Slashdot Mirror


Boulevard of Broken .dreams

kubla2000 writes "Salon has a fascinating article up examining the detritus of the dotcom craze of registering anything and everything as a domain name. This is, by turns, a tragic and hilarious piece... there's an irrisistable pathos to the fact that "FreeRoofTile.com" has expired as well as an urge to take a clue-bat to whoever "thought" to register it in the first place."

181 comments

  1. A simple commodity landrush like any other by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 4, Insightful
    To be fair, there was a year or so there where you could have made absurd amounts of money selling domain names. You probably still cna make a little scratch here and there - I'm sure the owner of "Slashdot.com" didn't give it away to this bunch for free.

    Otherwise you can apply all of the standard economic models recently applied to tulips, beanie babies, cabbage patach dolls, etc.

    1. Re:A simple commodity landrush like any other by You're+All+Wrong · · Score: 1

      Yup, certainly some domains were traded for unbelievable, and stupid amounts.

      Reading the article, I spotted this shoddy tabloid journalism:
      {{{
      Assuming annual registration fees between $15 and $30 these days
      }}}

      Grrrr! In bulk (500 or more, ISTR), the domains were registered for about $6 each. However, $6*15m is still a whole load of beer-money.

      YAWIAR.

      --
      Your head of state is a corrupt weasel, I hope you're happy.
    2. Re:A simple commodity landrush like any other by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It really depends these days. If you own a trademarked name, with the current domain dispute procedures, it's quite easy to lose a domain you bought and never make any money from it. (In fact, you could potentially lose a great deal.) Even if it's something "generic," a lot of the procedures are so messed up, you may still lose it. Hardly worth the hassle anymore.

    3. Re:A simple commodity landrush like any other by Shelled · · Score: 2

      Back in the early eighties a co-worker was scrambling to register as many random trade names as he and his associates could think of. Their hope was that some unwary entrepenuer who actually created value would unwittingly step on their trademark and be forced to pay up. Slimy then, slimy now.

    4. Re:A simple commodity landrush like any other by FirstOne · · Score: 1
      Reading the article, I spotted this shoddy tabloid journalism:
      {{{Assuming annual registration fees between $15 and $30 these days}}}

      Actually, that's probably an underestimate, more like $70 per domain.
      Network solutions was the only registrar up until late 1999, almost 2000.
      See. History of the Shared Registration System.

      In the early stages of the shared registration system, there weren't many bargains like there are today.
      As I recall, NS only offered two year initial registrations ($70) and yearly renewals ($35yr).
      Two year initial registrations placed in 1999 expired in 2001.

      So your really looking $70*15m or 1 Billion+.. Even more bear money!!

    5. Re:A simple commodity landrush like any other by You're+All+Wrong · · Score: 1

      Yes, but in theory, since late 1999, the cynical domain name resellers have been able to register every dictionary word, every place name, and many other common patterns too, for $6 apiece, and then tried to sell them on.

      The ones we're seeing expiring aren't necessarily _end user_ registrations, but are probably the domain name prospecters/squatters.

      For example, when I looked there yesterday, I think I noticed that
      lovenevada.com, lovekansas.com, loveoregon.com, lovealaska.com, lovehawaii.com, etc. all expired on _exactly_ the same date.

      I would claim - without proof - that these were registered en bloc at $6 apiece net, and not registered at $70 apiece.

      There's a supplier-wholesaler-retailer chain in domain names, just as there is with cornflakes, you know.

      YAWIAR

      --
      Your head of state is a corrupt weasel, I hope you're happy.
  2. Why no, I'm not by ObviousGuy · · Score: 0, Troll
    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:Why no, I'm not by ObitMan · · Score: 0

      yeah that was rather annoying.
      of course salon just put that up because they knew that the desparate slashbots were coming and figured it was an easy way to get some business.

      --
      Who run Barter Town?
    2. Re:Why no, I'm not by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I can't even get in to see the article, because it appears to use flash to show ads, and I refuse to install flash. Flash lets them send images all over my screen that I can't close, and make sounds that I can't silence.

      As I said in the letter I wrote to salon, "I'm sorry, but you'll have to treat me like a human with rights and let me close the ads that I so choose."

      So, I just don't get to see the article, and I tell everybody I know that

      Salon treats you like a monkey in a cage, beating you over the head with ads. If you think you don't want to see an ad, they know better, because you're just a monkey.

    3. Re:Why no, I'm not by You're+All+Wrong · · Score: 1

      Looks like all that is required is the ?x at the end...

      http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/2002/08/03/delet eddomains/index.html?x

      Stupid dumbarses. Phil

      --
      Your head of state is a corrupt weasel, I hope you're happy.
    4. Re:Why no, I'm not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bla bla bla "I don't like flash" bla bla. Jesus christ - Shut the hell up already, install flash, enjoy the interactivity it provides and view the article. And quite whining like a little bitch.

    5. Re:Why no, I'm not by MaxVlast · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      If you think you don't want to see an ad, don't go to a site that makes pays its bills through advertising. What makes you think that you're better than the people who watch the ads? You're not, get the clue. Real world coming up on the right.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    6. Re:Why no, I'm not by reaper20 · · Score: 2

      Works for me in Mozilla ... looks like you need to switch your browser. Complaining about simply fixed problems on Slashdot, which is read by techies (at least used to) is a pretty lame excuse.

      If you want later, we can send someone over to your house and show you how to use your mouse too.

    7. Re:Why no, I'm not by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My complaint was not that I have to see ads. I apologize for not making that clear. I totally understand and respect that model. But also, they have to respect that once I see an ad, if I choose to skip it because it doesn't interest me, I should have that right. It's just wasting their bandwidth and my time if it's not something I'm interested in pursuing.

    8. Re:Why no, I'm not by DennyK · · Score: 2

      Odd...I was able to read the article with no Flash and images from Salon blocked. Then again, I didn't see any "Get this plugin" boxes either, so maybe I just didn't get the Flash ads this time...

      What did the page do to you? The only time I have trouble with having no Flash plugin is when stupid webmasters insist on making their only navigation system in Flash. Sites with Flash ads or extraneous components have never caused a problem. Do you use IE? I've seen IE harass users endlessly when it encounters content for a plugin like Flash it doesn't have. Moz and Netscape just replace the content with a "click here to get the plugin" box and go on their merry way, though...

      DennyK

    9. Re:Why no, I'm not by BitHive · · Score: 0, Troll
      I just sent your post to my local chapter of Amnesty International. I'm sure they will take up your cause immediately, as I was in tears just reading about your plight.

      Wake up.

    10. Re:Why no, I'm not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Real world coming up on the right."

      What? What a retard.

      Is this Dennis Leary?

  3. Cricket by Tom+Davies · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Cricket is not a minor sport. Not compared to baseball, anyway.

    Tom

    --
    I have discovered a wonderful .sig, but 120 characters is too small to contain it.
    1. Re:Cricket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cricket is most certainly a minor sport. It is a game played by whiny fags from the Commonwealth.

    2. Re:Cricket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe in Britain and a few of her once-subjugated lands, but not in America, Japan, or Canada. I'd say they're about equal. Of course, compared to soccer, everything's a minor sport, isn't it?

