Slashdot Mirror


Home Entertainment PC Mod

Hughesey writes "With PC's beginning to enter the Home Entertainment scene, OC-Melbourne have come up with the perfect way to integrate a PC into your Home Theater setup. The OC-Melbourne HEPC. Quote From the Article: 'So now we have a PC that is capable of replacing many separate devices (such as a DVD player, and consoles), but lets admit it, that big beige case probably looks far worse than the hardware its replacing. Some people have gotten around this by using specialised cases such as those from Shuttle, or fancy aluminium cases such as those from LianLi. These cases, however, still don't integrate seamlessly into modern home theater systems, as they still maintain their "PC" look. Enter the OC-Melbourne HEPC...'"

203 comments

  1. Not to PC-looking case by SigveK · · Score: 5, Interesting
    1. Re:Not to PC-looking case by opto · · Score: 1

      I love the way they talk about the fins along the side. The only problem is that they should be oriented vertically. The way it is they provide a little more surface area, but unless you have a fan blowing over them, very little convective cooling.

    2. Re:Not to PC-looking case by SigveK · · Score: 1
      The only problem is that they should be oriented vertically

      Well yeah, for cooling reasons, maybe, but a microATX with a Celeron or Duron playing DVDs or MP3s either from the hard drive or over the network powered by a 145W PSU wouldn't get to hot, now would it?

    3. Re:Not to PC-looking case by ZhuLien · · Score: 1

      Funny how when this is done over 10 years ago with Amigas no-one notices, but now when it is done with clonePCs the world sits up? The last thing I want is to have to wait 45 seconds to boot up my so-called CDPlayer replacement or my DVDplayer replacement - clonePCs just simply aren't made for speed (of booting) which is the *most* important aspect of the computer in the living room, noise is another.

    4. Re:Not to PC-looking case by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 2

      A new processor (these days) and Win98 have great boot speeds. I've seen a Duron 850 boot in 15 seconds, flat. This was with automatic drive detection disabled, but how many people change their hardware in their entertainment console so frequently they would need it?

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
  2. *Slurrrrp* by Em+Emalb · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    2 posts (first posts no less, already slashdotted. slap a mirror up will ya?

    I'm sure they are quite cool mods

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
  3. PC Case by af_robot · · Score: 4, Funny

    that big beige case probably looks far worse than the hardware its replacing...

    No problems for me, i never close my case anyway...

    1. Re:PC Case by Milalwi · · Score: 3, Informative

      No problems for me, i never close my case anyway...
      Obviously, you don't have any cats.

      Milalwi
    2. Re:PC Case by KUHurdler · · Score: 4, Funny

      Obviously, you don't have any cats.

      Not anymore anyway.

      --
      Fix Your Own TV - RiddledTV.com Avoid the Landfill
    3. Re:PC Case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or filthy, drunken animal slob roommates...

    4. Re:PC Case by Grizzlysmit · · Score: 1

      There's a real geek talking

      --
      in my life God comes first.... but Linux is pretty high after that :-D
      Francis Smit
  4. Anyone remember those Intel cases? by httpamphibio.us · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A couple years back when Intel had the guys in the anti-static suits doing their advertising I remember catching some pictures of some really awesome cases at some Intel show in Japan. There were a couple round ones in colors like bright orange and pink. Overall they were really great, but of course they were never mass produced. I'd love to get my hands on one, it at least pictures.

    Am I the only one that remembers these?

    --
    sig.
    1. Re:Anyone remember those Intel cases? by fons · · Score: 2


      no I remember those. I also remember some pyramid-shaped ones.

      IRC, Intel was afraid of the iMAc. They thought it would affect the sales of the 'dull' PC's and so they made some cool cool cases as an example to the PC-makers.

    2. Re:Anyone remember those Intel cases? by I+didn't · · Score: 4, Informative

      Is it one of these concepts?

    3. Re:Anyone remember those Intel cases? by cebarro · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, I think I just figured out why MS went with Intel guts for the xbox - check out the eXo. All packaged really pretty and ready to go (almost).

    4. Re:Anyone remember those Intel cases? by httpamphibio.us · · Score: 1

      Nope... those aren't the ones I'm talking about. But they are all very cool.

      --
      sig.
    5. Re:Anyone remember those Intel cases? by Erik+K.+Veland · · Score: 1

      Funny. I was thinking "My god that's some fugly objects".

      --
      "I tend to think of OS X as Linux with QA and Taste", James Gosling, creator of Java
    6. Re:Anyone remember those Intel cases? by httpamphibio.us · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiosity... what sort of cases do you fancy?

      --
      sig.
    7. Re:Anyone remember those Intel cases? by Erik+K.+Veland · · Score: 1

      Cases where form is equal to function. Things I would actually concider having in my living room. Yes, I'm talking about Apple cases.

      These? 90% bullshit, futuristic for the heck of it, cheap-looking and some unoriginal too.

      --
      "I tend to think of OS X as Linux with QA and Taste", James Gosling, creator of Java
  5. The case if the least of the issues by PhotoGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The box can be hidden. It's the poor integration of various bits of software that is the problem with integrating into a home theatre system.

    Having to pull out a keyboard to do certain things, poor flexibility in IR remotes for PCs (and their integration to software), having to reboot Windows when it gets grumpy, and so forth, are the reasons why it's painful to get a PC as a regular part of your home theatre. The box color or size is trivial as compared to those issues.

    -me

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    1. Re:The case if the least of the issues by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Having to pull out a keyboard to do certain things, poor flexibility in IR remotes for PCs (and their integration to software), having to reboot Windows when it gets grumpy, and so forth, are the reasons why it's painful to get a PC as a regular part of your home theatre.

      You seem to know the issues. Hop on your nearest Open Source home entertainment project, test drive, comment, maybe even develop! It's easy to post to slashdot what's wrong it's PRODUCTIVE to point out errors to those who will FIX them. Help out, enjoy.

    2. Re:The case if the least of the issues by yatest5 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Having to pull out a keyboard to do certain things, poor flexibility in IR remotes for PCs (and their integration to software), having to reboot Windows when it gets grumpy, and so forth, are the reasons why it's painful to get a PC as a regular part of your home theatre.

      Yeah, I reckon someone should come up with dedicated boxes you can buy and link up to your tv.

      --
      • Mod parent up! [a] by Anonymous Coward (Score:5) Thurs, June 31, @13:37
    3. Re:The case if the least of the issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      > The box can be hidden

      I was thinking a rackmount system hidden inside a drawer would be pretty sweet, so long as there's good ventilation for cooling.

    4. Re:The case if the least of the issues by Chrome-Dragon · · Score: 1

      A good place to start is http://www.avsforum.com/ it has a large Home Theatre PC Section.

    5. Re:The case if the least of the issues by Cacophony · · Score: 2, Informative

      I haven't had any problems with intergrating everything...mostly because of one great piece of hardware that came from a not so great company...

      The MouseRemote from X10...

      I have complete control over all my multimedia functions using a third party open source driver (maX10). I can program any key on the remote to send any keyboard command...any program with keyboard shortcuts is useable with the remote.

      Honestly without this remote i would have ditched the whole idea of using a PC as an Entertainment center a while ago. I originally did use a wireless keyboard but since getting the remote there's nothing i use the keyboard for anymore i have total control with the remote. The only thing I can't do with the remote that I'd like to is be able to power up with it. Other than that I can launch and use any program i choose to as well as program buttons for shutdown.

      As for windows reboot probs. get windows 2k or xp they've been fine for me. I haven't had xp crash yet and it's been a few months.

    6. Re:The case if the least of the issues by EvilGeekGirl · · Score: 1

      Obviously you have not done your research. Screw IR go with RF there are keyboards with build in rollerball mice (for example check out http://www.globlink.com.tw) and PLENTY of remotes that are also RF (one of the best rated ones actually comes with the Radeon All-In-Wonder card I purchased). My case is being delivered today (Cooler Master ATC-600-DX1)which is the final piece I was waiting for to build my home theater pc. I will be running XP on it only because of drivers etc for the devices I'm using but I anticipate no problems getting everything to work just fine.

    7. Re:The case if the least of the issues by rsborg · · Score: 2
      Poor remotes?

      Check out what I'm getting(in the mail already)

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    8. Re:The case if the least of the issues by Eil · · Score: 2


      Yeah, I reckon someone should come up with dedicated boxes you can buy and link up to your tv.

      As a matter of fact, I've been doing just this for the last few months. AND it'll run Linux, though the user won't even know it unless they plan to hack it. Right, now I'm planning on having the following features available:

      * Play DVDs as well as any kind of movie that MPlayer supports from a CD, network, or local hard disk.

      * Play audio CDs and MP3s from CD, network, or local hard disk.

      * Play console games via emulation. Planned systems to emulate are any that are relatively bug-free, will do fullscreen in X and can be launched from the command line.

      * Rip CDs, encode MP3s, and copy audio CDs on the fly.

      Right now I'm in the midst of writing up the interface in Tcl/Tk (but without the traditional ugliess that's associated with Tk widgets). I'm also investigating hardware, which is by far the toughest part. For example, TV-out support for video cards in Linux is spotty at the very best. I'm leaning towards trying to find a cheap ATI Radeon card and hoping the GATOS software does what I need it to.

      Right now, I'm planning on only doing just one for my enjoyment only. I *was* planning on selling these boxes as a kind of side-business until I heard that Microsoft is going to be making their own. I can't compete with Microsoft! :P I suspect most people who'd choose a Linux-based media box over the M$ one would rather build their own than buy one. One thing about mine is that it would have been relatively low-cost (in the area of $500-$700) in contrast to the MS box, which will be starting at $1200.

      If anyone thinks they would probably purchase one of these at some point (at the cost of the hardware), or if you have any ideas or comments, drop me an email at [dincht at securenym dot net] .

    9. Re:The case if the least of the issues by Eil · · Score: 2


      Forgot to mention that it'll have an LCD display occupying the 3 1/2" floppy bay powered by LCDProc.

  6. Okay, but.. what about the noise by 91degrees · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How do we ditch the fan?

    Even the quiet fan on a PS2 is clearly audible in quiet points of a DVD or CD. No audiophile will tolerate this sort of interference

    1. Re:Okay, but.. what about the noise by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 1

      Even the quiet fan on a PS2 is clearly audible in quiet points of a DVD or CD. No audiophile will tolerate this sort of interference Now we have a reason to build our liquid cooled cases. Even our sig. other will understand!!!

    2. Re:Okay, but.. what about the noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      www.quietpc.com - they do all sorts of quiet PSU, System and CPU Fans.

    3. Re:Okay, but.. what about the noise by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Those are quiet, but they are still audible.

    4. Re:Okay, but.. what about the noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So get one of those new Via Eden EPIA boards. They don't need any active cooling at all. Go to http://www.caseoutlet.com and click on the barebones link and look at the mini-PCs based on the mini-ITX form factor. The one case has a DC interface and external power supply much like the old Mac G4 cube did so there's NO fan needed anywhere in the system unless you're going to go plop in a big old fucking 7200rpm drive.

    5. Re:Okay, but.. what about the noise by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 2

      The other posts above this one are interesting, but what about using a C3 processor of some sort - perhaps one like this:

      http://www.mini-itx.com/hardware/images/hardware 00 11L.jpg

      You can even get some very attractive cases for the mini-itx boards, like this one:

      http://www.caseoutlet.com/case/2677/CS-2677.html

      But I don't know if the hardware is supported under anything other than Windows.

