Slashdot Mirror


Pig-to-Human Transplants On Their Way

cscx writes: "From the folks who brought you Dolly the cloned sheep, come genetically modified cloned pigs which they claim may eventually be able to donate their organs to humans for transplant usage. Who knows, we may make that mark on your driver's license obsolete after all."

94 of 289 comments (clear)

  1. question for the jewish folks by Afrosheen · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is this gonna be kosher or not?

    1. Re:question for the jewish folks by papasui · · Score: 2

      I would think this would come down to your values. Would you sacrifice your life because of your religious beliefs or would you compromise your beliefs to save your life. (I'm not Jewish, but I fall under the later.)

    2. Re:question for the jewish folks by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      Looks to me like people in the middle east, Jewish or Muslim, don't really have a problem with sacrificing their lives for their religious beliefs. I doubt anyone who had a religious and deeply ingrained aversion to pork could live with themselves having a pork heart beating away inside their chest. I was hoping some Jewish people could provide some insight.

    3. Re:question for the jewish folks by Moosifer · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes - it would be acceptable. There's a law in judaism that translates roughly to "for the sake of the life" that essentially overrides most other restrictive laws, including those of the sabbath and kosher practices. Contrary to what the "fanatical middle-east religion" poster suggested, life is actually considered valuable.

    4. Re:question for the jewish folks by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 2

      No, definately not. The whole point is that the products of a non-kosher animal must not enter your body. This obviously includes eating, but also applies to transplants.

      Does this means that a devout Jew can only accept organ, tissue and blood donations from people of the same faith? Where does this leave people who are involved in accidents that require immediate surgery? Or haemophiliacs?

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    5. Re:question for the jewish folks by Warped-Reality · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This was during a time where the Jewish church(?) was very corrupt, much like the roman catholic church of the middle ages ("We've found a witch, may we burn her?!?")

      Jesus then pointed out through logic their flawed interpertation of jewish law (the sabbath was made for man, not man for the sabbath, etc. etc)

      --
      This is not the greatest sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
    6. Re:question for the jewish folks by dollargonzo · · Score: 2, Informative

      not true at all. there are definitely rules that override kashrut. this is one of them. if it saves a life, it's all good. not sure about muslim belief, though. u really can't associate the 2: they are quite radically different.

      --
      BSD is for people who love UNIX. Linux is for those who hate Microsoft.
    7. Re:question for the jewish folks by mr100percent · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Hmmm, there are a variety of fatwas(Islamic rulings) by clerics which make it seem halaal(kosher for Muslims).


      One such fatwa reccomends that in cases of transplant where an organ is necessary for survival, a non-living component can be used or the organs of animals permissible to eat and killed according to Islamic rites of slaughter (similiar to Kosher).


      If the transplant need is life-threatening and the organ is only found in Haraam(forbidden) animals or permissible animals that were killed in a non-Islamic/non-Kosher fashion, then it's permissible. "However, if there is no imminent danger of loss of life then it will not be permissible to use anything from the pig. "

    8. Re:question for the jewish folks by mr100percent · · Score: 2
      I forgot to mention that not all Muslims are in agreement, a fatwa doesn't necessarily apply to everyone since scholars can disagree on points.


      Another fatwa by an Ayatollah (so he's a Shi'ite?) has this to say:


      It is permissible to transplant an organ from an animal (including dogs and pigs) to a human being; the transplanted organ will be considered as an organ of the recipient


      So not everyone is in perfect agreement. I feel I should echo what the scholars all agree upon.

      Allah knows best.

  2. What effect will this have on the Earth? by rice_web · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Okay, so fifty years ago a patient would have died from a failing organ, now that patient lives. Is this a case where the strongest no longer survive? Are we on our way to overpopulation? Eh, that's off topic. But, after we all praise this as a life saver, what are the consequences?

    --
    The Political Programmer
    1. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by tempny · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My grandma is at that stage of her life where she should have normally been dead. Not to sound coarse, as I love her, but she is being kept alive by drugs which reduce her life to confusion and pain, and I suspect against her will. A lot of medical science these days seems to have forgotten that quality of life matters as much as life itself.

    2. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      Take into consideration all the medicines that have been created and successful over the last century or two. We're already on our way to overpopulation as the senior population grows by leaps and bounds. There are probably (I'm guessing) 10% more people surviving potentially life-threatening illnesses than there were 100 years ago. No more tuberculosis, polio, pneumonia doesn't kill (as often) and neither does influenza. The only two things that can potentially hit the reset switch on overpopulation is a massive world war or another plague with the same scope and devastation as the Black Plague which swept Europe.

      I doubt this will change much. You can rest assured that this process will be available almost exclusively to the rich and powerful. I doubt it'll ever become affordable and convenient enough to affect the population at large.

    3. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by Neverrtfm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think it is most definitely getting to the point where we need to consider the effect of unnatural life extension on overpopulation. At this point we are expending tremendous effort to extend life, but very little on preventing new births. Um, folks, if we keep breeding, and quit dying, it doesn't take much to see that that's an unsustainable situation. Unless we magically figure out how to extend the available food supply, we're looking at rough times starting in about 20-30 years. I dunno, maybe we should just start up the ol' soylent green plant. But a more likely solution would be to expand worldwide family planning services.

