Slashdot Mirror


FBI Arrests 4 College Interns For Stealing Lunar Materials

An anonymous reader "Today, the fourth member of a group of college interns working at NASA's Johnson Space Center in Houston turned herself in after being charged with conspiracy to steal government property. Click2Houston.com has an article with a video feed covering many details of the case. Apparently, three of the alleged theives went to Florida and tried to sell, online, the 5 oz. of moon rocks and meteorite material they lugged out of the JSC in a 600lb case. Here's another article from the Houston Chronicle."

86 of 289 comments (clear)

  1. What did they expect.. by Chicane-UK · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And they didn't expect to get caught? I might understand if they were trying to sell a harddrive they had stolen from work, or a 2nd hand base unit they had sneaked out. But a few hundred pounds of moonrock are sure to be noticed, especially when you sell em on eBay!

    They deserve to get caught..

    --
    "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    1. Re:What did they expect.. by Ignavus+Anonymous · · Score: 2, Funny

      We're lucky that they weren't planning any terrorist activities with the rocks!

      --

      --

    2. Re:What did they expect.. by Subcarrier · · Score: 3, Funny

      But a few hundred pounds of moonrock are sure to be noticed, especially when you sell em on eBay!

      You would be surprised, the kind of ideas you come up with after consuming a gallon of moonshine with your friends.

      "Hic! Man, this rocks! Show me the money! SHOW! ME! THE! MONEY!"

      --
      "I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree with them." -- George H. W. Bush
    3. Re:What did they expect.. by Mr+Guy · · Score: 2

      Well, they aren't rocket scientists.

      Ba dum bum CHING.

    4. Re:What did they expect.. by WinDoze · · Score: 2

      It's amazing what people will go through just to get their rocks off.

    5. Re:What did they expect.. by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

      The first three -- Thad, Tiffany, and Gordon -- sound like just plain bad influence. Sorta sucks for Shae -- she's by far the youngest of the three and working as an intern there, and turned herself in.

      My guess -- three idiots think they can run off with hundreds of thousands of high-profile goods, and now the fourth is screwed for life for letting them pull it off.

    6. Re:What did they expect.. by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 2
      Well, they aren't rocket scientists.

      Well, one of them is apparently pretty close...

      # Shae Lynn Saur, NASA intern, Age: 19, Worked in Structural Engineering with Thermal Design. Worked last summer in the X-38 program. Pursuing a B.S. in engineering from Lamar University.
      In any case, there's a big difference between intelligence and wisdom. Remember that Wernher Von Braun was (from what I've heard) pretty brilliant (and probably the reference for the 'rocket scientist' references.. Nontheless, he worked for Hitler in WW2. He either liked what Hitler was up to, or he didn't care enough to slow down his rocket research on the V1 and V2 rockets.
      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  2. The dark side of the moon... by lfourrier · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...brings no
    money.

    sorry for the youngs here. A long time ago, there was some band named Pink Floyd...

  3. Should have sold... by __aadhrk6380 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The rocks in their heads, instead.

  4. A tribute to the FBI... by iworm · · Score: 5, Funny

    "We put two and two together," Houston FBI spokesman Bob Doguim said Monday. "We had missing rocks in Houston, and some people trying to sell them online."

    Heck, they're clever these FBI chaps, eh?

    1. Re:A tribute to the FBI... by Cpyder · · Score: 2
      Thanks... I just spilled coffee all over my keyboard while laughing my * off...

      You just made my day, thanks!

    2. Re:A tribute to the FBI... by Daetrin · · Score: 2

      No, but in that case you might have expected them to mention to NASA that they might want to keep a better eye on their moon rocks :)

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    3. Re:A tribute to the FBI... by kaimiike1970 · · Score: 2

      I'm sorry, you were laughing your star off? Your asterisk off?

      I'll bet I could beat you up.

      --


      Do a google search before posting.
  5. Government property? by plumby · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why is it government property? I thought there was an agreement that the moon was not owned by any country or government. Surely taking the rock from the moon doesn't actually mean that you then own it (as you've then stolen it from the rest of the world). If it belongs to anyone one earth, then maybe the UN, but not an individual government.

    1. Re:Government property? by MadFarmAnimalz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Us Government property, UN property... Hmm. Am I missing a distinction in there?

      Let's not split geopolitical hairs.

      --
      Blearf. Blearf, I say.
    2. Re:Government property? by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 2

      The U.S. considers all lunar material brought back to Earth (so far) to be the property of the U.S., and I agree with them. They (we) are the ones who spent billions of dollars to get there and fetch it.

      One point on which I don't agree is the idea that we own it forever. Apparently there was some recent disagreement (perhaps discussed here on the dot?) that involved a moon rock that had changed hands a few times. The first change of hands (from the U.S. to a foreign dignitary) was legit, but one or more of the later transfers were not legit. I don't agree that the U.S. has a legitimate claim to it.

