Slashdot Mirror


Pittsburgh Launches Large, Free, Public WiFi Network

Snkscore writes: "Pittsburgh launched an outdoor public Wi-Fi network on Monday. The story here from cnet talks about their plan to cover 4sq miles of downtown Pittsburgh with 10Mb internet access and charge a $20/month access fee (cheap!!). I think this is the coolest thing. Next, I think they should setup access points along the train tracks." Update: 05/21 18:59 GMT by T : Garbled URL fixed now -- sorry 'bout that.

65 of 220 comments (clear)

  1. Community WiFis by glenstar · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I have been trying to get my city (small suburban community north of Seattle) to do something like this for quite some time. It is definitely technically doable, but politically a no-go. My firm has discussed doing a guerilla-style implementation.

    Anyone have any stories about pulling something like that off?

    1. Re:Community WiFis by rakslice · · Score: 2

      Ask a silly question...

      So, "guerilla-style"? What, using small groups and ambushing the attacking troops with wi-fi equipment? =)

    2. Re:Community WiFis by GlassUser · · Score: 2

      Linked to from attrition.org (at least that's where I found it), see http://www.guerrilla.net/.

  2. $20/m == free? by sehryan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How exactly does $20/m equal a free network?

    PS the link to the article is messed up.

    --
    The world moves for love. It kneels before it in awe.
    1. Re:$20/m == free? by Mr+Guy · · Score: 2, Informative
      The network, which became available for public use on Monday, is free to use for now. Organizers envision charging $20 a month for access once the network, covering a 4-square-mile area of downtown Pittsburgh, is built, according to Executive Director Ron Gdovic.
      Well, since the click through didn't work, I guess we can only hit you a little bit for not reading the article first.
    2. Re:$20/m == free? by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2

      I was hoping it meant "free as in freedom". I'd gladly pay $20/month for that.

      Of course, I can already predict that someone's just going to tell me that anyone willing to part with $20 in exchange for freedom deserves neither the $20 nor the freedom...

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    3. Re:$20/m == free? by bugg · · Score: 2

      First of all, how does "free as in freedom" apply here? Secondly, If you have to pay for freedom you aren't really free, are you?

      --
      -bugg
  3. Phones by pagercam2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is not only important for web surfing and the like but brings up the possibility of cheap non celluar phone access. This could spawn a whole new industry, this just needs to get repeated in a few cities so that it becomes trendy and will then be adopted country wide (be the first one in your neighborhood).

  4. Re:free for $20? by rickshank · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's free for a few months, to get people to open up to the idea.

    ~rickshank

  5. fixed link by jspey · · Score: 4, Informative

    I don't know what's up with the link in the blurb, but here's a working link to the article: http://news.com.com/2100-1033-918439.html?tag=fd_t op

    Mr. Spey

    --
    Cover your butt. Bernard is watching.
  6. hmmm... by edrugtrader · · Score: 2

    link doesn't work, but this has the classic ISP problem built in... don't you have to charge your users AT LEAST your cost?

    a 10MB pipe is not cheap, and at 20 a pop is probably very poor service (technical and customer) i don't see this sticking around too long.

    --
    MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
    1. Re:hmmm... by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 2

      Well first, it's 10 Mb not 10 MB. But that is of course just the WIFI communication speed. Then it goes to a central server, then to the internet. So whatever the internet connection point speed is, it would probably be shared with every single user on the network (Maybe as it grows they'll add a second, third internet access point). Who knows what the actual internet access speed would be for the end user. This is much the way the cable modem works. You CAN get phenominal speeds (DL anyway) on a cable modem, as long as all your neighbors aren't all trying to do the same. But it all averages out to $40 charge for everyone even though you (I) can get 3x t-1 DL speeds.

      --
      Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
    2. Re:hmmm... by ch-chuck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is run by 3 Rivers Connect, a nonprofit whose major source of funding is the state of Pennsylvania.

      taxes, baby. People who may never use a computer are helping to fund it. Of course it's for, ahem, their benefit, in that it should help to attract new businesses to the area, project a 'wired high tech' image and create jobs, you know, like those multi-billion $ software companies everyone wants in their tax district?

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  7. The real link by BlueFall · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The story is here. As for free vs. $20, it looks like it's free for now and they want to start charging $20 eventually.

