Slashdot Mirror


Pig-to-Human Transplants On Their Way

cscx writes: "From the folks who brought you Dolly the cloned sheep, come genetically modified cloned pigs which they claim may eventually be able to donate their organs to humans for transplant usage. Who knows, we may make that mark on your driver's license obsolete after all."

194 of 289 comments (clear)

  1. question for the jewish folks by Afrosheen · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is this gonna be kosher or not?

    1. Re:question for the jewish folks by NMerriam · · Score: 1

      Strangely enough, that was my first question as well. If it comes down to saving a life or not, where will Jews & Muslims draw the line at the the uncleanliness of swine?

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    2. Re:question for the jewish folks by yaqub0r · · Score: 1

      IANAJ, but as far as I know...No.

      I know for certain it isn't going to be halaal (kosher for muslims). Even though the technology didn't exist, Islamic authorities have already dealt with this topic.

    3. Re:question for the jewish folks by papasui · · Score: 2

      I would think this would come down to your values. Would you sacrifice your life because of your religious beliefs or would you compromise your beliefs to save your life. (I'm not Jewish, but I fall under the later.)

    4. Re:question for the jewish folks by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      Looks to me like people in the middle east, Jewish or Muslim, don't really have a problem with sacrificing their lives for their religious beliefs. I doubt anyone who had a religious and deeply ingrained aversion to pork could live with themselves having a pork heart beating away inside their chest. I was hoping some Jewish people could provide some insight.

    5. Re:question for the jewish folks by Moosifer · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes - it would be acceptable. There's a law in judaism that translates roughly to "for the sake of the life" that essentially overrides most other restrictive laws, including those of the sabbath and kosher practices. Contrary to what the "fanatical middle-east religion" poster suggested, life is actually considered valuable.

    6. Re:question for the jewish folks by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 2

      No, definately not. The whole point is that the products of a non-kosher animal must not enter your body. This obviously includes eating, but also applies to transplants.

      Does this means that a devout Jew can only accept organ, tissue and blood donations from people of the same faith? Where does this leave people who are involved in accidents that require immediate surgery? Or haemophiliacs?

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    7. Re:question for the jewish folks by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      due to some interpretation of a passage (not sure which one) devout jehovas witness won't accept a blood transfusion even to save their life

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    8. Re:question for the jewish folks by CowbertPrime · · Score: 1

      This mustve been added after Christianity had a arrived, since clearly the Pharisees really had issues with Jesus healing people on the Sabbath. Corrections to this inference are appreciated.
      On a separate note, personally, if I was a devout Jew (as I am not Jewish) I might choose to uphold the law (and die) since the whole concept is that the material life means little compared to obeying God's law since it is the afterlife that is glorious and so on... (This still does not excuse suicide bombers and such, since the law/God condemns suicide and murder)

    9. Re:question for the jewish folks by Warped-Reality · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This was during a time where the Jewish church(?) was very corrupt, much like the roman catholic church of the middle ages ("We've found a witch, may we burn her?!?")

      Jesus then pointed out through logic their flawed interpertation of jewish law (the sabbath was made for man, not man for the sabbath, etc. etc)

      --
      This is not the greatest sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
    10. Re:question for the jewish folks by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      This mustve been added after Christianity had a arrived, since clearly the Pharisees really had issues with Jesus healing people on the Sabbath

      Actually, that was put in later as a justification for anti-semitism. It most likely didn't happen.

    11. Re:question for the jewish folks by dollargonzo · · Score: 2, Informative

      not true at all. there are definitely rules that override kashrut. this is one of them. if it saves a life, it's all good. not sure about muslim belief, though. u really can't associate the 2: they are quite radically different.

      --
      BSD is for people who love UNIX. Linux is for those who hate Microsoft.
    12. Re:question for the jewish folks by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      Oh come on. Isn't anyone gonna mod this guy up to 5:funny. I think this is pretty funny.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    13. Re:question for the jewish folks by nidarus · · Score: 1
      I might choose to uphold the law (and die)

      Actually, as far as I can recall, this kind of sacrifice is really frowned upon. To be honest, I think that according to the Halacha, it will be considered suicide - something that doesn't lead to a very happy afterlife.

      (Disclaimer: I am Jewish, but not religious at all, so there's a chance that I'm wrong).

    14. Re:question for the jewish folks by mr100percent · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Hmmm, there are a variety of fatwas(Islamic rulings) by clerics which make it seem halaal(kosher for Muslims).


      One such fatwa reccomends that in cases of transplant where an organ is necessary for survival, a non-living component can be used or the organs of animals permissible to eat and killed according to Islamic rites of slaughter (similiar to Kosher).


      If the transplant need is life-threatening and the organ is only found in Haraam(forbidden) animals or permissible animals that were killed in a non-Islamic/non-Kosher fashion, then it's permissible. "However, if there is no imminent danger of loss of life then it will not be permissible to use anything from the pig. "

    15. Re:question for the jewish folks by mr100percent · · Score: 2
      I forgot to mention that not all Muslims are in agreement, a fatwa doesn't necessarily apply to everyone since scholars can disagree on points.


      Another fatwa by an Ayatollah (so he's a Shi'ite?) has this to say:


      It is permissible to transplant an organ from an animal (including dogs and pigs) to a human being; the transplanted organ will be considered as an organ of the recipient


      So not everyone is in perfect agreement. I feel I should echo what the scholars all agree upon.

      Allah knows best.

    16. Re:question for the jewish folks by Syphilis · · Score: 1

      From the Soc.Culture.Newsgroups FAQ:

      "There is an over-riding principle in Judaism (every movement) that any Jewish law can be broken when it comes to saving a human life. The only exceptions are for idolotry, adultery, or murder. These are the only situation in which is Jew must choose death to avoid violating the law."

      And from the Chassidism FAQ:

      "You shall live by these laws, not die by them."

      "Violate one Sabbath that you may live to keep many Sabbaths"

    17. Re:question for the jewish folks by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

      I think bin Laden knows quite well that he worships the same god as the Christians and the Jews, and he knows about Jesus. Bin Laden is a very educated man, who was a mujahadin (sp?) in the 1980's war with the USSR, during which the CIA was aiding the mujahadin. The mujahadin accepted this help largely because the folks from the CIA knew "the book" meaning the bible, as apposed to the atheistic Soviets they were fighting.

      What I think about bin Laden is that he is manipulating the less educated and highly devoted.

      I am an atheist raised by loosely Christian parents, and I must say that the more I learn about either Judaism or Islam (true Islam) the more I like the fundamentals of each, but I am not one for ceremony (besides that whole almighty being thing I don't buy), both have a lot of that... So I will not be converting any time soon

      --
      "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    18. Re:question for the jewish folks by Anonymous+Cow+herd · · Score: 1

      much like the roman catholic church of the middle ages

      Actually, witchfinding wouldn't really be considered corruption per se... more on the fanatical side. The corruption in the Roman Catholic church had more to do with the selling of indulgences and "holy relics" than anything else.

      --
      Ita erat quando hic adveni.
  2. What effect will this have on the Earth? by rice_web · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Okay, so fifty years ago a patient would have died from a failing organ, now that patient lives. Is this a case where the strongest no longer survive? Are we on our way to overpopulation? Eh, that's off topic. But, after we all praise this as a life saver, what are the consequences?

    --
    The Political Programmer
    1. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by neoform · · Score: 1

      i don't think you'd have the same viewpoint if you were the one who would on the chopping block so that the world doesn't become 'overpoppulated'..

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    2. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by rice_web · · Score: 1

      Of course I'd have a different viewpoint. My uncle nearly died a few years ago from a failing kidney, so I understand my statement. Yet, this could become a problem in the near future.

      --
      The Political Programmer
    3. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by tempny · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My grandma is at that stage of her life where she should have normally been dead. Not to sound coarse, as I love her, but she is being kept alive by drugs which reduce her life to confusion and pain, and I suspect against her will. A lot of medical science these days seems to have forgotten that quality of life matters as much as life itself.

    4. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      Take into consideration all the medicines that have been created and successful over the last century or two. We're already on our way to overpopulation as the senior population grows by leaps and bounds. There are probably (I'm guessing) 10% more people surviving potentially life-threatening illnesses than there were 100 years ago. No more tuberculosis, polio, pneumonia doesn't kill (as often) and neither does influenza. The only two things that can potentially hit the reset switch on overpopulation is a massive world war or another plague with the same scope and devastation as the Black Plague which swept Europe.

      I doubt this will change much. You can rest assured that this process will be available almost exclusively to the rich and powerful. I doubt it'll ever become affordable and convenient enough to affect the population at large.

    5. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by Kadeybugh · · Score: 1

      I applaud your initiative to question the true value of these "life-saving" techniques. In the last hundred years we have increased the average life span by decades and lowered infant mortality to almost negligable amounts, and as a result of this and other factors (like the increasingly consumer attitude of society both in the US and the world), we have done more damage to the environment and the world as a whole than we have in thousands of years. Our death fearing culture, resistant to the realities of the cycles of life and the nature of our existance, cannot accept the idea of creating technology that improves the true qualify of life, and not just the length of it. Until we can stand with a holistic view of the world in which ALL things are factored into decisions about growth and change in our culture, we will continue to improve one aspect of our world, while leaving destruction and horrible repercussions trailing behind our "progress".

