Slashdot Mirror


Mathematical Lego Sculptures

Daedalus_ writes "Some guy has created mathematical surfaces (mobius strips, klein bottles, etc) out of Legos. He also has some other interesting creations (such as Dilbert figurines and a Hoberman Sphere)."

185 comments

  1. Can he make... by cardshark2001 · · Score: 1

    One of those snakey thingeys that have all those sections you twist go back into the container?

    I could NEVER figure that out.

    --
    WWJD? JWRTFA!
    1. Re:Can he make... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did :P

    2. Re:Can he make... by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 2

      You mean these ?

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
    3. Re:Can he make... by inka9983 · · Score: 1

      Do you mean the Palindrome bottles? They're on that web page.

  2. Not married by ObviousGuy · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
  3. Does this mean... by URoRRuRRR · · Score: 1

    Does this mean that the lego representation of a surface integral is not far behind?

    --
    "Oh no, 3 horny women and only 2 condoms...Thank god I read slashdot"
    1. Re:Does this mean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone needs to write a LegoCAD plugin for MathCAD or Mathematica.

    2. Re:Does this mean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, take your pick. Gimme a function... It's been a while since multivariable calc. Just don't do one of those damn strange triple integrals.

    3. Re:Does this mean... by kingkade · · Score: 1

      fubinis' theorem...ahhhh :)

  4. Looks like Slashdot has eaten my link by ObviousGuy · · Score: 1

    Here's the un-hrefed link.

    http://www.lipsons.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/index.ht m

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:Looks like Slashdot has eaten my link by rehannan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Be sure to include the "http://" for the link to work properly. It should look like this:

      <a href="http://www.lipsons.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/inde x.htm">some text</a>

      My apologies if you already knew this and just forgot... :)

    2. Re:Looks like Slashdot has eaten my link by ObviousGuy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Try it for yourself. Slashdot has eaten the link.

      Note that all the periods have been removed as well.

      --
      I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    3. Re:Looks like Slashdot has eaten my link by rehannan · · Score: 1

      Huh, I didn't notice the period bit. I wasn't able to recreate the problem. Maybe you live inside a slashdot vortex or something...?

    4. Re:Looks like Slashdot has eaten my link by ObviousGuy · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I just tried it out again and the problem appears to be fixed. With all those periods and slashes in there, the new anti-page widening code must have thought it to be malicious code.

      --
      I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    5. Re:Looks like Slashdot has eaten my link by Juhaa · · Score: 1

      Same thing happend to me earlier today, even when I pressed preview, all I got was garbled links, till I scratched that comment posting and posted a new comment. I think there is something wrong with the comment posting section of the slash code (in particular the html filters), could someone verify this.

    6. Re:Looks like Slashdot has eaten my link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Verified

      This happens when lameness filters are run through comment posting, all the '.' are removed from the URL, and so is any slash, this problem has been sent as a bug to slash.

      Thank you.

      Eric

  5. Holy crap! by TheCyko1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Lego people can walk sideways on buildings?? We must make them our leaders!

    --
    This message was brought to you by the death of 30 brain cells.
    1. Re:Holy crap! by cdtoad · · Score: 5, Funny

      THEY'RE NOT LEGO PEOPLE! The polically correct term is "MiniFig". Please refer to them as such since "Lego People" is a demoralizing term.

      --
      when they ban enctryption only criminals wi$21*J *#JF$%!@#$':
    2. Re:Holy crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure they don't prefer "miniature people with no genitalia"?

    3. Re:Holy crap! by Ig0r · · Score: 1
      --
      Soma: because a gramme is better than a damn.
    4. Re:Holy crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The politically correct term is "lego-american"

    5. Re:Holy crap! by swaic · · Score: 1


      What the *#JF$%!@#$ is 'enctryption'? :)

    6. Re:Holy crap! by netsharc · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of where I used to work (a McDonald's Kitchen, actually), there was a girl whose last name was Flego, and she was being a bitch one day. She was a bit flat-chested, so a guy started making fun of her, saying out loud to the others "Anyone here know Legos? Those are cool toys. But the Lego people, the girls have no tits, you know.".

      It worked and got her a bit upset, it was funny.. :o

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
  6. And the conjugate... by digitalhermit · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Creating legos out of mathematical surfaces... (Use POVRay to render this :D).

    #include "colors.inc"
    #include "textures.inc"
    #include "metals.inc"

    camera {
    location
    look_at
    }

    plane { , -1
    pigment {
    checker color Red, color Blue
    }
    }

    light_source { color White} // example of object unions

    #declare lego=union {
    box {
    ,

    }

    #declare cyl1=cylinder {
    , .5
    }

    object { cyl1 }
    object { cyl1 translate }
    object { cyl1 translate }
    object { cyl1 translate }
    object { cyl1 translate }
    object { cyl1 translate }

    texture { Glossy
    pigment { Red }
    }

    }

    object { lego }
    object { lego
    translate
    rotate 20*y
    }

    1. Re:And the conjugate... by digitalhermit · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Let's try this again...