      --
      This sig may be reproduced by anyone for any reason.
    4. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      Is this a case where the strongest no longer survive?

      Was that ever the case? Are you stronger than a baboon?

      Are we on our way to overpopulation?

      Yes. See Tragedy of the Commons. "A finite world can support only a finite population; therefore, population growth must eventually equal zero."

    5. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      Darwin stopped working when we started living in civilized societies. 10,000 years ago someone with bad eyesight would be lion food so only people with good eyes would be around long enough to breed.

      Darwin didn't say anything about survival of those with the best eyesight. A hermit crab is a sitting duck without its shell, but that doesn't mean that evolution failed 500 million years ago.

    6. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by garver · · Score: 2

      Our species gave up the benefits of evolution by natural selection (at least as Darwin saw it) when we decided to come out of the trees and build civilizations. Think about it: instead of letting the weak die, we raly to help them and the strong no longer have a reproductive advantage. Is this right or wrong? Who cares, but it isn't helping our gene pool.

      Instead of natural selection at an individual level, we have natural selection at a civilization level. The earth has multiple civilizations, whether they are delinated by geography or culture can be debated, and they rise and fall, just as species come and go.

      The interesting part is that what makes a good civilization is rarely something physical, like it usually is for species, but something mental (if that's the right word).

    7. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      OK. That solves the food problem. Now what about the fact that there is only a finite amount of space on the planet?

    8. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      And yes eyesight to avoid predators, and assist in catching/gathering food or mates would count as a survivability trait.

      Not if you have glasses. The ability to make glasses, or to convince others to make glasses for you counts as a survivability trait as well.

    9. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by Com2Kid · · Score: 2

      Wait a few generations, I am talking about the species wide mind set. It seems as if more and more of each generation is satisfied to live in some small bundled room surrounded by other people in small bundled rooms, not even being able to take a piss without half a dozen neighbors knowing about it.

    10. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by mgv · · Score: 2

      The funny thing about the retirement age is that it is totally arbitrary.

      I thought it was originally based on the ability to do manual labour:

      Most 55 year old labourers could work, but by 65 most could not do hard physical labour.

      Unrelated to todays need for a retirement age, of course.

      Michael

      --
      There is no cryptographic solution to the problem where the intended receiver and the attacker are the same entity.
    11. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by Pxtl · · Score: 2

      Well, eating pork might actually be a very bad thing if you have pig organs - the pig organs could be succeptable to swine diseases, and so could contract diseases from the food you eat. These diseases would then redevelop to attack your human body, and then could spread to other humans.

      There are known immunodeficiency diseases (like AIDS) that occur in pigs. While transplants would be carefully screened for this, the bacon on your McHulkaBurger is not. Normally these diseases not contractable by human organs - but if you have a pig organ, this could be very, very bad.

    12. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by tgibbs · · Score: 2

      Realistically speaking, the environmental impact of a medical technology that will be unaffordable by the great mass of people on the planet for the forseeable future is negligible.

      Yes, one aspect of any effective medical treatment is that certain genetic diseases/weaknesses are not weeded out of the population as rapidly. But so what? Pretty soon, we'll probably be curing genetic disease directly.

    13. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but eye glasses might inhibit your ability to attract mates ;)

      So there is an evolutionary bias towards better natural eyesight.

  3. organs by prichardson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Many people may find it squeemish to have an organ of a pig in their bodies, but it is a good alternative to death.

    --
    Help I'm a rock.
    1. Re:organs by rbgaynor · · Score: 5, Funny

      Unless, of course, you are the pig...

      --
      "Good things don't end with eum, they end with mania or teria." - H. Simpson
    2. Re:organs by ONOIML8 · · Score: 2

      That might depend on ones belief as to what comes after death.

      --
      . Quit playing Monopoly with Bill. Switch to one of many non-Microsoft products today.
  4. Dual use pigs. by coryboehne · · Score: 4, Funny

    MMMM, Bacon.... drool :p~~~~

    Now after I block my veins with fatty deposits, and destroy my heart, the same pig can now give me a new heart? Awesome....

    1. Re:Dual use pigs. by unicron · · Score: 3, Funny

      Make the pig pay for your mistakes, that's real friggin compassionate, man.

      =)

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    2. Re:Dual use pigs. by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ok.. I have to quote the Simpson's episode:

      Homer: Are you saying you're never going to eat any animal again? What about bacon?
      Lisa: No.
      Homer: Ham?
      Lisa: No!
      Homer: Pork chops?
      Lisa: Dad, those all come from the same animal!
      Homer: Heh heh heh... ooh... yeah... right, Lisa. A wonderful... magical animal.

