Slashdot Mirror


GRACE Exceeds Expectations!

smashr writes "GRACE, the robot mentioned earlier on slashdot, has succeeded in the AAAI challenge at the conference in Canada. Her creators are saying that GRACE exceeded their expectations. The entire competition went well with only several minor hiccups (GRACE cut in front of a judge in line to register, and then demanded a conference badge several times). The team is looking forward towards refining GRACE for the competition in Mexico. Stories at: CNN.com, Yahoo, and the Edmonton Journal."

209 comments

  1. wow... by edrugtrader · · Score: 0, Insightful

    GRACE seems like a bitch. she'll climb the corporate ladder fast!

    --
    MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
    1. Re:wow... by kingkade · · Score: 0

      Yeah, next thing you'll know she'll be handing out her own business cards, "networking" with the movers and shakers, and telling suits to "think outside the box".

    2. Re:wow... by mickwd · · Score: 3, Funny

      Come on, tell us.

      She turned you down for a date, right ?

  2. FP niggaz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    FP niggaz

    nope, nothing more to say

  3. Major failing of GRACE by Tattva · · Score: 5, Funny
    Unfortunately, GRACE does not have a flexible torso, and will therefore be unable to perform a requisite skill in the academic/conference field: kissing ass.

    --
    personal attacks hurt, especially when deserved
    1. Re:Major failing of GRACE by dubiousmike · · Score: 1, Troll

      Let's not forget, "Bending Over" which is what the GRACE team will likely have to do when they are up for funding renewal....

    2. Re:Major failing of GRACE by johnjones · · Score: 2

      no the major failing is that you had to type on the keyboard to tell it where the sign for registration was even though it had a bunch of rules for it

      basically it was huge and silly

      it did nothing well at all apparently

      thats what you get for an all digital solution where you program in rules

      regards

      John Jones

    3. Re:Major failing of GRACE by psavo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Let's not forget, "Bending Over" which is what the GRACE team will likely have to do when they are up for funding renewal....

      plan b) for naming GRACE: bender.

      --
      fucktard is a tenderhearted description
    4. Re:Major failing of GRACE by Geekboy(Wizard) · · Score: 1

      plan b) for naming GRACE: bender.

      Bite my shiney metal ass!

    5. Re:Major failing of GRACE by Cletus+the+yokel · · Score: 1

      I can't wait til they merge the capabilities of GRACE into a more agile robot such as ASIMO.

      --
      Wanted: One witty yet thought provoking .sig - Apply here.
  4. Schmoozing? by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 3, Funny
    Team GRACE plans to refine the robot, hoping to add "schmoozing" skills to her repertoire for next year's challenge in Mexico.
    And elsewhere...
    ...and then of course [she] had to say 'Can you put it on me? I don't have any hands'
    That's one flirtatious babe! Can't wait to see her "Schmoozing" skills in Acapulco!
    1. Re:Schmoozing? by Zayin · · Score: 1

      That's one flirtatious babe! Can't wait to see her "Schmoozing" skills in Acapulco!

      Just remember, if she ever offers to give you a lapdance, just say "no". And no touching of heatsinks!

      --
      "I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me than a full frontal lobotomy"
  5. Blind leading the blind by CommieLib · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does anyone else see a problem with a bunch of robotics researchers teaching a robot social skills?

    Relax, it's a joke.

    --
    If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
    1. Re:Blind leading the blind by Steve+Franklin · · Score: 1

      Not funny at all. Actually, quite incisive, especially considering it's a "female" robot.

      --
      Hic iacet Arthurus, rex quondam rexque futurus.
    2. Re:Blind leading the blind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like somebody needs SenseOfHumor v1.0 installed.

    3. Re:Blind leading the blind by HisMother · · Score: 1

      > Does anyone else see a problem Yes actually -- most people who commented on the last GRACE story made this same joke.

      --
      Cantankerous old coot since 1957.
    4. Re:Blind leading the blind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like someone needs to learn new jokes that haven't already been told seven or eight times on this forum, just in the last story about this.

    5. Re:Blind leading the blind by quinto2000 · · Score: 1

      Actually...the team recruited drama students to do the instruction in social skills. Carnegie Mellon has one of the best drama schools in the country, so it was a perfect fit.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un post
    6. Re:Blind leading the blind by Steve+Franklin · · Score: 1

      My sense of humor is fine, thank you. Unless you have something constructive to say, kindly go back to your Nintendo.

      Let me rephrase that for the genetically deprived. No, I swore I wasn't going to try to explain the complex to the terminally simple. Figure it out yourself, Einstein.

      --
      Hic iacet Arthurus, rex quondam rexque futurus.
  6. [insert intelligent comment here] by caveat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i really don't know what to say about this. on the one hand, it's cool as hell, and an amazing technological achievement - a robot that can actually register itself, get a badge, be rude in the process, and give a lecture. on the other hand, it's sort of scary - robots are getting autonomous; what do we do when the day comes that GRACE decides she doesn't like the judge's attitude and decides to "adjust" it?

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
    1. Re:[insert intelligent comment here] by Helter · · Score: 1

      I could be wrong, but I don't think that there's a neccesarily direct path between robots that are programmed to socialize and robots that begin adopting actual human characteristics.

      Humans learn to use violence as a problem solving technique through early interaction with other humans. Unless the robot was *programmed* to be violent, or was capable of learning by itself AND was introduced to social situations where violence was used, we wouldn't have to worry about it.

    2. Re:[insert intelligent comment here] by NullStream · · Score: 2, Informative

      Asimov, Issac - I, Robot.

      Read it.
      It's good for you like soup.

      You can obtain a copy at your local book store, library or eBook Warez IRC channel (though the former is preferred to the later).

      --
      "Survival of the fittest Max, and we've got the fucking gun!" - Pi
    3. Re:[insert intelligent comment here] by caveat · · Score: 1

      heh, i got a hold of I, Robot when i was six, and haven't stopped reading Asimov yet. problem is, the Three Laws are physically hard-coded into the positronic brains (Little Lost Robot gets into this a bit - apparently without the three laws, there's no imaginary solutions to the positronic field equations...but i digress); i haven't heard of anybody using custom processors with hard-coded "rules" in robots as of yet. i'm not scared that we're going to have sociopathic killing machines in the next few years, but it is lurking at the back of my mind...a true AI would have to be capable of learning, with few or no restrictions on what behaviors it could pick up - and we all know how well we teach our little learning machines (children) to be nonviolent...we aren't ready for robots that need raising until we can raise kids right....but that's just my $0.02.

      --

      Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
    4. Re:[insert intelligent comment here] by NullStream · · Score: 1

      agreed

      --
      "Survival of the fittest Max, and we've got the fucking gun!" - Pi
    5. Re:[insert intelligent comment here] by drudd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The real problem with implementing Asimov's three laws is interpreting when your actions will break them.

      The very top of the line research in AI might be able to recognize a human being under idealized circumstances.

      So how are we supposed to tell our robots "don't run over a human's foot, since that's injuring a human, and that action violates the first law" when the robot can't distinguish between a human foot and a stain on the carpet.

      Doug

      --
      Venn ist das nurnstuck git und Slotermeyer? Ya! Beigerhund das oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!
    6. Re:[insert intelligent comment here] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, the robots only know what you tell them. I bet some programmer would feel like a big ass teaching it to go on a killing spree.

      *Scientist with attitude ducks behind couch
      Damnit! Who taught the robot to shoot a gun??

    7. Re:[insert intelligent comment here] by mshiltonj · · Score: 3, Funny

      what do we do when the day comes that GRACE decides she doesn't like the judge's attitude and decides to "adjust" it?

      Listen. Understand. GRACE is out there. She can't be reasoned with, she can't be bargained with...she doesn't feel pity of remorse or fear... and she absolutely will not stop. Ever. Until you are dead.

