeon - it looks like a ghost ran through the room and piled all your belongings in a huge heap.) Luckily, my computer rack remained standing, and my Linux box and Sun Ultra 5 were still humming along, with no damage. I wound up sleeping with my amateur radio and a flashlight next to the bed, just in case... And we had several aftershocks throughout the night, the most notable being about a 3.4.

    We were lucky, we didn't have any structual damage (that I can see, anyhow, I plan on having a home inspector out within the week). A neighbor down the street had his chimney collapse, the gas station across town had a column on their roof get damaged, and the Wal-Mart's sprinklers went off, dumping a quarter-inch of water on the floor there and damaging lots of merchandise.

    Anyone who makes light of earthquakes hasn't been in one that's 5.x or higher. A large quake is a true natural disaster, and something to be feared and prepared for.

    chrisd, I'd be interested to find out where your sister's father-in-law lives - there's no way you could have barely noticed this sucker if you were in my house.

    1. Re:I *live* in Gilroy... by chrisd · · Score: 2
      This will be a little vauge, but his house overlooks the basiny area about a raleys and such. It's perched at teh top of one of the smaller hills surrounding gilroy.

      His place is pretty cool, it's a wide low slung place, and when they built it, they drove 18' piles into the mountain to protect it from slides and quakes. Your experience sounds pretty wild , thugh, and not tame at all.

      One of the reasons I posted this was I Wanted to see the range of experiences that area /. readers experienced, it's fascinating the range of responses (even considering the folks who may fudge their experience for others enjoyment).

      Chrisd

      --
      Co-Editor, Open Sources
      Open Source Program Manager, Google, Inc.
  73. The Onion by brer_rabbit · · Score: 2

    I prefer The Onion's headline for the 1906 SF earthquake:
    Earth-Quake Marks Least Gay Day In San Francisco History

  74. Last "big one" over a decade ago by Xtifr · · Score: 2

    The last earthquake in the Bay Area that did any noticable damage was in 1989, 13 years ago. How long ago did the last major hurricane trash the Eastern Seaboard? How long since the last tornado tore up houses/trailer parks in the midwest? Less than a year in both cases, I'll betcha.

    Actually, earthquakes are nothing -- the real killer in California is floods. Every year, several houses get major flood damage, and it's an unusual year when at least one house isn't destroyed by floods. Earthquakes are just a little harmless fun, normally.

    1. Re:Last "big one" over a decade ago by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2

      You are comparing disasters over a small zone to disasters over a large one, making for an unfair comparasin. You are comparing when the last disaster in JUST the SF bay area was to when the last disaster SOMEWHERE on the eastern seaboard, or SOMEWHERE in the midwest was. That's like trying to claim it's common to win the lottery because *someone* did it *somewhere*.

      Randomly pick a small zone the size of the SF bay area and compare with that. Then you will get more comparable figures. Tornadoes sweep through the Midwest all the time, but they are very small in area covered compared to an earthquake. The likelyhood that some town will lose, say, 20 houses to a tornado strike somewhere is high. The likelyhood that it will be the specific town you live in is very low. I've watched tornadoes. I've been camping outside when one went by about a mile away that I could see. (that was exciting but scary. If the wind changed direction I could have been deeply screwed. There was nowhere good to go.) But because they cover such a tiny area, I can witness one live and not actually be in it. The same isn't true of an earthquake.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    2. Re:Last "big one" over a decade ago by Xtifr · · Score: 2

      I've lived in the bay area for nearly 40 years, and in that time, I've never even met someone who has suffered in an earthquake. Loma Prieta in '89, which did a fair amount of damage (for an earthquake) knocked a couple of books off my bookshelf. And I was living less than two miles from the Cypress Freeway in Oakland, which collapsed. There were maybe a dozen earthquakes on the US west coast in the twentieth century that did enough damage to mention. Most of the damage, even in the worst ones, has come from secondary effects like fires.

      The funny thing is that even though I live on the west coast, I know more people who have been directly affected by tornadoes! (My family is from the midwest originally.)

      Actually, snow is the real killer in the midwest, just as floods are the real killer on the west coast. Earthquakes and tornadoes are more photogenic, but probably really shouldn't be a source of worry to anyone living in "danger zones". Lightning is probably more of a threat whereever you live. :)

    3. Re:Last "big one" over a decade ago by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2
      I've lived in the bay area for nearly 40 years, and in that time, I've never even met someone who has suffered in an earthquake.

      And I can say the same thing of tonadoes and snow and floods here in the midwest. Just like most people who witness an earthquake aren't hurt by it, most who witness bad weather aren't hurt by it. The reports you see on TV of a bit swath of damage by a tornado are the excpetion. Pick a random path of a few miles in the midwest and you are more likely to find grass and trees and feilds than houses - so most tornados don't damage people's homes. And even the few that do don't often kill many people. (There's a reason people in the Midwest tend to build houses with basements.) The only major damaging tornado I can recall in the area was back in, I think 1985 in the town of Barneveld, WI (and since that was over 150 miles from home, it only barely fits the criteria of "in the area".) That one was pretty bad - wiped out about every building in town (which was only about 120 buildings, since it was a small town, but still that's a lot of property damage all at once), But since I don't know anyone from the area, it still fits the criteria of "nobody I met has suffered" from a tornado, if you want to compare apples to apples with your disaster comparasins.

