my little way, I'm sneakily helping people understand a bit more about the sort of people God likes.
Thus it is God's own will that thou shalt program perl. Let us strike down the heathens who worship at the altar of (PHP|Python|Ruby)! or: dear lord, foreach $languser (@scriptinglanguages) {
kill 1, $languser; } amen
Yes, and what's even worse is when Verisign buys a smaller registrar, and updates the domains registrar as verisign/netsol, but don't update their own database with the information. Two domains now I've tried to transfer that all whois utilities say are registered with netsol, but when you talk to netsol or try to get the account number, "there is no such domain in our records"
it's the fastest browser on earth. It also seems to make my other apps hiccup (like making winamp skip) when I minimize it, but I think that is more of a problem with W2K
Sorry (damn < screwing up my post ) Basically: unless the word's good weight and bad weight are.lt. 5 then find the word's average badness [(/ b nbad)] and it's average goodness [(/ g ngood)] and add them [(+ avg_good avg_bad)] (my edit). Then find it's normalized badness [(/ avg_bad +( avg_good avg_bad))] and that is the word's new "badness". Again, gurus, please correct me.
LISP is prefix so instead of a+b you'd have +(a b) IIRC in c this would be similar (LISP guru's please correct me):
int g(char* word) { /* if word is in good hash, return weight,
else return 0 */
return 2*good_word_weight; } int b(char* word) { /* if word is in bad hash, return weight,
else return 0 */
return bad_word_weight; }
Of course, when filtering the bodies of messages, the easiest defeater is encoding the bodies of the messages. It's easy to block all messages which have "longer" within 1 or 2 words of "thicker" or "intense", but it's much harder to block SGkgVGhlcmUsDQogDQpUaG91Z2h0IHlvdSBtaWdodCB3YW50IH RvIHRha2Ug. Then you're back to blacklisting based on senders and domains and header information. Of course, this is for the ISP I work for, for personal mail I could just reject all encoded mails.
LOL. I'm the (former) dns master of ChristmasTree-ChristmasTree-ChristmasTree-Christma sTree.com, and our company specializes in search engine rankings, so let me tell you about keyword stuffing. Of course no one expects to type this domain in, but when it comes up 1 or 2 in $search_engine_of_choice, they just click the returned result. Then I'm the poor sap who also has to re-register said domains. (And you want to talk about niche markets? How about 2brsanibelislandfloridabeachfrontmidpricedvacation condo.com?)
I've always had problems with biometrics. I am a diabetic, and have been for almost 20 years. One of the main complications of diabetes is retinopathy, ie. the clouding and overgrowth of the retina. So how do I explain to the security guards "Yes, that/was/ my retina two years ago, but I didn't take good enough care of myself." Or do I just get to get my metrics re-evaluated every couple of years?
the machine was an IBM ps/note laptop with a 486, no cdrom, and 4 megs of ram. I had the Slack 3.0.0 available, and thought I'd worry about upgrading after I got something installed in the first place.
Then what did Frodo see in Galadriel's mirror? I don't believe that they would have shot these scenes for just 10 seconds of screen time in FotR.
since they don't have a hardware player
yet. but how long till MS buys Rio/SonicBlue/Creative/any of 25 other mp3 player distributors.
you didn't even reverse the order. /you/ pay /Microsoft/ ...oh, wait
In Soviet Russia,
P2P hogs up to 60% of bandwidth...by the way, you can download the matrix here, here, and here.
funny
Not according to the latest poll. Now whether the poll is accurate is a whole nother issue.
Finally we'll be able to apply our escape techniques in a real life nuclear disaster!
I won't be impressed until someone gets apache (linux) running on their x-box with SSI so that we can have the hack x-box xbit hack
Edison may have invented the lightbulb, but he was a bastard to his wife and kids!
Or Bob Geldof, Bono, and all their musician friends begging for money to support the clones
It soon became one of the major hubs for peer-to-peer exchange programs like KaZaA
DMCA enforcement in full effect
Braun, 46, is both jovial and German
OMG, I didn't think that was possible! What will genetics bring us next?!?
unintentional dig at MS SQL?
my little way, I'm sneakily helping people understand a bit more about the sort of people God likes.
Thus it is God's own will that thou shalt program perl. Let us strike down the heathens who worship at the altar of (PHP|Python|Ruby)!
or:
dear lord,
foreach $languser (@scriptinglanguages) {
kill 1, $languser;
}
amen
followed closely by mind+R and mind+RW, neither being mind-R/mind-RW compatible
I plugged my modem into the wall, and all I got was magic smoke, and smelly ozone.
Yes, and what's even worse is when Verisign buys a smaller registrar, and updates the domains registrar as verisign/netsol, but don't update their own database with the information. Two domains now I've tried to transfer that all whois utilities say are registered with netsol, but when you talk to netsol or try to get the account number, "there is no such domain in our records"
arrrgh
it's the fastest browser on earth. It also seems to make my other apps hiccup (like making winamp skip) when I minimize it, but I think that is more of a problem with W2K
Sorry (damn < screwing up my post ) .lt. 5 then find the word's average badness [(/ b nbad)] and it's average goodness [(/ g ngood)] and add them [(+ avg_good avg_bad)] (my edit).
Basically:
unless the word's good weight and bad weight are
Then find it's normalized badness [(/ avg_bad +( avg_good avg_bad))] and that is the word's new "badness". Again, gurus, please correct me.
LISP is prefix so instead of a+b you'd have +(a b)
/* if word is in good hash, return weight,
/* if word is in bad hash, return weight,
IIRC in c this would be similar (LISP guru's please correct me):
int g(char* word) {
else return 0 */
return 2*good_word_weight;
}
int b(char* word) {
else return 0 */
return bad_word_weight;
}
int main() {
if (g(word) + b(word)
Of course, when filtering the bodies of messages, the easiest defeater is encoding the bodies of the messages. It's easy to block all messages which have "longer" within 1 or 2 words of "thicker" or "intense", but it's much harder to block SGkgVGhlcmUsDQogDQpUaG91Z2h0IHlvdSBtaWdodCB3YW50IH RvIHRha2Ug. Then you're back to blacklisting based on senders and domains and header information. Of course, this is for the ISP I work for, for personal mail I could just reject all encoded mails.
It doesn't matter what the service is, the point is you're sitting on a /GOLDMINE/ Trebek!
LOL. I'm the (former) dns master of ChristmasTree-ChristmasTree-ChristmasTree-Christma sTree.com, and our company specializes in search engine rankings, so let me tell you about keyword stuffing. Of course no one expects to type this domain in, but when it comes up 1 or 2 in $search_engine_of_choice, they just click the returned result. Then I'm the poor sap who also has to re-register said domains. (And you want to talk about niche markets? How about 2brsanibelislandfloridabeachfrontmidpricedvacation condo.com?)
Ha! AOL!
pinky pain, and load time (esp. on 33.6k dialup) were the main reasons I left emacs too.
I've always had problems with biometrics. I am a diabetic, and have been for almost 20 years. One of the main complications of diabetes is retinopathy, ie. the clouding and overgrowth of the retina. So how do I explain to the security guards "Yes, that /was/ my retina two years ago, but I didn't take good enough care of myself." Or do I just get to get my metrics re-evaluated every couple of years?
the machine was an IBM ps/note laptop with a 486, no cdrom, and 4 megs of ram. I had the Slack 3.0.0 available, and thought I'd worry about upgrading after I got something installed in the first place.