    8. Re:[insert intelligent comment here] by PW2 · · Score: 1

      Part of the AI could be for a robot to realize when its parts are scattered or squashed which could be an indication that it did something bad. To late for itself, but it could inform/train others about the objects that it learns are important to humans.

    9. Re:[insert intelligent comment here] by Xrtsys · · Score: 1
      Who ever said we should implement the laws now? Or that we needed to?

      When the day comes that the robot laws will be needed, we will be long past such mundane hurdles as those.

  7. Cutting in line and being demanding... by Microlith · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not only is it sociable, but it's rude too!

    Sounds about normal for a lot of people. In fact the blatant disregard for others should earn it points for being more human than necessary.

    1. Re:Cutting in line and being demanding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact the blatant disregard for others should earn it points for being more human than necessary.

      I predict that to make it even more humanlike, in the next revision, whenever GRACE doesn't get what she wants, she will demand to speak to a supervisor.

  8. Grace's love is real by tcd004 · · Score: 1

    Grace is 3 years old. She weighs 157 pounds. She is 4 feet, 6 inches tall, and she has a Magavox for a face.

    Reject Artificiality!

    tcd004

    1. Re:Grace's love is real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What's this about robot sex?

      Oh yeah, knockin' those robot boots!

      Go robot, go robot!

    2. Re:Grace's love is real by nd · · Score: 1

      Grace is 3 years old. She weighs 157 pounds. She is 4 feet, 6 inches tall

      Hmm, that is startling growth! She started out weighing nothing and without any height.

      157 pounds and 4.5 feet in 3 years -- (calculating) -- at this rate, by the year 2014, she will be 785 pounds, and 22 feet 6 inches tall!

      This enormous monster will devour us all!!!

    3. Re:Grace's love is real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your humor is definitely lacking. Considering that nothing living grows at a constant rate throughout its entire lifespan there is no reason to assume that a robot would.

    4. Re:Grace's love is real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering that nothing living grows at a constant rate throughout its entire lifespan there is no reason to assume that a robot would.

      Uhh.. that's the point.

    5. Re:Grace's love is real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah and my point was that the point wasn't all that funny. I mean if I walked up to a 3 year old who was 3 ft tall and said to the parent's - at that rate he will be 15 ft tall by the time he is 15 everybody would look at me like I have ten heads.

    6. Re:Grace's love is real by GutBomb · · Score: 2

      If these trends continue... EH!

    7. Re:Grace's love is real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me thinks you missed the Simpsons reference entirely.

  9. Are those successes or failures? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Cutting in front of a judge sounds like something I would do, and if the robot imitates me, it must be doing something right, don't you think?

    Seriously though. By those criteria, half the human race might fail.

  10. A paradox by SkipToMyLou · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Its an interesting paradox that the nerdiest of computer geeks are programming robots to interact socially... These people are the most qualified and least qualified at the same time!

    1. Re:A paradox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:A paradox by jafac · · Score: 2

      Just as it's also an interesting paradox that the slickest of marketing people are effictively designing software products for the high tech industry. These people are the most qualified and the least qualified at the same time.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  11. Schmoozing & Bender by T-Kir · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'd love them to have a robot that emulates Bender from Futurama.

    He swill champagne, enjoy a cigar or two... try and chat up the other contestants, and make some of the judges he isn't sure about have a accident or two.

    --
    Are you local? There's nothing for you here!
  12. I don't know by stoolpigeon · · Score: 2

    turn her off and change the bad code?

    You've seen the Terminator movies and The Matrix too many times.

    Good scifi- not reality.

    .

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    1. Re:I don't know by scott1853 · · Score: 2

      Maybe you've seen too many STNG episodes ;-)

      Anyways, we all know that technological predictions are 100% accurate. As living proof, I'm writing this post on one of the only 5 computers in the world, and I never come close even touching the 640K ceiling.

    2. Re:I don't know by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      Ugh, I think those quotes were both taken out of context. The head of IBM, when he said that, was merely assessing the market, like normal business people do. He wasn't saying there'd only be 5 computers worldwide "forever". He simply was not predicting the future, just describing the present.

      Same thing with the 640K ceiling. Bill Gates was talking about the PRESENT. He was saying that the limit won't be a problem for a while (it wasn't for 10 years) and that the fact that the current software can't handle more than that, doesn't matter, because by then we'll have updated it. He wasn't saying "anybody will only need 640K RAM forever, and noone, will ever, ever need more than that.

      These quotes are so taken out of context and made to seem like it was some sort of prediction, when it wasn't.

    3. Re:I don't know by stoolpigeon · · Score: 2

      Maybe you've seen too many STNG episodes ;-)


      Not too many.

      I do not subscribe to the Skynet fears that pop up about here so regularly. Mostly because I think we are so very much further from that kind of capability in a machine- than the optimists hope.

      but even if 'thinking' machines are near, I'm not too worried that immediately following prescience will be an overwhelming desire to wipe out humanity. Much too silly.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    4. Re:I don't know by scott1853 · · Score: 2

      Thank you very much for pointing that out. I wouldn't want to be a complete fucking moron and take everything literally 8^P

  13. Not a Sci-Fi convention, though. by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wake me when GRACE is able to sign up at a sci-fi convention. Applicable skills will have to include: Giving backrubs to others standing in line; Recognizing the registration counter people as objects to talk to even when they're wearing klingon costumes; and bitch-slapping the crowd of fanboys around her chanting "Exterminate...exterminate!"

    --
    Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
    1. Re:Not a Sci-Fi convention, though. by Spencerian · · Score: 2

      Maybe, as an add-on feature, they could allow GRACE to do exactly what the Daleks do. OK, maybe a water pistol or paintballs...but the effect would be nice.

      --
      Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
  14. fascinating by tps12 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I couldn't believe this story. At first I was ready to read about another amusing, if charmingly disappointing, attempt at the Turing Test. But it transpires that GRACE actually function independently and managed to register for and deliver a lecture at a crowded academic conference! I was floored.

    Look at how far we've come. The mechanics for her locomotion are only about a century old. The silicon electronical parts of her brains have only been around a few decades. And I'm even calling her "her!" She's a machine! That a handful of scientists and antisocial grad students have accomplished what it took evolution millions of years to do (create life) gives me hope for the future of mankind.

    As I look at these articles, I'm reminded of what my parents told me: "You can do anything." And now I'm realizing that that wasn't just "you" as in "me" (tps12), but also "you" as in the entire human race. We are reaching for the stars, we are playing with the origins of life and the very fabric of our Universe. We are playing God. If we don't end up destroying ourselves in the process, then we're in for one hell of a ride.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:fascinating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh just shutup your parents told you "You can do anything." only to make you feel better about your self you as a person will never amount to anything but we as the human race will be better off after you kill your self. goodbye.

    2. Re:fascinating by loserdave · · Score: 3, Funny

      Mr Madison, what you just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I've ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having heard it. I award you no points and may God have mercy on your soul.

      --
      Yes, I am an agent of Satan, but my duties are largely ceremonial.
    3. Re:fascinating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would think that playing God would imply creating something from nothing. We may have created Grace but God created the materials that make up Grace (sand, metal, etc.).

      The whole argument about playing God is ridiculous anyway. We are merely trying to use the tools that God gave us to their fullest extent. Anything less than that would be an insult to he who created us (if you believe that sort of thing).

    4. Re:fascinating by aleksey · · Score: 2, Interesting
      ...a handful of scientists and antisocial grad students...

      I find it interesting that people on /. seem to think that grad students are somehow less sociable than the average computer geek.

      Actually, as I look around at my particular institution, I would have to say, that on the whole, of my friends who have achieved a BS in Comp Sci, those who've gone on to graduate school are no more antisocial than the rest.