    6. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by Malc · · Score: 1

      This would probably only be affordable in one of the world's richer countries. Those countries already have low fertility rates, and many of them have falling populations, or maintain the status quo with immigration policies.

      I think that all these medical advances just lead to us dying in other ways. There are probably rare diseases today that will become more prevalent. I definitely think that retirement age needs to revised upwards quite drastically though in an effort to maintain the welfare state.

    7. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      Darwin stopped working when we started living in civilized societies. 10,000 years ago someone with bad eyesight would be lion food so only people with good eyes would be around long enough to breed. Now you have kids that die after smelling a peanut or getting a cold.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    8. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by Neverrtfm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think it is most definitely getting to the point where we need to consider the effect of unnatural life extension on overpopulation. At this point we are expending tremendous effort to extend life, but very little on preventing new births. Um, folks, if we keep breeding, and quit dying, it doesn't take much to see that that's an unsustainable situation. Unless we magically figure out how to extend the available food supply, we're looking at rough times starting in about 20-30 years. I dunno, maybe we should just start up the ol' soylent green plant. But a more likely solution would be to expand worldwide family planning services.

      --
      This sig may be reproduced by anyone for any reason.
    9. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by Com2Kid · · Score: 1
      Thus the AC spoke unto the world:

      • With no attempts to curb population growth -- yes, we are on the way to overpopulation.


      And thus it was replied:

      On our way, already there, only a matter of how tightly you don't mind being squeezed into your own little hutch. Err I mean condo.
    10. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      Is this a case where the strongest no longer survive?

      Was that ever the case? Are you stronger than a baboon?

      Are we on our way to overpopulation?

      Yes. See Tragedy of the Commons. "A finite world can support only a finite population; therefore, population growth must eventually equal zero."

    11. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      Now you have kids that die after smelling a peanut or getting a cold.


      Mind you MR lion tamer could be dumb as a fucking stone and eat his own shit, but hey, smart enough to run away from lions, and can discern color, sounds like good material to spread around the ol' gene pool!

      See, the dudes with bad eyesight? They invented projectiles, sold them to the dudes with good eyesight, and then they invented glasses cutting out the middle man altogether.

      Humans are pathetic in the natural world when it comes to physical superiority. Our species best ain't but jack fucking shit compared to even what the middle weights of Nature are like.

      Besides, Lions run faster then humans, that dude with good eyesight? He better be able to run faster then the dude with poor eyesight, because even with the head start, if the guy with poor eyesight can catch up. . . . well you know the saying, don't gotta run faster then the lion, just gotta run faster then the guy behind yah. ;)

      But yah, the only advantage human's really have ever had is their brains. Sure a certain minimum level of physical fitness was required in the species for quite some time, but even then a good mind would be able to survive better then a strong fist.

    12. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by Scaebor · · Score: 1

      Though I firmly believe that Earth is on a seemingly inevitable path to disastrous overpopulation, I do not think that this will really add appreciably to the problem. While it is relatively cheap to grow a pig, the cost of surgery will be prohibitively expensive for the vast majority of the population of even countries as wealthy as the United States and other industrialized nations, not to mention the rest of the world.

      --
      "Hey brother Christian with your high and mighty errand / your actions speak so loud I can't hear a word you're saying"
    13. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by tspears · · Score: 1

      I think the thing you guys are forgetting is that while the death and infant mortality rates go down in civilized nations, the birthrates also go down. I would imagine that these factors generally remain comensurate to one another.

    14. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      Darwin stopped working when we started living in civilized societies. 10,000 years ago someone with bad eyesight would be lion food so only people with good eyes would be around long enough to breed.

      Darwin didn't say anything about survival of those with the best eyesight. A hermit crab is a sitting duck without its shell, but that doesn't mean that evolution failed 500 million years ago.

    15. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1
      Darwin stopped working when we started living in civilized societies.


      Darwin didn't stop working, he just started favoring those that are best suited to survive in society. So now it is not the fastest or strongest that survive, but those who bargan the best, or are persuasive enough to get others to do the dangerous work of the society.
      --
      "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    16. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by Qrlx · · Score: 1

      The funny thing about the retirement age is that it is totally arbitrary. Many people are completely healthy and able to still work past 62 or 65 or whatever, while others are really falling apart by then.

    17. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by Qrlx · · Score: 1

      The reason we have poor eyesight is because of rampant literacy. Kids are sitting on the floor with books inches away from their face, rather than out wokring in a cotton field or something. Their eyes atrophy. They should probably be playing more sports. My eyesight is shot and what do I do? Stare at a computer screen for 12+ hours a day.

    18. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by theCat · · Score: 1

      Regarding the "earth" writ large, it means nothing (unless She gets fed up with us as a result.) Regarding the human population, I should say that the overall population is more influenced upward by past improvements in agriculture and hygiene going back thousands of years than it ever will be by something like this, or any kind of organ transplant/replacement. Same goes for bionic organs. Also, population growth over a given period of time depends more on parameters of birth and death rates across the population than on late-life developments that serve only to extend individual life (especially if it is extended for older non-reproductives.) As such, the growth we see today was influenced by factors and events several generations back that served mostly to reduce infant mortality. If, as some say, the Big Crunch and eventual Collapse will happen in the next 100 years then whatever allowed our numbers to explode up to then has taken place mostly in the last century (1900's, for those still getting adjusted.) Adding into the mix a few survivals due to exotic organ transplants just makes the rubble bounce a little higher (to mix metaphors a bit.)

      Just for the record, I don't think anything of the sort will happen. Relax and enjoy your pork heart.

      --
      =^..^= all your rodent are belong to us
    19. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      If I get one of these transplants, will I start involuntarily attacking or even killing people who eat bacon, ribs, sausage, pepperoni, and pulled pork? Will I start to dislike these foods myself?

      How long before I can get a brain transplant from a pig? I've heard pigs are pretty smart. Does this mean that I will finally be able to figure out the great unification theory in physics and maybe invent a warp drive by figuring out how to create a gravitational pressure gradient in the fabric of space-time thus creating a propellant-free rocket so I can take my next vacation on the fifth planet of the Alpha Centauri A star system. Can I change my name to Wilbur?

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    20. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by TyZone · · Score: 1

      Didn't this all get started back in the 80's when they transplanted the first genuine horse's ass onto management!

      --
      TyZone
    21. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Fuck the planet.

      Got it? Let's hear that again, in case anyone thinks I'm kidding.

      FUCK the planet.

      When it comes right down to it, human beings are the only living creatures that matter one whit. Every last square inch of the "precious" planet should be completely subjugated to the support of the Human Race, as should every last square inch of every other habitable planet we should ever happen across. Why? Real simple - we're the only intelligent life known to exist.

      (Pre-emptive statement of forthcoming weak, snotty comment:)

      Hippie: Yeah, YOU sound REALLY intelligent!

      Me: Fuck you, hippie. You're sitting on the corpses of millions upon millions of people who died of tooth decay, compound fractures and measles so that their descendents might someday obtain some (unfathomable to them) measure of control over their destiny, let alone of the natural world. And here you sit, in your self-important pachouli stink, with the dipshit stupidity to think that any insect, bird, fish or tree holds one billionth the value of a single human life. Pick the human being you love most in the world - pick yourself, if you wish. Now imagine, say, any tree on earth. I give you a choice: Either the person you love most in the world may live, or the tree may live. The other dies, right now. Which do you choose? ...Yeah, that's what I thought.

      Overpopulation? FEH. We could support ten times the current population, and ulimately will, whether you cry about it or not. Run out of farmland? Build hydroponic factories, fifty times the size of the Sears Tower. Run out of lakewater? Mine the polar ice caps. Run out of ice? Drain the ocean. Run out of ocean? Harvest the atmosphere. Run out of energy? Pebble-bed nuclear reactors. Nuclear waste? Dump it in a salt dome, until fusion and antimatter reactors go online. Run out of everything? Find a new solar system.

      A thousand years from now, the planet will resemble nothing so much as a combination of a global golf course, and Courascant. The Earth Firsters and all of their moldy ilk will be remembered as nothing more than a curious kook-sect with a fetish for wiping their asses with leaves.

    22. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by garver · · Score: 2

      Our species gave up the benefits of evolution by natural selection (at least as Darwin saw it) when we decided to come out of the trees and build civilizations. Think about it: instead of letting the weak die, we raly to help them and the strong no longer have a reproductive advantage. Is this right or wrong? Who cares, but it isn't helping our gene pool.

      Instead of natural selection at an individual level, we have natural selection at a civilization level. The earth has multiple civilizations, whether they are delinated by geography or culture can be debated, and they rise and fall, just as species come and go.

      The interesting part is that what makes a good civilization is rarely something physical, like it usually is for species, but something mental (if that's the right word).

    23. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      LOL, I don't know about you, but I have 6.5 acres on a river...

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    24. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by eric6 · · Score: 1
      Are we on our way to overpopulation?

      Yes.


