Slashdot Mirror


Skydiving from 25 Miles Up

chisox writes "The Observer has a story about a retired French army colonel who is soon to make a free fall parachute jump from 25 miles up. In the process he will break the sound barrier, reaching a top speed of mach 1.68 before he opens his parachute 1,000 metres above the Earth. Of course, if the chute doesn't open, the hole he'll make will be about 1,000 metres deep." Well, actually his max speed will be high up and near the earth the atmosphere will have slowed him down to terminal velocity.

85 of 282 comments (clear)

  1. His Ears by Daveman692 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Will he really experience a sonic boom? If so wouldn't that destroy his ear drums.

    1. Re:His Ears by einhverfr · · Score: 5, Informative

      I don't think his ears will be in the area which could experience the sonic boom. The sonic boom is actually a cone-shaped are where the sound becomes concentrated (because you are moving faster than it).

      I am more interested in how much his suit would heat up if his chute doesn't open due to air resistance and decreasing terminal velocity.`

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    2. Re:His Ears by Bullschmidt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Nope. Won't be any sonic boom. He'll break the sea level speed of sound high in the atmosphere, where the speed of sound is higher. As he descends, he'll slow to terminal velocity. So there will never be a shockwave.

      --
      "Of all days, the day on which one has not laughed is the most surely the one wasted." -Sebastian Roch Nicol
    3. Re:His Ears by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Funny

      (* Will he really experience a sonic boom? If so wouldn't that destroy his ear drums. *)

      Do French sonic booms sound more romantic to chicks than American sonic booms?

    4. Re:His Ears by EvanED · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Drag by what? All the air that is present at 25 miles?

    5. Re:His Ears by spike+hay · · Score: 3, Informative

      Will he really experience a sonic boom? If so wouldn't that destroy his ear drums.

      Actually, no. The sonic boom is never heard by the body traveling at supersonic speeds, wether it be plane, rocket, or person. Concorde passengers are unaffected by the boom.

      The conical shock waves never touch. At least they aren't supposed to. Now, since a person is thin like a rocket, I am sure he won't have to worry about shock waves.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    6. Re:His Ears by John+Biggabooty · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just a song before I go, to whom it may concern. Traveling twice the speed of sound, it's easy to get burned.
      He's Toast!

      --
      That's Bigboo TAY! TAY!
    7. Re:His Ears by Xaoswolf · · Score: 2

      Wouldn't the boom always be just behind him? He is afterall going faster than sound.

  2. Read the article by rblancarte · · Score: 2

    Sounds very interesting. I wish him the best of luck in getting this done. I think I read something about him a couple of years ago, though I could be wrong.

    I have to admit, considering applications of this, such as parachuting from a Space Shuttle, IIS, etc, it does make you wonder why something like this has not been undertaken by any government agency.

    RonB

    --
    It is human nature to take shortcuts in thinking.
    1. Re:Read the article by Alrescha · · Score: 5, Informative

      "it does make you wonder why something like this has not been undertaken by any government agency."

      This has been done. I'm not sure why we forget. In 1960, Joe Kittenger jumped from ~20 miles, breaking the sound barrier. See:

      http://www.dropzone.com/news/SpaceParachutingSky di vin.shtml

      A.

      ps: I'm sorry that /. injects a space in that URL.

      --
      ...bringing you cynical quips since 1998
    2. Re:Read the article by Jondor · · Score: 3, Funny

      my IIS is also in the serverroom, on a CD which makes sure the table stays stable and horizontal..

      Sorry, couldn't resist.. :-)

      --
      Nobody expects the spanish inquisition!
    3. Re:Read the article by gasp · · Score: 4, Informative

      Just because several (I know of at least half a dozen) sites have that sound-barrier quote, that doesn't make it true.

      I consider the several links on that page as a good cross-section of sources, and from what I read, I agree with Kittenger himself that the most reliable information is that he achieved 90% of the speed of sound at his altitude. The most credible information was that his top speed was 614mph, and that somebody somewhere made a typo of 714, hence many sources believed he broke the speed of sound. It turned into one of those urban myths. There was no evidence at all that he broke the sound barrier, and reasonably solid data that he didn't, and the man himself agreed with the 614mph data. Also, the math agrees with this, showing that another 1300m or so of altitude is needed to break the sound barrier.

      It's not like everybody was out there with their own altitude radar taking measurements. I'll side with Kittenger's own opinion, that the radar reading was the most reliable, and that the man himself is more likely to be correct than a few sensationalist storytellers. ;)

      So when the data and the people involved say he didn't break the sound barrier, I'd say that's the closest to definitive that we have.

