Slashdot Mirror


Slashback: Film, Solaris, Contention

Slashback with a load of updates for you tonight on modchips for Xbox, Nigerian spam-scams, missing Mozilla hackers, Guillaume Laurent on Murray on Guillaume Laurent, and more. Read on for the details.

Sun giveth and taketh away. axehind writes: "This ZDNet article tells us StarOffice will no longer be free. The decision completes the transition of the StarOffice suite back to being a paid product, as it was when Sun bought the software along with its maker, Germany's Star Division, in 1999. Sun says it will stop free downloads of StarOffice 5.2 at midnight on Wednesday night."

On the other hand, The Pi-Guy writes: "It has been confirmed by Sun that Solaris 9 will be on Intel platforms - you can get it for free on DVD here. Quite surprising considering that a few months ago they were saying 'No S9 at all on x86!'"

Update: 05/29 03:03 GMT by T : As several readers have noticed, the page no longer indicates Solaris 9 once you've chosen x86 as your platform of choice -- looks like a case of mistaken identity.

Strong opinions tend to draw answers. Guillaume Laurent writes "Given that Murray mentions me in his interview, and that I disagree with most of what he says, I felt the need to reply. Enjoy."

Six seems a tad low. supafly613 writes: "Six people were arrested in South Africa over the weekend on suspicion of being involved in the infamous 'Nigerian' e-mail and letter fraud. Four of those detained were Nigerian, one was Cameroonian and the sixth was South African. Police in South Africa believe that the six are part of an international fraud and drug-dealing cartel, sending out thousands of e-mail and letters in an attempt to defraud."

Lost in cyberspace ... Mindphunk writes "Six hackers remain to be found so that Mozilla can be relicensed under the LGPL and GPL as well as the MPL original license. This is really important if Mozilla is going to interoperate readily with all kinds of free software. Perhaps the power of Slashdot can find them in time for the 1.0 release?? The missing hackers are:

  • David Nebinger
  • 'Uncle George'
  • Sanjay Gupta
  • Makoto Kato
  • Thierry LeBouiland
  • Jiwei Wang"

This is a followup to our earlier mention of the missing hackers.

Still waiting for NetBSD :) llordsmiff writes: "According to this, the world's first Xtender Xbox modchip preorders were shipped today (24 May). There are installation pictures also. "It plays back all import and backups on all worldwide sold Xbox machines." It's also supposed to play any DVD, regardless of region."

Wonder if this will be 'content protected.' neema writes: "Just a bit of an update to an older post, but Revolution OS will apparently be released on DVD (region free) in September for 20 dollars. Trailer and first 8 minutes can be found here. I, for one, welcome the chance to see it."

73 of 215 comments (clear)

  1. LGPL and GPL by rootlocus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I dont understand how something can be licensed under both LGPL and GPL at the same time.. That seems like a contradiction.. Can someone explain it?.. TIA..

    1. Re:LGPL and GPL by MisterBlister · · Score: 4, Informative
      By dual licencing under the LGPL and GPL (not to mention MPL) those who develop derivitive works can decide whether to use the LGPL, GPL or MPL for their project.

      So say I create an offshoot of Mozilla called Boozila, I can pick the LGPL license for this project, which means anyone who derives from my work must abide by the LGPL (or they can go use the original Mozilla source minus my changes and use GPL, or MPL..up to them!).

      In essence, it gives developers a bit of a choice over which licenses they want to support while using the codebase...They are free to choose GPL, LGPL or MPL.

    2. Re:LGPL and GPL by amccall · · Score: 4, Interesting
      That sounds all well and good, but...

      ..doesn't the LGPL give the option of redistribution under the GPL? So, if you distribute your program under the LGPL, anyone can redistribute it under the terms of the GPL.

      Which is to say, by LGPL'ing your software, you are effectively dual licensing it with the GPL anyway(it's implied).

      So, what's the point?

      --
      ------ 24.5% slashdot pure
    3. Re:LGPL and GPL by Vanders · · Score: 2, Informative

      doesn't the LGPL give the option of redistribution under the GPL?

      No. No more than the GPL gives you the option to redistribute under the LGPL. If someone forked an LGPL project and changed it to the GPL, the original author would not be able to take the changes from the fork and fold them back into their own tree under the LGPL. Which is unfair, to say the least.

    4. Re:LGPL and GPL by ReelOddeeo · · Score: 2

      I dont understand how something can be licensed under both LGPL and GPL at the same time.. That seems like a contradiction.

      If I write a program, then I own the copyright on it. That is, I have the exclusive right to reproduce the program in any form. If you reproduce it, or even posess a copy, without the right to do so, then you are guilty of copyright infringement.

      If I want to, I can grant you a license to my copyrighted work. Maybe I would do this in exchange for money, sex, or just because I'm a nice guy.

      Closed source licenses (often EULA's) may require you to agree to certian terms in exchange for the grant of a license. In other words, I may not choose to grant you a license unless you (A) pay me, (B) promise not to decompile the program, (C) promise to run through the streets in your underwear screaming at 3 AM, etc.

      Once you are granted a license, you are entitled to a copy under the terms of that license. The license may or may not include the right to reproduce the program in either source or binary form.