  8. Missing link by 56ker · · Score: 4, Informative

    For all those looking for the missing link (and that includes any anthropologists) check here.

    1. Re:Missing link by quinto2000 · · Score: 2

      That was pretty useless. All we had to do was go to the front page of news.com to find the link. Slut.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un post
  9. What if someone steals a connection? by Limburgher · · Score: 5, Funny

    If they NAT it to all their friends, would they be the Pittburgh Pirates?

    --

    You are not the customer.

    1. Re:What if someone steals a connection? by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2

      I don't know if they are proposing to use it, but VPN and traffic shaping would make their skull and cross bones wave a lot less vigorously I would think.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    2. Re:What if someone steals a connection? by 9633 · · Score: 4, Funny

      and if they all used Linux would they be the Pittsburg Pengiuns?

  10. On the Train Tracks by skroz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If your goal is to have access while on the train, wouldn't it be cheaper to outfit the TRAIN with access points and have a single data connection from the train to some home base? They already have some form of communication with the station anyway. It would be MUCH cheaper to retrofit that line on each passenger train and equip each passenger train with WAPs.

    --
    -- Minds are like parachutes... they work best when open.
    1. Re:On the Train Tracks by Matey-O · · Score: 2
      If your goal is to have access while on the train, wouldn't it be cheaper to outfit the TRAIN with access points and have a single data connection from the train to some home base?
      THAT way, if you lived near the tracks, you could just leave netstumbler on and it'd BING! every time a train passed!
      --
      "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    2. Re:On the Train Tracks by SanLouBlues · · Score: 2

      Or use the tracks as a really big antenna. Of course you'd need a very large amplifier connected too . . .

    3. Re:On the Train Tracks by clem.dickey · · Score: 2

      Wireless on the train has been done, sort of. Amtrak Acela (northeast corridor), Hiawathas (Chicago) and Capitols (SF Bay Area) provide wireless internet access. But only with their computers, not yours.

  11. What a great way... by Pinball+Wizard · · Score: 3, Insightful
    to bring business to and revitalize a city. Especially a city like Pittsburgh, which I'm sure is trying to be more than just an old industrial steel center.


    10 MB/s is almost 7x as fast as a T1. I could see this attracting lots of businesses, and lots of geeks to Pittsburgh.


    Yeah it costs taxpayer money, but so does giving tax breaks, and so does building convention centers. To me this is a smarter way to attract business to your city. I hope others follow suit.

    --

    No, Thursday's out. How about never - is never good for you?

    1. Re:What a great way... by Zelet · · Score: 2, Informative

      Read the article... it was a typo... it is supposed to be 10 Mb (small b)/sec.

      Sorry to squash your (and my) dreams of having that fat of a pipe to play in.

      --
      ...And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me." - Martin Niemoeller (1892-1984)
    2. Re:What a great way... by Mongr · · Score: 2, Informative

      The original post is right...he just has the abbreviation wrong. T1 is 1.5Mb, and the proposed connection is 10Mb. Still 7X

      --
      -=Mongr=-
    3. Re:What a great way... by dreamt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, just a quick note, Pittsburgh is very much NOT a steel city any more. Its not quite the high-tech city that somewhere like Boston is, but still is pretty high-tech. (I'm orig from Pgh, but live in Boston now).

      I don't even think that there are any working steel mills within 10-15 miles of the city, maybe even further. There is, however, CMU, the supercomputing center, UPMC medical center and a whole bunch of other research facilities.

    4. Re:What a great way... by Alsee · · Score: 2

      The article says:

      "We're looking to help Pittsburgh...be perceived as a wired city"

      Don'tchya just love how the goal is to create a perception? Any degree to which they actually *do* wire the city is merely incidental. Sigh.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  12. Along train tracks... by dstone · · Score: 5, Funny

    Next, I think they should setup access points along the train tracks.

    I agree. Think of the 1337 h0b05. 0wn1n6 all the train commuters' wireless notebooks & PDAs. Good stuff.

    1. Re:Along train tracks... by hfollmann · · Score: 3, Informative

      Forget it! 801.11 does not have something like handover if you change cells. This is only available in IN (cellular) Telephone networks.

      --
      hfoo
  13. not new in pittsburgh by techstep · · Score: 5, Informative
    I guess the newest thing about this is the proposed contiguous range. But public wireless service in Pittsburgh isn't a new idea. Telerama has been offering free wireless service for the better part of a year, but mostly at coffeeshops and a few restaurants. While this is a far cry from the four square miles of coverage 3 Rivers Connect offers, it's hard to beat "free", especially outside of the downtown area.

    One of the big problems with wireless connectivity around Pittsburgh is the local topology. There are lots of hills and valleys and comparatively little flat land. This has made cellular service rather unreliable in a lot of cases, and makes wireless service difficult outside of short ranges (at least, outside the relatively flat downtown area). It'll be a while before both providers offer service beyond small ranges, but it's a promising start all the same.

  14. Train tracks idea won't work by Chmarr · · Score: 2, Informative

    Next, I think they should setup access points along the train tracks.

    Nice idea, but it wouldn't work. The 'cell' size of WiFi is very small. At standard (or even slow) train speeds, you'd be in and out of the cell before your laptop can handshake with the access point.

    1. Re:Train tracks idea won't work by wizman · · Score: 2

      If you use omni antennas, yes.

      If you take 2 very narrow beamwidth sector antennas, and have 2 on each pole pointing in each direction, then you only cover the track. This highly increases your dbi. Also the power limits on directional antennas are more leniant, meaning you can pump something like 250mw to the antennas as opposed to 100.

      Still, you'd need one about every few miles, making it rather inconvenient and costly.

    2. Re:Train tracks idea won't work by Chmarr · · Score: 2

      Granted, I did not consider directional (ie, high gain) antennae.

      However, 'pointing it down the tracks' typically means attempting to send the radio radiation longditudinally through the train, rather than through the sides, which would be very well blocked by the amount of metal in the carriages and engine.

      The only reasonable way to get the signals in and out is through the sides of the train, which preclude using a particually high-gain (highly directional) antenna.

      Now... if we were to start talking about putting a reception antenna on the top of the train, and low-energy repeaters inside each carriage, we'd certainly be talking :)

  15. Holy by TheDarkRogue · · Score: 4, Funny

    Moving out of edgewood into the City of Pittsburgh - Several thousand dollars and many headaches
    Dealing with the city of Pittsburgh parking shit and most likely not having a driveway - Many Migraines
    Increased Tax rates - Alot

    Ripping off the RIAA and MPAA, not waiting for the pr0n images to load, not getting packetloss when ever someone uses Pay-Per-View downstairs, and all at 10Mbits for half of what I'm paying for ISDN speed Cable right now - Priceless

    --
    (Score:0, Interesting)
  16. NYC Wireless Project by subbie · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is happening in NYC as well, only there are non-for-profit groups such as NYCwireless working to provide FREE access in public spaces throughout the NYC metropolitan area. If you're in NYC, check out this Community Network Node Database (also available for other major US cities.)

  17. Just what we need. by papasui · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now when people go outside to get away from technology and back to nature, they can pirate some mp3s at the same time.

    1. Re:Just what we need. by MaxVlast · · Score: 2

      Point Park is pretty nice. Not nature, per say, but nice, nonetheless. Rivers everywhere!

      My roommate just suggested we go downtown and use our computers at point park. I yelled at him. We use our computers wirelessly in the apartment, and in the park, he'd complain about sunlight making the screen hard to see.

      Good idea, though. I can't wait until it's fully implemented.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
  18. Very clever indeed by Sanity · · Score: 5, Funny
    Pittsburgh is creating the network to show off its technological savvy and attract new businesses to move there, Gdovic said.
    Amazing, they can actually set up a Wifi network which anyone can access - most people do that by mistake...
  19. Re:such a good idea? by Nothinman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm curious how you think a (currently)free wireless Internet connection is going to make music piracy and child pr0n any more popular?

    Just because I can connect to the Internet from the Point doesn't mean I immediately go download unreleased CDs or naked 8 year olds.

  20. Re:such a good idea? by mark_lybarger · · Score: 2

    For one thing, it means a blossoming of software and music piracy, not to mention child pronography

    Not in Penn. Their ISP are regulated to keep out the kiddie porn. Gotta love those state officials and their thoughtfull freedom restri^^^protecting during an election year.

  21. Re:Free 'for now' but... by Ageless · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How is getting something for a period of time for nothing anything like getting half a wheel?
    If it were anywhere near your analogy it would be, "Here is a working wheel. You can use it for now but eventually you will have to pay or stop using it." In the mean time you save time and effort. It's free.

    Any time you get something that benefits you for nothing, even if it's just for a second you are getting it for free. Maybe you can't access the network everywhere in the city, but if you can access it anywhere you have gained something for nothing. That is free.

    I just don't see how anyone can do anything but say, "Thanks. That's cool." about this.

  22. Seattle Wireless by marshac · · Score: 2, Informative

    We have had a 802.11b network across most of seattle and the east side for a long time now. Seattle Wireless has a nice webpage up complete with a coverage map at

    http://www.seattlewireless.com

    The pringle can network that they have constructed is quite impressive ;)

  23. Re:such a good idea? by Paul+Komarek · · Score: 2

    Given the area that they're covering, I doubt it. I would assume that porn in public spaces is not as popular as porn in your home. This wifi network appears to cover some popular public parks, and a *lot* of office buildings. It seems unlikely that the clerks or shoppers at Kaufman's are going be pirating music while riding the old wooden escalator. Especially given the really low bitrate an individual is likely to receive.

    Allowing wifi on the trolley sounds like a great idea, too (at least for me ;-). When I ride the trolly, there's at least another 15 people on board. Again, it's a public space. Same goes for the cafes that my ISP, Telerama, is covering. We're mostly talking about students who are working on research/homework, or addicted to the web (and coffee).

    -Paul Komarek

  24. Re:such a good idea? by mark_lybarger · · Score: 2

    no, the state is regulating something that is legal (ip traffic) in assumption that it might be used for something illegal. why aren't they requiring the usps to filter all kiddie porn ? (first off, they don't 0wnz the USps, do they own the internet traffic?) why aren't the phone companies required to filter spam calls?

    it's election year, these guys want some good pr stuff to throw around when the campaigns hit heavy and hard.

  25. how? by BenTheDewpendent · · Score: 2, Interesting

    what channels does one go threw to get this kind of thing done? I could setup a gorilla system and cover a few blocks of down town area Salem if i played my cards right but id love to get Salem to do it and have it be offical and be involved in the implemtation of it.

    who do you have to call? how many signatures are needed? how many tons of paper work must be delt with? startup fee and cost? etc... any one??

    1. Re:how? by mike_the_kid · · Score: 2

      Check out http://www.3rc.org/index.html, the homepage of 3 Rivers Connect, the organization that set all this up. When you look at their board members their are a lot of upper level university players and brass. 3RC has a pretty good list of projects in progress, and they have actually gotten some things done. That gives them a bit of political clout, not just in the city (the city would let a group like this do whatever it wants). The real key is having the connections in Harrisburg, not Pittsburgh. The money is coming from the state.

      --
      Troll Like a Champion Today
  26. Re:$20/m == free? -- Free Now Pay Later by alanjstr · · Score: 2
    Obvious the title and blurb are misleading. But a quick glance at the article shows that:
    The network, which became available for public use on Monday, is free to use for now. Organizers envision charging $20 a month for access once the network
  27. naw, they'd be the Pittsburgh Stealers (NT) by hamburger+lady · · Score: 2

    nt

    --

    ---
    Is this the MPAA? Is this the RIAA? Is this the DMCA? I thought it was the USA!
  28. Re:such a good idea? by Matthew+Weigel · · Score: 2
    Allowing wifi on the trolley sounds like a great idea, too (at least for me ;-).

    Man, that would be great. Right now I commute about 45min over public transit each way, spending more of that online and able to work would me excellent.

    --
    --Matthew
  29. interconnect by akb · · Score: 2

    I wonder if they'll interconnect to Pittsburgh's I-net. Its the fiber network Pittsburgh got as a result of its cable franchise renewal. Last I heard it connects the city government, educational, nonprofit sites at 100mbps. That would be a truly innovative municipal infrastructure, using wireless for the last hop to homes and fiber for the backbone. The group behind the wireless project, 3 Rivers Connect worked on that project after all.

  30. What's their upstream like? by daviddennis · · Score: 2

    This is like saying I have a 100mbps network at home because I have a 100mbps hub connected. I still get only 384k to the Internet, because that's the speed of my DSL.

    They're probably running this off a T1, and if so, obviously you're not really going to get more than a T1 worth of bandwidth, and that's if you're the only person using the network.

    I've been to Pittsburgh, and they're going to have to open some half-decent restaurants and lease a weather changing machine before they'd have a chance at getting me to live there.

    D

  31. Re:$20/month! by discstickers · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, its alot better than the US$30,000 I'm paying for wireless access @ CMU.

    --
    I have a shitty sig!
  32. In unlicensed spectrum? by bruckie · · Score: 2

    The problem with running phones over this service is that the 802.11b network could be knocked off the air by an interfering signal.

    I wouldn't want to depend on a wireless phone that disconnects every time an amateur radio operator goes on the air.

    (Interesting side note: I worked at Intel when they were doing interoperability testing of DSL in its early days. One of the big problems that they had was that every time someone turned on their vacuum cleaner, the internet connection would get dropped. :)

    That said, such a service would be cool, and would be a good alternative for many types of communication. I just wouldn't want to rely on it for business or for calling 911.

    --Bruce

    --
    There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary, and those who don't.
  33. Access control? by tweakt · · Score: 2
    How exactly do you do access control and authentication on WiFi?

    I'm thinking the upstream locked down and only accessible via IPSec (which you would pay to get an account for). This would be an excellent solution since it would also serve to secure your communications.

  34. San Francisco Bay Area by stephanruby · · Score: 2, Informative
    If you live in the San Francisco Bay Area, check out www.bawug.org, they have an ad-hoc Linux wireless network.
    Personally, I love the fact that the bawug network depends on the work and resources of individuals, and not the government.
    Since Metronome/Ricochet failed, I don't expect our local government to do any better.

    Stephan

  35. Similar efforts in SF, Denver by yppiz · · Score: 3, Informative
    There are similar commercial (www.surfandsip.com) and grass-roots (www.bawug.org) efforts in the San Francisco Bay Area.

    For instance, here's a list of intentionally open wireless access points around SF

    --Pat / zippy@cs.brandeis.edu

  36. Re:free for $20? by MaxVlast · · Score: 2

    To open up Pittsburgh to the idea, you'd need a website, a parade, a commission, a mascot to wander around Downtown dressed as a PCMCIA card, and some sort of perogie festival. That might not do it, though, in which case, you'd have to pretend that it wasn't there and go to bed at 6:00 like usual.

    --
    There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
    Max V.
    NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
  37. Re:Smacks of security issues. by MaxVlast · · Score: 2

    Because viruses are transmitted over networks? I'm not sure I get your point.

    --
    There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
    Max V.
    NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
  38. Re:Interesting, by MaxVlast · · Score: 2

    Argh. I'd happily deal with a beer tax if I could buy it in the G'Eagle like in a sensible city. Or, heavens forbid, be able to buy wine in the same place. Is that that radical an idea?

    --
    There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
    Max V.
    NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
  39. Re:a WiFi for dawntawn by MaxVlast · · Score: 2

    When I first came here about three years ago, there was a billboard that read "Will the last person to leave please turn out the lights." Good introduction to Pittsburgh.

    --
    There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
    Max V.
    NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
  40. Re:oh sure, NOW they do it... by MaxVlast · · Score: 2

    Were you thinking of CMU? If so, then you made the right decision in not coming. Hell on earth. Misery. People climbing over each other to get out. Like a scene from the Bible, really.

    --
    There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
    Max V.
    NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
  41. Re:Phreaking? by LinuxHam · · Score: 2

    Drexel University wireless-enabled their entire campus and completely bailed on WEP, opting instead to use a Cisco 3060 VPN with individually-registered MAC addresses of wireless cards. That could easily cause problems for Linux users unless a Linux client exists, but it is possible to do easy, large scale, secure wireless. MAC spoofing is not enough to get by this.

    Check it out.

    --
    Intelligent Life on Earth
  42. Businesses "stealing" this connection by glSt0rm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you had a small business within the access range, what would prevent you from sharing this internet connection and use it for commercial purposes? Is this part of the plan?

  43. Pittsburgh by Animats · · Score: 2

    Population isn't down that much, but it's a lot older. The percentage of people over 65 in Pittsburgh is up there with retirement areas in Florida. Plus, very few immigrants move to Pittsburgh; those numbers are among the lowest in the US.