      Nope. Technology progresses fast enough to feed people, if we let it.
      --

      --
      fight global cooling

    25. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      OK. That solves the food problem. Now what about the fact that there is only a finite amount of space on the planet?

    26. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by ElectricRook · · Score: 1
      It's not that evolution stopped working. Evolution is still going strong. We developed our brain enough, that our species can survive without selecting the most durable physical traits. We can grow and store food. Through livestock we utilize what we cannot use directly. Basically we manipulated the environment (agriculture and irrigation), out-smarted or sub-ordinated the competition (predators), And utilized resources other creatures cannot (fishing). Hence we don't need to be physically stronger (there's a little Sun Tzu).

      The ability for indivuduals with fatal traits (under the old world) to survive is a recent thing, and only exists in a few places.

      Now if the food supply becomes constrained among the homo sapians. then you will see competition and survival of the fittest.

      Now some may think what we've done is wrong... But ask them after a few weeks of not eating.

      --
      - High Tech workers, please say NO to Union Carpenters, their Union sees fit to control our compensation.
    27. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by ElectricRook · · Score: 1
      Anthony Diperro wrote --Darwin didn't say anything about survival of those with the best eyesight.

      Darwin said those with traits leading to increased survivability. And yes eyesight to avoid predators, and assist in catching/gathering food or mates would count as a survivability trait.

      Having a shell is one of those things which can allow a indivduals to utilize a resource others (non-shelled) cannot.. But the shell comes with a cost. Cost of development, and cost of lost mobility.

      --
      - High Tech workers, please say NO to Union Carpenters, their Union sees fit to control our compensation.
    28. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      And yes eyesight to avoid predators, and assist in catching/gathering food or mates would count as a survivability trait.

      Not if you have glasses. The ability to make glasses, or to convince others to make glasses for you counts as a survivability trait as well.

    29. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      The reason we have poor eyesight is because of rampant literacy. Kids are sitting on the floor with books inches away from their face, rather than out working in a cotton field or something. Their eyes atrophy. They should probably be playing more sports. My eyesight is shot and what do I do? Stare at a computer screen for 12+ hours a day.


      I would respond to this, but I cannot figure out if you are trolling, serious, joking, forgot a few words in there someplace, or just have no idea WTF you are talking about. . . .

      To refer to a previous post by yourself;

      I do believe that sarcasm tags are called for sommeliers in that post. . . .

    30. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by Com2Kid · · Score: 2

      Wait a few generations, I am talking about the species wide mind set. It seems as if more and more of each generation is satisfied to live in some small bundled room surrounded by other people in small bundled rooms, not even being able to take a piss without half a dozen neighbors knowing about it.

    31. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by tempny · · Score: 1

      I didn't mean the word "will" as in the legal document.

    32. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by mgv · · Score: 2

      The funny thing about the retirement age is that it is totally arbitrary.

      I thought it was originally based on the ability to do manual labour:

      Most 55 year old labourers could work, but by 65 most could not do hard physical labour.

      Unrelated to todays need for a retirement age, of course.

      Michael

      --
      There is no cryptographic solution to the problem where the intended receiver and the attacker are the same entity.
    33. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by Pxtl · · Score: 2

      Well, eating pork might actually be a very bad thing if you have pig organs - the pig organs could be succeptable to swine diseases, and so could contract diseases from the food you eat. These diseases would then redevelop to attack your human body, and then could spread to other humans.

      There are known immunodeficiency diseases (like AIDS) that occur in pigs. While transplants would be carefully screened for this, the bacon on your McHulkaBurger is not. Normally these diseases not contractable by human organs - but if you have a pig organ, this could be very, very bad.

    34. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by splume · · Score: 1

      It really is too bad that this was modded "funny" when it clearly is not. I would say "Insightful" would be a better mod. Oh well!
      Well said man, let's just hope the gov't will start easing some restrictions on business so that they can develop the technology to keep up with the growth rate.

      --

      Who is John Galt?
    35. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by tgibbs · · Score: 2

      Realistically speaking, the environmental impact of a medical technology that will be unaffordable by the great mass of people on the planet for the forseeable future is negligible.

      Yes, one aspect of any effective medical treatment is that certain genetic diseases/weaknesses are not weeded out of the population as rapidly. But so what? Pretty soon, we'll probably be curing genetic disease directly.

    36. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by ElectricRook · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but eye glasses might inhibit your ability to attract mates ;)

      --
      - High Tech workers, please say NO to Union Carpenters, their Union sees fit to control our compensation.
    37. Re:What effect will this have on the Earth? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but eye glasses might inhibit your ability to attract mates ;)

      So there is an evolutionary bias towards better natural eyesight.

  3. organs by prichardson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Many people may find it squeemish to have an organ of a pig in their bodies, but it is a good alternative to death.

    --
    Help I'm a rock.
    1. Re:organs by rbgaynor · · Score: 5, Funny

      Unless, of course, you are the pig...

      --
      "Good things don't end with eum, they end with mania or teria." - H. Simpson
    2. Re:organs by ONOIML8 · · Score: 2

      That might depend on ones belief as to what comes after death.

      --
      . Quit playing Monopoly with Bill. Switch to one of many non-Microsoft products today.
  4. New question by papasui · · Score: 1

    So is it going to be healthy for you to eat bacon or does it simply make you a cannibal?

  5. Dual use pigs. by coryboehne · · Score: 4, Funny

    MMMM, Bacon.... drool :p~~~~

    Now after I block my veins with fatty deposits, and destroy my heart, the same pig can now give me a new heart? Awesome....

    1. Re:Dual use pigs. by unicron · · Score: 3, Funny

      Make the pig pay for your mistakes, that's real friggin compassionate, man.

      =)

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    2. Re:Dual use pigs. by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ok.. I have to quote the Simpson's episode:

      Homer: Are you saying you're never going to eat any animal again? What about bacon?
      Lisa: No.
      Homer: Ham?
      Lisa: No!
      Homer: Pork chops?
      Lisa: Dad, those all come from the same animal!
      Homer: Heh heh heh... ooh... yeah... right, Lisa. A wonderful... magical animal.

      Courtesy of http://www.kerp.net/homer.html

    3. Re:Dual use pigs. by cscx · · Score: 2

      Don't forget the argument between Vincent and Jules in Pulp Fiction:

      -"Want some bacon?"
      -"Nah, man, I don't eat pork."
      -"Are you Jewish?"
      -"Nah, I ain't Jewish. I just don't dig on swine, that's all."
      -"Why not?"
      -"Pigs are filthy animals. I don't eat filthy animals."
      -"Yeah, but bacon tastes good. Pork chops taste good."
      -"Hey. Sewer rat may taste like pumpkin pie, but I'd never know cuz I wouldn't eat the filthy motherfuckers. Pigs sleep and root in shit. That's a filthy animal. I ain't eatin' nothin' that ain't got sense enough to disreguard it's own feces."
      -"What about a dog? A dog eat's it's own feces."
      -"I don't eat dog either."
      -"Yeah, but do you consider a dog to be a filthy animal?"
      -"I wouldn't go so far as to call a dog filthy, but they're definately dirty. But, a dog's got personality, personality goes a long way."
      -"Ah, so by that rationale, if a pig had a better personality, he'd cease to be a filthy animal. Is that true?"
      -"Well, we'd have to be talkin' about one charming motherfucking pig. I mean, he'd have to be ten times more charming than that Arnold on Green Acres."

    4. Re:Dual use pigs. by kaygee · · Score: 1

      hmmm, it seems unlikely that the SAME pig that you ate to give you atherosclerosis will still be around to donate it's heart to you.

    5. Re:Dual use pigs. by coryboehne · · Score: 1

      Easy answer, Cryo-freeze it.... LOL.. sorry but this whole thread is just too funny.

  6. I honestly don't see... by thewheeze · · Score: 1

    ...how you're going to make the Under 21 marking on my CT Drivers License dissapper. I dont know, maybe I'm just being pessimistic

    1. Re:I honestly don't see... by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 2

      The reference is to the "Male" marking on your license.

      --
      taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
    2. Re:I honestly don't see... by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      The reference is to the organ donar that appears on driver licenses in the U.S. (if you're an organ donar, of course).

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
  7. I thought they got cancelled? by Codex+The+Sloth · · Score: 2

    Wasn't this covered already?

    Call me when they have human-to-animal transplants...

    --
    I am not a number! I am a man! And don't you ... oh wait, I'm #93427. Ha ha! In your face #93428!
    1. Re:I thought they got cancelled? by ramdac · · Score: 1

      that article to which you refer talks about the project being cancelled.

      You can infer, therefore, that any change from that story would be "news" (root word "new". See "New developments")

    2. Re:I thought they got cancelled? by DrSkwid · · Score: 2

      human-to-animal

      nice 1

      I've got a disease that might end with organ trouble.

      I'm sat here now saying that if it's me or the pig I'll let the pig live.

      "We can take your body after you're dead,
      We can take the eyes out your fucking head.
      Yeah, we'll take 'em out use 'em again,
      We can do it you know, cos we've got your brain

      We'll crucify you like we crucified him,
      Make you obey our every whim,
      Cos we've got the power,
      The power and the glory
      "

      Crass

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  8. Old News by rbgaynor · · Score: 1

    Politicians have been conducting Pork transplants for years...

