Slashdot Mirror


Bon Jovi Tries New Approach To Fight Piracy

Dudio writes "80s-era rock band Bon Jovi is taking a novel approach to fighting piracy of their upcoming album, Bounce. Retail CDs will be distributed with a unique serial number with which the purchaser can register in order to receive such exclusives as prioritized concert ticket purchases and unreleased music. Finally, somebody in the entertainment industry is attempting to adapt to the changing market rather than rushing to protect an outdated business model." All Bon Jovi jokes aside, it is nice to see a fresh approach.

159 of 489 comments (clear)

  1. Good Job! by Locke!Erasmus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Locke!Erasmus feels that this is a prudent and wise course of action for Bon Jovi to take. I only hope that they will keep some records on whether they profit from this strategy, and how much they profit. Hopefully, if it works, we will see more labels/artists try new tactics such as this one instead of simply threatening to DOS people who are running a P2P application.

    --
    I should have picked out the nickname Demosthenes!Tecumseh.
    1. Re:Good Job! by macdaddy357 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Both of Bon Jovi's fans should eat this up!

      --
      How ya like dat?
    2. Re:Good Job! by DESADE · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Thank goodness!!! I proposed this idea to a digital music list almost two years ago hoping that things would evolve this way. The labels could marginalize piracy if they approached the problem intelligently.

      The Nature of Demand
      It seems to me one of the key problems facing the music industry in the
      digital age is the "commodity" approach to marketing music. Who was the
      genius that first determined that the real product is a piece of plastic?
      When I buy a CD, it's not because I simply want to be able to play the music
      at my leisure. At the core of every music purchase is a connection between
      the artist and the consumer. For some, it's an association of ideals. For
      others, it may be image, lust, identity, craft or a myriad of other
      possibilities. This is the real nature of demand in this business and it's
      being completely ignored under the current model.

      Pissing Off the Consumer
      This whole idea came to me as I was driving to work one day listening to
      "Celebrity Skin." I'm on my third copy now and it irks my hide a little each
      time I buy a CD that I have previously owned. Especially considering the
      fact that I know so little money is going to the artist.

      Why can't I just buy personal rights to the piece of work and pay a media
      fee for whatever form of media I choose as a playback device? If I lose the
      CD, why can't I just pay a reasonable media fee to replace it? Why can't I
      be a patron of the artist rather than a consumer of plastic? The value of a
      CD is in the beauty of the work, not in its physical manifestation.

      In a Perfect World
      I'd pay $25 bucks for a CD. It would come with a serial number. I'd go to a
      Web site managed by the artist or their representatives and register. Once
      registered, I'd be able to download the CD in MP3 format. Maybe I'd get
      access to a couple of bonus tracks as well. Maybe I'd like a second copy of
      the CD or a tape for my car. I'd be able to buy a second copy for 5-7 bucks.
      Call it a media fee.

      A Different Approach
      Now here's the real power of this model. Now that I've registered, the
      artist can send me an email telling me about what's going on in their
      creative life every now and then. Maybe I'd be able to get an early copy of
      the next album in MP3 format for pre-ordering. Maybe the artist could send
      me a link to some live tracks from concerts or some things they have been
      playing around with in the studio between major releases. Maybe they could
      point me to a couple of older albums I might be interested in. Maybe once I
      have purchased the rights to three albums I would achieve "distinguished
      patron" status that allows me special access to other material. That's
      value. Now I feel like I have a relationship with the artist. Now I feel
      like a patron who helps support the artist so they can spend their time
      working on their art. Now the artist has a direct way to build a
      relationship with me the fan. Foster that relationship and the artist is
      meeting the real demand of a music consumer.

      Maybe when the artist comes to town, they can put on a special show at a
      small venue for "distinguished patrons." I think a show like this would be
      good for the artist and the patron. The artist would know they are
      performing for a select group that appreciates their craft and has shown it
      by supporting them. The patron gets to see his or her favorite artist up
      close and personal. The patron would be willing to pay a higher price as
      well. The next day, maybe a special commerative t-shirt would be available
      at the web site when the patron logs in.

      Also, think about how valuable the database would be.

      Watch the Money Roll In
      So under this scenario, I'd probably spend at least a couple hundred bucks
      with an artist. Under the current model, I might have shelled out $100 for a
      CD and a couple of concert tickets. Why allow labels to take so much money
      for "managing" the artist, when what they really should be doing is managing
      the relationship with between the artist and the patron? The marketing
      potential under this model is a no brainer. Some might abuse it, some might
      manage it well. At the end of the day, it's the relationship that counts.
      Piss off your registered fan base with a load of spam and chances are the
      fan won't cough up any more dough. Provide a real value to registering and
      watch the money roll in. The better an artist manages the relationship, the
      more money they make. Make the management earn their keep for a change.

      This Kills the Napter Problem
      Piracy will never go away. Instead of trying to limit access to an artist's
      work, why not take a different approach... provide real value for paying for
      the work. Why would I spend hours trolling Napster for bad MP3's encoded at
      different bit rates and labeled with no common format when I can just buy
      the CD and have access to clean copies encoded at a high bit rate for my
      desktop machine and maybe another set encoded at a low bit rate for my car
      or portable player? Napster's cool, but face it, it's still a
      pain-in-the-ass. Today's average MP3 collection is a sloppy mess. Why would
      I pirate when buying the work and registering offers me real value? Sure
      some people will pirate. Face it folks, it's going to happen no matter what.
      The loss from piracy would be more than covered by the additional revenue.
      This would also go a long way to killing the demand for used CD's.

      Eviscerate The Damn Middlemen
      I'm offended that the record companies skim off such a disproportionate
      amount of income from the process compared to the value they inject into the
      transaction. They get away with it because they control the distribution
      channel. That control is dying and all the industry seems to want to do is
      come up with another way to protect it. Wake up! Fans are pissed off.
      Artists are pissed off. Everyone is sick and tired of paying twenty bucks
      for a CD and knowing that the artist only ends up with a buck or two. That's
      why everyone is sucking songs off of Napster. We're all tired of feeding
      your machine. Let go and start fresh. Didn't most people in the business get
      into management or promotion or whatever because they loved music? Wouldn't
      it be nice to get back to that rather than working in a system that is
      basically a leech feeding upon both artist and consumer?

      Someday Soon
      An new act is going to make it big direct. No label. No management. No
      distribution deal. Self-financed. Self-promoted. Self-Published. Another
      possibility is a major act going direct successfully. The day is coming soon
      and when it happens, a lot of people in this business are going to face a
      rude wake-up call. Why not make a deal now while you still have a chance?

    3. Re:Good Job! by Disevidence · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Honest World -

      If it fails, they made shitty music which wasn't marketed well.

      If it succeeds, its due to better music and perhaps the added incentive of the aforementioned offer.

      Marketing world -

      If it fails, its due to blatant piracy

      If it succeeds, it didn't succeed enough. Piracy was still rampant.

      --
      Think nothing is impossible? Try slamming a revolving door.
    4. Re:Good Job! by Locke!Erasmus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, I'll tell you one thing - I've already decided I'm not going to download the music. I will buy the CD instead.

      --
      I should have picked out the nickname Demosthenes!Tecumseh.
    5. Re:Good Job! by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 2

      Wait ... you're going to combat piracy by doubling the price of CDs, and then offering other services which may or may not be of benefit to the customer? I fully support the record industry's right to set CD prices at whatever they want, but I hardly think that doubling the price is going to be a good business move. (I don't have the money to buy many as it is; at $25 a pop, I'll stick with my current collection.)

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    6. Re:Good Job! by afidel · · Score: 2

      I've never said this before but I wish I had a mod point to give here. This is probably the best post I've seen on Slashdot and I have been here since before accounts were added, it is interesting, insightfull, on topic all at the same time.
      p.s.
      I have been cruising at 50 karma for about 9 months or so and have been soaking karma points like a whore on a race from 0-50, but I have never once had mod privlidges, what gives?

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    7. Re:Good Job! by tahpot · · Score: 2

      This is incredibly funny. I spent 5 hours yesterday looking for your original post because I wanted to spread your ideas around the internet. Due to my vague recollection of the post and poor slashdot searching facilities :P I couldn't find it.
      Good job in posting it again! Thanks.

      I'm pissed off at wasting 5hrs though.

    8. Re:Good Job! by afidel · · Score: 2

      I was at RIT in the fall of 1997 and frequently visited slashdot back when it was hosted on robs server.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    9. Re:Good Job! by LarsG · · Score: 2

      Desade, mind if I forward that thing to a bunch of places? (Oh, and the list you sent it to two years ago - was it the beef noodle soup thingie?)

      --
      If J.K.R wrote Windows: Puteulanus fenestra mortalis!
    10. Re:Good Job! by DESADE · · Score: 2

      LarG,

      Do as you wish. Embellish, paraphrase, whatever you like. Any you're right about the list. That was the perfect forum. Comprised of people on both sides of the issue that really care about fixing this damn mess.

      As an aside, I saw a post from Brad King (he covers this stuff for Wired and is a regular on the soup list) hinting about the next wave of CD's. I't possible something like this may be in the works among the major labels. Very watered down and still restrictive on personal rights, but it will be interesting to see if the rumors pan out.

  2. What will they blame it on when this doesn't sell? by sys$manager · · Score: 3, Funny

    It must be piracy because everyone wants to buy new records from a rock band that is 15 years out of date.

    Or will they go down in a blaze of glory?

  3. Amen to that by Em+Emalb · · Score: 2

    Well, it's good to see someone fighting it in a novel way, but will it make much difference?

    The guy downloading it for free probably wouldn't buy it in the first place, much less go to a concert.