      By the way, and I think this came out in the earlier discussion, I think you misunderstand the concept of "ownership" of the moon. While it's true that we have agreed that the moon will not be the sovereign territory of any nation, that does not mean that materials and resources obtained on the moon cannot be owned. The point is that anyone has access to it. If anyone brings stuff back, it's theirs.

      --


      Evil is the money of root.
    3. Re:Government property? by great+throwdini · · Score: 3, Interesting

      One point on which I don't agree is the idea that we own it forever. Apparently there was some recent disagreement (perhaps discussed here on the dot?) that involved a moon rock that had changed hands a few times. The first change of hands (from the U.S. to a foreign dignitary) was legit, but one or more of the later transfers were not legit. I don't agree that the U.S. has a legitimate claim to it.

      Should I happen to be so lucky to recall this particular dispute correctly, the issue was that the lunar rock in question had been gifted to a foreign dignitary, subsequently stolen, and was now in process of being resold.

      Ah. Here's a reference to the lunar dispute. Seems the Feds want to reclaim a rock originally given to Honduras by President Nixon so that they may return it to the Honduran government. The person most recently in possession of the rock claimed to have bought it from a Honduran military officer who, in turn, claimed to have been given it as a gift some time ago. The Honduran gov't claims they never let it go willingly in the first place.

      And here's a 1995 lunar rock dispute, wherein the Feds claimed a rock put up for sale was stolen in the mail some twenty-odd years back. No idea what the resolution was in that case.

      Two things I note, here: (1) proposed sale of lunar material invites close scrutiny by the Feds; and (2) the Feds don't seem to be claiming ownership without end, but instead inspection and enforcement of transfer to and among individuals.

      Makes me wonder whether such intervention on the part of the Federal Government is really out of line with handling of similar national treasures. (Yes, though given as goodwill trinkets to other nations, I do believe the expense and historical value of the materials in question qualify them as such.)

    4. Re:Government property? by bbc22405 · · Score: 2, Funny
      One point on which I don't agree is the idea that we own it forever. Apparently there was some recent disagreement (perhaps discussed here on the dot?) that involved a moon rock that had changed hands a few times. The first change of hands (from the U.S. to a foreign dignitary) was legit, but one or more of the later transfers were not legit. I don't agree that the U.S. has a legitimate claim to it.

      Well, if you had read the Lunar Materials End User License Agreement that was shrink-wrapped around those rocks, you would know that the Central American government only had a non-transferable license to house and view those rocks; we actually retained ownership. That EULA explicitly prohibits resale and reverse engineering, and disclaims the rocks to be suitable for any purpose.

    5. Re:Government property? by LittleGuy · · Score: 3

      [i]Why is it government property? [/i]

      Procured with Government funds, perhaps?

      When individuals can send vehicles to land on the moon, scoop up samples, and return them safely, then they can do whatever with the samples.

      Rebuttal?

      --
      Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
    6. Re:Government property? by plumby · · Score: 2
      No one owns the moon, but the gob'ment owns what it hauls back from the moon. They put the labor in, you see.

      I suspect burglars could use that arguement. "I had to haul the TV out of his house, so it must be mine".

      Remember, you own what you put your sweat in.

      Tell that to your employer. If your contract is anything like most peoples, they own what you put your sweat in.

    7. Re:Government property? by itsnotme · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Its not like you OWN the earth either, its been around longer than any of us and we are claiming that patches of land on it belong to us exclusively. Why should the moon be any different, greed is greed.

    8. Re:Government property? by plumby · · Score: 2

      Kuwait was procured with Iraqi government funds. Does this meant that they should have been legally entitled to it?

    9. Re:Government property? by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 2

      the Lunar Materials End User License Agreement that was shrink-wrapped around those rocks...

      Actually, there is some disagreement here as well. The EULA was posted on a small brass placard mounted to a boulder in the center of the far side of the moon. It reads, in part, "By landing on this surface, you agree to be bound by the provisions of this license, including any future changes that may be made to it."

      --


      Evil is the money of root.
    10. Re:Government property? by the+gnat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's shocking how many people in this thread agree with you. As government property, it was available for research (one of the linked articles has an archived article discussing this) and held in trust for the people. In fact, that article says they get requests from institutions all over the world to study the rocks. Anyone who wants their own personal moon rocks can fund their own expedition to get them. I doubt the feds would have much of a case trying to wrest those away.

      At any rate, the point here is that these particular rocks were most certainly US property, and these assholes were trying to sell them to a private collector. I fail to see any gray area.

    11. Re:Government property? by CodeMonky · · Score: 2

      Apples and oranges.
      The moon is an unoccupied 'territory' not owned or claimed by any nation on earth.
      Kuwait is an occupied country with a government citizens.