      #include "colors.inc"
      #include "textures.inc"
      #include "metals.inc"

      camera {
      location < 0, 8, -8 >
      look_at < 0, 1, 2 >
      }

      plane { <0, 1, 0>, -1
      pigment {
      checker color Red, color Blue
      }
      }

      light_source { <2, 4, -3> color White} // example of object unions

      #declare lego=union {
      box {
      <6, 0, 0>,
      <0, 2, 4>
      }

      #declare cyl1=cylinder {
      <1, 0, 1>,
      <1, 2.5, 1> .5
      }

      object { cyl1 }
      object { cyl1 translate < 2, 0, 0> }
      object { cyl1 translate < 4, 0, 0> }
      object { cyl1 translate < 0, 0, 2> }
      object { cyl1 translate < 2, 0, 2> }
      object { cyl1 translate < 4, 0, 2> }

      texture { Glossy
      pigment { Red }
      }

      }

      object { lego }
      object { lego
      translate < -6, 0, 5 >
      rotate 20*y
      }

    2. Re:And the conjugate... by Wiseazz · · Score: 1

      Yep... that works better :)

      --
      My sig sucks.
    3. Re:And the conjugate... by vectra14 · · Score: 2

      in case anyone is wondering, this is POVRay code... i think.

      (dont have POVray installed right now, can someone tell me what this looks like?)

    4. Re:And the conjugate... by boneshintai · · Score: 1

      A pair of red lego blocks on a sadisticly-tinted red/blue checkerboard plane. I'd post the image, but anywhere I COULD post it would die a horrible death. Render it yourself.

    5. Re:And the conjugate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You lucky bastard... double the karma for a double post!

    6. Re:And the conjugate... by big_hairy_mama · · Score: 2, Funny

      Quoth the parent's parent: Use POVRay to render this :D

      Quoth the parent: in case anyone is wondering, this is POVRay code... i think.

      ObviousMan apparently has an alias: Vectra "duh" Fourteen.

  7. Figure Eight Knot by abigor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That is totally amazing. And for what it's worth, I think it's a worthwhile use of his time (not that my opinion on how someone uses their time matters, but whatever). I don't know, to me for some reason non-trivial acts of creation like this seem to touch whatever it is to be human -- our creative endowment is one of our signature traits, I think. What impulse would drive this sort of creative urge, to create beautiful mathematical shapes out of Lego, of all things? Whatever it is, it's mysterious, and it wasn't a waste of time. That figure eight knot is incredible.

    1. Re:Figure Eight Knot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see you have not learnt any manners whilst I've been away.

      You are still the same ill mannered little toe wrag studying at a jumped up Polytechnic north of London who knows so much because he sells goods to people and uses Daddy's money to surf the Net.

      Get some manners, experience, knowledge and do something in life before mocking your betters.

      As I've told you before, you know nowt, have experienced less and you have little to say that is relevant, informative or accurate.

    2. Re:Figure Eight Knot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i wish people would stop doing this...their ability to put so much time and intelligence into creating beauty makes me feel both worthless and lazy =) ...cato

    3. Re:Figure Eight Knot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats why theres a lot of violence and unhappiness - people are guilty about the fact that all they generally do is break things and fuck other stuff up.

  8. Wow.... by RaboKrabekian · · Score: 5, Funny

    Very, very cool.

    Now show me a hypercube and I'll be really impressed.

    --
    "Moderate drinking can help prevent amputated limbs" -- Abigail Zuger, NYTimes, 12/31/02
    1. Re:Wow.... by Medevo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Only way humans can view a hypercube (a 4d cube) is using 3D representation. The basic idea behind this is similar to how we can make 3d looking things on our 2d monitors. Since humans find it next to impossible to visualize hypercubes, we would need to program a computer with enough knowledge of 3d and 4d shapes (and how to represent them).

      Even if we did this the BEST way to view a hypercube would be either to go to the 4th dimension to look at one, or have a creature from the 4th dimension come here and make a 3d representation of on.

      Don't think this is happening anytime soon.

      Medevo

    2. Re:Wow.... by RaboKrabekian · · Score: 1

      Yes, I know - I was making a joke.

      --
      "Moderate drinking can help prevent amputated limbs" -- Abigail Zuger, NYTimes, 12/31/02
    3. Re:Wow.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      or you could just run xlock -mode hyper.

    4. Re:Wow.... by Hollinger · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's easy. Take a 4-cube. Pass it through 3-space, and what you'll see is an infinitely small cube at the point in the center of the 4-cube which will then grow to the cross-sectional size of the 4-cube, and shrink back down. Not too hard to wrap your head around. Tesseracts are a totally different matter...

    5. Re:Wow.... by NaDrew · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I was hoping to see a Calabi-Yau space, myself. How many 1x3's would that take?

      --
      Vista:XPSP2::ME:98SE
    6. Re:Wow.... by Cuthalion · · Score: 2

      That doesn't stop him from building a klein bottle and so on.

