Slashdot Mirror


The Last Place

angela morgenstern writes "Buddhist Bhutan was the last place on earth to legalize television. Trading traditional practices for daytime soaps and WWF, many fear that western influence will trample the culture." A whole set of articles about the effect of American television on one of the most remote places on earth - it's official, there is no escape from American "culture".

144 of 469 comments (clear)

  1. No escape? by warmcat · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sure there is, turn off your TV, prise your kids out of the kid-shaped depression in the sofa and do other things that don't require you to be passive and watch ads to give you a value system.

  2. WWF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    What does the world wildlife fund have to do with any of this?

    1. Re:WWF by Jugalator · · Score: 2

      Hmm... Wildlife fund you say? I suppose that's the guys funding Slashdot.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  3. "...all for about $5 a month." by Erik_ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In the report it says : "Rinzy has hooked up this secluded society to 45 cable television channels, featuring everything from the BBC to Baywatch, all for about $5 a month: the price of a bag of red chillies."
    Is that the cost of a bag of red chillies in the United States ? How much buying power is $5 in Bhutan ? So these people get to watch adverts for cars/food/luxuries that they will not be able to purchase.

    1. Re:"...all for about $5 a month." by laa · · Score: 3, Informative

      ...with the risk of being unbearably dull...

      The GNP per capita 1995 for US seems to be $26 062, ranking at 12th postition. Bhutan, again, is 145th with a GNP per capita of $172. So, I suspect five bucks is a huge portion of a normal monthly salary.

      --
      Why does the kernel go through stable and then unstable forks? Can't it always be a stable build, like with Windows?
    2. Re:"...all for about $5 a month." by Zarf · · Score: 3, Funny

      So these people get to watch adverts for cars/food/luxuries that they will not be able to purchase.

      Sounds like TV in Alaska.

      --
      [signature]
    3. Re:"...all for about $5 a month." by io333 · · Score: 3, Funny

      So these people get to watch adverts for cars/food/luxuries that they will not be able to purchase.

      Exactly. And plenty of folks there are going to want to purchase those things. And they're going to realize that they need to quit hanging out in the monestary so often, or meditating, or whatever other unproductive things they do and GET A JOB.

      And in a few years they're gonna be waking up early every morning and going to a job they hate and busting their butt every friggin' day, just like you & me, to get all that stuff.

      Welcome to the west.

    4. Re:"...all for about $5 a month." by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      You were OK with hiring these people at such a miserable wage? Why didn't you pay them for real? $11 per hour for instance? Western cheapskate.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    5. Re:"...all for about $5 a month." by doubtless · · Score: 2

      If you really read the article, there's a link about the country that stated the GNP at about $1000 for year 2000.

      So I guess $5 is about 6-7% of monthly salary.

      --
      geek page at KY speaks
    6. Re:"...all for about $5 a month." by LeftOfCentre · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're making two assumptions here. First, that local stations will purchase American some programming. That may well happen but is far from a certainty. Secondly, and most importantly, that they will show American ads. That makes exactly zero sense. They would show ads targeted towards the local population. No other country I know of, even with some American TV and movies, has ads for exclusively American products. Do you really think that they will broadcast directly from American channels??

    7. Re:"...all for about $5 a month." by droleary · · Score: 2

      Is that the cost of a bag of red chillies in the United States ? How much buying power is $5 in Bhutan ?

      Who cares? You're missing the big picture! Why the hell can they wire remote areas for cable at $5/month but I can't get it right in the middle of my pre-wired metro area without paying an order of magnitude more? I mean, damn, just the listing of what's on costs twice as much from the TiVo people!

    8. Re:"...all for about $5 a month." by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

      I was just thinking... why does it have to be American TV they're watching?

      Why can't they make their own programming. TV doesn't have to be evil.. it's what you watch.

    9. Re:"...all for about $5 a month." by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 2

      Here in Canada, many of the stations we rebroadcast from the states are localized. So it's definately a possibility.

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    10. Re:"...all for about $5 a month." by droleary · · Score: 2

      So, what you're really saying is that you don't understand purchasing power and other basic economic concepts.

      No, what I guess I'm having to say is that you seem to have no sense of humor.

      What can that US$5 buy you at home? What can it buy you in Bhutan?

      Please fill free to post a link to the price of common consumer items in Bhutan. Until you do, you're talking out of your ass.

    11. Re:"...all for about $5 a month." by droleary · · Score: 2

      You were saying?

      I was saying I wanted you to post a link to the price of common consumer items in Bhutan. You have failed to do so.

      What you seem unable to understand is that the per-capita income of the people doesn't significantly reduce the cost of items, but rather increases the value proposition. A $300 iPod doesn't suddenly cost $3 when you cross the border, rather the value of such an item suddenly must be the equivalent of $30,000 to make it worth having. Needless to say, I wouldn't expect many in Bhutan to be dancing around with a portable MP3 player any time soon.

      When you actually understand something about economics, I hope you'll post again.

  4. they will be less affected than is thought by Zemran · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have only just got back from SEasia and could not find much to watch on their TV as they have their own programming that I found terrible. They have a good strong culture of their own and I think it will prevail. I had to resort to MTVasia and the BBC world. Even MTVasia is their own bubble pop rather than the stuff we are used to. As the tube moves into Bhutan I think it will be asian TV that goes with it and they will not get this expected burst of western "culture" when it arrives.

    American "culture" ? is that an oxymoron ?

    --
    I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    1. Re:they will be less affected than is thought by PSC · · Score: 2

      American "culture" ? is that an oxymoron ?

      Well for sure it's not a tautology :-)

      --
      --- The light at the end of the tunnel is probably a burning truck.
  5. Avoiding US Cultural Imperialism. by tjensor · · Score: 3, Funny

    it's official, there is no escape from American "culture".
    Sure there is. Here are a set of simple instructions.
    1) Locate point of entry for electricity in to your house.
    2) Disconnect Electricity (some car is advised at this point). 3) Locate all telephones in house.
    4) Smash telephones with Hammer, or other large heavy object (possibly your now useless VCR).
    5) Locate large wads of cotton wool.
    6) Insert cotton wool in to ears (in case of passing boombox).
    7) Never leave house.

    Never mind Pax Americana, fear Pax AOL / Time Warner.

    --
    <fnord>OBEY</fnord>
    1. Re:Avoiding US Cultural Imperialism. by EverDense · · Score: 3, Funny

      ... 6) Insert cotton wool in to ears (in case of passing boombox).
      7) Never leave house.

      8) ???
      9) Profit

      --
      http://jesus.everdense.com/
    2. Re:Avoiding US Cultural Imperialism. by DeadSea · · Score: 2

      Televesion isn't the problem, its the stuff on it. They should just make WWF, and other Hollywood crap illegal.

  6. Waitasec. by vavenger · · Score: 3, Funny

    Bhutan's top 10 cable channels.

    They mean to tell me that they get HBO in friggin' Bhutan? I can't even get it in Canada!

  7. Spread of US "culture" by jamieo · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually this is a bit more accurate than you may think. Recently I spent a month trekking in Nepal - a nearby country to Bhutan and one that has only recently (30 years) opened itself to foregin influences.

    The popularity of WWF, even high in the remote mountain villages, was not something I expected. Then again, this is usually the only "culture" the US exports.

    I also visited the country about 10 years earlier after a few months backpacking through India. For around 3 months I travelled and didn't once see a bottle/can of Coca Cola (or derivative) - it was all local soft drinks that were available. At the time it was a refreshing change, and gave you a much more local flavour.

    On my more recent trip you could *only* get Coca Cola soft drinks (Coke, Sprite, Fanta, etc.), even high in the mountains a week's travel from the nearest road. OK, they were locally manufactured (under license) and tasted different (the Fanta was nice!), but it was something that got in the way of emersing yourself in a completely different culture. As for the locals themselves, there seemed to be no benefit whatsoever for them having "Coke" soft drinks compared to the local ones before them.

    Ho hum, roll on the Disneyfication of the planet.

    1. Re:Spread of US "culture" by Zemran · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree that there are stacks of Coke/Fanta bottles but you can always ask for something different if you want the "local" flavour. I preferred to ask for a Watermellon shake. They use the inside of a watermelon, liquidised with ice. It is really simple and a great drink costing 10cents (up to 70 cents if you are in a hotel).

      I think a more interesting report will be "how the marketting men got on" in 5 years time. Can they really understand a culture so different ? Bhutan is classified as one of the poorest countries but there is very little real poverty. It is hard for us to relate to a country that does not need money, so we call them poor. We think of poverty as not having a TV, extreme poverty as not having food. So how do you classify poverty in a country where food is there on the trees all year round? Where people happily feed a stranger just because he is passing at meal time? Where people will work for no wages because those around them will look after them? I do agree that their culture will lose from TV but I think we have far more to learn from them. The children in Bhutan already wear t-shirts and trainers so this is not a big step but it is a step further away from the beauty of what they had.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    2. Re:Spread of US "culture" by Rayonic · · Score: 2

      > As for the locals themselves, there seemed to be no benefit whatsoever for them having "Coke" soft drinks compared to the local ones before them.

      Uhm, you're expecting some sort of change when people switch from one brand of suger water to another? And then you're blaming Coca Cola and American culture when there isn't one? You could at least try/i to hide your inherent cultural bias.

      Culture is bunk.

    3. Re:Spread of US "culture" by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
      For that matter, there was a time when there weren't old beer cans and cigarette butts strewn by the side of the road- in Sweden.

      A bit of Westernization later, and there were- and I've never heard of any country going back and regaining its original character once it goes down this path. Something about Western Culture (tm) seems to teach people, 'consume, charge ahead towards whatever goal you claim to have, stomp anything that's in the way and chuck your trash out the window because you can't be bothered to waste time taking care of somebody ELSE'S roadside'.

      On the subject of soft drinks, anyone noticed how "Red Bull" is made in Austria? Anyone noticed how American companies are now fighting for shelf space with their own imitations, anyone get the feeling that Coke and Pepsi are just not OK with you being able to buy soft drinks from some not-Coke company in Austria? Disneyfication is an awfully cheery word for global control. It will be interesting to see whether 'Copsi' choose to kill 'Red Bull' with price cutting and subsidizing their alternatives with the sales of their regular soft drinks, or whether they choose to kill it by demanding stores not carry it and threatening to pull the regular soft drinks off the shelves. The advantage of the latter is that once Red Bull is killed they get to still sell their 25 cent ripoff sugar water at 2$ a tiny can...

      Ho fucking hum, business as usual...