      We went to the moon and took some rocks that (last I checked) where just chillin on the moon not being used for anything.
      Iraq went to Kuwait and took over their oil fields, equipment and all. Those where being used for something, namely providing oil and money for the people of kuwait.

      Now, if we knowlingly took the moon rocks knowing they where the fuel and income source of the moon people then your analogy would stand.

      --
      --"Karma is justice without the satisfaction"
    12. Re:Government property? by plumby · · Score: 2

      The statement that I was replying to claimed that the reason it was US property was that it was Procured with Government funds, not that it wasn't being used by anyone else. The point was that procurement by government funds by itself is not enough justification to claim ownership by that government (and that was presented by the previous owner as the only justification needed).

    13. Re:Government property? by clickety6 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Us Government property, UN property...

      Is the US still actually a member of the UN? I thought their representative just went along to the meetings for the free cookies!

      --
      ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    14. Re:Government property? by iCEBaLM · · Score: 2

      Us Government property, UN property... Hmm. Am I missing a distinction in there?

      Yes, yes you are my arrogant american friend.

      -- iCEBaLM

    15. Re:Government property? by CodeMonky · · Score: 2

      Oh I see.
      My mistake.

      --
      --"Karma is justice without the satisfaction"
    16. Re:Government property? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2

      The point was that procurement by government funds by itself is not enough justification to claim ownership by that government

      True, but the whole "government funds" angle is quite common in governmental policy. If Joe Schome's Moon Transport was hired by the gov't to go get moon rocks, then the gov't could claim ownership of the rocks. They specify "gov't funds" as a shorhand way of saying "not only did our employees go there and get it, we paid every cent of the cost of doing so, so there's no frickin' way anyone can claim part of the loot we brought back".

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    17. Re:Government property? by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      Kuwait was procured with Iraqi government funds. Does this meant that they should have been legally entitled to it?

      Yes. And they *were* legally entitled to it - it was theirs for awhile.

      Then about a dozen countries banded together and bought it back for the Kuwaiti people. What a nice gift.

      --
      Evan "You can buy things with money, subtlety, blood, or a combination of the three. Money and blood have finite limits".

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  6. Who would buy these? by Myco · · Score: 5, Insightful
    What kind of idiot would buy moon rocks over the Internet for any appreciable sum of money? How exactly would you verify what you were buying? And what kind of idiot wouldn't know that any moon rocks for sale must be stolen property?

    There is, last time I checked, *one* moon rock in the U.S. (or the world?) that is in any way available to the public. You can go and touch it. I did. Whee. Looked like a rock, to me.

    1. Re:Who would buy these? by little1973 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "And what kind of idiot wouldn't know that any moon rocks for sale must be stolen property?"

      This is not true. You can find Moon rocks (even Mars rocks) on Earth since meteorites can tear material from the Moon (or Mars) at impact which may land on Earth afterwards.

      --
      Government cannot make man richer, but it can make him poorer. - Ludwig von Mises
    2. Re:Who would buy these? by collectspace · · Score: 2, Informative
      Lunar "touchstones" are located at the National Air & Space Museum, Space Center Houston and the Museo de Las Ciencias in Mexico. (I believe Kennedy Space Center also has a touchstone, but I am not sure.)

      You could also buy touchable lunar dust earlier this year...

    3. Re:Who would buy these? by nettdata · · Score: 2

      What kind of idiot would buy moon rocks over the Internet for any appreciable sum of money?

      Ironically, in this case, someone who would actually WANT moon rocks... these were legit!

      Hmmm... makes me re-think that whole Penis Enlargement ad I saw...

      --



      $0.02 (CDN)
    4. Re:Who would buy these? by Peyna · · Score: 2
      Hmmm... makes me re-think that whole Penis Enlargement ad I saw...

      Perhaps this might change your mind about the Penis Enlargement Companies.

      --
      What?
    5. Re:Who would buy these? by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      And what kind of idiot wouldn't know that any moon rocks for sale must be stolen property?

      To be honest, I didn't know until now that there weren't any moon rocks in private hands. If you had asked me yesterday, I would've speculated that NASA allowed the astronauts to keep some samples that they brought back. I mean, isn't that the LEAST they could do? I'd be pissed if I went to the moon, but they didn't let me keep any souvenir. :)

      Obviously I would expect some sort of authenticity verification...

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    6. Re:Who would buy these? by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      (* What kind of idiot would buy moon rocks over the Internet for any appreciable sum of money? *)

      Hmmmm. Maybe I should sell "Fake Moon Rocks" via ebay or spam. Perhaps somebody wants to impress a babe or something. Don't need a real moon rock to do that since nobody without a lab can tell the difference. And, the prettier the girl, the less likely she has a lab. (No, I don't have statistics to back that.....yet.)