    --
    "Good things don't end with eum, they end with mania or teria." - H. Simpson
  9. Re:My vegan side coming out. by tempny · · Score: 1

    I'm sure the brief lives of these pigs will be a lot more pleasant than the animals we raise to be eaten.

  10. Re:My vegan side coming out. by Tackhead · · Score: 1
    > Now animals wont just be raised for the slaughter, but for organ transplants as well. I sure am glad that america wont just eat healthily and not drink beer nonstop.

    Now barley and hops won't be just raised for the slaughter, but for... heyyy, wait a minute, beer's a vegetable! ;-)

  11. The CIA info by coryboehne · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here is what the CIA has to say on the subject.
    Demo Trends CIA report

  12. As a type 1 diabetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    I watch all of this carefully. For many years, they made insulin for humans from pigs (and then later cows). About 20 years ago, they started producing real human insulin. The pig/cow insulins were fairly close to human, and worked well enough to keep people alive.

    In recent years, they've been able to transplant islet cells from human pancreases into type 1 diabetics, essentially making them non-diabetic. However, each procedure requires two prancreases, so that drives the cost and effort up. If they could use pig pancreases instead, it'd probably be quite easy and even affordable (once you consider the cost of insulin and all the other supplies) to perform this procedure more.

    Of course, the major obstacle they still face is rejection. Beyond the normal sort of organ rejection problem is the fact that type 1 diabetics' bodies were the ones that killed off the insulin producing cells in the first place. A lot of the anti-rejection drugs have their own nasty side-effects, and I'm not sure a life of those is any better than a life of injecting insulin.

  13. Clone me for later harvesting by Ra5pu7in · · Score: 1

    Why does the logical conclusion to all this seem to be human cloning? Eventually, I could have myself cloned and the organs harvested if I should need replacements.

    --
    I was taking one day at a time, but then several days got together and ambushed me. (from a Rhymes with Orange comic)
    1. Re:Clone me for later harvesting by Stonehand · · Score: 2

      Too slow -- you'd need the clone to develop at least to an adult stage, so that the organs are of a reasonable size for you, and unless it was done VERY early for you you'd be dead by then of whatever necessitated the transplant. Unless there's a way of massively stimulating growth of a human... and that's if you can get past the ethical and legal complications of the fact that you'd be committing premeditated murder.

      It'd be much better, for both practical and ethical grounds, to be able to generate a single organ within some kind of nutrient bath.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    2. Re:Clone me for later harvesting by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      I'll take a clone of myself, headless, with some gene corrections (eyesight), created when I hit about 20 years old. By the time I'm 40 I'll have somewhat fresh 20 year old parts to choose from.

      Maybe in a few hundred years there'll be Soylent Green style warehouses with tons of headless clones, ready to be harvested. Creepy isn't it?

    3. Re:Clone me for later harvesting by Harold+Hill · · Score: 1

      Errm, you're going to correct the genes for eyesight and then grow a headless clone?

    4. Re:Clone me for later harvesting by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      Good eye, I wanted to fix it after I posted it. Ack.

    5. Re:Clone me for later harvesting by geekoid · · Score: 2

      creepy? no. Hopefull, yes.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  14. Re:My vegan side coming out. by LobsterMagnet · · Score: 1

    It was a point of ruining your liver, not what goes into beer itself.

    --
    I will not be trained.
  15. Come on... by thelinuxking · · Score: 1

    If many people don't accept stem cell research as ethical, do you really think that they will accept something like this, which involves a whole animal?

    1. Re:Come on... by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 1

      Why not? Humans are only mad at people who play god with their own species....

      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
    2. Re:Come on... by CowbertPrime · · Score: 1

      thing is, it's an animal, and not a human.
      The opponents of stem cell research are those who are against the source of the tissue (aborted human fetuses or a human embryo whose development is halted). The pro abortion people usually have issues with animal rights and the anti abortion people usually have no issues with animal rights, so go figure :)

  16. Why sugars (or why not proteins)? by CowbertPrime · · Score: 3, Informative

    When we look at tissue grafting and associated histocompatibility issues, we usually think of proteins. That is, after all, how the histocompatibility genes were discovered first in mice then humans, and the modern field of immunogenetics was founded. However, the article points to sugars and how their absence can so lessen acute xenograft rejection. The role of sugars in cell recognition can be found in the January 1993 issue of Scientific American.

  17. Proof by J4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We need more philosophy and less technology.

    1. Re:Proof by bravehamster · · Score: 2
      We need more philosophy and less technology.


      Not if the philosophers spout crap like that. Why not just have more of both?

      --
      ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
  18. Gives new meaning... by Max+the+Merciless · · Score: 1

    to the phrase: "Saving my bacon" - hahahaha... *sigh*

    --
    * * Always question "the National Interest" - 9 times out of 10 it is a cover for evil
  19. There's a joke somewhere in there... by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2
    about Pigs and Cops, but I'm not sure what it is.

    This is the perfect forum to try out your pork chops.

    Gotta wake up! Gotta wake up!

  20. Make 'em sapient first by StefanJ · · Score: 2
    Riffing off of Douglas Adams:

    If we make these xenotransplant pigs intelligent, they'll be able to give informed consent.

    This way, if any right groups challenge the ethics of the transplant, the hospital adminstrators can whip out a donor consent card with the pig' little hoof print.

    Or course, we'd have to make them really gullible, so they actually volunteer when asked, instead of rolling their eyes and saying "yeah, right!"

    1. Re:Make 'em sapient first by HiThere · · Score: 2

      There was this experimenter in Russia, can't remember his name, it might have been Pavlov. He was doing some experiments with pigs where he strapped them down to a rack and conditioned them awhile before he killed them (looking for some physical results from conditioning, I think). The pigs all got hysterical, so he stopped using them and switched to dogs. The dogs just played their part nicely, and got their hearts cut out. He decided that pigs were just too hysterical. Perhaps they *are* sapient?

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  21. Anyone read Animal Farm? by euxneks · · Score: 1

    The pigs will take us over if we're not too careful!

    --
    in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
  22. True but... by sterno · · Score: 2

    I don't know about you, but I find that a slow excruciating death makes me a tad more squeemish than a pig's organs :)

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
  23. I'd Switch(TM)! by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 2
    Could you imagine Apple's advertisers doing THIS campain?

    And my heart was going like beep beep beep beep beep. And then my bloop pressure dropped in half and I was like, bhmuuuggghhh? And then half my good heart was, like, gone. It's a shame too, cause it was a really nice heart. Bummer. Oh, and my name is Eric Cartman, and I'm a student. www.apple.com/Have_A_Heart/Switch/

  24. Remember the mammoth... by Scaebor · · Score: 2, Funny

    Forget the pigs, what I'm waiting for that mammoth to be cloned. I may need a backpack to carry around my heart, but by God they made 'em good back in the old days.

    --
    "Hey brother Christian with your high and mighty errand / your actions speak so loud I can't hear a word you're saying"
  25. YES! by Wolfier · · Score: 2

    I can get a brain transplant from one of these pigs to use it as my math co-processor!

    Then...I'll have 3 brains!

  26. Will people actually be comfortable with this? by streak · · Score: 1

    My bet is not. A large segment of the population fear other "modified" things like irradiated meat, what's to make them want actual animal tissue inside of them (and cloned tissue at that..)
    Though the prospect of life or death might be enough to persuade most. Of course this still has a long way to go, never mind the cross-species disease issues, etc.

  27. New meanings to the phrases: by questionlp · · Score: 1

    "He is such a pig", "Pig-headed bastard!", "Quit being such a pig, leave some for us", and "Everything seems so muddy...".

  28. The *really* scary part hasn't even been mentioned by McSpew · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Anybody who watches Frontline on PBS has already seen a lengthy and incredibly in-depth story about the future of xenotransplantation.

    The scary part about pig-to-human transplants is the possibility of humans contracting pig viruses through xenotransplants that could mutate and cause widespread disease. Transplant patients have to take medications that suppress their immune systems so their bodies won't reject their new organs. Thus, the possibility of cross-species disease propagation is very real and very scary.

    Pigs being bred for transplantation are currently birthed by caesarian section directly into a bath of iodine and kept in a sterile environment from then on. But even so, it's unlikely that such animals are 100% free of pathogens. Anyone who receives a pig organ should understand that they will be considered as much of a disease threat as if they were HIV-positive for the rest of their lives. They are not to have unprotected sex and should not have children.

    It's scary stuff and not to be taken lightly.

  29. Great, if by viol2001 · · Score: 1

    This could be a great breakthrough. There are currently long lists for organ transplants, as there are not enough donors for the demand.
    However, it must be proven that this works, as they are working on. I wish them luck, this could be a wonderful thing.

  30. I'm waiting for the donkeys ... by MisanthropicProggram · · Score: 1

    to be modified to produce human organs. Think of the possibilities for the penis enlargement industry. Think about the spam ... "Get a Donkey Dick! Send $99.99 to www.donkeydick.ru .. I thought it was funny :(

    --

    There is no spoon or sig.