    4. Re:Spread of US "culture" by hether · · Score: 2

      There IS Fanta in the US. We get it here in Iowa, but its not easy to find.

      According to the Coca Cola web site, "Fanta sells best in Brazil, Germany, Spain, Japan, Italy and Argentina. Fanta distribution was increased in the U.S. in 2001 with the return of four flavors: orange, strawberry, pineapple and grape. Orange, the biggest seller, is now available in most of the country. " :-)

      --

      Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do.
    5. Re:Spread of US "culture" by Broccolist · · Score: 2
      As for the locals themselves, there seemed to be no benefit whatsoever for them having "Coke" soft drinks compared to the local ones before them.

      I find this hard to believe. If they decided to give up their local soft drinks to buy coke instead, they must have had a reason.

      As much as everybody hates big corporations, we still buy from them. Having no large brand sucks, because you can never be sure you're going to get something of good quality. With coke, you're always certain to get exactly the same drink.

    6. Re:Spread of US "culture" by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 2

      Actually, soft drinks are bottled under local licenses so you may not be getting the "exact" same drink in different parts of the world.

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    7. Re:Spread of US "culture" by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 2

      We have Fanta in Canada. I don't drink soft drinks myself though - just a bunch of empty carbs - no nutritional value.

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
  8. Bhutan Broadcasting Services' schedule for today by jukal · · Score: 2

    this is hot stuff!:

    19:00-19:15 Tonight & The News in Dzongkha
    19:15-19:20 Advertisement and announcement
    19:20-19:50 Dzongkha Gongphel
    19:50-20:00 UK TODAY Sutton Hoo- The London Marathon
    20:00-20:10 News in English
    20:10-20:15 Advertisement and announcement
    20:15-20:30 Telematch
    20:30-21:00 Telematch

    I am ready to Dzongkha! Whatever it is ;)

  9. Re:What's with the quotes? by mike_sucks · · Score: 2

    Hah Har! Loser!

    --
    -- "So, what's the deal with Auntie Gerschwitz et all?"
  10. I guess I am too young ... by Monkelectric · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It never occured to me that there might be a place that there *ISN'T* TV.

    --

    Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    1. Re:I guess I am too young ... by sgage · · Score: 2

      "It never occured to me that there might be a place that there *ISN'T* TV."

      There is such a place... my house :-)

    2. Re:I guess I am too young ... by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 2

      I don't watch tv either. But I do play video games. I only have cable because of my girlfriend. Odd thing is, nobody I talk to really watches much TV either. I do watch movies though :)

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
  11. Re:Hmm by velco · · Score: 2, Funny

    What is so "wrong" with American culture? Why everybody hates it?! If our culture can so easily break your own traditions from usual TV broadcasts then you should blame only yourself, not Americans. And if you don't like American Rationalism then welcome back to medieval age...

    Nothing's wrong with American culture. Nor with the USA "culture", it's just that people outside USA don't call WWF, McDonalds and The Simpsons "culture".

    ~velco

  12. Re:Hmm by jamieo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Are you happy with US "culture" as it is today? By that term I do not mean real US culture (there is some), but the jokingly termed "culture" many non-US people label for things like Disney, Coke, WWF, etc.

    Travelling around the US you see that such companies have had, what I believe, to be a very negative effect. Everywhere you go it all looks the same, tastes the same, hears the same (same music industry manufactured "pop"), etc. Local and regional flavour is lost. This is great if you like Taco Bell, only drinking Coke and listening to Britney. But there is a lot more to life than that!

    Why is it popular in other countries? Well, 2 reasons:

    1) The *good* thing about the US - **freedom**. You live a very privelidged life compared to many people of the world. Many people of the world see the US and freedom as being very related things. So when they are given a bit of freedom they have previously lacked, they gravitate towards such things. Think as a teenager and how you behaved once given freedom from parents.

    2) This is a not so good thing about the US - **money**. Consider the situation in Bhutan as an example. At the moment there are local (very small) companies that make soft drinks - these won't be copies of Coke, etc., but will be genuine different soft drinks you've never experienced. As Bhutan opens itself up, Coca Cola will move in and either set up a new company to manufacture their drinks, or buy existing ones. People will buy their drinks first of all because of #1 above - it's new, it's cool, etc. Within a very short time, there will be no local soft drinks made. The reason for this will *not* be because Coke is better and people only want it. It will be because the Coca Cola company have the financial muscle to completely control the soft drinks industry of that country. This is not good.

    #2 applies to things much more than soft drinks, TV, etc. When you're talking about 3rd world countries and things like agricultural seed supplies and strictly controlled genetically engineered crops, this can have a very bad effect. It's very realistic for companies akin to Monsanto to completely control who areas of agricultural production in these kinds of countries.

    So if you believe "raionalism" is #2 above, and this is a good thing, you can surely extrapolate this to meaning there will eventually be only 1 of anything in the world - a single soft drink we all only buy, a single type of car, etc. I don't think this will be a nice place to live.

    Left uncontrolled, #2 will eventually remove much of the choice and freedom in the world, thereby harming the greatest thing about the US, #1.

  13. American Culture by YeeHaW_Jelte · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I guess there should be a distinction made between american culture and american "culture" as used by michael. Yes, you americans have a great culture; excellent writers, great artists and original musicians. Too bad that the stuff that actually gets exported the most is "culture": coke, disney and the worst of hollywood.
    I've been reading some of the comments and all I have to say is this: don't short change yourself or your culture, be aware of the things that have real value and give these to the world.

    --

    ---
    "The chances of a demonic possession spreading are remote -- relax."
    1. Re:American Culture by Arsewiper · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, what's sad is that the 'culture' is what the rest of the world subscribes to. It's market led so for people outside of the US to complain they are really complaining about the tastes of their own culture. I'm glad that the US has provided us with some excellent tv like the Simpsons and early X-Files. If I have any objection it's to the marketing of unhealthy food like McDonalds to children - that's harmful and underhand.

    2. Re:American Culture by asreal · · Score: 4, Insightful
      This reminds me of a question that came up while I was studying in the UK. My Pop Culture in Britain 1800-Present class was discussing what the term culture means. Many people were certain culture meant what was played on BBC4 and "the classics." I took another point of view. Culture is everything produced by a civilization... there is no real yardstick.

      After all, in his day, Shakespeare's plays were considered to be for the common people. I don't mean to equate The Fast and the Furious with Hamlet, but I think we are too fast to dismiss anything other than 'high culture'.

    3. Re:American Culture by pamri · · Score: 2, Insightful
      American culture suceeds not becuase it is one of the greatest, but it's Corporations with their deep pockets have marketed it successfully. And what you are saying is very true.

      The culture that get's exported out of america is not the best, but that which thrives on popular emotions & has a transnational appeal(coke, wwf, spiderman).
      The reason WWF succeeds, say, compared to Mark Twain maybe because WWF cuts across many barriers like language, the emotions conveyed are easily decipherable & more easily understood by a villager in bhutan than say, the meaning of songs by any US folk artist(Not that other cultural aspects like the writings of Mark Twain or David Thoreau may be unrelated to people across the globe, but it's just that they don't appeal to everyone & it is not marketable, esp the Corporations).
      But, not all american culture does suceed, rather, the host country's culture or it's presentation get's a make-over(Glocalisation anyone?).eg:Switch on MTV in any country- Most of the pop song videos (their packaging) look similar, where as the folk-music that you would get, say on their PBS, would reflect the country's national ethos.

    4. Re:American Culture by gosand · · Score: 2
      Too bad that the stuff that actually gets exported the most is "culture": coke, disney and the worst of hollywood.

      And Slashdot. Don't forget about Slashdot. :-)

      Sometimes it is really hard to be proud to be an American. We do have so many great things in this country, but we have so many things to be ashamed of. I guess it just comes with the territory. Everything seems to be a paradox. We have a great country, with so much to offer by way of music, food, wine, entertainment, fashion, culture. But we always seem to just push things a little too far. I mean, we landed on the moon for crying out loud. We send missions into space on a pretty regular basis, and it barely makes the news. But Britney Spears breaks up with her boyfriend, and I have to hear about it for weeks. There are many things that I am proud of about my country, but it is really hard sometimes to remember those things when we act so stupid. About the only thing we don't have here is a deep rooted tradition. Maybe that contributes to our culture and our "culture".

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    5. Re:American Culture by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      Too bad that the stuff that actually gets exported the most is "culture": coke, disney and the worst of hollywood.

      Actually, I would consider Coke to be a positive part of the American culture. What is negative about Coke? It's been around a looooong time, and people like it. One of the oldest American companies, and still successful.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    6. Re:American Culture by gosand · · Score: 2
      Maybe it's because we are constantly told that we are evil and our culture is not actual culture. Everytime we want something for ourselves it's labeled as either: a. Stolen or b. Not actual culture.

      We, as a country, do evil things. Most countries do. We also do good things. Most countries do.

      I think part of the problem is the unwashed masses completely deny that the US could do anything wrong, that we are totally original, and everyone wants to be like us. These are the people that chant "USA USA USA" at everything.

      More Americans, not less, need to look at our culture and what we do objectively. I can say "Yes, we don't have the thousand-year-old traditions of some countries, and that's OK. Yes, a lot of our culture is borrowed. That's OK. We are a young nation, and we have done some things wrong, and some things right. "

      We have stolen a lot of things and called them our own. The ignorant thing is not that we have stolen an idea or two, everyone does that. It is that we claim it to be our own. That can piss people off, and rightly so. But we also have a lot of original things as well, that a lot of people around the world like. It is good to have a reality check sometimes, both the positive and the negative.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    7. Re:American Culture by maelstrom · · Score: 2

      I like to diss Disney too, but you hafta admit some of the things they've done easily qualify as art, ever watched Fantasia?

      --
      The more you know, the less you understand.
    8. Re:American Culture by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      IMHO I think wrestling more accurately portrays a much older theme: that of ancient Rome and the gladiatorial battles that throngs of people came to see. Only with the gladiators it was real and people actually died. And there were lions. And weapons.

      Nevermind.

  14. Please use google cache by shomon2 · · Score: 2

    This is a tiny country, and they don't need a slashdotting.
    http://www.google.com/search?q=+site%3Awww.bbs.com .bt+bhutan

    That might be a good enough link to use for most pages in the bhutan broadcasting service.

  15. American Culture Not That Bad by Kirby-meister · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I think American culture is much better than some of the less-tolerant cultures there are in this world.

    Come on, what's so bad about our culture? Not all of us are the stereotyped fat slobs who stare at the TV all day. Our music is diverse, our people tend to work, and our culture is mostly tolerant on issues. And I like the fact that we are free to discuss issues concerning the government.