    Some people do illegal things just because they can.

    Side note: That flag in my back pocket thing Sambora did was in bad taste.

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
    1. Re:Amen to that by susano_otter · · Score: 2

      Sure, some people are just criminals at heart, but haven't the surveys been showing that the biggest "pirates" are also the biggest "fans"? If this is true, then I'd expect that the people most likely to DL the album for free would be the same people who'd want extra band goodies and concerts. So suddenly Bon Jovi is rewarding their fans for liking them (and voting with their wallets), while protecting their (debatable) revenue stream, and wisely ignoring the minority of haters (who don't really make up much of their listener-base anyway, and won't make much of a difference one way or the other).

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    2. Re:Amen to that by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 5, Interesting
      "The guy downloading it for free probably wouldn't buy it in the first place, much less go to a concert."

      Of course. But I think a better point is that someone in the industry is realising that the real money maker will NOT be CDs in the coming years. They are starting to cultivate the market for concerts instead. This priority ticket purchasing with CDs would probably cause people who would never have considered going to concerts to buy concert tickets.

      And live concerts, I do believe, will be the real money makers in the future as opposed to CD sales.

      THANK YOU Bon Jovi et al for rewarding purchases of the CD with real perks, as opposed to assuming the purchase is a copyright infringement waiting to happen.

    3. Re:Amen to that by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2

      Concerts have always been the real money maker for those who deserve the money...

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    4. Re:Amen to that by geekoid · · Score: 2

      again. not true.
      I have downloaded music, then gone and bought the CD.
      I have also downloaded music, then dleted it because I didn't enjoy it.

      ON an unrelated note, can somebody please tell me who I need to contact so that /. will fix there American flag icon?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:Amen to that by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      What about me, I've downloaded every Bon Jovi song I like, and I'm still looking for more. Despite this, I gladly paid for a DVD of a concert (which by the way has an incredible version of Runaway which is not to be found on P2P networks). I also would gladly pay to go to a concert. Concerts are much higher on my purchase list than a CD because I concert is something I will remember.

      The same applies to other artists I download. I would gladly pay to see them in concert and other such events.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    6. Re:Amen to that by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      Subtract out venue costs and it's less than 3 million, but the point is well taken. And on top of that, the music industry as a whole will benifit from this because people who can't make real music, and rely on the studio to clean up their sound when it's all over will fail miserably, while people who can perform and create music people will enjoy will rise to the tops.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    7. Re:Amen to that by drinkypoo · · Score: 2
      The guy downloading it for free probably wouldn't buy it in the first place, much less go to a concert.

      Let's see, a recording artist makes a record, it goes gold, and he ends up in debt to the label. Or a recording artist goes on tour and actually gets to collect a significant amount of the ticket price. Do I better support the artist by attending a show or buying an album?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:Amen to that by fishbowl · · Score: 2
      "Concerts have always been the real money maker for those who deserve the money..."

      And even for some who do not:

      $5000+ for two tickets to New Years' Eve?

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    9. Re:Amen to that by fricto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I managed an indipendant record label, and a friend of mine worked for Sony in A$R - live concerts HAVE ALWAYS BEEN the real money makers, this is the spin on the piracy debate they've tried to hide.

    10. Re:Amen to that by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "Not too bad for working less than 3 hours a night."

      What you're paying for is the probably 50+ YEARS total practice, training, shitty unpaid gigs, rehearsal, and the honing of the individual artists' skills, all of which together have created a band which you want to go and see. The three hours is the time your butt is in the seat, not the "working".

    11. Re:Amen to that by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2

      Yeah, saying a concert is only 3 hours work is a stupid as saying The Empire Strikes Back was only 2hours, 8 minutes of work.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    12. Re:Amen to that by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2

      And that also happens to be slightly similar to saying it only took you 5 minutes to check IMDB.com and write this post. The reality is it took you a lifetime of strenuous social engineering for us to enjoy that incredibly insightful piece of information. Of course, by 'social engineering' I mean 'you're a huge geek'.

      Hah. it only took me 10 seconds to find out how long ESB is, and I didn't use IMDB.com. Everybody knows that a Real Geek need only grab the tape/DVD from the stack next to his computer to find out. I am indeed a Huge Geek.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  4. Combatting piracy? I don't think so... by blazin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It sounds like he's not really trying to combat piracy, per se, but more encourage people to buy the CD for the perks and benefits that would come of it.

    Sounds like a great idea... Do something where people want to buy your CD more than trying to make it impossible for them to copy it.

    I hope it works for him.

  5. Bon Jovi??? by tsmit · · Score: 3, Funny


    Never heard of him.

    --
    Yes, my girlfriend is a BitchX
    1. Re:Bon Jovi??? by unicron · · Score: 2

      He's the guy in the sample at the end of the live version of Orbital's Halcyon where they loop his "Shot to the Heart" with Balinda Carlisle's "Heaven is a place on Earth"..

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    2. Re:Bon Jovi??? by Deagol · · Score: 2

      He was the plumber in the last season of Ally McBeal, wasn't he? :)

  6. Unreleased Music?!? by carambola5 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    such exclusives as prioritized concert ticket purchases and unreleased music.

    Um, yeah. Unreleased until it's released to the paying customers, who then pass it off to the non-paying "customers." The prioritized ticket thing, on the other hand, actually makes sense.
    --
    IWARS.
    People, in general, disappoint me. Politicians even more so.
    1. Re:Unreleased Music?!? by tsmit · · Score: 3, Funny

      Really, what type of music from Bon Jovi is unrealeased? I mean...really.

      I'd be all excited about an unreleased single from Pink Floyd...but, Bon Jovi?


      What, are they going to remix "Living on a Prayer"?

      And now, the previously unreleased version of "Living on a Prayer", with Busta Rhymes singing backup.

      Please.

      --
      Yes, my girlfriend is a BitchX
    2. Re:Unreleased Music?!? by Mononoke · · Score: 2, Funny
      with John Bon Jovi signing backup.
      Wow! A version for the deaf?

      I thought the deaf lucky enough just by not having to hear JBJ.

      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    3. Re:Unreleased Music?!? by jbf · · Score: 2

      ...and you could embed the unique serial number in any downloaded music via the then-in-vogue watermarking scheme. Since it's hard to do this with pressed CDs, this seems like the ideal way to snag leaked serial numbers...

    4. Re:Unreleased Music?!? by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      Actualy, this is another incentive. Instead of having to wade through the garbage of files on Kazza et al to find the appropriate version of the song, I'm guarenteed a highquality, accurate file. That's worth it to me.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  7. Nice idea but i doubt it'll work by grahamsz · · Score: 2

    Anyone that likes bon jon enough to care about priority concern ticket sales is going to buy his albums anyway.

    It's a step in the right direction, but doesn't seem like a very big one.

    Why not just make the cd cost $5 instead!?

    1. Re:Nice idea but i doubt it'll work by grahamsz · · Score: 2

      Well at the end of the day I only buy the cd's of bands I really like because of their current price. Things I kinda like I'll usually download or share from a friend (sorry riaa) and maybe i'll grow to like them and buy their next cd.

      However if cds were only $5 then i'd probably buy more than 4 times as many as I do today - That way I'd hear a cool song on the radio and wouldn't think twice about picking up the album.

      It's the same with that one movie studio that was considering releasing dvd's at that price point. They'd do away with blockbuster and probably make just as much money by selling many times more copies.

      As it happens I am a software developer and placing your product price is a tradeoff against how many copies you expect to sell at a given price point.

      If a personal use copy of MS Office were $30 then i'd buy it... but instead I use Staroffice/Openoffice which is maybe only 90% as good but cheap/free.

      Surely there are other people in the same boat. And yes, I do buy good shareware products - 2 in the last 6 months - because they were excellent products at a good price.

  8. huh? by DA_MAN_DA_MYTH · · Score: 5, Funny

    What Bon Jovi jokes?

    Triumph the Insult Comic Dog: Bon Jovi you are filming a new vampire movie, yes?
    Bon Jovi: Yes I am...
    Triumph: At last a role that requires you to suck...

    --
    "It takes many nails to build a crib, but one screw to fill it."
  9. Back to the 70s by cDarwin · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I remember when I bought Dark Side of the Moon back in the '70s. It came with a really cool poster and a bunch of truly groovy stickers that you couldn't get anywhere else. It added a lot to the value of the album.


    Dark Side of the Moon was a top 40 record for five years running.

    --

    --
    Socrates was asked where he was from. He replied not "Athens," but "The world."

    1. Re:Back to the 70s by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2
      Dark side of the Moon was on Billboard top 100 for something like 20 years.

      I still get TCH flashbacks from hearing any song off that album. :-)

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    2. Re:Back to the 70s by cDarwin · · Score: 2
      "I still get TCH flashbacks from hearing any song off that album. :-)"


      Wow, you must have inhaled :)

      --

      --
      Socrates was asked where he was from. He replied not "Athens," but "The world."

    3. Re:Back to the 70s by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2
      LSD, now that gives you flashbacks.

      Yea, LDS, whatever. No fsking sense of ha ha have you, young grasshopper?

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    4. Re:Back to the 70s by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2
      (cheech):How's my drivin man?

      (chong):I think we're parked man.

      Not just a movie, words to live by! Who needs to see through the windscreen?

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    5. Re:Back to the 70s by DaytonCIM · · Score: 2

      Not to mention the album had great artwork and an insert with more artwork and liner notes. Yes liner notes, something that most bands today know nothing about.
      Lyrics (of course more than 50% of the bands today don't write their own music or lyrics, so they couldn't add lyrics to their insert) and artwork and photos, etc... adorned almost every album from the early Beatles to the last Zeppelin album. Original artwork, reproduced works...