      --
      Trees can't go dancing
      So do them a big favor
      Pretend dancing stinks!
    7. Re:Wow.... by ErfC · · Score: 5, Informative
      That's easy. Take a 4-cube. Pass it through 3-space, and what you'll see is an infinitely small cube at the point in the center of the 4-cube which will then grow to the cross-sectional size of the 4-cube, and shrink back down. Not too hard to wrap your head around. Tesseracts are a totally different matter...

      I disagree. That nicely describes what happens with a sphere, but not so much with a cube.

      I guess it depends on how it's passing through 3-space. The best way to imagine this stuff is to imagine a 3-D object passing through 2-space. If you pass the cube through corner first, you'll get something like what you describe, except the cross sections will be triangular most of the time. Edge on, you'll get rectangles.

      Face-on, your 2-space will see nothing until the 3-cube hits it, then the 2-space will see a square just sitting there until the 3-cube is all the way through.

      What's the difference between a tesseract and a 4-cube? According to Eric Weisstein, it seems they're the same thing.

      --

      -Erf C.
      Cthulu always calls collect...

    8. Re:Wow.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is the curse of geeks everywhere - we know so much, that we can kill any joke, just by saying "Well, actually it works like this... (making a sketch on the back of an envelope)" and people around you roll their eyes and sigh. :)

    9. Re:Wow.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it did stop him, in the sense that he hasnt made one.

    10. Re:Wow.... by Hollinger · · Score: 2

      You know, you're perfectly correct. I defer to you. You know, it's too bad you can't append old posts...

    11. Re:Wow.... by irving47 · · Score: 1

      If he did construct a hypercube, he'd probably spontaneously transcend to a higher plane of existance as soon as he put the last brick in place.

      --
      I had a sucky sig.
    12. Re:Wow.... by daniel_mcl · · Score: 1

      If you want to view a hypercube, it's actually pretty easy. First of all, consider the corners of the unit hypercube: (0,0,0,0), (0,0,0,1), (0,0,1,0), (0,0,1,1), (0,1,0,0), (0,1,0,1), (0,1,1,0), (0,1,1,1), (1,0,0,0), (1,0,0,1), (1,0,1,0), (1,0,1,1), (1,1,0,0), (1,1,0,1), (1,1,1,0), and (1,1,1,1). Then in order to see all the possible projections, just rotate it around the w axis, project into three-space, then put the resulting 3d figure into OpenGL and rotate around the x, y, and z axes on screen.

      Rotations are done in 4d much like in 3d -- A rotation can be expressed as a linear transformation, and rotations and reflections are uniquely represented as matrices for which transpose(A) = inverse(A), whether A is 2x2 or 7x7.
      If there's enough demand, I suppose I could write such a program, but I'd have to learn OpenGL first.

      --
      I used to read Caltizzle. I was a lot cooler than you.
    13. Re:Wow.... by Mr.+McGibby · · Score: 1

      He wants to see one made out of LEGO, bonehead.

      --
      Mad Software: Rantings on Developing So
    14. Re:Wow.... by ErfC · · Score: 2

      Cool. Makes sense. Is that how the "tesseract" xscreensaver hack works, or does that do something else? It'd be cool to see it in something besides wireframe, though. If you did it for xscreensaver, I bet they'd start distributing it.

      --

      -Erf C.
      Cthulu always calls collect...

    15. Re:Wow.... by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 2
      he'd probably spontaneously transcend to a higher plane of existance

      ...where the sky is a hyperintelligent shade of blue, no doubt.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
  9. Other lego sculpture sites by Juhaa · · Score: 5, Informative

    I love Andrew Lipson's Math site, thought it was on slashdot for a while. If you like to see other such sites check out Eric Harshbarge's Lego page (cool stuff like wedding cakes and skyscrapers), Henry Lim's totally awsome lego sculptures, he's even got Natalie Portman (Not naked, and next to the petrified beethovan). BTW, Eric's got a very interesting page on on San Mononoke (more on those).

    1. Re:Other lego sculpture sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That DMS link is too funny... It goatse.cx, but it's funny as hell.

  10. The Plural of Lego is, um, Lego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Much like fish or sheep.

    1. Re:The Plural of Lego is, um, Lego by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      (* The Plural of Lego is, um, Lego.... Much like fish or sheep. *)

      You mean I have to take "fishies" and "sheeps" off of my resume?

      That could explain the lack of responses.

    2. Re:The Plural of Lego is, um, Lego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually fishes is correct if you are referring to a group of fish consisting of more than one species.

  11. Microserfs by taloobie · · Score: 1

    Wait a second, isn't this idea very very close to the Oop! idea in Douglas Coupland's "Microserfs"?

  12. actually by Catskul · · Score: 3, Funny


    Actually, he mentions building something to amuse his 5 year old son,
    so I imagine that he IS married...

    He must have a very patient wife : )

    --

    Im not here now... Im out KILLING pepperoni
    1. Re:actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Actually, he mentions building something to amuse
      > his 5 year old son, so I imagine that he IS
      > married...

      Because everyone who has a child is married...

    2. Re:actually by The_dev0 · · Score: 1

      Doesn't he mention how much his wife likes his Dilbert models?

      --
      Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
    3. Re:actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I'm married. And yes, she's very patient.