    1. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by Per+Wigren · · Score: 3, Interesting

      and our culture is mostly tolerant on issues.

      Yes, I've seen that on Ricky Lake and Jenny Jones. ;)

      "Oh no, you're not normal! We have to change/brainwash you so you can fit in with the rest!"

      --
      My other account has a 3-digit UID.
    2. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by jafuser · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Our music is diverse

      Only if you know where to look. Remember, before the internet, the same crap you hear on all of the current Clear Channel radio stations was the majority1 of what would make it to other countries.

      our people tend to work

      True, but we seem to be prejudiced against rest and relaxation of any sort. What ever happened to enjoying life? What's the big deal if you die a "successful" millionaire if you Can't Take it With You"TM?

      My roommate from England tells me about how many Europeans get a month of vacation per year; they get even more (6 weeks?) if they've got some seniority. The average full-time American employee gets two weeks of vacation time per year, and those with seniority may even be lucky enough to get three! And even when we do finally get to take some down time, we still can't get some rest and relaxation without overworking ourselves.

      and our culture is mostly tolerant on issues

      More like Apathy. Passivity. Sheep-like behavior.

      There are many issues which are worth some time to consider:

      • Human rights
      • Civil rights
      • Racism
      • Affirmative Action
      • Funding education
      • Arms control
      • Campaign finance
      • Missile defense
      • Immigration
      • The USA PATRIOT ACT, UCITA, DMCA, etc
      • The corruption of mainstream media
      • Medicare/Medicaid
      • AIDS
      • Drug patents
      • Disabled rights
      • Juvenile justice
      • Conflicts in Africa
      • The cause of poverty
      • Third World Debt
      • Free trade and globalization
      • Creeping corporate power
      • Consumerism
      • International criminal court
      • The Middle East
      • The War on TerrorTM
      • Foreign Policy
      • Israel and Palestine
      • Kosovo
      • Chechnya
      • East Timor
      • China
      • Genetically modified food
      • Global Warming
      • Animal/Nature conservation
      • Human cloning
      • Prayer in school
      • Gun control
      • Patient rights
      • Euthanasia
      • Privacy
      • Terrorism
      • Tobacco
      • Health Care
      • United Nations
      • Veterans
      • Tort Reform
      • Separation of church and state
      • Bill of Rights
      (just to name a few)

      At least some of these issues should be things people talk about and think about every day, instead of going home to be brainwashed by MTV or the latest episode of Friends (aka "culture"). I know there *are* people in the USA who do stay on top of the issues, but for the most part, people prefer to stick their heads in the ground and be apathetic (aka "tolerant") of how everything is going now. Honestly, do you think our leaders are going to make the right decisions?

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    3. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by jafuser · · Score: 4, Interesting
      If i want an abortion, i can march my ass down town and get one.

      Yeah, right past the "tolerant" americans holding their picket signs, their list from the Nuremberg Files, and their tote bag full of weapons which has "choose life" printed on the outside.

      if i want to have a gay marraige, I can go to vermont or new mexico.

      We're so "tolerant" that 4% of our state governments allow gay marriage. And then there's always the issue of dealing with our "tolerant" neo-nazis, Aaron McKinneys, and "tolerant" churches and conservative groups?

      if i want to claim glaucoma and smoke a fat tasty spliff, I go to Cali (id rather fly to amsterdam, but whatev).

      I'll agree a lot of people are tolerant to light drug use, but my problem with it is that as long as it's widespread and illegal, it makes a lot of people arrestable for something the majority of the public accepts.

      Funny that you dont realize how much of a role intolerance plays in the two international issues you addressed. If im living in Israel and Im Palestinian, you bet your ass I'll be seeing some intolerance. If im a Catholic living in the wrong Neghborhood in Belfast, you bet your ass I'll be seeing some intolerance. But if I'm any of these living in any neighborhood in the U.S. I'll bet your ass that no one will give a flying fuck.

      You're mostly correct as far as extent, but your colorfully metaphored assertion that there is complete racial apathy here in the USA is a little bit inaccurate. For example, what about a black family living in an all-white community in a southern state, or a young married couple moving into a community of mostly retirees? While in most cases, we've reached the point where physical violence is rare between these groups, there is certianly at least a small degree of intolerance.

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    4. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by Brian_Ellenberger · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, right past the "tolerant" americans holding their picket signs, their list from the Nuremberg Files, and their tote bag full of weapons which has "choose life" printed on the outside. We're so "tolerant" that 4% of our state governments allow gay marriage. And then there's always the issue of dealing with our "tolerant" neo-nazis, Aaron McKinneys, and "tolerant" churches and conservative groups? For example, what about a black family living in an all-white community in a southern state

      And then there are those ignorant people who stereotype all pro-lifers as violent abortion clinic-bombers, evangelical churches as neo-nazi gay bashers, and white southerns as racists.

      Brian Ellenberger
    5. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by Per+Wigren · · Score: 2

      It was (mostly) a joke, get over it.. :)

      --
      My other account has a 3-digit UID.
    6. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by Spectra72 · · Score: 2

      Commonplace?? Killing abortion doctors is commonplace? Abortion clinic bombings are commonplace? Do you have your VCR set on repeat or something?

      These events, while tragic, are definitely NOT commonplace. The famous Nuremburg Files website case was declared a "true threat" and not protected by the First Amendment in Planned Parenthood of the Columbia/Willamette v. American Coalition of Life Activists. The last documented case of an abortion doctor being murdered was in 1998, the last attempted murder was in 1999. There have been three bombings or bombing attempts since 1999. Hardly qualifying as "commonplace".


      Info

      You should look into ratcheting down the rhetoric.

    7. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by jafuser · · Score: 2
      Gotta watch out for those highly dangerous retirees

      You obviously don't live in Boca Raton. I do. ;-)

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    8. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by jafuser · · Score: 2
      Your right to have an abortion is still legal as is their right to protest it.

      Sounds like you're all for tolerance, as long as it's something you're in favor of and anyone who disagrees can get the fuck out. Brilliant.

      A woman's right to have an abortion is still legal as is other people's right to protest it, and my right to protest the protestors, and your right to protest my protest, and now my right to protest your protest with a metametametameta protest.

      Now feel free to followup with your metametametametameta protest, but don't expect me to do this forever.

      Brilliant? Yes. So there ;-P

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    9. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 2

      Although I agree with you the American culture is far more diverse than advertised, the problem here is that the bits of our culture that make it across the border are overwhelmingly backed by Time-Warner and other media conglomerates. In other words, your average 3rd world country (and most of the 2nd and 1st ones, actually) only see the *marketable* side of our culture. Denim jeans and McDonalds and the like -- cultural artefacts and institutions that sell.

      It's sad, really, but it works both ways. Yesterday on NPR there was an article about movies from India - so-called "Baliwood" - the announcer noted that the cinematic output of India was something like 300 movies a year, and that they were all action-packed and strongly dependant on musical numbers and outlandish plot devices. It was pretty snide, as the implication was that these movies were somehow completely inferior to the summer lacklusters we're used to in the USA.

      Bah. Bah on all of them.
      GMFTatsujin

    10. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by Kirby-meister · · Score: 2
      Where do you hide all of this "diverse" music of yours, America?

      We hide them in the local Sam Goody's and from the RIAA on P2P networks.

      I love the use of the word "tend" in there! You should compare unemployment & working week figures with other western countries. American workers don't work as much as most of the rest of the world.

      You mean western like Spain, where vacations are a lot longer than American vacations?

      BOO! Palestian! Northern Ireland! Abortion! Gay marriage! DRUGS! Tolerent...hah, good one.

      "BOO! Different colored skins! Different cultures! Different religions!" Believe it or not, some parts of Europe still acts like that.

      Only as much as they'll let you. Remember the guy who filmed the cops beating up a black guy? Guess where he ended up?

      In prison, on earlier charges. Compare that to even Canada, where filming the police is illegal (or so I've been told).

      You say a lot of things but you don't seem to give reasons behind them. Our constitution is very important in our freedoms. Washington DC is not the only place where the Constitution is interpreted. And our civil rights are at a level that half the world's population never get to reach.

    11. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by Dirtside · · Score: 2

      Always remember this: The opposite of "pro-choice" is not "pro-life." It is "anti-choice."

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    12. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by extrasolar · · Score: 2

      First, let me say that I am generally against abortions. Perhaps there are reasons for abortions under certain circumstances, but surely that doesn't mean that all abortions are ethical and should be lawful, but this is a digression to what I want to say.

      And to avoid any sort of ad hominem attacks, I'll say that I am an atheist. But I am not politically active.

      "Religion breeds intolerance not because of its belief in a God, however erroneous such a belief may be. It breeds intolerance by its very assertion that it has the 'one true, straight and narrow way' to God, setting its people apart from the rest of the world."

      This may be your belief, but it is certainly not mine. There is, perhaps, a One True Way. Relativism simply doesn't hold to reason. I won't digress into my reasons though.

      But the difference between people of religious zeal and others who do, in fact, believe in a One True Way is a lack of humility. While complete humility of one's beliefs is almost impossible, it is essential to be humble enough to know that even if you believe there is a One True Way, you aren't completely sure what it is. It is better, IMHO, to pretend to be Socrates and be wise simply by admitting to knowing nothing. That is true wisdom.

      So if you want to argue about the ethics of abortion, you must argue it rationally. There IS a single correct answer to this ethical problem. We just have to find it.

      As far as tolerance of beliefs goes, you must not be completely tolerant. Most people use such a politically loaded word as "tolerance" as a boolean value. Its not and it mustn't be. I have no tolerance for religious jihad's or international terrorism, no matter what belief system they are rationalized by.

      My level of tolerance is what I would call Americanized beliefs. This goes right back to the subject line of this thread, but we Americans are for the most part able to live with other Americans with quite a diversity of beliefs. We have Muslims living in our country who don't seem so interested in attacking countries who aren't theocracies. Black people and women have all the legal rights the rest of us do. We have Christians who aren't hanging witches and seem to have a good amount of tolerance for homosexuals.

      So Americanization changes people's beliefs to be compatible with each other.

      This, I believe, is a good thing.

    13. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by extrasolar · · Score: 2

      "What is used to determine truth?"

      I don't know. In some ways, determining truth is impossible. Like how do you know you're not the star in The Truman Show or trapped in the Matrix? But just because it may be impossible to tell what truth is doesn't mean they are all true to each individual, as is the meaning of relativism. And given that some truths may be impossible to know, what benefit do our beliefs grant us?