      "Fake Incased Moon Rock - Impress The Girls!"

      Sounds as good as any spam to me. Or how about:

      "Who needs a longer p*nis when you have a fake moon rock!"

    7. Re:Who would buy these? by guttentag · · Score: 5, Funny
      What kind of idiot would buy moon rocks over the Internet for any appreciable sum of money?
      The FBI.

      Idiot Selling Moon Rocks: "Hey, I got me some moon rocks for sale! Moon rocks! Get 'em while they're hot!"
      FBI Agent: "I'm very interested in your moon rocks. Where did you get them? I see... Where do I send the check?"

    8. Re:Who would buy these? by PatientZero · · Score: 3, Funny

      All they got was a fscking T-shirt.

      --
      Freedom to fear. Freedom from thought. Freedom to kill.
      I guess the War on Terror really is about freedom!
  7. uhm? by zmooc · · Score: 4, Funny

    oz? lbs? People living somewhere on the southern hemisphere and a harddisk access format? What do they have to do with moonrocks?

    --
    0x or or snor perron?!
  8. You got that all wrong... by cnelzie · · Score: 2, Funny

    They would have gotten away with it, if it weren't for those kids and that dog!

    -.-

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
  9. other stolen rocks.. by Fuzzums · · Score: 5, Interesting

    one year ago there was a big diamond theft in amsterdam. No guns were used.
    the diamonds wee carried out thtough the front door in a microwavebox!

    [http://www.preciousgemstones.com/gffall01.html# th iev]
    $8 Million in Diamonds Stolen in Microwave
    In the Netherlands, a 25-year-old man calmly walked out of the offices of Amsterdam's Gassan Diamonds carrying a box stuffed with uninsured diamonds. He had arrived at the office with the box at the start of the working day, saying it contained a microwave oven. Benno Leeser, director of the 56-year-old family-run firm said, "He came with a microwave in the box, but he left with the diamonds." The suspect, said to be a former army cook who had worked for the firm since April, has vanished without a trace.

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
    1. Re:other stolen rocks.. by GigsVT · · Score: 2, Funny

      The suspect, said to be a former army cook

      Hey I saw him in that action movie. It's a good thing they didn't try to fuck with him.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:other stolen rocks.. by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

      sounds like how we stole beer when i worked for a grocery store... worked next to the cooler, had an apple box cases fit right in.

  10. The "Moon": A Ridiculous Liberal Myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It amazes me that so many allegedly "educated" people have fallen so quickly and so hard for a fraudulent fabrication of such laughable proportions. The very idea that a gigantic ball of rock happens to orbit our planet, showing itself in neat, four-week cycles -- with the same side facing us all the time -- is ludicrous. Furthermore, it is an insult to common sense and a damnable affront to intellectual honesty and integrity. That people actually believe it is evidence that the liberals have wrested the last vestiges of control of our public school system from decent, God-fearing Americans (as if any further evidence was needed! Daddy's Roommate? God Almighty!)

    Documentaries such as Enemy of the State have accurately portrayed the elaborate, byzantine network of surveillance satellites that the liberals have sent into space to spy on law-abiding Americans. Equipped with technology developed by Handgun Control, Inc., these satellites have the ability to detect firearms from hundreds of kilometers up. That's right, neighbors .. the next time you're out in the backyard exercising your Second Amendment rights, the liberals will see it! These satellites are sensitive enough to tell the difference between a Colt .45 and a .38 Special! And when they detect you with a firearm, their computers cross-reference the address to figure out your name, and then an enormous database housed at Berkeley is updated with information about you.

    Of course, this all works fine during the day, but what about at night? Even the liberals can't control the rotation of the Earth to prevent nightfall from setting in (only Joshua was able to ask for that particular favor!) That's where the "moon" comes in. Powered by nuclear reactors, the "moon" is nothing more than an enormous balloon, emitting trillions of candlepower of gun-revealing light. Piloted by key members of the liberal community, the "moon" is strategically moved across the country, pointing out those who dare to make use of their God-given rights at night!

    Yes, I know this probably sounds paranoid and preposterous, but consider this. Despite what the revisionist historians tell you, there is no mention of the "moon" anywhere in literature or historical documents -- anywhere -- before 1950. That is when it was initially launched. When President Josef Kennedy, at the State of the Union address, proclaimed "We choose to go to the moon", he may as well have said "We choose to go to the weather balloon." The subsequent faking of a "moon" landing on national TV was the first step in a long history of the erosion of our constitutional rights by leftists in this country. No longer can we hide from our government when the sun goes down.

    1. Re:The "Moon": A Ridiculous Liberal Myth by bailout911 · · Score: 2

      Please, I'm sure you think it's funny to spew out garbage about the moon landing being a hoax, but some of us take science a little more seriously. Just in case you're serious about the moon landings being fake, here's some real scientific information about why they can't be fake.