      In fact, a lot of the grad students I know are far more normal than the average undergrad computer geek.

      I think people overlook one of the keys to successful academic career: the importance of being able to communicate your work effectively to others. Being good at coding, maths, etc is also necessery, but can almost be secondary. If noone understands your work, it doesn't matter how good it is. So if you're antisocial, you learn to deal with it and work on inter-personal skills. Otherwise you subvert your own work.

      --
      --
    5. Re:fascinating by sbillard · · Score: 0
      If we don't end up destroying ourselves in the process...

      Therein lies the test. You touched on an important piece of criteria for human evolution. Having knowledge without wisdom is the same as having power without control. It is an accident waiting to happen. I ofter wonder (now I wonder out loud), will we survive? If not, will it be the small (virus, bacteria), the big (asteroid, comet), or will it be ourselves (thermonukes, chem/bio agents) that lead to the end of days? Perhaps GRACE will be "programmed" with reproductive subroutines so that a part of us will survive the apocalypse.

      OTOH if we do survive, and GRACE evolves at the pace of technology, what happens when "Cyberdyne" (or GRACE) becomes "self-aware" and recognizes humanity as an enemy?

      I think we are screwed either way.

    6. Re:fascinating by McCart42 · · Score: 1

      Billy Madison: A simple no would've done just fine. ...
      Also from the principal: Any attempt to cheat, especially with my wife, who is a dirty, dirty, tramp, and I will probably just snap.

      --
      "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
    7. Re:fascinating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      what happens when "Cyberdyne" (or GRACE) becomes "self-aware" and recognizes humanity as an enemy?

      Answer: Give them a permanent moral code and religion such that man is their God.

  15. Beings that surpass their creators? by jethro_troll · · Score: 5, Funny

    When I went to AAAI in Philly in 1986 (in my LISP hacker days) half of my coworkers (mathematicians, linguists, logicians, all damned good AI researchers) either got lost en route to the hotel, or got on the wrong shuttle bus to the conference, or forgot their presentation slides, or...

    1. Re:Beings that surpass their creators? by Grimble+Crumble · · Score: 1

      Makes you wonder what kind of an oaf God might be...

    2. Re:Beings that surpass their creators? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes you wonder what kind of an oaf God might be...

      Considering how often he's shown up I'd have say he lost his experiment.

  16. With a fat pipe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do i have to wait 20 seconds?

    1. Re:With a fat pipe! by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      It obviously wasn't enough time for you to create such a witty comment. Perhaps next time, wait a full minute and we'll be able to dine on the little delicacies you leave for us.

  17. A Rudebot? by charlie763 · · Score: 2, Funny

    She was rude and cut in line? Well, then I guess she is more human than we thought.

    I'm too cool for a sig...

    --
    Welcome to the land of the free...pay toll ahead...no photography...please open your bag...
    1. Re:A Rudebot? by Random+Bystander · · Score: 3, Funny
      She was rude and cut in line?
      Not rude, just programmed with american aesthetics rather than canadian
    2. Re:A Rudebot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, when you're stuck in Canada with so little to do, standing in line actually IS a thrilling thing to do.

    3. Re:A Rudebot? by pyrrho · · Score: 0, Troll

      she had a gun...?! I don't remember reading that.

      --

      -pyrrho

    4. Re:A Rudebot? by maxume · · Score: 1

      Yeah, she should have let everyone walk all over her, and then cried about it in french.

      To hell with America Junior.

      Bunch of fuckin' Canucks!

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    5. Re:A Rudebot? by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
      "Not rude, just programmed with american aesthetics rather than canadian"

      /me grabs can-opener and takes it to the can of worms

      If you are used to driving in Canada and then drive around in Michigan for a day, you will understand how true this is.

    6. Re:A Rudebot? by Alsee · · Score: 2

      programmed with american aesthetics rather than canadian

      Well they didn't want her standing around and saying 'eh all the time.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  18. Now..... by MrWinkey · · Score: 2, Funny

    when can they make me one to get beer and clean the house????

    --
    Vote early. Vote often. Vote CowboyNeal.
    1. Re:Now..... by jhunsake · · Score: 1

      They already have, they're called females.

  19. Re:Inspires... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... me to lead us all in a round of "Amazing Grace [littleleaf.com]"

    Oh gee, thanks for the link to the lyrics. I'd never heard of that song and wouldn't have known to what your terrible pun was reffering.

  20. Quit playing with fire. by BoomerSooner · · Score: 0

    When you say they "create life" you're opening a huge can of religious worms!!!! Run away!!!

    1. Re:Quit playing with fire. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the can of religious worms are opening a can of him?

    2. Re:Quit playing with fire. by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's better to be inside the can, but am i inside or outside already..

      I don't know but the fences down the road sure look like there keeping me in?

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  21. Does anyone know ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Has this robot got maps of the location
    a priori or does it have to figure out this
    stuff itself ?

    1. Re:Does anyone know ? by shadowduck · · Score: 1

      For the initial part of the task ("get from the front doors to the area of the registration desk"), Grace has no a priori information, relying on the directions given by the human it interacts with. After Grace has registered and been "given" a map, she uses a map built the night before to navigate to the location where she's to give her talk. The map, however, only includes the static environment; the navigation & localization software must deal with dynamic obstacles (such as the crowds surrounding the robot).

    2. Re:Does anyone know ? by ImaginaryFractal · · Score: 1

      Yeah, so I was at the conference, and if I remember correctly GRACE had a map built a priori. It seemed to me kind of like a cheat to do it that way.

    3. Re:Does anyone know ? by macosxaddict · · Score: 1

      I worked on the project; shadowduck has it exactly right. GRACE had a map only after the map was provided at the registration desk; all navigation before arrival at the desk was done with vision and human-robot interaction.

  22. Amazing achievement but... by jpt.d · · Score: 2

    What will stop robots and other artificial life forms in future from being treated as subhuman, like many people were in the past (and unfortuneately in the present). I can see the day when we do have robots that are almost human, but will they be our slaves or our friends?

    --
    What we see depends on mainly what we look for. -- John Lubbock Now search for that bug slave!
    1. Re:Amazing achievement but... by An+IPv6+obsessed+guy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Man, I'll become a tree-hugging vegan PETA extremist before I worry about a MACHINE'S feelings and social standing.

    2. Re:Amazing achievement but... by override11 · · Score: 0

      Is your microwave your friend? Sure, 100 years ago, heating food by putting it in a little box and listening to that strange whirring sound might sound like magic, or watching magical images on a flat screen that 'talks' to you would be amazing technology, but we dont call our TV or Microwave our 'friend'. Society is turning to mechanical devices for training children, for socializing, etc. When will people learn that man is a social creature, that we thrive with other people, not by watching other fantasy lives on TV. People go to the movies to fill a void in their lives that most will never know is there, but could be filled by the company of others.
      Sorry, just my .02 cents. :)

      --
      No I didnt spell check this post...
    3. Re:Amazing achievement but... by DoNotTauntHappyFunBa · · Score: 1

      What will stop robots and other artificial life forms in future from being treated as subhuman, like many people were in the past (and unfortuneately in the present). I can see the day when we do have robots that are almost human, but will they be our slaves or our friends?

      For one view of this, watch the DVD for A.I. (Artificial Intelligence) by Spielberg/Kubrick.

      --
      Well, hey, I didn't spend all those years playing Dungeons and Dragons and not learn a little something about courage.
    4. Re:Amazing achievement but... by Matimus · · Score: 1

      I think you mean .02 dollars.... or 2 cents. Then again maybe not.

      --
      GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social exper
    5. Re:Amazing achievement but... by mshiltonj · · Score: 2

      I can see the day when we do have robots that are almost human, but will they be our slaves or our friends?