      Courtesy of http://www.kerp.net/homer.html

    3. Re:Dual use pigs. by cscx · · Score: 2

      Don't forget the argument between Vincent and Jules in Pulp Fiction:

      -"Want some bacon?"
      -"Nah, man, I don't eat pork."
      -"Are you Jewish?"
      -"Nah, I ain't Jewish. I just don't dig on swine, that's all."
      -"Why not?"
      -"Pigs are filthy animals. I don't eat filthy animals."
      -"Yeah, but bacon tastes good. Pork chops taste good."
      -"Hey. Sewer rat may taste like pumpkin pie, but I'd never know cuz I wouldn't eat the filthy motherfuckers. Pigs sleep and root in shit. That's a filthy animal. I ain't eatin' nothin' that ain't got sense enough to disreguard it's own feces."
      -"What about a dog? A dog eat's it's own feces."
      -"I don't eat dog either."
      -"Yeah, but do you consider a dog to be a filthy animal?"
      -"I wouldn't go so far as to call a dog filthy, but they're definately dirty. But, a dog's got personality, personality goes a long way."
      -"Ah, so by that rationale, if a pig had a better personality, he'd cease to be a filthy animal. Is that true?"
      -"Well, we'd have to be talkin' about one charming motherfucking pig. I mean, he'd have to be ten times more charming than that Arnold on Green Acres."

  5. I thought they got cancelled? by Codex+The+Sloth · · Score: 2

    Wasn't this covered already?

    Call me when they have human-to-animal transplants...

    --
    I am not a number! I am a man! And don't you ... oh wait, I'm #93427. Ha ha! In your face #93428!
    1. Re:I thought they got cancelled? by DrSkwid · · Score: 2

      human-to-animal

      nice 1

      I've got a disease that might end with organ trouble.

      I'm sat here now saying that if it's me or the pig I'll let the pig live.

      "We can take your body after you're dead,
      We can take the eyes out your fucking head.
      Yeah, we'll take 'em out use 'em again,
      We can do it you know, cos we've got your brain

      We'll crucify you like we crucified him,
      Make you obey our every whim,
      Cos we've got the power,
      The power and the glory
      "

      Crass

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  6. The CIA info by coryboehne · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here is what the CIA has to say on the subject.
    Demo Trends CIA report

  7. As a type 1 diabetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    I watch all of this carefully. For many years, they made insulin for humans from pigs (and then later cows). About 20 years ago, they started producing real human insulin. The pig/cow insulins were fairly close to human, and worked well enough to keep people alive.

    In recent years, they've been able to transplant islet cells from human pancreases into type 1 diabetics, essentially making them non-diabetic. However, each procedure requires two prancreases, so that drives the cost and effort up. If they could use pig pancreases instead, it'd probably be quite easy and even affordable (once you consider the cost of insulin and all the other supplies) to perform this procedure more.

    Of course, the major obstacle they still face is rejection. Beyond the normal sort of organ rejection problem is the fact that type 1 diabetics' bodies were the ones that killed off the insulin producing cells in the first place. A lot of the anti-rejection drugs have their own nasty side-effects, and I'm not sure a life of those is any better than a life of injecting insulin.

  8. Re:I honestly don't see... by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 2

    The reference is to the "Male" marking on your license.

    --
    taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
  9. Why sugars (or why not proteins)? by CowbertPrime · · Score: 3, Informative

    When we look at tissue grafting and associated histocompatibility issues, we usually think of proteins. That is, after all, how the histocompatibility genes were discovered first in mice then humans, and the modern field of immunogenetics was founded. However, the article points to sugars and how their absence can so lessen acute xenograft rejection. The role of sugars in cell recognition can be found in the January 1993 issue of Scientific American.

  10. Proof by J4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We need more philosophy and less technology.

    1. Re:Proof by bravehamster · · Score: 2
      We need more philosophy and less technology.


      Not if the philosophers spout crap like that. Why not just have more of both?

      --
      ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
  11. There's a joke somewhere in there... by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2
    about Pigs and Cops, but I'm not sure what it is.

    This is the perfect forum to try out your pork chops.

    Gotta wake up! Gotta wake up!

  12. Make 'em sapient first by StefanJ · · Score: 2
    Riffing off of Douglas Adams:

    If we make these xenotransplant pigs intelligent, they'll be able to give informed consent.

    This way, if any right groups challenge the ethics of the transplant, the hospital adminstrators can whip out a donor consent card with the pig' little hoof print.

    Or course, we'd have to make them really gullible, so they actually volunteer when asked, instead of rolling their eyes and saying "yeah, right!"

    1. Re:Make 'em sapient first by HiThere · · Score: 2

      There was this experimenter in Russia, can't remember his name, it might have been Pavlov. He was doing some experiments with pigs where he strapped them down to a rack and conditioned them awhile before he killed them (looking for some physical results from conditioning, I think). The pigs all got hysterical, so he stopped using them and switched to dogs. The dogs just played their part nicely, and got their hearts cut out. He decided that pigs were just too hysterical. Perhaps they *are* sapient?

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  13. True but... by sterno · · Score: 2

    I don't know about you, but I find that a slow excruciating death makes me a tad more squeemish than a pig's organs :)

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
  14. I'd Switch(TM)! by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 2
    Could you imagine Apple's advertisers doing THIS campain?