      It would be nice to get more than 12 songs on a shiny disc for $18.99.

      I suspect if bands began adding inserts, posters, registration numbers for concert tickets, anything really, people would be a little more motivated to "PURCHASE" albums, rather than downloading. However, there are still those people who (rightfully in my view) refuse to pay $18.99 for something that isn't worth more than $10. So, Napster-like services will remain extremely popular.

    6. Re:Back to the 70s by gmhowell · · Score: 2

      No way in hell that:

      a) "Dark Side of the Moon" would be published today.

      b) Pink Floyd would be signed by a major label today.

      I'd like an original "Wish You Were Here" with the nifty black cellophane cover.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    7. Re:Back to the 70s by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      I still get TCH flashbacks from hearing any song off that album. :-)

      TCH...is that anything like LDS?

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    8. Re:Back to the 70s by garcia · · Score: 2

      I bought Kottonmouth Kings a few years back '98/99 maybe? It came w/a free t-shirt (You Got that Kottonmouth Feeling?) and a video.

      They weren't top 40 but it wasn't from piracy I am sure ;)

    9. Re:Back to the 70s by ajs · · Score: 2

      Dark Side of the Moon was a masterpiece album (regardless of taste in music, the craftsmanship of everything in that album was astounding). _That_ is the reason that it was on the charts for so long. In 1988, I bought it and listened for the first time, and it blew me away. I don't _like_ all of the music on it, and some of it took years to become relevant to me, but I'm in awe of the work.

      I can say that about _nothing_ today. What artist puts out masterfuly crafted albums of songs that explore the human condition? No, today music labels push music that fits a particular market and is bland enough within that market to keep everyone from thinking too much about who's feeding it to them.

      Just do yourself a favor and stop listening.

      Go back and buy some strange stuff from the 60s or 70s at a used music store. Find a seller on the net who can get you things from the music scenes in other countries (a friend of mine points out that 1960s south-american psych-pop is awesome stuff).

      The world is your musical oyster, grab the horseradish and let it slide! :-)

    10. Re:Back to the 70s by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      I bought a Meatloaf Greatest Hits collection despite the fact that I had already downloaded the songs for the simple reason that the cover art was amazing.

      I bought an Eagles CD full of live recordings of their songs, even though I could have easily found them elsewhere, because I like to have original copies, and because as I found out afterwards there were some cool notes on the concert.

      I have seen very few new CDs that offer these items. Most just have a cover art and nothing else, no lyrics, nor notes, no additional art, nothing.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    11. Re:Back to the 70s by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      Wasn't "Wish You Were Here" all about the music industry and how it was a souless corporation that sucked you dry?

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    12. Re:Back to the 70s by cDarwin · · Score: 2

      Dark Side of the Moon was a masterpiece album (regardless of taste in music, the craftsmanship of everything in that album was astounding). _That_ is the reason that it was on the charts for so long.

      This is absolutely true. I have been listening to this album regularly for almost thirty years, and I still can't get enough of it. It's the "Apocalypse Now" of music.

      Still, given the choice of either buying or downloading, I would still choose to buy this album partly because of the artwork that it's bundled with.

      Cheers
      --

      --
      Socrates was asked where he was from. He replied not "Athens," but "The world."

    13. Re:Back to the 70s by NewWazoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm going to go out on a limb here, and ask if you've listened to any Tool lately. :)

      Every single one of Tool's albums (with the sole exception of Opiate - it's more of a "garage" album) is masterfully produced and explores some very deep topics - Jungian "breaking through" and connecting with the Freudian alter-ego in AEnima, and dealing with prison rape in Undertow. Much of what you've said applies directly to Tool's music - regardless of musical taste (it may be a little "heavy metal" for some) it's amazing work, all of it.

      While they're becoming more and more of a commercial success, Tool is still one of the best bands around. And they're coming to Tallahassee Nov. 7! w00t! (Sorry, I degress...) ...and remember, this is coming from someone who almost solely listens to pre-1980 music. :) I live off Zep, Sabbath, Tull, etc (along with the likes of James Taylor, Crosby Stills Nash and Young, and the Beatles). Give AEnima and Undertow a shot - you may be suprised.

      Brandon

    14. Re:Back to the 70s by gaudior · · Score: 2
      ... By the Way, Which one's Pink?...

      - Have a Cigar

    15. Re:Back to the 70s by XorNand · · Score: 2



      Yup, yup... Like "The Wall", WYWH was a personally motivated by Roger Waters. The album is about making it to the top and missing the old days with Sid Barrett. Sid was the original guitarist and the intial creative leader before he kinda lost it, mentally. Check out "Saucer Full Of Secrets" to hear some Sid stuff. Then in the mid-80's Waters split with the rest of the members in a nasty battle. Today PF is a mere shadow of what they used to be, in my opinion (listen to the lyrics of the newer stuff -- they're meaningless). They've been making music for over 40 years. Sadly, I think it's time for them to let go.

      :: sigh :: I think the PF story would make an awesome movie, if done right.

      --
      Entrepreneur : (noun), French for "unemployed"
    16. Re:Back to the 70s by liquidsin · · Score: 2

      If you're into Tool, check out A Perfect Circle, which is a side project Maynard did with one of the guitar techs from Tool. They opened for Nine Inch Nails on the Fragility tour. They're almost as good live as Tool.

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    17. Re:Back to the 70s by Sabalon · · Score: 2

      Beat me to it...if you have never listened to Brave by Marillion - do so now.

    18. Re:Back to the 70s by NorthDude · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Today's recipe for being a sucessfull group:

      - Include baby baby 10x in each song
      - Take the good ol' I love you and I want you back theme, stir a bit, remix...
      - Color your hair, put a lot of gel in there and shake well.
      - Travel almost undress, thus revealing your new 100% remolded boobs (or totally fake skin tan)
      - Move your back a lot
      - Find a kewl nick-name
      obligatory... - ??? - succeedddd!!!! /obligatory


      Now, why are people not buying albums anymore?!?

      --


      I'd rather be sailing...
    19. Re:Back to the 70s by jred · · Score: 2

      All the kool kids. Not like the brats of today.

      Tthhhbbtt! :)

      Actually, "Whip It" was the first non-country song I ever heard, whenever that was put out.

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    20. Re:Back to the 70s by TotallyUseless · · Score: 2

      Quaker Oats actually started this type of marketing, believe it or not. They would give away things such as pots/pans and other merchandise with proofs of purchase, were the first to put coupons in newspapers, and offer things like money back guarantees. They basically kicked off consumerism as we know it.

      It's amazing what you can learn watching Connections.

      --

      Time for some tasty Shiner Bock!
    21. Re:Back to the 70s by ajs · · Score: 2

      Tell you what: I'll check out some 60's South-American psych-pop if you'll check out some 00's Scandinavian black/death metal.

      Deal.

      Yeah, I know there's a lot of good "underground" music. That same friend of mine I mentioned has a band of his own that I think is very creative (woefully psych just isn't my thing). The problem is that there used to be a decently rewarding career path for the most creative and talented of those underground bands. Today, that career path is locked out by the fact that broadcast music and retail sales are 99+% locked out by large labels and companies like Clearstation.

      I guess I was a little too abstract in my post, but I don't think you and I really disagree on this point.

  10. Aside by tunabomber · · Score: 5, Funny

    But...I already feel like NOT pirating Bon Jovi music.

    --

    pi = 3.141592653589793helpimtrappedinauniversefactory71 ...
  11. Re:Congrats by cosmosis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, lets not forget the efforts and foresigth of people like David Bowie who is totally hip to the values of Slashdot. He feels that copyright will be obsolete in 10 years, and he thinks its a good idea.

  12. Holograms next... by philipsblows · · Score: 2

    I wonder if we will start seeing something like the hologram certificates that came with windows install CDs, or maybe even the new holographic CDs themselves.

    Eventually, one could just buy a site license for a particular artist's music, and receive upgrades for a nominal charge. Of course, if you buy a new CD player (or equivalent), you'll have to re-register.

    All kidding aside, this sounds like an interesting idea (whether BJ is first with or not) and I hope similar creative ideas become popular over the more draconian RIAA plans we've been hearing about.

  13. If only... by jcsehak · · Score: 2

    This is exactly the stance I've been hoping the whole music industry takes. I'd love to buy a CD and show my support... except they need a new option when you register:

    I bought this CD for-

    [ ] the music
    [ ] the principle

    --

    c-hack.com |
    1. Re:If only... by Xerithane · · Score: 5, Funny

      I bought this CD for-

      [ ] the music
      [ ] the principle


      Just remember, even if you do buy the Bon Jovi CD on principle, your friends will still lose respect for you.

      "I bought it for the principle!" just doesn't sound right.

      In other news, Kenny G announced his new piracy-defeating measures by releasing another CD. His plans entail marketing only to the over-80 market, who still call computers televisions. In a recent interview, he seemed very excited to demonstrate that piracy only affects good musicians. When asked about Bon Jovi, Kenny G said they were planning a duet in which would be titled, "Kenny G and Bon Jovi: A tribute to the corpses who used to listen to us" and marketed under the pretense of expected zero piracy.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
  14. -1 OT Bon Jovi Joke (It had to be done) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Four Catholic mothers were having coffee together discussing how important their children are.
    The first one tells her friends, "My son is a priest. When he walks into room, everyone calls him 'Father.'"

    The second Catholic woman chirps, "Well, my son is a bishop. Whenever he walks into a room, people say 'Your Grace'."

