Slashdot Mirror


Eight Technologies That Will Change the World

lostincyberspace writes "This story looks at existing advanced technologies, and contemplates how they may combine in the future to create the technology of 70's TV shows. Sensors + Mobile Power + Biomanufacturing = ... Bionics. ("We have the technology") The most fascinating part is that all of these new technologies seem like they'll be available in the not too distant future."

157 comments

  1. technologies of 70s TV shows? by TomRitchford · · Score: 1

    transporters and communicators?

    1. Re:technologies of 70s TV shows? by garren_bagley · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hopefully it'll be more advanced than that. That was 60's technology.

    2. Re:technologies of 70s TV shows? by BLAMM! · · Score: 5, Funny

      Where's my flying egg?

    3. Re:technologies of 70s TV shows? by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 1

      They did mention replicators (Molecular Manufacturing). The ability to create complex molecular structure without large equipment is a very exciting concept...

      Then comes the problem of the trillions of trillions of bytes of storage it would need to know how to create anything. We would probably have to create absolutely incredible new storage and compression technologies to make it work well. That, or we could carry around suitcases filled with Super-MegaDVD v9 discs (the 60 terabyte verions ;) and spend a day watching messages like, "Please insert disc 371..." to have the computer build us that watch we really like.

      My bet for future data storage is a microscopic version of IBM's storage brick - something that can be easily added to, is self-maintaining, and takes up as little space as is possible.

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    4. Re:technologies of 70s TV shows? by Darth+RadaR · · Score: 2

      According to this, we've had this technology for the past 3 years.
      :)

      --
      /*drunk.. fix later*/
    5. Re:technologies of 70s TV shows? by frozenray · · Score: 1

      > transporters and communicators?

      Forget about these, the Orgasmatron is definitively the gadget that the 70s promised but that never was delivered. Talk about technology that has the potential to uproot (no pun intended) society.

      :P

      --
      "There are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare." - Blair Houghton
    6. Re:technologies of 70s TV shows? by RetroGeek · · Score: 1

      We would probably have to create absolutely incredible new storage and compression technologies to make it work well.

      Just use lossy compression. You will never know the difference.

      Rely, hw cud u tl?

      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    7. Re:technologies of 70s TV shows? by sharkey · · Score: 2

      transporters and communicators?

      No, hair products that will keep your mutton-chops, afro, handle-bar, etc. picture perfect even after mixing it up with Cylons, Motown-ninjas or mutants from the sewer.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    8. Re:technologies of 70s TV shows? by Tablizer · · Score: 2
      Where's my flying egg?

      Sunny-side-up on I-80.

  2. Not from TV... by blankmange · · Score: 2

    But a tractor beam would be nice....

    --
    ...we are from the government - we are here to help...
    1. Re:Not from TV... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no, never saw one of those on tv...nope...

    2. Re:Not from TV... by batemanm · · Score: 0
      We already have those, well at least on the microsocpic level. Physics type people at St Andrews university are using lasers to move atoms around more infor here. Also a seach for tractor beam and St Andrews will bring up a load more links.

  3. We all can get Starsky and Hutch haircuts by teamhasnoi · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So we can properly ask Jamie Summers out.

  4. Larger article on wearables by Kajakske · · Score: 1

    /. has recently posted another story on the first technology described here.

    It's about wearable devices. Read more here.

    Personally, I think they look cool.
    In Belgium (where I live) there was recently an interview with a company making such things (shown on TV, don't remember when).
    They made a shirt + scarf + shoes & glass to see it all.

    They also showed a working demo version :-)

    1. Re:Larger article on wearables by Kajakske · · Score: 1

      The link ...

      It's friday and I'm tired :-)

  5. Future Soldiers by coryboehne · · Score: 1

    You can have little doubt that this will soon be employed by the United States military, as they are usually the first to adopt this type of technology. Due to our current technology and training right now we have something like a 50 or 100 to 1 kill ratio (50 to 100 of their soldiers die for every 1 of ours that is killed) If we have bio-mech soldiers how high do you think the odds will go then? Mess with the USA? I think not.

    1. Re:Future Soldiers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only problem is that US isnt the only country in the work that know tech. Sorry but I never been to US, and we pretty high tech here to.

    2. Re:Future Soldiers by HiQ · · Score: 2, Funny

      Pwaaah, well our soldiers will be manufactured from the ground up from carbon nanotubes, assembled by our Lego Quantum Storms (tm) molecular building set, and they will run on biodiesel, or even on a quantum nucleonic fuell cell. They will all be linked in on big matrix by our new cognitronic network. So where will your soldiers be then, huh?

    3. Re:Future Soldiers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow! I we train everyone in the US we would be able to kill 250m * 50 = 12.500.000.000 people.

      Cool!!! that will keep the world safe for Americans for the next couple of millenia....

      btw, you should now by now that high-tech isn't everything.

      Yes, I do think your an asshole...

    4. Re:Future Soldiers by Tsunami_In_My_Head · · Score: 0

      One problem with your argument is that while we may not be the only country that knows tech, we probably have a post 911 defense budget that approaches your national gdp.

    5. Re:Future Soldiers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "50 or 100 to 1 kill ratio "

      Judging by events over recent years, I rather suspect you meant to say that for ever 1 USA soldier killed, the USA soldiers kill 100 enemy soldiers and another 50 "allies" soldiers in "friendly fire"...

    6. Re:Future Soldiers by Tsunami_In_My_Head · · Score: 0

      name someone we couldn't beat.

    7. Re:Future Soldiers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone with Nukes.

      The Vietnamese.

      A United Europe (Well, a United Northern Europe, the latin countries have a habit of surrendering/losing/changing sides.)

    8. Re:Future Soldiers by Skevin · · Score: 3, Funny

      Made of carbon nanotubes?

      Well, what's going to happen if you want to snap a picture of them?


      Solomon

      --
      "Twice half-assed makes an ass whole." --Solomon K. Chang
    9. Re:Future Soldiers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the states is going to use this power for good instead of evil, right?

    10. Re:Future Soldiers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eeek towards that... what if they got even more out of control? revolutionary action would be much harder then(which is also why i am so scared of technologies furthering what the polygraph tried to start..).... guerrilla techniques might not even work towards such things.... not a very nice future, IMO....

    11. Re:Future Soldiers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well in most of your wars you simply kill each other. Read up on Panama, keyword "friendly fire".

    12. Re:Future Soldiers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The kill ratio has very little do with the soldiers and a lot to do with the availability of weapons that operate from a distance.

  6. Soon, to a hospital near you... by gone.fishing · · Score: 1

    I doubt it, the FDA will take eons to approve this.

    The tech may all be close but medical testing and then approval will make this take a lot longer.

  7. Technology previews by NETHED · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think it was in the early 30s or 40s that they demonstrated a video phone. Its twenty-o-two, I see no video phones.

    How about that molecular manufactering. Sounds like the replicator they had on the Enterprise. Truthfully, I don't see this even being in the lab for decades. Sure, we can theorize about these things that it is possible, but I can also theoretically date Britney Spears, and we ALL know that ANIT gonna happen.

    I take these tech preview thingies with many grains of salt.