      --
      --Stupid Sig Here--
    2. Re:The "Moon": A Ridiculous Liberal Myth by Marx_Mrvelous · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you're referring to any of the following "proof" that the landings didn't take place, then you need to do some real research:
      1. There was no crater under the lander.
      2. The shadows should have been completely dark.
      3. There are no stars in the night sky.
      4. You can see the letter "N" (or something) on a "prop" rock.
      5. You can see a reflection of a video camera, or an incorrect reflection (3rd spaceman, etc) in a visor.
      All of these "proofs" have been easily disproven. I'll enumerate:
      1. There will never be one, they approached the moon at several feet/sec. Do you hit the parking space at 100MPH?
      2. Simple physics: Light reflects. There are no truly dark shadows anywhere there is a light source that can reflect.
      3. The cameras were set to very fast exposure due to the extreme brightness so the stars did not have time to expose the film. (In addition, I beelive that there are stars in some of the real NASA pictures.)
      4. This is a scratch in the film; the real photo does not have this (or other imperfections that have been added by bad photocopies).
      5. I won't go into detail on all of them, but the imfamous "3rd spaceman" is actually an editied picture: again, it is not present in the originals.
      Go to the webpage previously referenced, it explains everything in detail.

      --

      Moderation: Put your hand inside the puppet head!
    3. Re:The "Moon": A Ridiculous Liberal Myth by crawling_chaos · · Score: 2
      On point 3, several of the astronauts commented that stars were not visible to the naked eye during lunar day. There was too much light bouncing off the surface. Stars won't appear just because the sky is black. Anyone who believes otherwise should try to find stars in the night sky in a brightly lit parking lot on Earth. The lunar surface is incredibly bright during the day, due to the lack of an atmosphere and a fairly high albedo. That's why they had the sunscreens down on their helmets 90% of the time.

      No that this changes the intent of your post in any way, of course. I just thought you might find it interesting.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    4. Re:The "Moon": A Ridiculous Liberal Myth by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "On point 3, several of the astronauts commented that stars were not visible to the naked eye during lunar day..."

      I think the lack of stars proves that Nasa landed on the moon. I mean think about it: If Nasa was really making a TV stunt, they would have had a starry background. That's the way TV worked those days, you give people what they expect.

      The 'hoax proof' is a rather comic read. They even had a version of it aired on FOX. Their 'expert photographer' knew absolutely nothing about how light works. That's pathetic. Somebody took some 'astronaut toys' and recreated the photos this guy panned. Heh it produced the same type of lighting.

      There's a book called 'Light-Science & Magic' by Hunter and Fuqua that goes into detail about how light works with photography. It doesn't talk about the moon specifically, but it does show how areas of light cause interesting shadows. I can imagine most anybody visiting Slashdot enjoying that book for one reason or another. It really helps you appreciate the pictures Nasa was able to take of the moon.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    5. Re:The "Moon": A Ridiculous Liberal Myth by Xerithane · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The analysis isn't conclusive because it's not only done by a bunch of tin-foil hat wearing people who think Art Bell should be president, but completely flawed.

      Have you seen the original photos? I mean the originals. The real originals.

      Let me tell you a story, it's about Mars. You see, Mars has this face on it, right? It's a human face, that's how the story goes, if I recall. I saw the original feed. I had access to all of those images. Every single mars image we have ever taken, straight from the archives.

      You know what? All those "Mars Face" images are doctored. In a really easy way, just playing around with overlay and contrast and you get a very nice face.

      If you think that analyzing photographs and only photographs is considered real research than you really do need to take a forensics course when you get into college. If it would have been real research they would have explained and counter-proofed all the rebuttals.

      Such as why there is no crater. Which I think is the stupidest one of all. We are talking landing at less than 2 feet per second. 2 feet per second. You jump harder than that dipshit. I don't see craters forming on NBA courts everywhere. Hell, I don't see craters forming out in the dirt when you jump up and down.

      Anyway, go open your eyes read up on light reflection on the moon and physics, and you will see that you sound like a complete fucking moron right now trying to say this is a hoax.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    6. Re:The "Moon": A Ridiculous Liberal Myth by Tablizer · · Score: 2
    7. Re:The "Moon": A Ridiculous Liberal Myth by PatientZero · · Score: 2

      "Texas Moon" is slang for a bare ass, like "full moon." Therefore, "Under a Texas Moon" refers to someone singing under someone else's bare ass. ;)

      --
      Freedom to fear. Freedom from thought. Freedom to kill.
      I guess the War on Terror really is about freedom!
    8. Re:The "Moon": A Ridiculous Liberal Myth by crawling_chaos · · Score: 2

      I would guess that those photos were taken in the "afternoon" or "morning" periods when the sun wasn't as bright.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
  11. Huh? by neksys · · Score: 2

    Is there a market out there to make any money off this? I mean - if I ran across "L@@K - real MOON ROCK from SPACE MISSIONS!!!!! N/R!!!!!!!" on eBay, I'd assume it was just a joke at best, or a scam at worst. I mean, sure, you can sucker someone into paying $100 for a fake moon rock, but a million or so for a rock that, as far as the public is concerned, may or may not be real? It doesn't seem like all that great a plan - perhaps it would've been better to contact some private collectors directly.