    The third Catholic woman says smugly, "Well, not to put you down, but MY son is a Cardinal. Whenever he walks into a room, people say, 'Your Eminence'."

    The fourth Catholic woman sips her coffee in silence. The first three women give her this subtle Well . . . ?

    Mrs. B. replies, "My son is Jon Bon Jovi. Whenever he walks into a room, people say, "Oh my God. . ."

  15. Re:Combatting piracy? I don't think so... by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Daft Punk put a credit card sized card inside their CD with a unique number were you could download MP3 singles of remixes and live versions of the song from a special website.

  16. I hope he doesn't get by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 2

    shot down in a blaze of glory.

    Sorry folks. I'll be here all week.

    --


    Evil is the money of root.
    1. Re:I hope he doesn't get by Rikardon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmmm... this needs a '-1 Groaner' moderation option. Too bad. =)

  17. Daft Punk by clinko · · Score: 2

    Daft punk's discovery cd did this a long while back by including a credit card w/a serial # on it. If you bought the cd you could go to their website, login, and download live videos etc.

    Really kool stuff...

    I think it said "Daft Club" on it.

  18. Resale by geekoid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    what happens to the peopel, who resale the disks later? can the remove there registration?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Resale by geekoid · · Score: 2

      soory. bt sumtymes I gut cared aweigh an tipe to faust.

      stoopod spelling Nazi.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Resale by geekoid · · Score: 2

      does the original register continue to get benefits after they sell the CD? or take the CD back to the original store?

      I just see some potential abuse, is all.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Resale by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      There's always abuse, no matter what. Lot's of gammers bought Zone of the Enders just for the Metal Gear Solid Demo, and when MGS came out, back to the store ZOE went.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  19. so what? by zoftie · · Score: 2

    Any medium to small time artists and few unfortunate to have negotiation with large reputation, don't get jack for CDs.
    Pirating CDs is good for the band, because you get to like the music and go to their concerts
    when and if they visit your stomping grounds.
    You go to concert, buy a shirt or two, and band
    gets rich from you liking the music that way.
    If you buy CDs, unless they are by Michael Jackson and alike, the rich part goes to RIAA
    friends, and jack squat to artists.

  20. Not exactly a novel approach.... by DavesError · · Score: 2, Redundant

    Daft Punk had something similar with their Discovery album. You got a card in the case with a number, and using that number you could register and receive access to songs and remixes and things that you couldn't really find anywhere else.

    It wasn't exactly advanced tickets, but it was something that you could only get with the purchase of the cd. And I wish more artist and record labels would move in this direction instead of worrying about something that is in reality helping their sales.

  21. Free Stuff by FatHogByTheAss · · Score: 2

    ...for not stealing my music!

    Imagin that.

    --

    --
    You sure got a purty mouth...

  22. Value-Added by DaytonCIM · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's refreshing to hear of a "retail-minded" band that is adding value to their CD in order to combat piracy. I like the idea of "perks" for those people who purchase the CD.

    Hopefully, this will do well and maybe the industry will begin looking at alternative ideas, those that benefit the customer, rather than punishing, to combat piracy.

    Then again pigs may fly over my house...

    1. Re:Value-Added by macdaddy357 · · Score: 2

      Offering perks should sell more CDs whether there is piracy or not. In fact, I don't think piracy ever entered their minds, only marketing. Even if I liked Bon Jovi, this would not be enough to make me stop boycotting the recording industry.

      --
      How ya like dat?
  23. Re:Combatting piracy? I don't think so... by Sirch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Daft Punk put a credit card sized card inside their CD with a unique number were you could download MP3 singles of remixes and live versions of the song from a special website.


    So the people who bought the CD could trade those as well?

  24. I don't get it. by wo1verin3 · · Score: 2

    So they now want you to submit personal information to marketing teams who provide you extra opportunities to spend your money with them?

    Isn't like like registering a piece of software so you can recieve technical support and advanced information on new features and upgrades?

    What on earth does this have to do with piracy?

  25. Don't care for the music but like the guy by Deanasc · · Score: 4, Interesting
    From what I hear Jon Bon Jovi is a nice guy. I remember when you couldn't turn on the TV without seeing him. Then I remember when the hair became a joke. This guy has been to the top and slid down to the bottom. Lately he's been working his way steadily back up. I say good for him.

    Another reason to like him is he married his high school sweetheart and stayed married through the rise and fall and so far for his second trip up the success ladder.

    Anyway this seems like the kind of thing a real musician would do for his fans. Certainly not the lawsuit slinging behavior some other hair metal rockstars have shown their fans.

    --
    I've hit Karma 50 and gotten a Score:5, Troll... I win!
    1. Re:Don't care for the music but like the guy by cluge · · Score: 2

      Never met Bon Jovi, but did meet Bruce Springsteen. Let's just say I'm glad you had a nice experience. He was in a cry baby mood the day I met him in Miami.

      I think the moral of the story is, you can catch anybody on a bad day, and that people change. If Bruce is still the same way or in the same mood that he was when I met him, he would be wearing depends now.

      cluge

      --
      "Science is about ego as much as it is about discovery and truth " - I said it, so sue me.
    2. Re:Don't care for the music but like the guy by chegosaurus · · Score: 2

      Remeber the band Skid Row, who JBJ took under his wing, took on tour, promoted, then stiffed for every penny they earned?

      When they tried to get their money JBJ turned nastier still and threw a heap of litigation at them. I think the Skid Row singer is still forbidden to talk about JBJ in interviews.

  26. hmmm by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

    well, even though I never liked bon jovi, this is an interesting idea.

    although after seeing jon bon jovi's interview on leno a while after he was on ally mcbeal - the guy is an absolute moron. self centered over the hill idiot.

    so its safe to say that this is *not* jon bon jovi's idea - and I would like to give credit to the person who came up with this plan.

    but seeing as how jon bon jovi is (as previously stated) a fool - I wonder what the hidden catches are.

    Hey jon bon jovi - you're not a rock star (as you said way too many times in your leno interview) you're a has been that has been sold a novel idea on the release of your(?) new CD.

    real musicians actually write all their own stuff - which is rare in the industry these days.

  27. Hey! C4n 50m3ne m41L m3 thE K3yG3N? by teamhasnoi · · Score: 4, Funny

    I need the keygen for Bon Jovi 1.0. Reply "me too" if you n33d it too. Many thanks to the CR3W!

    1. Re:Hey! C4n 50m3ne m41L m3 thE K3yG3N? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "I need the keygen for Bon Jovi 1.0. Reply "me too" if you n33d it too. Many thanks to the CR3W!"

      It wouldn't be that hard to generate a valid #: Start with 0000000000000001, then 0000000000000011, then 0000000000000010, then 0000000000000111, then 0000000000000110, and so on. I bet you crack it within an hour. =)

    2. Re:Hey! C4n 50m3ne m41L m3 thE K3yG3N? by utahjazz · · Score: 2, Funny

      1,3,2,7,6...?

      Ah yes, an oft overlooked cousin of the 'brute force attack', this 'retarded tantrum attack' was orinially invented by monkeys attempting to reproduce Hamlet on a typewriter.

  28. ban jovi by solferino · · Score: 4, Interesting

    why not pass on bon jovi and go for the much cooler 5 piece banjo ensemble ban jovi?

    can't find a website for these guys, but here's a place where you can buy their cd

    no real affiliation to th band in question - just heard them play once at an underground music festival in taiwan (they are american)

    1. Re:ban jovi by Surt · · Score: 2

      Are they poor at math, or did one of their members die or something?

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  29. Great, just great by BurritoWarrior · · Score: 2

    Now I have to cancel my subscription to the RIAA backed online music sites.

    Make up your minds already!

  30. Counting Crows are doing the same thing by cpfeifer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you buy the new Counting Crows CD (and you should, because it's quite good) it gives you access to a secret bit of their site with unreleased tracks and whatnot. Makes for an interesting reverse engineering project.

    --
    it's not going to stop until you wise up, no it's not going to stop. so just give up.
    1. Re:Counting Crows are doing the same thing by DaytonCIM · · Score: 2

      Again, this is "value-added" to the album.

      "Get something by purchasing our album, that you couldn't possibly get by downloading."

      The music industry sees downloading as a "problem," when in fact they should see (treat) it as competition. If the industry stepped up and spent half of the money they spend "combating" Napster sites on adding value to albums (in the form of posters, liner notes, inserts, giveaways, etc...) they might see a distinct change in consumer attitudes toward downloading.