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    6. Re:Okay, but.. what about the noise by mleopold · · Score: 1

      IMHO Flytech is still the most attractive in the small noise-free genre - they are fairly expansive, and not entirely state of the art on graphics and CPU slots (custom made motherboard), but I've had no problems installing a 750 MHz VIA C3 (all though this requires an undocumented jumper setting), and on the NC3 I've actually managed to squeeze an expansion card in there.

      With just passive cooling and the external fan-less PSU this make my PC entirely noise-free, ahh..

      http://www.flytech.com.tw/nc4-1.htm

    7. Re:Okay, but.. what about the noise by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Funny

      first off an Audiophile DOES in fact deal with fan noise. Most high end amps have fans that come on when the device asks for it. Second audiophiles (real audiophiles) have all their equipment mounted in a 19 inch rack with custom trim plates for the faces of all the equipment therefore isolating the equipment's noise. And finally.. high end audiophiles have all the equipment in the projector room (a thin closet with a prjoector window where EVERYTHINg resides and is controlled via a nice AV control system from AMX or Panja.)

      finally a real audiophile would NEVER own a PS2... they are busy spending their money on overpriced audio equipment and would be utterly appaled at the video quality out of any of these toys call console games. (the Xbox,PS2 and GC all suck horribly when blown up to a 10foot screen.)

      so this is a non issue. and most "audiophiles" have at least 1 pc in their audio rack already. (rackmount case, no work and the air filters in the front behind the door muffles the fans nicely.)

      so yes, audiophiles don't care one bit about fan noise, as we muffle it properly.

      BTW, I am NOT an audiophile... anyone that calls themself that is only a poser that is trying to impress people with their lack-of-knowlege. (Ohhh you have to use $23.00 a foot speaker cable! I can hear the diference!)

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    8. Re:Okay, but.. what about the noise by radish · · Score: 2


      Why on earth would an _audio_ phile have a "projection room", or indeed 19" rackmount gear, or for that matter a PC? An audiophile is someone who cares about sound quality, that infers nothing about video.

      Home Cinema Enthusiast != audiophile.

      Top end (and I mean real top end) audio equipment would not be happy crammed into a 19" rackmount. Real top end audio equipment NEVER has fans, they have HUGE heatsinks and good design. And putting the gear in a seperate room? Hmm...you're increasing the cable run lengths, which increases interference, crosstalk and impedence. All bad things. The 2 cardinal rules of audio cables, use the best you can afford, and the shortest you possibly can. I would say that the average audiophile will have a turntable, a tuner, a single deck CD transport (jukeboxes universally suck) & a DAC. Add to that a preamp and 2 stereo power amps (one for bass, one for everything else). A pair (yes a pair!) of main speakers and a pair of subs. No surround - very important.

      Not that I'm claiming to be an audiophile at all, I can't afford it, but I know a few who can & are.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    9. Re:Okay, but.. what about the noise by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      The point about the ps2 wasn't that it was a good system, but that it is has a quiet fan (by PC standards) and even that is too noisy. None of the amps I've seen are powerful enough to absolutely need a fan (all of them use huge heatsinks), so I can't make any judgement on this, but I presume that this is the same sort of volume as a "quiet" PC fan.

      While there are many ways to muffling the fan, getting the noise down for the majority of consumers could be rather expensive. As far as I can tell, the cases emntioned in the article don;t address this issue at all.

    10. Re:Okay, but.. what about the noise by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      You know nothing about high end audio do you...

      an audiophile has no less than 3 amps. 1 for high end, one for the mid and low woofers, and one for a subwoofer if they are not a purist. Bi-amped is the ONLY way to get audio slightly right. and any audiophile that uses a subwoofer is usually shunned and made fun of. the best I have seen is Tri-amped with one for Tweets, one for mids, and one for lows. a preamp is pretty-much universally stupid unless you have a B&O turntable that is from the 70's and there are plenty of 5 disc and jukebox Cd players that have awesome sound (and cost $3500.00). Everyone knows that the FUD about wire quality is that , lies and false information spread by itiod sales-people. The smartest men I have ever met have publically said in audiophile arenas that anyone that buys anything but the correct gague copper wire for their power range, to hell with lo-ox, ribbion cables with opposing fields, or al,l that other snake oil surrounding high end audio are pure idiots with lots of money.

      and that really does sum up the audiophile.. an idiot with lots of money.

      you want perfection in sound? Build your speakers by hand .. the Ariel Loudspeaker sounds better than ANYTHING I have ever heard or touched in the detroit/chicago area including the $12,000.00 a pair overpriced wannabees at the ultra-high-end shops.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    11. Re:Okay, but.. what about the noise by pmz · · Score: 1

      BTW, I am NOT an audiophile... anyone that calls themself that is only a poser that is trying to impress people with their lack-of-knowlege.

      This is often true of many enthusiast-based industries/cliques. Other examples: kernel hacker, phophet of the second coming, fantasy novel series guru, etc.

      (Ohhh you have to use $23.00 a foot speaker cable! I can hear the diference!)

      Just recently, I read a review that recommended lamp cord for this very same reason (that most people can't tell the difference between $0.50 of lamp cord and $150 of "high-end" stuff). I suppose some people can tell, which would indicate that $10.00 of shielded cable from Radio Shack probably satisfies nearly all of them, too.

    12. Re:Okay, but.. what about the noise by fendel · · Score: 1

      what about using a C3 processor of some sort
      I wouldn't recommend it. I recently bought a mini-ITX system with a C3-800, and it's a real turkey. Lousy sound quality, even with the digital coax output; and the processor is downright anemic. I'm struggling to get DivX files to play on the thing without stuttering and getting out of sync.

      Anyone wanna buy this tur^H^H^H cute little mini-ITX system? Cheap?

    13. Re:Okay, but.. what about the noise by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 2

      Yes, I know I am responding to a troll, but
      an audiophile has no less than 3 amps. 1 for high end, one for the mid and low woofers, and one for a subwoofer if they are not a purist.

      If you're going to use more than one amp, you might as well use one for each channel. Better stereo separation that way.

    14. Re:Okay, but.. what about the noise by adamjaskie · · Score: 1

      From what I have heard, you don't need to buy particularly special speaker cable, just make sure it is fairly heavy gauge. If the run is really short, say only two feet or less, you can use thin, cheap cable, but any longer than that, and you need the thick stuff. Of course, thats not $23 a foot, but more like $3-5 a foot. I think my system is using just the thickest cable I could find at Radio Shack (12 gauge or 10 gauge IIRC) for about a 10 foot run.

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
    15. Re:Okay, but.. what about the noise by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 2

      That depends on _how_ cheap it is :-)

      I'm contemplating using such a system as a low-end webserver, but I haven't seen any benchmarks/tests on its ability do be a such ... any experience with that?

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    16. Re:Okay, but.. what about the noise by radish · · Score: 2

      You know nothing about high end audio do you...

      yes I do, but hey, I like feeding trolls and I've got karma to burn :)


      bi-amped is the ONLY way to get audio slightly right


      I was talkikng about bi-amping, did you not see where I said 2x STEREO amps?? Bi means 2 right? Sheesh. 2x stereo poweramps == 4 discreet channels == biamping. Sure tri-amping could be better. You can always add more amps, why not quad? Break out your output into top tweets, mid, bass and sub bass. I was simply stating the most common config that I have seen.


      any audiophile that uses a subwoofer is usually shunned and made fun of


      Subwoofer == speaker that puts out sub bass (around 50-20hz). If I don't have one, I don't have any bass below that which my woofers can put out, which is probably around 40-50 hz (and of course they roll off before that). I'm not talking about a silly little home theatre box, I'm talking proper quality bass units, either seperate or integrated into the mains. Of course, some mains can go that low without rolloff, in which case you don't need the bass units. Check this out: http://www.quad-hifi.co.uk/esl.htm - those guys sound amazing (beat the whatsits out of your DIY Ariel things).

      a preamp is pretty-much universally stupid unless you have a B&O turntable that is from the 70's

      You have volume adjustable poweramps? What planet are you on?? Assuming you want to (a) switch sources and (b) adjust volume (maybe even tone), you need SOMETHING between your sources and the poweramps. I call that a preamp, you can call it whatever you like.

      there are plenty of 5 disc and jukebox Cd players that have awesome sound (and cost $3500.00)
      Great, $3500 for $2000 sound quality. No thanks.

      As for your cables stuff, did I say anything about going for al or silver cables? Nope. I said get the best you can afford, and make them SHORT. There's no FUD in that, it's basic physics that the longer your conductor is within an EM field, the greater the induced current. Likewise the impedence, directly related to line length.

      you want perfection in sound?

      Go to a concert hall. Anything less is a compromise.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    17. Re:Okay, but.. what about the noise by bmud · · Score: 2, Funny

      Heh. A discussion 5 replies deep on the meaning of a "true" audiophile. It's always amazed me that so many people shell out piles and piles of cash for high end speakers, _and they listen to curdled genital cheese_. "yeah, I spent $10,000 on audio equipment. I'm an audiophile. Cat Stevens, Yani, and Grandmaster P never sounded so good." Give me a break. I'll take the $10 computer speakers with Radiohead over your setup any day.

    18. Re:Okay, but.. what about the noise by Wildcat+J · · Score: 1
      It's always amazed me that so many people shell out piles and piles of cash for high end speakers, _and they listen to curdled genital cheese_.
      Yeah, I find it funny that their audio equipment, purchased specifically to "faithfully reproduce" the original sound, probably costs more than the equipment said original sound was recorded with.

      -J

    19. Re:Okay, but.. what about the noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You haven't been reading Stereophile magazine recently. Apparently, you need $500 *power* cords if you really want excellent sound.

      (that's almost as bad as the CD demagnetizers ...)

    20. Re:Okay, but.. what about the noise by matt-fu · · Score: 1

      so yes, audiophiles don't care one bit about fan noise, as we muffle it properly.

      BTW, I am NOT an audiophile



      So, uh.. are you or aren't you?

    21. Re:Okay, but.. what about the noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uNF... uNF... uNF... sucka..

    22. Re:Okay, but.. what about the noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go to a concert hall. Anything less is a compromise.

      I'm not an audophile, but can I just quickly say that I don't try to reproduce sound. Sure, at a concert hall I get a perfect reproduction of the artists' sound. But with reverb-ish effects and a sub, I feel I can get sound better than what some artists can do.

    23. Re:Okay, but.. what about the noise by fendel · · Score: 1

      Dunno, but I think someone over at the Anandtech forums had a thread about that in the last week or two. (I posted in the thread, IIRC, but I don't have a link handy.)

    24. Re:Okay, but.. what about the noise by the_machine · · Score: 1
      so yes, audiophiles don't care one bit about fan noise, as we muffle it properly.

      BTW, I am NOT an audiophile... anyone that calls themself that is only a poser

      Hmmmmm......

    25. Re:Okay, but.. what about the noise by lordaych · · Score: 1
      Why on earth would an _audio_ phile have a "projection room", or indeed 19" rackmount gear, or for that matter a PC? An audiophile is someone who cares about sound quality, that infers nothing about video.

      While we're quibbling over definitions, to "imply" is to express indirectly, whereas to "infer" is to draw conclusions. So, to describe someone as an "audiophile" would imply nothing about their video preferences...

    26. Re:Okay, but.. what about the noise by stagl · · Score: 1

      (the Xbox,PS2 and GC all suck horribly when blown up to a 10foot screen.)

      i know this was supposed to be humorous, which it is, but i, in fact, own a 10 foot screen in which i display my xbox on. and when you run component out on an xbox, the result is pretty darn clear. since ps2 only supports s-video, i completely agree. (unsure about gamecube)

      that is all

      --

      R.I.P.
    27. Re:Okay, but.. what about the noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you want perfection in sound? Build your speakers by hand .. the Ariel Loudspeaker [aloha-audio.com] sounds better than ANYTHING I have ever heard or touched in the detroit/chicago area including the $12,000.00 a pair overpriced wannabees at the ultra-high-end shops.