    3. Re:Cricket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And why the fuck is this Offtopic? Moderators, have some sense. I know the World Series in baseball is played exclusively by North American teams, but I can assure you teams from all continents for World Cup Cricket 2003, to be held in South Africa.

    4. Re:Cricket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yea? all continents?
      are brazil, mexico, us, canada or argentina going
      to play for the cricket world cup ?
      Cuz some tiny islands from the atlantic play for it does no mean it's a

      get serious man!

    5. Re:Cricket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, compared to soccer, everything's a minor sport, isn't it?

      Thats football, not soccer

    6. Re:Cricket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no but UK, India, Pakistan Australia and New Zealand might, plus their combined populations make the population of USA look like a church hall day out

    7. Re:Cricket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does africa play cricket?
      Does america play cricket?
      Does europe? ok for europe only uk, but
      mostly cuz pakis immigrants.

      Anyways nobody gives a damm about such a funny sport wich is played almost only by pakies and ghandies.

    8. Re:Cricket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cricket is most definitely played by a larger number of people than baseball. It is also played in many more countries - baseball never really caught on internationally.

      Want to know what I'm talking about? - England, India, Australia, Pakistan, New Zealand, South Africa, Zimbabwe, West Indies, Sri Lanka, Saudi Arabia, Kenya, Bangladesh and even Canada have international cricket teams. Get your facts straight before making asinine comments.

    9. Re:Cricket by mino · · Score: 1
      are brazil, mexico, us, canada or argentina going to play for the cricket world cup ?

      Ummm... yes. Canada is going to play for the cricket world cup.

      Along with teams from Africa (Kenya, South Africa, Zimbabwe, Namibia), Europe (Netherlands, England), Oceania (Australia, New Zealand), the Caribbean (West Indies), Asia (Bangladesh), and the 'subcontinent'/middle east (India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka). Pretty much everywhere except South America, in other words.

      I'm pretty sure that the billion-plus people over in India alone would come close to bringing cricket well clear of baseball in terms of supporter numbers (except for whatever it is that everyone plays in China).

  4. But what everyone who reads /. wants to know is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who registered that damn Goatse site!

    1. Re:But what everyone who reads /. wants to know is by echucker · · Score: 2

      Sadly, nic.cx's whois query won't retun that information.

    2. Re:But what everyone who reads /. wants to know is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Registrant:
      Web World Services (HICK3-DOM)
      12221 carter street
      Overland park, KS 66213
      US

      Domain Name: HICK.ORG

      Administrative Contact, Technical Contact:
      Miller, Matt (MM8608) miller@HICK.ORG
      Hick Organization
      12221 Carter St.
      Overland Park, KS 66213
      (913) 897 - 5980 (FAX) 816-842-9909

      Record expires on 30-Aug-2003.
      Record created on 29-Aug-1997.
      Database last updated on 3-Aug-2002 11:27:39 EDT.

      Domain servers in listed order:

      NS.HICK.ORG 209.242.124.241
      NS1.MWIS.NET 209.242.124.12
      MO.RAYTOWN.COM 209.184.161.83

    3. Re:But what everyone who reads /. wants to know is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy crap! That guy is right down the street from me! Oh Mapquest...

      Can't wait to make a cron job to fax that pic to 816-842-9909 over and over and over again. This oughta be a fun weekend.

    4. Re:But what everyone who reads /. wants to know is by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Funny

      (* Who registered that damn Goatse site! *)

      Possible leads:

      1. Check medical records for somebody who had an ass-ectemy.

      2. Check Guiness records for pole-sitting accidents.

      3. Look for a shack-like shop with a sign that reads "Over 5 Million Lunches Ruined".

      4. Ask websites that sell jumbo-sized toilet rolls.

      5. Check court records for any bicycle seat lawsuits.

  5. Very frustrating by sambo99 · · Score: 1

    reminds me of the old

    blowthedotcomoutyourass.com web site

    some old links to it

    Wired story

    some old pictures

    They actually registered ijusthadarectalexamonline.com (dead link) got to love the picture

    --
    - Sam
    1. Re:Very frustrating by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      (* reminds me of the old blowthedotcomoutyourass.com web site *)

      I wonder if there were names like DotComCrazeWillFall.com and DotComBubbleWillBurst.com registered in the 90's.

      Many people predicted a stock "correction", but it was more focused on stocks than the dot-com fad itself.

  6. This stuff isn't funny.... by Newer+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Take the site: civilwarbattles.com. My friend's 13 year old son had to do a school report on the civil war, so my friend suggested they look there. Check it out yourself..then explain what this has to do with the civil war..and why the site owner is so irresponsible in his posting of porn there.

  7. ILoveClaireAlways by BinBoy · · Score: 1

    I like the ILoveClaireAlways domain in the picture. I guess that little affair lasted as long as some of the lifetime free email accounts.

    1. Re:ILoveClaireAlways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Ars longa, vita brevis" - Latin for "love is eternal, but the domain registrars are blood-sucking vermins that threaten my online existence."

  8. Oh the irony... by JohnA · · Score: 2

    See my journal for a discussion of this very topic, including a domain much more exciting than freerooftile.com. :-)

  9. Re:This stuff isn't funny.... by BinBoy · · Score: 2

    Yeah, like the infamous whitehouse.com porn site.

  10. The two domain names I never registered... by httpamphibio.us · · Score: 1

    Back in the early days of high school thinking of names for porn sites was a common lunch table activity... the two I thought of that I most liked where habersnatchery.com and ithinkimgoingto.com.

    --
    sig.
  11. From the article by ALoverOfPeace · · Score: 1

    >What service was going to be offered at Thepenismightier.com?

    What do you think was going to be offered at The Penis Mightier website?

    Evidently the author of this story has an incredible spam filter ;p

    1. Re:From the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this is what the author was refering to.

    2. Re:From the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Her point was, somebody registered "the pen is mightier" (...than the sword) without considering the consequences of jamming those words together.

      Silly.

    3. Re:From the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It turns out that The Pen is Mightier than the sword.

    4. Re:From the article by bsd-mon · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter what the service is, the point is you're sitting on a /GOLDMINE/ Trebek!

      --
      To read makes our speaking English good. - X. Harris
    5. Re:From the article by puckhead · · Score: 1

      I've been going to that site for a couple of years.

      --
      Watching Cowboy Bebop in my jammies, eating a bowl of Shreddies.
    6. Re:From the article by Stonent1 · · Score: 0

      Couldn't it be The Pen Is Mightier?
      Pen is mightier

  12. Gordonisamoron.com by seanyboy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not the best article in the world. If there was any substance hidden in the 1000 something domain names, I didn't find it. The only interesting thing was that with "...Such emotion may well have lead to IDislikeRob.com, GordonIsAMoron.com, IHateAdamOliver.com, and HeatherThompsonIsABigDork.com" he missed the cultural significance of www.gordonisamoron.com. (A major cultural event from the Eighties in Britain. If you're 25-32, you'll probably have chanted this at schoolmates at some time in your life.) I'm wondering how much else he missed, and how many of the funny domains were automatically registered by automated robots.

    --
    Training monkeys for world domination since 1439
    1. Re:Gordonisamoron.com by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      Personally I thought it was an absolutely hilarious article, and being within the age span that you indicated, let me say that I have never in my life heard the term "Gordon is a moron" (is it a British thing? Here in Southern Ontario it wasn't in any of my schools).