      And "deaths" from snow are actually deaths from auto accidents while the snow made the roads slippery. (Hardly anyone dies anymore from being "caught out" in the cold of a blizzard.) How many people die on California's congested freeways? I'll take a blizzard in traffic with Wisconsin drivers who know how to drive in it any day over trying to drive on roads with way more traffic than they were ever built to handle.

      (Interesting anecdote. I was visiting Louisville Kentucky on a business trip once when they had an uncharacteristic 4-inch snowfall, for which they weren't prepared. The city doesn't keep many snowplow trucks on hand since it rarely snows. I was driving in my rental car (A corsica, not a good snow car due to low ground clearance) down the freeway in the 4-inch snow at about 35 miles per hour, which I considered a prudently cautious speed given that the snow was unplowed (otherwise I would have been going faster). There was one lone snowplow out on the freeway, moving along at about 25 miles per hour. All the locals were lined up in a slow procession behind the lone snowplow. I passed the snowplow in an unplowed lane. In my cheapo rental car. The people must have thought I was nuts. I got pulled over later by a cop for driving "too fast for conditions" (I was 30 mph UNDER the speed limit, but he considered the snow to be that much of a problem). I tried explaining how a 4-inch snowfall isn't really that bad if you are used to it. You just have to look really far ahead on the road and start reacting to things you see long before you reach them. It's no different from what a semi-truck driver has to do every day. The big problem is visibility. If it's foggy or still snowing, then you have to slow down because you need to be sure your stopping distance doesn't exceed your visibility range. I said I could see plenty far ahead to stop at 35 mph. The only reason I wasn't going any faster was that the car didn't have good enough traction to accellerate more than that. I didn't dare go slower because then the car with low clearance could get stuck.

      He saw my WI driver's license, and decided not to give me a ticket, but he give me a warning and force me to go into the line of slow shmucks behind the lone snowplow. I understood what road rage meant as I was forced to sit in line behind a snowplow driver who didn't know he could go a lot faster and still be safe.

      The only trick to snow driving is to just remember that since all delta-V is effected through the friction between the tires and the road, when you have less friction, you can't effect as much delta-V. And that that applies to all directions, accellerating, decellerating, and changing your momentum vector direction (turning). Also an understanding that it is better to line up the accelleration vector with the orientation of the wheels than have it be sideways to the wheels helps. That's why you have more control when you slow down a lot before the turn and accellerate back up to speed during the turn than when you try to slow down some and then turn at a constant speed. Accellerating during the turn changes the direction of the vector so that it is closer to the way the wheels are pointed, instead of being sideways to them. Hitting the brakes while turning is actually worse than trying to turn without slowing down, since it makes the vector be perpendicular to the angled front wheels. (It's the same thing race car drivers do, but it also applies in any situation where you barely have enough friction to effect the turn). Just look a lot farther ahead on the road and remember not to make quick jerky motions (which are an attempt to do too much delta-V in one instant) and snow driving is just fine. People die driving in snow because they don't know how. Almost everyone gets into some very minor 5-10 mph fender-bender accident at some point early in their snow-driving experience and then after that they "get it" and deal with it just fine.

      And as for floods, they are sometimes quite prevelent in the midwest (remember when the mississippi river flooded?) but around here in Wisconsin they aren't a big deal. We aren't as flat as most of the midwest, so the river valleys (which are of course the lowest spots there area) can hold a lot more water before it breaks out. Plus the ground tends to be able to sponge up a lot of water.

      Also, with floods, there's no surprise about where one will strike. I have no sympathy for those who lost their homes in the Mississippi flooding that one year. None whatsoever. They were told they were building their homes in a flood plain. The geologists knew the river tends to have a major flood once every fifty years or so, and told people. I don't think the government should have bailed them out with FEMA funds. They lived there because the soil was soo rich (gee, I wonder why that is, duh), when they could have put their house a few miles away from the plot of land they farm and travelled to it only when working it, but NOOO that would have made too much sense.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  75. OT: Re:5.2 is not so scary by Mr_Matt · · Score: 2

    Hey, waitaminute...'termchimp' nick, 'my spoon is too big' sig...you wouldn't happen to be an HP engineer, would you?

    --


    But what does my opinion matter, I just vote here. It's not like I have any money or anything.
    1. Re:OT: Re:5.2 is not so scary by Mr_Matt · · Score: 2

      Heh...yeah, I knew all of that - and you might want to check out the Bitter Films webpage, because you can, in fact, buy the 'Rejected' short on DVD. My friend has a copy, and also likes chimpanzees, and also occasionally reads /., which is why I posted: I think the parent post of my original post (confused? I am! :) is actually my 'Rejected'-fan, chimp-loving friend, who also coincidentally works for HP. Sorry about the confusion!

      And it's odd how certain natural disasters get coverage, while others go unmentioned. I had to say that, just to keep this somewhat on topic. :) Thanks for the info, though!

      --


      But what does my opinion matter, I just vote here. It's not like I have any money or anything.
  76. Re:A More Official Way of Measuring... by dangermouse · · Score: 2

    Okay, it's time for Fun with Basic Math!

    Even if you consider someone from LA to be equivalent to someone from SF, at a rough estimate you've got (2*2500+1*0)/3 = 1667 miles on the LA/NJ side and (2*70+1*500)/3 = 213 miles on the Santa Cruz/NV side.

    And for the record, I vaguely remember some of the quakes you mentioned, but only because you mentioned them; I'm from Georgia. So your "Bay Area elitist" snub sort of falls flat. Sue me for not being hip to your quake scene.