Slashdot Mirror


Penguin Airlines

An anonymous reader writes "DesktopLinux.com interviews Chris Stevens, President of Penguin Airlines about his young venture's business model that includes using Linux in all aspects from the ground up -- from desktops to the reservations system! 'Tux' is more than just a name for this new air taxi service which brings convenient, economical, time-saving air travel via the shortest route between home and destination." They wrote an essay about their business plans, and their heavily computerized jets look nifty as well. CD:Those interested in the aviation side of things should check out James Fallows book "Free Flight" as well.

196 comments

  1. sounds like a joke to me! by TomRitchford · · Score: 0

    that's hardly a business model, now is it?

    1. Re:sounds like a joke to me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux controlling our skies? Might as well stop all airborne travel.

    2. Re:sounds like a joke to me! by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Linux controlling our skies? Might as well stop all airborne travel."

      I wouldn't go that far, but you would need to know Bernoulli's Law to board the plane.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:sounds like a joke to me! by purpledinoz · · Score: 1

      Sounds like something that would get unlimited investor funding for the dot-com days. If I were an investor, I would run away from this with my arms flailing, screaming like a little girl. Using Linux as an advertising gimick is ridiculous for this kind of stuff.

    4. Re:sounds like a joke to me! by mikehoskins · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I'd need to know more about it, before I judged it.

      If he's saving mega bucks on software, hardware, licensing, maintenance, down time, etc., on systems where your life does not depend on it, then great. Remember that airlines all over the world are going bankrupt, merging, needing yet another loan, etc.

      Using Linux everywhere could save megabucks.

    5. Re:sounds like a joke to me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wish him the best of luck. I live here in Albuquerque and the roll-out of the first flyable Eclipse 500 was the big local story of the day. However, there are questions about the viability of the Eclipse company. It seems that one of their first customers, a similar yet-to-fly- a-passenger air taxi company, ordered an unbelievable amount of planes, like 1,000 units. That air taxi company failed to put up the down payment and has now pretty much disappeared from the scene.
      Penguin Airlines is betting their company on an unproven business plan in a very shakey air travel market, an untested aircraft that won't have FAA cert for many months, and that a lot aviation pros say can't be built for the low price (under a million) that Eclipse is selling them for. I'm glad that they are using Linux but I sure wouldn't want to be their financial backer.

  2. Hate to be obvious... by dagoalieman · · Score: 5, Funny

    But Penguins don't fly....

    I hope they have better luck than the real birds.

    --
    We don't need no Net Explorer We don't need no Thought control
    1. Re:Hate to be obvious... by Kenja · · Score: 5, Funny

      Penguins, like pigs, in fact can fly. It's just a matter of applying enough force. I recommend a tin foil jacket and a gause gun.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    2. Re:Hate to be obvious... by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      Penguins, like pigs, in fact can fly. It?s just a matter of applying enough force. I recommend a tin foil jacket and a gause gun.

      Or,as said in Chicken Run: THRRRRUUUSSSST!

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    3. Re:Hate to be obvious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They "fly" under water...

    4. Re:Hate to be obvious... by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      But Penguins don't fly

      Niether do flowers, yet that is what Hawaii Airlines has as a logo.

      BTW, Does Linus Travolds fly for free?

    5. Re:Hate to be obvious... by strredwolf · · Score: 2

      Penguins fly... ...in water. Ask any animal researcher!

      --

      --
      # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
      $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
    6. Re:Hate to be obvious... by GrenDel+Fuego · · Score: 1

      Does this mean that Pengiun Airlines has submarines instead of planes?

    7. Re:Hate to be obvious... by JFMulder · · Score: 4, Funny

      Anything can fly, you just have to forget you're falling...

    8. Re:Hate to be obvious... by egreB · · Score: 1

      Well, to take your comment and sig into consideration, your a bit wrong.

      It's not about forgetting that you're falling, it's about forgetting to hit the ground.

      If you fall, and during the fall get distracted to a such degree that you forget all about hitting the ground, you fly.

    9. Re:Hate to be obvious... by dagoalieman · · Score: 2

      I went out and got some reynolds wrap and started shootin...

      So far, I've only been able to produce what golfers know as a "worm burner."

      Of course, seeing the target windows across the field, I think I'm doomed for a crash anyway. I hear penguins are right up there next to humming birds and robins when it comes to large windows with blue reflections...

      .

      --
      We don't need no Net Explorer We don't need no Thought control
    10. Re:Hate to be obvious... by zaffir · · Score: 1

      Well, technically it's about throwing yourself at the ground and missing. Forgetting that you're falling is merely a tactic for missing.

      --
      "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
    11. Re:Hate to be obvious... by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1

      yup.

      (someone had to say it)

    12. Re:Hate to be obvious... by IXI · · Score: 1

      They advertise "travel via the shortest route". Depending on the distance this will quite likely be under the surface due to the spherical shape of the earth.

      --
      He saw some dirty arabs and fired. Too bad it was just some friendly kurds, BBC reporters and his fellow cowboys.
    13. Re:Hate to be obvious... by Analog+Penguin · · Score: 1

      Probably not. Linus Torvalds, on the other hand, has a better shot at it ;)

    14. Re:Hate to be obvious... by grazzy · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm the CEO of a newly founded company called "BSOD Airlines", in answear to the parent post, yes we do infact run Windows 95 on every machine we have - from black boxes (which are very black btw) to control systems.

      Yes, Bill Gates DOES fly for free.

  3. Get it out of the way by GoodWebDesigns · · Score: 5, Funny

    Upside: An airline that never crashes. Downside: Who wants uptimes that last for months?

    --
    Let me design your website. www.navalswebdesigns.webhop.biz
    1. Re:Get it out of the way by unicron · · Score: 3, Funny

      The upside: Perfect flying record.

      The downside: Takes a team of 4 people reading faqs for 2 hours just to figure out how to get the damn landing gear to retract.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    2. Re:Get it out of the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, as long as there are no web servers (like the one that is down right now) on the plane we're safe.

    3. Re:Get it out of the way by casings · · Score: 1

      Howto: Land this Plane using Kernel 2.4.18.

      or how about

      landinggear --help

    4. Re:Get it out of the way by realdpk · · Score: 3, Funny

      Only to then find out that Linus has deemed the previous method for retracting landing gear "inefficient" and that you'll be lucky if it works at all. There'll be a new way to do it. If you're lucky, you'll run across this obscure e-mail somewhere on Google.

    5. Re:Get it out of the way by dillon_rinker · · Score: 1, Troll

      Takes a team of 4 people reading faqs for 2 hours just to figure out how to get the damn landing gear to retract.

      ...but the landing gear on the airplanes that THOSE people operate will NEVER fail.

      MS: Click here to retract landing gear.
      Q105832 The "Click here to retract landing gear" button has no corresponding button to deploy landing gear. This will be addressed in the next hotfix or service pack or feature upgrade or automatic update. Please remain in the air until this is released. Your purchase is important to us.

      Linux: OK, now that you've finished studying physics, chemistry, metallurgy, aeronautical engineering, and CNC mill operation (ie how to machine your own parts from raw bits of metal - preferable ones you cast yourself, but if you want to be a non-free kinda guy you can buy the metal), it should be obvious to you that turning this crank will open/close the landing bay doors while lowering/raising the landing gear, depending on whether you turn it clockwise/counterclockwise. Visit the GNOME project for instructions on installing an electric motor with a button that will retract the landing gear. There's not a corresponding instructions for installing a motor for deployment because MS aircraft don't work that way, but feel free to turn the crank manually.