      As the exclusive copyright owner, I can license the program to as many as I would like under whatever terms I would like. I can license you the right to have one copy of the program, and 3 backup copies. But I can license Joe the right to give his 25 closest friends copies, because I like him better. I could (probably in exchange for $$) license Microsoft to reproduce the program in binary form only as part of their closed source product. Finally, I could still turn around and license the program under the GPL. (A commercial vendor might rather pay for an alternative license rather than use the GPL.)

      Finally, back to your question. As the copyright holder, I can grant different licenses. In fact, if I am a really nice guy, I can put the program under several different open licenses. You choose which license you wish to agree to, and then you better abide by the terms of that license. Nothing, other than the grant of a license by the copyright owner, gives you any right whatsoever to the program! For instance, with the GPL, if you don't agree to it, then you are not granted a license, and nothing else gives you a right to the program, so you are guilty of copyright infringement.

      Other software, such as Open Office, for instance, is dual licensed. I'm sure others can point out even more dual licensed software. One or more public licenses do not prevent the copyright owner from also offering closed source licenses to other parties.

      Does that clarify things?

      --

      Those who would give up liberty in exchange for security and DRM should switch to Microsoft Palladium!
  2. Solaris 9 by MBCook · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've never tried Solaris (to my knowledge), but I'd love to. It's a good thing that I found the page where they give it away for free before it got posted on here on Slashdot. Now I might actually have a chance to get a copy ;). Thanks, [H]ardOCP!

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:Solaris 9 by cscx · · Score: 2

      Solaris is very powerful. Judging from the link they are only releasing Sol 8 for x86 and Sol 9 for Sparc.

      The downside is that is ships with CDE by default, which is an eyesore (it can be changed, provided you have root access). I wonder if Sol 9 is shipping with CDE or Gnome?

      BTW, I don't think Sun has a chance of being "Slashdotted" any time soon. They sit on one of the biggest pipes in the country. And just think of the purple server boxes their web servers sit on... (drool...)

    2. Re:Solaris 9 by discstickers · · Score: 2, Funny

      Damn slashdot... that should have been a

      --
      I have a shitty sig!
    3. Re:Solaris 9 by fsmunoz · · Score: 2, Informative

      The downside is that is ships with CDE by default, which is an eyesore (it can be changed, provided you have root access). I wonder if Sol 9 is shipping with CDE or Gnome?

      CDE almost certainly. GNOME 2 is not yet ready and they probably need more integration to include it. Anyway, as with Solaris 8, the "Bonus Software" CD pack that comes with the OS (or OE, whatever :) ) includes a CD "Exploring GNOME" that installs an "unsupported evaluation" of GNOME. Pretty slick, installed it at work, ppl are using the Sun boxen much more hapilly now.
      BTW, that Bonus pack also includes the GNU utils, Emacs, even KDE. Also StarOffice (at least Solaris 8 did) and Netscape 6.

      Regards,

      fsmunoz

    4. Re:Solaris 9 by Dicky · · Score: 2
      AFAIK, S9, at this point, has the same thing w.r.t. CDE GRIN>), off the top of my head.

      And no, there is currently noSolaris 9 for Intel. Again, believe me, I'd know if there were. :-)

      --
      Paranoia isn't an infectious condition, it's a way of life
    5. Re:Solaris 9 by arivanov · · Score: 3, Informative
      Several corrections:

      Solaris has many pluses like scheduler optimised for threading, working POSIX realtime priorities, etc but it also has a slow filesystem that is technologically inferior to anything else out there. It is also fairly buggy and ridden with security holes. The buggy bit is especially valid for x86. Bugs are of all varieties: non-working multicast on half of the network adapters, crashes, memory leaks, you name it. Neither ACPI nor APM are supported either which means that it will not work properly on laptops and many desktop class new machines. The range of supported hardware is also very small compared to what you get working with BSD or Linux. So it depends what you want it for, but you better get a proper server class system with SCSI to run it on.

      Sun (the download section) got slashdotted to hell and gone when they released Soffice 5 for free for the first time.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    6. Re:Solaris 9 by cscx · · Score: 2

      Neither ACPI nor APM are supported either which means that it will not work properly on laptops and many desktop class new machines. The range of supported hardware is also very small compared to what you get working with BSD or Linux.

      I think this is because Sun is like Apple in a way... they release Solaris only with SPARC in mind. They don't have to give a shit about support on Wintel/Lintel boxes cause that's not their main target audience. I mean, why waste their time if 90% of Solaris installations are on Sun hardware?

  3. Solaris 9 really for intel? by pythas · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hmm. I looked at the sun link provided above, and it gives you 2 choices:

    Solaris 9 for Sparc
    Solaris 8 for Intel

    Are you sure they're releasing 9 for intel?

    1. Re:Solaris 9 really for intel? by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 2, Funny

      Great catch.

      According to this page make reference to deferring and discontinuing Solaris for Intel...

      Who knows why they say "We no long offer Solaris on Intel" on one page, and "yes, I want a free copy" on another page.

      Developers: There is NO WAY IN HELL that we can develop or maintain Solaris Intel binaries. Not enought staff. We have enough work as it is! We should drop the whole projet.

      Marketing translation: Coming in Q4, Solaris on Intel!

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  4. For News Stories... by gvonk · · Score: 5, Funny

    FROM THE DESK OF: MR. WORGEE G. SHUB
    Corporate (Special) Trust Fund,
    United Political Parties of America,
    Contract Award Committee,
    Washington DC USA

    Dear Esteemed Nigerian Sir:

    I am the Chairman of the Contract Award committee and my committee is solely responsible for awarding and payment of contracts on behalf of the United Political Parties of America. My Committee has received payments from Enron, Microsoft, Walt Disney, and many other large American companies that we then disbursed in accordance with United States law to the intended politicians in return for government services rendered to The Corporations. We overshot the contracted sum by USD35 Million. We have paid the politicians and withholding the balance of Thirty-Five Million United States Dollars. Since the existing domestic laws forbid civil servants from opening, operating and maintaining foreign accounts, we do not have the expertise to transfer this balance of funds to a foreign account.

    Due to the salubrious investment and taxation climate in Nigeria, as outlined in FMF A26 Unit 3B paragraph "D" of the Auditor General of the Federal Republic of Nigeria Report of NOV. 1999 about annual estimated petroleum revenues of 28billion US Dollars, and especially opportunities relateed to the late Head of State General Sani Abacha who died on 8th June 1998, which we have become aware of through various emails we have received from your countrymen about the supply of Agricultural Machines and spare parts to the Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources, we have prepared to pay a commission to a worthy individual like yourself equal to 25% of the total sum transfered while 5% will be reserved for incidental expenses that both parties will incur in the course of actualizing this transaction and the balance of 70% will be kept for the Committee members.

    If you know you are capable of helping us actualize our life's dream, you should send to me immediately the details of your bank particulars or open a new account where we can transfer the money(US$35M)which you will hold in trust for us until we come over there for our own share.

    As soon as you open the account, send by e-mail to me immediately the details of the account viz: Name of bank, address, routing number, telex number, Account number, Tel and Fax number.You should also include the name of your company, your personal address, Tel and Fax numbers for further communication.

    Note that this transaction will be concluded within 10 working days from the day you give your consent.

    Sincerely yours,

    Worgee G. Shub
    Chairman of Disbursements,
    Corporate (Special) Trust Fund,
    United Political Parties of America,
    Contract Award Committee,
    Washington DC USA

    tel: 1-900-CON-4YOU

    NOTE THAT FOR THE CONFIDENTIALITY OF THIS TRANSACTION, WHEN YOU CALL ME THE FIRST THING YOU DO IS FOR YOU TO ASK ME WHAT IS THE CODE, AND MY RESPONSE WILL BE (055).IF I DO NOT TELL YOU (055) THEN KNOW YOU ARE NOT
    TALKING TO ME. DROP THE PHONE IMMEDIATELY AND CALL ME BACK TILL I GIVE YOU THE CODE WORD. THIS IS DUE TO JAMMING TELECOMMUNICATION DEVICES IN YOUR COUNTRY AS A RESULT OF THE BOMB EXPLOSION IN A LAGOS MILITARY BASE.

    (Thanks to RobLimo)

    --


    El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
    1. Re:For News Stories... by perky · · Score: 3, Informative
      scamorama for lots more amusing advance fee frauds.

      --
      "The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
  5. Solaris 9 on x86? by jscott · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It sure looks like it reads "Solaris 8 on Intel" to me.

    --
    signal, noise, to me it's all the same.
  6. Solaris 9 on x86? I don't think so... by Cutriss · · Score: 2

    From the website...

    "Which version of the Solaris Operating Environment would you prefer?
    Solaris 9 on SPARC(TM) platform, Solaris 8 on Intel

    --
    "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
    1. Re:Solaris 9 on x86? I don't think so... by Cutriss · · Score: 2

      Oh wait...Maybe it was a typo...

      From the confirmation page:
      "Thank You! You will receive your FREE copy of the Solaris 9 Operating Environment on a DVD (while quanitities last) and be contacted by our sales organization shortly."

      --
      "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
  7. Coincidence? by NickRob · · Score: 5, Funny

    6 Mozilla hackers missing.... 6 People arrested for the 'Nigerian' email.

    Juxtaposition saves the day.

  8. Prison Defense Fund by Kelerain · · Score: 2, Funny

    Six people were arrested in South Africa over the weekend on suspicion of being involved in the infamous 'Nigerian' e-mail and letter fraud, and they need your help! See they have a rich uncle who has some ill goten gains, and wants to give it to them for thier defense fun, but he cant do it legaly. If you would just let them use your bank account to launder they moeny they will give you 20%! just email inmates@prison.ng with your bank acount number and pin..

  9. /em holds hands *this* far apart by realgone · · Score: 4, Funny
    According to this, the world's first Xtender Xbox modchip preorders were shipped today

    Whoa, whoa, whoa there sonny. Did you say "Xtender"? You mean they're making the damned thing even bigger?

    *sigh* Someone save me a spot in line at IKEA; I'm gonna need a larger entertainment center.

    P.S. - I kid, I kid. I swear. I love my XBox. I'm actually dying to slot Morrowind in it... whenever that game gets around to releasing itself. =)

  10. "Revolution OS", not "Revolution codec"... by Papineau · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I juste tried to download the trailer of Revolution OS, and since I use Mozilla 1.0rc2 (yes, I know 1.0rc3 has been released) on Linux, I'm not able to view it. It seems to be offered in Real, Windows Media Player, Quicktime, and Flash(?, probably for surfing the site and not the actual film). So I'm not sure who's targetted by this... but I know I'm not able to view it easily (could fire up Mplayer, but still need a copy of the actual file). Not very good for a film of this nature.

    Anybody had more luck than me?

    1. Re:"Revolution OS", not "Revolution codec"... by Papineau · · Score: 2

      My point is they did a documentary on something, then market it to those same people (region free DVD, etc), but fail to address one of the needs of those same people by not allowing free software to play the trailer and/or the first 8 minutes. I was looking forward to maybe buy it, but since I can't see either the trailer nor the preview on the exact platform they based the movie on, I won't.

      An mpeg would be really difficult to produce... right?

    2. Re:"Revolution OS", not "Revolution codec"... by m3000 · · Score: 2

      Realplayer is avaliable for Linux. Get it here.

      And here are the direct links to the Real Player movies, since Mozilla just tells me to download the plugin and so I have to search through the source:

      Trailer

      First 8 Minutes

    3. Re:"Revolution OS", not "Revolution codec"... by rbeattie · · Score: 2


      Flash may be able to play the quicktime video. Apple is suing Sorenson for licensing the codec to Macromedia.

      But I have no idea if this is true or not, just a suposition.

      -Russ

      --
      Me
  11. Re:Surprised by cscx · · Score: 2, Funny

    I would have expected the scam to be run by some guy named Tony living in New Jersey that had set up a psuedo-corporation in Nigeria.

    I'd keep a lookout for newly-opening sanitation companies opening in Nigeria. Also be suspicious of the 4 stocky Italian guys meeting outside the pork store.

  12. Re:Will it be piracy to copy Staroffice after midn by Triskaidekaphobia · · Score: 4, Informative
    The EULA says


    1. License to Use. Sun grants to you a non-exclusive and
    non-transferable license for the internal use only of the
    accompanying software and documentation and any error
    corrections provided by Sun (collectively "Software"). You
    have no right to distribute the Software.


    so the answer is no.

    (This assumes the EULA hasn't changed since the time you didn't read it.
  13. Re:Linux vs. Solaris: sink or swim by kabir · · Score: 2

    Um.... Solaris has been available on Intel for quite a while now.

    Mind, it's not always been great (hence the nickname "Slowaris"), but it's been there.

    --
    Behold the Power of Cheese!
  14. Re:Linux vs. Solaris: sink or swim by Phork · · Score: 2

    umm, solaris and linux have ran on the same platforms for years. Solaris 7 was released for x86, and i think a version prior to that was also, and linux runs on almost all sun hardware.

    --
    -- free as in swatantryam - not soujanyam.
  15. Re:Surprised by Zurk · · Score: 2, Informative

    not only are they nigerians but they have authentic material including stamped and signed letters, P.O's, contracts and other stuff. check out the pictures and read thru the stories here :
    http://www.waronspam.com/cases/ibrahim/ibrahim. htm
    http://thespamletters.com/letter.php?spamID=1 01&so rtBy=da&start=0&search=Nigerian

  16. StarOffice no longer free after Wednesday??? by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 2, Funny


    See you guys later, I'm off to download at least hundred copies of it.

  17. Re:Correction: Solaris 9 on Intel by rvr · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Well, something funny going on - the site I went to (see.sun.com/cgi-bin/gx.cgi/mcp?q=STNdTTEqcdpGc)
    which says:

    Which version of the new Solaris 9 Operating Environment would you prefer?
    SPARC(TM) platform
    Intel

    But when I submitted the page I got this msg:

    The following required questions were left blank:
    * Which version of the Solaris Operating Environment would you prefer?

    Please fill out all of the required fields and re-submit.

    And of course it was *not* blank. And when I went back - i didn't have the option for Solaris 9 but then it was " Solaris 8 on Intel". Guess you gotta be quick...
  18. Tsk. Tsk. Tim.... by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 2

    potlatch-is-the-way-to-eat

    If you are still in Knoxville, then it is a "pot luck." And, by Gawd, any carbonated drink is a Coke irregardless of flavor or manufacturer.

    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
    1. Re:Tsk. Tsk. Tim.... by caca_phony · · Score: 2, Interesting
      potlatch-is-the-way-to-eat

      If you are still in Knoxville, then it is a "pot luck." And, by Gawd, any carbonated drink is a Coke irregardless of flavor or manufacturer.

      Don't mean to be a nerd, but a potlatch was an orgy of a social festival from what is now the Pacific Northwest USA / Southwest CA in which the chieftan who gave away the most stuff to his opponents and killed the most of his own slaves was officially the most important chief for the next year. Sounds like quite the party to me, they probably ate better during the potlatch than otherwise.

      --
      ...and this lie crawls out of its mouth: 'I, the state, am the people.'
    2. Re:Tsk. Tsk. Tim.... by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 2

      Interesting. And would probably be quite an acceptible party here in Knoxville.

      --
      Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
    3. Re:Tsk. Tsk. Tim.... by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 2

      So are "ain't", "you'uns" and "nabs." Irrespective of the fact that irregardless is bad usage, usage rules, and the practice of pointing them out, are for the particulary Pecksniffian. This is not unlike the odd fallacy monger who tosses out post hoc, ergo propter hoc whenever someone mentions the time.

      --
      Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
  19. Solaris, the film. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 3, Informative

    Coincidentally, the book "Solaris" by Stansislas Lem is being made into a film (for the second time, first time around was by the brilliant, late Andrei Tarkovsky) by Steven Soderbergh. And that's what I thought this slashback was about, at first glance. Oops.

    1. Re:Solaris, the film. by Cryptnotic · · Score: 2
      Andrei Tarkovsky's Solaris is an amazing film, by the way, for the 99.999% of you who haven't seen it.

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    2. Re:Solaris, the film. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2

      I think it's a good but flawed film. Tarkovsky for his own part didn't like it - he made the movie to make the Powers That Be happy, but he wasn't fond of the film. Stalker is a better movie. However, the original story by Lem is a great novel, and I believe Soderbergh, with his sensitivity to the contradictions and conflicts in human relationships and the poignancy of regret, will do it justice.

    3. Re:Solaris, the film. by Cryptnotic · · Score: 2
      Overrated? Do people rate it enough for it to be considered overrated?

      The film is interesting because it is a very "heady" sci-film. It is a film in which takes place far into the future and in futuristic settings, but portrays its characters as being conventional humans. There were no special effects at all used in the making of the film. But it still captures all of the confusion and complexity associated with sci-fi.

      The only other film I can think of right now with a similar feel is Jean-Luc Godard's "Alphaville". Wait, that's not true, there is also David Cronenberg's "eXistenZ", another excellent heady sci-fi film.

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    4. Re:Solaris, the film. by Chasuk · · Score: 2

      This isn't a flame or a troll or a personal attack, but I do have to ask you this question:

      Why would you watch a film three times that you consider overrated?!?

    5. Re:Solaris, the film. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2
      Well, see, now you're just asking for trouble. I'd place the adventures of Lemmy C. ahead of Solyaris, should push come to shove.

      Thanks!

      Responding to your parent poster, there are those of us who like cerebral films who find Solyaris flawed as a cerebral film - and the director himself was one of them. Again, Stalker is far better. Solyaris loses focus, it does get tedious (and I like good slow films - I like Tarkvosky, I liked Gattaca). It was made partially as a sort of cinematic space-race to show that the Soviet film industry could produce a 2001. Alphaville is an infintely better film - daring, innovative, funny, a little absurd, avant-garde yet still citing tradition film narrative techniques, ahead of its time, and the quirky plot was completely redeemed by the lack of affect of thein the last scene - great Verfremdungseffekt.

      I think Cronenberg as an auteur is better than most of his works. Dead Ringers is his best movie - I like eXistenZ, but it wasn't half as clever as it liked to think it was. Actually, I've always thought Naked Lunch got a bum rap, and was a better film than a lot of people gave it credit for.

    6. Re:Solaris, the film. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2

      Tarkovsky is important. His failures are more illuminating than George Lucas' successes.

  20. Re:Surprised by Zeinfeld · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I'm actually surprised that any of them were really Nigerian. I would have expected the scam to be run by some guy named Tony living in New Jersey that had set up a psuedo-corporation in Nigeria.

    The info I got on the scam was that there is a definite Nigerian connection. A number of people duped in the scheme have gone off to meet people in Nigeria, some have disappeared entirely.

    Scams of that sort are much easier to conduct in a country where laws are not exactly diligently enforced so Nigeria would be a much more likely base than the US. Compared to the Nigerian mafia Tony Soprano is a real small time player, all he has is a garbage business and a strip joint, in Nigeria they run the country.

    --
    Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
    Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  21. StarOffice Free by grahamsz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    StarOffice may no longer be free but Open Office will remain free.

    I think this is part of some master plan to conquer the problem of corporations who dont like free software because nobody is acountable.

    Seems like a win-win situation - we get openoffice, corps get staroffice, microsoft get less sales.

  22. "Whoops." by The+Pi-Guy · · Score: 2, Funny

    HUH?? I coulda sworn when I ordered, it was S9. I already got S8 - "Anyone want a free S9 DVD?"

    (a very humble) Pi

  23. Umm. by mindstrm · · Score: 3, Informative

    Solaris has been running on the x86 since before linux existed.

    1. Re:Umm. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

      Wow. Nitpick or what.

      I should have said "The Unix operating system that Sun Microsystems Inc. Produces" and you would have been happy.

      So they changed the name for marketing reasons. Whee.

      Yes, I know that there were other changes as well.

  24. I know it's probably been tried by GigsVT · · Score: 2, Informative

    But has anyone tried to reach Dr. Wang (heh heh) at jiwei@taralnetworks.com?

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  25. "Uncle George" by pgrote · · Score: 3, Funny

    Died last year. He left the still to me and the pickup to my sister.

    Ma got the coffee makers while Pa got the coon hound.

  26. Conspiracy's all around... by ebbomega · · Score: 2

    Meanwhile, Six hackers uncovered in a fraud scheme in Nigeria are apparently needed for Mozilla to be able to relicense its product....

    17 more and this would be one HELL of a conspiracy theory...

    --
    Karma: Non-Heinous
    1. Re:Conspiracy's all around... by Glytch · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's close enough. There are only five proper names on that list, and "Uncle George" is obviously a code word for George Dorn.

  27. Region-free: bad tactical idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It would be better if they released it for region 2 only instead, at least for a while. People could then complain to them about how they can't view it in the USA. Then, they could make an official statement that they as the copyright holders do not mind if viewers in region 1 use any other player or process (including DeCSS) to play their own legitimately purchased DVDs.

    Voilla! Now DeCSS has substantial non-infringing uses and since they have the explicit authorization of the copyright-holder, the DMCA can no longer be used against it.

    Sure, it might cost them a few sales at the beginning. But the free press would more than make up for it when they quietly release region 1 disks a few months later.

  28. Qt, rosegarden, etc. by bcrowell · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Some random thoughts and questions about the Qt-Gtkmm debate:
    1. Qt turns me off because you can't do cross-platform without paying big licensing fees. GTK turns me off because in the only examples I've seen, the code just looked like an untracked wilderness: hundreds and hundreds of unreadable toolkit calls, one after the next. I like Perl/Tk, but it doesn't make a nice double-clickable GUI. Are there better alternatives? How do people like wxWindows?
    2. This is kinda OT, but since a bunch of the article used Rosegarden as an example, I'm curious: does anyone have comments on Rosegarden as opposed to GNU Lilypond?
    3. I've been using Unix more or less continuously for 20 years, but I've only started using Linux within the fast few months, and although my impression is pretty favorable overall, I'm shocked at how hard it is to install applications, partly because of how the use shared libraries, and all the hassles associated with having the wrong version of the libraries, having them in the wrong place, etc. This seems to be an argument in favor of Qt, since it has more built in, so there's less need to link in a lot of extra crap. The article is all about the programmer's point of view, but does it actually help from the user's point of view?
    1. Re:Qt, rosegarden, etc. by Yohahn · · Score: 2

      You don't want to compare lilypond to rosegarden.

      Perhaps you could compare Denemo, for a gtk vs. qt kinda thing (denemo is further behind).

      Denemo is focused on typesetting though. Staffs are just one of the things rosegarden can do.

      All that said, I like gtk+, but notice qt audio apps getting ahead of gtk ones (with the very significant exception of Ardour

      Ardour is only half done, but it rocks!

    2. Re:Qt, rosegarden, etc. by dvdeug · · Score: 2

      I'm shocked at how hard it is to install applications, partly because of how the use shared libraries, and all the hassles associated with having the wrong version of the libraries, having them in the wrong place, etc.

      What distribution are you using? I use Debian, wherein apt just downloads whatever versions of the various libraries I need along with the program. Whenever this comes up, RPM people claim their various systems use apt or some other system to solve the problem just as elegantly.

      What are you doing on Linux that you weren't doing on Unix? As far as I can tell, the same problems should pop up with add-on packages and Unix.

    3. Re:Qt, rosegarden, etc. by Arandir · · Score: 2

      Crossplatform licensing fees: Yeah, it's a bitch. Are you writing Free Software? If so, it doesn't matter much, because qt-win32 is free beer. Are you writing proprietary software? If so, how can you expect your users to pay for your software if you don't want to pay for Trolltech's?

      It would be fantastic if there were QPL/GPL versions of Qt for Windows and Mac. It would also be fantastic if I got a 25% raise. But I don't expect either to happen tomorrow.

      Shared libraries: I'm not sure I understand your concern. Shared libraries may be relatively new to Unix, but all modern unices (except some embedded ones) have them. You problems with Linux are going to be identical under Solaris, AIX, HPUX, etc. Try installing Gnome from scratch under IRIX without going mad...

      But perhaps you're using a distro/OS that's a bit too rigid when it comes to package management. My suggestion would be to try Debian or FreeBSD.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    4. Re:Qt, rosegarden, etc. by WWWWolf · · Score: 2
      This is kinda OT, but since a bunch of the article used Rosegarden as an example, I'm curious: does anyone have comments on Rosegarden as opposed to GNU Lilypond?

      Rosegarden is a music sequencer/notation thing. It works in X11. It can export to variety of typesetting formats.

      Lilypond is, on the other hand, just a music typesetting system - but it can, if so desired, also produce MIDI files.

      Rosegarden's weakness is that it lets you actually put notes on staves (click click!) and export to MIDI beautifully, but it doesn't really do adequeate job at typesetting.

      Lilypond's weakness is that it doesn't have a GUI - it just reads text file and produces a DVI file through TeX (than can then be dvips'ed or dvipdf'ed). However, the textual format brings its advantages, such as that it's mostly human-readable =)

      I'm not a professional musician, or even an amateur one (I don't have a Vast Knowledge of the music theory, and the only instrument I can play well is my throat - hey, wolves are supposed to know how to sing =) but I found that using Rosegarden to notate, then midi2ly'ing and editing the produced source, is a wonderful way of making beautiful expressions of melody - and it's immediately fit to be included in E2.

      PS. GTK+ isn't so bad - especially with Glade. I use Glade with Perl, and it just rocks - The thing produces the GUI (bare GTK+ or with GNOME), all I need to provide are the signal handler functions... The reason GTK+ looks cryptic is that C wasn't really designed for OO and some macros are required =)

    5. Re:Qt, rosegarden, etc. by bcrowell · · Score: 2
      Are you writing Free Software? If so, it doesn't matter much, because qt-win32 is free beer
      Huh? I checked pretty recently, and the only Qt I saw that was free as in anything was Linux. Both the Windows version and the Mac version are $1000 licenses. Has this changed within the last month? Did I miss something on Trolltech's web page?

      It would be fantastic if there were QPL/GPL versions of Qt for Windows and Mac.
      It is fantastic that there's a GPL'd version of GTK for Windos.

      You problems with Linux are going to be identical under Solaris, AIX, HPUX, etc. Try installing Gnome from scratch under IRIX without going mad...
      Well, let's compare with the OS that constitutes 90% of the desktop Unix market: MacOS X. To install a MacOS X app: (1) drag it to the Applications folder, (2) double-click on it. That's the way it should be. The heavy use of shared libraries in Linux is just one of the many design decisions that makes it too hard to use for most desktop users.

    6. Re:Qt, rosegarden, etc. by HydroCarbon10 · · Score: 2

      Well, let's compare with the OS that constitutes 90% of the desktop Unix market: MacOS X. To install a MacOS X app: (1) drag it to the Applications folder, (2) double-click on it. That's the way it should be. The heavy use of shared libraries in Linux is just one of the many design decisions that makes it too hard to use for most desktop users.


      No, the heavy use of shared libraries that break binary compatibility between every freakin' release makes it too hard to use for most desktop users.

      --
      The best way to accelerate a windows box is at 9.8 meters per second square.
    7. Re:Qt, rosegarden, etc. by Arandir · · Score: 2

      1) There is a "free beer" non-commercial Qt for Windows. You must release your code as Open Source, but you don't have to pay for it, and it's fully operational. The only difference I've seen between it and the "real" version is that it sticks a "Freeware" in the title bar.

      2) Maybe the Windoze GTK has improved, but the last time I used a WinGTK application it stuck out like a sore thumb. It rather resembled a Unix app ported to Windows (duh!) rather than a native app. That's not what you want for a crossplatform toolkit.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  29. How fight the Nigerian Spammers by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is a denial of service attack on the spammers:

    If you get a lot of the Nigerian spam, here's a cute way to fight them. All it takes is two or more spams. Set your email client to forge the address of the first spammer and use that to reply to the second spammer, then switch addresses and reply to the first spammer. Make the replies good, but not identical. Tell them how excited/honor/glad/etc you are to help them in their important/meaningful/lucrative venture.

    You will never see the result of this, but you can count on each spammer trying real hard to con the other spammer for at least a couple of messages back and forth (these guys really are tenacious, I've been baiting them regularly and sometimes they just don't give up unless you out and out call them con men).

    This attack wastes there time and energy on their like-minded fellow con-men rather than on the suckers that are their true marks. If even 10% of the people who got Nigerian spam did something like this, they would be overwhelmed and crushed by the weight of their own greed.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  30. Re:Surprised by rgmoore · · Score: 3, Informative

    You might be surprised at which schools are not accredited. Accreditation is most useful for schools without great reputations. After all, everyone knows about Harvard, Stanford, MIT, Caltech, and similarly presigious places. They know that those schools aren't just handing out degrees to anyone with a big enough stack of cash, so who cares what some agency says? Some of those schools, though, might not want to do everything that whatever accrediting group claims is important, so they may give up formal accreditation to maintain their academic independence. In fact, when I got my degree, Caltech was not accredited as an institution for exactly that reason. Individual departments and programs were accredited by appropriate professional groups, but not the school as a whole.

    OTOH, the average man on the street has probably never heard of Backwater State and doesn't know if they have a real program there or not. The only thing they have to go on is what the accrediting agencies say. If they want anyone to take their degrees seriously, they need the accreditation.

    --

    There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.

  31. Re:Linux vs. Solaris: sink or swim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    Solaris 7 was released for x86, and i think a version prior to that was also

    Yes, there was. Nine years ago this month (May 1993), Solaris 2.1 for x86 was released. Interestingly, x86 support was apparently dropped after that and didn't reappear until Solaris 2.4.

    The releases of Solaris that have existed are 2.0, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 2.5.1, 2.6, 7, 8, and (now) 9. Of these, 2.1, 2.4. 2.5, 2.5.1, 2.6, 7, and 8 have been available for Intel. 2.5.1 (and maybe 2.5?) was available for PowerPC as well. And Sun was the very first vendor to announce they had an operating system (that would be Solaris) running on an Itanium simulator. BTW, more Solaris version info can be found by going to google.com, typing in "Solaris FAQ", and hitting the "I'm Feeling Lucky" button.

    Also, as long as I'm clearing things up, Sun's statement about Solaris 9 and Intel availability was fairly ambiguous. Essentially, it said that when Solaris 9 was released, there wouldn't be a version for Intel. But Sun releases updates about every quarter, and it wasn't really said AFAIK that one of those wouldn't have Intel support. Probably it won't happen, but I'm just trying to say that "we will make the Intel version a lower priority and release it at our leisure" may be a valid interpretation of Sun's statements.

  32. App server bundled with Solaris 9 by (H)elix1 · · Score: 2
    Damn... I could have swore it said (_) sparc (_) intel when I did my order earlier today. No mention of version 8.

    Anyhow, one of the reasons I was excited about trying rev 9 on x86 is Sun is bundling a J2EE app server with Solaris 9. Yes, I could use Jboss - but if Sun released something that even comes close to what I can do with Weblogic and it is free - I can use it for personal use. Alas, no x86 rev9.... No bundled app server.... Not quite sure what is going to be part of the Platform Edition, but it looks interesting...

    • The Platform Edition of the Sun ONE Application Server is integrated into the Solaris 9 OE. The licensing terms are for NO COST, evaluation, development and deployment of this J2EE 1.3 compliant application server. The license allows a single administration server for each application server instance, which means that centralized management of multiple application servers is not provided with this product.

  33. Xtender will not play back any region DVD by Namarrgon · · Score: 3, Informative
    "It's also supposed to play any DVD, regardless of region."

    Actually, that's incorrect. According to the table here, and similar info elsewhere, it will reset the region code that the DVD dongle writes to your Xbox, but you still require dongles from different regions to play import DVDs. Playback of any region DVDs may require modding the dongle, not just the Xbox itself.

    However, the mod will of course allow you to play import games (great for me - if I move back to Australia, I'd prefer to take my Xbox & games with me, rather than selling the lot & buying it all over again in a new region).

    Even more interesting, it will allow the Xbox to run unsigned code. This opens up the box completely to developers - for example, an ISO has already been released to switch the Xbox between PAL & NTSC (excellent :-) and the Enigmah-X group are rumoured to be working on a DivX player. Add an Ethernet-streaming MP3 player to that & you have a very versatile entertainment appliance. Not to mention that it'll give the Xbox Linux Project a huge boost, and may even make that old MAME port useful :-)

    This could give Xbox sales a significant boost. I'm sure Microsoft would be delighted - if they were actually making money on each sale.

    --
    Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
  34. Gtk alternatives to Gtk by Ilan+Volow · · Score: 2

    Assuming the only GTK code you've seen is the C code (which I agree looks incredibly rowdy) you might want to have a look at the Gtk-Perl or PyGtk. I've used both and they make writing gnome/gtk applications tolerable. Also, learn how to use the Glade feature of Gtk. You design your interface in the Glade wyswyg UI editor, which generates an xml file describing the layout of the interface. You can have any number of scripting languages with Gtk bindings (Perl, Python, Ruby etc) at runtime load up the Glade xml file to build the GUI. Once you get Glade under your belt you'll be surprised how amazingly fast you can bang out workable GUI program.

    --
    Ergonomica Auctorita Illico!
  35. Revolution OS on DVD by ncc74656 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I just checked the website, and the only mention of DVD availability is this page where you can tell them you're interested. A Google search turned up this page on why it's not on DVD already.

    As for the possibility that the DVD will be region-free, I was at the screening in Pasadena three weeks ago. J.T.S. Moore did a little Q&A at the end of the film; in response to a question, he did mention that a region-free, CSS-free release is a possibility that's being considered. From what I gathered, the decision isn't yet final. I also gathered that he doesn't have much love for the movie cartel. Neither the movie site nor iFilm mentioned specific release dates or prices.

    (If it becomes available, I'd buy it. I liked it, and I'm not the open-source zealot that some people around here are (I tend to use whatever's appropriate for the task at hand). If a large enough number of copies get sold and it doesn't turn up on Gnutella, maybe it'll be a small lesson to the movie cartel about treating your customers right.)

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  36. Re:What is Solaris? by wwwillem · · Score: 2, Informative

    Does this "Solaris" support Beowulf clustering?

    Solaris supports either Sun Cluster for high-availability purposes. Or for HPC, you can use Sun Grid computing. And, compared to Linux, Solaris scales to a much higher amount of CPUs "within the box".

    So to answer your question, no it doesn't do Beowulf, but there are many, many other ways to scale your system.

    --
    Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
  37. Re:Qt by Arandir · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I like feeding trolls, so sue me...

    You are right that Qt and GTK+ are divided along language lines. For the most part, those who prefer C prefer GTK+ while those who prefer C++ prefer Qt. User interfaces are naturally object oriented, so in my opinion it makes sense to use a language that does OO well, like C++. Thus, everything else being equal, Qt is the better choice for writing GUI applications. Yes, I know you can do OO in C. So what? You can do OO in assembly, but I don't know anyone who does.

    Okay, to the meat of the issue: the best and most advanced apps. Since most old time Unix hackers are C fanatics, they tend to use GTK+. But that doesn't rule out the multitude of fantastic advanced applications for Qt such as KOffice, KDevelop, Doxygen, QCad, etc.

    --
    A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  38. Re:Surprised by arivanov · · Score: 2
    Sifting through the headers of the 419's I have received over the last several months:
    • one was from Nigeria
    • one from Belgium
    • five or so was from US, mostly East Coast and MidWest
    • Rest was from South Africa

    In the nigerian case I tried (with some success) to persuade the upstream ISP to act as per their AUP. In other words consider it as SPAM and disconnect them to hell and gone.

    In all SA, US and BE cases I have asked the ISP in question to try to both apply their AUP and contact the local law enforcement. To the extent of my knowledge the law was got involved only in one of the SA cases. The US law ISPs usually drop the ball in these cases.

    No wonder that the number of these SCAMs we all get in our mailbox steadily increases. If the ISPs were doing the right thing (TM) this would not have been a profitable business. Too high risk levels.

    --
    Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
    http://www.sigsegv.cx/
  39. Damn! by david.given · · Score: 2

    What with 'Film, Solaris', I thought the post was going to be talking about a certain obscure Russian science-fiction movie...