      (posted by the anonymous coward who made the mathematical lego sculptures)

  13. What would be impressive is.... by warpSpeed · · Score: 2

    I would be impressed with a Dyson Sphere out of legos. That would be cool.
    And you could have a little Scotty Lego charachter next to a crashed shuttle craft on the surface.

    1. Re:What would be impressive is.... by Russ+Steffen · · Score: 1

      What do you mean "little"? I want to see a full size Lego Dyson Sphere.

      Gotta think big.

    2. Re:What would be impressive is.... by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1

      your sig has a spelling mistake. It's "Deity"

      otherwise, it's cool :)

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
    3. Re:What would be impressive is.... by warpSpeed · · Score: 2

      Thanks, I guess that is yet another exception to the i before e except after c rule. I hate english... but it is all I got, not many people speak in Perl.

    4. Re:What would be impressive is.... by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 2

      You're welcome. There was someone on here who used to have the sig "'i-before-e' rules are weird and unscientific."

      I can only speak a little bit of perl, My native tongue is C ;)

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
  14. tell me... by csguy314 · · Score: 1

    I'm not the only person that realizes that a klein bottle can't be made with lego? Or with anything that we know of...
    klein bottles can't really be represented in three dimensions...

    --
    This is left as an exercise for the reader.
    1. Re:tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, you're the only one who was smart enough to take topology, ever. Yet oddly, you're a pedantic retard.

    2. Re:tell me... by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 2

      It cannot be embedded in R^3, but it sure can be represented in r^3. See here

      It's like saying you cant represent a cube in R^2, or any other 3d shape we commonly see represented on our computer monitors and tv screens, which are 2d last time I looked :)

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
    3. Re:tell me... by matrix29 · · Score: 2

      I'm not the only person that realizes that a klein bottle can't be made with lego? Or with anything that we know of...
      klein bottles can't really be represented in three dimensions...


      Um, (claps one hand against belly or other skin-coated surface) you must have overlooked these.
      http://www.kleinbottle.com/

      Although I cannot figure how as it is the first hit when I GOOGLE a [ Klein Bottle ] search. There is even a Klein Coffee cup! Now stop being silly and order one for goodness sake.

      --
      "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
  15. I love it by nfras · · Score: 4, Funny

    On his other page I particularly liked the machine for switching itself off. Mind you, he'd need to be careful, he might be breaching Microsoft's patent on Windows.

    --
    You call me a pedant? I prefer the term "correct"
    1. Re:I love it by napa1m · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think he's safe. Most of my windows machines won't even switch themselves off! "Windows is shutting down" my @ss..

      I obviously need a small lego machine to pull the plug out of the wall every time it locks up... hmmm

    2. Re:I love it by MicroBerto · · Score: 2

      At least your Windows partition BOOTS UP! I'm at the infamous NT blue screen of death...

      --
      Berto
    3. Re:I love it by Xcruciate · · Score: 1

      Try LEGO MindWorks...

      --
      It's like "looking busy" at your employment - it's actually easier to do real work than to fake it. - bmo
  16. Oh yeah? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can make a near-perfect rectangular parallelepiped out of single Lego brick. Top THAT!

  17. Mirror Site by zerocool^ · · Score: 3, Informative


    Mirror site up.

    www.netmar.com/~will/lego

    Disclaimers:
    1.) Not my work, I don't claim any of it.
    2.) I didn't get the .DAT files.
    3.) I know it's not slashdotted yet, just preparing/ karma whoring.
    4.) If it does get slashdotted, and everyone starts testing my load balancing, why not sign up for hosting at the same time? We're running a no setup fee promotion at the moment.

    ~Will

    P.S. became friends with the :%s/JPG/jpg command - when I saved the images, the file extentions converted themselves to lowercase. God bless vi.

    --
    sig?
    1. Re:Mirror Site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as long as you're pretending you know how to run a web hosting company, you should learn how to use wget to make your mirrors. easier. faster. more accurate. would've gotten the dat files.

    2. Re:Mirror Site by zerocool^ · · Score: 2

      eh...

      It grabs files i don't need if i do a site-suck.

      Whatever, my method worked OK, and now I have them saved on my home computer under my random pictures saved for posterity directory.

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    3. Re:Mirror Site by someonehasmyname · · Score: 1

      yeah, I used wget and pulled his entire site in the event it's slashdotted. I really run an isp. =)

      --
      Common sense is not so common.
    4. Re:Mirror Site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His sig talks about linux, but he's running on a solaris box..

    5. Re:Mirror Site by zerocool^ · · Score: 1

      A lot of our core servers are running solaris. We have a linux box for shared hosting, and one for dns, one for routing, and a couple of others, but almost all of our boxes are solaris.

      We offer shared solaris hosting, but all you get is to be on a faster machine and you get front page extentions. Linux is more economical.

      ~will

      --
      sig?
  18. Hypercube by magicslax · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Even if we did this the BEST way to view a hypercube would be either to go to the 4th dimension to look at one, or have a creature from the 4th dimension come here and make a 3d representation of on.

    ..and the second best way is right here.