    2. Re:Counting Crows are doing the same thing by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Q: Do you think the RIAA and the government should be going after the Napsters of the world they way they are?
      AD (as in Adam Duritz): Yeah, I do. I'll tell you why....well, I don't know. The fact is, it is illegal, so if you want to go after Napster, you can go after Napster. But there's always going to be another one. It's just too easy to make them. I mean, now there are nine Napsters, or 20 Napsters. What I didn't like about Napster was the way they took on that mob mentality. Because you know you're doing something wrong, right? Let's face it: Everybody loved it, but let's not lie about it. It was wrong. So don't pretend that you're the Great White Hope, or that you're this great rebel, because the only people you're ripping off are the artists you supposedly love.
      And what I really hated about Shawn Fanning and those guys is that they really whipped up a mob mentality toward the artists who spoke out against them, as if they were these rich corporate types. You know, Lars Ulrich was this guy who had the decency and the guts to speak out, and they really jumped on him. I thought, "Man, that is so wrong." I mean, do what you want to do, be a fan, whatever. I'm cool with that. But where do you get off lecturing him when you know you're wrong. It's just too easy to shout somebody down when you have the majority with you. I always feel like that's wrong, no matter whether you're Napster and MTV, or whether you're Joe McCarthy at the Communist trials in the '50s. It's just too easy to shout someone down when everyone's on your side. It's always wrong. It's just never right to be in a mob. Never.
      But, I don't know, the government...See, I really think it's just a world. I mean, we've got countries, and they're not going anywhere. But they're just these things we made up. Really, it's just a world. We've made up these countries, and I'm not sure how much good they've done us. It's just because our nature is to become a mob and gang up on each other, so we make these boundaries to sort of scare ourselves into not doing it. Maybe it's the only way we keep ourselves from slaughtering each other daily. And we still do that, but the great thing about the Web is that it's sort of this untamed thing. It crosses all natural boundaries, it is lawless. It just doesn't belong to anybody. There are no rules, in a world that's so obsessed with rules, there aren't any. I kind of think that's cool. I really do appreciate that part of it. And regardless of what I think about things like Napster, I'd be really hesitant to involve our government, because I'm hard pressed to think of examples in which our government gets involved and does a particularly good job of it. They generally step in there and do it all wrong. Because who are they, really? Where are their interests? They're not with me and you. They just generally aren't. If the government had to choose between me and your and Universal/Vivendi - and I've got nothing against my record company, they've been great to me - but they're going to choose Universal/Vivendi.
      The perfect example was when the record companies got that law passed that music was a work-for-hire a couple of years ago, and they did it effortlessly even though it was clearly unconstitutional and wrong. The fact is that all it takes is a vote of the government, and when you're the biggest company in the world, it's easy. It's not that hard to get it passed. We're an unorganized group of artists, you know? It couldn't be more unorganized. Thank God for people like Sheryl (Crow), Don Henley, and people that organized against it. But we're not the union types. It's not in our nature to be organized, and to be, like, a union. It's not the nature of anyone in this business to do it. As a result, the companies run roughshod over us at times. I'm very lucky, you know? I'm part of a very, very small percentage of people who do what I do who make a living at it. Generally, they've made it almost impossible to make a living doing what we do. Very hard. You get paid almost no money, percentage-wise. So if you're small, you just can't do it.
    3. Re:Counting Crows are doing the same thing by cpfeifer · · Score: 2

      Yeah, saw this on the site. So why didn't the extra tracks make the US version, when they did make the international version?

      --
      it's not going to stop until you wise up, no it's not going to stop. so just give up.
    4. Re:Counting Crows are doing the same thing by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      I'd like to see how you managed that, given that you copied and pasted it from somewhere else, uncredited.

      It was credited. Adam Duritz said it, as I mentioned.

      Somewhat ironic in a discussion about IP...

      Really, why you not expect a discussion about IP to have examples of copyright infringement in it?

  31. Re:How does this fight piracy? by fanatic · · Score: 2

    I think the theory is that it adds something of value, that can't be ripped and distributed, to the CD.

    --
    "that's not encryption - it's a new perl script that I'm working on..." - from some Matrix parody
  32. Prince sorta kinda does this. by Brigadier · · Score: 2



    you can pay a anual fee for access to teh site that has interview concert tickets, unreleased music. If this concept was implimented like BonJovi has I think it woudl work. The serial number gives you an exclusive access to the site ( it would finally justify the cost of CD's) then fans could get access to exclusive offerengs thus bring the artists and fan closer. Almost makes me wish I thought of it.

  33. Curing the problem, not the symptoms. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Problem: RIAA products overpriced given what you get, people don't want to pay for them.
    Sympton: People pirate the music instead.

    Solution: Add value to the CD that makes people more willing to buy it.

    The RIAA in the past has been trying to cure the symptoms, without attacking the core problem. This is a MAJOR step in the right direction.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:Curing the problem, not the symptoms. by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      No, cause the RIAA went balistic over cassette tapes too, because those were supposed to destroy the industry, bring it to it's knees and ruin music. The RIAA want's to be the sole provider of music, venues and listening options. I guarentee if the RIAA owned the MP3 codec, they would tag on a licence fee and not care about MP3s anymore.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    2. Re:Curing the problem, not the symptoms. by spitzak · · Score: 2
      The price of pirating music is not zero. There is a price of guilt (I'm not joking, though for some people guilt is really cheap). More importantly there is the price of the time it takes to locate and download a usable version.

      Because this price is not zero, your argument is wrong. It is not impossible for the RIAA to sell for less than this price. They can also raise the price in legal ways by going after the people who post the music so it gets harder to find.

    3. Re:Curing the problem, not the symptoms. by richieb · · Score: 2
      Guess what. The average price someone wants to pay for something, regardless of its value, is zero.

      Not true. I'm willing to pay a price that I feel is fair. But I don't want to pay, if I'm being ripped off.

      For example, I buy a lot of old jazz recordings. Why should I pay $15 for a CD of music that's 50 years old, when I know the CD costs 50 cents and that the artists is not getting anything.

      --
      ...richie - It is a good day to code.
  34. Plastikman by cpeterso · · Score: 2


    and Plastikman's "Sheet One" album came with a (dud) sheet of acid .

  35. the Tragically Hip has done this before by blonde+rser · · Score: 2, Redundant

    When you by the Hip album "In Violet Light" you get membership to The Hip Club. Membership includes things like free bonus tracks of unreleased and live material, exclusive merchandise only available to THC members, first in line ticket access to select shows... Sounds like more new ground being broken by Canadians and credit being given to Americans.

    1. Re:the Tragically Hip has done this before by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2

      Um. I don't think you could really say the Hip started it either.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  36. Re:Combatting piracy? I don't think so... by blazin · · Score: 2

    The point is, if you're not going to buy the CD, you're not going to buy the CD. At least this way, people who actually shelled out the money for the CD don't have to jump through hoops to get it to play on the computer or in the car, or wherever they want, plus, as an added bonus, they get some extras from an artists whose music they enjoy anyway.

    If someone really enjoys Bon Jovi or and they also enjoy but they are short on budget, then it may come down to getting the one with the extras. Or maybe they'll decide that they'd rather get both and forego a few Happy Meals.

    If a CD provides more than just music, then there's more incentive to buy the CD than just Kazaa it.

  37. This could only work for bigger acts? Ask /. ! by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2
    I don't see how this would work for a smaller band, since smaller shows aren't usually sold out, they (usually) don't have a relationship with the ticket seller, and unreleased music would be spread as soon as one file trader gets it.

    Pehaps this could be submitted as an 'ask slashdot' (and promptly rejected), but what could a smaller band do to promote CD's in the face of file sharing? An old band I was in made little refrigerator magnets (by hand with markers!) for anyone who came to a show. What is something that is cheap and scalable, includeable in a cd, yet adds value (assuming the music doesn't suck :) to a CD purchase?

    What you you want to see?

  38. Building one hell of a mailing list by Logic+Bomb · · Score: 2

    A company could get a bundle for selling the customer list from registrations. You'd have some seriously targeted advertising possibilities.

  39. hah by FallLine · · Score: 2

    I don't know about that. Very funny, yes, but I think the one where he "interviewed" the starwars fans waiting outside the theater is the best.

    1. Re:hah by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2

      That was hilarious. I've even talked to that guy "Blackwolf the Dragonmaster" once (before he was on TV)

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    2. Re:hah by MadAhab · · Score: 2
      Right on. I nearly pissed myself when he reminded the black Gandalf to finish his filet o fish, and when he told the pregnant star wars fan that on the child's birth, to remind him that's the last time he'd see female genitalia.

      Now that I've buried this in a slightly OT post, I'l say what I really have to say. I talked with Bon Jovi's producer at the height of Napster, and he was all bummed because he depends on royalties for his income. I reminded him that at the dawn of radio it wasn't as if some nirvana of record companies and radio stations magically enriched deserving and popular artists: people put music out there until the law compelled all parties to find a way to compensate copyright holders (not necessarily the "artists") and permit play of music recordings in public. He didn't really seem to buy it. I'll state for the record that I'm pretty much pro-Napster and pro-non-commercial distribution. I'm also radically FOR paying artists: I buy tons of music, as much as I can afford to, so I call bullshit when you say I'm enjoying the smell of a fish I didn't buy. I'm glad to see that people are actually attempting to find creative ways to get their fans money (because fans WANT to pay money; that's the only thing that prevents rampant piracy) and discourage piracy by those who might actually be willing to pay for something, without killing the tremendous promotional value of letting people hear music they aren't sure they want to pay for. Tambourine , fooey.

      --
      Expanding a vast wasteland since 1996.
  40. A little different from fighting piracy IMHO by foqn1bo · · Score: 5, Interesting



    While I'm sure tactics like this are advertised as anti-piracy measures, I'm excited about this as a sales technique. The online community(slashdot especially) has been talking for quite some time about the relative value of copyright when it comes to music recordings. A very common response has been one which suggests that in order to assure sales, a retailer/merchant/distributor/manufacturer needs to give a prospective buyer a good reason to purchase.

    The traditional extension to that idea I've come across here is that in most transactions the consumer is paying for a service rendered. For example, a new car was built by a factory and an ordinary consumer cannot make his own. Same goes for computer parts, TVs, and many types of clothes. The consumer has discovered, through the advent of consumer digital media devices(esp computers), that the act of taking an existing digital audio recording and duplicating it is trivial and practically mundane. The artist(who only has to record the album once) does a lot more work than the record company copying it, particularly within the boundries of the insane amount of elbow grease that goes into writing/recording/touring.

    You may think Bon Jovi is the lamest crap on earth, but in my opinion this strategy not only sounds like an effective solution but a vote of confidence for consumers. For once a recording institution is admitting that it needs to work to keep it's customers loyal instead of the other way around.