    1. Re:I'm waiting for the donkeys ... by Student_Tech · · Score: 1

      When someone calls you a complete ass you can say that only your heart (or whatever transplanted part) is.

  31. Older folks by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

    A lot of people who would be getting these transplants are likely past child bearing age anyway, and would not have an exponential effect on population growth. And since they probably already reproduced, they don't have any evolutionary effect either.

    The kids are usually given higher priority when it comes to getting human organs now (the have their whole lives ahead of them... and all that) and I see no reason for that to change, since the pig organs will probably never be as good as the real thing.

    All this will do is make it so the older folks who were dying without organs before can get transplants and watch their grandkids with the human organs in 'em play in the back yard...

    --
    "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    1. Re:Older folks by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      A lot of people who would be getting these transplants are likely past child bearing age anyway, and would not have an exponential effect on population growth. And since they probably already reproduced, they don't have any evolutionary effect either.

      Exactly! If anything technology has helped us to delay overpopulation. Just think how many more people we would have if it wasn't for the invention of the birth control pill.

    2. Re:Older folks by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 2

      Exactly! If anything technology has helped us to delay overpopulation. Just think how many more people we would have if it wasn't for the invention of the birth control pill.

      And don't forget how the Internet delays overpopulation.. I mean, how many of us Slashdot readers will actually reproduce?!

  32. Been using them for years... by NineNine · · Score: 1

    Pig heart valves. They've been put in human hearts for years when human heart valves have been destroyed by disease. My grandmother had several pig valves put in many years ago. Nothing new here.

  33. Re:Faced with "pig heart or die", you'll fold by LobsterMagnet · · Score: 1
    "Faced with "pig heart or die", you'll fold. You can bet on that."

    I cant completely disagree with you, because I am not, and probably will never be in that position, so I don't know how I would respond to "your only chance of living is this pig implant from a clone harvested for the slaughter". But I'm also not some crazed animal rights activist that values the life of an animal over the life of a human being, I believe that there has to be a balance somewhere between the two.

    --
    I will not be trained.
  34. Sugars Aren't Enough by krmt · · Score: 2

    I'm pretty skeptical of this one myself. One sugar isn't all that's going to trigger an immune reaction to cause graft rejection. The MHC molecules are perhaps the biggest known issue, given that the pig has very different MHC molecules than a human. Hell, even different humans have different MHC molecules, which is why kidney donors should be related to the receiver.

    While sugars do play a role in cell recognition, it's not nearly so important in graft rejection because graft rejection is mediated by the immune system, which focuses more on protein-protein interactions. Knocking out a sugar might help with graft rejection (this seems dubious to me) but seriously... don't you think that a pig should be producing plenty of other molecules with slightly different epitopes to be recognized by human antibodies?

    At the most, I'd imagine that this would delay acute graft rejection in a very well done transplant. But I still think immunosuppression, very likely over the remainder of the patient's life, would be necessary.

    --

    "I may not have morals, but I have standards."

  35. That rules out jewish girlfriends, I guess by Subcarrier · · Score: 2

    The whole point is that the products of a non-kosher animal must not enter your body. This obviously includes eating, but also applies to transplants.

    If I had a heart transplant from a pig, would I qualify as a non-kosher animal?

    --
    "I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree with them." -- George H. W. Bush
  36. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  37. Re:The *really* scary part hasn't even been mentio by dvdeug · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the possibility of cross-species disease propagation is very real and very scary.

    Why? We've been living with and eating these creatures for millenia. (We've probably been having sex with them for the same time, sick as the concept may be.) Many farmers have probably got pigs blood in open wounds - they tend not to be squeamish when killing animals. If there's a disease that pigs carry that humans haven't already developed at least partial immunity to, then it is extraordinarily hard to catch.

    They are not to have unprotected sex and should not have children.

    Um, why? Why do we think that those will be the primary means of transmission? If a new disease does come out of the woodwork, it seems that any mode of transmission may be used.

  38. Re:The sheer racist bigotry of this is unbelievabl by Nihilanth · · Score: 2

    if someone wants to die rather than receive medical aid, then..well, that's their perogative.

    Keep in mind, though, those ancient laws were to -protect- their adherants, since suitable technology for safely perserving the meats had not been invented. Basic memetics. Can't pass on the ideas if all your followers are dead. If you trace back the relegious percicution of homosexuality, you find its the same sort of thing, tight reproductive rules had to be formed to keep the dwindling population alive in the face of persecution.

    The ultimate irony is that those rules now cause the descendents of those same people to persecute others.

    But I digress. If the codes of ethics can't adapt to future circumstances, the memeplex dies as surely as a maladapted organism dies in the environment. Human innovation is accellerating beyond the knee of the exponential curve, its going to be a rough transition, and those of us who know how to bend rather than break will be the ones left.

  39. Pigs by infornogr · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can understand the medical benefits of taking organs from pigs and putting them into people... but if we keep doing this... won't we eventually run out of politicians and CEOs?

    1. Re:Pigs by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      I can understand the medical benefits of taking organs from pigs and putting them into people... but if we keep doing this... won't we eventually run out of politicians and CEOs?

      You say that as if it would be a Bad Thing...

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  40. alcohol ain't all bad by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

    There is a lot of data out there to suggest that alcohol in moderation is good.

    quick search

    --
    "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    1. Re:alcohol ain't all bad by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      There is a lot of data out there to suggest that alcohol in moderation is good.

      Bottle-conditioned beer (most homebrew and some microbrews/imports...Sierra Nevada and Chimay come to mind as commercial examples) even contains some vitamins, from the yeast that's used to carbonate the beer. If you happen to drink too much of the stuff, it's also not supposed to leave you with as bad a hangover. (I wouldn't know, as I don't drink to get wasted.) It's like getting some Marmite or Vegemite with your brew. :-)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    2. Re:alcohol ain't all bad by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

      It is not just red wine (and it is the skins of the grapes in that case). Research (previously linked) has shown that most alcoholic beverages consumed in moderation do improve heart health, one of the most accepted theories on this is that the 2-5 drinks per week, not all in one day crowd has a more relaxed life style (not necisarily less work, but less worried about it) and therefor less stress, and fewer heart problems.

      --
      "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    3. Re:alcohol ain't all bad by ShavenYak · · Score: 2

      Yep, it's part of the wonderful circle of life (cue Mr. Hankey and Cornwallis singing "Circle of Poo"). The little yeasties turn sugar into alcohol, and synthesize vitamin B. When your body tries to break down the alcohol, it depletes vitamin B reserves. Having the yeast in the beer helps you out a bit by giving you back some extra B.

      It won't do the whole trick though, because the majority of fermentation takes place before bottling, and the yeast from the bottom of the fermentation tank are typically discarded. Also, a hangover is primarily due to dehydration, so drink plenty of water while you're getting drunk and it won't be nearly as bad.

      Worst-case scenario, you wake up massively hungover - take aspirin, Gatorade, and a teaspoonful of brewer's yeast (you could scavenge this off the bottom of the aforementioned fermentation tank if you're a homebrewer, otherwise buy it at the grocery store).

      Oh, and to avoid being completely off topic, a bacon and egg biscuit from the greasiest fast food place you can find.

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
  41. At last.. by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 2

    .. a real life Police Chief Wiggum!

  42. valves by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

    People have been getting pig heart valves for years, does all this apply to them?

    --
    "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
  43. How scary is it really? by krmt · · Score: 2

    How is this any different than what is currently happening?

    How is this any different than a current human disease mutating to become more virulent? Or perhaps simply virulent? HIV didn't spring from SIV because of some transplant, it happened in the wild. The Hong Kong strain of influenza that caused such a scare didn't happen because of human meddling, it happened in the wild.

    These things happen in nature, and are rare there, even when all these pathogens have the opportunity to do things like coinfect cells, swap genes, and mutate like crazy. What makes you think that it's so likely as to happen simply due to a transplant?

    The problem, as you mention, is immunosuppression, which prevents the body from fighting off any infection that could get in to their transplant. The point of research like this (if it even works, that remains to be seen) is that you don't have to fully immunosuppress, if at all. I'm confident that one day short term immunosuppression will be enough for most transplants, and these people will be able to live normal, healthy lives. Then the chance of this happening drops even further, to the point where all the scaremongering over mutation becomes pointless. Mutations happen, you can't stop them, but that doesn't mean they're really more likely or more dangerous due to science.

    --

    "I may not have morals, but I have standards."

  44. transgenic by f00zbll · · Score: 1

    Hmm, eyes like an eagle, heart of an ox, ears of an owl and feet of a cheetah might not be metaphors in the future.

  45. A wonderful magical animal by xsfo · · Score: 1
  46. Re:Scientific Ethics and Epidemics by japhyaz · · Score: 1


    A troll.?.?....

    hmmm ... while I'm not a frequent poster to slashdot (I'm just to occupied with other affairs) the label troll is one I must admit no prior experience with. Having now read the Troll HOWTO I'm put off with the supposed accusation that my motivation is to get as many replies as possible. With interest in full disclosure, yes many replies would be nice if not great. My motivation for getting such replies may be misunderstood though. The discussion is what is of value in a community. Not the ego boost that comes form harvesting as many replies as possible. That would be a purely individualistic goal at odds with the goal of positive discussion for the good of the community.