  16. Bhutanese Culture will cease to exist. by Zarf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Just like I've seen the culture of a small Alaskan village cease due to the introduction of T.V. So will the culture of Bhutan. This letter to the editor is very convincing on that point.

    When I was young, we were Alaskans. We had our own culture and music both the old (native alaskans) and the new Russians and Americans had forged a unique identity that was Alaskan. Then TV came. By the time I left High School you could see the changes.

    My point is well illustrated by this story:
    I graduated high school in 1992, the kids from our class did the Christmas dance theme on some cute "Stairway to Heaven" or other schmaltzy thing. The kids that were class of 1994 did "Christmas in da 'Hood". The '94 kids had gang violence in their classrooms. Kids bringing guns to school (with the intent of shooting other kids and not to show off their new hunting rifle), weapons, and grafiti became problems.

    The ironic thing was that the younger classes were smaller ours was the largest graduating class.

    I remember all the Rappers and the oppressed gansta' types sulking about the remote and wild wilderness of one of the remotest places on earth. Some people run away to the untouched beauty of Alaska to escape inner-city grime. How ironic that an aspiring young rap-star would be cursed with living in a place where there was hardly any crime and the government paid you to live there.

    If religion is the opiate of the masses, then television is the crystal-meth of the glue huffing, crack-smoking, I-got-the-munchies masses.

    --
    [signature]
    1. Re:Bhutanese Culture will cease to exist. by Zarf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not that it's a bad thing ofcourse. A single world-culture and a single world language would be good for trade. I still own a TV and I watch it BTW and I think that a strong mind can use TV rather than be used by it.

      I just don't hold any illusions that you can preserve a local culture under the constant wash of TV. It just is as it is. TV's unblinking eye serves us well in many ways. As it connects it also provides a common experience to all who are watching, the common experience causes common culture. Just how GNU/Linux has a culture formed about it, and TV shows tend to spawn sub-cultures too (ie: Star Trek, Star Wars, et al.).

      So maybe I'm being a bit harsh with my last post. Still, it is sad to see the end of a culture. Just like it was sad to see the end of Amiga, OS2, or Novell.

      --
      [signature]
  17. Nothing on TV, and you still pay for it?? by Flounder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    After realizing that I never watched TV anyway, and the kids were watching too much, I disconnected the cable.

    Got internet for news, info, and entertainment. The kids now spend more time playing outside and reading. The only thing I really miss is sports (no big deal, as I hate all the local teams here in Maryland) and 24hr news (at least have the net).

    Still have the TV (gotta watch DVDs and the kids still have the kiddie movies). But it mostly stays off now. It's nice.

    Granted, instead of spending $40 a month on cable, I'm spending $100+ a month on DVDs.

    --

    No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

    1. Re:Nothing on TV, and you still pay for it?? by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      (* I disconnected the cable....The kids now spend more time playing outside and reading. *)

      Younger kids who cannot really read yet can be a pain in the bleep, and the TV seems to be the only thing that calms them down at times.

      True, if you interacted with them, they would probably mellow a bit also.

      However, it takes a lot of discipline for me to play butterfly for 2 hours. After a while you say to yourself, "I'm turning into another F__ Barney!" and turn on the tube for the brats.

    2. Re:Nothing on TV, and you still pay for it?? by Angst+Badger · · Score: 2

      I haven't watched TV -- except, I must confess, for four seasons of The X Files -- since 1990. I don't miss it. When I do have occasion to be near a TV, I have the same feeling I had hanging out with stoners after I had quit smoking pot: man, was I really that stupid?

      The only problem I have is that my coworkers and many of my casual acquaintances use TV as the same kind of common cultural touchstone as previous generations did with art and literature. I remember this was particularly annoying while Seinfeld was on the air. But even then, someone usually recited the entire plot and most of the dialogue, thereby relieving me of the need to actually watch, for example, the "Soup Nazi" episode.

      --
      Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    3. Re:Nothing on TV, and you still pay for it?? by Flounder · · Score: 2

      You'd be amazed at how much quicker your kids learn to read when they're not watching TV all day. I speak from personnal experience.

      I've got three boys. Twin 5 year olds, and a 2 year old. The twins started learning to read when they were 3. Once the TV went off permanently, their reading skills shot through the roof. I actually caught one of my five year olds reading my copy of Lord of the Rings. LOTR!! That in itself is worth not having cable TV. The 2 year old is even picking up on the reading now.

      I have learned this in the last few months. Thousands of generations of children were raised to be intelligent successful adults without TV. Why do our kids need it now??

      The kids do get the occasional movie on video if they have earned it through helping around the house and generally being very well behaved.

      --

      No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

    4. Re:Nothing on TV, and you still pay for it?? by Flounder · · Score: 2

      Several people have mentioned NetFlix instead of my $100/mo DVD habit. I also have that, I use it for movies I've never seen before. However, alot of movies I want to permanently have.

      Besides, with all of the box sets coming out, $100/mo really isn't much. Hell, it's not even the 10th and I'm already almost to my $100 limit.

      LOTR Widescreen
      Simpsons Season 2 Box
      SuperTroopers
      Blackhawk Down
      Dogma
      Vulgar

      Some months are going to kill me, like Nov of this year. LOTR:FOTR Platinum, Star Wars Ep3, Spiderman, Band of Brothers box set

      --

      No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

  18. Re:What's with the quotes? by tunah · · Score: 2

    Um... the simpsons spends half its shows making fun of american culture. I love the simpsons, but there must be a better example.

    --
    Free Java games for your phone: Tontie, Sokoban
  19. Bhorgtan by Zephy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "THIMPHU, Bhutan -- Microsoft's latest venture is a localized version of its dominant Windows operating system for the tiny Himalayan kingdom of Bhutan. "

    Article Here

    1. Re:Bhorgtan by sql*kitten · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "THIMPHU, Bhutan -- Microsoft's latest venture is a localized version of its dominant Windows operating system for the tiny Himalayan kingdom of Bhutan. "

      Is there a Bhutan-localized version of Red Hat?

      That's a rhetorical question.

      Which brings me nicely to my point: it is literally impossible for a capitalist culture to force itself on another culture. Capitalists can advertise products and services for sale but cannot force anyone to buy; the only people that eat at McDonalds, drink Starbucks, watch Disney and so forth are people who want to and are willing to pay with their own money.

      If people don't want to buy, corporations will collapse and leave. The only people who complain aren't the ones freely spending their own money on what they enjoy. Rather, they are the self-proclaimed elite, those who don't offer anything that their people actually want, and can only survive where there is no competition. An example of this is the way the French taxpayer has to subsidise the production of French films, but with the money they are allowed to keep, they queue up to watch films from Hollywood.

      Imperialism is something different. Imperialism is when one country conquers another with military force, forming an empire, and imposes its culture on the conquered. Imperial means "to do with an empire". Examples of imperialism are, for example, the conquests of eastern European countries and the imposition of Communism by the Soviets.

      So I applaud the government and people of Bhutan - and the global corporations - for bringing freedom and choice to the most remote parts of the world.

    2. Re:Bhorgtan by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
      "it is literally impossible for a capitalist culture to force itself on another culture."

      Ye gods. Nice oversimplification of psychology! Nice resolute ignoring of history and current freaking events, guy. You're playing logical games- go learn about 'game theory' and get it through your head that there is such a thing as non-optimal outcomes. You're insisting on a religious faith in stuff that is not backed up by reality, and every bit of it is to defend your little axiom, that cannot be questioned, that capitalists cannot possibly influence or direct a market other than to offer goods and services.

      Post-Enron that sounds freaking insane- and that's just one side of things. People have been studying the psychological manipulation of 'consumers' (the word alone is a bias) for DECADES, how is it that you know nothing of this?

      Damn randite. "no no, there is no such thing as force unless you point a gun at somebody!" You just keep on quote "applauding global corporations" unquote and let's hope enough people notice that and recognize you for what you are. You are not the apex of enlightenment, and your opinions are not the height of wisdom. They are brainwashed foolishness.

    3. Re:Bhorgtan by sql*kitten · · Score: 2

      Nice resolute ignoring of history and current freaking events, guy. You're playing logical games- go learn about 'game theory' and get it through your head that there is such a thing as non-optimal outcomes. You're insisting on a religious faith in stuff that is not backed up by reality, and every bit of it is to defend your little axiom, that cannot be questioned, that capitalists cannot possibly influence or direct a market other than to offer goods and services.

      I stand by what I said. The US military can invade Iraq and install a puppet regime, but can you imagine them corralling Iraqis into line at the newly opened Baghdad McDonalds? Of course not. Now if you're saying a corporation can bribe a government into doing something, that's true. But if the government's open to bribery, then any corporation who doesn't play along is at risk from their rivals getting there first.But that's just the corporation making the best of the murky environment it finds itself in.

      Church and state were long ago separated; time for economy and state to be uncoupled also.

      Post-Enron that sounds freaking insane- and that's just one side of things. People have been studying the psychological manipulation of 'consumers' (the word alone is a bias) for DECADES, how is it that you know nothing of this?

      Yes, it's called advertising. The worst it can do to you is annoy you. It can't make you do anything you don't want to do - and that's a fact.

      And what has Enron got to do with anything? Enron is proof that the system works: they tried to break the law, they got caught, they got busted. That's the beauty of the capitalist system, if you set it up right, it's self-regulating.

  20. Re:Ah yes! by SerpentMage · · Score: 2

    Your comment would make a lot more sense if it actually were Europeans making the comments. Check the facts a bit. The site hosting the article is PBS, which is American. And the people writing the stories are Americans. So no Europeans here!

    --

    "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
    "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
  21. Even worse !! by Salsaman · · Score: 2

    As if that weren't bad enough, Bill Gates won't leave them alone either

  22. TV--the great equalizer. by quintessent · · Score: 2

    So the rich will raise children on WWF, Martha Steward, and boy bands. After a generation or so, rich IQs will be cut in half, and the poor will begin to replace them in the high-paying jobs until they too can afford TV...

  23. Re:Hmm by SerpentMage · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think the problem with American culture is that it tends suck you in and forget about the others.

    Let me give you an example. In the US there is a wine company that sells itself as Cabris, which is actually a region in France that is know to sell a good white wine. Well the American company took advantage of this to "con" people. The French region on the other hand has problems now because people get confused by the marketing message.

    The problem of American culture is not the American's themselves, but the companies that take advantage of situations. Corporations in their quest for profits and bigger market share do not care a rat's butt about culture. Just more money. And in the past that has not been a problem. But now in a global economy that is a problem. Since it means some things will be lost, even though they should not be.