  41. Bon Jovi is going by geekoid · · Score: 2

    to buy a fleet of spanish Galleons, and combat piracy throughout the Caribean.

    When ask why, his Parrot said "SQUAWK!"

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  42. Tough decision by SIGFPE · · Score: 2

    And I think I can resolve it. Maybe I'll buy the album to encourage others to do the same and then immediately sell it so I don't have to actually listen to it.

    --
    -- SIGFPE
  43. It's Direct Marketing just for a "live chat"! by mekkab · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Read the article (I thought of submitting this too!)
    This isn't JUST to combat piracy, but they are collecting more detailed marketing information, such that in the future it will be easier for sales to hit their target without "wasting" money on promo's that don't work; be they airplay at the wrong time, or video exposure on VH1...

    SO let me get thsi straight: I pay money, I sign up online, they get a WHOLE lot of personal data (I wonder if they ask for household income?), and I get a newsletter and maybe the chance to talk to the band and maybe a first crack at buying over-priced concert tickets at an arena where the pre-selected seats are all nose-bleeders?

    SIGN ME UP!

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    1. Re:It's Direct Marketing just for a "live chat"! by Coplan · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The reality is that even if it were as bad as you think it is, its more likely to work than the negative combat techniques.

      Enforcement through perks is always better than enforcement through military tactics. Rather, I should say it works more efficiently without as much controversy.

      It may not be perfect, but its a step in the right direction. If nothing else, it does cut down on the backlash. And lord knows, you get the RIAA and anyone else in a screaming match, you might as well be back in third grade. Nothing productive truly comes from backlash, aside from the obvious statement that people are pissed off. We already know that. So steps like this need to be made in order to find the most widely selected solution.

  44. Re:Combatting piracy? I don't think so... by Verence · · Score: 2, Informative

    Only with a bit of effort. It used a 'digital wallet' or something of the sort. Some Windows program in order to download them and open them with a special app.

    It was nicely done, but they tried to make the player too hip/unusable for my tastes.

    --

    ... that's all i wrote...
  45. CD file sharing and piracy by Daimaou · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I really hate when people compare the sharing of mp3 files to software piracy. Why? Because the two are totally different.

    Music has been broadcast over the airwaves for years and years and then some more years. For most of those years, there has existed the technology to copy those songs onto cassette tapes and other mediums and listen to those songs at a later time; and numerous times.

    Growing up, I always recorded my favorite songs off the radio; and I believe, just like recording a TV show, it was perfectly fine for me to do so. In fact, wasn't it Sony, one of the companies that is now whining about music sharing, that sold me the ability to record radio broadcasts? Why, I believe it was!

    Since the radio reaches nearly every corner of our country and nearly everone owns the technology to record that music, I don't see a difference between that and sharing an mp3 file with your friends, other than you get to cut out the retarded DJ who always talks over the song like some dimwit fart.

    A couple more interesting things to note, in Japan, they have stores that will rent you CDs, for a couple hundred yen, in much the same way American's rent VHS and DVD movies. Those same stores also sell very specialized cassette tapes so you can record the CD instead of having to pay around $30.00 for it. Since the stores are not owned by the record companies, I don't see a difference between this and sharing mp3s with your friends (other than you've cut out the middle man).

    Also, you most public libraries will loan you music CDs for free.

    On the otherhand, software has NEVER been broadcast over public airwaves or freely distributed in your public library. Nor are there stores that will rent you software and then the media to use to copy it. Nor has the means to copy software ever been commercially provided with the copying of software being its primary marketed function.

    I think that the record industry is too damn stupid to provide their customers with a product in the form their customers demand and I think they are using an apples to oranges comparison of software piracy to sharing music to force the governments to pass laws that maintain the status quo of their current, obviously undesirable, business plans.

    And all of that is why I hate hearing music sharing compared to software piracy.

    1. Re:CD file sharing and piracy by stubear · · Score: 2

      "Since the radio reaches nearly every corner of our country and nearly everone owns the technology to record that music, I don't see a difference between that and sharing an mp3 file with your friends, other than you get to cut out the retarded DJ who always talks over the song like some dimwit fart."

      For starters you could never record the entire album off the radio. Radio stations rarely spin the entire album and when I say rarely I mean rarely.

      Next, even with radios using CDs and you recording onto the bext tape possible you still had an inferior copy which would degrade over time. MP3s can be recorded at high bitrates making them effectively equivalent to CD and they do not degrade over time.

      This doesn't even go over the copyright issues you face. Radio stations pay licensing fees to broadcast the music they play. Napster and their kin did not. They would have never taken off if they had to. Individuals do not license the rights to distribute music, they are only allowed to make personal copies for themselves. When you place a song onto Napster or soem other P2P network you are distributing intellectual property illegally.

    2. Re:CD file sharing and piracy by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2

      Radio stations pay licensing fees to broadcast the music they play.

      Um, sure. Radio stations pay miniscule fees to labels that pay massive sums to "promoters" that pay massive sums to the radio stations so that the radio station will play the music.

      So legally, yes, there is a difference. De facto, however, the only difference between Napster and ClearChannel is that the record labels have to pay ClearChannel, and Napster was supplied to them for free. Of course, on Napster, you get to choose what you listen to, and on ClearChannel, the record labels get to choose.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    3. Re:CD file sharing and piracy by evbergen · · Score: 3, Informative
      On the otherhand, software has NEVER been broadcast over public airwaves
      Why, it has! Here in the Netherlands in the 80's, you had the NOS Hobbyscoop, a radio programme on public radio that broadcast home computer software. It used a standard for compatible BASIC programs, called BASICODE. It was basically a 'shared library' with well-known subroutines at well-known line numbers.

      You'd record the part with the awful sounds on your cassette recorder, and then you could load it onto your Spectrum or C64 or MSX. Loads of fun!
      --
      All generalizations are false, including this one. (Mark Twain)
    4. Re:CD file sharing and piracy by Daimaou · · Score: 2

      Note the key difference: you were recording from ${publicly available source} for your own personal use - Legal; You distribute copies of the recording - Illegal.

      You miss my point. Actually, most of the comments here have missed my point. Radio is not broadcast solely to you and then you illegally distribute it to your friends. It is broadcast to EVERYONE at the same time. Therefore, if somebody wants to hear a song, they can call the radio station and ask them to play it. When the radio station does, then they can record it. In effect, music is free. This isn't the case with current commercial software products (notice I'm not talking about freeware, open source, etc.) It is possible for the whole of the United States (which is where I'm talking about) to record the same song off the radio. This is not true by any stretch of the imagination of software. Radio is free, comercial software isn't. Therefore, I don't see how you can logically draw a parallell between the piracy of something that isn't and never has been broadcast freely (such as current Microsoft products) to something that is broadcast freely to everybody everyday.

  46. A much more effective anti-piracy feature is by pbox · · Score: 2, Funny

    A much more effective anti-piracy feature built in to Bon Jovi's brand new album is that it is such a crap that no one will want to listen to it let alone copy it or download it. It keeps piracy at practically zero level.

    --
    Code poet, espresso fiend, starter upper.
  47. Re:Don't you guys get it? by symbolic · · Score: 2


    Bon Jovi doesn't appreciate the fact that people would steal his music, so he's pandering to those who would consider it. This is why I think that even if the business model changed, pirated music would be every bit as much a problem as it is today. The RIAA is used as a scapegoat to justify theft, even if it's against the wishes of an artist that so many 'fans' claim to support.

  48. Serial Number = Watermark? by mini+me · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Conspiracy Theory: Little do these people know, their serial number is embedded into the audio tracks on the CD. When distributed on the internet these wartermarks can be matched against the contact information used for signing up for the free merchendise. Therefore the person who distributed the audio on the internet will be known.

    Well that probably isn't the plan here, but who knows what the future will hole.

  49. Artists versus fat cats by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 2

    I'm sure we'll see more of this. It will be the artists who will adapt to new business models, not the fat cats. The cigar-chomping execs are too enamoured of the status quo to want to evolve. So it will be the musicians pushing the envelope. Jon Bon Jovi, unlike some other musicians (*cough*Metallica*cough*) actually gets it. Bravo, Jon!

    --
    'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
  50. One more time.... by Kibo · · Score: 2

    Daft Punk already did it.

    All kinds of cool remixes and blends of their songs, almost enough for another CD. Needless to say, that's the kind of value I appreciate. But again that's something that makes Daft Punk cool, and says nothing positive about the RIAA. Some bands like to give back.

    As far as Bon Jovi goes, Young Guns is fine as a diversion maybe once a year, other than that they should have left their butt rock back in 1988. Christ first Bon Jovi, then Axel Rose and four dudes who call themselves Guns and Roses, I await the return of Winger with baited breath...no that's rising bile.

    --
    --Jimmy has fancy plans; and pants to match.
    1. Re:One more time.... by VivianC · · Score: 3

      The Dave Matthews Band did this with the CD Busted Stuff a couple months ago. They even included a DVD with more material. All this for only $9.99 on the release date and $11.99 the rest of the week (Best Buy, Chicago).

      --
      Viv

      Gmail invites for ip
  51. Re:Been done by Sinistar2k · · Score: 2

    Crystal Method also did this for their Tweekend release.

  52. This sure beats extra-cost fan clubs. by dbirchall · · Score: 4, Insightful
    During the '90s, I was relatively involved with a band that never got quite as big as Bon Jovi did, but still sold millions of albums. (Those who know me know who the band is.)

    At the beginning of the decade, they were asking some amount for lifetime membership in their fanclub. I don't remember the amount, but it was between $15 and $35. Got you a bunch of stickers, a newsletter, etc.