    1. Re:Hypercube by Medevo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ouch it makes my puny 3d eyes hurt

      Medevo

  19. My Mozilla crashes on the link! by kbroom · · Score: 1

    I think slashdot has discovered a mozilla bug.
    Everytime i click on the "out of legos" link, my
    Mozilla(1.0) crashes! ...Or maybe there is a new weapon against the /. effect!

  20. check out www.ericharshbarger.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lots of legos

  21. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  22. Find a pixel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks an awful lot like a 2D projection of a hypercube to me.

    Impressed yet?

  23. That ain't nothin' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man, one time we were so desperate we put ourselves together a lego bong! More like a pipe, but it was wild man!

    (for tobacco use only, of course)

  24. Two heads are better.......than one by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Funny


    I would like to see this guy get together with the creater of this site:

    http://drew.corrupt.net/lp/series2.html

    The Kline Bottle would then never be looked at in the same light.

    (Warning: not for minors)

    1. Re:Two heads are better.......than one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and the (Warning: not for minors) just caused a quake of 8.2 on the /. scale and the site goes boom.

    2. Re:Two heads are better.......than one by MicroBerto · · Score: 2
      Here's what I saw on the corporate lan:

      RESTRICTED SITE

      --
      Berto
    3. Re:Two heads are better.......than one by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      (* Here's what I saw on the corporate lan:
      RESTRICTED SITE *)

      The same thing is in a report that will go to your boss. (Pause for "gulp".)

      Anyhow, as for what is actually there, lets just say that the author's lego kit has parts in it that are probably *not* standard. (Although such anatomy could probably be done with standard Lego bricks; the square edges just would look a little uncomfortable from the partner's perspective.)

  25. This one is better by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2

    http://mrl.nyu.edu/~perlin/demox/Hyper.html

    Tim

    --
    Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
  26. It's a game. Guess who I am! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'm posting AC, but my login name is:

    • Jon Katz
    • Trollaxor
    • PhysicsGenius
    • dipfan
    • 56ker
    • Cack-cack-cack-cack-cack!

      Cack-cack-cack-cack-cack!
      CACK

      Cack?

      Cack.

      caaaaaaaaaaaaaaack! Other (you fill in reply)
    Mark your guesses in the reply. Remember, you are allowed to "write-in" other answers...keep those number twos sharp and...go!
  27. Re:Disclosure ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for the warning. I wonder why this wasn't publicized. It seems quite contrary to the spirit of Open Source.

  28. Klein's bottle by WetCat · · Score: 1

    I wonder if Klein's bottle emerged waterproof. It will be a great vase for flowers if put to stand.
    I would like to have one, made of glass. Will look gorgeous, especially if made of colored glass.

    1. Re:Klein's bottle by dpp · · Score: 4, Informative

      I believe Clifford Stoll (of Cuckoo's Egg fame) makes them out of glass. See www.kleinbottle.com.

      --
      This post is strictly my own opinion and not necessarily that of my employer.
    2. Re:Klein's bottle by duckpoopy · · Score: 1

      The klein bottle cannot be embedded into 3 dimensional space. These legos and the models people sell are not real klein bottles.

      --
      word.
    3. Re:Klein's bottle by op00to · · Score: 1

      I'd love to see oen of those somehow made into a nice bong...

    4. Re:Klein's bottle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Klein Bottle can be easily immersed in 3-dimensional space. See http://www.kleinbottle.com/acme_faq.htm

  29. education potential? by bobtheprophet · · Score: 0

    This might be a good way to start kids on geometry. Being able to actually build something like a mobius strip makes it much easier to understand it. And to think that the only things I built with legos were space ships.

    --
    Don't give me none of this "nature theme" business.
  30. time by DopeThrone · · Score: 0

    i wish i had that much time, cause if i did, i'd do something worthwhile like cleaning the 328 ramen cups stacked in a sphere out of my room

    --

    Righteousness postpones the inevitable
    http://burningaureole.caveism.net
  31. Testing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  32. Lego Pieces by XBL · · Score: 2

    Where does this guy get all of these lego blocks? It looks like he has all weird sizes too.

    Maybe he cheats and makes his own lego blocks... ;-)

    1. Re:Lego Pieces by DrEldarion · · Score: 4, Informative

      Shop.lego.com probably.

      -- Dr. Eldarion --

  33. Lego Mandelbrot Set, Anyone? by Peahippo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm a firm believer in Legos * and am thoroughly convinced that they helped strongly in developing my inquisitive intellect. I still have my Legos from when I was 10.

    Look at 'em: they teach you to design, build, modify, and to have the patience for all of that. Legos are the best thing for the price that I can think of that can spur a young intellect. (Erector Sets were great for that too.) And if you get older and still play with them ... well, here's hoping that the world's first Lego Julia or Mandelbrot set will be made within our lifetimes. Lipson's surface models are just beautiful, so just imagine the beauty of a more sophisticated set.

    BTW, I am down on all this Lego model crap I see in the stores. Give kids a bucket of basic blocks and let them create ... that's the strength and appeal of Legos. However, I admit that the addition of gears makes the entire matter more challenging, perhaps for the 14+ age group.

