Slashdot Mirror


E3: Epic, US Army Develop Games as Recruitment Tool

securitas writes "Reuters and AP tell us that Epic Games and the US Army have announced the America's Army series of games, jointly developed by the Department of Defense and Epic. The first two-part game in the five-year project includes an RPG called Soldier and a first-person shooter called Operations. The game will be free of charge and available for download in July or August, with 1.2 million CDs simultaneously released, attached to gaming magazines. Does this remind anyone else of the war-room scene from Toys or Ender's Game?" Future installments will include Sim Mess Duty, Sim Standing Guard in the Rain, Sim Blister, and Sim Invading Iraq to Keep Approval Ratings High.

45 of 754 comments (clear)

  1. I just hope the games kick ass... by neo · · Score: 3, Funny

    and I also hope that Microsoft doesn't start complaining about how the Military is now in competition with their games. How is Microsoft supposed to make money on military games if the US Military is giving games away for free?

    On a serious note, I'd only have a problem with this if it didn't show what military life was really like. For example, I hope their sims version shows you the excitement of cleaning bathrooms and that you can level up in rock painting. Both of these skills are extremely important to the US Military.

    1. Re:I just hope the games kick ass... by reaper20 · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Green soldier has gained a level!"

      YES! Fear me mighty urinal!

  2. Missing the point yet again by Wind_Walker · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Blah blah blah Army blah blah games blah blah brainwash the youth of America... God, get over yourself.

    Speaking as a hardcore gamer myself, I could care less about who makes a game. I couldn't care less about how it's distributed. I couldn't care less about how it's "brainwashing people" or how it's "like Toys!". It all comes down to one thing: Is the game fun? From what Penny Arcade tells me, it is going to be fun. That's all I care about.

    This is what separates the average geek crowd from the true gamers among us. The average geeks don't understand what it really means to be a hardcore gamer. All they care about is how many polys a model has, how good it looks, or how the breasts are modeled ("She kicks high"). Hell, I'm 23 and I'll be playing Mario, Zelda, and dozens of other "kiddie" games the day they're released, and I don't care.

    This is why I hate mainstream media coverage of games. Leave it to the professionals, please.

    1. Re:Missing the point yet again by sg3000 · · Score: 4, Funny

      > Isn't anyone afraid the game will be filled
      > with advertisements for the military, such as
      > tons of "Join NOW!" buttons, and pop-ups
      > displaying the US Army website?

      You know what would be funny?

      I'm assuming the game runs on Windows. With the Bush Administration working so much with Microsoft-- you know, getting rid of th pesky lawsuit and trying to get Passport made a type of nationwide ID .

      So imagine you're playing the game on Windows XP with all your Passport stuff filled in, like a good End User. You finish a really hard level, and suddenly a dialog box pops up and asks, "Do you wish to continue?". When you click yes, you get signed up for the army!

      --
      Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
  3. Army of One by Imperator · · Score: 5, Funny

    See, I don't get this whole "Army of One" business. If I were to join the army, I wouldn't want to be fighting alone. I'm not delusional: I know I can't defeat enemies Rambo-style. No, I'd want to be part of a "Big-Ass Army of Many Ass-Kicking Soldiers, Tanks, and Other Military Equipent". Apparently I have to sign up with some other country to get this.

    --

    Gates' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves.
    1. Re:Army of One by Martin+Blank · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's an attempt to stamp out the perception of a soldier being a mindless automaton, a concept well overdue. I know a number of military people, and aside from being generally more disciplined and more respectful, they're not all that different. Once they get into other, more elite units like the Rangers, Airborne, Special Forces, etc, they *have* to be able to think for themselves, particularly because their missions require flexibility and since command may well fall on them in an emergency.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    2. Re:Army of One by Rolker · · Score: 5, Funny

      Join Canada'a army! Then you will be part of an "Army of about Eight"

    3. Re:Army of One by rark · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think the idea is that they are trying to get away from the whole 'cannon fodder' stereotype -- where any individual soldier is merely one more target in a wall of human targets, and nothing more.

      That, and trying to convince a generation that at least *thinks * they are individualistic that they really want to join up.

    4. Re:Army of One by Pentagon13 · · Score: 5, Funny

      thats "Army of aboot Eight"...

    5. Re:Army of One by GMontag · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Frankly I'd like those people to have a firm understanding of how the "regular" military units and people operate.