    By the end of the decade, they were asking around $35 a year for a glossy magazine-style newsletter, preferential ticket sales, and backstage potential. (They were also selling 1/10th the albums.)

    Doing it this way makes a lot of sense to me. Instead of charging extra to join the fanclub, put those unique codes on everything, and let folks punch in codes for everything they buy. Bought the CD? Yeah, we can hook you up with good seats at a good price. Bought the last five CD's, plus posters, videos and t-shirts? Front row center, baby!

    Reward the folks who are dedicated to you, and all that stuff.

  53. Re:I've said this before... by MoneyT · · Score: 2

    Like the Special Edition Star Wars soundtracks. 2 CDs and they came with a *book* of note by John Williams about the composition of the music. Very interesting to read.

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  54. I tried, but I couldn't do it. by CustomDesigned · · Score: 2, Funny
    This is a trend that really needs encouragement. So, despite the fact that I can't stand modern rock, I went to their web site for some 30 second samples to see if I could bring myself to buy a CD as a vote of confidence.

    With the first sample, I had to cover my ears, and now I've got my David Bellugi early rennaisance CD on to clear out my eardrums. I'm truly sorry, but someone that actually likes this stuff will have to take up the slack.

  55. Re:Bon Jovi who? by MoneyT · · Score: 2

    Search for the following songs:

    "It's My Life"
    "Livin on a Prayer"
    "You Give Love a Bad Name
    "Captain Crash and the Beauty Queen From Mars"
    "Runaway"
    "Bad Medicine"
    "Wanted Dead or Alive"

    that should get you started

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  56. Drinking the Kool-Ade Again, Eh? by guttentag · · Score: 2
    Retail CDs will be distributed with a unique serial number with which the purchaser can register in order to receive such exclusives as prioritized concert ticket purchases and unreleased music.
    Slashdotters should know better: registration is not a perk! Registration requires you to divulge information about yourself from which the record company can make additional profit.

    There's nothing extra being offered here.

    "Unique serial numbers" come with every AOL disk, but that doesn't make them any more valuable. It's a tracking tool for AOL that's also designed to make the mindless masses think they're getting into some secret club.

    Bon Jovi says that registering will give you "the chance" to buy concert tickets before they go on sale to the public. But guess what? If you and 3 million other fans who bought the album have all registered, you're competing with each other for tickets. I'd say that makes that ticket sale pretty public. This is simply an effort to disenfranchise people who don't buy the latest album AND divulge whatever information the record company wants. Suddenly you're paying more (not just the price of the album, but with your personal info too) to see concerts, and you think you're getting more.

    "Unreleased music" means music that wasn't good enough to make it onto the album. If the record company thought they were good enough to sell, it would have included them on the album instead of the other crap (most albums have 1-3 good songs at most, and the rest is just crap -- this unreleased music is the stuff that was worse than the crap).

    Bon Jovi also promises access to exclusive areas of BonJovi.com. What a load of crap. Anything of value that shows up in this "exclusive area" is going to end up on Gnutella or Geocities within hours.

    Step away from the Kool-Ade, people.

  57. Already done! by Jetson · · Score: 2

    Rather than waiting to see how the plan works out for Bon Jovi, why not ask Daft Punk? They did it on their "Discovery" album in 2001. The CD came with a credit card (16 digits, expiry date, etc.) that is used to access the www.daftcard.com site.

  58. Is this a bad thing? by PhxBlue · · Score: 2

    Seriously, a plan to strip the anonymity from the people who "rip and share" this stuff may be the best deterrent to copyright violators that the RIAA can accomplish. Think about it, when was the last time you saw members of PWA put their real names, addresses, phone numbers, etc., in something they warezed?

    --
    !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
  59. Whoa... by mshomphe · · Score: 3, Funny

    they're halfway there...

    --
    She sat at the window watching the evening invade the avenue.
  60. daft punk/discovery by cdf12345 · · Score: 2

    Daft punk did this with last years release of 'Discovery'. Each cd had a faux credit card with a number that allowed access to daftclub.com where b-sides, remixes and other things were offered.

    So lets give credit where its due.

    --
    Chicago2600.net more than a lifestyle, its a survival trait.
  61. Toad the Wet Sprocket Did this 5 Years ago by weston · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Toad the Wet Sprocket did this 5 years ago. May of 1997 was the release date for their album Coil. If you bought Coil, you got two special bonuses:

    1. A free ticket to a promo tour they were doing for the album
    2. When you visited their website with the CD in the drive, you could play a hidden track on the CD. There was a contest, too -- the first person to correctly identify all the lyrics from this song won a signed guitar.


    The result: my brother and sister and I bought four copies for the three of us and a friend we would take to the concert. Ticket prices were usually well above the $12.99 promo price for the CD. Even though I had access to a burner and blank CDs cheaply, it simply didn't make sense NOT to buy the CDs with the ticket incentive. The multimedia was nice, too.

  62. Not that new... by fooguy · · Score: 2

    The Goo Goo Dolls last CD did a similar thing. You needed to buy the CD to access the "Member's Only" section of the website. Once there, you got special videos and song downloads, and the passwords to preorder tickets from Ticketbastard for their concert.

    I admit, I bought the CD when I did to preorder tickets (great seats), but I would have bought it eventually.

    --
    "All I ever wanted was to see Larry Wall give Bill Gates a Perl necklace."
    http://www.eisenschmidt.org/jweisen
  63. obligatory mst3k reference by jcsehak · · Score: 2

    Reminds me of a bit in an episode of Mystery Science Theatre 3000:

    (Joel is standing by huge array of keyboards, Crow enters, holding sandwich)

    Joel: Oh, hiya, Crow...
    Crow: Oh hi, whatcha doing?
    Joel: Oh, we were just inspired by the cool New Age music of this movie, so we decided to use the Wall O' Keyboards to make our own great new New Age music, you wanna help?
    Crow: Sure, uh, what can I do?
    Joel: Well, I could teach you how to play the keyboards
    Crow: Will it take long?
    Joel: No, of course not, come on over here. Here, check this out, okay, put your hand over here.
    Crow: Okay.
    Joel: Put your finger down, see?
    Crow: Like that? (puts finger on a random key, a single note is heard) Oh!
    Joel: Yeah, you're playing a New Age chord now, okay? Just like Yanni. Alright now, put another finger down.
    Crow: Okay. (presses another random key, a second note plays with first one, and persists throughout the rest of the scene)
    Joel: See, now you're playing a Yanni lick, now hold it down for an hour...
    Crow: Yeah?
    Joel: Now hold it down...until you get a record contract from Windham Hill!
    Crow: OH, hey cool! Servo, check it out, it's my new New Age Yanni lick! Uh, Joel, hold down my new New Age Yanni lick, I gotta put my sandwich down.
    Joel: Okay, got it. (holds it)
    Crow: This music's kind of dull, isn't it?
    Joel: Yeah, but it's a good way to make a lot of money without a big initial investment. (lights dim, 'music' swells, Cambot zooms in on Tom Servo)
    Tom: (clears throat loudly) Okay... (in laid back DJ voice) And now, 'Music From Some Guys In Space.' Tonight on 'Music From Some Guys In Space,' more fine new New Age music and sounds from super-progressive Bay Area New Age keyboardist, Joel Robinson. Joel will be accompanied on the Wall O' Keyboards by veteran minimalist Crow T. Robot. We invite you to sit back and enjoy more repetitive New Age music, as we cruise the spaceways. Come along, fellow travelers, and enjoy 'Music...From...Some Guys...In Space.

    --

    c-hack.com |
  64. I guess "sucking" won't prevent piracy. by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2

    But wait, I thought Britney already proved that. I guess this is just confirmation.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  65. bounce the CD by ProfKyne · · Score: 2

    As far as stopping piracy is concerned, Bon Jovi's performance in Times Square during that first football game pretty much ensured that I wouldn't be pirating this album ... the song is terrible.

    --
    "First you gotta do the truffle shuffle."
  66. Re:Mobile Fidelity being the best by Technician · · Score: 2

    I agree on Mobile Fidelity, but I bought it for another reason, a pristine original. Both of mine are before CD's (12 inch) and have only been played twice to enjoy while putting them on tape for the car. (one of them is Dark Side of the Moon which is an awsome pressing) I put it on the best tape avaliable at the time and have worn out one copy. The other still gets played from time to time. At this rate the original will have seen a needle in the groove about 6 times by the time I retire. Much of my music gets the same treatment. It's an investment. The industry has no intrest in replacing just the worn out media for the performance instead of selling you a new lisence for the same content. Until that changes, I will continue to protect my investment. I learned early on (8 tracks and pre-recorded tapes, & LP's) that the media does not last forever. I am now in the process of transferring the remainder of my pre-recorded cassettes (lots of lost pads to replace) to CD to preserve whats left. I would love to trade in my tape collection for CD's for just the cost of the media. That does not appear to be an option however, so I have to do it myself.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  67. Free Software at the Library by Ramuh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    On the otherhand, software has NEVER been broadcast over public airwaves or freely distributed in your public library. Nor are there stores that will rent you software and then the media to use to copy it. Nor has the means to copy software ever been commercially provided with the copying of software being its primary marketed function.
    outstanding idea. why isn't there free software (ie: debian, slackware, or [insert your favorite distro here]) available from libraries?
    This would be a great way to introduce adventurous people to free software et al. Also, it would give FS a larger presence in the education field.
    get out and visit your local library today...

    --
    //radiotakeover.
    .for indep
  68. d00d! i needz bon jovi serialz! by mr_gerbik · · Score: 3, Funny

    is this going to be the future of warez? i think i'll start working on my bon jovi serial generator now.