    2. Re:Gordonisamoron.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well we all miss something, sometimes. You missed the fact that he is called Heather, for instance.

    3. Re:Gordonisamoron.com by awrc · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm surprised you're saying it's an 80s thing - wasn't the original "Jilted John" single from like 1978? At which point a 25 year old would be approaching their first birthday, and wouldn't have been capable of chanting much at anybody. Gurgling, possibly. I'd reckon anyone who was between 5 and 15 in 1978 and called Gordon had a pretty miserable time of it though.

      They released the original album (_True Love Stories_) on CD a year or two back, just under eight quid from Amazon UK. Includes two cash-in singles recorded by "Gordon The Moron" but, sadly, not the "Gordon Is Not a Moron" single (despite what the track listing on Amazon UK says).

    4. Re:Gordonisamoron.com by awrc · · Score: 2, Informative

      I suppose that, other than correcting some dates, my post doesn't actually shed any light on the "Gordon Is A Moron" phenomenon.

      The year 1978. In the wake of the whole punk thing, 18-year old art student Graham Fellowes adopts the persona and haircut of Jilted John and pens the lightweight pop-punk novelty hit "Jilted John", a tale of "teen angst, rejection and confrontation", in which the hero-protagonist, John, loses his girlfriend Julie to the villain, Gordon, "just coz he's better looking than me, just coz he's cool and trendy." The song is best know for the memorable chorus in which our hero gives vent to his despair, chanting "Gordon Is A Moron. Gordon Is A Moron. Gordon Is A Moron. Gordon Is A Moron." It reached number 4 in the UK singles charts. There was an album too, which was all much in the same vein.

      So, there.

    5. Re:Gordonisamoron.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm British, in the age range, and I definitely recall it. I remember anyone at school called Gordon had a pretty torrid time too...

    6. Re:Gordonisamoron.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      let me say that I have never in my life heard the term "Gordon is a moron" (is it a British thing? Here in Southern Ontario it wasn't in any of my schools).

      Yeah, I'm sure it was a British thing... you know how those British are: always thinking the UK is the center^H^Hre of the universe and that anything that happens there is really important to people all over the world.

    7. Re:Gordonisamoron.com by seanyboy · · Score: 1

      Arrrgh. Good call. I don't know if it's because I'm a sexist pig(I hope not), or just because the article is a huge and boring list, but somehow I just assumed it was written by a man. Somebody please - mod me down -1 (Misogynist)

      --
      Training monkeys for world domination since 1439
  13. Re:This stuff isn't funny.... by SimplyCosmic · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One thing I noticed happening a couple of years ago was that as soon as a domain with even a minimum amount of traffic or visibility in search forums expired, it was quickly purchased by a porn site.

    At one time, no doubt, that was a valid site about civil wars, but the domain owner let it expire, and it was snatched up because it probably came up high on a search engine for it's term.

    I wouldn't be surprised to find out that several of the larger porn site chains either have deals with several domain registars to let them move in pretty quickly on bulk expired domain snatching, or that there's a small company out there that makes money with scripts that watch for new domain expirations, then checks to see what their google.com ranking is, calculates a set fee based on potential "accidental traffic" from people going to the site and then offers a large number of such site names to a porn chain.

    Just more reason for me to go to google first for whatever I'm looking for, rather than bother with a "search by typing a term as a domain". And yet another reason why domain names are rapidly losing their value based on their name.

  14. ambiguous spacing by kisrael · · Score: 5, Funny

    Odd that she mentioned thepenismightier.com, since a version of it it is a fairly thriving site, and they like the ambiguity of the name.

    One my favorite tech info resource sites has to have a dash in its name, otherwise it might look like "expert sexchange" instead...

    --
    SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
  15. porn game by MaxVlast · · Score: 2

    That brought about the oh-so-fun porn game that my roommate and I started a couple of years ago. It happens most often with movie websites. If the movie has an unexpected name (like moviename-movie.com or the such), each player places a bet on what kind of website moviename.com is, and the closest person wins. It's usually porn, thus the name =)

    --
    There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
    Max V.
    NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
  16. Sadly people are still "making" money out of this by sambo99 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I guess the all forgot to use the Evan's system when they registered there domains :)

    --
    - Sam
  17. Re:This stuff isn't funny.... by NineNine · · Score: 1

    Actually, there are lots of services that'll do that. They do that to increase link popularity in SE's. Most people who do it buy 'em by the hundreds.

  18. FreeRoofTile.Com by SEWilco · · Score: 1

    There are no free roof tiles? I thought that was an AOL project, and that was why they keep giving me reflective roof tiles.

    1. Re:FreeRoofTile.Com by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      You know, that sounds kinda silly, but at one point I was seriously considering shingling a outdoor UPS Battery storage shed that I am planning to build with AOL CDs. I figure it will be great for reducing heat build up due to the sun.

      I better keep it in the back yard though, I can see explaining to the people that crashed into my house blinded by the sun about the AOL cds.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  19. Based on the lack of comments so far... by WEFUNK · · Score: 2

    I'm assuming that most slashdotter's are too busy snatching up these wonderful steals...

    With all the potential troll site names, I'm seriously afraid to know how many of these will be registered in the next day or so.

    --
    My next sig will be ready soon, but friends can beat the rush!
    1. Re:Based on the lack of comments so far... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure I just bought buyclamsonline.com :)

  20. on the same topic... by AnonymousCowhand · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    --- Ask me about my Sig -- it's a 9mm.
  21. MONKEYTONGUE.COM !!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a timeless classic

  22. Keyword stuffing by bsd-mon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    LOL. I'm the (former) dns master of ChristmasTree-ChristmasTree-ChristmasTree-Christma sTree.com, and our company specializes in search engine rankings, so let me tell you about keyword stuffing. Of course no one expects to type this domain in, but when it comes up 1 or 2 in $search_engine_of_choice, they just click the returned result. Then I'm the poor sap who also has to re-register said domains. (And you want to talk about niche markets? How about 2brsanibelislandfloridabeachfrontmidpricedvacation condo.com?)

    --
    To read makes our speaking English good. - X. Harris
    1. Re:Keyword stuffing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't you got anything better to do than waste other people's time and infest their search results with crappy, irrelevant spam?

      I hate you and all your kind. Please take your stupid company and go to hell.

  23. Silly boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Salon treats you like a monkey in a cage, beating you over the head with ads. If you think you don't want to see an ad, they know better, because you're just a monkey.

    You actually expect a bunch of leftists to treat others like human beings?

    What a silly, naive boy you are!

  24. They laughed at me too by namtog · · Score: 1

    When I registered namtog.com all my buds thought is was a real big hoot. Dumbest name ever. Who could ever remember it.

    Look at where the site is at today. Nowhere. Nothing. Na DA.

    Chuck stops now to beat himself with the clue-bat.

    1. Re:They laughed at me too by martin-k · · Score: 2
      namtog.com -> go(a)tman.com ???

      And you were surprised they were laughing ...?

      -Martin

  25. slashdotsolutions.com by axolotl_farmer · · Score: 1

    I did a search for expired domains containing the word 'slashdot'.

    Guess there is no hope for us since slashdotsolutions.com went under.

    Wonder what bizarro-slashdot.org would have been like? A bunch of healthy fashion designers whining about switching to Windows or trying to post sheepchastity.org links as last post.

  26. billromanowskisucks.com by presearch · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hey, that's my name! I take great offense at that article.
    I'd sue Salon but they probably don't have any money left anyway....

    Bill Romanowski
    TQworld, LLC

    1. Re:billromanowskisucks.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. you're with the Raiders now. I thought you were still with the Broncos.

      Did Ray Rhodes register that domain?

    2. Re:billromanowskisucks.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It must have been J.J. Stokes. HAD to be.

  27. eventual domain name meltdown? by merc_sa · · Score: 1


    So given the everexpanding reach of porn versus the unfailing WIPO trampling of corps interest against the individuals, what will win out in the end?

    more than likely it'll be 99% porn, 1% big corp.

    but wait.. that's already happened..

    maybe the best chance I can hope for to get any kind of a decent domain name that catches my fancy like the good ol virgin net days will be day of the "great pr0n meltdown"..

    I wonder if that'll ever happen...

    --
    -- I have enough stupid gadgets to know that I can do without -- http://www.modestneeds.org
  28. Re:This stuff isn't funny.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering who was President at the time, whitehouse.com was very appropriate.

  29. Re:This stuff isn't funny.... by squiggleslash · · Score: 3, Informative
    Whitehouse.com is legitimate - the registered owner ran a porn magazine called Whitehouse well before registering the domain name. What other name would have been as appropriate for the online version?

    It is hilarious though...

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  30. Re:This stuff isn't funny.... by timeOday · · Score: 1

    Now *that's* a very "dot-com" strategy... trick people into visiting your site and maybe they'll give you money! The exact opposite of targeted marketing.

  31. hope less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    well, eye gas that between the whoreabull stock markup FraUDs greedmongering, & the pairannoyed whining of the hobbyists, mom&pop.retail should be quite discouraged buy the "new" way to do business. 'coarse VAlairy/tahoe are praying (atheistically of coarse) that NO really new stuff comes about from any url they haven't bought/condemmned/comandeered.

    we've managed to set aside a couple of 100 relevant words (turning DOWn billyuns of captollist payola) for the REAL future of REAL mom&pop 'net commerce. damm us if you will.

    I DOWt that the 'net is anything like the tulips craze (although the FraUDuleNT stock markup scam is). hopefully (IT's already happening) much of the greed/fear based whoredoggying will be eradicated buy J. Public refusing to buy into IT.

    hopefully, we'll still be around to offer unbeatable value for ma&pa's IT buks. three cheers for paypal et al.

  32. comment on Thepenismighter.com by bons · · Score: 5, Funny

    Probably from this old Saturday night live skitAlex Trebek: Mr. Connery, why don't
    you pick?

    Sean Connery: Ah! Well met! I'll take Months That Start With Feb, Trebek.

    Alex Trebek: For how much?

    Sean Connery: Suprise me, you filthy bastard!

    Alex Trebek: Okay, that's completely unnecessary. Months That Start With Feb for $800. This is the only month that starts with Feb. [ Sean Connery buzzes in ] Mr. Connery?

    Sean Connery: Febtober!

    Alex Trebek:No. [ Calista Flockhart buzzes in ] Calista Flockhart.

    Calista Flockhart: What is.. Febturday?

    Alex Trebek: No.

    Sean Connery: She said turd!

    Alex Trebek: I hate you! The answer was February. That's the month that starts with Feb. It was last month!

    Sean Connery: Aha! A trick question!

    Alex Trebek: Yeah, it was a trick question, Mr. Connery. Why don't you pick a category?

    Sean Connery: I've got to ask you about the Penis Mightier.

    Alex Trebek: What? No. No, no, that is The Pen is Mightier.

    Sean Connery: Gussy it up however you want, Trebek. What matters is does it work? Will it really mighty my penis, man?

    Alex Trebek: It's not a product, Mr. Connery.

    Sean Connery: Because I've ordered devices like that before - wasted a pretty penny, I don't mind telling you. And if The Penis Mightier works, I'll order a dozen.

    Alex Trebek: It's not a Penis Mightier, Mr. Connery. There's no such thing!

    Nicholas Cage: Wait, wait, wait.. are you selling Penis Mightiers?

    Alex Trebek: No! No, I'm not.

    Sean Connery: Well, you're sitting on a gold mine, Trebek!

    1. Re:comment on Thepenismighter.com by Rachel+Ellis · · Score: 1

      Did you just make this up? It's pretty funny :)

      --

      -
      26 year-old Web developer from Seattle. And yes, chicks do dig *nix ;)
    2. Re:comment on Thepenismighter.com by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 2

      RTFP, its a Saturday Night Live skit.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    3. Re:comment on Thepenismighter.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes... yes i did

    4. Re:comment on Thepenismighter.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sean Connery: I'll take The Rapists for $200!
      Alex Trebek: I'm sorry, that's "therapists".

    5. Re:comment on Thepenismighter.com by xintegerx · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised nobody has seen many jeopardy skits... I think there have been about 11 (every half a year they seemed to have one.)

      There's people that don't get this reference (including the salon writer) but thank you for clearing it up for those lucky enough to get slashdot on their internet.

    6. Re:comment on Thepenismighter.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Speaking about Sean Connery....

      www.YOURETHEMANNOWDOG.com

      the things you can find when you have a little too much time on your hands...

    7. Re:comment on Thepenismighter.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sean Connery: I'll take Anal Bum Cover for $100.
      Alex Trebek: That's "An Album Cover!"

  33. Lesser known sport? Excuse me? by aarondsouza · · Score: 1
    ...or aficionados of lesser-known sports (IPlayCricket.com, ILoveIceFishing.com)...

    Interesting... over one out of every 6 people in the world is a cricket fanatic (world population = 6G, India's population = 1G), and this guy has the gall to call it a "lesser-known" sport?

    --
    "In mathematics, it's not enough to read the words -- you have to hear the music"
    1. Re:Lesser known sport? Excuse me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting... over one out of every 6 people in the world is a cricket fanatic (world population = 6G, India's population = 1G)

      Maan, that was uncalled for. Doesn't help us at the Indian National Association for the Promotion of American Games (INAPAG) in promoting football, hockey and baseball instead of, ummm, football, hockey and cricket. (Hint:- You are American if you don't get the joke.)
    2. Re:Lesser known sport? Excuse me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how many people in India have Internet access?

    3. Re:Lesser known sport? Excuse me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh come now, that's like saying that every single person in the United States is a baseball fanatic. I've known several dozen Indians over the years and I can't remember any of them ever talking about cricket.

    4. Re:Lesser known sport? Excuse me? by xintegerx · · Score: 1

      Not 1 out of 6. The only time I heard that was about Volleyball.

      What with Indoor Volleyball (high school, college, club, olympics, word cups, state tournaments, corporate-sponsored leagues, intramurals, chinese (nine player), etc.)
      and Outdoor Volleyball (beach, club, back yard, picnic) and all, that statistic by the International Volleyball Federation (FIVB) sounds right. But about cricket, nuh uh.

    5. Re:Lesser known sport? Excuse me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next thing ya know they'll be condemning curling!