      Disclaimer: No, I don't believe anything simply because it's posted on a website. But I remain happy to disagree with you. Enjoy!

  3. Force? by NickRob · · Score: 2

    Wouldn't the amount of force be more than a parachute is used to receiving? This could possible rip a rope or the parachute itself.

    1. Re:Force? by Bullschmidt · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nope, not at all. Terminal velocity is the max velocity you can travel at a certain point in the atmosphere. You hit it really quickly. By the time he pulls his shoot he won't be travelling any faster than someone who jumped from 15000ft. He'll be going fast when hes REALLY high up and the atmostphere is thin and terminal velocity is higher.

      --
      "Of all days, the day on which one has not laughed is the most surely the one wasted." -Sebastian Roch Nicol
    2. Re:Force? by BabyDave · · Score: 2, Informative

      The force on the parachute when it opens is due to air resistance, which is (roughly) proportional to speed, not acceleration.

      The OP's thoughts were probably something along the lines of "Since he's falling for much longer, won't he be going much faster, and hence won't the force on the 'chute be huge?"

      The answer is almost certainly "no" though - as he falls, air density increases, creating an extra drag force on the parachutist, slowing him down. So when he pulled the ripcord, he'd only be falling at about the terminal velocity of a skydiver at 1000m. Therefore the 'chute would be subject to similar forces to those of a normal skydiver.

    3. Re:Force? by terminal.dk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Disclaimer: I am a skydiver, has slightly more than 300 jumps, so I am not really that experienced.

      I have been doing a jump from 22000 ft = 6700 meters. And I also experienced the thin air, making it more difficult to turn, and my speed max was around 300 km/h, where it normally tops at 200 km/h on a normal skydive.

      At deployment time (1000 meters / 3500 ft), the thick air near the planet had slowed me to below 180 km/h.

    4. Re:Force? by AntiNorm · · Score: 2

      Wouldn't the parachute only open once he slows down due to terminal velocity--something I'm sure parachutes are subject to?

      The parachute will open at just about any speed as long as he is falling. It'll open at as little as 10-20 mph, and if he wants it to, it'll open at 500-600 mph. He'd have to be brain-dead to open at this speed though...since kinetic energy depends on the square of velocity, he would be putting an incredible strain on the parachute (which likely wouldn't survive opening at this speed) and himself.

      --

      I pledge allegiance to the flag...
      of the Corporate States of America...
    5. Re:Force? by AntiNorm · · Score: 2

      His velocity will probably be about 200 km/h when his chute gets pulled. Why 200 km/h? That's the terminal velocity due to wind resistance at the height (1000ft) where his chute gets pulled.

      1000 feet? Let's hope he pulls higher than that. At 1000 feet, terminal velocity is around 120 mph, which means that you have about five seconds until impact. If you take into consideration that some parachutes are packed or designed to snivel on opening, 1000 feet may even be too low for him. He could use his reserve, which according to FAA TSO guidelines must open within 300 feet, but an opening that quick would damage the reserve.

      Generally, when jumps from this high are made, they pull at 10000-15000 feet. I've pulled this high before (I pulled right after I got out of the airplane) -- the view is INCREDIBLE.

      --

      I pledge allegiance to the flag...
      of the Corporate States of America...
    6. Re:Force? by John_Booty · · Score: 2

      Wouldn't the amount of force be more than a parachute is used to receiving? This could possible rip a rope or the parachute itself.

      Yeah! You're right! Maybe he shouldn't use those standard bargain parachutes you buy at Wal-Mart!

      *mutters and shakes head*

      --

      OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
    7. Re:Force? by AntiNorm · · Score: 2

      A reserve that would blow up on a terminal deployment wouldn't be much of a reserve, now would it?

      Guess not...my reserve deployment was a cutaway from a spinning malfunction, but it wasn't anywhere near terminal.

      --

      I pledge allegiance to the flag...
      of the Corporate States of America...
  4. Where Did He Get the Funding??? by Zspdude · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sponsored by the Darwin Awards...

    --
    What's in a Sig?
    1. Re:Where Did He Get the Funding??? by Carlos+Laviola · · Score: 2

      Have you even read the article? The man has been doing it for his entire life (he has jumped 8300 times before). He seems to be very prepared and there are actual details of the pressure and temperatures his space suit can resist to. Overall, I'd say this man has everything to be successful.