    -gerbik

  69. Re:Pentium IDs were bad, but CD IDs are good? by Technician · · Score: 2

    I think the record companies are too cheap to go the the expense of remastering for single copy pressings. So far the CD's are mass pressed and the number is on a seprate card just like the early Windows CD keys. (any valid key for the disks.)

    Office 97 is the first one I know of that does protect an install using the CD serial number. I found this when a 52X CD tossed a disk and trashed it. Later when upgrading the hardware, I tried to uninstall office to legaly transfer it from one machine to another. The office worker upgraded and passed along the old hardware & OS. I thought it pretty stupid to require the original CD to uninstall a program. Even though there were many CD's in the office of the same software (legal original copies) none of the other copies would uninstall Office 97 because it wanted the copy of the CD with the original serial number. Now there is an illegal copy simply because it will not uninstall, because the scratched CD is in a drawer for proof of ownership of the install on the new machine. The transfer was done using another copy that is installed on another machine. So the transfer was done usning the wrong copy of media (the correct CD key however) and the uninstallable copy. We tried to uninstall it. We should ask the BSA how to uninstall the extra instalation. Maybe they can tell us how (without formatting the drive and having to reinstall everything else) and replace the damaged media for us. The anti piracy feature is preventing an uninstall of a legal copy to transfer it.
    Due to this experiance fighting locks with a broken key (scratched install CD) on products, we are looking at more user friendly office software. This was a consideration in not upgrading the software by the same vendor.
    I personally never install anything from orignal CD's to prevent losses. I install from a working copy and keep the originals locked up.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  70. Re:so did others by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually it isn't. The CPCC (Canadian Private Copying Collective) has managed the enviable (for the RIAA) task of charging you for nothing. The copyright law in Canada was only recently ammended to allow copying "for personal use". Previously, this was appearently illegal. In ammending the act, the government placed a levy on all blank media to compensate the recording industry or "unauthorized copies", which includes EVERYTHING, not just actual music piracy.

    Now, the CPCC is trying to extend this welfare project to flash memory (for MP3 players), DVD-R (HA!), and small removable and non-removable hard drives - by the megabyte (seriously!). It doesn't take a genius to see that they are pushing for a levy on all digital storage.

    In a related issue, a different copyright welfare lobby is pushing for a levy on all internet access. Seriously. These crooks make the RIAA and MPAA look stupid by comparison. While the XXIA's are buying laws that nobody can enforce, the CPCC has been raking in the dough. Myself, I'd prefer the bullshit law (since I can ignore it).

    --

    In Soviet America the banks rob you!
  71. Somebody is finally in tune... by Mulletproof · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No, seriously... Besides going cold turkey internet, subscriber base and everything that goes with a downloading service, what Bon Jovi is doing is THE ONLY way to lure fans back from the brink of piracy. it's all about added value and so far, the labels have been doing nothing but subtractive value marketing. MP3 added value because I could at very least burn my own CDs, let alone ~ahem~ sample them before I buy. You can damn near do anything to MP3. There is so much added value in the digital format it's pathetic and the best the Labels can think of is encryption and new media formats? Not to stroke myself, but me and others have been saying this for years now-- The only way to combat this if you aren't going to move away from CDs is pack in shit with the CDs. Autographed guitar pics, tickets (their method is probably easier) and other stuff you simply can't get online. hell, I might just buy the CD as a show of support. This is actually one submission I totally agree with... Somebody is finally doing something right here, so support the bad man (it's like that 'going to a crappy video game movie' thing to 'support the cause').

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  72. Yadda... by Mulletproof · · Score: 2

    When the long day is over and it's all said and done, Aunt Betty tucked in her bed while your singing yourself a lullaby in the closet, maybe, just maybe you might admit to yourself somewhere around 70%-80% of the people who use MP3 probably engage in the defined act of piracy; Downloading media they don't own with no intention of paying for some, if not all of it. You may not do it, or even like it, but the fact is that Mp3 is starting to becoming a synonomis with pirate as hacker is to some teenage idiot looking to crack a system because curosity killed the chicken before it counted all it's eggs that crossed the road and curiosity is my only crime. Yah. Yes, I honestly believe those percentages because I believe people are that weak, lazy and hypocritical (myself included).

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:Yadda... by horza · · Score: 2

      you might admit to yourself somewhere around 70%-80% of the people who use MP3 probably engage in the defined act of piracy; Downloading media they don't own with no intention of paying for some, if not all of it.

      Throwing around percentages is all very well but you can't boil down such a complex issue into a simple number imho. For instance say 70%-80% of people _are_ downloading copyrighted music... is that music they would have otherwise bought? I know that 90+% of the music I download is just to listen to what it's like, and it gets wiped to make space on my hard drive pretty quickly. I would never have bought it at any price, so it certainly doesn't count as a lost sale for a record company. All the decent stuff I listen to regularly I have the original on CD, despite having listened to it first on a burned CD (I tend to wait for a CD to come down to ~8ukp before buying it, which I consider the reasonable price I am prepared to pay).

      It is very much like, as the parent poster said, a time-shifted radio for the consumer. Do you think the consumer ever thinks about the overheads of running a radio station? About the license fees a radio station pays? Nope, they just flick a button and it comes on. Much like Napster et al.

      Yes, I honestly believe those percentages because I believe people are that weak, lazy and hypocritical (myself included).

      What a sad take on life :-( I believe the percentage may be true as people have more freedom to explore new music they may not have otherwise heard, they are expanding themselves culturally, and are learning to define their own tastes through having real choice as opposed to being told by blanket marketing what they should and shouldn't listen to. Sure artists have to make a living, but listening to music is appreciating those good at their art. Listening to music is not a cold business transaction.

      Phillip.

  73. Weee! Law Enforcement! by Mulletproof · · Score: 2

    And don't come crying to us when you stumble upon a key that has already been used, the computer notes it, your phone/IP tagged and a SWAT team/RIAA Shock trooper combo squad busts down your door and subjects you to a very harsh scolding.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  74. It's not just about fighting piracy. by Tsuzuki · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's about getting people to buy the damn album - pure and simple sales. If that means less people pirate it, all the better.

    Working in a promotional company has exposed me to a fair bit of how marketing and sales operate, and "new and innovative" is what every client always wants, no matter how much or how little they're willing to pay for the resulting premiums (ie. toys) or services.

    Most of you would be physically sick if you saw some of the promotions that are being planned in the name of kids (and their parents) maintaining the market share of certain fast food and cereal companies. Sony Ericsson phones and POX were advertised in unique and innocuous ways that increased their "cool" factor.

    These promotions are ways to add perceived value to a product, which are a big part of increasing sales. We all complain about the price of CDs, whether we choose to buy them or not. Don't you think it's about time we started to at least feel like we got more value out of them?

    People who solely download music are being conceited if they think approaches like this have been generated in direct retaliation to piracy. It may be one of many reasons to carry out a promotion like this, but gathering valuable market research data and generating sales full stop are far more lucrative reasons to do it.

    (Regarding market research: a large company will probably keep your under lock and key for themselves so they know how to target future promotions. A company that provides free services is far more likely to sell information about you to others without asking you.)

    All that said, the first value-added CD I ever bought was a Pitch Shifter album. Not only did it have two small multimedia clips on it, the last two tracks of the album were made up of royalty-free samples they'd created of the album itself. They were full stereo, neatly separated, there to be ripped and used however the buyer pleased. The only "condition" of their use was that you sent the band what you'd done with it later. I think I bought it in about 1995...

  75. Offspring already did this... by Builder · · Score: 2

    The Offspring already did this on their latest album (Conspiracy of One).

    Noting new to see here.. Move along.

  76. Re:What will they blame it on when this doesn't se by cpfeifer · · Score: 2

    Here's an entry from Moby's journal where he claims that bands with technically savvy audiences don't do well in the charts because their fans rip & burn their CDs. I guess he's a little bitter about '18' not doing as well as 'Play'.

    My $.02: I listened to '18' on MP3 with full intention of buying the album if I like it (I did this with Play), and I just didn't like it. IMHO, it sounded lik 'Play' warmed over, and didn't do much for me. So I didn't buy it, and I deleted the MP3s.

    --
    it's not going to stop until you wise up, no it's not going to stop. so just give up.
  77. Snooked. by Gray · · Score: 2

    Daft Punk did it over a year ago with their Daft Card. Every CD came with a credit card type bit thing with a unique serial. Punch the serial into the website and get content.

    I suspect what's really happened here is somebody at Bon Jovi's label is very clever and figured out a way to get a big hard plug on Slashdot.

  78. Adding value by techstar25 · · Score: 2

    I always felt that since manufacturing costs are going down, but CD prices are not, they should give us a little more with the CDs we buy. The Dave Matthews Band's latest album "Busted Stuff"(which has been floating around the internet for a year under the name "The Lillywhite Sessions")was released packaged with a free DVD which had two great live performances, and one song (audio only) in 5.1. It was sort of a DVD "single" if you will. It gave fans a real reason to buy even though just about everybody had already downloaded the same songs on the internet. That's smart marketing.

  79. Right. by serutan · · Score: 2

    Jon B J, can you say "Duh?"

  80. The most shocking thing by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2

    The thing that is really shocking is that someone would want to pirate Bon Jovi.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  81. I disagree by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

    Art is aesthetic in nature, whereas software is functional in nature. There may be art underlying the actual code, such as the layout of the icons on the screen (and obviously the icons themselves), but the algorithms themselves are merely functional. This becomes clear when you consider software such as database software or webserving software, where the artistry is absent completely and only the functionality remains.