    --
    --sig fault--
    1. Re:Technology previews by White+Shade · · Score: 2, Informative

      Video phones exist and are actually reasonably common, especially in business circumstances. The reason most home users don't see them though is that for the most part the quality is sorely lacking, and they're often way too expensive...

      a quick search on google netted me this:
      a home videophone...
      another home video phone...
      and, for what appears to be the prevailing standard: h.232

      molecular manufacturing is a bit of a different story, but:
      a group devoted to molecular manufacturing
      some interesting stuff on it
      and, last but not least:
      IBM does some cool stuff sometimes

      hope this helps dispel your mistrust of tech previews (Although i'll admit that at least a grain or two of salt is warranted in many occasions)

      --
      ìì!
    2. Re:Technology previews by Weird_Hock · · Score: 1

      During the late sixties, my stepfather worked for Western Electric. At the time, it was the research and installation arm of AT&T. What's left of it is now Lucent, by the way. One of the projects he worked on was a test of the "Video Phone". There were a limited number of test subscribers on the East coast somewhere. It worked rather well, to hear him talk about it. What killed it was that the users really didn't want it. As I recall, one of the big complaints was that they were afraid of being seen getting out of the shower to answer the phone, etc. No matter that you could turn off your camera. Also, no one wanted to bear the extra cost of the equipment or the service. The technology was there, but no one seemed to want it. It was killed due to lack of market.

    3. Re:Technology previews by ClickNMix · · Score: 1

      I think it was in the early 30s or 40s that they demonstrated a video phone. Its twenty-o-two, I see no video phones.

      So all the people with webcams are dreaming?

      The technology is here, and beyond.. sure its changed in its use, but thats the nature of development. And the law of supply and demand of consumers, Vs what the boffins dream up.

      --
      I saw the light at the end of the tunnel... But it was just someone with a flashlight bringing more work.
    4. Re:Technology previews by NETHED · · Score: 1

      OFFTOPIC
      I'm going to steal your sig for a shirt if that's alright.

      --
      --sig fault--
    5. Re:Technology previews by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

      Videophones have been the next big thing for 60 years - the technology problems have been solved, and they can be made cheaply, and provide acceptable quality even over standard phone lines. Problem is, on the consumer side, _people don't want to use them_. Video telephony has always been a technology searching for consumer demand, and it hasn't gotten there yet.

    6. Re:Technology previews by flewp · · Score: 2

      I don't want a video phone. Ever. Well, maybe, if I can turn off the camera that's recording me. I don't want people to call in the morning before I've gotten up. Or what if you just got out of the shower. Sorry, can't think of any better examples, but you get the idea.

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
    7. Re:Technology previews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can also theoretically date Britney Spears, and we ALL know that ANIT gonna happen.

      It's ok, we understand if you want to protect your tasteful reputation.

    8. Re:Technology previews by MSBob · · Score: 2
      I see a lot of people replying that there is no market for a videopohone. Video phones make sense but only in a limited number of scenarios.

      While it's true that most people don't want to be seen when talking on the phone. It only makes sense for folks like me who want to be seen and see their families who are 5000 miles away. I am in the market for a long distance videophone. Webcams do the trick but the quality is definitely not there yet.

      There is a market for videphones but it's not for short distance/local calls. You probably want to videoconference with someone you haven't seen for three years but video-talking to someone you saw last night really doesn't make much sense.

      --
      Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
    9. Re:Technology previews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got something (small) to hide, eh? I wouldn't mind taking a vidphone call right after getting out of the shower. Make the women fawn and the men jealous.

  8. Combinatorial Science is the way to go by cyborch · · Score: 1

    Given that technology the rest of the technologies could be achieved rather quickly...

  9. The makers of Viagra won't be happy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember, Steve Austin was bionic from the waist down....

  10. Star Trek TOS Disks by Toshito · · Score: 1

    I'd like to have those small red squares to carry data... They're small and solid (no moving parts!!!) I wonder how much Gb you could put on these?

    --
    Try it! Library of Babel
    1. Re:Star Trek TOS Disks by zaren · · Score: 1

      Umm.... Smart Media? Flash RAM? Sony memory sticks? I think they've already got that technology covered :)

      -----
      Apple hardware too expensive? How about a raffle ticket?

      --
      Come to the University of Mars! Classes starting soon!
  11. Cognitronics by IxnayOnTheIxnay · · Score: 5, Funny

    This tech will allow people to "drive a car simply by thinking about doing so" Of course, thinking about driving will be an entirely new skill, now only inherent in about 10% of the population.

    1. Re:Cognitronics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      >"drive a car simply by thinking about doing so"

      The downside is if you're driving down the road, and hear a bad Monster Truck commercial.

      "SUNDAY! SUNDAY! SUNDAY! Come see MONSTER TRUCKS wreck cars ..."

      "Wreck car?" you think. "Nooooooooooooo!" CRASH!

      Anonymous Kev
      Proudly posting as AC since 1997

  12. There's an idea... by HiQ · · Score: 1

    This nano-army of robots would then begin assembling atoms into any material the laws of physics will allow.
    Now, my dear nanobots, build me a Natalie Portman and a fine bowl of... ah, well, you get the picture

  13. Not so distant future? by juliao · · Score: 2

    The way the article is written , it seems that most of this is just around the corner. But so is cold fusion, and has been, for a number of yeras now. [/sarcasm]
    One of the ideas that attract me the most, "cognitronics", as they call them, is reportedly based upon sensors, advanced analytics and smart materials. And none of those will be sufficiently advanced in the next 10 years to allow for any kind of practical widescale use.

  14. Number Nine: Weird Science by delphi125 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Dildonics

    The big idea:

    Providing pleasurable massage sensations without using hands, in the privacy of one's own home.

    Image of three intersecting circles, labeled 'Internet connectivity', 'AI', 'ultra-delicate tactile stimulators'

    The challenge:

    There are two major issues still to be solved: making sure the electrical parts don't get wet and sticky, and hiding the gadgets from the unsuspecting parents.

    (I hope I didn't use any naughty words there!)

    1. Re:Number Nine: Weird Science by spazimodo · · Score: 2
      --

      Fsck the millennium, we want it now.
      Millennium Crisis Line: 0890 900 2000 [calls cost 50p/min]
  15. Right! by mjh · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The most fascinating part is that all of these new technologies seem like they'll be available in the not too distant future.

    Right. Which is exactly what they thought in the 70's, too, hence the TV shows.

    --
    Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
  16. I would go for the eyesight stuff. by AltGrendel · · Score: 1

    Infrared, UV, etc, etc.. a la Shadowrun.

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

  17. The Companion Piece by donnacha · · Score: 3, Informative


    The companion piece to this article, Untangling the Future, is also pretty interesting.

  18. Six Million Dollars? by tshoppa · · Score: 2
    But is it worth paying six million dollars of taxpayer money for this?

    :-). I'm sure that sounded like a large sum of money in the 1970's, but today it's a drop in the bucket compared to other military projects.

  19. i think that by paradesign · · Score: 1

    i think that Duracell and Energizer are probably pissed about remote energy sources, but me want!