      If you can't do it, that doesn't mean it can't be done.

    2. Re:Where Did He Get the Funding??? by Mad+Quacker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know why this got modded up.

      As Slashdotters we should recognize people trying to do "crazy" things are the ones who expand the frontiers of our society. Would you also have nominated the lunar Apollo teams for the darwin awards?

      If slashdot were around in 1633 perhaps we would also be the first to condemn Galileo as a heretic lune.

      --
      "I don't know that atheists should be considered citizens, nor should they be considered patriots." George HW Bush
    3. Re:Where Did He Get the Funding??? by stuffman64 · · Score: 2
      Well, if you read the article:

      'I sold my house, my collection of weapons, my stamp albums and my military medals to get this project off the ground after training for more than two years for the official experiment before it was abandoned,' he said. 'I'm not looking for fame. What fascinates me is the record and the physical challenge involved.

      This guy has balls.
      --
      --- At my sig, unleash hell.
    4. Re:Where Did He Get the Funding??? by cburley · · Score: 2, Funny
      Well, if you read the article:
      'I sold my house, my collection of weapons, my stamp albums and my military medals to get this project off the ground[...]'

      This guy has balls.

      What, he hasn't sold those, too?

      --
      Practice random senselessness and act kind of beautiful.
  5. Physics by drfrank · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well, actually his max speed will be high up and near the earth the atmosphere will have slowed him down to terminal velocity.

    Well, actually he'll be at terminal velocity for nearly the entire time... Terminal velocity is dependant on the density of the atmosphere. You'd think that someone that posted a link to a page which defined "terminal velopcity" would have at least read the definition...

    1. Re:Physics by Alsee · · Score: 4, Interesting

      actually he'll be at terminal velocity for nearly the entire time

      Nope. At that altitude you are practically in a vacuum. He will accelerate for close to half the distance. You haven't hit terminal velosity untill you stop accelerating. That won't happen until his altitude gets down to around 70,000 to 90,000 feet where the atmosphere starts thickening up.

      After he does hit terminal velocity, the atmosphere will thiken rapidy. The local value (for that altitude) of terminal velocity will drop rapidly. The air resistance will exceed the force of gravity and he will start slowing down, bleeding off his inertia. He will actually be ABOVE the local terminal velocity during this process - pretty much the second half of his trip.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    2. Re:Physics by Alsee · · Score: 2

      terminal velocity is a velocity that is reached through accereration, not deceleration.

      Terminal velocity is the balance point where drag and gravity match resulting in no change in speed. It is approached asymtoticly from EITHER side.

      And if you re-read my post more carefully you'll see that I specificly said that he'd be above terminal velocity for pretty much the last half of the trip.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  6. others trying same stunt by what_the_heck · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wired had an article in August 2001 about two other people attempting much the same thing.

  7. 1000 metres by nakaduct · · Score: 4, Funny

    Someone should tip off the drilling companies: rather than pay skilled people to operate fancy drilling rigs, just drop the rigs and/or people out of an airplane.

    1. Re:1000 metres by DemiKnute · · Score: 2, Funny

      Someone should tip off the drilling companies: rather than pay skilled people to operate fancy drilling rigs, just drop the rigs and/or people out of an airplane.

      Yeah, we like to call those airplanes B-52's.

      --
      .
  8. Actually... by Russ+Steffen · · Score: 2, Informative

    If the cute doesn't open, the crater he makes will be the same size if jumps from 25 miles or 10,000 feet. That's how terminal velocity works. Sure he'll break Mach 1 in the thin air aloft, but as he gets to into progressivly thicker air he'll be slowed to the same 55 m/s as any other skydiver. As long as he doesn't tuck into a ball or go head first, that is.

    1. Re:Actually... by mamba-mamba · · Score: 2

      Mach is always relative to the speed of sound where the travelling body is.

      I believe that's why they use Mach instead of specifying an actual velocity or speed.

      MM
      --

      --
      By including this sig, the copyright holders of this work or collection unreservedly place it in the public domain.
  9. natural selection? by Narcocide · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... this kindof reminds me of the time that guy strapped a solid fuel booster to his Nova trying to break a landspeed record somewhere out in the desert. he hit a solid rock wall probably mere seconds after realizing no less than three critical errors in his planning:

    1) solid fuel boosters can't be stopped; once they're ignited they burn till they're used up.

    2) at 400 miles per hour those cliffs way off on the horizon approach much faster than you'd have thought.