    Slashdot seems hardly the place to debate the psychological, sociological, or even anthropological nature of "Trolls" as used above. So I will not delve into this arena of rapport here. I will say that if you feel my post is fabricated or exaggerated to produce replies then you check my research. Flu: The Story of the Great Influenza Pandemic of 1918 and the Search for the Virus That Caused It by Gina Kolata is a good place to start.

    The pure goal of my post was to start an informed discussion.

    I will close by playing the devils advocate here and point out that this reply itself could be viewed as a Troll defending oneself by denying they are a Troll, or an attempt to vindicate myself from the accusation of another. You be the judge. Both options are irrelevant in reference to the topic at hand though.

  47. Somewhere... by sczimme · · Score: 1

    in there is a joke or two about 'Deliverance'...

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
  48. Donor by Sivar · · Score: 2

    "Who knows, we may make that mark on your driver's license obsolete after all."

    I thought it was pigs that would be doing the... Oh.

    --
    Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes. --E. W. Dijkstra
  49. aging countries by phriedom · · Score: 2

    To me, the most surprising part of the CIA report was this: In Florida, reknown for its elderly population, 18.5% of the population is over the age of 65. Italy as a whole will reach this same 18.5% in 2003, joined by Japan in 2005, and Germany in 2006. France follows in 2016, and the US as a whole reaches 18.5% in 2023. I assume a big reason for the US staying younger for longer will be immigration. I wonder when "white" people will no longer be more than 50% of the US.

    --
    Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
  50. Ahem. by Sj0 · · Score: 2

    Ahem.

    BRING ON THE LUDDITES!

    Thank you. That is all.

    --
    It's been a long time.
  51. Retirement age by Malc · · Score: 1

    Wasn't retirement age originally chosen to be average life expectancy plus one year? They have it easy now! Seeing as average life expectancy for woman in some rich countries has now exceeded 80 years, it's obvious why coupled with falling fertility rates that the burden on the employed is getting heavier.

  52. This works out well... by .com+b4+.storm · · Score: 1

    ... since us guys are pigs anyway, there should be minimal compatibility issues. :)

    --
    "Wow, you're like some kind of superhero able to ward off happiness and success at every turn."
    -- Ryan Stiles
  53. At least now... by bjtuna · · Score: 2

    ... my girlfriend will be somewhat correct when she calls me a pig.

    1. Re:At least now... by geekoid · · Score: 2

      what a tease , here I thought I was going to pick up a SCSI ZIP drive cheap, you pig.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  54. Go read Animal Farm again. by wirefarm · · Score: 2

    Think about it.

    --
    -- My Weblog.
    1. Re:Go read Animal Farm again. by ElectricRook · · Score: 1

      I think you did not understand "Animal Farm", which is about Socialism. Animals happen to be the characters.

      --
      - High Tech workers, please say NO to Union Carpenters, their Union sees fit to control our compensation.
  55. Not If It's Saturday by cscx · · Score: 2

    Anyone remember John Goodman's character in The Big Lebowski?

    "Saturday, Donny, is shabbas, the Jewish day of rest. That means I don't work, I don't drive a car, I don't fucking ride in a car, I don't handle money, I don't turn on the oven, and I sure as shit don't fucking roll!"

    So this could be up in the air for all we know.

    1. Re:Not If It's Saturday by Debillitatus · · Score: 2

      Beautiful quote. That's one of the Top 10 for sure.

      --

      Come on, give it up, that's

  56. Different perspectives... by Andy+Smith · · Score: 2
    From the folks who brought you Dolly the cloned sheep
    Dolly is often referenced as a scientific success but don't forget that the success was only partial. She is aging abnormally. The process was imperfect, but pro-cloners seem keen to overlook this...?
    genetically modified cloned pigs which they claim may eventually be able to donate their organs to humans for transplant usage.
    The pigs won't be donating anything. They'll be born, we'll kill them with, I'd guess, little consultation or due process, and then we'll take their organs. It's not going to be a voluntary act of piggy good nature.
  57. Re:Clone me for later harvesting, Oh god NO!!! by Hott+of+the+World · · Score: 1

    Screw that... Seriously.
    Born and raised knowing that one day, when the person you were cloned from, who smokes, eats fatty foods excessively, and never exercises, dies, that you will have to give up your heart, eyes, lungs etc, just so the person will live...

    Two many issues were this would not be acceptable.. If you did clone yourself at birth for organs, then you damn well better not let the general public find out.

    As for the pigs (trying to stay on topic), Seems that PETA will have a feel day with this, although if we eventually find a way to make synthetic hearts and make artificial hearts that last more than a year or two, then using pigs would not be so bad.

    In conclusion, this issue of using animals for human benefit is a hard issue to deal with, but we can't ignore the research that one day may save thousands of lives.

    DamN! forgot to post AC!!!

    --
    | - | - |
  58. Not a good idea by El · · Score: 2

    Just what we need is another vector for animal diseases to pass over into humans.

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  59. Horrible Idea by Phanatic1a · · Score: 2

    This is an awful idea. Other posters have pointed out how this makes it far easier for viral and bacterial diseases to leap across the species barrier, but there's a good story about it that they may not know.

    In The Coming Plague , Laurie Garrett recounts how the primate supply facility that supplied the baboon whose heart was transplanted into Baby Fae was horrified when they learned what was done with it. They had not known that the ape was to be used as a transplant donor, and would have refused had they know. Seems the ape in question was infected with cytomegalovirus, simian AIDS, and a variety of other diseases that generally don't infect humans, but might if you take the organ out of the ape and stick it in a person.

    Later, she tells of a virus carried by a certain species of monkey. It's harmless to that monkey, but readily infects another species which shares habitat with the first. Upon infection, it causes a variety of leukemias and lymphomas so widespread and virulent that death frequently occurs in mere weeks.

    And it's airborne.

    Man, I'm not sure if any pigs carry anything even near so nasty, but I can't think of a worse thing to be doing. Research money spent for this purpose would be far, far better spent on learning how to grow fresh, healthy, transplantable human organs.

    1. Re:Horrible Idea by ElectricRook · · Score: 1
      I've lived through the Sixties, and Seventies... Any time I see a book title begin with "The comming..." I get out the barf bag.

      If you would believe ten percent of them, the world ended in 1999 by: The comming "Over Population", The comming "Fuel shortage", The comming "Struck by a comet", The comming "Famine", The comming "Plague", The comming "Super Nova", The comming "Global cooling", The comming "Global warming", The comming "Not enough socializm", The comming "Dogs and Cats living together", The comming "etc".

      My wife's grand mother told me she saw it all in the Twenties, when the disaster mongers then were called "Worry Willies".

      --
      - High Tech workers, please say NO to Union Carpenters, their Union sees fit to control our compensation.
    2. Re:Horrible Idea by ShavenYak · · Score: 2

      If you've seen all these books, shouldn't you have learned to spell the word "coming" by now?

      I liked the Ghostbusters reference though.

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    3. Re:Horrible Idea by geekoid · · Score: 2

      few things:
      First, I doubt they will just grab a pig at random. They'll have specific 'breeds' of pigs.

      Second, If a disease doesn't infect humns, then it doesn't infect humans. Putting an organ in a human doesn't suddenly changy physiology

      third, we have been getting mutated viruses from pigs, and other animals, for as lngs as pigs and humans have been living together.

      Did you know the flu comes from chickens in China?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  60. Microsoft tried this a while ago by guttentag · · Score: 1
    Microsoft tried Pig-to-Human transplants when they were first experimenting with the power of bundling. Couldn't make it work -- they ended up with Steve Ballmer.

    Sorry, it was just sooo begging to be posted.

  61. Oh good! by Camel+Racer · · Score: 1

    At last, my chance for a brain transplant. It will only help my karma.

    --
    Anybody can work under ideal circumstances. -- Jeff K. (January 4, 2001)
  62. Oy... by r_j_prahad · · Score: 2

    Where I work, this would not be considered by any of us a trans-species transplant if it were for our boss.

  63. I can't read today. by scumdamn · · Score: 1

    I saw the word usage while skimming the blurb and my brain swapped it for the word "sausage". More appropriate, but not correct.

  64. Re:The *really* scary part hasn't even been mentio by Peyna · · Score: 2

    pigs and other animals are already the sources for many of our horrible diseases. We already got most of them from living so close to them.

    --
    What?
  65. New meaning to when pigs fly by w00tgrl · · Score: 1

    I read about pig wings somewhere. they used organic tissue to make live wings. . ick

  66. A little light reading... by nickgrieve · · Score: 1

    Xenotransplantation - How Bad Science and Big Business Put the World at Risk from Viral Pandemics.

    http://www.i-sis.org.uk/xeno.php

  67. Could be the end of diabetes... by rmpotter · · Score: 1

    A working pancreas would be nice -- or even cloning Islet cells for transplant into Type I diabetics. Let's do it soon. We are already injecting transplanted human Islet cells, but that requires a lifelong cocktail of immunosuppressants to prevent rejection.

