Slashdot Mirror
Web Profits in the Gutter
The New York Times has an article about the web's one true growth industry: spam, fraud and porn. Societal meltdown or flourishing ecosystem? The talking heads debate.
← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)
← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)
Web profits in the gutter, talking heads debate. Maybe they should try getting their heads out of the gutter.
I'm the Devil the Windows users warned you about.
Three! The web's three true growth industries!
"My bullshit web company didn't succeed because it was bullshit, and the only new or good thing about it was its .com address! God, come from heaven and save me!"
How about retooling your business plan to provide services and products that people want. Saying that the only successful businesses that use the web are web-only companies (such as porn) is like saying that the only successful businesses that use the highway are truck stops, motels, and Cracker Barrels.
Spam becomes less successful daily. The first successful spam was the Green Card Lawyer spam and it's all gone downhill radically from there.
As far as fraud goes, show me a commercial space that's free of fraud and I'll show you one that's pretty profitless, constrained, and empty of innovation in general.
What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey
1. Spam is extremely irritating
2. pr0n is ok, as long as it doesn't lead to #1
People who spam need to die, people who spam about pr0n are still spammers. Kill them all
There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
But isn't that 3 growth industries, not one? Unless the nigerian schemes are somehow connected to young 18 year olds spamming you.
Think nothing is impossible? Try slamming a revolving door.
the web's one true growth industry: spam, fraud and porn.
Um, that would be three true growth industries.
society meltdown - no matter where you go, there is someone out there that will do what you least expect for money, and that means absolutely anything.
flourishing ecosystem - having said that, this brings us to the new breed of low lives that will do anything for money, maybe an old ecology of ppl using new methods - no matter how much other ppl have to suffer for them to consider themselves 'successful'.
Unfortunately the internet is now where they breed and this is a complete abuse of the technology that was there for totally opposite reasons.
Analytic & algebraic topology of locally Euclidean meterization of infinitely differentiable Riemmanian manifold
I'm sure the new york times makes a healthy profit selling people's information that they collect from mandatory registration to advertising firms.
GoatPigSheep, the 3 most important food groups
L: sporkboy5
PW: sporkboy
get it while its hot! you too can be a PR teacher from algeria making less than 20k!
when all is said and done, all a man has left are his blades and his honor.
Porn helped drive the printing and video industries. Gutenberg's second book, after the Bible, was erotic stories.
Spam? Hell, if the U.S. Post Office stopped all "third class" mail (spam), they'd be broke and out of business tomorrow. I've always looked at online spam as an opportunity -- ISPs should do more research into filtering spam and offer it as a premium service.
Fraud online is just like fraud offline. Snake-oil salesman that traveled from town to town during the 1800s comes to mind. Cavaet Emptor -- nothing new here. And with all due respect, anyone who believes some Nigerian ex-thugs that stole billions picked YOU to launder it (and apparantly all your friends, since they all got the same e-mail) DESERVES what they get.
Try as you might, you just can't legislate away greed, sloth and stupidity.
Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
one if you realize that spam about free porn is also fraud.
-- john
I totally understand how porn makes all the money it does, but frankly i don't know how people are so stupid that they fall for internet scams or buy products through "special deals" *exclusively* for them and 20,000,000 other people. It's really sad when you think about it.
I really, really did not expect that many people out there to be buying the penis enlargment pills. I mean... think about it for a moment here:
It is really indicative of either
a) a lot of people are erm... sub-par intelligence-wise. or
b) porn / magazine / whatever has gotten a lot of men in a same gridlock as mannaquins has on women: except while you have the "our store sells clothes to 'real women' and we use 'natual models'", you won't ever find a "real-sized penis men's club"... when's the last time you really saw "size small" condoms on sale?
c) or both.
it is really worth worrying to a certain degree. as for the part that basically says "sex sells," well no kidding...
My life in the land of the rising sun.
"When the Arizona attorney general's office recently shut down a Scottsdale company, CP Direct, it offered a glimpse into the spoils of the Internet's dark side. The company sold pills via the Web that promised to increase penis length, bust size and body height."
:(
I guess my pills aren't coming then
Now I will have to send away for that tiger penis balm that is guaranteed to make me hung like a stallion and sexually attractive to women.
The company sold pills via the Web that promised to increase penis length, bust size and body height. Enough people had spent $60 an order -- mostly for the "Longitude" treatments, with ingredients that included pumpkin seed, sarsaparilla and "oyster meat" -- that the state was able to seize more than $30 million in luxury real estate and a herd of Mercedes-Benzes, Rolls Royces and a Lamborghini.
Of course the libertarians want to abolish the FDA and make these scams legal, as long as the companies don't guarantee success.
Porn has been the instigation for nearly every modern communication medium. If it wasn't for porn we probably wouldn't be using: VCRs, DVDs, Pay-per-View TV, cable TV and the internet. We have porn to thank for all of these.
FoundNews.com - get paid to blog.,
spam, fraud and porn. has not made a dime off of me...
What do you think the rest of the *real* world is?
:-)
Pr0n? The pr0n industry is bigger than all of the major sports leagues combined in terms of overall revenues. Much larger in fact. Just on print and videos alone, not including the net. It has always been so. That doesn't even consider the highly lucrative pr0n *merchandising* aspect
Spam? I don't know if anyone has checked their mailboxes in front of tehir homes yet, or watched a 1/2 hour of tv, or even walked outside! It's all spam!
Scams? Turn on your tv after 1am and you'll see every scam there is.
This Intraweb thingy is simply maturing to meet the demands of it's consumers- you and me. So give me pr0n, spam, and scams!
(negate that last part)
I remember when the first talk of web-based shops were on the cards. They were saying it was the 'High Street' stores that would lose profits and business... and some chose to do the 'ostrich effect', while others went for the full madness effect (i.e. anyone remember EggHead stores - DUH!).
But it is those stores that have an existing infrastructure who then expand into using the web to generate extra revenue are the ones who will thrive. Just because web shopping came along doesn't mean people will all of a sudden stop going to the mall.
A lot of the porn industry has thrived because of the anonimity, as well as the breaking down of borders... hence laws governing porn.
"We will lose the Internet if we don't save it." and "civil society" has broken down online... probably not, it's just that people know that they can currently get away with doing stuff, and the net still being in its relavtive infancy, people know that they'll be able to do whatever they want until push comes to shove and the governments themselves catch up with technology.
Are you local? There's nothing for you here!
I dunno about the other spam and fraud... but as far as pr0n goes...
(1) create something that satisfies basic human urges
(2) ???
(3) PROFIT!!!
Why is anyone surprised by this? After all, practically none of the dot coms had a viable business model -- it was all "get customers now and make it up later (on volume!). The only thing that made it possible in the first place was the billions upon billions of dollars that venture captial threw into the pot...
As the article mentioned, the things that are working well on the web are the same things that work well (from a financial standpoint) in real life: selling pr0n and ripping people off. Only with the web, you can reach a MUCH wider audience (such as under-age boys [sub-18] with the pr0n -- all without fear of prosecution). After all, no one in their right mind would stand outside a middle school trying to sell copies of porno magazines -- he'd be arrested (and most likely hung) in quick fashion.
But with the web (and spam), these sleazeballs are allowed to advertise to a group that was previously off-limits. The rest is basic economics: increase the size of your target audience, increase your sales...
The same thing goes for ripping people off: you're able to reach a wider audience. Slap together a slick web page, and you give yourself an air of legitimacy -- all the better to draw in the stupid and gullible.
The internet is not making people more stupid, and isn't contributing to the demise of society... It is merely bringing the existing stupidity and lack of culture to the forefront of society, instead of letting it hide in dark corners... It is making depravity more visible, that's all.
If spam ever gets erradicated I think it will go a long way to cleaning up the image of the net.
I think people start out as innocent internet users who use the internet to look up information etc. They way the writers of the article want it to be used.
But then they receive that bit of spam that promises hot horny teens, then the lightbulb goes on saying "Hey, I can get this depraved stuff here instead of at my local Club X". Also you won't get the morons who purchase all those magic pills as often.
Spam, Fraud, and Pr0n predate the internet. The only difference is that the Internet allows for faster exposure. Just think about all the interupted dinners from telemarketers and all the "Buy Life Insurance for 1$/day" and Pre-approved credit card offers that come into your mailbox along with your bills and letters. Porn has been around since at least the 70's (cheezy guitar music) Fraud..well identity theft may not require the internet.
The internet is a relatively new medium, and everyone (including Spammers and Porn directors) will take advantage of it, for the good or bad of the entire online community. As with everyting else in the consumer realm, people should be educated and aware of what is around, and overall social behavior must be changed. It is sad that people are getting scamed for penis enlargment kits and spreading email viruses thinking they'll get a peep of Kornikova (sp) naked.
I know the interent was first used for military purposes (or so I've heard/read), but I wonder if maybe these low-brow things are what spurred widespread adoption.
$cat
Funny because I heard on NPR a couple days ago that "e-commerce was having a great year". I guess it all depends on who you ask, and if the person you ask had a bullshit business model to start with.
I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
Of course the profits are in the gutter -- they're attached to people's minds, so they _must_ follow....
This is a no brainer. Don't expect telcoms, music publishers, TV people, commercial software vendors, governments and any other large, entrenched and threatened industry to say that the web is good for anything but kiddie porn, bomb making and whatever horror is up for the day. I'm tired of hearing all the BS from the so called reputable news sources.
Advertising is in a slump because no one expects anyone to have any money soon. The NYT itself is in the same shitcan everyone else is in. Sorry, that's the way the cycle turns.
The problem for those interests is that people will get what they want without the helping hand of those who would control them. People want telcom services they don't have to pay by the minute for. They want news they can pull for themselves rather than the stream of push current media provides. They want feedback on that news, pure objective informed voices on the spot. They want to make their songs availble to others without the intervention of one of five big publishers. They will build what it takes to get those things and those that publish nonsense about it will simply fail. Their are more powerful motives than profit.
Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.
In a settlement with the company, the government got $30 million for consumer refunds.
Like everything else, if the government can get a cut, they will finally get its hands dirty... I am normally against the government to make a profit off crime, but its nice to seem the get off thier ass.
When I browse at work, I can't go look at any pr0n. But I get as many annoying ads and popups on legit sites as I did on pr0n sites before I started using galeon. :-) As for Spam, I get nearly as much from legit companies (Sony, Orbitz, Priceline, Alaska Air...) as I do from the snakeoil salesmen.
A bigger question, though, is why do we have to "save the Internet?" Many legitimate industries started out with less-than-honorable beginnings. And places can transform their images from sin to family.
Look at Vegas.
In some ways, I wish the "cyberspace" notion had never been introduced, because it furthers bad analogies like these, comparing the net to a geographical neighborhood, which has apparently become a red-light district.
The reality, of course, is that the internet is a communication medium, not a neighborhood, and the apparently-proliferating number of sleazy businesses making use of it proves very little. Sure, you can make money selling fake penis-enlargement pills at a $57 markup, so long as you can find suckers (although I do admit being a bit surprised that there are so many of them).
Brewster Kahle is right on point, even if his thoughts are buried in the article:
Now if only the NY Times would stop running articles about the supposed decline of electronic "civil society," and start commentataing on the actual decline of actual civil society. Or, heaven forbid, the sleazy nature of elected officials and their corporate benefactors.
Red All Over: Rambling Missives from an Aspiring Revolutionary
You can make up a bunch of stickers that have nothing more than the web address for your band or your blog or whatever written in an interesting way, plaster them everywhere at sight level, and you'll get a few hits from it. A web address is best used as a link from a tiny part of the real world (a business card, a t-shirt, a sticker on the wall of the bathroom at a dance club) to whatever else you'd like to tell someone. Pretty much every weird sticker or poster you see put on anything that will stand still has a web address on it. Near where I live, a cellphone company put up lots of billboards that just had their web address on it. The fact that I heard about this from other people says that it was a useful marketing tactic, this time. Not sure if it sold anything, but it did get the word around.
What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey
This is because it's a "pull" medium; you look at what you want to look at. Advertising depends on shoving stuff in people's faces, and they hate that. Everything that looks like a "push" medium on the Web has flopped. Even spam is a dud; most spammers are very tiny operators; they're annoying, but, as businesses, less successful than the typical local retailer. The publicly held spam-type companies, 24/7 Media and DoubleClick, are in the tank.
The winners in this are the big online retailers, most of whom were big offline catalog retailers. L.L. Bean, and Barnes and Noble, for example. Their customers are mostly repeat ones, their advertising is in traditional media, and they have a brick-and-mortar presence.
It's sad that Sears failed as a catalog operator just before the Web took off; their broad catalog would have worked on line.
It's a fun idea and all, but I'd kill for some content. Otherwise it's like these Magic Eye things that you stare at for a half-hour but can never get to work. Maybe my eyes just suck.
If you look for porn, you will find so much porn that you will not be able to look at a fraction of it.
However, the same thing goes for heraldry and blazons, Loglan, go, Irish music sessions, AK-47 variants, Super Mario Bros. 3, or gender studies- to name the contents of some of my most recent bookmarks. They came off of Google searches that spit out thousands of pages each.
What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey
We need an XML spec that defines the viewer's advertising preferences. Advertising is a way of life for free services. The thing I hate the most is watching Old Navy commercials or seeing a banner ad for X10. If there was an advertising preferences XML standard, advertisers wouldn't annoy me with stuff that didn't fit my preferences. I would be much more likely to sit through 5 minutes of commercials that advertise things I am actually interested in than to tell my Tivo to skip them.
OASIS would need to approve it. It could be kept in a standard location on each type of medium. The server side could pull down the viewer's advertising preferences, and dish out the appropriate ads.
This would benefit the viewer and the advertiser. Ads are a way of life for free services, I would just like to see this help the situation. We can do much better here. How do we make this happen?
--
The Grid Report
.. I would definitely go for porn. Unfortunately, I mostly get screwed by the spam.
"It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
What about profits from web design? The whole time, web designers toiled over their computers for millions of hours building the crazy ideas for the dot-com boom. My gain from the Internet boom was all positive, despite the fact that most of the "pure-play" clients I had died out. Also, think of all the increased sales in computer and telecom equipment. I don't know the facts, but I think Sun made a pretty penny during that time. Plus I'm sure Adobe, Macromedia, and Microsoft made lots of profit out of it. It's the companies who relied soley on the Internet who got fux0red. The Internet is like the highway system. It helps everybody, but not anybody who bases themselves solely on being on the highway.
Philosophistry
I've been saying for a long time and will continue to do so, you can not easily make money off of something which promotes the free and unrestricted flow of information. The internet allows for data to move easily from point to point and removes many of the barriers that allow for making money. To make money off the net is chalenging and very few will ever be succesful.
T Money
World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
Every other measure is subjective and it would be supremely arrogant to assume that your subjective measurement is any better than the next guys.
Watching Cowboy Bebop in my jammies, eating a bowl of Shreddies.
(emphasis mine)
Are we sure they're talking about e-mail? Don't they mean
--j
Porn helped drive the printing and video industries. Gutenberg's second book, after the Bible, was erotic stories.
So he moved from hardcore to softcore, huh?
RMN
~~~
Do con artists have income statements or something? If so, and they report growth... should they be trusted?
The New York Times would LOVE to have those gullible people buying from them...
Dawn of the Dead
Now there's a libertoon for ya ... I fraud, therefore I am. Not putting de-kart before da bourse, are we ?
Posted AC because I'm talking about clients.
The fact that a bunch of Harvard MBA lemmings needed three years and billions of wasted dollars to discover that industry-leading companies don't just pop into existance when the swag's delivered does not mean that all, or even most, mainstream businesses are unsuccessful on the web.
I have a client. She sells, for the purposes of this discussion, widgets. She has a retail widget store, and an online store. In the last two years, her web sales have *dwarfed* her physical store sales, by a factor of 10 or more.
I have fifty clients, all with similar stories, all with varying degrees of success. In the past five years, two of them have gone under. Both of them had dot.com-type business plans: Offer something nobody wants for more money than anyone wants to spend, and make it up on the volume.
The rest are all thriving, by varying definitions of the word 'thriving'.
Me? I work in my bathrobe. I spend time with my wife and my dog. I drink coffee. I'm not a millionaire, but I've got enough work to stay busy. It's not easy, and alot of times it's not even interesting, but it beats pumping gas.
Seems like a bum rap to me...
I don't know. The sites that actually offer up good old fashioned product seem to be doing pretty good. It's the smoke and mirror sites that went under. People who thought they would make money just by showing up....Well they are where they should be -- gone and/or going. I have done ALL of my Christmas shopping online for the last 3 years (granted I tried to go to the sites that offered reduced or free shipping). I purchase most of my music online -- in the past I have also used the internet to decide what music deserved purchasing -- but the RIAA thought I was not buying enough...but thats another story. I buy most of my books online (even though I have not quite figured out how to suck a mocha through my modem just yet). I bargain hunt at ebay (I bet they have not passed out many pink slips). All the special software we use at work, and my wife uses at home is researched, reviewed, and purchased online....
I could go on forever and ever -- the bottom line being: People are spending money online -- they are just spending it on products.
(+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Really, Jackson, any culture worth the name does just about the opposite. The useful culture reduces risk while encouraging gain. It's non-linear, Jackson. Even 5-th Century BC Greeks bragged that one traveled the country without weapons.
Three years ago, the internet (the web in particular) was hyped into being the biggest change to society since the printing press.
Obviously most of the hype has not materialized. Although it does make some money for some people, the web has basically returned to what it was in the first place: a massive and highly efficient facilitator of information exchange. Much of this is business to business and is behind the scenes, but some of it, such as email, eclectic news sites, file sharing, and software distribution are in public view. Probably 90% of the non-computer-geeks that I know use the web for little more than email, reading news, and occasional shopping. And much of the shopping is from retailers that also have a brick-and-morter establishment.
Probably the biggest single effect of the internet is that more non-mainstream information reaches more people than ever before. This primarily non-economic use has been the major revolution brought about by the web. Although porn and spam are more prevalent than they used to be, they were always there, even before the big web hype bubble.
Try 5,750!
Not that the author wasn't doing their homework or anything.
I agree with Ann Coulter, I'm very happy to see the demise of the dot-com bullsh*t. What's left is free marketeering at it's best. Free markets for marijuana, prostitution, gambling, and methamphetamines. Now if those government reg's would get out of the way, and let be sold what ordinary folks want in a free market want, then we will have freedom.
Don't be horn-swaggled by radical clinton-loving leftists, free the markets now!
It makes sense that pr0n would be a growth industry. When you look at it, you grow.. Or something like that..
I believe I have read that any post office's largest cost is manpower to deliver the mail to individual addresses. This is any post office, and there's not much they can do about it. If they stopped delivering to the 10% hardest addresses, snail mail value would drop dramatically - it could no longer be depended upon to get bills to all customers.
Junk mail does not directly subsidize first class, but it does indirectly, by paying part of the individual delivery charge. The cost of the delivery charge is pretty much the same regardless of how much mail is delivered to each address; they can only walk or drive to so many places in one day. Sorting mail and moving it between post offices is small potatoes compared to deliverying.
Infuriate left and right
main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
All you lazy bums out there that give a crap need to do something about it.
Everyone says "new laws won't solve anything" but neither does sitting around doing nothing.
Contact your state reps today and complain about the spam abusing your network resources and bandwidth.
I had a conversation with a local spammer last Friday. His theory was that the 25 emails his company sent mine weren't going to hurt my bandwidth, so then I said, what about the other 100,000 jerks like you that don't care about my operating expenses? If everyone sends me 25 pieces of UCE everyday, who pays for that bill? He didn't have an answer. I sent him a bill for $50/incident after I sent them a warning. (after the first 5 were received.)
Why can't we have a clean internet? We deserve it! It's OUR RIGHT! I pay my $1000/month T1 bill for T1 bandwidth. After all the massive amounts of spam (mostly coming from Asia) who knows how much bandwidth I'm actually getting. I can't block Asia, I have some valid customers on the other half of the world.
We need to make spammers PAY! I'm so sick of spam I don't even care if it does start getting the government involved to the point of regulation.
I guess the next step is to go down guns blazing...
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
We need to get together, identify solutions for spam, document them, approach congress through the appropriate channels and DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT.
Spammers should be shot but till they are, we'll keep getting it so let's do something about it.
What are the business implications against spam?
What is the cost to an ISP of spam traffic?
What is the cost to a company or individual of their mailserver getting hijacked for spam?
How much does spam cost us in a social level, quality of life level, loss of time level and business distraction level?
mail me. Zavpublic at mac dot com
- Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
OK, I doubt any /.ers would fall for these but they are worth knowing about as they are getting very popular right now. The way they work is simple but very elegant and even has a Dr. of Physics is well & truly sucked in to one of them.
It's basically a "new age" take on the old evangelists' preacher routine, "send me money and you will be saved".
If anyone wants to make a bit of money here's the magic formula: Setup a web site that reveals the "end of the world" such as PlanetX, Earth Changes, Comet collisions, alien invasion or all of the above. Link this in with bits of information from "psychics" like Edgar Cacye, Nostrodamus, and even the bible structured it in a way to provide proof of what you say (if you look hard enough you can find apparent evidence for anything). It is also advisable to have your own private channeled aliens as well. The idea is to make people as paranoid as possible.
Then sell a "savior kit" including detailed information gained from your aliens, maybe a map, of where is safe during the Earth Changes, how to signal UFOs to be rescued or other variations.
If using the channeled alien approach, your little ETs must state that every other bit of info around is from negative entities that wish to mislead. Also have your ETs state that anyone who tries to warn your suckers is being controlled by dark forces / is possessed / not in their soul plan to survive / has no soul.
Furthermore, state something like "If you have found this web site, you must have been spiritually guided to it, it must be your destiny to survive the earth changes", that's a killer and works almost every time as all people want to believe they are special. Never ever claim to sell anything; your web site must appear as an information source not a sales pitch for your hacked up book, introduce the book / tapes later on when you know people are hooked.
If people send you emails that disagree with your web site, always snidely reply something like "Ask for a refund at the door", if they really show you for what you are, use your channeled ETs to attack them. While waiting to spring the book / tapes / savior kit on people do drop in the fact that the web site costs money to maintain etc and ask for no pressure donations. Same ploy with the book, state that you needed to get it independently published and hence that is why it is expensive.
The only tricky side of this is of course you have to claim to care about people and that is why you are bringing this information out in public but the flip side is, you have to charge money for the actual information that you claim will help people. Not very spiritual, in fact totally materialistic and shows your motive is to make money from the gullible but the way to avoid this is to make people as paranoid as possible then they will not notice. If a few people do in fact notice that you have a big web site that you already pay for and you could publish the information for free without additional cost & killing a load of trees for the book, state that you have to make a living somehow in this horrible materialistic world, that you don't like it but you have to eat and Porches are expensive to run. This usually works even though you also claim their are massive spiritual rewards for helping people, use the "spiritual rewards" ploy to get others to forward your emails around to attract new customers.
This scam sounds very bizarre to anyone that hasn't come across it but its in full swing right now as there is certainly a lot of money to be made from the gullible new age crowd, I have met a lot of people that believe in this stuff and they have spent a fortune on it. Certainly a great money spinner for out of work techies, you need to learn the lingo and beliefs of the new age gang but that is entertainment in its self.
A journey of a thousand miles starts with a brutal anal raping at airport security
I just downloaded an incredible find on the net, The GNU C Programming Tutorial. It's well written and completely free. It just goes to prove that there are many people out there who use the net in the spirit it was intended to be used, they just aren't in your face like the porn and spam. I think if you were to compare the amount of sleaze to the amount of beneficial documents on the net, the good stuff would far outweigh the bad.
<a href="http://www.joblessjimmy.com">Work is dumb and so is Jobless Jimmy.</a>
Expanding a vast wasteland since 1996.
1. Install it
2. ???
3. Profit!
Tribune Co. announced last Thursday that their sales grew by 2% in July of this year. What I found interesting, though, was the fact that their "Sales were lifted by a hefty gain in Web site advertising revenues, which grew 46% to $7.1 million, up from $4.9 million last year."
While the dollar amount is still basically 'petty cash' to most big media companies, the fact that it grew by almost 50% is a really good sign, especially with so many people foolishly talking of late about charging for web content in the near future.
The other interesting tidbit was that their "Classified advertising dropped 8%, dragged down by a 25% decrease in help wanted ad sales."
J-Log: Journalism News, Media Views
1. Set up website spamming people with fraudulent offers for porn. 2. ??? 3. Profit!
Invest accordingly
First Post, Fork Pork, Forst Pist. All the same.
Furthermore, I do not even get NYT type spam at this address ("sign up for our premium content" and so forth).
Rather than idle accusations, does anyone have any proof of this accusation I hear so many peddling?
Cheers,
-- RLJ
>the full madness effect (i.e. anyone remember EggHead stores - DUH!).
I just checked www.egghead.com.
and got a redirect to amazon.com
1000 SlashDot sigs
...if only we had some sort of drm to promote online movies and high speed internet access so we could truly have a multimedia experience. We need the government involved in this to change things and make it a requirment so the web can truly be free.
http://saveie6.com/
-- RLJ
Information wants to be free. So do bits.
Running with Linux for over 20 years!
Why are spam and porn more profitable? Because they're destroying everything else. The increase of Internet scams, porn, spam, popup advertising, viral marketing, anti-privacy policies and other trash that comes with the Internet's popularity are actually what causes this problem. The con games some dotcom millionares pulled have soured others on investing in legitimate web companies. Millions of dollars of advertising sold to companies with overinflated traffic numbers destroyed the Internet advertising market. Corporate bean counters that suffocated fast sites with good content (replacing original news with Yet-Another-Reuters-Report) reduced the legitimacy of online news sites. Greedy and immoral/unethical people with their fake companies have ruined things for the good little businesses trying to survive. As always, the worst people have ruined things for the best people and society as a whole must suffer for it.
== Paul Rickard, Editor of The Microsoft Boycott Campaign ====
of course. Just down the street from Santa's Village.
The best education consists in immunizing people against systematic attempts at education. - Paul Feyerabend
Come on... so, the only businesses making money on the web are spammers and pornographers? What about game sites? What about personal ad sites? How about mail order sites (DELL, AMAZON, etc). The medium is still new and there is plenty of opportunity. You need not become an Amazon to be considered sucessful.
That means that 500,000 people ordered penis enlargement pills!!! Five hundred thousand!!!.
If there are five hundred thousand people out there stupid enough to read their spam, then visit the web site and actually send the money... it shouldn't surprise people that the internet is full of garbage content. Oh wait, the surprised people are probably the same people who sent their $60.
The internet can't make stupid people less stupid, and frankly it can't make smart people smarter. All it can do is let smart people get at information they want faster, and stupid people get to the charlatans faster. Anyone who is really surprised by any of this, please send me $40 and I'll send you my left over penis enlargement pills.
"Puppies, Kitties: Cute"
"Our Ass Or A Hole In The Ground?"
The New York Times has an article about the web's one true growth industry: spam, fraud and porn. Societal meltdown or flourishing ecosystem? The talking heads debate.
/. karma system ("50 + 1 - 1 = 49", etc) has a worthy sucessor...
Spam, fraud and porn. One true growth industry.
1 + 1 + 1 = 1
And there was me thinking that should be three.
It looks as if the old
"Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
For som reasin i canot gat two there web sights. i typ htp:/ww.bastbai.co/ ore htpp//:wwww.compyus.om butt there stars web sights neva apearr.
What the hell are people doing paying for porn when there are gigs and gigs and gigs of it out there just waiting to be downloaded for free. I'll never figure it out. Are people that dumb that they've never heard of Usenet.
Do you have historical evidence to back that up?
He was wrong. It was the first Gutenberg book.
Find "Song of Solomon" in your favorite Bible. (The preceding link is to the appropriate Gutenberg image. I don't know German, but I know several related languages and it looks like it starts at the "O".)
You obviously have to take the good with the bad.
As you do..
I learned this when I got my MBA at
the University of "No Doy!"
" he'd be arrested (and most likely hung)"
People are hanged, not hung.
Dictionary.com: "Usage Note: Hanged, as a past tense and a past participle of hang, is used in the sense of "to put to death by hanging," as in Frontier courts hanged many a prisoner after a summary trial. A majority of the Usage Panel objects to hung used in this sense. In all other senses of the word, hung is the preferred form as past tense and past participle, as in I hung my child's picture above my desk."
* * Always question "the National Interest" - 9 times out of 10 it is a cover for evil
That's right these low life businesses that wont to make sure you see EVERY BIT of their add are just moving to different avenues. Like in Germany and other European countries you get Spam SMS! So as personal communication devices get more popular the tricks of spamming and annoying advertisement will get more personally invading.
This SIG pulled due to lack of funding. (This damn war is costing too much!)
But some companies, especially the catalog companies are a throwback. They charge shipping on the $ amount rather than an estimate at an actual weight. So the more you by the higher the shipping charges which is ridiculous and simply encourages people to go elsewhere or by under a certain amount.
Throw in difficult to navigate sites, and (my personal peeve) those that block entrance or casually perusing without letting it set cookies and it's no wonder they have problems.
Many of these people started a web business with the idea that they could throw anything up there and it would work. It doesn't work that way in the real world (something like 75% of businesses fail within their 1st year and 50% remaining fail within 5 years) so it won't be much different in cyberspace. They forgot all about basic marketing and targeting your audience.
I'm not surprised porn succeeds. They certainly have a built in advantage in that most people don't want to be caught walking into a dirty bookstore, but they can go on-line and *feel* relatively anonymous. However, as to the spam, I think the only ones making money are the ones selling the lists. The businesses are popping in and out of business like Amway MLMs. It's the same product, but different people are being sucked in to try marketing it.
If you've never been modded as "flamebait" or "troll," you've never tried to argue a minority viewpoint here!
I've been on the 'net since the days of Mosaic and before that, WAIS and Gopher. You know what I just realized? I've NEVER paid cash money for "online content". Maybe someday I will, but not yet. I don't use the internet as a "consumer". I use it for information, mostly, and maybe 10% of the time for entertainment. The non-pr0n kind. Big media wanted the internet to become another vehicle to the masses like television. It's not working and I say Thank Heaven. It doesn't surprise me at all that AOL has hit the wall. They have never really provided their customers with "the Internet". They basically provided their advertisers with their subscribers' eyeballs. AOL in trouble. What a beautiful thing.
Clueless congressional representatives, obeying their masters in Holywood, have taken up the cry that the reason highspeed broadband internet access hasn't really taken off is that there is no "online content" that will entice consumers into the arena. Then they use that excuse to say that Holywood won't provide this content until they can be "protected" from IP theft (which is a bogus concept, but that's another story). The bright spot in there is that the big communications giants have strung a ton of fiber around the U.S. and there's a glut of it. I have a cable modem and my satisfaction with speed on the internet as a whole is above 90%. Thank heaven (again) they built out this high-speed infrastructure before going into a tailspin.
Actually, the porn thing is the one that baffles me. We are talking about the same internet where people trade music all the time for free, but for some reason they don't get that concept with porn? (But then again, I have never even desired to be a member of a porn site, so maybe I am missing something about the motivations involved)
I can answer that one....it's because the pr0n-lords are smart enough to come up with a business model that adapts to the nature of the internet and the needs of the customers.
They charge a reasonable rate for access to their (and often times several partnering) websites...usually $10-$20 for a month's worth of unlimited downloading of pics, movies, etc. Then they keep rolling out new material to keep people coming back. They have different websites to cater to peoples' different tastes, be it asians, blacks, gay, fat chicks, or what have you.
If the RIAA, or better yet the individual artists, would open their eyes and follow a similar model, I think everyone would be a lot better off for it. Yeah there are a lot of charlatans out there, but many of the people running the pr0n companies are smart, smart businessmen. (and women)
This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
Oh, wait, I forgot. They're not profitable :)
(Yes, I love the smell of karma burning in the morning.)
have you entered "sex" or "fuck" in the search field of your favorite gnutella or fasttrack-client recently?
:)
if you do, pr0n galore would come flooding your harddrive. people GET that concept of pr0n on p2p, but somehow they rename, mangle and transcode most of the good films so that there exist a thousand versions of each. so you have to preview and sort out doublettes before the dl finishes. but hey, thats easy
doublettes aside, there is still an enormous base of pr0n on the p2p-networks. as pr0n on dvd is on the rise, we're supposed to see even more pr0n with improved visual quality, as pple don't have to digitize some old vhs tapes anymore. if you ever wanted to see things like goatse.cx live in full color and action, you gotta grab a p2p-client fast... at least, they really nail some goats and horses there.
your legitimate (even important) mail get erroneously filtered. This is unavoidable albeit rare when the filter works correctly, but if anyone there makes a mistake, quite a few important e-mails may get lost. What's worse, you generally cannot figure out why it got filtered, and resending usually yields the same result.
I think the internet has become quite an interesting beast today.. it certainly looks a lot different to the internet I used for the first time in 1996.
The best thing for me about the internet as it is today, is that it has matured a little. It has given the chance for the big companies with a great product (Google for example), and companies with great business models and online stores the chance to get going and become popular. I was really surprised on a recent visit to Yahoo auctions to discover they had shut up shop and advised former Yahoo auctioneers to visit eBay.
Of course the downside to the internet.. now that the technology has matured it has made higher power technology available to people who only want to abuse it. Carding, hacking, and DoSing all seem to be pretty rife today. And not to mention the spam.. thankfully I only get a small amount to my few different email addresses, but I would much rather get none - I *hate* spam!
My other hate about the internet are huge corporations who feel they can get in and police the internet according to their own standards. Companies like Disney who have forged 'relationships' with government members, who barely have any grasp on the technology they want to censor.
I dunno.. I think the net needs some kind of revival. I think I am ready for the next big thing.
"Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
These 3 succeed because they serve their customers. The others are basically doing a terrible job at understanding what the customer wants and providing it at a reasonable price, under reasonable terms.
This is quite obvious. The customer wants it. Someone has it. And the price seems to work out. And the terms are usually pretty good, too (e.g. we're in a different country than your law enforcement, so they can take a hike).
First, understand that the customer is not the one getting the mail. The customer is the one paying the spammer to send mass mail. The price is way cheaper than snail mail spam, so the spammers are succeeding and meeting what their customers want.
The customer in this case is the fraud perpetrator themselves. The victim is not the customer. So in a sense this works, too, when the perpetrator gets away with the booty.
Perhaps internet gambling should be included here, too. It's not as big as porn, but from what I hear, it's nearly as successful. Vice does tend to be a good business model. I'm sure once they have the technology to download matter replication (if there is some kind of digital rights management for it), there will be plenty of places to get marijuana and drugs online. They'd do it if they could, because this is a massive market. Also, knives, guns, bombs, and maybe even nuclear material might be sold this way. You can bet the government would have a fit if the technology allowed this to go on without them being able to trace it all.
now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
We installed a freebsd box to filter our incoming mail using spamcop.org and MIMEDefang/spamassassin. Since then our spam amount has dropped considerably. My boss observed if an ISP used a service like spamcop they would get much more business then their competitors. I recommend any small business to look into a solution like this.
Well actually, porn may be making a larger sum gross, but profits per webmaster are dropping, I'd wager. Every Schmoe who can steal some content and whip up a 4x4 table can make a signup or two, but these are signups from larger and mroe established webmasters.
..vicious circle?
Incidently, many of these come-by-night webmasters try spam and fraud to rip the market off.
You missed an important reason why porn and fraud have done so well on the internet: anonimity. In the case of porn, it is anonymity form the buyer's point of view. You don't have to go to a video store and admit to a bitter store clerk that you need your porn fix, you just get it deliverd to your home from a faceless company. In the case of fraud, the scammers feel like (and generally are right) that it's easier not to get caught since it's more anonymous and law enforcement is still scrabbling to keep up.
Which idiot modded this insightful?
So, which one is Slashdot? Porn, spam, or fraud?
Canthros
Over the last one and a half year or so, I have registered 3 nicks, all with the easy to remember password "12345", "other" for every required field, born 1/2/1953 (to give those older demographics a little boost, what with interest in tech and all...), "never read the NYT", and an invalid email.
All still work.
The NYT registering is also pretty benign since they don't require a real-world address, but come on, you know that 10007 is a valid zipcode in NY... and if they check for a valid street address too, search google.
Of course, I have to admit that if they're fairly clever, they might use the tracking of my info to figure out what overly-paranoid nerds are interested in (mainly trash, really). But without a valid email, what's the point? And if they'd check that (which they don't), what are hotmail addresses good for except as an extra to smother with never-read spam?
That still leaves us with possible IP address cross-referencing, but I don't think they do that yet. Hm, that would be one advantage of dynamic IP.
Imagine the Creator as a stand up commedian - and at once the world becomes explicable. -Mencken
That's kind of what I meant, though not so much in terms of the store clerk than the law enforcement. But you're right, that is certainly one aspect of it that influences how readily people might buy. That and, someone might recognize them in the store (especially in a smaller community) or their car in the parking lot. I wouldn't worry about that as much at my grocery store, whereas delivery of food by a truck meant having to be home whenever the trick might arrive.
now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
"We will lose the Internet if we don't save it." and "civil society" has broken down online... probably not it's just that people know that they can currently get away with doing stuff, and the net still being in its relavtive infancy, people know that they'll be able to do whatever they want until push comes to shove and the governments themselves catch up with technology.
And what if "governments themselves catching up with technology" amounts to taking that technology out of the hands of the citzenry and reserving it for themselves?
The rhetoric now emerging and being bandied about by the talking heads of hollywood isn't new. It was a precursor to prohibition back in the early 20th century, it was a precursor to the War on Drugs in the late 20th century, which continues to this day (now financing terrorism where previously it merely financed crime lords and thugs), in short, it has been a precursor to every act of government which has taken freedom from the people in the name of 'civil society', 'common decency,' and other such tripe. Indeed, whenever anyone hears the words 'common decency' they should look around and determine where the next attack on their civil liberties is going to come from, since what is commonly decent recreation to one person is commonly indecent to another, and any effort to put such terms into legislation by definition means someone's notion of commonly decent is about to trample someone elses.
The government cannot take the internet away from the people outright and publicly admit that they are doing so to prop up the profit margins of dinasaur entities such as the MPAA and the RIAA, nor can they admit that they'd like us all to shut up and get back on the couch, where they can conviniently spoonfeed us what they'd like us to think without the annoying backtalk.
Does this mean they don't plan to take the internet away from us (or do so effectively by reducing it to just another home shopping network)? Hardly.
What it does mean is that they need to manipulate the popular perception of the internet, until they can build up sufficient support, particularly in the easy-to-manipulate and already-well-organized religious right, until such a point where they can point to some kind of popular demand to take away the internet as we know it "for our own moral good."
That is what this rhetoric is all about. It is a precursor, and an opening salvo, in the effort to institute digital prohibition in America. It frankly amazes me that no one on slashdot, where we've seen all the pieces of this puzzle presented to us time and time again vis-a-vis the lobbying of Hollywood, Microsoft, and the Recording industry to restrict our digital rights, can see this coming.
It is all about information, and the government would like to control that information. Dealing with entrenched media oligarchies, while imperfect, facilitates this. The Internet on the other hand will never be ameanable to this sort of thing, unless is it changed radically, or eliminated altogether.
Indeed, the government's lust to do so grows with their beligerence in foreign military theaters. But to be fair it isn't only the government that lusts after such control: most large businesses do likewise (how better to quiet criticism of a new product or a profitable business model that may not be so optimal, like say, Monsanto dumping toxic chemicals into the groundwater of a small southern US town).
Couple that with the desire of four very strong entities (the RIAA, the MPAA, Microsoft, and, lest we forget, the baby bells who fear VoIP more than anything) to cripple and control the internet or, failing that, do away with it altogether, and you have a very strong group with the will, and the power, to take away our digital freedom.
The only problem is how to make such a power grab into our personal lives palitable to the majority of Americans. How fortuitious for them that the educational level of America has declined so much over the last four decades, and that by playing the morality card they'll have a large portion of the population on board with nary a thought about the underlying issues, or very real consiquences, of such a move.
Indeed, policymakers already know this works. It allowed them to gut the most potent civil protections of the constitution in their persuit of their War on Drugs, and to continue doing so even after failure upon failure. Should it be of any surprise to any of us to see them doing it again as they try to put the digital genie back in the bottle and deny us our digital freedoms?
The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
The internet four years ago was alive, as we all know. Organizations were in thick bloody competition with each other. Pre-college geeks were in direct competition with the big boys of industry. Spawns of insightful, intelligent, and enthusiastic bachelors made and lost billions over night... Or so it was said. So the world thrust itself hysterically into this madness, hoping the trend would continue. And continue it did, for awhile. Everything from illegal pornography to OEM distributions made money.
Some people believe it was the distraction or corruptness the internet offered that has seemed to break it down. That people got sick of pop-up advertisements and spam e-mails and such. Others think it was expense. That your average small business never had a fighting chance against it's bigger brothers - that spam was necessary, and (in and of itself) not enough to keep so many heads above water. Some even believe there was conspiracy afoot. Services such as the ever-alliterated-to Napster, that brought so many such joy, were attacked and slaughtered by more developed investments - just because they'd cooked for longer. Today, OGG-fans and Linux guru's are still screaming for light to be shed on this subject. For what it's worth, I think it was a very diverse combination of the above, depending mostly on the sort of market that's in question.
Regardless, a cognative dissonance has settled in. Both the supply and the demand has generally fallen online. There's no denying that - unless you're a so-called "online marketing" company.
In reading through most of these posts, I recognize a general feeling of acceptance. "Advertising is everywhere - get used to it" seems to be the moto. I agree with this to an extent, but not enough to allow my ISP any under-the-table maneuverability. Advertising is everywhere, but it's nowhere so intrusive and thick as it is online. As it is typically affordable even for a home-based small time business to post ads on sites that offer "thousands of hits daily," I would be suprised if this wasn't true. That any old 500MHz OEM machine that'll grok TCP/IP can be a full-fledged HTTP server doesn't help either. We've got millions of kids hosting what most consider to be crap from bedroom computers. The "net" result (couldn't help myself) is a load of wasted bandwidth, as people are forced to sort through so much to find so little.
Then, there's the outright bad. We've got crooked politicians e-mailing terrorists (or so the theorists say - I think the terrorists just waltz in: the politicians are running Windows, after all). People crying "firewall" in a post-9/11 frenzy; cops entrapping perverts in teen chat rooms; underground FTP servers distributing oh-so-horrible copywritten MP3's and Windows XP keys...
Yes, you must say, the internet has lost it's feel. Every time I get online, I'm bombarded by nonsense and bewhildered by an ever-growing capitolist feeding frenzy. I search for this and get that. I ask for that and end up paying for this. I can't seem to make all that much sense out of things - even the things that are done right are only so deep, and I usually have to pay for them...
Unlike most, though, I'm not mad. Cognative dissonance, after all, is there for a reason. If you do happen to screw up, it's more likely than not your own fault. If you're fed up with e-mail providers selling your address, run your own mail server. If you can't find it, get it in book form. You shouldn't be suprised to know that in most cases, you can save money (and so much time!) by using your head. Nobody's gonna hold your hand online, and if you don't keep it to yourself, someone might try to cut it off. But that's no reason to throw a fit...
The internet is a case of CB vs HAM vs Cell.
:). There's little regulation and controls and everyone knows it. If you don't know it, you'll find out soon.
CB and Single Side Band(aka dial-up and DSL) is a relative low quality, extremely cheap, but usable media. However since it's so cheap everyone can join in.
Ever listen to channel 14 on a CB around 8:00pm? You'll hear stuff that would make some of these porn producers blush
HAM and Shortwave Radio This a licenced media on a seperate frequency. This is probly where Internet 2 will be going. Internet 1 has reached it limit. Internet 1 will soon be written off as reaching it's point of limited return. In other words we're very close to the point that it costs more to get more out of Internet 1 then it is to move to Internet 2.
To get on the 'real' pipe you will have get licenced. If you violate the regulations your licence and IP will be pulled and you'll be dead in the water. Thats where you get the real control on copyright material control.
Cell Phone Finally came a useable Peer2Peer media, cell phone. Cell phone is a simplified communication system; flip and talk. It's a cheap, resonably good quality, well maintained communication media.
Cell now allows you to filter calls based on the name(phone number) of the caller via a universal ID system.
Internet 1 will always have it's dark underside. It will not get better. They, goverment and corperate enities, will let it get worse to force you to new mediums.
Internet 2 will be a closely controlled network but the need for regulations will keep many people off.
A middle ground will be a moderately regulated and controlled peer to peer medium. This new medium will grow for the rest of the world.
You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
Porn! Most certainly porn! That is, if you're into this sort of thing...
If you're of an inventive breed of computer geek, Slashdot could also be a spam portal of sorts. And if you're a dumb-ass (creator of bad or failing technology), Slashdot could start off spam-ish, and potentially be fraudulent.
Is it really useful to group spam and fraud along with porn? Fraud and spam are inherently harmful. Porn may be de facto harmful in its production, but there is an important distinction. Now, if only the porn distributors would stop spamming everyone!
Um, Einstein? That wasn't Disevidence--that was *me.* Man, you really are a mental zero, aren't you? But then again, you're aTroll, so. . .
Web Profits in the Gutter
I love it!
The advertising model COULD have been made to work. Perhaps it would never work quite as well as some had hoped for, but I do believe it can work better than some are now claiming.
One of the ways it failed is due to an expectation that wasn't realistic. Unlike other forms of advertising, such as radio spots, TV commercials, and blocks or pages in a newspaper or magazine, the web/internet came with technology that could gauge a response when people clicked on the ads. The reason this fails is because too many people just don't click on the ads. Now I have clicked on a few, even here on Slashdot, but that was only when it was a combination of something I was really intersted in, and I happened to be bored at the time. When I'm not bored, I have goals, such as reading the interesting article. I still see the ads, but I move on.
The brightest green laser pointer around is now at ThinkGeek.
The correct way to do advertising on the web, and the way it will work, is to expect them to work the same way they work in other media ... make impressions. Banner ads, and even the hated big box ads can have that effect. And small text ads can have that effect, too. But what the ads writers/creators have to do is make the ads impressionable. The ones that say "Click here for the best home mortgages" don't do any good to create a brand impression. Instead it should give the mortgage company name along with words that say what is being offered, e.g. lower rates, loans to those with poor credit, no down payment loans, or whatever. Don't depend on people to click through today, but make sure they know your name so they will seek you out when they are in the need for your product or service.
integrate. collaborate. accelerate. SourceForge 3.1, from VA Software.
Because advertising and marketing executives were so interested in this new technology to allow them to track click throughs, they forgot about what makes advertising work in the first place, which is a combination of simple information and brand recognition. Making them obtrusive may have some negative impact, but when advertising is done on the old tradition impression basis (which is still going to work because the audience is still the same species that it has worked on before), even small text blocks used to separate sections or stories can have as good an impression as that big annoying box, and work out as a better compromise between an advertiser seeking more returns for a smaller investment, and a publisher seeking larger revenues while retaining and growing an audience to deliver to that advertiser.
Smart mass putty. Bounce, stretch, contort, relieve stress. At ThinkGeek.
now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
Before the Internet even got popular in the mid 1990's... Spam, Porn and Fraud were the 3 biggest "growth industries" on the Internet. Now after the bubble has burst (and as Homer Simpson so wisely says, "The Internet... is that thing still around?") those three are still the biggest growth insudtries on the 'net. Long after the Internet has gone the way of CB radios, vinyl records and cassette tapes.... those three will still be there.
It is "nice" to see that something is still making money on the web. It is nearly impossible to make an dollar anymore on the web (using the ideal that you can make something from nothing) through anything other than porn, spam, or fraud (although I don't think fraud is "making money ... more like stealing it from trusting people that aren't used to reading the fine print"). People used to be able to make money off of advertising banners, but that day has long since past.
...
Now, in order to make money (with out selling a "real' product), people have to revert to some of the world's oldest ways (the sex industry is the oldest business on the planet)to make a quick buck. What else did people think would happen after all of the investment money disappeared? It appears as though the cyber world works just like the real world (like an old abandoned neighborhood). Once the people with money move out, all the scum moves in!
My 2 cents
HallmarkOrnaments.Com
i actually am very surprised that so many people actually paid almost $60 to buy the stuff from CP direct. These people must have a lot of free time to kill. With nearly 200 such junk mails coming to my mailbox everyday, I won't have time even read the mail that's proved useful, not mention those junk mails.
Lands' End does *really* *really* well on the web.
Oh, my bad, they have real products that customers with disposable income desire.
The whole "nothing is impossible" cliché is very annoying and also rather close-minded. Want me to try and slam a revolving door? Give me some tools and time and I'll fix it up to slam.
Of course, then you could say "Slam it without making modifications." But when you add restrictions to something, it will make anything become impossible.
Give me the freedom and time to do something, and I will prove to you that nothing is impossible.
.. it should not be okay to do in an online store either.
My particular pet peeve is online stores that require particular browsers and settings, or they don't work. B&M stores, and traditional mail-order retailers, know it's good business practice to never piss off more than a max of 5% of potential customers. Yet online stores think nothing of artificially limiting their customer base by 30% to 80%, due to designing for whatever browser the webmaster uses, or whatever glitz the webmaster is in love with this week.
~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
More than mere navel gazing.
His problem is still the same, with most tools you still have to download it, or part of it, in order to do analysis and determine what is spam and what isn't spam. These filters *must* go on the ISP end of the equation or else there's no bandwidth saved.
I just found out there's no such thing as the real world. It's just a lie you've got to rise above. - John Mayer
More or less, what it boils down to, is that the internet/web in its current form is what the world would look like if you ran around wearing x-ray magnifying glasses and omni-directional microphones for your hearing. It's the same as the real world, only bigger, louder, in your face. All the same dangers, crooks and the lot, they're just faster and contrasted better.
I just found out there's no such thing as the real world. It's just a lie you've got to rise above. - John Mayer
The real goal is to stop the spam from coming down the pipe.
Your method is potentially good for the end users, but you guys are still footing the bill for abuse to your network.
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
No affiliation than I just tried them but snapfish.com may be viable. This is an example, it's a discount photo processing plus online digitizing. But perhaps it doesn't count due to actually providing a service? There are many useful services using the internet HTTP protocol as an addition to the business. I just downloaded the user manual to a fax machine, but Sharp is not a dotcom, so it doesn't count?
He's hungry.
It should come as no surprise that the NY Times, who's principle readers are retired or elderly, would print an article bashing how dirty, sinful, and dangerous the internet is. It's stories like that that elderly people use to justify not learning how to use email, "That internet thing . . . it's all just porn, spam and scams."
Human nature just dictates that people will always like sex, advertisers will always cram ads down our throats, and criminals will commit crimes, no matter what the medium is.
Ignorance on that many levels is the reason we have the word 'stupid'.Being uninformed is naive, making uninformed decisions is stupid.
If you want to be fair, you might say that some of the people had that ernest combination of gulibility, wishful thinking and innocent ignorance... but 500,000 people. That is a clear indication of a stupid people doing stupid things.
Cyberspace is "debasing itself in front of our eyes," said Bruce Sterling, a science fiction author. Mr. Sterling, who sees the Internet becoming a pit of spam and swindles, pornography, corporate advertising and government surveillance, warns, "We will lose the Internet if we don't save it."
I'm curious as to the original context of those quotes.
Thanks
..post something like that when I don't have the mod points to boost it up.
Sheesh.
That Jesus Christ guy is getting some terrible lag... it took him 3 days to respawn! -NJ CoolBreeze
Here in CA where I am, property owners have NOT paid for their PO boxes in 5 or 10 years. Don't think even renters do. This happened specifically because the residents live too far from the PO for street delivery to be practical, so the free PO box is the substitute. It would probably take several full time employees to wander these dirt roads. This is supposed to be a national policy. Ask about it.
Infuriate left and right
Yahoo?
you sound like the introductory page of some hokey extension college 'e-biz 101' class textbook..
now mod me up, im AC