    --
    I want 2D games back.
  20. Predicted Slashdot comments breakdown to this: by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Ah! An article about possible future technologies. I see the comments broken down like this:

    The standard guff:
    1% - "Imagine a beowulf cluster..." posts
    2% - "First post" posts
    10% - "Off-topic, Microsoft stinks" posts
    12% - "Big Business is evil" posts

    And the more relevant posts. I predict:
    20% - "Very cool and exiting, I want this" posts
    25% - "Very dangerous, we do not want this" posts
    30% - "Very cool but it'll never happen, people" posts

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    1. Re:Predicted Slashdot comments breakdown to this: by loconet · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      1% - "I see comments being broken down like this:"

      --
      [alk]
    2. Re:Predicted Slashdot comments breakdown to this: by Skidge · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Don't forget the standard 0.02% of comments predicting what everyone else will post. :)

    3. Re:Predicted Slashdot comments breakdown to this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Completely harmless and the technology sucks, but I want this.

    4. Re:Predicted Slashdot comments breakdown to this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you forgot the metaphysical ones:

      this is against the bible! -> and the 13 level deep argument that follows:

      christian: go bible!
      athiest: go science!
      pussy: science and the bible can co-exist

  21. Gee-whiz predictions the future tend not to work by Seth+Finkelstein · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I'm always skeptical of any gee-whiz predictions of the future. They tend to have a bad track record , e.g :

    The future isn't what it used to be. Take Tomorrowland. When it opened in 1955 as one of the five original sections of Disneyland, Walt Disney himself appeared on the live opening-day telecast and promised "a step into the future with constructive predictions about things to come." He may have been a dull public speaker, but in envisioning "the world of 1987," as it was at one point conceived, he did offer up such astounding attractions as TWA's Rocket to the Moon and Monsanto's all-plastic House of the Future ("Hardly a natural material appears anywhere"). We now know that people still live in wood and brick houses; and that even if TWA did fly to the moon, no one would go because the service would be ghastly; and that if Disney could have given 1950s parkgoers a genuine look at the future, the most amazing thing about 1987 would have been the presidency of Ronald Reagan, ...

    Where's my flying car?

    But then again, we do have Soma, err, Slashdot :-)

    Sig: What Happened To The Censorware Project (censorware.org)

  22. Hey, here's something we've had the technology for by fatalist23 · · Score: 1

    Slashdot + Unsuspecting site + Slashdot users = Server meltdown! wheeeeee!

  23. Power Sources? by TheNecromancer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Seems to me that this technology is limited, not by what it can do, but by the energy it consumes performing its function. Think about it, the SmartShirt that is talked about has electronics embedded in the fabric, but how is it powered? Current batteries in PDAs don't last very long, and it would be easy enough to replace batteries in the SmartShirt, but what about replacing power cells of electronics embedded in a person's skin? Once we are able to miniaturize powercells enough without sacrificing longevity of power, this field will thrive enormously!

    --
    Attention all planets of the Solar Federation! We have assumed control! - Neil Peart
    1. Re:Power Sources? by Jodrell · · Score: 2

      The rate of innovation of portable power sources is a lot slower than in the technologies that depend on them, for a number of reasons - mainly due to the fact that after a century or so of development we're reaching the theoretical limits of the current technology.

      This issue was discussed recently following an article on CNN (that's disappeared, unfortunately).

    2. Re:Power Sources? by firebat162 · · Score: 1

      some wrist watches (seiko) these days use pendulums to collect kenetic energy. While obviously a lot more refinement would be needed to generate more power, it seems like it could work

  24. Too late by anpe · · Score: 2

    The most fascinating part is that all of these new technologies seem like they'll be available in the not too distant future.

    Sure.
    "The height technologies that will change the world once you'll be in the grave" sounds less attractive.

  25. Not just 70's TV shows... by Innominate+Recreant · · Score: 2

    How about 90's TV shows? The human/computer topic seemed to be limited to mobility. What about sight? A Geordi visor from ST:TNG would be a valuable invention and a really cool integration of computer technology with the human brain.

    1. Re:Not just 70's TV shows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I'd guess that Geordi's visor is one of the closest-to-reality Star Trek technologies; something similar has been done, but at a very low resolution.

  26. When can I trade in this ugly body... by tmcmsail · · Score: 1

    Can I trade this old, worn out POS for the new coolness? Or do I need to be Will Smith?

    It looks like the next step is near, replaceable bodies and the ability to transfer knowlege. The line from Star Wars could come true, Darth Vader was "more machine than man."

    I will wait for the first service pack before trading my bio for bio-machine....

    --

    What OS do you want to abuse today?

  27. Not for everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Biofuel production plants? It'll never work on a large enough scale.

    Cognitronics? I don't trust anyone in the world enough to let them implant devices that will manipulate my brain.

    Genotyping? Fertile ground for rampant abuse. No thanks.

    Combinatorial science? It already exists. There are hundreds of super-computers that have been doing that kind of stuff for over a decade.

    Now quantum nucleonics? I'd really like to see that idea come to fruition, as well as some of the others.

    1. Re:Not for everyone by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      Biofuel production plants? It'll never work on a large enough scale.

      Why not? What part of the chain do you think will fail?

  28. Business 2.0 Front Cover by donnacha · · Score: 5, Funny


    With regard to the front cover's question, overlayed on possibly the smuggest Bill Gates photo I've ever seen:

    "How To Beat Him"

    I'm hoping that the answer boils down to "with a large wooden bat, spiked with rusty nails".

  29. Solution: by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

    Embedded electronics might well have a reather small power requirement. A few solutions (not all too serious)
    - Using the heat of ones body to generate electricity.
    - A tiny turbine/generator in the bloodstream. Go easy on the cholesterol or you'll clog it up!
    - A micro fuel cell. Heat can be dissipated through the normal body functions, and it would run off regular petrol or methanol. When you go to gas up the car, remember to fill up yourself as well.
    - Rechargeable batteries with an induction coupled charger under your bed. No worries.

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  30. Don't drool, beware! (The Luddite approach) by juliao · · Score: 5, Interesting
    All of them seem like great things to happen! But are they? Let's take a look...

    Biointeractive Material: An idea with a lot of potential, and that may see light sooner than we think. The risk here is reverse interaction, that may allow your shirt to be hacked into heating just a bit too much...

    Biofuel Production Plants: They mention the risks themselves: using bio-engineered plants for fuel production may create mutated species that grow beyond our control. And on another issue, growing GMO for fuel will legitimise using GMO for food, won't it?

    Bionics: A wonderful potential, but so many risks: yes, it can be use to cure the deaf, and the blind, but as you go on it allows you to replace organs, even to enhance them, and in due time it will allow you to slowly become a bit like a cyborg. It sounds great to me, but maybe it will create even a greater divide between the "have"s and the "have not"s. Will humanity (the poor of the world, their strenght being the numbers) rebel against the cyborgs (the bionic we) someday?

    Cognitronics: The greatest of all greats, but... If ir can control, can it be controlled? If it interacts, can you read my mind? It kind of redefines the notion of "0wn3d"...

    Genotyping: Hmmm... What was this one good for, again? Too much potential for the wrong things happening...