    3) it doesn't really matter how hard you push in on the brake pedal if the car is being propelled by something they use for jet-assisted takeoff of military cargo planes.

    1. Re:natural selection? by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2, Informative
      And:

      4) Everyone in Slashdot knows the story and knows that it is an urban legend (U) for untrue.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    2. Re:natural selection? by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2
      You are welcome to believe in him, the tooth fairy or Santa Claus.

      However, apart from the story there is no corroborating evidence to back it up. Right?

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    3. Re:natural selection? by jbf · · Score: 2

      A good analysis of this story is here.
      Also more info here.

  10. Take off, eh?!? by xipho · · Score: 2, Funny

    Its a plot, the French have decided to take back Canada by dropping old people on them... Oh well at least he won't hit nothin' too important when he crashes into Saskatoon.

    --

    only infrmatn esentil to understandn mst b tranmitd
  11. Will advance science. by Carlos+Laviola · · Score: 2

    Quoth the article,

    The free fall will involve 200 scientific experiments in the stratosphere and the troposphere, some of them linked to the possibility of parachute escapes from stranded space shuttles.

  12. Does "Mach 1.68" make any sense? by splorf · · Score: 3, Informative
    And what does it really mean, here?

    ISTR that the speed of sound changes with air pressure and it's faster when the pressure is lower. The speed of sound at sea level is around 300 m/sec so mach 1.68 at sea level would be around 500 m/sec.

    But at 100,000 feet, the speed of sound in that thin air might be 1000 m/sec. So if the guy is falling at 500 m/sec at that altitude, that's really just half the speed of sound there. If he's falling at 1700 m/sec, that sounds awful, sonic booms and all that kind of thing.

    So what's the deal?

    1. Re:Does "Mach 1.68" make any sense? by mberman · · Score: 2, Informative

      From the second paragraph in the article: "[He will] reach a top speed of Mach 1.68 (1,680kph at that height)." As for the sonic booms, it's been mentioned in posts above that the boom takes place in a cone shape behind him, and by then he's long past it.

      Maybe you should read the article before asking questions about it?

      --

      This is a self-referential sig

    2. Re:Does "Mach 1.68" make any sense? by Papineau · · Score: 4, Informative

      Try the other way. It's faster when the pressure is higher. The more closer together the molecules, the easier it is for them to collide and spread the sound. The speed of sound in a solid is a couple times higher than in air.

      If you're insterested: in perfect gases, v=(p*k/rho)^(1/2), with pressure p, k=Cp/Cv, and density rho.

      So the speed of sound (Mach 1) at high altitude is way lower, in terms of absolute speed, than near the ground. Mach 1.68 at 25 miles is probably not even the same absolute speed (m/s) than Mach 1 at ground level. In a sufficiently rarified atmosphere (eg Mars), you might even be able to run faster than sound! How's that?

    3. Re:Does "Mach 1.68" make any sense? by smoondog · · Score: 2

      I thought so, too. But that isn't correct. The speed of sound at 100,000 feet is within 30-40% of the speed of sound at sea level. From:

      The same publication lists the soundspeed at sea level as 340.29 m/s, and 302.03 m/s at an altitude of 100,000 ft.

      -Sean

  13. Landing site? by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Funny

    (* Of course, if the chute doesn't open, the hole he'll make will be about 1,000 metres deep." *)

    I hope he does it near my hometown. I always wanted to visit that crater in Arizona, but it is too far and too hot.

    We need a local one.

  14. kittinger - The longest leap by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 5, Informative
    US Air Force Captain Kittinger made the previous world record jump in 1960 from 19 miles up. There's an archive of the Life story on it at:


    http://www2.tsixroads.com/Corinth_MLSANDY/jk004. ht ml

    including an amazing shot of him taken from the gondola from which he jumped:


    http://www2.tsixroads.com/Corinth_MLSANDY/corint h_ images/jk20.jpg

    --
    I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
  15. No... by Xeriar · · Score: 2, Informative

    Speed of sound is significantly lower higher in the atmosphere, and since there is less air resistance, he can fall faster.

    The last attempt, five miles lower, got pretty close to the speed of sound, this should do it. Not sure how safe it would be, but he should break it.

    Of course, if his chute doesn't open, he becomes his own airbrake and bursts into flames.

    1. Re:No... by zer0vector · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why would he burst into flames if his chute did not open? He's not planning on opening it until 1000m, well in the range of normal skydiving, so obviously the chute has no bearing on what happens above that. At this point he'll only be traveling at terminal velocity anyway, which ain't so fast (~160mph, rough estimate for a human body).