    6. Re:Get it out of the way by unicron · · Score: 5, Funny

      I would be worried about the level of customer service for the airline:

      Passenger: Stewaress, can I get some peanuts?

      Stewardess: Get em yourself, fucking newb. Can you believe this little bitch? Thinking he has skills.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    7. Re:Get it out of the way by SquadBoy · · Score: 2

      ITBWTCL :) Same deal but with cars.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    8. Re:Get it out of the way by Micah · · Score: 4, Funny

      or she could just refer him to the Peanut-HOWTO.html

    9. Re:Get it out of the way by KshGoddess · · Score: 1

      This comes to mind, although it'd probably be closer to this.

      --
      It's a little wrong to say a tomato is a vegetable. It's a lot wrong to say it's a suspension bridge.
    10. Re:Get it out of the way by DemiKnute · · Score: 1

      Hell, if instead of going through the whole "this is how you put on your seatbelt" "this is how you put on your oxygen mask" "this is what to do if the plane crashes and by some mirarcle there's enough plane left that you have to find a door" speel they just said "RTFM", I'd be really happy. And the flights would probably be about 15 minutes faster.

      --
      .
    11. Re:Get it out of the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's disappointing how any criticism of Linux turns into a Microsoft/Linux comparison.

      Believe it or not, there are other OSes out there, many of which are more suited for commercial use than Linux.

      Some OSes even have professionally produced documentation, speaking to the original 'FAQ' topic.

    12. Re:Get it out of the way by rmohr02 · · Score: 2

      Better than waiting on hold for multiple hours with M$ to figure out how to get the landing gear down.

    13. Re:Get it out of the way by sharkey · · Score: 3, Funny

      RTFPM - Read The Fucking Peanut Manual

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    14. Re:Get it out of the way by IXI · · Score: 1

      MS: Click here to retract landing gear.
      Q105832 The "Click here to retract landing gear" button has no corresponding button to deploy landing gear. This will be addressed in the next hotfix or service pack or feature upgrade or automatic update. Please remain in the air until this is released. Your purchase is important to us.

      But that's not really a problem because:

      "You have changed the settings of landing gear, please restart for the changes to take effect."

      --
      He saw some dirty arabs and fired. Too bad it was just some friendly kurds, BBC reporters and his fellow cowboys.
    15. Re:Get it out of the way by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Please fasten your seatbelt during take-off and landing. Fastening your seatbelt is done by typing seatbelt -f now into your console, after you've logged in. If your seat still has installed an older version before 1.7.4, you also have to add the option -x belt-type. If you don't know what type your seatbelt is, the info in /proc/seatbelt may help. The newer versions auto-detect the type. Should this fail, you'll have to tell the type as well.

      Please note that the driver for the seatbelt model 42X is still beta, so you may have trouble to fasten some versions of that model. If your seatbelt is of that type - you can test this by typing cat /proc/seatbelt | grep xA53 and comparing the last number with the device minor number of /dev/seatbelt -, then please read the seatbelt-42X-HOWTO and follow the instructions therein.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    16. Re:Get it out of the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it were Linux, you'd have to remember a badly spelt command and all it's flags. By the time it was done rebooting, youd have gottn through the typo-ridden man pages.

  4. Imagine Beowulf eating a cluster of those.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look, somebody had to say something like that ....

  5. YAY! :) by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

    I guess this means no crashes no matter how hard people try.

  6. Using Linux in all aspects from the ground up ... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    You know what that means: All of the Customer Service Agents will have to be able to type 160 words per minute to keep up!

  7. Not the analogy I would've used by theRhinoceros · · Score: 4, Funny

    The airlines like to use majestic bird names like Eagle and Falcon that convey a powerful animal soaring gracefully through the air. Since one of our fundamental missions is to make private jet travel affordable for all travelers, we needed something that most people could relate to.

    So, instead of a large bird majestically soaring through the air, the chose a name of a... dumpy, flightless bird that spends most of its time in the water. Hmm...

    To the non-linux savvy, the choice of imagery to represent the company is perhaps less than ideal. I mean, how's about starting with a bird that actually flies through the air?

    1. Re:Not the analogy I would've used by jazman_777 · · Score: 2, Funny
      I mean, how's about starting with a bird that actually flies through the air?

      First bird that came to my mind: Turkey Buzzard.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    2. Re:Not the analogy I would've used by Sivar · · Score: 2

      First bird that came to my mind: Turkey Buzzard.

      No, that would be Microsoft Airlines.

      --
      Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes. --E. W. Dijkstra
    3. Re:Not the analogy I would've used by SethJohnson · · Score: 1


      Quantas uses a sluggish marsupial as it's mascot, but that hasn't discouraged passengers from flying on the safest airline around.
    4. Re:Not the analogy I would've used by sharkey · · Score: 2

      dumpy, flightless bird that spends most of its time in the water.

      And the rest of his time running for Vice-President alongside a dirty, occasionally-dead Communist cat.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  8. Windows.. by Mir322 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will it be possible to get a seat by the window ? Or will they offer economy command line flights... the jets being much faster and streamlined after all ;)

    --
    "There is always some madness in love. But there is also always some reason in madness."- Friedrich Nietzsche
    1. Re:Windows.. by JPriest · · Score: 1

      You can get a window but not natively, instead there is an LCD display that communicates with a server named X11. Not quite the real deal, but at least you can look out the other windows without leaving your seat.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
  9. Thank God it's not running windows by TrollsamaBinLaden · · Score: 1

    Could you imagine what Nimda would do airborn? Restarting everything on the plane from memory leaks would have to suck too. But then again, if they were using windows some buffer error may change the in flight movie into pr0n!

    1. Re:Thank God it's not running windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux never had a buffer error? Only hundreds of them. Linux is at least as big a piece of shit as windows for anything mission (or god forbid life) critical.

      The airplace isn't going to be run on linux for gods sake.

      What a difference a missing brain makes.

  10. Flying Penguins by T-Kir · · Score: 2, Funny

    So if a Pengiun Airlines jet does a fly over of a fleet of parked Penguin Airlines planes, will the planes all fall backwards in unison??

    BBC link - old news

    --
    Are you local? There's nothing for you here!
  11. Why is this a Good Thing (tm)? by Kenja · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why is using one platform, regardless of it's appropriateness, just for the sake of using it, a good idea? Shouldn't a company or group look into all options and decide on tools that are the best fit for what needs to be done?

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:Why is this a Good Thing (tm)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what makes you think they havent ?

    2. Re:Why is this a Good Thing (tm)? by mong · · Score: 1

      Agreed. This reeks of insular snobbery perchance?

      --

      *...Slacker, Artist, Techie - Geek *
      Remember: Nothing is Cool.
    3. Re:Why is this a Good Thing (tm)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Choosing one platform just for the sake of it is great. It will be totally awesome when the next flaw is discovered in linux and then you can attack their systems front to back.

    4. Re:Why is this a Good Thing (tm)? by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

      Ok, we're building this airline ourselves and we've got to have software. Ummm...why don't we just use Linux because we all know it really well? Objection...something else might be better. Yeah, but then we'd A have to hire someone or B waste valuable time learning something. Don't we want to learn stuff? Sure, but we can do that after we've made tons of money and retired. Cool... Ok, are we all agreed? Yeah...given the needs of the business, our resources, and our time limits, we're agreed that Linux is the best tool for our situation.

      Can we run it on Macs?

      Um....no. Macs are evil.

    5. Re:Why is this a Good Thing (tm)? by Verizon+Guy · · Score: 1

      Right. I've been on flights (USAirways) that use Sony's P@ssport system, which it totally based on Windows NT Server 4, IIS 4, Netshow Server, and Internet Explorer 4 as kiosks in the seats. The seats run either Windows 95 or Windows CE... I don't remember which. It is way cool --- the best part is that the system is offered in all the Economy seats as well, which is usually rare for airlines to pull something like this. Basically the system consists of an in-seat kiosk lets you pick from a dozen-plus or so each of new movies, full CD albums, and TV shows. You use the joystick in your seat to control the kiosk (resembles a Super Nintendo controller) select your movie, etc that you would like to watch, and then it is streamed from the Windows Media server on the plane to your seat, in good quality! Need to pee? No problem, hit pause. Does the steward(ess) need to make an announcement? When they pick up the interphone, all 300-to-500 or so streaming movies pause, let her make the announcement through the headphones, and resume when she hangs up. It made my flight more enjoyable to say the least (you don't have to watch THEIR crappy movie, you watch your own), and I choose that airline/flight now whenever I'm traveling solely based on that! The only downside to the system is that since it's all IE and WMP-based, you can't watch Airshow, since that is a straight composite video feed from the Airshow box on there. Unless they compressed that real-time....

      --

      Aw, fuck it. Let's go bowling. - The Big Lebowski

    6. Re:Why is this a Good Thing (tm)? by Micah · · Score: 2

      Why is using one platform, regardless of it's appropriateness, just for the sake of using it, a good idea?

      It's not, necessarily (yeah, I realize it was rhetorical)

      What IS a good idea is that they're basing their entire system on Open Source Software. If I was setting up a new business, I would try like crazy to avoid using proprietary software for anything important unless there was really no choice.

      Anyway, the applications they use (which are probably custom written anyway) are far more important than the OS. We all know that Linux is good enough to handle this stuff!

    7. Re:Why is this a Good Thing (tm)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Heh... you obviously have a scewed definition of "mission critical". Linux, Solaris, Windows, etc. (basically any 'desktop' OS) are by no means mission critical.

      Mission Critical in airplane terms means that it *will not crash*. Not even once. Ever. If it does, it kills people.

      If you'll remember, an airplane company once made a big deal about having a Motif on top of a commercial mission-critical Un*x for a display for equipment guages and such. The problem was that there was no testing that could give 100% code coverage for the Motif package so it *could not* be used for mission critical anything. All the dead code and impossible-to-take pathways caused the testers to get a max of about 2/3 coverage. The Motif diplay could only be used for non-critical displays and they had to all have a mechanical backup (redundancy) 'just in case'. The OS was certified mission critical already and had been used for some time in airplanes.

      The first time a plane crashes and finds a core file where there was a divide by zero or something, the company will have a serious legal problem.

    8. Re:Why is this a Good Thing (tm)? by Malcontent · · Score: 2

      Lots of companies are MS only. What's the big deal?

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    9. Re:Why is this a Good Thing (tm)? by Moofie · · Score: 2

      You understand that nobody's talking about having Linux run the flight control software, or even for secondary nav aids, right? I mean, Linux is going to be used on the business end. On the ground. In the part of the company that's not in an airplane. Feel better?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    10. Re:Why is this a Good Thing (tm)? by Grax · · Score: 1

      Yes. I can't tell you how tired I got hearing "oh, but we're a Microsoft shop here"

  12. Computers can't fly. by Computer! · · Score: 1

    I choose to fly based on destinations, safety, quality, and comfort, not in that order. No where on that list is the computer operating system used by the reservation clerks.

    --
    If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
  13. Minor point about penquins overlooked by pseudogratixsignatus · · Score: 1

    "Welcome to Penguin Airlines. This is a non-stop swim to NY. In the event of an emergency, a snorkle will be released from above..."

  14. And why does the Linux matter?! by micromoog · · Score: 2
    They've named their business and based much of their marketing on the fact that they use a particular computer operating system. This reads more like a tech-company pitch, not an airline pitch.

    Linux is great and all, but I'd feel a little more comfortable knowing that the people behind the scenes are experts in something else, like, I don't know . . . FUCKING AIRPLANES?!

    1. Re:And why does the Linux matter?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Q: how do you fuck an airplane?

    2. Re:And why does the Linux matter?! by T3kno · · Score: 4, Funny

      You spend way too much time on /. and IRC when the muscle memory in your fingers types out fucking as the default word.

      --
      (B) + (D) + (B) + (D) = (K) + (&)
    3. Re:And why does the Linux matter?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux is great and all, but I'd feel a little more comfortable knowing that the people behind the scenes are experts in something else, like, I don't know . . . FUCKING AIRPLANES?!

      Yeah, that would be great, unfortunatly the only airline companies I see are only experts at putting more money into their pockets. :)

    4. Re:And why does the Linux matter?! by mstyne · · Score: 2

      In New York, we use 'fuck' like a comma.

      --
      mstyne: real name, no gimmicks
    5. Re:And why does the Linux matter?! by intuition · · Score: 2
      They've named their business and based much of their marketing on the fact that they use a particular computer operating system. This reads more like a tech-company pitch, not an airline pitch.


      Linux is great and all, but I'd feel a little more comfortable knowing that the people behind the scenes are experts in something else, like, I don't know . . . FUCKING AIRPLANES?!



      Mod parent up. Didn't we already learn our lesson when the .com bubble burst?

    6. Re:And why does the Linux matter?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Chicago, we use "little bitch" instead.

    7. Re:And why does the Linux matter?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can you fuck an airplane?

  15. Re:Using Linux in all aspects from the ground up . by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Funny

    Lol!

    "What's the command to change this guy's reservation?"

    "It's 'chgres -x -p#30240 -usrname=John Doe -t12:00 -tx13:35 -fn usa412."

    "Oh... Didn't realize that command had a vowel in it."

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  16. what a bunch of morons you all are by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 3

    Gee, I'm ashamed of you idiots! Look at you! You act like you didn't even read the interview (you probably didn't). You sound like you didn't look at the airplane. And you obviously didn't think about the fact that this is *general aviation*. No fricking security checks. No X-raying. No pat-downs. No opening up your laptop and turning it on just to prove that you didn't replace your hard drive and cdrom with explosives (which duh you could have anyway).

    What they're selling is freedom, and it's freedom at a reasonable price. I'm definitely going to check these guys out next time I fly. Yeah, I won't be flying to Texas any time too soon, but still, I'll encourage them to expand as rapidly as they can.

    Not only that, but they're flying from small town to small town. So intead of having to go to an "airport", you can go to your town's airport, e.g. Potsdam's. This jet can land, pick you up, and take off again in less than ten minutes. And that airport is only ten minutes from my house.
    -russ

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    1. Re:what a bunch of morons you all are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm definitely going to check these guys out next time I fly.

      And so, if the security is as lax and irresponsible as you suggest, will all the terrorists.

    2. Re:what a bunch of morons you all are by Alkaiser · · Score: 2

      Yeah, pretty cool, huh? If they ever start flying internationally, I'm SO never driving my ass down to LAX again.

      The "shortest possible route" thing is what I'm interested in. Unfortunately, they're in Texas, an area not known for supporting new ways of thinking.

      --
      Netjak.com independent reviews of domestic & import video ga
    3. Re:what a bunch of morons you all are by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Actually the FAA is looking into running GA flights through security. It really makes the celebs mad, since they would have to enter the main terminal, cause a riot when hundreds of fans see them, go through security, head over to their now secure private jet, and take off. If their air taxi service works, good for them, but currently smaller airports have to give airlines fairly large subsidies to get any services.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    4. Re:what a bunch of morons you all are by Otter · · Score: 1
      The "shortest possible route" thing is what I'm interested in. Unfortunately, they're in Texas, an area not known for supporting new ways of thinking.

      Hey, I'm as up for ridiculing Texans as the next guy (Vermont was an independent republic for 14 years, with a more impressive military record than fighting a crumbling Spain at the edge of their empire, and you don't hear them bragging about it all the time.) but it is the place where Southwest Airlines began, for one thing.

      Besides the opportunity to take a private jet seems like something they'd jump at.

    5. Re:what a bunch of morons you all are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, they're in Texas, an area not known for supporting new ways of thinking.

      Yeah, we don't take well to these communist ideas that are exposed on Slashdot. You can keep you fucking "new ways of thinking" to yourself.

    6. Re:what a bunch of morons you all are by melee · · Score: 1

      Oh come now. Taking over a ten-seat business jet is about as glamorous as taking over a bus. Or maybe your SUV. Flights like this have been taking place for a long time now, and have garnered very little in the way of trouble, especially since (a) they aren't all that good for going to whatever crappy far-away destination you might want and (b) don't really provide a suitable body count for dastardly purposes. Ground based car bombs are likely to be much more efficient.

      In fact, heavy use of air-taxi type services would almost entirely obviate the threat of air-based terrorism or crime, at least for domestic flights where such things are efficient. And if you really want such a plane, it's easier to charter a flight and etherize the pilot when he comes out to greet you than go through with the whole ski-mask approach.

    7. Re:what a bunch of morons you all are by melee · · Score: 1

      And apparently the Los Angeles suburbs can't be much bothered to know much about the world than can be learned from the movies and People.

      Of course, what I wrote above is a stupid statement too: try a regional Turing test sometime, and I'm pretty sure nobody would really be able to tell the difference between a room full of people from the cities of California, Texas, Florida, Missouri, Illinois, or wherever.

      And just try telling the difference between Houston and LA when you step through my random-teleportation-to-LA-or-Houston machine.

    8. Re:what a bunch of morons you all are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Eclipse Jet probably won't trigger the proposed FAA/TSA security requirements; those are only being proposed for aircraft over 12,500 pounds max gross takeoff weight (MGTW). The Eclipse weighs in a little under 5,000 pounds at MGTW. It's a pretty small airplane; consider that a single-engine propeller-driven Beech Bonanza, a fairly typical "little plane", can weigh in at about 3,600 lbs MGTW, and a four-seat Cessna 172 weighs in at about 2,400 lbs MGTW.

    9. Re:what a bunch of morons you all are by gregorio · · Score: 1

      What they're selling is freedom, and it's freedom at a reasonable price.

      What are you talking about? Freedom from what? What difference does it make if the airline runs Linux, Windows, etc. etc. etc.?

    10. Re:what a bunch of morons you all are by zaffir · · Score: 1

      Freedom from the sardine cans coach passengers are subjected to on every other airline (except JetBlue, that is). This company might have a good idea - give people more than 8" worth of seat, and more than 3" of leg room, and something other than meals ready/refusing to exit, and they might actually fly your airline!

      --
      "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
    11. Re:what a bunch of morons you all are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >In fact, heavy use of air-taxi type services would almost entirely obviate the threat of air-based terrorism or crime

      I remember seeing Piper Cubs fitted out with guns, and carrying bombs, back in the mid sixties.

      I don't see why three or four people couldn't carry on the equivelent, overpower the crew, and everybody else, then cause their little surprise.

  17. Re:Using Linux in all aspects from the ground up . by Wee · · Score: 2, Funny
    "It's 'chgres -x -p#30240 -usrname=John Doe -t12:00 -tx13:35 -fn usa412."

    I don't mean to be pedantic, but you probably ought to quote the username. The shell will think it's another arg otherwise. So you'd change his reservation like so:

    chgres -x -p 30240 -usrname 'John Doe' -t 12:00 -tx 13:35 -fn usa412

    Yes, I realize you were joking.

    -B

    --

    Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

  18. Google cache for those too lazy to find it ... by Greedo · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
  19. Oops.... by r_j_prahad · · Score: 3, Funny

    All flights are temporarily grounded due to a severe slashdotting. You may move about the cabin until the disturbance subsides, but please refrain from smoking. Thank you.

  20. general public by wikiwa · · Score: 1

    too bad the general public won't fly them due to fears of being hacked while in flight

  21. I will start a company called Penguin Moon Trips by jukal · · Score: 2
    ...in the beginning of the next century, our spaceship has been already ordered, and hey, now you asked the coolest question: our business plan? Well, we name the company "Penguin" Moon trips, cause you know, it's easy to get published on Slashdot and that sort of places if you just mention that bird, dunno why. We are even planning to send them to moon, as one market trick.

    Seriously, come on!?!? It might be news if their business ever gets really started and if using Linux really provides them with some other competitive edge than the one - marketing edge - which was already used.

  22. Doh.... by T3kno · · Score: 2

    The server's /.'ed, I think I'll start Beastie Airlines or maybe Daemon Air. Plus Beasties can fly.

    --
    (B) + (D) + (B) + (D) = (K) + (&)
    1. Re:Doh.... by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      "Daemon Air"?
      Hmmm...doesn't sound like a very marketable name for an airline.

    2. Re:Doh.... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Slashdot Airlines!

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  23. Breaking News by borgasm · · Score: 1

    In the news today, Penguin Airlines lost half their fleet today as Slashdotters overloaded their plane's computer systems.

    On a lighter note, future passengers will not have to use a Passport (get it...Microsoft) because of conflicts with the OS of their planes and general hatred of Microsoft.

  24. We will all be forgiving . . . by r_barchetta · · Score: 2


    . . . and understand that you meant to say "flying airplanes."

    -r

    --
    Just because something is free does not mean you have to take it.
    1. Re:We will all be forgiving . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You hope.

  25. Re:TROLLAXOR SPOTTED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree. A country-western bar? Who does he think he is, John Travolta?

  26. GNU/tux by LiquidPC · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    How long before RMS is going to start whining^H^H^H^H^H^H^H asking to have it called GNU/Tux to help spread his commie^H^H^H^H^H^H GPL, free software movement?

    1. Re:GNU/tux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How long before LiquidPC is going to stop being a fucking idiot? Probably the same amount of time.

    2. Re:GNU/tux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I forgot, if you don't give your full support to free software then your just a fucking idiot. You *must* be an American because you think that the only right opinion is the popular underdog. The people with too much suport are evil and too little suport means no future. Troll this, since after all I am part of the unpopular minority, the people who think that freedom and rights apply to everyone. Go GNU. GO DMCA. Go fuck yourself.

  27. Re:Using Linux in all aspects from the ground up . by ShinGouki · · Score: 1

    HAHA YAH!!!!!!!!!!!
    CUZ EVERY1 KN0Wz THAT LINXU DUN HAEV ANY G00D GRAFICAL INTERFRA....INTEFER....THINGHIEZ!!!!

    get real man, seriously
    the majority of people who use the unix command line functions do so because they _can_ type 160wpm and get work done faster like that. the rest, who can't, use the friggin gui tools like everyone else.

    --
    -dk
    Dream with the feathers of angels stuffed beneath your head.
  28. fly for free? by wikiwa · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Does this mean we can fly for free now ?

    1. Re:fly for free? by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      (* Does this mean we can fly for free now ? *)

      If you market to hackers, that is probably what will end up happening. Very few will end up buying real tickets. The rest will have have "magic coupons" that cannot be traced to any revunue.

  29. Formal dress required? by Subcarrier · · Score: 2

    I'm trying to imagine a Beowulf cluster of these but the bowtie is cutting the flow of blood to my brain.

    --
    "I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree with them." -- George H. W. Bush
  30. Sp Southwest must mean ... by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 2

    ... the airlines is going south, and you should fly it, because Horace Greely said "Go west, young man, go west."

    Well, pretty lame, but what the heck, it's only karmakarmakarma.

    1. Re:Sp Southwest must mean ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want maximum karma, turn off your posting bonus.

  31. Welcome aboard! by borgdows · · Score: 1

    Welcome aboard! Where do you want to go today?

    1. Re:Welcome aboard! by Sivar · · Score: 2

      That's "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
      "Where do you want to go today?" is Microsoft's.

      --
      Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes. --E. W. Dijkstra
  32. Good timing... by Sivar · · Score: 2

    As we all know, right now is the best time to be in the airline business...

    Seriously though, I wish them intelligence. I'd wish them luck, but intelligence seems to be so much more scarce.

    --
    Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes. --E. W. Dijkstra
    1. Re:Good timing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it is a great time to start an airline.
      You can get good cheap aircraft.
      Good help and reasonable costs.
      Won't have airports trying to screw you (they will be happy to rent you a gate cheap).
      You just have to learn how to keep rates low, be courteous, and be safe (Not necessarily in that order).

  33. Wrong icon for the story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It should be "It's Funny...Laugh".

  34. Re:Using Linux in all aspects from the ground up . by CaseyB · · Score: 2

    Ever seen an agent use the old SABRE reservation system? It wasn't nearly as friendly as a typical UNIX shell - the commands were even more terse and cryptic. A well trained agent could get information faster than with any fancy point and click UI.

  35. I think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the one at the end of Meet The Parents is up to the task.

  36. old email humor, IF LINUX MADE AIRLINES by Froze · · Score: 1

    Linux Air

    Disgruntled employees of all the other OS airlines decide to start their own airline. They build the planes, ticket counters, and pave the runways themselves. They charge a small fee to cover the cost of printing the ticket, but you can also download and print the ticket yourself. When you board the plane, you are given a seat, four bolts, a wrench and a copy of the seat-HOWTO.html. Once settled, the fully adjustable seat is very comfortable, the plane leaves and arrives on time without a single problem, the in-flight meal is wonderful. You try to tell customers of the other airlines about the great trip, but all they can say is, "You had to do what with the seat?"

    --
    -- The morphemes of your disquisition are ascertainable, but they have eschewed an ambit of transpicuous exposition.
  37. Odd Schedule by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hmmm. They only sell one-way tickets *out* of Redmond WA.

  38. Airline Security Standards? by Anarchos · · Score: 2

    One important point about the airplanes only seating a handful of people is that they probably wouldn't be subject to the new airline security standards. At least, this is what I'm guessing; does anyone know for sure? It doesn't really seem like hijacking a 5-person flight would be that attractive to terrorists.

    --

    "A good conspiracy is an unprovable one." -Conspiracy Theory
    1. Re:Airline Security Standards? by jc42 · · Score: 2

      Last October, NPR had a good article on the topic. They started off by saying that there were some airlines that were prepared to profit handsomely from the WTC attack. They then mentioned an aircraft manufacturer (not Penguin, could it have been Maverick?) that had already received orders for a billion dollars worth of airplanes. That's 1000 planes at $1 million each. The model was a new and very small jet with a seating capacity of 6, and the customers were new air taxi services.

      They went on to explain that, because all flights would be "charter" and to/from small airports, they would be exempt from the new security checks. And unlike airliners, there were over 5000 airports in the US where they could land.

      The estimated cost of a flight was somewhat more than the price of a first-class airline ticket. But for that price, you could take up to six people.

      They were predicting lots of business as the airlines came under the control of the new security procedures.

      Occasional followup reports have said that these predictions are slowly coming true.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  39. Not a good idea... by jaymz168 · · Score: 0

    In reference to the Eclipse 500 aeroplane they are going to be using, Penguin Airlines states in the interview :

    An aviation analyst recently compared the level of electronics integration on this aircraft to the Boeing 777 or V-22 Osprey.

    This is about the worst aeroplane one could possibly compare your fleet to. They have a horid track record especially in the software implementation side of things...what were they thinking?!?!

  40. Cab Service by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    They can spin off a taxi company called "Tuxi Cabs" or "Tuxi's Taxis".

    1. Re:Cab Service by adolf · · Score: 2

      Wouldn't Tux E-Cab be a much beter pun?

  41. How about inflight email? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I wonder if they'll offer inflight email?

    Hopefully they'll use Tenzing's inflight system, since it uses Linux in the air to manage all the air-based proxying for email.

    I've used the system, it's really user-friendly and works very well.

  42. Jets for nerds... by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

    ... stuff that matters.

    --
    "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    1. Re:Jets for nerds... by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Jets for nerds...stuff that matters

      Can you buy tickets with Karma?

      Are trolls kept off, or have to sit in back?

    2. Re:Jets for nerds... by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

      Will we see "first flight" posts?

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    3. Re:Jets for nerds... by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Will we see "first flight" posts?

      Just don't make me sit next to Goatse.

  43. Quote from their jet brochure by guttentag · · Score: 5, Funny
    The Eclipse 500 is constructed principally of aircraft aluminum.
    That's good to know. I hate it when airlines use jets constructed principally of coke-can aluminum. And the aluminum siding planes are just annoying when one end of a plank breaks loose and starts thwacking against the side of the plane. These guys show real promise.
    1. Re:Quote from their jet brochure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, if someone were to take the time to hit you over the head with a clue-by-four, you'd know that there is a big difference between the "aluminum" used in pop cans and the 2000/6000/7000/etc. series alloys used by Eclipse. 2024T3 aluminum, for example, is much stronger than the cheap stuff pop cans are made of (or of the pure aluminum sold in most hardware stores). More info here.

    2. Re:Quote from their jet brochure by guttentag · · Score: 1

      That was my point. They highlight the fact that they use aircraft aluminum in their aircraft. I'd be worried if they were using any lesser type of aluminum, like coke cans.

    3. Re:Quote from their jet brochure by Maxwell'sSilverLART · · Score: 1

      The point is that they're using aircraft aluminum (or aluminium, if you're British), instead of, say, carbon-fiber composites, like many modern aircraft (see also: Cirrus Designs' SR20 and SR22, Airbus Industrie's (yes, that's spelled right, just trust me) latest designs, and others), or fiberglass (see also: Schweizer 2-32, which has fiberglass components in the fuselage, among others). They're not highlighting their use if aircraft aluminum, they're highlighting their use of aircraft aluminum.

      --
      Moderate drunk! It's more fun that way!
    4. Re:Quote from their jet brochure by guttentag · · Score: 2
      Shouldn't Airbus be using aircraft carbon-fiber composites?

      It's just unnecessary fluff -- they should just say aluminum and assume people will figure out that it's aircraft aluminum. Otherwise, it's like the Marines saying "we're using military-grade kevlar in our bulletproof vests." Duh.

      When a laptop manufacturer says it's using aircraft aluminum, or when a bicycle tire manufacturer says it's using military-grade kevlar, or when Jack-in-the-Box says it's using military-grade titanium 99-cent buttons on its cash registers, then it's a bit more appropriate.

    5. Re:Quote from their jet brochure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm afraid your humor is wasted on these morons.

  44. Maybe, who knows. by CanadaDave · · Score: 2

    Well the airlines is certainly a tough business to be operating in. Airlines go out of business in Canada faster than fashions go out of style. Maybe cutting costs in this area would be enough to help their bottom line and bring down costs. It would be incredibly damaging to Linux's reputation though if some systems failed, and chaos or bankrupcy resulted.

    1. Re:Maybe, who knows. by Darby · · Score: 2

      Airlines go out of business in Canada faster than fashions go out of style.

      Dude, flannels, mooseskin hats, and Kraft Dinner in an igloo will *never* go out of style, Eh.

    2. Re:Maybe, who knows. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canadian went out of business because the government is more than willing to front some cash to Air Canada as 'no-interest loans' and stuff on a wim. Hard to compete when your competitor doesn't have to.

      WestJet on the other hand is doing damn good for a new western based company. No westner based airline has survived better.

  45. A paranoiac writes: Finally!! by The_Guv'na · · Score: 2, Funny

    An airline where I don't have to wear my tinfoil hat!

    Do you people have ANY IDEA of the shit I've had to put up with gettin that thing onboard normal airlines?

    Ali [the dark side]

  46. This Company Needs Focus by dustym · · Score: 0

    First off, I live in the dfw/dallas/denton area, and I can see a service like this working out. Southwest is king of business travel (and pretty much all the domestic travel for me), especially here in Texas. But SW is pretty uncomfortable compared to the smack they are talking about this Eclipse jet, so there is a valid business to be had, there.

    Secondly, Linux makes things cheap. We use it almost exclusively here for servers (except for some legacy windows stuff we have to run) and the push for Linux on the staffs desktops has started rolling. It would make my job infinitely easier.

    That said, this guy seems to worry more about Tux crap and using open source software at every level, than creating a useful and solid system for management of their business. PostNuke? PHPGroupware? I didnt think anyone really used that stuff for REAL business, I know I wouldnt. We have craploads of solid programmers in North Dallas that can write these applications from ground up with features that count and without all that bullshit those other programs have already included. They can hire 2-3 programmers to write their system from ground up in Python/Zope/WebWare or Perl/Mason w/ SapDB/PostgreSQL and be better off than molding PHPGroupware and Postnuke into a different app.

    Linux and free software packages are great when used properly, but software should be molded for a business not a business molded around software.

    Best of luck, though.

  47. This is perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This guy is trying to break into the CEO lear jet world. They're offering general aviation flights (which means they can pick you up and drop you off practically anywhere there's 200 yards of pavement) that are high-class. Now that's generally an expensive proposition, and they have a tough market to break into. A lear jet costs about $8000 (according to the article) for a flight. These guys are trying to do the same thing for much much less and linux is really helping them do it. Linux is allowing the little guys to break into the market and offer an affordable solution. That's supposed to be the beauty of it all, right?

  48. Flight problem by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Funny

    I couldn't get up to stretch and shmooze because the overhead "No Trolling" light was on the entire fricken time!

    Next time I'll take Blue Skies of D (BSOD) Airways, a subsidiary of MS. (They wouldn't tell me what the 'D' stood for.)

  49. Choice of software packages by mgkimsal2 · · Score: 2

    phpgroupware and postnuke?

    Yes, both have made progress, but it's STILL a bit much to say that you're basing an entire airline's support on those projects. I loved the line about 'phpgroupware is rumored to potentially support VoIP in the future'. Great reason to use things now - something in the future *might* support something that other packages already *do* support today.

    My company supports PHP wholeheartedly - phphelpdesk.com and PHP training courses are two services we offer. But trying to run a whole airline (even if it's small) off postnuke and phpgroupware - they're going to spend quite a lot on inhouse staff writing custom modules. They *might* be better off financially using *some* third party stuff.

    The focus here is as much on open source stuff as Linux (phpgroupware could be run on Windows, for example) so instead of 'right tool for the job' you've got 'open source at any cost', which is, imo, just as bad as 'closed source at any cost'.

  50. Re:Using Linux in all aspects from the ground up . by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    Yeesh, somebody cracks a joke and suddenly the preach wars start.

    Sounds like the AC touched on a sore spot there. Heh.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  51. Big Mistake by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    You got it all wrong: "Penguin" in the name has nothing to do with Linux, but what they serve for meals. I learned that after taking "Dogways Airlines".

  52. And this is a good thing??? (for all us nuts) by WankersRevenge · · Score: 1

    I hate flying - everybit about it. I'm backseat mechanic. Any noise - thumb - jigger - I apply my pathetically poor analysis of airplane maintence that I learned off the internet and start examining the problem. Of course, every analysis ends with the plane exploding into bits and myself clutching the seat in front of me shouting a four letter word while doing it at the same time.

    I don't need to know this info. I somewhat know about Linux and tanked a lot of servers. I know how to crash a box and this knowledge will only contribute to my paranoia. I like to think that airplanes are running some superior sophisticated NASA alien technology not an off the shelf distro, or even worse Lindows. Can you imagine if a pilot inadvertently wiped out the drivers for the engines because he didn't know the plane defaulted him as root?

  53. Site not responding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it running Linux?!?

  54. Re:Using Linux in all aspects from the ground up . by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1
    HAHA YAH!!!!!!!!!!!
    CUZ EVERY1 KN0Wz THAT LINXU DUN HAEV ANY G00D GRAFICAL INTERFRA....INTEFER....THINGHIEZ!!!!

    get real man, seriously
    the majority of people who use the unix command line functions do so because they _can_ type 160wpm and get work done faster like that. the rest, who can't, use the friggin gui tools like everyone else.


    Oh suck it up. Linux people crack jokes about Windows all the time. Jokes like that aren't so funny when you know the truth, aren't they? Now you know how a Windows 2000 user feels about BSOD jokes.
  55. The Tux For The Reservation System: Big NoNo by spacefight · · Score: 1

    ... as long as the passenger rate is as low as their earnings, it's fine... but...

    if they grow and I assume they want to, you can suck Linux or any other Unix compared to the good old TPF, IBMs Transaction Processing Family, scalable like hell, fast like a rocket and secure as you could hardly imagine. And I've recently saw a nice article about SMTP beeing ported to the TPF as well and POP3 is already their, carrying 250 Mio POP Boxes without being slashdotted all the time.... Tux, you better wach your ass in the Rerservation Systems Area of the Airlines around the globe... at least EDS and their client/whatever Sabre and many others are still using it and they won't stop for now ;) Sure, you can port the Tux to the zSeries of big blue but with that you won't get the realtime OS behaviour which TPF is providing.

  56. Cool, but... by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 1

    how long will it take for the mount jokes to get old (assuming they keep a simple structures)?

    Ok, mount the pilots...
    (snicker)
    Now the passengers...
    (giggle)
    Now mount the stewardesses!!!

    (uh-huh-huh-huuhhh...heh, he said "mount").

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
  57. Re:Using Linux in all aspects from the ground up . by ShinGouki · · Score: 1

    jokes are one thing...i dig on linux jokes as much as any other os' jokes, it's the bold "i do animation in lightwave so you can't tell me shit" statement i was responding to :)

    and the point that i was making is that there are plenty of gui tools in linux so you don't have to use the command line if you don't like it. how, exactly, does a windows user get around bsod's that (s)he doesn't like?

    --
    -dk
    Dream with the feathers of angels stuffed beneath your head.
  58. Screen by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    The pilots' display looks more impressive than the passengers tv-screen (or lack of). I can imagine them saying "hey, we dont need those stupid engine guages, put Starwars on the center screen." or, if it was my plane "Sir, we're being hailed" - "On screen!"

    i think the whole plane needs to be bigger before you can use it for an airline. Maybe say.. big enough for a toilet and more than 3 seats...

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  59. You guys are missing the point by ArticulateArne · · Score: 5, Informative

    I, for one, am terribly interested in the aviation side of this. Using Linux all the way through is very cool and all of that, and I suppose it's groundbreaking for an airline, but it's more an adaptation of existing technology (OS, desktop software, database, web server, scripting software) to a new problem (an airline). Where these guys are really breaking new ground is on the airplane side of things. I read the interview, and somehow I've managed to miss these guys, but I've heard references to this concept before, and as soon as this takes off, I hope to be using it as much as possible.

    What these guys are proposing is using the Eclipse 500 to fly people all over the place. It's a six-seat airplane, 355 knot cruise (ca 410 mph), and according to the specs page, it has an accelerate-stop takeoff distance of 2,595 feet. This means it can accelerate to just under the speed it needs to fly on one engine, lose an engine, and still stop safely without running off the end of the runway. This will increase the number of airports Penguin can fly to versus, say, Northwest Airlines, by at least a factor of five. Most municipal airports have at least a 3,000 foot runway. Now, their page is slashdotted, so I'm not sure exactly how they'll handle this, but theoretically that means they could fly me (on a typical trip) from Springfield, MO to New Richmond, WI in a total time of about two hours, including drive time to and from the airport. Currently, it takes about six hours, including nintey minutes for checkin/security and an excursus through St. Louis, Memphis, or (heaven forbid) O'Hare, and then an hour driving from the Minneapolis airport to New Richmond. It's about twelve hours to drive, so it's almost not even worth it to fly, but with these guys, it would be so much nicer. This has the potential to be a serious boon for travellers. Depending on how they do this, it could eliminate hubs, and eliminate having to fly into one of the larger airports, followed by up to three hours of driving.

    The Eclipse isn't yet certified, but it looks like it has a really good chance. These guys have been working on it for a while, and they seem to know what they're doing. They're using the Williams EJ22 engine, which is similar to their FJ44 engine that has been very successful on the Cessna CitationJet series. What really amazes me, though, is the price of these things. They're only asking about $850,000, which is barely enough to buy a twin-engine pison (instead of jet) Beech Baron these days.

    All of which is to say, I'm really, really excited to hear about these guys, and I hope their business does well. I'll be flying them as soon as I can. They've got cool technology all the way around, and it has the potential to make life much better.

    1. Re:You guys are missing the point by Trickster+Coyote · · Score: 3, Funny

      I suppose it's groundbreaking for an airline

      I must say, seeing the words "groundbreaking" and "airline" together in the same sentence mad me a tad nervous.

      --
      Ideology is for ideots.
    2. Re:You guys are missing the point by Maxwell'sSilverLART · · Score: 1

      Yes, this is, indeed, very cool. I've been following the Eclipse for a couple of years, and I'm very excited at the possibility of a twinjet (a jet, for chrissakes!) selling for less than a million clams. I hope this company takes off (pun intended!); I recall reading about a similar proposition being cancelled recently.

      Side note: if anybody from the company is reading this, and you need pilots, please (!) drop me a note. I'm an aviation major at the University of Oklahoma, and desperately seeking a flying job. Check out my resume (presently being updated; if it doesn't work, give it 24 hours).

      --Dave

      --
      Moderate drunk! It's more fun that way!
    3. Re:You guys are missing the point by cybrthng · · Score: 2

      The aircraft may go for an asking price of 850k, but the other 150k will got to the insurance company for risk/liability suites.

      I love the thought myself, but right now my "jet" is a "Compair 7" with a turbo-prop. I can carry 6 people at 250mph at a cost of about 100 grand after 2 years of building hehe.

      AeroComp itself is working on a Jet as well. http://www.aerocompinc.com/airplanes/CA-Jet/

      The experimental restrictions prohibit commercial use of such aircraft, but atleast it will help accelerate development/r&d of such aircraft to ultimately lower the TCO of Certified jets.

    4. Re:You guys are missing the point by Radice+Utente · · Score: 1
      The Eclipse isn't yet certified, but it looks like it has a really good chance.

      I too would love to see the Eclipse fly with paying passengers. But the certification process isn't going to be a cakewalk. The FAA has a constituency which consists of its largest paying customers, the big airlines. And if you think Big Air is going to let small-timers mess up their playpen, I refer you to the reactions of other Bigs to encroachment on their turf (RIAA, MPAA, et al).

      Once it's past the certification process, the next hurdle is the product liability lawyers. The appropriate insurance spells required to repel the lawyer demons will, I fear, drive the Eclipse price up to a level comparable to other jets.

      The combination of a burdensome certification process plus product liability has all but killed general and small-time aviation. Until that two-headed monster is killed or at least corralled, we're going to see very little real innovation in aviation.

  60. essay mirror by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 2

    Here's a mirror of the essay, because penguin airlines' own site is kinda DOS'd for a while

    http://www.desktoplinux.com/articles/AT801548471 6. html

    --
    Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
  61. Watch out for bugs by alue · · Score: 1

    That Penguin Airlines is touting its employment of Linux in its business and aircraft sounds novel for the free software movement, but should anything ever go wrong on one of their "heavily computerized jets," their problems just might become one of the most infamous software engineering mistakes of all time--and a dark stain on the reputation of open source software.

    A malfunctioning aircraft could be more disasterous than either the Therac-25 accidents or the Patriot Missile failure in Dhahran.

  62. Re:Using Linux in all aspects from the ground up . by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

    "and the point that i was making is that there are plenty of gui tools in linux so you don't have to use the command line if you don't like it"

    I know, I've used it. heh.

    " how, exactly, does a windows user get around bsod's that (s)he doesn't like?"

    Win9X (95, 98, Me...) are awful and BS all the time. Win2k almost never Bsod's. When it does, it's a driver making a bad call.

    Let me put it to you this way: I've never had an overnight or over the weekend process interrupted because of Windows stability or lack of. It's been quite reliable. Lotsa places that use Win2k for LW rendering farms will tell you a similar story. That's why I find BSOD jokes about as interesting as 'Dan Quayle is stupid!' jokes.

  63. Sorry bub... by jsonmez · · Score: 1

    "We started off unofficially using TexasJet Direct and I liked it because we're all very proud of our state down here."

    Sorry bub, you lost all credibility when you said your proud of the ugliest redneck state in the union.

  64. Bill Gates a major investor? by Ambush · · Score: 1
    Did anyone else notice who one of the major investors is?

    The No. 18 employee at Microsoft and the company's first consumer products division president, he has tapped a number of friends and leaders in other industries for cash, including Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates (who became a major Eclipse investor) and retired Ford Motor Co. CEO Harold "Red" Poling, who serves as Eclipse's board chairman.

    Interesting mix of an airline who run Linux as their O/S of choice, yet the planes themselves are manufactured (in part) by BG.

    Maybe someone has finally worked out how to have the two peacefully co-exist?!? :-)

    --
    There are 10 kinds of people; those who know ternary, those who don't, and those now hunting for a dictionary.
    1. Re:Bill Gates a major investor? by bsDaemon · · Score: 1
      Maybe someone has finally worked out how to have the two peacefully co-exist?!? :-)

      Yes, don't tell Bill

  65. If they are all Linux, why is the server named by Vodalian · · Score: 1
    IRIX?!

    And running a buggy version of Apache as well!

    telnet www.penguinairlines.com 80
    Trying 216.143.162.33...
    Connected to irix.penguinairlines.com.

    Apache/1.3.23 Server at www.penguinairlines.com Port 80

  66. Re:Using Linux in all aspects from the ground up . by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1, Troll

    "A well trained agent could get information faster than with any fancy point and click UI."

    'Fancy point and click UI's have advantages that keyboards don't have, and vice versa. I know DOS really well, and I'm able to take advantage of that to fly around Windows. But, not everything can be done easily from a keyboard. Don't forget that not every agent is 'well trained'. There's still the matter of giving the user clues as to what he/she needs to do in order to make the computer do what they want.

    Microsoft and Apple both understand this and give you very helpful pointers. You can click on File and hit Open, or you can Alt+F then O. If you click on File, you'll see that the O in Open has an underscore in it, thus familiarizing yourself with productivity enhancements of the app you're using.

    The short version of what I'm saying is that one isn't 100% superior to the other, so don't treat them that way. The mouse and the keyboard (as well as text and graphics) compliment each other, they don't compete with each other.

    My comment that started this thread was not a 'Linux doesnt have a UI so nobody can do any work' joke, it was a "Linux doesn't give enough visual clues to the user" joke. The 'I didnt see that command had a vowel' joke made after my post was funny as hell because even in the text side of Linux this is true. Linux has a wonderful helpfile system, but the command to call it is a little cryptic. 'Man'. It's not 'manual', it's 'man'. So the mapping is a bit broken here. You have to remember the short form of manual, as opposed to just remembering manual. That's a huge UI problem with Linux, it isn't very helpful if you don't have the commands you need to use memorized. That's a bit different from a graphical UI that shows you what options you have available for you to use at any given time.

    I think this is a legitimate criticism of Linux. I really hope more attention is paid to this aspect of it in the near future. The OS is very sophisticated and extremely flexible, but it needs a lot of evolution in the user-experience department in order to win a larger market share. Is this important to the Linux Community? Oh I dunno. What could it possibly hurt, though?

  67. Re:Windoze is reliable!!!! by snoozebutton · · Score: 1

    "I've never had an overnight or over the weekend process interrupted because of Windows stability or lack of. It's been quite reliable. "

    Bullshit.
    And BTW, Lightwave blows goats.

  68. Re:Windoze is reliable!!!! by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1
    Bullshit.
    And BTW, Lightwave blows goats.


    Heh yeah. "Im a ChickenHawk, and I only eat Chickens."

  69. Re:Windoze is reliable!!!! by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    How long have you been wearing your 'troll trainee' button?

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  70. Depends on the Penguin by stoolpigeon · · Score: 2

    Because this Penguin flys very well.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  71. Re:Why is this a Good Thing (tm)?-Singular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Why is using one platform, regardless of it's appropriateness, just for the sake of using it, a good idea?"

    I don't know. Why don't you ask all the windows only shops out there?

    ----
    No one was ever fired for buying IBM.

  72. But are the flights free as in freedom and beer? by Pac · · Score: 2

    Can I take one of their flights, remake the flight plan and have it deliver me elsewhere? Or still better, can I take one of their planes and just fly it myself wherever I want? What about the ticket source? Can I print my own ticket? Can I print tickets to anyyone who wants it? Do they give away free beer during th flight?

    If the answer to these questions is a Yes, then I can believe "Tux' is more than just a name for this new air taxi service which brings convenient, economical, time-saving air travel via the shortest route between home and destination.".

  73. RFC1925 by Loualbano2 · · Score: 1

    I refer you to RFC1925 titled "The Twelve Networking Truths", truth #3:

    (3) With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly overhead.

    http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1925.html

    -ft

    1. Re:RFC1925 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROFL

      +1 Informative +1 Funny

      Too bad im not a moderator just a lowly AC.

  74. Just as long as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just as long as they don't use Linux for the avionics!

  75. Re:Using Linux in all aspects from the ground up . by sheckard · · Score: 1

    Sad thing is, airline reservation systems are nearly as cryptic.

  76. New definition by kireK · · Score: 1

    An entire new way of looking at Linux overhead!

  77. I refuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to fly this airline.

  78. Re: Qantas by Matt_R · · Score: 1

    QANTAS (no U) have a kangaroo as their mascot. Have you ever tried to catch a roo? I'd hardly call them sluggish.

  79. RTFM by Kenshin · · Score: 2

    Or she could say:
    RTFM: Read the fucking magazine!

    --

    Does it make you happy you're so strange?

  80. Am I the only one by huntz0r · · Score: 1

    reminded of that episode of "The Critic"?

    "Wait a minute... penguins can't fly. PENGUINS CAN'T FLY!!" (plane spirals into ocean)

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly affected when you come and go, you come and go)
  81. Re:Using Linux in all aspects from the ground up . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux will save all your problems.

  82. Re:Using Linux in all aspects from the ground up . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how, exactly, does a windows user get around bsod's that (s)he doesn't like?

    By installing a gnu system, of course.

  83. The difference Re:Windoze is reliable!!!! by IXI · · Score: 1

    > What's the difference between Windows and Linux? 1000's of games...

    I always regarded DOS/Windos to be toy systems.

    --
    He saw some dirty arabs and fired. Too bad it was just some friendly kurds, BBC reporters and his fellow cowboys.
    1. Re:The difference Re:Windoze is reliable!!!! by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      I feel the same way about Linux. "Oo, if I do this, this, this, this, this, that, and this, I can make it as useful as Windows! I wonder what else I can do to make it do stuff that Windows has done for ages?"

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  84. Tuxracer by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1
    The game Tuxracer, has a really fun level called "Who says penguins can't fly?"
    It has a bunch of ice-walled canyons where you can build up a lot of speed and make huge jumps.
    1. Re:Tuxracer by dagoalieman · · Score: 1

      If only my laptop had a decent enough video card to run Tuxracer... *sigh*

      --
      We don't need no Net Explorer We don't need no Thought control
  85. Standardization by Tony-A · · Score: 2

    You standardize the things that are not worth being different.
    As a ridiculous example, a sentence is composed of words. Pick each word from the language that best characterizes the exact shade of your meaning. Each word is the best choice, but the sentence is a mess.
    With a name like Penguin Airlines, there are some natural image effects with the Linux mascot. As long as it's not a horrible choice for the particular job, methinks they'll do just fine.

  86. penguins can't fly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ha ha ha ha. They need to run FreeBSD instead. Linux is way too unstable to run an airline on. To quote Andrew Hume at the last Usenix, "Is Linux ready for prime time? Of course not."

  87. You've got it all wrong... by MQBS · · Score: 0

    I want BSD airlines! Who besides me thinks it'd be cool to fly in a plane shaped like a daemon? Woosh!

    The superman people will have our ass for this.

    And the pitchfork thingy would solve all the problems of birds (plus maybe skewer you your inflight meal...)

    --
    The dream reveals the reality which conception lags behind. That is the horror of life- the terror of art. -Franz Kafka
  88. Oil-free turbomachinery is no joke by Jerry+Hicks · · Score: 1

    Make sure to check out the details of the EJ-22 turbofan. It contains technology which will forever change the face of civilian (and military) aviation.

    Among its innovations, this engine uses foil air bearings with PS-304 high-temperature lubricant developed by NASA.

  89. Re:TROLLAXOR SPOTTED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If he's drinking, he must have used up all of his weed.

    They play both kinds of music: country AND western (Blues Bros. reference, for those who don't know).

  90. Ever seen a penguin fly underwater? They rock. by dotslashdotdot · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, by combining several /. stories, a new one evolves.

    Penguin Airlines
    Sea Gliders for Other Worlds
    Big Black Delta Mystery Solved?
    Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Competition

    Gravity and thermal powered transoceanic submarine service.
    Gravity and thermal powered transglobal air service.

    Imagine if the craft all looked like Tux.
    Operating a fleet of "Big Black Tuxs" would be pretty wild.
    Maybe I should start this project on SourceForge.

    --
    It is now time to flip off your computer.
  91. CLI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    echo 'right' > /dev/rudder