    1. Re:Huh? by MadFarmAnimalz · · Score: 2

      Please permit me to refer you to the authority on demand creation for potentially bogus merchandise.

      Glad to help out.

      --
      Blearf. Blearf, I say.
  12. "Adventures" at NASA by collectspace · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The wonders the web holds. One of the defendents identified by agents as the ring leader maintained an autobiography on NASA JSC's Co-Op website (since removed by NASA but archived by collectSPACE.com).

    Quoting Thad Roberts:

    "At NASA I have been assigned to the coolest department of all. Formally known as the Earth Science and Solar System Exploration Division (ESSSE) it is now know as the Astromaterials Research and Exploration Science Division (ARES). Most of the people in my building are Geologists, and that's how I got in here.

    "There are so many potential adventures to be had in my building."

    Somehow, I don't think NASA had his type of adventures in mind...

    (More on this story here.)

  13. Does this answer your question? by chevelleSS · · Score: 2, Informative
  14. Where is the news? by pieterh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What is the real story here? 10oz of rock fragments for $2000-8000 per oz = $20-80k, not really a million dollar heist. This amounts to a theft of around 1/1400th of the total brought back from the moon. Big deal. It's the price of one new car.
    It's maybe worth commenting how law enforcement is starting to use the Internet to cross reference thefts with sales. But seriously: doing manual searches of e-Bay is not what I'd consider automation.
    Summer time... and the news is slow.

    1. Re:Where is the news? by drsoran · · Score: 2

      I wonder if the FBI was actually the ones to notice it or if the NASA engineers browsing eBay for shuttle replacement components saw it and tipped them off.

    2. Re:Where is the news? by UM_Maverick · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not exactly...it was 2-8K per GRAM, not per ounce. At 28.4 grams per ounce, this becomes $568K-$2.2 million. So yeah, it really is a million-dollar heist.

      Also, the FBI didn't find it themselves...they were tipped off by "a belgian rock hound"

  15. ...can't...resist... by McCart42 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It'll be interesting to see them use the defense that "it was the moon rock gnomes!" ...can't resist this one.

    1. Steal moon rocks.
    2. ???
    3. Profit!

    --
    "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
    1. Re:...can't...resist... by Mr+Guy · · Score: 2

      Are you kidding?

      Can you imagine the panty removal power of:

      "Actually, I AM a rocket scientist..."

      or

      "I have tomorrow off, NASA believes even astronauts should get a break once in a while."

      You don't need to BE an astronaut or rocket scientist, you just need the NASA id badge.

  16. thank you, you stupid fucking intern by xeeno · · Score: 2, Insightful

    for making life hard for the rest of us at NASA. Because of this, every person interning at NASA is going to be put under the microscope.

    1. Re:thank you, you stupid fucking intern by The+Dobber · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah right. NASA willl probably form a team to review the issue and come back with the suggestion of A) decreasing the standards for internship B) increasing the compensation.

      As for the FBI, gotta love those analytical skills
      To quote:

      "We put two and two together," Houston FBI spokesman Bob Doguim said Monday. "We had missing rocks in Houston, and some people trying to sell them online."

      Wow.

  17. Money on the the Moon! by invid · · Score: 2

    For any far reaching businessman, the Moon means ready cash. Heck, and $8000 an ounce, this should make a private enterprise trip to the Moon financially viable. Send up an unmanned probe with a big scoop and bucket and you should be able to get a few hundred pounds back no problem. 100 pounds of the stuff will get you almost 13 million dollars. With all the money leaving the stock market, the rich need to invest in something. Forget gold, invest in Moon rocks!

    --
    The Moore-Murphy Law: The number of things that will go wrong will double every 2 years.
    1. Re:Money on the the Moon! by invid · · Score: 2

      If you bring, lets say, a ton of it back to Earth, it will still be a rare enough commodity to make money on. Take a few visible grains, put them in clear resin in cheap $2 rings and sell them on The Home Shopping Network for $50 bucks a piece. "Get your cosmic moon ring!" Sure, the price will go down, but it will still be rarer than diamonds.