    The American corporations are just too damm efficient at taking over the world. Result is hatred. Whenever you see people hating America, do you see people hating individual American's? Nope just icons, flag, McDonalds, jeans, etc.

    I think that the challenge of this century will not be tech, or political, but social. This century will be the century when humanity is tested to see if we can truly live together! Or if we are doomed to be fighting each other. We have the technology to destroy each other and we have the means to live together.

    --

    "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
    "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
  24. cultural memetics by shomon2 · · Score: 2

    Yes, I'm not "American" (well I am, I'm south american, but in the states people take that name to mean them. In Chile, "America" means the continent). It's not about it being right or wrong, but it's the fact that it influences other people's culture. And the point that you can then argue is wether those other cultures should survive, be preserved, or if they are subject to "survival of the fittest".

    As far as I'm concerned, one of my cultures was destroyed when the spaniards invaded northern chile and bolivia, and huge areas of that culture are now gone. But even though I've never even spent more than a couple of days in the places where my ancestors lived, I can still pick up a book or search the internet and learn about it. So yes, preserve it, but no, don't force people to keep it while they want to watch WWF, eat at McDonalds or whatever else.I don't want to impose my judgement on that. Otherwise you're teaching people to see their culture as obligatory...

  25. ups and downs by zephc · · Score: 2

    downsides:
    - WWE (formerly the WWF)
    - The Anna Nicole Smith Show
    - Jackass
    - Springer/Oprah/etc.
    - FOX News

    upsides:
    - Simpsons
    - Red Dwarf
    - Cartoon Network's Adult Swim
    - MST3K

    --
    "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    1. Re:ups and downs by zephc · · Score: 2

      yes yes i KNOW red dwarf is from the UK, I'm just using it as an example of good, innovative TV. This is a list of TV in general that I like (and dislike), not strictly American TV *sigh*

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
  26. Read Kuensel by rpjs · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you want a glimpse of Bhutan, read their national newspaper Kuensel on the web. It's in English and it gives a fascinating insight into a country that's still trying to take on the modern world on its own terms.

    And it uses Slash.

  27. WWF by oliverthered · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's good to see that the people of Bhutan keep up with there budist nature and look after pandas and the wildlife...

    didn't you mean WWE

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  28. Clasification for Bhutan by oliverthered · · Score: 2

    pure and uncorrupt, just like a lot of africa etc ..... a hundred and a bit years ago.

    As a gross overstatement Africa hasn't become poor, it's become greedy.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  29. Television is like Alcohol by jafuser · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Lately, I like to consider watching television and/or movies, the same as most people think of the consumption of alcoholic beverages. It's fine to do it socially, while in the company of friends or family, but taking in too much (especially while you're only by yourself), is not good for you.

    --
    Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
  30. A sudden revelation by forkboy · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    As I was reading through these posts, wondering why American culture has spread so virally throughout the rest of the modern world, it struck me as to WHY foreign governments don't seem to be saying a while lot about it: Control.

    Think about it....has the American populace ever been so apathetic and easily manipulated as we have in the last 25 years? Our political and corporate leasership gets progressively worse and worse and yet the same people keep getting re-elected into office and appointed to positions of trust. This is a fucking wet dream not only for corrupt despots of all kinds in the rest of the world, but other so-called democracies and republics that don't want all the hassle that comes with actually appeasing people through honesty and care for citizens' well being.

    "Fuck it", they say, "let em watch TV so we can manipulate their views with mass media and satiate their desires by making them think they have to have all the useless crap that's advertised...they'll feel their needs are met when they make a few purchases."

    It's made most of us lazy, greedy, and apathetic...hardly anyone votes anymore and most of the ones that do cannot be bothered to think about who they're voting for, they just vote for whatever party they decided they liked in high school civics class. No one takes an interest in their community anymore. How many of you can say you know the names of all your neighbors? How many of you care? By this loss of sense of community and the artificial contentment that arises from being a "consumer", we don't take nearly as much of an active part in what's going on around us, community or government. Local or National.

    Don't let it fool you...American culture is about being controlled while at the same time feeling like you're the one in charge. You ARE in charge...of what channels you watch and what merchandise you buy. I have genuine respect for those who are willful enough to avoid watching television, or better yet, do not own one. When the revolution comes, you'll be the ones who aren't watching it on CNN.

    Happiness can't be found in catch phrases, soft drinks, feel-good tv shows, or pop music. I feel sorry for the people of Bhutan. It sounds like it used to be a nice place.

    --
    This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
    1. Re:A sudden revelation by Tyrell+Hawthorne · · Score: 3, Interesting
      If you only knew how right you are... Everybody, think about this question for a while:

      In which society is propaganda most important, in a dictatorship or a democracy?

      For more on this subject, read Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky's Manufacturing Consent, which explains how the seven media filters make sure nothing nasty (like, for instance, the truth) reaches the public. It's a quite heavy book to read, but very interesting.

      Also, for brilliant US political satire comics, something I discovered yesterday: This Modern World, by Tom Tomorrow. (I don't think the penguin is related to Linux though.)

    2. Re:A sudden revelation by osolemirnix · · Score: 2

      Yeah dude, old Julius Caesar figured this one out too, he called it "bread and games". So in other words, give your people jobs/consumer goods and entertainment and you can pretty much rule as you like.

      Interesting to note though, that it was the King of Bhutan who resisted this for so long. Sounds like a good leader to me (tries to do what's in the best interest of his people). So maybe all is not lost for Bhutan.

      --

      Idempotent operation: Like MS software, wether you run it once or often, that doesn't make it any better.
    3. Re:A sudden revelation by Skip666Kent · · Score: 2

      It's not entertainment opiates that make for an 'apathetic' populace, it's FOOD.

      We're not hungry, we're not angry, at least not for any appreciable amount of time. That why Saddam Hussein and African Dictators starve their own people, to encourage misery and dissent which can be used to blame and destroy the cultural 'enemy' of their choosing.

      If and when the Revolution comes, the New Boss will be much worse than the Old Boss, believe you me. Ideology thrives on mountainous piles of human meat and oceans of blood, because the End is always deemed as more important than the means.

      Kicking the TV habit and getting to know your neighbors are things we each do ourselves by choice. The minute you try to mandate such things you have created a State. Feed people, educate them in the basics and then let them live. If their idea of living is endless rounds of WWF, then so be it. You and I have come to find greater value in other things, but that does not mean that we are superior.

      --
      **>>BELCH
    4. Re:A sudden revelation by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 2

      How can a single persons decision ever be in the best interest of the people? That's an amazingly elitest and aristocratic view of things. That one man can know what's best for all? Well maybe those TVs will inform the people that they should have more self governance and not continually rely on the whims of one man.

      A lot of the posts here talk about TV as being a tool of the govenment controlling the masses. But in this case (as in many other cases) it may be the opposite.

      Course this gang of idiots (slashdot) here discussing what may or may not be good for Bhutan without knowing a single thing about it, is the very pinnacle of elitism. It's sickening!

      --
      Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
  31. Re:time heals all wounds by echucker · · Score: 2

    The article made the Bhutanese people seem, to me, like America's children. But in a few years, hopefully the novelty will wear off, and Bhutan won't lose its rich culture to Sex in the City and MTV.

    By the time you stop watching, it's already too late. TV has had its effect on you during your formative years, and your adult life will be forever shaped by it.

  32. Will Thee Move Thy Horseless Carriage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't know, the Amish have been doing a pretty good job of preventing their culture from becoming "Americanized" as far as I can tell, and they live in America.

  33. Homogonized Culture by Ezubaric · · Score: 3, Insightful


    These fears aren't just about Bhutan. If anything, America faces as great a threat from the death of local culture as anywhere else. The only difference is that we delude ourselves into thinking that raking in money makes it all "okay."

    Sure, we feel more comfortable when we travel when we can order the same extra value meal in in every time zone, but I can only echo the sentiments of Lisa on the variety of Americana:

    Lisa: Wow, Dad and Bart have been everywhere! They've eaten submarine sandwiches, grinders, *and* hoagies.

    Damn. I guess I've been taken in by the tentacles too. I guess it's okay as long as I can super-size.

    --

    ----------
    I am an expert in electricity. My father held the chair of applied electricity at the state prision.
  34. Re:Hmm by Angry+Toad · · Score: 2

    Actually I think this is all a pretty interesting issue. What is it about the influence of American culture that makes it so pervasive and insidious that it pretty much instantly infects and metastasizes inside cultures hundreds or even thousands of years older?

    Rationalism? Well, maybe to a degree, but I don't think the WWF, Rosie O'Donnell, and When Aliens Attack IV really represents the height of the Western Rational tradition.

    Freedom? Hmmmm... again maybe to a degree but probably not in the way people are thinking about. Consumerism (of which I freely admit to being an addict as much as the next guy) tends to blur over and confuse itself with Freedom, but it isn't freedom in the same sense that the framers of the constitution thought about. What it is about is a much more elementary and slightly infantile wish for instant gratification and godlike immediate access to all objects of desire. This is a human universal, so the appeal there is obvious...

    The Big Corporate Conspiracy? It always comes up, but moving past the tinfoil-hat brigade there's an element of truth there all the same. Shows and advertisments are both crafted to go under our rational radar and appeal to the idea of the life we wish we had. We tune in to a show or watch a movie because we are entertained - traditional cultural stuff is often enjoyable in a forced and strained way (kind of like a visit with Grandma) but the latest Arnie movie is a cheap date who wants to go home with you right now. Who doesn't like that? The Corporate Media (hate using that term, but let's not pretend it doesn't exist) craft the American Media Experience to appeal instantly to everyone, and they do it in a darwinian environment that encourages doing it better all the time. Can the ten-thousandth retelling of Fred the Barber and His Magic Scissors compete with Sex In The City?

    The real problem with this is that people tend to confuse success with value. I think that's what angers the anti-american-culture reactionaries.

  35. ...and give these to the world. by dpilot · · Score: 2

    Your whole post is great, but these last few words really nail it. The fact is, common Americans have squat to do with "giving our culture to the world." First off, we don't export, big Katzian corporations do. Second off, we don't travel abroad, at least we can't afford to very often, and can't do much personal export.

    So maybe I'd be willing to give some of my culture to the world, but there's not much way or opportunity. Instead we have Disney and AOL/Time Warner selling American "culture", as you say. The key distinction is between "give" and "sell".

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  36. Linux is american!?!?! by jonr · · Score: 2

    WOW, I didnt know that!!!
    Who is this Linus Torvalds then?

  37. Re:Hmm by af_robot · · Score: 2

    Thank you for very intelligent reply and very strong points.