    * Legos {tm} is the registered trademark of some silly corporation or something like that.

    --
    [also misbehaves on Kuro5hin as Peahippo]
    1. Re:Lego Mandelbrot Set, Anyone? by orkysoft · · Score: 2

      I played with Lego gears since I was five years old, and I'm sure I'm not the only one.

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    2. Re:Lego Mandelbrot Set, Anyone? by Mawbid · · Score: 1
      It amazes me that people who call Mnchen Munich can get all high an mighty when someone dares say "Legos".

      It's OK to change words--in all or some forms--when you import them into your language, to make them blend in better. There's absolutely nothing wrong with that and it's done all the time. Wouldn't it be simpler if Lego behaved like most other nouns? So why complicate matters?

      --
      Fuck the system? Nah, you might catch something.
  34. Geeze... by kzinti · · Score: 2

    You try to make a little joke, but there is always some Poindexter out there who takes you literally and points out your "mistake" in mind-numbing detail...

  35. Wait a second... by niftyeric · · Score: 1

    ...doesn't his Klein bottle have multiple surfaces? Damn legos!

    --
    proton != antielectron
  36. Re:A Tribute To The Greats (USian pie) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    C'mon. Mod him up. That's a great song. I was wiping tears from my eyes.

  37. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  38. Not to be picky... by carnageonline · · Score: 3, Informative

    Sorry, but technically a klein bottle is a four-dimensional figure (impossible to A) comprehend and B) create). Still looks cool!

    1. Re:Not to be picky... by jschmerge · · Score: 1

      Actually, a klein bottle is a 3d figure... it is an example of a figure which has no orientation (i.e. the inside is the same as the outside. Nothing impossible here, just a neat curiosity.

    2. Re:Not to be picky... by muon1183 · · Score: 1

      A kleinbottle is a 2d surface that cannot be represented in less than 4 dimensions without self-intersecting. It is basically a torrus, except that the tube goes through itself in 3d. A diagram of how to make one is:

      |-->--|
      ^' '' '^
      |--<--|

      Just line up the arrows and connect. For more information, check out mathworld.com.

      --

      There's no sig like SIGSEG
  39. It's LEGO!!!! by psyconaut · · Score: 1, Informative

    Why do people insist on saying Legos? The plural and singular of the word is: LEGO.

    I think it's the "sheeps" syndrome ;-)

    -psyconaut

    1. Re:It's LEGO!!!! by pandemonia · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, the plural of LEGO as in the Toys is neither 'LEGO' nor 'LEGOS' - it is LEGO Bricks.

      --
      -mz
  40. The usual bitch and whine (was Re:The Plural of�) by zobier · · Score: 1

    Come on now. There is NO Plural of LEGO® there is ONLY ONE LEGO® and that is the 'Group of companies' that makes the bricks.

    As for the usual argument as to the correct LEGO® terminology check out what LEGO® has to say about it (about 13 parragraphs down 'Proper Use of the LEGO Trademark')

    LEGO® is a trademark of the LEGO Group of companies

    --
    Me lost me cookie at the disco.
  41. umm by DarkHelmet · · Score: 2
    One dimensional lego objects are cool, but can you make a machine out of them that keeps turning faster and faster?

    Oh, I'm sorry. I forgot that this post obeys the laws of thermodynamics!

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  42. Legos by totallygeek · · Score: 2
    As a kid, I couldn't even build the damn lego item on the box the legos came in! Most of the Lego creations I made were used to test fireworks' strengths.

    But, for those interested, here are some other cool Lego sites:

    Stegosaurus
    Lego Town
    Lego City
    Beethoven
    Queen Amidala
    Audrey Hepburn Wall
    Big Clock
    Alice in Wonderland

  43. jamie is a fucking cock gobbler! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't WIDE!

  44. I built a sphere by dfgdfgdfg · · Score: 1
    I once built a sphere out of lego. It was completely white and I still have it at home; I see it every day.

    I had no computer, not even a graphical calculator, so I had to calculate separately for each dot the distance to the center using and ordinary calculator and the pytogoras formula. The radius was 10 "units". Unfortunately, the unit brick in lego is not a cube. I think to ratio of base to height of these pieces is 5:6. So the sphere now looks more like an ellipsoid. Maybe I should photograph it and put it on the web.

    --
    -- 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.Sc3 de4: 4.Se4: Sd7 5.Sg5 Sgf6 6.Ld3 e6 7.S1f3 h6 8.Se6:
  45. Not "fishi"? (re: the plural of Lego....) by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    I still have not figured out the correct plural of Elvis and Lexus (the car). Elvi and Lexi?

  46. Plural of Lego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look you lot.

    While we are having a discussion in English, the plural of Lego is not Legos

    We don't make stuff from Legos
    We make stuff from Lego
    or We make stuff from Lego bricks

    I hope that this will help some of you comments look less ignorant

    GrumpyBastard

  47. +1, Coolest nerdy article in a while! by dstone · · Score: 2

    Wow. Maybe it's the beer I just drank, but this is truly TRULY the coolest thing /. has shown in some time. Okay, maybe it's not strictly _news_, but WOW.

  48. But... by IanBevan · · Score: 1

    ...can he build a lego page counter than can keep up with the hits from /. ? :)

  49. Cheat, Raytrace it! by peterpi · · Score: 1
    Lego is astonishingly easy to model in a 3d program.

    For inspiration, check http://ben.com/LEGO/ out

  50. It's LEGO, not LEGOS!!!! by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

    I'm sure I'm not the first to say it, but that's what it is.
    It always has been, it always will be, you can confirm this on their web site.
    It's like Sheep and Sheep - ok, NEVER call them "LEGOS" it grates people (whiners) like myself intensely.

    1. Re:It's LEGO, not LEGOS!!!! by twoslice · · Score: 1

      Are you sure the plural is not LEGOES??? look at the word potato and the plural potatoes...

      Now don't have a hissy fit I like teasing whiners...

      --

      From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
    2. Re:It's LEGO, not LEGOS!!!! by aziraphale · · Score: 1

      It's even less complicated than you make out. Lego is the name of a company. You don't pluralize it. You wouldn't say 'I have to reinstall several Microsofts this afternoon', would you? We call things Microsoft makes, 'Microsoft Applications' (if we're feeling generous). So, similarly, you wouldn't say you were going to build a moebius strip out of Legos. Lego bricks, Lego pieces, etc., yes, fine, but NOT Legos.

    3. Re:It's LEGO, not LEGOS!!!! by Mawbid · · Score: 1

      You picked an awful example. Microsoft makes a lot of products and not one of them is commonly called simply "Microsoft". But there are many companies whose products are commonly called by the company's name and the company name, in the role of a product name, is pluralised. If I told you I owned two Ferraris, would you correct me? What would you have me say? "I own two Ferrari cars"?

      --
      Fuck the system? Nah, you might catch something.
  51. Hrrmph... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not interested. Unless the guy can make an image of Natalie Portman buck naked, otherwise... don't bother. Oh and if he can do that, I think that would certainly call for a new /. topic "Naked lego images".

  52. Bah, amateur! :) by jonr · · Score: 2

    Anybody seen White Stripe's "Fell in Love With a Girl" video? Made entierly out of Lego's, using real Lego set, not CGI, as I thought first.
    You can see it here, along with some info of how it was done.

  53. Hrrumph... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not interested. Unless the guy can make a sculpture of Natalie Portman buck naked then let me know, otherwise don't bother. Oh, and if he can do that, I think that would deserve a new /. column "Naked Lego Chicks" Later

  54. Another way to see a hypercube by quintessent · · Score: 2

    Let's use time as our 4th dimension. Imagine a cube that appears and then disappears in an instant. That's a 3D cube. Now stare at a cube for a few seconds.

    That's a hypercube.

    A 4D being would see the difference instantly. The 3D cube would seem kind of "flat" next to the other one.

    1. Re:Another way to see a hypercube by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to knock your post or anything, but a 4th spacial dimension is much more mind-bending (interesting) than a time as our 4th dimension.

    2. Re:Another way to see a hypercube by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 2
      Not to knock your post or anything, but a 4th spacial dimension is much more mind-bending (interesting) than a time as our 4th dimension.

      Very true, but he's still pretty much right. Anyone capable of seeing an entire object 'at once' (however much that phrase means on this subject) on all 3 spatial and the temporal axis would see an ordinary cube as a tesseract (hypercube is the general term for n-d cube where n>3).

      Check it out. I can read all this, but it helps me not one bit in visualizing it. The thing that blows my mind is the sheer quantity of math available for 4-d figures. Want the hyper-surface area of a Glome (4-d hypersphere) or the 'content' (hyper-volume) of a pentatope (4-d equilateral triangle)? Wild stuff...

      --
      Dyolf Knip
  55. Good site to buy legos... by swaic · · Score: 1


    For people new to building and need a resources to buy their goodies, here is a pretty good site. They have just about everything you would need (all different kinds of gears, axles, motor boxes, etc.). Everything you wish the main Lego site sold.

  56. Ideal surfaces by omnibee · · Score: 1
    I found it very useful to have ideal surface renderings while contemplating the lego constructions.
    This site has nice rotatable images:

    http://mathworld.wolfram.com/topics/MinimalSurface s.html

    Nice job indeed!

    1. Re:Ideal surfaces by FLT · · Score: 1

      It is not 'ideal surface', but 'minimal surface'. A minimal surface is a surface that has minimal area within certain constraints. Soap bubbles are examples of minimal surfaces. Floating in the air they ar not so very interesting. But when three or more bubbles stick together you get interesting membranes. Also using metal-wire frames and emmerging them in soap gives strange examples of minimal surfaces. FLT, not just any theorem.

      --
      FLT, not just any theorem.
  57. Turn yourself off machine by FLT · · Score: 1

    The machine that turns itself off is so cool!! During math-colleges I was completely facinated by this idea and drew cartoon-like scenario pictures of it again and again, dreaming of building it. it probably appeals only to the more math-minded people.

    FLT, not just any theorem.