    --
    Is this sig nificant?
  68. File 13 by Mulletproof · · Score: 2

    Another topic to file under "Just because you can, doesn't mean you should." First, I wouldn't use a religious argument against it's use, because it mainly applies to their consumption and the infested environments pigs live in regularly. I figure pigs marked for "harvesting" would have grow up in a relatively sterile environment. The cross species disease thing is a worry, however. Whee, you can transplant ape hearts. I guess. And pig valves. Yay. But the entire process reminds me of lazer eye surgery to some extent and it shakey beginnings. Sure, you were promised 20/20, but more often than not one wasn't told of the very risky side effects that could result. Never heard much about those, at least not as much as you probably should have. Piggly trnasplant endorcements remind me of this very issue...

    "We can rebuild him. Stronger. Faster. And he'll taste like a BLT, too!"

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  69. PERV by tlambert · · Score: 5, Informative

    You are talking about Porcine Endogenous Retro Virus (PERV).

    The answer is that we have actually been using pigs for Xenotransplantation for a very long time: my Grandfather had a pig-valve in his heart, and Jim Finn has fetal pig brain cells in his brain, along with 12 other people, which has (effectively) halted his parkinsons disease, and reversed most of the symptoms (he can work on his car himself now, when before he was reduced from crawling from room to room on his elbows).

    Both of these surgeries are vintage 1980's/1990's, and many heart-vavle operations predate that time period, since we did not have mechanical replacements designed until more recently.

    The Russians have also been using pig liver cells to treat incurable, and otherwise fatal hepatitus and liver cancer cases, successfully.

    In all cases, the protocols require that the person remain sexually inactive in order to avoid the risk of transmitting PERV human-to-human.

    However, all testing for the past two decades has indicated that PERV is not transmissable to humans from transplanted tissue: out of the many hundreds of porcine xenotransplant recipients, not a single one tests positive for PERV anywhere but the transplanted porcine cells themselves.

    If you are up for a lot of reading, Jim Finn's story (in short form) with a lot of links is available at:

    http://tv.carlton.com/organfarm/jim.jhtml

    See also Jim's own online journal:

    http://www.geocities.com/jimcfinn/index.html

    Here is the medical writeup of Jim and the 12 other patients in the journal "Neurology":

    http://www.neurology.org/cgi/content/abstract/54 /5 /1042

    -- Terry

    1. Re:PERV by red_gnom · · Score: 1

      The Russians have also been using pig liver cells to treat incurable, and otherwise fatal hepatitis and liver cancer cases, successfully.


      Do you have any references to this topic?
      I would like to read more about it.

  70. Uhg. by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    You, my dear sir, ought be shot. Wait. Shooting's too good for you...

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  71. 10000 years by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1
    I was pointing out the error of the post which I was replying too.

    Read their post:
    Darwin stopped working when we started living in civilized societies. 10,000 years ago someone with bad eyesight would be lion food so only people with good eyes would be around long enough to breed. Now you have kids that die after smelling a peanut or getting a cold.


    I was stating that at the time that humans began to live as societies the survival priorities changed.

    Next time, read the thread before point out my mistakes.
    --
    "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
  72. Modified Humans Soon for Pig Transplants by DrInequality · · Score: 1
    McDonalds,Burger King and numerous other "restuarant" chains are engaged in a secret conspiracy to breed a species of human which prefers tasteless, fatty junk food.

    Clearly, these humans are destined for pig transplants in the next life!

  73. Re:The sheer racist bigotry of this is unbelievabl by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
    Keep in mind, though, those ancient laws were to -protect- their adherants, since suitable technology for safely perserving the meats had not been invented. Basic memetics. Can't pass on the ideas if all your followers are dead. If you trace back the relegious percicution of homosexuality, you find its the same sort of thing, tight reproductive rules had to be formed to keep the dwindling population alive in the face of persecution.
    Well, now that technology or the overpopulation condition does not call for more babies are here to allow those forbidden acts, why don't those religions take notice and amend their "laws"?

    But again, religions are not particularly noted for evolving...

  74. Grrrrls from PETA by marko123 · · Score: 1

    The animal lovers should donate their body organs to keep animals alive after I've turned cow and pig livers and giblets into delicate tasting cracker spreads.

    Booyah!

    --
    http://pcblues.com - Digits and Wood
  75. why not... we already get drugs from them... by gilxa1226 · · Score: 1

    I just spent 10 days in China travelling around with my Dad visiting pig intestine workshops. Basically what they do is take the raw intestine and turn it into a usable casing for things like sausage and brats. However, a very important drug, which is used in practically every operation performed in the world, is pulled out of this process... Heparin. So why not have them give us other things too.

  76. Also Looking Forward To... by FrankDrebin · · Score: 2

    • everyone living in nice, wolf-proof, brick houses
    • finding more and more restaurants with slop on the menu
    • women getting somewhat smaller, but remarkably more numerous, breasts
    • WWE going all-mud
    • NOT being ridiculed for looking/acting like a such a g*dd*mned pig
    --
    Anybody want a peanut?
  77. Re:The *really* scary part hasn't even been mentio by gene_tailor · · Score: 1

    "hasn't been mentioned"? Even the short article that this discussion is linked to includes this statement, "Several significant problems need to be overcome before xenotransplantation can be attempted in humans, particularly the danger that pig viruses might cross the species barrier and create a new disease. " Yes, it is a concern, but nobody's hiding it. And the sky is not falling.

    --
    It also occurs to me that if one was drowning, yelling "Help! I'm drowning and I lost my bikini top" would probably be m
  78. Re:The sheer racist bigotry of this is unbelievabl by mr100percent · · Score: 1

    Who says religions don't evolve?

    Read my above post that comments how pig organs are considered acceptable transplants to Muslims, since they save lives.

  79. Re:The *really* scary part hasn't even been mentio by McSpew · · Score: 2

    Sorry, I was talking about the discussion threads here, not the article itself. However, the article was far too short and superfluous to truly address the ethical and epidemiological repercussions.

  80. Human organs for pigs? by jamieo · · Score: 1

    So when are we going to have human organs for pigs? Hey, they gotta live too!

  81. Re:The *really* scary part hasn't even been mentio by svindler · · Score: 1

    Does something like this also account for horse transplants or will I have to give up the transplant from a stallion that I was thinking of?

  82. Organ transplants allowed in Judaism? by mirnav · · Score: 1
    I thought organ transplantation was frowned upon in the Jewish community, perhaps even downright forbidden.

    A friend of mine (Jewish herself) died of lung cancer because the ideal donor's family (other Jews) would not let the doctors take away major organs of their son for religious reasons - something to do with not messing around with the body before laying it to rest, definitely not without some major organs.

    1. Re:Organ transplants allowed in Judaism? by JMan1 · · Score: 1

      As far as I know, Jewish law entirely permits transplantation if a life will be saved.

  83. The Island of Doctor Moreau by msheppard · · Score: 2

    Reminds me of a story I just read on my palm, an older story by H.G. Wells. You can download it free at memoware for free.

    M@

    --
    Krispy Cream is people
  84. Oh no you don't by paiute · · Score: 1

    I've watched just enough pr0n to know that I don't want parts made from the other white meat.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  85. All well and good, unless you're Jewish or Muslim by fudgefactor7 · · Score: 1

    Can't wait for the religious factions to begin to scream about this one!

  86. Re:The *really* scary part hasn't even been mentio by tgibbs · · Score: 2
    Ummmm.. I'll bet that most farmers are not taking immuno-superssives though and that makes a difference.
    We are talking about centuries here, and there are lots of disease and illnesses that produce immunosuppression. You don't suppose anybody with a weak immune system ever cut themselves while butchering a hog?
  87. Re:The *really* scary part hasn't even been mentio by JahToasted · · Score: 2
    Thus, the possibility of cross-species disease propagation is very real and very scary.

    Yeah just like cow pox. Oh wait... cow pox was the first ever vaccination (vacca is the latin word for cow) and because of it smallpox only exists in 2 places in the world (frozen in Atlanta and in Moscow). We've been around animals like pigs and cows for so long that the risk of getting a new disease from them is very slim. The risk of a patient rejecting the organ is a major concern however. But I guess if you need a new heart you may be willing to take that chance.

  88. This is already being done. by rendermouse · · Score: 1
    Pig Livers and heart valves are used today to save human lives.
    In 1978, Lincoln heart surgeon Dr. Deepak M. Gangahar, president of the Nebraska Heart Institute, was the first Nebraska physician to insert a pig valve in a patient. Today, the use of pig valves -- as well as other "biologic" valves constructed from cow heart valves or from human valves taken from cadavers -- is routine.
    --
    "Follow your Bliss." -- Joseph Campbell
  89. sod the pigs try bonobo's by johnjones · · Score: 2

    ok

    why cant they just say transgenic pigs ?
    (or arn't the slashdot crowd able to understand technical terms)

    if you really wanted to go after this and you had money (like a drug company) then you would use Bonobo's because they are much closer to humans and the the organs are the right size (the primary reason to use pigs is that the organs are the right size )

    whatever your postion on this dont think its not going to happen it is
    (drug companys have to much to gain)
    lets keep it in the open and monitor it rather than banning it and leting the drug companies move to a nation which will turn a blind eye and selling it on there (to have the op you fly to chad and pay your money then fly back to the country which banned it)

    basically the Biological people screwed themselves by allowing patents on genetic sequences and had to get a non profit group do the human genome so that could not be patented lets not allow that to happen in software

    regards

    John Jones

  90. For A Limited Time Only... by ShavenYak · · Score: 2

    A free honey-glazed ham with every heart transplant!