      --
      The Moore-Murphy Law: The number of things that will go wrong will double every 2 years.
  18. I don't get it by The+Mutant · · Score: 3, Interesting
    How on earth did they expect to get away with it, considering its relatively (in italics since I'm assuming folks like these would have clear knowledge) well known that possession of moon rocks by US citizens is illegal.

    Its even been discussed on /. before.

    Now that being said, its very common in the art world for works of art - sometimes priceless ones at that - to be stolen and to disappear into private collections.

    And I could fully understand if any one of these geeks took the rocks and stashed them away in their bedrooms. Hell, who wouldn't want a chunk of the moon in their bedroom?

    But to try to sell on the 'Net?!??

    I'm missing something here, but I guess its because was assuming they were bright.

    1. Re:I don't get it by HiQ · · Score: 2

      This law then doesn't make a whole lot of sense. Considering the fact that, given the effort, it is perfectly legal to visit Antarctica, plus the fact that a lot of material from Mars, and even probably from the moon, can be found there, it is very well possible to own this kind of material, without the need to ever visit the actual moon/planet(s).

  19. Not exactly... by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 2

    Unlike the moon rocks, the TV in your example belongs to somebody else to begin with. The moon rocks were just sitting there on the moon until the US Gov't. (admittedly not my favorite institution) spent $billions to bring them back for scientific analysis. Therefore, I'd say they're the "owners". And it's not like they don't release the data to the scientific community by publishing it. That's far more useful than giving away the rocks themselves.

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
  20. What do you bet.... by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... one of them tried to smoke the moon rock in thier crack pipe.

  21. Obligatory Simpsons Quote: by dr_dank · · Score: 2

    "I've got moon rocks in my nose!"
    -Ralph Wiggum

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  22. Bible proves the moon can't orbit the earth. by dpbsmith · · Score: 2

    "And God made the two great lights, the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night." Ergo, the God-given purpose of the moon is to provide light during the night. Ergo, there cannot be such things as moonless nights. Ergo, the moon cannot orbit the earth.

  23. The Moon Landing was Faked. by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2
  24. Too late once again.. by kemster · · Score: 2, Funny

    .. Damn it. I knew I should have used Buy It Now. Now the auction is gone :( No moon rocks for me, and I was all ready to paypal those guys too.

  25. Hmm. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    Okay.. so if I'm in the US of A, and I pick up a rock off the ground, and take it home to Costa Rica...

    have I 'stolen' US Property?

    1. Re:Hmm. by plumby · · Score: 2

      If it's a valuable rock (which I'm assuming the moon rock is), then quite possibly. You've probably breached someone's mineral rights.

    2. Re:Hmm. by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 2

      JSC houses a considerable collection of rocks they picked up from the ground from various sites around the world. They are meteorite fragments. In fact, this very case involved not just lunar rocks but samples of the infamous Mars meteorite. What do you think JSC security would think about you waltzing in there and just picking one or two up to take home?

      Many museums have extensive rock and mineral collections. Some consist of precious stones. Some are simply examples of more common minerals. You would find the same kind of reaction from their security if you decided to take home a sample from there too.

      Now - what if you launched your own moonshot a'la Salvage1. Then you would be free to pick up as many rocks as you wished and take them home to Costa Rica. Or begin a brisk business on eBay and complicate the FBI's future lunar sample theft investigations.

  26. Boy did I get the wrong image in my mind... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    "FBI Arrests 4 College Interns For Stealing Lunar Materials"

    When I read this headline, the first image in my mind was of college kids building a rocket and 'stealing' lunar materials. I can see some MIT kids getting drunk and doing exactly that heh. As for the FBI getting involved: Anybody remember that Simpsons quote "The Moon belongs to America." :)

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  27. Here's what went down... by Gennette · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here's what I get from reading the actual article in the Houston paper, rather than just reading the little summary. Four friends decide it would be funny to post something about selling moon rocks. They haven't stolen the rocks at this point, and they probably don't really intend to. They have some good laughs over it, I'm sure. Then, someone actually replies about wanting them! (someone that is just a front for the FBI) Encouraged by the huge amount that he is supposedly willing to pay, they are enticed to actually steal the rocks. In fact, they don't even steal them till after the undercover FBI people set up a price and meeting place. By this point, they feel like they're in too deep to back out. The joke has gone too far. They feel they have no choice but to actually follow through. Hello entrapment! (anyone who actually read it, feel free to discuss...others please don't comment)

    1. Re:Here's what went down... by Binky+The+Oracle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You wouldn't happen to be their defense lawyer, would you? Because that's exactly the argument I'd take to try to make to weasel out of this. "It's ahl a gubmint cohnspeerasee yah honah! These heah rocket wizahds was TRICKED into a life ah crime!"

      I'm not a lawyer, but if I recall correctly, entrapment only occurs when the enforcement organization actively initiates the transaction or crime.