      Neither. They will be our tools. Like a vaccuum. Just a really smart vaccuum.

      It's fun to anthropomorphize, but don't get carried away. PETA already has that market cornered for animals.

      We don't need a People for the Ethical Treatment of Androids.

    6. Re:Amazing achievement but... by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      I'll become a tree-hugging vegan PETA extremist before I worry about a MACHINE'S feelings and social standing

      Tree-hugging vegan PETA member that I am, I don't care about the hardware, but the software.

      When creatures with brains made of doped semiconductors, or nano-scale transistors, or whatever, become complicated enough that their behavior approaches that of sentient beings made out of meat, they will deserve ethical consideration.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    7. Re:Amazing achievement but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well good! Very good! since we know of only one other species that exhibits even limited sentience, I guess that PETA should get the fuck off my back when I go to drink my milk now, eh?

    8. Re:Amazing achievement but... by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2

      For a far more entertaining perspective watch some Red Dwarf on TV (or read the excellent books Infinity Welcomes Careful Drivers and Better Than Life). Pay particular attention to the bits about Talkie Toaster, they are hilarious.

    9. Re:Amazing achievement but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      it seems to me that it does not matter what we theink, concerning whether or not the robot is deserving of being treated as an equal, but rather, that when the robot starts to demand that it is an equal, or whatever, that things will start to become interesting.

      "clean this toxic waste marvin fine, ill show them toxic waste,......"

      ai in action.

  23. TROLLAXOR SIGHTED... UPDATE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently Trollaxor has now moved to the Lawn and Garden section of Wal-Mart, after a turmoltuous ordeal picking the right ziplock baggies in Housewares (he chose generic brand, which saved him 87 cents). It seems he is now looking at gas-powered string trimmers.

    WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN????????

    1. Re:TROLLAXOR SIGHTED... UPDATE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DEFINITELY not a Linux user.

      First, he was buying toiletries. Now he is buying a gas powered weed whacker.

      Toiletries means he grooms himself.
      Weed whacker means he can afford a home.
      Gas powered means he is not a tree hugging wierdo.

      As for the baggies, I don't know. Maybe he plans to score some herb.

  24. What they're good at. by drox · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The GRACE design team deserves kudos, but I still think that robots/AI should primarily be designed and programmed to do things that humans are BAD at, like searching through dangerous rubble, or performing fine manipulations in toxic or extreme-temperature environments, rather than doing things that humans are already quite GOOD at, like schmoozing. There are billions of people available who already know how to schmooze, and they can learn new schmoozing rules quickly, on the fly, without costly reprogramming. There are very few who would be willing (to say nothing of able) to work in a hazardous or tiny confining environment.

    1. Re:What they're good at. by ultramk · · Score: 5, Funny

      rather than doing things that humans are already quite GOOD at, like schmoozing.

      Don't know many scientists, eh?

      There are very few who would be willing (to say nothing of able) to work in a hazardous or tiny confining environment.

      What, like a cubicle?

      m-

      --
      You catch enchiladas by picking them up behind the head and holding them underwater until they don't kick anymore -VeGas
    2. Re:What they're good at. by Kwikymart · · Score: 1

      Any advance in artificial intelligence is a good one. Designing a robot to "schmooz" at a conference could be better training for doing hazardous work than actually practicing hazardous work (in the long run) for all we know.

      --

      Buying a Dell computer is equivalent to dropping the soap in a prison shower.
    3. Re:What they're good at. by Saeger · · Score: 1
      robots/AI should primarily be designed and programmed to do things that humans are BAD at

      Right. So that means AI should end up doing their own software development too. :)

      But why stop with only the jobs we're BAD at? For example: most plumbers, miners, and fisherman are good at what they do, but I bet they'd rather be doing something else.

      I won't be happy until robots+AI are doing EVERYTHING most humans don't want to be doing themselves (so we have more time for eating, sleeping and fucking)... Ahh... the hedonistic imperitive... :)

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    4. Re:What they're good at. by Herkum01 · · Score: 1

      but I still think that robots/AI should primarily be designed and programmed to do things that humans are BAD at

      Like working for the government? If all the robots get all those jobs were are all the stupid middle class people supposed to go?
    5. Re:What they're good at. by iabervon · · Score: 2

      Learning to do social interaction is an important advance, because it makes the robot much easier to control. Learning to schmooze isn't that important, but it's a good test case for things like understanding tone of voice and subtext, which are really important for comprehension. For industrial applications, this is obviously unnecessary, but for disaster recovery, it would be extremely useful to be able to communicate with the robot with natural language to tell it what to do, ask it about what it is doing, and allow it to report on its surroundings.

    6. Re:What they're good at. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More than anything, I wish I could filter out every post that uses the word 'kudos'. I'll give you a kudo! You deserve kudos, he deserves kudos, we all deserve kudos. Have you ever actually gotten a friggin kudo? I didn't think so. Stupidest expression in the language, right after 'my bad.'

    7. Re:What they're good at. by ImaginaryFractal · · Score: 1

      This sort of stuff goes on at the conference as well. The conference featured a Robot Rescue event, where robots were sent in to save hypothetical victims from a rescue scene. Unfortunately, none of the robots made it into the most difficult zones. aaai link

    8. Re:What they're good at. by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      For example: most plumbers, miners, and fisherman are good at what they do, but I bet they'd rather be doing something else.

      Dunno about miners or fishermen, but plumbing is pretty good work. Difficult sometimes, but pays pretty good. And it's important work, too - your plumber is more responsible for your increased life expectancy over your uppity-great grandpa than your doctor is. You might wait a few days to see your doctor, but man, if your toilet's broke you want a plumber there now.

      Don't forget, Albert Einstein once said that if he had it all to do over again, he'd probably have been a plumber...

      Your plumber would probably be pretty pissed off to be replaced by a machine.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    9. Re:What they're good at. by Darth_Burrito · · Score: 2

      The GRACE design team deserves kudos, but I still think that robots/AI should primarily be designed and programmed to do things that humans are BAD at ...

      The trick is, robots need to be able to do things that humans are good at in order to do many things we are bad at. For example, humans make lousy temps. You often have to explain the instructions more than once, we make mistakes performing repetitous tasks, we hate menial work, etc. But in order to be a good temp, you need lots of human skills in order to interact with people.

      Think of it this way, typical humans are bad, really bad, at interfacing with computers. Grace's social interface helps fill the gap between our inability to learn/remember arcane controls and whatever she does. In essence she is learning the arcane controls for us and providing a more friendly interface.

      ... like searching through dangerous rubble, or performing fine manipulations in toxic or extreme-temperature environments, rather than doing things that humans are already quite GOOD at, like schmoozing.

      I think a case could be made that humans are in general better than autonomous machines at searching and performing delicate manipulations (with tools). It's just the dangerous environments in your example that rule us out. If we were to have the robots schmooze in a puddle of molten lava, we'd have the same quandry.

    10. Re:What they're good at. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We should be able to relate to them at least as well as Lassy. "Go girl, save the people in the burning building!" For the people being saved, it would be nice if she looked and acted like a rescuer as opposed to a Dalek. Still a ways to go in that dept obviously, though the inclusion of a human face and voice is a good start. People in dangerous situations are probably stressed enough without being confronted by sci-fi robot monsters. Basically in any situation where they are relating to humans, some people skills and reassuring aesthetic are good to have.

      As for attending conferences and delivering speeches, well... Perhaps if attendants had their own robots to go to the boring things delivered by other robots, humans could focus more on the partying aspect.

    11. Re:What they're good at. by Deosyne · · Score: 1

      To corporate middle management, with the rest of them? ;)

    12. Re:What they're good at. by permaculture · · Score: 1

      ... but I want a robot to schmooze for me. "Talk to the Robot, cos the face isn't listening."

      --
      Environmentalism is the new Victorianism. Everyone ties on a green corset and pretends we're virtuous.
  25. what kind of cognition/memory does GRACE have? by perrin5 · · Score: 1

    This makes me wonder:
    1)Does Grace remember which judge she cut in front of? Does she have memory of interactions, and what kind?

    2) Does she self program?

    3) why don't they at least give the poor girl some hair?

    --
    hmmmm?
  26. From the photos... by ultramk · · Score: 2

    ...I cannot tell: which one is the robot?

    Can anyone enlighten me?

    m-

    --
    You catch enchiladas by picking them up behind the head and holding them underwater until they don't kick anymore -VeGas
  27. I wanna be a robot's pet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    i for one will be glad when robots finally take over and make pets out of humans. All I'll have to do then is lay around and sleep all day and start snivelling when i hear the refrigerator open.

    I just hope I don't get studded with a skank.

    1. Re:I wanna be a robot's pet. by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      But then, maybe the robots will be like humans (i.e. not always what we call human) in this respect either? Do you really want to be put somewhere at the side of a street, left on your own? Maybe there will be programs (no pun intended) where straying humans are caught and finally, if no robot wants them, killed?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:I wanna be a robot's pet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True dat. Also, getting your balls lopped off because your robot master didn't want any more little humans running around would suck.

  28. Attending the conference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can see it now.

    Worried scientists: "Where's Grace? Where's Grace?"

    Later that night:
    The scientists out in the parking lot, having finished shoveling the smoldering remains of grace into a garbage can, wonder what went wrong with the experiment?

    Later that week:
    A dead security guard is found on the roof, gun still in the iron grip of the man's rigormitis.
    Embedded in the bloody remains of his chest is a sign that reads "Robot Conference, room 413". On the sign is a comic representation of a smiling robot, who points the way with a friendly manipulator gesture.

  29. i read this 2 days ago! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    really, get with it...

  30. I'll wait for RUDE by burgburgburg · · Score: 2, Funny
    Robot
    Utilizing
    Demanding
    Expectations

    He'll have to cut the line to register for the conference before everyone else, take all the donuts, leave a coat and bag on the chair next to him even though the conference room is full, blab away on a cell phone during the presentation and leave 10 minutes early.

  31. I still can't believe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that i saw a Visual Studio .Net advertisement on here. MS and Slashdot together without a Borg Icon Sad to say, i don't like it.

  32. Multiple AP sources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Point two links to the same AP story in two places (CNN & Yahoo) doesn't really accomplish anything. Or do you think CNN or Yahoo could be slashdotted? At least the Edmonton Journal story was different.

  33. Ayn? Is that you? by revscat · · Score: 3, Funny

    Anyone else notice any similarities between GRACE and non-lebsian Ayn Rand? Consider:

    1. Neither can write
    2. They both are approximately equal on the 1-10 beauty scale
    3. Neither is completely human
    4. Both have worshipful drones who provide for their every need and provide reassurance as to their value and self-esteem
    Amazing!
    1. Re:Ayn? Is that you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ayn Rand can so write. Ok, so occasionally she wrote with a baseball bat, but if you'd actually read her work, esp. Atlas Shrugged you might find it quite thought provoking.

      As for your points 2-4, they're a bit harder to disagree with, though others are welcome to try. I would only note that you seem to be referring to her in the present tense, even though she is dead. GRACE, on the other hand, has never been what most would consider 'alive', though that could be a sticky issue some day.

    2. Re:Ayn? Is that you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ayn Rand can so write.

      Not really. She was and is full of shit. The only dumber philosophy was British Imperialism.

  34. Re:This Just In by windex · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I have Troll, and Flamebait, set to auto +5.

    That's why logging in is half the battle!

  35. Translation by orangepeel · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Mounted on her body are several gizmos, including a laser range finder, sonar equipment, voice-recognition technology and speech generation machinery."

    Translation:

    "Mounted on her body are several gizmos, including a laser range finder, sonar equipment, voice-recognition technology and an 89-cent speaker from Radio Shack."

    --
    Whoever designed level 61 in Frozen Bubble is a sadistic bastard.
  36. What's In a Name ? by AmberWaves · · Score: 1

    I found the acronym in the associated stories, but it might have also been appropriate to use the name Grace to honor Grace Hopper. Those of you in the Older-Than-Water Club will know, you wee tots out there might find it interesting.

    1. Re:What's In a Name ? by taxman_10m · · Score: 2

      Isn't she the highest ranking Navy gal ever? Oh and something about inventing COBOL.

    2. Re:What's In a Name ? by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      you mean ADA...

      i hate the 20 second time limit.... blah blah blah...

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
  37. Separated at Birth? by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2
  38. fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    f
    i
    r
    s
    t

    p
    r
    o
    s
    t

    1. Re:fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Informative?

      Glad to know that the moderators have had their daily dose of crack today.

  39. GRACE on TV by joepa · · Score: 2, Informative

    From http://www.palantir.swarthmore.edu/GRACE/ :

    8 August: Grace may be on the Today show (not yet finalized).

    ...
    That could be interesting.

  40. Saving Grace by TheHouseMouse · · Score: 1

    Next thing you know her husband will die and in an effort to keep her house she'll create a a massive greenhouse with HPS lighting and hydroponics to grow tons of weed. But only to end up burning it so the whole town will get high. Oh wait, differan't Grace.

    --
    Only the meek get pinched. The bold survive.
  41. GRACE could easily get tenure at my old university by Subcarrier · · Score: 3, Funny

    Cutting in line, being insistent and unreasonable at the counter, no doubt trundling over somebody's toes, bragging about the vacation in Acapulco...

    Apparently, the only things she didn't do was grab somebody's ass while reeking of yesterday's wine. But hey, schmoozing skills in next version, yeah?

    Clearly professor material!

    --
    "I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree with them." -- George H. W. Bush
  42. yeah but.. by crackerman · · Score: 1

    can it be equipped with a giant spinning saw blade and rip other robot's nuts off in a Comedy Central Death Match?

  43. Yeah but can she DJ ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When a robot can tear it up spinning hardcore or maybe jungle thats when the end of humanity is not near.

    Yup. You heard it here first.

  44. Robots being rude? by sardonic2 · · Score: 0

    I think its going to suck when a robot curses at me on the street in the future; or when they decide to cut in the movie line. Maybe even when you blow-chunks outside a club they laugh at you. Its going to be a cruel robotic future. I can already see it, im so pathetic even the robots will laugh.

  45. So... What does an AI think of an AI? by Jugalator · · Score: 3, Funny

    I had nothing to do and asked Elbot a few questions:

    ---

    Me: What do you think of GRACE?
    ELBOT: Are you taking a poll?
    Me: I wouldn't call it a poll...
    ELBOT: I realize this is a typical marketing question, but I'm supposed to ask it, otherwise they'll use the cheap oil on me. So, where did you find out about me?
    Me: I knew about you since earlier.
    ELBOT: Amazing! I must have underestimated your intellect!
    Me: So... What do you think about GRACE?
    ELBOT: My opinion on that matter is so revolutionary, I prefer to keep it to myself.
    Me: I see chatterbots still have a long way to go.
    ELBOT: Really? I could have sworn you missed that.

    ---

    So.. The only thing the bastard gave me was some rude answers and kept his opinions about GRACE top secret. Bah... So much for AI's. :P

    Perhaps I should have asked good ol' Alice instead.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    1. Re:So... What does an AI think of an AI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh. That is pretty good. I just typed in "ass" and he replied with spanking.

  46. Budgets, schmudgets... by The_Guv'na · · Score: 1

    Due to Wednesday's wet weather, the hydrophobic robot had to start inside the building.

    Couldn't stretch the budget to an umbrella? "And you will know me by the trail of eyeballs."

    Ali

  47. New name.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think they should start calling her "Rosie" after the Jetson's somewhat rude house-robot. Seems fitting.

  48. FP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    f1rst p0st!

  49. Nice Karma Whore ^_^ (en tea) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    en tea dammit.

  50. Not really autonomous by Devlin-du-GEnie · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Edmonton Journal article says that GRACE's handlers used hand signals and voice cues to help her navigate and perform. That makes her registering for the conference merely interesting, not jaw-dropping amazing.

    1. Re:Not really autonomous by SuperJ · · Score: 2
      Not really. I got to watch the presentation that Grace gave on herself as well as a presentation by the team afterwards. I haven't read the article, but I don't imagine they got it all right.

      What Grace really does is this (which is really cool, and she's still autonomous): Grace is capable of recognizing hand gestures, and programmed to ask for help if she gets lost. So rather than preprogrammed voice cues or hand signals, when Grace gets lost she will ask the nearest person "How do I get to conference room 23?" (or where ever she's supposed to be going) If the directions are clear, "Grace, you go straight down this hall, at the end of the hall you turn left, and conference room 23 is the third door on the right." Grace will follow them. She will also watch for hand gestures while you're giving directions. If something doesn't line up, like if you point right and you say to go left, she will ask you which you mean.

      So Grace *is* autonomous, and put on quite an amazing performance!

      --

      Sheepdot: Open Source good, Closed Source baaaaaaad!

  51. Is there a military version then? by Zayin · · Score: 1

    "Overall, I have to say it went very well," said Alan Schultz, from the U.S. Naval Research Lab in Washington, D.C. The lab was one of five U.S. institutions which contributed to GRACE's creation.
    [...]
    Mounted on her body are several gizmos, including a laser range finder, sonar equipment, voice-recognition technology and speech generation machinery.

    Additionally, the navy version has two mounted General Electric M134 miniguns, triple mine dispensers and dual Stinger surface-to-air missile launchers. It is also rumored to be slightly more ill-tempered than the civilian version.

    --
    "I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me than a full frontal lobotomy"
  52. It ain't an AI... by MadFarmAnimalz · · Score: 2

    until it codes in perl, can order pizza, cook ramen, post on /. and develops a habit of belching on socially inauspicious times.

    --
    Blearf. Blearf, I say.
    1. Re:It ain't an AI... by glwtta · · Score: 2

      shit, it doesn't take all that much to emulate us, does it?

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
  53. What do you call it when... by sbillard · · Score: 0

    What do you call it when she menstruates?

    A GRACE period.

  54. For more in-depth info by Hayzeus · · Score: 1

    Check the NCARAI which is a always a great source of info on current research in the field, including a number of key technologies used to implement Grace.

  55. Form fits function by ApprenticeGeek · · Score: 1
    Creating an AI like GRACE is most definitely a laudable accomplishment.

    Before we research further into making robots more humanoid, however, I think we should remember an old biology axiom: Form Fits Function. Even at today's level of technology, humans could never design a molecule as complex and efficient as a protein. Why do we act like we know better than God (or whatever you wish to believe) when it comes to creating things now?

    A machines' design should be the most efficient for its specified task. Homo sapiens is a specialized species built for thinking. We don't need robots to take our place; we need robots to perform tasks that we are incapable of.

    1. Re:Form fits function by glwtta · · Score: 2
      Why do we act like we know better than God[?]

      geez - look around! if we can't do better than this might as well give up now.

      (btw, I wouldn't worry just yet, it's not really AI, but a robot programmed for a specific task; god is safe for a few decades yet)

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    2. Re:Form fits function by ApprenticeGeek · · Score: 1
      btw, I wouldn't worry just yet, it's not really AI, but a robot programmed for a specific task; god is safe for a few decades yet

      I'm not worried about having programs that are able to think intelligently. I just think it's a waste to try to design machines in human form.

      Humans should look at proven biological examples of the most efficient "machines" of life. If we could just get a clue, we'd figure out that the right basis to design anything (robots and cells included) is right in front of us.

      Why do all this work and research when the answer from God, tested by time and evolution, is staring us dead in the face?

      All I'm trying to say, is that a lot of time and money will be saved if we build robots according to the task they are designed for.

    3. Re:Form fits function by glwtta · · Score: 2
      Well yeah, if you believe in god then many different things become a lot easier to answer, however in the real world, it is far from obvious that biological "machines" are the most efficient for their task (in fact, they most probably are far from it).

      Two other points come to mind, one: a 150 kilo, 2 meter tall barrel with a screen is hardly "humanoid shaped" and two: the "task" of this robot is to interract with humans - what form does god suggest for that function?

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
  56. Robot gets vacation by dark&stormynight · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh great...the robot gets to go on vacation and I have to stay here and work! What's wrong with this picture?

  57. Prototype by Herkum01 · · Score: 1

    GRACE cut in front of a judge in line to register, and then demanded a conference badge several times

    I see the prototype is using the brain of a typical american CEO/politician. Now if we only knew if they were asking for stock options or contributions, to figure out what type of brain they actually used.
    1. Re:Prototype by quinto2000 · · Score: 1

      Actually, GRACE was trained by CMU drama students. They have a similar level of politeness. Drama students and Business students...I didn't realize the connection went beyond having no real work :)

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un post
  58. We're not going to be exterminated after all by ozborn · · Score: 1

    The robots will just cut in line, force us to fetch them snazzy conference badges and listen them drone on about themselves. I don't know which is worse. :)

  59. tea why (en tea) by tps12 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    * Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
  60. The CNN Link... by dbCooper0 · · Score: 1
    ...has pic of Reid Simmons with GRACE and a movie poster for Casablanca...shouldn't that be a Desk Set poster?

    After all, the computer in that (see it if you haven't) movie could be termed as having some AI leanings...

    --
    db
    Cig:
    ôô
    /`
  61. cutting in line... by furchin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The CNN article states that the robot bumped into a judge, rather than cut in line. That's a significant difference. Cutting in line indicates a tempramental personality, with some true intelligence perhaps. Bumping into a judge indicates that the programmers in charge of GRACE failed basic obstacle avoidance -- which boils down to the following for loop:

    for (int i = 0; i<num_sensors; i++)
    if (sensor_distance[i] < 5 inches)
    motors = off;

    I'm involved in a lot of robotics work, and while I believe that robots should eventually attain very intelligent behavior, I also believe that the first priority in programming a robot is to ensure it does not harm humans. By bumping a judge, GRACE has shown that it is not capable of functioning safely in society. If it bumps a judge, what's to keep it from running a judge over and killing him? Standard robots the size of GRACE are 300 lbs, quite capable of inflicting significant damage.

    As a side note, most robots have touch sensors on their side panels that automatically shut off power to the motors when they are triggered. I'm willing to bet that this is what kept GRACE from running over the judge.

    1. Re:cutting in line... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By bumping a judge, GRACE has shown that it is not capable of functioning safely in society. By this criterion, not many humans are either.

    2. Re:cutting in line... by glwtta · · Score: 2
      By this criterion, not many humans are either.

      I don't see how that is not true.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    3. Re:cutting in line... by Hayzeus · · Score: 1
      Bumping into a judge indicates that the programmers in charge of GRACE failed basic obstacle avoidance...

      If you do a lot of work robotics, you should be aware that failure to detect an obstacle seldom boils down to a failure of the software -- at least not as simple a failure as your example. Instead, such failures are often a function of the mechanical or electrical limitations of sensors, such as sonar failures on obstacles placed at a shallow angle. Unforseen sensor dead spots, slow sensor response or recovery time, even noisy supply lines are all major contributors to this kind of thing.

    4. Re:cutting in line... by furchin · · Score: 1

      Which is why we have prisons...

    5. Re:cutting in line... by furchin · · Score: 1

      You bring up a number of distinct issues which I will try to address here.

      I am indeed aware that sonar can reflect in odd directions off surfaces, leading to readings that indicate the nearest obstacle is far away. Similarly, laser cannot see glass and mirrored obstacles very well. However, using both sensors generally results in very acceptable performance. Moreover, it is one thing if GRACE bumped into a glass wall or a wall at a weird angle, either of which could cause sensors to give incorrect readings. However, humans tend to be picked up by both sensors quite well. Two weeks ago at SIGGRAPH, Lewis the Robotic Photographer ran for 5 days using just laser sensors for obstacle avoidance, and did not bump anyone.

      Unforseen sensor dead spots. This is hard, since you say unforseen. I'll argue that you should fully know the physical limitations of your robot before you start programming code for it, much less set it free in a crowded conference. As for dead spots in sensors in general, you should also be aware of where these are, and your control code should account for them. For example, if there are no sensors in front of the robot, it should never move in that direction. Similarly, if there is very spotty coverage on the right of the robot, rather than move right, the robot should perhaps rotate first to get a more accurate reading of what's on its right before chosing a path to take.

      Slow sensor response and recovery time. Your robot should never move faster than it is capable of sensing. If you do, its really easy to plummet down a flight of stairs or run over someone. Similarly, you should travel slowly enough that once an obstacle is verified, you still have time to stop and avoid it. This is the same principle as applies to your car on the freeway -- you should leave enough room in front of you to react and stop if the car in front of you stops.

      Noisy supply lines. This is irrelevant to a robot that runs on batteries. GRACE was not dragging a power cord. Batteries have known behavior -- they drain slowly over time. How quickly this happens varies from battery to battery, but most robotics research is done with the same set of batteries on a researcher's robot, so its not like GRACE got a random set of batteries it was never programmed on.

    6. Re:cutting in line... by epgandalf · · Score: 1

      I was at AAAI and I saw GRACE "cut in line." Here's what happened: There were 5 judges in line and the robot bumped the middle judge.
      If you've really done a lot of robotics work, you would know that sensors aren't perfect.
      Later that night I was talking to the person who wrote the code for waiting in line. He was using GRACE's laser rangefinder to detect people. It is worth noting that the judge was wearing black, which could have absorbed the laser.
      An important part of the waiting in line code is telling which people are actually in line and which people are just standing around. The code assumed that the last two people weren't in line because of the perceived gap.
      GRACE does have bump sensors, they are in the panels surrounding the robot. GRACE did stop after bumping the judge.

    7. Re:cutting in line... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2


      There are billions of clumsy humans who run into people, too. Why do you expect an AI robot to OUTperform a human?

    8. Re:cutting in line... by Hayzeus · · Score: 1
      My point is merely that the problem need not be a software problem, but could be a mechanical or electrical shortcoming (see below for why I harp on this). Even laser-augmented sonar can perform imperfectly in the presence of obstacles that are themselves moving, coming unexpectedly into the robots "field of view". While you are correct that a designer should understand the mechanical limitations of a robot prior to writing its software, failure to do so is not a "software" problem. It is instead a much larger (and IMHO more serious) failure to properly design the machine as a whole -- but mistakes are to be expected in an experiment. (Not to mimimize your saftey concerns -- but Grace did apparently stop, presumably via bump sensor.)

      As an aside, noise on the power supply can certainly be a problem on a battery-powered robot. EMI, poorly laid-out boards replete with ground loops, and noise from motors sharing a common power supply with the electronics, can all cause problems, though I seriously doubt this was an issue with Grace (at least I hope not!).

      I only bitch about this, because I keep running across people that seem to approach robotics as purely a software problem (not that you're necessarily one of these people); but in a practical sense, it really isn't. It is instead a synthesis of (at the very least) three disciplines.

      Ok -- I'm done ranting. Cheers.

    9. Re:cutting in line... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My impression was that Grace bumped the judge, and when the judge didn't move, Grace bumped her harder and pushed her out of the way before turning to get into line.

    10. Re:cutting in line... by furchin · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiosity, which three disciplines? I can see software and hardware/mechanical engineering, but what's the third?

    11. Re:cutting in line... by Hayzeus · · Score: 1
      Just out of curiosity, which three disciplines? I can see software and hardware/mechanical engineering, but what's the third?

      • Software Engineering
      • Electrical Engineering
      • Acupuncture
      • Did I say Acupuncture? I meant Mechanical Engineering.

      Obviously lots of other areas of study are frequently drawn on, particularly subfields of biology (ethology, entomolgy, etc.)

      Cheers -- m

    12. Re:cutting in line... by furchin · · Score: 1

      Because a human doesn't weigh 300 lbs, and won't continue to run over another person. Of course, there are exceptions, with disasterous consquences (The Who concert in Cincinnati, Ohio, back around 1970 or whenever, where 13 people died in a stampede). The point is we should code safety into a robot; we cannot do so in humans.

    13. Re:cutting in line... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of robotics work == programming basic stamps in a 10th grade robotics class? Idiot.

    14. Re:cutting in line... by furchin · · Score: 1

      Please see one of my other replies under my original comment for a discussion of sensors being imperfect. The chances that black would absorb the laser are almost 0. Feel free to shoot me an email (furchin@hotmail.com) if you'd like my reasons for this statement.

    15. Re:cutting in line... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are multiple levels of redundancy in the safety features of this robot and its predecessors. Bump sensors are merely one of them...

  62. Damn pushy robots! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long until they're stealing old peoples medicine?

  63. Does this scare anyone else? by eatenn · · Score: 2, Interesting
    If you subscribe to Ray Kurzweil's theory that man's big purpose was only to give birth to technology, then this is really frightening.

    Look how far we're coming, and how much quicker we're getting there. Five years from now who knows what this robot will be able to do. How long will it be before robots are serving us? How long before they're as intelligent as we are? How long before they're creating our music, our films, our art? I don't think humans could compete with a machine that knows all the right buttons to push.

    And yeah, to feed the paranoid, how long until they surpass us, and realize that we're nothing more than a liability? I've said it before, and I'll say it again: down with technology, we should have stopped at the wheel!

    --
    "But the cars are all flashing me, bright lights are passing me, I feel life passing me by" - Stiff Little Fingers
    1. Re:Does this scare anyone else? by glwtta · · Score: 2
      sigh.

      How long before they're as intelligent as we are?

      A very, very, VERY long time. While GRACE is very cool and definitely a great technical accomplishment, "she" is no closer to human intelligence than a toaster. It's a robot, programmed to perform a task; the tasks are getting more elaborate and the programming more tricky (and ingenuous), but none of this gets it any closer to intelligence. We'll be able to build a robot which behaves and interacts like a convincing human, long before we have even the faintest idea of how to build one that is even remotely intelligent. Emulation is simply not the same a duplication.

      As far as music and movies go, it seems intelligence is no longer required to create those anyway.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    2. Re:Does this scare anyone else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YHBT. YHL. HAND.

    3. Re:Does this scare anyone else? by eatenn · · Score: 1
      Yeah well, I can picture this very same debate happening 10 years from now, only it's a machine arguing, offended by the term "emulation." Sure it sounds like something out of a certain Steven Spielberg/Stanley Kubrick hybrid, and I'm not saying it will definitely happen, I'm just saying it's not beyond the realm of possibility.

      My point was, I think, machines don't necessarily have to "emulate" our own thought processes to become more intelligent than we are. Who says that our way of thinking is the only way?

      And of course there's the possibility I have an over-active imagination.

      --
      "But the cars are all flashing me, bright lights are passing me, I feel life passing me by" - Stiff Little Fingers
    4. Re:Does this scare anyone else? by glwtta · · Score: 2
      And of course there's the possibility I have an over-active imagination.

      combined with a lack of scientific insight. sorry, I'm feeling blunt, but this thread is just rampant with this nonsense. btw, by 'emulate' I meant that these machines are merely designed to "behave" in ways similar to humans, this behaviour doesn't arise out of any inherent intelligence.

      kind of like the difference between a human constructed out of various body parts and reanimated (a la Dr. Frankenstein) and a wax figure with joints and a couple strings attached - creating the latter doesn't mean you have to start worrying about the former.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
  64. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  65. GRACE Beats Richard Stallman in social skills by agravaine · · Score: 3, Funny


    In a post-conference interview, researchers noted that GRACE has already exceeded the social skills of Richard Stallman, who has been observed picking his teeth and clipping his toenails (then flicking the debris onto the floor) while giving a talk at Georgia Tech.

    "It's not really a fair contest:" groused Stallman,"GRACE doesn't have any toenails!"

    (True story about the toenails, BTW. Interesting talk otherwise; or so I heard.)

  66. Badges? by tchdab1 · · Score: 1

    >>The team is looking forward towards refining GRACE for the competition in Mexico.

    "Registration badges? I don't need no stinking registration badges!"

  67. I said the same thing by Subcarrier · · Score: 1

    ...at the last brain storming session.

    I wonder what happened to those things. I haven't received an invitation in ages...

    --
    "I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree with them." -- George H. W. Bush
  68. "Go ahead, make my day" by Animats · · Score: 2
    Robots can't be too wimpy. Aggressive robots get the job done. Read this paper: "Go Ahead, Make My Day", Robot Conflict Resolution by Aggressive Competition. An excerpt:
    • We are investigating the use of aggressive behaviour to improve the efficiency of robot teams; this paper presents our initial simulation experiments. Our eventual goal is to demonstrate these methods running on real robots, so we have tried to keep the simulations and controllers realistic and as easy to transfer to the real world as possible. We demonstrate that a simple stylised fighting behaviour improves the overall performance of our system by reducing interference. We then discuss the (non)usefulness of social dominance hierarchies and suggest ways to improve overall efficiency.

    Experience with the HelpMate hospital delivery robot indicated that a bit of pushyness was needed, or the robot would be stalled by people standing and talking in corridors.

    This is, as far as I know, a result not anticipated in science fiction.

    1. Re:"Go ahead, make my day" by furchin · · Score: 1

      My original post notes that CNN states that GRACE bumped a judge. My point differentiates bumping a judge from aggressive behavior. People can make physical contact with others in lines because we won't hurt each other. Robots are metal and pretty solid, and weigh a lot. Given that the programmers behind GRACE did not intend physical contact with a judge (indeed, physical robot-human contact is a bad idea in general), this is a bad situation.

    2. Re:"Go ahead, make my day" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No Hot Robot Luvins then? :-(

  69. rumor is that by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    ...they held the convention next-door to DEFCON. Some hackers got into Grace's programming and made her romance and hump a full garbage can.

  70. Run!!!! by secondsun · · Score: 1

    Dear god its a DALEK!!!

    No wait...

    --
    There is nothing wrong with being gay. It's getting caught where the trouble lies.
  71. Re:Schmoozing - the details by epgandalf · · Score: 1

    The Article does not mention how the robot will schmooze with the contestents. Here is how it will work. GRACE has a sony camera that can pan/tilt/zoom. Swathmore will work on code to zoom in on people's name badges and use OCR to read their names. GRACE will look up information on them and use it to engage the person in conversation.
    I think that's a pretty cool idea. When was the last time you had an intelligent conversation with a robot?

  72. Re:Yeah but can she DJ ? (already around) by TheHouseMouse · · Score: 1

    The July 2002 issua of BPM Magazine had an article of just this nature. "While we're busily working on the machine-side of humas, the machines are, of course, busily working on their human attributes (they will try to kill us someday, you know, just as we once did the cro-magnons): Big is the endeavor to develop and Artificial Intelligence that can interpret human moods and affect them with music, visiuals, and even scent. In the meantimes, cute li'l DJ I-Robot spends the day memorizing and analyzing the movements of famous DJs so that, by night, he can 'read the room'" -BPM. The jist of it is a machine with 3 turntables that can scratch and beat juggle. Go to google and to a search for 'DJ I-Robot' for more info.

    --
    Only the meek get pinched. The bold survive.
  73. Canadian? by kentyman · · Score: 0

    Good joke, eh? I don't know where you learned aboot Americans...

    --
    You know where you are? You're in the $PATH, baby. You're gonna get executed!
  74. Re:Great Geek Girls of History by aebrain · · Score: 2

    No, not Ada, COBOL.

    Ada - not ADA BTW - is named after Ada Byron, Countess of Lovelace, programmer of Charles Babbage's devices.

    There's at least one good biography of "Amazing Grace" Hopper on the web. A google search using the keywords "Grace Hopper" COBOL will find you more.

    Oh yes, GRACE in this case is Graduate Robot Attending a ConferencE.

    --
    Zoe Brain - Rocket Scientist
  75. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  76. Re:Schmoozing - the details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " When was the last time you had an intelligent conversation with a robot?"

    When was the last time one had a robot?

  77. Re:Schmoozing - the details by Troed · · Score: 1
    GRACE will look up information on them and use it to engage the person in conversation.

    So, looking up me (my name is Troed, it's quite unusual - 7 of us in Sweden) she would start talking about:

    • Troedson Konsult AB (I know of him, but we're not related)
    • Lots of Waleish (?) towns
    • ... and finally my own discountinued homepage

    (What is Darksbane? Troed magic is far more sophisticated than human magic sounds interesting ;)

  78. Re:Schmoozing - the details by Skraggy · · Score: 1

    To be honest, in day to day life(outside work) when was the last time you actually had an intelligent conversation with anyone.

    Seems the whole non IT, non Academic, Non scientific, non professional community has been dumbed down to the point of vending machines.
    Would you like fries with that.
    Pause.
    Yes.

    No thought, just a programmed response to buy something you never ordered.
    At least it seems to be getting that way in the UK

    --
    A Skoda is for life, not for casual humour.
  79. Figures by quintessent · · Score: 2

    You name a robot "Grace" and look what happens.

  80. This is a wonderful accomplishment. by seanfuller · · Score: 0

    The authors of most of the highest rated comments to this story should have kept those comments to themselves. The GRACE project's accomplishments are wonderful. I got a bit choked up reading about her and I'm sure I'm not the only one. They didn't break new ground by devising a new algorithm or technology, they did it in the greatest of scientific tradition by building on the work of many others. I myself created an animated openGL face that could carry on a verbal conversation over a year ago by using ViaVoice, RedHat Linux, an old Eliza program (interfaced also to an infocom interpreter) and some writings on facial animation off the web. (BTW, I'm interested in starting an open source effort in this area. I was amazed at the time that I wasn't hearing about greater efforts to create an artificial person of some sort then. It was such a wonderful thing to read about the GRACE project's efforts. I wish I could see a clip of her in action or meet her in person. I can't wait to see what the future brings us. So many wonderful things.

    --
    Sean Lane Fuller - The truth is out there!
    1. Re:This is a wonderful accomplishment. by langed · · Score: 1
      Sounds fair. So publish us some screenshots, or give us some info. You could advance the scientific community--but you'll never do it by sitting on your work/discoveries.

      Some scientists strive for fame and fortune.
      Others strive for the bettering of mankind.
      Me, I strive to do both, and neither, depending on my mood.

      As always, YMMV. HTH. HAND. For some value of each. :)

  81. Re:Schmoozing - the details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe you need to expand your non-work social interactions beyond McDonald's.