      --

      ----
      Striving to put right what once went wrong, and hoping each time that his next leap, will be the leap ho
    2. Re:No... by p3d0 · · Score: 2
      Of course, if his chute doesn't open, he becomes his own airbrake and bursts into flames.
      Nonsense. If he was moving so fast that this were a possibility, then a parachute would be useless.

      You must be imagining that anything falling from space must be falling from orbit, and therefore has to deal with reentry. Not so--he's jumping from a stationary balloon held aloft by buoyancy, not by the momentum of an orbiting spacecraft.

      This raises another question though: if they are considering this as an escape route for shuttle or space station passengers, then they will have to deal with re-entry. I wonder how they plan to do that...

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  16. Re:Wouldn't be cool if he died by Restil · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Nobody is obligated to do with their money what YOU feel is the best thing. How many of the qualities of life you take for granted today would not exist if someone hadn't "wasted" a lot of time, money, and effort on things that have "no relevance"?

    I personally have no desire to float 25 miles up into the atmosphere in temperatures over a hundred degrees below freezing just so I can fall faster than the speed of sound. But if this guy wants to do it, more power to him. As long as SOMEONE is reaching higher for what nobody in their right mind would ever want to do, the rest of the world will benefit as a result, even if indirectly.

    I'm not saying that funding medical research is bad. Its just as noble an endevour as any other. But to say that other reasearch does no good for the world simply because the immediate results do not, is very short sighted and reeks very badly of the "everything's already been invented" mentality. And besides, consider the fact that since he has partially funded this effort of his, the experiments he's carrying out will benefit agencies that otherwise would have to spend their own money to carry out similar experiments anyway. That means that money will be saved.. which means it might be available elsewhere, including your own personal preferred pet projects. And that's just looking at things from an immediate economic point of view.

    -Restil

    --
    Play with my webcams and lights here
  17. A Timeline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    65 million years ago, the dinosaurs disappeared mysteriously from the earth, supposedly caused by an impact from a meteor or piece of comet.

    A.D.2002: A retired French army colonel makes his skydive from 25 miles up. As he approaches mach 1.68, a bright flash is seen, and he vanishes. For years, the mystery of what happened to him remains unsolved.

    A.D.2042: It is discovered that at the moment the retired colonel reached mach 1.68, he caused a rift in the space-time continuum and travelled 65 million years back in time and slammed into the earth at 1200MPH, creator a crator and wiping out dinosaur life.

    1. Re:A Timeline by MarkusQ · · Score: 2

      65 million years ago, the dinosaurs disappeared mysteriously from the earth, supposedly caused by an impact from a meteor or piece of comet.

      A.D.2002: A retired French army colonel makes his skydive from 25 miles up. His chute* fails to open and he makes a large crater. Experts measuring the crater realize how luck we are that he didn't weigh several tons...

      And in that instant new theory about extreme sports among the dinosaurs is born.

      -- MarkusQ

      * If it fails to open, is it still called a "shoot" or would the proper now be "a fuck"?

    2. Re:A Timeline by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Another way to look at this:

      Dinosours became extinct because of falling meteors.

      Stupid humans are becomming extinct by *being* meteors.

  18. Dangerous Ascent by imkonen · · Score: 3, Funny
    But the risks of an accident during the jump are considered lower than during the painstaking process of reaching maximum altitude.

    Yeah, going straight up in a balloon can be pretty dangerous. He should bring a parachute just in case.

  19. Re:parachute necessary? by DutchSter · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I have always wondered if there were any examples (probably from war) of people bailing over the ocean with no/unopened parachute and surviving. Terminal velocity around sea level is like 120 mph, right? That's pretty fast, but I wonder if there's some chance of surviving an impact with water at that speed.
    Given that water is an incompressible liquid and you would be hitting at such a high rate of speed, you'd be better off landing in a dirt field at the same high speed. Just think about those belly-flops; they hurt from three feet up. The second you hit, the water doesn't move. It's only after the blow has rippled out that the water moves and you begin to sink.

    According to the Worst-Case Scenario Survival Handbook (http://www.worstcasescenarios.com) if you plan to jump from anything high you should be prepared to at least break your legs, and clench your buttocks as you go down so as to keep water from rushing in and um, causing severe "internal" damage. Jumping from over 50 feet is ill-advised as it will almost certainaly break something other than your legs (spine) unless you hit at exactly the right angle. At 120 MPH you may not be able to adjust yourself by the time you realize that you're going to enter at a slight angle thanks to that last second cross breeze.

    Interestingly though, according to the same book you can probably survive a 50 foot fall into a dumpster of boxes with few complications.
  20. Re:Wouldn't be cool if he died by WCMI92 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "So I look at something like this and go how will this advance mankind. The only answer is that it will not. This is like trying to balloon around the world. I think subjuects like this have no0 relevence on slashdot. He could take the money that he is squandering on this and give it to doctors without borders and actually do some good in this world. Isn't it time that postmodernism died."

    You know what the moral difference is between robbing someone on the street at gunpoint, and using your government representatives to do it for you?

    None.

    What you state is VERY contrary to the spirit of freedom and individual liberty. What someone does with his own time and money is no business of yours at all.

    How about your own life? That money you spent on that new RAM upgrade could have gone to help AIDS victims. That money you blew on beer and pr0n magazines could have gone to help the homeless.

    See what I mean? This is, in essence, what socialism is: A central comitte decides what is done with money, property, and individuals, NOT the individuals.

    I don't think that is what you are advocating, at least, I hope not...

    If not for the individual freedom the USA is supposed to stand for, and the incredible spirit of adventure and creativity this spawns, the world wouldn't have had:

    Charles Lindburgh
    Wilbur and Orville Wright

    Who both did things that were thought to be nutty at the time.

    There is a reason why most great inventions of the past 150 years have happened in America. One word: Freedom.

    Freedom to do with what is yours, and what gifts you have, as you will.

    --
    Corporatism != Free Market
  21. Re:well by spike+hay · · Score: 2

    How does a chute become frozen? Last time I checked nylon was already "frozen" at room temperature. ;-P

    --
    If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
  22. If you want more info on his jump... by zrosener · · Score: 3, Informative

    check out his home page:

    http://www.legrandsaut.org/

    or straight to the english version:

    http://www.legrandsaut.org/ressources/gb/gb_page s/ gb_accueil.html

    He has some movies and facts and explanations and interviews....etc

  23. Re:parachute necessary? by NearlyHeadless · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have always wondered if there were any examples (probably from war) of people bailing over the ocean with no/unopened parachute and surviving.
    I haven't heard of any cases over water, but there have been a
    few on land.
  24. Big Airy Sponges... by roberto0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    At 25,000 feet, the earth's atmosphere is significantly thinner than at ground level. So there's an interesting effect going on here: When the skydiver jumps from the plane, he'll accelerate until he's falling at "terminal velocity".
    But as he falls, the atmosphere will be thickening around him, and the "terminal velocity" will decrease. Which is kind of cool, because he'll be slowing down as he's falling!
    The atmosphere is like a big, airy sponge around the Earth...

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, simulate.
  25. Skydiving from 25 Miles Up by guru312 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well...He may get to hold the record for highest skydive but *I* hold the record for parachuting night pukes.

    No one has gotten sick jumping out of an airplane at night as many times as I have.

    I keep waiting for someone to try to break my record. They are all afraid to try!

    See it here: http://AICommand.com/PukeDuke.htm

    Guru312

    1. Re:Skydiving from 25 Miles Up by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      (* *I* hold the record for parachuting night pukes. No one has gotten sick jumping out of an airplane at night as many times as I have. *)

      Isn't that a biohazard? All that stuff is going to land *somewhere*.

      Unless, perhaps you have never heard of this important rule: "Never puke into the wind".

      BTW, if it makes you sick, then why do you keep doing it? I never found puking pleasent in the least amount.

  26. Good Timing... by Calle+Ballz · · Score: 2

    I just went skydiving for the first time yesterday.... albeit I only jumped from 10,000 feet... but the experience is undescribable. To all other slashdotters, I recommend that you give it a shot, even if you only jump from 2 miles, and not 20.

  27. Sonic "click" by s4m7 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The sound heard on the ground as a "sonic boom" is the sudden onset and release of pressure after the buildup by the shock wave or "peak overpressure." The change in pressure caused by sonic boom is only a few pounds per square foot -- about the same pressure change we experience on an elevator as it descends two or three floors -- in a much shorter time period. It is the magnitude of this peak overpressure that describes a sonic boom.

    now, all this relies on air pressure! If our skydiver hits the speed of sound up where there isn't any air to speak of, then he's not going to experience much of a boom at all now, is he?

    This is not to say nothing of the fact that the boom appears to occur behind the cause, from the pilot's, or in our case the intrepid colonel's perspective. (that is, he is moving away from the sound at the speed of sound.)

    NO BOOM PEOPLE, GET IT?

    --
    This comment is fully compliant with RFC 527.
  28. Better Picture by crisco · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I like this picture better.

    --

    Bleh!

    1. Re:Better Picture by MulluskO · · Score: 2

      Is that a red toolbox strapped to his but?
      I think I see drawers.

      --

      Too busy staying alive... ~ R.A.
    2. Re:Better Picture by MulluskO · · Score: 2

      *butt, I noticed just after posting. I can spel butt. It's not like I'm stupid.

      --

      Too busy staying alive... ~ R.A.
    3. Re:Better Picture by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 2

      aye, that's a nice picture too. i had found a very small version of it, but not a decent sized one. there should be quite a few more pictures of his jump, but i cant find any online. :(

      My preference in the pictures though is for the one that appeared on the Life cover - an expanse of cloud mass, that looks like it's photographed from orbit/high up - and a wee speck of a man in a space suit sticking one leg out to control his fall. You just get an amazing sense of how extreme his jump was, as the background and the man look more like the images we've seen of astronauts on EVA than of a man parachuting to earth. The only clue: no umbilical.

      Though the picture you posted a link to is technically more interesting as you get a much better view of his kit, i like the cover picture better for it's sense of perspective.

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
  29. MOOSE - Personal Re-Entry Kit by Komodo · · Score: 4, Informative

    GE once designed a device called the MOOSE, to allow astronauts to bail out from orbit and re-enter the Earth's atmosphere with little more than a space suit and plastic cocoon (remember that early heat shields where basically a big slab of high-temperature plastic that would flake off during re-entry).Here's one link about the MOOSE: http://www.boggsspace.com/strange_but_true.htm

  30. Re:parachute necessary? by AntiNorm · · Score: 2

    According to the Worst-Case Scenario Survival Handbook

    As a licensed skydiver, I will say that the Worst-Case Scenario Survival handbook is full of shit. They have a section on how to survive if your parachute doesn't open; part of what they tell you to do is signal to other jumpers in the air that your parachute won't open, dock on them, and hold on to them until landing. First of all, everybody else will have deployed by the time you realize you're in trouble, and even if there were people with you, you wouldn't have time to dock onto them, get a good grip on them, and let them pull. It would take a VERY good grip on them too -- the deceleration of them pulling with the added weight of you hanging on would make holding on a bit difficult.

    What they don't tell you is what you are taught over and over and over again during your student training -- if your parachute doesn't work, pull your friggin' reserve!

    It is blatantly obvious to me that whoever wrote that book never took a lick of skydiving training. They have NO business telling people what to do in a situation like that. Their advice wouldn't help you; it would more than likely kill you. Look at this book as nothing more than a humor book...you're putting yourself in danger if you take it seriously.

    --

    I pledge allegiance to the flag...
    of the Corporate States of America...
  31. Well, there's the end of JBoss! by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 2

    Marc! Marc Fleury! Vous etes trop age! Restez ici a Atlanta, et gagnez un grand vie!

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
  32. Re:Impressive. by Toraz+Chryx · · Score: 2

    you have that wrong, it's He's sure to make an impact on the skydiving industry^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hground.

  33. Re:parachute necessary? by PhotoGuy · · Score: 2

    Here's some examples from http://www.urbanlegends.com/death/falling_terminal _velocity.html

    This is what the Guinness Book of Records has to say:

    It is estimated that the human body reaches 99% of its low-level terminal velocity after falling 573m 1880ft which takes 13-14 sec. This is 117-125mph at normal atmospheric pressure and in a
    random posture.

    (At the 1100 ft Emley Moor TV mast near me they reckon that you would reach terminal velocity (great term) well before hitting the ground)

    Longest fall without a parachute:

    World: Vesna Vulovic (Yugoslavia, wherever that is now), stewardess in a DC-9 which blew up at 10160m 33330ft over Serbska Kamenice, Czechoslovakia, 26 Jan 1972.

    UK: Flt-Sgt Nicholas Steven Alkemade (d. 22 Jun 1987) from a blazing Lancaster bomber at 5485m 18000ft over Germany (near Oberkuerchen) on 23 Mar 1944.

    On a mathematical note, the acceleration force is always constant, whereas the drag increases as the square of the speed. The line reaches an asymptote at about 125mph. Interestingly though,
    it is actually the 0mph bit at the end which actually kills you.

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  34. Re:parachute necessary? by Iamthefallen · · Score: 2

    It's been done before, but, there's no way you can hold on to the other person with hands alone. Put your arms inside their harness, entangle as much as you can, wait for them to pull, hope your arms don't break. Now, providing the canopy and lines hold, you have a chance to survive, with modern small <120sqft canopies the chance isn't that big, but there's at least a chance.

    Microlines would prolly be very painful for a brief moment until they snap.

    Although, the technique is, as you said, pointless really, no one will be around. Once your main has failed, you deploy reserve, if that doesn't work, your buddies will most likely be long gone already, and on a normal jump you'll be at <2000ft with <10 seconds until impact...

    --
    Wax-Museum Fire Results In Hundreds Of New Danny DeVito Statues
  35. Heating by friction by Mr.Sharpy · · Score: 2

    How hot would the surface of ones clothing/body become while traveling at mach 1.68 due to friction with the air?

  36. Where this Urban Legend Comes From by dmaxwell · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's a good story so I don't want to Lone Gunman it. Suffice it to say, no one gets killed and those involved weren't QUITE that stupid. There is a true story that gave birth to the urban legend. What REALLY happened isn't quite like the parent quoted Legend.

    http://www.wagoneers.com/pages/RocketCar/rockit. ht ml

  37. Wrong, but right by Goonie · · Score: 2, Informative
    The maximum height in competitive diving is the 10 metre platform.

    However, you're absolutely right in that it's not that hard to safely dive from much greater heights. I've personally seen people do 30 metre dives at acquatic shows.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  38. He's not the only one by M.+Silver · · Score: 2

    There's an article here on a different skydiver (mentions Fournier and another attemptee, too) shooting for the same record.

    "If her plans succeed, on Sept 3, 2003, she'll ride a balloon to 130,000 feet, jump out in a McConnell Air Force Base pressurized space suit and free fall to Earth nearly 25 miles below -- landing somewhere within 70 miles of Wichita."

    --

    Slashdot's token middle-aged housewife
  39. Re:Parachuting from space? by Kredal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Going down isn't the problem. If the shuttle were geosynchronous, no problem.. if you had space suit, you could make the jump no problem (well, very little problem)..

    But the shuttle is also moving around the earth VERY quickly.. something like 17,000 kph (feel free to correct me), which would kill you pretty much instantly when you encountered the atmosphere, and had to slow down your sideways speed.

    --
    Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  40. he is ALWAYS at terminal velocity by Transcendent · · Score: 2

    "Well, actually his max speed will be high up and near the earth the atmosphere will have slowed him down to terminal velocity."

    at that high altitude, mach 1.6 IS his terminal velocity.....

  41. Feet and meters by theolein · · Score: 2

    The U.S. Army did this stuff back in the late 60's, only it was at 75-100K.

    That was at 75 000 to 100 000 feet. This is to be done at 41 000 meters. There are just over three feet in a meter. Do the rest yourself.

  42. However, his later jump... by kikta · · Score: 3, Informative
    ...was a bit faster:
    His later jumps were much more stable, and with a functioning 6 foot drogue, he achieved a terminal velocity of 702 MPH! He is still the holder of several world records, including longest (4.5 minutes) and highest freefall (81,000 feet) as well as highest bailout.
    Source: The Ejection Site
  43. Close Harmoney by BoBaBrain · · Score: 3, Funny

    Since he will break the sound barrier and eventually start to slow down, he could sing a close harmony duet with himself.

    Cool.

    --
    I am a Karma Library.
  44. Misread by AJSchu · · Score: 2, Funny

    First time I read the story, I thought it said "a retarded French army colonel who is soon to make a free fall parachute jump from 25 miles up."

    AJS

  45. last record set in 1966? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

    The previous records he'll be breaking were set in the 60's, the last being in 1966. What's the deal? Have there just been two generations of lamers?

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  46. Re:Make this a park attraction by CormacJ · · Score: 2

    It's the edge of space. To protect yourself at this altitude you use essentially a space suit. This gets past all the issues of lack of oxygen, decompression etc.

    You're right there is a reverse effect at high altitude. Climbers need to acclimatize properly otherwise they risk problems from oxgen deprivation and a rather nasty problem where the brain swells.

    In standard parachute jumping though the exposure is not long enough for these problems to be apparent. The only time problems occur is when you go from the altitude metioned here. Instant death from lack of oxygen, and freezing is pretty assured if you tried going from this height without some protection.