    Combinatorial Science: Wow! At last, a way for the government to find all about life, the universe and everything without having to bother with those pesky scientists and their silly notions of "moral" and "ethics"...! Anyway, anything that is comparable to Excel has to be a bad thing. :)

    Molecular Manufacturing: One of the coolest technologies ever. And yet, a great potential for being abused. This effectively removes the limit of scale on anything we build, be it large or small. But the planet isn't large enough for us to start building our private megalopolis and robot armies anytime soon. This had better come true after generalized space travel and colonization.

    Quantum Nucleonics: Hmmm.. Boom?

    1. Re:Don't drool, beware! (The Luddite approach) by DarenN · · Score: 1

      Molecular Maufacturing

      Ummm, this is almos a prerequiste to space travel, as builing craft that are reliable, strong, and light enough will almost certainly require this technology.

      This is probalby the most likely of those technologies to become realistic in the near(ish) future

      --
      Rational thought is the only true freedom
    2. Re:Don't drool, beware! (The Luddite approach) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we already have viable biofuels, availble from cannabis, which is fast growing, high yield and grows almost anywhere (it is a weed). But the US government in its war on drugs will not allow this to be used.

    3. Re:Don't drool, beware! (The Luddite approach) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great, even more enslavement of humans by technology. After some of these above listed are in place, Apocalypse will actually be wanted and desired.

    4. Re:Don't drool, beware! (The Luddite approach) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Molecular Manufacturing. Yawn.

      I've heard enough crap about "Molecular Manufacturing". The worshippers and followers of MNT AKA Drexlerites - named after their prophet - have been forseeing the 'singularity' for years. The fact that nanobots are not feasible apparent never entered their heads. The fact that atoms aren't benign building blocks but are sticky, vibrating and unpredicable particles never crossed their thoughts. Show me a working "universal assembler" or shut up and stop singing the praises of a non-existant technology.

    5. Re:Don't drool, beware! (The Luddite approach) by Fesh · · Score: 2

      "Molecular Manufacturing: One of the coolest technologies ever. And yet, a great potential for being abused.This effectively removes the limit of scale on anything we build, be it large or small."

      You cover the large bit. The small bit is that anyone can create a large batch of any chemical compound at will as long as they have the raw ingredients. Suddenly instead of kids bringing guns to school, they've got a jar of VX in their bookbags.

      You're absolutely right. We ought to be thinking about the risks as well as the benefits on these.

      --
      --Fesh
      Kill -9 'em all, let root@localhost sort 'em out.
  31. Hook me up... by bsdparasite · · Score: 1

    "I would like the X-10 auxiliary cerebrum please!"
    "Oh, we don't have it in stock. It's the only part for which you want to wait for a truck to arrive in the store."
    "It figures!"

  32. Nanotech in Sci-Fi by PortPuppie · · Score: 1

    If any of you have not taken the opportunity (doubtful, but I'll toss it out there in case any one isn't aware of him), Ben Bova has an excellent Sci-Fi series with nanotech as one of the aspects of the near future.

    He does a really good job of showing potential applications and FUD spread by political movements.

    Check out the first two books:

    Moonrise
    Moonwar

    The rest of the series is also very good. Mars, Jupiter, Venus, Asteroid Belt, etc.

    Do a search for Ben Bova on bn.com, they have the complete list.
    --
    Abort, Retry, Fail?
    1. Re:Nanotech in Sci-Fi by shess · · Score: 1
      Sorry, dude, I read Moonrise. It was a soap opera in a futuristic setting, and then only reason I finished it is because I couldn't believe that they'd publish such a crummy book with no redeeming qualities. It literally put me off Ben Bova (admittedly, I've only read three or four of his other books).

      I was wrong and now those hours (and that $5.95) are lost to me forever.

  33. But... by squaretorus · · Score: 1

    The most fascinating part is that all of these new technologies seem like they'll be available in the not too distant future

    They always do!
    They never ARE!

    1. Re:But... by EmphaticMan · · Score: 1

      Yeah...where's that "fire" thing and "flint tools" they keep promising are "right around the corner"?

  34. Like Alpha Centauri by AnotherSteve · · Score: 1

    This article reads like a Sid Meier game - what I want to know is how did they figure out the technology tree for all these cool things so they'd know what to work on next.

    --
    Information wants to be $1.98/lb.
    1. Re:Like Alpha Centauri by drachenstern · · Score: 1

      Duh, Sid's design team told 'em.

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
  35. Right... forgot about that one. by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

    Can't be right all the time ;-)

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  36. Did steve austin see popup ads? by Madman · · Score: 1

    The main difference between the bionic man and the people of the future is that we're likely to be bombarded 24 hours a day by unwanted ads. I wouldn't mind being able to lift 2000 lbs but I'm leery of having an electronic device control what I see and hear.

  37. cognitronics - dangerous? by Sarin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You could turn lights on and off, mute the TV, or drive a car simply by thinking about doing so.

    Sounds dangerous to me, you have to be carefull what you think instead of being carefull what you do, escpecially when these devices have lethal uses, like a car.
    What if you bionic arm would act on your impulsive first toughts after being annoyed or arroused by someone.Instead of pulling your middle finger to another roaduser, the car might try to hit this person.

    Thinking is not a crime might not be true in such a future.

    1. Re:cognitronics - dangerous? by Thornae · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Very true - and naturally, David Brin has already written about this. He describes a computer interface called a subvocaliser, which reads your unspoken pre-speech impulses in the larynx before they actually get to the word stage, and is the nearest thing to a direct brain interface you can get.

      From my well-thumbed copy of Earth:
      "Even the tiniest signal to her jaw or larynx might be interpreted as a command... Few people used subvocals, for the same reason few ever became street jugglers. Not many could operate the delicate systems without tipping into chaos. Any normal mind kept intruding with apparent irrelevancies, many ascending to the level of muttered or almost-spoken words the outer consciousness hardly noticed, but which the device manifested visibly and in sound.
      ... When invented, the subvocal had been hailed as a boon to pilots - until high-performance jets began plowing into the ground. We experience ten thousand impulses for every one we allow to become action. Accelerating the choice and decision process did more than speed reaction time. It also shortcut judgement.
      ...If they ever really developed a true brain-to-computer interface, the chaos would be even worse.
      ... Imagine giving a machine like this to young, libidinous, hormone-drenched male pilots! Of all the silly things to do.
      "


      Written in 1988, set in 2038, Earth is probably the best 50 year prediction of the future I've ever read. Brin actually extrapolated from the state of usenet at the time of writing to predict something that looks very much like our present www (only with more discussion and less ads. He was out by about 45 years there...).

      While much of the novel may well turn out to be inaccurate, and (much to my concern) overly optimistic, it covers many issues that are just beginning to be recognized as important - privacy, globalization, eco-crimes, and so-on. I'm convinced that his "Sea State" - a floating, multi-boat/raft 'nation' of asylum seekers and the like - is only a matter of time (no, Stephenson wasn't first with this idea - although Brin probably wasn't either).

      Of course, the subvocaliser is the nearest Brin actually gets to any of the above-mentioned eight. Instead, there's a heavy focus on Gaia theory - very popular at the time of writing. He also invents a new branch of gravitational science, which I won't spoil for you by expanding upon.