    And my heart was going like beep beep beep beep beep. And then my bloop pressure dropped in half and I was like, bhmuuuggghhh? And then half my good heart was, like, gone. It's a shame too, cause it was a really nice heart. Bummer. Oh, and my name is Eric Cartman, and I'm a student. www.apple.com/Have_A_Heart/Switch/

  15. Remember the mammoth... by Scaebor · · Score: 2, Funny

    Forget the pigs, what I'm waiting for that mammoth to be cloned. I may need a backpack to carry around my heart, but by God they made 'em good back in the old days.

    --
    "Hey brother Christian with your high and mighty errand / your actions speak so loud I can't hear a word you're saying"
  16. YES! by Wolfier · · Score: 2

    I can get a brain transplant from one of these pigs to use it as my math co-processor!

    Then...I'll have 3 brains!

  17. The *really* scary part hasn't even been mentioned by McSpew · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Anybody who watches Frontline on PBS has already seen a lengthy and incredibly in-depth story about the future of xenotransplantation.

    The scary part about pig-to-human transplants is the possibility of humans contracting pig viruses through xenotransplants that could mutate and cause widespread disease. Transplant patients have to take medications that suppress their immune systems so their bodies won't reject their new organs. Thus, the possibility of cross-species disease propagation is very real and very scary.

    Pigs being bred for transplantation are currently birthed by caesarian section directly into a bath of iodine and kept in a sterile environment from then on. But even so, it's unlikely that such animals are 100% free of pathogens. Anyone who receives a pig organ should understand that they will be considered as much of a disease threat as if they were HIV-positive for the rest of their lives. They are not to have unprotected sex and should not have children.

    It's scary stuff and not to be taken lightly.

  18. Re:Older folks by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

    A lot of people who would be getting these transplants are likely past child bearing age anyway, and would not have an exponential effect on population growth. And since they probably already reproduced, they don't have any evolutionary effect either.

    Exactly! If anything technology has helped us to delay overpopulation. Just think how many more people we would have if it wasn't for the invention of the birth control pill.

  19. Sugars Aren't Enough by krmt · · Score: 2

    I'm pretty skeptical of this one myself. One sugar isn't all that's going to trigger an immune reaction to cause graft rejection. The MHC molecules are perhaps the biggest known issue, given that the pig has very different MHC molecules than a human. Hell, even different humans have different MHC molecules, which is why kidney donors should be related to the receiver.

    While sugars do play a role in cell recognition, it's not nearly so important in graft rejection because graft rejection is mediated by the immune system, which focuses more on protein-protein interactions. Knocking out a sugar might help with graft rejection (this seems dubious to me) but seriously... don't you think that a pig should be producing plenty of other molecules with slightly different epitopes to be recognized by human antibodies?

    At the most, I'd imagine that this would delay acute graft rejection in a very well done transplant. But I still think immunosuppression, very likely over the remainder of the patient's life, would be necessary.

    --

    "I may not have morals, but I have standards."

  20. That rules out jewish girlfriends, I guess by Subcarrier · · Score: 2

    The whole point is that the products of a non-kosher animal must not enter your body. This obviously includes eating, but also applies to transplants.

    If I had a heart transplant from a pig, would I qualify as a non-kosher animal?

    --
    "I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree with them." -- George H. W. Bush
  21. Re:The *really* scary part hasn't even been mentio by dvdeug · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the possibility of cross-species disease propagation is very real and very scary.

    Why? We've been living with and eating these creatures for millenia. (We've probably been having sex with them for the same time, sick as the concept may be.) Many farmers have probably got pigs blood in open wounds - they tend not to be squeamish when killing animals. If there's a disease that pigs carry that humans haven't already developed at least partial immunity to, then it is extraordinarily hard to catch.

    They are not to have unprotected sex and should not have children.

    Um, why? Why do we think that those will be the primary means of transmission? If a new disease does come out of the woodwork, it seems that any mode of transmission may be used.

  22. Re:The sheer racist bigotry of this is unbelievabl by Nihilanth · · Score: 2

    if someone wants to die rather than receive medical aid, then..well, that's their perogative.

    Keep in mind, though, those ancient laws were to -protect- their adherants, since suitable technology for safely perserving the meats had not been invented. Basic memetics. Can't pass on the ideas if all your followers are dead. If you trace back the relegious percicution of homosexuality, you find its the same sort of thing, tight reproductive rules had to be formed to keep the dwindling population alive in the face of persecution.

    The ultimate irony is that those rules now cause the descendents of those same people to persecute others.

    But I digress. If the codes of ethics can't adapt to future circumstances, the memeplex dies as surely as a maladapted organism dies in the environment. Human innovation is accellerating beyond the knee of the exponential curve, its going to be a rough transition, and those of us who know how to bend rather than break will be the ones left.

  23. Pigs by infornogr · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can understand the medical benefits of taking organs from pigs and putting them into people... but if we keep doing this... won't we eventually run out of politicians and CEOs?