    American culture (mostly the entertainment area) is like cocaine - once you've tried it you can't live without it...It is tailored for the people and sharpened to penetrate instantly into average men's mind.

    It is just like business competition of different cultures.. If your own culture can offer you better or to least same way to live (read entertain) than American's, then it can survive. Otherwise, it is doomed. So don't blame us, you have to offer something better or survive.

    No one really wants to live in a traditional culture without movies, TVs and internet.

  38. Re:Hmm by SerpentMage · · Score: 2

    And here is the point to a T. I drink wine and really like it. But the problem in the wine community is that people in Europe are stuck up about American wines because marketing companies do these dumb stunts. There are good American wines, but those get tarnished by corporations that only see profit. And all of this cummulates into hate of America, when it was just a few dumb companies.

    What I sometimes miss among some American corporations and some American politicians is a global attitude.

    --

    "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
    "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
  39. Mod me "Off Topic" if you will, but... by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've had it up to here (hand waving just over top of head) with people dissing American "culture", as it's always put.

    Let's face it, what passes for culture in, say, Northern Europe is the art produced to the taste of a small elite that maintained its position through violence and threats of violence.

    In much of the rest of the world, what passes for culture involves things like clitorectomy, honor killing of women, huge rates of infant mortality, etc.

    What's America got by comparison? Well, an empowered middle class that gets to do pretty much what it wants. Hence we have backyard barbeques, tailgate parties, Budweiser, The Simpsons, large bellies, and early cholesterol death.

    And guess what? We like it like that!

    Now, don't get me wrong, there is room in the fringes for the next Mozart. In fact, bring it on! If we like it, we'll make you a multi-millionaire.

    You see, that's the beauty of American culture: it's a total democracy of taste, and the mob gets to vote with its pocket book.

    Now, I know that the elites in other parts of the world just totally gnash their teeth at this. That's what elites do when confronted with deomcracy.

    Well, get used to it.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
  40. Don't unplug your TV, don't unplug your mind eithr by FatSean · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You claim that the manipulation of the population of the US has become much more profound in the last 25 years. I think you are being a bit short sighted. You speak of Mass Media manipulating people...but people have been manipulated for eternity. Does being told what to buy and believe become more acceptable when it's the rest of your town/neighborhood doing the telling, rather than a corporation? Your complaints about corrupt polititions being re-elected is also an on-going theme in human government.

    In short, nothing has changed except your perception. Do you truely think that Maw and Paw Kettle out in Bumfuck, ID knew about political scandles back in the 1800's? Of course not, all they knew about washington was reported in a newspaper. A newspaper that 'played nice' with the politicos. Things seem worse because you can see all the bad events, but trust me, this stuff has been going on forever. Do you really think the industrial magnates of the first half of the 20th century were 100% pure? Yeah right! When you own all the steel in the country, you do what you want.

    Don't throw out the TV...maybe turn off the cable. Just remember that it's all entertainment. Even the 'news', and especially CSPAN!

    --
    Blar.
  41. Europe got culture? by marlowe · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh, boy. I am such a redneck. I need to put on a Kraftwerk CD and read some gibberish by Derrida. And then maybe go out and pogrom a few Jews. Then I'll be suave and sophisticated.

    And now is the time on Sprockets where we go on about how much more culture we have than the Americans.

    Okay, I'll grant Europe had a fine culture, once. Operas and architecture and symphonies and everything. But that was a gosh-darn long time ago. Let's just face it. Europe has been in decline, culturally and politically, for about a century now.

    I can get Beethoven, Mozart and Sibelius on CD. I can get the Dutch masters in high quality reproduction. I can even get the worthless crap the French are passing off as philosophy these days, though there's not much point. Who needs Europe anymore? It's all used up.

    Nowadays, someone mentions European culture, and what comes to mind is the topless aerobics in that Chevy Chase movie. Just think, honey. They've been doing this for eons!

    --
    http://www.angelfire.com/ca3/marlowe Better a smartass than a dumbass.
  42. McDonalds... by jonr · · Score: 2

    Whats wrong with McDonalds? Tasteless, bland, small, factory-style food. Here we have local hamburger joint, ironically named "American Style" where you can get hamburgers like god intended them to be. Big, juicy and with TASTE! Something that McDonalds totally forgot.
    But of course the sheeps go to McDonalds with their screaming kids. I have taken a vow to never set a foot inside McDonalds again!

    1. Re:McDonalds... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      Whats wrong with McDonalds? Tasteless, bland, small, factory-style food. Here we have local hamburger joint, ironically named "American Style" where you can get hamburgers like god intended them to be. Big, juicy and with TASTE! Something that McDonalds totally forgot.
      You have to understand that if Wac Donald's (or Burper King for that matter) would make hamburgers that did taste something, the taste would be bound to displease some people. So, in order to keep market share, hamburgers are totally tasteless in order to offend no one.
  43. The Evil TV plot... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    it's official, there is no escape from American "culture".

    Or Great Britian "culture" or Austrailian "culture" or whatever "culture"

    television is an entertainment device and if people are entertained by "culture" then let them.

    God forbid they discover that the world isnt flat and there are other people in it.. let alone the fact that the people you were bred to hate all your life are not really as bad as your government told you they were... (Go watch some Chinese or Russian Television programmes or movies.)

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  44. Americans who travel abroad by dpilot · · Score: 2

    I'd assert that by the time an American goes abroad, there's already likely been quite a bit of "sorting" done. Those party-hearty young Americans are most likely out of the very wealthy, as are the old energetic. They're not average.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    1. Re:Americans who travel abroad by Afrosheen · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I had to explain this to my wife one time.

      She's from Thailand (Bangkok), and they get their share of American tourists. Her stereotypical idea of an American, based on her experiences, is that of a loud-mouthed, demanding person that's always smacking gum and throwing money around. Once she moved here to the US she saw things alot differently.

      The problem with foreign perception of Americans is that about the only Americans that travel and make it overseas are rich jackasses. They treat people like shit here and going overseas doesn't magically change that. So other countries get the worst upper-crust nimrods and the rest of us nice folks take the rap for them. I think if most foreigners that hate Americans actually come visit Texas or some other state for a year, they'll learn what Americans are really like.

    2. Re:Americans who travel abroad by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 2

      I thought Texas was your holding pen for crazy conservative types (and California for the liberals, respectively) - shouldn't we foreigners visit upper new york state or something? :)

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
  45. Bhutanese football by The+Pim · · Score: 2

    Another curious story about Bhutan.

    --

    The evaluation of an action as 'practical' . . . depends on what it is that one wishes to practice.
  46. Re:What's with the quotes? by moogla · · Score: 2

    At least we know how to laugh at ourselves. Give us that, at least.

    Also, I think "culture" is overrated. I'm creating beautiful disarray, ejaculate meaningless drivel. I like doing whatever the fuck I want when I want, all of the time.

    For example, I like saying fuck. FUCK FUCK FUCK!!!
    Try it, feels gooooood

    --
    Black holes are where the Matrix raised SIGFPE
  47. Re:negative connotation to consolidation by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
    Whoa. On what planet are Buddhist monks the stagnant warmongering old guard, and "Terminator" and the world wrestling federation a 'peaceful world'?

    We in America are a cancerous growth- sort of. We're a hell of a lot like, say, Microsoft- everything will be great if we don't ask any questions, don't stop to think, don't slow down! This masks some fundamental problems with our values.

    There are a lot of places in the world where trying to imitate us in the USA has led to a world of hurt. Attempts to do high-yield agriculture, attempts to use 'free trade' by setting up sweatshops and such things- if our value is just 'MORE' well, that's a problem.

    There was a time when we had much more specific values- 1776. If you read things like the Federalist Papers you'll see the words of people with far more depth to them than you commonly see these days. I have! Everybody here is fond of Jefferson for his thoughts on IP being like a flame that is spread, not diminished, but I'm also a fan of Madison and Federalist #10, and that guy would have understood this situation perfectly. He was the one loudly demanding that the majority be prevented from automatically trampling smaller factions (cultures) just by its own weight. Instead of proposing that Shangri-La be trampled by the weight of Western 'culture' (exactly how do you consider 'Seinfeld' culture? Answer carefully- it's a trick question, and a deeper question than you think), how about devoting some thought to how this 'living meme', Shangri-La, which has echoed throughout culture and literature like some earthly Heaven, can be allowed to retain its own identity? Because IT WANTS TO. It's just that you don't saddle a damned butterfly and expect it to be the same.

    Can't help but be reminded of Douglas Adams' little parable about Fuolornis Fire Dragons...

  48. Didn't we undergo this before?? by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2

    Folks,

    I think the fall of cultural provincialism via the spread of television is not exactly a new phenomenon.

    Think about it: when the Roman Empire spread throughout the Mediterrean, the culture of that empire heavily stomped out most local cultures and/or adapted local cultures to Roman needs. It was this singular culture that allowed Christianity to spread throughout the Empire by the 3rd Century AD.

    When Johann Gutenberg invented the moveable type printing press around 1453, it made it much easier to spread learning around Europe. The ability to print thousands of identical copies of books formed the basis of national culture throughout Europe.

    And from the 1920's on, the rapid deployment of radio did a lot to reduce provincial spoken dialects, especially with national radio networks pretty much forcing people to speak in very few or only one standard dialect(s).

    Television is just only a recent medium that is stomping out cultural provincialism through the world; the Internet is doing the same right now.

  49. Re:Life without TV is good by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
    I do, and I'm an American. I haven't had broadcast TV in my place for over eight years, and when you have 10 times the number of books as you do videos, the videos kinda sit unplayed.

    Of course, I'm one of those freaks supporting Bhutan's desire to not be Westernized, so maybe you shouldn't listen to me. Or maybe it's worth asking 'why does living that small amount more like Shangri-La lead one to understand and sympathise with them more?'

  50. Some people are crazy by Cpl+Laque · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As someone who has actually left the country(USA) and travaled to diffrent parts of the world (mainly asia and the middle east)let me tell you something; US, Canada, England, Australia, and many of the european countries have a good deal of freedoms pretty much in line with the bill of rights none of these countries way out thier in there laws(minus few tech laws but these will get ironed out in time and reps get more tech savvy). When I was in thailand I found it is legal to have sex with very young girls and prostitution is a mojor industry there. Some may say they have the freedom to prostitute themselves others would say its morally objectionable. these are the things that go on in other countries generally I like thai peopel they are friendly and don't look down on you because your american. when I was in japan and hong kong they would not let americans in to certain bars and nightclubs this obviously racism but no one cares. when in the middle east our female marines and sailors could not go out at night becuase they are females. If i was to rank America on personal freedoms she would easily be in the top ten. The U.S. set the standard for personal freedoms for citizens but now I think the Us has been lagging a little bit putting corporate interests ahead of the peoples. Currently this is just a minor nuisance but could get bad if left unchecked. Eventually the world be completely connected ( all hail the internet) . And the best ideas will surface and eventually be accepted. Right now Everything has an American slant to it because Americans and American Corporations get these products and ideas to market to the widest spectrum of people eventually this will change. and we will all be better for it. but whatever ihave to get back to work.

  51. Re:"No Escape from American 'culture'?" by Moridineas · · Score: 2

    I recently visited Egypt, and while there, at least 5 or 6 different times had people come up saying something along the lines of "Hello!! Are you from America? Yes?? Hi Ho Silver!!"

    Very friendly people, and loved trying to use their english, and also saying "Hi ho silver!!!" :)

  52. Export it all by Tony+Shepps · · Score: 2

    I'm sure that following shortly on the heels of WWE and Coca-cola will be the highly judgemental and anti-populist attitudes about such things. Your reaction to these things is also a part of the culture. Meanwhile, we should be kinda happy about the export of these other cultural notes:

    - trial by jury
    - women's rights
    - end of torture
    - highly productive economy
    - separation of church and state
    - education of the masses
    - modern medicine
    - multicultural tolerance ...and much, much more.

  53. Re:What's with the quotes? by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
    The Simpsons is too self-referential as far as culture. It's one big mockery OF Western Culture, but it's fixating on the symptoms.

    I don't like it, but I would say Seinfeld was one of the high points of unmistakably American culture- particularly the famous last episode which illustrates exactly what Seinfeld was about all along. Seinfeld is vicious, mean, cheap, self-absorbed, pitiless, joyless... the few times I saw it I just did NOT 'get' it, I couldn't see what the hell was supposed to be so funny about this hugely popular show. When I read about that final episode, that notorious final episode, then I got it, and I respected the nerve of it. Seinfeld was observational humor on a grand scale, and what was being observed was the practical result of Western culture and values- a fantastic integration of what you might call Western Corporate Capitalism into the characters' very psyches. They were pitiful, utterly isolated- the only interaction they could do with anything was the crudest sort of tearing-down. There were no connections, no social context for them, no home or support- the ultimate nihilism- and the show's observational humor was built on that void, which resonated with the American viewing audience.

    That is why I think 'Seinfeld' is the ultimate expression of American Culture.

    That is also why I think 'American Culture' as it stands today is poisonous and unworthy of being exported. It's like, you could have a form of cancer that infected really well, and spread really fast, making it by far the most efficient organism around- it just kills its host, woopsy. Is that a reason to infect people with it? "Look, it expands really fast! That must mean it's good for you!"

  54. Old joke by r_j_prahad · · Score: 2

    What do I think of American culture?

    I think it would be a good idea.

    Yes, I know it's probably redundant, but if this joke has been posted here then the original is already at -1 and I didn't get a chance to enjoy it again. No culture, no sense of humour, no cuisine... no wonder you people wig out over Monty Python and pizza.

    1. Re:Old joke by geekoid · · Score: 2

      "No culture"
      apparently you have no dictionary:

      culture Pronunciation Key (klchr)
      n.
      The totality of socially transmitted behavior patterns, arts, beliefs, institutions, and all other products of human work and thought.

      by definition, we have culture.
      If you mean arts, well we brought rock and roll to the world. We have produced some damn good movies. some greatmonuments.

      if you mean science, we brought you the internet, put many men on the moon, sent probes out into space, invented hook and loop fastners, etc, etc, etc.

      no sense of humour
      I'd like to see how you came up with this.

      no cuisine
      we have some og the best beef in the world. Some of the best Resturants in the world.

      Pizza is an american dish. It has roots in italy, but its is signifigantly different.

      we have a great many misro culutures, from little tokyo, to little italy. All this things are different facets of the american culture.

      We also have enough culture to understand that other countries produce thing we can enjoy as well, and not deride them of there contibution

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  55. Re:Rumschpringen by SN74S181 · · Score: 2, Informative

    They really played up that 'defame the Amish' show on NPR that you link to. It seemed like the liberals at NPR were actually gleeful in the endless promotional material they played in the weeks before the program. They also allowed the promotional spots to 'lead' the listener to believe the young Amish were engaging in orgies, rather than a little youthful drinking.

    One can reject something one has been exposed to.

  56. Re:Life without TV is good by Steve+B · · Score: 2
    Bhutan's desire to not be Westernized

    A meaningless phrase, as only individuals can have a "desire" for anything. Presumably it is shorthand for "the desire of certain people within Bhutan to prevent anyone in the country from having the option of adopting Western ways".

    --
    /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
  57. This is what's good/bad about the West by duck_prime · · Score: 2, Insightful
    So these people get to watch adverts for cars/food/luxuries that they will not be able to purchase.

    Exactly. And plenty of folks there are going to want to purchase those things. [...]

    And in a few years they're gonna be waking up early every morning and going to a job they hate and busting their butt every friggin' day, just like you & me, to get all that stuff.

    Welcome to the west.
    Just as a thought experiment, I'd like to suggest that one of the great hallmarks of the West is exactly that -- dissatisfaction with who you are, where you are, and what you have.

    This produces drive. Drive to "get ahead", drive to "keep up with the Jonses", drive to get your butt off the sofa and finish that goddamn Great American Novel.

    That a side effect of this institutionalized dissatisfaction is a household full of unneeded, worthless goods is a small price to pay, sez I.
    1. Re:This is what's good/bad about the West by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      So true, so true. The main reason corporate america keeps doing invasive drug screening on prospective employees is to weed out the weed smokers.

      Pot smokers traditionally have little drive for working. They're usually happy to sit on the couch in front of a playstation and make bong loads disappear. If they're late for work, no worry. Miss a day or two? No worry. That's corporate america's biggest enemy: apathy. If you don't care about your job they have no power over you.

      I'm not saying all stoners are lazy bastards, but most stoners would rather do something creative (make a new bong out of odd materials or play hacky sack with friends) than go to work. I can't say I don't blame them. I had my own halcyon days that I'm beginning to miss. Damn this western world.

  58. If only it were true by drox · · Score: 2

    The U.S. has done better than many countries in these areas, but we're far from perfect. Bhutan is far from perfect too. It might be a good idea to consider American failings before allowing the American cultural Juggernaut to roll into one of the last places on the planet that it hasn't already been. That having been said, I doubt that television will be the death knell of Bhutan's culture. There is always the option of not buying a TV set, or not watching it if the village buys one.

    Still I do get tired of listening to defensive-sounding Americans brag about their culture. Like they invented all the things on that list.

    - trial by jury

    A good thing, if you can afford to get that far. Many more court cases are settled without trial (money buys justice) than ever go to trial.

    - women's rights

    U.S. laws protect women's rights to a degree, but there's still no equal rights amendment. And the laws' limited protection does not extend outside the U.S. The culture does, and the culture increasingly objectifies women. What I see happening is the exploitative culture is exported, while the laws that protect against the worst of the exploitation are not.

    - end of torture

    You might want to ask Amnesty International about that. The U.S. does not have a spotless track record, and often exports torture to other countries (avoiding for a moment the issue of whether Britney Spears videos ARE torture)

    - highly productive economy

    Which wouldn't look nearly so productive without the importation of cheap foreign-made goods, made by people who are, in every meaningful way, slaves.

    - separation of church and state

    On paper anyway.

    - education of the masses

    The why do American youth consistently score so very low compared to youth in other countries?

    - modern medicine

    Which is happily exported for a price... that few in Bhutan will ever be able to afford.

    - multicultural tolerance

    If Americans REALLY had multicultural tolerance they'd appreciate other cultures for more than just their restaurants and video games. They might actually learn more about other cultures than what their food tastes like and the names of all the Pokemon. And they wouldn't feel the need to crow all the time about how tolerant they are. It'd be a natural thing, like breathing.

    1. Re:If only it were true by dvdeug · · Score: 2

      U.S. laws protect women's rights to a degree, but there's still no equal rights amendment.

      Can you name another country that has an equal rights amendment?

      - separation of church and state

      On paper anyway.


      And in fact. Whatever fine details of the issue are argued out, the fact is that there is no state church (unlike, for example, England), religion is not taught in schools (except in small backwater towns) (unlike, for example, Germany) and religion cannot be a factor in many things (and usually isn't.)

      - education of the masses

      The why do American youth consistently score so very low compared to youth in other countries?


      If you're comparing the US high schools to the German gymnasium (which is what I understand has been done), then of course US students will score low, as high schools are for all, and the gymnasium is only for the brightest. A fair comparison of all German students with American high school students would reveal that American youth do better on SAT-type material - of course, because the majority of German students go to vocational-type schools.

      In other words, the US tries to educate the masses in a liberal-arts style; if you compare it to other countries that don't do that, your results, if meaningful, will make for lousy soundbytes. Easier just to slap a number on it and not think about the meaning.

  59. Southpark it by Tablizer · · Score: 2


    Let's pass a law that requires all exported media to be labeled as "Made in Canada".

    That way they will blame Canada instead of us. Of course, Canada will be pissed, but we can handle them.

  60. Don't Ghettoize the Bhutanese by duck_prime · · Score: 2, Interesting
    These fears aren't just about Bhutan. If anything, America faces as great a threat from the death of local culture as anywhere else. The only difference is that we delude ourselves into thinking that raking in money makes it all "okay."
    So ... um ...

    What's so great about local culture that it must be preserved At All Costs?

    What if these locals want to watch American television? Who are you to tell them that they are obligated to go meditate on snow or sing Bhutanese chants instead? Are the Bhutanese somehow obligated to maintain their current culture forever? What's it to you? And what happened to the idea of American culture being enriched by the contributions from abroad? Does it only work for us?

    I'm not trying to annoy here, this is a serious question. If so-called cultural imperialism is done by request of the imperialized, what's the damage?
  61. Pop Quiz: by SuuSt · · Score: 2

    When I say WWF what do you think of first:
    a) World Wrestling Federation
    b) World Wildlife Fund

    Aparently British courts believe that most people will answer B and have ruled that the (now) WWE no longer use WWF as people might confuse it with the World Wildlife Fund. It's obviously a bunch of white hairs (literally) frowning upon that rubbish on television in favor of the much more civilized environmentalists. It's not at all different than the myriad domain disputes that populate Slashdot, only this time both companies are big, its just that one is being discriminated against based on their content.