      Total agreement there. We have had that problem in Aviation since about 1983, when the branch was formed and immediately started training Aviation Officers within the branch from day one.

      In the past, one had to work in another branch, at least through their Basic Course, before going to flight school and then they were still maanaged by their primary branch. We (I was Armor and Air Defense before going Aviation) had a much better understanding and appreciation of the "ground guys" than these newer folks seem to have.

      On another note, they could add Sim bust-your-knuckles-repairing-track and Sim bang-the-crap-out-of-your-head-inside-the-tank, Sim fall-off-the-speed-rope, i.e., "you can get hurt without being shot" games.

  4. Don't Foget This One... by Livn4Golf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Future installments will include Sim Mess Duty, Sim Standing Guard in the Rain, Sim Blister, and Sim Invading Iraq to Keep Approval Ratings High.

    Don't forget the final game in the series: "Risking Their Lives to Protect Your Right to Make Stupid Jokes."

    1. Re:Don't Foget This One... by cjpez · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Um, wasn't he making fun of the game? I didn't see anything in there ridiculing the actual armed forces . . . Unless you consider programming video games equivalent to "Risking Their Lives." I don't.

    2. Re:Don't Foget This One... by gaudior · · Score: 4, Informative

      Dumbass. It's called the First Amendment.

    3. Re:Don't Foget This One... by cjpez · · Score: 5, Insightful
      (sigh, responding to trolls...)

      No, he wasn't making fun of the game, he was using joke game titles to belittle the work done by the army.

      Well, that's your opinion and you're entitled to it, of course, but I disagree. Anyone who joins into a branch of the military expecting to be all action and intrigue and excitement is going to be disappointed, if what my friends in the service have told me is true. Sure, there certainly is some more "glamorous" things that happen, but unless I'm mistaken, you can also expect a hell of a lot of boredom. Again, if you feel that he was belittling the armed services, that's your perogative, but it's also my right to disagree with you. I didn't find anything at all insulting in the jokes, and I stand by that opinion.

      As to your dig at moderation, does that mean that you have absolute control over what other people consider insightful, or interesting? If I find a post interesting and moderate it so, but you disagree, does that mean that the system doesn't work? If you're going to get pissed off about it, just wait until you've got some mod points of your own and then mod it down. That's the beauty of it - YOU control moderation as much as the next guy, so what are you complaining about?

    4. Re:Don't Foget This One... by swillden · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Keep in mind that few soldiers are given the option of deciding whether or not they agree with the current war enough to fight in it. In order for someone to be both intelligent and noble, under your definition, they'd have to stay a civilian until an appropriate conflict came up and then join up. Unfortunately, if that was what people did we'd be completely unprepared when the conflict did come up.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    5. Re:Don't Foget This One... by Roblimo · · Score: 4, Flamebait

      Michael was in the Marines. If he wants to poke fun at the game and at the Army, that's cool with me.

      I was in the Army, and I assure you there was plenty of standing around, lots of blister-raising marches, and more pointless missions in foreign countries than were really needed.

      Somehow I doubt that the game is going to dwell much on the sheer stupidity of making sure your socks are all rolled "just so" before a barracks inspection.

      There's a line from one of the little ditties (called "jodies") we sang while we marched along, raising blisters, that goes, "Oh woe woe we, my recruiter lied to me."

      This game is a recruiting tool. Recruiters lie. Therefore this game will sugarcoat the Army and make it look lots more exciting than it really is.

      I'm not saying you shouldn't join the Army (or, if you have mental problems, the Marines or even one of the lesser branches*), just that you should go in with your eyes open after talking to people who've been in, not because of a video game.

      - Robin

      * Veterans of other service branches are free to disagree with my belief that the Army is not only the Senior Service but also the finest one. Non-veterans are allowed to join this discussion only if they buy drinks for all the veterans, and even then their opinions don't really count

    6. Re:Don't Foget This One... by richj · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I served on active duty for 7 years with the Navy and Marines. I was in Somalia when the shit hit the fan but guess what other than that two weeks of my life in the military... it was yes boring mundane stuff like posted above. My best friend from high school joined the navy to see the world and work on aircraft engines... he spent the first 6 months cleaning toilets on the USS Roosevelt.

      I agree, I spent 4 years in the Marines as well (like an idiot I joined the Infantry, because I wanted action). I was in Somalia for 3 months, other than the time in Somalia life pretty much sucked. Some of the training is fun, but it gets old pretty quick. Especially when you're out in the field in Feb practicing the same thing over and over again.

      It was a great experience, I would have never traveled the world and done a lot of things I did, but the job itself isn't all it's cracked up to be.

    7. Re:Don't Foget This One... by makohund · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Almost...

      In the Marine Corps, you ALL go in to fight.

      Rank and job make no difference. You may all be pulled from regular duties to to go kick booty.

      At least, that's what they always TOLD me. :)

      (Good point though... hadn't thought about that before.)

      I almost take offense at Roblimo referring to other services as inferior... but I won't. (You know, that's ALMOST a troll. And a good one at that.) I mean, he's an Army dog for chrissakes. He probably doesn't know any better. ;-P

      Hell, I thought fellow Marines were the arrogant ones!

      Anyway, remember, we've all got our purpose and things we're good at. We all save each other's asses all the time.

      Want something bombed? A lot? Air Force.
      Want the skies cleared? Air Force.
      Need something moved fast? Air Force.
      Need troops moved fast? Air Force.

      Need an embargo or blockade? Navy.
      Want the ocean safe? Navy.
      Want an major intimidating display? Navy.
      Need a LOT of stuff moved? Navy.
      Need a LOT of troops moved? Navy.
      Need a mobile base with some air power? Navy.

      Need lots of guys with big guns? Army
      Need tanks and artillery? Army.
      Need to march in and take the place? Army.
      Need a massive invasion? Army. (Marine assist.)
      Need airborne gunships? Army.
      Gonna be in the area for a while? Army.
      Need a fine-combed search and destroy? Army.
      -- whoops... I mean "sweep and clear". :)

      Need a security team? Marines.
      Need to distract attention from your main force? Marines.
      Need an invasion? Marines. (Follow with Army.)
      Need direct air support for ground troops? Marines.
      Need everything everyone else has, but need it there RIGHT NOW? Marines.
      Need everything, but on a smaller scale? Marines.

      Have very specific needs? All have special forces units for special jobs of varying types. Pick your poison.

  5. friendly fire by Bassthang · · Score: 3, Funny

    Accidently shooting your allies in "Operations" will gain you extra points. (The versions of the game in non-US NATO countries will not have this feature).

    --
    "What I look forward to is continued immaturity followed by death."
  6. Navy games? by pjdepasq · · Score: 5, Funny

    Gee, I hope if the Navy does something like this, there will be SimTailHook.... now that's one I'd like to play!

  7. Re:Gimme a break by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country." --George S. Patton

  8. I have seen this by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Informative

    It is based on the Unreal engine, and it is awesome. nothing like your regular FPS.. it has the reality dial turned way up... if you get hit once you are dead, or bleeding to death no mega heath, no railgun's, no ammo everywhere, just your handy GI issued weapons. From the demo I watched and played, FPS fans will hate it. and several of the "kids" though it sucked, it requires thinking, skill, and for the player to be clever... very unlike FPS games where most of the players just run around hopping firing at everything that moves... camping is a requirement and only the stupid players do anything other than camping (stupid players=dead players)

    so basically, if you're the type of FPS player that gets' wildly mad at campers, you will hate it.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:I have seen this by FortKnox · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I thought the fundamental rule of game design is to balance Realism with Fun. Ask any famous game designer about it. Sometimes you gotta reach out away from the real to make the game flow well, or to balance out what you can do.

      Lets look at some popular games:
      CounterStrike: Most people would say this is as "real" as it gets, when you die, your gone. But you can get hit in the leg, stamper for a second, then are back running full speed again. You can get shot in the arm, but still fire back. This game has a lot of realism, but it still balances it out with a 'fun factor.'
      Age Of Empires: The designers of AoE always talk about how stuff like Catapults had to be changed. Originally, you needed someone to fire and move them, but it lead to too many problems, so they just made them self useable, and movable. Upon doing this, they felt the game flowed better, and the testers had more fun with the game.

      I could go on, but I think "true realism" isn't what the gaming community wants. Games are a time when you can do stuff you normally wouldn't do...

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
  9. Re:You shut up. by Peyna · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes, I am replying to a troll, but I feel the need to.

    I only hope this comment was done in sarcasm, but this elitist attitude I so often see from people who served in the military that bothers me. You tell me that I don't understand the meaning of the military or service, yet every day I drive by dozens of memorials to those who have died in the past, and am reminded of their sacrifice. I am thankful that there were people like them to protect our nation.

    Then I drive by lots of real tall buildings, and I am reminding of the what they were fighting to protect. Which is more important, the fight, or that which is being protected? I am grateful forpeople serve our military; my grandfather was in Korea, and my father served during the Vietnam Era.

    Still, that which is protected bears greater significance than the protectors. Our freedoms, liberties, our constitution, all are much more important than the soldier that died in an attempt to preserve them.

    The fight to preserve our liberties is no longer being fought on foreign battlefields, but in our legal system. I think we had a better chance when it had to do with who lasted the longest out there than we do putting faith in judges, juries, and politicians.

    But please, do not ever tell me I don't understand the military, or have no right to make light of it. If it really was protecting my rights, then I can say anything I want to about them, now can't I? =]

    --
    What?
  10. Speaking from experience... by Art_XIV · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't seem to recall there being any "Save often, Reload when you are Killed" workaround during my time in the Army.

    Nor were power-ups of any sort available, unless you count caffiene.

    It was certainly real-time, though much of the real-time was spent waiting.

    --
    The only thing that we learn from history is that nobody learns anything from history.
  11. Re:Ender's Game? by arkanes · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, but imagine the suprise when they go to recruit the high scorer and it's just some punkass kidd with a wallcheat and an aim bot.

  12. Please Explain....... by rabbits77 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    what /. has against military service? In many countries the average /. reader's military service is *mandatory*. Also, as a US citizen myself,I volunteered and served in the U.S. Navy and cannot complain one bit about the experience. Was it harder than sitting on my ass playing Mortal Kombat(which was new at the time >:)? Yes it was. Did it help me pay for college and make me a better person? You bet your ass it did. Maybe I don't come from as privileged a background as the rest if you but military service helped me out substantially. I guess it is just fashionable to spend your late teens and twenties doing drugs and being a bored, sullen, and directionless loser nowadays.

    1. Re:Please Explain....... by Rupert · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think for a living. I do not find the idea of being told I can't think for myself at all appealing. So I don't do it.

      Not that I'm particularly knocking the Army's training methods. I just think I'm very poorly suited to being a soldier.

      --

      --
      E_NOSIG
    2. Re:Please Explain....... by jamie · · Score: 3, Informative
      "Please Explain... what /. has against military service? ... I guess it is just fashionable to spend your late teens and twenties doing drugs and being a bored, sullen, and directionless loser nowadays."

      Several of the people involved in bringing you Slashdot, including the author who posted this story, have previously been in the U.S. armed forces.

      And -- Hey... I may be sullen, and I may be directionless, but... uh what was that other thing you said?

    3. Re:Please Explain....... by Sebbo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey, I manage to be bored, sullen, and directionless without drugs, I'll have you know!

  13. Iraq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    1) Saddam Husain has used weapons of mass destruction( WMDs) such as nerve gas against Iraqi kurdish civilians.

    2) He ejected U.N. inspectors who were making sure he complied with the peace terms stating he wouldn't continue to develop WMDs including the Iraqi nuclear program.

    3) He has launched strikes on civilian populations in Israel during the Gulf War even though Israel was not part of the military coalition. He did this in the hopes invoking an Israeli response which would gain him the support of other Arab nations.

    Now because you obviously didn't know this or understand the implications I will state it slowly:

    If allowed to develope a nuke, he's likely to use it against a civilian target. Possibly in a pre-emptive strike.

    Where is it going to happen? Who knows. Will it be trucked in or on top of a missle? Not sure. A strike against him is necessary to make sure that this doesn't happen.

    Sidenote: Informative opposing opinions != Troll, a point often lost on the moderators of this "news source".

    1. Re:Iraq by WildBeast · · Score: 4, Funny

      War on drugs failed, now let's do war on terrorism, oh we can't get hold of Osama, let's go after Saddam.

    2. Re:Iraq by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You could have written the exact same post in 1998. Why do we have to go to war now? Because approval ratings are down and without a war going on, people might notice that Bush's fiscal policy is a complete mess.

      And why just attack Iraq? Iran and North Korea both have nuke programs. They're the Axis of Evil you know.

      -B

  14. Re:Is this news or editorial? by kramer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't think you get it. This isn't a news site. They don't have reporters, they don't write stories. They link to other news stories, it's a meta-site it's about opinion and commentary, that is the value added. There is nothing here other than opinion and commentary that couldn't be found at the various sites they link to.

  15. America's Army is by the MOVES Institute by Professor · · Score: 5, Informative

    The America's Army videogame suite, Operations and Soldiers, were built completely by the MOVES Institute, not by Epic Games. We licensed the Epic Games engine for Operations. For more information on the games and imagery from E3, see http://movesinstitute.org

    Michael Zyda

  16. Sure to succeed by sg3000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This idea to use games to convince impressionable kids to join the army is a good one.

    Looking around, all the people of my generation have one of a few careers:

    * Alien-attacker, particularly where you have three bases to hide behind
    * Ever-hungry giant mouth eating never-ending supply of pellets
    * Race car driver on tracks with a lot of popup
    * Professional princess rescuer, particularly when you can jump on a lot of mushrooms
    * Cubical worker

    That last one is the least suprising. I remember as a kid, me and my friends would never stop playing "Cubical Worker!" It was the most popular game in America at the time, which is why everyone seems to have grown up to do it for a living.

    > The Army expects by September to spent about $7.5 million on the program

    Whew! I'm glad we're spending $7.5 million on this project. With this new Republican leadership manning the purse strings, we've got so much money, I was worried there was no way we'd be able to spend it all. This is a great example of how to get rid of it.

    What was that? A $100 billion dollar deficit ?

    Wait... which party was for big government and likes to waste money?

    --
    Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
  17. Re:Gimme a break by ocbwilg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think it's very classy of you to make jokes about people who have died for your freedom. Sure, it sucks that the US get stuck policing the world, but as we've been shown, it's not going to do it on its own, and it doesn't look like anyone else is jumping up to do the job. Your attitude is disgusting.

    Get off your high horse. Yes, they died for our freedom but that also includes the freedom to say what we want about them and criticize the government when we feel it's necessary. Pull your head out of your ass and smell reality for a change.

    If Bush invades Iraq it certainly won't be the first time that a politician has picked a fight to boost his approval ratings. What I find to be truly disgusting is the way that the Bush-Cheney gang have used and are still using the events of September 11th as an excuse to grab more power for themselves and then keep the American people and congress in the dark by claiming "national security". This also isn't the first time that a politician has done this either.

  18. Submarine Sim by bubblegoose · · Score: 5, Funny

    Here is the new Sim being designed by the Navy to simulate Sub duty:
    HOW TO SIMULATE SUBMARINE LIFE AT HOME
    Surround yourself with a few people you don't like. Close all windows and doors tightly, close curtains. Seal any openings to the outside world with a proper vault. Unplug all radios and TV sets to cut yourself off completely from news, football games, Saturday Night Live, the Muppet Show, etc.

    Hourly monitor all operating home appliances, if not in use, log as secured. If using the bathroom, do not flush toilet for first two days to simulate smell of blowing sanitaries and venting inboard. Then flush daily.

    Wear only approved FBM coveralls, or proper Navy uniforms. No hats, special T-shirts, etc. Cut your hair once a week ensuring that you make it look like hell. Work 18-hour day intervals to ensure your body really gets confused. Listen to the same cassette over and over until you can't stand it anymore, and then put in one that you can't even listen to without acute nausea setting in. Set your alarm to go off just as you fall asleep, with alarm set at loud, or buy a special alarm clock with various settings, (i.e., "Man Battle Stations, Fire, Flooding in the Basement").

    Prepare food with a blindfold on to simulate what real submarine cooks do. Then take the blindfold off and try to get your dog to eat it. Then break out a can of tuna and/or peanut butter.

    Cut your bed in half, and enclose all but one side using the dimensions of a small casket as a reference. When not in bed, make up blankets properly so no one will see or care.

    Periodically, for want of excitement, open main power breaker and run around yelling, "Reactor Scram", until you are sweating profusely, then restore power. Buy yourself a snorkel and mask, and again, periodically, just for want of nothing else to do, put it on and pretend you're in a smoke filled room with no way out. For added variety, hook up the garden hose and pressurize it.

    To enable yourself to handle anything, constantly study wiring diagrams and operating instructions for various home appliances (stove, refrigerator, can opener). For no reason at all, at specified intervals (monthly, weekly, etc.) tear one item apart, just in case it was going to break down.

    Paint everything around you gray (Navy FSN gray, no substitutes) or off-white. To be sure you are living in a clean and happy environment, every Friday, set alarm on loud for a short but hated drill sound, then get up and manned with only a bucket and sponge and greeny, clean one area over and over, even if it was already spotless. Then make out a discrepancy list.

    Once a day, after normal programming hours, plug in TV and watch one movie being careful that it is (a) at least five years old, (b) made long enough prior to showing to be sure that you've seen it at least once before, or (c) be so bad you have to install a seatbelt in your chair to keep you there until it is over.

    Since no doctor will be available, stockpile Band-Aids, aspirin, and Actifed as these are proven cure-alls. Practice if necessary on your dog (surgery, dentistry, or death).

    When commencing this test simulation, lock your family, friends, and anything that means anything to you outside. Tests will run for at least two months with no end in sight.

    --
    I hope that someday we will be able to put away our fears and prejudices and just laugh at people. - Jack Handey
  19. Funny? by SPYvSPY · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's frightening that people think this is funny. Not only are you pissing all over the dead Canadians' graves, but you're also taking a high moral ground that I doubt you can defend. When's the last time you did anything perfectly? Poster and mods: Get some perspective.

  20. Invading Iraq to Keep Approval Rating High by lkaos · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think the better statement is "Not Invading Iraq to Keep Cheap Oil."

    Iraq has a murderous dictator in charge who has waged genocide against his own people and is developing weapons of mass destruction. If we really were a country that believed in freedom and good will towards men, we would have bombed the shit out of Iraq years ago instead of letting millions die at the hands of Sadam.

    Since people tend to believe in hollywood so much, just look back to Spider-man and the message that everyone was touting as being so grand, "Great power comes with great responsibility." We sure as hell have the power but we're just sitting around on our lazy asses so that we only have to pay $1.25 a galloon to drive the /. PT Crusier.

    --
    int func(int a);
    func((b += 3, b));
  21. Waiting for the alternate by LittleGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Blah blah blah games blah blah turn the youth of America into violent hoolums blah blah blah parental restrictions blah blah blah Army blah blah ...

    Army?? Blah blah blah?!? Uncle Sam??

    Blah blah blah games GOOD! blah blah patriotic blah blah blah defeat evil blah blah blah WTC Guliani Let's Roll FDNY et al....

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  22. Re:You speak a very eloquent truth. by radish · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And then of course there are those of us who don't hate the _existance_ of a military, but do hate it's self perpetuating nature and do hate it's use to kill innocents in countries far away simply to boost the ratings of a brain-dead president. If I thought any of the recent operations would actually do anything to protect the interests of the US population (or any other part of the West, as I'm not american) then maybe I'd support them, but history will show them to be little short of expensive, pointless, wastes of time and lives.

    --

    ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  23. Re:You speak a very eloquent truth. by DarkZero · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Don't forget number 4: War movies don't look like Captain America taking on the Nazi forces with his bar hands any more. They more like the real thing. The real thing that leaves people with nightmares, flashbacks, and deep psychological scarring.

    Oh, and possibly number 5: First Person Shooters. Once you've seen yourself go down in two seconds among a hail of enemy fire, you start to laugh at the idea of entering a similar situation in real life, only with one hit point instead of one hundred.

  24. Didn't we learn this lesson yet? by telstar · · Score: 3, Funny

    Didn't we already give terrorists the keys to the castle with Microsoft Flight Simulator 2000? Now we're showing them how to drive our tanks and humvees, and perform tactical raids?

  25. Re:Gimme a break by fwr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Personally, I don't know of any power grab that the Bush-Cheney gang have done that I don't agree with. Perhaps the most controversial, arresting and/or detaining ILLEGAL immigrants, is even acceptable. After all, that's what the government is SUPPOSED to do. If you ask me, they should step up the INS enforcement division and go after ALL illegal immigrants -- and either immediately kick them out of the country or detain them for up to two years if they have any interesting ties to fundamental islamic extreamist terrorists, which I believe is the legal length of time they can detain someone before kicking them out of the country (and was well before 9/11). I have nothing against LEGAL immigrants, and would have a problem if they started kicking out legal immigrants for no reason, but I believe even legal immigrants can be held for up to two years if there is some charge / belief that they may have broken the law and forfited their privelage of being a legal immigrant.