      Try these if you want to hear music like you've never heard it before:

      http://www.slsloudspeakers.com

      C

    28. Re:Okay, but.. what about the noise by The_dev0 · · Score: 1

      F.Y.I-Gamecube also supports composite video and most games can be run in progressive scan, too.

      --
      Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
    29. Re:Okay, but.. what about the noise by amberspry · · Score: 1

      For those who care about noise in their PC: http://www.quietpc.com . It really is possible to make the PS2 sound loud by comparison.

    30. Re:Okay, but.. what about the noise by radish · · Score: 1

      "John is an audiophile, he cares about the sound quality from his hifi. From that fact alone we cannot draw any conclusions regarding his opinions of home cinema or the importance of video quality. "

      The english language is a wonderful thing :-)

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    31. Re:Okay, but.. what about the noise by PRickard · · Score: 2

      91degrees typed: How do we ditch the fan?
      Even the quiet fan on a PS2 is clearly audible in quiet points of a DVD or CD. No audiophile will tolerate this sort of interference

      This has always been an issue for those who care about audio/video enjoyment. That's why true fans have Macs, and we no longer have a problem with it.

      --

      == Paul Rickard, Editor of The Microsoft Boycott Campaign ====

  7. Other non-fugly cases? by AllNicksTaken · · Score: 1

    The last time there was a story on cases someone posted a link to some gorgeously designed cases by some company in Japan. I was at work and was unable to bookmark it... Enermax and Lian-Li make decent-looking cases but there must be other manufacturers who use interesting design in their PC cases? Oh, and windows are overrated =P

    1. Re:Other non-fugly cases? by Steve+Franklin · · Score: 1

      I have a Lian Li PC56. Nice case. Easy to access, add/remove stuff. Looks pretty cool too, though it would be nice to have silver fronted drives instead of beige.

      The first step, of course, is to get the computer in the same room as the stereo and hook them up, which I've done. Obviates the need for a separate speaker system, which is pretty much a joke anyway.

      The computer sits on a desk with its keyboard and its own chair. For streaming audio I just set things up and then retire to my Swedish easy chair and listen through the stereo speakers.

      Video's another story, though. I find myself sitting at the computer and swiveling around to see what's happening on TV. Now I could have a video card with a TV tuner and watch through the monitor, but I'd still be sitting in the, relatively, uncomfortable computer chair.

      I could do what I do with streaming audio and set a movie up and run it and then retire to the easy chair. I don't have a DVD drive but that's not really an issue. Just go out and buy one. But if I want to change a setting or just do something else at the same time, I have to get up and move to the other chair.

      So, as I've suggested before, the real problem is one of furniture design. WebTV tried to solve this problem by having a wireless keyboard that could be used from an easy chair, and I'm sure it wouldn't be hard to implement this on a computer, if it hasn't already been done. From personal experience, though, I can say that the wireless keyboard from an easy chair just isn't terribly easy to do. Computing is active, while watching TV is passive. What you need is a chair that's comfortable enough to sit in for extended periods watching a movie but which can be easily converted to a more active position where you could use the computer functions without getting up and going to another chair.

      --
      Hic iacet Arthurus, rex quondam rexque futurus.
  8. Frozen Case by duren686 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wouldn't mind having one of these next to my TV.

    --
    Y2K Compliant since the late 1890s
    1. Re:Frozen Case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry but the first item on your list would make me cover my tv and item 3 with numbers 2 and 4, in terror and disgust.

  9. Temple of Worship by warmcat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There's something about these 'Home Entertainment' systems that is deeply disturbing. They sit in a corner of your living space like a modern shrine, exciting in their adherents the same passivity and receptiveness as the old places of worship.

    The worshipper sits before them slackjawed, Pringles are the Body of Christ and Sunny Delight their communion wine. The worshipper becomes the holy consumer, contributing nothing but willing to pay, and pay again for his 'entertainment' to any creature that can make them forget themselves for a while longer.

    There is a strange social aspect to these systems, too. The size of your television is important to men. Self-loathing eats away like a cancer at the man who cannot afford a television at least as large as his friends; why, he is not only willing but eager to go into debt to avoid this Terrible Shame. And the man who buys his first DVD player knows he is someone.

    Yes, someone who will be paying inflated prices for 'entertainment' on DVD from now on. For just like the Old Religions, there is a coinslot built into the edifice.

    It doesn't have to be this way. You don't have to build it into your life day by day.

    1. Re:Temple of Worship by happyslinky · · Score: 1

      It's not the size of your tv that counts.... it's how you use it.

      Besides I can turn my tv off any time I want to... really.

    2. Re:Temple of Worship by phunhippy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's something about these 'Home Entertainment' systems that is deeply disturbing. They sit in a corner of your living space like a modern shrine, exciting in their adherents the same passivity and receptiveness as the old places of worship.

      hehehe.... And this is different then your Computer Set-up how? Its like anything else.. Some people love good sound and quality tv's to watch well tv or movies and music..

      some like to have kick ass computer networks in thier house.. the list can go on & doesn't just hold water to technological devices..

      relax..

    3. Re:Temple of Worship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The worshipper sits before them slackjawed, Pringles are the Body of Christ and Sunny Delight their communion wine. The worshipper becomes the holy consumer, contributing nothing but willing to pay, and pay again for his 'entertainment' to any creature that can make them forget themselves for a while longer.

      I only use my home theater to watch CBN, I swear!!! There's something so powerful about watching the 700 Club in all its glorious surround sound.

    4. Re:Temple of Worship by Sarcasm_Orgasm · · Score: 0, Interesting

      Please go back to China you dirty communist.

      --
      Special people have long socks, ride short buses, & invent witty sigs.
    5. re: temple of worship by cameron+vanderzanden · · Score: 1

      it is not, i think, the home entertainment system which is purely at fault here, but a growing reliance or 'worship' of entertainment as a whole.

      the "slackjawed" feeling which is invoked by a good film is the same feeling that is invoked by a good book - rapt, absorbed, engaged.

      many things are entertaining. television, music, sports, woodworking, slashdot. entertainment is a diversion, and it is that diversion that keeps followers coming back, whatever their particular shrine.

      as for the other fork of your post...
      i think the gee-whiz factor of new technology has always drawn attention (and followers.) the race for the latest, most crisp equipment is just another form of one-up-manship. it'd likely cost less if we each pissed in a straight line to see whose urine travelled the farthest.

      the combination of deified entertainment and technological one-up-manship apppears to be a lucrative business.

    6. Re:Temple of Worship by frog51 · · Score: 2

      >>And the man who buys his first DVD player knows he is someone.

      Well, I still don't have a DVD player but I have installed pacman on my car stereo along with a hacked up init, telnetd, httpd and ftpd.

      Am I someone???

    7. Re: temple of worship by pmz · · Score: 2

      the "slackjawed" feeling which is invoked by a good film is the same feeling that is invoked by a good book - rapt, absorbed, engaged.

      Good film and good books, yes. However, for most people, the important differences between Apocalypse Now and Survivor now on DVD! or between Sergei Rachmaninoff and Saturday Night Live band X, for example, are lost.

      A friend of mine proposed an interesting question after seeing a disturbing lack of books at a local flea market: "Does anyone read anymore?"

    8. Re:Temple of Worship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I still don't have a DVD player but I have installed pacman on my car stereo along with a hacked up init, telnetd, httpd and ftpd.

      Yes, you are someone. A nerd.

    9. Re:Temple of Worship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As they say on the springer show,
      Go To OPRAH!

    10. Re: temple of worship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm currently reading Slashdot.

      Oh wait. You meant paper books.

    11. Re: temple of worship by pmz · · Score: 1

      I'm currently reading Slashdot.

      Oh wait. You meant paper books.


      Paper is still the only media for books that is available to everyone cheaply (not counting overpriced textbooks). Even though I have been using a computer for over a decade, I still haven't seen enough incentives to switch to e-books for general reading.

      Slashdot really isn't a book, anyway; it is a news/editorial source that people read for information. Also, Slashdot doesn't suffer from the same sort of copyright issues that books do.

    12. Re:Temple of Worship by marick · · Score: 2

      Right. You could worship shoes instead.

      Hey, we all need our little joys. I happen to enjoy being blasted out of my seat by a nice surround-sound DVD of The Matrix. I also like to watch the Iron Chef and some Baseball/Football/Basketball. I also read books and hike and mountain bike. And go out drinking with friends.

      You know, it IS possible to have stuff you like AND do other things too.

    13. Re: temple of worship by jgerman · · Score: 2

      Coincidentally enough, I just cancelled all but local channels through Comcast. I'll miss Cartoon Network but hey, I've got piles of books I need to read. Personally I'm tired of wasting my time watching tv when there are more fulfilling things to do ;) Tonight will be the first night where my wind down from work is not surfing through the channels, but instead finishing up The Selfish Gene.

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
    14. Re: temple of worship by .milfox · · Score: 1

      www.websubscriptions.com (www.baen.com) :P That plus a palm makes great 10+hour flight reading, or underway reading.

      Sure, I like paper, but there's something about 8 or so novels in my pocket.

    15. Re:Temple of Worship by frog51 · · Score: 2

      Seems a reasonable comment. Luckily, to avoid nerddom, and show myself as a true geek, I also snowboard, windsurf, bungee jump, cliff-dive and play very loud guitar;-)

      But enough of my yakkin'. On with the show.

  10. Necessary in the long term by virtual_mps · · Score: 2, Interesting

    (Sure, the images load fast--it's the unnecessary shtml that's /.ed...when will they learn?)

    This sort of integration is a good thing, though it really needs to be done commercially (not as a case mod hack.) At some point in the future I hope to see ubiqutous computing--people should just be able to do what they want without having to sit in front of "the computer" like a supplicant in a shrine. That sort of approach changes the design of computers out of necessity--a distinct keyboard and monitor just don't make any sense in that environment. And human nature being what it is, people are going to want machines that blend into their homes, not stick out like ugly distractions the way they do now.

    1. Re:Necessary in the long term by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      removed the SSI.... trying to get the damn CSS to work now...

  11. Very nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But somehow I can't see it topping this in the aesthetic computer department :).

  12. Slashdot enabled pages by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 5, Funny

    How about letting someone know when they are going to make the slashdot site. They could make websites without the encumbersome banner ads, obligatory BIG images on every page. Then just maybe, I, with my T1 could actually see there page. Very unfortunate as I am truly interested in this piece.

    1. Re:Slashdot enabled pages by mskfisher · · Score: 2

      Here's a mirror.

      I don't have the full-size images (I've got bandwidth concerns, too) but the thumbnails are pretty representative.
      If you want to jump straight to the gallery, there's the link.

      --
      0x0D 0x0A
    2. Re:Slashdot enabled pages by fean · · Score: 1

      why would they want to take off the banner ads? Hey guys, we're gonna get 1 month worth of traffic in the next 2 hours, let's take off the adds that we get paid $.0125 per viewing....

      the only reasons some sites can actually "survive" a /. is because of the income generated by so many people

  13. a computer will allways be a computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    a computer will allways be a computer, and a television will allways be a television, you can take some of the features of a computer and add it to a television, and maybe improve it, like maybe one of those new 200 gig harddrives would replace a VCR for recording & replaying shows, etc...etc...

    but to try to add a desktop computer to a TV/Stereo combo in the living will only complicate things, what do you do of a family member wants to piddle with the computer while you want to watch TV, i can see the feuds now over something like this...

    keep computers & TV/stereos seperate, but it does not hurt to add features from one to the other...

    1. Re:a computer will allways be a computer by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 1

      but to try to add a desktop computer to a TV/Stereo combo in the living will only complicate things, what do you do of a family member wants to piddle with the computer while you want to watch TV

      That's easy you tell them to use their own computer. No true technophile - geek etc... would use their "web surfing, email etc..." PC for this.
      The truest geeks would sort of use their main for this, but only because this a perfect excuse to upgrade to a newer PC. You don't even have to admit secretly having wanted a faster chip!

    2. Re:a computer will allways be a computer by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 2

      My plan is to build an entirely new computer for use in my entertainment center. With a big hard drive and a DVD, it can store all of my music and most of my movies. There are IR receivers that can hook up to the serial port so I can use a remote. The hard part here will be writing the software for everything.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
    3. Re:a computer will allways be a computer by Sloppy · · Score: 1
      but to try to add a desktop computer to a TV/Stereo combo in the living will only complicate things, what do you do of a family member wants to piddle with the computer while you want to watch TV, i can see the feuds now over something like this..
      The key word there is "desktop." What is the difference between a desktop computer, a server computer, and a Tivo? From humans' point of view, it's the interface. But more generally, they're all the same thing: a microcomputer. Put the right interface on it, and a computer works anywhere. You don't have to worry about a family member "piddling with the computer," even though the computer is most assuredly there, because "piddling" isn't what this computer is for. Serving content from the fileserver to your screen, is what it's for.
      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  14. PC in an old VCR case... by Soulslayer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...which has actually been done before. I have also seen PC's crammed into old CD Player cases. While a fairly nifty hack it is by no means what a home entertainment PC system should look like.

    This is what a PC disguised as a cruddy VCR looks like.

    Is it just me or are /. headlines becoming more and more full of hyperbole?

    --


    Once more unto the breach dear friends...
    1. Re:PC in an old VCR case... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's just you. Slashdot headlines have always been full of hyperbole. That's the reason most of us long-time readers keep coming back: to have a good laugh.

      Just enjoy it, sonny. It only gets worse from here!

  15. HTPC Link... by Ringthane · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's a great resource for those wanting to buy or to build a Home Theater PC, complete with sleek, black cases for the do-it-yourselfers and some ultra-quiet pre-fab models:

    http://www.digitalconnection.com/

    --
    Friends help you move... Real friends help you move bodies...
    1. Re:HTPC Link... by CTBlog · · Score: 1

      I'm not trolling, but seriously can anyone even navigate that site?

      I couldn't even find where to get to slim black cases.

      --
      Read some more critical thoughts.
    2. Re:HTPC Link... by RedX · · Score: 2

      Perhaps the link on the left side in the top third of the page that reads "Black LP Desktop Case"?

    3. Re:HTPC Link... by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      My biggest problem with this case is that it is only 17" wide, leaving a two inch gap. That's a pain in the ass, and all too common for cases that claim to look like av equipment. All of my a/v/c equipment is on a rack, with the computer systems rackmounted, the sterio equipment on trays. Everything except one VCR and the small TV I use as a preview monitor (the projection system is in the other room) is 19", and fits perfectly (and the whole setup has has two big fans running air across the back of the unit).

      I've been thinking about paying $20 or so for a broken early model (read: large) laserdisk player - I know I could hook up the buttons no problem, and I've found a link for a jogdial to PC interface, so with a bit of work, I can get that working. The display is much more hit or miss, but I can probably, with a dremel and a steady hand, slice and dice the front panel of the tray and get a DVD and CD-R to fit in there, inline with the contours of the case.

      I just need to find one that is totally broken, beyond hope of repair - it would be a shame to ruin a perfectly fixable LD player, even if my LD collection is on the other coast right now...

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    4. Re:HTPC Link... by dublin · · Score: 2

      Actually, almost all audio gear is only 17" wide. In fact, if you measure some actual rackmount gear, you'll find 17" is the most common width. Most audio gear is not designed to be directly mounted in a rack, but there's a very good reason that extra 2 inches is there: So that it can fit in a 19" rack.

      See, this way, there's room to bolt an adapter onto the sides of the box with enough room for rack handles and slides between the rails. (And don't forget, you don't have 19" between the rails, that's the space between the holes in the rails, IIRC...)

      Of course, telco equipment uses 23" rails, just to be different. Go figure.

      --
      "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
    5. Re:HTPC Link... by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      Hurm... interesting. My Kenwood, Sony, Apex and JVC equipment all fit *perfectly* in the rack... I had assumed they were 19 inches. That assumption may very well be wrong if what you say is correct. :)

      So I guess 17 inches is what I should be looking for - which is what this is. Thanks for the correction - having "known" they are called "19 inch racks", I never thought to measure the internal width, and it's not a topic that comes up often.

      telco equipment uses 23" rails, just to be different.

      Pro musician gear and most DJ equipment racks on 19", but I've recently (in the past two years) spotted a couple of DJ-oriented units that rack on a smaller system. I can't recall the details, but I assume that it's for crowded DJ tables that can benefit from a smaller format.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  16. Some suggestions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    How about a "Heat Pipe"?
    I don't mean a peltier,

    I refer to Tom's hardware review of the Shuttle mini-pc:

    http://www6.tomshardware.com/howto/02q3/020710/m in ipc-07.html

    and

    http://www6.tomshardware.com/howto/02q3/020710/m in ipc-09.html

    (it does have a fan, but it's rotation can be controlled)

    Personally, (if I had the money) I'd either get a brand new computer and UNDERclock it so it doesn't heat up while I disconnect the fans,

    OR I'd get one of those "Sigma Designs" MPEG1,2,4 hardware decoders so I would'nt have to use a new noisy computer.

    Another thought:
    Anyone have an idea how much noise these 115V oversize fans make?

  17. We're trying, HELP us! by fons · · Score: 5, Informative

    at

    http://davedina.apestaart.org

    we're trying to make a linux-box that seamlessly integrates every bit of software needed for a multimedia box.

    Development has been slowing down lately. But we HAVE a working model in our living room.

    So give us a bit incentive to keep working on this project: subscribe to our sourceforge mailing-list and give us your comments/ideas.

    Thanks!

    1. Re:We're trying, HELP us! by dago · · Score: 2

      this is an incentive

      seriously, I'll try it as soon as my motherboard come back.

      --
      #include "coucou.h"
  18. Voice command by legoboy · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    On the topic of PCs and home entertainment, could anybody out there point out some decent (and yet preferably free) linux voice command software?

    The only thing I can spot via google is some shareware app called MP3VoiceCommand which seems to not even be available any more.

    Although some sort of daemon which monitors the microphone and can do anything whatsoever would be nice, I'd settle for something which can only control music... I have a computer which pumps music to speakers outside by my hot tub, I'd love to be able to run a microphone out to it and change the songs and/or volume just by speaking. It would be nifty, oh yes.

    --
    If a tree falls on an anonymous coward yelling 'first post' in the forest, does anybody hear?
    1. Re:Voice command by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a followup to my own post, cvoicecontrol might be a satisfactory solution.

    2. Re:Voice command by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:Voice command by huinya · · Score: 1
      Oh yeah, that's a great idea:

      "mr. computer, su, [password], c-d user-local, r-m dash-f-r StarOffice..."

      $ su
      Password:
      $ cd /usr/local
      $ rm -fr *

    4. Re:Voice command by legoboy · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but I can't pronounce any of my passwords.

      On the other hand, whereas a 'Computer, command' type of command is totally lame and too derivative of Star Trek, 'Mr. Computer, DoStuff' is funny.

      Playing around with cvoicecommand, I'm having a hard time getting it to recognize my commands, despite giving it about thirty or so good samples to work with.

      xvoice, on the other hand, requires IBM's library, which I don't really feel like buying for what amounts to a whimsical reason.

      --
      If a tree falls on an anonymous coward yelling 'first post' in the forest, does anybody hear?
    5. Re:Voice command by huinya · · Score: 1

      First off, I hate star trek and I don't know how anybody watches it (but Doctor Who is semi-watchable i think). I was thinking of a more Homer Simpson tone, but whatever.

      I've worked with IBM ViaVoice and was disappointed by the performance (although I only have a PII300) and I hear that it's accuracy is greatly improved by a quality mic, something i don't have.
    6. Re:Voice command by Gog · · Score: 1

      I work for Nuance communications, www.nuance.com and our latest version of the software is available for Linux and the developper license supports 2 simultaneous connections free of charge (extranet.nuance.com).

      Of course, that will only give you the speech rec part of the system, you have to deal with the command execution yourself. That and you'll need a few hundred megs of RAM just to load the thing...

      One day I'll kick my ass hard enough to make a VXML system that controlls my house.

      Gog

  19. Jukebox Hero by turnstyle · · Score: 4, Informative

    I keep an old PC hidden behind the couch, wired to my stereo. It's running Andromeda, which manages and serves MP3 collection. I remote control it via my laptop over Wi-Fi. It's pretty neat, actually...

    --
    Here's what I do: Bitty Browser & Andromeda
    1. Re:Jukebox Hero by Skraggy · · Score: 1

      I'm doing pretty much the same thing.

      My Matrox G450 is connected only by TVout to my Widescreen in the Lounge.

      Which means when a movie is played it goes DVDmax full screen, and you can't see the controls or the mouse.

      but If I VNC in with my laptop, and use it as a remote control, I can play with the sound settings, stop and pause the movie, and use the DVD menus fine.

      Plus I can check my Mail, and make sure any DivX downloads are resumed ;)

      --
      A Skoda is for life, not for casual humour.
    2. Re:Jukebox Hero by turnstyle · · Score: 1
      VNC, Windows XP's Remote Desktop, pcAnywhere, and GoToMyPC all seem to work as multimedia PC remote controls.

      fwiw, I also use that same copy of Andromeda to play back to other PC's on my LAN (it also works over the Internet if you've got enough upstream bandwidth).

      So, I've got one PC wired to the stereo that I remote control, but I also access the same collection of tunes from the bedroom over my local network. It's pretty neat, actually...

      --
      Here's what I do: Bitty Browser & Andromeda
    3. Re:Jukebox Hero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm doing something similar, except I had $0 as a budget so had to work with what I had on hand, and I wanted to learn more about CGI in the process.
      I'm using a surplus workstation (SGI) running headless (monitor died 2 weeks in) as a web server (apache, of course) with a CGI to kick over mpg123 to do playback.
      Stupid little shell script to go through the mp3 library and build indexes by artist and by title alphabetically, dumps it out as a web page, just click on the "song" and it starts playing, click on a series of songs and it adds them to the "queue", then plays them in order.
      The harder parts included the "reject" button and the "show me what's in the queue" button.
      The trickiest part was the "what's playing now" window. I'm still not happy with how it turned out.

      My non-techie friends love it because they can use it without knowing a darn thing about how it works. It's just "is the jukebox on?", and away they go.

      Anonymous Coward

    4. Re:Jukebox Hero by zaqattack911 · · Score: 1

      My PC and stereo/TV happen to be in the same room, only instead of wifi and laptops I just run over from the couch to the PC to pick a playlist:)

      It does get a little annoying, but untill there is a good IR/radio controller out there for my PC. I'm not spending 1k on a laptop just so I don't have to leave my couch:)

  20. That one IS nice by 91degrees · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Its also slim and sexy. They should base their designs on this sort of thing.

  21. Laptops by zevans · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My laptop, along with 802.11 setup, makes a decent entertainment system in EVERY room in the house (and the garden, although I do have problems with sunlight [when I don't have problems with rain :-) ] ).