      Finally, the book has an excellent postscript in which Brin discusses his basis for many of his extrapolations, and issues he considers likely to arise in the next few decades. Those wanting some entertainment along with their speculation upon the next thirty-six years could do far worse than chasing up a copy of Earth.

      (My, that wandered a bit. But it's all relevant. Honest.)
      --
      |>
      Here be Dragons
  38. Re:Gee-whiz predictions the future tend not to wor by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 2

    I think someone in 1957 would be pretty impressed with home computers, cell phones, big screen TV's, VCR's, etc...

  39. "Quantum Nucleonics"??? by wowbagger · · Score: 2

    Halfnium amplifying X-Rays "exponentially"?? OK, I realize that this is a e-mag for PHB's, but come on - that reads like something straight out of Star Trek: "I know - we'll use a sheet of halfnium to amplify the X-Rays exponentially" "Shut up, Wesley" (no offense intended, CleverNickName...) Ignoring the fact that "exponentially" makes no sense in this context (after all, .9^n 1, you cannot define this without stating your units), but more importantly the energy must come from somewhere - either you are causing fission or some other form of decay in the halfnium, or you aren't getting any more energy out than you put in.

    Secondly, did anyone else feel like they were reading the Great Library from any of the Civilization games - "Domestication + Iron working = Stirrup" "Bio-informatics + Genetics = Enhanced crops"?

    I agree - the tech of the future will come about as combinations of what we have: I'm far too big a fan of James Burke to dispute that. But this article was "a crock of excrement, and none may abide the odor thereof".

  40. Check Out IBM's Science Division by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are working on transporters... they have successfully teleported instantaneously both massless photons and single electrons. Huge energy costs, and it would take a quantum computer to do the math needed to quanitfy and digitize even just one molecule, but cool stuff none the less.

  41. Keep reading... by H0NGK0NGPH00EY · · Score: 1

    If you read through to the end of the article (a rare thing around here, I know) you will find this:

    Quantum Nucleonics
    The big idea: A portable, safe, nonpolluting source of nuclear power

    As long as we're being fanciful, why not use these amazing portable nuclear devices to power our whiz-bang portable devices?

    --
    Do not read this sig.
  42. Osama Bin Laden by Wind_Walker · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    America obviously can't beat that revolutionary...

    1. Re:Osama Bin Laden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So, when have you seen him last?

      How's his organization and puppet government in Afghanistan doing?

  43. An answer to one of your questions... by H0NGK0NGPH00EY · · Score: 1

    Will humanity (the poor of the world, their strenght being the numbers) rebel against the cyborgs (the bionic we) someday?

    For some insight into that question, may I recommend you view Episode 6 of Sealab 2021--I, Robot. An insightful debate on the issue is contained within. ;^)

    --
    Do not read this sig.
  44. "beating" Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nah, The handwriting's already on the wall and they know it at MS. Lindows, WINE, OSX, OpenOffice, etc.. They are all much more painful than a bat.

    1. Re:"beating" Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but it more fun with the bat

  45. The Future is Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The army has several Future Soldier Projects in the pipe, some nearing completion.

    1) First Gen Cyber Soldier - Wearable field computer, integrated into light weight ClassIII+ armour suit that is NBC capable and has auto med functions (to integrate with the now deploying auto stretcher). The suit has integrated radio, microwave shortrante comms, GPS, HUD, infra/night vision integration and enhancements on the HUD, target ID visualization systems, target designation systems, and built in navigation.

    The big hang up is with the existing rifle systems. Some sectors of army RnD want a new battle rifle based on a german caseless design (3.7mm) that has limited recoil and a ROF that exceeds 1500RPM with a 200rnd mag and a relatively flat trajectory over 850-900m. Another sector loves the newer version of the Olin CAWS, with an integrated 15mm smart nade launcher and caseless 12ga low recoil multi-purpose long range shotgun. A third gun, put forward by the Klashinokov folks no less, is caseless with a high ROF and an integrated 25mm smart nade launcher and very high capacity mag.

    The hang up ends up being cost (the guns would each be 5x to 10x as expensive as the M16A2/3) for the new rifle (it has to be low recoil for improved accuracy and shock effect on mounted or integrated electronics) as well as the overall cost of the deployed infantry system (close to 25K a pop in general issue, over 33K in small issue to organizations like special forces and security). The upside is that they could realistically cut manpower in the infantry by a quarter and have twice the force thanks to the ability of C3 integrated down to the squad level and enhanced ability to cover more forward field per soldier.

    2) EMMCAS (pronouced em-kaz) - Enhanced Multi-Mission Combat Armour System. Basically this is an armoured exoskeletal suit that weighs in at over 800lbs. It's fully self contained, offers NBC and classIV protection, has all of the features above in terms of electronic capability, as well as enhanced strenght. This suit would be 'worn', reading the soldiers movements with micro sensor and react instantly, amplifying their movements and strength. Power comes from ultra dense (and horribly toxic) fuel cells and storage capictors. It charges in two hours and has six hours of heavy use duration (12 - 14 of light use duration, like walking a post).

    The vision is to deploy these in mechanized units, with a new APC that is capable of charging and maintaining the suits. They would be the shock infantry of the mech brigade, working in a 1 to 4 ration with standard infantry to get the job done in high stress / combat environments.

    There are rumors that certain material technologies are integrated for stealth purposes, including RAM and/or chamelic outer coverings.

    3) Memory plastics (artifical muscles) are being looked at in combination with high energy power sources, ceramic armours, and micro sensors, all networked together in a similar system as above, but at 1/4 the cost and 1/2 the weight. Mass produced, it would still cost 200K per soldier to outfit, but they are 5X as effective in the field and far more suvivable.

    1. Re:The Future is Here by mikerich · · Score: 1
      Interesting, thanks for the posting - any links?

      Of course the real problem with a rifle that fires 1500 RPM is keeping the soldier equipped with enough bullets!

      Can I have a jetpack now?

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

  46. Re:Gee-whiz predictions the future tend not to wor by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 2, Funny

    Agreed. Plus, this sounds like some bad Cosmo article headline:

    Eight Technologies That Will Change the World
    Eight Makeup Tricks to Make You Look Thinner
    Eight Ways to Keep Your Man Interested
    Eight Hot Looks for Summer

  47. Try TerraBytes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember a couple of episodes where they actually complained about the limited storage of those disks... that being like 150Tb.

    1. Re:Try TerraBytes by hplasm · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but remember, Windows 2300/XXPP/NG is ultrabloatware and ships in a 500Tb zip...

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
  48. Interesting theme. by Junta · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Not too long ago, the top list of techs that would change the world were typically all about computers and the internet, focusing on how people interact with each other and get information. The big internet bubble kinda grew out of this whole excitement over computer and internet technology as an end in and of itself rather than a means to another end.

    Now it seems like the general populace have tired of thinking of computers and the internet as they did before. This lack of interest and the recession have fed each other to a downward spiral. It seems that now the populace is getting more excited about biotech things, as reflected in this article. e-everything and fast communications got boring, but now people see biotech as having the potential for enhancing and extending life in a very real and pervasive way.