    1. Re:Pigs by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      I can understand the medical benefits of taking organs from pigs and putting them into people... but if we keep doing this... won't we eventually run out of politicians and CEOs?

      You say that as if it would be a Bad Thing...

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  24. At last.. by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 2

    .. a real life Police Chief Wiggum!

  25. How scary is it really? by krmt · · Score: 2

    How is this any different than what is currently happening?

    How is this any different than a current human disease mutating to become more virulent? Or perhaps simply virulent? HIV didn't spring from SIV because of some transplant, it happened in the wild. The Hong Kong strain of influenza that caused such a scare didn't happen because of human meddling, it happened in the wild.

    These things happen in nature, and are rare there, even when all these pathogens have the opportunity to do things like coinfect cells, swap genes, and mutate like crazy. What makes you think that it's so likely as to happen simply due to a transplant?

    The problem, as you mention, is immunosuppression, which prevents the body from fighting off any infection that could get in to their transplant. The point of research like this (if it even works, that remains to be seen) is that you don't have to fully immunosuppress, if at all. I'm confident that one day short term immunosuppression will be enough for most transplants, and these people will be able to live normal, healthy lives. Then the chance of this happening drops even further, to the point where all the scaremongering over mutation becomes pointless. Mutations happen, you can't stop them, but that doesn't mean they're really more likely or more dangerous due to science.

    --

    "I may not have morals, but I have standards."

  26. Donor by Sivar · · Score: 2

    "Who knows, we may make that mark on your driver's license obsolete after all."

    I thought it was pigs that would be doing the... Oh.

    --
    Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes. --E. W. Dijkstra
  27. aging countries by phriedom · · Score: 2

    To me, the most surprising part of the CIA report was this: In Florida, reknown for its elderly population, 18.5% of the population is over the age of 65. Italy as a whole will reach this same 18.5% in 2003, joined by Japan in 2005, and Germany in 2006. France follows in 2016, and the US as a whole reaches 18.5% in 2023. I assume a big reason for the US staying younger for longer will be immigration. I wonder when "white" people will no longer be more than 50% of the US.

    --
    Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
  28. Ahem. by Sj0 · · Score: 2

    Ahem.

    BRING ON THE LUDDITES!

    Thank you. That is all.

    --
    It's been a long time.
  29. At least now... by bjtuna · · Score: 2

    ... my girlfriend will be somewhat correct when she calls me a pig.

    1. Re:At least now... by geekoid · · Score: 2

      what a tease , here I thought I was going to pick up a SCSI ZIP drive cheap, you pig.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  30. Go read Animal Farm again. by wirefarm · · Score: 2

    Think about it.

    --
    -- My Weblog.
  31. Not If It's Saturday by cscx · · Score: 2

    Anyone remember John Goodman's character in The Big Lebowski?

    "Saturday, Donny, is shabbas, the Jewish day of rest. That means I don't work, I don't drive a car, I don't fucking ride in a car, I don't handle money, I don't turn on the oven, and I sure as shit don't fucking roll!"

    So this could be up in the air for all we know.

    1. Re:Not If It's Saturday by Debillitatus · · Score: 2

      Beautiful quote. That's one of the Top 10 for sure.

      --

      Come on, give it up, that's

  32. Different perspectives... by Andy+Smith · · Score: 2
    From the folks who brought you Dolly the cloned sheep
    Dolly is often referenced as a scientific success but don't forget that the success was only partial. She is aging abnormally. The process was imperfect, but pro-cloners seem keen to overlook this...?
    genetically modified cloned pigs which they claim may eventually be able to donate their organs to humans for transplant usage.
    The pigs won't be donating anything. They'll be born, we'll kill them with, I'd guess, little consultation or due process, and then we'll take their organs. It's not going to be a voluntary act of piggy good nature.
  33. Not a good idea by El · · Score: 2

    Just what we need is another vector for animal diseases to pass over into humans.

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  34. Horrible Idea by Phanatic1a · · Score: 2

    This is an awful idea. Other posters have pointed out how this makes it far easier for viral and bacterial diseases to leap across the species barrier, but there's a good story about it that they may not know.

    In The Coming Plague , Laurie Garrett recounts how the primate supply facility that supplied the baboon whose heart was transplanted into Baby Fae was horrified when they learned what was done with it. They had not known that the ape was to be used as a transplant donor, and would have refused had they know. Seems the ape in question was infected with cytomegalovirus, simian AIDS, and a variety of other diseases that generally don't infect humans, but might if you take the organ out of the ape and stick it in a person.

    Later, she tells of a virus carried by a certain species of monkey. It's harmless to that monkey, but readily infects another species which shares habitat with the first. Upon infection, it causes a variety of leukemias and lymphomas so widespread and virulent that death frequently occurs in mere weeks.

    And it's airborne.

    Man, I'm not sure if any pigs carry anything even near so nasty, but I can't think of a worse thing to be doing. Research money spent for this purpose would be far, far better spent on learning how to grow fresh, healthy, transplantable human organs.

    1. Re:Horrible Idea by ShavenYak · · Score: 2

      If you've seen all these books, shouldn't you have learned to spell the word "coming" by now?

      I liked the Ghostbusters reference though.

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    2. Re:Horrible Idea by geekoid · · Score: 2

      few things:
      First, I doubt they will just grab a pig at random. They'll have specific 'breeds' of pigs.

      Second, If a disease doesn't infect humns, then it doesn't infect humans. Putting an organ in a human doesn't suddenly changy physiology

      third, we have been getting mutated viruses from pigs, and other animals, for as lngs as pigs and humans have been living together.

      Did you know the flu comes from chickens in China?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  35. Oy... by r_j_prahad · · Score: 2

    Where I work, this would not be considered by any of us a trans-species transplant if it were for our boss.

  36. Re:The *really* scary part hasn't even been mentio by Peyna · · Score: 2

    pigs and other animals are already the sources for many of our horrible diseases. We already got most of them from living so close to them.

    --
    What?
  37. Re:Clone me for later harvesting by Stonehand · · Score: 2

    Too slow -- you'd need the clone to develop at least to an adult stage, so that the organs are of a reasonable size for you, and unless it was done VERY early for you you'd be dead by then of whatever necessitated the transplant. Unless there's a way of massively stimulating growth of a human... and that's if you can get past the ethical and legal complications of the fact that you'd be committing premeditated murder.

    It'd be much better, for both practical and ethical grounds, to be able to generate a single organ within some kind of nutrient bath.

    --
    Only the dead have seen the end of war.
  38. Re:alcohol ain't all bad by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
    There is a lot of data out there to suggest that alcohol in moderation is good.

    Bottle-conditioned beer (most homebrew and some microbrews/imports...Sierra Nevada and Chimay come to mind as commercial examples) even contains some vitamins, from the yeast that's used to carbonate the beer. If you happen to drink too much of the stuff, it's also not supposed to leave you with as bad a hangover. (I wouldn't know, as I don't drink to get wasted.) It's like getting some Marmite or Vegemite with your brew. :-)

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  39. File 13 by Mulletproof · · Score: 2

    Another topic to file under "Just because you can, doesn't mean you should." First, I wouldn't use a religious argument against it's use, because it mainly applies to their consumption and the infested environments pigs live in regularly. I figure pigs marked for "harvesting" would have grow up in a relatively sterile environment. The cross species disease thing is a worry, however. Whee, you can transplant ape hearts. I guess. And pig valves. Yay. But the entire process reminds me of lazer eye surgery to some extent and it shakey beginnings. Sure, you were promised 20/20, but more often than not one wasn't told of the very risky side effects that could result. Never heard much about those, at least not as much as you probably should have. Piggly trnasplant endorcements remind me of this very issue...

    "We can rebuild him. Stronger. Faster. And he'll taste like a BLT, too!"

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  40. PERV by tlambert · · Score: 5, Informative

    You are talking about Porcine Endogenous Retro Virus (PERV).

    The answer is that we have actually been using pigs for Xenotransplantation for a very long time: my Grandfather had a pig-valve in his heart, and Jim Finn has fetal pig brain cells in his brain, along with 12 other people, which has (effectively) halted his parkinsons disease, and reversed most of the symptoms (he can work on his car himself now, when before he was reduced from crawling from room to room on his elbows).

    Both of these surgeries are vintage 1980's/1990's, and many heart-vavle operations predate that time period, since we did not have mechanical replacements designed until more recently.

    The Russians have also been using pig liver cells to treat incurable, and otherwise fatal hepatitus and liver cancer cases, successfully.

    In all cases, the protocols require that the person remain sexually inactive in order to avoid the risk of transmitting PERV human-to-human.

    However, all testing for the past two decades has indicated that PERV is not transmissable to humans from transplanted tissue: out of the many hundreds of porcine xenotransplant recipients, not a single one tests positive for PERV anywhere but the transplanted porcine cells themselves.

    If you are up for a lot of reading, Jim Finn's story (in short form) with a lot of links is available at:

    http://tv.carlton.com/organfarm/jim.jhtml

    See also Jim's own online journal:

    http://www.geocities.com/jimcfinn/index.html

    Here is the medical writeup of Jim and the 12 other patients in the journal "Neurology":

    http://www.neurology.org/cgi/content/abstract/54 /5 /1042

    -- Terry

  41. Re:Older folks by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 2

    Exactly! If anything technology has helped us to delay overpopulation. Just think how many more people we would have if it wasn't for the invention of the birth control pill.

    And don't forget how the Internet delays overpopulation.. I mean, how many of us Slashdot readers will actually reproduce?!

  42. Re:The sheer racist bigotry of this is unbelievabl by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
    Keep in mind, though, those ancient laws were to -protect- their adherants, since suitable technology for safely perserving the meats had not been invented. Basic memetics. Can't pass on the ideas if all your followers are dead. If you trace back the relegious percicution of homosexuality, you find its the same sort of thing, tight reproductive rules had to be formed to keep the dwindling population alive in the face of persecution.
    Well, now that technology or the overpopulation condition does not call for more babies are here to allow those forbidden acts, why don't those religions take notice and amend their "laws"?

    But again, religions are not particularly noted for evolving...

  43. Also Looking Forward To... by FrankDrebin · · Score: 2

    • everyone living in nice, wolf-proof, brick houses
    • finding more and more restaurants with slop on the menu
    • women getting somewhat smaller, but remarkably more numerous, breasts
    • WWE going all-mud
    • NOT being ridiculed for looking/acting like a such a g*dd*mned pig
    --
    Anybody want a peanut?
  44. Re:The *really* scary part hasn't even been mentio by McSpew · · Score: 2

    Sorry, I was talking about the discussion threads here, not the article itself. However, the article was far too short and superfluous to truly address the ethical and epidemiological repercussions.

  45. Re:Clone me for later harvesting by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

    I'll take a clone of myself, headless, with some gene corrections (eyesight), created when I hit about 20 years old. By the time I'm 40 I'll have somewhat fresh 20 year old parts to choose from.

    Maybe in a few hundred years there'll be Soylent Green style warehouses with tons of headless clones, ready to be harvested. Creepy isn't it?

  46. The Island of Doctor Moreau by msheppard · · Score: 2

    Reminds me of a story I just read on my palm, an older story by H.G. Wells. You can download it free at memoware for free.

    M@

    --
    Krispy Cream is people
  47. Re:The *really* scary part hasn't even been mentio by tgibbs · · Score: 2
    Ummmm.. I'll bet that most farmers are not taking immuno-superssives though and that makes a difference.
    We are talking about centuries here, and there are lots of disease and illnesses that produce immunosuppression. You don't suppose anybody with a weak immune system ever cut themselves while butchering a hog?
  48. Re:The *really* scary part hasn't even been mentio by JahToasted · · Score: 2
    Thus, the possibility of cross-species disease propagation is very real and very scary.

    Yeah just like cow pox. Oh wait... cow pox was the first ever vaccination (vacca is the latin word for cow) and because of it smallpox only exists in 2 places in the world (frozen in Atlanta and in Moscow). We've been around animals like pigs and cows for so long that the risk of getting a new disease from them is very slim. The risk of a patient rejecting the organ is a major concern however. But I guess if you need a new heart you may be willing to take that chance.

  49. sod the pigs try bonobo's by johnjones · · Score: 2

    ok

    why cant they just say transgenic pigs ?
    (or arn't the slashdot crowd able to understand technical terms)

    if you really wanted to go after this and you had money (like a drug company) then you would use Bonobo's because they are much closer to humans and the the organs are the right size (the primary reason to use pigs is that the organs are the right size )

    whatever your postion on this dont think its not going to happen it is
    (drug companys have to much to gain)
    lets keep it in the open and monitor it rather than banning it and leting the drug companies move to a nation which will turn a blind eye and selling it on there (to have the op you fly to chad and pay your money then fly back to the country which banned it)

    basically the Biological people screwed themselves by allowing patents on genetic sequences and had to get a non profit group do the human genome so that could not be patented lets not allow that to happen in software

    regards

    John Jones

  50. For A Limited Time Only... by ShavenYak · · Score: 2

    A free honey-glazed ham with every heart transplant!

    --

    Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
  51. Re:My vegan side coming out. by ShavenYak · · Score: 2

    I'm sure the brief lives of these pigs will be a lot more pleasant than the animals we raise to be eaten.

    If by "more pleasant" you mean they'll have less time to be miserable, you might be right. If you think transplant pigs are going to be put up in cushy hotel rooms with free HBO, I'm pretty sure you're wrong. I expect they'll have healthier diets than food pigs though, to keep the heart as healthy as possible.

    --

    Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
  52. Re:alcohol ain't all bad by ShavenYak · · Score: 2

    Yep, it's part of the wonderful circle of life (cue Mr. Hankey and Cornwallis singing "Circle of Poo"). The little yeasties turn sugar into alcohol, and synthesize vitamin B. When your body tries to break down the alcohol, it depletes vitamin B reserves. Having the yeast in the beer helps you out a bit by giving you back some extra B.

    It won't do the whole trick though, because the majority of fermentation takes place before bottling, and the yeast from the bottom of the fermentation tank are typically discarded. Also, a hangover is primarily due to dehydration, so drink plenty of water while you're getting drunk and it won't be nearly as bad.

    Worst-case scenario, you wake up massively hungover - take aspirin, Gatorade, and a teaspoonful of brewer's yeast (you could scavenge this off the bottom of the aforementioned fermentation tank if you're a homebrewer, otherwise buy it at the grocery store).

    Oh, and to avoid being completely off topic, a bacon and egg biscuit from the greasiest fast food place you can find.

    --

    Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
  53. Re:The sheer racist bigotry of this is unbelievabl by ShavenYak · · Score: 2

    My suggestion would be Horses, since they are not haram/non-kosher in any religion. Or dogs.

    The reason pigs are being used is because their anatomy is very similar to human anatomy. This is also why high school biology classes dissect fetal pigs (at least, mine did, that may not be common any more). Horses and dogs probably wouldn't work - in particular, dog parts seem likely to be too small.

    If there were another animal equally appropriate for the task and kosher as well, don't you think it would have been chosen instead?

    --

    Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
  54. Re:All well and good, unless you're Jewish or Musl by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 2

    That's an interesting point - as far as I know, the religious prohibitions specify EATING "non-Kosher" critters as bad. Wonder how they'll come down on "non-foodular" uses of the critters...

    Though given that I occasionally hear them referred to as "unclean" in this context, I suppose it's unlikely that organ transplants will be treated any better than food...

  55. Re:Clone me for later harvesting by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

    Good eye, I wanted to fix it after I posted it. Ack.

  56. Re:Clone me for later harvesting by geekoid · · Score: 2

    creepy? no. Hopefull, yes.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  57. Russian Porcine Xenotransplantation references by tlambert · · Score: 2

    Here are some Russian porcine xenotransplantation references; this is not a complete set of references, so you will have to do some searching on your own:

    Islets of langerhan (treatment of type I diabetes):
    http://www.islet.org/41.htm

    Liver xenotransplants (company involved in study):
    http://www.novartis.com/

    Bioartificial Liver in vivo (Dutch):
    http://www.cordis.lu/tmr/src/grants/fmbi /961547.ht m

    Suggested search terms:
    russia liver xenotransplant
    dutch porcine hepatocytes
    russia porcine hepatocytes

    Tiny bibliography:

    Reversal of acute liver failure by xenografts of microencapsulated porcine hepatocytes Z Du, T Li, GM Shu, JC Song, AM Sun (Canada) 122

    Experimental studies on hepatic support device using heterogeneous alive animal to substitute failed liver N Cui, N Cui, J Wang, Q Fu, H Cui, J Feng (China) 128

    Development of xenogeneic direct hemoperfusion method for bioartificial liver K Naruse, Y Sakai, D Endoh, J Shindoh ,K Kojima, Y Karasawa, T Kohsaki, Y Iida, M Makuuchi (Japan) 130

    Postoperative liver failure successfully treated by hepatic arterial infusion of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) and aperesis therapy Y Asanuma, T Sato, O Yasui, T Kurokawa, K Koyama (Japan) 120

    Precrinical Study of a Hybrid Artificial Liver Support System J Fukuda, K Okamura, R Sakiyama, K Nakazawa, H Ijima, Y Yamashita, M Shimada, K Shirabe, S Tanaka, E Tsujita, K Sugimachi, K Funatsu (Japan) 123

    Development of a hybrid bioartificial liver using hepatocytes entrapped in a basement membrane matrix M Nagaki, K Miki, Yl Kim, T Naiki, A Sugiyama, H Moriwaki (Japan) 127

    See also:
    Frontline: Organ Farm, part 2
    Program #1913
    Original Airdate: April 3, 2001

    http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/or ga nfarm/

    "Although organ transplants cannot be performed in the U.S., two people have had their lives saved by organs from a humanized transgenic pig. Both were treated at the Baylor University Medical Center in Dallas, Texas. The first was 20-year-old Rob Pennington. He was an emergency admission for liver failure in the autumn of 1997, just weeks before such experiments were halted by the FDA."

    If this is *specifically* for liver cancer, see also:
    http://www.mad-cow.org/UKGMO/GMO_news14.html
    19 Jun 00 - GMO - Tests on GM 'missiles' to target cancer cells

    Suggested search terms:
    "David Kerr" liver cancer

    Clinical trials only, at this point; so far 200 patients have been treated in the UK using a genetically modified retrovirus. This is probably a better bet at this point than a xenotransplant, for this *specific* problem.

    -- Terry

  58. Re:All well and good, unless you're Jewish or Musl by geekoid · · Score: 2

    actual, when it come down to life and death, most of those rules can be set aside.

    however, I get this from my Jewish froms and IANAR(I am not a rabii).

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  59. Medical science out of control? by geoswan · · Score: 2
    A lot of medical science these days seems to have forgotten that quality of life matters as much as life itself.

    I don't want to seem unsympathetic to you and your family. Your grandmother is experiencing a terribly reduced quality of life? You suspect she is being kept alive against her will? That is truly awful.

    But humans made the decision to keep her alive. I believe it is a mistake to blame science for this. Her children and other relatives should not be feeling like helpless victims here. Her doctors are not modern shaman, whose suggestions you have to take. If they act that way, if they are playing god, you, her relatives, should challenge them, and keep challenging them.

    We face the same kind of decisions, around xeno-transplants, as a society, as your family faces with your grandmother. If we believe in democracy, it is time to be really diligent about keeping our selves informed. And we have to be prepared to explore our values, and what we believe in, and speak up once we have figured it out.

  60. Re:The sheer racist bigotry of this is unbelievabl by Nihilanth · · Score: 2

    Right, that's what i'm talking about. I wasn't commenting on any religion as a whole, merely the relegious views being espoused by the person i was replying to.

    Anyhow, yeah, read your post, sounds pretty sensible to me.