    It's handy (obviously), attractive (small black thing with sexy flat panel display), and does most things pretty well (Radeon is OK for 3D games, and there's an inbuilt DVD and CD-RW.)

    Plus, it has SVGA out for those occasions where you do want to use the big TV - and when you are doing that, the Clie solves the problem of multiple remote controls. I am lacking a wireless keyboard and mouse, because the range on most of them is only a couple of metres which isn't quite enough in a big Victorian house.

    Integration of all the software is of course a nightmare, under both of the installed operating systems.

    Zack

    --
    "... and more and more now there are all kinds of electronic goodies available" -- Pink Floyd 1972
    1. Re:Laptops by turnstyle · · Score: 1
      "Integration of all the software is of course a nightmare, under both of the installed operating systems"

      Zack - you really should check out my software Andromeda (see the post immediately above yours). You might be interested to know that it works on Unix, Windows, and Mac OS X. Also, it's designed to work on smaller decives like your Clie. (and even PocketPC's, etc.)

      --
      Here's what I do: Bitty Browser & Andromeda
    2. Re:Laptops by NickV · · Score: 2

      Not to be a dick, but why pay $35 for Andromeda when you can download AMPache for free? :)

      It works with apache so it works on everything too.

    3. Re:Laptops by turnstyle · · Score: 1
      "Not to be a dick, but why pay $35 for Andromeda when you can download AMPache for free?"

      Hey, it's a reasonable question. First, I should point out that the free evaluation of Andromeda is fully functional. Probably the best way to answer your question is to just take it for a spin.

      Ok, for starters, Andromeda is multi-platform. PHP and ASP versions are available for Unix, Windows, and Mac OS X.

      It's very easy to set up: it's all just a single file, and you don't need to know any coding at all to get it to work.

      As for specific features, some people like the built in search, others the "what's new" feature, others still that you can add folders as well as MP3's to the playlist. Also, Andromeda works with OGG, MPG, WMA, and many other formats.

      The main Andromeda site itself is richly documented, and there are handy features there like an interactive skin editor.

      For the non-English speaking, the Andromeda software includes translations for about 35 languages.

      It's not like I'm Microsoft, and the $35 goes a long way to supporting active development. I really believe that it's also important to make Andromeda a financially stable project in order to guarantee its long-term progress. We've all read the threads here recently about free sites packing up - I don't want Andromeda to share in that fate.

      It's a good thing to toss a little support toward an independent developer working on good software. But that, of course, comes from an independent developer ;)

      I say just try it, and see for yourself...

      --
      Here's what I do: Bitty Browser & Andromeda
  22. HTPC case I've ordered... by tinla · · Score: 3, Informative

    There are heads of HTPC cases out there, if you look hard enough. All the shuttle cases still look like PCs, just PCs with plastic "chrome" on them. I managed to hunt down a case that came in Gold and more or less matches my Marantz 6200 AV Amp (a beast of a machine). Sure it costs a heap and has to be imported from Korea but check out the pictures...

    http://www.e-capsule.co.kr/shop/read.cgi?board=htp c_board&y_number=65
    http://www.e-capsule.co.kr/shop/read.cgi?board=htp c_board&y_number=70&nnew=2
    http://www.e-capsule.co.kr/shop/read.cgi?board=htp c_board&y_number=79&nnew=2
    http://www.moddin.net/review.asp?ReviewID=45

    I found it via the "Home Theater Computers" forum at:

    http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/


    Take the hint - look to Korea for cool cases.

    --
    0daymeme.com: Great stuff.
    1. Re:HTPC case I've ordered... by tinla · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      And because I'm not cool enough to avoid replying to my own post -

      The gallery section of this site is awesome: Koreamod.com

      --
      0daymeme.com: Great stuff.
    2. Re:HTPC case I've ordered... by NickV · · Score: 2

      That case is SO close to what I've been looking for in a HTPC case. I need two more things and I'd buy one in a second (especially since I can't add them myself because I love my appendages too much to try and cut alumnium cleanly)

      1) Room in the front of the case for 2 USB/2 Firewire ports. I want to be able to plug my Playstation USB-modified controller into the front of my HTPC to play MAME and emulated games. It'd be nice to plug my iPod right in too, so I can sync it up before I go out.

      2) An opening in the front for an IRMan or something similar. An HTPC needs an IR port in the front. Maybe it's there, (the review is slashdotted so I can only see the pics)

      Finally, once again has anyone solved the problem of flipping channels on the cable box to get TiVo functionality? That's the last piece of my puzzle, and I don't know how I'd get PVR like functionality without the ability to change the television channels on my cable box. The TiVo has these IR emitters that do all the dirty work.

      Oh well, time to look at the TiVo source when I have some free time.

    3. Re:HTPC case I've ordered... by NickV · · Score: 1

      Nevermind regarding point #2. It does have an IR port. Cool! Now just for #1.

    4. Re:HTPC case I've ordered... by pangloss · · Score: 2

      there are also models of the dign with firewire and usb in front. now you just have to figure out a way to get one: last i read, international orders had a 50 unit minimum. there was some u.s. outfit that was going to start selling one of the models though--sorry don't have the url (i know, what a tease).

    5. Re:HTPC case I've ordered... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can buy an IR blaster that plugs into your serial port to control AVR equipment.

      You can get it via the Snapstream site, or on ebay.

      It works with both Snapstream and Showshifter, as well as a variety of 3rd party apps.

  23. The best way to do it? by lute3 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I've been working on the whole HEPC/TVPC thing for a while.. Most of my 'work', of course, has consisted of tons and tons of research and drawings/schematics instead of purchasing/building much of anything.

    I finally broke down and built a TV machine last summer.. I mainly used it to play Divx movies--both ones I ripped from my DVDs myself and ones I downloaded from Morpheus.

    Remote Control:

    1. I bought an IRman and got it working with Winamp's VidAmp..
    2. At first, I kept no mouse or keyboard on the box. I opted instead to use the remote,
      TweakUI-configured auto-login, and VNC (from my laptop already wired-up in the living room.
    Case:
    1. I tore down a mid-tower case and buffered all of the metal joints with duct tape as I built it back up.
      This eliminated any inherent case rattle.
    2. I layed the side and reconfigured my entertainment center's shelves to accommodate it.
    3. The case had a interesting configuration of fans (combinations of Thermaltake "smart" fans and things)
      to try to keep the AthlonXP 1700+ and three Maxtor drives (one 30GB and two 80GB) cool.

    What have I learned?

    1. I *have* to have TiVo functionality and soon.
    2. Morpheus/Kazaa and other online sources of movies are dying.
    3. Drives fail quickly if not properly cooled.
    4. Drives tend to fail anyway or have the remote possibility of very quickly losing 100 of your
      hard-earned movies in the event of failure.
    5. Almost no matter what, a TV PC is going to be too loud to enjoy having in the living room.

    What will I do differently next time?

    1. I will build two different boxes--one bare and quiet set-top box or something in the living room and the other a
      nasty, tricked-out, noisy system to handle all of the grunt-work in another room.
    2. IDE RAID. 'nuff said.
    3. Linux--as much as possible. I will actually make the full effort to get away from Windows and build
      On-Screen Display menus and things.. One of the bottom lines of my experience is that Windows/FAT32
      *kills* drives.
    4. I *have* to have TiVo/PVR/DVB/DVR/VDR functionality.. I could theoretically
      have one DVB card in the
      STB to add pause-live-TV functionality. For the setup and recording of other scheduled TV programs and movies, the "big box" in the other room that will have somewhere in the
      neighborhood of 4 or 5 DVB cards. This is fine for Digital Cable.. If I had a dish, it would
      likely be very different.
    5. Rip, rip, rip. Get those DVDs archived onto file and quit letting other peoples' copies be sufficient.
      I really didn't do all *that* bad.. I had ripped somewhere around 60 of the DVDs myself.
      I've really got to say this--AVI-archived DVDs beats the friggin bug juice out of any multi-DVD player.

    Here are some more related links..
    LinuxDVB
    VDR

    1. Re:The best way to do it? by lute3 · · Score: 1

      Sorry for the formatting screwups. I was more concerned about spelling, information accuracy, and sharing.
      Thanks : ).

    2. Re:The best way to do it? by The_Shadows · · Score: 2

      ...three Maxtor drives (one 30GB and two 80GB) cool.

      3) Drives fail quickly if not properly cooled.
      4) Drives tend to fail anyway or have the remote possibility of very quickly losing 100 of your
      hard-earned movies in the event of failure. ...my experience is that Windows/FAT32
      *kills* drives.


      I think your problem may just be the first part. Maxtor drives, in my experience, fail. They make a habit of it. I don't think it's Windows or Fat32.

      I, myself, have been running a 20GB Deskstar (IBM) for the past three years. It's quite happy. One backup drive is a 13GB Seagate that I salvaged from an old machine. It's now starting to die(or is at least making the noises that cry out for help), but I swear it's 5 or 6 years old.

      I've also got a pair of WD Caviar 40GB drives. One is taking over for the old 13 Seagate (and then some, of course). They're new (within a year) but I've had no problems with them. My case is pretty well cooled, but the drives aren't. They're kind of in a dead air section (too many IDE and power cables blocking them). I should add another fan for them, but I haven't gotten a chance to do it yet.

      The only reason that I even know they get warm (not exactlt hot) is that when the 13 tried to kill itself I shut the machine down, opened it up and checked the relative drive temps. The 13 and 20 weren't exactly cool.

      Anyway though. Maxtor: fails. WD has been wonderful for myself and others. I worked at a local comp. shop for a couple years, and we sold machines with caviars almost exclusively. We had a bad drive maybe once or twice / year.

      Try again, use WD drives. I would wager that your problems will vastly decrease, OS independent.

      Otherwise, your project sounds really promising, and I wish you the best of luck and skill.

      Oh, and be careful with the IDE Raid. Especially if you stick with Maxtor. Unless you were talking about mirroring. Then, don't worry about it as much. BUT if you're concerned with drive failure, striping is not worth the risk. Me, I'm going to put my two 40s into an array soon, but striping for speed. I don't need fault tolerance. That's what WD is for. Later.

    3. Re:The best way to do it? by Caez · · Score: 0

      Use GOOD hard drives, not cheap Maxtor or Western Digital, THEY SUCK!

      --
      http://www.mistersampo.com
    4. Re:The best way to do it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Try this.. This is my Configuration..

      New Cyrix/Via ITX form factor motherboard/cpu built in combo.

      It is small..

      Needs little power.

      The fan on the CPU is about the size of a normal chipset cooler. No fan noise..

      Small 2 gig boot drive. Keep all movies on the network server.

    5. Re:The best way to do it? by fldvm · · Score: 1
      What is the best windows software to rip DVD's to AVI?

      Are there any Linux software packages to rip DVD's?

    6. Re:The best way to do it? by harborpirate · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd like to make some comments from the point of the research I've done so far on this subject, in relation to some of the things you've said.

      First, on hard drive failure:
      Hard drives fail. This seems obvious to me, I was a network admin in college and I saw a lot of hard drives fail. Pity the poor fool who tries to transport them.. click click, click click.
      My Tip: Burn. CD burners are cheap, reliable, and the media is super cheap. Yeah, an entire movie won't fit on on CD. But you won't be playing from the CD, the idea is merely to have a copy on permanent media in case of HD failure - then put it back on the new HD when you get it. So, make sure you have your media box hooked to your LAN and copy those files to your CD burning machine. No burner? Buy one. - Note: My Pine drive shipped with Nero full version, thus I recommend buying one, because otherwise I would have bought it seperately anyway.

      Noise:
      Computers are noisy. This is probably the biggest hurdle to overcome in a entertainment center pc.
      My Tip: abandon convention. To combat noise, I'm looking at using a specialized watercooled case. I realize this case doesn't fit the traditional entertainment device size/configuration - but I've abandoned that notion and just committed myself to buying the quietest setup I can find and figuring out a way set up my entertainment center around it so that it doesn't look out of place. I have to admit, at first, a "dumb terminal" type setup seems like a good idea, but most of the stuff has to run from the client, not the server. You basically aren't buying yourself any help because your powerful video card and processor have to be on the client anyway, and those cause heat - so even a dumb terminal is going to be noisy.

      TIVO Functionality:
      A must-have. Clearly an entertainment PC is only going to be more than a fancy looking DVD player if you include video capture and playback.
      My Tip: ATI All-in-Wonder. The ATI All-in-Wonder is still the best video capture card on the market. Note that it comes with a remote. NVidia has one now, but reviews are not as glowing. Program guides for both are free.

      Output:
      TV resolutions aren't very good. My research suggests that even new, fancypants TVs resolution isn't good enough to use for a computer.
      My Idea (not advice): projector. Currently I'm considering buying a high resolution computer projector for about the same cost as a very nice TV (a.k.a $2,000-$3,000). I've seen one of these at one of the places I've worked, and I was impressed. It showed both a 1024x768 computer screen and DVD playback very well. (Comon, I *HAD* to play a DVD on it!) The only issue here is obviously light - projection does not work well in a room with a lot of light. Even though otherwise this is an ideal solution (huge screen, relatively low cost, high res) - I'm not sure I can live with the tradeoff. I imagine for normal TV viewing I will still go with the regular TV I already own. My super-sneaky idea for a "close" monitor - build a flap to come up closer to the projector. I doubt the text would be readable, though. I'm still mulling over the possibilities.

      --
      // harborpirate
      // Slashbots off the starboard bow!
    7. Re:The best way to do it? by drewpt · · Score: 1

      2. Morpheus/Kazaa and other online sources of movies are dying.

      Check out EDonkey. Tons of movies.

    8. Re:The best way to do it? by fendel · · Score: 1

      Have you been able to get decent video playback? I have the same setup, except with video files on the 80GB drive I installed in the box. I'm having a tough time getting video files to play with stuttering and getting out of sync, if they're playable at all. And I hate the audio quality.

    9. Re:The best way to do it? by dublin · · Score: 2

      As the architect of a high-performance multi-terabyte storage subsystem based on IDE disk array technology, I beg to differ about Maxtor's quality. Just this past fall, we spent a long time evaluating which drives were the best. The general consensus (and our own conclusion) is Maxtor's large drives run cooler and last longer (failure rates start to become an important item when you have several hundred such drives in an array.)

      IBM drives were better at one time, but that's not been the case for a while, and I doubt Hitachi can change that anytime soon.

      Anyway, Maxtor's good enough for large (256 node and up) Linux and Windows clusters doing seismic processing work worth hundreds of millions, if that's any consolation.

      --
      "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
  24. How to solve the HEPC problem? by altgrr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Currently, computers cannot, and will not, simply fit in with home entertainment setups. There are several reasons why:

    1. Inconvenient input devices. Though wireless keyboards and mice (and integrated wireless keyboard/trackball) are all very well, what you're after most of the time is simply a remote control. There was a device made by Animax called the Multimedia Magic, which was perfect for the job - it even allowed you to control the mouse and type addresses into IE - but it doesn't have W2K drivers at the moment, and it relies on an external IR receiver. Perhaps some universal IR input device standard should be made, so that you can have an IR input port on the front of your PC, and use any input device you wish with it. Difficult to set up, I know, but it's an idea.

    2. Appearance - whilst there are many nice PC cases around at the moment, getting one small enough that looks nice is difficult. That said, the Dell Optiplex GX150 is a sleek little thing - I can't get on with its laptop-style drives though. Also, it's not configured for home entertainment.

    3. Graphics systems - some PCs don't come with TV-out, which is pretty much a necessity, unless you want to buy a very big monitor and shove a standalone TV tuner in.

    4. Noise - covered by previous posters, getting a silent PC is nigh on impossible. It would be possible in theory, but you'd need some hefty heatsinks sticking out of the back, which could compromise the appearance.

    5. Squeezing it all in the box - for a decent HEPC, you'll be wanting 5.1 sound output, a decent graphics card with S-Video out, a reasonable processor, large hard drive to store your (il)legal MP3s and DivXs, DVD reader, decent processor, etc etc etc... the Shuttle SS51 looks good for this, but again, it's only one system and it's not ideal. It does look quiet though...

    6. Not many people want one - whilst I feel I am making a circular argument here, there must be little demand for HEPCs because there aren't any ideal devices.

    --


    Like car accidents, most hardware problems are due to driver error.
    1. Re:How to solve the HEPC problem? by bruanor · · Score: 1

      I would have to disagree with you on most of your points..I have had a PC hooked into my stereo/tv for over two years now, fitting nicely into my entertainment center. I have a small 14" monitor on the bottom shelf for when the TV-Out on my creative card is no active, or when I want to use tv and computer at the same time. In the case of appearance, I have it all neatly hidden by a dark glass door on the front of the center. For input, I use a wireless keyboard/mouse combination, similar to a laptop design. Built in CD controls/volume/etc makes it a quick and easy tool. It also has nicely placed hand holds on both side of the kb. As for getting everything you want out of your HTPC, that's easy.. I've got a vid card with s-vid out, dolby 5.1 audio, 30 gig (hd for now), 450 proc.. plent good for playing movies and mp3s. My case solution was to use a desktop case, not a shuttle.. desktop cases will fit nicely and allow you too have as much as you want in your HTPC. The noise level I would have to say is minimal. It's only noticable when the tv itself is off. I have no special cooling put in place for the machine, apart from it's own chip fan and the PS fan, and to date, for two years, virtually 24 hours a day, no heat problems. And just for the record, it's running 2K and I literally don't remember the last time it crashed, for those of you who THINK you have to re-boot 'doze boxes all the time. ... my 2c. B.

    2. Re:How to solve the HEPC problem? by mt-biker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Currently, computers cannot, and will not, simply fit in with home entertainment setups. There are several reasons why:

      Damn. I thought mine fit pretty well. Here's why:

      1. Inconvenient input devices

      IR-receiver, 15 Euro. Old remote-control, free. LIRC software, free. Controls every media-related Linux application I want to use.

      2. Appearance

      My media-server is in the basement. Audio, video, and serial cables run to the lounge. The only presence in the lounge is the IR-receiver (tiny), although I intend to add a LCD display in an external drive-case at sometime in the future.

      3. Graphics systems

      Yes, a TV-out conneciton is pretty much a requirement, but not as hard to find as you seem to assume.

      4. Noise

      Already covered by remote location of the PC. I should add the the disadvantage of having the PC elsewhere is having to leave the room to change the DVD/CD. Problem solved by ripping the discs to your hard-drive.

      5. Squeezing it all in the box

      Not as hard as you might think. I use a DVB card, which includes digital TV receiver, MPEG2 decoder, external video connection, SPDIF audio out. High-power processors are only really required for on-the-fly format conversion. Large HDs are readily available. Probably most important is a good case to keep your disks nice and cool.

      6. Not many people want one

      You mean that you don't know many people who want one. Or know that they want one.

      Tivo is cool, right? What if you could expand your Tivo's disk space by as much as you could afford to buy new disks? Add additional receiver-cards to be able to record as many channels at once as you wanted?

      Add a DVD-ROM drive and play DVD's through it, or buffer your DVDs to disk?

      Play CDs and MP3s through it? How about AVIs, as well as keeping up with whatever new codecs come out?

      Then your needs would be well served by a general purpose computer, not some consumer device which is destined for obsolecence within 3 years.

      Another poster mentioned the poor integration between different software. Take a look at VDR for Linux - it does all of what I've mentioned above, and more. How about an image viewer, for bvrowsing your photo collection? All there, and fully integrated.

    3. Re:How to solve the HEPC problem? by altgrr · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you have a pretty nice setup - but I bet you didn't just go out and buy it from a shop, all set up nicely like that. Sure, people make nice home entertainment systems, but there aren't (m)any available off the shelf.

      --


      Like car accidents, most hardware problems are due to driver error.
    4. Re:How to solve the HEPC problem? by bruanor · · Score: 1

      Yes, I would have to agree on that point, off-the-shelf isn't easy to find all the time, at least not for the same cost as a regular PC. My system is custom built by myself, with the express purpose of operating off of a tv..nicer case would be nice, but that will come...

  25. What's all this about looks? by Bocaj · · Score: 1

    So your home entertainment systems looks like either a pc or a pile of stereo equipment. At least with a pc you have plenty of case options to match the room. It may still look like a pc, but as long as the feng shui is good, it works. Standards in pc hardware shape make adding and upgrading easier than a home stereo too. Try mixing and match different pieces of home entertainment equipment from different manufacturers. Sure most is a standard width and made to be somewhat stackable, but the front bezel's usually have designs that only match there particular manufacturers line. That is, if you go with black, the universal home stereo color. If not, your really in trouble. With a pc, just buy a case with front door. Then it doesn't matter that the dvd drive is a different color. It's also all in one clean, easy to manage, box. :-)

  26. noise problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a solution to the noise would be to run keyboard/mouse/ir/svideo extensions to the room the Home theatre is in an keeping the pc elsewhere
    main prob then would be drives... what's the max length of a firewire cable?

  27. Rackmount Case by huinya · · Score: 1

    If you need something sleek looking and space-saving, get a rackmount case like this one I'm not recommending this particular case actually - I'm late for work and I just ran to partspc.com for the first pic I could find ;)

    And did anyone else vomit over their hardware choices (let alone their OS choice)?
  28. Anyone have a Cached link to the page? by X!0mbarg · · Score: 1

    /.ed again! And not a Chance to see it, eigther!

    Somebody fire up the Way Back Machine to, say yesterday and post a link, please?

    Thanks!

  29. Those ads were real? by spacefrog · · Score: 2

    God damn, those ads really happened?!? I thought they were just a side effect of the drugs me and all my dotcom buddies were doing at my apartment.

    Man, I miss the 90's!

  30. Beige case solution by Sogol · · Score: 1

    I had my entertainment-system pc case painted shiny black at a local auto paint shop. It cost about $40, and looks awesome.

  31. Oh, who cares what it *looks* like??? by mwood · · Score: 1

    I'd much rather have entertainment gear that *works like* my PC. That is, I can reprogram it to suit my needs; various data sources are multiplexed onto a data bus and can be routed concurrently to various sinks; I can plug a card into the bus and add new ports or other capabilities; I can just copy losslessly from old to new media as storage technology changes.

    Think about *that*, media moguls!

  32. Coolmaster case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would buy the Coolmaster case if I had the money. There is a good review here..
    www.hexus.net
    This is the case I wanna get, its about £170. I'll put in a 200Gig HD, DVD etc. Lan connection back to my ADSL.

  33. IBM Ispirati by MarvinMouse · · Score: 2

    The old IBM Ispiratis were classic examples of VCR Computers. They were sleek, black, had a dvd, and one Christmas they were selling (w/o a monitor) for $499CAN.

    They don't sell Ispiratis anymore, but their netvistas still have the potential (with a few case mods) to be sleek, black, cool little VCR computers for your home entertainment system.

    (Or if you cold find an Ispirati case and install a better board and memory in it, it would work as well.) :-)

    --
    ~ kjrose
  34. PCs? CDs? DVDs? by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

    The audiophiles I know are exclusively vinyl-based, with turntables so solid (and finely balanced) that my bathwater goes down the plughole the other way round when they switch their kit on.

  35. Antigrav turntable!?!? by Beetjebrak · · Score: 1

    Wow, a turntable that reverses the earth's magnetic poles!! Where can I get one of those!?!? Imagine all the fun that can be had with one of those, not to mention the awesome breakbeats oozing out of my speakers while I wreak havoc on the world's compasses!! :-)) (--insert megalomanic grin here)

    --
    Learn from the mistakes of others. There isn't enough time to make them all yourself.
    1. Re:Antigrav turntable!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uhhhhhh, the way water goes down your drain has nothing to do with the magnetic pole dude... it's the direction the earth spins...

    2. Re:Antigrav turntable!?!? by turpie · · Score: 1

      Actually the direction water goes down the drain is caused by local factors, such as random currents and the shape of the sink. Coriolis effects from the spinning of the Earth are too small to affect the water in your sink.

      See this link from Bad Astronomy.

  36. What I want in an HEPC by boy_afraid · · Score: 0

    I see a lot on what case to use to minimize the eye carnage when you web a PC and your living room, and also I've read on what OSes to use. But what I have not seen is a comiplation of software to use.

    I want to be able to:
    * Have TIVO functionality
    * Play my MP3s
    * RIP CDs
    * Download multimedia files via broadband inernet
    * Manage my downloaded and existing media
    * Be able to copy a CD without having to use my PC
    * Play DVDs
    * Listen to the radio
    * Record radio shows (I like talk radio and Art Bell)
    * Be able to transfer files to and from my PC
    * And most of all, BE SO EASY TO USE MY PC-ILLITERATE WIFE CAN USE IT!

    I think I have the remote control problem licked. I have a Philips Pronto T-1000. Probably the best remote control you can have, but I know newer versions with RF exist. Mine is IR only, but that is fine, I want my HEPC for one room, for now.

    I can build the PC, I know how to install Linux perfectly, but want software will let me do all of the above and probably more in one cohesive GUI that can be controlled with a remote control. Keep in mind, again, that I can do A LOT with my Pronto remote control including creating macros.

    1. Re:What I want in an HEPC by Bodhammer · · Score: 1
      Here is a better remote http://www.theonion.com/onion3104/newremote.html

      TOKYO--Television watching became even more convenient this week with Sony's introduction of a new remote-controlled remote control.

      The new device, which can be controlled via remote control through the use of a second remote control unit, will replace older models that needed to be held in the hand to be operable.

      "Constantly leaning forward to pick up the remote control from the coffee table is a tiresome, cumbersome chore that will soon be a thing of the past," Sony director of product development Dan Ninomiya said. "These new remotes, should they be left on the coffee table or in some other barely-hard-to-reach place, will not need to be picked up and actually pointed at the screen in order to work."

      The new remote control--along with the additional remote it is designed to control--will soon come standard with all Sony televisions, allowing viewers to remain "more immobile, more stationary, and more physically inert than ever before."

      "Imagine a remote control capable of switching channels on your television right from its spot on the table, one that requires no clumsy fumbling about with the hands to operate," Ninomiya said. "Well, that bold, inactive future is here."

      The Sony remote-controlled remote control, or RCRC, also puts an end to worries about losing the remote in the couch.

      "The RCRC works from anywhere in the room, even deep inside a hide-a-bed sofa," a Sony press release read. "This puts an end to distracting remote searches, frustrating lifting and stacking of cushions, as well as eventual cushion replacement after retrieval, an annoying task that can sometimes result in missed programming and, in some cases, serious waste of valuable television-viewing time."

      As an added convenience, in the event that the RCRC itself is accidentally placed in a less-than-immediately-accessible spot, it will come with an additional third remote control.

      "Should the second remote end up under a magazine or newspaper, the third remote will still be capable of controlling the second remote, enabling the second remote to change channels on the first one, and ultimately the television itself, with just the touch of a button," Sony spokesperson Rich Hervey explained. "Regardless of the location of the remote control unit, the ease and comfort of remote-control television viewing will be assured."

      To ensure that the third remote is not lost as well, it will come with a handy adhesive pad affixing it to the owner's forehead at all times. Or, in the case of more expensive models, it be implanted directly within the sinus passages of the user.

      "This," Hervey said, "will make the loss of the third remote control a possibility that is, at most, remote."

      Home entertainment industry insiders predict that the new RCRCs will be hugely successful.

      "These things are fantastic," said Seated Viewing Magazine editor Ted Kohrs at a recent Las Vegas trade show demonstrating the new product. "I've been here all morning and my heart's only beaten six times!"

      It is believed that the new Sony remote may prove even more popular than competitor Toshiba's new Pepsinjection intravenous soda-drip televisions as the hot home entertainment item for 1997.

      --
      "I say we take off, nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."
  37. This is so great... by TechnoWeenie · · Score: 1

    for all us people to whom fashion is more important that function.

    1. Re:This is so great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean every mac user?

  38. Never heard of an 'envision' ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here in Europe we had this. It was called Olivetti Envision. I was working in a department store by the time, and the first time I saw it I thought it was REALLY cool, but there was no actual reaction from people, and Technical Service sucked. But had the most sleek wireles keyboard w/ integrated trackball i had seen. We are talking year 1996 ya know!

  39. A whore in pretty lingerie is still a whore. by InOverMyFeet · · Score: 1

    This guys inspiration for doing this was to have it look like an integral part of his home entertainment setup. Have you looked at the pictures? He could have put a full tower server case there and it wouldn't look any worse than the cheap OSB modular TV stand or the sheet covering something in the background. The mod is cool, I'll admit, but he probably doesn't have a wife telling him he can't have a computer in the living room. So why confine yourself to a system limited to the insides of a VCR. BTW, what pc mod'er doesn't own a Dremel????

    --

    -- Probability does not dismiss possibility --

  40. let me see, mine covers all the basis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. I use Zapstream remote control. I never even touch my keyboard/mouse. (http://www.streamzap.com/)

    2. cases are easy to find, I have one that insulates the noise

    3. Hmm, I have a Nividia MX 4400 card that outputs 1024X768 to my tv will no problem. Even booting and bios is displayed on screen,

    4. I have case fans, cpu fans, and an an enermax powersupply and my sound is muffled by insulation padding. The PC is quieter than my Sony VHS VCR..

    5. They have many mini-atx case and custom boxes , even some rack mounts that fit well in a home entertainment system.

    6. I sure want one. everyone I show my system seems to want one.. I have over 60 gigs of mp3, tons of ripped dvd movies, dolby 5.1 surround sound, games like Max payne, Allied Assault, GTA3 that I could play on my big screen.

    The problem I have is my reliance on Microsoft. All the cool HTPC stuff like 5.1 sound. games, remote control is dependent on MS.

    1. Re:let me see, mine covers all the basis by pavera · · Score: 1

      1024x768? I assume you have an hdtv?

  41. Not for me.. Using Windows XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I hate to admit this but using XP, I dont have this problem. The machine boots up in 6 seconds fast (from Bios to desktop). I use a remote control, streamzap and it has hot keys for all my major apps -- Windows Media Player,TV, WinAmp, PowerDVD, WinDVD.

    When I stick a DVD in, the automatically fires up and I can control it from the remote. There is no windows' desktop. I use Talisman and have about 4 icons Bug buttons) that I use to navigate my hot key apps.

    I hate to admit this but Windows XP does a good job. I've tried several remotes and girder. It can be programmed/customized to the point where you don't need to use a keyboard/mouse for your regulat activites. Only time I use those input devices is to play games.

    1. Re:Not for me.. Using Windows XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mention that you "hate to admit this" a couple of time? why? is it just because it's a microsoft os? that is not a valid reason. you seem to be using a product that works well and that is all that matters. don't worry about what every other linux geek around here thinks. cheers!

  42. Micro$oft to the rescue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Attention windows lovers! Our old buddy Bill has anticipated your needs and is hard at work on EXACTLY what you want! Yes, this Chritma$, for ONLY $1500-$3000 you too can own a Windows Media Center PC, which incorporates the oh-so user-friendly Windows XP Media Center Edition OS in a TV-based PC that is "specifically designed for use with a remote control" and includes a "Digital Video Recorder" integrated with the OS!!!! This integrated program breaks new ground just like your old favorite monopolistic application, Internet Explorer! Manufacturers rushing to market with this breakthrough consumer-oriented device include Hewlett-Packard, Samsung, and NEC. Integrated Copy Protection, anyone?

    Waiting to be slashdotted: http://www.winsupersite.com/showcase/freestyle_pre view.asp

  43. hooking up pc to tv by tezzery · · Score: 1

    I recently took on this pc-to-tv project, thought I'd share my experience.

    I purchased a 42" mitsubishi hdtv.. after adding all the usual suspect components (progressive scan dvd/dts receiver/surround speakers) I looked at hooking up an existing pc to the system for listening to mp3's/having a cool winamp visual screen on the tv, as well as having icq and aim from the living room. I purchased a wireless keyboard/mouse combo off ebay for about $30 which works very nice from up to a 15-20 foot range. overall, it worked wonderfully with the exception of resolution (for hdtv standards). my goal was to get 1024 res on the 42". I found a cool VGA to component (Y-Pb-Pr) converter for $119. This is where I'm at now.. my next project will be a wireless video transmitter from the computer to the tv, since the fans do get kind of noisy, not to mention the issue of heat.

  44. How to build a real HTPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While I find this to be an amusing case mod, it doesn't really fit the bill of a true home entertainment pc. Visit http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/forumdisplay.php?s= &forumid=26 for the real thing. Don't forget to read the FAQ! It takes a lot more than a unobtrusive case to make a useful HTPC.

    1. Re:How to build a real HTPC by tlastrange · · Score: 1

      Yup, the AV Science forum is *the* place to learn about this stuff. I followed their advice a little over a year ago. Hand selected a case, motherboard, video card, sound card, version of Windows, driver versions, software DVD player, etc., etc., etc.

      It's still a PC. I had to reboot it the other night while I was giving a demo of my home theater setup...

      --
      Tom LaStrange
      tom@lastrange.com

  45. I'm getting a hard on just waiting for this thing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, this will solve all my digital hub needs.

  46. My thoughts by Sloppy · · Score: 2
    1. I will build two different boxes--one bare and quiet set-top box or something in the living room and the other a nasty, tricked-out, noisy system to handle all of the grunt-work in another room.
    2. IDE RAID. 'nuff said.
    Yep, I figured this out a while ago: storage should be left to a specialist. Every home needs a fileserver.

    Run Linux, *BSD, or some other traditional server OS on there. Storage should be RAID5 with huge/cheap ATA drives, and just assume they're going to fail, so make sure you monitor the RAID's status and replace drives as necessary. (Maxtor is ok, because they're cheap. Remember: you're already resigned to occasional drive failure. If you buy quality drives because you can't stand the thought of a drive going out, then you've already lost. Look at it merely in terms of yearly equipment cost, where time and dataloss cost should be about zero if you do things right.) Speed isn't a major factor: you're mostly going to be doing sequential reads, requested at less than one megabyte per second. Hard disks are almost overkill, but that's where the price/size winner is today. What you need is capacity and redundancy. ATA combined with RAID5, delivers.

    (I wish someone made cheap/huge ATA drives that spun at only 3600 RPM, or even slower. I want big energy-efficient and cool-running drives for my server, and I'm willing to trade transfer speed for it.)

    Then multimedia stuff can be done on a separate machine which doesn't have its own storage, and instead, relies on the network. Lighter and more RT-ish OSes such as QNX, BeOS, etc. should theoretically work a lot better, but I'm starting to think Linux is good enough, provided you have a fast CPU (or two ;-). And multimedia is something where openness is very important. You don't want to be using closed codecs or have your playback application(s) not be tweakable, or have to be limited by someone else's imagination of how you're going to be doing things. I think that at the highest levels, the app should be in a high-level scripting language (e.g. Python) so that it's easy to diddle with. Python+PyOgg(and related libraries)+lcdproc+libirman has turned out to be a major winner for my music playback; I hope to use a similar approach for video, someday.

    5. Rip, rip, rip. Get those DVDs archived onto file
    IMHO, this is premature unless you're keeping the DVD's encoding instead of transcoding. I don't think today's super-compressed video codecs (e.g. DiVX) are good enough, yet. At least not for action and special-effects movies; if it has Jet Li or a spaceship in it, I don't want to watch a DiVX. But you're right: movies need to get onto always-accessible media, not removable media. I want to be picking an entry from a menu, not physically juggling/finding shiney disks. Like CDs have become, DVDs should be for distribution, not playback.
    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    1. Re:My thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The question I have about home fileservers is: How do you back it up?

      If I have 200+ GB RAID array, it seems like my only choice is to backup to tape. Unless I set up a backup RAID, make a copy of everyhing, and then put the whole array in a closet for safe keeping.

      Or is there a better way?

  47. XBox is the best home entertainment PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not only can it play games, but there is already a mod to allow us tp play DivX movies streamed over our lan. Linux support is just around the corner, who could ask for anyting more for $200?

    Let's all say it, Thanks Microsoft!

    --Chris

  48. Isn't tha the point? by g(zerofunk.org) · · Score: 1

    Isn't it kind of the point to have a PC next to your entertainment center so when someone asks 'What is that?' you can brag about how you have Gb's of mp3's and 100's of divx on there? Did I miss something here? Since when did the /. community not want to have a bit of 'nerd' in every room of the house? g

  49. 15 seconds is too slow by The+Salamander · · Score: 1

    15 seconds?? I get annoyed at my DVD player
    taking 2 seconds to announce "Welcome to DVD World!!" whenever I turn it on.

    1. Re:15 seconds is too slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Why would it need to boot? Why would you switch it off? Just let it go sleep when not needed, and wake up when you do. A reasonable system comes up from standby in under a second.

    2. Re:15 seconds is too slow by drewpt · · Score: 1

      Exactly.. I don't see anyone complaining about Tivo- yes for all you Linux fans out there..

  50. Get over yourself by x+mani+x · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There's nothing like blurting out religious metaphors about home theater enthusiasts to score a little karma! You know our geek community is getting bad when there are sociology majors trolling in our forums.

    You're a very poetic troll indeed, but a troll is a troll and it's unfortunate you weren't moderated as such.

    People just want to replicate the movie experience at home, nothing more, nothing less. It's a money pit, a dubious one at that, but what hobby isn't?

    Cheers.

  51. URLs and e-mail by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Having to pull out a keyboard to do certain things

    Yeah? Even if some open-source project manages to make a set-top Linux distribution that manages to move almost everything to the numeric keypad (for binding to IR remotes), how do you enter a URI into a set top box's web browser? Or to compose e-mail? Or to enter the name of a CD that isn't up on freedb yet?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:URLs and e-mail by CavemanKiwi · · Score: 1

      Yes but most pple who want one of these already have a PC and would like to be able 2 watch movies, Listen to Mp3s, record TV and play mame games in the living room. So as long as you can remotely manage it from a PC over the network. I personally would like to do without the bulk of a K/b in my Living room thx.

  52. Xcard from sigma Designs by ArcAdes · · Score: 2, Informative

    I am looking into the home pc entertainment and i saw this card that came out for sigma designs. http://www.sigmadesigns.com/products/xcard.htm

    It is a great card with component out 5.1, able to display a full screen movie while browsing internet on your computer with a separate monitor. Includes a remote control as well and supports a dedicated processor for divx movies as well as the decoder for most popular dvds.

    Works great and my case is a all black case to match my black entertainment system, and going to install a clear panel with a blue neon light :)

  53. Shuttle SV24 by carambola5 · · Score: 3, Informative

    So, I bought one of these and it's sitting in pieces on top of my current 'puter. But after move-in, it will have a tremendous job ahead of it:

    It will serve as one of these HEPC or whatever you call it. It has S-video out, decent sound (my standalone DVD player will take care of good sound requirements), and best of all, it has 2 fans... nothing else. No hard drive, no floppy, no cd-rom. Nothing.

    That said, it is quite obvious that it will be functioning as a diskless client, booting off a server. This server will provide everything via NFS (yes, I'm behind a firewall, so don't bother trying to hack). Hopefully, in time I will produce some software that is basically an OSD similar to that of the TV guide with Time Warner's digital cable. That way, there is no need to move a pseudo-mouse with the numbers on the remote. The last step of the project will be to create a CD-archiver that mechanically loads/unloads CDs remotely. mmmm, laziness



    Call your senator! I did
    --
    IWARS.
    People, in general, disappoint me. Politicians even more so.
  54. Their site is hosed by _ZorKa_ · · Score: 1

    I went to their main home page and got re-directed to the system control panel. Not the smartest re-direct I've ever seen. Has anyone else been able to get to anything?

    -Z

    --
    "With enough memory and hard drive space, anything in life is possible!"
    1. Re:Their site is hosed by D1ScDuC3 · · Score: 0

      Yes, their site is indeed hosed. Only now it doesn't re-direct, it just says they wont resolve.. Apparently they weren't ready to be /.'d and they took their servers down or at least their hosting application. Not the best move on their behalf.

      --
      "Well, if you don't want your relatives and friends to die, help me spread the news." -Alex Chiu
    2. Re:Their site is hosed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its Hughesey from OC-Melbourne Here.

      Our host suspended our account as the bandwidth was too much for their server.

      Sorry about that, it pisses me off just as much as you.

  55. underclocking? Re:Okay, but.. what about the noise by phsdv · · Score: 1

    What about underclocking? Reduce the core voltage and lower the frequency your CPU is running on. Both will reduce the power consumption, and thus reduce heat and this might make it possible to not use a fan at all! You have to find out yourself which values actually work, I am still overclocking mine... Paul

  56. For those interested in a HTPC case... by ap0 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Can't see if this has already been posted, but I found this at Trendetronics. It has that home theatre piece of equipment look that most people desire for HTPCs, but it only accepts MicroATX. (Doh!)

  57. Backing up hectagigabytes by Sloppy · · Score: 1
    I don't know how you back 'em up. I also have a 200+ GB array (though it's only about half full right now). It doesn't get backed up. (Keeping my head buried in the sand seems to be working out, so far. And single drive failure is the biggest menace, so RAID makes me cocky in that regard.)

    Tape is a pretty iffy answer as well, as there aren't any affordable tape drives with that capacity. Last I checked, the biggest tapes were 33GB (fraudulently advertised as 66GB, of course), so it a backup would take multiple volumes. Multiple volumes means it doesn't get done.

    *clickity-click* Hmm.. it looks like bigger tape drives have come along. 100 Gig tapes are available at $3000 for a drive and $100 per tape. Ugh, that's not the way to go.

    Backing up to other hard disk(s), as you mentioned, may be the best way to go.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  58. Re:The Projector by rawg · · Score: 1

    Oh yes, the projector is the way to go with DVD's. I have the Plus 1100 and its great. I get a 20 foot screen. Its just like being at the movies.

    Your right about the light. I can only use it at night. We have "Movie Night" about three times a week. For the rest of the time I have a TV that someone gave me. Next year I'm going to build a theater in my back yard. No windows.

    --
    The above is not worth reading.
  59. Says you. by phriedom · · Score: 2

    Thats a nice anecdote, but I prefer actual statistics. When I was last shopping for HDD, the Maxtor 7200rmp disk had a better mean time between failures than either the WD or IBM drives.

    Since I have not had any trouble with my Maxtor drives, I think that the guy is probably correct in supposing that the deaths were heat related.

    --
    Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
  60. Best AV Case Yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It depresses me that because I don't have an account, most poeple will never see this case. I won't, however, make an account.

    Case fits an ATX motherboard, 600W PSU, and the facade has an IR port as well as a place for a DVD drive.

    AV Computer Case

  61. dead link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the link in the story is dead.

  62. Old news for some by BurntSand · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Beginning to enter the Home Entertainment scene"?!?

    Some PCs, such as the Commodore Amiga CDTV have been integrated seamlessly into modern home theater systems for over a decade now.

    The CDTV was expressly designed to not look like an intimidating computer; rather it was supposed to look like a friendly, familiar stereo or home video component. It didn't help much; CDTV was an expensive failure for Commodore, much like the similar Philips CDi system.

  63. Cooling / noise.. by SectoidRandom · · Score: 2

    "5. Almost no matter what, a TV PC is going to be too loud to enjoy having in the living room. "

    There is so much that can be done here, I can see you have put a little effort into reducing noise, (duct-tape case joints, etc) but you made some fatal mistakes.. I have just completed my quiet pc project, and i'll tell you it went from 6 months ago unbearable to silent today! Now I cannot hear the sound of my pc over the static from the dodgy speakers when idle. :)

    Quick tips:
    Firstly get rid of that Athlon! Sorry it is a lost hope, I went through so many differnt fans and heatsinks before I realised my Athlon1.33 was a dead end. Thermaltake are very good fans but even the 'quite' ones will vary in noise, ie when it heats up it goes from 'quiet' 22db to jet engine 43db! :( Personally the best results I got was a Thermaltake Volcano7 with the 80cm fan replaced with a fan from www.quietpc.com. Of course this does not compare with the virtually-FANLESS operation of my new PentiumIV 2.26Ghz! That heatsink is big enough that with the fan removed and a nice 90cm quiet fan (Zalman fan less than 20db) mounted above it is enough! Only one case intake fan is required to keep the system temp average 30deg, and at most 48deg celcius.

    Next the harddisk, get rid of them, go for a Seagate Barracuda IV, these things run almost silent and very cool. Only use one HD in the system aswell. With the DVD-ROM, I highly recommend SONY, next to replacing the CPU my best move was junking a Pioneer 16x (noisy bastard!) with a SONY 16x DVD, that thing is the quietest DVD/CD I have heard in many years!

    Lastly the powersupply again many quiet alternatives are available, www.quietpc.com is a good place, Just Cooler make a very quiet PSU which I love (sorry no link :( )..

    It is so possible to make a quite pc, you would quickly learn this like I did when I started working on some Dell and Compaq corporate desktop's Optiplex's, etc.. Those things run silent, like all pc's should be! ;)

  64. MIRROR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there is a mirror available at

    http://www.grabualsa.net/hepc_mirror/

    thanks to the grabualsa.net team!

    --SileNceR (OC-Melbourne)

  65. Its Hughesey from OC-Melbourne HERE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry guys, our host didnt like the amount of data transfer that was going on and suspended our account :(.

    I dont like it any more than you guys.

    Suffice to say we are looking for a new host!

  66. We're trying too, HELP us!! by Snover · · Score: 1

    OpenPVR -- an open *nix video recorder project.

    --

    [insert witty comment here]
  67. I love the "big beige case" by Grizzlysmit · · Score: 1
    but lets admit it, that big beige case probably looks far worse than the hardware its replacing.

    There just a bunch of suites, be a real Geek, gotta love the beige case.

    --
    in my life God comes first.... but Linux is pretty high after that :-D
    Francis Smit