    So are we about to see a "biotech" bubble like the "internet" bubble we saw in the past few years? Are bio-engineering, genetics, and biology programs about to reach record high enrollments like computer science and engineering programs saw a few years ago (when the general populace thought computer knowledge = big bucks).

    Anyway, though boring to the public in general, botany research could have great impact on our lives. Things like spider silk and insulin from plants, as well as enhancing foods to feed more people could offer further reaching impact than anything mentioned in the article, in terms of reaching third world countries, for example. It's pretty exciting. Before long, they expect to be able to produce enough insulin to supply all the world's diabetic population in a few farms. Pretty cool stuff, just hope this stuff doesn't get lost in the noise of "bionic man" super-hyped research.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  49. Re:Gee-whiz predictions the future tend not to wor by Incorrigible · · Score: 0

    The future isn't what it used to be. Take Tomorrowland. When it opened in 1955 as one of the five original sections of Disneyland, Walt Disney himself appeared on the live opening-day telecast and promised "a step into the future with constructive predictions about things to come." He may have been a dull public speaker, but in envisioning "the world of 1987," as it was at one point conceived, he did offer up such astounding attractions as TWA's Rocket to the Moon and Monsanto's all-plastic House of the Future ("Hardly a natural material appears anywhere"). We now know that people still live in wood and brick houses; and that even if TWA did fly to the moon, no one would go because the service would be ghastly; and that if Disney could have given 1950s parkgoers a genuine look at the future, the most amazing thing about 1987 would have been the presidency of Ronald Reagan, ...

    You know what the first thing that popped into my head after I read that quote?

    If you guessed "1.21 jigawatts!," you were correct.

  50. The Ninth Technology of the Future. by actor_au · · Score: 1

    A Slashdot proof server.
    Made up of Linux and about fifty Beowulf Clusters of the latest 'wunderkind' hardware this server will one day almost be able to withstad the force of several thousand people attacking it simultaneously. Thus destroying googles popular Cache service forever.

    Slashdot Math 50+5-3= More Karma than I have

    --
    Read Errant Story.
  51. Half of that is Nearly Reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cloning... They can clone your body, using genetic engineering to take out the flaws (obesity, disease, whatever... make mine a body like a 21 year old decathalete, the metabolisim of a rabbit, the reproductive organs of a porn star, and the immune system of a god please). That only means they have to figure out how to read your mind in it's entirety and how to transfer it to a suitable blank.

    1. Re:Half of that is Nearly Reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey, I am a 21 year old decathalete. heh, cool. I never knew my body was in such high demand.

    2. Re:Half of that is Nearly Reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean your body isn't like that already? Aside from the 21 year old part (I'm 24), you've just described me perfectly.

  52. neural interface by Black_Logic · · Score: 1

    Man, I'd cut my hand off for a neural interface :)

    Although, it says in the article, that someone with a paralyzed leg was able to move the mouse by attempting to move the leg. Makes me wonder how it could work for someone with a complete, healthy body. I remember reading a case study about a person who had two fingers melded together (naturally) at birth. They did an MRI on his brain before and after separating his fingers and the results showed that his brain changed slightly. Their hypothesis was that it made new connections to deal with more input resulting from the extra skin and nerves. So, I wonder if it'd be possible to help the brain make new facultys for input/output. (although, i'm clearly not a neurosurgeon. :) ) Maybe they could just interecept and block input to the leg temporarily, rerouting it to the computer interface. I remember reading about a study that showed there is some mechanism in the body that blocked input to your body from your brain during sleep, as an explanation for people who don't have control over their body for a couple seconds after waking up. (never happened to me though)

    --
    Ansi's and stupid tricks!
    1. Re:neural interface by drachenstern · · Score: 1

      okay, first off, yes, you're brain does disconnect from the body (issuing commands for movement anyways) when you sleep. yes the brain does adapt to new channels of incoming information. if you would like to speak with someone knowledgeable about this and cannot find anyone locally, then let me recommend a gentleman with two doctorates, several masters and numerous bachelor's/other studies, who has worked and still occasionally does work for the FBI, and put in twenty+ years working at Bryce Hospital studying the brain, and it's functions. Okay, he's fairly busy, and he may take a while to get back to you, but here's is email addy dgunn @ ayers cc al us.

      to all of slashdot that may read this: yes, it's spam guarded for a reason. if you are lowlife enough to start spamming him, then i will personally trace you down, by the recorded IP of your last contact with that webpage, and thus contacting your ISP and he will undoubtedly talk to the FBI about your prank, and yes, i do have that capability and desire. I admire this man more than any other three people i know. (it doesnt hurt that he thinks i'm cool too).

      okay, now on to book references:
      have you read terminal man by crichton? good book, and sorta related

      okay, now really bad jokes:
      someone with a completely healthy body would move the mouse with, say, two or three fingers, or for mac ppl, a palm and a knuckle, at the least.

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
  53. Bio Digital Spammers are out there! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think about it, you are a bionically enhanced super stud with a genetically perfect bio half and a cybernetically omni-powerful and linked brain. The only problem is that every nanosecond of the waking day you are getting spammed by some lamer on the internet who has your IP#, asking you to get a new morgage from them or to check out their Woman Done by Barn Animal virtual reality website! It will drive you insane!!!

  54. Perpetual motion machines! Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    From the article: Similarly, methanol takes almost as much energy to create as it releases when it's burned.

    Well that is sweet! It produces more energy than it takes to make! Perpetual motion, here we come ;)

  55. You Forgot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2% - "Somebody Famous" dead at age "xx"

    .5% - Sex story unrelated entirely, usually involving incest or fisting

    4% - Anon Coward Trolls serving no purpose to but to waste electrons

  56. Jesus, that's scary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happens when a Nascar driver gets on the road after a day at the track?

    What happens when pretty much any blonde gets behind the wheel... nothing, the car just sits there waiting for a thought.

    What happens when the chinese get behind the computer thought reader of a car?

  57. Predicting the future by MarvinMouse · · Score: 1

    I remember hearing a quote a while ago in a book I read titled "The year in 1980". The book was a collection of predictions from scientists, engineers, and other academics about what the world would be like in 1980. The quote went:

    "The problem with predicting the future is that you either predict that we can do far too much, or that we can do far too little."

    I think this applies to these predictions. A good number of them, humourously enough, were in this book that I just quoted from. Eventually, they'll come, but I wouldn't hold my breath.

    (IMHO, as always)

    --
    ~ kjrose
  58. No one notices whats done, only whats yet to come. by ClickNMix · · Score: 1

    A common theme of the posts Iv read so far seem to moan about how so much was promised years ago, and how nothing much has come of it.

    Which at a glance, might seem right. But thats only because Im guessing there is a pretty youngish age group of readers here (Ie, under 40?) how have grown up with technology to the point, they see it as normal, not gee-wizz. Since its going from 'old computer to better computer' not no computers, to computers etc.

    Im sure in some years to come Ill be talking to my kids(Maybe :o) and be amazed at how little they think of even a few of these things, and just pass them of as nothing new or impressive at all.

    --
    I saw the light at the end of the tunnel... But it was just someone with a flashlight bringing more work.
  59. Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hmmm... having done a few stints in the USAF, the term "Brillian Pebbles" comes to mind. Only one country in the world can threaten the US with nukes (okay, two if you count Ukraine, but only for a year or so more thanks to us buying them up), that being Russia. And, given that they have not built a new bomber or ISBM since 1990, nor do they have more than three working SSBMs, that may not even be true, and we would BURY them if that happened.

    Vietnam... read up. We could take them in a week these days, they are broke, dispirited, and brutalized. You equate a political situation and blunder from the 60's to the reality of today... it just doesn't hang.

    A united Europe? LOL. YOu have no shipping for invasion, only two good french and one old brit carrier, a divided political base, a limited amount of nukes, no intercontinental ranged strike AC. Two dozen ICBMs and it is over pally. Worse still, the US wouldn't even resort to that, we would just park 10 nuclear carriers and two dozen top notch attack boats around the edge and blocade your butts while we economically bury you. And finally, you do have the French and Italians, who while nice people (my mom is french), couldn't fight their way out of a wet paper bag with a shotgun and a map when it comes to war and only know how to wave white flags (must be taugh in basic training), and France is one of your nuclear nations and has the two decent carriers!

    1. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *yawn*

      What's your point anyway ? Why not dump a few nukes here and there (mostly there), and be done with it.

      I mean, that's where your heading anyway with the attitute ur displaying at the moment.

      Come on, you can do it, press the button, life wil be so easy after that.

      M.
      location: Europe (NL), near Den Haag, just so you know where to aim.

    2. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, Europe doesn't have to do anything to economically bury the US. The US can do that all on its own by continually increasing its deficit to spend yet more money on its military, when no-one else can be bothered to compete.

  60. many grains of salt by stego · · Score: 2

    unless by date you mean 'frantically and repeatedly masturbate to'...

  61. Technology increase by Kushana · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Venn diagrams of the article remind me of the pretty pictures I see whenever I get a new technology in Alpha Centauri or Civilization. How long do I have to wait for Matter Transmission?

    --

    Careers should combine three things: what you can do, what you want to do, and what you can get paid for.
  62. Article's crap by stud9920 · · Score: 1

    They didn't even mention the Ginger/IT/segfault^H^H^H^H^Hway

  63. Seems awfully redundant (and boring) by pshoemaker · · Score: 1

    The real interesting stuff--the advances that will really shake things up--aren't readily apparent to mainstream business writers. This cluelessness is to be expected, and is compounded by a well-engrained fear of going out on a limb. Instead we see these sorts of articles, with these sorts of lists, i.e. those that most people really won't complain about, and that you can find in any good scifi overview. They are safe. Less so are the 'future technologies' that will drive enormous transformations in basic industries (industries BTW that will continue to be important for the foreseeable future), the development of new technologies of death (first for the military and then as denuded civilian applications), and ubiquitous connectivity at the level of the individual. The aggravating thing is that any good review of current research suggests a multitude of alternative views that don't include Star Trek tech.

  64. I am still waiting. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for edible underware that doesn't taste like sh!t.

  65. Structuralism is for suckers! by Interrobang · · Score: 1

    Hey, yes, your brain really *does* rewire itself when something about you changes drastically. I know. I have cerebral palsy, which results from a combination of predisposition, circumstance, and brain damage, and if brains didn't fix their own "short circuits" to a certain extent, I wouldn't have walked into the office this morning, and I wouldn't be typing this to you now. Granted, it takes a hell of a lot of work, stimulation (the important bit), exercise, and determination, but in general, it's possible.

    In short, believing that everything in the brain is absolutely hard-and-fast controlled by *one place* and *one place* in your brain alone is nonsense. Some of those places that should control various parts of my body (the "default settings," if you will) are long since dead. Other parts picked up the slack, more or less. I wouldn't mind a little cognitronic jolt to the rest to get up to 100% functionality, though...

    Cheers,

    Interrobang, upright and striving for a reasonable hand-drawn facsimile of "able-bodied" since 1978

  66. Re:Gee-whiz predictions the future tend not to wor by Untimely+Ripp'd · · Score: 2, Interesting
    We now know that people still live in wood and brick houses

    Well, yes, but ... Your kitchen cabinets and most of your cheap, assemble-it-yourself furniture are made of particle board (wood fibers glued together in a plastic matrix). Your countertops are particle board and formica if you're a working joe, and Corian if you're a yuppie. Your subfloor -- and your roof sheeting -- are Oriented StrandBoard (wood fibers glued together in a plastic matrix). Your floor is probably "tiled" with either polyurethane or vinyl, and carpeted with recycled polyester. Your exterior walls have an OSB layer (if you're lucky), a polystyrene insulating layer, and more probably vinyl than brick to face the elements. Your bathtub is either acrylic or fiberglass (silica fibers in a polyester matrix). Your deck is quite likely to be either sheathed in plastic, or simply made of plastic. Your couch is upholstered with polyurethane foam covered with polyester fabric. Your patio furniture is, of course, resin (plastic). Your LOTR chess set is resin (plastic). etc.

    --

    And let the angel whom thou still hast serv'd tell thee ...

  67. chamelic outer coverings ... by SmartAs · · Score: 1

    You heard it hear first!

    chamelic outer coverings

    I saw it did you?

    --
    'In pusuit of the greater good! ... Setting good ideas free, just to see them fly.'
  68. As the old adage goes by Starbuck · · Score: 0

    Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

  69. Re:Six Million Dollars? Adjust for Inflation by Mad+Man · · Score: 1

    That was $6,000,000 in 1976.

    It would be nearly $19 million today.

    [Inflation calculator at http://www.westegg.com/inflation/ ]

  70. Why it takes so long to get this stuff built by BlueFall · · Score: 1

    Money is the biggest obstacle to all of this. We've had the technology to build a lot of this stuff for a while, just not cheaply. If there's money in it, and a profit margin, then it'll get built. Otherwise, it's just 70's TV-show fodder...

  71. No they won't by r_j_prahad · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They won't change a damn thing, they'll never even get a chance to, because they'll all violate either the DMCA, the CBDTPA, a EULA, somebody's Terms of Service Agreement, UCITA, a patent, the Bern Convention, the Patriot Act, or some as yet unknown restrictive legislation yet to be enacted.

    The technology future for the U.S. was yesterday. It's all over, man. We're rushing headlong into third-world status at breakneck speed and there's nobody out there to stop us.

  72. Life in 1957 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's see...

    - Rotary telephones.
    - Phone numbers like "Beachwood 4-5789."
    - B&W TV (for most of us), with three channels.
    - TV was controlled with a pair of pliers grabbing the thing where the knob used to be.
    - Your father spent at least ten minutes of every show blocking the screen while he adjusted the antenna.
    - Stores closed at 5pm.
    - Everything closed on Sunday.
    - No Seven-Elevens.
    - Going to McDonald's was the new exciting thing to do.
    - No drive-though windows. You parked and got your ass out of the car.
    - No Burger King, Wendy's, KFC, Arby's, etc.
    - The only way to to do banking was at a teller window.
    - No home computers, cell phones, microwave ovens, video games.
    - No traffic jams.
    - All you needed to get on an airplane was a ticket. Anybody's ticket.
    - You could leave your house unlocked, and leave your bicycle in the yard.
    - lots more stuff, but I'm so old my feeble brain can't recall it.

  73. Re:Gee-whiz predictions the future tend not to wor by RetroGeek · · Score: 1

    Sure, create more SPAM subject lines....

    --

    - - - - - - - - - - -
    I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
  74. You alredy have a tractor beam by kilroy_hau · · Score: 1

    it's called gravity

    --


    Kilroy was here!
  75. two words by sugrshack · · Score: 1
    road rage

    uh oh.

    --
    I can't believe it's not lard!
  76. Re:Really?... complexities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Overt military conquest or nuclear obliteration may work that way on paper, but holding territory is much different that taking it. Point your eyes to Israel and take note... there are many ways to fight battles. In the modern world war is as much about media as it is about military. Unless of course, you are planning on eliminating free speech and freedom of the press completely (good luck on that one though).

  77. Hey! by RoadWarriorX · · Score: 1

    When are we goona be like the Jetsons? When are we gonna fly in cars? Or have robotic maids? Or living in the sky? When?


    Business 2.0 certainly does not know....

  78. So that ears of corn will be able to really hear? by lys1123 · · Score: 1

    Biologic sensing devices will become small enough to reside on or inside people, animals, and crops.

    Crops?

  79. Re:Gee-whiz predictions the future tend not to wor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BS. My floor and deck are 100% pine, my couches are solid oak frames w/genuine leather cushions, my living room set is all oak, my exterior walls are stone, my bathtub is cast iron, my countertops are marble, my floor tiles are marble, my patio furniture is aluminum and my (non-LOTR) chess set is jade.

  80. The bionic augmentations I want... by DarkGamer · · Score: 1
    • Augmented reality...
      built into my retina
    • Brain to wireless networking bridge (as seen in the Matrix or Ghost in the Shell, but wireless)
      I hate how low bandwith spoken language currently is. It takes forever to upload my ideas into others' heads.
    • One of those IBM micro-drives with a database interface built in.
      never forget a name or face! Play Counterstrike anytime, anywhere.
    • 24/7 net access
      another perk of the NIC in my nervous system...
    • an older CPU (celeron perhaps?)
      Pass advanced calculus in about a week. Older because I don't want any overheating issues... What's that smell
    • A vibrating, mildly electrically charged penis
      because I can.
    • And Finally... P2P (pleasure to pleasure) protocol.
      fully compatible with the previous device. Get your bionic babe's body and mind off at the same time!

    On that note, if there are any bionocists in the house please add me to your waiting list as soon as it's post-beta. Thank you. *g*

  81. No replacement for Jim Rockford by gej · · Score: 1

    Nothing in this list could replace good dependable PI technology like Jim Rockford. The future has a long way to go before it catches up to the 70s.

  82. Re:Gee-whiz predictions the future tend not to wor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    my bathtub is cast iron

    So, how does one get the rust off of one's proverbial ass?

  83. Re:Really?... complexities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The media can't always be used as a tool though.. just look at the 800,000 Rwandans who desperately sought some international prevention of the genocide - little to no press coverage. Also.. look at all the media attention Tibet has - what good has that done?

    The Middle East is a completely different picture in that 1) Arab nations have extended and promoted the suffering for over 54 years and 2) Arab nations virtually *have* eliminated free speech and freedom of the press - unless people don't mind getting lynched for saying what they believe.

    Unfortunately the media only works against democracies and open societies.

  84. Re:Gee-whiz predictions the future tend not to wor by Untimely+Ripp'd · · Score: 1
    BS. My floor and deck are 100% pine, my couches are solid oak frames w/genuine leather cushions, my living room set is all oak, my exterior walls are stone, my bathtub is cast iron, my countertops are marble, my floor tiles are marble, my patio furniture is aluminum and my (non-LOTR) chess set is jade.

    Hey, give me a break. My note referenced an archetypal "you" -- the average american living on an average wage. The examples you present identify you as someone who either a) makes a lot more money than the average american, or b) chooses expensive, high-quality natural materials and forgoes other varieties of comfort or indulgence that most Americans prefer not to sacrifice.

    Drive by any middle-class suburban development and count the houses with vinyl siding versus those with stone walls. In these parts, the ratio is likely to be NAN. A cast iron bathtub (without whirlpool jets) costs $2000. An acrylic tub costs $200. The typical home today is built with a fiberglass tub/shower enclosure, not a cast-iron Kohler tub.

    Many people these days can't even tell the difference. The last time I was shopping for used furniture, I saw several particle-board tables that had been advertised as oak by their owners.

    --

    And let the angel whom thou still hast serv'd tell thee ...

  85. Attention Enemy Troops! by Guru2Newbie · · Score: 1
    There will be no flash photography allowed on the battlefield!

    (heh heh)FLASH Poof! Poof! Poof!...Poof!

    D'OH!!!

  86. ferroelectric molecular optical nanotechnology by geekster_2000 · · Score: 1

    many applications are being researched at
    universities around the world for further
    info go to

    www.colossalstorage.net

  87. Mod parent up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Slashbots here badly need a taste of reality.

  88. Re:No one notices whats done, only whats yet to co by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But thats only because Im guessing there is a pretty youngish age group of readers here (Ie, under 40?) how have grown up with technology to the point, they see it as normal, not gee-wizz.

    I'm 37. Comparing my childhood to my kids'?

    My first home computer was early, I was 14. I even used a teletype and an acoustic modem before that! I got my own first modem (1200 baud) when I was 23. I got a Pong game at age 12, a console (Mattel Intellivision) when I was 16.

    In contrast, my kids have my old 133 Mhz Pentium for their exclusive use, and play lots of games on my 450 with GeForceMX, and a cable modem. He has an N64 and a Gameboy. (No Pokemon on the other systems saves Daddy money! :-)

    I had e-mail and limited USENET at age 21, and was an early adopter. I first surfed at age 29. My son checks sports scores over the Internet. My daughter had a web page at two days old.

    My parents bought their first VCR when I was 19. My kids have never been in a house without one. My daughter still doesn't quite understand that just because you can see a movie in the theater, that doesn't mean you can go out and buy the tape.

    I did not live in a house with cable until I signed up for it myself at age 21. My older child lived briefly in a house without it.

    My parents first bought a car with A/C when I was 19. My children have never ridden in a car without A/C (except when it was broken.)

    I was 14 when we finally moved into a house with central A/C; my kids have never lived in such a place. (Except for a few days after our heat pump broke.)

    Other differences? Cordless phones, answering machines, cell phones, a greater variety of food (and better food: OJ not from concentrate, fuji apples instead of red delicious, etc.) Cars are overall better and more reliable. My kids have flown a lot more than I ever did. I don't think they've ever seen a typewriter; I wrote my college papers on one. Clothing colors are better, artworks more colorful and colorfast.

  89. Re:Gee-whiz predictions the future tend not to wor by bsane · · Score: 1

    I'm assuming then that the floor is SYP (Southern Yellow Pine) and your oak furniture is Quarter-Sawn White Oak? If its not, then you got scammed into buying trashy furniture made to make people think 'real wood' is better. Whicherver way though I'm sure the parent poster was correct about having OSB subfloors, walls and countless other plastic enabled materials.