    --

    Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
  91. Re:My vegan side coming out. by ShavenYak · · Score: 2

    I'm sure the brief lives of these pigs will be a lot more pleasant than the animals we raise to be eaten.

    If by "more pleasant" you mean they'll have less time to be miserable, you might be right. If you think transplant pigs are going to be put up in cushy hotel rooms with free HBO, I'm pretty sure you're wrong. I expect they'll have healthier diets than food pigs though, to keep the heart as healthy as possible.

    --

    Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
  92. Re:The sheer racist bigotry of this is unbelievabl by ShavenYak · · Score: 2

    My suggestion would be Horses, since they are not haram/non-kosher in any religion. Or dogs.

    The reason pigs are being used is because their anatomy is very similar to human anatomy. This is also why high school biology classes dissect fetal pigs (at least, mine did, that may not be common any more). Horses and dogs probably wouldn't work - in particular, dog parts seem likely to be too small.

    If there were another animal equally appropriate for the task and kosher as well, don't you think it would have been chosen instead?

    --

    Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
  93. kind-hearted swine by pjgeer · · Score: 1

    come genetically modified cloned pigs which they claim may eventually be able to donate their organs to humans for transplant usage.
    How do you like that. The porcine genus evolves the ability to speak, and the first thing they say is how eager they are to donate their own organs to help us out. After all the things we've done to them, it kinda gets you right here, don't it?

  94. first generation test group forming by pjgeer · · Score: 1

    At a press conference, Jack Valenti and Hilary Rosen confirmed the sudden career change. "Really, it's not all that different from our former work" insisted Valenti, whose name will change to 'P0174' on Monday. "Spread filth, hoard garbage, frighten the timid, I'd say we've got as much experience as Steve Balmer." Rosen mentioned that transplantation of cloned organs would require agreement to monthly licensing fees, but insisted that cloning was not a DMCA prohibited procedure for circumventing entropy.

  95. Re: Jews aren't dumb by MrMrBen · · Score: 1

    Maybe some Jews will refuse a pig implant. History has shown that the Jewish people are, pretty resourceful though, and I don't think most of them would be dumb enough to turn down down life saving treatment, unless they happen to be suicidal. If there's a religious issue, I'm confident they'll find a way around it. Is a genetically engineered pig still a pig?

  96. Re: Why not elephants? by MrMrBen · · Score: 1

    The reason pigs are being used is because their anatomy is very similar to human anatomy.

    Yeah. I'm not a vet or anything, but aren't horses 3 or 4 times as big as a human being? Wouldn't a horses's heart be about as big as my head?
    Hey, I've got an idea, how about transplants from elephants? Finally a profitable way to keep them off the endagered list!

  97. Re:All well and good, unless you're Jewish or Musl by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 2

    That's an interesting point - as far as I know, the religious prohibitions specify EATING "non-Kosher" critters as bad. Wonder how they'll come down on "non-foodular" uses of the critters...

    Though given that I occasionally hear them referred to as "unclean" in this context, I suppose it's unlikely that organ transplants will be treated any better than food...

  98. woohooo for cannibals!!! by guanno · · Score: 1

    No more going to jail for cannibalism. You can grow your own human tissue and eat it with a side of eggs for breakfast.

    Is there a moderator value of "6 and twisted" yet...? LOL

  99. Russian Porcine Xenotransplantation references by tlambert · · Score: 2

    Here are some Russian porcine xenotransplantation references; this is not a complete set of references, so you will have to do some searching on your own:

    Islets of langerhan (treatment of type I diabetes):
    http://www.islet.org/41.htm

    Liver xenotransplants (company involved in study):
    http://www.novartis.com/

    Bioartificial Liver in vivo (Dutch):
    http://www.cordis.lu/tmr/src/grants/fmbi /961547.ht m

    Suggested search terms:
    russia liver xenotransplant
    dutch porcine hepatocytes
    russia porcine hepatocytes

    Tiny bibliography:

    Reversal of acute liver failure by xenografts of microencapsulated porcine hepatocytes Z Du, T Li, GM Shu, JC Song, AM Sun (Canada) 122

    Experimental studies on hepatic support device using heterogeneous alive animal to substitute failed liver N Cui, N Cui, J Wang, Q Fu, H Cui, J Feng (China) 128

    Development of xenogeneic direct hemoperfusion method for bioartificial liver K Naruse, Y Sakai, D Endoh, J Shindoh ,K Kojima, Y Karasawa, T Kohsaki, Y Iida, M Makuuchi (Japan) 130

    Postoperative liver failure successfully treated by hepatic arterial infusion of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) and aperesis therapy Y Asanuma, T Sato, O Yasui, T Kurokawa, K Koyama (Japan) 120

    Precrinical Study of a Hybrid Artificial Liver Support System J Fukuda, K Okamura, R Sakiyama, K Nakazawa, H Ijima, Y Yamashita, M Shimada, K Shirabe, S Tanaka, E Tsujita, K Sugimachi, K Funatsu (Japan) 123

    Development of a hybrid bioartificial liver using hepatocytes entrapped in a basement membrane matrix M Nagaki, K Miki, Yl Kim, T Naiki, A Sugiyama, H Moriwaki (Japan) 127

    See also:
    Frontline: Organ Farm, part 2
    Program #1913
    Original Airdate: April 3, 2001

    http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/or ga nfarm/

    "Although organ transplants cannot be performed in the U.S., two people have had their lives saved by organs from a humanized transgenic pig. Both were treated at the Baylor University Medical Center in Dallas, Texas. The first was 20-year-old Rob Pennington. He was an emergency admission for liver failure in the autumn of 1997, just weeks before such experiments were halted by the FDA."

    If this is *specifically* for liver cancer, see also:
    http://www.mad-cow.org/UKGMO/GMO_news14.html
    19 Jun 00 - GMO - Tests on GM 'missiles' to target cancer cells

    Suggested search terms:
    "David Kerr" liver cancer

    Clinical trials only, at this point; so far 200 patients have been treated in the UK using a genetically modified retrovirus. This is probably a better bet at this point than a xenotransplant, for this *specific* problem.

    -- Terry

  100. Re:All well and good, unless you're Jewish or Musl by geekoid · · Score: 2

    actual, when it come down to life and death, most of those rules can be set aside.

    however, I get this from my Jewish froms and IANAR(I am not a rabii).

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  101. Animal diseases transferred? by Julz · · Score: 1

    What concerns me most is that if you have cloned organs in your body from animals like pigs or cows or whatever then, will you also have to watch what you consume and be careful that you don't get to close to animals that are sick?

    --
    When shit hits the fan get some of these https://youtu.be/pY-GncsZ-UE
  102. Re:My vegan side coming out. by C0LDFusion · · Score: 1

    But the question is, do you care about the living things you kill in order to survive? Those plants might very well be capable of feeling pain. I mean, a plant lives, grows, and operates in what would be the most rational and intellegent method of growing. Example: A vine of kudzu has the option of growing wide or narrow. Depending on the light situation, it may spread out or up. Who is to say that the cells of that plant combined do not create an intellegent creature, even with the lack of what it considered a "brain"?

    If anything the past has taught us, is that life is full of surprises. Just because something doesn't have organs doesn't mean it doesn't have feelings. If you want to take your vegan beliefs out to examination, I'm sure they will fall under the same things that you probably believe faulty about the average carnivore.


    The fact is that you are human. The way of nature is to protect the species that you are a part of, no matter what. You don't often see wolves protecting cows from Coyotes.

    So, why don't you Vegans come and rejoin the rest of humanity and do the natural thing. Raise a BBQ Turkey leg with me, and give a hearty "HURRAH!"

    --
    Only in slashdot are posts of solidarity modded at -1 Redundant, while posts of antagonism are modded as -1 Flamebait.
  103. Medical science out of control? by geoswan · · Score: 2
    A lot of medical science these days seems to have forgotten that quality of life matters as much as life itself.

    I don't want to seem unsympathetic to you and your family. Your grandmother is experiencing a terribly reduced quality of life? You suspect she is being kept alive against her will? That is truly awful.

    But humans made the decision to keep her alive. I believe it is a mistake to blame science for this. Her children and other relatives should not be feeling like helpless victims here. Her doctors are not modern shaman, whose suggestions you have to take. If they act that way, if they are playing god, you, her relatives, should challenge them, and keep challenging them.

    We face the same kind of decisions, around xeno-transplants, as a society, as your family faces with your grandmother. If we believe in democracy, it is time to be really diligent about keeping our selves informed. And we have to be prepared to explore our values, and what we believe in, and speak up once we have figured it out.

  104. Re:The sheer racist bigotry of this is unbelievabl by Nihilanth · · Score: 2

    Right, that's what i'm talking about. I wasn't commenting on any religion as a whole, merely the relegious views being espoused by the person i was replying to.

    Anyhow, yeah, read your post, sounds pretty sensible to me.