    Of course I don't seriously expect the Slashdot crowd to care about wrasslin', but it's interesting to see that all courts can be dumb when deciding who gets to use what name, not just domain name courts.

    1. Re:Pop Quiz: by k_187 · · Score: 2

      It's obviously a bunch of white hairs (literally) frowning upon that rubbish on television in favor of the much more civilized environmentalists.

      That and the fact that the World Wildlife Fund has been using the monkier WWF longer than the World Wrestling Federation.

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
    2. Re:Pop Quiz: by SuuSt · · Score: 2

      I wasn't going to respond to this until I came to a rather unsettling realization. You are of course right when you say that the World Wildlife Fund had the name first, I'll even grant that they used the acronym first though I'm not sure. Whats got me botehred though, is that I much like a great many other people, applied a good old doulbe standard. I'd rather WWE be able to use the WWF moniker and the World Wildlife Fund just not worry about it. WWE certainly didn't have any complaints with the World Wildlife Fund using the name, the Fund are the folks who made it a binary issue.

      But that's not really the point, the point is that the World Wildlife Fund has as much right to the name as Nissan Computers has to nissan.com. They've got a name, they weren't piggybacking off another companies success, and they got there first. Those are usually the criteria we use when defending some guy with a URL. The wrestling use of WWF is certainly better known, but that argument is the very one we deride when judging cases like the one of nissan.com. Sue nissan motors is better known than nissan computers, but nissan computers has just as much right to the name as the car company.

      So effectively what I've done is picked the guy who I want to win, and geared an argument to defend him. Certainly not uncommon in the world today. Perhaps, and here I'll begin rambling so bear with me or just stop reading, its the fact that the World Wildlife Fund filed the suit claiming the (then) World Wrestling Federation could no longer use their name of 20+ years. At this point I've been conditioned to believe that whoever files a suit is a greedy petty twit who deserves to loose. Stand up comics, SNL, and goobers sueing because McDonalds made them fat have done that. Of course there's lots of valid suits like when my car blows up and kills my dog or something, then that's okay, but the instant I hear "lawsuit" I just say "uggghh..." and tune out. I"m not going to foward a consipiracy theory about how this helps large corps, but it is at least lucky :) Mostly though, it's telling of me, and whoever may be similar to me in this regard.

      Thanks for bearing with me on that. So in conclusion, crow tastes remarkably like chicken...

  62. Re:Hmm by Zemran · · Score: 2, Informative

    Another example would be Buddweiser . I prefer the original but buying the real Buddweiser can get a little confusing especially when the American version calls itself original even though the Czech version has been around longer than America.

    --
    I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
  63. Re:Culture?!? by sugrshack · · Score: 2
    Okay here is a classic misunderstanding of the word "Culture." To say that the US has no culture is ridiculous.

    Here is definition 1. from dictionary.com

    culture Pronunciation Key (klchr) n.

    a) The totality of socially transmitted behavior patterns, arts, beliefs, institutions, and all other products of human work and thought.
    b) These patterns, traits, and products considered as the expression of a particular period, class, community, or population: Edwardian culture; Japanese culture; the culture of poverty.
    c) These patterns, traits, and products considered with respect to a particular category, such as a field, subject, or mode of expression: religious culture in the Middle Ages; musical culture; oral culture.
    d) The predominating attitudes and behavior that characterize the functioning of a group or organization.

    Again to suggest that America has no culture would be to suggest that nobody lives in the US or they have no patterns of behavior.

    --
    I can't believe it's not lard!
  64. Re:BS by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 2

    1.-Think Medicis
    2.-It ain't racist, or even quasi-racist, if it's so. At that point it's an uncomfortable truth for the politically correct.
    3.-Way of life. Culture. What's the diff?
    4.-Oprah.
    5.-I'm have a barbeque tomorrow. Fatty meat and Budweiser. Yummy.

    Th point is that in most of the world, life is mostly vicious, bloody, and short, except for a small elite that occasionally also sponsors the art that becomes viewed as the culture.

    America's broken that. The culture is actually in the hands of the middle class, which has totally bought into life as the pursuit of happiness.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
  65. Re:Hmm...differences... by SerpentMage · · Score: 2

    And there you fell for the trap. Hook line and sinker! Thanks...

    The problem is that you think that French and California Cabris are two single distinct entities. When in fact a California Cabris is a single grower with a trademark like Coca Cola and a French Cabris has many growers. And just like you said now with your diference you will associate one bad French Cabris as all French Cabris being bad, since there is only a French Cabris and a Californian Cabris.

    --

    "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
    "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
  66. Re:Hmm by SerpentMage · · Score: 3, Insightful

    First that is a very narrow minded attitude. This is the reason why people get annoyed at American attitudes. Yes people want some parts of the American dream. But there is nothing wrong with that. Just like how Americans want part of the European dream, by driving European vehicles or using Swiss Showers (which btw I have no idea ever existed and I live in Switzerland).

    The problem is that many American corps have an in your face attitude, whereas other global companies are not quite that bad. Consider Nestle, which is the biggest producer of food globally and they produce an almost majority of the processed food consumed by Americans. Does the average American know that? Not likely because Nestle is very deversified and adjusts their food to local cultures. Then consider Walmart, which tries to do everything their way. It works in the US, partially Canada and partially Mexico, but they are getting their butt kicked in Europe. Consider the opposite case of Carrefour which is kicking Walmarts butt globally by respecting local cultures. Not all American corps do this. A prime example are the music labels and MTV. They adjust their content respective to each country. In India MTV is VERY different than MTV in America or MTV in Europe. MTV adjusts to local tastes and languages. Or even CNN. CNN Europe (CNN Spain, CNN Italy, CNN Germany) is not CNN America.

    That is my point. There are ways to become a dominate company globally...

    --

    "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
    "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
  67. Re:Hmm by geekoid · · Score: 2

    I find it interesting that people from other country use McDonalds as an example of whats 'bad' with american culure. Yet enough people in other countries still go to one to keep them in epanding further.
    If it is so terrible, why are there lines?

    If it wasn't for the spread of American culture, the Cold war would still be on.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  68. Hahaha by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    I don't even want to think about that.

    I get my valuesystem from the web and thats the way I likes it

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  69. Well, not exactly by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    Taliban Afghanistan banned television before legalized it. So you could have moved from Butan to Afghanistan. If you wanted to.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  70. Re:What I think will survive: by Saeger · · Score: 2
    Musicmachines - Pop music composed and performed by digital stars, RIAA introduces bill banning non- organic musicians.

    You're right on about that one - for at least some types of music isn't too terribly difficult to automatically sythesize on-the-fly according to taste.

    Also, I'd add "Pornmachines" to that list a little later... then I'd get to be director. :)

    --

    --
    Power to the Peaceful
  71. Re: opposites by Sharkeys-Day · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What is the opposite of "pro-life"?

    "anti-life" or "pro-death"?

  72. The problem with Coke. by Apuleius · · Score: 2

    APart from the health issues of marketing
    caffeinated sugar water, there's the Coke
    company's responsibility for the decline of
    Indonesia's tea-related traditions, for example.

    1. Re:The problem with Coke. by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      1. There are no health issues in marketing caffeinated sugar water, only health issues from drinking TOO MUCH of such a product.

      2. My point was Coke is a nice American tradition. I didn't say it was a good tradition in Indonesia. Apparantly people like Coke more than tea, that's what happens when people are exposed to more choices. As far as I know, you are still able to observe tea-related traditions in Indonesia if you'd like.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
  73. Exactly! by Apuleius · · Score: 2

    And the same applies to Native Americans
    and many others in the US. Soon the Bhutanese
    will decide what is worth preserving and
    they will hold on to it despite having
    ready access to things like WWF.

  74. yeh by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    But they didn't lose controll untill 2001, so you could have goten 2 more years of of freedom from other people watching TV if you had wanted to.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  75. Re:Whoa whoa whoa hotshot... by SuuSt · · Score: 2

    Sorry if I gave the impression that I was insulting wrestling, I use the term "wrasslin" purley out of affection. Though this is neither the topic nor the forum, I've got the karma to burn so who cares. I too am a fan of our beloved "sports entertainment" even during the last year or so of its doldrums. I've watched the mess that was the ungodly wcw/ecw invasion and the crap that followed. All so I could occasionally get a good Kurt Angle or Chris Benoit match.

    Wrestling is one of those interesting things (at least to me) whose value can't really be explained. It's grown men in their underwear pretending to fight, and yet theres something more to it. Something that makes 4 hours of crappy television worth 15 minutes of gold. In few other venues of entertainment would the fans say "this products sucks and I do not enjoy watching it," and yet continue to watch. It's because at some point, be it when you met the much maligned Von Erics, or when I saw the Undertaker debut (on TV, never been to a live show) something so enjoyable happens that you're desperate to get that back.

    I'm a fan of football and baseball, yet what are often heralded as some of the greatest moments in those sports (such as Oaklands game saving catch over the wall a couple of nights ago) can't begin to compare with the elation I feel when watching RVD and Eddie Gurrero in a ladder match. I knew who was going to win that match before it started, just like you know the good guy is going to win at the end of practically every movie you see, but it's the process of getting from the beginning to the inevitable end that you're interested in.

    Saddly, it seems like the true artists in wrestling have never really gotten their fair shake in the big times, they sit somewhere in the middle of the card providing the real entertainment, while the guys who can talk decently get the top story lines and drive the shows. Granted it would probably be a dull time if all we got was technical wrestling. After all, we need to have some idea of why these two men in their underwear are pretending to fight.

    Anyway, all that aside, I don't "suggest" anyone try to like wrestling. It's like Linux or vi, you know what it is and what it's all about. If your the kind of person who would be interested in one of those things you'll eventually find your way to, no amount of forcing someone to use either or watch wrestling is going to make them like it.

  76. Re:Whoa whoa whoa hotshot... by SuuSt · · Score: 2

    I find it funny that despite my defence of it, and how much I enjoy parts of wrestling, stating such things still caries a stigma like no other. You can be a fan of allot of silly or lude things and not get half the ridicule you'll draw by stating you are a fan of wrestling. Everyone just assumes your that you're an idiot who thinks it's real, or phenominally childish. I guess wrestling earned it's reputation though, considering such a large amount of the show is very childish... oh well, such is life.

  77. Re:free by oliverthered · · Score: 2

    Well it works like this,

    People who think xyz are evil and should be shunned.
    so you keep your thoughts inside your head where know-one will see them.

    Are you free?

    In the EU it is a criminal offence to say the the holocast never happened, even if you believe that to be the case.

    You can't call that freedom?

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.