    6. Re:Lesser known sport? Excuse me? by crimsonistaken · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter if its well known or not, its still dumb.

  34. Typical Holier than Thou BS by Jesus+IS+the+Devil · · Score: 1

    It seems every god damn journalist or wannabe journalists comes out after it's really evident that the dot com crash has occurred and starts to preach to us about how stupid that whole episode was.

    Well my question is, where was Heather Cochran PRIOR to the dot com heyday? Where were all the stock analysts telling us of the impending doom? Fact is, either they were too cowardly to stand up and tell us then, or they too were sucked into the trap.

    I'm so sick and tired of these types of articles.

    And the author isn't very knowledgeable about domain names either. Ever heard of search engine seeding using keywords in domain names? Next time do a search on Yahoo for "free hosting" and see what the first few results say. Don't be surprised to see sites like "www.free-web-site-hosting.com", "www.free-web-page-space-hosting.com", etc... listed at number one!

    --

    eTrade SUCKS
    1. Re:Typical Holier than Thou BS by Kamel+Jockey · · Score: 2

      Where were all the stock analysts telling us of the impending doom?

      Actually, Warren Buffet refused to invest in a single tech stock during the 90s because he saw the dot-bomb coming (although he invested in Level 3 communications this year). Many of his investors were angry with him for doing so, especially in light of the outrageous gains some of the stocks had seen. After the crash, the same investors thanked the hell out of him for being wise and prudent.

      --
      In case of fire, do not use elevator. Use water!
    2. Re:Typical Holier than Thou BS by kubla2000 · · Score: 2

      I posted the article precisely because I didn't think it was "holier than thou".

      The article is funny. It's also imbued with a sense of sadness that a lot of people's dreams and desires were contained in those expired domains (a lot of stupidity too).

      I don't think the author was trying to show that she's more clever than anyone else ... just making an insightful sociological observation.

    3. Re:Typical Holier than Thou BS by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      (* Actually, Warren Buffet refused to invest in a single tech stock during the 90s because he saw the dot-bomb coming *)

      IIRC, he initially said that he avoided the sector because "somebody should not invest in a sector they don't understand." I don't know if he ever indicated they were overvalued, or simply ignored them.

      (* Many of his investors were angry with him for doing so, especially in light of the outrageous gains some of the stocks had seen. *)

      That would be great to walk into a room with all those investors after the melt-down and see them cringe.

      Buffet had the last laugh.

      Mr. Metcalf (forgot first name), part inventor of the Internet, kept predicting a stock meltdown. He kept getting the date wrong, and thought it would be a single-day crash, though. But he got the essence right.

      I also avoided any dot-com purchases in my stock portfolio because I considered them overvalued then, investing instead in things related to the boom, such as UPS (for all those petfood.com deliveries). I did invest in some non-dot-com tech stocks that went south though. Overall my portfolio got dented rather than killed. But, whose didn't?

  35. I feel dirty by outlier · · Score: 1

    What does it say about me that after viewing the 'newly abandoned' list on deleteddomains.com I thought "wouldn't it be cool to register 4bud.com and 4weed.com" even if I have no relevant content....

    Bad late-dot-commer-wannabe. Bad.

    Ineverlearnmylessonuntilitstoolate.info

  36. Salon doesn't understand the internet. by ivan256 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know that, though ultimately unexpressed, each expired URL represents a discrete idea deemed good, or at least good enough, at the point of inception to justify its registration fee.

    We've always known that salon doesn't really understand the internet, but here is proof. If you fall into the trap of thinking that the only thing the internet is good for is commerce, then you are practically guaranteed to lose money.

    Not only that, but an expired domain name can mean that it has served out it's usefulness. Sites don't have to live forever. Who said that that an expired domain means that some idea went unexpressed. Hell, most of those domains were probably registered by some idiot taking part in the domain name "Land Grab", and was hoping to resell them later at a huge markup. Most names were probably registered because the random collection of letters happened to make some sense in english, and contained a buzzword (like "free"). There were no broken dreams here, just idiocy, and I don't feel too badly for the greedy bastards who blew $200 million trying to make a quick buck with something they couldn't even bother to take the time to try and understand.

    Now I remember why I usually don't even bother reading salon.

    1. Re:Salon doesn't understand the internet. by Jonathan · · Score: 2

      Did you read the article? The author *knows* that not all the domains were registered with the intent of business. "Iloveclaire.com", etc. was obviously registered by some geek who had a crush on some girl named Claire -- and clearly it didn't work out -- it is funny and pathetic at the same time.

    2. Re:Salon doesn't understand the internet. by nomadic · · Score: 1

      We've always known that salon doesn't really understand the internet

      Speaking for all of us, are we...

    3. Re:Salon doesn't understand the internet. by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      http://quotes.nasdaq.com/Quote.dll?page=multi&mode =stock&mode=Stock&symbol=SALNC

      If we didn't all know it, we should have. The information is available.

  37. What about Finding Forrester fan sites? by banal+avenger · · Score: 1

    I believe that article forgot to mention YoureTheManNowDog.com. Oh wait, that one's still there.

    1. Re:What about Finding Forrester fan sites? by banal+avenger · · Score: 1
  38. In an alternate universe, not too unlike our own by guttentag · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Aug. 5, 2003 | It's late afternoon, you're thinking about dinner, and you realize it's been a long while since you had a good perm. Do you (a) head to the hair salon in your local strip mall and ask your beautician if she thinks you could use another or (b) sign on to Salon.com?

    I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that you chose Curtain No.1. Fact is, you'd have to; the Web site Salon.com doesn't exist -- never did, so far as I can tell -- and the domain name expired on April 12. But the very fact that Salon.com has expired means that someone, maybe a year ago, maybe two, registered it. Someone out there, someone living among us, chose to bet that the road to online success would be paved with women who wanted their hair colored online.

    The arrogant fools.

  39. Re:This stuff isn't funny.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't love a battlefield?

  40. heathercochran.com by rbruels · · Score: 1

    Now you know somebody is going to go register heathercochran.com now, just because she mentions it at the bottom of the story. And it's probably going to be one of you. You fucking geeks. :)

    --

    "All your base are belong to this file I send in order to have your advice."
  41. FoxTrotDenise.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Along these lines, the author probably also failed to realize that Denise is Peter Fox's girlfriend in the comic strip FoxTrot.

  42. url vs domain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder why tf is she using the word "url" as a synonym for "domain".
    An url can contain a domain, that's about the only connection.

  43. Re:This stuff isn't funny.... by tqbf · · Score: 2

    Check it out yourself..then explain what this has to do with the civil war..and why the site owner is so irresponsible in his posting of porn there. No, what's irresponsible is you adopting the mindset that the domain name system is a keyword search engine.

  44. Boulevard of Broken Dreams? by Dirtside · · Score: 2

    I always preferred the Boulevard of Broken Limbs, myself.

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  45. And it's killing Verisign by Animats · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Look at Verisign's stock. High of around $200, currently around $5. Domain names are not being renewed, they have heavy price competition from other registrars, and growth is negative. Verisign's current rate of losses is around $120 million per year. I had Verisign on Deathwatch years ago. Their cash position has improved since then, but they've downsized. They now have more than a year of cash, so they can probably hang on for a while. But if you invested in Verisign stock, you lost most of your money, so they belonged on Deathwatch.

    GreatDomains (a Verisign acquisition) is a joke. As I've mentioned previously, there's a huge difference between asking prices (often five figures) and actual sales prices (a few hundred dollars). Right now, you can probably buy almost any unused domain on the Internet for under $200.

    Back when there was the big push for additional top-level domains, I pointed out that they were unnecessary. And, in retrospect, we didn't need ".biz", or ".info"; we had ".com" and ".net", and they did the job. Having more TLDs was just a moneymaker for registrars, not something useful.

    It's all Esther Dyson's fault. She insisted, when she headed ICANN, that there had to be more TLDs, and that whether there should be more TLDs wasn't open to discussion. She was wrong.

    1. Re:And it's killing Verisign by PCGod · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting those lame phuqs that like to register 10,000 domains and give them to people for about 200 times what they paid for them. That's why I have my .info domain. .com, .net, and .org were all taken. I wasn't about to pay $600 for my personal domain when I could get a .info for $30 for two years :P

    2. Re:And it's killing Verisign by guttentag · · Score: 2
      Verisign's still worth $5? Obviously Esther Dyson didn't push hard enough if Verisign's still alive. At this rate, the company might still be around when the market comes back, and then we're stuck with them.

      Friends, Countrymen, Romans. Lend me your domains and I will dump them on your behalf. Together we can stamp out this Verisign scourge.

  46. So do something about it by PizzaFace · · Score: 1
    Complain to the owner:
    Registrant:
    Lonnie Martinez
    524 Asquith Ave.
    Unit 22
    Ames, MO 68950
    US

    Domain Name: CIVILWARBATTLES.COM

    Administrative Contact:
    Martinez, Lonnie admin@civilwarbattles.com
    524 Asquith Ave.
    Unit 22
    Ames, MO 68950
    US
    267-612-8897

    Technical Contact:
    Martinez, Lonnie hostmaster@civilwarbattles.com
    524 Asquith Ave.
    Unit 22
    Ames, MO 68950
    US
    267-612-8897

    Registrar of Record: TUCOWS, INC.
    Record last updated on 20-Mar-2002.
    Record expires on 01-Mar-2003.
    Record Created on 01-Mar-2000.

    Domain servers in listed order:
    DNS1.BELENT.COM 207.96.133.10
    DNS2.BELENT.COM 207.96.133.11
    And there are laws that prohibit and punish The Missouri Attorney General might be able to help.
  47. s14shd0t.org by dacetone · · Score: 2, Funny

    I registered s14shd0t.org a couple years ago, hoping to make:

    News for H@x0r5, stuff that r0x0r5.

    I let it expire. I don't know what I was smoking when I registered it, but I hope I come across some more of it.

    --
    Just follow the day, and reach fo
    1. Re:s14shd0t.org by caferace · · Score: 2
      Chuckle. I registered hashpot.org a couple of years back. I was going to do a parody, but got about halfway done and got bored. And no, I wasn't smoking anything. I think.

      Actually, I don't remember. I'll have to dig up the site again. It's here somewhere on one of these hard drives....

      And yes, I too let it expire.

      "Brews for stoners, stuff that pipe."

  48. Re:In an alternate universe, not too unlike our ow by kisrael · · Score: 5, Informative

    Cute point.

    And for a long time, salon.com was the site of some kind of resource for hairdressers (one that seemed to be pretty content light and coming soonish) and salon had to use salonmagazine.com. (That url still works, actually...they had better maintain it or the pornlords would swoop down.)

    And "salon" isn't just a random name. It's an old fashioned term for a conversation group-- well, m-w.com says " a fashionable assemblage of notables (as literary figures, artists, or statesmen) held by custom at the home of a prominent person", but I remember the liberal rag Utne Reader was trying to start a kind of grassroots "salon revival", and I think this was a few years before the site, might well have been an inspiration for the name; there's overlap between the general feel of the two publications.

    I'll miss Salon if it goes the way of Suck.com.

    --
    SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
  49. Re:In an alternate universe, not too unlike our ow by Robotech_Master · · Score: 4, Informative

    You're closer than you think. Salon Magazine used to be stuck with the longer salonmagazine.com, and some hairstylist' collective site had salon.com. Then Salon Magazine worked out some kind of a deal to get the domain name, and they wandered off to salon.net or some such.

    --
    Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
  50. Serves Squatters Right by SuperDuG · · Score: 2
    I really despise the type of people who register a domain name in hopes that some company will want it. And I think it's hallarious that register.com, along with other registrars, will help you pick an alternate name if the original is already taken.

    Hmmm ... should I pick a slightly different domain name and advertise it to my clientel and potential clientel, or go through the hassel of arguing with some 14 year old about how $4K is absurd to buy. Basically squatters became screwed when register came out with its "alternative name engine". And here's what's left of it.

    What would have been even more interesting is to see how many of the expired domains were listed on EBAY. I can still today see domains on the auction block for over thousand dollars, it's insane. The only time that I've ever heard of ANYONE buying a domain is when two companies basically had the same trademark (usually acronyms) and the one with more flash money bought it from the other. Any other time I've just seen them sued away.

    So I guess it's gone from squatting to "potentially going to court!"

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
  51. Re:This stuff isn't funny.... by StillAnonymous · · Score: 1

    It's not irresponsible to assume that a domain name should have SOMETHING to do with the content of the site, just as you should expect the name of a store to have SOMETHING to do with what they sell.

    Would you be a little surprised to walk into a store called "Barry's Bistro" (expecting a restaurant) and find out they deal in the latest in S&M gear?

    What IS irresponsible and selfish is people who deliberately register domain names that are misleading or are one typo away from a popular site in the hopes of tricking people into visiting and thus boosting their ad revenue. That's the issue here. Civilwarbattles.com should NOT point to a porn site and I think something as blantant as this should be handled by the registrars.

  52. myname.com by mjj12 · · Score: 1

    The domain name of the form firstnamelastname.com, where firstname and lastname are my actual names, was registered by someone a couple of years ago, and for a while there was a "This domain name is for sale for $250" site there. Then the design of the page changed and the request was for $500. A few months ago, the requests for money for the domain name vanished, and if you go to the site now you are forwarded to an anti-abortion site with pictures of aborted fetuses on it. This is really quite disturbing.

    (I haven't provided a link to the page, and I would prefer it if people do not figure out the URL and go there. I am hoping that sometime soon the domain will expire and I can then buy it, and if the page gets a lot of hits, that might make the present owners realise that someone wants it and encourage them to renew it).

    1. Re:myname.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you didnt want people figuring out the URL. it was probably a bad idea to have your blogspot.com site address listed in your header...

    2. Re:myname.com by jhunsake · · Score: 1

      I just put a bid for it in on namewinner.com. Too bad for you!!

    3. Re:myname.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for some cute kids, click here!!

    4. Re:myname.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Errr..

      You do realize it's up there in your blogspot link don't you?

      *Posting AC so hopefully not too many people will see but you might*

      ...if that makes sense :-S

    5. Re:myname.com by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      IIRC MSNBC.com had a story a while back about anti-abortion activists buying up expiring domains and forwarding them to gruesome sites... kinda nasty.

    6. Re:myname.com by mjj12 · · Score: 1

      Well, people can just go to my slashdot homepage if they want to. My name is there, too. I wasn't trying to make the URL hard to figure out so much as just asking people not to go there. (I would have posted as an Anonymous Coward if I had really cared).

    7. Re: myname.com by elemental23 · · Score: 1

      Mee too </aol>

      I was talking with someone a few months back about people who register theirname.com and out of curiosity looked up mine. Before I knew it, I was looking at probably the same abortion pictures you were. Weird stuff. It's a frameset with the bigger frame opening up a page at abortionismurder.com.

      Hmm... I'm sure I could sue for the domain pretty successfully... Nah, I'm not nearly that narcissistic.

      --
      I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
  53. One made laugh.. by MADCOWbeserk · · Score: 4, Funny

    I would think that Ceilinghooks.com was an artistic bondage site.

  54. Re:myname.com MikeJexxxxxx.com site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice troll mike. You just want me to look at religious jesus loving anti abortin pix... good troll though i went there

  55. Wanna rent a chicken?! by dacarr · · Score: 1

    The scary thing is, I know the people who would probably have registered "rentachicken.com" if they thought about it.

    --
    This sig no verb.
  56. Good selection of utterly pointless domains by screwballicus · · Score: 2

    Portal of Evil has a great selection of totally arbitrary and utterly silly domain names at which you can get email addresses

    Favourites include

    Chlamydia-is-not-a-flower.com

    IAmOffended.com

    IFuckedSteveJobs.com

    and

    Bottomless-Abyss-Of-Suckitude.com

    I, myself, chose an address at YouEatPoopy.com.

    1. Re:Good selection of utterly pointless domains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Portal of Evil [portalofevil.com] has a great selection of totally arbitrary and utterly silly domain names [evilemail.com] at which you can get email addresses.

      Heh. And if you want to get an "interesting" domain name for yourself, there are still plenty of unregistered domains listed at Peckerheads domain board. :-)

  57. LA Medic by thepoolguy · · Score: 1

    Along a similar line- a friend of a friend was an EMT in LA and had a license plate with LA MEDIC on it. Until one day he was in a local bar with some friends when some lady walked in and asked "who has the license plate with LAME DIC on it?" He soon got a new plate... :-)

    -tpg

  58. Wait a moment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    have you considered that the site was registered with false information? You could be faxing that picture to a school for all we know.

    True story: a satire website in my country used a STD clinic's phone number in its registrant information.

    1. Re:Wait a moment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I thought about that after I posted (hell, I falsified most of my reg info). I usually try to do research before I do something asinine.

      The "fax" number belongs to:
      Laughing Pants
      1735 Swift Ave
      Kansas City, MO 64116
      816-842-9909

      laughingpants.com... A Hot Wheels Collectibles Site which is not owned by the same person. Not that I have anything against the goatse guy. Other than being duped into seeing that picture a couple times, the legendary goatse has amused me more than half the other trolling on here. I just thought it would be an amusing post which I probably would've never actually carried out (although it is true that I'm close to that address - 13 minutes by Mapquest's account). Oh well.

      And for the record, MMMMMMMetc. is the least interesting troll on /.

  59. Has Anyone Tried This? by davidstrauss · · Score: 1

    Hold down the character 'w' in the address bar until it crosses 1/4 to 1/2 the screen (mine runs at 1600x1200) and type ".com". I can almost guarantee a trip to a porn site and a screen covered with popups (and popunders).

    1. Re:Has Anyone Tried This? by lizzybarham · · Score: 1

      Yes, that is strange.

      I have heard little mention of one of my all-time favorite URL's anywhere, and that is www.whereintheworldisosamabinladen.org. The owner has a game in which people try to pick where Osama Bin Laden will be found for a fee; whoever is the closest wins have of the funds contributed into the guessing.

      Oh, yes, I did.

  60. Re:This stuff isn't funny.... by dacarr · · Score: 2, Insightful
    One has to remember that the 'net wasn't really designed with that in mind. Keep in mind that it was originally a Department of Defense project - when it was first started, Admiral Random didn't expect that J. Random Civilian would ultimately be using it from his America Online account.

    It also comes back to the purpose of TLD's. .net was for networks out there, .com was for commercial entities, .org was for non profit organizations, .edu and .gov remain to this day for schools and government agencies respectively. Somewhere along the life of the 'net, the lines between .com, .net and .org became blurred - which is why you get domains like "IAmCarbonatedMilk.com". By your logic, I will assume that the registrant of this domain was into some seriously hardcore zen.

    Admittedly, if we harken back to the original TLD logic, my website should be on "northarc.org" as it is clearly not for profit.

    But nonetheless, the respondent to the root of this tree is right - assuming you type "civilwarbattles.com" and you will get data on the American Civil War of the 19th century is just plain dumb and irresponsible. If you want civil war battles, you go to Google and type (with quotes) "civil war battles" at the prompt.

    And for the benefit of my readers, this is the results of that search.

    --
    This sig no verb.
  61. Slashdot doesn't understand Salon by mrandre · · Score: 1
    I suspect the only point being missed here is the point of this article. It's a joke, kids. Do let it be a joke. Did everyone read the whole thing? There was a mixture of disdain, and tenderness. There was indeed a time when people just sucked up domain names willy-nilly (myself included). They were heady times. But now we are in different times, on the brink, it seems, of a little more maturity about the internet, and its uses. In the meantime, people did some stupid things, but there is a sort of irresistible humanity about stupidity, a certain Forest-Gump charm about thousands of people purchasing domain names for their current sweethearts. So awful, so wonderful, such is the human.

    The best thing about Slashdot is that it lets anybody with keyboard say anything they want.

    The worst thing about Slashdot is that it lets anybody with a keyboard say anything they want.

    Of course, the above statements go equally well for the internet as a whole, and that, I would argue, is the real point of the article. There was something very human in lapsed domains. So as we leave those times behind, we take a humorous back at that foolishness with a sense of fondness but relief that those days are passing, and not (I would hope) pretend that we're somehow superior to those attitudes, which some posters on this forum seem inclined to do. BuyClamsOnline.com is funny. JanLovesJim.com is sweet. IamCarbonatedMilk.com is curious. Leave them that way.

    We are passionate, silly things. Let's laugh at eachother.

    --
    "I don't want to achieve immortality through my work. I want to do it by not dying." -Woody Allen
  62. my mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my mistake was to type www.ibiblo.org instead of www.ibiblio.org

  63. Re:This stuff isn't funny.... by StillAnonymous · · Score: 1

    So if the domain name is to mean nothing, why should we even have them to begin with? Why not just access everything by IP address and use a search engine to find it all?

    This won't solve the problem either, as people will just find ways to trick the search engines by putting bogus information in meta-tags and maybe a misleading title to their website.

    The whole point of DNS was for user convenience. We're quickly reaching the point where it is no longer convenient. The whole issue of people ignoring the .com, .net, .org TLD structure also annoys me somewhat, especially when I see stuff like "My First Website" with a .com suffix on the domain name.

    I think many disputes could have been avoided if companies stuck to the .com and .net (for ISPs/backbones, etc) and others used .org or .countrycode appropriately. Let the businesses have their suffix and leave the .org people alone.

    And don't get me started on the individuals who buy up blocks of names of what they think will be popular in hopes of selling them for a million dollars a piece later on. That's greedy, opportunistic manipulation of a system designed in good faith. People like this make me taste ashes in my mouth when I hear the word "capitalism".

  64. Searching existing domains by NaveWeiss · · Score: 1

    The inverse of deleteddomains.com is netcraft.com (well known from the BSD troll), which can search in the list of the *active* domains list. Someone should make an article about the funny domains she finds there.

    --
    Slashdot community, please notice: I am looking for a girlfriend.
    Nave H. Weiss
  65. .scamsters vs. .power&.controll freaks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    vs. J. Public/mom&pop

    after fuddles.con & VAlairy.FraUD are butt bad history, the 'net will be doing several million transactions per hour/day for the REAL backbone of .commerce J. Q. Public, who, lest we forget, has the final say by voting with his/her wallet. you go J., we're here, & there for you, should you need US.

  66. Re:This stuff isn't funny.... by dacarr · · Score: 1
    Imminent death of the net predicted!!!

    Look, I'll leave it at this: no matter how you work it, it is still a dumb and irresponsible idea to rely solely on domain names. I don't know about anyone else, but most people I know, the first trip is to the search engines if they need to research anything.

    --
    This sig no verb.
  67. Clearing out the cruft by dannannan · · Score: 1

    Finally... we are starting to clear out the DNS cruft!

  68. Re:This stuff isn't funny.... by newestbob · · Score: 0
    What a great way of promoting your porno site!

    Post a link to it in /. and pretend you're disgusted with it!

    It's even sadder that the stupid Mac-heads who frequent slashdot fell for your trick.

    I hope you get modded down to hell.

  69. Re:This stuff isn't funny.... by Shelled · · Score: 3, Funny
    ... it was snatched up ...

    No pun intended I presume.

  70. Re:This stuff isn't funny.... by Xtifr · · Score: 2

    It's not irresponsible to assume that a domain name should have SOMETHING to do with the content of the site

    Yes it clearly is. At least, unless you WANT to be inundated with porn! :)

    just as you should expect the name of a store to have SOMETHING to do with what they sell.

    Completely different case. A domain name is far more analogous to a street address.

    In the old days (before the steaming pile of groat clustards we call the World Wide Web appeared), if you wanted info on Civil War battles, you'd go to sci.history.civilwar, check the FAQ, and find a referral to (say) thompson.unc.edu:/pub/civilwar. (Note that the domain name has nothing to do with the civil war.) Nowadays you go to Google and type "civil war battles". At no point in time was typing "www.civilwarbattles.com" ever a recommended search method. The fact that it may have worked for you once or twice simply shows that some SITE OWNERS misunderstood the purpose of DNS, which is what lead to your misunderstanding.

  71. Clue-Bats! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >clue-bat

    its good to see that InterLISP manuals are still required.

  72. I allowed . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    . . . notmale.com to expire unused after two years. Some fool picked it up hoping to squat right afterward, too. Probably would have been WIPOd by M$ if I'd done anything with it, anyway.

    ~~~

  73. Re:This stuff isn't funny.... by hachete · · Score: 1

    the other strategy is:

    register a domain under some TLD's and some joker register's the name under the rest of the of TLD's a week later.

    --
    Patriotism is a virtue of the vicious
  74. Re:This stuff isn't funny.... by discogravy · · Score: 2

    ...and the reason it was called whitehouse is because it's a dig at an english censor/activist-type lady, Ms. Mary Whitehouse (now deceased, she used to ardently fight against "filth" on TV.) Pink Floyd name-checks her on a song on their album "Animals" and there's a shock-noise group by the same name.

  75. Step three by WebMasterJoe · · Score: 2
    And countless, surely, just never made it to step two, "Build Wb site" remaining uncrossed off the weekly to-do list, somewhere below "Dust" in priority.

    Sadly, the Salon.com writers never made it to step three, "check your damn spelling." (And don't tell me I never made it to step two... it's built, just not open to the public yet)

    --
    I really hate signatures, but go to my website.
  76. My favorite domain name by ragtimesf · · Score: 1
  77. Three-character names by Megane · · Score: 2
    In about a one-week period during late September 2000, some group of people went and registered every available three-character name combination in .com and .net. The only reason I knew was because I had a 3-character .com name (picked at random using a Casio calculator's random number function and a lookup table) and one day I noticed the .net got registered. Then I looked at "nearby" names and noticed they were all recently registered too.

    As I expected, they didn't get renewed.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  78. Look and Feel before and after by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    Even for those sites that survived, I notice that the look and feel changed after the melt-down. The boom look had a kind of psychodelic melted plastic goo look to it. Salvador Dali meets punk rock. But after that the sites went "corporate" in their look. They are now kind of boring looking, but a least they load faster because there is less layout graphics.

    I am surprised that techiegold.com has not changed its look much though. It still has an electric-guitar-shaped logo and that damned goldfish. Although there are more rectangles than there used to be IIRC.

    The most dramatic change I saw was in Xdrive.com. They used to have tons of melting green goo all over the place. Now they are pure corporate.

  79. and yet, they still hold hope... by willconsult4food · · Score: 1

    I note that DORKASS.COM is still being held by a domain name speculator.

    Seems to me like some dorkass has already paid about as much as you could expect for the domain.

    --
    Dull tools are useless. Sharp tools are dangerous. Never use the sharp end as the handle.
  80. Re:This stuff isn't funny.... by Kredal · · Score: 1

    I wonder if Barrysbistro.com is taken? I should buy the name and put my pr0n on it... Hmmm

    --
    Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  81. The domain name I wish I had thought of... by Kredal · · Score: 2
    Allyourbasearebelongto.us. If I had that, it would keep most people away from my site, unless they had half a clue about internet culture (is that an oxymoron?)

    Anyways, kredal.allyourbasearebelongto.us is mine now. Muahaha!

    --
    Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  82. URLs as a search by os2fan · · Score: 2
    How many of you guys have put something like a product name (as opposed to a company name), and expected a hit?

    With the failure of any reliable default search, what we have is search through urls... If we had some sort of alternate commonly used search, the search-by-url may not have been needed.

    An alternate would be to set up some default alias where people who wanted names could buy it, and forward it onto their URL.

    But then that's just another domain, a la .com, .org.

    --
    OS/2 - because choice is a terrible thing to waste.
  83. I'm confused by pussyco · · Score: 1

    You seem to be telling me that the "hot intern" at Whitehouse.com isn't staying at 1600 Pennsylvannia Avenue. Have things really changed that much since Clinton?

  84. Re:This stuff isn't funny.... by SCHecklerX · · Score: 2

    why would your friend's 13 year old son be using a '.com' site for civil war research? .org, .gov, .edu would be a better search.

  85. Re:This stuff isn't funny.... by jeff.covey · · Score: 1
    One thing I noticed happening a couple of years ago was that as soon as a domain with even a minimum amount of traffic or visibility in search forums expired, it was quickly purchased by a porn site.

    at freshmeat, we regularly get complaints that the homepage link for "myphpapp" is leading to "lesbolovefest".

  86. http://www.salon.com is still Salon magazine by Jammer@CMH · · Score: 1

    Salon.com (206.14.209.40) is still Salon magazine, or was as of 9:46 EST Aug 5th.