    --
    FLT, not just any theorem.
  58. Natalie Portman! by gnugnugnu · · Score: 1

    It is not really Natalie Portman it is Queen Amidala. I feel cheated, Queen Amidal looks more like a bad set of curtains than Natlie Portman.

    On his web page he even titles the sculpture.
    Queen Amidala
    "My apologies to Ms. Portman"

    Now this page is more like it (no lego though)
    http://www.natalie-portman.net/pictures.h tm

    --
    "This isn't a Troll"
    Of course a troll would say that

  59. Gabriel's Trumpet by e03179 · · Score: 1

    Let me know when he has made a model of Gabriel's Trumpet! Now, that would be something!

    --
    -516
  60. Hahaha, fooled you all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work with this guy, he doesn't actually build the things out of lego's at all, they're just ray-traced :)

    -snarkosm

  61. Then I'm sure by llamalicious · · Score: 2

    ...you'd hate for me to start my comment in the subject line, 'eh?

  62. What a 4d Cube looks like to us by invid · · Score: 1

    Imagine a 2 dimensional person seeing a 3 dimensional cube pass through his space. If the flat surface of the 3d cube is parallel with the 2d universe, the 2d person will simply see a square miraculously appear before him, hover for awhile, and then disappear. If the surface of the 3d cube is not completely uniform the 2d person might see the surface of the square "morph" a little. Similarly, if a 4d cube passed through our 3d universe, we would see a cube miraculously appear and then, after a few moments, disappear.

    Things become interesting if you pass the corner of the 3d cube through the 2d universe first. The 2d person would see tiny triangle appear before him that grows larger and larger, until you hit the next corners and things become complex, especially if the cube entered at an angle. Eventually you'll get back to a floating triangle that shrinks down to nothingness. Similarly, a 4d cube going through our universe will appear as a 3 sided growing pyramid at first.

    Another way to imagine a 4d cube is to think about what its shadow would look like in our universe. The way to do that is to take a 3d cube and project its shadow on a wall. Straight on from the light source it looks like a square. Move it around and see how it morphs. Now image a 4d person was projecting the shadow of a 4d cube onto our universe. Straight on we would have a 3d cube. If he moved the cube around, various corners of the 4th dimension would "morph" out of the flat sides.

    When we talk about seeing a hypercube we usually talk about the shadow of a transparent cube, where you just see the connecting lines. This would give you a cube inside of a cube with the corners of the inner cube connected to the corners of the outer cube.

    --
    The Moore-Murphy Law: The number of things that will go wrong will double every 2 years.
  63. Legoland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have any of you ever been to a Legoland amusement park? All I can say about that is holy cow. I went to the park near Munich and there are some incredible Lego sculptures, like Venice, Frankfurt skyscapers, Berlin, etc... How do they do that?

  64. I tried this once by proverbialcow · · Score: 1

    I figured I'd build the sphere first, and ignite the star inside it.
    As it turns out, I could never get the damn fusion reaction going. Stupid Zippo.

    --
    The only surefire protection against Microsoft infections is abstinence. - The Onion
  65. Hey, baby! by Rupert · · Score: 2

    Wanna come over to my place and see my 14' lego stegosaurus?

    Yeah, there's a reason why my dining table is on the front lawn.

    --

    --
    E_NOSIG
  66. 1st and 2nd mixed partial differential equations by gelfling · · Score: 2

    mmmmm yeah that's what I'm talkin bout.

  67. Mobius stripping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The mobius strip looks great, but how does he cut it in half to check it stays in one piece?
    To quote Isaac Asimov:

    • A mathemtician confided,
      That the mobius strip is one sided
      And you'll get quite a laugh
      When you cut it in half
      For it stays in one piece when divided
  68. I'll be impressed... by mikecarrmikecarr · · Score: 1

    ...when I can get a Lego model of a singularity

    --

    ID-10-T is a way of life

  69. Re:The Plural of Lego is, um, Lego -- No, it isn't by ay2b · · Score: 1
    > (* The Plural of Lego is, um, Lego.... Much like fish or sheep. *)

    Actually, according to the fairplay page on the LEGO website, "LEGO" is an adjective, not a noun, so it has no plural.
    Proper Use of the LEGO Trademark on a Web Site
    If the LEGO trademark is used at all, it should always be used as an adjective, not as a noun. For example, say "MODELS BUILT OF LEGO BRICKS". Never say "MODELS BUILT OF LEGOs".Also, the trademark should appear in the same typeface as the surrounding text and should not be isolated or set apart from the surrounding text. In other words, the trademarks should not be emphasized or highlighted. Finally, the LEGO trademark should always appear with a ® symbol each time it is used.
    --
    "Those who would sacrifice essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
  70. Tesseracts in OpenGL by f00Dave · · Score: 1

    Oddly enough, I wrote a tesseract viewer that uses OpenGL a few years ago. Source is in C++ and GLUT. The program, source and readme file are all on my OpenGL/GLUT demos page. Specific URL:

    http://personal.nbnet.nb.ca/daveg/opengl/viewtes s/ index.html

    Enjoy. ;-)

    --
    .f00Dave