      For example, let's say that the FBI puts two and two together (as they're apparently good at doing) and thinks that Senator Hollings is on the take. They call him up, offer him some money in return for some legislation, and pay him off. Well, ok, that's not a great example because we already know he's on the take, so this is just a sting proving his behavior. ;-)

      Instead, let's say your local police force sends an undercover officer to your house and the cop convinces/coerces you to take his gun and hold up the convenience store down the street. He goes with you and arrests you when you pull out the gun in the store. That's entrapment.

      If, however, I start asking around about where I can get a gun fast and the police get tipped off and start an undercover operation to catch me doing whatever it is I'm planning, that's not entrapment.

      Regardless of their original intent, at least one of these four posted an email saying they had lunar materials for sale on a web site and subsequently followed through with the theft and attempted sale. Their intent could conceivably have bearing on sentencing, but shouldn't on whether or not they're guilty of the crime. They said they had moon rocks for sale, they stole moon rocks, they tried to sell the stolen moon rocks. Period.

      (And yes, I read the Chron article.)

      --

      Slashdot comments... splitting hairs since 1997.

  28. Thad Roberts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    One of the arrested interns, was a student of mine when I was a teaching assistant at the University of Utah. He was quite a people-pleaser, but as I recall, had little academic ability. I was told, that he commonly cheated his way through classes. I can't substantiate such a claim, but given the difficulty he had with freshman physics, I don't find it difficult to believe.

    He was instrumental in starting the University of Utah Astronomical Society, though this was probably largely a social exercise for him, as his knowledge of astronomy was weaker than that of the average high-school student.

    Thad was quite fond of fantasizing about his future career as a Noble prize-winning astronaut (email was astronaut_thad@yahoo.com at one point). As great as my doubts were at the time about him achieving his ambitions, it seems quite unlikely that he shall succeed at this point; though it would be untrue to suggest that recent events are anything short of shocking, my perception of Thad as someone with a proclivity for dishonesty was apparently not entirely unjustified.

    I thought a little (scandal-mongering) biographica would be appropriate, as I doubt very much any of the major news sources are likely to interview me.

    Disclaimer: I am not presently affiliated in any way with the University of Utah, NASA, or Thad Roberts.

  29. spacesuit dust by peter303 · · Score: 2

    I recall the dust on lunar space suits was auctioned to public by a private collector at one time.

  30. Ahh by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    But the moon rock is not valuable because of some inherent value. It's valuable because it's from the moon. There is no shortage of moon rock; it's not unique, nothing has been 'stolen' from the moon.Anyone else who goes there can get truckloads of it.

    So to say that the US has 'stolen' the rock from the moon because they don't have rights to the moon is absurd.

  31. One of these things is not like the other... by Binky+The+Oracle · · Score: 2

    One of these things is not like the other... tell me, can you guess which one?

    (Scroll down and look at the photos and descriptions)

    When I first saw the lineup I laughed out loud:

    • Thad Ryan Roberts, NASA co-op, Age: 25, Worked at the Neutral Buoyancy Lab Mission Operations Directorate. Triple major at University of Utah.
    • Tiffany Brooke Fowler, NASA intern, Age: 22, She worked in Biological Systems in Space and Life Sciences. Recent graduate of Texas Lutheran University. From Odessa.
    • Shae Lynn Saur, NASA intern, Age: 19, Worked in Structural Engineering with Thermal Design. Worked last summer in the X-38 program. Pursuing a B.S. in engineering from Lamar University.
    • Gordon Sean McWorter, Age: 26

    Just look at those photos and descriptions and then try to guess which one was saying (in his best Steve from Dell voice), "DUDE! Like, if you could get some of those rocks, we could make... like... I bet at least 200 bucks!" (Suppressed laughter to hold his smoke)

    Incidentally, I bet the University of Utah, Texas Lutheran University, and Lamar University are oh so happy with having their names displayed so prominently. Shining alumni indeed!

    --

    Slashdot comments... splitting hairs since 1997.

  32. What is really interesting... by cr0sh · · Score: 2
    What I find really interesting about this story (as well as the assertations I have read of it being illegal for an American to own lunar surface artifacts) is the high value placed on these things.

    While I understand that the properties of lunar dust and rocks is unique, it is still just "dirt". Nothing really that special. What makes these things so valuable isn't their properties, or the rarity - but rather the amount of money and time it took to go there and get them, and bring them back.

    The only way these items could ever drop in value would be if travel to the moon became more routine, especially if artifacts were brought back. However, I wonder if certain interests want to prevent this from happenning.

    Here we are, the world, a couple of years into a new millenium, and the greatest acheivement ever in mankind's history happened 30 years ago, and has never been repeated. Instead, we wage war on each other, stifle each other's rights, are ground up and spit out, and if we are lucky, we die leaving a little something behind for our children.

    So fucking pathetic.

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon