Slashdot Mirror


Linux Continues March On China

elucidus writes: "A government-sponsored software development group in China unveiled a version of the Linux operating system it has developed that it said will eventually replace Windows and Unix on all of its government PCs and servers. Called Yangfan Linux, which means 'raise the sail' in Chinese, the open source operating system is being pieced together by the Beijing Software Industry Productivity Center, a group established by the government to organize Linux development in China." Update: 08/14 22:34 GMT by T : Note that the story from which this text is drawn originally appeared in InfoWorld; thanks to writer Matt Berger for pointing this out. Read on below for a bit more, and some interesting links.

"The source code for Yangfan was made available last week under the GNU General Public License. The group is now collecting feedback and will continue improving the operating system.

The group has also done significant work localizing the operating system to support Chinese-language characters, which will be contributed back into the Linux community, according to Jon 'Maddog' Hall, director of Linux International.

Yangfan is based on two distributions of the Linux operating system. One is the distribution developed by Chinese Linux vendor Red Flag Software. The second is a version of the operating system called Cosix Linux, developed by China Computer Software Corp."

Reader kchris59 points to these articles at The Screen Savers and at chinadaily.com.cn which provide some more insight on what's going on behind that firewall.

121 of 371 comments (clear)

  1. So, was Steve Ballmer right? by richie2000 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is Open Source Communism? Discuss among yourselves. :-)

    --
    Money for nothing, pix for free
    1. Re:So, was Steve Ballmer right? by FooBarWidget · · Score: 3, Insightful

      China is only communist by name. Their economy is, in fact, a mix between communism and capitalism. There are lots of capitalist companies in China. When you walk over the street, you'll be flooded with ads.

      Actually, the US' economy is also a mix between capitalism and socialism, no matter how much people deny it. Think Social Security and that kind of things.

  2. Supporting Chinese characters by jonasj · · Score: 2, Redundant
    The group has also done significant work localizing the operating system to support Chinese-language characters, which will be contributed back into the Linux community
    Uhm, why does Linux need to be localized to support Chinese characters? Doesn't the thing use Unicode?
    --
    You know, Microsoft's street address also says a lot about their mentality.
    1. Re:Supporting Chinese characters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's a lot more complicated than that.

      Unicode is a step in the right direction, but there are still different ways of encapsulating Unicode.

      I mean, transferring an 'A', (ASCII code 65), in unicode is generally NOT done like this:

      0 0 0 0 65

      that's wasteful.

      There are encodings that 'escape' from a one or two byte encoding in to the higher-order ones. You really need to read the full spec to understand it properly.

      Also, a lot of people don't really properly understand the way Eastern languages such as Chinese work. For example, some of the same *characters* might be used in Chinese and Japanese, but if you write Chinese in a Japanese *font*, it will look very unusual to a Chinese national. Compare it to writing English using Greek characters, and you will get some idea of what I mean. To foreign students of Eastern languages, the differences might look very minimal, but these are all important issues.

      Also, I am not sure about Chinese, but in Japanese, you certainly need to include ruby text, (small characters alongside or underneath the main writing, usually to indicate pronunciation - you will have seen it on the lyrics to Anime theme music).

      Yet another thing, you have to address vertical/horizontal writing.

      Input methods, as well, there are so many ways to input Eastern languages. What about if somebody needs to mix in Korean in the same document, for example. Very, very, complicated issues.

      Incidently, for anybody wanting to do all this - the latest version of EMACS is about the best thing to use, in my opinion, with LEIM installed - you can mix scripts, and use sensible input methods, it's great. Not ideal for word processing, but it gets the job done.

      Any other questions about Eastern word processing, just ask.

    2. Re:Supporting Chinese characters by Yokaze · · Score: 5, Informative

      First, when speaking of Linux, one usually speaks of a whole bunch of software and not all software might support unicode.

      Second, Unicode is just an encoding (or a set of encodings).

      All the messages have to be translated, the applications have to be checked whether the display is correct or not.
      The layout may be incorrect. Not to mention that the application might rely on some assumptions, which are correct for latin1, but not for other character-sets.

      Not to mention that several applications aren't prepared to be localised.

      --
      "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
    3. Re:Supporting Chinese characters by Yarn · · Score: 3, Funny

      Heh, I remember at school when we got our first Windows 3 machines, some guy was certain you could translate to greek by typing in English then setting the 'Symbol' font.

      Laurence Brice, are you still out there. heh.

      --
      -Yarn - Rio Karma: Excellent
    4. Re:Supporting Chinese characters by leonbrooks · · Score: 2
      the applications have to be checked whether the display is correct or not.

      Ah. A Windows programmer. (-:

      Use something like Tk or Qt (yes, you can use both of those on Windows and Macintosh as well as Linux/UNIX/*BSD) and the dialogs etc pretty much sort themselves out. That doesn't mean that all of your problems are solved in one go, but it does mean that such issues crop up only around 5% as often.

      --
      Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    5. Re:Supporting Chinese characters by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      heh. That kinda reminds me of that Far Side cartoon where some scientists are trying to decipher the Dolphin language. They were extremely frustrated because they couldn't figure out why the translator kept saying 'ah blow ess pan yol.'

  3. Time for new linux slogan by af_robot · · Score: 5, Funny

    Choise Linux - a billion Chinese can't be wrong

    1. Re:Time for new linux slogan by sql*kitten · · Score: 2

      Choise Linux - a billion Chinese can't be wrong

      I wonder, given China's record on Human Rights, whether the Linux community will find itself in a similar situation to IBM?

    2. Re:Time for new linux slogan by DarkZero · · Score: 2

      Throw dissidents in jail and torture them - a billion Chinese can't be wrong

  4. This is great for China by Zemran · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I really do think this is great for China BUT I cannot see this effecting me. I do not think I am going to rush out and get a copy to play with... I think any tools etc. that they develop will be specific to thier needs and unlikely to be of use to me. Good luck to them and I wish them well.

    --
    I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    1. Re:This is great for China by Lucky_Pierre · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most of the world's computer hardware is made by Taiwanese companies with factories in mainland China.....who do you think writes the drivers???

      If Linux becomes big in China and Taiwan, hardware support is no longer going to be a problem.

      By the way, the oldest and best Chinese Linux distro is Linpus from Taiwan:

      http://www.linpus.com.tw/main.htm

      --
      "Whenever the cause of the people is entrusted to professors, it is lost." ~ V.I. Lenin
    2. Re:This is great for China by pr0nbot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Much of the work to localise to Chinese (e.g. broadening UNICODE support) will benefit other localisation efforts. This in turn could mean broader adoption of Linux, since language is a big barrier to adoption - one that MS recognizes.

  5. Internet-ready Microwave Oven by jukal · · Score: 2

    They make rather interesting products and concepts Redflag Linux, including this Internet ready Microwave Oven design concept. Thanks for posting this article Timothy, these companies seem like worth following!

    1. Re:Internet-ready Microwave Oven by kwishot · · Score: 2

      I'll second that.... I was expecting some dumb american version that plays mp3s and dances or something stupid, but it seems as if their "smart" appliances will actually have legitimate uses and seem quite innovative. I just wonder how long a) it will take for these to seep into US/European markets or b) US/European manufacturers and engineers to get the same mindset for useful devices. ....... I'm counting on the former =P

      -kwishot

  6. Oh darn by Datasage · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... Thats one billion windows licences microsoft wont sell... i wonder if the calculate that as a loss?

    --
    In America we are imprisoned by our fear of them.
    1. Re:Oh darn by kwishot · · Score: 2

      I wonder if the RIAA is reading this....
      Same concept, different context.

      "But we would have sold X million copies of that cd..."

  7. Is there any chinese slashdotters? by t0qer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That could provide a cultural insight as to why china would be so open to open source?

    As an american slashdotter, i'd like to point out why the US doesn't more readily adopt linux.

    1. Microsoft lobbyist
    2. Microsoft license sweeps
    3. Microsoft Strongarm tactics
    4. [insert your own M$ reason]

    Technically from what I know of Bill Gates (throwing a fit at ppl pirating his altair basic) and what I know of chinese copyright laws (nearly non-existant) I guess the only conclusion is it's quality that is winning out in china.

    I have heard about the open markets in china where you can purchase bootlegs of any software for near the cost of the CD. If the choice is between M$ at .5 dollars and Linux at .5 dollars linux wins.

    Sorry, I was just kinda scrapin for some insightfullness there.

    1. Re:Is there any chinese slashdotters? by G-funk · · Score: 2

      You miss the only important reason:

      Microsoft tax.

      Microsoft is a fuckin huge company,and they pay a lot of tax (although not enough i'm sure), and all their employees can go out and buy stuff, and pay tax on that.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    2. Re:Is there any chinese slashdotters? by mirko · · Score: 4, Informative

      A lot of tax ?
      Read this :
      "Microsoft enjoyed more than $12 billion in total tax breaks over the past five years. Microsoft, in fact, actually paid no tax at all in 1999, despite $12.3 billion in reported U.S. profits. Microsoft's tax rate for the past two years was only 1.8 percent on $21.9 billion in pre-tax U.S. profits."

      Never underestimate GwB's close friends.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    3. Re:Is there any chinese slashdotters? by mentin · · Score: 2
      As an american slashdotter, i'd like to point out why the US doesn't more readily adopt linux. 2. Microsoft license sweeps

      Strange, I thought (and all computer magazines agreed) that license sweeps push people towards Linux. Just thing about it: if MS rise price or more strictly enforces licenses, people have to pay more. So they look for alternatives. So they switch to Linux. A lot of articles at /. blamed MS for license sweeps.

      Am I wrong?

      Oh, no, forget about this. As a good slashdotter you learned that you can simultaneously blame Microsoft for doing and not doing the same things.

      --
      MSDOS: 20+ years without remote hole in the default install
    4. Re: Is there any chinese slashdotters? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2


      > That could provide a cultural insight as to why china would be so open to open source?

      IANAChinese, but I would guess that the less cozy a country's relationship with the USA, the quicker that country will adopt OSS and/or non-Made-in-the-USA software, for a variety of reasons.

      • as a symbol of cultural independence from American hegemony
      • (for communist countries) as an explicit rejection of US IT companies as symbols of capitalism
      • for reasons of national security
      Regarding that last one, I don't know whether there's any spyware in Windows or not, but I do know that spyware happens, and if I ran a country I don't think I'd rely on any concept of basic human honesty to assure me that MS & the US government weren't in cahoots, systematically shipping software to spy on my country.

      Heck, if I were a petty dictator I would probably try using spyware on my neighbors.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    5. Re:Is there any chinese slashdotters? by sql*kitten · · Score: 2, Flamebait

      1. Microsoft lobbyist
      2. Microsoft license sweeps
      3. Microsoft Strongarm tactics
      4. [insert your own M$ reason]


      Idiot. The US doesn't more readily adopt Linux because Joe User and his Grandma don't want to mess around with recompiling their kernels and editing text based configuration files and bitching to hardware manufacturers about device drivers in order to write letters, play games and email pictures of their kids and puppies to each other. If Microsoft didn't exist, Linux would still be confined to the tech community, and Apple (or Commodore or Acorn or whoever) would dominate the consumer and desktop space.

      Face it, for 99% of computer users, Linux simply isn't suitable, at least not at the moment.

    6. Re:Is there any chinese slashdotters? by JWW · · Score: 2

      Yes, but your initial post would have been better without the political rhetoric.

      The scariest part of your first post is, it doesnt MATTER who is president, Microsoft pays no taxes. This kind of thing is the real reason why it would be better for corporations to pay no tax at all. Because their tax avoidance practices (expensing stock options anyone) are really pushing many of corporations' cook the books policies.

    7. Re:Is there any chinese slashdotters? by Moridineas · · Score: 2

      Why don't they pay any tax? I don't know the full reasons obviously, but I bet part of it is the INSANE amount of money MS and Bill Gates give to charities, foundations, schools, etc.

      People talk all the time about how greedy and all Gates is, but they don't realize he gives away more money in a day then most people will make in a lifetime. My school for instance has gotten somewhere around 40 million dollars from Gates in the past couple years--one of my computer science professors joked that "with the amount of money microsoft gave us for this room [a special MS room in comp sci building" we could have plated it in gold and had money to spare." -- they didn't plate it in gold but they bought the biggest widescreen flatpanel computer monitor I've ever seen.

    8. Re:Is there any chinese slashdotters? by Jason+Earl · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I am not Chinese, but it would seem the answer is fairly obvious. The primary reason that China is looking at Free Software is that Free Software is less expensive than the alternatives. This sort of thing didn't matter before the WTO started pressing China to stamp out software piracy, but it does now.

      The second reason that Free Software is advantageous to the Chinese is that it allows them to bootstrap their own software economy instead being second or third class citizens in an American-led software economy. Their are plenty of bright folks in China who can write software. China would much rather put them to work than to pay software developers from overseas to do the work for them. The fact that Chinese developers are far less expensive than American ones doesn't hurt either.

      The third reason has to do with Chinese national security. China has no idea what is in most U.S. written commercial software, but they do know that versions of Excell shipped with a flight simulator, and that before it was GPLed Interbase had a backdoor password for years. It's hard enough trusting commercial software on the very best of days, but trusting commercial software written by foreign nationals is a very sticky subject if you happen to be the Chinese government.

      One thing is certain, China is not afraid of Microsoft. Microsoft and the BSA might seem scary to companies in the United States, but China is a sovereign nation (and a powerful one at that). If the BSA got too pushy the Chinese government could run their representatives over with tanks and there would be nothing that the BSA could do about it. China is cleaning up its act as regards to software piracy only because the U.S. has threatened to put sanctions on Chinese trade if they didn't. The U.S. market is important to the Chinese, and so they are trying to comply.

    9. Re:Is there any chinese slashdotters? by Moridineas · · Score: 2

      I'm sorry, but your post is not really true. For one, it's NOT just software licenses that Microsoft gives. I told you for one about thE MS room at my school, not to mention they are building an entire new building now named after Gates' wife (Duke University--check me out if you don't believe it). This is not built with software licenses.

      Secondly, your assertion that MS doesn't give much to charity is also incorrect. As near as I could find MS gave almost 37 million dollars in 2001. This doesn't even count the salaries of the people employed by its charitable foundations. They donated 180 million worth of software--which again is hardly inconsiderable. How much of a sacrifice it is, is a ridiculous classist argument--MS's 37 million hard cash can do more good than a life time of Joe's $20.

    10. Re:Is there any chinese slashdotters? by dalutong · · Score: 2

      you've already gotten a reply from a "pure" Chinese -- now you get to get one from a "pure" "laowai" (old foreigner) who grew up in china and has CCP (chinese communist party) buddies and whose father works for the U.S. gov't (so therefore gets to hear the U.S. side)

      The Chinese people love windows. The government doesn't. What the other poster said about WTO and all is one of there issues with it, but a larger, and older, issue is one of control.

      MS has been accused and convicted of many things. One of those things is having backdoors in their software (netscape developers are weenies).

      The NSA has to check the source for windows if it wants to get used in gov't agencies. this means that the U.S. National Securty Agency has seen these backdoors (maybe has a special non-backdoor version? i don't know) and can therefore break into all chinese computers.

      or at least that's what the chinese gov't is paranoid about.

      with linux, this is not an issue. they can have their little software security group members spend all day checking out the code of the "approved" distros (Red Flag, for instance, is sold in more places than Red Hat is) and the popular unapproved ones to make sure that the chinese gov't isn't being spied on.

      after that, the WTO and licences thing comes then, then the Confucius thing.

      --

      What comes first, finding a teacher or becoming a student?
  8. linux, communism, humor by bani · · Score: 5, Funny

    Whenever I hear "linux" and "chinese" in the same sentence, I always get this image of Microsoft waging a 1950s-mccarthy propaganda war:

    "When you use Linux,
    you're using COMMUNISM"

    I guess I've been tainted by http://www.modernhumorist.com/mh/0004/propaganda/m p3.jpg

    1. Re:linux, communism, humor by oliverthered · · Score: 2

      The funny thing is, what you are saying is compleatly true!

      GPL is all but comunist, because it removes ownership from a single person.

      ELUA's are super capatilist (more like corporate state capatilist) because the enforce the ownership with the software producer.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    2. Re:linux, communism, humor by kubrick · · Score: 2

      GPL is all but comunist, because it removes ownership from a single person.

      Not necessarily. GPL depends on copyright to enforce the wishes of the author -- that's why use by those others than the author is 'licensed'. The author also has the freedom to re-license the code, or derivatives, under a different license if she so chooses.

      Maybe we need a Socialist Public License, for people to release things like DeCSS under -- "Don't blame me, it's the fault of the populace at large!" :)

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    3. Re:linux, communism, humor by kubrick · · Score: 2

      No. Relinquishing copyright would be the same as releasing code into the public domain. As it is, the author of GPL'd code can sue to protect their moral rights if the code is being used in a way that does not comply with the GPL, because and *only* because they still hold copyright over the code.

      Basically, the GPL is an elegant hack to use the idea of copyright against people making money from intellectual property, whether or not that IP was their own invention to begin with.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    4. Re:linux, communism, humor by JanneM · · Score: 2
      Not really. You retain all rights as a copyright holder. What you really are doing is allowing people to use your property in any way they please, as long as they "pay" by extending the same courtecy in turn.

      It does _not_ in any way remove ownership. Given that you have not accepted patches from anyone else, nothing prevents you from releasing another version under any license you want. Of course, you can not 'ungrant' a license (like GPL) from a version already released. What you are thinking of is perhaps the sometimes practice of granting FSF the copyright - in that case you do lose ownership, but it is a separate action that has nothing to do with GPL (and that most people would not want to do).

      /Janne

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    5. Re:linux, communism, humor by Tony-A · · Score: 2

      because it removes ownership from a single person.
      True. It's owned by each person who has the program. Not shared ownership, but each person fully owns it and can do anything they like with it (except depriving other owners of their rights). This increases, guess what? CAPITAL!

    6. Re:linux, communism, humor by zenyu · · Score: 2

      GPL is all but comunist, because it removes ownership from a single person.

      Um, no. as the author of some GPL'd and LGPL'd programs, I'm the only one who can relicense the code for unrestricted commercial use.

      EULA's are anti-capitalists because they deter competition. When I put something under GPL anyone can figure out how it works and write a clone, add some features and compete with my implementation. A EULA often makes figuring out how the program works a licence violation, even reading the machine code is disallowed in some cases. So it acts to restrict competition since no amount of capital will get you a clone of their protocols legally. Hence they restrict the flow of capital and enforce a government coerced monopoly, i.e. communism. Actually socialism, cuz there is still a quasi-democratic government that could theoretically make EULA's illegal.

    7. Re:linux, communism, humor by oliverthered · · Score: 2

      If you only had communism then evrything would be licenced in the same way as GPL.

      GPL is a communist framework in a capatilist world.

      Capatilism has nothing to do with competition, ELUA's enforce the ownership of whatever you using, they say you don't own a copy I do.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    8. Re:linux, communism, humor by kubrick · · Score: 2

      The GPL enforces socialism, to an extent, by people other than the author, but you are only obliged to deliver source code, or source code modifications, to those people you have distributed the binary to, not to society at large. Thus "society" is limited to the society of people using the code, and this can be kept small while obeying the terms of the license if all parties agree on this.

      The author still owns the code, and the copyright on the code. (However, they can't "take back" any release under the GPL, but they can improve the code and choose to release it under a proprietary license.) Thus, the GPL is not explicitly communist, as it still permits ownsership of software by the author (in fact, it's about the only form of intellectual property it does recognise), and this ownership is necessary for the GPL to be effective, otherwise the license could not be enforced.

      You are looking at the software from the perspective of use/consumption, while I am looking at it from the perspective of a content producer and programmer, which is how I make my living. I assure you, the distinctions I am making are important to me as an author of software.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    9. Re:linux, communism, humor by jmv · · Score: 2

      GPL includes some good ideas in communism. Why does anything that could resemble communism necessarily has to be bad? It's like saying "capitalism = bad", thus anything that has to do with money is bad. I think McCartism is still not that forgotten in the US.

    10. Re:linux, communism, humor by kubrick · · Score: 2

      Well, the only reason the GPL is enforceable is that exists within a capitalist system. Which is good, because the only reason it needs to exist is the capitalist system it's reacting against in the first place. :)

      Sort of a moebius strip approach to software licensing, turning the principle of intellectual property against itself. I only wish similar practices were possible in the world of material objects; that is, the ability to share your posessions with others while mandating that they will find it difficult to take without giving.

      (I approach property discussions from something of a Proudhon-ist position; i.e. libertarian socialism. "Property is theft" and all that. :)

      (BTW, if you develop code based on someone else's GPL'd code you only have author's rights over the code you wrote (of course), so it is not quite a turnaround from consumer to producer, as the main code is still 'owned' by the author, at least for any purpose that would remove it from the GPL'd area -- i.e. they still decide what is copyright infringement (people copying the code and not obeying the GPL) and what is not (relicensing the code under another license to people who want a closed version so they won't be bound by the GPL.) But apart from that it's much closer to that model than proprietary code, and attempts to ensure more consumption and production in ways that BSD, public domain et. al don't.)

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    11. Re:linux, communism, humor by oliverthered · · Score: 2

      "the only reason the GPL is enforceable is that exists within a capitalist system", this is a bit of a rhetorical hypothesis,The only reason GPL exists is because we have a system that enforces ownership.If everywhere was communist then there would be no need for GPL.

      If I am given some GPL'd code (assuming it wasn't stolen by whoever gave it to me!) I can give the code away to all and sundry, making it effectively completely public. The person who gave me the code may not have intended this to happen, in which case they should have chosen a different licence.

      On the other hand Public domain or BSD means that the intermediary could change the license to whatever they please and prevent me from giving the code away.

      "the only reason the GPL is enforceable is that exists within a capitalist system", this is a bit of a rhetorical hypothesis, if everywhere was communist then there would be no need for GPL.

      If I am given some GPL'd code (assuming it wasn't stolen by whoever gave it to me!) I can give the code away to all and sundry, making it effectively completely public. The person who gave me the code may not have intended this to happen, in which case they should have chosen a different licence.

      On the other hand Public domain or BSD means that the intermediary could change the license to whatever they please and prevent me from giving the code away.

      I choosing a GPL licence the author is saying that the code(and non author derived works) can be given away freely and no-one can change that, even the original author.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  9. Heh... by autopr0n · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Of course, the difference is, digital information can be copied infinitely, while labor can't.

    I wonder, if we had replicator technology today would it create a star-trek style utopia, or would manufacturing companies rush to try to protect their 'intellectual property'?

    Btw, the Chinese government no longer considers itself to be "Communist".

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Heh... by redcliffe · · Score: 2

      No. It would create an energy economy.

    2. Re:Heh... by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 2, Insightful
      if we had replicator technology

      It would surely be banned by companies. Made illegal, you know. The whole economy as we know would collapse. Besides, I don't think humankind would be ready for it, I'm pretty sure everyone would start to replicate Ferrari's, BMW and caviar and Champagne. It would be a neverending decadent party (think "Roman Empire"), not a strict military-like society like Star Trek where knowlegde and research goes above all.

      the Chinese government no longer considers itself to be "Communist".
      Not meant to flame: but how does it consider itself now? Socialist? I don't know... I know that there are more economical liberties in China now, but that doesn't really make it less communist.

      To stay on topic: *if* China pulls this through, it means a whole continent converted to our beloved Penguin. This can have major impact worldwide, because (even if they wished so) China is no island, and bussiness (in the US and Europe) will be confronted with Chinese people using Linux...on the desktop! Word documents? Not anymore for our Chinese friends ;-)

    3. Re:Heh... by autopr0n · · Score: 2

      the Chinese government no longer considers itself to be "Communist". Not meant to flame: but how does it consider itself now? Socialist? I don't know... I know that there are more economical liberties in China now, but that doesn't really make it less communist.

      Yes, socialist. Some people call it 'facist', but I doubt that. Certanly they wouldn't call themselves facist.

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    4. Re:Heh... by den_erpel · · Score: 2, Funny

      Word documents? Not anymore for our Chinese friends ;-)

      :0 Bf
      * Content-Type: application/msword;
      | formail -b -f -A "$MSHEADER evil-word"

      # reply rule
      -snip-

      :0 H
      * $ ^$MSHEADER
      trash

      (or /dev/null, as you prefer)

      --
      Genius doesn't work on an assembly line basis. You can't simply say, "Today I will be brilliant."
    5. Re:Heh... by sql*kitten · · Score: 2

      Of course, the difference is, digital information can be copied infinitely, while labor can't.

      Unless you're China, in which case you just imprison a few more people in a forced labor camp and make them do it.

    6. Re:Heh... by brunes69 · · Score: 2

      not a strict military-like society like Star Trek where knowlegde and research goes above all.

      I really hate when people make this generalization. Earth in Star Trek is not "militarized" Starfleet exists totally seperate from the World Governmnet, just as the US Military exists seperattly from the US government. The difference between Earth in Satr Trek and Earth of today isn't the militarization, it's that people became enlightened enough to realize that property is MEANINGLESS. According to the timeline, this was way before they got replicators too, BTW( sometime in the late 21st cen, after WW3). After this revolution, people started just enjoying life, doing research and space exploration for the fun of it, not pointless material profit.

  10. I do. by autopr0n · · Score: 3, Informative

    Windows 2k supports Chinese (and japanese/korean) for things like filenames and anything else you might want to do out of the box, as long as the apps support it.

    I was also able to get Chinese characters in word 2000 with windows 98 after a free download from Microsoft.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:I do. by Surak · · Score: 2

      Support for Eastern languages in Windows 2000 is buggy in non-localized versions. A quick check of the README files and such will reveal that. Always the recommendation is to get the localized version of Windows.

      That's because Microsoft doesn't bother to test with foreign language support until they begin releasing the localized versions somewhat after the North American versions ship.

  11. Ironic isn't it? by I+Love+this+Company! · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That China, a country with draconian human-rights laws has open, flourishing Linux use and development? It doesn't quite seem to work so well (at least on a government and regular user level) in the west.

    --

    "All art is quite useless." -- Oscar Wilde
    1. Re:Ironic isn't it? by sapone · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're fine as long as you're not a terrorist muslim these days. Who knows what they do to the genitals of Guantanamo Bay prisoners...

    2. Re:Ironic isn't it? by toriver · · Score: 2

      The laws associated with the U.S./U.N. War on Drugs. :-)

  12. Don't you mean 0, 65? by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    I don't think anyone uses UTF32, in UTF16 it would just be 0 then 65.

    Anyway, while it might be wasteful, I think the world would be a better place for programmers if everyone stuck with UTF16 rather then other crazy encodings.

    Compression can take care of the rest, besides how much of the large, space-taking-up information is plain text anyway?

    What about if somebody needs to mix in Korean in the same document, for example. Very, very, complicated issues.

    How so? It dosn't seem like it would be complicated to me.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Don't you mean 0, 65? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2

      That's UCS16... UTF is an encoding, UCS is a character set.

      Sensible setups use UFT8, which can encode up to UCS32 - good enough for any languages we're likely to use in the near future (assuming we don't meet aliens with billions of characters in their language).

      The advantage of UTF8 is ease of transition - you can still use strcmp, normal "" strings, etc. (compare to the hoops that Win32 has to go through to do UTF16... I tried to convert a program once, and gave up after a month banging my head against a brick wall).

      The disadvantage is that it's biased towards western character sets - once you get into things like chinese it takes something like 6 bytes to describe a 4 byte character (btw. 2 byte characters are not enough for chinese. Presumable 'doze uses UTF16 to get around this limitation).

  13. Network effects. by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    Imagine tens of millions of kids growing up learning Linux rather then windows (I'm not going to pretend like a large percentages of Chinese schools are going to have computers. check out the film not one less)

    it'll mean a lot more software and stuff for Linux. Eventually.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  14. Premtive Joke suppression. Plz no "Rinux" jokes. by autopr0n · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Chinese people have no problem pronouncing "L"s, it's the Japanese who make that mistake.

    Thanks in advance.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  15. There aren't a billion people there... by RedBear · · Score: 5, Insightful
    but they are also doing this in the Philippines. The Advanced Science and Technology Institute has put together a somewhat simplified single-cd distro on which they've included such things as OpenOffice. They've been showing it off to the public and getting great response to it. It seems to be targetted toward home users and educational environments. According to the FAQ it's based on Red Hat 7.2. Anyone interested in trying it out can download an ISO here. A snippet from the website (the distro is named Bayanihan Linux):
    BAYANIHAN is a Filipino tradition where people in a community help their neighbor in physically moving their house to a different place.

    BAYANIHAN embodies the spirit of the Open Source movement. BAYANIHAN connotes people joining in and helping those in need. It also implies a movement from one place to a hopefully better place.

    LINUX was added to the final name since the software's basic framework is LINUX. It was built on top of a Red Hat Linux operating system.
  16. How so? by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    It dosn't really seem that ironic to me. What does computer use have to do with political freedom?

    While many people in the west consider Free Software a bit 'subversive' and politicized, they are right in line with the communist rhetoric that the nation was founded on.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  17. moving a house? by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    BAYANIHAN is a Filipino tradition where people in a community help their neighbor in physically moving their house to a different place.

    What a bizarre tradition! I mean I realize there are times when it might be convenient to move a house, but still. Such a strange idea.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  18. How many Chinese by oliverthered · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The population of china is huge, if they wanted to they could easly mobalise a workforce the same saze as the UK who only work on linux. After a coupld of months a few thousand man years of work will have been done.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:How many Chinese by zoccav · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A similar scientific experiment has been conducted by putting 9 women to work on the birth of one child.
      It was only after approximately 9 months that the average throughput raised in an almost discontinuous way from 0 to a staggering 0.95 kids/month. Also, the complementary 8 kids were considered very-cute-but-not-quite-planned.
      High amounts of resources accelerate production processes. Creative processes (like software development) are less affected by mass.

  19. Traditional vs simplifed chinese by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    The Taiwanese still use Traditional Chinese characters, while the mainland uses Simplified ones. A mainlander might have trouble using a Taiwanese distro and vise versa.

    Ironically, computer technology has completely negated the need for simplified characters

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Traditional vs simplifed chinese by wenzi · · Score: 3, Informative

      It is a little bit more complicated than that.

      Taiwan = Traditional
      China = Simplified
      Hong Kong = Traditional
      Singapore = Both ( But most kids learn Smiplified )
      Overseas Chinese = Traditional

      Traditional encoding uses Big5, but simplified uses HZ and GB2312.

      http://www.artsiv.net

      --
      -- I doubt, therefore I might be.
  20. Stupid mods by oliverthered · · Score: 2, Redundant

    Why is the parent flamebate?

    Personally I would call opensource, P2P networks &co comunist.

    DMCA and all the RIAA lobying is capatilist.

    If you don't believe me then lookup what the words comunist and capatilist mean and go and read the communist manifesto

    Moding as flame-bate is the only flame here.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:Stupid mods by JWW · · Score: 2

      DMCA and the RIAA are certainly not capatilist.

      Where in the restrictive rules they want is "Let the market decide." Nowhere the DMCA is a market restriction policy and everything the RIAA wants would limit the market as well. The DMCA and RIAA 's desired rules could basically be described as a twisted type of corporate socialism. Which, unlike true socailism, wanting to try to take care of the needs of the people, is taking care of the needs of the corporation in direct opposition to the needs and desires of the people.

    2. Re:Stupid mods by oliverthered · · Score: 2

      DMCA and the RIAA are certainly not capatilist.
      What,
      Please goto www.m-w.com or www.dictionary.com and look up capatilist.

      DMCA and the RIAA are enforcing strict ownership and copyright that is capatilist.

      Your thinking about free market which differet from capatilist. Read wealth of the nations be Adam Smith .

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    3. Re:Stupid mods by bwt · · Score: 2

      DMCA and all the RIAA lobying is capatilist.

      B.S.

      The RIAA is a "special interest" that seeks to lobby Congress to regulate in its favor against the public interest. It is corporatist and elitist, but certainly not capitalist. Selling a product does not make you a free trader.

      The DMCA is fascist -- it takes property rights away from the owners of the property and gives them to somebody else. "Access" is a right own the owner of the physical medium. Declaring otherwise is fascist in the strictest sense of the word.

      Personally I would call opensource, P2P networks &co comunist.

      P2P is a form of rebellion and civil disobedience to oppressive laws that create and maintain a sound recording cartel that has market power to exclude innovative alternatives, fabricate "artists", and exclude alternative music from radio and record stores.

      Open source is extremely capitalist. I trade my IP for yours, and we both act voluntarily and without government coercion .

      Open source is not communist because an author if they desired sell their own copyright ownership to someone else. The fact that they often choose not to is irrelevent.

  21. Inputing Chinese characters by ukryule · · Score: 3, Informative

    One *big* problem that I've found trying to use Linux with Chinese is in inputting chinese characters. There is software available (e.g. 'xcin'), but it's not anywhere near as easy to use and smooth as in Windows.

    This is a difficult problem to solve - there are a large number of different methods to input Chinese which all have to be supported. Then this input method has to be easy to use across all potential applications (i.e. if you change from your Abiword window to a shell to an emacs window you still want to be able to use the same input method).

    It's still at the 'doable-but-painful' stage in Linux (heh! What's new there?), but something as fundamental as entering text needs to be really simple for Linux to be useable natively in Chinese.

    At the moment Windows beats Linux hands-down on this front ... so any progress in this area is very welcome.

    1. Re:Inputing Chinese characters by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2

      My guess is that this problem will get solved as more and more Chinese folks use Linux. As the Chinese government begins to actually roll out Linux they will undoubtedly notice that input could be slicker, and someone will fix it. Either it will be Sun trying to sell the Chinese StarOffice, or it will be hackers at Red Flag, or some Chinese college student trying to make a name for himself, but it is sure to happen. One thing is certain about Free software and that is the more use it gets the more polished it becomes. Right now Chinese input is not a big deal in Linux. Few Chinese people actually use Linux, and those that do have gotten used to the various hacks Chinese input requires. My guess is that it will become a big deal soon.

  22. How to use Chinese characters on Linux system ? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 2



    This is the question I always want to ask :

    How to use Chinese characters on Linux system ?

    On Windoze, there are several ways to achieve the goal. But on Linux, so far, it's kind of hard to do so.

    So, anyone out there who know the answer ?

    Please share !

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  23. Open Source vs Revolution by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here: "We are allowed to change our government, why not our software?"
    There: "We are allowed to change our software, why not our government?"

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  24. power/hours != quality. by oliverthered · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well you could look at it this way.

    take 1 Billion(US) Chinese
    say 0.1% are exelent coders and 1% are ok coders that gives you.

    900,000 coders and 100,000 UBA coders to hand.
    when you take into account 'given enough eyes all bugs are shallow'
    I'm sure between them they can produce quality code.

    The Chinese are well known for there technical exelance.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:power/hours != quality. by oliverthered · · Score: 2

      1:
      Well the original parent said somthing along the lines of,
      'What with the 2000 apps x distro installs It's going to take them ages to convert them all'
      2: Thats were design comes in,
      Project management is well shit, what they need is a tool that integrates project management and design from the framework level right down to each function in an application.
      This method allows micro management of a node so that you can have 1000 managers/drivers on a project, each managing a node and each talk up or down a node, even the person who codes the function can be considered a manager.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  25. Steganography by tlambert · · Score: 4, Funny

    So how long before there are stegonographic comments in Linux source coming out of China to get around the gvernment censorship of the media, but not of source code?

    "Take the first letter of each fortune in the fortune file, and then..."

    -- Terry

    1. Re:Steganography by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 2

      What message are they going to send that we are not already aware of? // Help! Help! Were being repressed! // Seriously, if you get this message // there are about a billion of us // trapped in this asian country // and we would really like to be // free. MUST TYPE QUEITLY, SECRET // POLICE MONITOR MY CODE!!!

  26. UTF-8 is The Way (TM) by joib · · Score: 2

    UTF-8 is somewhat ascii compatible, and an efficient coding for mostly ascii data. Looks like the unix world, ietf protocols etc. are moving in this direction. For more info check out
    UTF-8 and Unicode FAQ for Unix/Linux.

  27. free==future. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My company is beginning the switch to linux terminal servers for the 90% of the machines at our work. The decision is soly based on that they do not want to pay $500,000 to microsoft so workers can browse the web and write memos. And we are really just a fairly small company - i cannot imagine what a large company or government must pay. Most amusing the top managers really have no idea what linux is, they just refer to them as the penguin machines.

    Linux is devleoped in a way that requires no profit margin, unlike microsoft. so unless microsoft finds a killer app it seems that companies,governments and any other organization that acts in their own self-interest will naturally swtich to the 'ultimate undercut' : linux.

    1. Re:free==future. by lingqi · · Score: 2
      ...so unless microsoft finds a killer app...

      yeah. it's called exchange server. and fscking outlook.

      i do wish that people would realize when you kill exchange / outlook combo with something with similar functionality but either not-on-windown-period, or OS independent (i.e. web interface), windows just lost 2/3 of it's charm to large organizations.

      --

      My life in the land of the rising sun.

  28. KDE 3.0 is your friend ... by ukryule · · Score: 3, Informative

    KDE3 has greatly improved international support - all the Unicode/il8n stuff support is built in.
    This means that at the GUI level it's just(!) a question of all the apps supporting and translating this - take a look at this table for information on the translation status for (Traditional) Chinese.

    If you've got a full (with international support/fonts) installation of KDE you should be able to try it out fairly easily - just change the language via the GUI configuration tool.

  29. propaganda forgot 'cooking the books' by oliverthered · · Score: 5, Funny

    Heard from ENRON just before they collapsed.

    "When I said burn all the books I meant , 'put them on the fire', not 'copy them onto CD'"

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  30. I am, for one. (Re: Are there any Chinese slash..) by DigitalHammer · · Score: 5, Informative

    Is there any Chinese Slashdotters...that can provide a cultural insight as to why china would be so open to open source?

    First of all I would like to state that I am of pure Chinese descent.

    To answer your question, I believe there are 3 factors that make China very open to open source: Confucianism, the WTO, and Microsoft licensing.

    The centuries-old mentality of being extremly frugal with one's money or possesions. Though this idea is ancient, the Communist government began to encourage the use of this virtue in times of famine and hardship. This article from Time Magazine titled "Overeating Dying in China" further explains:

    "In the early 1980s when some nouveau rich squandered their money on restaurants delicacies and government officials took advantage of their jobs to attend luxurious feasts, a distorted concept was built up in most Chinese's minds: the wealthier one is, the more fatty foods are on your dinning table.

    The grumbles about upstarts' arrogance and the government officials' corruption turned into general disapproval. People began to look favorably at the ancient Chinese maxim which praises abstinence in consumption....Considering the 30 million destitute Chinese struggling in remote mountainous areas and those laid-off work who are living a hard life, traditional virtues like fighting one's way up and building the country through hardship and thrift are still highly encouraged by the Chinese government.
    "

    This "frugal ideal", reinvigorated in the minds of mainland Chinese, compounded with ancient Confucian values of filial piety encourage the development and acceptance of open source software over propeitery ones in China. The bit about filial piety applies to the corporate environment of Chinese businesses. Filial piety in Chinese families enforce the younger family members' respect of older ones. This encourages the younger members' to set priorities that value the importance of the older family member (typically the father, mother, and grandparents). Chinese children, raised under this mentality, carry these priorities over to their workplace where they place their upmost importance upon the boss and senior officials (formerly occupied by older family members).

    In most, if not all jobs in China involving internal technology, the IT manager must find software that will create a stable infrastructure while saving as much money as possible. This is where the "frugal mentality" and the rigid set of priorities converge to brighten the appeal of open source software. Because China is attempting to gain full membership within the WTO, which requires its adherance to strict IP rules, the country began an enormous crackdown on the "pirated" software industry. Using pirated (MS) software no longer was an option, as it used to be 10 years ago. Another path would be to purchase MS software licenses. However, the thought of accepting the dinosauric financial demands of Microsoft licensing contracts clashed with the frugal mentality prolific with Chinese tech companies, and the set of priorities spawned by Confucian filial piety led them to consider the amount of funds that could be saved and allocated for other departments by not buying licenses. In turn, Chinese techs were left with another option: Open source software, more specifically Linuix. The legal and cost-free nature of the penguin OS became an appealing option to the Chinese techs, and in turn took the opportunity to develop and integrate it in to their corporate infrastructure.

    Chinese cultural traditions of filial piety and frugality are further explained in this excerpt of the site "Paul Herbig's Working Papers":

    Chinese Network

    The Chinese commonwealth is a group of small Chinese companies from all over the world affiliated with each other, protecting and taking care of each others businesses. They are also referred to as 'Greater China', or the 'Chinese Network'.

    The survival mentality and the Confucian tradition of patriarchal authority, form the values of a typical Chinese entrepreneur - one who seeks to control his own small dynasty. These so call life raft values are:

    l.Thrift ensures survival.
    2.A high, even irrational, level of savings is desirable, regardless of immediate needs.
    3.Hard work to the point of exhaustion is necessary to ward off the many hazards present in an unpredictable world.
    4.The only people you can trust are family-- and a business enterprise is created as a familial life raft.
    5.The judgment of an incompetent relative in the family business is more reliable than that of a competent stranger.
    6.Obedience to patriarchal authority is essential to maintaining coherence and direction for the enterprise;
    7.Investment must be based on kinship or clan affiliations ,not abstract principles.
    8.Tangible goods, like real estate ,natural resources, and gold bars are preferable to intangibles like illiquid securities or intellectuals properties.
    9.Keep your bags packed at all times,day or night (Kao,p.25).
    Unlike the Japanese Keiretsu, the Chinese network is an open system for all Chinese entrepreneurs all over the world. They watch for each others businesses and help those who are in need. These Chinese entrepreneurs have a give - and - take relationship. The network is usually formed by joint ventures, weddings, political opportunities and common cultures. Ownership of the company are usually passed to relatives, regardless of their educational background or competency (the classic example is An Wang's passing of his company, Wang Computers, to his mediocre son instead of professional managers--which ended in failure). Generation after generation, no matter in what culture they were brought up, every Chinese seeks control and security of their businesses.
    The first Chinese generation has a survival and Confucius mentality. Every business decision is made for the future of the family. Unlike the old generation, the younger generation are born in other countries outside of mainland China. They do not only carry the Chinese culture, but the one they were born in as well. This generation, especially if born in a western country, has a sense of individualism. Companies like Winbond,a high-tech company in Taiwan, which considers themselves to be a Chinese company , believes that you should respect your family and love ones but you have to set your mind on what is right for the company. D.Y. Yang,owner of Winbond, says, "A Chinese company depends less on data and more on intuition,feelings,and people." But on the other hand, he also mentions, "Of course you have to respect the family business structure, but since this is a high tech company,individual contributions are important (Kao,p31)."

    ---snip

    I have heard about the open markets in china where you can purchase bootlegs of any software for near the cost of the CD. If the choice is between M$ at .5 dollars and Linux at .5 dollars linux wins.

    On a side note, frugality, combined with Communist ideals and Confucian values led to the explosive growth of the pirated software and media industry in China, as this essay written by Rutgers Univesity student Sheng Ding explains:

    "Confucius's concept of the transmission of culture and Marx's views on the social nature of language and invention arose from very different ideological foundations. Nonetheless, because each school of thought in its own way saw intellectual creation as fundamentally a product of the larger society from which it emerged, neither elaborated a strong rationale for treating it as establishing private ownership interests.[15] Deeply influenced by these two ideologies, China falls behind all developed countries and many developing countries in the field of intellectual property protection. It is also not difficult to understand why most of Chinese did not know what were IPRs in 1980s."

    Well, I am confident that this reply answers your question. More information about Chinese philosophies and other ideals that are involved in China's flourishing open source movement can be found below:

    Paul Herbig's Working Papers

    A Paper on IP Rights in China, by Sheng Ding

    The Chinese Way with Money, an article from the Shanghai Star

  31. Re:US / Leftist politics by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 2

    Hospitals don't make a profit =p

    It's so rediciously regulated, we have to charge 5x the cost of an item to break the origional purchase price in the amount we get from insurance companies.

    If one were to abolish all regulation in the field everyones hospital bills would plumit overnight (though other bad things would happen also, but thats a diffrent topic). Currently my hospital to choose a random item has a 17.41x multiplier on the cost of using a X-Ray machine for a "standard" x-ray (eg broken arm), this will net us a few cents to a dollar after we get done collecting real hard cash from your insurance company, who will thusly start paying us less so we have to charge more. It makes medical treatment a imposibility for the non-insured. A simple ER visit for a non-trivial issue can easily break 1k in the course of a few hours because of it, which is absolutly disgusting.

    --
    I live in a giant bucket.
  32. Re:Why this doesn't happen in western countries? by goldspider · · Score: 2
    Linux web servers running Apache are actually becoming quite popular in the government, since in many cases, IIS doesn't pass the security litmus.

    However, as far as converting the workstations over to Linux, it's not even being close to economically feasable. What you save on the licenses would quickly be surpassed by the cost of A) disposal of the old workstations and making sure they are wiped clean of all information (there's been alot of problems with this lately), B) training of some very brain-dead users who believe that a computer without Windows is not a computer, and C) everything related with dismantling an ENORMOUS existing infrastructure and getting all of the new systems to work seamlessly (which equals alot of time and $$$).

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
  33. Developing Countries Showing Us the Way? by shahakran · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I find it intriguing that the developing countries are some of the world's largest users of the Linux system. Africa and China are now almost exclusively using Linux and/or unlicensed Microsoft systems, a fact which Bill Gates would no doubt like to set right. But aren't they right?

    Why pay for buggy pieces of crap when you can get a decent operating system for free? Not to say Linux is the be all and end all but as operating systems go it is more robust.

    I think countries like China who will now be developing more and more applications for Linux could finally get the proverbial show on the road and give companies a very useable option to forking out truck loads of money for Microsoft licences.

    One of the major fallbacks of Linux is the lack of applications especially those for development. The day there is an equivalent to Visual Studio in Linux is the day that companies will realistically think more about changing to Linux.

    That's my opinion anyway.

  34. Given what IBM achieved with punched cards... by leonbrooks · · Score: 2

    ...what sort of position can you see Microsoft fulfilling when it rolls out Palladium in concert with Passport?

    Drop the P to see what Passport actually is... and remember that the `My' in `My Computer' is William Henry Gates III.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  35. For taxation purposes? by leonbrooks · · Score: 2

    They'll find a way, you watch and see! )-:

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  36. Re:Why this doesn't happen in western countries? by Salsaman · · Score: 2
    They would actually gain money if MS were a smaller company. First, the money wouldn't disappear, it would be spent in other ways, which would likely be taxed anyway.

    Second, see for example this post. MS pays hardly any tax as it is.

  37. And that's not all... by leonbrooks · · Score: 3, Interesting

    `Fraud! ' came the cry! Microsoft overvalues shares.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  38. Virus Propogation by capt.Hij · · Score: 2
    This is a really good thing for Linux. When governments use a piece of software the companies that want to deal with that government have a strong incentive to also use the same software because of the convenience factor. On the down side, a huge installed base increases the probability that more people will try to propagate a virus for those machines. It would be far too tempting to try to debilitate a whole government.

    There will be a threshhold at which the number of linux boxes will make for a target rich environment for virus writers. This is something that should be anticipated and dealt with now before it becomes an embarrassment. Let's learn from others mistakes!

  39. Spyware? In a Microsoft product? Inconceivable! by leonbrooks · · Score: 2
    I don't know whether there's any spyware in Windows or not

    You do now. In fact since IE v5, Alexa has been spying on you. I guess they must really despise competition if they forbid other remote management software (in the XP EULA).

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  40. Welcome to the 21st century! by leonbrooks · · Score: 2
    The US doesn't more readily adopt Linux because Joe User and his Grandma don't want to mess around with recompiling their kernels and editing text based configuration files and bitching to hardware manufacturers about device drivers in order to write letters, play games and email pictures of their kids and puppies to each other.

    Which rock have you been hiding under for the last decade?

    Very few people, even technicians, ever have to do anything like that today, let alone all of it.

    As an aside: 99% of Windows users would refuse to try installing their OS. A GUI doesn't magic complexity and problems away, it just makes them prettier. A modern Linux install is actually simpler, faster and easier than a Windows install. Even RedHat, hardly the holder of a reputation for pushing the envelope, is easier to install than W2k, even though the W2k tested was a set of manufacturer's recovery CDs!

    My wife (SWMBO) uses Mandrake Linux 8.2, Kmail, Konqueror (or Mozilla for sites that break Konq), OpenOffice.org, The Gimp, XMMS and about twoscore of the games. She fears the toaster, that's how technical she is (not so her sister, who flipped the PSU switch on the back of her own computer from 220 to 110 and blew it up).

    Last week, I shut down SWMBO's machine for the first time in about 8 months to add some new hardware to it. She came home as it was booting and asked me what the startup screen is (text in a fancy framebuffer border with a progress bar) because she'd never seen it before, never knew textmode or the boot screen existed, never rebooted her machine. She doesn't know that it has a kernel, or that it has a USB webcam that I use as a kiddie monitor, or that her printer talks to it through USB; and your reward for asking her how the dual-scroll-wheel AOpen optical mouse connects (PS/2, in fact) would be a blank and concerned look. No worries.

    Are we there yet?

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:Welcome to the 21st century! by radish · · Score: 2


      All well and good, but as you point out, she has you to look after the system for her. Now imagine she was on her own (perish the thought).

      I'm a smart guy, I know Unix, I've been developing on it for years, but until recently I always ran windows at home. So the other week I pop SuSE on a new box I just built. So yeah, it works, and it's pretty neat. But I'd take w2k over KDE in the interface stakes any day. And yes, you still have to fiddle with countless config files to make it do anything interesting. I'm leaving SuSE on that box, it does the job I want it to do well. But there's no way I'd recommend linux (well not SuSE anyway) to anyone who isn't of a technical background.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  41. Not so... by leonbrooks · · Score: 2

    Red Flag Linux is being run by the Emperor's son or something like that. I'd expect this little QANGO pressure-cooker to be attached to power in a similar fashion. It's not entirely ethical from our PoV but we can be grateful that number-one-son didn't get employed as head of Microsoft in China.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  42. Re:Why this doesn't happen in western countries? by Tony-A · · Score: 2

    How much $$$ in taxes would the US loose if microsoft would be a much smaller company?
    The US would gain taxes from moneys saved, hence increasing taxable income, by companies not so adept at avoiding tax as Microsoft. A rather substantial gain I would imagine.

  43. HAHAHA by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    LOL, that is seriously pretty funy dude :P

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  44. In some minds Capitalism + Totalitarian = Facist by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    Of course, this is a pretty gross simplification. I have seen people online call the current Chinese system 'fascist'.

    I don't really know all that much about fascism per se, but if you remove the 'national identity' or 'racial identity' component, there are a lot similarities with Confucianism. IE Confucius believed each person should be in a strict hierarchy with the emperor at the top. Of course, the ancient Chinese believed they were the only actual nation in the world (everyone else was one of 4 types of barbarians, barbarians from the east, barbarians from the west, barbarians from the north, and barbarians from the south)... so obviously they would have no 'national identity' concept :P

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  45. Re:US / Leftist politics by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    If one were to abolish all regulation in the field everyones hospital bills would plumit overnight (though other bad things would happen also, but thats a diffrent topic)

    "Other band things" hrm. hehe. "Clean needles? Pff, who needs 'em"

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  46. Re:US / Leftist politics by operagost · · Score: 2

    Of course, you guys don't mind charging the artificially inflated price to your patients who have no health insurance as well. I know from personal experience. You also like to make billing mistakes, and instead of eating the mistake you send a bill for the difference three months later and expect payment immediately. Imagine booking a flight, and then months after you return getting a bill because you were undercharged. Could you imagine the airline being able to get away with that?

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  47. UTF16 has 1,310,720 characters, actualy. by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    They have some escape stuff built in... but those would only be used in extreemly rare situations.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  48. && no pronunciation? by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    Well, I asked one chinese person if they 'heard' the characters when she read them, and she said she did.

    And I do usualy think "and" or "or" when I see those symbols in code.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  49. DMCA and the RIAA are certainly not capatilist. by oliverthered · · Score: 2

    This is now a standard reply, so i've included links and copytext!!!

    What,
    Please goto www.m-w.com look up capatilist.

    Main Entry: capitalism
    Pronunciation: 'ka-p&-t&l-"iz-&m, 'kap-t&l-, British also k&-'pi-t&l-
    Function: noun
    Date: 1877
    : an economic system characterized by private or corporate ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by private decision, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined mainly by competition in a free market

    Main Entry: state capitalism
    Function: noun
    Date: 1903
    : an economic system in which private capitalism is modified by a varying degree of government ownership and control

    Sound like what the DMCA/RIAA are based on?

    DMCA and the RIAA are enforcing strict ownership and copyright that is capatilist.

    Your thinking about free market which differet from capatilist. Read Wealth of the nations be Adam Smith .

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  50. Re:Linux in china? by WowTIP · · Score: 3, Informative

    Communist country?

    Check your facts, troll.

    --

    --

    "I'm surfin the dead zone
    In the twilight, unknown"
  51. Re:What a shame !!! by sketerpot · · Score: 2
    The chinese approach to monitoring their citizens' internet traffic is refreshing compared to the USA: publicly say that they are watching their citizens and not pretend that they aren't doing anything, as opposed to the USA, where the approach is to secretly (or at least semi-secretly) do the same thing, and then bill themselves as defenders of freedom.

    I would prefer neither policy, but at least China isn't hipocritical about it.

  52. Re:US / Leftist politics by Archie+Steel · · Score: 2

    You're right, the U.S. could be considered a socialist country, but not because of Social Security. Rather, it is its heavily-subsidized industries (military, aerospace, hi-tech, biotech, agriculture) that make it ressemble the socialist model...to a point. In fact, apart from individual liberties - including the fact that mom and pop could have a store - the U.S. of the cold war was strikingly similar to the U.S.S.R. It is safe to say that they were rivals (for oil, mostly) instead of enemies.

    BTW, there are very few "capitalist" countries left in the world. After 1929, everyone pretty much understood that "pure" capitalism didn't work. So most industrialized countries now have mixed economies - the sad thing is that the U.S. forces its client nations to adopt the capitalist models and therefore become markets for american goods, even though it also ensures that their economy won't develop normally...

    --

    Reminder: find a new sig
  53. Re:I am, for one. (Re: Are there any Chinese slash by Khalid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I believe many of the traits (maybe not all) you are depicting are not specific to the Chinese society, but are rather those of traditional societies. Many African and Islamic societies function the same way. I am from Morocco (An Islamic, African, Arabic and Berber country, yes all that in the same time :) ) and this is the way many moroccans do business too.

  54. Re:US / Leftist politics by Khalid · · Score: 2

    Capitalism is the exploitation of men by other men
    Communism is the contrary :)

  55. Old /. news - Not Again by jsse · · Score: 3, Funny

    After 302 posts, no one caught this guy repeating old /. story.

    I think he's just testing /. editors' ability to recognize old news. I think he got the answer. :)

  56. Re:US / Leftist politics by greenrd · · Score: 2
    Yes, which just goes to show capitalism doesn't work for healthcare.

    Suck on that, libertarians!

    Also, I should point out that, despite libertarians' consistent inability to grasp this basic point, government underfunding in particular cases does not prove that socialised healthcare can't work.

  57. Why this REALLY doesn't happen in western countrie by commodoresloat · · Score: 2

    Because all the documents for this stuff are in Chinese!

  58. I meant 'OWNERSHIP' by oliverthered · · Score: 2

    once code is relased under GPL you no longer 'OWN' it, it is free to run wild and you can't stop it.

    Unless. someone else trys to 'OWN' the code and prevent it from running wild, then you can stop them owning it.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  59. DMCA Copyrights. by hackus · · Score: 2

    I was afraid this was going to happen.

    What I have said before now begins.

    Countries will not use nor build thier societies economies or government bodies on information technology that unfairly gives the US/Europe an edge.

    They will use our own laws against us and defeat us in the economic arena, just as we did with the USSR, as American companies quickly find they cannot sell products abroad in such markets that do not recognize DMCA or Copyright laws as they are written in US/Europe.

    This is just the beginning.

    There will come a time when China and the Soviet Union will awaken economically, and the US and Europe are going to be very very sorry implementing laws based on simple greed.

    Greed doesn't work, quick and very fast innovation does, and with heavy laws and legal fees to bear American/European companies will not stand a chance.

    The only logical move will be exactly what we see today happening in the manufacturing base in our society. It will be moved.

    In this case, American and European companies will move the construction and design of software to the Soviet Union and China to escape the copyrights, patents, DMCA and all the legal expenses to build software in the US.

    Companies already do this to escape the tax laws, they most certainly will do this as well when the time comes.

    Which is very soon I am afraid.

    Hack

    --
    Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
  60. Hate to break it to you by theolein · · Score: 2

    but the Soviet Union doesn't exist any more.

  61. its socialism not communism by HanzoSan · · Score: 2

    And it also proves, along with gnutella, napster etc that socialism does work at least for technology

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:its socialism not communism by johnnyb · · Score: 2

      Actually, copyrights and patents are socialistic, and the lackthereof is capitalistic. In the case of copyrights and patents, the government is artificially playing with the market, and therefore is more of a socialist way of doing things. Napster et al are making free markets, just like capitalists like.

      In fact, the big businesses don't like Napster specifically because it is capitalistic. They enjoyed their government-sponsored position as holder of the copyrights. Because they had the government's help in having monopoly power over culture, they are able to become big.

      From your posts, I wonder if instead of being socialist, you're just anti-big-business. If so, you may like capitalism more than you think, because big businesses are usually created because of government interventions. For example, big drug companies are created because it requires a big company to be able to handle FDA regulations. In a free market, the same could be done with small companies at a fraction of the cost.

  62. USA was never pure capitalist. by HanzoSan · · Score: 2



    Pure capitalism isnt how the USA was founded to begin with. USA had labor from slaves to build up the country, this was never a true capitalist nation.

    Public schools didnt always exsist but they do now, police, libraries, healthcare, we are moving toward socialism.

    Pure socialism we arent ready for, pure capitalism we have moved beyond. Some people want to go to pure capitalism but they dont understand in pure capitalism, the losers or people who dont benifit from it, will become terrorists, steal, rob and so on, theres no such thing as 100 percent employment, and even if there were, without a minimum wage employment wouldnt be fair employment, pure capitalism would create class warfare to the highest degree.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:USA was never pure capitalist. by johnnyb · · Score: 2

      in pure capitalism, the losers or people who dont benifit from it, will become terrorists, steal, rob and so on, theres no such thing as 100 percent employment, and even if there were, without a minimum wage employment wouldnt be fair employment, pure capitalism would create class warfare to the highest degree.

      ***

      And this is based on what?

      Usually, this sort of thing happens when capitalism _doesn't_ happen. People often confuse big business with capitalism - they aren't the same. If you have large, controlling companies, chances are you do not have capitalism. Why? Because capitalism creates competition, and breaks down the barriers to entry. Big corporations usually exist in fields with large barriers to entry, because they are the only ones with enough cash flow to do it. Remove the barriers to entry, and all of a sudden the small companies have the upper hand because they are more nimble.

  63. Re:US / Leftist politics by Archie+Steel · · Score: 2

    Dan Rather? What the hell are you talking about, you brainwashed moron? Do you think I waste my time with U.S. network news? Another thing, asshole (you had to insult me, now, didn't you?), if you think Germany and Japan have economic problems then perhaps you should take a trip through this great big world of ours. Just because they sometimes hit recessions or suffer from the economic woes that invariably affect industrialized nations doesn't take away from the fact that they are the #2 and #3 economic powers of the world. And that, after suffering a major military defeat 57 years ago.

    Client countries would indeed include most of Central America, except for Nicaragua and Cuba, the two officially "socialist" countries. Note that, if it hadn't been for constant U.S. harassment/blockade (and an earthquake to boot, in the case of Nicaragua) these countries would have among the healthiest of economies. But all the other central american countries can be considered "client states" of the U.S. who is forcing them to adopt "free markets" by equating this concept with that of democracy (a fallacy, since you can have a free market in an otherwise autoritarian society). Implying that Honduras, Costa Rica or El Salvador are "socialist" reveals how little you know about that part of the world...

    In any case, about the comparison between the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. during the cold war, you'll notice that I did write "apart from individual liberties ", which covers the jeans situation. As far as natural resources are concerned, that's certainly true if you look at the two individual nations themselves, though if you include the resources of their client states, then it was probably pretty much the same.

    Finally, when I say "everyone understood after 1929 that pure capitalism didn't work", I mean the governing elites of the industrialized nations, who since then have incorporated parts of the socialist model of govt. intervention in the economy, the U.S. being a champion of this. You may think that governments consistently screws things up (typical), but without that govt. and its development of the american economy through the Pentagon system, you wouldn't be typing your idiotic drivel on a PC to then post it on the Internet at all. Understand this before continuing this conversation, otherwise you're not worth my time.

    Dickhead.

    --

    Reminder: find a new sig
  64. Re:I love it when America.... by bwt · · Score: 2

    No I didn't read the definitions, because those aren't words that have arcane definitions. I don't need a weatherman to tell me which way the wind blows, nor some "scholar" to tell me what capitalism is.

    And the DMCA does NOT enforce ownership, it DIMINISHES it. If I own the DVD, certain uses of that DVD are taken from me and given by statutory decree to someone who is no longer the owner of the physical object. You cannot tell me that capitalism smiles on a situation where I need a licence to access the contents of my own propery.

    Open source, 'I trade my IP for yours' what I've never known anyone who thinks that way about open source.

    You should get out more.

    Most people promote open source because they don't believe it should be owned, GPL prevents ownership by giving the author some rights.

    This is almost unintelligable. At best you are badly stating a common myth and misconception.

    Open Source is not the same thing as public domain. Open Source retains and DEPENDS ON active retaining of copyright ownership. If NuSphere violates the MySQL licence, they get sued.

    I have no idea what the hell you mean when you say " GPL prevents ownership by giving the author some rights." The GPL does not give the author any rights. The Copyright Act creates those rights, and the GPL retains them, but grants OTHERS, not the author, certain LIMITED permissions.

    The limitations are designed to assure that code written to extend the original will be passed back to the original author, which is why I say open source is "my IP for yours".

  65. Re:US / Leftist politics by johnnyb · · Score: 2

    (though other bad things would happen also, but thats a diffrent topic)

    *******

    I don't think so. I think this sort of thing is best handled through consumer groups, not mandated government decrees.

    If I want medical care from a substandard facility and doctor - why can't I get it? It's my life, isn't it?

  66. There arent REAL socialist countries, Fuzzy Logic by HanzoSan · · Score: 2

    60 percent socialist and 40 percent capitalist

    There arent any real socialist or communist countries.

    China never was communism, and there never was a true socialist country. Communism can only work when all the people are equal. Socialism can only work when theres true democracy. China or Europe never had true Democracy, hell USA doesnt have it either, we all have republics. Socialism can only work in a true Democracy where everyone can vote on anything.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac